Two ubiquitin-like conjugation systems essential for autophagy
细胞自噬的分子学机制及运动训练的调控作用_钱帅伟

来 说 ,适 宜 强 度 的 运 动 训 练 可 通 过 上 调 细 胞 自 噬 水 平 ,降 解 由 于 运 动 刺 激 所 积 累 的 损 伤 细 胞
钱 帅 伟1 ,罗 艳 蕊1,2 ,漆 正 堂1 ,丁 树 哲1 QIAN Shuai-wei 1 ,LUO Yan-rui 1,2 ,QI Zheng-tang1 ,DING Shu-zhe1
摘 要 :细 胞 自 噬 (autophagy)是 真 核 细 胞 中 普 遍 存 在 的 生 命 现 象 ,是 将 细 胞 内 变 形 、衰 老 或 损伤的蛋白质和细胞器转运到溶酶体腔中消化降解的一种代谢过程。它的分子发生机制和
向为运动适应与线粒体调控。
作者单位:1.华东师范 大 学 体 育 与 健 康 学 院,上 海 200241;2.河 南师范大学 体育学院,河南 新乡 453007 1.School of Physical Education and Health,East China Normal University,Shanghai 200241,China;2.College of Physical Education,Henan Normal University,Xinx- iang 453007,China.
Tel:(021)54341544,E-mail:qianshuaiwei999@yahoo. com.cn;罗艳蕊(1974-),女,河 南 南 乐 人,副 教 授,博 士, 硕士研究生导师,研究方向为 运 动 人 体 科 学 和 体 育 信 息
自噬在发育及干细胞中的作用

ISSN㊀1007⁃7626CN㊀11⁃3870/Q中国生物化学与分子生物学报㊀http://cjbmb.bjmu.edu.cnChineseJournalofBiochemistryandMolecularBiology2016年9月32(9):998 1003㊃综述㊃DOI:10 13865/j.cnki.cjbmb.2016 09 06自噬在发育及干细胞中的作用任立鹏,㊀华进联,㊀彭㊀莎∗(西北农林科技大学动物医学院,陕西省干细胞工程技术研究中心,陕西杨凌㊀712100)摘要㊀自噬是亚细胞膜结构发生动态变化并经溶酶体介导的细胞内蛋白质和细胞器降解的过程㊂通过平衡细胞内的合成和分解代谢,自噬可以维持细胞内环境稳态㊂干细胞是具有自我更新能力和多向分化潜能的细胞,对组织器官再生和维持组织稳态有重要作用㊂近年的研究表明,自噬在维持干细胞功能方面有非常重要的作用,本文综述了自噬的形成过程和分子机制及其在发育及干细胞中的作用㊂关键词㊀自噬;发育;干细胞中图分类号㊀Q291TheRoleofAutophagyinMammalianDevelopmentandStemCellsRENLi⁃Peng,HUAJin⁃Lian,PENGSha∗(CollegeofVeterinaryMedicine,ShaanxiCentreofStemCellsEngineering&Technology,NorthwestA&FUniversity,Yangling712100,Shaanxi,China)Abstract㊀Autophagyisalysosome⁃dependentdegradationpathwaythatallowscellstorecycledamagedorsuperfluouscytoplasmiccontent,suchasproteinsandorganelles.Recyclingofcellularcomponentsthroughautophagyisacrucialstepforcellhomeostasisaswellasfortissueremodellingduringdevelopment.Stemcellsaredefinedbytheirself⁃renewalcapacityandtheirabilitytodifferentiateintothematurecellsofthebody.Thisuniquetypeofcellsplaysessentialroleindevelopmentandtissuerenewal.Recentstudiesshowthatautophagyisacrucialplayerinstemcellsfunctionmaintenance.Inthisreview,wehavehighlightedthemostsignificantadvancesinthecomprehensionofautophagyanditsroleinmammaliandevelopmentandstemcells.Keywords㊀autophagy;development;stemcells收稿日期:2016⁃02⁃22;修回日期:2016⁃03⁃21;接收日期:2016⁃03⁃23国家自然科学基金(No.31101775);西北农林科技大学基本科研业务费(No.2452015034)资助∗联系人㊀Tel:029⁃87080068;E⁃mail:pengshacxh@163.comReceived:February22,2016;Revised:March21,2016;Accepted:March23,2016SupportedbyNationalNaturalScienceFoundationofChina(No.31101775),BasalResearchFundofNorthwestA&FUniversity(No.2452015034)∗Correspondingauthor㊀Tel:029⁃87080068;E⁃mail:pengshacxh@163.com㊀㊀自噬是真核生物中一种进化上高度保守的㊁用于降解㊁回收利用细胞内生物大分子和受损细胞器的过程㊂在此过程中,胞质内生物大分子和细胞器被具有双层膜的自噬体包裹,并在自噬体与溶酶体所形成的自噬溶酶体中降解,降解物如氨基酸等可供机体再次利用㊂饥饿㊁缺氧㊁内质网应激㊁氧化应激㊁细菌感染等均会诱导自噬的产生㊂激活的自噬可以清除积聚的蛋白质㊁损伤的细胞器和侵入的病原,从而维持细胞内环境的稳态[1]㊂干细胞是机体组织器官中一类具有自我更新和多向分化潜能的细胞,在组织发育及更新修复过程中发挥重要作用㊂干细胞中应该有一套高效的用来维持自身内环境稳态的机制,因此科学家们将研究对象转移到了自噬㊂研究表明,自噬在干细胞自我更新㊁多能性维持㊁分化及静息状态中有重要作用[2⁃4]㊂本文将就最近的研究进展进行综述㊂1㊀细胞自噬及其分子机制1962年,科学家Ashford和Porter在肝灌流液第9期任立鹏等:自噬在发育及干细胞中的作用中加入高血糖素后,发现肝细胞内溶酶体增多,并发生 自食(self⁃eating) 现象[5]㊂随后,人们将这一现象命名为自噬(autophagy)㊂但是,直到20世纪90年代,随着基因工程技术及酵母模型的发展,自噬的形态特征和发生机制才逐步被发现和揭示㊂自噬在进化上高度保守,从酵母中发现的自噬相关基因(autophagy⁃relatedgene,ATG),在线虫㊁果蝇及高等脊椎动物中都能找到对应的同源基因㊂作为细胞中降解长周期蛋白质和细胞器的一种机制,自噬对维持细胞稳态有重要作用㊂通过亚细胞膜结构的动态变化和溶酶体介导的细胞内蛋白质和细胞器的降解,最终实现代谢物的循环再利用[6]㊂根据细胞底物进入溶酶体方式不同,可将自噬分为3类:巨自噬(macroautophagy)㊁微自噬(microautophagy)和分子伴侣介导的自噬(chaperone⁃mediatedautophagy,CMA)㊂三者之间的共性为它们都需要溶酶体来完成最后的降解功能,且都可以分为选择性自噬和非选择性自噬两种类型[7]㊂饥饿及各种应激条件下都会诱导巨自噬的发生㊂巨自噬过程中,细胞质中的蛋白质和细胞器先被双层膜包裹隔离,形成自噬体(autophagosome),随后在自噬体与溶酶体结合形成的自噬溶酶体(autolysosome)中完成降解过程㊂微自噬在饥饿或用雷帕霉素诱导时发生,其可以通过凹陷或伸出手指样突出膜包裹的方式将胞质内物质直接吞入溶酶体进行降解[8,9]㊂分子伴侣介导的自噬往往在长时间饥饿的条件下出现,是将含KFERQ样模体的蛋白质通过分子伴侣Hsc70的介导而进入溶酶体内被降解的过程[10,11]㊂相比之下,3种类型的自噬中,巨自噬是最常见㊁最主要的自噬形式[12]㊂以下未特别指出自噬类型,均以 自噬 指代 巨自噬 ㊂自噬的发生是一个连续的动态过程,为了方便描述,将自噬分为4个阶段:第1阶段为自噬前体(pre⁃autophagosomalstructure,PAS)或吞噬泡(phagophore)的形成阶段,即游离的双层膜(分离膜)扩张形成杯状结构的过程;第2阶段为自噬体(autophagosome)的形成阶段,双层膜结构扩张延伸形成包裹降解物的圆形或椭圆形结构;第3阶段为自噬溶酶体(autolysosome)的形成阶段,即自噬体与溶酶体融合形成自噬溶酶体的过程;第4阶段为内容物降解阶段,即溶酶体酶降解自噬体内膜后,自噬体内容物暴露在溶酶体内,从而进一步被溶酶体酶降解成小分子物质如氨基酸㊁脂肪酸等(Fig.1)[12,13]㊂自噬的发生过程需要以下4组复合物的参与:Atg1/ULK1激酶复合物㊁Ⅲ型磷脂酰肌醇三磷酸激酶复合物(classIIIphosphatidylinositol3⁃kinasecomplex,PI3K3C)㊁含Atg9的膜穿梭复合物以及Atg8和Atg12两种泛素样共轭系统(Fig.1)[14]㊂自噬起始时,分离膜大多形成于内质网膜和线粒体膜连接处,但是细胞质膜和其它细胞器膜可能是自噬体膜的来源[13,15⁃17]㊂哺乳动物细胞中,调控自噬起始的上游激酶是Atg1的同系物ULK1,ULK1可以与Atg13㊁FIP200和Atg101形成复合物,参与自噬的起始㊂在细胞营养富足的情况下,哺乳动物雷帕霉素靶蛋白(mammaliantargetofrapamycin,mTOR)通过磷酸化ULK1和Atg13,抑制ULK1复合物活性从而阻滞自噬的起始㊂而在细胞处于饥饿或应激状态时,能量感受器腺苷酸活化蛋白激酶(adenosine5ᶄ⁃monophosphate(AMP)⁃activatedproteinkinase,AMPK)被激活,AMPK可以抑制mTOR的活性而减少ULK1磷酸化,促进ULK1复合物的形成而诱导自噬的起始[13,14,18]㊂液泡分选蛋白34(vacuolarproteinsorting34,Vps34)与Beclin1㊁Vps15㊁Atg14形成的PI3K复合物磷酸化磷脂酰肌醇后所形成的磷脂酰肌醇三磷酸(phosphatidylinositol3⁃phosphate,PI3P)对自噬的起始也极为必要[18]㊂在上述过程中,已知的唯一一种Atg跨膜蛋白Atg9可能参与分离膜上脂质的募集,ULK复合物有招募PI3K复合物的作用[1,12,13]㊂分离膜的延伸和闭合需要Atg12⁃Atg5⁃Atg16和LC3⁃PE(酵母中为Atg8⁃PE)两种泛素化系统的参与㊂Atg12在被E1泛素样连接酶Atg7活化后,被E2泛素样连接酶Atg10催化,而与Atg5共价结合形成Atg12⁃Atg5,最后Atg16聚集到Atg12⁃Atg5上形成Atg12⁃Atg5⁃Atg16复合物㊂在LC3⁃PE泛素化系统中,Atg4将微管相关蛋白LC3(microtubule⁃associatedproteinlightchain3)蛋白C端精氨酸水解后,LC3(LC3⁃I)先后在Atg7和E2样连接酶Atg3的作用下,与磷脂酰乙醇胺(phosphatidylethanolamine,PE)结合,形成LC3⁃PE即LC3⁃Ⅱ㊂Atg12⁃Atg5⁃Atg16复合物对LC3和PE的共价结合也很重要,在细胞自噬过程中,当自噬泡闭合时,Atg12⁃Atg5⁃Atg16复合物从膜上脱落,只有膜结合形式的LC3⁃Ⅱ定位于自噬体膜上,LC3⁃Ⅱ的含量与自噬体数量成正比,因而被广泛用于自噬研究[13,18⁃20]㊂之后,在SNARE样蛋白的作用下,自噬体与溶酶体结合999中国生物化学与分子生物学报第32卷形成自噬溶酶体,自噬体包裹物在溶酶体酶的作用下被降解(Fig.1)[15]㊂Fig.1㊀Theautophagypathwayinmammal㊀㊀Whenautophagyisactivatedbystarvation,stressandpathogeninfection,ULK1complexandPI3KcomplexareresponsiblefortheformationoftheisolationmembraneandrecruitmentcomponentsoftheLC3andAtg12ubiquitin⁃likeconjugationsystems.Atg12complexfunctionsastheE3⁃likeenzymefortheLC3⁃PEubiquitin⁃likesystemwhichfacilitatestheclosureoftheisolationmembrane,anddissociatesfromtheisolationmembraneuponthecompletionofautophagosomeformation.Afterclosureoftheisolationmembrane,thesubsequentlysosome⁃autophagosomefusionleadstodegradationofthecontentsoftheautophagosomebylysosomalhydrolasesintheautolysosome[13]2㊀自噬在发育及干细胞中的作用2 1㊀自噬在哺乳动物发育中的作用哺乳动物胚胎在发育过程中,自噬最早在受精卵内出现[21]㊂卵子作为高度分化的细胞,在受精后很快变为分化潜能最高的细胞㊂在这个过程中,受精卵内母源mRNA和蛋白质在2细胞后很快被降解㊂与此同时,由受精卵基因组编码的mRNA和蛋白质开始合成,到4 8细胞期时受精卵内蛋白质种类出现明显变化[22]㊂自噬活性在未受精的卵子中维持在较低水平,而在受精4h后会猛然升高㊂条件性敲除小鼠自噬相关基因Atg5的受精卵能发育成胚胎,但将卵子中母源Atg5去除后,受精卵会在4 8细胞期死亡㊂进一步研究发现,自噬缺陷的胚胎中,蛋白质合成率较低㊂据此推测,正常水平的自噬因能提供充足的氨基酸而有利于蛋白质的合成[21]㊂另外,条件性敲除其它自噬相关基因,如Beclin1㊁Ambra1和FIP200,均会导致胚胎在发育不同时期死亡[22]㊂小鼠中第二波高水平自噬出现在早期新生儿体内[23]㊂胎盘在哺乳动物胚胎形成过程中为其提供丰富的营养,出生后营养供给被切断,新生儿不可避免地要面临饥饿刺激㊂研究发现,出生后1 2d内,正常小鼠除脑以外的所有组织器官中,自噬水平均会明显升高[23]㊂条件性敲除Atg3㊁Atg5㊁Atg7㊁Atg9㊁Atg16L1的小鼠,因其受精卵中卵源Atg蛋白的存在而能正常发育直到出生㊂这些小鼠出生后虽然外观正常,但均会在1d内死亡[22,24]㊂进一步的研究发现,这些新生敲除鼠血浆和组织中氨基酸水平较正常低,提示自噬对维持新生儿体内氨基酸水平至关重要[23]㊂但是,氨基酸水平的降低到底是不是新生儿死亡的罪魁祸首目前仍不清楚㊂自噬在组织器官如胰腺的发育中也有非常重要的作用㊂胰腺能帮助消化㊁控制机体血糖水平㊂研究发现,随着年龄的增长,大鼠胰岛组织中LC3⁃II㊁Atg7等蛋白质表达水平均有不同程度下降,而p62/SQSTM1蛋白的表达则相应增加[25]㊂提示自噬可能对胰岛的发育和维持有重要作用㊂特异性敲除小鼠胰岛β细胞中自噬相关基因ATG7后发现,胰岛β细胞的增殖受到抑制㊁凋亡增加㊁胰岛素水平降低㊁葡糖耐受能力降低㊂形态学特征显示,β细胞内线粒体肿胀㊁内质网延伸胀大㊁泛素化蛋白积0001第9期任立鹏等:自噬在发育及干细胞中的作用聚[26⁃28],说明自噬对胰岛的正常发育必不可少㊂在维持胰岛正常功能方面的研究发现,高脂喂养的非糖尿病鼠中胰岛细胞内自噬水平会上调[29],用软脂酸和高糖干预后的胰岛素细胞(INS⁃1)内自噬水平显著升高[30]㊂用链脲佐菌素(streptozocin,STZ)诱导1型糖尿病时,大鼠胰岛β细胞对STZ处理的最早反应是产生自噬[31]㊂在胰岛素分泌缺陷小鼠模型即Rab3A敲除鼠中的研究发现,模型鼠可以通过上调自噬维持β细胞内胰岛素平衡[32]㊂还有研究发现,β细胞中的自噬水平与胰岛素水平成正相关[33]㊂研究表明,自噬在胚胎及组织器官的发育中必不可少,是胚胎发育㊁组织器官发育中的重要调节者㊂2 2㊀自噬在干细胞调控中的作用干细胞自我更新和分化的过程需要对细胞内蛋白质和细胞器数量进行严格控制,自噬快速有效地降解细胞内酶和转录因子等物质,因而可能对干细胞自我更新和分化起调控作用[34⁃36]㊂2 2 1㊀自噬在胚胎干细胞调控中的作用㊀具有多向分化潜能的胚胎干细胞(embryonicstemcells,ESCs)来源于囊胚时期的内细胞团,并且具有分化为三胚层的能力㊂在自噬与发育部分已经提到,自噬对早期胚胎干细胞的形成至关重要㊂在未分化的人ESCs中能检测到基础水平的自噬,用BafA1或3⁃MA抑制自噬后,发现Oct4㊁Sox2和Nanog等多能性蛋白会在人ESCs中积聚,提示多能性蛋白可能会通过自噬而降解[4]㊂条件性敲除Atg5的小鼠ESC在14C标记的氨基酸的培养液中培养时,细胞内蛋白质的合成降解率明显降低[37]㊂人ESCs分化过程中,在培养基中添加I型转化生长因子⁃β(transforminggrowthfactor⁃β,TGF⁃β)受体抑制剂或移除成纤维细胞分泌的维持因子后,自噬活性显著升高[38]㊂移除白血病抑制因子(leukemiainhibitoryfactor,LIF)后,Atg5缺陷小鼠的ESCs不能形成正常的拟胚体[39]㊂上述研究表明,自噬参与ESCs中蛋白质平衡的调节,对维持ESCs多能性有重要调控作用㊂2 2 2㊀自噬在成体干细胞调控中的作用㊀成体组织中的干细胞能分化成特定类型的细胞㊂自噬在成体干细胞自我更新和分化中发挥重要调控作用㊂表皮干细胞㊁真皮干细胞和造血干细胞的自噬水平显著高于其分化下游细胞,抑制自噬会抑制这3种细胞的分化,影响其在应激条件下的存活能力[2]㊂在造血干细胞(hematopoieticstemcells,HSCs)中,抑制自噬会引起骨髓增生性疾病,特异性敲除Atg7的HSCs中,线粒体数量异常增高,线粒体自噬受损,从而导致大量活性氧(reactiveoxygenspecies,ROS)产生,损伤DNA在细胞内积聚[40]㊂敲除Atg12后,在移除细胞因子或限制能量供给的情况下,HSCs更容易走向凋亡,而野生型HSCs因有FoxO3A介导的自噬发生而得到了保护[41]㊂此外,自噬可在HSCs向红细胞分化过程中起清除线粒体等细胞器的作用[42]㊂在室管膜下区神经干细胞(neuralstemcells,NSCs)所在位置能检测到LC3的转化,敲除FIP200后NSCs的数目显著减少㊂当小鼠体内胚胎发育到15 5d,发现NSCs向神经元分化过程中,自噬相关基因表达显著升高,抑制自噬会影响神经元的形成[43]㊂研究说明,自噬在NSC分化和维持中有重要作用㊂间充质干细胞(mesenchymalstemcells,MSCs)具有多向分化潜能,能分化为脂肪㊁骨㊁软骨和肌肉等组织㊂人MSCs中自噬水平较高,同HSCs一样,增高的自噬能减少应激条件下细胞凋亡的发生㊂MSCs向成骨组织分化过程中能观察到明显的自噬,并且自噬是由AMPK和Raptor升高抑制了mTOR而引起的[44]㊂心肌干细胞(cardiacstemcells,CSCs)的分化受成纤维细胞生长因子(fibroblastgrowthfactor,FGF)的负调控,FGF能通过抑制自噬抑制CSCs的分化,添加FGF抑制剂或敲除FGF受体均能促进CSCs中自噬的发生[45]㊂自噬对维持肌肉卫星细胞静息状态有重要作用㊂在生理性衰老的卫星细胞或者自噬缺陷的年轻细胞中,自噬障碍会导致蛋白质内稳态丧失㊁线粒体功能障碍和氧化应激增强,相应毒性废物的累积最终使卫星细胞进入衰老状态㊂进一步研究表明,在老年卫星细胞中重建自噬可以逆转衰老,恢复其再生功能㊂因此,自噬是一个决定性的干细胞命运调控者,是肌肉卫星细胞维持干性的关键[3]㊂总之,自噬在干细胞自我维持和分化调控中有重要作用(Fig.2),但自噬在不同干细胞中的调控作用机制是否相同目前仍不清楚[24,35]㊂2 3㊀自噬在肿瘤干细胞中的作用同其它干细胞一样,肿瘤干细胞(cancerstemcells,CSCs)也有自我更新和分化能力㊂在肿瘤组织中,CSCs常处于低氧和营养不足的微环境中,促进1001中国生物化学与分子生物学报第32卷Fig.2㊀Autophagyinadultstemcells㊀㊀Activationoftheautophagyprocessindifferenttypesofstemcellsisabletomaintainenergyandorganelleshomeostasis,toaffordprotectiontowardsROSinduceddamage,toregulateproliferation,tobalancebetweenself⁃renewalanddifferentiation,andtopromotetheshifttowardsglycolyticmetabolism[46]自噬因能促进细胞内物质的循环利用而有利于CSCs的存活[47]㊂抑制自噬后,乳腺癌干细胞和肝癌干细胞更容易凋亡,而且降低CSCs形成肿瘤的能力㊂在结直肠肿瘤干细胞中,抑制自噬能促进抗癌药物的治疗效果㊂敲除Atg5和Beclin1的CD133阳性神经胶质瘤干细胞对γ射线更敏感㊂另外,自噬因能促进上皮间充质转化而有利于间充质肿瘤干细胞的形成和迁移㊂不过,也有研究表明,诱导自噬有利于机体清除CSCs㊂诱导自噬能促进乳腺癌干细胞和睾丸癌干细胞走向凋亡㊂敲除Beclin1的小鼠能自发形成肿瘤,用AKT抑制Beclin1可促进肿瘤的形成,因而自噬可能对CSCs的形成起抑制作用㊂总之,自噬的作用可能因肿瘤干细胞种类的不同和其所处阶段的不同而异㊂正如在黑色素瘤研究中所发现的,自噬可能对早期肿瘤的形成起抑制作用,而有利于之后发病期肿瘤的维持和迁移[24,35]㊂2 4㊀自噬在细胞重编程中的作用自噬对细胞重编程过程也很重要㊂有报道指出,用雷帕霉素抑制mTOR信号通路能促进诱导多能性干细胞(inducedpluripotentstemcells,iPSCs)的形成,对mTOR的表达水平和活性的调节是细胞成功重编程的关键[48,49]㊂自噬对于iPSC的诱导形成至关重要㊂在重编程诱导过程中,自噬发生在诱导的第1d,而在诱导的第2d达到高峰㊂敲除Atg5的MEF将无法启动干性基因的表达,不能产生iPSC细胞,也不能形成畸胎瘤㊂进一步研究发现,诱导早期自噬的发生是由SOX2介导的mTOR的下调所引起的[50]㊂但最近又有研究表明,自噬虽然在重编程中被强烈激活,但阻断自噬后细胞重编程效率反而更高[51]㊂另外,也有研究表明,自噬能防止iPSCs的凋亡和衰老,从而提高iPSCs的存活能力[52]㊂3㊀展望近几年来,有关自噬和干细胞的研究报道越来越多,自噬在干细胞自我更新和分化中的作用也越来越受到人们的重视㊂然而,自噬和干细胞干性之间的关系及其背后调控的分子机制仍需进一步研究㊂对自噬在干细胞静息状态㊁自我更新及分化中作用机制的研究将极大地促进我们对机体生理和病理现象的理解,而这些基础研究无一例外都会对干细胞的临床应用有重要的指导意义㊂参考文献(References)[1]㊀HurleyJH,SchulmanBA.Atomisticautophagy:thestructuresofcellularself⁃digestion[J].Cell,2014,157(2):300⁃311[2]㊀SalemiS,YousefiS,ConstantinescuMA,etal.Autophagyisrequiredforself⁃renewalanddifferentiationofadulthumanstemcells[J].CellRes,2011,22(2):432⁃435[3]㊀García⁃PratL,Martínez⁃VicenteM,PerdigueroE,etal.Autophagymaintainsstemnessbypreventingsenescence[J].Nature,2016,529(7584):37⁃42[4]㊀ChoYH,HanKM,KimD,etal.Autophagyregulateshomeostasisofpluripotency⁃associatedproteinsinhESCs[J].StemCells,2014,32(2):424⁃435[5]㊀AshfordTP,PorterKR.Cytoplasmiccomponentsinhepaticcelllysosomes[J].JCellBiol,1962,12(1):198⁃202[6]㊀BoyaP,ReggioriF,CodognoP.Emergingregulationandfunctionsofautophagy[J].NatCellBiol,2013,15(7):713⁃720[7]㊀MünzC.Enhancingimmunitythroughautophagy[J].AnnuRev2001第9期任立鹏等:自噬在发育及干细胞中的作用Immunol,2009,27:423⁃449[8]㊀MijaljicaD,PrescottM,DevenishRJ.Microautophagyinmammaliancells:revisitinga40⁃year⁃oldconundrum[J].Autophagy,2011,7(7):673⁃682[9]㊀LiWW,LiJ,BaoJK.Microautophagy:lesser⁃knownself⁃eating[J].CellMolLifeSci,2012,69(7):1125⁃1136[10]㊀DiceJF.Chaperone⁃mediatedautophagy[J].Autophagy,2007,3(4):295⁃299[11]㊀MajeskiAE,DiceJF.Mechanismsofchaperone⁃mediatedautophagy[J].IntJBiochemCellBiol,2004,36(12):2435⁃2444[12]㊀MizushimaN,KomatsuM.Autophagy:renovationofcellsandtissues[J].Cell,2011,147(4):728⁃741[13]㊀ShibutaniST,SaitohT,NowagH,etal.Autophagyandautophagy⁃relatedproteinsintheimmunesystem[J].NatImmunol,2015,16(10):1014⁃1024[14]㊀FloreyO,OverholtzerM.Autophagyproteinsinmacroendocyticengulfment[J].TrendsCellBiol,2012,22(7):374⁃380[15]㊀MariñoG,Niso⁃SantanoM,BaehreckeEH,etal.Self⁃consumption:theinterplayofautophagyandapoptosis[J].NatRevMolCellBiol,2014,15(2):81⁃94[16]㊀RubinszteinDC,ShpilkaT,ElazarZ.Mechanismsofautophagosomebiogenesis[J].CurrBiol,2012,22(1):R29⁃R34[17]㊀李文,魏科,冯杜.自噬体膜的来源[J].中国生物化学与分子生物学报(LiW,WeiK,FengD.Sourcesofautophagosomemembrane[J].ChinJBiochemMolBiol),2014,30(10):957⁃962[18]㊀PiekarskiA,GreeneE,AnthonyN,etal.Crosstalkbetweenautophagyandobesity:potentialuseofavianmodel[J].AdvFoodTechnolNutrSciOpenJ,2015,1(1):32⁃37[19]㊀BildiriciI,LongtineM,ChenB,etal.Survivalbyself⁃destruction:aroleforautophagyintheplacenta?[J].Placenta,2012,33(8):591⁃598[20]㊀MizushimaN,YoshimoriT,LevineB.Methodsinmammalianautophagyresearch[J].Cell,2010,140(3):313⁃326[21]㊀TsukamotoS,KumaA,MurakamiM,etal.Autophagyisessentialforpreimplantationdevelopmentofmouseembryos[J].Science,2008,321(5885):117⁃120[22]㊀MizushimaN,LevineB.Autophagyinmammaliandevelopmentanddifferentiation[J].NatCellBiol,2010,12(9):823⁃830[23]㊀KumaA,HatanoM,MatsuiM,etal.Theroleofautophagyduringtheearlyneonatalstarvationperiod[J].Nature,2004,432(7020):1032⁃1036[24]㊀GuanJL,SimonAK,PrescottM,etal.Autophagyinstemcells[J].Autophagy,2013,9(6):830⁃849[25]㊀LiuY,ShiS,GuZ,etal.Impairedautophagicfunctioninratisletswithaging[J].Age(Dordr),2013,35(5):1531⁃1544[26]㊀JungHS,ChungKW,KimJW,etal.Lossofautophagydiminishespancreaticbetacellmassandfunctionwithresultanthyperglycemia[J].CellMetab,2008,8(4):318⁃324[27]㊀FujitaniY,KawamoriR,WatadaH.Theroleofautophagyinpancreaticβ⁃cellanddiabetes[J].Autophagy,2009,5(2):280⁃282[28]㊀QuanW,HurK,LimY,etal.Autophagydeficiencyinbetacellsleadstocompromisedunfoldedproteinresponseandprogressionfromobesitytodiabetesinmice[J].Diabetologia,2012,55(2):392⁃403[29]㊀EbatoC,UchidaT,ArakawaM,etal.Autophagyisimportantinislethomeostasisandcompensatoryincreaseofbetacellmassinresponsetohigh⁃fatdiet[J].CellMetab,2008,8(4):325⁃332[30]㊀ChoiSE,LeeSM,LeeYJ,etal.Protectiveroleofautophagyinpalmitate⁃inducedINS⁃1β⁃celldeath[J].Endocrinology,2009,150(1):126⁃134[31]㊀GrassoD,SacchettiML,BrunoL,etal.AutophagyandVMP1expressionareearlycellulareventsinexperimentaldiabetes[J].Pancreatology,2009,9(1⁃2):81⁃88[32]㊀MarshBJ,SodenC,AlarcónC,etal.Regulatedautophagycontrolshormonecontentinsecretory⁃deficientpancreaticendocrinebeta⁃cells[J].MolEndocrinol,2007,21(9):2255⁃2269[33]㊀GoginashviliA,ZhangZ,ErbsE,etal.Insulinsecretorygranulescontrolautophagyinpancreaticβcells[J].Science,2015,347(6224):878⁃882[34]㊀PhadwalK,WatsonAS,SimonAK.Tightropeact:autophagyinstemcellrenewal,differentiation,proliferation,andaging[J].CellMolLifeSci,2013,70(1):89⁃103[35]㊀WangS,XiaP,RehmM,etal.Autophagyandcellreprogramming[J].CellMolLifeSci,2015,72(9):1699⁃1713[36]㊀PanH,CaiN,LiM,etal.Autophagiccontrolofcell stemness [J].EMBOMolMed,2013,5(3):327⁃331[37]㊀MizushimaN,YamamotoA,HatanoM,etal.DissectionofautophagosomeformationusingApg5⁃deficientmouseembryonicstemcells[J].JCellBiol,2001,152(4):657⁃668[38]㊀TraT,GongL,KaoLP,etal.Autophagyinhumanembryonicstemcells[J].PLoSOne,2011,6(11):e27485[39]㊀QuX,ZouZ,SunQ,etal.Autophagygene⁃dependentclearanceofapoptoticcellsduringembryonicdevelopment[J].Cell,2007,128(5):931⁃946[40]㊀MortensenM,SoilleuxEJ,DjordjevicG,etal.TheautophagyproteinAtg7isessentialforhematopoieticstemcellmaintenance[J].JExpMed,2011,208(3):455⁃467[41]㊀WarrMR,BinnewiesM,FlachJ,etal.FOXO3Adirectsaprotectiveautophagyprograminhaematopoieticstemcells[J].Nature,2013,494(7437):323⁃327[42]㊀MortensenM,FergusonDJ,EdelmannM,etal.Lossofautophagyinerythroidcellsleadstodefectiveremovalofmitochondriaandsevereanemiainvivo[J].ProcNatlAcadSciUSA,2010,107(2):832⁃837[43]㊀VázquezP,ArrobaAI,CecconiF,etal.Atg5andAmbra1differentiallymodulateneurogenesisinneuralstemcells[J].Autophagy,2012,8(2):187⁃199[44]㊀PantovicA,KrsticA,JanjetovicK,etal.Coordinatedtime⁃dependentmodulationofAMPK/Akt/mTORsignalingandautophagycontrolsosteogenicdifferentiationofhumanmesenchymalstemcells[J].Bone,2013,52(1):524⁃531[45]㊀ZhangJ,LiuJ,HuangY,etal.FRS2α⁃mediatedFGFsignalssuppressprematuredifferentiationofcardiacstemcellsthroughregulatingautophagyactivity[J].CircRes,2012,110(4):e29⁃e39[46]㊀RodolfoC,BartolomeoSD,CecconiF.Autophagyinstemandprogenitorcells[J].CellMolLifeSci,2015,73(3):475⁃496[47]㊀GongC,BauvyC,TonelliG,etal.Beclin1andautophagyarerequiredforthetumorigenicityofbreastcancerstem⁃like/progenitorcells[J].Oncogene,2013,32(18):2261⁃2272[48]㊀ChenT,ShenL,YuJ,etal.Rapamycinandotherlongevity⁃promotingcompoundsenhancethegenerationofmouseinducedpluripotentstemcells[J].AgingCell,2011,10(5):908⁃911[49]㊀HeJ,KangL,WuT,etal.Anelaborateregulationofmammaliantargetofrapamycinactivityisrequiredforsomaticcellreprogramminginducedbydefinedtranscriptionfactors[J].StemCellsDev,2012,21(14):2630⁃2641[50]㊀WangS,XiaP,YeB,etal.TransientactivationofautophagyviaSox2⁃mediatedsuppressionofmTORisanimportantearlystepinreprogrammingtopluripotency[J].CellStemCell,2013,13(5):617⁃625[51]㊀WuY,LiY,ZhangH,etal.AutophagyandmTORC1regulatethestochasticphaseofsomaticcellreprogramming[J].NatCellBiol,2015,17(6):715⁃725[52]㊀MenendezJA,VellonL,Oliveras⁃FerrarosC,etal.mTOR⁃regulatedsenescenceandautophagyduringreprogrammingofsomaticcellstopluripotency:aroadmapfromenergymetabolismtostemcellrenewalandaging[J].CellCycle,2011,10(21):3658⁃36773001。
(2021年整理)Epigeneticsglossary表观遗传名词解释

Epigeneticsglossary表观遗传名词解释
编辑整理:
尊敬的读者朋友们:
这里是精品文档编辑中心,本文档内容是由我和我的同事精心编辑整理后发布的,发布之前我们对文中内容进行仔细校对,但是难免会有疏漏的地方,但是任然希望(Epigeneticsglossary表观遗传名词解释)的内容能够给您的工作和学习带来便利。
同时也真诚的希望收到您的建议和反馈,这将是我们进步的源泉,前进的动力。
本文可编辑可修改,如果觉得对您有帮助请收藏以便随时查阅,最后祝您生活愉快业绩进步,以下为Epigeneticsglossary表观遗传名词解释的全部内容。
Epigenetics glossary
Discover our epigenetics glossary with definitions covering the。
Ubiquitin and Ubiquitin-like proteins - UAB泛素与泛素样蛋白- UAB

Cellular Protein Degradation
• Lysosomal • Nonspecific • Endocytosis • Foreign proteins • Energy favorable to degrade proteins
Non-lysosomal Protein Degradation
1977 – Etlinger and Goldberg (PNAS) Protein degradation in reticulocytes But ----- no lysosomes ATP dependent
1980 – Wilkinson et al (JBC) Identify protein degradation system in reticulocyte Two fractions – (ATP-dependent Proteolytic Factor; APF) APF-1 fraction conjugates to proteins APF-1 identified as ubiquitin
Conserved cysteine Active “thio ester”
E3: Ligase Specific w/E2
Usually do not conjugate Hold complex together
19S and 20S Proteasome Subunits Characteristics
146: 5079-5085.
Outline
• History and Evolution of Ub-pathway • Sites where ubiquitination regulates
细胞自噬机制--2016年诺贝尔生理或医学奖

Scientific Background Discoveries of Mechanisms for AutophagyThe 2016 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine is awarded to Yoshinori Ohsumi for his discoveries of mechanisms for autophagy. Macroautophagy (“self-eating”, hereafter referred to as autophagy) isan evolutionarily conserved process whereby the eukaryotic cell can recycle part of its own contentby sequestering a portion of the cytoplasm in a double-membrane vesicle that is delivered to the lysosome for digestion. Unlike other cellular degradation machineries, autophagy removes long-lived proteins, large macro-molecular complexes and organelles that have become obsolete or damaged. Autophagy mediates the digestion and recycling of non-essential parts of the cell during starvation and participates in a varietyof physiological processes where cellular components must be removed to leave space for new ones. In addition, autophagy is a key cellular process capable of clearing invading microorganisms and toxic protein aggregates, and therefore plays an important role during infection,in ageing and in the pathogenesis of many human diseases. Although autophagy was recognized already in the 1960’s, the mechanism and physiological relevance remained poorly understood for decades. The work of Yoshinori Ohsumi dramatically transformed the understanding of this vital cellular process. In 1993, Ohsumi published his seminal discovery of 15 genes of key importance for autophagy in budding yeast. In a series of elegant subsequent studies, he cloned several of these genes in yeast and mammalian cells and elucidated the function of the encoded proteins. Based on Yoshinori Ohsumi’s seminal discoveries, the importance of autophagyin human physiology and disease is now appreciated.The mystery of autophagyIn the early 1950’s, Christian de Duve was interested in the action of insulin and studied the intracellular localization of glucose-6-phosphatase using cell fractionation methods developed by Albert Claude. In a control experiment, he also followed the distribution of acid phosphatase, but failed to detect any enzymatic activity in freshly isolated liver fractions. Remarkably, the enzymatic activity reappeared if the fractions were stored for five days in a refrigerator1. It soon became clear that proteolytic enzymes were sequestered within a previously unknown membrane structure that de Duve named the lysosome1,2. Comparative electron microscopy of purified lysosome-rich liver fractions and sectioned liver identified the lysosome as a distinct cellular organelle3. Christian de Duve and Albert Claude, together with George Palade, were awarded the 1974 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for their discoveries concerning the structure and functional organization of the cell.Soon after the discovery of the lysosome, researchers found that portions of the cytoplasm are sequestered into membranous structures during normal kidney development in the mouse4. Similar structures containing a small amount of cytoplasm and mitochondria were observed in the proximal tubule cells of rat kidney during hydronephrosis5. The vacuoles were found to co-localize with acid-phosphatase-containing granules during the early stages of degeneration and the structures were shown to increase as degeneration progressed5. Membrane structures containing degenerating cytoplasm were also present in normal rat liver cells and their abundance increased dramatically following glucagon perfusion6 or exposure to toxic agents7. Recognizing that the structures had the capacity to digest parts of the intracellular content, Christian de Duve coined the term autophagy in 1963, and extensively discussed this concept in a review article published a few years later8. At that time, a compelling case for the existence of autophagy in mammalian cells was made based on results from electron microscopy studies8. Autophagy was known to occur at a low basal level, and to increase during differentiation and remodeling in a variety of tissues, including brain, intestine, kidney, lung, liver, prostate, skin and thyroid gland4,7-13. It was speculated that autophagy might be a mechanism for coping with metabolic stress in response to starvation6and that it might have roles in the pathogenesis of disease5. Furthermore, autophagy was shown to occur in a wide range of single cell eukaryotes and metazoa, e.g. amoeba, Euglena gracilis, Tetrahymena, insects and frogs8,14, pointing to a function conserved throughout evolution.During the following decades, advances in the field were limited. Nutrients and hormones were reported to influence autophagy; amino acid deprivation induced15, and insulin-stimulation suppressed16 autophagy in mammalian tissues. A small molecule, 3-methyladenine, was shown to inhibit autophagy17. One study using a combination of cell fractionation, autoradiography and electron microscopy provided evidence that the early stage of autophagy included the formation of a double-membrane structure, the phagophore,that extended around a portion of the cytoplasm and closed into a vesicle lacking hydrolytic enzymes, the autophagosome18 (Figure 1).Despite many indications that autophagy could be an important cellular process, its mechanism and regulation were not understood. Only a handful of laboratories were working on the problem, mainly using correlative or descriptive approaches and focusing on the late stages of autophagy, i.e. the steps just before or after fusion with the lysosome. We now know that the autophagosome is transient and only exists for ~10-20 minutes before fusing with the lysosome, making morphological and biochemical studies very difficult.Figure 1. Formation of the autophagosome. The phagophore extends to form a double-membrane autophagosome that engulfs cytoplasmic material. The autophagosome fuses with the lysosome, where the content is degraded.In the early 1990’s, almost 30 years after de Duve coined the term autophagy, the process remained a biological enigma. Molecular markers were not available and components of the autophagy machinery were elusive. Many fundamental questions remained unanswered: How was the autophagy process initiated? How was the autophagosome formed? How important was autophagy for cellular and organismal survival? Did autophagy have any role in human disease? Discovery of the autophagy machineryIn the early 1990’s Yoshinori Ohsumi, then an Assistant Professor at Tokyo University, decided to study autophagy using the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisae as a model system. The first question he addressed was whether autophagy exists in this unicellular organism. The yeast vacuole is the functional equivalent of the mammalian lysosome. Ohsumi reasoned that, if autophagy existed in yeast, inhibition of vacuolar enzymes would result in the accumulation of engulfed cytoplasmic components in the vacuole. To test this hypothesis, he developed yeast strains that lacked the vacuolar proteases proteinase A, proteinase B and carboxy-peptidase19. He found that autophagic bodies accumulated in the vacuole when the engineered yeast were grown in nutrient-deprived medium19, producing an abnormal vacuole that was visible under a light microscope. He had now identified a unique phenotype that could be used to discover genes that control the induction of autophagy. By inducing random mutations in yeast cells lacking vacuolar proteases, Ohsumi identified the first mutant that could not accumulate autophagic bodies in the vacuole20; he named this gene autophagy 1 (APG1). He then found that the APG1 mutant lost viability much quicker than wild-type yeast cells in nitrogen-deprived medium. As a second screen he used this more convenient phenotype and additional characterization to identify 75 recessive mutants that could be categorized into different complementation groups. In an article published in FEBS Letters in 1993, Ohsumi reported his discovery of as many as 15 genes that are essential for the activation of autophagy in eukaryotic cells20. He named the genes APG1-15. As new autophagy genes were identified in yeast and other species, a unified system of gene nomenclature using the ATG abbreviation was adopted21. This nomenclature will be used henceforth in the text.During the following years, Ohsumi cloned several ATG genes22-24and characterized the function of their protein products. Cloning of the ATG1gene revealed that it encodes a serine/threonine kinase, demonstrating a role for protein phosphorylation in autophagy24. Additional studies showed that Atg1 forms a complex with the product of the ATG13 gene, and that this interaction is regulated by the target of rapamycin (TOR) kinase23,25. TOR is active in cells grown under nutrient-rich conditions and hyper-phosphorylates Atg13, which prevents the formation of the Atg13:Atg1 complex. Conversely, when TOR is inactivated by starvation, dephosphorylated Atg13 binds Atg1 and autophagy is activated25. Subsequently, the active kinase was shown to be a pentameric complex26 that includes, in addition to Atg1 and Atg13, Atg17, Atg29 and Atg31. The assembly of this complex is a first step in a cascade of events needed for formation of the autophagosome.Figure 2. Regulation of autophagosome formation. Ohsumi studied the function of the proteins encoded by key autophagy genes. He delineated how stress signals initiate autophagy and the mechanism by which protein complexes promote distinct stages of autophagosome formation.The formation of the autophagosome involves the integral membrane protein Atg9, as well as a phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3K) complex26 composed of vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 34 (Vps34), Vps15, Atg6, and Atg14. This complex generates phosphatidylinositol-3 phosphate and additional Atg proteins are recruitedto the membrane of the phagophore. Extension of the phagophore to form the mature autophagosome involves two ubiquitin-like protein conjugation cascades (Figure 2).Studies on the localization of Atg8 showed that, while the protein was evenly distributed throughout the cytoplasm of growing yeast cells, in starved cells, Atg8 formed large aggregates that co-localized with autophagosomes and autophagic bodies27. Ohsumi made the surprising discovery that the membrane localization of Atg8 is dependent on two ubiquitin-like conjugation systems that act sequentially to promote the covalent binding of Atg8 to the membrane lipid phosphatidylethanolamine. The two systems share the same activating enzyme, Atg7. In the first conjugation event, Atg12 is activated by forming a thioester bond with a cysteine residue of Atg7, and then transferred to the conjugating enzyme Atg10 that catalyzes its covalent binding to the Atg5 protein26,28,29. Further work showed that the Atg12:Atg5 conjugate recruits Atg16 to form a tri-molecular complex that plays an essential role in autophagy by acting as the ligase of the second ubiquitin-like conjugation system30. In this second unique reaction, the C-terminal arginine of Atg8 is removed by Atg4, and mature Atg8 is subsequently activated by Atg7 for transfer to the Atg3 conjugating enzyme31. Finally, the two conjugation systems converge as the Atg12:Atg5:Atg16 ligase promotes the conjugation of Atg8 to phosphatidylethanolamine26,32.Lipidated Atg8 is a key driver of autophagosome elongation and fusion33,34. The two conjugation systems are highly conserved between yeast and mammals. A fluorescently tagged version of the mammalian homologue of yeast Atg8, called light chain 3 (LC3), is extensively used as a marker of autophagosome formation in mammalian systems35, 36.Ohsumi and colleagues were the first to identify mammalian homologues of the yeast ATG genes, which allowed studies on the function of autophagyin higher eukaryotes. Soon after, genetic studies revealed that mice lacking the Atg5gene are apparently normal at birth, but die during the first day of life due to inability to cope with the starvation that precedes feeding37. Studies of knockout mouse models lacking different components of the autophagy machinery have confirmed the importance of the process in a variety of mammalian tissues26,38.The pioneering studies by Ohsumi generated an enormous interest in autophagy. The field has become one of the most intensely studied areas of biomedical research, with a remarkable increase in the number of publications since the early 2000’s.Different types of autophagyFollowing the seminal discoveries of Ohsumi, different subtypes of autophagy can now be distinguished depending on the cargo that is degraded. The most extensively studied form of autophagy, macroautophagy, degrades large portions of the cytoplasm and cellular organelles. Non-selective autophagy occurs continuously, andis efficiently induced in response to stress, e.g.starvation. In addition, the selective autophagy of specific classes of substrates - protein aggregates, cytoplasmic organelles or invading viruses and bacteria - involves specific adaptors that recognize the cargo and targets it to Atg8/LC3 on the autophagosomal membrane39. Other forms of autophagy include microautophagy40, which involves the direct engulfment of cytoplasmic material via inward folding of the lysosomal membrane, and chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA). In CMA, proteins with specific recognition signals are directly translocated into the lysosome via binding to a chaperone complex41.Autophagy in health and diseaseInsights provided by the molecular characterizationof autophagy have been instrumental in advancing the understanding of this process and its involvement in cell physiology and a variety of pathological states (Figure 3). Autophagy was initially recognized as a cellular response to stress, but we now know that the system operates continuously at basal levels. Unlike the ubiquitin-proteasome system that preferentially degrades short-lived proteins, autophagy removes long-lived proteins and is the only process capable of destroying whole organelles, such as mitochondria, peroxisomes and the endoplasmic reticulum. Thus, autophagy plays an essential rolein the maintenance of cellular homeostasis. Moreover, autophagy participates in a variety of physiological processes, such as cell differentiation and embryogenesis that require the disposal of large portions of the cytoplasm. The rapid inductionof autophagy in response to different types of stress underlies its cytoprotective function and the capacity to counteract cell injury and many diseases associated with ageing.Because the deregulation of the autophagic flux is directly or indirectly involved in a broad spectrum of human diseases, autophagy is a particularly interesting target for therapeutic intervention. An important first insight into the role of autophagy in disease came from the observation that Beclin-1, the product of the BECN1gene, is mutated in a large proportion of human breast and ovarian cancers. BECN1 is a homolog of yeast ATG6 that regulates steps in the initiation of autophagy42. This finding generated substantial interest in the role of autophagy in cancer43.Misfolded proteins tend to form insoluble aggregates that are toxic to cells. To cope with this problem the cell depends on autophagy44. In fly and mouse models of neurodegenerative diseases, the activation of autophagy by inhibition of TOR kinase reduces the toxicity of protein aggregates45. Moreover, loss of autophagy in the mouse brain by the tissue-specific disruption of Atg5and Atg7 causes neurodegeneration46,47. Several autosomal recessive human diseases with impaired autophagy are characterized by brain malformations, developmental delay, intellectual disability, epilepsy, movement disorders and neurodegeneration48.Figure 3. Autophagy in health and disease. Autophagy is linked to physiological processes including embryogenesis and cell differentiation, adaptation to starvation and other types of stress, as well as pathological conditions including neurodegenerative diseases, cancer and infections.The capacity of autophagy to eliminate invading microorganisms, a phenomenon called xenophagy, underlies its key role in the activationof immune responses and the control of infectious diseases49,50. Viruses and intracellular bacteria have developed sophisticated strategies to circumvent this cellular defense. Additionally, microorganisms can exploit autophagy to sustain their own growth.ConclusionThe discovery of autophagy genes, and the elucidation of the molecular machinery for autophagy by Yoshinori Ohsumi have led to a new paradigm in the understanding of how the cell recycles its contents. Because of his pioneering work, autophagy is recognized as a fundamental process in cell physiology with major implicationsfor human health and disease.Nils-Göran Larsson and Maria G. Masucci Karolinska InstitutetReferences1. de Duve, C. (2005). The lysosome turns fifty.Nat Cell Biol 7, 847–849.2. de Duve, C., Pressman, B.C., Gianetto, R.,Wattiaux, R., and Appelmans, F. (1955)Tissue fractionation studies. 6. Intracellulardistribution patterns of enzymes in rat-livertissue. Biochem J 60, 604–617.3. Novikoff, A.B, Beaufay, H., and de Duve, C.(1956) Electron microscopy of lysosome-richfractions from rat liver. Journal BiophysBiochem Cytol. 2, 179–190.4. Clark, S.L. (1957) Cellular differentiation in thekidneys of newborn mice studied with theelectron microscope. J Biophys BiochemCytol 3, 349–376.5. Novikoff, A.B. (1959) The proximal tubule cellin experimental hydronephrosis. J BiophysBiochem Cytol 6, 136–138.6. Ashford, T.P., and Porter, K.R. (1962)Cytoplasmic components in hepatic celllysosomes. J Cell Biol 12, 198–202.7. Novikoff, A.B., and Essner, E. (1962)Cytolysomes and mitochondrial degeneration.J Cell Biol 15, 140–146.8. de Duve, C., and Wattiaux, R. (1966)Functions of lysosomes. Annu Rev Physiol 28,435–492.9. Behnke, O. (1963) Demonstration of acidphosphatase-containing granules and cytoplasmic bodies in the epithelium of foetalrat duodenum during certain stages ofdifferentiation. J Cell Biol18, 251–265. 10. Bruni, C., and Porter, K.R. (1965) The finestructure of the parenchymal cell of the normalrat liver: I. General observations. Am J Pathol46, 691–755.11. Hruban, Z., Spargo, B., Swift, H., Wissler,R.W., and Kleinfeld, R.G. (1963) Focalcytoplasmic degradation. Am J Pathol 42,657–683.12. Moe, H., and Behnke, O. (1962) Cytoplasmicbodies containing mitochondria, ribosomes,and rough surfaced endoplasmic membranesin the epithelium of the small intestine ofnewborn rats. J Cell Biol 13, 168–171.13. Napolitano, L. (1963) Cytolysomes inmetabolically active cells. J Cell Biol 18, 478–481.14. Bonneville, M.A. (1963) Fine structuralchanges in the intestinal epithelium of thebullfrog during metamorphosis. J Cell Biol 18,579–597.15. Mortimore, G.E., and Schworer, C.M. (1977)Induction of autophagy by amino-aciddeprivation in perfused rat liver. Nature 270,174–176.16. Pfeifer, U., and Warmuth-Metz, M. (1983)Inhibition by insulin of cellular autophagy inproximal tubular cells of rat kidney. Am JPhysiol 244, E109-114.17. Seglen, P.O., and Gordon, P.B. (1982) 3-Methyladenine: specific inhibitor of autophagic/lysosomal protein degradation inisolated rat hepatocytes. Proc Natl Acad SciUSA 79, 1889–1892.18. Arstila, A.U., and Trump, B.F. (1968) Studieson cellular autophagocytosis. The formation ofautophagic vacuoles in the liver after glucagonadministration. Am J Pathol 53, 687–733.19. Takeshige, K., Baba, M., Tsuboi, S., Noda, T.,and Ohsumi, Y. (1992) Autophagy in yeastdemonstrated with proteinase-deficientmutants and conditions for its induction. J CellBiol 119, 301–311.20. Tsukada, M., and Ohsumi, Y. (1993) Isolationand characterization of autophagy-defectivemutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBSLett 333, 169–174.21. Klionsky, D.J., Cregg, J.M. Dunn, W.A. Jr.,Emr, S.D., Sakia, J., Sandoval, I.V., Sibirnya,Y.A., Subramani, S., Thumm, M., Veenhuis,M., and Ohsumi, Y. (2003) A unifiednomenclature for yeast autophagy-relatedgenes. Dev Cell 5, 539-545.22. Kametaka, S., Matsuura, A., Wada Y., andOhsumi, Y. (1996) Structural and functionalanalyses of APG5, a gene involved inautophagy in yeast. Gene 178, 139-43.23. Funakoshi, T., Matsuura, A., Noda, T.,Ohsumi Y. (1997) Analyses of APG13 geneinvolved in autophagy in yeast,Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Gene. 192, 207-213.24. Matsuura, A., Tsukada, M., Wada, Y., andOhsumi, Y. (1997) Apg1p, a novel proteinkinase required for the autophagic process inSaccharomyces cerevisiae. Gene 192, 245–250.25. Kamada, Y., Funakoshi, T., Shintani, T.,Nagano, K., Ohsumi, M., and Ohsumi, Y.(2000) Tor-mediated induction of autophagyvia an Apg1 protein kinase complex. J CellBiol 150, 1507–1513.26. Ohsumi, Y. (2014) Historical landmarks ofautophagy research. Cell Res 24, 9–23.27. Kirisako, T., Baba, M., Ishihara, N., Miyazawa,K., Ohsumi, M., Yoshimori, T., Noda, T., andOhsumi, Y. (1999) Formation process ofautophagosome is traced with Apg8/Aut7p inyeast. J Cell Biol 147, 435–446.28. Mizushima, N., Noda, T., Yoshimori, T.,Tanaka, Y., Ishii, T., George, M.D., Klionsky,D.J., Ohsumi, M., and Ohsumi, Y. (1998) Aprotein conjugation system essential forautophagy. Nature 395, 395–398.29. Shintani, T., Mizushima, N., Ogawa, Y.,Matsuura, A., Noda, T., and Ohsumi, Y. (1999)Apg10p, a novel protein-conjugating enzymeessential for autophagy in yeast. EMBO J 18,5234–5241.30. Mizushima, N., Noda, T., and Ohsumi, Y.(1999) Apg16p is required for the function ofthe Apg12p-Apg5p conjugate in the yeastautophagy pathway. EMBO J 18, 3888–3896. 31. Ichimura, Y., Kirisako, T., Takao, T., Satomi,Y., Shimonishi, Y., Ishihara, N., Mizushima,N., Tanida, I., Kominami, E., Ohsumi, M., et al.(2000) A ubiquitin-like system mediatesprotein lipidation. Nature 408, 488–492.32. Hanada, T., Noda, N.N., Satomi, Y., Ichimura,Y., Fujioka, Y., Takao, T., Inagaki, F., andOhsumi, Y. (2007) The Atg12-Atg5 conjugatehas a novel E3-like activity for proteinlipidation in autophagy. J Biol Chem 282,37298–37302.33. Nakatogawa, H., Ichimura, Y., and Ohsumi, Y.(2007) Atg8, a ubiquitin-like protein requiredfor autophagosome formation, mediates membrane tethering and hemifusion. Cell 130,165–178.34. Xie Z., Nair U., Klionsky D.J. (2008) ATG8controls phagophore expansion during autophagosome formation. Mol Cell Biol 19,3290-3298.35. Kabeya, Y., Mizushima, N., Ueno, T.,Yamamoto, A., Kirisako, T., Noda, T.,Kominami, E., Ohsumi, Y., and Yoshimori, T.(2000) LC3, a mammalian homologue of yeastApg8p, is localized in autophagosome membranes after processing. EMBO J 19,5720–5728. 36. Mizushima, N., Yamamoto, A., Matsui, M.,Yoshimori, T., and Ohsumi, Y. (2004) In vivoanalysis of autophagy in response to nutrientstarvation using transgenic mice expressing afluorescent autophagosome marker. Mol BiolCell 15, 1101–1111.37. Kuma, A., Hatano, M., Matsui, M., Yamamoto,A., Nakaya, H., Yoshimori, T., Ohsumi, Y.,Tokuhisa, T., and Mizushima, N. (2004) Therole of autophagy during the early neonatalstarvation period. Nature 432, 1032–1036. 38. Mizushima, N., and Komatsu, M. (2011)Autophagy: Renovation of cells and tissues.Cell 147, 728-741.39. Liu, L., Sakakibara, K., Chen, Q., Okamoto, K.(2014) Receptor-mediated mitophagy in yeastand mammalian systems. Cell Res 24, 787-795.40. Li, W.W., Li, J., Bao, J.K. (2012)Microautophagy: lesser-known self-eating.Cell Mol Life Sci 69, 1125-1136.41. Cuervo, A.M., and Wong, E. (2014)Chaperone-mediated autophagy: roles in disease and aging. Cell Res 24, 92–104.42. Liang, X.H., Jackson, S., Seaman, M., Brown,K., Kempkes, B., Hibshoosh, H., and Levine,B. (1999) Induction of autophagy andinhibition of tumorigenesis by beclin 1. Nature402, 672–676.43. Choi, A.M.K., Ryter, S.W., and Levine, B.(2013) Autophagy in human health anddisease. N Engl J Med 368, 651–662.44. Ravikumar, B., Vacher, C., Berger, Z., Davies,J.E., Luo, S., Oroz, L.G., Scaravilli, F., Easton,D.F., Duden, R., O'Kane, C.J., et al. (2004)Inhibition of mTOR induces autophagy andreduces toxicity of polyglutamine expansionsin fly and mouse models of Huntingtondisease. Nat Genet 36, 585–595.45. Ravikumar, B., Duden, R., and Rubinsztein,D.C. (2002) Aggregate-prone proteins withpolyglutamine and polyalanine expansionsare degraded by autophagy. Hum Mol Genet11, 1107–1117.46. Komatsu, M., Waguri, S., Chiba, T., Murata,S., Iwata, J.-I., Tanida, I., Ueno, T., Koike, M.,Uchiyama, Y., Kominami, E., et al. (2006)Loss of autophagy in the central nervoussystem causes neurodegeneration in mice.Nature 441, 880–884.47. Hara, T., Nakamura, K., Matsui, M.,Yamamoto, A., Nakahara, Y., Suzuki-Migishima, R., Yokoyama, M., Mishima, K.,Saito, I., Okano, H., et al. (2006) Suppressionof basal autophagy in neural cells causesneurodegenerative disease in mice. Nature441, 885–889.48. Ebrahimi-Fakhari, D., Saffari, A., Wahlster, L.,Lu, J., Byrne, S., Hoffmann, G.F., Jungbluth,H., and Sahin, M. (2016) Congenital disordersof autophagy: an emerging novel class of inborn errors of neuro-metabolism. Brain 139,317–337.49. Nakagawa, I., Amano, A., Mizushima, N.,Yamamoto, A., Yamaguchi, H., Kamimoto, T.,Nara, A., Funao, J., Nakata, M., Tsuda, K., etal. (2004) Autophagy defends cells against invading group A Streptococcus. Science 306,1037–1040. 50. Gutierrez, M.G., Master, S.S., Singh, S.B.,Taylor, G.A., Colombo, M.I., and Deretic, V.(2004) Autophagy is a defense mechanisminhibiting BCG and Mycobacterium tuberculosis survival in infected macrophages.Cell 119, 753–766.Nils-Göran Larsson, MD, PhDProfessor of Mitochondrial Genetics, Karolinska InstitutetAdjunct Member of the Nobel CommitteeMember of the Nobel AssemblyMaria G. Masucci, MD, PhDProfessor of Virology, Karolinska InstitutetAdjunct Member of the Nobel CommitteeMember of the Nobel AssemblyIllustration: Mattias Karlén*FootnotesAdditional information on previous Nobel Prize Laureates mentioned in this text can be found at/The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1974 to Albert Claude, Christian de Duve and George E. Palade “for their discoveries concerning the structural and functional organization of the cell”/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/1974/claude-facts.html/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/1974/duve-facts.html/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/1974/palade-facts.htmlGlossary of Terms:Lysosome:an organelle in the cytoplasm of eukaryotic cells containing degradative enzymes enclosed in a membrane.Phagophore: a vesicle that is formed during the initial phases of macroautophagy. The phagophore is extended by the autophagy machinery to engulf cytoplasmiccomponents.Autophagosome:an organelle that encloses parts of the cytoplasm into a double membrane that fuses to the lysosome where its content is degraded. The autophagosome is thekey structure in macroautophagy.Selective autophagy: a type of macroautophagy that mediates the degradation of specific cytoplasmic components. Different forms of selective autophagy are called mitophagy(degrades mitochondria), ribophagy (degrades ribosomes), lipophagy (degradeslipid droplets) xenophagy (degrades invading microorganisms) etc.。
Ubiquitin Proteasome Pathway 泛素途径

真核细胞内蛋白质降解的两条途径
1、不依赖ATP的溶酶体途径(无需能量,无选择性降解) 外来蛋白质、膜蛋白、胞内长寿蛋白质 组织蛋白酶 肽酶 肽 游离氨基酸 2、 依赖ATP的蛋白酶体途径(需能、高效、指向性很强) ATP 泛素化 短寿蛋白或异常蛋白+泛素 标记蛋白 蛋白酶体 肽酶 识别并降解蛋白质 肽链 游离氨基酸
ቤተ መጻሕፍቲ ባይዱ
第二阶段:靶蛋白被26s蛋白酶体识别、降解。
• 靶蛋白在26s蛋白酶体的作用下, 由泛素介导的蛋白水解过程。泛 素在这一过程中释放出讯号,让 蛋白酶体分辨出有待降解的蛋白 质。 • 过程:进入26s蛋白酶体的底物蛋 白质被多次切割, 最终,被标记 的蛋白质被蛋白酶分解为3~22个 氨基酸残基的小肽、氨基酸以及 可重复利用的泛素。 • Plus:多泛素化后的蛋白质是如何 被蛋白酶体所识别的,还没有完 全弄清。
肿瘤发病机制中的作用
泛素蛋白酶体通路在肿瘤的发病机制中起 重要作用。肿瘤可以起因于癌基因蛋白生长促 进因子的稳定或由于肿瘤抑癌基因的不稳定。 某些常规通过蛋白酶体降解的癌基因蛋白, 如果 不能及时地从细胞中清除,就会诱导细胞恶变。
神经系统疾病发病机制中的作用
近年来发现泛素系统也与神经细胞变性有关。 如引起帕金森病的一个重要因子是Parkin,后者是 泛素和蛋白的E3连接酶,能与E2 UbcH7 和UbcH8 共同作用 , 而 Parkin 自身也是经泛素化调节降解 , 一旦 Parkin 变性 , 影响某些蛋白降解 , 就会引起多 巴胺类神经元的毒性损伤而引起常染色体隐性 少年型帕金森病 ( autosomal recessive juvenile parkinsomism)。
Atg8, a ubiquitin-like protein required for autophagosome formation

Atg8,a Ubiquitin-like Protein Required for Autophagosome Formation,Mediates Membrane Tethering and HemifusionHitoshi Nakatogawa,1,2Yoshinobu Ichimura,1,3and Yoshinori Ohsumi1,*1Department of Cell Biology,National Institute for Basic Biology,Okazaki444-8585,Japan2PRESTO,Japan Science and Technology Agency,Saitama332-0012,Japan3Present address:Department of Biochemistry,Juntendo University School of Medicine,Bunkyo-ku,Tokyo113-8421,Japan. *Correspondence:yohsumi@nibb.ac.jpDOI10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.021SUMMARYAutophagy involves de novo formation of double membrane-bound structures called autophagosomes,which engulf material to be degraded in lytic compartments.Atg8is a ubiq-uitin-like protein required for this process in Saccharomyces cerevisiae that can be conju-gated to the lipid phosphatidylethanolamine by a ubiquitin-like system.Here,we show using an in vitro system that Atg8mediates the teth-ering and hemifusion of membranes,which are evoked by the lipidation of the protein and reversibly modulated by the deconjugation enzyme Atg4.Mutational analyses suggest that membrane tethering and hemifusion ob-served in vitro represent an authentic function of Atg8in autophagosome formation in vivo.In addition,electron microscopic analyses indicate that these functions of Atg8are in-volved in the expansion of autophagosomal membranes.Our results provide further insights into the mechanisms underlying the unique membrane dynamics of autophagy and also in-dicate the functional versatility of ubiquitin-like proteins.INTRODUCTIONAutophagy is an evolutionally conserved protein degrada-tion pathway in eukaryotes that is essential for cell survival under nutrient-limiting conditions(Levine and Klionsky, 2004).In addition,recent studies have revealed a wide variety of physiological roles for autophagy(Mizushima, 2005)as well as its relevance to diseases(Cuervo,2004). During autophagy,cup-shaped,single membrane-bound structures called isolation membranes appear and expand,which results in the sequestration of a portion of the cytosol and often organelles.Eventually,spherical, double membrane-bound structures called autophago-somes are formed(Baba et al.,1994),and then delivered to and fused with lysosomes or vacuoles to allow their contents to be degraded.Studies in S.cerevisiae have identified18ATG genes required for autophagosome formation,most of which are also found in higher eukary-otes(Levine and Klionsky,2004).Recent studies have shown that Atg proteins constitutefive functional groups: (i)the Atg1protein kinase complex,(ii)the Atg14-contain-ing phosphatidylinositol-3kinase complex,(iii)the Atg12-Atg5protein conjugation system,(iv)the Atg8lipid con-jugation system,and(v)the Atg9membrane protein recycling system(Yorimitsu and Klionsky,2005).The mechanisms by which these units act collaboratively with lipid molecules to form the autophagosomes,how-ever,are still poorly understood.Atg8is one of two ubiquitin-like proteins required for autophagosome formation(Mizushima et al.,1998;Ichi-mura et al.,2000).Because it has been shown that Atg8 and its homologs(LC3in mammals)localize on the isola-tion membranes and the autophagosomes,these proteins have been used in various studies as reliable markers for the induction and progression of autophagy(Kirisako et al.,1999;Kabeya et al.,2000;Yoshimoto et al.,2004). In S.cerevisiae,Atg8is synthesized with an arginine resi-due at the C terminus,which is immediately removed by the cysteine protease Atg4(Kirisako et al.,2000).The resulting Atg8G116protein has a glycine residue at the new C terminus and can serve as substrate in a ubiqui-tin-like conjugation reaction catalyzed by Atg7and Atg3, which correspond to the E1and E2enzymes of the ubiq-uitination system,respectively(Ichimura et al.,2000). Remarkably,unlike other ubiquitin-like conjugation sys-tems,Atg8is conjugated to the lipid phosphatidylethanol-amine(PE),thereby Atg8is anchored to membranes (Ichimura et al.,2000;Kirisako et al.,2000).Immunoelec-tron microscopy revealed that Atg8,probably as a PE-conjugated form(Atg8-PE),is predominantly localized on the isolation membranes rather than on the complete autophagosomes(Kirisako et al.,1999),suggesting that Atg8-PE plays a pivotal role in the process of autophago-some formation.The precise function of Atg8-PE,how-ever,has remained unknown.The conjugation of Atg8to PE is reversible;Atg4also functions as a deconjugation enzyme,resulting in the Cell130,165–178,July13,2007ª2007Elsevier Inc.165release of Atg8from the membrane(Kirisako et al.,2000). This reaction is thought to be important for the regulation of the function of Atg8and/or the recycling of Atg8after it has fulfilled its role in autophagosome formation.We reconstituted the Atg8-PE conjugation reaction in vitro with purified components(Ichimura et al.,2004). Here,we show using this system that Atg8mediates the tethering and hemifusion of liposomes in response to the conjugation with PE.These phenomena observed in vitro are suggested to reflect a bonafide in vivo function of Atg8 in the expansion of the isolation membrane.Based on mutational analyses and structural information,the mech-anisms of Atg8-mediated membrane tethering and hemi-fusion as well as its regulation are discussed.This study sheds light on the molecular basis of unconventional membrane dynamics during autophagy,which is gov-erned by the Atg proteins.RESULTSLipidation of Atg8Causes Clustering of LiposomesIn VitroAs reported previously(Ichimura et al.,2004),when puri-fied Atg8G116(hereafter,referred to as Atg8),Atg7,and Atg3were incubated with liposomes containing PE in the presence of ATP,Atg8-PE was efficiently formed (Figure1A,lanes1–6).Intriguingly,the reaction mixture became turbid during the incubation(Figure1B),which under a light microscope,was found to be a result of grad-ually forming aggregates(Figure1C).Both the degree of turbidity and the size of the aggregates appeared to corre-late with the amount of Atg8-PE produced in the mixture. Size-distribution analyses using dynamic light scattering (DLS)clearly showed that the aggregates formed in an Atg8-PE dose-dependent manner(Figure1D).These aggregates disappeared when the samples were treated with the detergent CHAPS(Figure1E,+CHAPS).In addi-tion,if a small amount of PE modified with thefluorescent dye7-nitro-2,1,3-benzoxadiazol-4-yl(NBD)was included in the liposome preparation,the aggregates became uniformlyfluorescent(Figure1E,NBD-PE).These results suggest that the aggregates generated during the produc-tion of Atg8-PE were clusters of liposomes.When the proteins were denatured with urea,the clus-ters of liposomes dissociated,although Atg8remained conjugated to PE(Figure1E,+urea and Figure1F,lane 2),indicating that the liposomes aggregated due to some function of the Atg8protein rather than an artifact caused by Atg8-PE as the lipid with the extraordinarily large head group.When the aggregates were sedimented by centrifugation,Atg8-PE co-precipitated with the lipo-somes(Figure1G,lane2),whereas Atg7,Atg3,and unconjugated Atg8did not(Figure1G,lane3).The sedimented liposomes containing Atg8-PE remained clustered even if they were briefly sonicated(Figure1H, ppt.).These results suggested that Atg8-PE molecules function to tether together membranes to which they are anchored.Atg8-PE Also Mediates Liposome FusionWe also examined if membrane fusion occurred between the liposomes connected by Atg8-PE.To this end,we took advantage of a well-characterized lipid mixing assay (Struck et al.,1981).This method is based on energy transfer from NBD to lissamine rhodamine B(Rho),each of which is conjugated to PE.Because the amino group of the ethanolamine moiety is modified with the dyes, these lipids cannot be conjugated with Atg8.If both of the conjugated dyes are present at appropriate concen-trations in the same liposome,thefluorescence of NBD is effectively quenched by Rho(Figure2A,compare col-umns1and4).If a‘‘NBD+Rho’’liposome is fused with a‘‘nonlabeled’’liposome,which results in an increase of the average distance between the two dyes on the membrane,the NBDfluorescence will be dequenched.A mixture of the nonlabeled and NBD+Rho liposomes were subjected to the conjugation reaction.The resulting liposome clusters were dissociated by proteinase K treat-ment,followed byfluorescence measurements.Remark-ably,a significant ATP-dependent increase of thefluores-cence was observed(ATP is required for the production of Atg8-PE;Figure2B,column6).This increasedfluores-cence was not observed with samples of nonlabeled lipo-somes alone,NBD+Rho liposomes alone,or a mixture of nonlabeled liposomes and liposomes containing NBD-PE but not Rho-PE(Figure2B,columns1-3).These results suggest that membrane fusion occurred between the lipo-somes tethered together by Atg8-PE.The increasedfluo-rescence was only observed if the reaction mixture was treated with proteinase K(Figure2B,columns4and6). This appeared to be due to the presence of Atg7and/or Atg3rather than Atg8or some effect of the clustering, because the NBDfluorescence was not increased by the addition of Atg4(Figure2B,column5),which detached Atg8from the membranes and dissociated the clusters of liposomes(see below).Instead,decreasing the con-centrations of the conjugation enzymes allowed the dequenching of the NBDfluorescence to be detected without proteinase K digestion(Figure2B,column7). The fusion of the liposomes was examined with various amounts of Atg8(Figure2C).The level of fusion increased Atg8dose-dependently and reached maximum at2m M (Figure2C).In contrast,a larger amount of Atg8produced an inhibitory effect(data not shown).This suggested that formation of the large aggregates resulted from excessive tethering by Atg8-PE,which no longer lead to fusion. We also carried out time-course experiments to roughly estimate the fusion rate using the lower concentrations of the conjugation enzymes(Figure2D),which eliminated the need for the proteinase K treatment(Figure2B).It should be noted that the incubation time includes the times re-quired for the formation of Atg8-PE and the subsequent tethering and fusion reactions.Under these conditions, the band of Atg8-PE could be seen on an SDS-PAGE gel after a10min incubation,and the reaction was completed within30min(Figure S1in the Supplemental Data available with this article online).It appeared that166Cell130,165–178,July13,2007ª2007Elsevier Inc.Figure1.Membrane Tethering Function of Atg8-PE In Vitro(A–C)Purified Atg8(10m M),Atg7(1m M),and Atg3(1m M)were incubated with liposomes(350m M lipids)composed of55mol%DOPE,30mol% POPC,and15mol%blPI in the presence(lanes1–6)or absence(lanes7–12)of1mM ATP at30 C for the indicated time periods,followed by urea-SDS-PAGE and CBB-staining(A),measurement of the absorbance at600nm(B),or observation under a light microscope(Nomarski images)(C).(D)Conjugation reactions with the various amounts of Atg8were performed as described in(A).After incubation for60min,the size distribution of the aggregates was examined using DLS measurements.d.nm,apparent diameter(nm).(E and F)The conjugation reactions were carried out as described in(A).They were further incubated at30 C for30min in the presence of either 6M urea or1%CHAPS and were then subjected to microscopy(E)or urea-SDS-PAGE and CBB-staining(F).The reaction was also performed with liposomes containing1mol%NBD-labeled DOPE(thus containing54mol%unlabeled DOPE),followed byfluorescence microscopy.Afluo-rescence image with afilter for YFP(NBD-PE,FL)and a Nomarski image(NBD-PE,DIC)are shown.(G and H)Atg8(30m M),Atg7(2m M),and Atg3(2m M)were incubated with liposomes(350m M lipids)consisting of70mol%DOPE and30mol% POPC in the presence of1mM ATP at30 C for45min(total).The mixture was microcentrifuged at15,000rpm for10min to generate the pellet (ppt.)and the supernatant(sup.)fractions.The fractions were briefly sonicated and were analyzed by urea-SDS-PAGE(G)or observed under a light microscope(H).In this experiment,blPI was omitted to prevent Atg7and Atg3from tightly binding to the liposome.We showed that Atg8could also cause hemifusion of liposomes with this lipid composition.Cell130,165–178,July13,2007ª2007Elsevier Inc.167the liposomes began to fuse shortly after the formation of Atg8-PE.The fusion reaction proceeded concurrently with the conjugation reaction and continued for 30min after the completion of the Atg8-PE production (Figure 2D,filled circles).Small liposomes <100nm in diameter tend to sponta-neously fuse (Chen et al.,2006),and the liposomes we used in the above experiments were 70nm in diameter (Figure 1D).However,we also showed that Atg8-PEcaused a significant level of fusion between larger lipo-somes in spite of their stability against spontaneous fusion (Figure S1).Taken together,these results suggest that not only tethering but also fusion of the liposomes is mediated by Atg8-PE.The Atg8-Mediated Membrane Fusion Is Hemifusion Recent in vitro studies on membrane fusion mediated by SNARE proteins and a class of viral proteinsrevealedFigure 2.Membrane Hemifusion Occurs between Liposomes Tethered by Atg8-PE(A and B)Nonlabeled (55mol%DOPE,30mol%POPC,and 15mol%blPI),NBD-labeled (55mol%DOPE,29mol%POPC,15mol%blPI,and 1mol%NBD-DOPE),and NBD+Rho-labeled (55mol%DOPE,27.5mol%POPC,15mol%blPI,1mol%NBD-DOPE,and 1.5mol%Rho-DOPE)liposomes were mixed in the differ-ent combinations and ratios indicated.Their relative intensities of the NBD fluorescence ob-served are shown (the value obtained with a 4:1mixture of the nonlabeled and NBD+Rho lipo-somes was defined as 1)(A).These mixtures of liposomes were incubated with Atg8(4m M),Atg7(0.5or 1.0m M),and Atg3(0.5or 1.0m M)in the presence (filled columns)or absence (open columns)of 1mM ATP for 60min,and were then treated with 1unit/ml apyrase.The mixtures were further incubated for 30min with the buffer (columns 4and 7),1m M Atg4(columns 5and 8),or 0.2mg/ml proteinase K (columns 1-3,6and 9),followed by measure-ment of the NBD fluorescence.The experi-ments were repeated three times and the average fluorescence values divided by those obtained from the original liposome samples (F/F 0)are presented with error bars for the stan-dard deviations (B).(C)A 4:1mixture of the nonlabeled and NBD+Rho liposomes was incubated with various amounts of Atg8,1.0m M Atg7,and 1.0m M Atg3in the presence (open circles)or absence (filled circles)of ATP,and the samples were then treated with proteinase K,followed by measuring the NBD fluorescence.(D)The conjugation reactions were performed with the mixed liposomes used for the lipid mixing assay,0.5m M Atg7,and 0.5m M Atg3in the presence or absence of Atg8(4m M)and ATP.After incubation for the indicated time periods,an aliquot of the samples was immediately subjected to the fluorescence measurements.The values that were obtained by subtracting the signals observed in the absence of ATP from those observed in the presence of ATP are presented.(E)The lipid mixing assay was performed with 4m M Atg8,1m M Atg7,and 1m M Atg3in the presence or absence of ATP (white bars in columns 3and 2,respectively)as described in(C).For PEG-induced fusion reactions,the mixed liposomes were incubated at 37C for 30min in the presence or absence of 12.5%PEG 3350(white bars in columns 5and 4,respectively).These samples as well as the original liposomes (column 1)were then incubated with 20mM sodium dithionite on ice for 20min in the presence (black bars)or absence (gray bars)of 0.5%Triton X-100,followed by the NBD fluorescence measurement.168Cell 130,165–178,July 13,2007ª2007Elsevier Inc.that fusion proceeds through an intermediate state called hemifusion,in which outer(contacting)leaflets of two apposed lipid bilayers merge,while inner(distal)leaflets remain intact(Chernomordik and Kozlov,2005).It was also reported that fusion can be arrested or delayed at the hemifusion state under some conditions.Therefore, we investigated whether the liposome fusion caused by Atg8in vitro was complete fusion(the merger of both inner and outer leaflets)or hemifusion(Figure2E).This can be examined using the membrane impermeable reductant sodium dithionite that selectively abolishes thefluores-cence of NBD conjugated to the lipid head group in the outer leaflet(Meers et al.,2000).Accordingly,when so-dium dithionite was added to the original liposomes,the background level of the NBDfluorescence was decreased by about50%,whereas it was hardly detected in the pres-ence of the detergent(Figure2E,column1).Strikingly,the NBDfluorescence increased by the Atg8-mediated fusion was totally eliminated by addition of sodium dithionite to the same level as those observed in the original lipo-somes and the reaction mixture incubated without ATP (Figure2F,columns1-3).Whereas,we confirmed that in liposome fusion induced by polyethylene glycol(PEG), which causes complete fusion(Akiyama and Ito,2003), about half of the increasedfluorescence was retained af-ter sodium dithionite treatment(Figure2F,columns4and 5).Taken together,membrane fusion mediated by Atg8 in vitro was suggested to be hemifusion.To obtain direct evidence of hemifusion,we analyzed the morphology of liposomes by electron microscopy (Figures3A–3E),in which liposomal membranes were observed as double white lines that correspond to the outer and inner leaflets.When the clusters of liposomes formed by Atg8-PE were analyzed,tight junctions between the liposomes were observed(Figures3B and 3C,arrowheads).Consistent with the biochemical results suggesting that complete fusion does not occur,the size of the individual liposomes did not appear to significantly increase(compare Figures3A and3B).Instead,hallmarks of hemifusion,trifurcated structures formed by one contin-uous outer leaflet and two separate inner leaflets,could be observed at the junction between the liposomes(Figures 3C–3E,arrows).These results strongly support our con-clusion that Atg8-PE causes hemifusion of liposomes. Atg8Forms a Multimer in Responseto the Conjugation with PEWe also performed immunoelectron microscopy of the liposomes clustered by Atg8-PE(Figures3F–3I).Intrigu-ingly,Atg8-PE tended to be enriched at the junction be-tween the liposomes(Figures3G–3J).While,if the mixture incubated without ATP was similarly analyzed,the signal was rarely observed on the liposome(Figure3F;the gold particles observed should represent unconjugated Atg8 adsorbed onto the grid).These results indicate that Atg8-PE is directly involved in the tethering and hemifu-sion of liposomes.We observed that‘‘naked’’liposomes do not associate with liposomes carrying Atg8-PE(data not shown), suggesting that tethering should be achieved due to interactions between Atg8-PE molecules on different membranes.We therefore examined the intermolecular interaction of Atg8-PE by crosslinking experiments(Fig-ure4).The reaction mixture containing Atg8-PE or unconjugated Atg8was incubated with the lysine-to-lysine reactive crosslinker DSS.We found that a crosslink adduct with a molecular weight of 24kDa on a SDS-PAGE gel specifically appeared in the sample containing Atg8-PE(Figure4A,lane5).Considering the molecular weights of the proteins included,this adduct should represent an Atg8-PE homodimer.Immunoblotting anal-yses with anti-Atg8revealed that two additional crosslink adducts of about37and100kDa were also specifically produced in the Atg8-PE-containing sample(Figure4B, lanes2–4and Figure S2).These products were immuno-stained neither with anti-Atg7nor anti-Atg3(data not shown),suggesting that they represent a trimer and a larger multimer of Atg8-PE,respectively,and thus that Atg8multimerizes in response to PE conjugation. We also showed that this multimerization correlates with the membrane tethering ability of Atg8(see below), indicating that interactions between Atg8-PE molecules on different membranes are responsible for the tethering of the membranes.The Membrane-Tethering and HemifusionFunctions of Atg8Are Modulatedby the Deconjugation Enzyme Atg4Our results suggest that the membrane-tethering and hemifusion functions of Atg8are evoked by the conjuga-tion with PE,whereas Atg4functions as a deconjugase that cleaves the linkage between Atg8and PE(Kirisako et al.,2000).We reconstituted this reaction in vitro.After producing Atg8-PE using the conjugation reaction,the re-action was terminated by adding apyrase to deplete the remaining ATP.When purified Atg4was then added, Atg8-PE was rapidly and almost completely deconjugated (Figure4C,lanes1-6).In contrast,when the Atg4was pretreated with the cysteine protease inhibitor N-ethylma-leimide(NEM),the deconjugation reaction did not occur (Figure4C,lanes7–12).These results clearly show that Atg4is sufficient for the deconjugation of Atg8-PE.Upon deconjugation,the liposome aggregates immediately dissociated(Figure4D).In addition,we found that multi-merization of Atg8is also reversible;the crosslink adducts corresponding to the Atg8-PE dimer(Figure4A,lane6)as well as the trimer and the multimer(data not shown)were hardly formed when DSS was added after the deconjuga-tion reaction.We also showed that the presence of Atg4in the conjugation reaction retarded the accumulation of Atg8-PE and accordingly interfered with the tethering and hemifusion of the liposomes(data not shown).It was indicated that membrane tethering and hemifusion by Atg8can be regulated by the balance between the conjugation and deconjugation reactions.Cell130,165–178,July13,2007ª2007Elsevier Inc.169Identification of Mutations that Impair the Postconjugational Function of Atg8In VivoIf the function of Atg8-PE we observed in vitro was involved in autophagosome formation in vivo,Atg8mutants defi-cient for this function should result in defective autophagy.To examine this idea,we performed structure-based and systematic mutational analyses of Atg8(Figure 5).The structures of mammalian homologs revealed that Atg8family proteins consist of two domains:an N-terminal heli-cal domain (NHD)and a C-terminal ubiquitin-like domain (ULD)(Paz et al.,2000;Coyle et al.,2002;Sugawara et al.,2004;Figures 5E–5H).Among the highly conserved residues in the ULD,we selected those with side chains that were exposed on the domain surface (Figure 5A),and individually replaced them with alanine,except that serine was substituted for Ala75.Consequently,we didnot mutate residues suggested to be important for interac-tions with the conjugation enzymes,because these resi-dues are conserved only for their hydrophobic nature (Sugawara et al.,2004).The Atg8variants were expressed from centromeric plasmids in D atg8yeast cells,and their autophagic activities were biochemically assessed (see Supplemental Experimental Procedures ).In nutrient-rich media,the autophagic activity was low in all of the mutant cells as well as in the wild-type cells (data not shown).In contrast,in nitrogen starvation conditions,which strongly induced autophagy,a number of mutants were found to have defective autophagic phenotypes (Figure 5B).Ala-nine replacement of seven residues,Ile32,Lys48,Leu50,Arg65,Asp102,Phe104,and Tyr106,significantly impaired the autophagic activity to 30%–60%of that of the wild-type (Figure 5B).Immunoblotting analyses showedthatFigure 3.Electron Microscopic Analyses of the Liposomes Tethered and Hemi-fused by Atg8-PEConjugation reactions were performed with 4m M Atg8,1m M Atg7,and 1m M Atg3in the presence (B–E and G–I)or absence (A and F)of ATP for 60min and subjected to phospho-tungstic acid-staining and electron micros-copy (A–E).The junctions between the lipo-somes and the structures suggested to represent hemifusion are indicated with arrow-heads and arrows,respectively.The same samples were also subjected to immunostain-ing using purified anti-Atg8-IN-13and anti-rab-bit IgG conjugated with 5nm gold particles,fol-lowed by phosphotungstic acid-staining and electron microscopic observation (F–I).To as-sess the enrichment of Atg8-PE at the junction of the liposomes (J),images of two contacting liposomes as shown in G and H were randomly picked up (n =41).The lengths of contacting (CR)and noncontacting regions (non-CR)of the liposomal membranes were measured (white bars),thereby the number of gold parti-cles on each region (gray bars)was divided,in which the length of the contacting region was doubled,to calculate the linear density (black bars).The average values are presented with error bars for the standard deviations.170Cell 130,165–178,July 13,2007ª2007Elsevier Inc.a substantial amount of each of the Atg8mutant proteins accumulated in the cells (Figure 5D),although there were some differences in their mobilities in SDS-PAGE analysis;for instance the PE-conjugated and unconjugated forms of the D102A mutant exhibited almost the same mobility.None of the mutations significantly affected the formation of Atg8-PE (Figure 5D),suggesting that the mutations impaired a function of Atg8that was exerted after the conjugation with PE.Notably,these mutants accumulated different levels of unconjugated Atg8under the starvation conditions (Figure 5D,starvation),which allowed us to classify them into three groups.For the class I mutants K48A and L50A,the levels of the unconjugated forms were similar to that of the wild-type (Figure 5D,denoted in purple).On the other hand,compared to the wild-type,lower levels of the unconjugated forms were detected in the class II mutants I32A,D102A,F104A and Y106A (Figure 5D,denoted in red),whereas a larger amount of the unconju-gated class III mutant R65A accumulated (Figure 5D,denoted in orange).We then mapped the mutated resi-dues onto the three-dimensional structure of LC3(Suga-wara et al.,2004),which revealed that class of the mutant corresponded to the location of the mutation.All the class II residues were clustered in a specific region on the ULD (hereafter,referred to as the class II region),and the two neighboring class I residues were located close to the class II region (Figure 5E).In contrast,the class III residue was located away from the other mutated residues (Fig-ures 5G and 5H).The NHD of Atg8contains two helices:a 1and a 2(Figure 5A).We constructed two mutants,one with a dele-tion of a 1(D N8)and a second bearing deletions of both helices (D N24).It was shown that the NHD is involved in autophagy partially but significantly;the D N8and D N24mutations decreased the autophagic activity by about 30and 40%,respectively (Figure 5C).We also showed that the deletions did not affect the stability of the proteins or the formation of the PE conjugates (Figure S3).Effects of the Atg8Mutations on the Membrane-Tethering FunctionWe next examined whether the mutations affected the liposome-clustering ability of Atg8in vitro (Figure 6).Figure 4.The Membrane-Tethering Function and Multimerization of Atg8Are Reversibly Regulated in Response to Conjugation with PE(A)Conjugation reactions were performed as described in Figure 3in the presence (lanes 2,3,5,and 6)or absence (lanes 1and 4)of ATP.They were mixed with 1unit/ml apyrase,and then incubated with (lanes 3and 6)or with-out (lanes 1,2,4,and 5)purified Atg4(0.5m M)at 30 C for 30min.These samples were further incubated with (lanes 4–6)or without (lanes 1–3)100m M DSS for 30min,and then analyzed by urea-SDS-PAGE and CBB-staining.(B)The reaction mixture including ATP was in-cubated with different concentrations of DSS as indicated,followed by urea-SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with anti-Atg8-IN13.We also identified a crosslink product that reacted with anti-Atg3(Atg8xAtg3).(C and D)The conjugation reactions performed as described in Figure 1A were mixed with 1unit/ml apyrase.Atg4(0.5m M)pretreated with (lanes 7–12)or without (lanes 1–6)10mM NEM was then added,and the samples were incubated for the indicated time periods and subjected to urea-SDS-PAGE and CBB-stain-ing (C).The same samples were also observed under a light microscope (D).Cell 130,165–178,July 13,2007ª2007Elsevier Inc.171。
细菌双组分调节系统 Two-Component Regulatory System

TCSTS)
Two-component regulatory systesms
1. 基本所有细菌都 有: 1% of genome 2. 有信号识别和传导 (激酶)两部分 3. RR通常为转录 调节蛋白
HPK是一种跨膜蛋白,几乎所有的HPK都含有2个 跨膜区(TM1、TM2)。HPK的N-端有一个能感受 外界信号的输入区,C-端有一个由约250个氨基酸 残基组成的转导区,该区具有自主磷酸激酶的功能, 磷酸化的位点一般是保守的His残基(H)。此外, 转导区中还含有5个由5~10个氨基酸残基组成的高 度保守区域。
本节内容总结
腺苷脱腺苷控制谷氨酰胺合成酶(GS)活性。氮信号被腺(尿)苷酰转移酶(ATase或 UTase)识别。低氮激活UTase,尿苷酰化的PII协助ATase对GS-AMP 去腺苷酰化。
细菌群体感应
抗生素诱细菌SOS反应
Kohanski MA, 201
细菌的SOS 反应
ቤተ መጻሕፍቲ ባይዱ
四种常用抗生素对大肠杆菌SOS反应的诱导
SOS反应诱导错误倾向的DNA复制,大大 提高碱基自发突变率,导致产生多重抗生素 耐药性; SOS反应通过诱导整合子重组,促进溶源 性噬菌体的裂解,加速了耐药基因在细菌间 的水平转移[18]。 另外,SOS反应诱导蛋白可以提高细菌对 抗生素的耐药性,比如链球菌 (Streptococcus pneumoniae)热休克蛋白 ClpL的诱导表达可以增强链球菌对青霉素的 耐药性。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
Seminars in Cell &Developmental Biology 15(2004)231–236Two ubiquitin-like conjugation systems essential for autophagyYoshinori Ohsumi ∗,Noboru MizushimaDepartment of Cell Biology,National Institute for Basic Biology,Myodaiji-cho,Okazaki 444-8585,JapanKeywords:Autophagy;ATG genes;Atg12;Atg8;apg1.IntroductionThere are two major pathways of intracellular protein degradation.First,the ubiquitin-proteasome system in the cytosol is involved in degradation of short-lived,damaged or misfolded proteins [1,2].Target proteins to be degraded are first tagged with ubiquitin and then digested by the protea-some with strict recognition by the ubiquitin ligase system.Long-lived proteins are believed to be degraded within a specific compartment,the lysosome/vacuole.So far sev-eral delivery routes to this lytic compartment have been pro-posed.The process of degradation of the cell’s own intracel-lular constituents in lysosomes is generally called autophagy in contrast to heterophagy,degradation of extracellular ma-terials [3].Macroautophagy (hereafter autophagy)is a major pathway in autophagy,and initiates by enwrapping a por-tion of cytoplasm by a membrane sac called the isolation membrane,to form a double membrane structure,the au-tophagosome [4].The autophagosome then fuses with the lysosome,becoming the autolysosome and its inner mem-brane and contents are digested for reuse.Autophagy is characterized as being nonselective result-ing in the bulk degradation of cellular proteins.More than 90%of cellular proteins are long lived,thus the turnover of long-lived proteins is important to understand the phys-iology of the cell.Since the lysosome was discovered [5],electron microscopy has revealed that autophagy occurs in a variety of cells from different tissues and cultured cells,and it is now generally accepted that autophagy is a ubiquitous activity in eukaryotic cells.However,the molecular mechanism of autophagy has re-mained elusive.There was no specific monitoring marker or quantitative assay system to detect autophagy in mam-malian cells.Therefore,the genes involved in autophagy re-mained unidentified for a long time.Here,we will focus on the recent progress in the molecular dissection of autophagy.∗Correspondingauthor.Tel.:+81-564-75-7515;fax:+81-564-75-7516.E-mail address:yohsumi@nibb.ac.jp (Y .Ohsumi).Discoveries of two ubiquitin-like conjugation reactions have begun to unravel the mystery of autophagy.2.Discovery of autophagy in the yeast,Saccharomyces cerevisiaeIt has been postulated that the vacuole is a lytic organelle in yeast like the lysosome [6].It was shown that bulk pro-tein turnover is induced upon nitrogen starvation,which is dependent upon vacuolar enzyme activities [7,8].Obvious questions are what kinds of substrates are degraded in the vacuole and what is the mechanism of sequestering those substrates into the vacuole?In early 1990,we found that the yeast cell induces au-tophagy under various nutrient starvation conditions.When vacuolar proteinase-deficient mutants in a rich medium were shifted to a nitrogen-depleted medium,spherical structures appeared in the vacuole after 30–40min of lag time,accumulated and almost filled the vacuole within 10h [9].These structures,named autophagic bodies,are mostly single membrane-bound structures containing a portion of cytoplasm [9].Furthermore,double membrane structures of the same size as autophagic bodies were found in the cytosol of the starved cells.The autophagosome in yeast is about 300–900nm in diameter and contains cytoplasmic components nonselectively.Fusion of the outer membrane of the autophagosome with the vacuole was shown by freeze-fracture electron microscopy [10,11].The mem-brane dynamics of autophagy in yeast are topologically the same as that of autophagy in mammals,though the vacuole is much larger than lysosome.The whole scheme of the autophagy in yeast is shown in Fig.1.3.Genetic approaches to yeast autophagyGenetic approaches were taken to address the molecular mechanism of autophagy.The morphological change of the1084-9521/$–see front matter ©2003Published by Elsevier Ltd.doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2003.12.004232Y.Ohsumi,N.Mizushima/Seminars in Cell&Developmental Biology15(2004)231–236Fig.1.Macroautophagy in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.A por-tion of cytoplasm,including organelle,isfirst enclosed in a double or multilamellar structure,the autophagosome.The outer membrane of the autophagosome then fuses with the vacuole,and the cytoplasm-derived materials in the inner membrane are rapidly disintegrated.vacuole under starvation,accumulation of autophagic bod-ies,and an immunoscreen of cells that retain a cytosolic enzyme(fatty acid synthase)after starvation,were used to obtain autophagy-defective mutants(apg and aut).Later, two hybrid screens using Apg proteins as bait identified two more APG genes[12,13].Klionsky’s group isolated mutants defective in the maturation of one of the vacuolar enzymes,aminopeptidase I(API)[14].These so called cvt mutants(cytoplasm to vacuole targeting pathway)over-lapped with autophagy-defective mutants[15,16]though the two pathways are quite different.Electron microscopic analyses showed that the Cvt pathway uses similar mem-brane dynamics to autophagy[17].These genetic analyses revealed that at least16genes(Table1)are required specif-Table1Atg proteins essential for autophagosome formationNew nomenclature Classical name Atg12conjugation systemAtg12Apg12Atg7∗Apg7Atg10Apg10Atg5Apg5Atg16Apg16Atg8lipidation systemAtg8Aut7/Apg8Atg4Aut2/Apg4Atg7∗Apg7Atg3Apg3Atg1protein kinase complexAtg1Apg1Atg13Apg13Atg17Apg17 Autophagy-specific PI3kinaseAtg6(Vps30)Apg6Atg14Apg14(Vps34)(Vps15)OthersAtg2Apg2Atg9Apg9Atg18Aut10∗Atg7functions in two conjugation systems.ically for autophagy in yeast.Recently the nomenclature ofautophagy-related genes was changed to a novel gene nameATG[18].Here,ATG x will be used instead of the previousAPG x nomenclature.4.Characterization of Atg proteinsAll the atg mutants grew normally in rich medium,butfailed to induce bulk protein degradation under nutrient-depletion conditions.A homozygous diploid with an atgmutation could not perform sporulation[19].Another fea-ture of autophagy-defective mutants is the loss of viabilityduring nitrogen starvation.These mutants start to die after2days of starvation and almost completely lose viabilityafter1week[19].Cloning and identification of autophagygenes revealed that almost all are novel genes except ATG6,allelic to VPS30[20].In yeast,autophagy is almost com-pletely shut off under growing conditions,but every ATGgene is expressed in the growing conditions.Several ATGgenes(ATG8and ATG14)were transcriptionally upregulatedby starvation or under the negative regulation of Tor kinases[21,22].Molecular biological and biochemical analyses ofthese gene products uncovered the genetic and physical in-teractions among the Atg proteins.One of the most remark-ablefindings amongst the Atg proteins was the discoveryof two ubiqutin-like conjugation systems[23].In fact,halfof the16former APG genes essential for autophagy are in-volved in these novel conjugation systems.5.The yeast Atg12conjugation systemAtg12,a hydrophilic small protein of186amino acidswith no apparent homology to ubiquitin,covalently links toAtg5[24].The mode of conjugation of Atg12to Atg5isquite similar to that of ubiquitination.The carboxy-terminalresidue of Atg12is a single glycine,which is activated byAtg7in an ATP-dependent manner[24].Then,Atg12formsa conjugate with Atg7through a thioester bond[25–27].Atg7shows restricted homology with the ubiquitin-E1en-zyme within the regions around the putative ATP-bindingsite and the active site cysteine[24].Atg12is then trans-ferred to Atg10through a thioester bond[28].The functionof Atg10is similar to that of E2enzymes,although Atg10shows no homology to a known E2.Finally,the carboxy-terminal glycine of Atg12forms an isopeptide bond with the ε-amino group of lysine149of Atg5[24].Formation of the conjugate is requisite for the progression of autophagy.For-mation of the Atg12–Atg5conjugate is a constitutive pro-cess,which is not regulated by nutrient conditions.Atg12and Atg5form a conjugate immediately after their synthesisand free forms of them are hardly detectable.The Atg12sys-tem has distinct features from other ubiquitin-like systems.Atg12is synthesized as an active form and does not requireC-terminal processing.Atg5is the only target of the Atg12Y.Ohsumi,N.Mizushima/Seminars in Cell&Developmental Biology15(2004)231–236233modification,and so far no protease activity to deconjugate this conjugate was found,suggesting that this conjugation reaction is irreversible.The Atg12–Atg5conjugate behaves as if it is a single protein.Yeast Atg12may consist of a C-terminal ubiquitin-fold and a long N-terminal region.The three-dimensional structure of Atg12has not been solved yet but recent analysis suggested that its essential function resides within the ubiquitin-fold.The Atg12–Atg5conju-gate then forms a complex with Atg16.Atg16binds to Atg5 but not to Atg12[12].Atg16has a coiled-coil region in its C-terminal half and likely forms a tetramer through this re-gion.Atg12–Atg5·Atg16forms a350-kDa multimeric com-plex essential for autophagy[29].6.Atg8conjugation systemThe second ubiquitin-like protein essential for autophagy is Atg8(Aut7/Apg8),a117-amino acid protein.Atg8was shown to be a good marker for membrane dynamics during autophagy because it resides on the membrane sac enwrap-ping the cytoplasm,autophagosome,and also the autophagic body[21].Cell fractionation studies showed that Atg8is mostly membrane bound;about half is peripherally bound to membrane but half behaves like an intrinsic membrane protein[30].Epitope tagging analyses of Atg8revealed processing of nascent Atg8near the C-terminal end[30].Atg4,a novel cys-teine protease,is responsible for processing Atg8by cleav-ing a single Arg residue,consequently exposing Gly at the C-terminus of Atg8.The processed form of Atg8is then activated by Atg7,and is transferred to a conjugating E2 enzyme,Atg3[31].Atg7is a unique enzyme that activates two different ubiquitin-like proteins,Atg12and Atg8,and assigns them to their proper E2enzymes,Atg10and Atg3, respectively.Atg3has no overall significant homology to E2 enzymes of the ubiquitin system but shows some homology to Atg10.Interestingly,Atg8forms a conjugate not with a protein,but with phosphatidylethanolamine(PE),an abun-dant membrane phospholipid[31].This lipidation reaction is necessary for the membrane dynamics of autophagy.For normal autophagosome formation Atg8-PE should be de-conjugated by the processing enzyme,Atg4,therefore,the cycle of conjugation and deconjugation is important for the normal progression of autophagy[31].The two conjugation reactions are somehow related,since the Atg8-PE levels be-come significantly reduced in the absence of the Atg12–Atg5 conjugate.7.Other factors required for autophagyRecent analyses of Atg proteins revealed that there are two kinase complexes in addition to ubiquitin-like conjuga-tion systems.One is the Atg1protein kinase associated with Atg13,Atg17,Cvt9[32,33].The N-terminus contains a pro-tein kinase domain,and kinase activity was detected in vitro.A kinase-negative atg1mutant is defective in autophagy,im-plying that the kinase activity is essential for the function [13,32].The kinase activity is upregulated during induction of autophagy,so the level of kinase activity seems to be important for the regulation of autophagosome formation. Atg13is highly phosphorylated under nutrient-rich condi-tions.Upon starvation,it is dephosphorylated[13].Atg13 functions as a positive regulator of Atg1kinase.Recent ge-netic analyses suggested that the Atg1complex functions at a rather late step of autophagosome formation[34].The Atg1complex may control membrane dynamics rather than act as a signal transducer.The fourth complex is the autophagy-specific phos-phatidylinositol3-kinase(PI3K)complex.It was found that Vps30forms two distinct protein complexes[35].One con-sists of Vps30,Atg14,Vps34,and Vps15,and the other of Vps30,Vps38,Vps34,and Vps15.Vps34is a sole PI3K in yeast and Vps15is a regulatory protein kinase of Vps34. The former PI3K complex is responsible for autophagy,and the latter is for vacuolar protein sorting.Vps30is a possi-ble coiled-coil protein and associated with the membrane through Vps15and Vps34.Atg14is a specific factor in the autophagy-specific PI3K complex[35].8.Preautophagosomal structure,the site of autophagsosome formationAll the former APG genes have a function before or dur-ing the formation step of the autophagosome.The mem-brane dynamics of autophagy are distinct from the classical vesicular membrane trafficking.There are many fundamen-tal questions relating to the molecular mechanism of au-tophagosome formation.For a long time,the origin of the autophagosome mem-brane was proposed to be the ER.Freeze-fracture of the autophagsome indicates that both membranes are quite dif-ferent from the ER,and only the outer membrane contains intramembrane particles.We proposed that autophagosome formation is not simply due to enwrapping by a pre-existing large membrane structure,such as the ER,but rather by as-sembly of new membrane from its constituents.As mentioned earlier,all former Apg proteins function quite closely together at the autophagosome formation step.It is therefore crucial to know the intracellular local-ization of Atg proteins.By usingfluorescent protein-fused Atg proteins,visualization of Atg proteins were performed. Atg8nicely stains autophagosomes,autophagic bodies in the vacuoles,and also the intermediate isolation mem-brane.However,Atg5shows a single bright dot structure next to the vacuole.Atg8also co-localizes with this struc-ture.We named it the preautophagosome structure(PAS). Recent studies indicated that almost all Atg proteins are co-localized in the PAS[34].This structure seems to be an organizing center of the autophagosome.The lipidation234Y.Ohsumi,N.Mizushima /Seminars in Cell &Developmental Biology 15(2004)231–236is requisite for the recruitment of Atg8to the PAS.In the mutants defective in Atg12system Atg8does not localize to the PAS.In atg14or atg6,Atg8and Atg5do not asso-ciate with PAS,indicating that the autophagy-specific PI3K complex may play an important role in the organization of PAS [34].Atg9also has a strong effect on organization of the PAS,whereas defects in the Atg1kinase complex show little effect on the PAS structure.9.The Atg conjugation systems in mammalian cells The two Atg conjugation systems are highly conserved in higher eukaryotic cells,suggesting that eukaryotes ac-quired the mechanism of autophagy at the beginning of its evolution.In both mouse and human,there is only one or-thologue for each component of the Atg12system.Atg12is conjugated to Atg5[36],which is catalyzed by Atg7[37]and Atg10[38,39].In mammalian cells,the Atg12–Atg5conjugate forms an ∼800-kDa protein complex.Character-ization of this complex revealed an additional protein that interacts with Atg5[53],a 63-to 74-kDa protein with sev-eral spliced isoforms.Since the N-terminal region of this novel protein exhibits several features in common with yeast Atg16,such as the Atg5-binding site and coiled-coil region,it was designated Atg16L.Atg16L,however,has a long C-terminal extension containing seven WD repeats.Atg16L homologues are found in all eukaryotes except two yeasts,Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Pichia pastoris ,which have Atg16lacking WD repeats.The role of the WD repeats in Atg16L has not been uncovered yet.In contrast to Atg12,at least three Atg8homologues were identified in mammals:microtubule-associated protein 1(MAP1)light chain 3(LC3)[40],Golgi-associated ATPase enhancer of 16kDa (GATE-16)[41],and ␥-aminobutyric acid (GABA)A -receptor-associated protein (GABARAP)[42].Among them,LC3was shown to localize on the au-tophagosome membrane [43].GABARAP was suggested to be involved in the GABA A receptor clustering [44]or trans-port [45].GATE-16has been suggested to be an intra-Golgi transport modulator that interacts with N -ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor (NSF)and Golgi v-SNARE GOS-28[46].However,further analyses are required to reveal thephys-Fig.2.Molecular mechanism of autophagy in mammalian cells.The Atg12–Atg5conjugate and Atg16L localize to the isolation membrane throughout its elongation process.LC3is recruited to the membrane in the Atg5-dependent manner.The Atg12–Atg5·Atg16L complex dissociates from the membrane upon completion of autophagosome formation,while LC3(-II)remains on the autophagosome membrane.Atg5and its modification by Atg12are required for elongation of the isolation membrane.PI3K activity is required for the formation of isolation membrane.iological roles of these three molecules and their modi-fied forms.All these Atg8homologues are processed by mammalian Atg4homologues to expose the conserved C-terminal glycine [47,48].They are modified by mammalian Atg7[37]and Atg3homologues [49].10.Role of Atg conjugation in mammalian autophagy The function of the mammalian Atg12system was shown using mouse embryonic stem (ES)cells.ES cells induce au-tophagy well by nutrient starvation and the size of the au-tophagosome in ES cells is larger than in other cell lines.First,the localization of Atg12–Atg5was examined in de-tail using GFP-fused Atg5[50].A small fraction of cy-tosolic Atg12–Atg5·Atg16L complex localizes to the isola-tion membrane throughout its elongation process (Fig.2).Atg12–Atg5initially associates with a small crescent-shaped vesicle evenly.As the membrane elongates,Atg12–Atg5shows asymmetric localization;most Atg12–Atg5associates with the convex surface of the isolation membrane.Finally,Atg12–Atg5dissociates from the membrane upon comple-tion of autophagosome formation.Atg16L is usually found complexed with Atg12–Atg5,suggesting that these proteins associate and dissociate from the membrane as the 800-kDa complex.LC3also targets to the isolation membrane in an Atg5-dependent manner,and remains on the autophagoso-mal membrane even after Atg12–Atg5dissociates (Fig.2)[43,50].The molecular basis of this transient association of Atp12–Atg5conjugates is not known yet.Visualization of GFP-Atg5in living cells directly demon-strated that autophagosomes are generated by elongation of small membrane structures,autophagosome precursors,not derived from pre-existing large membrane such as ER cister-nae [50].The nature of the precursor vesicle remains to be solved.Treatment of cells with 3-methyladenine,which is widely used as an autophagy inhibitor [51],abolishes the for-mation of any Atg5-positive structure [50].3-Methyladenine is now considered as a PI3K inhibitor [52].Indeed,the au-tophagosome precursors are not formed by treatment with wortmannin,a well-known PI3K inhibitor,suggesting that PI3K activity is required for early stage of autophagosome formation [50].Although it is not known whether a structureY.Ohsumi,N.Mizushima/Seminars in Cell&Developmental Biology15(2004)231–236235equivalent to the yeast PAS exists in mammalian cells,these results are quite consistent with those observed in yeast.A gene targeting study demonstrated that Atg12–Atg5 is essential for elongation of the isolation membrane in mammalian cells[50].LC3cannot target to the membrane in ATG5−/−cells.In wild-type cells,LC3is detected in two forms on immunoblotting at18kDa(LC3-I)and at 16kDa(LC3-II)[43].Since LC3-II is a tightly membrane-bound form,it may be a PE-conjugated form.Strikingly,in ATG5−/−cells,LC3-II is not generated at all[50].Thus,re-lationship between the Atg12and LC3system is quite sim-ilar to the yeast system.Using these Atg proteins as molecular marker,and com-bination of yeast and mammalian system,we will be able to unveil the membrane dynamics during autophagy in the near future.References[1]Hochstrasser M.Ubiquitin-dependent protein degradation.Annu RevGenet1996;30:405–39.[2]Hershko A,Ciechanover A.The ubiquitin system.Annu RevBiochem1998;67:425–79.[3]Mortimore GE,Poso AR.Intracellular protein catabolism and itscontrol during nutrient deprivation and supply.Annu Rev Nutr 1987;7:539–64.[4]Seglen PO,Bohley P.Autophagy and other vacuolar protein degra-dation mechanisms.Experientia1992;48:158–72.[5]de Duve C.In:Hayashi T,editor.Subcellular particles.New York:Ronald;1959.p.128–59.[6]Klionsky DJ,Herman PK,Emr SD.The fungal vacuole:composition,function,and biogenesis.Microbiol Rev1990;54:266–92.[7]Zubenko GS,Jones EW.Protein degradation,meiosis and sporulationin proteinase-deficient mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Genetics 1981;97:45–64.[8]Egner R,Thumm M,Straub M,Simeon A,Schuller HJ,Wolf DH.Tracing intracellular proteolytic pathways.Proteolysis of fatty acid synthase and other cytoplasmic proteins in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.J Biol Chem1993;268:27269–76.[9]Takeshige K,Baba M,Tsuboi S,Noda T,Ohsumi Y.Autophagy inyeast demonstrated with proteinase-deficient mutants and conditions for its induction.J Cell Biol1992;119:301–11.[10]Baba M,Takeshige K,Baba N,Ohsumi Y.Ultrastructural analysisof the autophagic process in yeast:detection of autophagosomes and their characterization.J Cell Biol1994;124:903–13.[11]Baba M,Osumi M,Ohsumi Y.Analysis of the membrane structureinvolved in autophagy in yeast by freeze-replica method.Cell Struct Funct1995;20:465–71.[12]Mizushima N,Noda T,Ohsumi Y.Apg16p is required for the functionof the Apg12p–Apg5p conjugate in the yeast autophagy pathway.EMBO J1999;18:3888–96.[13]Kamada Y,Funakoshi T,Shintani T,Nagano K,Ohsumi M,OhsumiY.Tor-mediated induction of autophagy via an Apg1protein kinase complex.J Cell Biol2000;150:1687–95.[14]Harding TM,Morano KA,Scott SV,Klionsky DJ.Isolation andcharacterization of yeast mutants in the cytoplasm to vacuole protein targeting pathway.J Cell Biol1995;131:591–602.[15]Harding TM,Hefner-Gravink A,Thumm M,Klionsky DJ.Geneticand phenotypic overlap between autophagy and the cytoplasm to vacuole protein targeting pathway.J Biol Chem1996;271:17621–4.[16]Scott SV,Hefner-Gravink A,Morano KA,Noda T,Ohsumi Y,Klion-sky DJ.Cytoplasm-to-vacuole targeting and autophagy employ thesame machinery to deliver proteins to the yeast vacuole.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA1996;93:12304–8.[17]Baba M,Osumi M,Scott SV,Klionsky DJ,Ohsumi Y.Two dis-tinct pathways for targeting proteins from the cytoplasm to the vac-uole/lysosome.J Cell Biol1997;139:1687–95.[18]Klionsky DJ,Cregg JM,Dunn Jr WA,Emr SD,Sakai Y,SandovalIV,et al.A unified nomenclature for yeast autophagy-related genes.Dev Cell2003;5:539–45.[19]Tsukada M,Ohsumi Y.Isolation and characterization of autophagy-defective mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.FEBS Lett1993;333: 169–74.[20]Kametaka S,Okano T,Ohsumi M,Ohsumi Y.Apg14p andApg6/Vps30p form a protein complex essential for autophagy in the yeast,Saccharomyces cerevisiae.J Biol Chem1998;273:22284–91.[21]Kirisako T,Baba M,Ishihara N,Miyazawa K,Ohsumi M,Yoshi-mori T,et al.Formation process of autophagosome is traced with Apg8/Aut7p in yeast.J Cell Biol1999;147:435–46.[22]Chan TF,Bertram PG,Ai W,Zheng XF.Regulation of APG14expression by the GATA-type transcription factor Gln3p.J Biol Chem 2001;276:6463–7.[23]Ohsumi Y.Molecular dissection of autophagy:two ubiquitin-likesystems.Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol2001;2:211–6.[24]Mizushima N,Noda T,Yoshimori T,Tanaka Y,Ishii T,George MD,et al.A protein conjugation system essential for autophagy.Nature 1998;395:395–8.[25]Tanida I,Mizushima N,Kiyooka M,Ohsumi M,Ueno T,OhsumiY,et al.Apg7p/Cvt2p:a novel protein-activating enzyme essential for autophagy.Mol Biol Cell1999;10:1367–79.[26]Kim J,Dalton VM,Eggerton KP,Scott SV,Klionsky DJ.Apg7p/Cvt2p is required for the Cvt,macroautophagy,and peroxi-some degradation pathway.Mol Biol Cell1999;10:1337–51. [27]Yuan W,Stromhaug PE,Dunn Jr WA.Glucose-induced microau-tophagy of peroxysomes in Pichia pastoris requires a unique E1-like protein.Mol Biol Cell1999;10:1353–66.[28]Shintani T,Mizushima N,Ogawa Y,Matsuura A,Noda T,Ohsumi Y.Apg10p,a novel protein-conjugating enzyme essential for autophagy in yeast.EMBO J1999;18:5234–41.[29]Kuma A,Mizushima N,Ishihara N,Ohsumi Y.Formation of the∼350kDa Apg12–Apg5·Apg16multimeric complex,mediated by Apg16oligomerization,is essential for autophagy in yeast.J Biol Chem2002;277:18619–25.[30]Kirisako T,Ichimura Y,Okada H,Kabeya Y,Mizushima N,Yoshi-mori T,et al.The reversible modification regulates the membrane-binding state of Apg8/Aut7essential for autophagy and the cyto-plasm to vacuole targeting pathway.J Cell Biol2000;151:263–75.[31]Ichimura Y,Kirisako T,Takao T,Satomi Y,Shimonishi Y,IshiharaN,et al.A ubiquitin-like system mediates protein lipidation.Nature 2000;408:488–92.[32]Matsuura A,Tsukada M,Wada Y,Ohsumi Y.Apg1p,a novel pro-tein kinase required for the autophagic process in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Gene1997;192:245–50.[33]Straub M,Bredschneider M,Thumm M.AUT3,a serine/threoninekinase gene,is essential for autophagocytosis in Saccharomyces cere-visiae.J Bacteriol1997;179:3875–83.[34]Suzuki K,Kirisako T,Kamada Y,Mizushima N,Noda T,Ohsumi Y.The pre-autophagosomal structure organized by concerted functions of APG genes is essential for autophagosome formation.EMBO J 2001;20:5971–81.[35]Kihara A,Noda T,Ishihara N,Ohsumi Y.Two distinct Vps34phosphatidylinositol3-kinase complexes function in autophagy and carboxypeptidase Y sorting in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.J Cell Biol 2001;152:519–30.[36]Mizushima N,Sugita H,Yoshimori T,Ohsumi Y.A new pro-tein conjugation system in human.The counterpart of the yeast Apg12p conjugation system essential for autophagy.J Biol Chem 1998;273:33889–92.236Y.Ohsumi,N.Mizushima/Seminars in Cell&Developmental Biology15(2004)231–236[37]Tanida I,Tanida-Miyake E,Ueno T,Kominami E.The human ho-molog of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Apg7p is a protein-activating enzyme for multiple substrates including human Apg12p,GATE-16, GABARAP,and MAP-LC3.J Biol Chem2001;276:1701–6. [38]Mizushima N,Yoshimori T,Ohsumi Y.Mouse Apg10as an Apg12conjugating enzyme:analysis by the conjugation-mediated yeast two-hybrid method.FEBS Lett2002;532:450–4.[39]Nemoto T,Tanida I,Tanida-Miyake E,Minematsu-Ikeguchi N,Yokota M,Ohsumi M,et al.The mouse APG10homologue,an E2-like enzyme for Apg12p conjugation,facilitates MAP-LC3mod-ification.J Biol Chem2003;278:39517–26.[40]Mann SS,Hammarback JA.Molecular characterization of light chain3.J Biol Chem1994;269:11492–7.[41]Sagiv Y,Legesse-Miller A,Porat A,Elazar Z.GATE-16,a membranetransport modulator,interacts with NSF and the Golgi v-SNARE GOS-28.EMBO J2000;19:1494–504.[42]Wang H,Bedford FK,Brandon NJ,Moss SJ,Olsen RW.GABA A-receptor-associated protein links GABA A receptors and the cytoskeleton.Nature1999;397:69–72.[43]Kabeya Y,Mizushima N,Ueno T,Yamamoto A,Kirisako T,Noda T,et al.LC3,a mammalian homologue of yeast Apg8p,is localized in autophagosome membranes after processing.EMBO J2000;19:5720–8.[44]Chen L,Wang H,Vicini S,Olsen W.The␥-aminobutyric acidtype A(GABA A)receptor-associated protein(GABARAP)promotes GABA A receptor clustering and modulates the channel kinetics.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA2000;97:11557–62.[45]Kneussel M,Haverkamp S,Fuhrmann JC,Wang H,Wassle H,Olsen RW,et al.The␥-aminobutyric acid type A receptor (GABA A R)-associated protein GABAPAR interacts with gephyrin but is not involved in receptor anchoring at the synapse.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA2000;97:8594–9.[46]Elazar Z,Scherz-Shouval R,Shorer H.Involvement of LMA1and GATE-16family members in intracellular membrane dynamics.Biochim Biophys Acta2003;1641:145–56.[47]Scherz-Shouval R,Sagiv Y,Shorer H,Elazar Z.The COOH terminusof GATE-16,an intra-Golgi transport modulator,is cleaved by the human cysteine protease HsApg4A.J.Biol.Chem.2003;278:14053–58.[48]Hemelaar J,Lelyveld VS,Kessler BM,Ploegh HL.A single pro-tease,Apg4B,is specific for the autophagy-related ubiquitin-like proteins GATE-16,MAP1-LC3,GABARAP,and Apg8L.J.Biol.Chem.2003;278:51841–50.[49]Tanida I,Tanida-Miyake E,Komatsu M,Ueno T,Kominami E.Hu-man Apg3p/Aut1p homologue is an authentic E2enzyme for multiple substrates,GATE-16,GABARAP,and MAP-LC3,and facilitates the conjugation of hApg12p to hApg5p.J Biol Chem2002;277:13739–44.[50]Mizushima N,Yamamoto A,Hatano M,Kobayashi Y,KabeyaY,Suzuki K,et al.Dissection of autophagosome formation us-ing Apg5-deficient mouse embryonic stem cells.J Cell Biol 2001;152:657–67.[51]Seglen PO,Gordon PB.3-Methyladenine:specific inhibitor of au-tophagic/lysosomal protein degradation in isolated rat hepatocytes.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA1982;79:1889–92.[52]Petiot A,Ogier-Denis E,Blommaart EF,Meijer AJ,Codogno P.Distinct classes of phosphatidylinositol3 -kinases are involved in signaling pathways that control macroautophagy in HT-29cells.J Biol Chem2000;275:992–8.[53]Mizushima N,Kuma A,Kobayashi Y,Yamamoto A,Matsubae M,Takao T,et al.Mouse Apg16L,a novel WD-repeat protein,targets to the autophagic isolation membrane with the Apg12–Apg5conjugate.J Cell Sci2003;116:1679–88.。