Studying Low-x Dynamics using the Hadronic Final State in DIS at HERA
Spin dynamics of strongly-doped La_{1-x}Sr_xMnO_3

a r X i v :c o n d -m a t /9712191v 1 [c o n d -m a t .s t r -e l ] 16 D e c 1997Spin dynamics of strongly-doped La 1−x Sr x MnO 3L.Vasiliu-Doloc,J.W.Lynn,NIST Center for Neutron Research,National Institute of Standards and Technology,Gaithersburg,Maryland 20899andCenter for Superconductivity Research,University of Maryland,College Park,MD 20742Y.M.Mukovskii,A.A.Arsenov,D.A.ShulyatevMoscow Steel and Alloy Institute,Moscow 117936,RussiaCold neutron triple-axis measurements have been used to investigate the nature of the long-wavelength spin dynamics in strongly-doped La 1−x Sr x MnO 3single crystals with x =0.2and 0.3.Both systems behave like isotropic ferromagnets at low T ,with a gapless (E 0<0.02meV)quadratic dispersion relation E =E 0+Dq 2.The values of the spin-wave stiffness constant D are large (D T =0=166.77meV ·˚A 2for x =0.2and D T =0=175.87meV ·˚A 2for x =0.3),which directly shows that the electron transfer energy for the d band is large.D exhibits a power law behavior as a function of temperature,and ap-pears to collapse as T →T C .Nevertheless,an anomalously strong quasielastic central component develops and dominates the fluctuation spectrum as T →T C .Bragg scattering in-dicates that the magnetization near T C exhibits power law behavior,with β≃0.30for both systems,as expected for a three-dimensional ferromagnet.75.25.+z,75.30.Kz,75.40.Gb,75.70.PaI.INTRODUCTIONSince the recent discovery of unusually large magne-toresistive effects in perovskite manganites,the doped LaMnO 3class of materials 1has generated continued interest and has motivated experimental and theoreti-cal work devoted to understanding of the origin of this colossal magnetoresistance (CMR)phenomenon.The large variation in the carrier mobility originates from an insulator-metal transition that is closely associated with the magnetic ordering.The on-site exchange inter-action between the spins on the manganese ions is be-lieved to be strong enough to completely polarize the (e g )conduction electrons in the ground state,forming a “half-metallic”ferromagnet.However,hopping,and hence conduction,may only occur if the Mn core spins (formed by the d electrons in a t 2g orbital)on adjacent sites are parallel,which then directly couples ferromag-netic order with the electrical conductivity at elevated temperatures.This mechanism,known as the double ex-change mechanism,2was first proposed in the 1950s,and has provided a good description of the evolution of the magnetic properties with band filling.However,in order to fully explain all the properties of the CMR materials,strong electron correlations,3and/or a strong electron-lattice coupling 4in different polaronic approaches are in-voked.Cooperative Jahn-Teller (JT)distortions associ-ated with the Mn 3+JT ions have been evidenced from structural studies at low doping,where the system is in-sulating and antiferromagnetic,and may be an important contribution to orbital ordering,double exchange,and related spin ordering and transport properties observed at higher concentrations.As the doping concentration x increases,the static JT distortion weakens progressively and the system becomes metallic and ferromagnetic,with the CMR property observed for doping levels x >0.17.It is believed that in the absence of a cooperative effect in this regime,local JT distortions persist on short time and length scales.These short-range correlations would contribute,together with the electron correlations,to cre-ate an effective carrier mass necessary for large magne-toresistance.This unique class of half-metallic ferromag-nets provides an excellent opportunity to elucidate the influence of such correlations on the lattice and spin dy-namics,which can best be probed by inelastic neutron scattering.In the optimally doped regime with x ∼0.3it has been shown that the ground state spin dynamics is es-sentially that expected for a conventional metallic ferro-magnet described by an isotropic Heisenberg model 5−7.For the Ca-doped system,however,results obtained on polycrystalline samples 8have indicated a possible coex-istence of spin-wave excitations and spin diffusion in the ferromagnetic phase.In particular,it was suggested that the quasielastic component of the scattering that devel-ops rapidly as the Curie temperature is approached is associated with the localization of the e g electrons on the Mn 3+/Mn 4+lattice,and may be related to the for-mation of spin polarons in the system 9.Furthermore,it is this spin diffusion that drives the ferromagnetic phase transition rather than the thermal population of conven-tional spin waves.In the present publication we report diffraction and inelastic measurements of the spin dy-namics in the metallic ferromagnets La 0.8Sr 0.2MnO 3and La 0.7Sr 0.3MnO 3.II.EXPERIMENTThe single crystals used in the present neutron scatter-ing experiments were grown at the Steel and Alloys In-stitute in Moscow,using the floating zone method.The crystals weighed 2.25and 4.25g,respectively.The sam-ples were oriented such that the[100]and[010]axes of the rhombohedral R¯3c cell lie in the scattering plane.The neutron scattering measurements have been carried out on the NG-5(SPINS)cold neutron triple-axis spectrom-eter at the NIST research reactor.The(002)reflection of pyrolytic graphite(PG)was used as monochromator and analyser for measuring the low-energy part of the spin-wave spectrum.We have used aflat analyzer with afixed final energy E f=3.7meV,a cold Befilter on the incident beam,and collimations40′-S-40′-130′in sequence from the neutron guide to detector.This configuration offered an energy resolution of∼0.15meV,together with good q-resolution.Each sample was placed in a helium-filled aluminum cell in a displex refrigerator.The sample tem-perature ranged from15to325K for La0.8Sr0.2MnO3, and from30to375K for La0.7Sr0.3MnO3,and was con-trolled to within0.1o.The crystal structure of both systems at room temper-ature and below is rhombohedral(R¯3c),with a0≃b0≃c0≃3.892˚A for x=0.2and a0≃b0≃c0≃3.884˚A for x=0.3.III.RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONFigure1shows the integrated intensity of the(100) Bragg reflection as a function of temperature for both samples.This reflection has afinite nuclear structure factor,and therefore the intensity in the paramagnetic phase is nonzero.The increase in intensity below T C is due to magnetic scattering produced by the ferromag-netism of spins aligning on the manganese ions and yield-ing a magnetic structure factor.The solid curve is afit of the points near T C to a power law.The bestfits give T C=305.1K and a critical exponentβ=0.29±0.01 for La0.8Sr0.2MnO3,and T C=350.8K andβ=0.30±0.02for La0.7Sr0.3MnO3.Both values of the critical ex-ponent are slightly below,but rather close to,the well known three-dimensional Heisenberg ferromagnet model value of∼1/3.We have investigated the spin dynamics in the(1,0,0) high-symmetry direction in both samples.The ground state spin dynamics for a half-metallic ferromagnet was not expected to differ much from the conventional pic-ture of well defined spin waves,and we found that the long wavelength magnetic excitations were in fact the usual spin waves,with a dispersion relation given by E=E0+Dq2,where E0represents the spin wave energy gap and the spin stiffness coefficient is directly related to the exchange interactions.The spin-wave gap E0was too small to be measured directly in energy scans at the zone center,but very high-resolution measurements on the NG-5(SPINS)cold-neutron triple-axis spectrometer have allowed us to determine that E0<0.02meV for both systems,which demonstrates that these are”soft”isotropic ferromagnets.A previously reported value of E0=0.75meV for the x=0.3system6was obtained from an extrapolation of higher q data,not from direct high-resolution measurements as in the present case.The low-temperature values of the spin-wave stiffness constant D are large:D T=0=(166.77±1.51)meV·˚A2for x=0.2andD T=0=(175.87±5.00)meV·˚A2for x=0.3,and show that the electron transfer energy for the d band is large. The low temperature value of the spin stiffness constantgives a ratio D/k B T C∼6.34and5.82for the x=0.2and 0.3systems,respectively.Both values are quite large,as might be expected for an itinerant electron system.Figure2plots the temperature dependence of the spin-wave stiffness D.The data have been analysed in terms of two-spin-wave interactions in a Heisenberg ferromagnet within the Dyson formalism,10which predicts that the dynamical interaction between the spin waves gives,to leading order,a temperature dependence:D(T)=D0 1−v0S k B T2) ,(1)where v0is the volume of the unit cell,S is the aver-age value of the manganese spin,andζ(5l2is the moment defined by 3D l n+2J(l) and which,compared to the square of the lattice parameter a2,gives information about the range of the exchange interaction.The solid curves in Fig.2arefits to Eq.1,and are in good agreement with the experimental data for reduced temperatures t=(T−T C)/T C up to t1≃-0.1for La0.8Sr0.2MnO3and -0.14for La0.7Sr0.3MnO3.Thefitted values ofT C ν′−β,where ν′is the critical exponent for a three-dimensional ferro-magnet.In the course of our measurements we have noticed that the central peak has a strong temperature depen-dence on approaching T C,while typically the central peak originates from weak temperature-independent nu-clear incoherent scattering.Figure3(a)shows two mag-netic inelastic spectra collected at300and325K,and reduced wave vector q=0.035away from the(100)re-ciprocal point in the La0.7Sr0.3MnO3(T C=351K).A flat background of4.9counts plus an elastic incoherent nuclear peak of110counts,measured at30K,have been subtracted from these data.We can clearly see the de-velopment of the quasielastic component,comparable in intensity to the spin waves,and the temperature depen-dence of the strength of this scattering is shown in Fig. 3(b)as a function of temperature.We observe a signif-icant intensity starting at250K(∼100K below T C),and the scattering peaks at T C.At and above T C all the scattering is quasielastic.For typical isotropic ferro-magnets,such as Ni,Co,Fe,any quasielastic scattering below T C is too weak and broad to be observed directly in the data,and can only be distinguished by the use of polarized neutron techniques.In Fig.3(a)we can nev-ertheless see that the spectrum starts to be dominated by this quasielastic component at temperatures well be-low T C.The appearance in the ferromagnetic phase of a quasielastic component wasfirst observed on Ca-doped polycrystalline samples,8and it has been suggested that it is associated with the localization of the e g electrons on the Mn3+/Mn4+lattice,and may be related to the for-mation of spin polarons in the system.9We have observed a similar anomalous behavior of the central peak in the more lightly-doped system La0.85Sr0.15MnO3,11but for that doping wefind that the central component becomes evident only much closer(∼25K)to the Curie temper-ature.Similar data have been obtained on both poly-crystalline and single crystal samples of the Ba-doped system.12It thus appears that the coexistence of spin-wave excitations and spin diffusion is a common charac-teristic for many perovskite manganites,and that it may be relevant for the giant magnetoresistance property of these systems.It is therefore important to pursue the study of this aspect with polarized neutron techniques, in order to determine the nature of thefluctuations in-volved in this new quasielastic component to thefluctu-ation spectrum.Research at the University of Maryland is supported by the NSF under Grant DMR97-01339and by the NSF-MRSEC,DMR96-32521.Experiments on the NG-5spectrometer at the NIST Research Reactor are sup-ported by the NSF under Agreement No.DMR94-23101.1G.H.Jonker and J.H.van Santen,Physica16,337 (1950);E.O.Wollan and W.C.Koehler,Phys.Rev.100, 545(1955);G.H.Jonker,Physica22,707(1956).2C.Zener,Phys.Rev.82,403(1951);P.W.Anderson and H.Hasegawa,Phys.Rev.100,675(1955);P.G.de Gennes,Phys.Rev.100,564(1955).3Y.Tokura,A.Urushibara,Y.Moritomo,T.Arima,A. Asamitsu,G.Kido,and N.Furukawa,J.Phys.Soc.Jpn. 63,3931(1994).lis,P.B.Littlewood,and B.I.Shraiman,Phys. Rev.Lett.74,5144(1995);lis,Phys.Rev.B 55,6405(1997).5T.G.Perring,G.Aeppli,S.M.Hayden,S.A.Carter,J.P. Remeika,and S.-W.Cheong,Phys.Rev.Lett.77,711 (1996).6M.C.Martin,G.Shirane,Y.Endoh,K.Hirota,Y. Moritomo,and Y.Tokura,Phys.Rev.B53,14285 (1996).7A.H.Moudden,L.Pinsard,L.Vasiliu-Doloc, A. Revcolevschi,Czech.J.Phys.46,2163(1996).8J.W.Lynn,R.W.Erwin,J.A.Borchers,Q.Huang,and A.Santoro,Phys.Rev.Lett.76,4046(1996).9J.W.Lynn,R.W.Erwin,J.A.Borchers,A.Santoro,Q. Huang,J.-L.Peng,R.L.Greene,J.Appl.Phys.81,5488 (1997).10D.C.Mattis,The theory of magnetism,Spinger-Verlag, Heidelberg,1981.11L.Vasiliu-Doloc,J.W.Lynn,A.H.Moudden,A.M.de Leon-Guevara,A.Revcolevschi,J.Appl.Phys.81,5491 (1997).12J.W.Lynn,L.Vasiliu-Doloc,S.Skanthakumar,S.N. Barilo,G.L.Bychkov and L.A.Kurnevitch,private com-munication.FIGURE CAPTIONSFIG.1.Temperature dependence of the integrated in-tensity of the(100)Bragg peak for(a)La0.8Sr0.2MnO3 and(b)La0.7Sr0.3MnO3.There is a nuclear contribution to this peak,and the additional temperature-dependent intensity originates from the onset of the ferromagnetic order at T C=305K for the x=0.2system,and T C= 350.8K for x=0.3.The solid curves arefits of the points near T C to a power law.FIG.2.Spin-wave stiffness coefficient D in E=E0+Dq2 as a function of temperature for(a)La0.8Sr0.2MnO3and(b)La0.7Sr0.3MnO3.The solid curves arefits to Eq.(1).D appears to vanish at the ferromagnetic transition temperature,as expected for a conventional ferromagnet. The dashed curves arefits to a power law.FIG.3.(a)Constant-q magnetic inelastic spectra col-lected at300and325K and a reduced wave vector vector q=(0,0,0.035)for La0.7Sr0.3MnO3(T C=350.8K),and (b)temperature dependence of the integrated intensity of the quasielastic central component.The dominant effect is the development of a strong quasielastic component in the spectrum.Above T C,all the scattering in this range of q is quasielastic.Fig.1:L.Vasiliu-Doloc et al.Fig.2:L.Vasiliu-Doloc et al.Fig.3:L.Vasiliu-Doloc et al.。
扬州2024年09版小学六年级上册J卷英语第3单元测验卷

扬州2024年09版小学六年级上册英语第3单元测验卷考试时间:100分钟(总分:100)B卷一、综合题(共计100题)1、听力题:I like to _____ (skateboard) at the park.2、填空题:The __________ is a famous canyon in the United States. (大峡谷)3、填空题:My favorite animal is a _________. (大象)4、填空题:My favorite character from a series is _______ (名字). 他/她的性格很 _______ (形容词).5、填空题:I like to read ______ (杂志) about different topics. It keeps me updated and informed.6、听力题:The symbol for indium is _____.7、听力题:The main component of the atmosphere is _____.8、填空题:Seeds can be stored for __________ (未来) planting.9、填空题:My sister calls me her _______ because we are close.10、What is the name of the famous holiday celebrated on October 31st?A. ChristmasB. EasterC. HalloweenD. Thanksgiving答案:C11、What is the capital of Belize?a. Belmopanb. Belize Cityc. San Ignaciod. Corozal答案:a12、选择题:What is 8 x 2?A. 10B. 12C. 14D. 1613、What is the capital of the United Kingdom?A. LondonB. EdinburghC. CardiffD. Belfast答案: A. London14、听力填空题:My favorite type of food is __________ because it makes me feel __________.15、选择题:What is the opposite of 'hot'?A. WarmB. ColdC. CoolD. Spicy16、How many zeros are in one hundred?A. OneB. TwoC. ThreeD. Four17、What is the capital city of Brunei?A. Bandar Seri BegawanB. Kuala BelaitC. SeriaD. Tutong18、填空题:My ________ (玩具) is full of surprises.19、What do we call a person who studies the social implications of scientific discoveries?A. Science HistorianB. SociologistC. AnthropologistD. Philosopher答案: A20、听力题:We have a _____ (项目) to complete.21、填空题:The little boy has a pet ______ (小狗). They play together every ______ (天).22、What do we call the science of studying the Earth’s physical features?A. GeologyB. GeographyC. CartographyD. Oceanography答案:B23、选择题:What is the capital city of Japan?A. SeoulB. BeijingC. TokyoD. Bangkok24、填空题:I saw a _______ in the garden (我在花园里看到一只_______).25、听力题:My sister loves to create ____ (digital art).26、填空题:I love to watch the _____ in the sky.27、填空题:My dad is a __________ (机械师).28、选择题:What is the capital city of Japan?A. SeoulB. BeijingC. TokyoD. Bangkok29、Which season comes after winter?A. SpringB. SummerC. FallD. Autumn30、听力题:A _______ can help to visualize the concept of thermal energy.31、听力题:The _____ (rainbow/sun) is colorful.32、听力题:The Milky Way is a ______ galaxy.33、听力题:A wave's amplitude affects its ______.34、听力题:A mixture of two or more liquids is called a _______ mixture.35、How many feet are in a yard?A. 2B. 3C. 4D. 5答案:B36、填空题:The __________ (宗教改革) challenged the Catholic Church.37、填空题:I enjoy _______ (制作) greeting cards.38、听力题:__________ are used in the production of batteries.39、填空题:A __________ (科学家社区) supports networking and mentorship for young researchers.40、What do you call a tree that loses its leaves in winter?A. EvergreenB. DeciduousC. PalmD. Fruit答案: B41、听力题:I love to ___ (travel/study) languages.42、Read and match.(看图连线。
Unit+2+Reading+课件-2023-2024学年高中英语牛津译林版(2020)选修第二册

contrast _h_o_u_r _o_v_e_r _th_e_i_r_li_f_e_ti_m_e_,_c_o_m__p_ar_e_d_ readers identify the (3)
Revision
• Can you identify all the point-by-point contrast in the documentary transcript? List them out. Examples using point-by-point contrast from the text: One of the reasons is that their carbon dioxide emissions tend to be lower. A study found that renewable energy sources emit about 50g or less of carbon dioxide per kilowatt-hour over their lifetime, compared to about 1,000g for coal. Besides, fossil fuels are non-renewable, whose reserves are estimated to dry up one day in the future. In contrast, renewable energy sources are basically inexhaustible and will be available to us for a few billion more years if our planet remains safe and healthy.
U2 Building the future
高中英语学术前沿单选题30题

高中英语学术前沿单选题30题1. In the latest academic research on climate change, the term "carbon footprint" is often mentioned. The meaning of "footprint" in this context is closest to _____.A. a mark made by a footB. a sign of presenceC. an impact or influenceD. a physical trace答案:C。
在这个语境中,“carbon footprint”( 碳足迹)中的“footprint”指的是“影响或作用”。
选项 A 指“脚留下的痕迹”;选项 B 指“存在的迹象”;选项 D 指“物理的痕迹”,都不符合在气候研究中“carbon footprint”所表达的意思。
2. The new academic study focuses on the ______ of artificial intelligence in healthcare.A. applicationB. operationC. implementationD. performance答案:A。
“application”在这个语境中指“应用”,强调将人工智能用于医疗保健领域。
“operation”侧重于“操作、运转”;“implementation”强调“实施、执行”;“performance”指“表现、性能”,这三个选项在该语境中不如“application”贴切。
3. Scientists are exploring innovative ways to enhance the ______ of solar panels.A. efficiencyB. productivityC. effectivenessD. capacity答案:A。
Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process - Wikipedia, the f

Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process - Wikipedia,the f...Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process undefinedundefinedFrom Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaJump to: navigation, searchNot to be confused with Ornstein–Uhlenbeck operator.In mathematics, the Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process (named after LeonardOrnstein and George Eugene Uhlenbeck), is a stochastic process that, roughly speaking, describes the velocity of a massive Brownian particle under the influence of friction. The process is stationary, Gaussian, and Markov, and is the only nontrivial process that satisfies these three conditions, up to allowing linear transformations of the space and time variables.[1] Over time, the process tends to drift towards its long-term mean: such a process is called mean-reverting.The process x t satisfies the following stochastic differential equation:where θ> 0, μ and σ> 0 are parameters and W t denotes the Wiener process. Contents[hide]1 Application in physical sciences2 Application in financialmathematics3 Mathematical properties4 Solution5 Alternative representation6 Scaling limit interpretation7 Fokker–Planck equationrepresentation8 Generalizations9 See also10 References11 External links[edit] Application in physical sciencesThe Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process is a prototype of a noisy relaxation process. Consider for example a Hookean spring with spring constant k whose dynamics is highly overdamped with friction coefficient γ. In the presence of thermal fluctuations with temperature T, the length x(t) of the spring will fluctuate stochastically around the spring rest length x0; its stochastic dynamic is described by an Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process with:where σ is derived from the Stokes-Einstein equation D = σ2 / 2 = k B T / γ for theeffective diffusion constant.In physical sciences, the stochastic differential equation of an Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process is rewritten as a Langevin equationwhere ξ(t) is white Gaussian noise with .At equilibrium, the spring stores an averageenergy in accordance with the equipartition theorem.[edit] Application in financial mathematicsThe Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process is one of several approaches used to model (with modifications) interest rates, currency exchange rates, and commodity prices stochastically. The parameter μ represents the equilibrium or mean value supported by fundamentals; σ the degree of volatility around it caused by shocks, and θ the rate by which these shocks dissipate and the variable reverts towards the mean. One application of the process is a trading strategy pairs trade.[2][3][edit] Mathematical propertiesThe Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process is an example of a Gaussian process that has a bounded variance and admits a stationary probability distribution, in contrast tothe Wiener process; the difference between the two is in their "drift" term. For the Wiener process the drift term is constant, whereas for the Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process it is dependent on the current value of the process: if the current value of the process is less than the (long-term) mean, the drift will be positive; if the current valueof the process is greater than the (long-term) mean, the drift will be negative. In other words, the mean acts as an equilibrium level for the process. This gives the process its informative name, "mean-reverting." The stationary (long-term) variance is given byThe Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process is the continuous-time analogue ofthe discrete-time AR(1) process.three sample paths of different OU-processes with θ = 1, μ = 1.2, σ = 0.3:blue: initial value a = 0 (a.s.)green: initial value a = 2 (a.s.)red: initial value normally distributed so that the process has invariant measure [edit] SolutionThis equation is solved by variation of parameters. Apply Itō–Doeblin's formula to thefunctionto getIntegrating from 0 to t we getwhereupon we seeThus, the first moment is given by (assuming that x0 is a constant)We can use the Itōisometry to calculate the covariance function byThus if s < t (so that min(s, t) = s), then we have[edit] Alternative representationIt is also possible (and often convenient) to represent x t (unconditionally, i.e.as ) as a scaled time-transformed Wiener process:or conditionally (given x0) asThe time integral of this process can be used to generate noise with a 1/ƒpower spectrum.[edit] Scaling limit interpretationThe Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process can be interpreted as a scaling limit of a discrete process, in the same way that Brownian motion is a scaling limit of random walks. Consider an urn containing n blue and yellow balls. At each step a ball is chosen at random and replaced by a ball of the opposite colour. Let X n be the number of blueballs in the urn after n steps. Then converges to a Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process as n tends to infinity.[edit] Fokker–Planck equation representationThe probability density function ƒ(x, t) of the Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process satisfies the Fokker–Planck equationThe stationary solution of this equation is a Gaussian distribution with mean μ and variance σ2 / (2θ)[edit ] GeneralizationsIt is possible to extend the OU processes to processes where the background driving process is a L évy process . These processes are widely studied by OleBarndorff-Nielsen and Neil Shephard and others.In addition, processes are used in finance where the volatility increases for larger values of X . In particular, the CKLS (Chan-Karolyi-Longstaff-Sanders) process [4] with the volatility term replaced by can be solved in closed form for γ = 1 / 2 or 1, as well as for γ = 0, which corresponds to the conventional OU process.[edit ] See alsoThe Vasicek model of interest rates is an example of an Ornstein –Uhlenbeck process.Short rate model – contains more examples.This article includes a list of references , but its sources remain unclear because it has insufficient inline citations .Please help to improve this article by introducing more precise citations where appropriate . (January 2011)[edit ] References^ Doob 1942^ Advantages of Pair Trading: Market Neutrality^ An Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Framework for Pairs Trading ^ Chan et al. (1992)G.E.Uhlenbeck and L.S.Ornstein: "On the theory of Brownian Motion", Phys.Rev.36:823–41, 1930. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.36.823D.T.Gillespie: "Exact numerical simulation of the Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process and its integral", Phys.Rev.E 54:2084–91, 1996. PMID9965289doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.54.2084H. Risken: "The Fokker–Planck Equation: Method of Solution and Applications", Springer-Verlag, New York, 1989E. Bibbona, G. Panfilo and P. Tavella: "The Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process as a model of a low pass filtered white noise", Metrologia 45:S117-S126,2008 doi:10.1088/0026-1394/45/6/S17Chan. K. C., Karolyi, G. A., Longstaff, F. A. & Sanders, A. B.: "An empirical comparison of alternative models of the short-term interest rate", Journal of Finance 52:1209–27, 1992.Doob, J.L. (1942), "The Brownian movement and stochastic equations", Ann. of Math.43: 351–369.[edit] External linksA Stochastic Processes Toolkit for Risk Management, Damiano Brigo, Antonio Dalessandro, Matthias Neugebauer and Fares TrikiSimulating and Calibrating the Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process, M.A. van den Berg Calibrating the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck model, M.A. van den BergMaximum likelihood estimation of mean reverting processes, Jose Carlos Garcia FrancoRetrieved from ""。
高三英语询问科学研究单选题50题

高三英语询问科学研究单选题50题1. In the famous Millikan's oil - drop experiment, which of the following was the key variable that Millikan was trying to measure?A. The size of the oil dropsB. The charge on the oil dropsC. The speed of the oil dropsD. The mass of the oil drops答案:B。
解析:在密立根油滴实验中,密立根主要是想测量油滴所带的电荷,这是该实验的关键变量。
本题主要考查对科学实验中变量概念的理解,同时也考查了词汇“variable( 变量)”“charge( 电荷)”等。
在语法上,这是一个由which引导的特殊疑问句。
2. When Darwin proposed his theory of evolution, his initial hypothesis was based on his observations during his voyage. Which of the following was part of his original hypothesis?A. All species are created equalB. Species do not change over timeC. Species evolve through natural selectionD. All organisms have the same ancestors答案:C。
解析:达尔文的进化论最初的假设是物种通过自然选择进化。
选项A所有物种生来平等不是其假设内容;选项B物种不随时间变化与进化论相悖;选项D所有生物有相同祖先不是最初假设。
高三英语询问科学探索单选题50题

高三英语询问科学探索单选题50题1. In an experiment about gravity, a ball is dropped from a certain height. If we ignore air resistance, which of the following statements is correct?A. The ball will fall at a constant speedB. The ball will accelerate at a decreasing rateC. The ball will accelerate at a constant rateD. The ball will decelerate as it falls答案:C。
解析:在忽略空气阻力的情况下,物体在重力作用下做自由落体运动,根据重力加速度的原理,物体下落时将以恒定的加速度下落,而不是匀速下落(A选项错误),加速度也不会减小(B选项错误),更不会减速 D选项错误)。
2. When studying electromagnetic induction, a conductor is moved ina magnetic field. What will happen?A. A static electric field will be generated onlyB. A magnetic field will disappearC. An electromotive force will be inducedD. The conductor will stop moving immediately答案:C。
解析:根据电磁感应原理,当导体在磁场中运动时,会产生感应电动势。
A选项,不仅仅是产生静电场;B选项,磁场不会消失;D选项,导体不会立即停止运动。
3. In a research on the force between two charged particles, if thedistance between them is doubled, according to Coulomb's law, which of the following is true about the electrostatic force?A. It will be doubledB. It will be quadrupledC. It will be one - half of the originalD. It will be one - fourth of the original答案:D。
Weak Interactions of Light Flavours

LSM = LH (φ) + LG (W, Z, G) + Higgs Gauge ¯ / ψ+ ψiD
ψ=fermions ψ,ψ′ =fermions
The Standard Model Lagrangian has four parts: ¯ ′ gψψ′ ψφψ Yukawa
QCD and QED conserve C,P,T separately. Local Field theory by itself implies CPT. The fermion and Higgs2 part of the SM-lagrangian conserves CP and T as well. The only part that violates CP and as a consequence also T is the Yukawa part. The Higgs part is responsible for two parameters, the gauge part for three and the HiggsFermion part contains in principle 27 complex parameters, neglecting Yukawa couplings to neutrinos. Luckily most of the 54 real parameters in the Yukawa sector are unobservable. After diagonalizing the lepton sector there only the three charged lepton masses remain. The quark sector can be similarly diagonalized leading to 6 quark masses, but some parts remain in the difference between weak interaction eigenstates and mass-eigenstates. The latter is conventionally put in the couplings of the charged W -boson, which is given by Vud Vus Vub dα g α − uα cα t γ µ (1 − γ5 ) Vcd Vcs Vcb sα − √ Wµ 2 2 V V V b
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
a r X i v :h e p -e x /0311055v 2 7 J a n 2004EPJ manuscript No.(will be inserted by the editor)Studying Low-x Dynamics using the Hadronic Final State in DIS at HERARoman P¨o schla bDESY,Notkestr.85,D-22603HamburgReceived:February 7,2008/Revised version:February 7,2008Abstract.This article describes different approaches to investigate the behavior of parton evolution inthe proton by exploiting various aspects of the hadronic final state produced in Deep Inelastic Scattering Events at HERA.PACS.13.60.Hb –12.38.Qk1IntroductionMeasurements of the hadronic final state in deeply inelas-tic ep scattering (DIS)provide precision tests of quan-tum chromodynamics (QCD).At HERA data are col-lected over a wide range of the negative four-momentum-transfer Q 2,the Bjorken variable x and the transverse mo-menta p T of hadronic final stateobjects.Fig. 1.Diagram of a generic DIS process at low x .Here k t denotes the transverse momenta of the exchanged gluons,x g is the fractional mo-mentum of the parton taking part in the hard interaction and x is theBjorken scaling variableStudies of the hadronic final state may be used to get insight into the dynamics of the parton cascade exchanged in low-x lep-ton proton interactions.Fig.1shows a generic DIS process in which a gluon from the proton undergoes a QCD cascade.The gluon interacts with the virtual photon via a hard photon-gluon process which can be calculated within perturbative QCD using an exact matrix element.The cascade itself represents an ap-proximation for an all order ma-trix element calculation and sev-eral prescriptions to describe the QCD dynamics within the cas-cade have been proposed.The most familiar one is given by the so called DGLAP evolution equations [1].In these equations the large logarithms in Q 2are resummed,neglecting log(1/x )terms.This practically corre-sponds to a strong ordering of the transverse momenta of the2Roman P¨o schl:Studying Low-x Dynamics using the Hadronic Final State in DIS at HERAd σπ/d x [n b ]Fig.2.Forward π0cross section as a function of Bjorken-x in different regions of Q 2compared with predictions of DGLAP and CCFM based QCD Models.for different regions of Q 2.The data are compared with predictions of the Monte Carlo models RAPGAP [5]and CASCADE [6].RAPGAP implements a QCD model based on Leading Order (O (αs ),LO)parton showers with (‘DIR +RES’)and without (‘DIR’)resolved photon structure.CASCADE is employedas an implementation of the CCFM evolution equation introduced above.The prediction by RAPGAP with a pointlike photon (DIR)is well below the data.A reasonable description of the data is achieved by including contributions from resolved virtual photons in the predictions and using a factorization scale of Q 2+4p T,π0.Note,that resolved contributions can be consid-ered to mimic a lack of ordering in transverse momen-tum as required for a DGLAP evolution scheme.CAS-CADE predictions based on the unintegrated gluon den-sity JS2001[6]on the other hand undershoot the data for lower values of Q 2.2.2Forward Jet Cross SectionsResults complementary to the ones discussed in Sec.2.1are obtained by studying jets in the same region of phase space.Jets are reconstructedwith the longitudinally in-variant k t cluster algorithm [7].Fig.3shows the forward jet cross section for transverse momenta p T,Jet >3.5GeV as a function of x .The data are compared with NLO (O (α2s ))QCD calculations performed with the program DISENT [9]and predictions by CASCADE based on two recent sets of unintegrated gluon distributions [8].While results of the NLO QCD calculations are significantly be-low the data,the CASCADE prediction based on the set labelled J2003-1is in good agreement with the data.The difference between the CASCADE predictions indicates the sensitivity of forward jet data to low-x dynamics.H1 Forward Jet Dataxd σ/d x (n b )Fig.3.Forward jet cross section as a function of Bjorken-x compared with NLO DGLAP QCD calculations and predic-tions by the CCFM Model CASCADE.Roman P¨o schl:Studying Low-x Dynamics using the Hadronic Final State in DIS at HERA3 4Azimuthal Correlations between JetsInsight into low-x dynamics can be gained from inclusivedijet data by studying the behavior of events with a smallazimuthal separation,∆φ∗,between the two hardest jetsas measured in the hadronic center-of-mass system[14–16].Partons entering the hard scattering process withnegligible transverse momentum,k t,as assumed in theDGLAP formalism,lead at leading order to a back-to-backconfiguration of the two outgoing jets with∆φ∗=180◦.Azimuthal jet separations different from180◦occur due tohigher order QCD effects.However,in models which pre-dict a significant proportion of partons entering the hardprocess with large k t,the number of events with small∆φ∗should also increase.Here we present a measurement of the ratioS= 120◦N dijet(∆φ∗,x,Q2)d∆φ∗。