Populations with Hepatitis B Virus Infection

合集下载

22841_ftp[1]

22841_ftp[1]

Long-Term Monitoring Shows Hepatitis B Virus Resistance to Entecavir in Nucleoside-Naı¨ve Patients Is Rare Through5Years of Therapy Daniel J.Tenney,Ronald E.Rose,Carl J.Baldick,Kevin A.Pokornowski,Betsy J.Eggers,Jie Fang, Michael J.Wichroski,Dong Xu,Joanna Yang,Richard B.Wilber,and Richard J.Colonno*Patients with chronic hepatitis B virus(HBV)infection who develop antiviral resistance losebenefits of therapy and may be predisposed to further resistance.Entecavir(ETV)resistance(ETVr)results from HBV reverse transcriptase substitutions at positions T184,S202,or M250,which emerge in the presence of lamivudine(LVD)resistance substitutions M204I/V؎L180M.Here,we summarize results from comprehensive resistance monitoring of patients with HBVwho were continuously treated with ETV for up to5years.Monitoring included genotypicanalysis of isolates from all patients at baseline and when HBV DNA was detectable by polymer-ase chain reaction(>300copies/mL)from Years1through5.In addition,genotyping wasperformed on isolates from patients experiencing virologic breakthrough(>1log10rise in HBVDNA).In vitro phenotypic ETV susceptibility was determined for virologic breakthrough iso-lates,and for HBV containing novel substitutions emerging during treatment.The results over5years of therapy showed that in nucleoside-naı¨ve patients,the cumulative probability of geno-typic ETVr and genotypic ETVr associated with virologic breakthrough was1.2%and0.8%,respectively.In contrast,a reduced barrier to resistance was observed in LVD-refractory patients,as the LVD resistance substitutions,a partial requirement for ETVr,preexist,resulting in a5-yearcumulative probability of genotypic ETVr and genotypic ETVr associated with breakthrough of51%and43%,respectively.Importantly,only four patients who achieved<300copies/mL HBVDNA subsequently developed ETVr.Conclusion:Long-term monitoring showed low rates ofresistance in nucleoside-naı¨ve patients during5years of ETV therapy,corresponding with potentviral suppression and a high genetic barrier to resistance.Thesefindings support ETV as aprimary therapy that enables prolonged treatment with potent viral suppression and minimalresistance.(H EPATOLOGY2009;49:1503-1514.)A pproximately400million people worldwide havechronic hepatitis B virus(HBV)infections,with arisk for chronic,life-threatening liver disease.1 Antiviral therapy for HBV can provide suppression of viral replication and halt disease progression.2,3However, therapeutic benefits are diminished with the emergence of drug-resistant virus,which occurs most often with pro-longed therapy and incomplete viral suppression.4 Resistance to nucleoside/nucleotide antivirals arises through substitutions in the HBV polymerase reverse transcriptase domain(RT),that arise spontaneously through low-fidelity replication and are enriched through drug-selective pressure.2,3Antiviral therapies are charac-terized by their barrier to resistance,which includes three components:(1)the potency of the antiviral in suppress-ing viral replication,(2)a“genetic barrier”,i.e.,the num-ber of genetic changes required to effectively reduce drug susceptibility that results in virologic breakthrough,and (3)the replicationfitness of the resistant virus.These factors act together to determine the levels of resistance which emerge during therapy.Other factors related to the particular binding site or mechanism of activity also con-tribute to determining the overall barrier to resistance. Lamivudine(LVD)resistance(LVDr)arises with changes in the HBV RT tyrosine-methionine-aspartate-Abbreviations:ADV,adefovir;ADVr,adefovir-resistant;AS-PCR,allele-spe-cific,single-nucleotide polymorphism polymerase chain reaction;EC50,median ef-fective concentration;ETV,entecavir;ETVr,entecavir-resistant,entecavir-resistance;HBV,hepatitis B virus;LVD,lamivudine;LVDr,lamivudine-resistant,lamivudine-resistance;nucleoside-naı¨ve,nucleoside-treatment-naı¨ve;RT,reversetranscriptase domain of the HBV polymerase;WT,wild type;YMDD,tyrosine-methionine-aspartate-aspartate.From Bristol-Myers Squibb Company Research and Development,Wallingford,CT.Received August20,2008;accepted December25,2008.*Present address for Richard Colonno:Presidio Pharmaceuticals Inc.,San Fran-cisco,CA.Address reprint requests to:Daniel J.Tenney,Ph.D.,Bristol-Myers SquibbPharmaceutical Research Institute,5Research Parkway,Wallingford,CT06492.E-mail daniel.tenney@;fax:203-677-6088.Copyright©2009by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.Published online in Wiley InterScience().DOI10.1002/hep.22841Potential conflict of interest:The studies were performed at Bristol-Myers Squibbby employees of Bristol-Myers Squibb.Study participants have been informed ofpotential conflicts of interest.Drs.Wilber,Eggers,Colonno,Baldick,Tenney,Pokornowski,and Xu own stocks in Bristol-Myers Squibb.1503aspartate(YMDD)nucleotide-binding motif,inϳ20%of treated patients annually.5Because virologic break-through can occur subsequent to emerging genotypic re-sistance,rates of resistance with virologic breakthroughare typically lower.Telbivudine resistance also arises atthe YMDD motif and has been reported in the context ofvirologic breakthrough,at22%and9%over2years inpatients who are positive and negative,respectively,forthe hepatitis B e antigen(HBeAg).6,7YMDD motifchanges reduce susceptibility to LVD or telbivudine by Ͼ100-fold.8Adefovir(ADV)resistance(ADVr)arises through HBV RT A181and N236changes9and occursin29%of patients who are HBeAg-negative after5years.ADVr in patients who are HBeAg-positive was reportedin the context of virologic breakthrough and occurred in25%of patients followed for110-279weeks of therapy.9For LVD,ADV,and telbivudine,the genetic barrier toresistance in antiviral-naı¨ve patients can be as low as asingle substitution.Several factors contribute to the high barrier to resistancewith entecavir(ETV).ETV is potent,resulting in a higherproportion of patients achieving undetectable HBV DNAthan those treated with LVD10,11or ADV.12Marked(Ͼ70-fold)reductions in ETV susceptibility requires substitutionsat residues T184,S202,or M250in LVDr HBV withchanges at M204I/VϮL180M.13,14Thus,the genetic bar-rier to ETVr involves multiple substitutions.In vitro studiesdemonstrated that the highest levels of phenotypic resis-tance,leading to virologic breakthrough,require both theM204V and L180M LVDr substitutions with at least oneETVr substitution.13,15Additionally,ETVr HBV exhibitsimpaired replicationfitness.14Thus,thefinding that ETVrhas been rarely observed in nucleoside-naı¨ve patients16,17islikely due to a combination of a high genetic barrier,potentviral suppression,and reducedfitness of resistant viruses.The development of viral resistance often predisposes pa-tients to resistance for subsequent antivirals.LVDr substitutionsM204V/IϮL180M result in complete functional cross resis-tance(Ͼ100-fold)to L-nucleoside analogs LVD,telbivudine,emtricitabine,and clevudine.8,15,18-21However,nucleotidephosphonates ADV and tenofovir are not cross-resistant toM204YMDD mutant HBV.Nevertheless,ADVr is morelikely to emerge in patients with LVDr HBV,at rates of18%and25%after1and2years,respectively.22-24Recently,evi-dence for cross-resistance of ADV and tenofovir with LVDrHBV with A181V or T substitutions was reported.25LVDr also reduces the barrier to resistance with ETV.ETV exhibitsϳ8-fold reduced potency against LVDrHBV.13,21Although48weeks of ETV therapy in LVD-refractory patients suppressed HBV DNA by a mean of5.1log10copies/mL,26,27this potency was reduced relativeto that in naı¨ve patients.10,11Additionally,because LVDr M204substitutions are a subset of the changes required for ETVr,8the genetic barrier to ETVr is reduced with LVDr HBV relative to wild-type virus.Previous analyses showed ETVr is rare in nucleoside-naı¨ve patients,but increases over time in LVD-refractory patients.15,16,28,29Here,we report a comprehensive assess-ment of resistance in both patient populations treated for up to5years with ETV.Patients and MethodsPatients.Patients from six phase2and3clinical studies of the safety and efficacy of ETV were moni-tored for resistance through Year5(week240).Serum samples were obtained from patients in studies ETV-02211 ( identifier:NCT00035633)and ETV-02710(NCT00035789)of nucleoside-naı¨ve HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients with compensated liver disease,respectively,as well as in LVD-refractory pa-tients(those with continued viremia or identified resis-tance while on LVD)in phase3study ETV-02627 (NCT00036608)and phase2study ETV-01426in pa-tients with compensated liver disease,and phase2study ETV-01515in orthotopic liver transplant recipients.All pa-tients provided written informed consent,and study proto-cols conformed to the1975Declaration of Helsinki and were approved by appropriate Institutional Review Boards. Patients initially randomized to treatment with the approved ETV daily dosages(0.5mg for nucleoside-naı¨ve and1.0mg for LVD-refractory)were eligible for inclusion in the resistance sur-veillance.Patients from naı¨ve trials ETV-022and ETV-027, conducted in patients who were HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative,respectively,were treated from1to2years,depending on the clinical response at week48.10,11Patients whose HBV DNA was suppressed below the limit of detection by the branched DNA assay(0.7MEq/mL)and were either HBeAg-negative(for HBeAg-positive patients)or had normalized ala-nineaminotransferase(forHBeAg-negativepatients)atweek48 were to discontinue treatment at week52.Patients whose HBV DNA was less than0.7MEq/mL but did not lose HBeAg or normalize alanine aminotransferase were allowed to continue treatment through week96.Patients who did not achieve either endpoint were offered alternative therapy in the rollover study ETV-901.All patients who remained on treatment were trans-ferred to the rollover study at week96.Most of the555patients who left the studies,therefore,did so as protocol-defined Re-sponders,and89%hadHBVDNAϽ300copies/mLbypoly-merase chain reaction(PCR),and therefore were unlikely to develop genotypic resistance and/or virologic breakthrough. Because the ETV-901study was blinded and included patients rolling over from both ETV and LVD arms of other studies,they initially received the combination of1504TENNEY ET AL.HEPATOLOGY,May2009100mg LVD and1.0mg ETV.Subsequently,a protocol amendment changed ETV-901to monotherapy with1.0 mg ETV.Results from the nucleoside-naı¨ve resistance cohort reflect the use of1.0mg ETV for147of149 patients in Year3,and all patients in Years4and5,rather than the0.5mg dosage.Patients who received extended therapy in study ETV-901were included in the resistance cohort if they received “continuous treatment,”with interruptions ofՅ35days between the end of dosing in the original study and the start of dosing in ETV-901.When treatment gaps ex-ceeded35days,the end of dosing in the primary study was considered the last on-treatment observation,and their subsequent virologic profile was excluded from the long-term resistance survey.Annual visits for Years1through5occurred at48-week intervals.These timepoints were“windowed”to in-clude annual patient visits collected betweenՆ42to Յ58weeks for Year1,betweenՆ90toՅ102weeks forYear2,betweenՆ132toՅ156weeks for Year3,between Ն180toՅ204weeks for Year4,and between Ն228toՅ252weeks for Year5of therapy.All patients receiving ETV forՆ24weeks were mon-itored for resistance using HBV DNA quantification and nucleotide sequence analysis.HBV DNA quantification used the Roche COBAS Amplicor PCR(version2,lower limit of quantification300copies/mL;57IU/mL).Base-line and on-treatment isolates from patients with PCR-detectable HBV DNA(Ն300copies/mL)at the end of each yearly interval or at end of dosing within each year were sequenced.These included patients experiencing a virologic breakthrough(defined as aՆ1log10increase in HBV DNA from the on-treatment nadir,confirmed by two sequential measurements,or unconfirmed when it was the last on-treatment assessment in each year).When multiple samples were available at the end of the yearly interval,the sample closest to the end of each year was used(i.e.,weeks48,96,144,192,and240). Genotyping.The HBV RT was PCR amplified from pa-tient serum HBV DNA,sequenced directly,and analyzed.15,16 Phenotyping.Phenotypic ETV susceptibility was de-termined for HBV with novel emerging substitutions as well as for paired baseline and breakthrough isolates from patients experiencing a virologic breakthrough.Virus sus-ceptibility assays used either patient RT population qua-sispecies or individual isolates cloned into a laboratory HBV genotype D expression plasmid.Susceptibility was determined by quantification of nucleocapsid-associated HBV DNA released from transfected HepG2cells,in the presence of0.2nM to15␮M ETV.15Cumulative Probabilities.The cumulative probabil-ity of resistance was calculated2using the formula P Totalϭ1Ϫ(1ϪP yr1)ϫ(1ϪP yr2)ϫ(1ϪP yr3)ϫ(1ϪP yr4)ϫ(1ϪP yr5),where Pϭprobability yr(i)ϭ(number of pa-tients with events at Year i)/(number of patients at risk at Year i)for iϭ1,2,3,4,5.A resistance“event”was defined as genotypic ETVr or genotypic ETVr with viro-logic breakthrough,in a yearly interval.Patients“at risk”were those during Year i who did not develop resistance during Year(i-1).Patients who discontinued ETV treat-ment in Year i were assumed to be in follow-up for the entire year.ResultsResistance Surveillance in Nucleoside-Naı¨ve Pa-tients Treated with ETV.In Year1,663nucleoside-naı¨ve patients treated with ETV were monitored for resistance(Table1).At the end of Year1,HBV DNA was successfully amplified and sequenced from243patients, including those128of the663(19%)patients with PCR-detectable HBV DNA,and a subset of the535patients with undetectable virus,who were analyzed because the patients’HBV DNA status was blinded at the time of analysis.ETVr substitution S202G with LVDr M204VϩL180M changes were detected in a single HBeAg-negative patient at week48(patient#16).De-spite being nucleoside-naı¨ve,baseline virus from patient #16harbored34%LVDr HBV(L80L/I,M204M/I),and subsequently developed L180M,M204V,and ETVr sub-stitution S202G at the time of virologic breakthrough (Table3).16Eight other nucleoside-naı¨ve patients had baseline LVDr,detected in three patients using standard nucleotide sequencing and in the otherfive using a moreTable1.Nucleoside-Naı¨ve Patients in ETV Resistance CohortStudy(Patient Population)*Treated and Monitored PatientsYear1Year2Year3Year4Year5ETV-022(HBeAg Positive)345234********* ETV-027(HBeAg Negative)31844865All Treated and Monitored663278149121108 No.Ͻ300copies/mL HBV DNA(%)†535(81)232(83)132(89)109(90)100(93) *Included time points in rollover study ETV-901as outlined in Patients and Methods.†Time point nearest to each year end window or the end-of-dosing.HEPATOLOGY,Vol.49,No.5,2009TENNEY ET AL.1505sensitive single-nucleotide polymorphism allele-specific(AS) PCR assay(Fang et al.,manuscript submitted).Two patients developed LVDr on ETV that was not detected at baseline; one breakthrough patient in Year1with11substitutions emerging,who left the study before confirmation of the changes;and one patient with LVDr emerging at the last treatment visit in Year5.Neither exhibited phenotypic resis-tance seen for patients with ETVr(see below).Aside from patient#16,none of the nucleoside-naı¨ve patients with LVDr at baseline subsequently developed ETVr. Fourteen patients treated with ETV experienced viro-logic breakthrough during Year1,six with HBeAg-posi-tive HBV and eight with HBeAg-negative HBV.The HBV DNA rise was confirmed in sequential visits in only two patients,one of whom was ETVr patient#16. Among the384patients discontinuing treatment at the end of Year1(and who were not included in the long-term resistance monitoring),92%(352)had HBV DNAϽ300copies/mL.A total of278nucleoside-naı¨ve patients were moni-tored in Year2,with the majority(232,83%)achievingHBV DNAϽ300copies/mL.Genotyping was successful in44of the46patients with detectable HBV DNA. ETVr(M204VϩL180M and S202G)was detected in one patient who was HBeAg-positive at week84(patient #23);this patient discontinued treatment at week97with 3.7log10copies/mL HBV DNA,without having experi-enced a virologic breakthrough.All three resistance sub-stitutions appeared simultaneously and sequencing of cloned isolates showed that all three resistance substitu-tions were genetically linked and that viruses with subsets of resistant substitutions were not detected.AfterϾ7 weeks without therapy,this patient’s HBV DNA reached 6.7log10copies/mL and ETV treatment was reinitiated; however,HBV DNA levels were not suppressed.Eight patients in Year2experienced unconfirmed vi-rologic breakthroughs.One had LVDr substitutions only at the time of breakthrough;however,the patient’s base-line isolate also harbored low levels(0.13%)of LVDr HBV by the AS-PCR method.Resistance at LVDr or ETVr residues was not found in any other patient.Of the129nucleoside-naı¨ve patients discontinuing in Year2,107(83%)hadϽ300copies/mL HBV DNA.A total of149patients continued therapy into Year3and were monitored for resistance.At the end of Year3,17 patients(11%)had HBV DNAՆ300copies/mL and genotyping was successful on15patient isolates.Two patients exhibited confirmed virologic breakthrough in Year 3.One patient(#44)had genetically linked M204VϩL180M and S202G resistance emerge at week 139and experienced virologic breakthrough at week148 and the addition of a T184T/I change.This patient had rolled over into study ETV-901at week100and com-pleted16weeks of combination treatment before resis-tance emerged with breakthrough.No ETVr or LVDr was found in any other patient.Of the28patients who discontinued without resistance prior to therapy in Year4,25(89%)had undetectable HBV DNA(Ͻ300copies/mL).A total of121nucleoside-naı¨ve ETV patients received therapy and were monitored for resis-tance in Year4.Twelve(10%)had HBV DNAՆ300cop-ies/mL and genotyping was successful in10of these patients. One patient experienced a virologic breakthrough.Analysis of these patients failed to detect resistance.Of the14patients who discontinued without resis-tance prior to therapy in Year5,12(86%)had undetect-able HBV DNA(Ͻ300copies/mL).Among108 nucleoside-naı¨ve ETV patients monitored in Year5,eight (7%)had HBV DNAՆ300copies/mL and genotyping was successful for seven patients.No ETV-resistance was found in these patients,including two who experienced virologic breakthrough.The overall results in nucleoside-naı¨ve patients are summarized in Fig.1.Through5years of ETV therapy, the cumulative probability of developing genotypic ETVr or genotypic ETVr accompanied by a virologic break-through was1.2%and0.8%,respectively.Cell culture susceptibility testing also showed that22of the27breakthroughs experienced by nucleoside-naı¨ve ETV patients through Year5were unrelated to resistance,because resistance substitutions were not detected and ETV suscep-tibility was relatively unchanged from the wild type(Fig.2). Isolates from the two patients with virologicbreakthroughs Fig.1.Cumulative probabilities of ETVr in nucleoside-naı¨ve patients. Bars indicate the cumulative probabilities of genotypic ETVr(open)and genotypic ETVr with virologic breakthrough(filled)that occurred over the course of5years.1506TENNEY ET AL.HEPATOLOGY,May2009associated with ETVr substitutions (patients #16and #44)showed decreased ETV susceptibility of 2790-fold and 32-fold,respectively.LVDr isolates were only 2.1-fold to 26.2-fold less susceptible than the wild type (Fig.2).This correlates with the finding that the two patients with LVDr who were further treated with ETV achieved HBV DNA Ͻ300copies/mL on continued ETV.LVD-Refractory Patients.The LVD-refractory resis-tance cohort included 187patients with documented resistance or recurrent/persistently detectable HBV DNA (Ͼ300copies/mL)whilereceivingLVD(Table2).Baselinesequenceevidence of genotypic LVDr was detected in 84.5%of patients.As re-ported,5%ofthesepatientsalsoharboredETVrsubstitutionsat T184,S202,or M250at study entry.15Emerging ETVr at T184,S202,and/or M250was observed by nucleotide sequencing in 11,12,16,6,and 2patients during Years 1through 5of ETV,respectively.Virologic breakthrough with ETVr,including those resis-tant at baseline,occurred in 2,14,13,9,and 1patients in Years 1through 5,respectively.Importantly,through Year 5,only three LVD-refractory patients achieving Ͻ300copies/mL HBV DNA on ETV subsequently de-veloped ETVr,and only two of them experienced a sub-sequent virologic breakthrough.The presence of ETVr did not always result in virologic breakthrough because only 68%(39of 57)of ETVr pa-tients experienced a virologic breakthrough through Year 5.Various substitutions were found (Table 3).Substitu-tions at residue I169emerged in 13of the 57(22%)patients with ETVr.All the I169changes occurred sub-sequent to or simultaneously with primary ETVr at T184,S202or M250.Only 9of 39(23%)breakthrough isolates had I169changes.Three patients with I169changes did not experience breakthrough,and one breakthrough pa-tient developed an I169substitution after breakthrough.This,along with the finding that I169substitutions do not consistently alter the phenotypic susceptibility to ETV,8suggests that the I169change is an adaptive or accessory substitution and not a primary ETVr change.In general,only a subset of ETVr changes was found in patients experiencing virologic breakthrough,including T184A/C/F/G/L/M,S202G,or M250V.Other substitu-tions at T184,S202,or M250were found in breakthrough isolates,but only as part of a combination with these re-stricted changes.Occasionally,further therapy resulted in an evolution of the ETVr changes to other residues (unpub-lished observations).Patients with T184I/S,S202C,or M250I/L tended not to experience virologic breakthrough unless these substitutions shifted to a more highly resistant substitution listed above.Often there was a delay between the appearance of genotypic ETVr and virologic break-through (unpublished observations),consistent with obser-vations that ETVr variants are replication impaired.8,14Through 5years of therapy with 1.0mg ETV in LVD-refractory patients,the cumulative probabilities of genotypic ETVr substitutions and virologic breakthrough with ETVr increased to 51%and 43%,respectively (Fig.3).The phenotypic ETV susceptibility of virologic break-through isolates from the LVD-refractory patients is sum-marized in Fig.4.In contrast to the results with most nucleoside-naı¨ve breakthrough patients (Fig.2),break-through isolates from LVD-refractory patients consisted predominantly of ETVr genotypes and exhibited substan-tial reductions in ETV susceptibility relative to the wild type (285-fold median [range ϭ29-4464]).A range of susceptibilities were observed due to differences in the proportions of resistant viruses in the quasispecies and from the different ETVr changes present;however,82%(32of 39)had median effective concentration (EC 50)forTable 2.LVD-Refractory Patients in ETV Resistance CohortsStudy*Treated and Monitored PatientsYear 1Year 2Year 3Year 4Year 5ETV-01440201691ETV-01599720ETV-026138117574132All Treated and Monitored 187146805233No.Ͻ300copies/mL HBV DNA (%)†38(20)38(26)27(34)24(46)20(61)*Included time points in rollover study ETV-901as outlined in Patients and Methods.†Time point nearest to each year-end window or theend-of-dosing.Fig.2.Phenotypic analysis of isolates from nucleoside-naı¨ve patients experiencing virologic breakthrough.Each diamond ({)represents the ETV susceptibility of the population isolate at baseline and is paired with a circle (E )representing the susceptibility of the virologic breakthrough population isolate for the same patient.Shapes are filled according to resistance genotype,as indicated.The wild-type (WT)/LVDr and LVDr/ETVr indicate mixtures.Susceptibility levels are expressed relative to the mean of 10WT HBV populations with no substitutions (EC 50ϭ1.5nM),tested in parallel.Breakthrough isolates with ETVr from patients #16and #44are the filled circles in Year 1and Year 3,respectively.HEPATOLOGY,Vol.49,No.5,2009TENNEY ET AL.15071508TENNEY ET AL.HEPATOLOGY,May2009Table 3.ContinuedHEPATOLOGY,Vol.49,No.5,2009TENNEY ET AL.1509Table 3.Continued1510TENNEY ET AL.HEPATOLOGY,May 2009ETV greater than 100nM,which is Ͼ66.7times the EC 50of the wild type.No changes other than those at T184,S202,or M250,in association with LVDr substitutions at M204I/V ϮL180M,emerged as candidates for primary ETVr substi-tutions during the 5-year resistance monitoring.We iden-tified 92other novel substitutions at 76positions in nucleoside-naı¨ve patients,and 22novel changes at 20Table 3.Continued1BL,baseline or on-treatment isolate at the last genotyped timepoint (treatment weeks)or,if the patient experienced a virologic breakthrough (VB),at the breakthrough timepoint.2HBV RT substitutions associated with resistance.Mixtures of substitutions (#/#)are ordered based upon the predominance in the sequencing chromatograph or using individual cloned isolates.X denotes a mixture of residues in the population that made it impossible to determine the identity of the aminoacids.Fig.3.Cumulative probabilities of ETVr in LVD-refractory patients.Bars indicate the cumulative probabilities of genotypic ETVr (open)or genotypic ETVr accompanied by a virologic breakthrough (filled)that occurred over the course of 5years.Fig.4.Phenotypic analysis of isolates from LVD-refractory patients expe-riencing virologic breakthrough.Each diamond ({)represents the ETV sus-ceptibility of the population isolate at baseline and is paired with a circle representing the susceptibility of the breakthrough population isolate from the same patient.Shapes are filled according to resistance genotype,as indicated.The wild-type (WT)/LVDr and LVDr/ETVr indicate mixtures.Sus-ceptibility levels are expressed relative to the mean of 10WT HBV popula-tions with no substitutions (EC 50ϭ1.5nM),tested in parallel.The WT baseline isolate results from one Year 4patient are shown without their on-treatment breakthrough isolate,which was unable to be amplified.An-other Year 3patient whose on-treatment breakthrough isolate was also unable to be amplified,and their baseline (WT)isolate,are both not shown.HEPATOLOGY,Vol.49,No.5,2009TENNEY ET AL.1511residues in LVD-refractory patients without primary ETVr;however,none of these occurred inϾ3patients (Ͻ2%),and none correlated with virologic responses or reproducibly reduced phenotypic ETV susceptibility, similar to results after2years of ETV.15,16One variant contained an F88Y substitution in a LVDr M204I/ VϩL180M background(Fig.4,Year4,second patient) and exhibited elevated ETV EC50levels;however,this change did not reproducibly confer resistance in other cloned isolates from the same patient or when the change was engineered into laboratory background viruses.Alto-gether,these analyses suggested that various novel changes emerging on ETV resulted from random genetic drift rather than resistance selection.A181Substitutions.A181substitutions are associated with both LVD-resistance and ADV-resistance,as well as resis-tance to LVD and ADV combination therapy.25,30Fifteen pa-tients in the long-term resistance cohort had A181substitutions at some time during ETV therapy,two from study ETV-022, 12from ETV-026,and one from ETV-015.These include changes of A181to C,G,S,T,or V.Seven of the15patients had baseline A181substitutions.Baseline A181substitutions disappeared during ETV therapy in four patients,two others achieved and maintained undetectable HBV DNA,and the A181substitution was maintained in one patient(data not shown).Eight other patients had A181changes emerge on ETV.These substitutions disappeared on continued therapy in three patients,three others achieved and maintained undetect-able HBV DNA,and the substitutions remained in two pa-tients.As reported,15,16phenotyping of the A181substitutions emerging in patients without ETVr showed no reduced suscep-tibility in the wild-type or LVDr HBV.All these results argue against a role for A181substitutions in ETV susceptibility or resistance.DiscussionThis report details the results of long-term HBV resis-tance monitoring over5years of ETV treatment.Our study methods closely adhered to recent guidelines2,31and in-volved genotypic analysis of patients with detectable HBV DNA by a sensitive PCR method(limit of quantification 300copies/mL)and phenotypic susceptibility testing of iso-lates from all patients experiencing virologic breakthrough or novel emerging amino acid substitutions.The most compellingfinding was that a high barrier to resis-tance was maintained through5years of ETV therapy in nucle-oside-naı¨ve patients,where the cumulative probability of genotypic ETVr and virologic breakthrough due to ETVr was 1.2%and0.8%,respectively.This barrier to resistance likely results from(1)potent suppression of viral replication,because 93%ofpatientsachievedundetectableHBVDNA(Ͻ300cop-ies/mL)during this5-year period,(2)a high genetic barrier to resistance,and(3)impaired replication of the ETVr variants.In the end,through5years,ETVr substitutions were detected in only three nucleoside-naı¨ve patients(3of663),with one patient having preexisting LVDr at baseline.There are particular strengths of our resistance study,such as the long-term observation period,the global enrollment of a large number patients in whom all relevant HBV genotypes were represented,and the practice of genotyping all patients with PCR-detectable virus,as well as the phenotyping of viro-logic breakthrough isolates irrespective of recognizable geno-typic resistance substitutions.Study limitations include the loss of patients over time due to protocol design,which mandated treatment discontinuation when patients met certain response definition.10,11Nevertheless,a high percentage of patients (89%)had undetectable HBV DNA(Ͻ300copies/mL)at the time of treatment discontinuation.Observation of those pa-tients who continued on treatment despite not achieving these patient management endpoints suggests that the patients who discontinued would have had a low potential for developing resistance had they continued therapy.Through5years of sur-veillance,one nucleoside-naı¨ve patient developed genotypic ETVr after achieving HBV DNAϽ300copies/mL,and only three LVD-refractory patients did.Another limitation of our resistance surveillance was introduced by the increase in ETV dosage from0.5to1.0 mg daily when the patients entered the ETV-901rollover study.Importantly,the results of a parallel survey of sur-veillance conducted in Japan in which nucleoside-naı¨ve patients received the0.5mg dosage of ETV for3years yielded only one of66patients who developed genotypic resistance(1.7%).17The three nucleoside-naı¨ve study patients,with emerging ETVr,all developed M204VϩL180M and S202G sub-stitutions.Two of these patients with wild-type virus at baseline developed M204VϩL180M and S202G simulta-neously,and these resistance substitutions were linked genet-ically,in that individual clones did not have different subsets of changes.This indicates that ETVr did not emerge in a stepwise manner;which would have resulted in a subset of the viral population with LVDr changes only,accompanied by a proportion with additional ETVr substitutions.Simul-taneous emergence of all three resistance substitutions has been noted in other reports of ETVr.32The requirement to simultaneously develop multiple resistance substitutions in the nucleoside-naı¨ve population most likely contributes to the high genetic barrier to ETVr.Although LVDr substitutions reduce ETV susceptibility, our results do not suggest that ETV selects for LVDr substi-tutions de novo.Instead ETV probably maintains or enriches LVDr variants that are already present.In all but two pa-tients,LVDr that was found during ETV treatment could be detected at baseline.The observation that LVDr was de-1512TENNEY ET AL.HEPATOLOGY,May2009。

全方位解读:2024年慢性乙型肝炎防治英文版

全方位解读:2024年慢性乙型肝炎防治英文版

全方位解读:2024年慢性乙型肝炎防治英文版Comprehensive Analysis: Prevention and Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B in 2024 Chronic hepatitis B remains a significant public health concern worldwide, affecting millions of individuals and leading to severe liver complications if left untreated. In 2024, the focus on prevention and treatment strategies for chronic hepatitis B continues to evolve, with a strong emphasis on vaccination, early detection, and personalized treatment plans.VaccinationVaccination against hepatitis B virus (HBV) has been proven to be highly effective in preventing new infections and reducing the burden of chronic hepatitis B. In 2024, efforts are being made to increase vaccination coverage, especially in high-risk populations such as healthcare workers, infants born to HBV-positive mothers, and individuals with multiple sexual partners.Early DetectionEarly detection of chronic hepatitis B is crucial for initiating timely treatment and preventing disease progression. Screening programs targeting at-risk populations, such as immigrants from endemic regions and individuals with a family history of HBV, are being implemented to identify cases early and provide appropriate care.Personalized TreatmentThe treatment landscape for chronic hepatitis B is rapidly advancing, with a growing emphasis on personalized treatment approaches tailored to the individual patient. In 2024, healthcare providers are utilizing a combination of antiviral medications, monitoring tools, and lifestyle interventions to manage the disease and improve outcomes for patients.Public Health InitiativesPublic health initiatives play a crucial role in the prevention and treatment of chronic hepatitis B. Governments and healthcare organizations are working together to raise awareness about theimportance of vaccination, early detection, and treatment adherence. Community outreach programs, educational campaigns, and policy interventions are being implemented to address barriers to care and improve health outcomes.ConclusionIn conclusion, the prevention and treatment of chronic hepatitis B in 2024 are characterized by a holistic approach that combines vaccination, early detection, personalized treatment, and public health initiatives. By focusing on these key areas, healthcare providers and policymakers aim to reduce the global burden of chronic hepatitis B and improve the quality of life for individuals living with the disease.。

乙肝病毒上报制度及流程

乙肝病毒上报制度及流程

乙肝病毒上报制度及流程英文回答:Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reporting system and process vary from country to country. However, I can provide a general overview of how the system works.In most countries, the reporting of HBV cases is mandatory for healthcare providers, including doctors, hospitals, and laboratories. When a person is diagnosed with HBV infection, the healthcare provider is required to report the case to the designated public health authority.The process usually involves filling out a standardized report form that includes information such as the patient's name, age, gender, contact information, and details about the diagnosis. The form may also include questions about the patient's risk factors, such as exposure to contaminated blood or unprotected sexual contact.Once the report is submitted, the public health authority enters the information into a centralized database. This database allows for the monitoring and surveillance of HBV cases in the population. It helps public health officials identify trends, track outbreaks, and develop appropriate prevention and control measures.The reporting system serves several purposes. Firstly, it helps to ensure accurate and timely data collection, which is crucial for monitoring the prevalence and incidence of HBV infections. Secondly, it enables the identification of high-risk populations and areas, allowing targeted interventions to be implemented. Finally, it facilitates the evaluation of the effectiveness of prevention and control measures.Let me illustrate the process with an example. Suppose I am a doctor working in a hospital. I have a patient who presents with symptoms of hepatitis. After conducting the necessary tests, I confirm that the patient is infected with HBV. As per the reporting requirements, I fill out a report form with the patient's information and details ofthe diagnosis. I then submit the form to the public health authority through the designated channels, such as online portals or fax. The public health authority receives the report and enters the information into their database. They may also follow up with me if there are any additional questions or if they require further information.中文回答:乙肝病毒的上报制度和流程因国家而异。

直接抗病毒药物时代特殊人群HCV感染的管理和治疗

直接抗病毒药物时代特殊人群HCV感染的管理和治疗

●^
Z斗
临床Hepatol。Vo1.34 No.2,Feb.2018
直 接 抗 病 毒 药 物 时 代 特 殊 人 群 HCV 感 染 的 管 理 和 治 疗
李俊利 ,尚 佳 ,宁会彬
(河 南 省人 民 医院 感 染 科 ,郑 州 450000)
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001—5256,2018.02.005
收 稿 日期 :2017—10—27;修 回 日期 :2017—10—27。 基 金项 目 :河 南 省 医 学科 技 攻 关计 划省 部 共 建 项 目(201401015);
河 南 省科 技 厅 医 学科 技 攻 关计 划 项 目(152102310135) 作者 简介 :李俊 利(1989一),女 ,主要从 事慢性肝 炎的研 究 通 信 作者 :尚 佳 ,电 子信 箱 :shangjia666@ 126.COB。
Abstract:Chronic Hepatitis C is a global epidemic,and people with different sexes,ages,races,and nationalities are susceptible to hepa—
tifs C virus(HCV)infection.This article elaborates on the management method and individualized treatment regimens for special popula— tions,including children with hepatitis C,patients with renal injury,patients undergoing liver transplantation,patients with liver cirrhosis,

HEPATITIS B VIRUS COMMENTS ON VIRAL AND HUMAN 乙型肝炎病毒对病毒和人类

HEPATITIS B VIRUS COMMENTS ON VIRAL AND HUMAN 乙型肝炎病毒对病毒和人类

Mortality per 100,000 py
2500 2000 1500 1000 500
0
M HBV+ M HBV- F HBV+ F HBV-
25-34
35-44
45-54 Age group (years)
55-64
65-74
G. Chen, W. Lin, F. Shen, U. Iloeje, T. London and A. Evans Inter. J. of epid. 2004, in print
HBV HBV ChHBV HBV HBV WMHBV HBV KHV) WHV GSHV ASHBV RGSHV THBV) DHBV HHBV HHBV SGHBV RGHBV STHBV CHBV CHBV SSHV)
(Items in parentheses have not been validated. Tree shrews were experimentally infected.)
CONTROL OF HEPATITIS B VIRUS IN CHINA
Z.Y. Xu, T.Q. Yan, S.J. Zhao, et al. Shanghai Medical University
“Infant HBV immunization has been implemented into public health service in China since 1986… the seropositivity for HBsAg was reduced from 16.3% (879/5397) of historical controls to 1.43% (70/4886) in cross-sectional study and 1.81% (210/11582) in a cohort study.”

关注HBV 感染特殊人群:早诊、早治、早获益

关注HBV 感染特殊人群:早诊、早治、早获益

关注HBV感染特殊人群:早诊、早治、早获益李艳伟,窦晓光中国医科大学附属盛京医院,沈阳110000摘要:HBV感染是世界范围内的主要公共卫生问题。

随着新生儿乙型肝炎疫苗的广泛预防接种以及越来越多的患者接受抗病毒治疗,我国儿童HBV感染方面取得了显著成就。

但我国成年人HBsAg阳性率仍然很高,特殊人群也越来越多,应做到对特殊人群及时筛查和诊断,以尽早抗病毒治疗,阻滞或者延缓HBV感染后进展至肝硬化、肝衰竭和肝细胞癌。

治疗时机及药物的选择除了关注HBV病毒学、肝功能,还要考虑合并慢性基础疾病、母婴传播、接受化学治疗及免疫抑制剂的患者HBV再激活等问题。

从而实现HBV高危和特殊人群应筛尽筛、及时诊断和治疗,以使更多患者获益。

关键词:乙型肝炎病毒;特殊人群;筛查;诊断;治疗学FocusonthespecialpopulationwithhepatitisBvirusinfection:Earlydiagnosis,earlytreatment,andearlybenefitsLIYanwei,DOUXiaoguang.(ShengjingHospital,ChinaMedicalUniversity,Shenyang110000,China)Correspondingauthor:DOUXiaoguang,guang40@163.com(ORCID:0000-0003-0694-7126)Abstract:HepatitisBvirus(HBV)infectionisamajorpublichealthproblemworldwide.WiththeextensiveprophylacticvaccinationwithhepatitisBvaccineforneonatesandanincreasingnumberofpatientsreceivingantiviraltreatment,remarkableachievementshavebeenmadeinHBVinfectionamongChinesechildren.Howeveratpresent,thereisstillahighHBsAg-positiverateamongtheadultsinChina,andwithmoreandmorespecialpopulations,itisnecessarytoperformtimelyscreeninganddiagnosisandgiveantiviraltherapyasearlyaspossi ble,soastopreventordelaytheprogressiontolivercirrhosis,liverfailure,andhepatocellularcarcinomaafterHBVinfection.TheselectionoftreatmenttiminganddrugsshouldnotonlyfocusonHBVvirologyandliverfunction,butalsoconsiderchronicunderlyingdiseases,moth er-to-childtransmission,andreactivationofHBVinpatientsreceivingchemotherapyandimmunosuppressants,therebyrealizingthetimelyscreening,diagnosis,andtreatmentofthepopulationatahighriskofHBVandspecialpopulationsandbringingmorebenefitstopatients.Keywords:HepatitisBVirus;SpecialPopulation;Screening;Diagnosis;TherapeuticsDOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2022.11.001收稿日期:2022-09-19;录用日期:2022-10-12通信作者:窦晓光,guang40@163.com HBV感染是世界范围内的主要公共卫生问题。

细小病毒B19感染临床表现的多样性

细小病毒B19感染临床表现的多样性

• 500 •Int J Blood I'ransfus Hematol, November 2020, Vol. 43, No. 6•专题论坛•细小病毒B19感染临床表现的多样性张陆阳郭晔竺晓凡中国医学科学院北京协和医学院血液病医院(中国医学科学院血液学研究所),实验血液学国家重点实验室,国家血液病临床医学研究中心,天津300020通信作者:竺晓凡,E m a i l:x f z h u@i h c a m s.a c.c n【摘要】细小病毒(P V)B19属细小病毒科,红病毒厲,是--种人群感染率高的单链I)N A病毒。

P V B19感染可累及多个组织器官,甚至参与某些疾病的发生、发展。

P V B19感染临床表现具有多样性,可能导致心肌炎、肺炎、肝炎、肾小球肾炎等多种并发症。

对于免疫功能正常人群.P V B19感染常症状轻微或无症状。

但是,对于实体器官移植(S O T)和造血干细胞移植(H S C T)等免疫功能缺陷的特殊人群,其可能导致移植器官功能障碍或移植物功能不良,甚至移植失败。

笔者通过P V B19病毒生物学及其感染免疫机制、P V B19感染的常见临床表现、移植后P V B19感染,以及P V B19感染的诊断、治疗方面,对P V B19感染临床表现的多样性进行阐述,旨在从屮物学及感染免疫等不同视角重新认识P V B19感染,并为移植后P V B19感染的诊断和治疗提供依据。

【关键词】细小病毒B19,人;感染;器官移植;造血干细胞移植;临床表现基金项目:天津市科技计划项目(15ZXLCSY00010)D O I:10. 3760/cma. j. cn511693-20200806-00162Diversed clinical manifestations of parvovirus B19 infectionZhung L u y a n g,Guo Y e,Zhu X ia u fa n.Statf K ey Laboratory o f Kxper'imental H em atology National Clinical Research Center fo r BloodDiseases,Institute o f H em atology Blood Disease Hospital* Chinese A cadem y o f MedicalSciences Peking Union Medical College <,Tianjiti300020, C'hitiaCorresponding author ••Zhu Xiao f a n,Email :x fz h u@ih c a m s.a c.c n[Abstract 1 Parvovirus ( PV ) B19 is a member of the erythrovirus genus, the familyParvoviriclae.It is a single-stranded DNA virus with a high rate of human infection. PVB19 infectioncan involve multiple organs and tissues»and participate in the occurrence and development of certaindiseases. The clinical manifestations of PVB19 infection are diverse, which can cause variouscomplications such as myocarditis,pneumonia,hepatitis and glomerulonephritis. For people withnormal immune function, PVB19 infection could be asymptomatic or mild. However,for specialpopulations with immune deficiencies such as patients after solid organ transplantation (S O T) andhematopoietic stem cell tran.splantation ( HSCT) *it may lead to dysfunction of the transplanted organor g ta ft,even transplant failure. This article explains the clinical manifestations in patients withPVB19 infection through PVB19 virus biology and its infection immune mechanisms, common clinicalmanifestations of PVB19 infection, PVB19 infection after transplantation, and the diagnosis andtreatment of PVB19 infection,in order to re-understand PVB19 infection from different perspectivessuch as biology and infection immunity, and provide a basis for the diagnosis and treatment of PVB19infection after transplantation.【Keywords】P a rv o v iru s B19, h u m a n;I n fe c tio n;O rg a n T r a n s p la n ta tio n;H e m a to p o ie tic s te mcell tra n s p la n ta tio n; C linical m a n ife sta tio nFund program:Science and Technology Program of Tianjin City (15ZXLC'SY00010)D O I:10. 3760/cma. j. cn511693-20200806-00162国际输血及血液学杂2020年11月第.13卷第6期• 501.细小病毒(p a r v o v i r u s,P V)B19由澳大利亚病毒学家C o s s a r t于1975年首次发现并命名。

艾滋病词汇中英互译

艾滋病词汇中英互译

艾滋病词汇中英互译接下来为大家整理了艾滋病词汇中英互译,希望对你有帮助哦!艾滋病词汇中英互译一:gonorrhea 淋病growing income disparities 收入差距越來越大has been hit the hardest ~ 的问题最为严重health official 卫生官员heterosexual population 异性恋者hemophilia(c) 血友病(人)hepatitis 肝炎hepatitis c/co-infection with HIV 艾滋病毒和肝炎病毒重叠感染herpes 疱疹herpes viruses 疱疹病毒heterosexual 异性恋的highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) 高效抗逆转录病毒疗法high-risk populations 高危险群HIV 艾滋病毒HIV carriers 艾滋病毒带原者HIV cases 艾滋病毒案例HIV disease 艾滋病,后天免疫缺乏症候群HIV patients 艾滋病携带者HIV positive HIV阳性HIV strains/ strains of HIV HIV 菌种HIV sufferers 艾滋病患者HIV/AIDS villages 愛滋村HIV-1 人类免疫缺陷病毒Ⅰ型艾滋病AIDS艾滋病毒HIV艾滋病毒案例HIV cases艾滋病毒带原者HIV carriers艾滋病毒和肝炎病毒重叠感染hepatitis c/co-infection with HIV艾滋病毒急性感染primary HIV infection 艾滋病服务组织AIDS service organization (ASO)艾滋病感染者AIDS-infected patient艾滋病工作者AIDS Worker艾滋病患者HIV sufferers艾滋病教育培训中心AIDS education and training centers (AETC)艾滋病快速诊断试剂quick AIDS tests艾滋病文献资料库AIDS hotline 艾滋病相关癌症AIDS-related cancers艾滋病相关症群期AIDS-related complex (ARC)艾滋病携带者HIV patients艾滋病宣傳員AIDS activist艾滋病药物数据库AIDSDRUGS艾滋病药物协助计划AIDS drug assistance program (ADAP)艾滋病,后天免疫缺乏症候群HIV disease艾滋村AIDS village(s)艾滋村HIV/AIDS villages艾滋消瘦症候群AIDS wasting syndrome白血球leukocytes白血球white blood cells伴随药物concomitant drugs保守估計conservative projections爆炸性的水平explosive level被动免疫passive immunityB细胞淋巴瘤 B cell lymphoma病毒讀數实验viral load test病毒学virology丙种球蛋白gamma globulin不安全的集血系统unsafe blood collection system补药,滋补品tonic(s)参加者不知情的研究blinded study成人艾滋病临床研究协作组adult AIDS clinical trials group (AACTG)重新复活的性产业resurgent sex industry丑化与歧视stigma and discrimination雏妓underage prostitute传媒press/media/mass media传染/传播transmission传染方式/ 流行方式spread path传染途径mechanisms for transmission传染途径routes of infection垂直传播vertical transmission耸人听闻sensational/ frightening大相径庭to stand in stark contrast to大众宣传public education蛋白分解抑制剂protease inhibitors蛋白酶protease盗汗night sweats~ 的问题最为严重has been hit the hardest地方病endemic低估数据an underestimate地位的象征status symbol第一阶段人体试验phase I trials定时炸弹time bomb对疫情不予重视downplay the epidemic鹅口疮thrush遏止其扩散to stem the spread of (HIV/AIDS)儿科艾滋病临床试验联盟pediatricAIDS clinical trials group (PACTG)发生频率出现的范围、程度或频率incidence贩毒者traffickers防治此传染病to contain the epidemic非何杰金淋巴瘤non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL)肺结核tuberculosis (TB)复苏的resurgent腹泻diarrhea辅助疗法complementary therapy副作用side effects改革开放reform and opening感染contract/infect感染infection感染HIV病毒to carry HIV肝炎hepatitis告诫to exhort高危险群high-risk populations高效抗逆转录病毒疗法highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART)个体户self-employed entrepreneurs公共保健public health care骨髓抑制bone marrow suppression管不著beyond the reach of officialdom官场; 官僚作风officialdom毫升milliliter (ml)合用针头sharing of needlesHIV 急性期感染acute HIV infectionHIV 菌种HIV strains/ strains of HIVHIV阳性HIV positive患上/染上to suffer from/ to be infected with/ to be afflicted with/ contract (the virus/AIDS)黄疸jaundice黄金時段in prime time婚前性行为premarital sex机会性感染opportunistic infections机能障碍lesion基因gene基因组,染色体组genome结核菌素皮下测试tuberculin skin test (TST)接种inoculation接种疫苗vaccination静脉内的; 静脉注射物intravenous (IV)静脉注射intravenous injection静脉注射使用者是中国艾滋病主要人口IV users constitute the largest proportion of HIV cases in China静脉注射药物intravenous (IV) drug精神病psychiatric disorders 惊险的经济发展breakneck economic development巨大的危险titanicperil卡波氏肉瘤Kaposi's sarcoma (KS)开矿mine exploration抗生素antibiotic抗体antibody抗体媒介免疫antibody-mediated immunity抗原呈递antigen presentation可归咎于be attributable to劳动力流动labor mobility联合国艾滋病计划U.N. AIDS program, the联合国艾滋病特别大会United Nations General Assembly Special Session on HIV/AIDS 淋巴lymph淋巴结lymph nodes淋病gonorrhea临床潜伏期clinical latency临床实验clinical trial流动人口transient population流行病epidemic流行病学epidemiology流行病学家epidemiologist乱交与婚前性关系casual and premarital sex乱交,性乱行为promiscuity**时代Maoist era梅毒syphilis美国疾病控制预防中心CDC ( US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)免疫反应immune response免疫疗法immunotherapy免疫缺乏immunodeficiency免疫缺陷immune deficiency免疫系统immune system免疫作用immunization男女婴每年出生自然比率natural ratio of males to females born each year男性继承人male heirs脑膜炎meningitis脑炎encephalitis逆转录酶病毒retrovirus剖腹产cesarean疱疹herpes疱疹病毒herpes viruses皮条客pimp皮下注射器syringe嫖客john平面广告billboard普遍的社会问题pervasive social problem潜伏期incubation period潜伏期latency求助于毒品to turn to drugs。

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

Special Populations with Hepatitis B Virus InfectionMarion G.PetersTreatment of patients with chronic hepatitis B virus(HBV)infection who have advanceddisease or comorbidities can be challenging,and recommendations may differ from standardguidelines.Among the special populations that merit specific consideration are patients withcompensated or decompensated cirrhosis,organ transplantation,acute hepatitis B,preg-nancy,coinfection with hepatitis C and/or D virus,chronic renal failure,and children.Major advances have been made in management of many of these special populationsbecause of recent increasing availability of oral nucleosides,which are generally well toler-ated and highly effective despite presence of other morbidities or viral infections.Alsoimportant have been changes in the management of hepatitis B during the peri-liver trans-plantation period that allows for prevention of reinfection in the majority of cases.However,much remains to be done to determine which patients should be treated and which should bemonitored on no specific therapy.Outcomes of chronic HBV infection in persons withcoinfection and in children have varied from different areas of the world,but it is not clearwhether these differences are due to host and racial differences or to viral genotypic differ-ences.Further studies are particularly needed in assessing the safety and efficacy of therapyin pregnant women,in children,and in patients with hepatitis D and C virus coinfection.(H EPATOLOGY2009;49:S146-S155.)IntroductionMany patients with hepatitis B virus(HBV)infection have comorbidities that may seriously complicate the standard approach to management and treatment of hep-atitis B or actually represent specific contraindications to treatment.Management of these patients with special co-morbidities is challenging,and the medical evidence in support of specific therapies in these populations is usu-ally inadequate.Furthermore,the role and safety of ther-apy with alpha interferon(standard interferon and peginterferon alfa)as opposed to nucleoside analogs has to be considered separately in these populations.Table1outlines the special populations with hepatitis B infection that merit specific consideration and the quality of evi-dence that supports current recommendations. Compensated CirrhosisAlpha interferon has multiple side effects that are par-ticularly difficult for patients with advanced hepatitis B. Small but convincing studies have shown that alpha in-terferon is rarely effective and has frequent,severe,and even life-threatening side effects in patients with decom-pensated cirrhosis.In contrast,patients with well-com-pensated cirrhosis can tolerate interferon therapy,and beneficial responses may be more frequent than in pa-tients with lesser degrees offibrosis.In the large,European study of a52-week course of peginterferon-␣2b alone or in combination with lamivu-dine in hepatitis B e antigen(HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B,patients with advancedfibrosis(Ishak stage 4-6)1were eligible for enrollment as long as they did not have evidence of decompensated liver disease(ascites,en-cephalopathy,low albumin,or prolonged prothrombin time)or severe cytopenias.2Among70patients with ad-vancedfibrosis or compensated cirrhosis,sustained viro-logical responses(loss of HBeAg and HBV DNA levels below10,000copies/mL)were more frequent than in patients with lesser degrees offibrosis(25%versus12%: PϽ0.02).Serious adverse events were not more frequent in the advancedfibrosis group.Abbreviations:adefovir,adefovir dipivoxil;ALT,alanine aminotransferase; HBeAg,hepatitis B e antigen;HCC,hepatocellular carcinoma;HBIG,hepatitis B immune globulin;HBsAg,hepatitis B surface antigen;HBV,hepatitis B virus; HCV,hepatitis C virus;HDV,hepatitis D(delta)virus;tenofovir,tenofovir diso-proxil fumarate.From the Division of Gastroenterology,University of California,San Francisco, CA.Received December15,2008;accepted March5,2009.Address reprint requests to:Marion Peters,Division of Gastroenterology,Box 0538,University of California,San Francisco,513Parnassus Avenue,Room S-357,San Francisco,CA94143-0538.E-mail:marion.peters@;fax: 415-476-0659.Copyright©2009by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Published online in Wiley InterScience().DOI10.1002/hep.22965Potential conflict of interest:Consulting fees from Hoffmann-La Roche,Merck, Pharmasset,Genentech,and Clinical Care Options.Data safety monitoring board for GlaxoSmithKline.S146In contrast to interferon,the oral nucleoside analogs are well tolerated and effective in suppressing viral repli-cation in the majority of patients with or without cirrhosis and with or without hepatic decompensation.The effi-cacy of nucleoside analogs in preventing progression of disease in patients with cirrhosis due to hepatitis B was convincingly shown in a landmark clinical trial from mul-tiple Asian-Pacific centers including China,Thailand, Singapore,the Philippines,New Zealand,and Australia.A total of651patients with advanced chronic hepatitisB (bridgingfibrosis or cirrhosis)were enrolled.3Enrollment criteria required HBV DNA to be detectable in serum using an assay with a lower limit of detection of0.7 mEq/mL(ϳ200,000IU/mL).Patients who were HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative were enrolled but all patients were required to have no evidence of hepatic decompensation or hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC). The primary endpoint of the study was time to disease progression which was defined by one of the following:an increase of at least two points in the Child-Pugh score, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis,bleeding gastric or esophageal varices,renal insufficiency,HCC,or death related to liver disease.The Child-Pugh score was chosen as an endpoint,because of its reliability in predicting liver disease outcome and because this endpoint(a Child-Pugh score of7)was the major criterion for eligibility for liver transplantation when the study was begun.A total of436 patients were randomized to receive lamivudine(100mg daily)and215patients received placebo.Importantly,the study was halted early(ϳ3.5years)by its independent data safety and monitoring board because of significant differences in rates of endpoints between the treatment groups.Overall disease progression occurred in17.7%of placebo-treated compared to7.8%of lamivudine-treated patients(Pϭ0.001).Furthermore HCC was diagnosed in7.4%of placebo-treated patients compared to3.9%of lamivudine recipients(Pϭ0.047).Kaplan-Meier plots demonstrated a steady separation in occurrence of end-points starting6months after initiation of treatment and separation of rates of HCC mivudine resistance developed in49%of patients,and this group had a higher rate of progression than patients without resistance(13%versus5%)but lower progression than those on placebo(21%).In summary,peginterferon can be used in patients with advanced chronic hepatitis B,but the better tolerance of oral nucleoside analogs and the strength of the evidence of benefit from the Asian-Pacific trial has led most experts and academic societies to recommend the use of nucleo-side analog therapy for all patients with cirrhosis or ad-vancedfibrosis due to hepatitis B,regardless of clinical features or serum aminotransferase levels,as long as HBV DNA is detectable.4-6The level of HBV DNA used to recommend therapy is generally above2000IU/mL (ϳ104copies/mL).It should be noted that this level is lower than that used to enroll patients in the Asian-Pacific trial(ϳ200,000IU/mL).Decompensated Liver DiseaseThe5-year survival of patients with chronic hepatitis B with compensated cirrhosis is approximately84%,com-pared to only14%-35%in patients with decompensated cirrhosis.7-9Although alpha interferon can be used in pa-tients with compensated cirrhosis,2it is contraindicated in patients with decompensated disease,largely because of the high rate of serious adverse events and even mortality of interferon treatment in this group.10,11In contrast,nu-cleoside analogs are well tolerated and safe in patients with advanced hepatitis B,and several studies have shown that their use is associated with improvement in or stabiliza-tion of liver decompensation,the avoidance of the need for liver transplantation,and may be associated with de-creased frequency of HCC.12-14In cohorts of patients with decompensated cirrhosis due to hepatitis B who are on the transplant list,therapy with several nucleosides analogs(lamivudine,adefovir dipivoxil[adefovir],and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate [tenofovir])has been associated with improved survival and a high rate of reversal of need for liver transplanta-tion.12,13,15In a study from the University of California San Francisco,Yao and coworkers compared a cohort of 23patients with HBV-related end-stage liver disease re-ferred for liver transplantation and who were treated with lamivudine,to a group of55historical controls.16The lamivudine-treated patients had markedly improved sur-vival,beginning6months after starting lamivudine(Fig.Table1.Special Populations and Hepatitis B Population Evidence Basis and Quality* Cirrhosis Single large,adequately poweredrandomized controlled trial Decompensated cirrhosis Two multicenter,open label studieswith historical controlsOrgan transplantation Small randomized controlled trialsand open label studiesAcute hepatitis B Two small randomized controlledtrial;several case series Pregnancy Several case series;singlerandomized controlled trialCoinfection with HCV or HDV Several randomized controlled trials and cohort studiesChildren Small randomized controlled trialswith short follow-up periodsChronic renal failure Single,small randomized controlledtrial*Evidence of safety and short-term effects in highest quality study.HEPATOLOGY,Vol.49,No.5,Suppl.,2009PETERS S1471)with a decreased need for liver transplantation (35%versus 74%:P ϭ0.04).Excluding patients who under-went liver transplant,none of the lamivudine-treated pa-tients died (follow-up for 1-44months)compared to six historical controls (within 3-12months)(P ϭ0.009).Perrillo and colleagues from multiple liver transplant centers throughout North America treated 77liver trans-plant candidates with end-stage chronic hepatitis B with lamivudine (100mg daily).No control group was used,but results were compared to outcomes in two previously published studies of decompensated cirrhosis due to hep-atitis B.HBV DNA levels decreased on lamivudine therapy,but levels were not reported.Alanine amino-transferase (ALT)values decreased and became normal in more than half of patients with elevations before treat-ment.Average serum bilirubin,albumin,and prothrom-bin times improved with treatment.The 4-year survival rate among lamivudine-treated patients was 70%,which was higher than historical cohorts (ϳ60%and 30%).Lamivudine was well tolerated.Antiviral resistance devel-oped in a proportion of patients,and appearance of resis-tance was generally followed by reversal of the virological and clinical benefit.In a third study,Schiff and colleagues from multiple clinical centers in North America,Europe,and Asia 17treated 128patients with HBV-related cirrhosis awaiting liver transplantation with adefovir (10mg daily).Therapy was associated with significant declines in HBV DNA levels (median decline of 4.1log 10by week 48)and serum aminotransferase levels (normal ALT in 76%by week 48).The Child-Pugh score stabilized or improved in more than 90%of patients and the 1-year survival rate was 84%.A total of 43%of patients underwent liver transplantation,36%were still on the waiting list,21%had been removed from the waiting list,and 5%of pa-tients died without undergoing liver transplantation.12,17Antiviral resistance was not encountered;however,the analysis was limited to 48weeks and subsequent studies have shown that adefovir resistance rarely arises during the first year of treatment.These three studies support the safety of using nucleo-side analog therapy in patients with decompensated cir-rhosis due to hepatitis B and provide strong,although indirect,evidence of marked benefit of therapy which usually requires 6months or more to become fully evi-dent.As a result of these studies,antiviral therapy is rou-tinely offered to patients with decompensated hepatitis B.Because of the problems of antiviral resistance,either combination therapy or use of agents with a high barrier to resistance (entecavir,tenofovir)is usually recom-mended.The time to clinical benefit with these more potent antivirals is not yet established,and whether more patients will avoid transplantation because of a more rapid clinical response is not yet known.The safety and efficacy of these newer agents for hepatitis B deserve care-ful study.The recommendation for combination therapy in pa-tients with decompensated cirrhosis due to HBV is based on the desire to prevent virological breakthrough,which may lead to multiple negative clinical consequences in-cluding death and need for transplantation.18Uncon-trolled studies in patients with lamivudine-resistant strains of HBV suggest that combination therapy with lamivudine and adefovir resulted in less resistance,19,20although clinical benefit could not be demonstrated in small,short-term studies.21,22In a study of 79HBeAg-positive,treatment-naı¨ve patients who completed 104weeks of a randomized controlled study of lamivudine and placebo versus lamivudine and adefovir,the combi-nation was associated with lower rate of virological break-through (19%versus 44%),less antiviral resistant mutations (15%versus 43%),and a higher rate of ALT normalization (45%versus 34%)than lamivudine alone.The combination did not result in a higher rate of HBeAg seroconversion than monotherapy (13%versus 20%).23Combination therapy does not appear to increase the rate of decline of HBV DNA or result in a more rapid clinical improvement,even in decompensated patients.Thus,the major reason for using combination nucleoside analog therapy is to prevent antiviral resistance to one or both of the agents.In summary,current recommendations include ther-apy directed at suppressing HBV DNA levels to undetect-able levels 24and use of either a single potent nucleoside analog or combination of nucleoside analogs to prevent resistance.Prevention of resistance is particularly impor-tant,because the ensuing flares of disease may be life-threatening in this category of patients.PatientswithFig.1.Cumulative probability of survival without liver transplantation in 23consecutive patients with decompensated cirrhosis due to HBV infection receiving lamivudine (solid line)compared with 23historical controls (dotted line).16S148PETERS HEPATOLOGY,May 2009decompensated cirrhosis due to hepatitis B should also be referred for liver transplantation.Organ TransplantationThe treatment of patients with end-stage HBV-related liver disease in the peritransplantation and posttransplan-tation period with nucleoside therapy in addition to hep-atitis B immune globulin (HBIG)has improved the 5-year posttransplant survival of patients with hepatitis B from 40%-60%to 81%25(Fig.2).Between 1987and 1991,the 5-year survival rates for transplantation of hep-atitis B averaged 50%(compared with 60%-65%among patients who underwent transplantation for other causes),and many centers considered hepatitis B to be a relative contraindication to liver transplantation.In the following decade,this attitude changed when outcomes improved as a result of use of high doses of HBIG and the introduc-tion of lamivudine.Presently,outcomes and survival after liver transplantation are as good or better for hepatitis B as for other etiologies.25Thus,use of HBIG after transplantation,in combina-tion with nucleoside analogs starting before or at the time of liver transplantation,is now considered the standard of care in managing patients with hepatitis B in order to prevent reinfection.24A continuing controversy sur-rounds the optimal dose and duration of HBIG therapy,and which nucleoside analog or combination of these agents is preferable.There have been many studies of different regimens of HBIG with and without nucleoside analogs,but most have lacked concurrent controls and have been limited in size and duration of follow-up.These studies have been,nonetheless,informative and show that the presence and level of HBV DNA and antiviral resis-tance status immediately before transplantation are the major determinants of ultimate outcome and whether HBV will recur in the graft.In a prospective trial from Spain,patients with chronic hepatitis B and relatively low levels of HBV DNA were randomized to receive bothHBIG and lamivudine indefinitely or for a limited period after undergoing transplantation,after which lamivudine alone was continued.26The recurrence rate was similar for the nine patients who received both HBIG and lamivu-dine long-term as for the 20patients who stopped HBIG after 1-18months (the actual duration of HBIG prophy-laxis varied).Four patients had HBV recurrence,three of whom were believed to have been noncompliant with taking lamivudine.The pretransplant level of HBV DNA and presence of antiviral resistance mutations have been shown to corre-late with the amount of HBIG needed to reach protective levels of antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs)in the perioperative period and with the risk of HBV recurrence.27In a study from Australia of 147pa-tients undergoing liver transplantation for chronic hepa-titis B and receiving lamivudine and HBIG prophylaxis,reinfection of the graft occurred only in five patients at 6-19months after transplant,all of whom had developed lamivudine-resistant strains of HBV.28An additional eight patients had lamivudine-resistant strains of HBV at the time of transplantation,and reinfection was prevented by combination therapy of lamivudine,adefovir,and HBIG.Posttransplant anti-HBs titers were lower in pa-tients with higher levels of HBV DNA at the time of transplant,and lower titers were associated with HBV recurrence.29-31In those patients with undetectable HBV DNA (Ͻ300copies/mL)at 1year after transplant,com-bination therapy of lamivudine and adefovir appeared to allow for discontinuation of HBIG without increasing the risk of recurrence.32Thus,these findings together led to recommendations that patients at low risk of recurrence (HBV DNA Ͻ10,000IU/mL)who have wild-type HBV are candi-dates for lower doses of HBIG and monotherapy with nucleoside analogs,whereas those with higher levels of HBV DNA (Ն20,000IU/mL)and/or withdrug-resis-Fig.2.Change in outcome of liver transplanta-tion for HBV-related liver disease over a decade.In Era 1(1987-1991),the 5-year survival rate was ϳ50%.In Era 2(1997-2002),concurrent with the introduction of hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG)and lamivudine (LMV),5-year survival rates for transplantation for HBV-related liver disease rose and were similar to rates related to other indica-tions.25HEPATOLOGY,Vol.49,No.5,Suppl.,2009PETERS S149tant HBV mutations should receive long-term HBIG and potent antivirals that target resistant virus.33Acute Hepatitis BAcute hepatitis B is not usually an indication for ther-apy because the majority of adults who develop acute infection recover spontaneously.34In small randomized controlled studies of lamivudine35and interferon36ther-apy,a more rapid decrease in HBV DNA levels resulted but this had no effect on clinical outcome,which was largely benign.In small case series of severe acute or ful-minant hepatitis B,lamivudine was well tolerated and safe and appeared to be associated with improved outcomes,at least as compared to historical controls.37,38Despite the absence of randomized controlled trials demonstrating the benefit of nucleoside analog therapy for acute hepatitis B,these agents are usually recommended for patients with protracted or severe acute disease.6PregnancyPregnancy offers several challenges in making recom-mendations for therapy of hepatitis B.Interferon has an-tiproliferative actions and is considered contraindicated during pregnancy.The nucleoside analogs with activity against HBV have not been adequately evaluated in preg-nant women,nor has their safety been proven(or dis-proven).Tenofovir and telbivudine are considered “Category B”,indicating that they have been found to be safe in animal models and there is limited data in humans, whereas lamivudine,adefovir,and entecavir are consid-ered“Category C”,indicating that their safety has not been shown adequately either in animal models or hu-mans.In pregnancy registries,there is extensive experi-ence with use of lamivudine during pregnancy and no evidence for its teratogenicity or adverse effects on preg-nancy().Because of these concerns, patients on antiviral therapy for hepatitis B are asked to practice birth control.Nevertheless,the question arises about what to do if a young woman on therapy becomes pregnant or wants to become pregnant.In this situation, interferon should be stopped and therapy with nucleoside analogs either stopped or changed to agents that have at least some record of safety during pregnancy(such as lamivudine or telbivudine).A second issue regarding therapy is use of antiviral agents to help prevent maternal-infant transmission of hepatitis B.Current recommendations are for all preg-nant women to be screened for the presence of hepatitisB surface antigen(HBsAg)and that the children of the HB-sAg-positive mothers receive prophylaxis using HBIG and HBV vaccine.The HBIG andfirst dose of vaccine should be administered within12hours of birth,and subsequent doses of vaccine given at1and6months of age.6This regimen is effective in preventing transmission of hepatitis B in more than95%of children.The5%of children who fail to be protected by this regimen and develop hepatitis B are usually those who fail to receive the full regimen of vaccination,who fail to develop antibody (anti-HBs),or who are born to mothers with very high levels of HBV DNA(Ͼ8Log10IU/mL).Thesefindings have led to the suggestion that HBsAg-positive mothers with high levels of viremia be given antiviral therapy dur-ing the last trimester in order to reduce the level of virus at the time of delivery,the time at which actual transmission is thought to occur.Several uncontrolled studies of this approach have suggested that lamivudine therapy may reduce the likelihood of transmission and,importantly,is safe both to the mother and the newborn.In a study from the Netherlands,eight women with high levels of HBV DNA(Ͼ109genome equivalents/mL)were treated with lamivudine during the last6to40days of pregnancy.39 Only one of eight children born to these mothers devel-oped chronic hepatitis B,compared to seven of24histor-ical controls with similar levels of HBV DNA.In a study from China,12women with HBsAg and HBeAg were treated with lamivudine starting during thefirst trimester of pregnancy,and none of their infants were infected during thefirst year of life.In comparison,among histor-ical controls of children receiving HBV vaccine alone, 26%-36%of newborns were infected.40In a second study from China,56HBsAg-positive pregnant women were given HBIG every4weeks from28weeks of gestation while43were given lamivudine and52were given no specific therapy.Transmission was assessed by testing newborns at birth,at which time16%of treated versus 33%of untreated newborns were either HBsAg-positive or HBeAg-positive.41Interpretation of these results is dif-ficult because of the problems of sample contamination at birth and the lack of correlation between HBsAg-positiv-ity at birth and subsequent transmission of infection.Fi-nally,in a recently published randomized controlled trial from China,42150mothers with HBsAg and high levels of HBV DNA(Ͼ109genome equivalents/mL)were ran-domized to receive lamivudine or placebo from week32 of gestation to4weeks postpartum.A high drop-out rate made interpretation of the results difficult,but three of49 (6%)infants of mothers given lamivudine compared to five of41given placebo(12%)had evidence of HBV transmission at1year of age(Pϭ0.368).There were no obvious safety concerns and adverse events were similar in the two groups.Thus,there are no convincing prospective controlled trials demonstrating the benefit of therapy of HBsAg-S150PETERS HEPATOLOGY,May2009positive mothers in reducing the likelihood of maternal-infant transmission,particularly when prophylaxis using HBIG and vaccination is applied to the newborn.The studies do indicate that lamivudine can be given safely during pregnancy.An important and still unresolved issue is whether this approach is safe for the mother,the major issues being posttreatmentflares of disease and develop-ment of antiviral resistance because of use of a nucleoside analog with a low barrier to resistance in a patient with high levels of HBV DNA.HBV-HCV CoinfectionHepatitis C virus(HCV)shares many but not all risk factors with HBV,and thus coinfection with both viruses is not rare.In nonendemic areas,HBV-HCV coinfection is seen predominantly in injection drug users.In endemic areas,the frequency of HBV infection provides the basis for an appreciable rate of HBV-HCV infection in the general population.Overall,HCV coinfection is found in 7%-15%of persons with chronic HBV infection43-45and is usually associated with more severe liver disease.In a cross-sectional study of837HBsAg-positive patients seen in14medical centers in Italy,antibody to HCV was present in7%,but was most frequent in persons over the age of50(15%).Independent predictors of HBV-HCV coinfection were age greater than42years,history of in-jection drug use or blood transfusion,and residence in Southern Italy.45A separate study from Italy on therapy suggested that higher doses of interferon were required for clearance of both viruses.46Importantly,rates of response to therapy of hepatitis C were similar in individuals with HBV-HCV coinfection as in monoinfected individuals. Viral interference occurs between hepatotropic viruses, and levels of viremia vary over time.Most commonly, HBV replication is inhibited by HCV as opposed to vice-versa.A study of103untreated HBV-HCV coinfected patients in Italy followed for1year with bimonthly eval-uation showed that both HBV DNA and HCV RNA were detectable in24subjects,HBV DNA alone in15, HCV RNA only in nine,and neither in15subjects.Im-portantly,32subjects hadfluctuating levels of virus.43An additional30patients had evidence of infection with three hepatitis viruses—HBV,HCV,and hepatitis D vi-rus(HDV)—of whom15(50%)had detectable HBV DNA and/or HCV RNA and eight(27%)hadfluctuating levels over the year of evaluation.Treatment of both in-fections with peginterferon alfa-2a(180␮g/week)and ribavirin was attempted in a study of161patients with coinfection from Taiwan.47Among97coinfected pa-tients with HCV genotype1treated for48weeks,72% had a sustained virological response,remaining HCV RNA negative at least6months after stopping therapy.Among64coinfected patients with HCV genotype2or 3,83%had a sustained virological response,rates that were similar to those in monoinfected patients with chronic hepatitis C.In addition11%of patients became HBsAg-negative and thus,in a small proportion,therapy was effective for both infections.Therefore,HBV coin-fection does not appear to affect response rates to therapy of hepatitis C.Whether HCV coinfection affects rates of response to hepatitis B is unclear,but there is no evidence that HBV suppression with nucleoside analog therapy is affected by concurrent HCV infection.It may be advis-able to attempt to treat hepatitis C(with peginterferon and ribavirin)before embarking on long-term nucleoside analog therapy of hepatitis B.HBV-HDV CoinfectionHepatitis D(delta)virus(HDV)only infects persons who have coincidental HBV infection.HBV-HDV infec-tion is relatively common in Mediterranean areas and in South America where it is estimated to affect5%of pa-tients infected with HBV.Chronic HDV infection is less common in the United States and Northern Europe where only1%of HBV-infected individuals also carry HDV infection.HDV coinfection is associated with more severe disease with a higher incidence of cirrhosis.48 A Taiwanese study of acute HCV or HDV in patients infected with HBV followed for as long as20years showed that one-third of coinfected patients developed hepatic decompensation with a mortality of10%in HCV-coinfected and7%in HDV-coinfected patients.49 Cirrhosis developed in48%of the patients who were HBV-HCV coinfected compared to21%of those who were HBV-HDV coinfected.But23%of patients in both groups lost HBsAg by20years.These results were in contrast to an Italian study in which cirrhosis was found in15%of patients with HBV monoinfection,compared to43%of patients coinfected with HBV-HDV,and29% of patients coinfected with HBV-HCV.45In one study, therapy with high doses of interferon for48weeks im-proved survival in adults,50but in another study it was not beneficial in children.51More recently,12patients with chronic hepatitis D received peginterferon alfa-2b for48 weeks.Six months later,undetectable HDV RNA and normal ALT were noted in17%.However,in those who did not achieve a3log10decrease in HDV RNA levels by month6,no patient had a lasting response(negative pre-dictive value was100%).Liver histology improved in re-sponders compared with nonresponders at the end of follow-up(13.5versus8.0;PϽ0.02).52A study of38 patients evaluated the utility of addition of24weeks of ribavirin with peginterferon alfa-2b for72weeks.53Addi-tion of ribavirin was not beneficial and almost30%ofHEPATOLOGY,Vol.49,No.5,Suppl.,2009PETERS S151。

相关文档
最新文档