Hypoglycemia as a driver of cardiovascular risk in diabetes.
英文版 心脏病与2型糖尿病

Ann.N.Y.Acad.Sci.ISSN0077-8923 ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCESIssue:The Year in Diabetes and ObesityCardiovascular disease and glycemic control in type2 diabetes:now that the dust is settling from largeclinical trialsFrancesco Giorgino,Anna Leonardini,and Luigi LaviolaDepartment of Emergency and Organ Transplantation,Section of Internal Medicine,Endocrinology,Andrology and Metabolic Diseases,University of Bari Aldo Moro,Bari,ItalyAddress for correspondence:Francesco Giorgino,M.D.,Ph.D.,Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Section of Internal Medicine,Endocrinology,Andrology and Metabolic Diseases,University of Bari Aldo Moro,Piazza Giulio Cesare,11,I-70124Bari,Italy.francesco.giorgino@uniba.itThe relationship between glucose control and cardiovascular outcomes in type2diabetes has been a matter of controversy over the years.Although epidemiological evidence exists in favor of an adverse role of poor glucose control on cardiovascular events,intervention trials have been less conclusive.The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes(ACCORD)study,the Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease(ADV ANCE)study,and the Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial(V ADT)have shown no beneficial effect of intensive glucose control on primary cardiovascular endpoints in type2diabetes.However,subgroup analysis has provided evidence suggesting that the potential beneficial effect largely depends on patients’characteristics,including age,diabetes duration,previous glucose control,presence of cardiovascular disease,and risk of hypoglycemia.The benefit of strict glucose control on cardiovascular outcomes and mortality may be indeed hampered by the extent and frequency of hypoglycemic events and could be enhanced if glucose-lowering medications,capable of exerting favorable effects on the cardiovascular system,were used.This review examines the relationship between intensive glucose control and cardiovascular outcomes in type2diabetes,addressing the need for individualization of glucose targets and careful consideration of the benefit/risk profile of antidiabetes medications.Keywords:type2diabetes;HbA1c;macrovascular disease;blood pressure;lipids;hypoglycemia;glucagon-like peptide-1;ADV ANCE;ACCORD;V ADTIntroductionCardiovascular disease(CVD)is the major cause of death in patients with type2diabetes(T2D), as more than60%of T2D patients die of my-ocardial infarction(MI)or stroke,and an even greater proportion of patients have serious burden-some complications.1The impact of glucose low-ering on cardiovascular complications is a hotly debated issue.The United Kingdom Prospective Di-abetes Study(UKPDS)was thefirst clinical trial to provide key evidence of the importance of using in-tensive therapy for diabetes control in individuals with newly diagnosed T2D.However,although the insulin or sulphonylurea-based intensified glucose-control treatment was effective in reducing the risk of major microvascular endpoints,the effects on CVD risk were modest and did not reach statisti-cal significance.2Recent large clinical trials(often referred to as“megatrials”),the Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease(ADV ANCE),3Action to Con-trol Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes(ACCORD),4 and the Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial(V ADT),5 reported no significant decrease in primary cardio-vascular endpoints with intensive glucose control. In the ADV ANCE study,11,140type2diabet-ics were randomly assigned to receive either stan-dard or intensive glucose control,defined as the use of gliclazide plus any other drug required to achieve a glycosylated hemoglobin(HbA1c)level of 6.5%or less(Table1).3After a median follow-up of 5.0years,the mean HbA1c was lower in thedoi:10.1111/nyas.12044Giorgino et al.Intensive glucose control and cardiovascular risk Table1.Age,diabetes duration,median follow-up,HbA1c values,and outcomes in the ACCORD and ADV ANCE studies and the V ADTDiabetes HbA1c(%):duration(year):Median intensive Primary All-cause Age intensive follow-up History versus endpoint HR mortality HR Study(year)versus standard(year)of CVD standard Primary endpoint(95%CI)(95%CI)ACCORD(n=10,251)62.2±6.810vs.10 3.435% 6.4vs.7.5Nonfatal MI,nonfatalstroke,or death fromCVD0.90(0.78–1.04) 1.22(1.01–1.46)ADV ANCE (n=11,140)66±6.08.0±6.4vs.7.9±6.35.032%6.53±0.91vs.7.30±1.26Death fromcardiovascular causes,nonfatal MI,ornonfatal stroke0.94(0.84–1.06)0.93(0.83–1.06)V ADT(n=1,791)60±9.011.5±8vs.11.5±75.640%6.9vs.8.4MI,stroke,death fromCVD,CHF,surgery forvascular disease,inoperable CAD,oramputation forischemic gangrene0.88(0.74–1.05) 1.07(0.81–1.42)intensive control group(6.5%vs.7.3%),with a reduction in the incidence of combined major macrovascular and microvascular events primarily because of a reduction in the incidence of nephropa-thy.There were no significant effects of the inten-sive glucose control on major macrovascular events, death from cardiovascular causes,or death from any cause.Similarly,in the V ADT,1,791suboptimally controlled type2diabetics,40%with established CVD,were randomized to receive either intensive glucose control,targeting an absolute reduction of 1.5%in HbA1c levels,or standard glucose control (Table1).5After a median follow-up of5.6years, HbA1c was lower in the intensive-therapy group (6.9%vs.8.4%).Nevertheless,there was no sig-nificant difference between the two groups in the incidence of major cardiovascular events,or in the rate of death from any cause.ACCORD was another study designed to determine whether intensive glu-cose control would reduce the rate of cardiovas-cular events(Table1).4In this study,10,251type 2diabetics with median baseline HbA1c of8.1% were randomly assigned to receive either intensive therapy targeting an HbA1c level within the normal range,that is,below6.0%,or standard therapy tar-geting HbA1c between7.0%and7.9%.The primary outcome was a composite of nonfatal MI,nonfatal stroke,or death from cardiovascular causes.Even though the rate of nonfatal MI was significantly lower in the intensive therapy arm,thefinding of higher all-cause and cardiovascular cause mortal-ity in this group led to discontinuation of the in-tensive therapy after a mean follow-up of3.5years (Fig.1).Notably,hypoglycemia requiring assistance and weight gain of more than10kg were more fre-quent in the intensive therapy group.The results of the ACCORD study raised concern about not only the effectiveness but also the safety of inten-sive glycemic control in type2diabetics.Prespec-ified subgroup analysis of the participants in this trial suggested that patients in the intensive group without history of cardiovascular event before ran-domization or whose baseline HbA1c level was8.0% or less may have had fewer fatal or nonfatal car-diovascular events than did patients in the standard therapy group.Several recent meta-analyses of randomized con-trolled trials have also investigated the effects of intensive glucose lowering on all-cause mortal-ity,cardiovascular death,and vascular events in T2D.6–10In the largest and most recent meta-analysis by Boussageon et al.,13studies were in-cluded.6Of the34,533patients evaluated,18,315 received intensive glucose-lowering treatment and 16,218standard treatment.Intensive treatment did not significantly affect all-cause mortality or cardiovascular death.The results of this meta-analysis showed limited benefit of intensive glucose-lowering therapy on all-cause mortality and deaths from cardiovascular causes,and a10%reduction in the risk of microalbuminuria.6Results from other meta-analyses have also shown no effects ofIntensive glucose control and cardiovascular risk Giorgino etal.Figure 1.Effects of intensive glucose control on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality and myocardial infarction in the ACCORD study.CV,cardiovascular.∗P<0.05.Adapted from Ref.4.intensive glucose control on all-cause or cardiovas-cular mortality,while indicating a modest15–17% reduction in the incidence of nonfatal MI in these cohorts.7–10Several potential factors could have contributed to limit the potential benefit of intensive glucose-lowering therapies on CVD prevention in T2D in-dividuals in studies such as the ACCORD and AD-V ANCE and the V ADT:(1)Concomitant targeting of other potentiallymore potent cardiovascular risk factors,suchas blood pressure and lipids,might havedampened the favorable effects of controllinghyperglycemia.(2)Intensive control of hyperglycemia could havebeen directed to patients unable to exhibit theexpected benefit due to their specific clinicalcharacteristics(“wrong”patients).(3)Limited benefit might have derived from usingglucose-lowering drugs with no favorable im-pact on the global cardiovascular risk profile.(4)Glucose-lowering drugs might have producedadverse effects on the cardiovascular systemby inducing weight gain and hypoglycemicevents,resulting in somewhat increased riskfor CVD and mortality(“imperfect”drugs).(5)Excess mortality might have potentially re-sulted from using too many drugs and/or toocomplex drug regimens,leading to undesir-able drug–drug interactions with a potentiallyharmful impact on patients’health.These diverse factors and their potential role in the relationship between intensive glucose control and CVD/mortality are outlined in Figure2,and will be discussed individually below.Limited benefit due to other therapies Although several studies have focused on intensive glycemic control to decrease the risks of macrovas-cular and microvascular diseases in T2D,glucose control is only one of the factors to be considered. Comprehensive risk factor management,including blood pressure control,lipid management,weight reduction in overweight or obese individuals,and smoking cessation,are also needed.The results of the ACCORD and ADV ANCE studies and the V ADT should be interpreted in the context of comprehen-sive care of patients with diabetes.Interventions for simultaneous optimal control of comorbidities of-ten present in type2diabetics,such as hyperten-sion and hyperlipidemia,have been shown to be a more effective strategy in reducing cardiovascular risk than targeting only blood glucose levels per se.11 Evidence for an aggressive approach to lipid and blood pressure control was supported by the re-sults from the Steno-2study.11,12In Steno-2,inves-tigators used intensified multifactorial intervention with improved glycemia,renin–angiotensin system blockers,aspirin,and lipid-lowering agents and evaluated whether this approach would have an ef-fect on the rates of death from cardiovascular causes and from any cause.11,12The primary endpoint at 13.3years of follow-up was the time to death from any cause.Intensive therapy was also associated with a significantly lower risk of death from cardiovascu-lar causes and of cardiovascular events.The Steno-2study did demonstrate a difference in levels of glycemia achieved when compared with the AC-CORD study:4,11HbA1c was a mean of8.4%at study entry and7.9%at end of study intervention for the intensively treated group,whereas it was8.8%at baseline and9.0%at study end for conventional treatment.In addition,only a limited proportion of subjects in the intensively treated group reached an HbA1c level of less than6.5%(i.e.,∼15%),and this proportion was not statistically different than in the conventionally treated group,indicating poor success in achieving the prespecified glucose target and somewhat reducing the relevance of the spe-cific intervention on the hyperglycemia component for CVD and microvascular disease prevention.The observational study has continued,and the differ-ences observed in glycemia between intensive andGiorgino et al.Intensive glucose control and cardiovascularriskFigure2.Relationship between intensive glucose control and cardiovascular outcomes and mortality in the ACCORD study and other megatrials.The potential mechanisms affecting this relationship and limiting the clinical benefit are outlined in the box on the left.CV,cardiovascular;CVD,cardiovascular disease.conventional treatments are much less than at endof intervention.Nevertheless,over the long-termperiod of follow-up,intensive intervention with avaried drug regimen and lifestyle modification hadsustained beneficial effects with respect to vascularcomplications and rates of death from any cause andfrom cardiovascular causes.12Blood pressureThe ACCORD study also had an embedded bloodpressure trial that examined whether blood pressurelowering to systolic blood pressure(SBP)less than120mm Hg provided greater cardiovascular protec-tion than a SBP of130–140mm Hg in T2D patientsat high risk for CVD.13A total of4,733participantswere randomly assigned to intensive therapy(SBP <120mm Hg)or standard therapy(SBP<140mm Hg),with the mean follow-up being4.7years.Theblood pressure levels achieved in the intensive andstandard groups were119/64mm Hg and133/70mm Hg,respectively;this difference was attainedwith an average of3.4medications per participantin the intensive group and2.1in the standard ther-apy group.The intensive antihypertensive therapyin the ACCORD blood pressure trial did not consid-erably reduce the primary cardiovascular outcomeor the rate of death from any cause.However,theintensive arm of blood pressure control reduced therate of total stroke and nonfatal stroke,with the estimated number needed to treat with intensive blood pressure therapy to prevent one stroke over five years being89.There were indicators of possi-ble harm associated with intensive blood pressure lowering(SBP<120mm Hg),including a rate of serious adverse events in the intensive arm.It should be noted that of the subjects investigated in the ACCORD glucose control trial∼85%were on antihypertensive medications,and their blood pres-sure levels were126.4/66.9and127.4/67.7in the intensive and standard groups,respectively,a differ-ence that was statistically significant(P<0.001) (Table2).4Thus,the effects of intensive glucose lowering on the CVD and other outcomes were ex-amined in a context in which blood pressure was being actively targeted,with possible differences between the intensively and conventionally treated cohorts.The ADV ANCE study also included a blood pres-sure intervention trial.In this study,treatment with an angiotensin converting enzyme(ACE)inhibitor and a thiazide-type diuretic reduced the rate of death but not the composite macrovascular out-come.However,this trial had no specified targets for the randomized comparison,and the mean SBP in the intensive group(135mm Hg)was not as low as the mean SBP in the ACCORD standard-therapy group.14However,a post hoc analysis of blood pres-sure control in6,400patients with diabetes andIntensive glucose control and cardiovascular risk Giorgino et al. Table2.Blood pressure and lipid levels and use of statin,antihypertensive medications,and aspirin in the ACCORD and ADV ANCE studies and the V ADT participants at study end(adapted from Refs.3–5)ACCORD(n=10,251)aADV ANCE(n=11,140)b V ADT(n=1,791)cStandard Intensive Standard Intensive Standard Intensive Blood pressure(mm Hg)Systolic128±16126±17137±18135±17125±15127±16 Diastolic68±1067±1074±1073±1069±1068±10 Cholesterol(mg/dL)LDL87±3387±33103±41102±3880±3180±33 HDL49±13(♂)49±13(♂)48±1448±1441±1240±1140±11(♀)40±10(♀)Total164±42163±42153±40150±40 Triglycerides(mg/dL)166±114160±125161±102151±94159±104151±173 On statin(%)888848468385 On antihypertensivemedications(%)858389887576 On aspirin(%)767655578586a Intensive(target HbA1c<6%)vs.standard(HbA1c7–7.9%).b Intensive(target HbA1c<6.5%)vs.standard(HbA1c>6.5%).c Intensive(target HbA1c4.8–6.0%)vs.standard(HbA1c8–9.0%).Abbreviations:HDL,high-density lipoprotein;LDL,low-density lipoprotein;♂,men;♀,women.coronary artery disease enrolled in the International Verapamil/Trandolapril Study(INVEST)demon-strated that tight control(<130mm Hg)was not associated with improved cardiovascular outcomes compared with usual care(130–140mm Hg).15In the V ADT,blood pressure,lipids,diet,and lifestyle were treated identically in both arms.By improving blood pressure control in an identical manner in both glucose arms,the V ADT excluded the effect of blood pressure differences on cardiovas-cular events between treatment arms and reduced the overall risk of macrovascular complications dur-ing the trial.5Participants in the V ADT(n=1,791) with hypertension(72.1%of total)received stepped treatment to maintain blood pressure below the tar-get of130/80mm Hg in standard and intensive glycemic treatment groups.Blood pressure levels of all subjects at baseline and on-study were analyzed to detect associations with cardiovascular risk.The primary outcome was the time from randomiza-tion to thefirst occurrence of MI,stroke,conges-tive heart failure,surgery for vascular disease,in-operable coronary disease,amputation for ischemic gangrene,or cardiovascular death.From data analy-sis,increased risk of cardiovascular events with SBP ≥140mm Hg emphasizes the need for treatment of systolic hypertension.Also,this study for the first time demonstrated that diastolic blood pressure (DBP)<70mm Hg in T2D patients was indepen-dently associated with elevated cardiovascular risk, even when SBP was on target.16Lipid profileIt has been widely demonstrated that intensive targeting of low-density lipoprotein(LDL)choles-terol contributes to CVD prevention in T2D.As a consequence,most guidelines suggest a target LDL-cholesterol level below100mg/dL as the primary goal in T2D individuals,with the option of achieving an LDL-cholesterol level below70mg/dL in those with overt CVD.Regarding the overall lipid-lowering approach in the ACCORD glucose control study,it should be observed that mean LDL cholesterol was below90mg/dL in both the intensive and standard glucose control arms,and that88%of subjects were on statin therapy.4Thus, the results from this study do not clarify whether lipid control and glycemic control,respectively,areGiorgino et al.Intensive glucose control and cardiovascularriskFigure3.All-cause mortality in intensive versus standard glycemia groups according to use of antihypertensive medications, statins,and aspirin in the ACCORD and ADV ANCE studies.∗P=0.0305for subjects on aspirin versus subjects not on aspirin. Adapted from Refs.3and18.related or synergistic,since the large majority of enrolled subjects were already receiving a lipid control regimen.Data from the Steno-2trial on combined control of glucose,lipids,and blood pressure levels demonstrated significant short-and long-term benefits from this multifactorial approach.11In the study,the effect seemed to be cumulative rather than synergistic.Recent results from the ACCORD-LIPID study indicate that intensive lipid control(i.e.,addition of afibrate to statin therapy)does not reduce car-diovascular events.17Specifically,the lipid-lowering arm of ACCORD failed to demonstrate any ben-efit of add-on therapy with fenofibrate to LDL-lowering treatment with HMG-CoA reductase in-hibitors(statins)on vascular outcomes in patients with diabetes.However,data from earlier studies and from a subgroup analysis of ACCORD indi-cate a probable benefit of adding treatment with fibric acid derivatives to individuals with persis-tently elevated triglyceride levels and low high-density lipoprotein(HDL)cholesterol despite statin therapy.17In the ACCORD and ADV ANCE studies and the V ADT,a large proportion of subjects,ranging from55%to85%,were also treated with aspirin (Table2).Thus,results from ADV ANCE,ACCORD, and V ADT suggest that a large proportion of par-ticipants in these trials,which were being treated intensively or less intensively for glucose targets, received extensive antihypertensive,lipid-lowering, and antiplatelet medications.Median levels of SBP, SDP,and LDL cholesterol in these cohorts were also indicative of a significant proportion of them be-ing adequately controlled for blood pressure and lipid targets(Table2).Therefore,the possibility ex-ists that active interventions for simultaneous con-trol of hypertension and hyperlipidemia and use of aspirin may have affected the impact of intensive glucose control on cardiovascular outcomes in the megatrials.Subgroups analyses,however,do not ap-parently support this conclusion(Fig.3).Whether patients were on antihypertensive or lipid-lowering medications was not associated with a different out-come of the intensive glucose control on mortality in ACCORD and ADV ANCE patients,even thoughIntensive glucose control and cardiovascular risk Giorgino et al.the different groups were largely unbalanced in size. Only aspirin use in the ACCORD study seemed to modulate the effects of intensive versus standard glucose control on mortality.18The“wrong patient”concept and the need for individualization of glucose targets The ADV ANCE and ACCORD studies and the V ADT provide conflicting evidence of mortality risk with intensive glycemic control.These trials showed an approximate15%reduction in nonfatal MI with no benefit or harm in all-cause or cardiovascular mortality.Potential explanations for the lack of im-pact of intensive glycemic control on CVD can be found in the patients’characteristics.Indeed,these studies were of shorter duration and enrolled gener-ally older patients than previous studies,including the DCCT and UKPDS in which the intensive con-trol had shown better outcomes.In addition,mean diabetes duration was longer and a greater portion of patients had established CV disease in the mega-trials(approximately32–40%)than in earlier trials (Table1).It is also possible that the follow-up of these studies was too short to detect a clinical ben-efit.Consistent with this hypothesis,in the UKPDS no macrovascular benefit was noted in the inten-sive control arm in thefirst10years of follow-up. Nevertheless,posttrial monitoring for an additional 10years(UKPDS80)revealed a15%risk reduction in MI and13%reduction in all-cause mortality in the intensive treatment group.19A possible explanation is that the wrong patients were investigated in the megatrials(Fig.2).Indeed, the population of the ACCORD study may not rep-resent the average patient with T2D in clinical prac-tice.Participants in this trial had T2D on average for10years at the time of enrollment,had higher HbA1c levels than most type2diabetic patients in the United States and most Western countries to-day(average of8.2%at baseline),and had known heart disease or at least two risk factors in addi-tion to diabetes,such as high blood pressure,high cholesterol levels,obesity,and smoking.4In the UKPDS,the benefits of intensive glycemic control on CVD were observed only after a long duration of intervention in newly diagnosed younger patients.2 In older patients with T2D with longer disease dura-tion,atherosclerotic disease may already have been established and thus intensive glucose control may have had little benefit.Conversely,patients with shorter disease duration,lower HbA1c,and/or lack of established CVD might have benefited signifi-cantly from more intensive glycemic control.20,21 Relevant to this concept,the V ADT showed that ad-vanced CVD,as demonstrated by computed tomog-raphy(CT)-detectable coronary artery calcium,was associated with negative outcomes.In a substudy co-hort of301T2D participants in V ADT,the ability of intensive glucose therapy compared with standard therapy to reduce cardiovascular events was exam-ined based on the extent of coronary atherosclerosis as measured by a CT-detectable coronary artery cal-cium score(CAC).The data showed that there was a progressive diminution of the benefit of intensive glucose control with increasing CAC.In patients with CAC≤100,1of52individuals experienced an event(HR for intensive therapy=0.08;range, 0.008–0.770;P=0.03),whereas11of62patients with a CAC>100had an event(HR=0.74;range, 0.46–1.20;P=0.21).Thus,this subgroup analy-sis indicates that intensive glycemic therapy may be most effective in those with less extensive coronary atherosclerosis.22Why does intensive treatment of hyperglycemia appear to be ineffective in reducing cardiovascular events in T2D with advanced atherosclerosis?Two potential mechanisms may be involved.First,once the atherosclerotic plaque has developed,modified lipoproteins,activated vascular cells,and altered im-mune cell signaling may generate a self-propagating process that maintains atherogenesis,even in the face of improved glucose control.Second,advanced glycosylation end-product formation,which may be involved in CVD,is not readily reversible and may require more than three tofive years of in-tensive glucose control to be reverted.Thus,the presence of multiple cardiovascular risk factors or established CVD may have reduced the benefits of intensive glycemic control in the high-risk cohort of ACCORD,ADV ANCE,and V ADT compared with the low-risk population of the UKPDS cohort,of whom only a minority had prior CVD.23The pres-ence of long-standing disease and prolonged prior poor glycemic control may be additional factors ac-celerating the progression of atherosclerotic lesions in T2D.The goal of individualizing HbA1c targets has gained more attraction after these recent clinical trials in older patients with established T2D failed to show a benefit from intensive glucose-loweringGiorgino et al.Intensive glucose control and cardiovascular riskTable3.Potential criteria for individualization of glucose targets in type2diabetes2–5,25,29HbA1c HbA1c Criterion<6.5–7.0%7.0–8.0% Age(years)<55>60 Diabetes duration(years)<10>10Life expectancy(years)>5<5 Possibility to performIGC for>5yearsYes No Usual HbA1c level(%)<8.0>8.0 CVD No Yes Prone to hypoglycemia No No Reduction of HbA1clevel upon IGCYes NoAbbreviations:CVD,cardiovascular disease;IGC,in-tensive glucose control.therapies on CVD outcomes.Recommendations suggest that the goals should be individualized,such that(1)certain populations(children,pregnant women,and elderly patients)require special con-siderations and(2)more stringent glycemic goals (i.e.,a normal HbA1c<6.0%)may further re-duce complications at the cost of increased risk of hypoglycemia.24For the latter,the recommen-dations also suggest that less intensive glycemic goals may be indicated in patients with severe or frequent hypoglycemia.With regard to the less intensive glycemic goals,perhaps consideration should be given to the high-risk patient with mul-tiple risk factors and CVD,as evaluated in the ACCORD study.4Thus,aiming for a HbA1c of 7.0–8.0%may be a reasonable goal in patients with very long duration of diabetes,history of se-vere hypoglycemia,advanced atherosclerosis,sig-nificant comorbidities,and advanced age/frailty (Table3),even though with what priority each one of these criteria should be considered is not clear at present(current recommendations from scientific societies also do not provide this spe-cific information).In younger patients without documented macrovascular disease or the above-mentioned conditions,the goal of attaining an HbA1c<6.5–7.0%may provide long-lasting bene-fits.In patients with limited life expectancy,more liberal HbA1c values may be pursued.In deter-mining the HbA1c target for CVD prevention,one should consider that at least three tofive years are usually required before possible differences in the incidence of nonfatal MI in T2D are observed.2 Thus,a clinical setting that allows tight glucose control to be implemented for this period of time should be available.Finally,an excess mortality was observed in the ACCORD study in those T2D in-dividuals who showed an unexpected increase in HbA1c levels upon institution of intensive glucose control.25Accordingly,patients exhibiting the pat-tern of worsening glycemic control when exposed to intensive treatment should be set at higher glucose targets(Table3).The above guidelines are apparently incorpo-rated into the updated version of the American Diabetes Association and the European Associa-tion for the Study of Diabetes recommendations on the management of hyperglycemia in nonpreg-nant adults with T2D.The new recommendations are less prescriptive and more patient centered.In-dividualized treatment is explicitly defined as the cornerstone of success.Treatment strategies should be tailored to individual patient needs,preferences, and tolerances and based on differences in age and disease course.Other factors affecting individual-ized treatment plans include specific symptoms,co-morbid conditions,weight,race/ethnicity,sex,and lifestyle.26Current“imperfect”glucose-lowering drugsThe inability of ACCORD,ADV ANCE,and V ADT to demonstrate significant reductions in CVD out-comes with intensive glycemic control also suggests that current pharmacological tools for treating hy-perglycemia in patients with more advanced T2D may have counterbalancing consequences for the cardiovascular system.The available agents used to treat diabetes have not been conclusively shown to reduce macrovascular disease and,in some in-stances,their chronic use may promote negative cardiovascular effects in diabetic subjects despite improvement of hyperglycemia.Importantly,these adverse cardiovascular side effects appear in several instances to be directly due to the mode of drug ac-tion.Selection of a treatment regimen for patients with T2D includes evaluation of the effects of med-ications on overall cardiovascular risk.27 Sulfonylureas have the benefit of acting rapidly to lower glucose levels but,unfortunately,on a。
-糖苷酶抑制剂阿卡波糖的临床药理作用

α-糖苷酶抑制剂阿卡波糖的临床药理作用刘志峰1, 2*李春梅1 李敏1 李慎军2刘珂1, 2*(1烟台大学药学院,2山东省天然药物工程技术研究中心,山东省烟台市,264005)中国图书分类号文献标识码文章编号阿卡波糖的降血糖作用,已经得到认可。
长期服用阿卡波糖在血糖尤其是餐后血糖得到有效控制后,还观察到对糖尿病病人的血脂代谢,血压的控制以及胃肠道功能的改善等方面具有明显的作用。
此外,其继发的饱食作用可以明显改善病人的饥饿感。
关键词糖尿病阿卡波糖Alpha -glucosidase inhibitor - the clinical pharmacological effects of acarboseLIU Zhi-Feng1, 2, LI Chun-Mei1, LI Min1, LI Shen-Jun2, LIU Ke1,2(1 School of Pharmacy, Yantai University; 2 Shandong Engineering Research Center of Natural Drug, Yantai, Shandong Province, 264005 )The hypoglycemia effect of acarbose has been recognized in the clinical treatment of diabetics. After the hyperglycemia, especially the postprandial hyperglycemia has been availably knocked-down, the other favorable effects including the metabolism of blood lipid, the control of hypertension and the improvement of gastrocolic function also have been observed during the long term use of acarbose. Otherwise, the hungry feeling of the diabetic patients also ameliorated because of the satiation ensued from the inhibition of decompos ition of polysaccharide.KEY WORD acarbose ; diabetes预防糖尿病血管并发症是糖尿病治疗的主要目标,其中控制血糖是关键的治疗措施。
严重鱼精蛋白过敏1例报告

严重鱼精蛋白过敏1例报告发表时间:2012-08-09T08:43:23.797Z 来源:《中外健康文摘》2012年第17期供稿作者:李宝芝[导读] 从本例患者的临床资料来看,该患者属于重型鱼精蛋白过敏。
李宝芝(云南省昆明市延安医院心胸外科手术室云南昆明 650051)【中图分类号】R595.9【文献标识码】A【文章编号】1672-5085(2012)17-0108-02我院2010年5月在体外循环下心内直视手术中出现一例鱼精蛋白严重过敏反应,经抢救无效死亡,现报告如下:1 病例患者,男,48岁,因劳累后心悸,胸闷2年而入院。
入院后,经体征、心脏彩超、心电图、胸片等检查后诊断为风湿性心脏病二尖瓣狭窄并关闭不全、主动脉瓣关闭不全。
经过术前准备后,择期于全麻体外循环下行主动脉瓣、二尖瓣机械瓣膜置换。
术中置换圣犹达23主动脉瓣号、27号二尖瓣。
术后心脏自动复跳。
体外循环停机供血结束后,心率89次/分,血压88/60mmHg,各项生命体征平稳。
由颈内静脉缓慢推注鱼精蛋白(3mmg/kg),中和肝素。
两分钟后,血压突然出现进行性下降,立即给多巴胺5mg静脉推注,血压继续下降至50/38mmHg,心肌收缩无力,监护导联显示为窦性心动过缓并频发室性早搏(46次/分)。
给肾上腺素1mg,同时开始重新建立体外循环,于5分钟后重新体外循环转流。
期间用甲基强的松龙400mmg、肾上腺素1mmg、氯化钙0.5g、阿托品1mg等,直到体外转流后血压才开始回升。
期间最低血压为37/34mmHg,心率为22次/分,体外循环后给甲基强的松龙、护心通、速尿等抗过敏,保护重要脏器。
转流102分钟后,待各项指标平稳后停机,关胸后送ICU继续治疗。
术后6天死于肾功能衰竭。
2 讨论鱼精蛋白是中和肝素抗凝作用的常用药物,广泛的应用于体外循环心内直视手术。
但鱼精蛋白是一种异种蛋白,部分病人在使用中会产生过敏反应。
肝素带强负电荷,通过血浆中的抗凝血酶Ⅲ(AT-Ⅲ)来抑制凝血过程,鱼精蛋白呈强碱性,其作用与肝素相反,阻止AT-Ⅲ的活性抑制肝素的抗凝作用[1]。
2020中国动态血压监测指南

摘要高血压是心脑血管疾病的重要危险因素。
动态血压监测已成为识别和诊断高血压、评估心脑血管疾病风险、评估降压疗效、指导个体化降压治疗不可或缺的检测手段。
本指南对2015年发表的《动态血压监测临床应用专家共识》进行了更新,详细介绍了动态血压计的选择与监测方法、动态血压监测的结果判定与临床应用、动态血压监测的适应证、特殊人群动态血压监测、社区动态血压监测应用以及动态血压监测临床应用展望,旨在指导临床实践中动态血压监测的应用。
关键词 动态血压监测;血压管理;指南;高血压2020 Chinese Hypertension League Guidelines on Ambulatory Blood Pressure MonitoringWriting Group of the 2020 Chinese Hypertension League Guidelines on Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.Corresponding Author: WANG Jiguang, Email: jiguangwang@2020中国动态血压监测指南中国高血压联盟《动态血压监测指南》委员会指南与共识AbstractHypertension is an important risk factor for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) has become an indispensable technique for the detection of hypertension, risk assessment of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, therapeutic monitoring, and guidance of the individualized treatment. Based on the “2015 expert consensus on the clinical use of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring”, the current guideline updates recommendations on the major issues of ABPM, such as the device requirements and methodology, interpretation of the reported results, clinical indications, application on special populations, the utility in the community and future perspectives. It aims to guide the clinical application practice of ABPM in China.Key words ambulatory blood pressure monitoring; blood pressure management; guideline; hypertension(Chinese Circulation Journal, 2021, 36: 313.)高血压是心脑血管疾病的重要危险因素,与心脑血管疾病发病和死亡密切相关[1-3]。
心血管功能英语作文高中

心血管功能英语作文高中Cardiovascular Function。
Cardiovascular function refers to the ability of the heart and blood vessels to efficiently transport blood and oxygen throughout the body. A healthy cardiovascular system is essential for overall health and well-being.There are many factors that can affect cardiovascular function, including diet, exercise, stress, and genetics. A diet high in saturated and trans fats can lead to the buildup of plaque in the arteries, which can increase the risk of heart disease and stroke. Regular exercise can help improve cardiovascular function by strengthening the heart and blood vessels, lowering blood pressure, and reducing the risk of obesity and diabetes.Stress can also have a negative impact on cardiovascular function. Chronic stress can cause the release of hormones that increase heart rate and bloodpressure, which can lead to damage to the heart and blood vessels over time. Genetics also play a role in cardiovascular function, as certain genetic mutations can increase the risk of heart disease and other cardiovascular conditions.There are many ways to improve cardiovascular function, including making healthy lifestyle choices such as eating a balanced diet, getting regular exercise, managing stress, and avoiding tobacco and excessive alcohol consumption. In some cases, medication or surgery may be necessary to treat cardiovascular conditions.Overall, maintaining a healthy cardiovascular system is essential for a long and healthy life. By making healthy lifestyle choices and seeking medical care when necessary, individuals can improve their cardiovascular function and reduce their risk of developing cardiovascular disease.。
低血糖-HYPOGLYCEMIA

Prevention
• Quit smoking • Avoid excessive drinking and drinking on an
empty stomach • Have a balanced diet and take in enough sugar • Follow the doctor's advice and take drugs
HYPOGLYCEMIA
Abnormally Low Blood Sugar Concentration
Characteristic Of Hypoglycemia
1.Central Nervous System(CNS) symptoms confusion,aberrant behavior or coma;
• Severe disease Liver failure, Heart failure, Kidney failure,Poor nutrition
• Lack of insulin antagonist hormone Glucagon,Epinephrine, Growth hormone, Cortisol……
• Relieve symptoms of low blood sugar • Correct various potential cause of the hypoglycemia
Eat/Drink something full of sugar Stop taking hypoglycemic drugs Inject glucose solution intravenously …………
• Excessive drinking
Blood Glucose Regulation
阿格列汀英文说明书
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ HIGHLIGHTS OF PRESCRIBING INFORMATIONThese highlights do not include all the information needed to use KAZANO safely and effectively. See full prescribing information for KAZANO. KAZANO (alogliptin and metformin HCl) tablets for oral administration Initial U.S. Approval: 2013 WARNING: LACTIC ACIDOSIS See full prescribing information for complete boxed warning ∙ Lactic acidosis can occur due to metformin accumulation.The risk increases with conditions such as sepsis,dehydration, excess alcohol intake, hepatic impairment, renal impairment, and acute congestive heart failure. (5.1) ∙ Symptoms include malaise, myalgias, respiratory distress, increasing somnolence, and nonspecific abdominal distress. Laboratory abnormalities include low pH, increased anion gap and elevated blood lactate. (5.1) ∙ If acidosis is suspected, discontinue KAZANO and hospitalize the patient immediately. (5.1) ---------------------------INDICATIONS AND USAGE-------------------------- KAZANO is a dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor and abiguanide combination product indicated as an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. (1.1) Important Limitation of Use: Not for treatment of type 1 diabetes or diabetic ketoacidosis. (1.2)-----------------------DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION---------------------∙Individualize the starting dose of KAZANO based on the patient’s current regimen. (2.1) ∙KAZANO should be taken twice daily with food. (2.1) ∙ May adjust the dosing based on effectiveness and tolerability, while not exceeding the maximum recommended daily dose of 25 mg alogliptin and 2000 mg metformin HCl. (2.1) ---------------------DOSAGE FORMS AND STRENGTHS--------------------Tablets: 12.5 mg alogliptin and 500 mg metformin HCl, 12.5 mg alogliptin and 1000 mg metformin HCl. (3) ----------------------------CONTRAINDICATIONS-------------------------------∙Renal impairment. (4, 5.5) ∙Metabolic acidosis, including diabetic ketoacidosis. (4, 5.1) ∙History of a serious hypersensitivity reaction to alogliptin ormetformin, components of KAZANO, such as anaphylaxis, angioedema or severe cutaneous adverse reactions. (4) -----------------------WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS---------------------- ∙ Lactic acidosis: Warn against excessive alcohol intake. KAZANOis not recommended in hepatic impairment and is contraindicated in renal impairment. Ensure normal renal function before initiating and at least annually thereafter. (5.1) ∙ Acute pancreatitis: There have been postmarketing reports of acutepancreatitis. If pancreatitis is suspected, promptly discontinue KAZANO. (5.2) ∙ Hypersensitivity: There have been postmarketing reports of serious hypersensitivity reactions in patients treated with alogliptin such as anaphylaxis, angioedema and severe cutaneous adverse reactions. In such cases, promptly discontinue KAZANO, assess for otherpotential causes, institute appropriate monitoring and treatment, and initiate alternative treatment for diabetes. (5.3) ∙ Hepatic effects: Postmarketing reports of hepatic failure, sometimesfatal. Causality cannot be excluded. If liver injury is detected, promptly interrupt KAZANO and assess patient for probable cause, then treat cause if possible, to resolution or stabilization. Do notrestart KAZANO if liver injury is confirmed and no alternative etiology can be found. (5.4) ∙ Temporarily discontinue in patients undergoing radiologic studies with intravascular administration of iodinated contrast materials or any surgical procedures necessitating restricted intake of food and fluids. (5.5) ∙ Vitamin B12 deficiency: Metformin may lower Vitamin B12 levels.Monitor hematologic parameters annually. (5.8) ∙ Hypoglycemia: When used with an insulin secretagogue (e.g.,sulfonylurea) or with insulin, a lower dose of the insulin secretagogue or insulin may be required to reduce the risk of hypoglycemia. (5.9) ∙ Macrovascular outcomes: There have been no clinical studiesestablishing conclusive evidence of macrovascular risk reduction with KAZANO or any other antidiabetic drug. (5.10) -----------------------------ADVERSE REACTIONS------------------------------Common adverse reactions reported in ≥4% of patients treated with coadministration of alogliptin with metformin were: upper respiratory tract infection, nasopharyngitis, diarrhea, hypertension, headache, back pain and urinary tract infection. (6.1) To report SUSPECTED ADVERSE REACTIONS, contact Takeda Pharmaceuticals at 1-877-TAKEDA-7 or FDA at 1-800-FDA-1088 or /medwatch.------------------------------DRUG INTERACTIONS-------------------------------Cationic drugs eliminated by renal tubular secretion: Use with caution. (7.2)-----------------------USE IN SPECIFIC POPULATIONS---------------------- ∙ Pregnancy Category B: There are no adequate and well-controlled studies in pregnant women. (8.1) ∙ Pediatrics: Safety and effectiveness of KAZANO in patients below the age of 18 have not been established. (8.4) ∙ Geriatric Use: Caution should be used when prescribing KAZANO to elderly patients because reduced renal functions are associated with increasing age. (8.5) See 17 for PATIENT COUNSELING INFORMATION and Medication Guide Revised: 01/2013FULL PRESCRIBING INFORMATION: CONTENTS*WARNING: LACTIC ACIDOSIS 1 INDICATIONS AND USAGE 1.1 Monotherapy and Combination Therapy1.2 Limitation of Use2 DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION 2.1 Recommendations for All Patients3 DOSAGE FORMS AND STRENGTHS4 CONTRAINDICATIONS5 WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS5.1 Lactic Acidosis5.2 Pancreatitis 5.3 Hypersensitivity Reactions 5.4 Hepatic Effects5.5 Monitoring of Renal Function5.6 Hypoxic States5.8 Vitamin B12 Levels 5.9 Use with Medications Known to Cause Hypoglycemia5.10 Macrovascular Outcomes 6 ADVERSE REACTIONS6.1 Clinical Studies Experience 6.2 Laboratory Abnormalities 6.3 Postmarketing Experience 7 DRUG INTERACTIONS7.1 Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors7.2 Cationic Drugs7.3 The Use of Metformin with Other Drugs 8 USE IN SPECIFIC POPULATIONS 8.1 Pregnancy8.3 Nursing Mothers 8.4 Pediatric Use8.5 Geriatric Use11 DESCRIPTION 14 CLINICAL STUDIES12 CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY 16 HOW SUPPLIED/STORAGE AND HANDLING12.1 Mechanism of Action 17 PATIENT COUNSELING INFORMATION12.2 Pharmacodynamics 17.1 Instructions12.3 Pharmacokinetics* Sections or subsections omitted from the full prescribing information 13 NONCLINICAL TOXICOLOGYare not listed13.1 Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________FULL PRESCRIBING INFORMATIONWARNING: LACTIC ACIDOSIS∙Lactic acidosis is a rare, but serious complication that can occurdue to metformin accumulation. The risk increases withconditions such as sepsis, dehydration, excess alcohol intake,hepatic impairment, renal impairment, and acute congestive heartfailure [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1)].∙The onset is often subtle, accompanied only by nonspecificsymptoms such as malaise, myalgias, respiratory distress,increasing somnolence, and nonspecific abdominal distress.Laboratory abnormalities include low pH, increased anion gapand elevated blood lactate. [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1)] ∙If acidosis is suspected, KAZANO (alogliptin and metformin HCl)should be discontinued and the patient hospitalized immediately.[see Warnings and Precautions (5.1)]1 1 INDICATIONS AND USAGE2 1.1 Monotherapy and Combination Therapy3 KAZANO is indicated as an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve glycemic control in4 adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus in multiple clinical settings when treatment with both5 alogliptin and metformin is appropriate [see Clinical Studies (14)].6 1.2 Limitation of Use7 KAZANO should not be used in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus or for the8 treatment of diabetic ketoacidosis, as it would not be effective in these settings.9 2 DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION10 2.1 Recommendations for All Patients11 ∙Health care providers should individualize the starting dose of KAZANO based on12 the patient’s current regimen.13 ∙KAZANO should be taken twice daily with food with gradual dose escalation to14 reduce the gastrointestinal (GI) side effects due to metformin. KAZANO tablets must15 not be split before swallowing.16 ∙Dosing may be adjusted based on effectiveness and tolerability while not exceeding17 the maximum recommended daily dose of 25 mg alogliptin and 2000 mg metformin18 HCl.19 ∙The following doses are available:20 12.5 mg alogliptin and 500 mg metformin HCl21 12.5 mg alogliptin and 1000 mg metformin HCl22 3 DOSAGE FORMS AND STRENGTHS23 ∙12.5 mg/500 mg tablets are pale yellow, oblong, film-coated tablets with “12.5/500”24 debossed on one side and “322M” debossed on the other side25 ∙12.5 mg/1000 mg tablets are pale yellow, oblong, film-coated tablets with26 “12.5/1000” debossed on one side and “322M” debossed on the other side27 4 CONTRAINDICATIONS28 KAZANO is contraindicated in patients with:29 ∙Renal impairment (e.g., serum creatinine levels ≥1.5 mg/dL for men, ≥1.4 mg/dL for30 women or abnormal creatinine clearance) which may also result from conditions31 such as cardiovascular collapse (shock), acute myocardial infarction, and septicemia32 [see Warnings and Precautions (5.5)].33 ∙Acute or chronic metabolic acidosis, including diabetic ketoacidosis. Diabetic34 ketoacidosis should be treated with insulin.35 ∙History of a serious hypersensitivity reaction to alogliptin or metformin, components36 of KAZANO, such as anaphylaxis, angioedema or severe cutaneous adverse37 reactions.38 5 WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS39 5.1 Lactic Acidosis40 Lactic acidosis is a rare, but serious, metabolic complication that can occur due to41 metformin accumulation during treatment with KAZANO and is fatal in approximately42 50% of cases. Lactic acidosis may also occur in association with a number of43 pathophysiologic conditions, including diabetes mellitus, and whenever there is44 significant tissue hypoperfusion and hypoxemia. Lactic acidosis is characterized by45 elevated blood lactate levels (>5 mmol/L), decreased blood pH, electrolyte disturbances46 with an increased anion gap, and an increased lactate/pyruvate ratio. When metformin47 is implicated as the cause of lactic acidosis, metformin plasma levels >5 mcg/mL are48 generally found.49 The reported incidence of lactic acidosis in patients receiving metformin HCl is very low50 (approximately 0.03 cases/1000 patient years, with approximately 0.015 fatal51 cases/1000 patient years). In more than 20,000 patient years exposure to metformin in52 clinical trials, there were no reports of lactic acidosis. Reported cases have occurred53 primarily in diabetic patients with significant renal impairment, including both intrinsic54 renal disease and renal hypoperfusion, often in the setting of multiple concomitant55 medical/surgical problems and multiple concomitant medications. Patients with56 congestive heart failure requiring pharmacologic management, particularly when57 accompanied by hypoperfusion and hypoxemia due to unstable or acute failure, are at58 increased risk of lactic acidosis. The risk of lactic acidosis increases with the degree of59 renal dysfunction and the patient’s age. The risk of lactic acidosis may, therefore, be60 significantly decreased by regular monitoring of renal function in patients taking61 metformin. In particular, treatment of the elderly should be accompanied by careful62 monitoring of renal function. Metformin treatment should not be initiated in any patients63 unless measurement of creatinine clearance demonstrates that renal function is not64 reduced, as these patients are more susceptible to developing lactic acidosis. In65 addition, metformin should be promptly withheld in the presence of any condition66 associated with hypoxemia, dehydration, or sepsis. Because impaired hepatic function67 may significantly limit the ability to clear lactate, metformin should generally be avoided68 in patients with clinical or laboratory evidence of hepatic impairment. Patients should be69 cautioned against excessive alcohol intake when taking metformin, because alcohol70 potentiates the effects of metformin on lactate metabolism. In addition, metformin71 should be temporarily discontinued prior to any intravascular radiocontrast study and for72 any surgical procedure necessitating restricted intake of food or fluids. Use of73 topiramate, a carbonic anhydrase inhibitor, in epilepsy and migraine prophylaxis may74 frequently cause dose-dependent metabolic acidosis (In controlled trials, 32% and 67%75 for adjunctive treatment in adults and pediatric patents, respectively, and 15 to 25% for76 monotherapy of epilepsy, with decrease in serum bicarbonate to less than 20 mEq/L;77 3% and 11% for adjunctive treatment in adults and pediatric patents, respectively, and 178 to 7% for monotherapy of epilepsy, with decrease in serum bicarbonate to less than 1779 mEq/L) and may exacerbate the risk of metformin-induced lactic acidosis [see Drug80 Interactions (7.1) and Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)].81 The onset of lactic acidosis often is subtle, and accompanied only by nonspecific82 symptoms such as malaise, myalgias, respiratory distress, increasing somnolence, and83 nonspecific abdominal distress. There may be associated hypothermia, hypotension,84 and resistant bradyarrhythmias with more marked acidosis.85 Patients should be educated to promptly report these symptoms should they occur. If86 present, KAZANO should be withdrawn until lactic acidosis is ruled out. Serum87 electrolytes, ketones, blood glucose, blood pH, lactate levels, and blood metformin88 levels may be useful. Once a patient is stabilized on any dose level of metformin,89 gastrointestinal symptoms, which are common during initiation of therapy, are unlikely to90 recur. Later occurrence of gastrointestinal symptoms could be due to lactic acidosis or91 other serious disease.92 Levels of fasting venous plasma lactate above the upper limit of normal but less than93 5 mmol/L in patients taking metformin do not necessarily indicate impending lactic94 acidosis and may be explainable by other mechanisms, such as poorly controlled95 diabetes or obesity, vigorous physical activity, or technical problems in sample handling.96 Lactic acidosis should be suspected in any diabetic patient with metabolic acidosis97 lacking evidence of ketoacidosis (ketonuria and ketonemia).98 Lactic acidosis is a medical emergency that must be treated in a hospital setting. In a99 patient with lactic acidosis who is taking metformin, the drug should be discontinued 100 immediately and general supportive measures promptly instituted. Because metformin 101 is dialyzable (with a clearance of up to 170 mL/min under good hemodynamic102 conditions), prompt hemodialysis is recommended to correct the acidosis and remove 103 the accumulated metformin. Such management often results in prompt reversal of104 symptoms and recovery [see Contraindications (4)].105106 5.2 Pancreatitis107 There have been postmarketing reports of acute pancreatitis in patients taking108 alogliptin. After initiation of KAZANO, patients should be observed carefully for signs 109 and symptoms of pancreatitis. If pancreatitis is suspected, alogliptin should promptly be 110 discontinued and appropriate management should be initiated. It is unknown whether 111 patients with a history of pancreatitis are at increased risk for the development of112 pancreatitis while using KAZANO.113 5.3 Hypersensitivity Reactions114 There have been postmarketing reports of serious hypersensitivity reactions in patients 115 treated with alogliptin. These reactions include anaphylaxis, angioedema, and severe 116 cutaneous adverse reactions including Stevens-Johnson syndrome. If a serious117 hypersensitivity reaction is suspected, discontinue KAZANO, assess for other potential 118 causes for the event, and institute alternative treatment for diabetes [see Adverse119 Reactions (6.3)]. Use caution in patients with a history of angioedema to another DPP-4 120 inhibitor because it is unknown whether such patients will be predisposed to121 angioedema with KAZANO.122 5.4 Hepatic Effects123 There have been postmarketing reports of fatal and non-fatal hepatic failure in patients 124 taking alogliptin, although the reports contain insufficient information necessary to125 establish the probable cause [see Adverse Reactions (6.3)]. In randomized controlled 126 studies, serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevations greater than three times the 127 upper limit of normal (ULN) were observed: 1.3% in alogliptin-treated patients and 1.5% 128 in all comparator-treated patients.129 Patients with type 2 diabetes may have fatty liver disease which may cause liver test 130 abnormalities, and they may also have other forms of liver disease, many of which can 131 be treated or managed. Therefore, obtaining a liver test panel and assessing the patient 132 before initiating KAZANO therapy is recommended. Because impaired hepatic function 133 has been associated with some cases of lactic acidosis with use of metformin, KAZANO 134 should generally be avoided in patients with clinical or laboratory evidence of hepatic 135 disease.136 Measure liver tests promptly in patients who report symptoms that may indicate liver 137 injury, including fatigue, anorexia, right upper abdominal discomfort, dark urine or138 jaundice. In this clinical context, if the patient is found to have clinically significant liver 139 enzyme elevations and if abnormal liver tests persist or worsen, KAZANO should be 140 interrupted and investigation done to establish the probable cause. KAZANO should 141 not be restarted in these patients without another explanation for the liver test142 abnormalities.143144145 5.5 Monitoring of Renal Function146 Metformin is substantially excreted by the kidney, and the risk of metformin147 accumulation and lactic acidosis increases with the degree of impairment. Therefore, 148 KAZANO is contraindicated in patients with renal impairment.149 Before initiation of KAZANO therapy and at least annually thereafter, renal function150 should be assessed and verified as normal. In patients in whom development of renal 151 dysfunction is anticipated, renal function should be assessed more frequently and152 KAZANO discontinued if evidence of renal impairment is present. Metformin treatment 153 should not be initiated in patients ≥80 years of age unless measurement of creatinine 154 clearance demonstrates that renal function is not reduced, as these patients are more 155 susceptible to developing lactic acidosis.156 Use of concomitant medications that may affect renal function or metformin157 disposition158 Concomitant medication(s) that may affect renal function or result in significant159 hemodynamic change or may interfere with the disposition of metformin, such as160 cationic drugs that are eliminated by renal tubular secretion [see Drug Interactions161 (7.2)], should be used with caution.162 Radiological studies and surgical procedures:163 Radiologic studies involving the use of intravascular iodinated contrast materials (for 164 example, intravenous urogram, intravenous cholangiography, angiography, and165 computed tomography) can lead to acute alteration of renal function and have been166 associated with lactic acidosis in patients receiving metformin. Therefore, in patients in 167 whom any such study is planned, KAZANO should be temporarily discontinued at the 168 time of or prior to the procedure, and withheld for 48 hours subsequent to the procedure 169 and reinstituted only after renal function has been re-evaluated and found to be normal. 170 KAZANO therapy should be temporarily suspended for any surgical procedure (except 171 minor procedures not associated with restricted intake of food and fluids) and should not 172 be restarted until the patient’s oral intake has resumed and renal function has been173 evaluated as normal.174 5.6 Hypoxic States175 Cardiovascular collapse (shock) from whatever cause, acute congestive heart failure, 176 acute myocardial infarction and other conditions characterized by hypoxemia have been 177 associated with lactic acidosis and may also cause prerenal azotemia. When such178 events occur in patients on KAZANO therapy, the drug should be promptly179 discontinued.180 5.7 Alcohol Intake181 Alcohol is known to potentiate the effect of metformin on lactate metabolism. Patients, 182 therefore, should be warned against excessive alcohol intake while receiving KAZANO. 183 5.8 Vitamin B12 Levels184 In controlled, 29-week clinical trials of immediate release metformin, a decrease to185 subnormal levels of previously normal serum Vitamin B12 levels, without clinical186 manifestations, was observed in approximately 7% of patients. Such decrease, possibly 187 due to interference with B12 absorption from the B12-intrinsic factor complex is,188 however, very rarely associated with anemia and appears to be rapidly reversible with 189 discontinuation of metformin or Vitamin B12 supplementation. Measurement of190 hematologic parameters on an annual basis is advised in patients on KAZANO and any 191 apparent abnormalities should be appropriately investigated and managed. Certain192 individuals (those with inadequate Vitamin B12 or calcium intake or absorption) appear 193 to be predisposed to developing subnormal Vitamin B12 levels. In these patients,194 routine serum Vitamin B12 measurements at two- to three-year intervals may be useful. 195 5.9 Use with Medications Known to Cause Hypoglycemia196 Alogliptin197 Insulin and insulin secretagogues, such as sulfonylureas, are known to cause198 hypoglycemia. Therefore, a lower dose of insulin or insulin secretagogue may be199 required to reduce the risk of hypoglycemia when used in combination with KAZANO. 200 Metformin hydrochloride201 Hypoglycemia does not occur in patients receiving metformin alone under usual202 circumstances of use, but could occur when caloric intake is deficient, when strenuous 203 exercise is not compensated by caloric supplementation, or during concomitant use with 204 other glucose-lowering agents (such as sulfonylureas and insulin) or ethanol. Elderly, 205 debilitated, or malnourished patients and those with adrenal or pituitary insufficiency or 206 alcohol intoxication are particularly susceptible to hypoglycemic effects. Hypoglycemia 207 may be difficult to recognize in the elderly, and in people who are taking β-adrenergic 208 blocking drugs.209 5.10 Macrovascular Outcomes210 There have been no clinical studies establishing conclusive evidence of macrovascular 211 risk reduction with KAZANO or any other antidiabetic drug.REACTIONS212 6 ADVERSE213 6.1 Clinical Studies Experience214 Because clinical trials are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reaction 215 rates observed in the clinical trials of a drug cannot be directly compared to rates in the 216 clinical trials of another drug and may not reflect the rates observed in practice.217218Alogliptin and Metformin hydrochloride219 Over 2700 patients with type 2 diabetes have received alogliptin coadministered with 220 metformin in four large randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trials. The mean 221 exposure to KAZANO was 58 weeks with more than 1400 subjects treated for more 222 than one year. These included two 26-week placebo controlled studies, one 52-week 223 active control study and an interim analysis of a 104-week active control study. In the 224 KAZANO arm, the mean duration of diabetes was approximately 6 years, the mean 225 body mass index (BMI) was 31 kg/m 2 (56% of patients had a BMI ≥30 kg/m 2), and the 226 mean age was 55 years (18% of patients ≥65 years of age).227 In a pooled analysis of these four controlled clinical studies, the overall incidence of228 adverse reactions was 74% in patients treated with KAZANO compared to 76% treated 229 with placebo. Overall discontinuation of therapy due to adverse events was 6.2% with 230 KAZANO compared to 1.9% in placebo, 6.4% in metformin, and 5.0% in alogliptin. 231 Adverse reactions reported in ≥4% of patients treated with KAZANO and more 232 frequently than in patients who received alogliptin, metformin or placebo are 233 summarized in Table 1. 234Table 1. Adverse Reactions Reported in ≥4% of Patients Treated with KAZANO and More Frequently Than in Patients Receiving Either Alogliptin, Metformin or Placebo Number of Patients (%)KAZANO* Alogliptin † Metformin ‡ Placebo N =2794 N =222 N =1592 N =106 Upper respiratory tractinfection 224 (8.0) 6 (2.7) 105 (6.6) 3 (2.8) Nasopharyngitis 191 (6.8) 7 (3.2) 93 (5.8) 2 (1.9) Diarrhea 155 (5.5) 4 (1.8) 105 (6.6) 3 (2.8) Hypertension 154 (5.5) 5 (2.3) 96 (6.0) 6 (5.7) Headache 149 (5.3) 11 (5.0) 74 (4.6) 3 (2.8) Back pain119 (4.3)1 (0.5)72 (4.5)1 (0.9)Urinary tract infection 116 (4.2) 4 (1.8) 59 (3.7) 2 (1.9)*KAZANO – includes data pooled for patients receiving alogliptin 25 and 12.5 mg combined with variousdose of metformin†Alogliptin – includes data pooled for patients receiving alogliptin 25 and 12.5 mg ‡Metformin – includes data pooled for patients receiving various doses of metformin235Hypoglycemia236 In a 26-week, double-blind, active-controlled study, of alogliptin in combination with 237 metformin, the number of patients reporting hypoglycemia was 1.9% in the alogliptin 238 12.5 mg with metformin HCl 500 mg, 5.3% in the alogliptin 12.5 mg with metformin HCl239 1000 mg, 1.8% in the metformin HCl 500 mg, and 6.3% in the metformin HCl 1000 mg 240 treatment groups.241 In a 26-week placebo-controlled study of alogliptin 25 mg administered once daily as 242 add-on to metformin regimen, the number of patients reporting hypoglycemic events 243 was 0.9% in the alogliptin with metformin and 2.9% in the placebo treatment groups. 244 In a 52-week, active-controlled, double-blind study of alogliptin once daily as add-on 245 therapy to the combination of pioglitazone 30 mg and metformin compared to the246 titration of pioglitazone 30 mg to 45 mg and metformin, the number of patients reporting 247 hypoglycemia was 4.5% in the alogliptin 25 mg with pioglitazone 30 mg and metformin 248 group versus 1.5% in the pioglitazone 45 mg with metformin group.249 In an interim analysis conducted in a 104-week, double-blind, active controlled study, of 250 alogliptin 25 mg in combination with metformin, the number of patients reporting251 hypoglycemia was 1.4% in the alogliptin 25 mg with metformin group versus 23.8% in 252 the glipizide with metformin group.253 Alogliptin254 Approximately 8500 patients with type 2 diabetes have been treated with alogliptin in 14 255 randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trials with approximately 2900 subjects256 randomized to placebo and approximately 2200 to an active comparator. The mean 257 exposure to alogliptin was 40 weeks with more than 2400 subjects treated for more than 258 one year. Among these patients, 63% had a history of hypertension, 51% had a history 259 of dyslipidemia, 25% had a history of myocardial infarction, 8% had a history of unstable 260 angina, and 7% had a history of congestive heart failure. The mean duration of diabetes 261 was 7 years, the mean body mass index (BMI) was 31 kg/m2 (51% of patients had a 262 BMI ≥30 kg/m2), and the mean age was 57 years (24% of patients ≥65 years of age). 263 Two placebo-controlled monotherapy trials of 12 and 26 weeks of duration were264 conducted in patients treated with alogliptin 12.5 mg daily, alogliptin 25 mg daily and 265 placebo. Four placebo-controlled add-on combination therapy trials of 26 weeks266 duration were also conducted: with metformin, with a sulfonylurea, with a267 thiazolidinedione, and with insulin.268 Five placebo-controlled trials of 16 weeks up through two years in duration were269 conducted in combination with metformin, in combination with pioglitazone and with270 pioglitazone added to a background of metformin therapy.271 Three active-controlled trials of 52 weeks in duration were conducted in patients treated 272 with pioglitazone and metformin, in combination with metformin and as monotherapy 273 compared to glipizide.274 In a pooled analysis of these 14 controlled clinical trials, the overall incidence of adverse 275 events was 66% in patients treated with alogliptin 25 mg compared to 62% with placebo 276 and 70% with active comparator. Overall discontinuation of therapy due to adverse277 events was 4.7% with alogliptin 25 mg compared to 4.5% with placebo or 6.2% with 278 active comparator.。
Hyperlipidemia
HyperlipidemiaOn November 12, 2013, the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the American Heart Association (AHA) published four related guidelines on the prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) events, with a focus on cholesterol, obesity, and lifestyle management tools.SummaryDescription∙Hyperlipidemia is a heterogeneous group of disorders characterized by an excess of lipids in the bloodstream. These lipids include cholesterol, cholesterol esters, phospholipids, and triglycerides. Lipids are transported in the blood as large 'lipoproteins'∙Lipoproteins are divided into five major classes, based on density: chylomicrons, very low-density lipoproteins (VLDL), intermediate-density lipoproteins (IDL), low-density lipoproteins (LDL), and high-density lipoproteins (HDL). Most triglyceride is transported in chylomicrons or VLDL, and most cholesterol is carried in LDL and HDL∙Primary hyperlipidemias are probably genetically based, but the genetic defects are known for only a minority of patients∙Secondary hyperlipidemia may result from diseases such as diabetes, thyroid disease, renal disorders, liver disorders, and Cushing's syndrome, as well as obesity, alcohol consumption, estrogen administration, and other drug-associated changes in lipid metabolism∙Hyperlipidemia is a major, modifiable risk factor for atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease, including coronary heart disease; this is true both of disorders involving hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia Synonyms∙Hypercholesterolemia∙Hypertriglyceridemia∙Hyperlipoproteinemia∙Dyslipidemia∙High serum cholesterol∙Hypertriglyceridemia∙Drug therapy for elevated triglycerides is presently available, and new drugs are being developed∙Contrary to widespread belief, hypertriglyceridemia is also a modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular diseaseCardinal features∙Hyperlipidemia is a group of disorders characterized by an excess of serum cholesterol, especially excess LDL-C and/or excess triglycerides ∙Hypercholesterolemia is generally asymptomatic∙Hypertriglyceridemia is generally asymptomatic until triglyceride levels are sustained above 1000 mg/dL - symptoms then include dermatologicmanifestations, such as eruptive xanthomas, and gastrointestinal manifestations, such as pancreatitis∙Hyperlipidemias are most often genetically determined, but can be caused or amplified by abnormal diet, drugs, and certain disease conditions ∙Drugs associated with hyperlipidemias include immunosuppressive therapy, thiazide diuretics, progestins, retinoids, anabolic steroids, glucocorticoids, HIV protease inhibitors, alcohol, retinoic acid, and beta-blockers ∙Diseases associated with secondary hyperlipidemias include diabetes mellitus (type I and type II), hypothyroidism, Cushing's syndrome, chronic kidney disease, nephrotic syndrome, and cholestatic disorders∙Hyperlipidemia is a major modifiable risk factor for atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease, including coronary heart disease∙Treatment goals are based on absolute serum levels of lipids, and/or risk stratification of patients - more aggressive treatment to achieve lower lipid target levels is indicated in higher-risk patients∙Evidence shows that effective therapy to lower serum LDL-C is associated with dramatic benefits in terms of short-term morbidity and mortality in patients with coronary artery disease, and long-term morbidity and mortality even in low-risk patientsCausesCommon causes∙Familial combined hypercholesterolemia is the most common primary lipid disorder, characterized by moderate elevation of plasma triglycerides and cholesterol and reduced plasma HDL-C∙Familial hypertriglyceridemiaRare causesHypercholesterolemia∙Familial hypercholesterolemia with raised cholesterol∙Familial dysbetalipoproteinemia (Type III hyperlipoproteinemia)∙Familial defective apolipoprotein (Apo) B100∙Apo AI deficiency∙Autosomal recessive hypercholesterolemia∙Tangier disease∙Wolman disease∙Sitosterolemia∙Remnant hyperlipoproteinemia with marked combined hyperlipidemia∙Polygenic hypercholesterolemia∙Lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase deficiency∙Cholesteryl ester transfer protein deficiencyHypertriglyceridemia∙Lipoprotein lipase deficiency (familial chylomicronemia syndrome, type I hyperlipoproteinemia) with extremely raised triglycerides and moderately raised cholesterol∙Apo CII deficiencySerious causesHomozygous familial hypercholesterolemia.Contributory or predisposing factorsOther diseases that may contribute to hyperlipidemia include:∙Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus∙Non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus∙Hypothyroidism∙Cushing's syndrome∙Renal failure and nephrotic syndrome∙Cholestatic disorders∙DysproteinemiasDrugs associated with hyperlipidemia include:∙Anabolic steroids∙Retinoids∙Birth control pills and estrogens∙Corticosteroids∙Thiazide diuretics∙Protease inhibitors∙Beta-blockersDietary causes include:∙Fat intake per total calories greater than 40%∙Saturated fat intake per total calories greater than 10%∙Cholesterol intake greater than 300 mg per day∙Habitual excessive alcohol useLifestyle contributing factors include:∙Habitual excessive alcohol use∙Obesity∙Lack of exerciseEpidemiologyIncidence and prevalencePrevalenceHypercholesterolemia∙Fifty percent of the population has an increased plasma lipid level, resulting in increased risk of coronary heart disease∙Plasma cholesterol >292 mg/dL (>7.5 mmol/L): 2000/100,000∙Ethnic groups adopting a 'western' lifestyle tend to have higher levels of plasma lipids∙Familial combined hyperlipidemia: 500/100,000 (also associated with high triglycerides)∙Familial heterozygous hypercholesterolemia: 200/100,000∙Familial dysbetalipoproteinemia (type III hyperlipoproteinemia): 1% of the general population are genetically homozygous, but only a small minority develop disease (also associated with high triglycerides)∙Other familial hyperlipidemias: 250/100,000∙Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: 0.1/100,000∙Type I hyperlipoproteinemia: approximately 0.1/100,000 (also associated with high triglycerides)Hypertriglyceridemia∙Fasting triglyceride level >200 mg/dL: 10% in men >30 years and women >55 years (in the U.S.)∙Severe hypertriglyceridemia (>2000 mg/dL); 18/100,000 in white populations;higher in diabetic patients or patients with alcoholism∙Familial hypertriglyceridemia: 200/100,000∙Lipoprotein lipase deficiency: 0.1/100,000 in the U.S.; the prevalence is much higher in Quebec, Canada∙Apoprotein CII deficiency: <0.1/100,000DemographicsAge∙Total and LDL-C rise about 20% in men aged 20 to 50 years∙Total and LDL-C rise steadily about 30% in women aged 20 to 60 years∙Younger women have lower levels than men∙Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia manifests itself from birth GenderIncidence is higher among men than women.Race∙Total cholesterol and LDL-C levels are similar in whites and blacks∙Triglycerides are lower and HDL-C levels tend to be higher in the African-American population∙Ethnicity determines absolute risk of coronary disease for given levels of cholesterol∙Asian-Indians have the highest risk∙Chinese have the lowest risk∙Europeans have an intermediate riskGenetics∙Familial combined hyperlipidemia: 500/100,000; inheritance is autosomal dominant and likely to involve one of multiple genetic defects ∙Familial hypercholesterolemia (deficit of LDL receptors) and familial defective Apo B100: heterozygotes (200/100,000 people) and homozygotes(0.1/100,000) with gene inherited as an autosomal dominant defect∙Familial hypertriglyceridemia: 200/100,000, most likely inherited as an autosomal dominant defect∙Lipoprotein lipase deficiency and hepatic lipase deficiency: very rare autosomal recessive conditions∙Hypercholesterolemia in the majority of the general public is attributed to high-fat diets and poorly understood susceptibility and modifier genes Geography∙Mean plasma lipids levels vary between different populations around the world and within different ethnic groups in North America∙Differences in plasma lipid levels can be partly explained by dietary and lifestyle differencesSocioeconomic status∙Awareness of dietary factors that affect plasma lipid levels increases with higher educational levels∙Low-cost food items are often higher in saturated fats and lower in nutritional value。
2型糖尿病患者低血糖风险预测模型的研究进展
outcomes of two randomized controlled trials. Scand J Med Sci Sports, 2020, 30(2): 339-348.[32] Korzeniowska-Kubacka I, Bilińska M,Piotrowska D, et al. Impact of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation on attitude to the therapy, aims in life and professional work in patients after myocardial infarction. Med Pr, 2019,70(1):1-7.[33] O' Brien L, Wallace S, Romero L. Effect ofPsychosocial and vocational interventions on return-to-work rates post-acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev, 2018,38(4):215-223.[34] Muschalla B, Linden M, Jöbges M. Work-anxiety and sickness absence after a short inpatient cognitive behavioral group intervention in comparison to a recreational group meeting. J Occup Environ Med, 2016, 58(4):398-406.[35] Petrie KJ, Cameron LD, Ellis CJ, et al.Changing illness perceptions after myocardial infarction: an early intervention randomized controlled trial. Psychosom Med, 2002,64(4):580-586.[36] 张蒙,杨辉,王易欣,等.首发急性心肌梗死病人疾病知识掌握现状及影响因素分析.护理研究,2020,34(13):2375-2379.[37] 杜若飞,王盼盼,陈长英.重返工作后心肌梗死患者健康需求及影响因素研究. 中国全科医学,2019,22(5):586-590.[38] Broadbent E, Ellis CJ, Thomas J, et al. Further development of an illness perceptionintervention for myocardial infarction patients: a randomized controlled trial. J Psychosom Res, 2009, 67(1):17-23.[39] Figueiras MJ, Maroco J, Monteiro R, et al.Randomized controlled trial of anintervention to change cardiac misconce-ptions in myocardial infarction patients.Psychol Health Med, 2017,22(3):255-265.[40] Bitsch BL, Nielsen CV , Stapelfeldt CM, et al.Effect of the patient education-learning and coping strategies-in cardiac rehabilitation on return to work at one year: a randomised controlled trial show (LC-REHAB). BMC Cardiovasc Disord, 2018,18(1):1-9.[41] Dennis C, Houston-Miller N, SchwartzRG, et al. Early return to work after uncomplicated myocardial infarction. Results of a randomized trial. JAMA, 1988, 260(2):214-220.[42] Hegewald J, Wegewitz UE, Euler U, et al.Interventions to support return to work for people with coronary heart disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2019, 3(3): CD010748.[收稿日期:2020-10-29][修回日期:2021-01-17](编辑:郑中燕 英文编辑:邵文利)基金项目:2019年度重庆市技术创新与应用发展专项面上项目(cstc2019jscx-msxmX0201)作者单位:重庆医科大学附属第二医院内分泌科,400010 重庆市(左丹,赵锡丽,刘莉,代旭丽);护理部(杨睿琦)作者简介:左丹,本科,护师通信作者:赵锡丽,本科,副主任护师,护士长,E-mail:*****************[摘 要] 本文从国内外2型糖尿病患者低血糖风险预测模型的研究现状及进展等方面展开综述,旨在为我国后期构建本土化、实用型低血糖风险预测模型提供理论依据。
小而密低密度脂蛋白与心血管疾病相关性的研究进展
㊃综述㊃小而密低密度脂蛋白与心血管疾病相关性的研究进展木那瓦尔㊃克热木㊀迪拉热㊃阿迪㊀魏娴㊀艾比班木㊃艾则孜㊀马依彤830011乌鲁木齐,新疆医科大学第一附属医院心脏中心冠心病科通信作者:马依彤,电子信箱:myt-xj@DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-5410.2023.06.016㊀㊀ʌ摘要ɔ㊀小而密低密度脂蛋白(sdLDL)为低密度脂蛋白亚型,是一种运输胆固醇进入外周组织细胞的脂蛋白颗粒㊂鉴于sdLDL较其他血脂成分有更强的导致动脉粥样硬化的能力,其被列为心血管疾病的新兴危险因素,已成为降血脂和抗动脉粥样硬化的药物研发新靶点㊂本文就sdLDL致动脉粥样硬化的分子机制及其与心血管疾病相关性进行系统综述,展望sdLDL作为降脂治疗靶标的潜能㊂ʌ关键词ɔ㊀小而密低密度脂蛋白;㊀心血管疾病;㊀药物干预靶点基金项目:国家自然科学基金(91957208㊁82260176);中央引导地方科技发展专项资金(ZYYD2022A01)Research progress on the association between small dense low density lipoprotein and cardiovasculardisease㊀Munawaer Keremu,Dilare Adi,Wei Xian,Aibibanmu Aizezi,Ma YitongDepartment of Coronary Heart Disease,Heart Center,The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang MedicalUniversity,Urumqi830011,ChinaCorresponding author:Ma Yitong,Email:myt-xj@ʌAbstractɔ㊀Small dense low-density lipoprotein(sdLDL)is a subtype of low-density lipoprotein that transports cholesterol into peripheral tissue cells.Due to its stronger ability to induce atherosclerosis compared to other lipid components,sdLDL has been recognized as an emerging risk factor for cardiovasculardisease and has become a new target for lipid-lowering and anti-atherosclerosis drug development.Thisarticle provides a systematic review of the molecular mechanisms underlying sdLDL-induced atherosclerosisand its association with cardiovascular disease,and discusses the potential of sdLDL as a target for lipid-lowering therapy.ʌKey wordsɔ㊀Small dense low density lipoprotein;㊀Cardiovascular disease;㊀Drug intervention targetFund program:National Natural Science Foundation of China(91957208,82260176);Special FundProject of Central Government for Guiding Local Science and Technology Development(ZYYD2022A01)㊀㊀心血管疾病(cardiovascular disease,CVD)已成为严重危害人类健康的慢性非传染性疾病,是我国居民死亡和疾病负担的首要原因[1]㊂以低密度脂蛋白(low density lipoprotein, LDL)为 元凶 的动脉粥样硬化(atherosclerosis,AS)是CVD 的病理基础,尽管以他汀类药物为基石㊁多种降脂药物,如依折麦布及前蛋白转化酶枯草溶菌素9(proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type9,PCSK9)抑制剂为辅助的强化降脂治疗策略已广泛应用于CVD的二级预防,但仅使心血管事件的相对风险降低15%~25%[2],表明仍存在残余风险未得到有效控制㊂因此,寻求有效风险预测因子及干预靶点已成为防治CVD的根本㊂大量研究表明AS的发生不仅与LDL的数量有关,还与其异质性更相关,1983年,Fisher等[3]首次提出LDL具有异质性,可分为大而轻型和小而密型㊂小而密低密度脂蛋白(small dense LDL,sdLDL)为LDL的亚型,因颗粒小㊁低LDL 受体亲和力及易被修饰等特性,于2002年首次被国家胆固醇教育计划成人治疗组认为是LDL颗粒中更易导致AS发生的主要 坏胆固醇 ,是CVD重要危险因素,亦是关键预测因子[4]㊂此外,相关研究表明sdLDL在代谢综合征[5]㊁2型糖尿病[6]㊁肥胖[7]㊁高脂血症[8]㊁脂肪肝[9]等心血管相关代谢性疾病的发生发展中发挥着重要作用㊂本文将在阐述sdLDL的生成㊁致AS的发病机制及其与CVD相关性的基础上,探讨sdLDL作为新型降血脂和抗动脉粥样硬化的药物干预靶点的潜能㊂1㊀sdLDL概述1.1㊀sdLDL定义sdLDL作为LDL的亚型,主要是通过分离法而获得㊂Krauss等[10]首次应用超速离心法根据LDL密度将其分为四种亚型:LDLⅠ型(1.025~1.034g/ml)㊁LDLⅡ型(1.035~1.044g/ml)㊁LDLⅢ型(1.045~1.060g/ml)以及LDLⅣ型,并把密度ȡ1.045g/ml的亚型(LDLⅢ型和LDLⅣ型)称为sdLDL;随后Austin等[11]利用梯度凝胶电泳法,根据LDL颗粒大小和形状分为四种亚型:LDLⅠ型(大LDL, 26.0~28.5nm)㊁LDLⅡ型(中间LDL,25.5~26.4nm)㊁LDL ⅢA型和LDLⅢB型(小LDL,24.2~25.5nm)以及LDLⅣA 型和LDLⅣB型(极小的LDL,22.0~24.1nm),并根据粒径峰值分成两种表型:A型(LDLⅠ型和LDLⅡ型)>25.5nm 及B型(LDLⅢ型和LDLⅣ型)ɤ25.5nm,B型被称为sdLDL㊂此外,Hoefner等[12]应用Lipoprint TM系统,通过聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳法,根据电荷和粒径将LDL分为7个亚组分,其中组分3~7被称为sdLDL㊂因此,sdLDL被定义为粒径ɤ25.5nm㊁密度为1.045~1.060g/ml的脂蛋白颗粒㊂1.2㊀sdLDL检测方法目前已有多种实验室方法用于检测sdLDL水平㊂其中,超速离心法㊁梯度凝胶电泳法的操作复杂㊁耗时久,而其他如核磁共振光谱法㊁化学沉淀法㊁离子迁移率分析㊁高效液相色谱法等缺乏统一的操作标准,均不适合临床常规检测[13]㊂Hirano等[14]首次应用均相酶法,即通过表面活性剂和鞘磷脂酶去除sdLDL以外的脂蛋白进而测定其水平,该法快速㊁简便,已广泛用于sdLDL的大规模试验分析㊂sdLDL水平还可通过其他脂蛋白进行估计㊂Srisawasdi 等[15]通过LDL㊁非高密度脂蛋白(non high density lipoprotein,nonHDL)㊁直接测量的LDL(direct LDL,dLDL)建立了sdLDL公式:sdLDL(mg/dl)=0.580ˑnonHDL+0.407ˑdLDL-0.719ˑcLDL-12.05sdLDL(mmol/L)=0.580ˑnonHDL+0.407ˑdLDL-0.719ˑcLDL-0.312注:cLDL(采用Friedewald公式计算出的LDL)=nonHDL-TGː5,nonHDL=TC-HDL(TC为总胆固醇),TG为三酰甘油此外,Sampson[16]等也提出了新的sdLDL估算公式: ElbLDL=1.43ˑcLDL-[0.14ˑ(ln(TG)ˑcLDL]-8.99; EsdLDL=cLDL-ElbLDL注:cLDL(采用Sampson公式计算出的LDL);ElbLDL (使用公式估算出的大而轻型LDL)虽然已有几种方法用于检测sdLDL,但尚未制定统一的检测标准,因此需要更多研究为sdLDL分析提供最简便且准确的试验室方法㊂1.3㊀sdLDL的生成针对sdLDL的来源,Berneis等[17]提出两种与肝源性三酰甘油(triglyceride,TG)利用率有关的生成途径㊂肝脏基于合成的TG含量分为两种极低密度脂蛋白(very low density lipoprotein,VLDL)和中间密度脂蛋白(intermediate density lipoprotein,IDL),其中VLDL1和IDL1为富含TG,而VLDL2和IDL2为缺乏TG㊂当肝脏合成的TG增多时,肝脏直接分泌VLDL1和VLDL2,而当合成的TG减少时,则分泌VLDL1和IDL2,其中VLDL1在脂蛋白脂肪酶(lipoprotein lipase, LPL)和肝脂肪酶(hepatic lipase,HL)的作用下分解为LDL Ⅲ和LDLⅣ,而VLDL2在LPL的作用下分解为IDL1,富含TG的IDL1被LPL和HL分解为LDLⅡ,IDL2则被LPL分解为LDLⅠ㊂此外,VLDL和LDL之间存在着由胆固醇脂质转运蛋白(cholesteryl ester transfer protein,CETP)介导的脂质交换过程,在CETP的催化下,LDL内的总胆固醇转移至VLDL,而VLDL内的TG转移至LDL㊂富含TG的LDL是HL的底物,被HL分解后去除TG,转变为颗粒更小的LDL 亚型 sdLDL[18](图1)㊂因此,LDLⅢ和LDLⅣ为LDL颗粒中被HL分解生成sdLDL的主要亚型㊂TG:三酰甘油;VLDL:极低密度脂蛋白;LPL:脂蛋白脂肪酶;HL:肝脂肪酶;LDL:低密度脂蛋白;IDL:中间密度脂蛋白;sdLDL:小而密低密度脂蛋白;CETP:胆固醇脂质转运蛋白图1㊀sdLDL来源于两种肝源性三酰甘油可用性的途径1.4㊀sdLDL与遗传变异研究发现血液循环中的sdLDL水平受遗传因素的影响㊂Hoogeveen等[19]的一项全基因组关联研究结果显示,14个基因(或基因簇)的127个单核苷酸多态性(single nucleotide polymorphisms,SNPs)与血浆sdLDL水平存在显著相关性(P<5ˑ10-8)(表1)㊂其中,PCSK7基因的rs508487位点不同基因型的sdLDL水平存在显著差异,TT基因型携带者的sdLDL水平显著高于CT和CC基因型携带者(P<0.0001);此外,对PCSK7基因进行全外显子组测序后发现,与野生型相比,携带非同义突变者的血浆sdLDL水平显著升高(ʈ7.5 mg/dl,P=0.012)㊂Tsuzaki等[20]对时钟基因(circadian locomotor output cycles protein kaput,Clock)的3111T/C位点进行基因型分型后发现,Clock基因的3111T/C位点与血浆sdLDL水平存在相关性,T/T纯合子基因型携带者的血浆sdLDL水平(sdLDL占总脂蛋白的百分比)显著高于C等位基因携带者(T/C或C/C)(1.7%比0.8%,P<0.05)㊂表1㊀影响sdLDL水平的基因多态性染色体基因SNP SNPs(个) 11q23.3APOA5/A4/C3/A1rs96418412 19q13.32APOE/C1/C4/C2rs44206386 19q13.32TOMM40rs20756503 1p13.3PSRC1/CELSR2/SORT1rs66024010 11q23.3BUD13rs658956418 11q23.3ZNF259rs20752905 8q24.13TRIB1rs298085338 2p23.3GCKR rs12603263 19q13.32PVRL2rs72548921 2p23-2p24APOB rs56233824 11q23-q24PCSK7rs5084871 19p13.2BCAM rs48037601 7q11.23MLXIPL rs11789773 7q11.23BAZ1B rs69769302㊀㊀注:sdLDL:小而密低密度脂蛋白;SNP:单核苷酸多态性2㊀sdLDL与心血管疾病2.1㊀sdLDL与不同CVD的关系大量研究已证实sdLDL是动脉粥样硬化性CVD的独立危险因素㊂Ikezaki[21]等开展的Framingham Offspring研究显示,sdLDL是最致AS的脂蛋白颗粒㊂此外,对既往无CVD 的受试者进行5年随访后评估颈动脉内中膜厚度(carotid intima media thickness,cIMT)[22],发现sdLDL水平的升高与cIMT进展有更强的相关性(P=0.009)㊂一项分析sdLDL与颈动脉斑块稳定性的研究显示,不稳定斑块组的sdLDL水平高于稳定斑块组(P<0.05)[23]㊂Balling[24]等对38319名普通人群随访3.1年,发现高水平的sdLDL与缺血性卒中(ischemic stroke,IS)的风险增加密切相关,并且调整其他危险因素后,sdLDL高水平组比低水平组发生IS的相对风险升高79%(HR=1.79)㊂Hoogeveen等[19]开展的一项评估社区动脉粥样硬化风险(ARIC)的前瞻性研究中发现,血浆sdLDL 水平与导致AS的脂质谱密切相关,调整已知危险因素后,sdLDL与冠心病(coronary heart disease,CHD)的发生仍具有相关性,其高水平组较低水平组致CHD的相对风险升高51%(HR=1.51)㊂Duran等[8]发现心肌梗死(myocardial infarction,MI)患者的sdLDL水平明显高于对照组,血浆sdLDL水平与MI存在显著相关性(P<0.001),认为sdLDL 水平可能通过增加致死性和非致死性MI的风险影响总体CVD事件的进展㊂国内有关sdLDL与CHD患者冠状动脉病变严重程度㊁经皮冠状动脉介入(percutaneous coronary intervention,PCI)手术预后评估等已有大量报道,通过Gensini评分评估冠状动脉狭窄程度后发现,sdLDL水平与Gensini评分呈正相关,CHD严重程度随着sdLDL水平的升高而显著增加,术前高水平的sdLDL是CHD患者PCI术后发生CVD事件的独立危险因素[25-26]㊂因此,sdLDL是一种与动脉粥样硬化性CVD病情及预后密切相关的新型生物标志物㊂2.2㊀sdLDL致AS机制AS始于胆固醇在内皮下沉积形成脂滴,是CVD事件的主要根源㊂sdLDL被认为是AS中胆固醇沉积的主要来源㊂与LDL相比,sdLDL的体积小,对动脉内膜的穿透力更强㊂sdLDL与LDL受体的亲和力更低㊁血浆半衰期更长㊁对氧化应激更敏感[21]㊂因此,sdLDL比LDL有更强的致AS能力㊂sdLDL致AS的机制包括:sdLDL的颗粒小,易穿透内皮间隙,易与动脉壁中蛋白多糖结合并沉积在动脉壁上,使sdLDL在循环中停留更久,更容易发生致AS性修饰,如氧化㊁脱烷基化和糖基化[27],进一步增强其致AS能力: (1)sdLDL穿透受损的内皮进入内膜时,受损的内皮细胞表达黏附分子,诱导单核细胞向内皮富集,单核细胞进入内膜后释放氧自由基氧化sdLDL㊂经氧化修饰的sdLDL (oxidized,oxsdLDL)在颗粒表面产生氧化特异性表位,吸引更多的单核细胞聚集,单核细胞在内皮下分化为巨噬细胞时,其表面表达清道夫受体(如CD36,SRBI)以识别并吞噬oxsdLDL,转变成泡沫细胞并在内皮下沉积形成脂滴,泡沫细胞释放促炎因子,引起内皮损伤[28]㊂(2)脱烷基化使sdLDL 的唾液酸含量降低,增加sdLDL与动脉壁中蛋白多糖的亲和力,延长sdLDL在动脉壁上的停留时间,促进其在内皮下沉积[22]㊂(3)糖基化使sdLDL颗粒表面的ApoB100发生构象改变,ApoB100在颗粒表面暴露减少导致其与LDL受体亲和力降低,sdLDL不易被LDL受体摄取,在血液中清除缓慢㊁对血管内皮造成持久的损伤[29]㊂此外,sdLDL内抗氧化剂成分如谷胱甘肽㊁过氧化物酶㊁辅酶Q10㊁维生素E及维生素C等含量较少,对氧化应激的抵抗力弱,易被氧化修饰[13]㊂sdLDL内富含脂蛋白磷脂酶A2,其裂解氧化的磷脂时产生促炎因子,加重内皮损伤[30]㊂另外,sdLDL引起的内皮功能障碍进一步激活纤溶系统并产生纤溶酶原激活物抑制剂1和血栓素A2,诱导血栓形成,从而加快AS进展[31](图2)㊂2.3㊀sdLDL与心血管相关代谢性疾病的关系代谢性疾病主要以糖脂代谢异常为特征,是CVD发生及进展的重要危险因素㊂脂质三联征(或致AS脂蛋白表型)是以sdLDL㊁TG升高,高密度脂蛋白(high density lipoprotein,HDL)水平降低为特征,是代谢综合征和2型糖尿病患者血脂异常的表现形式[32]㊂图2㊀sdLDL在循环中的修饰导致动脉粥样硬化㊀㊀sdLDL水平的升高还与代谢性疾病的病理机制有关㊂胰岛素抵抗是肥胖㊁代谢综合征及2型糖尿病患者最常见的代谢紊乱状态㊂生理状态下,胰岛素通过抑制激素敏感性脂肪酶活性,抑制脂肪组织中的脂肪分解,减少游离脂肪酸释放入血㊂此外,胰岛素刺激循环中的LPL及HL活性,加速VLDL等富含TG的脂蛋白水解㊂而在胰岛素抵抗状态下, LPL及HL分解VLDL-TG的作用受抑制,使循环中的VLDL 水平升高㊂另外,HSL抑制脂肪分解的活性受抑制,游离脂肪酸释放入血,使肝脏合成TG增加并分泌更多的VLDL,从而促进sdLDL的生成[7,18]㊂Nakano等[33]发现,糖尿病合并代谢综合征患者的主要表现为高水平sdLDL和低水平HDL,并指出代谢综合征是血浆sdLDL水平升高的重要决定性因素㊂此外,Hoogeveen等[19]研究发现sdLDL水平与体质指数的增加以及糖尿病㊁高血压和代谢综合征等疾病的患病风险性增加有关㊂总之,随着sdLDL水平升高,代谢性疾病患者CVD风险性增加㊂因此,降低sdLDL水平可以降低长期CVD的发生风险㊂3㊀sdLDL与降脂治疗措施血脂异常是引起AS的主要原因之一,因此改善脂质谱已成为抗AS的重要措施㊂临床上常用于治疗血脂异常的药物如他汀类,主要通过抑制羟甲基戊二酰辅酶A还原酶从而减少胆固醇的合成㊂Ishii等[34]将CHD患者随机分为高剂量他汀治疗组和常规剂量他汀治疗组,分别给予高剂量和常规剂量的匹伐他汀,随访1月及6月后评估血浆sdLDL水平,发现两组均能降低sdLDL水平,而高剂量组降低sdLDL 的效果更为明显㊂研究者选择50例已接受他汀类药物治疗的2型糖尿病患者并分为两组,一组应用非诺贝特联合依折麦布治疗,另一组应用他汀类药物治疗,12周后发现与他汀类药物用药组相比,非诺贝特联合依折麦布联合用药组可有效降低sdLDL水平㊂另外,一些新型降脂药物如PCSK9抑制剂也能降低sdLDL浓度CVD高危患者的血浆PCSK9和sdLDL水平呈正相关㊂因此,靶向抑制PCSK9也是降低循环sdLDL水平的一种有前途的策略㊂另一项有关阿利西尤单抗的Ⅱ期临床研究的事后分析结果显示,阿利西尤单抗能显著降低sdLDL水平㊂此外,限制热量摄入㊁体育锻炼㊁减轻体重㊁食用乳制品㊁鳄梨㊁开心果㊁玉米油㊁膳食纤维及ω-3脂肪酸等也是降低sdLDL水平非药物治疗的有效手段[5]㊂因此,应多提倡除药物治疗外通过合理膳食㊁运动及减少体重来降低sdLDL水平,从而降低CVD的风险㊂4㊀小结综上所述,sdLDL因小颗粒㊁低LDL受体亲和力及易被修饰等特征,较其他血脂成份有更强的致AS能力,与CVD 有更强相关性,还在CVD相关代谢性疾病的发生及转归中发挥重要作用㊂因此,sdLDL作为一种强致AS特性的脂蛋白,为基于抗AS靶点的新药研发奠定了基础,开启了降血脂抗AS精准治疗的新思路和新方向,在CVD高危人群的风险评估㊁早期诊断及降低疾病进展具有全新的预测及指导价值㊂鉴于遗传因素影响血浆sdLDL水平,基因检测有望为sdLDL的降脂措施提供新的参考㊂未来,根据影响血浆sdLDL水平的基因多态性的表达与呈现情况,个性化制定治疗方案可能突破新药研发瓶颈,实现CVD的精准治疗㊂利益冲突:无参㊀考㊀文㊀献[1]Li S,Liu Z,Joseph P,et al.Modifiable risk factors associatedwith cardiovascular disease and mortality in China:a PUREsubstudy[J].Eur Heart J,2022,43(30):2852-2863.DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehac268.[2]O donoghue ML,Giugliano RP,Wiviott SD,et al.Long-TermEvolocumab in Patients With Established AtheroscleroticCardiovascular Disease[J].Circulation,2022,146(15):1109-1119.DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.061620. [3]Fisher WR.Heterogeneity of plasma low density lipoproteinsmanifestations of the physiologic phenomenon in man[J].Metabolism,1983,32(3):283-291.DOI:10.1016/0026-0495(83)90194-4.[4]National Cholesterol Education Program Expert Panel on DetectionE,Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In A.Third Report of theNational Cholesterol Education Program(NCEP)Expert Panel onDetection,Evaluation,and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterolin Adults(Adult Treatment PanelⅢ)final report[J].Circulation,2002,106(25):3143-3421.DOI[5]Santos HO,Earnest CP,Tinsley GM,et al.Small dense low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol(sdLDL-C):Analysis,effects oncardiovascular endpoints and dietary strategies[J].ProgCardiovasc Dis,2020,63(4):503-509.DOI:10.1016/j.pcad.2020.04.009.[6]Kim HK,Hong J,Ahn S,et al.Association between measured orcalculated small dense low-density lipoprotein cholesterol andoxidized low-density lipoprotein in subjects with or without type2diabetes mellitus[J].J Clin Lab Anal,2023,37(1):e24807.DOI:10.1002/jcla.24807.[7]Vekic J,Zeljkovic A,Stefanovic A,et al.Obesity anddyslipidemia[J].Metabolism,2019,92:71-81.DOI:10.1016/j.metabol.2018.11.005.[8]Duran EK,Aday AW,Cook NR,et al.Triglyceride-RichLipoprotein Cholesterol,Small Dense LDL Cholesterol,andIncident Cardiovascular Disease[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2020,75(17):2122-2135.DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2020.02.059. [9]Hwang HW,Yu JH,Jin YJ,et al.Correlation between the smalldense LDL level and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease:Possibility ofa new biomarker[J].Medicine(Baltimore),2020,99(28):e21162.DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000021162. [10]Krauss RM,Burke DJ.Identification of multiple subclasses ofplasma low density lipoproteins in normal humans[J].J LipidRes,1982,23(1):97-104.[11]Austin MA,Breslow JL,Hennekens CH,et al.Low-densitylipoprotein subclass patterns and risk of myocardial infarction[J].JAMA,1988,260(13):1917-1921.DOI:10.1001/jama.1988.03410130125037.[12]Hoefner DM,Hodel SD,O'brien JF,et al.Development of arapid,quantitative method for LDL subfractionation with use ofthe Quantimetrix Lipoprint LDL System[J].Clin Chem,2001,47(2):266-274.[13]Qiao YN,Zou YL,Guo SD.Low-density lipoprotein particles inatherosclerosis[J].Front Physiol,2022,13:931931.DOI:10.3389/fphys.2022.931931.[14]Hirano T,Ito Y,Saegusa H,et al.A novel and simple methodfor quantification of small,dense LDL[J].J Lipid Res,2003,44(11):2193-2201.DOI:10.1194/jlr.D300007-JLR200. [15]Srisawasdi P,Chaloeysup S,Teerajetgul Y,et al.Estimation ofplasma small dense LDL cholesterol from classic lipid measures[J].Am J Clin Pathol,2011,136(1):20-29.DOI:10.1309/AJCPLHJBGG9L3ILS.[16]Sampson M,Wolska A,Warnick R,et al.A New EquationBased on the Standard Lipid Panel for Calculating Small DenseLow-Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol and Its Use as a Risk-Enhancer Test[J].Clin Chem,2021,67(7):987-997.DOI:10.1093/clinchem/hvab048.[17]Berneis KK,Krauss RM.Metabolic origins and clinicalsignificance of LDL heterogeneity[J].J Lipid Res,2002,43(9):1363-1379.DOI:10.1194/jlr.r200004-jlr200. [18]Hirano T.Pathophysiology of Diabetic Dyslipidemia[J].JAtheroscler Thromb,2018,25(9):771-782.DOI:10.5551/jat.RV17023.[19]Hoogeveen RC,Gaubatz JW,Sun W,et al.Small dense low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol concentrations predict risk forcoronary heart disease:the Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities(ARIC)study[J].Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol,2014,34(5):1069-1077.DOI:10.1161/ATVBAHA.114.303284. [20]Tsuzaki K,Kotani K,Sano Y,et al.The association of the Clock3111T/C SNP with lipids and lipoproteins including small denselow-density lipoprotein:results from the Mima study[J].BMCMed Genet,2010,11:150.DOI:10.1186/1471-2350-11-150.[21]Ikezaki H,Lim E,Cupples LA,et al.Small Dense Low-DensityLipoprotein Cholesterol Is the Most Atherogenic LipoproteinParameter in the Prospective Framingham Offspring Study[J].JAm Heart Assoc,2021,10(5):e019140.DOI:10.1161/JAHA.120.019140.[22]Ikezaki H,Furusyo N,Yokota Y,et al.Small Dense Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Carotid Intimal MedialThickness Progression[J].J Atheroscler Thromb,2020,27(10):1108-1122.DOI:10.5551/jat.54130. [23]Pan Z,Guo H,Wang Q,et al.Relationship between subclasseslow-density lipoprotein and carotid plaque[J].Transl Neurosci,2022,13(1):30-37.DOI:10.1515/tnsci-2022-0210. [24]Balling M,Nordestgaard BG,Varbo A,et al.Small dense LDLcholesterol and ischemic stroke[J].Ann Neurol,2023,93(5):952-964.DOI:10.1002/ana.26598.[25]朱竞,王舒,游莉.血清sdLDL-C对冠心病PCI手术患者病情与预后评估的临床价值[J].武汉大学学报(医学版),2021,42(6):1012-1015,1022.DOI:10.14188/j.1671-8852.2019.0476.㊀Zhu J,Wang S,You L.Clinical value of serum sdLDL-C inevaluating the condition and prognosis of patients with coronaryheart disease undergoing PCI[J].Med J Wuhan Univers,2021,42(6):1012-1015,1022.DOI:10.14188/j.1671-8852.2019.0476.[26]孙佳音,闫振娴,郭永和,等.小而密低密度脂蛋白胆固醇与35岁以下青年冠心病患者冠状动脉病变严重程度的关系[J].中国医药,2021,16(8):1135-1139.DOI:10.3760/j.issn.1673-4777.2021.08.004.㊀Sun JY,Yan ZX,Guo YH,et al.Association between smalldense low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and the severity ofcoronary artery lesion among young coronary atherosclerotic heartdisease patients below35years old[J].Chin Med,2021,16(8):1135-1139.DOI:10.3760/j.issn.1673-4777.2021.08.004.[27]Higashioka M,Sakata S,Honda T,et al.Small Dense Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and the Risk of Coronary HeartDisease in a Japanese Community[J].J Atheroscler Thromb,2020,27(7):669-682.DOI:10.5551/jat.51961. [28]Khatana C,Saini NK,Chakrabarti S,et al.Mechanistic Insightsinto the Oxidized Low-Density Lipoprotein-InducedAtherosclerosis[J].Oxid Med Cell Longev,2020,2020:5245308.DOI:10.1155/2020/5245308.[29]Vekic J,Zeljkovic A,Cicero AFG,et al.AtherosclerosisDevelopment and Progression:The Role of Atherogenic Small,Dense LDL[J].Medicina(Kaunas),2022,58(2):299.DOI:10.3390/medicina58020299.[30]Santoso A,Heriansyah T,Rohman MS.Phospholipase A2is anInflammatory Predictor in Cardiovascular Diseases:Is there anySpacious Room to Prove the Causation?[J].Curr Cardiol Rev,2020,16(1):3-10.DOI:10.2174/1573403x15666190531111932.[31]Jin X,Yang S,Lu J,et al.Small,Dense Low-DensityLipoprotein-Cholesterol and Atherosclerosis:Relationship andTherapeutic Strategies[J].Front Cardiovasc Med,2021,8:804214.DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2021.804214.[32]Vekic J,Zeljkovic A,Stefanovic A,et al.Novel Pharmaceuticaland Nutraceutical-Based Approaches for Cardiovascular DiseasesPrevention Targeting Atherogenic Small Dense LDL[J].Pharmaceutics,2022,14(4):825.DOI:10.3390/pharmaceutics14040825.[33]Nakano S,Kuboki K,Matsumoto T,et al.Small,dense LDLand high-sensitivity C-reactive protein(hs-CRP)in metabolicsyndrome with type2diabetes mellitus[J].J AtherosclerThromb,2010,17(4):410-415.DOI:10.5551/jat.1891.[34]Ishii J,Kashiwabara K,Ozaki Y,et al.Small Dense Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Cardiovascular Risk in Statin-Treated Patients with Coronary Artery Disease[J].J AtherosclerThromb,2022,29(10):1458-1474.DOI:10.5551/jat.63229.(收稿日期:2023-03-19)(本文编辑:李鹏)。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
glycemic control on cardiovascular outcomes, but failed to demonstrate benefit on theprimary outcome measures of cardiovascular disease. However, participants randomized tothe intensive glucose arm in ACCORD study where hemoglobin A1c was targeted at < 6.0%had 22% more mortality than those randomized to the standard glucose arm with ahemoglobin A1c target of 7.1-7.9%; largely due to cardiovascular disease. A similar findingof increased mortality risk in participants randomized to intensive glucose control was alsofound in the NICE-SUGAR (Normoglycemia in Intensive Care Evaluation–Survival UsingGlucose Algorithm Regulation) (5) trial that examined the impact of intensive glycemiccontrol in critically ill patients with type 2 diabetes. In the NICE-SUGAR trial target bloodglucose ranged between 81 to 108 mg/dl in the intensive control group as compared to atarget of 180 mg/dl or less in the conventional group. Reasons for the increased mortality inparticipants randomized to intensive glycemic control in these trials is not well understood,but hypoglycemia has been implicated as a possible cause. Individuals in the intensivelytreated arms in these trials all had significantly higher rates of hypoglycemia than theircontrols.In this paper we will review the results of recent post hoc analysis of ACCORD andADVANCE done to examine the relationship between hypoglycemia and mortality, as wellas review the epidemiological data that links hypoglycemia, mortality and cardiovasculardisease. We will also discuss what is known about how hypoglycemia might increasecardiovascular morbidity and mortality.Insights from recent large clinical trialsThe ACCORD trial (2) was designed to study whether a strategy of intensive glycemiccontrol with target glycated hemoglobin level of < 6% would reduce risk of seriouscardiovascular events in patients with advanced type 2 diabetes and additionalcardiovascular risk factors. The study was stopped early (mean of 3.7 years of followup)because of a 22% increased risk of death in the intensive therapy group. While the causes ofdeath were highly variable, most of them were believed to be due to cardiovascular causes.Interestingly, the incidence of severe hypoglycemia was three times higher in the intensivegroup as compared to the standard group, and there was immediate discussion thathypoglycemia must have been contributing to the increased risk of death (6). However, atthe conclusion of the glucose arm of the study, all participants were transitioned to thestandard treatment that targeted a glycated hemoglobin of 7.1-7.9% so that the bloodpressure and lipid arms of the trial could be completed. At five years of followup (•7), therisk of mortality continued to be greater in those who had been randomized to the intensiveglycemic arm, even though the rate of hypoglycemia after transition dropped. Because therate of hypoglycemia was similar in both groups in the post transition period, it seemsunlikely that hypoglycemia was the cause of the continued increase in mortality in theparticipants who had originally been randomized to the intensive glucose arm.The ACCORD investigators have performed post hoc analyses to understand the linkbetween hypoglycemia and mortality in their cohort. In 2010, Bonds et al (•8) reported thatmortality risk was increased in those participants who experienced severe hypoglycemia,which was defined as hypoglycemia that required the assistance of another to treat.Interestingly, this relationship was seen in participants randomized to both the intensive andstandard glycemia treatment strategies. For those participants who experienced more thanone episode of severe hypoglycemia, the risk of mortality was greater in those participants inthe standard group than in the intensive group. In this analysis no temporal relation was seenbetween hypoglycemia and death, and only one death was adjudicated as definitely relatedto hypoglycemia. The authors concluded that severe hypoglycemia did not account for thedifference in mortality between the two study arms.NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author ManuscriptIn another post-hoc analysis of ACCORD study cohort, Seaquist et al (•9) examined therelationship between frequent and unrecognized hypoglycemia as a surrogate for recurrenthypoglycemia and mortality risk. Analysis from this study showed a lower risk of death inACCORD study subjects assigned to the intensive treatment group who experienced moreepisodes of hypoglycemia. Such a relationship was not seen in the standard group. Oneexplanation for these findings could be that individuals with diabetes who are exposed tofrequent hypoglycemia develop blunted counterregulatory response to hypoglycemia, whichcould potentially reduce the impact of hypoglycemia to cardiovascular function.ADVANCE (3) and VADT (4) trials also randomized patients with type 2 diabetes tointensive vs. standard glucose control. No significant effects of intensive glycemic controlwas seen on rates of major cardiovascular events or death in these trials. As with theACCORD study, the rate of hypoglycemia was higher in the intensive control arms. In aretrospective analysis of ADVANCE study, Zoungas et al (•10) examined the associationsbetween severe hypoglycemia and the risks of vascular complications and death among11,140 patients with type 2 diabetes. During a median follow-up of 5 years, severehypoglycemia was found to be associated with increased risks of macrovascular events,microvascular events, and death from both cardiovascular and noncardiovascular causes.The relationship was highly significant, but no temporal relationship or a dose–responserelationship was observed. Analysis from VADT trial showed that severe hypoglycemiawithin the past 90 days was associated with increased cardiovascular events and death (11).Association between hypoglycemia and cardiovascular events in epidemiological studiesSeveral epidemiological studies have shown that hypoglycemia is associated with increasedrisk of death in patients with diabetes. In a large-scale retrospective study Johnston et al (12)examined the association between outpatient hypoglycemic events and acute cardiovascularevents in patients with type 2 diabetes. Acute cardiovascular events included acutemyocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass grafting, revascularization, percutaneouscoronary intervention, and incident unstable angina. In this analysis 27,065 patients hadhypoglycemic events during the evaluation period. Outpatient hypoglycemic events in thisstudy were independently associated with an increased risk of acute cardiovascular events.In a prospective study, McCoy et al (13) examined the relationship between a history ofsevere hypoglycemia with mortality risk during the subsequent five years in more than 1000adult patients with diabetes. They found that the odds ratio for mortality was 3.38 in thosewith a history of severe hypoglycemia; a significantly higher ratio than for patients withoutsuch a history.Recently, Hsu et al (14) investigated the relationship between hypoglycemia with totalmortality and cardiovascular events, including stroke, cardiovascular diseases, and all-causehospitalization in a population of more than 77,000 Taiwanese with newly diagnosed type 2diabetes. Between 1998-2009, there were 1,844 hypoglycemic events (500 inpatients and1,344 outpatients) among the 77,611 patients. Symptomatic hypoglycemia in patients withdiabetes was associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events, all-causehospitalization, and all-cause mortality. Similar association between hypoglycemia andhigher risk of cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes has been shown in otherstudies as well (15).While most work in this area has examined risk in patients with type 2 diabetes, a recentstudy by Gruden et al (16) evaluated risk in a population with type 1 diabetes. Theydetermined the relationship between severe hypoglycemia at baseline and incidentcardiovascular disease up to 8 years in the future in a population of more than 3000Europeans. They found that the frequency of severe hypoglycemia at baseline was not a NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscriptpredictor of subsequent cardiovascular events and that hypoglycemic episodes were notcross-sectionally associated with increase in markers of inflammation and endothelial injury.Impact of hypoglycemia in hospitalized patients Investigators have also looked at impact of tight glycemic control and hypoglycemia on mortality in hospitalized patients. Trials of tight glycemic control in critically ill individuals have shown conflicting results, with one trial showing decreased mortality (17), another showing no benefit (18), and the most recent (5) showed an increase in mortality. As shown in studies done in the out patient setting, intensive control also increases the risk of hypoglycemia in hospitalized patients (18, 19). A meta analysis which included results from twenty-nine randomized control trials in critically ill patients did not show reduced hospital mortality with tight glucose control but tight glucose control resulted in significantly higher risk of hypoglycemia (19). Multiple studies have demonstrated that hypoglycemia in hospitalized patients is associated with increased mortality (20, 21).Very little work has been done to determine the impact of hypoglycemia on outcomes in non-critically ill hospitalized patients. In a retrospective cohort study, Boucai et al (22)compared in-hospital mortality risk of in patients with hypoglycemia (defined as at least 1blood glucose ≤ 70 mg/dL) relative to patients with normoglycemia. They found that hypoglycemia was associated with greater risk of in-hospital mortality, but this association was seen only in patients who developed hypoglycemia spontaneously. Hypoglycemia that occurred with initiation of antidiabetic medications was not associated with higher in-hospital mortality. The authors concluded that these findings suggest that hypoglycemia in hospitalized patients is likely a marker of disease rather then a direct cause of death.How might hypoglycemia increase mortality and cardiovascular disease?The mechanisms by which hypoglycemia may increase cardiovascular events and mortality are not fully understood. Proposed pathways include sympathoadrenal activation, abnormalcardiac repolarization, induction of cardiac and cerebral ischemia, development of cardiac autonomic neuropathy, increased thrombogenesis and enhanced inflammation all of which could cause sudden death (Figure 1).Landstedt-Hallin and colleagues (23) were among the first to study the effects of insulin-induced hypoglycemia on cardiac repolarization using QT interval measurements in individuals with type 2 diabetes. In their investigation, participants were studied undereuglycemic and hypoglycemic clamps in which plasma concentration of glucose and insulin were carefully controlled. Mean QT intervals and QT dispersion increased significantlyduring hypoglycemia, indicating that hypoglycemia led to changes in cardiac repolarization that could increase risk of arrhythmia in patients with diabetes. Sympathoadrenal stimulation in response to hypoglycemia is thought to drive these ECG changes. Hypokalemia may be another contributing factor; hypoglycemia can decrease serum potassium through activation of of sympathoadrenal system along with direct effects of insulin (•24). Increases in QT interval (QTc) and QT dispersion (QTd) during acute experimental hypoglycemia is prevented with β adrenoceptor blockade, whereas potassium replacement prevented the increase in QT dispersion only (25).In real life settings, hypoglycemia has been found to be associated with cardiac ischemia.Desouza et al (26) carried out 72-hour continuous glucose monitoring along withsimultaneous cardiac Holter monitoring in 21 patients with coronary artery disease andinsulin treated type 2 diabetes. Participants in this study also recorded symptoms of cardiac ischemia and symptoms of hypoglycemia while they were monitored. The investigators found that some but not all participants had definite ECG abnormalities duringNIH-PA Author ManuscriptNIH-PA Author ManuscriptNIH-PA Author Manuscripthypoglycemia that were suggestive of cardiac ischemia. Such ECG changes were seen much more often during hypoglycemia than during normoglycemia and hyperglycemia andparticipants reported more cardiac symptoms during hypoglycemia than at other levels of glycemia.Cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy has been associated with increased risk of mortality in patients with diabetes (27, 28). Recurrent antecedent hypoglycemia in patient with diabetes can lead to development of syndrome of hypoglycemia associated autonomic failure (HAAF), which includes defective glucose counterregulation and hypoglycemiaunawareness (29). In addition to hypoglycemia, antecedent hypoglycemia can also impair autonomic responses to other physiologic stresses. Davis et al showed that in healthy individuals antecedent hypoglycemia attenuates normal exercise induced rise incatecholamines, cortisol and growth hormone (30). Recent antecedent hypoglycemia has been shown to impair autonomic cardiovascular function with reduced baroreflex sensitivity and sympathetic response to a hypotensive stress. Impaired autonomic cardiovascularfunction, including decreased cardiac vagal baroreflex sensitivity, can potentially increase vulnerability to a ventricular arrhythmia (31).More recently, the impact of hypoglycemia on the risk of thrombosis has been examined. In a study of subjects with type 1 diabetes and healthy controls, Wright et al (32) showed that markers of inflammation and platelet activation including P-selectin, expression of CD40 on monocytes and hsCRP were significantly higher during acute insulin-induced hypoglycemia.Another study looked at the effects of 2 hours of clamped hyperinsulinemic euglycemia and moderate hypoglycemia on markers of inflammation and fibrinolytic balance in individuals with type 1 diabetes and healthy individuals (33). Results from this study demonstrated that hypoglycemia had acute and widespread effects including activation of proinflammatory mechanisms (ICAM, VCAM, E-selectin, VEGF, IL-6), increase in platelet activation (P-selectin), and decrease in systemic fibrinolytic balance (increase in PAI-1, no change in tPA)in both individuals with type 1 diabetes and healthy controls.Hypoglycemia predictor vs cause of cardiovascular eventsAs discussed earlier in this review, recent large clinical trials in patients with type 2 diabetes have shown that hypoglycemia is associated adverse cardiovascular outcomes and death.Similarly, several epidemiological studies have shown a strong association betweenhypoglycemia and increased cardiovascular events and mortality. However, none of these data establish a direct causal relationship between severe hypoglycemia and increased mortality. None have found a close temporal or a dose response relationship between hypoglycemia and adverse outcomes. Study participants who have higher rates of severe hypoglycemia usually have more comorbidities and are on more glucose-loweringmedications than participants without severe hypoglycemia. Acute hypoglycemia induces physiological changes that can lead to a pro arrhythmic and pro thrombotic state and it is plausible that these changes can lead to acute cardiac ischemia or ventricular arrhythmias.Evidence from these studies also suggest that severe hypoglycemia may be a marker of frailty. In patients with diabetes severe hypoglycemia may be prognostic tool identifying susceptible patients who may be at increased risk of cardiovascular event and death.ConclusionOver the last several years, a significant body of evidence has appeared that indicates severe hypoglycemia in patients with diabetes is associated with an increased risk of adversecardiovascular events and death. Several possible mechanisms has been proposed to explain the increase risk of cardiovascular events with hypoglycemia but direct evidence linking hypoglycemia to adverse cardiovascular outcomes is lacking. Investigation to date also NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscriptsuggests that severe hypoglycemia is a marker of frailty and predictor of adverse outcomes in patients with diabetes. Providers should routinely evaluate patients regarding risk and history of hypoglycemia. Patients should receive education on how recognize, treat and prevent hypoglycemia. Diabetic patients with history of severe hypoglycemia should receive close attention and providers should individualize treatment plans based patient’s age,duration of diabetes and other comorbidities and adjust glycemic goals to avoid severe hypoglycemia and any related morbidity and mortality.References Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as:• Of importance 1. Riddle MC. Glycemic control and cardiovascular mortality. Current Opinion in Endocrinology Diabetes and Obesity. 2011; 18(2):104–9.2. Gerstein HC, Miller ME, Byington RP, et al. Effects of intensive glucose lowering in type 2diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358(24):2545–59. [PubMed: 18539917]3. Patel A, MacMahon S, Chalmers J, et al. Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358(24):2560–72. [PubMed: 18539916]4. Duckworth W, Abraira C, Moritz T, et al. Glucose control and vascular complications in veterans with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2009; 360(2):129–U62. [PubMed: 19092145]5. Finfer S, Blair D, Bellomo R, et al. Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2009; 360(13):1283–97. [PubMed: 19318384]6. Riddle MC. Counterpoint: Intensive glucose control and mortality in ACCORD-still looking for clues. Diabetes Care. 2010; 33(12):2722–4. [PubMed: 21115778]•7. Gerstein HC, Miller ME, Genuth S, et al. Long-term effects of intensive glucose lowering on cardiovascular outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2011; 364(9):818–2. This report describes the 5-year outcomes on mortality and cardiovascular events in participants of ACCROD trial. [PubMed:21366473]•8. Bonds DE, Miller ME, Bergenstal RM, et al. The association between symptomatic, severehypoglycaemia and mortality in type 2 diabetes: Retrospective epidemiological analysis of the ACCORD study. Br Med J. 2010; 340:b4909. Post hoc analyses of ACCORD study suggesting that severe hypoglycemia was likely not the cause of difference in mortality between the intensive and control arms. [PubMed: 20061358]•9. Seaquist ER, Miller ME, Bonds DE, et al. The impact of frequent and unrecognized hypoglycemiaon mortality in the ACCORD study. Diabetes Care. 2012; 35(2):409–14. This post hoc analyses of ACCORD study showed that subjects in the intensive control group who experienced more episodes of hypoglycemia had a lower risk of death. One explanation for this interesting finding is that individuals with diabetes who are exposed to frequent hypoglycemia can develop blunted counterregulatory response to hypoglycemia which could reduce impact of hypoglycemia on cardiovascular function. [PubMed: 22179956]•10. Zoungas S, Patel A, Chalmers J, et al. Severe hypoglycemia and risks of vascular events anddeath. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363(15):1410–8. This retrospective analysis of ADVANCE study showed severe hypoglycemia was associated with increased risks of cardiovascular events and death. [PubMed: 20925543]11. Skyler JS, Bergenstal R, Bonow RO, et al. Intensive glycemic control and the prevention of cardiovascular events: Implications of the ACCORD, ADVANCE, and VA diabetes trials: A position statement of the american diabetes association and a scientific statement of the american college of cardiology foundation and the american heart association (vol 32, pg 187, 2009).Diabetes Care. 2009; 32(4):754.12. Johnston SS, Conner C, Aagren M, et al. Evidence linking hypoglycemic events to an increased risk of acute cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2011; 34(5):1164–70. [PubMed: 21421802]NIH-PA Author ManuscriptNIH-PA Author ManuscriptNIH-PA Author Manuscript13. McCoy RG, Van Houten HK, Ziegenfuss JY, et al. Increased mortality of patients with diabetes reporting severe hypoglycemia. Diabetes Care. 2012; 35(9):1897–901. [PubMed: 22699297]14. Hsu P, Sung S, Cheng H, et al. Association of clinical symptomatic hypoglycemia with cardiovascular events and total mortality in type 2 diabetes A nationwide population-based study.Diabetes Care. 2013; 36(4):894–900. [PubMed: 23223349]15. Zhao Y, Campbell CR, Fonseca V, Shi L. Impact of hypoglycemia associated with antihyperglycemic medications on vascular risks in veterans with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care.2012; 35(5):1126–32. [PubMed: 22432106]16. Gruden G, Barutta F, Chaturvedi N, et al. Severe hypoglycemia and cardiovascular disease incidence in type 1 diabetes the EURODIAB prospective complications study. Diabetes Care.2012; 35(7):1598–604. [PubMed: 22584135]17. Van den Berghe G, Wouters P, Weekers F, et al. Intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients.N Engl J Med. 2001; 345(19):1359–67. [PubMed: 11794168]18. Van den Berghe G, Wilmer A, Hermans G, et al. Intensive insulin therapy in the medical ICU. N Engl J Med. 2006; 354(5):449–61. [PubMed: 16452557]19. Soylemez Wiener R, Wiener DC, Larson RJ. Benefits and risks of tight glucose control in critically ill adults - A meta-analysis. JAMA-J Am Med Assoc. 2008; 300(8):933–44.20. Svensson A, McGuire D, Abrahamsson P, Dellborg M. Association between hyper- and hypoglycaemia and 2 year all-cause mortality risk in diabetic patients with acute coronary events.Eur Heart J. 2005; 26(13):1255–61. [PubMed: 15821004]21. Kagansky N, Levy S, Rimon E, et al. Hypoglycemia as a predictor of mortality in hospitalized elderly patients. Arch Intern Med. 2003; 163(15):1825–9. [PubMed: 12912719]22. Boucai L, Southern WN, Zonszein J. Hypoglycemia-associated mortality is not drug-associated but linked to comorbidities. Am J Med. 2011; 124(11):1028–35. [PubMed: 22017781]23. Landstedt-Hallin L, Englund A, Adamson U, Lins P. Increased QT dispersion during hypoglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Intern Med. 1999; 246(3):299–307.[PubMed: 10475998]•24. Frier BM, Schernthaner G, Heller SR. Hypoglycemia and cardiovascular risks. Diabetes Care.2011; 34:S132–7. Review article on effects of hypoglycemia on cardiovascular system.[PubMed: 21525444]25. Robinson R, Harris N, Ireland R, Lee S, Newman C, Heller S. Mechanisms of abnormal cardiac repolarization during insulin-induced hypoglycemia. Diabetes. 2003; 52(6):1469–74. [PubMed:12765959]26. Desouza C, Salazar H, Cheong B, et al. Association of hypoglycemia and cardiac ischemia - A study based on continuous monitoring. Diabetes Care. 2003; 26(5):1485–9. [PubMed: 12716809]27. Gerritsen J, Dekker J, TenVoorde B, et al. Impaired autonomic function is associated with increased mortality, especially in subjects with diabetes, hypertension, or a history ofcardiovascular disease - the hoorn study. Diabetes Care. 2001; 24(10):1793–8. [PubMed:11574444]28. Maser R, Mitchell B, Vinik A, Freeman R. The association between cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy and mortality in individuals with diabetes - A meta-analysis. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(6):1895–901. [PubMed: 12766130]29. Cryer P. Mechanisms of hypoglycemia-associated autonomic failure and its component syndromes in diabetes. Diabetes. 2005; 54(12):3592–601. [PubMed: 16306382]30. Davis S, Galassetti P, Wasserman D, Tate D. Effects of antecedent hypoglycemia on subsequent counterregulatory responses to exercise. Diabetes. 2000; 49(1):73–81. [PubMed: 10615952]31. Adler GK, Bonyhay I, Fainng H, et al. Antecedent hypoglycemia impairs autonomiccardiovascular function implications for rigorous glycemic control. Diabetes. 2009; 58(2):360–6.[PubMed: 19056608]32. Wright RJ, Newby DE, Stirling D, et al. Effects of acute insulin-induced hypoglycemia on indices of inflammation putative mechanism for aggravating vascular disease in diabetes. Diabetes Care.Jul; 2010 33(7):1591–7. [PubMed: 20587725]NIH-PA Author ManuscriptNIH-PA Author ManuscriptNIH-PA Author Manuscript33. Joy NG, Hedrington MS, Briscoe VJ, et al. Effects of acute hypoglycemia on inflammatory andpro-atherothrombotic biomarkers in individuals with type 1 diabetes and healthy individuals.Diabetes Care. 2010; 33(7):1529–35. [PubMed: 20587723] NIH-PA Author ManuscriptNIH-PA Author ManuscriptNIH-PA Author ManuscriptNIH-PA Author ManuscriptFigure 1.Potential mechanism underlying hypoglycemia related cardiovascular disease or death NIH-PA Author ManuscriptNIH-PA Author Manuscript。