安乐死论文 英文版
Advantages of the Implementation of EuthanasiaEuthanasia, originated from the Greek, formerly refers to "happy death" or "dignified death". In several English dictionaries, it is explained as 〝painless death of a person with an incurable and miserable disease or of an aging person〞, or 〝the practice of killing without pain a person who is suffer from a disease that cannot be cured〞. Chinese scholars define euthanasia like this "to an incurable patient in critically ill critical condition, due to his physical and spiritual suffering, with the patient’s and their relatives’ request and after the doctor's approval, the operation of the method which lead the patient to die without pain〞(1).In the 1930s, in American and some European countries scholars began to promote euthanasia. In American people established the "death without pain" society and British a "voluntary analogue death" community was built, people started activities related with euthanasia in order to achieve the legal admission.Afterwards, legal issues about euthanasia have been discussed over the whole world; hence much progress has been achieved. Since 1980s, some developed western countries gradually passed some laws and regulations related to euthanasia. In China, June 1986, the first euthanasia case happened Shaanxi province, Hanzhong city. And in 1992, June 25, Shaanxi provincial higher people's court upheld this case in the second final -- not guilty plea (2). This case caused quite a sensation at that time, and proposed the issues of Chinese euthanasia. From then on, discussions about the issue have never stopped.Virtually there are many advantages of implementing euthanasia, in terms of social, family, and the patients themselves. In this essay all the benefits will be elaborated respectively as follows. With regard to the social benefits, if the euthanasia is applied legally, not only the large amount of medicinal expense, but the medicinal resources can be saved reasonably.Firstly, the implementation of euthanasia can reduce the social burden of medical expenses. According to statistics, there are 5 ~ 7 million vegetative patients in current China, consequently, in order to maintain these patients of medical expenses of the first year cost in hospital the cost is 10 to 30 million Yuan, and after hospitalization it costs about 6 ~ 9 million each year(5). Meanwhile every year the total money that needs to spend on the home treatment and nursing costs at least 1.5 million. Thus to maintain such is two much expensive and the big deal of money can be used in other more useful fields.Secondly, euthanasia helps save more medicine resources and thus realizes a more reasonable distribution of them. As a developing country, all sorts of medical resources in the domestic market are still relatively in deficiency. However, patients without survival hope occupy medical equipment and medical personnel in long term, and they use a lot of medical drugs to continue a meaningless hope. This apparently is a serious waste to limited health resources. If these resources can be used for those more urgent and hopeful patients, they will receive an effective utilization. Thirdly, euthanasia does much good to the transplant of human organ. At present each country is faced with the human organ source shortage predicament. Since there are no enough organ sources, many patients die. If those seriously ill patients without curable hope can denote their organs after euthanasia, more alive patients will recover.However, some people are against the implantation of euthanasia in the view that those hopeless patients have their own right to live and the society should not sacrifice their common rights. But as far as laws are concerned, euthanasia is implemented according to the patient, theirfamily and the doctor’s willing, therefore, it is an end of the patients’suffering rather than sacrifice.If the opponents of euthanasia are against the social benefits as mentioned above, people can not ignore the requests of the patients themselves. For those who are seriously ill and incurable, a painless death is a satisfactory ending to them. Through euthanasia, they will die peacefully without the physical and spiritual suffering. 1971 in Dutch, a doctor helped her mother to apply euthanasia according to her mother’s request, thus her mother can rest after horrible torture. In this way both the patient and people around receive a resolution. For those who are against this issue and take this behavior as illegal, they should stand in the patients’ shoes and realize that they would rather die dignifiedly than suffering.Meanwhile, it is not doubt that an incurable patient causes heavy burden to the family. Relatives of such patients have a moral obligation to take care of them. However, in the long run, both the nurse and seeing of patients’ torture put the whole family a lot of pressure. Meanwhile, there is still a great financial burden. As for the patients themselves, they would not let to see the family take so many troubles for them. So with the implementation of euthanasia, the patient can reduce the family’s emotional suffering as well as the economic burden.On the contrary, some humanists argue that euthanasia shows the indifference and coldness of the family, which results in remote relationships among people. However, in the family’s perspective, it is just because they don’t want the patients to suffer any more that they agree to use euthanasia, which also is a manifestation of their love and care to the patient rather than being indifferent.Every coin has two sides, and it is the same with the issue of euthanasia. People blame it for the shrinking of responsibility, human coldness and crimes it brings, at the same time many others are calling for the legalization of it. From the above elaborations, and take the consideration of the patients themselves, the family burdens and the social benefits, a conclusion can be drawn that advantages of euthanasia outweigh its disadvantages. Therefore, the permission of legalization of euthanasia should be advocated for the sake of the whole society.References1. 楚东平.安乐死[M].上海:上海文化出版社,1988:10.2. 王晓慧.论安乐死[M].长春:吉林人民出版社,2004.3. 欧阳涛：“安乐死的现状与立法”，载《法制与社会发展》1996年第5期.4. 呼满红张晖《“安乐死”离我们有多远》载《民主与法制》2001年第11期.5. He Nong ＆Zhu Xiaoying, a survey and analysis of social attitude toward euthanasia, Journal of Tianjin Manager College, 2009(04).6. Zhang Wangqiang, The Analysis of the Necessity and Practicality of Euthanasia in China, Theory Research, 2010(14).7. Li Yingxia, About Euthanasia, Manager Journal, 2009(09).8. Nicolas p. Dictionary of Western Philology, The People’s Press, 2001:2.9. John Rawls, A Theory of Justice, China Social and Science Press, 1998:3.。
考研英语写作30篇范文：安乐死
考研英语写作30篇范文：安乐死范文（八）Writi ng （图画提纲式议论文）Directio ns: Study the followi ng picture carefully and write an essay of 160 -200 words in which you should1）describe the picture.2）state differe nt views on mercy killi ng, and3）give your opinion on it.晚期癌症病人请求安乐死。
我们怎么办？范文Mercy killi ng is one of the most con troversial issues in the world of medici ne. As the picture give n above depicts, a late-stage cancer patie nt is term in ally-ill, asking the doctors for mercy killing. But the doctors look deeply embarrassed, feeling helpless because they are at a loss what to do about it.The picture really sets me thinkin g. It implies that people differ in theirattitudes towards the mercy killi ng. Some people think that physicia n-assistedsuicide can relieve dying patie nts of un bearable pain and sufferi ng. They maintainthat as long as a doctor prescribes a drug for a legitimate medical purpose, he hasdone nothing illegal even if the patie nt uses the drug to haste n death. Others arestron gly opposed to physicia n-assisted suicide. They contend that a doctor has noright to give a patient sufficient medication to control his pain if that may hasten death. They conclude that it is illegal for doctors to help the dying end their lives.As far as I'm concerned, doctors have a duty to help dying patients to alleviate their pain and suffering. I also agree that doctors deserve to be punished if theyprolong the needless suffering of their terminally-ill patients. In short, I am infavor of mercy killing. (207 words)译文：安乐死是医学界最有争议的问题之一。
安乐死的英文作文
安乐死的英文作文英文：Euthanasia, also known as assisted suicide or mercy killing, is a controversial topic that has been debated for decades. Some people believe that individuals who are terminally ill or suffering from unbearable pain should have the right to choose to end their own lives with the help of a physician. Others argue that euthanasia goes against the sanctity of life and can lead to abuse.Personally, I believe that euthanasia should be legalized under certain circumstances. For example, if a patient has a terminal illness and is in constant pain, they should have the right to end their suffering. However, strict regulations and guidelines must be put in place to prevent abuse and ensure that the patient is making an informed decision.In my opinion, the decision to end one's own life is adeeply personal one and should not be made lightly. It is important for the patient to have access to counseling and support to help them make an informed decision. Additionally, the physician who assists with the euthanasia should be well-trained and experienced in end-of-life care.中文：安乐死，也称为协助自杀或慈悲杀死，是一个备受争议的话题，已经争论了几十年。
支持安乐死英语作文
支持安乐死英语作文Title: The Case for Euthanasia: A Moral Imperative。
Euthanasia, also known as assisted suicide or mercy killing, has long been a topic of ethical debate worldwide. Proponents argue that it is a compassionate choice for individuals suffering from incurable illnesses or unbearable pain, granting them the dignity of a peaceful death. I firmly support euthanasia as a fundamental human right and a morally justifiable act for several reasons.Firstly, euthanasia respects individual autonomy and self-determination. Every person has the right to make decisions about their own life, including the right to end it if they are facing terminal illness or intolerable suffering. Denying individuals the option of euthanasia deprives them of their autonomy and forces them to endure unnecessary pain and indignity against their will.Secondly, euthanasia is a manifestation of compassionand empathy towards those who are suffering. It offers a humane way to alleviate the physical and emotional distress of patients who have exhausted all treatment options and face a grim prognosis. Allowing them to end their lives with dignity and without prolonged agony is an act of kindness and mercy.Moreover, euthanasia can prevent unnecessary financial and emotional burdens on both patients and their families. Terminal illnesses often require extensive medical care and resources, placing a significant strain on healthcare systems and exhausting the savings of individuals and families. By opting for euthanasia, patients can avoid prolonged hospital stays and expensive treatments, freeing up resources for others in need and sparing their loved ones from witnessing their prolonged suffering.Critics of euthanasia often raise concerns about the potential for abuse and the slippery slope towards involuntary euthanasia. However, strict safeguards and regulations can be implemented to ensure that euthanasia is only carried out with the explicit consent of mentallycompetent patients who are facing unbearable suffering with no hope of improvement. Medical professionals can be involved in the decision-making process to verify the patient's condition and ensure that all other options, such as palliative care, have been explored.Furthermore, legalizing euthanasia can lead to greater transparency and accountability in end-of-life care. Currently, patients may resort to clandestine methods or unregulated practices to end their suffering, putting themselves at risk of botched attempts or inadequate pain management. Legalizing euthanasia allows for proper oversight and regulation, ensuring that patients receive the necessary support and guidance in making their end-of-life decisions.In conclusion, euthanasia is a compassionate andethical choice that respects the autonomy, dignity, and suffering of individuals facing terminal illness or unbearable pain. By legalizing euthanasia and implementing appropriate safeguards, society can uphold the principles of compassion, autonomy, and dignity in end-of-life care.It is time to recognize euthanasia as a fundamental human right and provide individuals with the option of a peaceful and dignified death when faced with unbearable suffering.。
对安乐死的看法英语作文
对安乐死的看法英语作文英文回答：Euthanasia is a complex and multifaceted issue that raises profound moral, ethical, and legal questions. In my opinion, the decision of whether or not to pursueeuthanasia should be a deeply personal one, based on the individual's values, beliefs, and circumstances.There are many factors to consider when contemplating euthanasia. One important aspect is the individual'squality of life. If someone is suffering from a terminal illness or a debilitating condition that causes unbearable pain or suffering, euthanasia may provide a way for them to end their life with dignity and on their own terms.Another factor to consider is the individual's autonomy. The right to make decisions about one's own body and lifeis a fundamental human right. This includes the right to choose to end one's own life if the individual is of soundmind and has made a fully informed decision.However, euthanasia also raises concerns aboutpotential abuse or coercion. It is important to ensure that individuals who choose euthanasia are not being pressured or manipulated into making a decision they do not truly want. There must also be safeguards in place to prevent euthanasia from being used as a means of eliminating people with disabilities or those who are considered a burden to society.Ultimately, the decision of whether or not to pursue euthanasia is a deeply personal one that should be made by the individual involved, in consultation with their loved ones and healthcare providers. It is a complex issue with no easy answers, but it is one that must be approached with compassion, understanding, and respect for the individual's autonomy.中文回答：安乐死是一个复杂而且多方面的议题，它引发了深刻的道德、伦理和法律问题。
英语安乐死辩论
英语安乐死辩论Good morning ,everyone ; my name is Yang .I am the first debater on positive side. Here are my opinions.1 First I will state the definaton of euthanasia,that is people who are attacked by incurable disease can’t surffer from the pains and decide to employ a humane way to end their lives without pain.2 Second, as with survival, death is a kind of human rights. When he felt happier than survival of death, he has the right to choose death, society should meet the people's needs, and give every person who is suffering incurable disease to choose the right euthanasia .So citizens have the right to choose the way of death. It is another case of freedom of choice.3 Third , for mortally ill patients, long life actually only means extend pain. For them to end their lives is a kind of happiness, It provides a way to relieve extreme pain, and this conforms to humanism.4 Fouth , this way can free up medical funds to help other people and reduce the burden of family and society. In this regard,it takes family members’ interest and supplies a lot of benefits to society.5 so according to the previous paper, we have reasons to believe that euthanasia is a proper way, not only does it respect personal dignity,but also helps with social development. And it is the performance of human civilization progress too.That’s all my ideas ,thank you。
安乐死 Die With Pleasure(大学英语作文)
安乐死Die With Pleasure大学英语作文Mercy killling has been the hot issue and some animals were accepted this way of death. In some countries, mercy killing is legal for human being. When people are badly ill and have given up life, they wished to die with pleasure. Betsy Davis made her choice.安乐死一直是一个热点话题，一些动物接受了这种方式离去。
在一些国家，安乐死是合法的。
当人们病得很严重的时候，对生命已经放弃了希望，他们就希望快乐地死去。
贝特西·戴维斯就做出了自己的选择。
Betsy Davis was an artist and she suffered from ALS. After being treated for some time, she still got sick worse and worse and she had big trouble in moving, so she decided to accept mercy killing. But she was not going to die sadly, instead, she emailed her families and friends to join her good-bye party for two days, and she told them not to be sad but only with pleasure.贝特西·戴维斯是一个艺术家，她患有肌萎缩性侧索硬化症，接受一段时间治疗后，病情仍然恶化了，她难以移动，所以她决定接受安乐死。
安乐死论文 英文版
Advantages of the Implementation of EuthanasiaEuthanasia, originated from the Greek, formerly refers to "happy death" or "dignified death". In several English dictionaries, it is explained as 〝painless death of a person with an incurable and miserable disease or of an aging person〞, or 〝the practice of killing without pain a person who is suffer from a disease that cannot be cured〞. Chinese scholars define euthanasia like this "to an incurable patient in critically ill critical condition, due to his physical and spiritual suffering, with the patient’s and their relatives’ request and after the doctor's approval, the operation of the method which lead the patient to die without pain〞(1).In the 1930s, in American and some European countries scholars began to promote euthanasia. In American people established the "death without pain" society and British a "voluntary analogue death" community was built, people started activities related with euthanasia in order to achieve the legal admission.Afterwards, legal issues about euthanasia have been discussed over the whole world; hence much progress has been achieved. Since 1980s, some developed western countries gradually passed some laws and regulations related to euthanasia. In China, June 1986, the first euthanasia case happened Shaanxi province, Hanzhong city. And in 1992, June 25, Shaanxi provincial higher people's court upheld this case in the second final -- not guilty plea (2). This case caused quite a sensation at that time, and proposed the issues of Chinese euthanasia. From then on, discussions about the issue have never stopped.Virtually there are many advantages of implementing euthanasia, in terms of social, family, and the patients themselves. In this essay all the benefits will be elaborated respectively as follows. With regard to the social benefits, if the euthanasia is applied legally, not only the large amount of medicinal expense, but the medicinal resources can be saved reasonably.Firstly, the implementation of euthanasia can reduce the social burden of medical expenses. According to statistics, there are 5 ~ 7 million vegetative patients in current China, consequently, in order to maintain these patients of medical expenses of the first year cost in hospital the cost is 10 to 30 million Yuan, and after hospitalization it costs about 6 ~ 9 million each year(5). Meanwhile every year the total money that needs to spend on the home treatment and nursing costs at least 1.5 million. Thus to maintain such is two much expensive and the big deal of money can be used in other more useful fields.Secondly, euthanasia helps save more medicine resources and thus realizes a more reasonable distribution of them. As a developing country, all sorts of medical resources in the domestic market are still relatively in deficiency. However, patients without survival hope occupy medical equipment and medical personnel in long term, and they use a lot of medical drugs to continue a meaningless hope. This apparently is a serious waste to limited health resources. If these resources can be used for those more urgent and hopeful patients, they will receive an effective utilization. Thirdly, euthanasia does much good to the transplant of human organ. At present each country is faced with the human organ source shortage predicament. Since there are no enough organ sources, many patients die. If those seriously ill patients without curable hope can denote their organs after euthanasia, more alive patients will recover.However, some people are against the implantation of euthanasia in the view that those hopeless patients have their own right to live and the society should not sacrifice their common rights. But as far as laws are concerned, euthanasia is implemented according to the patient, theirfamily and the doctor’s willing, therefore, it is an end of the patients’suffering rather than sacrifice.If the opponents of euthanasia are against the social benefits as mentioned above, people can not ignore the requests of the patients themselves. For those who are seriously ill and incurable, a painless death is a satisfactory ending to them. Through euthanasia, they will die peacefully without the physical and spiritual suffering. 1971 in Dutch, a doctor helped her mother to apply euthanasia according to her mother’s request, thus her mother can rest after horrible torture. In this way both the patient and people around receive a resolution. For those who are against this issue and take this behavior as illegal, they should stand in the patients’ shoes and realize that they would rather die dignifiedly than suffering.Meanwhile, it is not doubt that an incurable patient causes heavy burden to the family. Relatives of such patients have a moral obligation to take care of them. However, in the long run, both the nurse and seeing of patients’ torture put the whole family a lot of pressure. Meanwhile, there is still a great financial burden. As for the patients themselves, they would not let to see the family take so many troubles for them. So with the implementation of euthanasia, the patient can reduce the family’s emotional suffering as well as the economic burden.On the contrary, some humanists argue that euthanasia shows the indifference and coldness of the family, which results in remote relationships among people. However, in the family’s perspective, it is just because they don’t want the patients to suffer any more that they agree to use euthanasia, which also is a manifestation of their love and care to the patient rather than being indifferent.Every coin has two sides, and it is the same with the issue of euthanasia. People blame it for the shrinking of responsibility, human coldness and crimes it brings, at the same time many others are calling for the legalization of it. From the above elaborations, and take the consideration of the patients themselves, the family burdens and the social benefits, a conclusion can be drawn that advantages of euthanasia outweigh its disadvantages. Therefore, the permission of legalization of euthanasia should be advocated for the sake of the whole society.References1. 楚东平.安乐死[M].上海:上海文化出版社,1988:10.2. 王晓慧.论安乐死[M].长春:吉林人民出版社,2004.3. 欧阳涛：“安乐死的现状与立法”，载《法制与社会发展》1996年第5期.4. 呼满红张晖《“安乐死”离我们有多远》载《民主与法制》2001年第11期.5. He Nong ＆Zhu Xiaoying, a survey and analysis of social attitude toward euthanasia, Journal of Tianjin Manager College, 2009(04).6. Zhang Wangqiang, The Analysis of the Necessity and Practicality of Euthanasia in China, Theory Research, 2010(14).7. Li Yingxia, About Euthanasia, Manager Journal, 2009(09).8. Nicolas p. Dictionary of Western Philology, The People’s Press, 2001:2.9. John Rawls, A Theory of Justice, China Social and Science Press, 1998:3.。
安乐死_英语辩论
安乐死_英语辩论第一篇：安乐死_英语辩论(!)Euthanasia is to kill people.Life is so important for every one.People don’t only live for themselves, but they also live for their families and the society.If they choose to leave the world, they are not responsible for themselves, their families and the society.Euthanasia is disparagement of life.Life is so precious.Patients should cherish their life.They should try their best to prevail incurable disease.Everyone should show basic respect for life.No matter what happens, we should face up to the facts, we should live on with great courage, we should believe in wonder.Nothing is impossible.so we view that Euthanasia should not be legeled(!)Euthanasia stops the medicine developing.If the patients require using euthanasia, doctors won’t try their best to save patients.The medicine will stop progress.If making euthanasia is made legal, patients who use euthanasia will be protected by law.The doctors’ right will be obvious.Doctors are given too much power, and can be wrong or unethical.Patients put their faith and trust in the opinions of their doctor.people abuse euthanasia when it is legalized, it can harm people lives.In the name of euthanasia, carry out committing suicide.Miracle cures or recoveries can occur.You can never underestimate the power of the human spirit.It demeans the value of human life.In this country, human life means something.It could open the floodgates to non-critical patient suicides and other abuses.Any loosening of the assisted-suicide laws could eventually lead to abuses of the privilege.Many religions prohibit suicide and the intentional killing of others.The most basic commandment is “You shall not kill”.Insurancecompanies may put undue pressure on doctors to avoid heroic measures or recommend the assisted-suicide procedure.Health insurance providers are under tremendous pressure to keep premiums down.Euthanasia can become a means of health care cost containment..Physicians and other medical care people should not be involved in directly causing death.Mercy killing is morally incorrect and should be forbidden by law.It's a homicide and murdering another human cannot be rationalized under any circumstances.Human life deserves exceptional security and protection.Advanced medical technology has made it possible to enhance human life span and quality of life.Palliative care and rehabilitation centers are better alternatives to help disabled or patients approaching death live a pain-free and better life.Family members influencing the patient's decision into euthanasia for personal gains like wealth inheritance is another issue.There is no way you can be really sure if the decision towards assisted suicide is voluntary or forced by others.Mercy killing would cause decline in medical care and cause victimization of the most vulnerable society.Would mercy killing transform itself from the “right to die” to “right to kill”? How would one assess whether a disorder of mental nature qualifies mercy killing? What if the pain threshold is below optimum and the patient perceives the circumstances to be not worthy of living? How would one know whether the wish to die is the result of unbalanced thought process or a logical decision in mentally ill patients? What if the individual chooses assisted suicide as an option and the family wouldn't agree? As to face the parting, helplessness, loss of self-control, fear of death and sorrow and so the majority of patients will experience mental suffering.In this psychological requirement under the “Euthanasia”, we can say that he isreasonable? “According to the study of suicide, suicide and treatable mental illness is intrinsically related, but not the fatal disease, a study found that in 44 patients with advanced cancer, only three thought about suicide, but are there is a serious depression.Another study shows that 85 suicides, only one person suffering from terminal illness, and 90-100% of the suicides were suffering from obvious mental illness.Undeniably, the modern medical practice slow death process, often cited the loss of personal characteristics of patients Mei, dignity, independence and autonomy.However, the expression of active euthanasia as acts of personal autonomy, it is wrong.Reasons:(a)Since active euthanasia need help, then it is not an individual matter, but the open or in the public thing.(B)under the public recognition to self-defense, capital punishment and justice in the form of war, murder, only to defend the life for everyone, not to the benefit of those killed.So, even if death is painful relief, can not be lightly taken away the right to life committed to personal.(C)even if the person's self-determination recognized the right to choose to die, that does not mean the right to ask others to kill themselves, does not include the right to authorize self to kill others.(D)autonomy, including the right of slavery has never been their own, in other words, the right to freedom does not mean the right not to freedom.So to maintain the autonomy, the need to protect life, to give others their right to life is not trampling the principle of maintaining independence.Therefore, individual autonomy and social need and public objectives and values to be consistent.结尾active euthanasia may gradually lose its spontaneity, and thus out of(i)”secret euthanasia“, meaning that without their own consent, to be a doctor euthanized.(Ii)”forced euthanasia“,meaning patients suffering from terminal illness would be coercion to lure choose euthanasia to relieve their families in the economic and psychological pressures, and save limited resources of society, the patients chose to die, do not feel life is a burden or tired of life, but he felt the burden of someone else, and that others dislike.(Iii)”Deputy euthanasia“ means to allo w patients who lack capacity to self-determination by the people ”proxy decision“ to euthanasia.(Iv)”Discrimination against euthanasia,“ the crisis is the number of types of patients such as the poverty stricken or belonging to ethnic minorities, may be ”clever“ to force that ”euthanasia“ requirement, the mercy of others.Made ill patients caught in the dilemma of both the opposition between the yield, resulting in additional unnecessary fear and anxiety.The information may be heard: ”Death is terrible!Your best choice of euthanasia.“ of the slip waves, is once the ”euthanasia“ is legalized, its use will inevitably extend to other types of patients but not the dying, if not cure patients, but not incurable disease, then the risk of Alzheimer's disease or brain degradation, even those born with severe disabilities Down syndrome baby..And so on.So, if this argument, once established, will only create panic and fear that they will be forcibly sent to ”euthanasia“ in the ranks.Therefore, I agree Frasen say, ”human life, merely the possibility of error, is enough to completely reject the“ euthanasia.” “ Euthanasia is humane because it helps to hasten the death of terminally ill patient.Death, as natural as birth, is sometimes a hard process that requires assistance, and euthanasia is part of such assistance.People have the right to die.It is unnecessary to maintain life artificially beyond the point when people will never regain consciousness.Extending an incurably ill patient’s lifemeans the same as aggravating his pain.Efforts should not be made to perpetuate what has become a meaningless existence.Euthanasia can bring mental and physical release to the patient and his family when he is terminally ill and has no prospect of recovering.Mercy killing is motivated by nothing but love and sympathy for the dying patient.Most of the terminally ill patients themselves want to die with dignity and peace instead of agony and degradation.Medical treatment for a comatose patient cause great burden economically for the hospital and the patient’s family.It is inhumane to perform euthanasia no matter how painless the process is.Anyone who voluntarily, knowingly or premeditatedly takes the life of another, even one minute prior to death, is a killer.Euthanasia is a criminal offense because it involves the killing of a person.Legalized euthanasia will invite abuse of human life because any form of murder many be conveniently dubbed “mercy killing ”by unscrupulous people.Euthanasia raises many moral issues since it implies that active measures are taken to terminate human life.Doctors and nurses should do everything they can to save dying patients instead of hastening their death by active measures.The instinct for self-preservation is the strongest instinct that human beings possess.It is untrue that any patient himself should want to die.Doctors and nurses involved in euthanasia have discredited their profession, for euthanasia is a violation of the fundamental medical principle to save human life.Mercy killing is one of the most controversial issues in the world of medicine.As the picture given above depicts, A late sick mother desperately ill son request for euthanasia.But the son was cut for this。
安乐死英文精选全文
30%
recent years.
20%
10%
0%
1947
1973
1983 recent
years
Part 3:But at the same time there
are many people disagree this
They keesonal
die happily.
Phenomenon
Reasons for support Another attitude Summary
Phenomenon
• Now there are a lot of people have an incurable disease. They want to be part of people with euthanasia over his own life. But it is not allowed ……
安乐死英语小论文Euthanasia
Euthanasia: A Means, Not the End Summary:Euthanasia means "happy death" or "mercy killing", which is sometimes used to help patients die without suffering too much pain. The purpose of euthanasia is kind and benevolent, but as it is related to death, the result may not seem so kind or benevolent when we see anyone die. This is why euthanasia becomes one of the most widely and hotly debated issues in society. Do we have "the right to die"? Should euthanasia be legalized? In what kind of situation will euthanasia be put into practice?(words:87)With the high-speed development of medicine, our life become much longer and more comfortable. Though medicine can usually prevent us from death, we cannot avoid dying throughout life. If your disease were incurable, of course high-level medicine could extend your life more or less, but it would also extend your pain at the same time. In this situation, as death is visible and unavoidable while pain is hard for you to stand, euthanasia is used.Many people around the world are in favor of the idea of euthanasia, the core concept they invoke is "the right to die", which means anyone who has incurable disease with pain beyond suffering can choose to die when they or their family is determined to. People supporting the idea "the right to die" believe that euthanasia is humane, because it helps hasten the death of hopelessly ill patients, relieving them from the fierce pain, which is good for not only the dying patients but their families.Of course, the use of euthanasia has rationality. It's necessary to permit euthanasia in some special situations.However, there are also many disadvantages of euthanasia. First, euthanasia can be abused when doctors is treating disabled people and old people, which leads to crime. Second, when a seriously-ill patient is determined to take euthanasia, he may not make clear-headed decision because his consciousness is probably muddled. Third, too many examples of euthanasia may result in social moral crisis and doctors may not try their best to cure a dying patient once they have the power to practice euthanasia. This conduct is nothing less than murdering.In order to prevent the abuse of euthanasia, we must strictly standard ize the application of euthanasia. So, when can doctor use euthanasia legally? I think it depends on several conditions.First of all, euthanasia can be only practiced on terminally ill patients, when the practice of euthanasia serves only to hasten death. Secondly, we should guarantee the earnest and strictness of euthanasia, so taking euthanasia need the permission of patient himself or his family, the acceptance of doctors and the certificate from court. Thirdly, the method to practice euthanasia must conform to humanitarianism, and only professional and qualified doctor can practice euthanasia. Finally, legal euthanasia can't betray its original purpose. Euthanasia is a merciful way to end patients' life. Doctors practice euthanasia in order that the patients will no longer suffer a fierce pain. Euthanasia can make the patients die peacefully. To some extent, it is a kind of respect to human life.Euthanasia has come into being for a long time, it's impossible and groundless to forbid it completely. I think it won't be long to legalize euthanasia in China, what we should do is to make the law on euthanasia as perfect as possible.Anyhow, we shouldn't regard euthanasia as a painless way to commit suicide, and there is no reason for us to take it for granted that euthanasia is a good way to terminate our life. Y ou cannot expect euthanasia to bring you any relief as it seems, the only thing euthanasia can do is take your pain with your life. After all, life is the most precious treasure we have.In fact, to terminate one's life by taking euthanasia is not only a legal issue but also a moral issue because it refers to a choice between painfully liv ing and comfortably dying. Which one would you choose? Just like what Confucius said: "It's useless talking about death before you understand life clearly."[1]According to Confucius's words, it's useless talking about choosing how to die while we haven't settled the problems of life. So should we pay too much attention on "the right of death" while we still can't guarantee the rights of life? Is it the time for us to focus more on those people who are alive?(words:655) [1] 出自《论语·先进》:孔子云：“未知生，焉知死？”Reference:1.Y e Gaofeng. "A Law View on Euthanasia",The Issues and Disputes of Penal Law . 1(2001): 3992.Zhang Yutang. "Do We Have right to die?" Law. 5(2001): 333.Wu Jing. "Euthanasia Is Not Crime", The Issues and Disputes of Penal Law. 1(2000): 1134.Wang Xiaohui. To Discuss Euthanasia. Jilin People's Press5.Chu Dongping. Euthanasia. Shanghai. Culture Press, 1988。