益生菌肠道微生物的基因组学英文论文及翻译
益生菌的介绍英文作文

益生菌的介绍英文作文### Probiotics: Your Gut's Best Friend。
Probiotics are live microorganisms that, when consumed in adequate amounts, provide health benefits to the host. They are often referred to as "good" or "helpful" bacteria because they help keep your gut healthy.Probiotics are found in a variety of fermented foods, such as yogurt, kefir, sauerkraut, kimchi, and miso. They can also be taken as supplements in capsule or powder form.How do probiotics work?Probiotics work by colonizing the gut and competing with harmful bacteria for food and space. They also produce antimicrobial substances that can kill or inhibit the growth of harmful bacteria.In addition, probiotics help to:Improve digestion and absorption of nutrients。
Boost the immune system。
Reduce inflammation。
Lower cholesterol levels。
probiotics翻译

probiotics翻译probiotics(益生菌)是一类有益于人体健康的微生物,主要包括某些菌种,如乳酸菌和双歧杆菌等。
这些微生物在人体内起到平衡肠道菌群、增强免疫力、改善消化系统功能等作用。
Probiotics可以通过食物或补充剂的形式摄入。
以下是一些常见的probiotics使用方法和中英文对照例句:1. Yogurt is a popular food source of probiotics.酸奶是常见的益生菌食物来源。
2. Some people take probiotic supplements to support their gut health.一些人服用益生菌补充剂来维护肠道健康。
3. Probiotics can help restore the natural balance of bacteria in the gut.益生菌有助于恢复肠道内细菌的自然平衡。
4. These probiotic strains have been shown to improve digestion and reduce bloating.这些益生菌菌株已被证明可以改善消化功能并减少腹胀。
5. Probiotics are believed to strengthen the immune system and prevent certain infections.人们认为益生菌可以增强免疫系统并预防某些感染。
6. It is important to choose a probiotic product with a sufficient number of live bacteria.选择含有足够数量活菌的益生菌产品非常重要。
7. Probiotics should be stored in a cool and dry place to maintain their viability.益生菌应存放在阴凉干燥的地方以保持其活性。
肠道微生物组与健康:机制见解

肠道微生物组与健康:机制见解摘要:肠道微生物群现在被认为是有助于调节宿主健康的关键元素之一。
几乎所有的身体部位都被微生物定植,这表明与我们的器官存在不同类型的串扰。
由于分子工具和技术(即宏基因组学、代谢组学、脂质组学、宏转录组学)的发展,宿主和不同微生物之间发生的复杂相互作用正在逐步被破译。
如今,肠道微生物群偏差与许多疾病有关,包括肥胖、2 型糖尿病、肝脂肪变性、肠病(IBD)和几种类型的癌症。
因此,表明涉及免疫、能量、脂质和葡萄糖代谢的各种途径受到影响。
在这篇综述中,特别关注对该领域当前理解的批判性评估。
讨论了许多解释肠道细菌如何与保护或疾病发作有因果关系的分子机制。
我们检查了公认的代谢物(即短链脂肪酸、胆汁酸、三甲胺 N-氧化物),并将其扩展到最近确定的分子作用物(即内源性大麻素、生物活性脂质、酚衍生化合物、晚期糖基化终产物和肠联基因)及其特异性受体,如过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体α (PPARα)和γ (PPARγ)、芳烃受体(AhR)和 G 蛋白偶联受体(即 GPR41、GPR43、GPR119、武田 G 蛋白偶联受体 5)。
总而言之,了解将肠道微生物与健康联系起来的复杂性和分子方面将有助于为已经开发的新疗法奠定基础。
人类肠道微生物组人类微生物组在这里被认为是微生物、它们的基因和产物的集合,它们从出生起就在我们体内定植并垂直转移。
虽然所有身体部位都被定植(图 1),但在肠道中发现的微生物数量最高,这已经得到了广泛的研究。
在这里,我们回顾了解决肠道微生物、其活性和介质分子如何促进我们健康的主要和最新发现。
图 1 根据不同身体部位的细菌总丰度。
不同器官中细菌数的边界,由细菌浓度和体积得出。
在健康受试者中,口腔和唾液微生物组包含数百万种微生物,这些微生物每天与我们的食物一起吞咽,但它们在肠道中的持久性受到许多因素的阻碍,包括胃的酸度、十二指肠内外胆汁酸(BA)的产生、消化酶和抗菌蛋白许多其他主要变量会影响进一步的下游微生物定植,例如 pH 值、氧浓度和氧化还原电位等化学参数、粘液、胆汁和抗体的生物产生,以及物理方面,包括肠道结构、蠕动和转运时间(图 1)。
微生物与细菌的英文作文

微生物与细菌的英文作文英文回答:Microorganisms and bacteria are both essential components of the natural world. They play significant roles in various aspects of our lives, including health, environment, and industry. However, there are some differences between the two.Microorganisms, also known as microbes, are microscopic organisms that can only be seen under a microscope. They include various types such as bacteria, fungi, viruses, and protozoa. Microbes are found everywhere, from the soil to the air, and even inside our bodies. They have a wide range of functions and can be both beneficial and harmful.Bacteria, on the other hand, are a specific type of microorganism. They are single-celled organisms that lack a nucleus and other membrane-bound organelles. Bacteria can be found in various environments, including soil, water,and the human body. They are known for their ability to reproduce rapidly, which is why they can cause infections and diseases.One major difference between microorganisms and bacteria is their size. Microorganisms can be seen only under a microscope, while bacteria are large enough to be seen with the naked eye. Another difference is their classification. Microorganisms are a broader category that includes bacteria, fungi, viruses, and protozoa, while bacteria are a specific type of microorganism.In terms of their roles, both microorganisms and bacteria have significant impacts on our lives. They are involved in food production, such as the fermentation of yogurt and cheese. They also play a crucial role in the environment by decomposing organic matter and recycling nutrients. Additionally, bacteria are used in various industrial processes, such as the production of antibiotics and biofuels.In terms of their effects on human health,microorganisms and bacteria can be both beneficial and harmful. Beneficial microorganisms, like probiotics, help maintain a healthy digestive system and boost the immune system. However, harmful bacteria can cause infections and diseases, such as pneumonia and urinary tract infections.In conclusion, microorganisms and bacteria are both important components of the natural world. They have various functions and impacts on our lives. While microorganisms are a broader category that includes bacteria, fungi, viruses, and protozoa, bacteria are a specific type of microorganism. Both have significant roles in health, environment, and industry.中文回答:微生物和细菌都是自然界中重要的组成部分。
益生菌_胃肠道微生物及宿主之间相互作用的研究进展

益生菌、胃肠道微生物和宿主之间相互作用的研究进展王丽凤张和平*(内蒙古农业大学乳品生物技术与工程教育部重点实验室国家奶牛产业技术研发中心乳制品加工研究室呼和浩特010018)摘要目前国内外的研究工作集中于了解肠道共生菌和益生菌以及人类宿主之间的相互作用。
利用组学技术,以便于了解益生菌和共生菌之间以及细菌环境和宿主胃肠道组织之间的相互作用。
利用测序技术对栖居在胃肠道内细菌的研究显示人体的复杂性随不同人群和个体的变化而变化。
此外,转录推动了我们对细菌(包括共生菌和益生菌)与胃肠道间复杂相互作用的洞悉。
本综述从胃肠道内微生物的作用等方面概括这一领域的最新研究进展,并在此基础上提出对未来的展望。
关键词益生菌;胃肠道;微生物;相互作用文章编号1009-7848(2011)04-0147-07益生菌是乳制品和功能性食品工业的重要组成部分,带来了数十亿美元的市场。
益生菌的多方面作用包括预防感染,降低腹泻发病率,抗微生物活性,病原菌的竞争性排斥,免疫耐受,减少大肠癌生物标志物,上皮屏障功能,增加细胞免疫力,增加体液反应,降低血胆固醇水平,减少过敏肠道疾病症状等。
目前研究的大多数益生菌来自乳杆菌属和双歧杆菌属。
乳酸杆菌与发酵产品相关,尤其在奶制品中应用最多。
最近向食品中添加双歧杆菌的研究不断增多,大多作为有益添加剂。
多数菌种天然存在于胃肠道,这些微生物通常能够抗酸、耐受胆汁。
某些菌株还具有发酵果糖诸如人类不能消化的低聚果糖(FOS )和半乳甘露寡糖(GOS )的能力,这些果糖能为胃肠道内的一些共生菌和益生菌提供一定生长优势[1]。
胃肠道是一个约有500种、100万亿微生物的复杂器官,大概是人类体内细胞总数的10多倍[2]。
对于这些细菌的遗传组成成分,可以在胃肠道中翻译编码成具有大量生理功能的基因储存器,对人体宿主的胃肠道产生有益作用。
胃肠道已经演变成为一个营养和微生物丰富的生存部位,细菌在其中不断地旺盛生长。
组学技术诸如转录组技术、宏基因组学和代谢组学的使用,促进人们了解胃肠道中益生菌如何生长以及共生菌如何发挥作用。
关于乳酸菌的英文文献及翻译.

2.4. Chemical and microbial analyses Analysis of DM and CP concentration in the experimental diets, excreta and probiotic products was done according to AOAC (1990 methods (930.05 and 976.05, respectively. The GE was measured by using the bomb calorimeter (model 1261, Parr Instrument Co., Moline, IL, and chromium concentration was determined with an automated spectrophotometer (Jasco V-650, Jasco Corp., Tokyo, Japan according to the procedure of Fenton and Fenton (1979. The microbiological assay of faecal samples (d 14 and 28 and intestinal digesta (d 28 was conducted by culturing in different media for the determination of total anaerobic bacteria (Tryptic soy agar, Bifidobacterium spp. (MRS agar, Lactobacillus spp. (MRS agar+0.02% NaN3+0.05% L-cystine hydrochloride monohydrate, Clostridium spp. (TSC agar and coliforms (violet red bile agar. The microbiological assay of probiotic products was also carried out by culturing technique. The L. acidophilus was enumerated using MRS agar+0.02%NaN3+0.05% L-cystine hydrochloride monohydrate, B. Subtilis by using plate count agar, S. cerevisiae and A. oryzae by potato dextrose agar. The anaerobic conditions during the assay of anaerobic were created by using gas pack anaerobic system (BBL, No. 260678; Difco, Detroit, MI. The tryptic soy agar (No. 236950, MRS agar (No. 288130, violet red bile agar (No. 216695, plate count agar (No. 247940, and potato dextrose agar (No. 213400 used were purchased from Difco Laboratories (Detroit,MI, and TSC agar(CM0589 was purchased from Oxoid (Hampshire, UK. The pH of probiotic products was determined by pH meter (Basic pH Meter PB-11, Sartorius, Germany.2.5. Small intestine morphology Three cross-sections for each intestinal sample were prepared after staining with azure A and eosin using standard paraffin embedding procedures. A total of 10 intact, welloriented crypt-villus units were selected in triplicate for each intestinal cross-section as described previously (Jin et al., 2008. Villus height was measured from the tip of the villi to the villus crypt junction, and crypt depth was defined as the depth of the invagination between adjacent villi. All morphological measurements (villus height and crypt depth were made in 10-μm increments by using animage proce ssing and analysis system (Optimus software version 6.5, Media Cybergenetics, North Reading, MA.2.6. Statistical analysesAll the data obtained in the current study were analyzed in accordance with a rand omized complete block design using the GLM procedure of SAS (SAS Inst. Inc., C ary, NC. In Exp. 1, one-way analysis of variance test was used and when signific ant differences (Pb0.05 were determined among treatment means, they were separ ated by using Duncan's multiple range tests. In Exp. 2, the data were analyzed as a 2×2 factorial arrangement of treatments in randomized complete block design. T he main effects of probiotic products (LF or SF, antibiotic (colistin or lincomycin, a nd their interaction were determined by the Mixed procedures of SAS. However, as the interaction (probiotic x antibiotic was not statistically significant (Pb0.05, it wa s removed from the final model. The pen was the experimental unit for all analysis in both experiments. The bacterial concentrations were transformed (log before st atistical analysis.3.1. Experiment 13.1.1. Growth performance and apparent total tract digestibilityDietary treatments had no effect on the performance of pigs during phase I (Table 3. However, during phase II and the overall experimental period, improved (Pb0.05 ADG, ADFI and G:F were observed in pigs fed PC, LF and SF dietswhen compared with pigs fed NC diet. Moreover, pigs fed PC and SF diets had hi gher (Pb0.05 ADG and better G:F than pigs fed LF diet during phase II and the o verall experimentalperiod. The dietary treatments had no influence on the ATTDof DM and GE; however, pigs fed PC and SF diets had greater ATTD of CP whe n compared with pigs fed NC and LF diets (Table 4.3.1.2. Bacterial population in faecesDietary treatments had no effect on the faecal total anaerobes and Bifidobacterium spp. population at d 14 and 28, and Lactobacillus spp. at d 14 (Table 5. However, pigs fed PC (d 14 and 28 and SF (d 28 diets had less (Pb0.05 faecal Clostridium spp. and coliforms than pigs fed NC diet.Moreover, pigs fed SF diet had greater (Pb0.05 faecal Lactobacillus spp. populatio n (d 28 than pigs fed NC, PC and LF diets.3.2. Experiment 23.2.1. Growth performance and apparent total tract digestibilityDuring phase I, pigs fed SF diet consumed more feed than pigs fed LF diet, wher eas the ADG and ADFI were similar between pigs fed LF and SF diets (Table 6. During phase II and the overall experimental period, pigs fed SF diet showed better ADG(Pb0.01, ADFI (Pb0.01 and G:F (Pb0.05 thanpigs fed LF diet. Howev er, different antibiotics had no effect on the performance of pigs. Pigs fed SF diet had greater ATTD of DM and CP during phases I and II (Pb0.01 and 0.001, respe ctively when compared with pigs fed LF diet (Table 7.However, different antibiotics had no effect on the ATTD of DM, CP and GE.3.2.2. Bacterial population in intestinePigs fed SF diet had greater (Pb0.05 Lactobacillus spp. And less Clostridium spp. (Pb0.01 and coliform (Pb0.05 population in the ileum than pigs fed LF diet (Table 8. Additionally,higher (Pb0.05 caecal Bifidobacterium spp. Population was observed in pigs fed SF diet. Antibiotics had no effect on the ileal microbial population; however, pigs fed colistin diet had less number of Bifidobacterium spp. (Pb0.05 and coliforms (Pb0.01 inthe cecum, whereas, feeding of lincomycin diet resulted in reduced (Pb0.05 caecal Clostridium spp.population.3.2.3. Small intestinal morphologyThe different probiotic products and antibiotics had no influence on the morphology of different segments of the small intestine, except for the greater (Pb0.05 villus height:crypt depth at the jejunum and ileum noticed in pigs fed lincomycin diet (Table 9.4.DiscussionPrevious studies on probiotics lack information on the method of production used, however, the preparation of probiotics by LF method is fairly common (Patel et al., 2004. The probiotic products used in the present study differedfrom the previous reports in that harvested probiotic microbes were added directly to the diets. In this study, the microbial biomass grown on the CB was directly sprayed onthe carrier (corn and soybean meal to obtain LF probiotic product. In case of the SF probiotic product, corn and soybean meal was used as a substrate during fermentation and as a carrier of probiotic microbes. We have reported previously that multi-microbe probiotic product prepared by SF method was better than the probiotic product prepared by submerged liquid fermentation in improving performance, nutrient retention and reducing harmful intestinal bacteria in broilers (Shim et al., 2010. In the current study, LF and SF method was used and corn–soybean meal was used as a substrate forthe growth of potential probiotic microbes under optimum conditions.2.4 化学和微生物分析在试验日粮干物质和粗蛋白含量的分析中,排泄物和益生菌产品是根据AOAC(1990方法(分别为930.05和976.05 分析。
益生菌英文介绍

pathogens ③ Produce bacteriocins to inhibit pathogens
hyporesponsiveness to food ④ Scavenge superoxide radicals
antigens
⑤ Stimulate epithelial mucin
2、History of probiotics
(2)、1917年,德国教授 Alfred Nissle从一位第一次 世界大战士兵的粪便中分离 了一株无致病性的大肠杆菌 (Escherichia coli)菌株, 这位士兵在一次严重的细菌 爆发中没有患小肠结肠炎。 人们常常用活性非致病菌改 造或替换肠道微生物来治疗 肠道疾病。Nissle于1917年 分离的大肠杆菌菌株是少量 非乳酸菌益生菌的一种。
• Probiotics are live microbes 【‘maɪkrob 微生物 、细菌】that can be formulated 【 'fɔrmjə'let按配方制造】 into many
different types of product, including foods, drugs, and dietary supplements【膳食补充 剂】. Species of Lactobacillus [,læktobə’sɪləs 乳酸杆菌] and Bifidobacterium [,baifidəubæk‘ti:riəm双歧杆 菌] are most commonly used as probiotics.
合生元是适当的益生菌和益生元合成物。合生元产品 同时兼有益生菌和益生元的功效。
4.Mechanisms of action
益生菌论文

关于益生菌食品的研究与发展的论文在欧美等国家,以乳酸菌发酵的乳制品发展已有上百年的历史,其在乳制品市场占有相当大的比例。
据英国某调研公司调查,欧共体国家中对乳酸菌乳制品的消费,每年都以17%左右的比例增长。
在日本、欧洲,活性乳酸菌发酵酸奶在乳制品中的比例高达80%,在北美也有30%。
而在我国台湾地区,活性乳酸菌发酵酸奶的消费量也已超过70%。
1962年,Bogdanov从保加利亚乳杆菌中分离出了3种具有抗癌活性的糖肽,首次报道了乳酸菌的抗肿瘤作用。
1965年, Lilly D. M.和Stillwell R. H.在《科学》杂志上发表的论文“益生菌—由微生物产生的生长促进因素”中最先使用益生菌Probiotic这个定义来描述一种微生物对其他微生物促进生长的作用。
20世纪70年代初由沃斯(Woese)、奥森(Olsen)等提出16s rRNA寡核苷酸序列分析法来对菌进行鉴定。
构建了现已被确认的全生命系统进化树,越来越多的细菌依据16SrDNA被正确分类或重分类,给乳酸菌的鉴定和肠内菌群分析带来极大方便。
1971年,Sperti用益生菌(Probiotic)描述刺激微生物生长的组织提取物。
1974年,Paker将益生菌定义为对肠道微生物平衡有利的菌物。
1977年,微生态学(Microecology)由德国人Volker Rush首先提出。
他在赫尔本建立了微生态学研究所,并从事对双歧杆菌、乳杆菌、大肠杆菌等活菌作生态疗法的研究与应用。
Gilliland对肠道乳杆菌的降低胆固醇作用进行了研究,提出了乳酸菌在生长过程中通过降解胆盐促进胆固醇的分解代谢,从而降低胆固醇含量的观点。
1979年中国的微生态学研究开始。
自中国微生物学会人畜共患病病原学专业委员会下属的正常菌群学组的成立.1988年2月15日中华预防医学会微生态学分会的成立有了学术组织。
1988年《中国微生态学杂志》创刊。
80年代初大连医科大学康白教授首先研制成功促菌生(蜡杆芽胞杆菌)。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
The genomics of probiotic intestinal microorganismsSeppo Salminen1 , Jussi Nurmi2 and Miguel Gueimonde1(1) Functional Foods Forum, University of Turku, FIN-20014 Turku, Finland(2) Department of Biotechnology, University of Turku, FIN-20014 Turku, FinlandSeppo SalminenEmail: *********************Published online: 29 June 2005AbstractAn intestinal population of beneficial commensal microorganisms helps maintain human health, and some of these bacteria have been found to significantly reduce the risk of gut-associated disease and to alleviate disease symptoms. The genomic characterization of probiotic bacteria and other commensal intestinal bacteria that is now under way will help to deepen our understanding of their beneficial effects.While the sequencing of the human genome [1, 2] has increased ourunderstanding of the role of genetic factors in health and disease, each human being harbors many more genes than those in their own genome. These belong to our commensal and symbiotic intestinal microorganisms - our intestinal 'microbiome' - which play an important role in maintaining human health and well-being. A more appropriate image of ourselves would be drawn if the genomes of our intestinal microbiota were taken into account. The microbiome may contain more than 100 times the number of genes in the human genome [3] and provides many functions that humans have thus not needed to develop themselves. The indigenous intestinal microbiota provides a barrier against pathogenic bacteria and other harmful food components [4–6]. It has also been shown to have a direct impact on the morphology of the gut [7], and many intestinal diseases can be linked to disturbances in the intestinal microbial population [8].The indigenous microbiota of an infant's gastrointestinal tract is originally created through contact with the diverse microbiota of the parents and the immediate environment. During breast feeding, initial microbial colonization is enhanced by galacto-oligosaccharides in breast milk and contact with the skin microbiota of the mother. This early colonization process directs the microbial succession until weaning and forms the basis for a healthy microbiota. The viable microbes in the adultintestine outnumber the cells in the human body tenfold, and the composition of this microbial population throughout life is unique to each human being. During adulthood and aging the composition and diversity of the microbiota can vary as a result of disease and the genetic background of the individual.Current research into the intestinal microbiome is focused on obtaining genomic data from important intestinal commensals and from probiotics, microorganisms that appear to actively promote health. This genomic information indicates that gut commensals not only derive food and other growth factors from the intestinal contents but also influence their human hosts by providing maturational signals for the developing infant and child, as well as providing signals that can lead to an alteration in the barrier mechanisms of the gut. It has been reported that colonization by particular bacteria has a major role in rapidly providing humans with energy from their food [9]. For example, the intestinal commensal Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron has been shown to have a major role in this process, and whole-genome transcriptional profiling of the bacterium has shown that specific diets can be associated with selective upregulation of bacterial genes that facilitate delivery of products of carbohydrate breakdown to the host's energy metabolism [10, 11]. Key microbial groups in the intestinal microbiota are highly flexible in adapting to changes in diet, and thus detailed prediction of their actions and effects may be difficult. Although genomic studies have revealed important details about the impact of the intestinal microbiota on specific processes [3, 11–14], the effects of species composition and microbial diversity and their potential compensatory functions are still not understood.Probiotics and healthA probiotic has been defined by a working group of the International Life Sciences Institute Europe (ILSI Europe) as "a viable microbial food supplement which beneficially influences the health of the host" [15]. Probiotics are usually members of the healthy gut microbiota and their addition can assist in returning a disturbed microbiota to its normal beneficial composition. The ILSI definition implies that safety and efficacy must be scientifically demonstrated for each new probiotic strain and product. Criteria for selecting probiotics that are specific for a desired target have been developed, but general criteria that must be satisfied include the ability to adhere to intestinal mucosa and tolerance of acid and bile. Such criteria have proved useful but cumbersome in current selection processes, as there are several adherence mechanisms and they influence gene upregulation differently in the host. Therefore, two different adhesion studies need to be conducted on each strain and theirpredictive value for specific functions is not always good or optimal. Demonstration of the effects of probiotics on health includes research on mechanisms and clinical intervention studies with human subjects belonging to target groups.The revelation of the human genome sequence has increased our understanding of the genetic deviations that lead to or predispose to gastrointestinal disease as well as to diseases associated with the gut, such as food allergies. In 1995, the first genome of a free-living organism, the bacterium Haemophilus influenzae, was sequenced [16]. Since then, over 200 bacterial genome sequences, mainly of pathogenic microorganisms, have been completed. The first genome of a mammalian lactic-acid bacterium, that of Lactococcus lactis, a microorganism of great industrial interest, was completed in 2001 [17]. More recently, the genomes of numerous other lactic-acid bacteria [18], bifidobacteria [12] and other intestinal microorganisms [13, 19, 20] have been sequenced, and others are under way [21]. Table 1lists the probiotic bacteria that have been sequenced. These great breakthroughs have demonstrated that evolution has adapted both microbes and humans to their current state of cohabitation, or even symbiosis, which is beneficial to both parties and facilitates a healthy and relatively stable but adaptable gut environment.Table 1Lessons from genomesLactic-acid bacteria and bifidobacteria can act as biomarkers of gut health by giving early warning of aberrations that represent a risk of specific gut diseases. Only a few members of the genera Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium, two genera that provide many probiotics, have been completely sequenced. The key issue for the microbiota, for probiotics, and for their human hosts is the flexibility of the microorganisms in coping with a changeable local environment and microenvironments.This flexibility is emphasized in the completed genomes of intestinal and probiotic microorganisms. The complete genome sequence of the probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM has recently been published by Altermann et al. [22]. The genome is relatively small and the bacterium appears to be unable to synthesize several amino acids, vitamins and cofactors. Italso encodes a number of permeases, glycolases and peptidases for rapid uptake and utilization of sugars and amino acids from the human intestine, especially the upper gastrointestinal tract. The authors also report a number of cell-surface proteins, such as mucus- and fibronectin-binding proteins, that enable this strain to adhere to the intestinal epithelium and to exchange signals with the intestinal immune system. Flexibility is guaranteed by a number of regulatory systems, including several transcriptional regulators, six PurR-type repressors and ninetwo-component systems, and by a variety of sugar transporters. The genome of another probiotic, Lactobacillus johnsonii [23], also lacks some genes involved in the synthesis of amino acids, purine nucleotides and numerous cofactors, but contains numerous peptidases, amino-acid permeases and other transporters, indicating a strong dependence on the host.The presence of bile-salt hydrolases and transporters in these bacteria indicates an adaptation to the upper gastrointestinal tract [23], enabling the bacteria to survive the acidic and bile-rich environments of the stomach and small intestine. In this regard, bile-salt hydrolases have been found in most of the sequenced genomes of bifidobacteria and lactic-acid bacteria [24], and these enzymes can have a significant impact on bacterial survival. Another lactic-acid bacterium, Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1, also contains a large number of genes related to carbohydrate transport and utilization, and has genes for the production of exopolysaccharides and antimicrobial agents [18], indicating a good adaptation to a variety of environments, including the human small intestine [14]. In general, flexibility and adaptability are reflected by a large number of regulatory and transport functions.Microorganisms that inhabit the human colon, such as B. thetaiotaomicron and Bifidobacterium longum [12], have a great number of genes devoted to oligosaccharide transport and metabolism, indicating adaptation to life in the large intestine and differentiating them from, for example, L. johnsonii [23]. Genomic research has also provided initial information on the relationship between components of the diet and intestinal microorganisms. The genome of B. longum [12] suggests the ability to scan for nutrient availability in the lower gastrointestinal tract in human infants. This strain is adapted to utilizing the oligosaccharides in human milk along with intestinal mucins that are available in the colon of breast-fed infants. On the other hand, the genome of L. acidophilus has a gene cluster related to the metabolism of fructo-oligosaccharides, carbohydrates that are commonly used as prebiotics, or substrates to肠道微生物益生菌的基因组学塞波萨米宁,尤西鲁米和米格尔哥尔摩得(1)功能性食品论坛,图尔库大学,FIN-20014芬兰图尔库(2)土尔库大学生物技术系,FIN-20014芬兰图尔库塞波萨米宁电子邮件:seppo.salminen utu.fi线上发表于2005年6月29日摘要肠道有益的共生微生物有助于维护人体健康,一些这些细菌被发现显着降低肠道疾病的风险和减轻疾病的症状。