Semiclassical Quantization of Two-Dimensional Dilaton Gravity

合集下载

Superconducting qubits II Decoherence

Superconducting qubits II Decoherence
present address: Physics Department and Insitute for Quantum Computing, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada; fwilhelm@iqc.ca ‡ mgeller@
The transition from quantum to classical physics, now known as decoherence, has intrigued physicists since the formulation of quantum mechanics (Giulini et al., 1996; Leggett, 2002; Peres, 1993; Feynman and Vernon, 1963; Zurek, 1993). It has been put into the poignant Schr¨ odinger cat paradox (Schr¨ odinger, 1935) and was considered an open fundamental question for a long time.
and compare it to the corresponding classical mixture leading to the same expectation value of σz 1 1 0 ρmix = (2) 2 0 1 we can see that the von-Neumann entropy ρ = −kB Tr [ρ log ρ] rises from Spure = 0 to Smix = kB ln 2. Hence, decoherence taking ρpure to ρmix creates entropy and is irreversible. Quantum mechanics, on the other hand, is always reversible. It can be shown, that any isolated quantum system is described by the Liouville von-Neumann equation i¯ hρ ˙ = [H, ρ] (3)

differential vector quantization y

differential vector quantization y

1. INTRODUCTION
Data compression algorithms reduce transmission bandwidth and/or storage space. Currently there is particular interest in the low bit rate coding of images. In this paper, we discuss the compression of digital video image data, which has become a central concern as HDTV standards develop. One compression technique, Vector Quantization (VQ) 1 2, has emerged as a powerful technique that can provide large reductions in bit rate while preserving essential signal characteristics. In this paper we show that error-insensitive VQ encoders can be constructed by employing entropy based VQ codebooks.
y
Appears in Applications of Arti cial Neural Networks III (S. K. Rogers, ed.), pp. 422-433, Proc. SPIE 1709, 1992.
maximum-entropy codebook. Experimental results investigating the edge preserving properties of di erent distortion measures and experiments investigating various tile sizes are then presented. These experimental results are followed by a short discussion on the Di erential Vector Quantization architecture which we use to minimize edge distortion. We then present results of experiments in which FSCL design codebooks are used in a DVQ architecture to compress monochrome and color digital images.

Inclusions of second quantization algebras

Inclusions of second quantization algebras
The second named author is supported in part by MURST and EU.
c 0000 (copyright holder)
· · · ⊂ R(M−1 ) ⊂ R(M0 ) ⊂ R(M1 ) ⊂ R(M2 ) . . .
1
2
FRANCA FIGLIOLINI AND DANIELE GUIDO
1. Introduction. In this note we study inclusions of second quantization algebras, namely inclusions R(M0 ) ⊂ R(M1 ) of von Neumann algebras on the Fock space eH (H is a separable complex Hilbert space) generated by the Weyl unitaries with test functions in the closed, real linear subspaces M0 , M1 of H. More precisely we concentrate our attention to the case where both R(M0 ) and R(M1 ) are standard w.r.t. the vacuum vector e0 ∈ eH , since in this case the tower and tunnel associated with the inclusion (and the corresponding relative commutants) can themselves be realized as second quantization algebras on the same space: First we show that the class of irreducible inclusions of standard second quantization algebras is non empty, and that they are depth two inclusions, namely R(M0 )′ ∩ R(M3 ) is a factor. Then we prove that, when M0 ⊂ M1 is a (not necessarily irreducible) inclusion of standard spaces with finite codimension n, R(M ) is isomorphic to the cross product of R(N ) with Rn . On the contrary, when the codimension is infinite, we show that the inclusion may be non regular (see subsection 4.1). Second quantization algebras and their inclusions occur when studying algebras of local observables for the free fields. Inclusions of local observable algebras are in general neither irreducible nor come from a finite codimension inclusion of real vector spaces. In [9] however, local algebras for conformal field theories on the real line are studied, and it is shown that the inclusion of the real vector space corresponding to a bounded interval for the n + p-th derivative of the current algebra into the real vector space for the same interval and the n-th derivative theory has codimension p (and is irreducible when p = 1). We show in Theorem 4.1 that the corresponding inclusion of second quantization algebras is given by a cross product for any n ≥ 0, p > 0. Our analysis was also motivated by results concerning depth two inclusions of von Neumann algebras. It is well known that, analyzing the Jones’ tower associated with the inclusion of a von Neumann algebra N into the cross product M of the same algebra with an outer action of locally compact group, the family of

Quantization of soliton systems and Langlands duality

Quantization of soliton systems and Langlands duality
QUANTIZATION OF SOLITON SYSTEMS AND LANGLANDS DUALITY
arXiv:0705.2486v3 [math.QA] 9 Dec 2007
BORIS FEIGIN AND EDWARD FRENKEL Abstract. We consider the problem of quantization of classical soliton integrable systems, such as the KdV hierarchy, in the framework of a general formalism of Gaudin models associated to affine Kac–Moody algebras. Our experience with the Gaudin models associated to finite-dimensional simple Lie algebras suggests that the common eigenvalues of the mutually commuting quantum Hamiltonians in a model associated to an affine algebra b g should be encoded by affine opers associated to the Langlands dual affine algebra Lb g. This leads us to some concrete predictions for the spectra of the quantum Hamiltonians of the soliton systems. In particular, for the KdV system the corresponding affine opers may be expressed as Schr¨ odinger operators with spectral parameter, and our predictions in this case match those recently made by Bazhanov, Lukyanov and Zamolodchikov. This suggests that this the correspondence between quantum integrals of motion and differential operators may be viewed as special cases of the Langlands duality.

The quantization dimension of

The quantization dimension of

1
Given a Borel probability measure on R d and a natural number n 1 let Fn be the set of all Borel measurable maps f : R d ! R d with card(f (Rd )) n. The elements of Fn are called n{quantizers and the number Z Vn = Vn( ) = finfn kx ? f (x)k2d (x) 2F
id S = S Rd : : : S ;; n 1
and
r = 1 : : : r ;; r1 n
(
(
p = 1 : : : p ;; = ; : : : : = 1 p1 n n A subset ? f1; : : : ; N g is called a minimal covering (of f1; : : : ; N gN ) i , for every 2 f1; : : : ; N gN , there exists a unique 2 ? with . It is easy to check that X p =1 (2.5)
p= N X i=1
pi
p
Si?1:
(2.2)
If each component pi of p is strictly positive then the support of p equals A. p is called the self{similar measure induced by (S1 ; : : : ; SN ; p). p can be constructed as follows: Let f1; : : : ; N gN be equipped with the product of the discrete topology on f1; : : : ; N g. Let p be the product probability on f1; : : : ; N gN obtained from the probability on f1; : : : ; N g induced by p. Let : f1; : : : ; N gN ! A be the function which maps a sequence = ( n)n2N from f1; : : : ; N gN to ^ 2 R d , where ^ is the unique element in T S 1 : : : S n (A). Then is continuous and n2N onto. Moreover, ?1 : (2.3) p= p There is a unique real number D with

Bohr-Sommerfeld Quantization Rules in the Semiclassical

Bohr-Sommerfeld Quantization Rules in the Semiclassical
Bohr{Sommerfeld Quantization Rules in the Semiclassical Limit
George A. Hagedorn Department of Mathematics and Center for Statistical Mechanics and Mathematical Physics Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Blacksburg, Virginia 24061-0123 Sam L. Robinson Department of Mathematics The William Paterson University of New Jersey Wayne, New Jersey 07470
We study one-dimensional quantum mechanical systems in the semiclassical limit. We construct a lowest order quasimode (~) for the Hamiltonian H (~) when the energy E and Planck's constant ~ satisfy the appropriate Bohr-Sommerfeld conditions. This means that (~) is an approximate solution of the Schrodinger equation in the sense that k H (~) ? E ] (~)k C ~3=2 k (~)k . It follows that H (~) has some spectrum within a distance C ~3=2 of E . Although the result has a long history, our time-dependent construction technique is novel and elementary.

绪论-光学人物

one of Einstein’s major discoveries the light quantum or « photon » - Major breakthrough in the understanding of light - Nobel prize for Einstein in 1921 only for this discovery Did physicists know everything about light in 1906 ?
Einstein 1905
Explains photoelectric effect (Hertz, 1887)
Ultra-violet light is able to extract electrons from metals, not visible light E
hn
s accurate formula for u(n) assuming that exchanges between light and matter only occur by multiples of h n New constant of physics
Einstein 1905
Newton (1704)
Explanation of colours Description of « Newton rings »
At the end of his book, he lists a series of questions: « rays of light are very small bodies
山西大学物理与电子工程学院
光信息科学与技术专业
光 学
主讲教师: 郑耀辉
(光电研究所, 量子光学与光量子器件国家重点实验室) Email: yhzheng@ 电话:7113885 办公地址:量子光学科研楼323

量子力学英文课件格里菲斯Charter8


The second equation [8.7] is easily solved:
where C is a (real) constant.
The first equation [8.6] cannot be solved in general - so here comes the approximation: We assume that the amplitude A varies slowly, so that the A" term is negligible.
In that case we can drop the left side of Eq.[8.6], and we are left with
ቤተ መጻሕፍቲ ባይዱ
and therefore
It follows, then, that
and the general (approximate) solution will be a linear combination of two such terms, one with each sign.
So far, we have assumed that E > V, so that p(x) is real.
But we can easily write down the corresponding result in the nonclassical region (E < V ) – it’s the same as before (Eq.[8.10]), only now p(x) is imaginary:
which are precisely the energy levels of the original infinite square well (Eq.[2.23]). In this case the WKB approximation yields the exact answer.

Fermionic Chern-Simons theory for the Fractional Quantum Hall Effect in Bilayers

1 2
state. In single-layer
ቤተ መጻሕፍቲ ባይዱ
systems, even though many transport anomalies have been reported, there is no evidence of FQHE. On the other hand, this is a well observed [5] FQHE state in double-layer systems. Motivated by the fact that very interesting physics can be found in these 2DES if one considers new degrees of freedom, we study double-layer FQHE systems. Our formalism can also be extended to the study of spin non-polarized systems. There are two energy scales that play a very important role in this problem. One is the potential energy between the electrons in different layers, and the other one is the tunneling 2
amplitude between layers. We only consider the case in which the tunneling between the layers may be neglected, and both layers are identical. Therefore, the number of particles in each layer is conserved, and the collective modes corresponding to in phase and out of phase density oscillations are decoupled. We generalize the fermionic Chern-Simons field theory developed in reference [6]. The generalization is straightforward. We consider a theory in which the electrons are coupled to both the electromagnetic field, and to the Chern-Simons gauge fields (two in this case, one for each layer). We show that this theory is equivalent to the standard system in which the Chern-Simons fields are absent, provided that the coefficient of the Chern-Simons action is such that the electrons are attached to an even number of fluxes of the gauge field in their own layer, and to an arbitrary number of fluxes of the gauge field in the opposite layer. In this form, the theory has a U (1) ⊗ U (1) gauge invariance. We obtain the same action as the one derived by Wen and Zee in their matrix formulation of topological fluids [7]. In this paper, we study the liquid-like solution of the semiclassical approximation to this theory. We can describe a large class of states which are characterized by filling fractions in each layer given by ν1 = ν2 = n − (± p12 + 2s2 ) n2 − (± p11 + 2s1 )(± p12 + 2s2 ) n − (± p11 + 2s1 ) n2 − (± p11 + 2s1 )(± p12 + 2s2 ) (1.1)

Canonical and Functional Schrodinger Quantization of Two--Dimensional Dilaton Gravity

a rXiv:h ep-th/981296v29Fe b1999CANONICAL AND FUNCTIONAL SCHR ¨ODINGER QUANTIZATION OF TWO–DIMENSIONAL DILATON GRA VITY S.Cassemiro F.F.1and Victor O.Rivelles 2Instituto de F´ısica,Universidade de S˜a o Paulo Caixa Postal 66318,05315–970,S˜a o Paulo,SP,Brazil 1E-mail:figueire@p.br 2E-mail:rivelles@p.br Abstract We discuss the relation between canonical and Schr¨o dinger quantization of the CGHS model.We also discuss the situation when background charges areadded to cancel the Virasoro anomaly.New physical states are found whenthe square of the background charges vanishes.The quantization of reparametrization invariant theories is an open problem with many unanswered questions.Even in two space–time dimensions many delicate questions remain without a clear answer.In the last few years much effort has been spent in the study of several two–dimensional dilaton gravity models as prototypes of reparametrization invariant theories.In particular the string inspired CGHS(Callan,Giddings,Harvey and Strominger) model[1]was intensively investigated.The CHGS model consists of a particular coupling of two–dimensional gravity and a dilatonfield.It is described by the actionS= d2x√(πaπa+r′a r′a),2H1=πa r′a.(3)In our notation a dot(dash)indicates differentiation with respect to time(space).The“in-ternal”indices a,b,...are raised and lowered with a Minkowskian metricηab=diag(1,−1) (not the space–time metric)so that the canonical variablesπa,r a appear in an indefinite quadratic form in Eqs.(2,3).We will then say that thefield r0(x)has positive signature while r1(x)has negative signature.Note that the constraints Eqs.(3)are just the components of the energy–momentum tensor of two massless scalarfields with opposite signature.The theory described by Eqs.(2,3)looks very simple since there are no interaction terms. In the gaugeλ0=0,λ1=1it describes two massless scalarfields with opposite signature and with a vanishing energy–momentum tensor.We would expect that the physical states should be the direct product of states for each degree of freedom separately.However,there are subtle correlations due to the constraints Eqs.(3)and the Hilbert space has not a direct product structure.The canonical quantization of the theory is upset with anomalies.Due to the normal ordering in the constraints Eqs.(3)there appears the well known Virasoro anomaly in the algebra of the energy–momentum tensor.It is possible to cancel the anomaly in three different ways and the resulting quantum theories are not equivalent.Thefirst possibility is to make a non conventional choice of the vaccum for one of thefields r a(x)[7].It is non conventional in the sense that the usual creation and annihilation operators have their role reversed.For thisfield the resulting central charge changes sign.Then the overall central charge vanishes and no anomaly is present.In the second possibility we add background charges to the scalarfields[7].By choosing appropriately the value of the background charges the anomaly can be made to cancel.Ghosts can also be added in this case.The third procedure consists in modifying the constraints in order to cancel the anomaly[8]but we will not take this route here.In this paper we will concentrate on thefirst and second procedures.We willfind new physical states in the presence of background charges.The usual way to incorporate background charges is to consider an improved energy–momentum tensor.To derive this improved energy–momentum tensor consider the La-grangian of a free massless scalarfieldφwith a surface term linear in thefield Q2φ,where Q is the background charge.From this Lagrangian we canfind the appropriate energy–momentum tensor.When this is done for thefields r a,taking into account their signature, wefindTµν=14ηµν∂ρr a∂ρr a+14ηµνQ a2r a.(4)The constraints H0=(T+++T−−)/2and H1=(T++−T−−)/2are nowH0=1anomaly.So,in general,Q a Q a will no longer vanish and the classical theory will loose reparametrization invariance.However,it will be recovered at the quantum level.Before performing the canonical quantization with the new constraints let usfirst consider a single massless scalarfield.In the canonical approach it has an expansion in terms of Fock space operators a†(k)and a(k)associated with particles of positive and negative energy respectively.The conventional vaccum is defined as a(k)|0>=0so that the Hilbert space is positive definite and the energy of the states is also positive.This gives rise to a central charge c=1in the energy–momentum tensor algebra when normal ordering is taken into account.An alternative choice for the vaccum is to take a†(k)|0>=0.In this case the Hilbert space is no longer positive definite,the energy of the states is negative and the central charge is c=−1.For conventional theories this choice of the vaccum is not allowed.Let us now consider a single scalarfield with negative signature.In the canonical ap-proach there is a crucial change of sign in the canonical momentum which leads to a change of sign in the algebra of creation and annihilation operators.Now if the vaccum is defined as a(k)|0>=0then the Hilbert space is not positive definite but the energy of the states is positive and the central charge is c=1.For the other choice of the vaccum a†(k)|0>=0 the Hilbert space is positive definite,the energy is negative and c=−1.Then the quantum theory of a scalarfield with negative signature has troubles for any choice of the vaccum.When a background charge Q is added its effect is just to shift the value of the central charge.A short calculation shows that for the conventional scalarfield we have for the usual choice of the vaccum a(k)|0>=0the value c=1+12πQ2while for the vaccum a†(k)|0>=0, c=−1+12πQ2.For the scalarfield with negative signature and vaccum a(k)|0>=0we have c=1−12πQ2,while for the vaccum a†(k)|0>=0wefind c=−1−12πQ2.This is summarized in Table I.As remarked before the CGHS model written in the form Eq.(2)involves two free massless scalarfields with opposite signature as can be seen when the gaugeλ0=1,λ1=0is choosen. Then canonical quantization allows several possibilities for the vanishing of the total central charge.If no background charges are present we can achieve c=0by choosing the vaccuma0(k)|0>=a†1(k)|0>=0.Note that since our Hamiltonian is zero we have no troubles with the positivity of the energy.If background charges with Q a Q a=0are present we must do the same vaccum choice.If the background charges have Q a Q a=0then the vanishing of the central charge requires Q a Q a=±1/(6π)depending on which vaccum is choosen. There are two possiblities:a0(k)|0>=a1(k)|0>=0or a†0(k)|0>=a†1(k)|0>=0.Either possibility is troublesome since positivity of the Hilbert space is compromised.We will also meet difficulties for the case Q a Q a=0in the Schr¨o dinger representation.These results are presented in Table IIPhysical states have been explicitely constructed for the case Q a=0[7].For the case Q a=0they have been found when the topology of space–time is non–trivial.We will comment on this at the end of the paper.Ghosts can also be added.They simply change the value of the background charges and the same analysis carries through.We now consider the Schr¨o dinger representation.The Scr¨o dinger functionalΨis a func-tional of r a,Ψ(r a),andπa is realized as a functional derivativeπa(x)=−iδ/δr a(x).In the Schr¨o dinger representation there is no normal products to be taken into account.The only source of ambiguity is in the operator ordering.So the questions about the value of the central charge are difficult to be posed in this formalism.The relevant point here is whether there is afirst class algebra of quantum constraints so that physical states can be properly defined.When the Poisson bracket algebra of the constraints Eqs.(7)is replaced by the respective commutator algebra we obtain the same central charge proportional to Q a Q a.The algebra of the constraints is notfirst class and physical states can not be defined unless Q a Q a=0. Alternatively we could try to modify the constraints to take normal ordering into account in order to recover afirst class algebra.So let us consider the effect of normal ordering in each term of the constraints.Let us assume again that we have a single scalarfieldφ.Assuming thatφ(x)andπ(x)have canonical commutation relations wefind thati:φ′(x)π(y):=φ′(x)π(y)−for any choice of the vaccum and for any signature of thefield.This means that:H1(x):=r′aπa+Q aπ′a−i lim y→xδ′(x−y),(9) which does not depend on which vaccum is choosen.This is the same ambiguity that we find if we consider the operator ordering in H1.Sinceπa and r a have canonical commutation relations there is an ambiguity in the termπa r′a in Eq.(6)with the same form as in Eq.(9). Then the coefficient of theδ′(x−y)term is notfixed.For each choice of this coefficient we have an operator ordering prescription.This is also consistent with the commutator algebra of the constraints.It is independent of the value for this coefficient as it is easily verified.Let us now consider the effect of normal ordering in H0.If thefieldφhas positive signature:π(x)π(y):=π(x)π(y)∓12π dk|k|e ik(x−y).(11) The upper sign in Eq.(10)is for the usual vaccum a|0>=0while the lower sign is for the unusual vaccum a†|0>=0.If thefieldφhas negative signature then:π(x)π(y):=π(x)π(y)±12(πaπa+r′a r′a)+Q a r′′a+cr a (x )δΨδr a (x )′−αlim y →x δ′(x −y )Ψ=0,(14)1δr a (x )δr a (x )+r ′a (x )r ′a (x )Ψ +Q a r ′′a (x )Ψ+c2 ω2 dx dy r 0(x )ω(x −y )r 0(y )+r 1(x )ω(x −y )r 1(y ) .(18)Since ω(x −y )Eq.(11)has a positive kernel this vaccum is normalizable.For the case Q a Q a =0the vaccum would be defined bya 0(k )Ψvaccum =a 1(k )Ψvaccum =0(19)ora †0(k )Ψvaccum =a †1(k )Ψvaccum =0.(20)These equations do not have normalizable solutions.The solution of Eq.(19),for example,is given by [7]Ψ=exp −12 dxǫab r a(x)r′b(x) .(22)For the case Q a Q a=0we still have c=0in Eq.(15)and wefind ΨQ a Q a=0=exp ±iHaving found new physical states still leaves open the main difficulty of this approach: how to extract the space–time geometric properties from the Hilbert space.It is also nec-essary to compare the non–perturbative results obtained in this approach with the semi–classical results.We must solve these issues in the two–dimensional models,where the problems are tractable,before embarking in realistic four or higher dimensional gravity theories with propagating gravitons.ACKNOWLEDGMENTSThis work is partially supported by FAPESP.The work of V.O.Rivelles is partially supported by CNPq.TABLESSignature Vaccum Norm Energy Central Charge Q a=0a0|0>=a†1|0>=0positive definiteQ a=0a†0|0>=a1|0>=0not positive definite Q a Q a=0a0|0>=a†1|0>=0positive definite Q a Q a=0a†0|0>=a1|0>=0not positive definiteQ a Q a=−1a†0|0>=a†1|0>=0not positive definite 6πTABLE II.Choices of the backgound charge and vaccum for vanishing central charge in theCGHS modelREFERENCES[1]C.G.Callan,S.B.Giddings,J.A.Harvey and A.Strominger,Phys.Rev.D45(1992)R1005.[2]J.G.Russo,L.Susskind and L.Thorlacius,Phys.Lett.B292(1992)13;T.Banks,A.Dabholkar,M.Douglas and M.O’Loughlin,Phys.Rev.D45(1992)3607;L.Susskind and L.Thorlacius,Nucl.Phys.B382(1992)123.[3]D.Cangemi and R.Jackiw,Phys.Rev.Lett.69(1992)233.[4]V.O.Rivelles,Phys.Lett.B321(1994)189;D.Cangemi and M.Leblanc Nucl.Phys.B420(1994)363;M.M.Leite and V.O.Rivelles,Class.Quantum Grav.12(1995) 627.[5]A.Mikovi´c,Black Holes and Nonperturbative Canonical2D Dilaton Gravity,hep-th/9402095(1994)[6]D.Cangemi and R.Jackiw,Phys.Lett B337(1994)271.[7]D.Cangemi,R.Jackiw and B.Zwiebach,Ann.Phys.245(1996)408.[8]H.Kuchaˇr,Phys.Rev.D39(1989)2263;K.Kuchaˇr and G.Torre,J.Math.Phys.30(1989)1796.[9]E.Benedict,R.Jackiw and H.-J.Lee,Phys.Rev D54(1996)6213.[10]P.Bouwknegt,J.McCarthy and K.Pilch,Commun.Math.Phys.145(1992)145.。

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

where φ is the dilaton field, Rg is the scalar curvature of the metric gαβ and SM is the action for the matter field f . The parameter µ is a generalized cosmological 2
where χ = 2 − 2h is the Euler number of the surface and Vgauge is the volume of the group of diffeomorphisms. The functional measures are defined in a diffeomorphism the dilaton are defined by the norms [12] ||δgαβ ||2 g = ||δφ||2 g = √ d2 ξ g (g αγ g βδ + ug αβ g γδ )δgαβ δgγδ √ d2 ξ g (δφ)2 . u>− 1 , 2 (3) invariant way using the metric gαβ . In particular, the measures of the metric and
where g ˆαβ is a reference metric which depends on the moduli τ of the Riemann surface. After the gauge fixing and an integration of the matter field we obtain ˜χ (A) = Z [dτ ] VCKV Dg ρDg φ δ d2 ξ g ˆe2(ρ−φ) − A e−Seff , (6)
constant. We have chosen the sign of the metric-dilaton terms in eq. (1) opposite to that of ref. [1]. This choice of the sign is convenient for a semiclassical analysis in the limit c → −∞. The partition function on the genus h Riemann surface is given by a path integral Z χ (µ ) = Dg gαβ Dg φ Dg f −S e Vgauge (2)
where we have used the fixed area condition. The Liouville action SL [ˆ gαβ , ρ] = γ 2π
′ 2ρ , ˆ g ˆαβ ∂α ρ∂β ρ + Rg d2 ξ g ˆ ρ + 2µ e
γ=
26 − c 12
(8)
Байду номын сангаас
is a result of the Weyl anomaly of the matter and the Faddeev-Popov ghost fields [12]. The parameter µ′ is regularization dependent and we choose it to be zero for simplicity. The functional measures of ρ and φ in eq. (6) are defined by the norms induced from eq. (3) ||δρ||2 g = ||δφ||2 g = ˆ e2ρ (δρ)2 , d2 ξ g d2 ξ g ˆ e2ρ (δφ)2 . (9)
3
where VCKV is the volume of the group generated by the conformal Killing vectors, which exist for genera h = 0, 1. The effective action is given by Seff = 1 2π d2 ξ g g αβ ∂α φ∂α ρ + 4ˆ g αβ ∂α φ∂β φ ˆ e−2φ Rg ˆ − 4ˆ + SL + µ A, π (7)
A two-dimensional metric-dilaton system coupled to matter fields (dilaton gravity) was proposed in refs. [1, 2] as a simple model to discuss the quantum theory of black holes. Although this model is exactly solvable at the classical level, the quantum theory is not yet fully understood. Recently, quantization of this model was discussed in refs. [3, 4] using techniques of conformal field theories. (Quantization was also discussed using other methods in ref. [5].) The authors in refs. [3, 4] made an ansatz about the functional measures of path integrals following a procedure applied to ordinary two-dimensional gravity in ref. [6]. In the case of ordinary gravity the ansatz was justified by comparing its results with those of the matrix models [7]. The ansatz was also checked by other approaches such as semiclassical analyses [8, 9], the light-cone gauge quantization [10] and direct calculations of the functional measures [11]. Since matrix models for the dilaton gravity are not known at present, it is important to study other approaches and compare their results with those of refs. [3, 4]. The purpose of the present paper is to study the dilaton gravity by a semiclassical a saddle point of the path integral with a fixed ‘area’ and quantize fluctuations of fields around it to one-loop order. In particular, we compute the string susceptibility on Riemann surfaces of arbitrary genus. Our result is consistent with that of refs. [3, 4]. We also study a case in which the functional measures are modified as in ref. [3]. We consider a conformal field theory with a central charge c coupled to a metricdilaton system on a compact closed surface. The metric is chosen to have the Euclidean signature. The classical action is S= 1 2π √ d2 ξ g e−2φ Rg + 2µ + 4g αβ ∂α φ∂β φ + SM [gαβ , f ], (1) approximation, which becomes exact for a matter central charge c → −∞. We find
The partition function (2) is obtained from eq. (4) by integrating over A. To fix the diffeomorphism invariance we choose the conformal gauge [12] gαβ (ξ ) = e2ρ(ξ) g ˆαβ (ξ ; τ ), (5)
Due to the factor e2ρ in these norms it is not obvious how to evaluate the functional integral. In refs. [3, 4] a relation of these measures to those without the factor e2ρ was given as an ansatz following the procedure in ref. [6]. We will check this ansatz by evaluating the functional integral (6) in a semiclassical approximation, which becomes exact for c → −∞. As a first step of the semiclassical quantization let us find a saddle point of the functional integral (6). We have to find a minimum of the exponent −Seff under the condition of fixed area. Introducing the Lagrange multiplier λ ∈ R it can be found √ 2(ρ−φ) λ ( d2 ξ g by the variational principle of Seff + π ˆe − A). The Euler-Lagrange equations are
相关文档
最新文档