土木工程专业Reinforced-Concrete钢筋混凝土大学毕业论文外文文献翻译及原文

合集下载

土木毕业设计外文翻译--近表面埋置加固的钢筋混凝土梁抗弯性能实验研究

中文2630字AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON FLEXURAL BEHAVIOR OF RC BEAMS STRENGTHENED WITH NSM REINFORCEMENTWoo-Tai JUNG1, Young-Hwan PARK2, Jong-SupABSTRACT: This study presents the results of experiments performed on RC (Reinforced Concrete) beams strengthened with NSM(Near Surface Mounted) reinforcement. A total of 6 specimens have been tested. The specimens can be classified into EBR(Externally Bonded Reinforcement) specimen and NSM reinforcements specimens. Two NSM specimens with space variables were strengthened with 2 CFRP(Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer) strips. Experimental results revealed that NSMspecimens used CFRP reinforcements moreefficiently than the EBR specimens. Even if CFRP crosssection areas of NSM specimens have 30%,50% of EBR Specimen, the strengthening effect of NSMspecimens is superior to EBR specimen. NSM specimens with space variables showed that thstrengthening effect of the specimen with narrow space is slightly increased as compared to thespecimen with wide spaceu KEYWORDS: carbon fiber reinforced polymer, externally bonded CFRP reinforcements, nearsurface mounted CFRP reinforcements, strengthening1. INTRODUCTIONAmong the various strengthening techniques that have been developed and applied to strengthendeteriorated RC structures, a number of applications using FRP reinforcements have significantly increased recently. FRP reinforcements are bonded to concrete surfaces by adhesives but frequently experience debonding failure at the interface between FRP reinforcements and concrete. Most research, to date, has focused on investigating the strengthening effects and failure modes of EBR systemThe problem of premature failure of EBR system may be solved by increasing the interface between FRP and concrete. Using this principle, the NSM system has been introduced recently. The NSM system for concrete structure using steel reinforcement already began in 1940s. However, the corrosion of the steel reinforcement and the poor bonding performance of the grouting material largely impaired its application. The development of improved epoxy and the adoption of FRP reinforcement offered the opportunity to implement NSM system (Hassan and Rizkalla 2003; Täljsten and Carolin 2001). Because of their light weight, ease of installation, minimal labor costs and site constraints, high strength-to-weight ratios, and durability, FRP repair systems can provide an economically viable alternative to traditional repair systems and materials(Mirmiran et al. 2004). Rizkalla and Hassan (2002) have compared EBR and NSM system in terms of cost, including costs of materials and labor,and strengthening effect. They concluded that the NSM system was more cost-effective than the EBR system using CFRP strips.This experimental study investigates the applicability and strengthening performances of NSM using CFRP strips. For comparison, flexural tests on RC beams strengthened by EBR and by NSM have been performed. In addition, specimens with space variables have been tested to compare the strengthening performance by cross section with wide and narrow space.2. EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAM2.1 MANUFACTURE OF SPECIMENSA total of 6 specimens of simply supported RC beams with span of 3m have been cast. The details andcross-section of the specimens are illustrated in Figure 1. A concrete with compressive strength of31.3 MPa at 28 days has been used. Steel reinforcements D10(φ9.53mm) of SD40 have been arrangedwith steel ratio of 0.0041 and a layer of three D13(φ12.7mm) has been arranged as compressionreinforcements. Shear reinforcements of D10 have been located every 10 cm in the shear zone to avoidshear failure. Table 1 summarizes the material properties used for the test beams.2.2 EXPERIMENTAL PARAMETERSTable 2 lists the experimental parameters. The control specimen, an unstrengthened specimen, has been cast to compare the strengthening performances of the various systems. CPL-50-BOND, EBR specimen, has been strengthened with CFRP strip. The remaining 4 specimens were strengthened with NSM CFRP strips. Among the specimens strengthened with NSM reinforcements, an embedding64 depth of NSM-PL-15 and NSM-PL-25 is 15mm and 25mm, respectively. A space between grooves of NSM-PL-25*2 and NSM-PL-2S is 60mm and 120mm, respectively. The strengthened length of all thespecimens has been fixed to 2,700 mm2.3 INSTALLATION OF THE FRP REINFORCEMENTSFigure 2 shows the details of cross-sections of the specimens. The strengthening process of EBR specimen (CPL-50-BOND) was proceeded by the surface treatment using a grinder, followed by the bonding of the CFRP strip. The strengthened beams were cured at ambient temperature for 7 days for the curing of epoxy adhesive. The process for NSM strengthening progressed by cutting the grooves at the bottom of the beams using a grinder, cleaning the debris, and embedding the CFRP strip after application of the adhesive. The strengthenedbeams were cured for 3 days so that the epoxy adhesive achieves its design strength.2.4 LOADING AND MEASUREMENT METHODSAll specimens were subjected to 4-point bending tests to failure by means of UTM (Universal Testing Machine) with capacity of 980 kN. The loading was applied under displacement control at a speed of 0.02 mm/sec until the first 15 mm and 0.05 mm/sec from15 mm until failure. The measurement of alltest data was recorded by a static data logger anda computer at intervals of 1 second. Electrical resistance strain gauges were fixed at mid-span and L/4 to measure the strain of steel reinforcements.Strain gauges to measure the strain of concrete were located at the top, 5 cm and 10 cm away from the top on one side at mid-span. Strain gauges were also placed on the FRP reinforcement located at the bottom of the mid-span and loaded points to measure the strain according to the loading process.3. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS3.1 FAILURE MODESBefore cracking, all the strengthened specimens exhibited bending behavior similar to the unstrengthened specimen. This shows that the CFRP reinforcement is unable to contribute to the increase of the stiffness and strength in the elastic domain. However, after cracking, thebending stiffness and strength of the strengthened specimens were seen to increase significantly until failure compared to the unstrengthened specimens.Examining the final failure, the unstrengthened control specimen presented typical bending failure mode which proceeds by the yielding of steel reinforcement followed by compression failure of concrete. The failure of CPL-50-BOND, EBR specimen, began with the separation of CFRP reinforcement and concrete at mid-span to exhibit finally brittle debonding failure (Figure 3). Failure of NSM-PL-15, NSM specimen, occurred with the rupture of the FRP reinforcement. Failure of the remaining NSM specimens(NSM-PL-25, NSM-PL25*2, and NSM-PL-2S) occurred through the simultaneous separation of the CFRP reinforcement and epoxy from concrete (Figure 4, 5, and 6).Table 3 summarizes the failure modes.3.2 STRENGTHENING EFFECTFigure 7 ploted the load-deflection curves of EBR and NSM specimens. The specimens with EBR,CPL-50-BOND, presented ultimate load increased by 30% compared to the unstrengthened specimen, while NSM specimens (NSM-PL-15, NSM-PL-25) increased the ultimate load by 40 to 53%.Observation of Figure 7 reveals that even if CPL-50-BOND with relatively large cross-sectional areaof CFRP reinforcement developed larger initial stiffness, premature debonding failure occurred because its bonding area is much smaller than NSM-PL-15, NSM-PL-25. EBR specimen behaved similarly to the unstrengthened control specimen after debonding failure. In Figure 7, the stiffness of NSM specimens before yielding of steel reinforcement was smaller than the stiffness developed by EBR specimen because NSM specimens have the smaller cross-sectional area of CFRP reinforcement than EBR specimen. The ultimate load and yield load are seen to increasewith the cross-sectional area of NSM reinforcement.Examining the ultimate strain of FRP summarized in Table 3, the maximum strain for EBR specimenappears to attain 30% of the ultimate strain, and 80 to 100% for NSM specimens. This proves that the NSM system is utilizing CFRP reinforcement efficiently（2S with the same cross-sectional area as CPL-50-Bond resented ultimate load increased by 95%, 90% compared to the unstrengthened specimen,respectively. Considering the same cross-sectional area, the strengthening effect of NSM specimens issuperior to the EBR specimen.In Figure 8,NSM-PL-25*2 and NSM-PL-2S, NSM specimens with space variables,showed that the strengthening effect of the specimen with narrow spaceis slightly increased by 2.5%as compared to the specimen with wide space.4. CONCLUSIONSPerformance tests have been carried out on RC beams strengthened with NSM systems. The followingconclusions were derived from the experimental results.It has been seen that NSM specimens utilized the CFRP reinforcement more efficiently than the EBR specimen. According to the static loading test results, the strengthening performances were improvedin NSM specimens compared with EBR specimen. However, the specimens NSM-PL-25, NSM-PL-25*2 and NSM-PL-2S failed by the separation of the CFRP reinforcements and epoxy adhesive from the concrete. Consequently, it is necessary to take somecountermeasures to prevent debonding failure for NSM specimens.Considering the same cross-sectional area, the strengthening effect of NSM specimens is superior to EBR specimen. NSM-PL-25*2 and NSM-PL-2S, NSM specimens with space variables, showed that the strengthening effect ofthe specimen with narrow space is slightly increased as compared to the specimen with wide space.5. REFERENCES1. Hassan, T. and Rizkalla, S. (2003), Investigation of Bond in Concrete Structures Strengthenedwith Near Surface Mounted Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer Strips”, Journal of Composites for Construction, Vol 7, No. 3, pp. 248-2572. Täljsten, B. and Carolin, A. (2001), “Concrete Beams Strengthened with Near Surface MountedCFRP Laminates”, Proceeding of the fifth international conference of ibre-reinforced plastics forreinforced concrete structures (FRPRCS-5), Cambridge, UK, 16-18 July 2001, pp. 107-1163. Mirmiran, A., Shahawy, M., Nanni, A., and Karbhari, V. (2004), “Bonded Repair and Retrofit ofConcrete Structures Using FRP Composites”, Recommended Construction Specifications andProcess Control Manual, NCHRP Report 514, Transportation Research Board4. Rizkalla, S., and Hassan, T. (2002), “Effectiveness of FRP for Strengthening Concrete Bridges”,Structural Engineering International, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 89-95近表面埋置加固的钢筋混凝土梁抗弯性能实验研究Woo-Tai JUNG1, Young-Hwan PARK2, Jong-Sup PARK3摘要：本研究介绍了近表面贴埋置加固钢筋混凝土（RC）实验结果。

土木工程专业毕业设计外文翻译--钢筋混凝土结构中钢筋连接综述

forced concrete structure reinforced with an overviewRein Since the reform and opening up, with the national economy's rapid and sustained development of a reinforced concrete structure built, reinforced with the development of technology has been great. Therefore, to promote the use of advanced technology reinforced connecting to improve project quality and speed up the pace of construction, improve labor productivity, reduce costs, and is of great significance.Reinforced steel bars connecting technologies can be divided into two broad categories linking welding machinery and steel. There are six types of welding steel welding methods, and some apply to the prefabricated plant, and some apply to the construction site, some of both apply. There are three types of machinery commonly used reinforcement linking method primarily applicable to the construction site. Ways has its own characteristics and different application, and in the continuous development and improvement. In actual production, should be based on specific conditions of work, working environment and technical requirements, the choice of suitable methods to achieve the best overall efficiency.1、steel mechanical link1.1 radial squeeze linkWill be a steel sleeve in two sets to the highly-reinforced Department with superhigh pressure hydraulic equipment (squeeze tongs) along steel sleeve radial squeeze steel casing, in squeezing out tongs squeeze pressure role of a steel sleeve plasticity deformation closely integrated with reinforced through reinforced steel sleeve and Wang Liang's Position will be two solid steel bars linkedCharacteristic: Connect intensity to be high, performance reliable, can bear high stress draw and pigeonhole the load and tired load repeatedly.Easy and simple to handle, construction fast, save energy and material, comprehensive economy profitable, this method has been already a large amount of application in the project.Applicable scope : Suitable for Ⅱ , Ⅲ , Ⅳ grade reinforcing bar (including welding bad reinforcing bar ) with ribbing of Ф 18- 50mm, connection between the same diameter or different diameters reinforcing bar .1.2must squeeze linkExtruders used in the covers, reinforced axis along the cold metal sleeve squeeze dedicated to insert sleeve Lane two hot rolling steel drums into a highly integrated mechanical linking methods.Characteristic: Easy to operate and joining fast and not having flame homework , can construct for 24 hours , save a large number of reinforcing bars and energy. Applicable scope : Suitable for , set up according to first and second class antidetonation requirement -proof armored concrete structure ФⅡ , Ⅲ grade reinforcing bar with ribbing of hot rolling of 20- 32mm join and construct live.1.3 cone thread connectingUsing cone thread to bear pulled, pressed both effort and self-locking nature, undergo good principles will be reinforced by linking into cone-processing thread at the moment the value of integration into the joints connecting steel bars.Characteristic: Simple , all right preparatory cut of the craft , connecting fast, concentricity is good, have pattern person who restrain from advantage reinforcing bar carbon content.Applicable scope : Suitable for the concrete structure of the industry , civil building and general structures, reinforcing bar diameter is for Фfor the the 16- 40mm one Ⅱ , Ⅲ grade verticality, it is the oblique to or reinforcing bars horizontal join construct live.conclusionsThese are now commonly used to connect steel synthesis methods, which links technology in the United States, Britain, Japan and other countries are widely used. There are different ways to connect their different characteristics and scope of the actual construction of production depending on the specific project choose a suitable method of connecting to achieve both energy conservation and saving time limit for a project ends.钢筋混凝土结构中钢筋连接综述改革开放以来，随着国民经济的快速、持久发展，各种钢筋混凝土建筑结构大量建造，钢筋连接技术得到很大的发展。

土木工程专业钢筋混凝土结构设计毕业论文外文文献翻译及原文

毕业设计（论文）外文文献翻译文献、资料中文题目：钢筋混凝土结构设计文献、资料英文题目：DESIGN OF REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES 文献、资料来源：文献、资料发表（出版）日期：院（部）：专业：土木工程班级：姓名：学号：指导教师：翻译日期： 2017.02.14毕业设计（论文）外文参考资料及译文译文题目：DESIGN OF REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES原文：DESIGN OF REINFORCED CONCRETESTRUCTURES1. BASIC CONCERPTS AND CHARACERACTERISTICS OF REINFORCED CONCRETEPlain concrete is formed from hardened mixture of cement, water , fine aggregate , coarse aggregate (crushed stone or gravel ) , air and often other admixtures . The plastic mix is placed and consolidated in the formwork, then cured to accelerate of the chemical hydration of hen cement mix and results in a hardened concrete. It is generally known that concrete has high compressive strength and low resistance to tension. Its tensile strength is approximatelyone-tenth of its compressive strength. Consequently, tensile reinforcement in the tension zone has to be provided to supplement the tensile strength of the reinforced concrete section.For example, a plain concrete beam under a uniformly distributed load q is shown in Fig .1.1(a), when the distributed load increases and reaches a value q=1.37KN/m , the tensile region at the mid-span will be cracked and the beam will fail suddenly . A reinforced concrete beam if the same size but has to steel reinforcing bars (2φ16) embedded at the bottom under a uniformly distributed load q is shown in Fig.1.1(b). The reinforcing bars take up the tension there after the concrete is cracked. When the load q is increased, the width of the cracks, the deflection and thestress of steel bars will increase . When the steel approaches the yielding stress ƒy , thedeflection and the cracked width are so large offering some warning that the compression zone . The failure load q=9.31KN/m, is approximately 6.8 times that for the plain concrete beam.Concrete and reinforcement can work together because there is a sufficiently strong bond between the two materials, there are no relative movements of the bars and the surrounding concrete cracking. The thermal expansion coefficients of the two materials are 1.2×10-5K-1 for steel and 1.0×10-5~1.5×10-5K-1 for concrete .Generally speaking, reinforced structure possess following features :Durability .With the reinforcing steel protected by the concrete , reinforced concreteFig.1.1Plain concrete beam and reinforced concrete beamIs perhaps one of the most durable materials for construction .It does not rot rust , and is not vulnerable to efflorescence .(2)Fire resistance .Both concrete an steel are not inflammable materials .They would not be affected by fire below the temperature of 200℃when there is a moderate amount of concrete cover giving sufficient thermal insulation to the embedded reinforcement bars.(3)High stiffness .Most reinforced concrete structures have comparatively large cross sections .As concrete has high modulus of elasticity, reinforced concrete structures are usuallystiffer than structures of other materials, thus they are less prone to large deformations, This property also makes the reinforced concrete less adaptable to situations requiring certainflexibility, such as high-rise buildings under seismic load, and particular provisions have to be made if reinforced concrete is used.(b)Reinfoced concrete beam(4)Locally available resources. It is always possible to make use of the local resources of labour and materials such as fine and coarse aggregates. Only cement and reinforcement need to be brought in from outside provinces.(5)Cost effective. Comparing with steel structures, reinforced concrete structures are cheaper.(6)Large dead mass, The density of reinforced concrete may reach2400~2500kg/pare with structures of other materials, reinforced concrete structures generally have a heavy dead mass. However, this may be not always disadvantageous, particularly for those structures which rely on heavy dead weight to maintain stability, such as gravity dam and other retaining structure. The development and use of light weight aggregate have to a certain extent make concrete structure lighter.(7)Long curing period.. It normally takes a curing period of 28 day under specified conditions for concrete to acquire its full nominal strength. This makes the progress of reinforced concrete structure construction subject to seasonal climate. The development of factory prefabricated members and investment in metal formwork also reduce the consumption of timber formwork materials.(8)Easily cracked. Concrete is weak in tension and is easily cracked in the tension zone. Reinforcing bars are provided not to prevent the concrete from cracking but to take up the tensile force. So most of the reinforced concrete structure in service is behaving in a cracked state. This is an inherent is subjected to a compressive force before working load is applied. Thus the compressed concrete can take up some tension from the load.2. HISTOEICAL DEVELPPMENT OF CONCRETE STRUCTUREAlthough concrete and its cementitious(volcanic) constituents, such as pozzolanic ash, have been used since the days of Greek, the Romans, and possibly earlier ancient civilization, the use of reinforced concrete for construction purpose is a relatively recent event, In 1801, F. Concrete published his statement of principles of construction, recognizing the weakness if concrete in tension, The beginning of reinforced concrete is generally attributed to Frenchman J. L. Lambot, who in 1850 constructed, for the first time, a small boat with concrete for exhibition in the 1855 World’s Fair in Paris. In England, W. B. Wilkinson registered a patent for reinforced concrete l=floor slab in 1854.J.Monier, a French gardener used metal frames as reinforcement to make garden plant containers in 1867. Before 1870, Monier had taken a series of patents to make reinforcedconcrete pipes, slabs, and arches. But Monier had no knowledge of the working principle of this new material, he placed the reinforcement at the mid-depth of his wares. Then little construction was done in reinforced concrete. It is until 1887, when the German engineers Wayss and Bauschinger proposed to place the reinforcement in the tension zone, the use of reinforced concrete as a material of construction began to spread rapidly. In1906, C. A. P. Turner developed the first flat slab without beams.Before the early twenties of 20th century, reinforced concrete went through the initial stage of its development, Considerable progress occurred in the field such that by 1910 the German Committee for Reinforced Concrete, the Austrian Concrete Committee, the American Concrete Institute, and the British Concrete Institute were established. Various structural elements, such as beams, slabs, columns, frames, arches, footings, etc. were developed using this material. However, the strength of concrete and that of reinforcing bars were still very low. The common strength of concrete at the beginning of 20th century was about 15MPa in compression, and the tensile strength of steel bars was about 200MPa. The elements were designed along the allowable stresses which was an extension of the principles in strength of materials.By the late twenties, reinforced concrete entered a new stage of development. Many buildings, bridges, liquid containers, thin shells and prefabricated members of reinforced concrete were concrete were constructed by 1920. The era of linear and circular prestressing began.. Reinforced concrete, because of its low cost and easy availability, has become the staple material of construction all over the world. Up to now, the quality of concrete has been greatly improved and the range of its utility has been expanded. The design approach has also been innovative to giving the new role for reinforced concrete is to play in the world of construction.The concrete commonly used today has a compressive strength of 20~40MPa. For concrete used in pre-stressed concrete the compressive strength may be as high as 60~80MPa. The reinforcing bars commonly used today has a tensile strength of 400MPa, and the ultimate tensile strength of prestressing wire may reach 1570~1860Pa. The development of high strength concrete makes it possible for reinforced concrete to be used in high-rise buildings, off-shore structures, pressure vessels, etc. In order to reduce the dead weight of concrete structures, various kinds of light concrete have been developed with a density of 1400~1800kg/m3. With a compressive strength of 50MPa, light weight concrete may be used in load bearing structures. One of the best examples is the gymnasium of the University of Illinois which has a span of 122m and is constructed of concrete with a density of 1700kg/m3. Another example is the two 20-story apartment houses at the Xi-Bian-Men in Beijing. The walls of these two buildings are light weight concrete with a density of 1800kg/m3.The tallest reinforced concrete building in the world today is the 76-story Water Tower Building in Chicago with a height of 262m. The tallest reinforced concrete building in China today is the 63-story International Trade Center in GuangZhou with a height a height of 200m. The tallest reinforced concrete construction in the world is the 549m high International Television Tower in Toronto, Canada. He prestressed concrete T-section simply supported beam bridge over the Yellow River in Luoyang has 67 spans and the standard span length is 50m.In the design of reinforced concrete structures, limit state design concept has replaced the old allowable stresses principle. Reliability analysis based on the probability theory has very recently been introduced putting the limit state design on a sound theoretical foundation. Elastic-plastic analysis of continuous beams is established and is accepted in most of the design codes. Finite element analysis is extensively used in the design of reinforced concrete structures and non-linear behavior of concrete is taken into consideration. Recent earthquake disasters prompted the research in the seismic resistant reinforced of concrete structures. Significant results have been accumulated.3. SPECIAL FEATURES OF THE COURSEReinforced concrete is a widely used material for construction. Hence, graduates of every civil engineering program must have, as a minimum requirement, a basic understanding of the fundamentals of reinforced concrete.The course of Reinforced Concrete Design requires the prerequisite of Engineering Mechanics, Strength of Materials, and some if not all, of Theory of Structures, In all these courses, with the exception of Strength of Materials to some extent, a structure is treated of in the abstract. For instance, in the theory of rigid frame analysis, all members have an abstract EI/l value, regardless of what the act value may be. But the theory of reinforced concrete is different, it deals with specific materials, concrete and steel. The values of most parameters must be determined by experiments and can no more be regarded as some abstract. Additionally, due to the low tensile strength of concrete, the reinforced concrete members usually work with cracks, some of the parameters such as the elastic modulus I of concrete and the inertia I of section are variable with the loads.The theory of reinforced concrete is relatively young. Although great progress has been made, the theory is still empirical in nature in stead of rational. Many formulas can not be derived from a few propositions, and may cause some difficulties for students. Besides, due to the difference in practice in different countries, most countries base their design methods on their own experience and experimental results. Consequently, what one learns in one country may be different in another country. Besides, the theory is still in a stage of rapid。

土木工程专业Reinforced-Concrete钢筋混凝土大学毕业论文外文文献翻译及原文

毕业设计（论文）外文文献翻译文献、资料中文题目：钢筋混凝土文献、资料英文题目：Reinforced Concrete文献、资料来源： __________________________ 文献、资料发表（出版）日期： _____________________ 院（部）:专业：_________________________________________ 班级：_________________________________________ 姓名：_________________________________________ 学号：_________________________________________ 指导教师：翻译日期：2017.02.14外文文献翻译Reinforced ConcreteCon crete and rein forced con crete are used as build ing materials in every coun try. In many, in clud ing the Un ited States and Can ada, rein forced con crete is a dominant structural material in engin eered con structi on.The uni versal n ature of rein forced con crete con structi on stems from the wide availability of rei nforci ng bars and the con stitue nts of con crete, gravel, sand, and cement, the relatively simple skills required in con crete con structi on, and the economy of rein forced con crete compared to other forms of con structi on. Con crete and rein forced con crete are used in bridges, build ings of all sorts un dergro und structures, water tan ks, televisi on towers, offshore oil explorati on and product ion structures, dams, and eve n in ships.Rein forced con crete structures may be cast-i n-place con crete, con structed in their fin al locatio n, or they may be precast con crete produced in a factory and erected at the con structi on site. Con crete structures maybe severe and functional in design, or the shape and layout and be whimsical and artistic. Few other buildi ng materials off the architect and engin eer such versatility and scope.Con crete is stro ng in compressi on but weak in tension. As a result, cracks develop whe never loads, or restrai ned shri nkage of temperature changes, give rise to tensile stresses in excess of the tensile strengthof the con crete. In a pla in con crete beam, the mome nts about the n eutral axis due to applied loads are resisted by an internal tension-compression couple involving tension in the concrete. Such a beamfails very suddenly and completely when the first crack forms. In a reinforced concrete beam, steel bars are embedded in the con crete in such a way that the tension forces n eeded for mome nt equilibrium after the con crete cracks can be developed in the bars.The con structi on of a rein forced con crete member invo Ives build ing a from of mold in the shape of the member being built. The form must be strong eno ugh to support both the weight and hydrostatic pressure of the wet concrete, and any forces applied to it by workers, concrete buggies,wind, and so on. The reinforcement is placed in this form and held in place duri ng the con cret ing operati on. After the con crete has harde ned, the forms are removed. As the forms are removed, props of shores are in stalled to support the weight of the con crete un til it has reached sufficie nt stre ngth to support the loadsby itself.The designer must proportion a concrete memberfor adequate strengthto resist the loads and adequate stiffness to prevent excessive deflecti ons. In beam must be proporti oned sothat it can be con structed.For example, the reinforcement must be detailed so that it can beassembled in the field, and since the con crete is placed in the form after the rei nforceme nt is inplace, the con crete must be ableto flow around,between, andpast the reinforcement to fill all parts of the form completely.The choice of whether a structure should be built of concrete, steel, masonry, or timber depends on the availability of materials and on a number of value decisions.The choice of structural system is made by thearchitect of engineer early in the design, based on the followingcon siderati ons:1. Economy. Freque ntly, the foremost con sideratio n is the overall const of the structure. This is, of course, a fun cti on of the costs ofthe materials and the labor necessary to erect them. Frequently, however, the overall cost is affected as much or more by the overall con structi on time since the con tractor and owner must borrow or otherwise allocate money to carry out the con struct ion and will not receive a retur n on this investment until the building is ready for occupancy. In a typical large apartme nt of commercial project, the cost of con struct ion financing willbe a significant fraction of the total cost. As a result, financial savings due to rapid con structi on may more tha n offset in creased material costs. For this reas on, any measures the desig ner can take to sta ndardize the desig n and forming will gen erally pay off in reduced overall costs.In many cases the Ion g-term economy of the structure may be more importa nt tha n the first cost. As a result, maintenance and durability are importa nt con siderati on.2. Suitability of material for architectural and structural function.A rein forced con crete system freque ntly allows the desig ner to comb ine the architectural and structural functions. Con crete has the adva ntage that it is placed in a plastic con diti on and is give n the desired shapeand texture by meansof the forms and the finishing techniques. This allows such elements ad flat plates or other types of slabs to serve as load-bearingelements while providing the finished floor and / or ceiling surfaces. Similarly, rein forced con crete walls can providearchitecturally attractive surfaces in addition to having the ability to resist gravity, wind, or seismic loads. Fin ally, the choice of size of shape is governed by the designer and not by the availability of standard manu factured members.3. Fire resista nee. The structure in a buildi ng must withsta nd theeffects of a fire and rema in sta nding while the build ing is evacuated and the fire is exti nguished. A con crete buildi ng in here ntly has a 1- to 3-hour fire rat ing without special fireproofi ng or other details. Structural steel or timber build ings must be fireproofed to atta in similar fire ratin gs.4. Low maintenan ce. Con crete members in here ntly require less maintenance than do structural steel or timber members. This is particularly true if den se, air-e ntrained con crete has bee n used forsurfaces exposed to the atmosphere, and if care has bee n take n in the desig n to provide adequate drain age off and away from the structure. Special precauti ons must be take n for con crete exposed to salts such as deici ng chemicals.5. Availability of materials. Sand, gravel, ceme nt, and con cretemixi ng facilities are very widely available, and rein forci ng steel canbe tran sported to most job sites more easily tha n can structural steel. As a result, re in forced con crete is freque ntly used in remote areas.On the other hand, there are a nu mber of factors that may cause one to selecta material other tha n rein forced con crete. These in clude:1. Low tensile strength. The tensile strength concrete is much lower than its compressive strength ( about 1/10 ), and hence concrete is subject to crack ing. In structural uses this is overcome by using rei nforceme nt to carry ten sile forces and limit crack widths to with in acceptable values. Un less care is take n in desig n and con struct ion, however, these cracks maybe unsightly or mayallow penetration of water. Wherthis occurs, water or chemicals such as road deicing salts may cause deterioration or stai ning of the con crete. Special desig n details are required in such cases. In the case of water-retai ning structures, special details and /of prestress ing are required to preve nt leakage.2. Forms and shori ng. The con structi on of a cast-i n-place structureinvo Ives three steps not encoun tered in the con struct ion of steel or timberstructures. These are ( a ) the con struct ion of the forms, ( b ) the removal of these forms, and (c) propp ing or shori ng the new con crete to support its weight until itsstrength is adequate. Each of these steps invoIves labor and / or materials, which are not necessary with other forms of con structi on.3. Relatively low strength per unit of weight for volume. Thecompressive strength of concrete is roughly 5 to 10%that of steel, while its unit den sity is roughly 30% that of steel. As a result, a con cretestructure requires a larger volume and a greater weight of material than does acomparable steel structure. As a result, Iong-span structures are ofte n built from steel.4. Time-depe ndent volume cha nges. Both con crete and steelundergo-approximately the same amount of thermal expansionandcon tracti on. Because there is less mass of steel to be heated or cooled, andbecause steel is a better con crete, a steel structure is gen erallyaffected by temperature cha nges to a greater exte nt tha n is a con crete structure.On the other hand, con crete un dergoes fryi ng shri nkage, which, if restrained, may cause deflections or cracking. Furthermore, deflecti ons will tend to in crease with time, possibly doubli ng, due to creep of the con crete un der susta ined loads.In almost every branch of civil extensiveuse is made of reinforced foundations.Engineers and architects reinforced con crete desig n throughout theirprofessi onal careers. Muchof this text is directly concerned with the behavior and proporti oningof components that makeup typical reinforced concrete structures-beams, colu mns, and slabs. Once the behavior of these in dividual eleme nts is un derstood, the desig ner will have the backgro und to an alyze and desig n a wide range of complex structures, such as foun datio ns, buildi ngs, and bridges, composed of these eleme nts.Si nee rei nforced concrete is a no homogeneous material that creeps, shri nks,and cracks, its stresses cannot be accurately predicted by the traditi onal equati ons derived in a course in stre ngth of materials forhomoge neous elastic materials. Much of rein forced con crete desig n in thereforeempirical, i.e., design equations and design methods are based on experime ntal and engineering and architecture con crete for structures and requires basic knowledge oftime-proved results in stead of being derived exclusively from theoretical formulati ons.A thorough un dersta nding of the behavior of rein forced con crete will allow the desig ner to con vert an otherwise brittle material into tough ductile structural elements and thereby take advantage of concrete ' s desirable characteristics, its high compressive stre ngth, its fire resista nee, and its durability.Concrete, a stone like material, is madeby mixing cement, water, fine aggregate ( often sand ), coarse aggregate, and frequently other additives (that modify properties ) into a workable mixture. In its un harde ned or plastic state, concrete can be placed in forms to produce a large variety of structural eleme nts. Although the harde ned con crete by itself, i.e., without any rein forceme nt, is stro ng in compressi on, it lacks ten sile stre ngth and therefore cracks easily. Because unrein forced con crete is brittle, it cannot undergo large deformations under load and fails sudde nly-without warni ng. The additi on fo steel rein forceme nt to the con crete reduces the n egative effects of its two prin cipal in here nt weaknesses, its susceptibility to cracking and its brittleness. Whenthe rein forceme nt is stro ngly bon ded to the con crete, a strong, stiff, and ductile con struct ion material is produced. This material, calledrei nforced con crete, is used exte nsively to con struct foun dati ons,structural frames, storage takes, shell roofs, highways, walls, dams, canals, and innumerable other structures and building products. Twoother characteristics of concrete that are present even when concrete is rein forced are shri nkage and creep, but the n egative effects of these properties can be mitigated by careful desig n.A code is a set tech ni cal specificati ons and sta ndards that con trol importa nt details of desig n and con struct ion. The purpose of codes it produce structures so that the public will be protected from poor of in adequate and con struct ion.Two types f coeds exist. One type, called a structural code, is orig in ated and con trolled by specialists whoare concerned with the proper use of a specific material or who are invo Ived with the safe desig n of a particular class of structures.The sec ond type of code, called a build ing code, is established to cover con struct ion in a give n region, ofte n a city or a state. The objective of a build ing code is also to protect the public by acco un ti ng for the in flue nee of the local en vir onmen tal con diti ons on con structi on. For example, local authorities may specifyadditional provisions toaccount for such regional conditions as earthquake, heavy snow, ortorn ados. Nati onal structural codes gen rally are in corporated into local build ing codes.The America n Con crete In stitute ( ACI ) Buildi ng Code coveri ng the desig n of rein forced con crete build in gs. It contains provisi ons coveri ngall aspects of re in forced con crete manu facture, desig n, and con structi on. It includes specifications on quality of materials, details on mixing andplacing concrete, design assumptions for the analysis of continuous structures, and equati ons for proporti oning members for desig n forces.All structures must be proporti oned so they will not fail or deform excessively un der any possible con diti on of service. Therefore it is important that an engineer use great care in anticipating all the probable loads to which a structure will be subjected duri ng its lifetime.Although the desig n of most members is con trolled typically by dead and live load acting simultaneously, consideration must also be given tothe forces produced by wind, impact, shrinkage, temperature change, creep and support settleme nts, earthquake, and so forth.The load associated with the weight of the structure itself and its perma nent comp onents is called the dead load. The dead load of con crete members, which is substantial, should never be neglected in design computations. The exact magnitude of the dead load is not known accurately un til members have bee n sized. Since some figure for the dead load must be used in computations to size the members, its magnitude must be estimated at first. After a structure has been analyzed, the memberssized, and architectural details completed, the dead load can be computed more accurately. If the computed dead load is approximately equal to the initial estimate of its value ( or slightly less ), the design is complete,but if a significant differenee exists between the computed and estimated values of dead weight, the computations should be revised using an improved value of dead load. An accurate estimate of dead load is particularly importa nt whe n spa ns are long, say over 75 ft ( 22.9 m ),because dead load con stitutes a major porti on of the desig n load.Live loads associated with building use are specific items of equipme nt and occupa nts in a certa in area of a build ing, buildi ng codes specify values of un iform live for which members are to be desig ned.After the structure has bee n sized for vertical load, it is checkedfor wi nd in comb in ati on with dead and live load as specified in the code. Windloads do not usually con trol the size of members in buildi ng lessthan 16 to 18 stories, but for tall buildings wind loads becomesignificant and cause large forces to develop in the structures. Under these conditions economycan be achieved only by selecting a structural system that is able to tran sfer horiz on tal loads into the ground efficie ntly.钢筋混凝土在每一个国家，混凝土及钢筋混凝土都被用来作为建筑材料。

土木工程混凝土论文中英文资料外文翻译文献

土木工程混凝土论文中英文资料外文翻译文献外文资料STUDIES ON IMPACT STRENGTH OF CONCRETESUBJECTED TO SUSTAINEDELEVATED TEMPERATUREConcrete has a remarkable fire resisting properties. Damage in concrete due to fire depends on a great extent on the intensity and duration of fire. Spalling cracking during heating are common concrete behaviour observed in the investigation of the fire affected structures. Plenty of literature is available on the studies of concrete based on time temperature cures. In power, oil sectorsand nuclear reactors concrete is exposed to high temperature for considerable period of time. These effects can be reckoned as exposure to sustained elevated temperature. The sustained elevated temperature may be varying from a few hours to a number of years depending upon practical condition of exposures. The knowledge on properties under such conditions is also of prime importance apart from the structures subjected to high intensity fire. Impact studies of structure subjected to sustained elevated temperature becomes more important as it involves sensitive structures which is more prone to attacks and accidents. In this paper impact studies on concrete subjected to sustained elevated temperature has been discussed. Experiments have been conducted on 180 specimens along with 180 companion cube specimens. The temperatures of 100°C, 200°C and 300°C for a duration of exposure of 2 hours 4 hours and 6 hours has been considered in the experiments. The results are logically analyzed and concluded.1. INTRODUCTIONThe remarkable property of concrete to resist the fire reduces the damage in a concrete structure whenever there is an accidental fire. In most of the cases the concrete remains intact with minor damages only. The reason being low thermal conductivity of concrete at higher temperatures and hence limiting the depth of penetration of firedamage. But when the concrete is subjected to high temperature for long duration the deterioration of concrete takes place. Hence it is essential to understand the strength and deformation characteristics of concrete subjected to temperature for long duration. In this paper an attempt has been made to study the variation in Impact Strength of concrete when subjected to a temperature range 100oC, 200oC and 300oC sustained for a period of 2 hrs, 4 hrs and 6 hrs.The review of the literature shows that a lot of research work [1 – 3] has taken place on the effect of elevated temperature on concrete. All these studies are based on time –temperature curves. Hence an attempt has been made to study the effect of sustained elevated temperature on impact strength of concrete and the results are compared with the compressive strength. The experimental programme has been planned for unstressed residual strength test based on the available facilities. Residual strength is the strength of heated and subsequently cooled concrete specimens expressed as percentage of the strength of unheated specimens.2. EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION2.1. TEST SPECIMEN AND MATERIALSA total of 180 specimens were tested in the present study along with 180 companion cubes. An electric oven capable of reaching a maximum temperature of 300oC has been used for investigation. Fine and coarse aggregates conforming to IS383 has been used to prepare the specimen with mix proportions M1 = 1:2.1:3.95 w/c = 0.58, M2 = 1:1.15:3.56 w/c = 0.53, M3 = 1:0.8:2.4 w/c = 0.4.2.2 TEST VARIABLESThe effects of the following variables were studied.2.2.1 Size sSize of Impact Strength Test Specimen was 150 mm dial and 64 mm thickness and size of companion cube 150 x 150 x 150 mm.2.2.2 Maximum TemperatureIn addition to room temperature, the effect of three different temperatures (100oC, 200oC and 300oC) on the compressive strength was investigated.2.2.3 Exposure Time at Maximum TemperatureThree different exposure times were used to investigate the influence of heat on compressive strength; they are 2 hrs, 4 hrs and 6 hrs.2.2.4 Cooling MethodSpecimens were cooled in air to room temperature.3. TEST PROCEDUREAll the specimens were cast in steel moulds as per IS516 and each layer was compacted. Specimens were then kept in their moulds for 24 hours after which they were decoupled and placed into a curing tank until 28 days. After which the specimens were removed and were allowed to dry in room temperature. These specimens were kept in the oven and the required target temperature was set. Depending on the number of specimen kept inside the oven the time taken to reach the steady state was found to vary. After the steady state was reached the specimens were subjected to predetermined steady duration at the end of which the specimens are cooled to room temperature and tested.ACI drop weight impact strength test was adopted. This is the simplest method for evaluating impact resistance of concrete. The size of the specimen is 150 mm dial and 64 mm thickness. The disc specimens were prepared using steel moulds cured and heated and cooled as. This consists of a standard manually operated 4.54 kg hammer with 457 mm drop. A 64 mm hardened steel ball and a flat base plate with positioning bracket and lugs. The specimen is placed between the four guides pieces (lugs) located 4.8 mm away from the sample. A frame (positioning bracket) is then built in order to target the steel ball at the centre of concrete disc. The disc is coated at the bottom with a thin layer of petroleum jelly or heavy grease to reduce the friction between the specimen and base plate. The bottom part of the hammer unit was placed with its base upon the steel ball and the load was applied by dropping weight repeatedly. The loading was continued until the disc failed and opened up such that it touched three of the four positioning lugs. The number of blows that caused this condition is recorded as the failure strength. The companion cubes were tested for cube compression strength (fake).4. ANALYSIS AND RESULTS4.1 RESIDUAL COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH VS. TEMPERATUREFrom Table 1, at 100°C sustained elevated temperature it is seen that the residual strength of air cooled specimens of mixes M1, M2 and M3 has increased in strength 114% for M1 mix, 109% for M2 mix and 111% for M3 mix for 6 hours duration of exposure. When the sustained elevated temperature is to 200°C for air cooled specimens there is a decrease in strength up to 910% approximately for M1 mix for a duration of 6 hours, but in case of M2 mix it is 82% and for M3 mix it is 63% maximum for 6 hours duration of exposure. When the concrete mixes M1, M2 and M3 are exposed to 300°C sustained temperature there is a reduction in strength up to 78% for M1 mix for 6 hour duration of exposure.4.2 RESIDUAL COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH VS DURATION OF EXPOSUREFrom Table 1, result shows that heating up to 100°C for 2 hours and 4 hours, the residual strength of mix M1 has decreased where as the residual strength of mix M2 and M3 has increased. The residual strength is further increased for 6 hours duration of exposure in all the three mixes M1, M2 and M3 even beyond the strength at room temperature. When the specimens of mixes M1, M2 and M3 are exposed to 200°C for 2,4 and 6 hours of duration, it is observed that the residual strength has decreased below the room temperature and has reached 92% for M1 mix, 82 and 73% for M2 and M3 mix respectively. Concrete cubes of mixes M1, M2 and M3 when subjected to 300°C temperature for 2,4 and 6 hours the residual strength for mix M1 reduces to 92% for 2 hours up to 78% for six hours duration of exposure, for M2 mix 90% for 2 hours duration of exposure up to 76% for six hour duration of exposure, for M3 mix 88% up to 68% between 2 and 6 hours of duration of exposure.5. IMPACT STRENGTH OF CONCRETE5.1 RESIDUAL IMPACT STRENGTH VS TEMPERATUREFrom the table 1, it can be observed that for the sustained elevated temperature of 100°C the residual impact strength of all the specimens reduces and vary between 20 and 50% for mix M1, 15 to 40% for mix M2 and M3. When the sustained elevated temperature is 200°C the residual impact strength of all the mixes further decreases. The reduction is around 60-70% for mix M1, 55 to 65% for M2 and M3 mix. When the sustained elevated temperature is 300°C it is observed that the residual impact strength reduces further and vary between 85 and 70% for mix M1 and 85 to 90% for mix M2 and mix M3.5.2 RESIDUAL IMPACT STRENGTH VS DURATION OF EXPOSUREFrom the Table 1 and Figures 1 to 3, it can be observed that there is a reduction in impact strength when the sustained elevated temperature is 100°C for 2 hrs, 4 hrs and 6 hrs, and its range is 15 to 50% for all the mixes M1, M2 and M3. The influence of duration of exposure is higher for mix M1 which decreases more rapidly as compared to mix M2 and mix M3 for the same duration of exposure. When the specimens are subjected to sustained elevated temperature of 200°C for 2,4 and 6 hour of duration, further reduction in residual impact strength is observed as compared to at 100°C. The reduction is in the range of 55-70% for all the mixes. The six hour duration of exposure has a greater influence on the residual impact strength of concrete. When the sustained elevated temperature is 300°C for 2,4 and 6 hours duration of exposure the residualimpact strength reduces. It can be seen that both temperature and duration of exposure have a very high influence on the residual impact strength of concrete which shows a reduction up to 90% approximately for all the mixes.6. CONCLUSIONThe compressive strength of concrete increases at 100oC when exposed to sustained elevated temperature. The compressive strength of concrete decreases when exposed to 200°C and 300°C from 10 to 30% for 6 hours of exposure. Residual impact strength reduces irrespective of temperature and duration. Residual impact strength decreases at a higher rate of 20% to 85% as compared to compressive strength between 15% and 30 % when subjected to sustained elevated temperature. The impact strength reduces at a higher rate as compared to compressive strength when subjected to sustained elevated temperature.混凝土受持续高温影响的强度的研究混凝土具有显着的耐火性能。

土木工程专业钢筋混凝土结构抗震性能外文翻译文献

文献信息：文献标题：Seismic Performance of Reinforced Concrete Buildings with Masonry Infill（砌体填充钢筋混凝土建筑的抗震性能研究）文献作者：Girma Zewdie Tsige，Adil Zekaria文献出处：《American Journal of Civil Engineering》,2018,6(1):24-33 字数统计：英文3088单词，16137字符；中文4799汉字外文文献：Seismic Performance of Reinforced Concrete Buildings withMasonry InfillAbstract Unreinforced masonry Infills modify the behavior of framed structures under lateral loads; however, in practice, the infill stiffness is commonly ignored in frame analysis, resulting in an under-estimation of stiffness and natural frequency. The structural effect of hollow concrete block infill is generally not considered in the design of columns as well as other structural components of RC frame structures. The hollow concrete block walls have significant in-plane stiffness contributing to the stiffness of the frame against lateral load. The scope of present work was to study seismic performance of reinforced concrete buildings with masonry infill in medium rise building. The office medium rise building is analyzed for earthquake force by considering three type of structural system. i.e. Bare Frame system, partially-infilled and fully- Infilled frame system. Effectiveness of masonry wall has been studied with the help of five different models. Infills were modeled using the equivalent strut approach. Nonlinear static analyses for lateral loads were performed by using standard package ETABS, 2015 software. The comparison of these models for different earthquake response parameters like base shear vs roof displacement, Story displacement, Story shear and member forces are carried out. It is observed that the seismic demand in the bare frame is significantly large when infillstiffness is not considered, with larger displacements. This effect, however, is not found to be significant in the infilled frame systems. The results are described in detail in this paper.Keywords: Bare Frame, Infilled Frame, Equivalent Diagonal Strut, Infill, Plastic Hinge1.IntroductionInfill have been generally considered as non-structural elements, although there are codes such as the Eurocode-8 that include rather detailed procedures for designing infilled R/C frames, presence of infill has been ignored in most of the current seismic codes except their weight. However, even though they are considered non-structural elements the presence of infill in the reinforced concrete frames can substantially change the seismic response of buildings in certain cases producing undesirable effects (tensional effects, dangerous collapse mechanisms, soft story, variations in the vibration period, etc.) or favorable effects of increasing the seismic resistance capacity of the building.The present practice of structural analysis is also to treat the masonry infill as non- structural element and the analysis as well as design is carried out by only using the mass but neglecting the strength and stiffness contribution of infill. Therefore, the entire lateral load is assumed to be resisted by the frame only.Contrary to common practice, the presence of masonry infill influence the over- all behavior of structures when subjected to lateral forces. When masonry infill are considered to interact with their surrounding frames, the lateral stiffness and the lateral load capacity of the structure largely increase.The recent advent of structural design for a particular level of earthquake performance, such as immediate post-earthquake occupancy, (termed performance based earthquake engineering), has resulted in guidelines such as ATC-40 (1996) FEMA-273 (1996) and FEMA-356 (2000) and standards such as ASCE-41 (2006), among others. The different types of analyses described in these documents, pushover analysis comes forward because of its optimal accuracy, efficiency and ease of use.The infill may be integral or non-integral depending on the connectivity of the infill to the frame. In the case of buildings under consideration, integral connection is assumed. The composite behavior of an infilled frame imparts lateral stiffness and strength to the building. The typical behavior of an infilled frame subjected to lateral load is illustrated in Figures 1 (a) and (b).Figure1. Behavior of infilled frames (Govindan, 1986).In this present paper five models of office building with different configuration of masonry infill are generated with the help of ETABS 2015 and effectiveness has been checked. Pushover analysis is adopted for the evaluation of the seismic response of the frames. Each frame is subjected to pushover loading case along negative X-direction.2.Building DescriptionMulti-storey rigid jointed frame mixed use building G+9 (Figure 2), was selected in the seismic zone (Zone IV) of Ethiopia and designed based on the Ethiopian Building Code Standard ESEN: 2015 and European Code-2005. ETABS 2015 was used for the analysis and design of the building by modeling as a 3-D space frame system.Figure 2. Typical building plan.Seismic performance is predicted by using performance based analysis of simulation models of bare and infilled non ductile RC frame buildings with different arrangement of masonry wall. The structure will be assumed to be new, with no existing infill damage.Building Data:1.Type of structure = Multi-storey rigid jointed frameyout = as shown in figure 23.Zone = Iv4.Importance Factor = 15.Soil Condition = hard6.Number of stories = Ten (G+9)7.Height of Building =30 m8.Floor to floor height = 3 m9.External wall thickness =20cm10.Internal wall thickness=15cm11.Depth of the floor slab =15cm12.depth of roof slab=12cm13.Size of all columns = 70×70cm14.Size of all beams = 70 × 40cm15.Door opening size=100×200cm16.Window opening size =200×120cm3.Structural Modeling and AnalysisTo understand the effect of masonry wall in reinforced concrete frame, with a total of five models are developed and pushover analysis has been made in standard computer program ETABS2015. In this particular study pushover loading case along negative X-axis is considered to study seismic performance of all models. Since the out of plane effect is not studied in this paper, only the equivalent strut along X-axis are considered to study the in plane effect and masonry walls along Y-axis are not considered in all models. From this different condition, all models are identified by their names which are given below.3.1.Different Arrangement of the Building ModelsTo understand the effect of masonry wall in reinforced concrete frame, with a total of five models are developed and pushover analysis has been made in standard computer program ETABS2015. In this particular study pushover loading case along negative X-axis is considered to study seismic performance of all models.Model 1:- Bare reinforced concrete frame: masonry infill walls are removed from the building along all storiesModel 2:-Reinforced concrete frame with 75% of masonry wall removed from fully infilled frameFigure 3. Plan View Model 2.Model 3:- Reinforced concrete frame with half of of masonry wall removed from fully infilled frameModel 4:- Reinforced concrete frame with 25% of masonry wall removed from fully infilled frameFigure 5. Plan view of Model 4.Model 5:- Fully infilled reinforced concrete frame (Base frame)3.2.Modeling of Masonry InfillIn the case of an infill wall located in a lateral load resisting frame the stiffness and strength contribution of the infill are considered by modelling the infill as an equivalent compression strut (Smith).Because of its simplicity, several investigators have recommended the equivalent strut concept. In the present analysis, a trussed frame model is considered. This type of model does not neglect the bending moment in beams and columns. Rigid joints connect the beams and columns, but pin joints at the beam-to-column Junctions connect the equivalent struts.Infill parameters (effective width, elastic modulus and strength) are calculated using the method recommended by Smith. The length of the strut is given by the diagonal distance D of the panel (Figure 7) and its thickness is given by the thickness of the infill wall. The estimation of width w of the strut is given below. The initial elastic modulus of the strut Ei is equated to Em the elastic modulus of masonry. As per UBC (1997), Em is given as 750fm, where fm is the compressive stress of masonry in MPa. The effective width was found to depend on the relative stiffness of the infill to the frame, the magnitude of the diagonal load and the aspect ratio of the infilled panel.Figure 7. Strut geometry (Ghassan Al-Chaar).The equivalent strut width, a, depends on the relative flexural stiffness of the infill to that of the columns of the confining frame. The relative infill to frame stiffness shall be evaluated using equation 1 (Stafford-Smith and Carter 1969):Using this expression, Mainstone (1971) considers the relative infill to frame flexibility in the evaluation of the equivalent strut width of the panel as shown in equation 2.Where:λ1= Relatire infill to frame stiffness garameterα= Equivalent width of infill strut, cmE m = modulus of elasticity of masonry infill, MPaE c = modulus of elasticity of confining frame, MPaI column = moment of inertia of masonry infill, cm4t = Gross thickness of the infill, cmh = height of the infill panel, cmθ = Angle of the concentric equivalent strut, radiansD = Diagonal length of infill, cmH = Height of the confining frame, cm3.3.Eccentricity of Equivalent StrutThe equivalent masonry strut is to be connected to the frame members as depicted in Figure 8. The infill forces are assumed to be mainly resisted by the columns, and the struts are placed accordingly. The strut should be pin-connected to the column at a distance l column from the face of the beam. This distance is defined in Equations 3 and 4 and is calculated using the strut width, a.Figure 8. Placement of strut (Ghassan Al-Chaar).3.4.Plastic Hinge PlacementPlastic hinges in columns should capture the interaction between axial load and moment capacity. These hinges should be located at a minimum distance l column from the face of the beam as shown in figure 9. Hinges in beams need only characterize the flexural behavior of the member.Figure 9. Plastic hinge placement (Ghassan Al-Chaar).3.5. Analysis of the Building ModelsThe non-structural elements and components that do not significantly influence the building behavior were not modeled. The floor slabs are assumed to act as diaphragms, which ensure integral action of all the vertical lateral load-resisting elements. Beams and columns were modeled as frame elements with the centerlines joined at nodes. Rigid offsets were provided from the nodes to the faces of the columns or beams. The stiffness for columns and beams were taken as 0.7EcIg, 0.35EcIg respectively accounting for the cracking in the members and the contribution of flanges in the beams.The weight of the slab was distributed to the surrounding beams as per ESEN1992:2015. The mass of the slab was lumped at the Centre of mass location at each floor level. This was located at the design eccentricity from the calculated centre of stiffness. Design lateral forces at each storey level were applied at the Centre of mass locations independently in two horizontal directions (X- and Y- directions).Staircases and water tanks were not modeled for their stiffness but their masses were considered in the static and dynamic analyses. The design spectrum for hard soil as specified in ESEN1998:2015 was used for the analysis.The effect of soil-structure interaction was ignored in the analyses. The columns were assumed to be fixed at the level of the bottom of the base slabs of respective isolated footings.Figure 10. Force-Deformation Relation for Plastic Hinge in Pushover Analysis (Habibullah. et al.,1998).4.Analysis Results and DiscussionsThe results of pushover analysis of reinforced concrete frame with different configuration of masonry wall are presented. Analysis of the models under the static and dynamic loads has been performed using Etabs 2015 software. All required data are provided in software and analyzed for total five models to get the result in terms of Base shear vs monitored roof displacement, Storey shear, story displacement and Element force. Subsequently these results are compared for reinforced concrete frame with different configuration of masonry wall.4.1.Base Shear vs Monitored Roof Displacement CurveBased up on the Displacement coefficient method of ASCE 41-13 all the five building models are analyzed in ETABS 2015 standard structural software and the static pushover curve is generated as shown in figure 11.Figure 11. Pushover analysis result for 10-story RC building.The presence of the infill wall both strengthens and stiffens the system, as illustrated in figure 11. For the case study building, the fully-infilled frame has approximately 3 times larger intial stiffness and 1.5 times greater peak strength than the bare frame. In figure 11, the first drop in strength for the fully and partially-infilled frame is due to the brittle failure of masonry materials initiating in the first-story infill walls. This behavior after first-story wall failure is due towall-frame interaction and depends on the relative strength of the infill and framing.So, based on these results, infill walls can be beneficial as long as they are properly taken into consideration in the design process and the failure mechanism is controlled.4.2.Story Displacement for Different ModelsFigure 12. shows the comparative study of seismic demand in terms of lateral story displacement amongst all the five types of reinforced concrete frame with different configuration of infill. The lateral displacement obtained from the bare frame model is the maximum which is about 60% greater than that of fully infilled frame, nearly 50% greater than that of frame with 25% of the masonry wall reduced, about 40% greater than that of frame with 50% of the masonry wall reduced and 30% greater than that of frame with 75% of the masonry wall reduced.Figure 12. Comparison of Story displacements for different models.Thus, the infill panel reduces the seismic demand of reinforced concrete buildings. The lateral story displacement is dramatically reduced due to introduction of infill. This probably is the cause of building designed in conventional way behaving near elastically even during strong earthquake.4.3.Member ForcesIn this project to understand the effect of different configuration of infill in reinforced concrete frame; study of the behavior of the column in all models for axialloads was conducted. Total of five nonlinear models are analyzed in ETABS 2015 and all models have same plan of building, therefore the position and label of columns are same in all plans of models which is shown in figure 2. After analysis consider the column no. 1(C1) shown in figure 2. from all models for pushover load case and get the axial forces of column at performance point at every story from software, which is given in table 1 and the values for each model is compared with the bare frame model.Table 1. Comparison of axial force for different models. (KN)From this observation, it is evident that when an infilled frame is loaded laterally, the columns take the majority of the force and shear force exerted on the frame by the infill which is modeled as the eccentric equivalent struts. Generally, the relative increase of axial force is observed when the percentage of infill in reinforced concrete frame increases. It is observed that fully infilled reinforced concrete frame showed around 10% increase in axial force relative to bare frame model. The other infill models showed a lesser increase. The effect of infill on columns is to increase the shear force and to reduce bending moments.In general compared to bare frame model, the infilled models predicted higher axial and shear forces in columns but lower bending moments in both beams and columns. Thus, the effect of infill panel is to change the predominantly a frame action of a moment resisting frame system towards truss action.4.4.Story ShearStory shear is the total horizontal seismic shear force at the base of structure. Results from static pushover analysis at performance point for the case study buildings are shown in figure 13.Figure 13. Comparison of story shear for different model.As observed from the figure 13 the story shear calculated on the basis of bare frame model gave a lesser value than the other infilled frames; It was observed that the story shear in fully infilled frame is nearly 15% greater compared to bare frame model and frame with 25% of the masonry wall reduced was nearly 10% greater compared to the bare frame, frame with 50% of the masonry wall reduced is nearly 8% greater compared to the bare frame and frame with 75% of the masonry wall reduced is about 5% greater compared to the bare frame.Since the bare frame models do not take in to account the stiffness rendered by the infill panel, it gives significantly longer time period. And hence smaller lateral forces. And when the infill is modeled, the structure becomes much stiffer than the bare frame model. Therefore, it has been found that calculation of earthquake forces by treating RC frames as ordinary frames without regards to infill leads to underestimation of base shear. This is because of bare frame is having larger value of fundamental natural time period as compared to other models due to absence of masonry infill walls. Fundamental natural period get increased and therefore base shear get reduced.5.ConclusionsFrom above results it is clear that pushover curve show an increase in initial stiffness, strength, and energy dissipation of the infilled frame, compared to the bareframe, despite the wall’s brittle failure modes.Due to the introduction of infill the displacement capacity decreases as depicted from the displacement profile (Figure 12). The lateral displacement obtained from the bare frame model is the maximum which is about 60% greater than that of infilled frame.The presence of masonry walls is to change a frame action of a moment resisting frame structure towards a truss action. When infills are present, shear and axial force demands are considerably higher leaving the beam or column vulnerable to shear failure. The axial force and shear force of the bare frame is less than that of the infilled frame. Columns take the majority of the forces exerted on the frame by the infill because the eccentrically modeled equivalent struts transfers the axial load and shear force transferred from the action of lateral loads directly to the columns.The story shear calculated on the basis of bare frame model gave a lesser value than the other infilled frames. It was observed that fully infilled frame is nearly 15% greater compared to bare frame model; frame with 25% of the masonry wall reduced was nearly 10% greater compared to the bare frame; frame with 50% of the masonry wall reduced is nearly 8% greater compared to the bare frame and frame with 75% of the masonry wall reduced is about 5% greater compared to the bare frame. This is because the bare frame models do not takes in to account the stiffness rendered by the infill panel, it gives significantly longer time period.中文译文：砌体填充钢筋混凝土建筑的抗震性能研究摘要无配筋砌体填充对框架结构在侧向荷载作用下的受力性能有很大的影响，但在实际应用中，往往忽略了框架结构的填充刚度，导致对框架结构的刚度和固有频率的估计不足。

土木工程专业钢筋混凝土土方工程大学毕业论文英文文献翻译及原文

毕业设计（论文）外文文献翻译文献、资料中文题目：钢筋混凝土土方工程文献、资料英文题目：文献、资料来源：文献、资料发表（出版）日期：院（部）：专业：土木工程班级：姓名：学号：指导教师：翻译日期： 2017.02.141 外文翻译1.1 Reinforced ConcretePlain concrete is formed from a hardened mixture of cement ,water ,fine aggregate, coarse aggregate (crushed stone or gravel),air, and often other admixtures. The plastic mix is placed and consolidated in the formwork, then cured to facilitate the acceleration of the chemical hydration reaction lf the cement/water mix, resulting in hardened concrete. The finished product has high compressive strength, and low resistance to tension, such that its tensile strength is approximately one tenth lf its compressive strength. Consequently, tensile and shear reinforcement in the tensile regions of sections has to be provided to compensate for the weak tension regions in the reinforced concrete element.It is this deviation in the composition of a reinforces concrete section from the homogeneity of standard wood or steel sections that requires a modified approach to the basic principles of structural design. The two components of the heterogeneous reinforced concrete section are to be so arranged and proportioned that optimal use is made of the materials involved. This is possible because concrete can easily be given any desired shape by placing and compacting the wet mixture of the constituent ingredients are properly proportioned, the finished product becomes strong, durable, and, in combination with the reinforcing bars, adaptable for use as main members of any structural system.The techniques necessary for placing concrete depend on the type of member to be cast: that is, whether it is a column, a bean, a wall, a slab, a foundation. a mass columns, or an extension of previously placed and hardened concrete. For beams, columns, andwalls, the forms should be well oiled after cleaning them, and the reinforcement should be cleared of rust and other harmful materials. In foundations, the earth should be compacted and thoroughly moistened to about 6 in. in depth to avoid absorption of the moisture present in the wet concrete. Concrete should always be placed in horizontal layers which are compacted by means of high frequency power-driven vibrators of either the immersion or external type, as the case requires, unless it is placed by pumping. It must be kept in mind, however, that over vibration can be harmful since it could cause segregation of the aggregate and bleeding of the concrete.Hydration of the cement takes place in the presence of moisture at temperatures above 50°F. It is necessary to maintain such a condition in order that the chemical hydration reaction can take place. If drying is too rapid, surface cracking takes place. This would result in reduction of concrete strength due to cracking as well as the failure to attain full chemical hydration.It is clear that a large number of parameters have to be dealt with in proportioning a reinforced concrete element, such as geometrical width, depth, area of reinforcement, steel strain, concrete strain, steel stress, and so on. Consequently, trial and adjustment is necessary in the choice of concrete sections, with assumptions based on conditions at site, availability of the constituent materials, particular demands of the owners, architectural and headroom requirements, the applicable codes, and environmental reinforced concrete is often a site-constructed composite, in contrast to the standard mill-fabricated beam and column sections in steel structures.A trial section has to be chosen for each critical location in a structural system. The trial section has to be analyzed to determine if its nominal resisting strength is adequate to carry the applied factored load. Since more than one trial is often necessary to arrive at the required section, the first design input step generates into a series of trial-and-adjustment analyses.The trial-and –adjustment procedures for the choice of a concrete section lead to the convergence of analysis and design. Hence every design is an analysis once a trial section is chosen. The availability of handbooks, charts, and personal computers and programs supports this approach as a more efficient, compact, and speedy instructional method compared with the traditional approach of treating the analysis of reinforced concrete separately from pure design.1.2 EarthworkBecause earthmoving methods and costs change more quickly than those in any other branch of civil engineering, this is a field where there are real opportunities for the enthusiast. In 1935 most of the methods now in use for carrying and excavating earth with rubber-tyred equipment did not exist. Most earth was moved by narrow rail track, now relatively rare, and the main methods of excavation, with face shovel, backacter, or dragline or grab, though they are still widely used are only a few of the many current methods. To keep his knowledge of earthmoving equipment up to date an engineer must therefore spend tine studying modern machines. Generally the only reliable up-to-date information on excavators, loaders and transport is obtainable from the makers.Earthworks or earthmoving means cutting into ground where its surface is too high ( cuts ), and dumping the earth in other places where the surface is too low ( fills). Toreduce earthwork costs, the volume of the fills should be equal to the volume of the cuts and wherever possible the cuts should be placednear to fills of equal volume so as to reduce transport and double handlingof the fill. This work of earthwork design falls on the engineer who lays out the road since it is the layout of the earthwork more than anything else which decides its cheapness. From the available maps ahd levels, the engineering must try to reach as many decisions as possible in the drawing office by drawing cross sections of the earthwork. On the site when further information becomes available he can make changes in jis sections and layout,but the drawing lffice work will not have been lost. It will have helped him to reach the best solution in the shortest time.The cheapest way of moving earth is to take it directly out of the cut and drop it as fill with the same machine. This is not always possible, but when it canbe done it is ideal, being both quick and cheap. Draglines, bulldozers and face shovels an do this. The largest radius is obtained with the dragline,and the largest tonnage of earth is moved by the bulldozer, though only over short distances.The disadvantages of the dragline are that it must dig below itself, it cannot dig with force into compacted material, it cannot dig on steep slopws, and its dumping and digging are not accurate.Face shovels are between bulldozers and draglines, having a larger radius of action than bulldozers but less than draglines. They are anle to dig into a vertical cliff face in a way which would be dangerous tor a bulldozer operator and impossible for a dragline. Each piece of equipment should be level of their tracks and for deep digs in compact material a backacter is most useful, but its dumping radius is considerably less than that of the same escavator fitted with a face shovel.Rubber-tyred bowl scrapers are indispensable for fairly level digging where thedistance of transport is too much tor a dragline or face shovel. They can dig the material deeply ( but only below themselves ) to a fairly flat surface, carry it hundreds of meters if need be, then drop it and level it roughly during the dumping. For hard digging it is often found economical to keep a pusher tractor ( wheeled or tracked ) on the digging site, to push each scraper as it returns to dig. As soon as the scraper is full,the pusher tractor returns to the beginning of the dig to heop to help the nest scraper.Bowl scrapers are often extremely powerful machines;many makers build scrapers of 8 cubic meters struck capacity, which carry 10 m ³ heaped. The largest self-propelled scrapers are of 19 m ³ struck capacity ( 25 m ³ heaped )and they are driven by a tractor engine of 430 horse-powers.Dumpers are probably the commonest rubber-tyred transport since they can also conveniently be used for carrying concrete or other building materials. Dumpers have the earth container over the front axle on large rubber-tyred wheels, and the container tips forwards on most types, though in articulated dumpers the direction of tip can be widely varied. The smallest dumpers have a capacity of about 0.5 m ³, and the largest standard types are of about 4.5 m ³. Special types include the self-loading dumper of up to 4 m ³and the articulated type of about 0.5 m ³. The distinction between dumpers and dump trucks must be remembered .dumpers tip forwards and the driver sits behind the load. Dump trucks are heavy, strengthened tipping lorries, the driver travels in front lf the load and the load is dumped behind him, so they are sometimes called rear-dump trucks.1.3 Safety of StructuresThe principal scope of specifications is to provide general principles and computational methods in order to verify safety of structures. The “ safety factor ”, which according to modern trends is independent of the nature and combination of the materials used, can usually be defined as the ratio between the conditions. This ratio is also proportional to the inverse of the probability ( risk ) of failure of the structure.Failure has to be considered not only as overall collapse of the structure but also as unserviceability or, according to a more precise. Common definition. As the reaching of a “ limit state ” which causes the construction not to accomplish the task it was desi gned for. There are two categories of limit state :(1)Ultimate limit sate, which corresponds to the highest value of the load-bearing capacity. Examples include local buckling or global instability of the structure; failure of some sections and subsequent transformation of the structure into a mechanism; failureby fatigue; elastic or plastic deformation or creep that cause a substantial change of the geometry of the structure; and sensitivity of the structure to alternating loads, to fire and to explosions.(2)Service limit states, which are functions of the use and durability of the structure. Examples include excessive deformations and displacements without instability; early or excessive cracks; large vibrations; and corrosion.Computational methods used to verify structures with respect to the different safety conditions can be separated into:(1)Deterministic methods, in which the main parameters are considered as nonrandom parameters.(2)Probabilistic methods, in which the main parameters are considered as random parameters.Alternatively, with respect to the different use of factors of safety, computational methods can be separated into:(1)Allowable stress method, in which the stresses computed under maximum loads are compared with the strength of the material reduced by given safety factors.(2)Limit states method, in which the structure may be proportioned on the basis of its maximum strength. This strength, as determined by rational analysis, shall not be less than that required to support a factored load equal to the sum of the factored live load and dead load ( ultimate state ).The stresses corresponding to working ( service ) conditions with unfactored live and dead loads are compared with prescribed values ( service limit state ) . From the four possible combinations of the first two and second two methods, we can obtain some useful computational methods. Generally, two combinations prevail:(1)deterministic methods, which make use of allowable stresses.(2)Probabilistic methods, which make use of limit states.The main advantage of probabilistic approaches is that, at least in theory, it is possible to scientifically take into account all random factors of safety, which are then combined to define the safety factor. probabilistic approaches depend upon :(1) Random distribution of strength of materials with respect to the conditions of fabrication and erection ( scatter of the values of mechanical properties through out the structure );(2) Uncertainty of the geometry of the cross-section sand of the structure ( faults and imperfections due to fabrication and erection of the structure );(3) Uncertainty of the predicted live loads and dead loads acting on the structure;(4)Uncertainty related to the approximation of the computational method used ( deviation of the actual stresses from computed stresses ).Furthermore, probabilistic theories mean that the allowable risk can be based on several factors, such as :(1) Importance of the construction and gravity of the damage by its failure;(2)Number of human lives which can be threatened by this failure;(3)Possibility and/or likelihood of repairing the structure;(4) Predicted life of the structure.All these factors are related to economic and social considerations such as：(1) Initial cost of the construction;(2) Amortization funds for the duration of the construction;(3) Cost of physical and material damage due to the failure of the construction;(4) Adverse impact on society;(5) Moral and psychological views.The definition of all these parameters, for a given safety factor, allows construction at the optimum cost. However, the difficulty of carrying out a complete probabilistic analysis has to be taken into account. For such an analysis the laws of the distribution of the live load and its induced stresses, of the scatter of mechanical properties of materials, and of the geometry of the cross-sections and the structure have to be known. Furthermore, it is difficult to interpret the interaction between the law of distribution of strength and that of stresses because both depend upon the nature of the material, on the cross-sections and upon the load acting on the structure. These practical difficulties can be overcome in two ways. The first is to apply different safety factors to the material and to the loads, without necessarily adopting the probabilistic criterion. The second is an approximate probabilistic method which introduces some simplifying assumptions ( semi-probabilistic methods ) 。

土木工程专业毕业设计外文文献及翻译

英文原文：Rehabilitation of rectangular simply supported RC beams with shear deficiencies using CFRP compositesAhmed Khalifa a,＊, Antonio Nanni ba Department of Structural Engineering，University of Alexandria，Alexandria 21544，Egyptb Department of Civil Engineering，University of Missouri at Rolla，Rolla，MO 65409，USAReceived 28 April 1999；received in revised form 30 October 2001；accepted 10 January 2002AbstractThe present study examines the shear performance and modes of failure of rectangular simply supported reinforced concrete(RC) beams designed with shear deficiencies。

These members were strengthened with externally bonded carbon fiber reinforced polymer （CFRP）sheets and evaluated in the laboratory. The experimental program consisted of twelve full—scale RC beams tested to fail in shear. The variables investigated within this program included steel stirrups, and the shear span-to—effective depth ratio, as well as amount and distribution of CFRP。

土木工程混凝土强度中英文对照外文翻译文献

<文献翻译一：原文>Strength of Concrete in Slabs, Investigates along Direction of Concreting ABSTRACTIn theory of concrete it is assumed that concrete composites are isotropic on a macro scale. For example, it is assumed that a floor slab’s or a beam’s streng th is identical in all directions and its nonhomogeneity is random. Hence neither calculations of the load-bearing capacity of structural components nor the techniques of investigating concrete in structure in situ take into account to a sufficient degree the fact that the assumption about concrete isotropy is overly optimistic. The present research shows that variation in concrete strength along the direction of concreting has not only a qualitative effect (as is commonly believed), but also a significant quantitative effect. This indicates that concrete is a composite which has not been fully understood yet. The paper presents evaluations of ordinary concrete (OC) homogeneity along component thickness along the direction of concreting. The ultrasonic method and modified exponential heads with a point contact with concrete were used in the investigations [1-3].Keywords: Concrete; Compressive Strength of Concrete; Non-Destructive1. IntroductionIn a building structure there are components which are expected to have special properties but not necessarily in the whole cross section. Components under bending, such as beams and floor slabs are generally compressed in their upper zone and the concrete’s compressive strength is vital mainly in this zone. The components are usually moulded in the same position in which they later remain in service, i.e. with their upper zone under compression. Concrete in the upper zone is expected to be slightly weaker than in the lower zone, but it is unclear how much weaker [4,5]. Also flooring slabs in production halls are most exposed to abrasion and impact loads in their upper zone which is not their strongest part. It is known from practice that industrial floors belong to the most often damaged building components.When reinforced concrete beams or floor slabs are to be tested they can be accessed only from their undersides and so only the bottom parts are tested and on this basis conclusions are drawn about the strength of the concrete in the whole cross section, including in the compressed upper zone. Thus a question arises: how large are the errors committed in this kind of investigations?In order to answer the above and other questions, tests of the strength of concrete in various structural components, especially in horizontally concreted slabs, were carried out. The variation of strength along the thickness of the components was analyzed.2. Research SignificanceThe research results presented in the paper show that the compressive strength of concrete in horizontally formed structural elements varies along their thickness. In the top zone the strength is by 25% - 30% lower than the strength in the middle zone, and it can be by as much as 100% lower than the strength in the bottom zone. The observations are based on the results of nondestructive tests carried out on drill cores taken from the structure, and verified by a destructive method. It is interesting to note that despite the great advances in concrete technology, the variation in compressive strength along the thickness of structural elements is characteristic of both old (over 60 years old) concretes and contemporary ordinary concretes.3. Test MethodologyBefore Concrete strength was tested by the ultrasonic method using exponential heads with a point contact with concrete. The detailed specifications of the heads can be found in [2,3]. The heads’ frequency was 40 and 100 kHz and the diameter of their concentrators amounted to 1 mm.In order to determine the real strength distributions in the existing structures, cylindrical cores 80 mm or 114 mm diameter (Figure 2) were drilled from them in the direction of concreting. Then specimens with their height equal to their diameter were cut out of the cores.Ultrasonic measurements were performed on the cores according to the scheme shown in Figure3. Ultrasonic pulses (pings) were passed through in two perpendicular directions I and II in planes spaced every 10 mm. In this way one could determine how ping velocity varied along the core’s height, i.e. along the thickness of the tested component.In both test directions ping pass times were determined and velocities CL were calculated. The velocities from the two directions in a tested measurement plane were averaged.Subsequently, specimens with their height equal to their diameter of 80 mm were cut out of the cores. Aver-age ultrasonic pulse velocity CL for the specimen’s central zone was correlated with fatigue strength fc determined by destructive tests carried out in a strength tester.For the different concretes different correlation curves with a linear, exponential or power equation were obtained. Exemplary correlation curve equations are given below:Lc c L c C f L f C f 38.1exp 0951.01.003.56705.232621.4=⋅=-⨯=where:fc —the compressive strength of concrete MPa,CL —ping velocity km/s.The determined correlation curve was used to calculate the strength of concrete in each tested core cross section and the results are presented in the form of graphs illustrating concrete strength distribution along the thickness of the tested component. 4. Investigation of Concrete in Industrial FloorsAfter Floor in sugar factory’s raw materials storage hall Concrete in an industrial floor must have particularly good characteristics in the top layer. Since it was to be loaded with warehouse trucks and stored sugar beets and frequently washed the investigated concrete floor (built in 1944) was designed as consisting of a 150 mm thick underlay and a 50 mm thick surface layer and made of concrete with a strength of 20 MPa (concrete A).As part of the investigations eight cores, each 80 mm in diameter, were drilled from the floor. The investigations showed significant departures from the design. The concrete subfloor’s thickness varied from 40 to 150 mm. The surface layer was not made of concrete, but of cement mortar with sand used as the aggregate. Also the thickness of this layer was uneven, varying from 40 to 122mm. After the ultrasonic tests specimens with their height equal to their diameter of 80 mm were cut out of the cores. Two scaling curves: one for the surface layer and the other for the bottom concrete layer were determined.A characteristic concrete compressive strength distribution along the floor’s thickness is shown in Figure 4.Strength in the upper zone is much lower than in thelower zone: ranging from 4.7 to 9.8 MPa for the mortar and from 13.9 to 29.0 MPa for the concrete layer. The very low strength of the upper layer of mortar is the result of strong porosity caused by air bubbles escaping upwards during the vibration of concrete. Figure 5 shows t he specimen’s porous top surface.Floor in warehouse hall with forklift truck transport The floor was built in 1998. Cellular concrete was used as for the underlay and the 150 mm thick surface layer was made of ordinary concrete with fibre (steel wires) reinforcement (concrete B). Cores 80 mm high and 80 mm in diameter were drilled from the surface layer. Ultrasonic measurements and destructive tests were performed as described above. Also the test results were handled in a similar way. An exemplary strength distribution along the floor’s thickness is shown in Figure 6.5. ConclusionsTests of ordinary concretes show unexpectedly greatly reduced strength in the upper zone of horizontally moulded structural components. This is to a large degree due to the vibration of concrete as a result of which coarse aggregate displaces downwards making the lower layers more compact while air moves upwards aerating the upper layers and thereby increasing their porosity. The increase in the concrete’s porosity results in a large drop in its compressive strength. Thanks to the use of the ultrasonic method and probes with exponential concentrators it could be demonstrated how the compressive strength of ordinary concrete is distributed along the thickness of structural components in building structures. It became apparent that the reduction in compressive strength in the compressed zone of structural components under bending and in industrial concrete floors can be very large (amounting to as much as 50% of the strength of t he slab’s lower zone). Therefore this phenomenon should be taken into account at the stage of calculating slabs, reinforced concrete beams and industrial floors [6].The results of the presented investigations apply to ordinary concretes (OC) which are increasingly supplanted by self-compacting concretes (SCC) and high-performance concretes (HPC). Since no intensive vibration is required to mould structures from such concretes one can expect that they are much more homogenous along their thickness [7]. This will be known once the ongoing experimental research is completed.Bohdan StawiskiStrength of Concrete in Slabs, Investigates along Direction of Concreting[D]Institute of Building Engineering, Wroclaw University of Technology Wybrzeze Wyspianskiego, Wroclaw, Poland Received October 15, 2011; revised November 21, 2011; accepted November 30, 2011<文献翻译一：译文>混凝土强度与混凝土浇筑方向关系的研究摘要从理论上看，假设混凝土复合材料是各项同性的从宏观尺度上讲。

土木毕业设计外文文献

土木毕业设计外文文献土木毕业设计外文文献在土木工程领域，外文文献是不可或缺的资源。

它们提供了最新的研究成果、技术发展和实践经验，为土木工程师们提供了宝贵的指导和参考。

本文将介绍几篇与土木毕业设计相关的外文文献，并对其内容进行简要概述。

1. "Structural Health Monitoring of Bridges: A Review" by Fu-Kuo Chang and Hoon Sohn这篇文献综述了桥梁结构健康监测的最新研究进展。

它介绍了不同类型的监测技术，包括传感器、无损检测和数据分析方法。

文献还讨论了桥梁结构健康监测的挑战和未来发展方向。

对于土木工程学生来说，这篇文献提供了一个全面的桥梁结构监测的概述，可以帮助他们在毕业设计中选择适当的监测方法。

2. "Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete Buildings" by Jack Moehle这本书是一本关于钢筋混凝土建筑抗震设计的经典著作。

它详细介绍了抗震设计的原理、方法和实践经验。

文献还包括了大量的案例研究和结构分析的示例。

对于进行毕业设计的土木工程学生来说，这本书是一个宝贵的参考资料，可以帮助他们理解抗震设计的基本原理，并应用于实际项目中。

3. "Sustainable Construction: Green Building Design and Delivery" by Charles J. Kibert可持续建筑是当今土木工程领域的一个重要话题。

这本书介绍了绿色建筑设计和施工的原则和实践。

文献探讨了可持续建筑的概念、设计方法和材料选择。

它还包括了绿色建筑认证体系和案例研究。

对于有意进行可持续建筑设计的毕业生来说，这本书提供了宝贵的指导，帮助他们在毕业设计中实现环境友好和可持续发展的目标。

4. "Geotechnical Engineering: Principles and Practices" by Donald P. Coduto,Man-chu Ronald Yeung, and William A. Kitch岩土工程是土木工程的重要分支。

1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。

毕业设计（论文）外文文献翻译文献、资料中文题目：钢筋混凝土文献、资料英文题目：Reinforced Concrete文献、资料来源：文献、资料发表（出版）日期：院（部）：专业：班级：姓名：学号：指导教师：翻译日期： 2017.02.14外文文献翻译Reinforced ConcreteConcrete and reinforced concrete are used as building materials in every country. In many, including the United States and Canada, reinforced concrete is a dominant structural material in engineered construction. The universal nature of reinforced concrete construction stems from the wide availability of reinforcing bars and the constituents of concrete, gravel, sand, and cement, the relatively simple skills required in concrete construction, and the economy of reinforced concrete compared to other forms of construction. Concrete and reinforced concrete are used in bridges, buildings of all sorts underground structures, water tanks, television towers, offshore oil exploration and production structures, dams, and even in ships.Reinforced concrete structures may be cast-in-place concrete, constructed in their final location, or they may be precast concrete produced in a factory and erected at the construction site. Concrete structures may be severe and functional in design, or the shape and layout and be whimsical and artistic. Few other building materials off the architect and engineer such versatility and scope.Concrete is strong in compression but weak in tension. As a result, cracks develop whenever loads, or restrained shrinkage of temperature changes, give rise to tensile stresses in excess of the tensile strength of the concrete. In a plain concrete beam, the moments about the neutral axis due to applied loads are resisted by an internal tension-compression couple involving tension in the concrete. Such a beam fails very suddenly and completely when the first crack forms. In a reinforced concrete beam, steel bars are embedded in the concrete in such a way that the tension forces needed for moment equilibrium after the concrete cracks can be developed in the bars.The construction of a reinforced concrete member involves building a from of mold in the shape of the member being built. The form must be strong enough to support both the weight and hydrostatic pressure of the wet concrete, and any forces applied to it by workers, concrete buggies, wind, and so on. The reinforcement is placed in this form and held in placeduring the concreting operation. After the concrete has hardened, the forms are removed. As the forms are removed, props of shores are installed to support the weight of the concrete until it has reached sufficient strength to support the loads by itself.The designer must proportion a concrete member for adequate strength to resist the loads and adequate stiffness to prevent excessive deflections. In beam must be proportioned so that it can be constructed. For example, the reinforcement must be detailed so that it can be assembled in the field, and since the concrete is placed in the form after the reinforcement is in place, the concrete must be able to flow around, between, and past the reinforcement to fill all parts of the form completely.The choice of whether a structure should be built of concrete, steel, masonry, or timber depends on the availability of materials and on a number of value decisions. The choice of structural system is made by the architect of engineer early in the design, based on the following considerations:1. Economy. Frequently, the foremost consideration is the overall const of the structure. This is, of course, a function of the costs of the materials and the labor necessary to erect them. Frequently, however, the overall cost is affected as much or more by the overall construction time since the contractor and owner must borrow or otherwise allocate money to carry out the construction and will not receive a return on this investment until the building is ready for occupancy. In a typical large apartment of commercial project, the cost of construction financing will be a significant fraction of the total cost. As a result, financial savings due to rapid construction may more than offset increased material costs. For this reason, any measures the designer can take to standardize the design and forming will generally pay off in reduced overall costs.In many cases the long-term economy of the structure may be more important than the first cost. As a result, maintenance and durability are important consideration.2. Suitability of material for architectural and structural function.A reinforced concrete system frequently allows the designer to combine the architectural and structural functions. Concrete has the advantage that it is placed in a plastic condition and is given the desired shapeand texture by means of the forms and the finishing techniques. This allows such elements ad flat plates or other types of slabs to serve as load-bearing elements while providing the finished floor and / or ceiling surfaces. Similarly, reinforced concrete walls can provide architecturally attractive surfaces in addition to having the ability to resist gravity, wind, or seismic loads. Finally, the choice of size of shape is governed by the designer and not by the availability of standard manufactured members.3. Fire resistance. The structure in a building must withstand the effects of a fire and remain standing while the building is evacuated and the fire is extinguished. A concrete building inherently has a 1- to 3-hour fire rating without special fireproofing or other details. Structural steel or timber buildings must be fireproofed to attain similar fire ratings.4. Low maintenance.Concrete members inherently require less maintenance than do structural steel or timber members. This is particularly true if dense, air-entrained concrete has been used for surfaces exposed to the atmosphere, and if care has been taken in the design to provide adequate drainage off and away from the structure. Special precautions must be taken for concrete exposed to salts such as deicing chemicals.5. Availability of materials. Sand, gravel, cement, and concrete mixing facilities are very widely available, and reinforcing steel can be transported to most job sites more easily than can structural steel. As a result, reinforced concrete is frequently used in remote areas.On the other hand, there are a number of factors that may cause one to select a material other than reinforced concrete. These include:1. Low tensile strength.The tensile strength concrete is much lower than its compressive strength ( about 1/10 ), and hence concrete is subject to cracking. In structural uses this is overcome by using reinforcement to carry tensile forces and limit crack widths to within acceptable values. Unless care is taken in design and construction, however, these cracks may be unsightly or may allow penetration of water. When this occurs, water or chemicals such as road deicing salts may cause deterioration or staining of the concrete. Special design details are required in such cases. In the case of water-retaining structures, special details and /of prestressing are required to prevent leakage.2. Forms and shoring. The construction of a cast-in-place structure involves three steps not encountered in the construction of steel or timber structures. These are ( a ) the construction of the forms, ( b ) the removal of these forms, and (c) propping or shoring the new concrete to support its weight until its strength is adequate. Each of these steps involves labor and / or materials, which are not necessary with other forms of construction.3. Relatively low strength per unit of weight for volume.The compressive strength of concrete is roughly 5 to 10% that of steel, while its unit density is roughly 30% that of steel. As a result, a concrete structure requires a larger volume and a greater weight of material than does a comparable steel structure. As a result, long-span structures are often built from steel.4. Time-dependent volume changes. Both concrete and steel undergo-approximately the same amount of thermal expansion and contraction. Because there is less mass of steel to be heated or cooled, and because steel is a better concrete, a steel structure is generally affected by temperature changes to a greater extent than is a concrete structure. On the other hand, concrete undergoes frying shrinkage, which, if restrained, may cause deflections or cracking. Furthermore, deflections will tend to increase with time, possibly doubling, due to creep of the concrete under sustained loads.In almost every branch of civil engineering and architecture extensive use is made of reinforced concrete for structures and foundations. Engineers and architects requires basic knowledge of reinforced concrete design throughout their professional careers. Much of this text is directly concerned with the behavior and proportioning of components that make up typical reinforced concrete structures-beams, columns, and slabs. Once the behavior of these individual elements is understood, the designer will have the background to analyze and design a wide range of complex structures, such as foundations, buildings, and bridges, composed of these elements.Since reinforced concrete is a no homogeneous material that creeps, shrinks, and cracks, its stresses cannot be accurately predicted by the traditional equations derived in a course in strength of materials forhomogeneous elastic materials. Much of reinforced concrete design in therefore empirical, i.e., design equations and design methods are based on experimental and time-proved results instead of being derived exclusively from theoretical formulations.A thorough understanding of the behavior of reinforced concrete will allow the designer to convert an otherwise brittle material into tough ductile structural elements and thereby take advantage of concrete’s desirable characteristics, its high compressive strength, its fire resistance, and its durability.Concrete, a stone like material, is made by mixing cement, water, fine aggregate ( often sand ), coarse aggregate, and frequently other additives ( that modify properties ) into a workable mixture. In its unhardened or plastic state, concrete can be placed in forms to produce a large variety of structural elements. Although the hardened concrete by itself, i.e., without any reinforcement, is strong in compression, it lacks tensile strength and therefore cracks easily. Because unreinforced concrete is brittle, it cannot undergo large deformations under load and fails suddenly-without warning. The addition fo steel reinforcement to the concrete reduces the negative effects of its two principal inherent weaknesses, its susceptibility to cracking and its brittleness. When the reinforcement is strongly bonded to the concrete, a strong, stiff, and ductile construction material is produced. This material, called reinforced concrete, is used extensively to construct foundations, structural frames, storage takes, shell roofs, highways, walls, dams, canals, and innumerable other structures and building products. Two other characteristics of concrete that are present even when concrete is reinforced are shrinkage and creep, but the negative effects of these properties can be mitigated by careful design.A code is a set technical specifications and standards that control important details of design and construction. The purpose of codes it produce structures so that the public will be protected from poor of inadequate and construction.Two types f coeds exist. One type, called a structural code, is originated and controlled by specialists who are concerned with the proper use of a specific material or who are involved with the safe design of a particular class of structures.The second type of code, called a building code, is established to cover construction in a given region, often a city or a state. The objective of a building code is also to protect the public by accounting for the influence of the local environmental conditions on construction. For example, local authorities may specify additional provisions to account for such regional conditions as earthquake, heavy snow, or tornados. National structural codes genrally are incorporated into local building codes.The American Concrete Institute ( ACI ) Building Code covering the design of reinforced concrete buildings. It contains provisions covering all aspects of reinforced concrete manufacture, design, and construction. It includes specifications on quality of materials, details on mixing and placing concrete, design assumptions for the analysis of continuous structures, and equations for proportioning members for design forces.All structures must be proportioned so they will not fail or deform excessively under any possible condition of service. Therefore it is important that an engineer use great care in anticipating all the probable loads to which a structure will be subjected during its lifetime.Although the design of most members is controlled typically by dead and live load acting simultaneously, consideration must also be given to the forces produced by wind, impact, shrinkage, temperature change, creep and support settlements, earthquake, and so forth.The load associated with the weight of the structure itself and its permanent components is called the dead load. The dead load of concrete members, which is substantial, should never be neglected in design computations. The exact magnitude of the dead load is not known accurately until members have been sized. Since some figure for the dead load must be used in computations to size the members, its magnitude must be estimated at first. After a structure has been analyzed, the members sized, and architectural details completed, the dead load can be computed more accurately. If the computed dead load is approximately equal to the initial estimate of its value ( or slightly less ), the design is complete, but if a significant difference exists between the computed and estimated values of dead weight, the computations should be revised using an improved value of dead load. An accurate estimate of dead load is particularly important when spans are long, say over 75 ft ( 22.9 m ),because dead load constitutes a major portion of the design load.Live loads associated with building use are specific items of equipment and occupants in a certain area of a building, building codes specify values of uniform live for which members are to be designed.After the structure has been sized for vertical load, it is checked for wind in combination with dead and live load as specified in the code. Wind loads do not usually control the size of members in building less than 16 to 18 stories, but for tall buildings wind loads become significant and cause large forces to develop in the structures. Under these conditions economy can be achieved only by selecting a structural system that is able to transfer horizontal loads into the ground efficiently.钢筋混凝土在每一个国家，混凝土及钢筋混凝土都被用来作为建筑材料。