RBV(资源基础理论)的经典文献及摘要
RBV观点与动态能力对比分析

RBV观点与动态能力对比分析[摘要]本文搜集了有关RBV理论和动态能力观点比较有代表性的文献,通过对文献的整理和理解,分别从定义、假设和适用条件、主要内容三个角度将这两种观点进行了对比,最后提出对可持续竞争优势能否获得的看法。
[关键词]RBV;动态能力;可持续竞争优势1 引言自从Penrose(1959)首次提出RBV理论以来,经过后来学者的不断完善与发展,RBV理论已经被越来越多的学者接受,但是随着当今环境变化越来越剧烈,也有很多的学者对可持续竞争力能否获得和保持表示质疑。
动态能力的观点就比较有代表性,这种观点虽然最早可以追溯到熊彼特,但是在最近才得到重视与发展,如Dosi,Teece和Winter,1989;Prahalad和Hamel,1990;Porter,1990;Kathleen和Jeffrey,2000等,本文搜集了有关RBV理论和动态能力观点比较有代表性的文献,通过对文献的整理和理解,分别从定义、假设和适用条件、主要内容三个角度将这两种观点进行了对比,最后提出对可持续竞争优势能否获得的看法。
2 定义对比2.1 RBV观点的主要内容RBV观点将公司视为一系列资源的组合,公司的竞争优势来源于公司所特有、稀缺和难以模仿的资源,包括物理资本、人力资本和组织资本等。
由于路径依赖、社会复杂性和因果模糊性等原因,这些构成公司竞争优势的特有资源很难被竞争对手所获得,因而有可能成为公司的可持续的竞争优势的来源。
而判断公司的资源能否成为可持续竞争优势的来源有以下几个判断标准:资源是否有价值,资源是否是稀缺的,资源是否可模仿以及该资源是否容易被替代,同时满足以上四条的资源就可以成为可持续竞争优势的来源(Barney,1991)。
2.2 动态能力观点的主要内容动态能力的观点有很多种不同的版本,Teece,Pisano和Shuen(1997)认为动态能力就是公司为了适应动态的环境而发展出的整合、建立和重新建立内部和外部竞争优势的能力,管理和组织的流程决定了公司的竞争优势,而资源定位和路径共同影响流程并与流程共同构成了决定企业竞争优势的因素。
(完整版)关于资源基础理论的相关论述

关于资源基础理论的相关论述来源:《经济管理.新管理》(2001年第12期)Rumet、Schendel和Teece在《战略管理和经济学》一文中明确指出,以20世纪70年代为开端,战略管理进入了一个全新的阶段。
与70年代之前的战略管理思想相比较,经济学的思想和方法被大量引入战略管理学,是这一阶段的最大特点。
在他们的眼中,70年代以来的阶段是战略管理与经济学相互融合的阶段(1991,P.5)。
在这一历史时期,战略管理界几乎先后出现了两个主流学派。
较早的一个是由哈佛大学的波特教授提出来的“五种力量模型”(又称竞争优势理论),几乎统治了整个80年代。
另一个是由Prahalad、Hamel等学者提出的核心能力理论,它几乎统治了80年代后期开始的战略管理学界。
然而,与波特几乎同时代还存在另一个学派,虽然这一学派的影响力不及波特教授的竞争优势理论和Prahalad等学者的核心能力理论,但是,作为与波特竞争优势理论相对应的~个学派,这一学派成功地从经济学中引入了不同于波特的芝加哥思想,为Prahalad、Hamel等学者后来提出核心能力理论提供了思想源泉(Ansoff,1987)。
这就是Barney、Rumelt、Peteraf等学者创立的资源基础理论。
一、资源基础理论的思想渊源在Rumelt、Schendel和Teece看来,“经济学对战略管理的主要贡献都来源于产业组织方面的文献”,因为(这一领域)“是经济学突破新古典的企业理论并取得重要成果的领域,在这一领域内建立了新经济学(1991,P.5)”。
这个论断,让我们回想到经济学在20世纪70年代发生的重大转折,在宏观经济学上是理性预期思想的引入。
在微观经济学上,则是现代企业理论与信息经济学的发展。
其中,与战略管理联系最密切的就是现代企业理论。
现代企业理论在思想上最大的特点就是放弃了新古典企业理论中同质性企业的假设,转而接受了差异性企业的现实,并试图用经济学的方法对这种差异给出有力的解释。
运用RBV之分析企业衰退期战略选择

摘要本文运用RBV(Resource--basedViewoftheFirm)分析企业面临衰退时所应采取的战略。
本文对企业衰退期概念作了界定,对企业衰退期和产业衰退作了区分,文中介绍了RBV的主要观点,采用RBV模式分析了企业面临衰退的原因,并对迈克尔·波特使甩SCP模式褥出的衰退产业中的企业战略提出了不同意见。
根据造成企业面临衰退的因素,本文提出了企业摆脱衰退的短期和长期战略。
根据RBV模式,借鉴博弈论的理论,本文推导出企业应采用短期战略和长期战略结合的方式摆脱衰退困境:短期内,企业主要采用战略调整是建立在企业现有战略资源基础上的营销创新等低成本战略;长期内,企业应进行战略创新,增加新的战略资源和提升组织创新、优化配置资源的能力,建立起企业持续竞争优势,从根本上摆脱衰退困境。
本文运用RBV模式对战略创新进行了新的探讨,讨论了战略创新的三个基本要素:基于资源的顾客价值观、基于资源和能力的技术创新战略和基于资源的组织创新能力。
最后,本文认为战略创新应通过四个层面的模式实现:1、基于企业资源优化配置的目的,退出某些不具有优势的业务;2、基于能力的流程再造(能力就是使组织具有竞争优势的业务流程);3、基于资源和能力的相关多元化,认为应根据企业战略资源和能力的相关性迸行多元化延伸:4、培育新的核心竞争力,刨造全新的产业,成为新产业的规则制定者,使企业最大限度地获得战略资源所仓U造的价值。
关键词:RBV企业衰退期衰退战略AbstractT11iStextUSeSRBV(Resource-basedViewoftheFirm)toanalyzethestrategythatenterprisesshouldadoptwhilefacingdeclining.Thetextdefinetheconceptofenterprisedeclineanddistinguishthefacttoactastoindustrydeclineandenterprisedecline.ItintroducethemainviewofRBVandadoptRBVmodetoanalyzethereasonthatenterprisesdecline.ComparetoMichael’PotteruseSCPmode,itdrawdifferentsuggestionsofthedeclinestrategytoenterprises.Accordingtothefactorcausingenterprisestodecline,thistexthasproposedthatenterpriseShouldadoptshorttimeandlong-termdecliningstrategytobreakawayfromthepredicamentofdeclining.AccordingtoRBVmode.drawlessonsfromthetheoryofgametheory,thistextsuggestthat:adoptstrategicadjustmentinashorttime,andadoptstrategytoinnovateforalongtime.Inashorttime,theenterprisesshouldmainlyadoptthestrategysuchasmarketinnovatingwhichset叩onthebasisofstrategicreSOUrcesofenterprises.Inbeinglong-term,enterpriseshouldcarryonstrategyinnovate,increasenewstrategicresourceanditsorganizing,distributingabilityofresourcerationallytopromotetosetupenterprisesandcompetefortheadvantagecontinuously,ThiSgoalofthestrate:gicinnovateiSthatenterprisescanbreakawayfromthepredicamentofdecliningcompletely.ThistextUSeSRBVmodetoinnovatenewdiscussiontostrategy,anddiscussthreebasickeyelementsthatstrategyinnovates:Basedonresourcecustomervalues.basedonresoUrceandabilit-/tectmologicaiinnovationstrategyandbasedonresourceinnovationabilityoforganizing.Finally,thistextthinksthatstrategyinnovatesandshouldberealizedthroughthemedeoffouraspects:l,Onthebasisofthepurposeofenterprise+Srcsoul℃erationaldistdbution,withdrawfromsomebusinessnothavingtheadvantage;2procedurebasedonabilityisgivenanewleaseoflifeto,abilityistoenableorganizingthebusinessprocedurevdthcompetitionadvantage;3.OnthebasisofresoUrcetsandability’Spluralismofdependence.iSitshouldgoondependenceextendaccordingtoenterprisestrategicresoUrceandabilityinplUralismtothink;4fostersthenewkeycompetitiveness,createthenewindustry.Iftheformulationofthenewindustryrulemakeenterprisesobtainpersonwhobecomesvaluethatthestrategicresourcecreatestothemaxim啪extent.Keywords:RBVEnterprisedeclinetimeDeclinestrategy.咝望查兰塑圭塑窒生兰焦堡壅笺!墨——_—————————‘--————●--——_—————^_————————●—_●—-——●——_————I●——一一第1章绪论自然界中的幸存者不是最强悍的物种,也不是最智慧的物种,而是那些最能应对变化的物种。
RBV回顾(资源基础理论的系统梳理)

(一)理论溯源:理论发展(2)
3.Barney, J.B. 1986. “Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy.” Management Science 32:1231-1241. 引入“战略性要素市场”:企业获取或培育其实施产品市场 战略所需资源的场所。“The ability to create imperfectly competitive product markets also depends on the cost of implementing the strategy” 如果战略要素 市场是完全竞争的,那么,在这些市场中对资源的获取 将会反映该资源用于实施产品市场战略时所能够创造的 绩效。如果战略性要素市场总是完全竞争的,企业则不 可能获得经济租。 (对 Porter研究的质疑) 获取经济租之所需资源两种途径:(1) Fortune and luck; (2)More accurate expectations(unusual insights about the future value of the resources) 企业已控资源比其他类型的资源更可能成为经济租来源。
解释企业为何存在,并聚焦于企业获取经济租的能力。探究了企业的寻租和配 租特性。将寻租理论、交易成本理论及随后出现的治理理论联系起来,致 力于发展一种企业的基于资源或基于知识的理论。将企业定义为一串生产 性资源束,且这些资源的价值将会依其应用情境变化而变化。他强调,这 些资源的可模仿性取决于它们被“隔绝机制”所保护的程度。甚至还提出 了一系列的隔绝机制并开始探讨那些能够增强不可模仿性的资源属性。
1.理论基础:特质能力理论(1)
企业核心竞争力的文献综述

企业核心竞争力的文献综述一、本文概述随着全球化经济的发展和市场竞争的加剧,企业核心竞争力已成为决定企业成功与否的关键因素。
本文旨在通过文献综述的方式,全面梳理和分析企业核心竞争力的相关理论、研究成果及其实践应用,以期为企业提升核心竞争力提供理论支持和实践指导。
本文将首先对企业核心竞争力的概念进行界定,明确其内涵和外延。
接着,从多个维度出发,探讨企业核心竞争力的来源、构成要素及其形成机制。
在此基础上,本文将重点分析企业核心竞争力的评价体系和测量方法,为企业进行核心竞争力评估提供科学依据。
本文将结合国内外典型案例,探讨企业核心竞争力的培育、提升和持续发展的路径与策略,为企业制定核心竞争力提升方案提供借鉴和参考。
通过本文的综述,我们期望能够为企业管理者和研究者提供一个全面、系统的企业核心竞争力理论框架和实践指南,助力企业在激烈的市场竞争中脱颖而出,实现可持续发展。
二、企业核心竞争力的理论框架企业核心竞争力的概念自提出以来,就受到了理论界和实务界的广泛关注。
对于其核心理论框架的探讨,涉及到了多个学科领域,包括战略管理、创新管理、组织行为学等。
这些理论框架试图从不同角度解析企业核心竞争力的来源、构成、发展及其对企业持续竞争优势的影响。
核心竞争力来源的理论框架主要关注企业如何形成和维持其核心竞争力。
其中,资源基础观(Resource-Based View, RBV)认为,企业拥有的独特、稀缺、不可模仿和不可替代的资源是形成核心竞争力的关键。
知识基础观(Knowledge-Based View, KBV)则强调知识、尤其是隐性知识在构建核心竞争力中的作用。
动态能力理论(Dynamic Capabilities Theory)则进一步指出,企业在面对环境变化时,通过整合、构建和重构内外部资源的能力,是形成和维持核心竞争力的关键。
核心竞争力构成的理论框架主要探讨核心竞争力的具体构成要素。
这些要素通常包括技术能力、管理能力、市场营销能力、企业文化等。
4 资源基础观的理论发展

4资源基础观的理论发展A Resource-Based View李玉刚博士 / 教授华东理工大学商学院yugangl@资源基础观要回答的问题⏹同行业不同企业的绩效为何长期不同?⏹对企业内部资源和核心竞争力的分析,现在一般称为资源基础学派(RBS,Resource-based school)或资源基础观点( RBV,Resource-based View )Ansoff和Andrew s⏹在战略研究中,对企业内部的优势和劣势的分析和评估作为战略制定的前提⏹Andrew s (1971) : "an internal appraisal of strengths and w eaknesses, led to identification of distinctive competencies."⏹Ansoff (1965) : synergy as "one internally generated by a combination of capabilities or competencies“⏹对企业内部因素的研究并没有深入展开资源基础的早期渊源⏹对企业内部资源和核心竞争力的分析,现在一般称为资源基础学派(RBS,Resource-based school)或资源基础观点( RBV,Resource-based View )⏹早期的三个来源⏹与众不同的竞争力理论⏹李嘉图(Ricardo,1817)的经济学⏹彭罗斯的企业成长理论与众不同的竞争力/总经理distinctive competence⏹1911年,在哈佛大学,分析组织中的总经理角色⏹总经理和企业的绩效之间的关系⏹高质量的总经理是企业的优势,低质量的总经理是企业的劣势⏹方法的局限性⏹总经理“高质”的品质和特性模棱两可⏹并不是企业优势的唯一来源与众不同的竞争力/制度性的领导能力distinctive competence⏹社会学家塞尔兹尼克 Selznick⏹制度性的领导者(constitutional leaders)⏹确保企业与众不同的价值和身份——企业与众不同的愿景租金理论⏹李嘉图(David Richardo )关注“最初的、不可扩大的、不可破坏的天赋因素”的经济结果⏹土地的总供给相对固定,供给弹性低⏹那些拥有无供给弹性的高质量生产要素的人可能获得经济租金(高于正常的经济绩效)⏹企业使用的许多资源是没有供给弹性的,并且这些资源可能成为经济租金的源泉彭罗斯的企业成长理论⏹Penrose(1959) :theory of the growth of the firm ⏹从两方面理解企业⏹企业是一个由个体和群体活动组成的行政结构⏹企业是一组生产资源⏹经理人的任务⏹通过企业已经创造的行政结构,来利用企业控制的生产资源⏹彭罗斯的研究发现⏹企业所控制的生产性资源本质上是异质的⏹将异质的资源拓展到了管理团队、高层管理人员,以及企业家技巧之类的不具备弹性的生产性资源经济学对企业专有资源的关注 企业资源理论的原始思想由来已久。
一种面向供应链治理的知识共享学习模型

一种面向供应链治理的知识共享学习模型文/唐泽威1蒋诚智2(1.南京大学工程管理学院,江苏南京210093;2.南京工程学院经济与管理学院,江苏南京211167)[摘要]供应链治理的基本目标之一是激励成员之间的协作,以提升供应链整体绩效。
互相合作的供应链成员之间可以通过知识共享而获得自身本没有的经验,从而提高为顾客提供优质产品和服务的能力。
供应链成员之间的知识管理与共享在供应链治理中起着重要的作用,并在一定程度上有利于提高供应链治理水平。
本文提出了一种供应链企业知识与经验管理、共享的合作学习机制,并用Agent技术构建了知识库结构以及知识建构、获取、转换和积累的学习过程。
本文建立了电力企业中管理信息系统供应链信息安全知识管理模型,并研究了合作学习机制。
此模型可以为供应链成员之间建立有效知识共享机制提供有益的参考。
[关键词]合作学习Agent供应链治理[作者简介]唐泽威,南京大学工程管理学院博士研究生,助理研究员,研究方向为管理科学与工程;蒋诚智,南京工程学院经济与管理学院,博士,高级工程师,研究方向为信息管理与信息系统。
[中图分类号]C931[文献彌码]A[文章编号]1008-7672(2020)04-0101-09一、引言供应链治理的目的是搭建一个协调框架,其基本目标包括激励成员之间的协作以及协调供应链各方的利益,以创造尽量大的供应链价值和实现供应链企业的长期利益。
①现有研究将供应链治理机①陈正林:《论供应链的治理机制及其完善对策》,《湖北社会科学》2014年第11期。
101■治理前沿224fr w4轄W35褓竦wo—k 欝详莎翠<奇02制划分为利益分享机制和关系协调机制。
①在关系协调机制中,信息共享机制是协调供应链的一个重 要手段,通过促进供应链企业之间沟通和合作,可以增强供应链的凝聚力。
在供应链治理机制与供应 链绩效相互关系的研究方面,通过构建两者相互作用的关系模型,研究了社会控制、正式控制、信息 共享等和供应链绩效之间的相关关系,发现信息共享对供应链绩效产生正向影响,并且信息共享在 社会控制和供应链绩效的作用关系中起着部分中介的作用。
RBV回顾(资源基础理论的系统梳理)

1.理论基础:李嘉图学派经济学(2)
李嘉图经济租和不同层级肥力土地的经济效果
1.理论基础:李嘉图学派经济学(3)
对这种持久的绩效优势的威胁(租金耗散) a.市场需求向左下方移动; b.某些低成本的方式来提高其土地的肥力,从而
减少拥有较肥沃土地企业的绩效优势。
D1 MC
S p* p** D
AC
MC AC
1.理论基础:李嘉图学派经济学(1)
“原始的、不可扩增的和不可毁灭的源自自然的馈 赠”相关的经济结果(Ricardo, 1817) “original, unaugmentable, and indestructible gifts of Nature”; 经济租(economic rents ):某种生产要素的所有 者获得的超过诱使这种要素进入生产过程所需的 最小支付额的部分。(Hirshleifer,1980)
RBV:缘起、释义与启示
(Origins and Implications)
报告内容
理论溯源
基本架构 实证研究 研究展望
一、理论溯源
“为什么一些企业的绩效总是胜过其 他企业?”(持久卓越绩效从何而来) Why do some firms persistently outperform others?
(一)理论溯源:理论发展(3)
4.Barney, J. 1991. “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage.” Journal of Management 17(1):99-120. 5.Dierickx, I. and K. Cool 1989. “Asset Stock Accumulation and Sustainability of Competitive Advantage.” Management Science 35:1504-1511. 6.Conner, K. 1991. “An Historical Comparison of Resource-based Logic and Five Schools of Thought within Industrial Organization Economies: Do We Have a New Theory of the Firm Here?” Journal of Management 17:121-154 (especially 132 to 150). 7.Peteraf, M.A. 1993. “The Cornerstones of Competitive Advantage: A Resource-based View.” Strategic Management Journal 14:179-192. 8.Teece, D. J, G. Pisano and A. Shuen. 1997. “Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management.” Strategic Management Journal, 18, 7, 509533.
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
Theory in RBV♦◆☐a) Penrose, 1959. "Theory of the Growth of the Firm".●Theme:1) The internal resources of a firm - the productive services available to a firm from its own resources, particularly the productive services available from management with experience within the firm.2) As management tries to make the best use of the resources available, a truly 'dynamic' interacting process occurs which encourages continuous growth but limits the rate of growth.●RQ: Assuming that some firms can grow, what principles will govern their growth, and how fast and how long can they grow? Alternatively, assuming that there are opportunities for expansion in an economy, what determines the kind of firm that will take advantage of them and to what extent?●What is a "firm":a) Economics: Price (p) and Output (q) --> Optimal size problem.(Size=output)b) The Firm as an administrative organization (central management)c) The Firm as a collection of productive resources.-- Resources: physical resources and human resources.-- Services yielded by resources-- The size of a firm should be measured with respect to the present value of the total of its resources used for its own productive purposes.●The motivation of the firm:a) The profit motive: The financial and investment decisions of firms are controlled by a desire to increase total long-run profits.b) Growth and profits become equivalent as the criteria for the selection of investment programs.●Inherited Resources and the Direction of Expansion1) Firm Growth: External and Internal inducement / obstacles- Internal obstacles arise when services (in particular the managerial capacity and the technical skills) required for expansion are not available in sufficient amounts within the firm.- Internal inducements arise largely from the existence of a pool of unused productive services, resources, and special knowledge.2) The continuing availability of unused services:强调人与资产的循环互动,相互推动,相互开发.a) So long as any resources are not used fully in current operations, there is an incentive for a firm to find a way of using them more fully.b) No "equilibrium position"Indivisibility of resources: There's always unused servicesIn the process of utilizing unused services, new types of resources will always be added to the firm's collection of resources.c)'Idle' services and 'specialized' services: Specialization leads to higher common multiplies, higher common multiplies leads to greater specialization. -- Specialization --> Diversification --> Specialization......d) New services will also become available from existing resources.Interaction between personnel and material resources: Not only can the personnel of a firm render heterogeneous varieties of services, but also the material resources can be used in different ways, if the people who work with them get different ideas.e) The creation of new productive services. The services that resources will yield depend on the capacities of the men using them, but the development of the capacities of men is partly shaped by the resources men deal with.3) Demand and ResourcesDemand is a necessary condition of entrepreneurial interest in any product, but the original incentive to a great deal of innovation can be found in a firm's desire to use its existing resources more efficiently.4) The Direction of ExpansionNew combinations previously acquired or inherited resources and other resources which must be obtained from the market.♦◆☐b) Wernerfelt, 1984. "A Resource-Based View of the firm".●Theme: to look at firms in terms of resources rather than products; & Sequential entry.●Resource: anything which could be thought of as a strength or weakness of a given firm. Definition: Tangible or intangible assets which are tied semi-permanently to the firm.●1. Resource and profitability1) General effect: monopolistic bargaining power, substitution2) First Mover Advantage - Resource position barriers (VS. entry barrier- entry barrier是针对incumbent和potential entrants,未考虑diversifier.)3) Attractive resources (difficult for others to catch up)4) Mergers and Acquisitions: to trade otherwise non-marketable resources and to buy or sell resources in bundles.●2. Dynamic resource management1) The resource-product matrix2) Sequential entry - to develop the resource in one market and then to enter other markets from a position of strength.3) Exploit and develop - a balance between exploitation of existing resources and development of new ones.4) Stepping stones - diversification step must be evaluated in terms of short-term balance effect and long-term function as stepping stones to further expansion.c) Barney, 1986. "Strategic factor markets: expectations, luck and business strategy".●Theme: Above normal economic returns comes from more accurate expectations (originated from unique skills and capabilities) or luck from the strategic factor market.●1. Strategic factor markets: where firms buy and sell the resources necessary to implement their strategies.●2. Expectation and luck in strategic factor market●3. To obtain above normal returns: a) must be consistently better informed concerning the future value of those strategies; b) there are some ways to be better informed1) by analysis of competitive environment: less likely to systematically generate the expectation advantages because the methodologies for collecting this information and the conceptual models for analyzing it are in the public domain.2) by analysis of unique skill and capabilities: to analyze information about the assets a firm already controls but are not available to other firms (special manufacturing know-how, business experience, TMT...).♦◆☐d) Barney, 1991, "Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage".●Assumptions: Firms may be heterogeneous and resources may not be perfectly mobile.●Key concepts:-Firm Resource: include all assets, capabilities, organizational processes, firm attributes, information, knowledge, etc. (or, strengths) controlled by a firm that enable the firm to conceive of and implement strategies that improve its efficiency and effectiveness. (physical capital resources, human capital resources and organizational capital resources)-Sustained Competitive Advantage: 1) compared with current and potential competitors; 2) notduplicable by others; 3) not necessarily survive in Schumpeterian Shocks.●4 attributes of resources to have potential SCA:-Valuable-Rare-Imperfectly imitable: path dependent, causally ambiguity and socially complexity.-Non substitutable: substituted by similar resources or different strategic resources.♦◆☐ePriem and Butler, 2001. "Is the Resource-Based 'View' a useful perspective for strategic management research?"●1. RBV as a Theory? - lawlike generalizationa) Generalized conditionsb) Empirical context (tautology)c) Nomic necessity●2. An elemental fallacy of RBVThe 'value' attribute and environmental side●3. For strategy researcha) Operational validity and implement abilityb) RBV boundaries ( context)c) All-inclusive Resourcesd) The process from resource to SCAe) Static RBV - limitations (hard to evaluate resource, process black box, difficult to practice,...) ●4. Discussion:Formalizing RBV towards a theoryAnswering the How questionIncorporating the temporal component - path dependentIntegrating demand heterogeneity model♦◆☐f) Barney, 2001. 'Is RBV a useful perspective for strategic management research? Yes.' Admitting market-side consideration♦◆☐g) Amit and Schoemaker, 1993. "Strategic Assets and Organizational Rent".●RQ: How to identify, develop and deploy firm-specific Strategic Assets?●Main Contributions: Strategic assets and Strategic Industry Factors●Firm level - Strategic assets: the set off difficult to trade and imitate, scarce, appropriable and specialized Resources and Capabilities.●Market level - Strategic Industry Factors: Certain resources and capabilities that have become the prime determinants of economic rents. (ex post)●Problem: how to identify, ex ante, a set of Strategic Assets.●Multidimensional view:1) Industry Analysis: the focus is on rent distribution2) RBV: the focus is internal evolutionary path; trade-off between specialization and robustness3) Behavioral view: uncertainty, complexity, conflict. --> suboptimal♦◆☐f) Dierickx and Cool, 1989. "Asset stock accumulation and Sustainability of competitive advantage". (early dynamic RBV article)●Main points:-Critical resources that are imperfectly imitable are accumulated rather than acquired in strategic factor market (Barney, 1986). Asset accumulation process: time compression diseconomies, asset mass efficiencies, inter-connectedness, asset erosion and causal ambiguity.-Accumulation of asset stocks: the strategic asset stocks are accumulated by choosing appropriate time paths of flows over a period of time.-Strategic asset stocks: non-tradable, nonimitable and nonsubstitutableEmpirical in RBVA. Topic: Managerial Ability and firm performance♦◆☐Holcomb et. al, 2009. "Making the most of what you have: managerial ability as a source of resource value creation".●This article goes back to Penrose (1959)'s seminal work, investigating the effect of managerial ability on resource productivity, interacting with resource quality. There are 3 main contributions:1. Managerial ability is a potential source of value creation.2. Managerial ability interactive with resource quality influences value creation.3. The process of managerial ability to optimize firm performance -- synchronization of combinations of resource bundles.●Data source: football team.B. Topic: Non-scale free capabilities and diversification♦◆☐Levinthal and Wu, 2010. "Opportunitycosts and non-scale free capabilities: profit maximization, corporate scope, and profit margins".●This study provides an alternative explanation for diversification discount, which relies on an opportunity costs logic to distinguish between non-scale free and scale free capabilities, and also provides a rational explanation for the divergence between total profits and profit margins.1. RBV logic: The fungibility of resource is the basis for the explanation of related diversification. --> Assumption: scale free.2. Opportunity cost of resources --> non-scale free resources3. Market demand and resource allocation - Diversification is also impacted by the market opportunities: when the current industry becomes mature, firms make rational decisions to increase total profit (profit maximization) via diversification. However, firms need to allocate their non-scale free resources to new business, which may lead to lower average returns.4. Diversifying firms are 'good types' (i.e., high capabilities) operating in 'bad' market context. (i.e., generalist firm)C. Topic: Formality and SME performance♦◆☐Terziovski, 2010. "Innovation practice and its performance implications in small and medium enterprises (SEMs) in the manufacturing sector: a resource-based view."●Theory: Schumpeterian's two-phase innovation theory; the benefits of formality (efficiency) and informality (flexibility).●Results: innovation strategy and formal structure are positive predictors of SME performance.D. Mergers and Acquisitions♦◆☐a) Puranam and Srikanth, 2007. "What they know VS. What they do: how acquirers leverage technology acquisitions".●Theme: to reconcile the integration paradox - Leveraging what they know (learning) & Leveraging what they do (disruption).●Main effect: Post acquisition integration (structural integration/structural separation) --> the success of leveraging.●Moderating effect: acquisition experience●Logic: integration mechanism both enhances coordination and harm leveraging technology.●Arguments:1. Structural integration enhances the leveraging of knowledge via coordination effect.2. Structural integration harms the leveraging of capability (ongoing innovations of the acquired firm) via the decrease of autonomy.3. Acquisition experience of acquirer moderates the relationship.4. Some solutions of post acquisition: rich unstructured communication, in the form of frequent face-to-face interactions, acids the disruptive consequences of administrative and cultural integration while also enabling high levels of coordination.♦◆☐b) Larsson and Finkelstein, 1999. 'Integrating strategic, organizational, and human resource perspective on mergers and ac questions: a case survey of synergy realization'.●Arguments: Synergy realization is a function of the similarity and complementarity of two merging businesses (combination potential), the extent of interaction and coordination during the organizational integration process, and the lack of employee resistance the combined entry.♦◆☐c) Haunschild, 1994. "How much is that company worth?: Interorganizational relationship, uncertainty and acquisition premiums."- Network perspective●Arguments:1. Firm managers will look to both their interlock partners and professional firms when deciding how much to pay.2. The impact of interlocks and professional firms on the premium decision will be stronger when managers are uncertain about the value of the Acquisition target.♦◆☐d) Stearns and Allan, 1996. "Economic behavior in institutional environments: the corporate merger wave of the 1980s".-Network and institutional perspective●A model: First, economic and political changes create conditions for merger wave; second, challengers (marginal actors) who lack status and resources exploit these conditions; third, the methods of successful challengers are imitated through the business community.。