星巴克五力模型论文英文
五力模型 英语

The Five Forces Model in English and ChineseThe Five Forces Model, also known as Porter's Five Forces, is a framework used in business strategy analysis to evaluate the competitiveness of an industry. Developed by Michael Porter of the Harvard Business School, it helps companies understand the industry's profitability and attractiveness.Here are the five forces in the model:Bargaining Power of Suppliers: This force considers the suppliers' ability to raise prices or reduce the quality of goods and services without facing significant competition from other suppliers. High supplier power can reduce profitability for companies in the industry.Bargaining Power of Buyers: This force looks at buyers' ability to force prices down or demand better quality and service. Strong buyer power can lead to decreased profits for companies. Threat of New Entrants: This force examines the ease with which new companies can enter the market and compete. High barriers to entry, such as capital requirements, technology, or brand recognition, can protect incumbent companies from competition.Threat of Substitutes: This force considers the availability of alternative products or services that can replace those offered by companies in the industry. High substitution potential can limit pricing power and profitability.Competitive Rivalry: This force assesses the intensity of competition among existing companies in the industry. High levels of competition can erode profits and make it difficult for companies to differentiate themselves.By analyzing these five forces, companies can gain insights into the attractiveness and profitability of their industry and develop strategies to compete effectively.五力模型,也称为波特五力模型,是一种用于商业战略分析的框架,用于评估一个行业的竞争力。
波特五力模型 英语

波特五力模型英语The Porter Five Forces ModelThe Porter Five Forces Model is a framework foranalyzing the competitiveness of an industry. It wasdeveloped by Michael Porter, a management professor atHarvard University. The model identifies five factors that determine the intensity of competition within an industry and the overall profitability of the industry.1. Threat of new entrantsNew entrants to an industry can increase competition and reduce profitability. The threat of new entrants is high when it is easy for new companies to enter the industry. Factors that determine the ease of entry include barriers to entry such as regulations, capital requirements, economies of scale, and brand recognition.2. Bargaining power of suppliersSuppliers can exert power over an industry by raising prices or reducing the quality of their products. The bargaining power of suppliers is higher when there are few suppliers, the suppliers’ products are unique, and the costof switching suppliers is high.3. Bargaining power of buyersBuyers can exert power over an industry by demanding lower prices or higher quality products. The bargaining power of buyers is higher when there are few buyers, the productsare undifferentiated, and the cost of switching products is low.4. Threat of substitute products or servicesSubstitute products or services can reduce demand for an industry’s offerings and reduce profitability. The threat of substitutes is higher when there are many substitutes available, they are of equal or better quality, and they are priced competitively.5. Rivalry among existing competitorsThe intensity of competition among existing competitors in an industry can affect profitability. Rivalry is higher when there are many competitors, the industry is growing slowly or declining, the products are undifferentiated, and exit barriers are high.In conclusion, the Porter Five Forces Model is an important tool for analyzing the competitiveness and profitability of an industry. By considering the threat of new entrants, bargaining power of suppliers and buyers,threat of substitute products or services, and rivalry among existing competitors, firms can develop strategies to compete effectively within their industry.。
星巴克swots英文分析

机会劣势分析WO Analysis
威胁劣势分析WT Analysis
SWOT分析矩阵
优势-S
SO strategy 发挥优势,利用机会 ST strategy 发挥优势,规避威胁 劣势-W
机会-O
WO strategy 利用机会,改变劣势 WT strategy 克服劣势,规避威胁
威胁-T
SO战略 WO战略 ST战略 这是一种最为理想的竞争态势,能 利用外部机会来弥补内部劣势,使 利用企业自身的优势回避或减轻外 够最大限度地发挥企业内部优势和 WT战略 企业的劣势地位有所改变,当由于 部威胁或风险,通过内部资源的合 充分利用外部环境机会。 这是一种应付危机的战略,当企业 内部劣势造成的困难制约外部机会 理配置,利用自身优势将外部威胁 内忧外患、时时面临危险时,需要 的利用时,采用此战略为好。 对企业发展造成的不利影响降到最 克服内在劣势同时回避外在威胁。
America with more than has a quarterspresence in the The organization three strong of their cafes located in the United States of America with more than three home market. quarters of their cafes located main home market. The organization is dependant on a in thecompetitive advantage, the retail of is dependant on a main competitive The organization coffee. advantage, the retail of coffee.This could make them slow to diversify into other sectors should the need arise.
星巴克SWOT分析-英文

SWOT Analysis of StarbucksGiven by group: GeilivableGroup members: 刘德欢0093075 罗睿棋0093111周丽丽0093120 孙玉0093112Background:Starbucks Corporation (SBUX) is an international coffee and coffeehouse chain based in Seattle, Washington. Starbucks is the largest coffeehouse company in the world, with 17,009 stores in 50 countries, including over 11,000 in the United States, over 1,000 in Canada, and over 700 in the United Kingdom.Starbucks sells drip brewed coffee, espresso-based hot drinks, other hot and cold drinks, coffee beans, salads, hot and cold sandwiches and panini, pastries, snacks, and items such as mugs and tumblers. Through the Starbucks Entertainment division and Hear Music brand, the company also markets books, music, and film. Many of the company's products are seasonal or specific to the locality of the store. Starbucks-brand ice cream and coffee are also offered at grocery stores.Strengths:•Starbucks Corporation is a very profitable organization, earning in excess of $600 million in 2004.The company generated revenue of more than $5000 million in the same year.•It is a global coffee brand built upon a reputation for well products and services. It has almost 9000 cafes in almost 40 countries. •Starbucks has a very low rate for the loss of its top managers. They give various ideas for their products.•Starbucks was one of the Fortune Top 100 Companies to Work For in 2005. The company is a respected employer that values its workforce. •Starbucks’ product is not just coffee, but the experience for coffee: atmosphere management, soft music, warm light and so on. •Starbucks uses the mode of flexible investments and cooperations according to the different market situations around the world. It always uses the direct way to sale its products.•The organization has strong ethical values and an ethical mission statement as follows, 'Starbucks is committed to a role of environmental leadership in all facets of our business.'•Starbucks always locates in the crowed mal so that it gives the consumers the good coffee as well as the space to have a rest.Weaknesses:•The short of capital:Whenever Starbucks plan to open a new shop, it would always be put in the most prosperous location of the city. Just in Shanghai, it needs 2 millions to open a new shop. It means that how to solve the demand ofcapital, labor and reserve resources is a big challenge for Starbucks. •High price:The price level of Starbucks is higher than corporations in the same industry. It concentrate on developing the high-end product and give up the profit from the low-income people. It will lead a high risk for Starbucks’ daily operation. Because Once•High concentration level:The organization has a strong presence in the United States of America with more than three quarters of their cafes located in the home market. It is often argued that they need to look for a portfolio of countries, in order to spread business risk.•Lack of diversification:The organization is dependant on a main competitive advantage, the retail of coffee. This could make them slow to diversify into other sectors should the need arise.Opportunities:•Starbucks are very good at taking advantage of opportunities.•In 2004 the company created a CD-burning service in their Santa Monica (California USA) cafe with Hewlett Packard, where customers create their own music CD.•New products and services that can be retailed in their cafes, such as Fair Trade products.•The company has the opportunity to expand its global operations. New markets for coffee such as India and the Pacific Rim nations are beginning to emerge.•Co-branding with other manufacturers of food and drink, and brand franchising to manufacturers of other goods and services both have potential.•Starbucks has the courage to try something challenging and innovative, for example, the construction of ‘the third space’, taking advantage of e-business.THREATAfter rapidly expanding, there exist a potential risk that the burden of set new cooperate chain is heavy. At the same time, because Franchisee is not allowed, operators can’t wait for benefits rely on its initial fee. There are a lot of competitors in potential and reality.What’s more, no one knows if the market for cof fee will grow and stay in favor with customers, or whether another type of beverage or leisure activity will replace coffee in the future. Starbucks are facing with treats as follows:•Cost raising:Starbucks are exposed to rises in the cost of coffee and dairy products. •The threat of new enters:Since its conception in Pike Place Market, Seattle in 1971, Starbucks' success has lead to the market entry of many competitors and copy cat brands that pose potential threats.•CompetitorsMainland China market existing Taiwan Shang Dao coffee, Japan really pot of coffee, and other coffee later into china ,Starbucks coffee among all as its biggest competitor, "coffee wars" royalties have become inevitable.Starbucks mission statement is 'Establish Starbucks as the premier purveyor of the finest coffee in the world.’ Facing with the competition from the coffee industry, the convenience store, fast food restaurant and coffee machine, Starbucks have a long way to go in the future.SolutionInternal:•Starbucks should take price discrimination strategy, which means it should offer products with different price levels for people with different income level.•Starbucks should set up a road map to achieve diversification, not only sell coffee , but also the cake, fruit salad and so on.•Starbucks should have regular research for the better understanding of its competitors and better service for its consumers.External:•Consolidate the relationship with government to strengthen the competence of the corporation among Chinese market.•To get a strong financing ability, Starbucks should consolidate its relationship with commercial banks and some other financial institutions.。
波特五力分析--Starbucks

㈡.购买者的讨价还价能力 购买者的讨价还价能力
• 星巴克咖啡作为一个休闲文化品牌,在中 星巴克咖啡作为一个休闲文化品牌, 国市场,星巴克犹如小资、白领代名词, 国市场,星巴克犹如小资、白领代名词, 代表了有品位的小小奢侈, 代表了有品位的小小奢侈,其消费人群主 要是收入较高的白领阶层, 要是收入较高的白领阶层,且星巴克有自 己的价格体系,产品有固定的价格。 己的价格体系,产品有固定的价格。
波特五力分析模型
• 简介 • 五力分析模型是迈克尔·波特(Michael Porter)于80 年代初提出,对企业战略制定产生全球性的深远 影响。用于竞争战略的分析,可以有效的分析客 户的竞争环境。五力分别是:供应商的讨价还价 能力、购买者的讨价还价能力、潜在竞争者进入 的能力、替代品的替代能力、行业内竞争者现在 的竞争能力。
㈠.供应商的讨价还价能力 供应商的讨价还价能力
• 咖啡和乳制品上升(成本.供货商议价能力 ) 咖啡和乳制品上升(成本 供货商议价能力 是星巴克暴露的一个问题。 是星巴克暴露的一个问题。 • 近日,星巴克更换了部分原料供应商:牛 近日,星巴克更换了部分原料供应商: 奶从“维记”换成了“蒙牛” 奶从“维记”换成了“蒙牛”,星巴克店 内咖啡自助吧台上原先蓝色包装的荷兰进 怡口”糖包已变成了绿色的“太古” 口“怡口”糖包已变成了绿色的“太古”。
星巴克的文化营销模式
• 自1998年星巴克品牌进入中国大陆以来,其以独特的品 年星巴克品牌进入中国大陆以来, 年星巴克品牌进入中国大陆以来 牌个性、服务内容与服务手段使大批城市白领成为其拥趸, 牌个性、服务内容与服务手段使大批城市白领成为其拥趸, 在星巴克营造的“第三空间”里惬意地看书,读报,上网, 在星巴克营造的“第三空间”里惬意地看书,读报,上网, 会友,聊天的同时,人们为星巴克的文化元素浸润、俘获, 会友,聊天的同时,人们为星巴克的文化元素浸润、俘获, 流连忘返、乐不思蜀.....说得直白一些,此时、 .....说得直白一些 流连忘返、乐不思蜀.....说得直白一些,此时、此 咖啡已经成为一种托辞、一种借口, 地,咖啡已经成为一种托辞、一种借口,星巴克以咖啡的 名义所整合的文化元素在释放心灵、回归本我、 名义所整合的文化元素在释放心灵、回归本我、自在率真 层面上与消费者高度契合、产生共鸣。 层面上与消费者高度契合、产生共鸣。正如美国社会学家 教授Odenburg在《交谊好去处》所说的那样,现代人需 教授 在 交谊好去处》所说的那样, 要有非正式的公共场所,供他们交友、聊天、聚集、解脱、 要有非正式的公共场所,供他们交友、聊天、聚集、解脱、 暂时抛开家庭和工作的压力。 暂时抛开家庭和工作的压力。星巴克作为现代人的心灵绿 在纷扰不安、喧嚣纷杂的滚滚红尘中, 洲,在纷扰不安、喧嚣纷杂的滚滚红尘中,提供了一个静 思的环境和不具威胁的聚集场所, 思的环境和不具威胁的聚集场所,是现代人真正需要的第 三空间。而这一点, 三空间。而这一点,恰恰才是星巴克文化营销的真谛与价 值所在。 值所在。
星巴克英文作文带翻译

星巴克英文作文带翻译英文:Starbucks is a popular coffee chain that has gained worldwide recognition for its high-quality coffee and cozy atmosphere. I personally love going to Starbucks because it provides a great environment for me to study, catch up with friends, or just relax.One of the things I appreciate about Starbucks is the variety of drinks they offer. From classic favorites like lattes and cappuccinos to seasonal drinks like pumpkin spice lattes and peppermint mochas, there's something for everyone. I also appreciate the customization options that allow me to make my drink exactly how I want it.Another thing I love about Starbucks is the food options. Whether I'm in the mood for a breakfast sandwich or a pastry, there's always something delicious to choose from. I especially love their blueberry muffins and eggbites.The atmosphere at Starbucks is also a big draw for me. The cozy seating, warm lighting, and background music makeit a great place to relax and unwind. I often go to Starbucks to study or work on my laptop, and I always feel productive in their environment.Overall, Starbucks is more than just a coffee shop to me. It's a place where I can go to enjoy a delicious drink and snack, catch up with friends, or get some work done. I appreciate the attention to detail in their drinks and food, as well as the inviting atmosphere that keeps me coming back.中文:星巴克是一家备受欢迎的咖啡连锁店,因其高质量的咖啡和舒适的氛围而在全球范围内获得了认可。
星巴克工作总结作文英语

星巴克工作总结作文英语Starbucks Work Summary。
Working at Starbucks has been an incredibly rewarding experience for me. As a barista, I have had the opportunity to interact with a diverse range of customers and develop my skills in a fast-paced and dynamic environment. In this article, I will share my personal work summary at Starbucks.First and foremost, I have learned the importance of providing excellent customer service. Whether it's taking orders, making drinks, or simply engaging in conversation with customers, I have come to understand the value of creating a positive and welcoming atmosphere. I have also learned to handle difficult situations with grace and professionalism, ensuring that every customer leaves satisfied.Furthermore, I have developed a strong work ethic and a keen attention to detail. The demands of the job require me to be efficient and organized, especially during busy periods. I have learned to multitask effectively and prioritize tasks in order to meet the needs of both customers and my team.Working at Starbucks has also allowed me to improve my communication and teamwork skills. I have had the opportunity to collaborate with my colleagues in a fast-paced environment, ensuring that we work together seamlessly to provide the best service possible. I have also learned the importance of clear and effective communication, both with my team and with customers.Additionally, I have gained valuable knowledge about coffee and the art of making the perfect cup. I have been trained to understand the different types of coffee, brewing methods, and flavor profiles, allowing me to confidently recommend beverages to customers and create delicious drinks with precision.In conclusion, working at Starbucks has been an enriching experience that has allowed me to develop a range of valuable skills. I have learned the importance of customer service, developed a strong work ethic, improved my communication andteamwork abilities, and gained knowledge about the world of coffee. I am grateful for the opportunities I have had at Starbucks and look forward to continuing to grow and learn in this dynamic and exciting environment.。
星巴克的一篇英语论文

Running Title: Creating Consumptionscapes in Starbucks in ChinaFrom Servicescape to Consumptionscape:A Photo-Elicitation Study of Starbucks in the New ChinaMeera VenkatramanAssociate Professor of MarketingSawyer Business SchoolSuffolk UniversityTeresa NelsonElizabeth J. McCandless Professor in EntrepreneurshipSchool of ManagementSimmons CollegeForthcoming in the Journal of International Business Studies20081From Servicescape to Consumptionscape:A Photo-Elicitation Study of Starbucks in the New ChinaAbstractA servicescape can be viewed as the frozen potential of a consumptionscape which is unleashed when consumers “twist” the resources of its built environment for their own purposes. In this paper weexplore how young, urban Chinese consumers transform the iconic global brand Starbucks into a consumptionscape through their enactment of personally meaningful experiences, roles, and identities inthe setting. We employ the qualitative research methodology of photo-elicitation by having consumersrecord their experience in a Starbucks in Beijing through photography and later using these images asprobes in a depth interview. The implications for new global servicescapes in local markets are discussed.Keywords:Photo-ElicitationChinaServicescapeGlobal Brand MeaningAdoption of InnovationStarbucks2INTRODUCTIONThe term servicescape connotes a physical, material setting designed and built to shape consumption behavior. Conceived by Bitner as a human built environment, the servicescape is nowunderstood to encompass design factors (e.g. layout, furnishings, and decor), ambient conditions (e.g.lighting and temperature), and social interactions amongst and between customers and employees(Baker,1987; Bitner, 1992, Sherry 1998). Construction of a servicescape sets the stage for consumption or to coina phrase based on Deighton (1992) -- a servicescape is the frozen potential of a consumptionscape (Gerand Belk, 1996). Consumers transform it into a consumptionscape when they act on and “twist” its resources (Aubert-Gamet, 1997) to achieve their own purposes. They engage the servicescape in theconstruction of experiences that fit with their life themes and projects and connect to culturally embeddedrituals and meanings (Arnould and Price, 1993; Schmitt, 2003; Sherry 1998). The examination of theconsumer‟s role in using the resources of the servicescape to compose meaningful experiences therebytransforming it into a consumptionscape is one of the contributions of this paper.The socio-cultural context of the consumer is crucial because it frames possibilities for thought, beliefs, and actions and makes the emergence of certain meanings more likely than others (Arnould andThompson, 2005; Thompson, 1997). Our context is the young, upwardly mobile, urban Chinese consumeror the “New China”. These consumers are in a liminal stage of life – composing new roles and identitiesandacquiring the accoutrements: brands, products, services and experiences that contribute to the creationof their evolving selves. Having acquired household goods like TVs and washing machines, and personalelectronics like computers, they are now avid purchasers of leisure and consumption goods and serviceslike coffee shops, movies, and theatre (Kilby and Carter, 2006). The acquisitiveness of this large and ripemarket is fuelling the growth of the Chinese economy (McEwen, Fang, Zhang, and Burkholder, 2006).Our focus is one particular consumption experience- that of the iconic experiential brand Starbucks andits role in the creation of new experiences and identities for this slice of the Chinese market.3Starbucks is a particularly relevant and meaningful site for this research for two important reasons. First, its built environment is a key strategic tool for the company so that the quality of its storedesign including layout, lighting, and furnishings reinforce its commitment to fine coffee products (Koehn, 2001 pp. 243). Second, the company‟s global strategy focuses on managing “the consumerexperience” which “includes not only what coffee customers drink, the interactions they have with storeemployees, and the visual environment; it also encompasses the coffee aromas in the air, backgroundmusic, and overall ambience of company stores” (Koehn, 2001, pp. 247). In the study of g lobal servicescapes in the Chinese context, McDonald‟s and Kentucky Fried Chicken with their focus onquality, value, and service represent the first generation of entrants (Watson, 1997) and Starbucks represents the next. It is an upscale, high-end brand seeking to make an emotional connection with theyoung, professional, upwardly mobile Chinese market. The focus on this “New China” market and theiruse of the resources of the built environment of an iconic global experiential servicescape to constructmeaningful experiences is another contribution of this paper.Consumption experience is subjectively felt and individually experienced and can only be credibly reported by informants who are in the setting (Caru and Cova, 2003). This made it incumbent forus to use an emic perspective or the actor‟s reporting of the experience rather than impose our understanding on the phenomena. Consequently, we had informants take photographs of their experienceas it was happening and later used these photographs as probes in depth interviews. This qualitativeresearch methodology is known as photo-elicitation and although very well established in anthropology,sociology, and leisure research, is less well known to International Business scholars. The demonstrationof photo-elicitation as a useful research technique in International Business is another purpose of thispaper.In the next section we review literature in two different fields that provide the conceptual underpinnings for our research. The first field examines the impact of the built environment on consumption behavior, and the second studies global brands in local markets.4CONCEPTUAL GROUNDINGThe Role of the Built EnvironmentTwo intertwined streams of research, “servicescapes” and “atmospherics”, help us und erstand the effect of built environments on consumption behavior. Bitner coined the term “servicescapes” and drawing on research in marketing, environmental and cognitive psychology, and ergonomics laid thefoundation for the study of the effect of built environments on consumer thought, emotions, and actions(Bitner, 1992). Recognizing that people experience an environment holistically, her work none-the-lessdecomposed the servicescape into three dimensions: ambient conditions; space and function; and signs,symbols, and artifacts. Based on the Stimulus-Organism-Response (S-O-R) theory in environmentalpsychology, Bitner developed a framework and an inventory of propositions for understanding the impactof the built environment on employees, customers, and their interactions.The term “atmospherics” is credited to Kotler who focused on understanding the impact of built retail environments on buying behavior (Kotler, 1973). “Atmospherics” is the conscious design of buyingenvironments “to produce specific em otional effects in the buyer that enhance his (sic) purchase probability”. Kotler argues that management should bring the resources of three art forms: architecture,interior design, and window dressing, to bear on the design of built environments. Further he argues thatit is buyers‟ perceptions of the space that is critical and since buyers understand environments throughtheir senses, sensory information about the atmosphere must be considered as for example color, brightness, size, and shape of the visual stimuli and volume and pitch of the auditory.Although the overall intent of the “servicescapes” and “atmospherics” research is similar, there are distinctions between them. They are different in origin - retailing research is older; methodologiesemployed - the servicescapes research has tended to use more interpretive research methodologies (Sherry, 1998); and biography - journal outlets tend to be different. Further, while the servicescapesliterature recognizes that servicescapes are commercial places designed and built by marketers to shapeconsumption behavior, researchers in the field have focused on consumers‟ use of the space for the 5production of personally significant experiences, meanings, and purposes (Arnould, Price, and Tierney,1998; Aubert-Gamet, 1997). Recent research shows that consumers assert some agency even in seeminglyoverpowering spectacle-like retail environments (e.g. the ESPN Zone Chicago) by resisting and subverting rules (Kozinets et al., 2004). In contrast, research in the atmospherics tradition has tended tofocus on the relationship between elements of the built environment and customer and employee responses including enjoyment, time in store, items examined, information acquired, purchases, andsatisfaction for consumers ; and mood, effort, commitment, attitude, knowledge, and skill for employees(Turley and Milliman, 2000). Overall, the servicescape literature tends to take a more holistic view of thebuilt environment and is given to broad categorizations like physical cues, people, and processes (Sherry,1998), while the atmospherics research is concerned with detail, carefully categorizing themultitude ofvariables that make up the built environment into external, general interior, layout and design, point-ofpurchaseand decoration variables, and human variables (Turley and Milliman, 2000).Despite these differences there is a cross-pollination of ideas and constructs between the fields. For example, Sherry in “The Soul of the Company Store” (1998) investigates the na ture of emplacementand brandscapes in the hyper retail environment of the Chicago Nike Town and “unpacks some of thedesign features” like suspended statues, lamps/altars, memorabilia that contribute to the engagement withthe servicescape. And Hightower, Brady, and Baker (2002) examine the impact of a servicescape onaffect, value, and behavioral intentions by using a multi-item scale that measures a holistic response to theservicescape instead of examining the relationship of specific servicescape elements of a baseball stadium, like crowdedness, to specific outcomes like patron response.Since we are interested in exploring the construction of meaning for the Starbucks experience by the New China, we ground our research in the servicescapes tradition of doing interpretive qualitativeresearch. We capture the experience through images taken by our informants and in depth interviewswhich enable us to get at the experience from their point of view. We expect that consumers will enactpersonally significant experiences, life projects, and life themes in the servicescape. Further, research in6the atmospherics tradition suggests that specific interior design and décor elements of the Starbucks willfeature prominently in the construction of these meanings.The Global Brand in a Local MarketHow does a Western, high-end, unique servicescape like Starbucks impact local consumption tastes, practices, and lifestyles when it enters a new market? Some might argue that like other globalservicescapes before it (e.g. McDonald‟s); Starbucks will become the agent for the imposition of standardized codes of practice and behavior that undermine local voices, practices, and lifestyles and thevery nature of local consumption cultures (Ritzer, 1973). Indeed, the experience of global brands likeCoca-Cola and McDonald‟s, who entered foreign markets with aggressive expansion plans and considerable marketing and financial clout, reveals that they do impact the local culture in significantways (Watson, 1997). However, at the same time a considerable body of research reveals that the outcome is more complicated than the replacement of old ways with new (Ger and Belk, 1996;Miller,1998; Watson, 1997). Local cultures, be they more or less economically affluent, are far from passive intheir response to foreign brands. Consumers can appropriate the brand to the local consumption milieu -altering its uses and functionality – resulting in the transformation of brand meaning. The result is thefusion of global and local meanings as is evidenced by a substantial body of research on inexpensiveconsumer consumables like Coca-Cola, more expensive consumer durables like scooters, and popularculture products like TV shows and soap-operas (Ger and Belk, 1996).The experience of McDonald‟s i n Southeast Asia since the mid-seventies is illustrative (Watson, 1997). Its impact on local cultures is irrefutable: in Hong Kong it has replaced traditional teahouses as avenue for breakfast, in Japan people now eat with their hands, and in Taiwan French fries is the snackfood of choice for young people. But while McDonald‟s has affected significant change in consumptionhabits, these changes must be considered in the context of larger societal and cultural changes sweepingthese countries. New classes of prosperous consumers were emerging and rising incomes produced newfamily structures as newly wed couples were choosing to live independently and not in extended family7households as had been the tradition. The focus became the needs and wants of the married couple “whichbrought with it an entire set of attitudes and practices that undermine older assumptions regarding themeaning of life” (Watson, 1997; pp. 16). Simultaneously, there was a decline in the birthrate and anassociated heightened focus o f time, money, and attention on children. McDonald‟s targeted these children and they in turn made the company‟s servicescape their own. For example, in many East Asiancountries teenagers can be seen hanging out in the McDonald‟s for hours after school, u sing it a leisurecenter and effectively taking the “fast” out of fast-food. So much so that for an entire generation of Japanese and Hong Kong children who has grown up with McDonald‟s it does not represent something“foreign”. Watson argues that for them it is “local” cuisine.This suggests that the New China will appropriate the meaning of the Starbucks commercial space to its own purposes. How this will happen will be contingent amongst other things on the resourcesthat Starbucks has to offer and the r elationship of those resources to consumers‟ life projects and lifethemes. Starbucks is a fundamentally different experience from McDonald‟s, Pizza Hut, and KentuckyFried Chicken. The latter differentiated themselves in the marketplace on the basis of what Pine andGilmore (2001) categorize as service: efficiency, modernity, and cleanliness. Starbucks, on the otherhand, is an iconic emotional brand, and emotional brands become meaningful in part because they become interwoven with the narratives of peopl e‟s lives. We expect that the narratives that New Chinaconsumers construct to give meaning to their Starbucks experience will be, to some extent, personallyunique yet not idiosyncratic: they will be framed both by the firm‟s actions and the cultural and socialmilieu in which the consumers live. In the next section we describe the site of the study, introduce photoelicitation,and lay out the research methodology used for this study.METHODStarbucks in ChinaStarbucks inaugurated its first store in China in 1999 and largely through cooperative arrangements with local partners had opened more than 300 stores by 2005, including locations in iconic8cultural heritage sites like Beijing‟s Forbidden City. In late 2005, signaling ambitious expansion plans,Sta rbucks appointed a senior VP to fill a newly created position of President of “Starbucks Greater China”. Starbucks‟ Global Strategist Howard Schultz, said, “We‟re talking about thousands of stores,where China will become absolutely the second-largest market in the world for Starbucks, second toNorth America” (Ouchi, 2005).Study SiteA Starbucks in the Modern Plaza on Haidian Road in Northwest Beijing was the site of this research study. The commercial space is situated at the corner of a multi-story shopping/entertainmentcomplex, separated by a plaza from a frenetically busy four-lane boulevard. The entire side of the coffeeshop that fronts the street is glass, allowing both passersby to peek in and patrons to gaze out at the plazaand the street. The shop is spacious and encompasses a number of different zones: the counter on the rightof the entrance where patrons can order drinks, cakes, and light foods; the open space on the left withround tables that seat two or three people; another seating area in the rear set up like a proto-typicalAmerican living room with sofas and chairs arranged around a coffee table in front of a fireplace; and amore dimly- lit space of four small tables with chairs in the very back.Photo-ElicitationThe distinguishing feature of Photo-elicitation, as we used it, is that the informants took photographs of their experience as it was happening in the Starbucks and later these images were presented to them one-by-one in a depth interview when they were asked to describe what they werethinking, feeling, and doing as they took each picture (Collier, 1967; Heisley and Levy, 1991; Ziller,1990). In this way we transported the informants back to the experience and had them reconstruct itframe-by-frame describing the experience in their own words. We preferred this inside-out emic perspective since the reports come from the only credible informant- the person who had the experience.Photo-elicitation also elicits rich descriptions of the physical layout and emotional reactions to the 9servicescape by facilitating deep dives by the informants or helping them go below conscious, surfacelevel observations to connect to deeper, submerged feelings, symbols, myths, and metaphors (Collier andCollier, 1986; Samuels, 2004; Ziller, 1990; Zaltman, 2003).Recent advances in neurological research have shown that a bulk of peoples‟ thoughts and feelings are below the level of consciousness, with the result that those within easy reach represent the tipof the iceberg (Zaltman, 2003). These finding challenge researchers interested in consumer-place interactions to use techniques that help people access and communicate beyond surface level factualphenomena. A plethora of evidence establishes that photo-elicited interviews are one such technique: theycan mine deeper shafts into the subconscious than words-alone interviews (Clark-Ibanez, 2004; Collier,1967; Samuels, 2004). And, since the different senses are connected, photographs can also trigger sounds,smells, and other sensations experienced. The effectiveness of photographs as probes is supported byrecent research from cognitive scientists and neurobiologists suggesting that thought is based on images,not words (Zaltman, 2003).In addition, there is evidence that photo-elicited interviews en gage the informant: “Subject cooperation is high, and there is a general atmosphere of sincerity, perhaps because a photograph is notperceived as a throwaway….Not infrequently, the subjects request copies of the sets of photos, or requestto keep the came ra for an additional day or more in order to take a particularly …important‟ photograph”.A natural outcome of this engagement is that “interviews are long and productive” (Ziller, 1990, pp. 36).Samuels, who conducted both photo-elicited and word-only int erviews, reports that, “The photo-elicitedinterviews were, on the whole, much longer than I had anticipated; indeed, most of the interviews lastedwell longer than 1 hour and several interviews took almost 2 hours” (Samuels, 2004, pp.1531). Thisproductiveness is particularly useful in the Chinese context, since informants generally are reluctant toopen up and speak about themselves (Eckhardt, 2004). Based on studies that used a number of differentqualitative research techniques, Eckhardt (2004) reports that “No matter how well designed the interviewquestions are, how comfortable the respondent is with the interviewer, how informal and /or structured10the discussion between the respondent and the researcher is, it is typical to receive one- and two-sentenceanswers to most questions”. We believe that by allowing the informants to express themselves boththrough picture-taking and in words, and by shifting the focus from the person to the images, we overcome some of these communication and cultural barriers.InformantsOur informants were purposefully chosen to represent the New China consumer (Thompson, 1997). They were drawn from a pool of recent graduates of a prestigious Beijing university with degreesin finance going on to lucrative jobs with perquisites like international travel in the public and privatesectors. On average they were 22 years old and six of the seven were female. Each had frequented Starbucks before, and when we recruited them they were told that the project involved -among otherthings- visiting Starbucks as they normally would. We gave them the equivalent of ten U.S. dollars tospend at Starbucks and equipped them with a 24-exposure disposable camera. Two informants, Cora andSharon, chose to take a girlfriend; Cora took Shaojin and Sharon took Cindy. One informant, Jackie, wentby herself and another Dawn took her boyfriend, Hudson, resulting in a sample of seven informants. Wejudged this sample to be sufficient for our purposes since our objective was interpretative research requiring intensive and not extensive data (Thompson, 1997). We were sanguine that the photo elicitatedinterviews would be productive, as demonstrated not only in photo-elicitation research but also othermethodologies like the Zaltman Metaphor Elicitation Technique (ZMET) that use images (in this casemetaphors) for in-depth probing. Validation studies for ZMET have found that “four to five depth interviews that are focused on identifying and understanding core themes can provide up to 90% of theinformation available from a larger set of interviews” (Coulter, Zaltman, and Coulter, 2001; pp. 4). Otherstudies have shown that seven or eight such in-depth interviews can be as productive as just as manyfocus groups (Zaltman, 2003; pp. 123).11Procedures and InstructionsWe set up two meetings with the informants, the first a relatively short appointment to make initial contact, get demographic information, brief the informants, and help them feel at ease. During thismeeting, we prepared the informants for their Starbucks visit by telling them that they should “takephotographs that capture your experience as a customer of Starbucks”. Informants were instructed thatthere were no right or wrong approaches to the visit or the photo taking and that they should “sho w howyou felt and what you did” using as many of the 24 camera exposures as they wished. They were alsoinformed that the Starbucks manager had given them permission to photograph everything but the menuboard with prices.The photo-elicited interview took place within three days of their visit to the Starbucks. After making the informant comfortable, the interview began with the researcher presenting the photographs(which had been printed in the interim) one at a time in chronological order to the informant and prompting them with broad, non-directive statement like, “Describe this photograph to me” or “What doyou see here?” Follow-up questions were used to clarify meaning, for example, if an informant used theword “home” we would ask what that word mea nt to them. Before the interviewer moved on to the nextphotograph they asked, “Is there any thing else you would like to tell me about this photograph?” Theinterviewer avoided leading the informant as much as possible and did not suggest ideas or favor aparticular line of thinking or response. The interviews were audio taped, transcribed by a native Englishlanguage speaker, and verified with the original tape by a native Mandarin speaker also fluent in English.Analysis involved close reading of the transcripts including identification of meaningful chunks of theinterviews or quotes, interpretation, and discussion among the researchers (Spiggle, 1994; Thompson,1997; Arnould and Thompson, 2005). The researchers first individually read a transcript carefully lineby-line, identifying quotes to represent the experience of the New China in Starbucks; and weaving thesetogether to develop themes. They then met and presented their quotes and themes, discussed these, andnegotiated disagreements. As each of the other transcripts was read, the themes were refined till the12researchers agreed on all the themes and quotes that captured them. Two independent judges verified thefinal categorization of the quotes with an 85% percent agreement rate.FINDINGSThe experience of the consumption of Starbucks for our informants is captured by four themes: “Starbucks as Home;” “Starbucks as a Constellation of Personal Spaces;” “Starbucks as Exotic;” and“Starbucks as a Bridge between Cultures”. Next, we will discuss each of these themes and their link toelements in the built environment.Starbucks as HomeInformants imbue the physical setting of the commercial, retail store of Starbucks with feelings of haven, warmth, security, and privacy typically associated with home (Mallett, 2004; Manzo, 2003). InsideStarbucks they felt free, comfortable, at peace, and relaxed in contrast to the noise and crowds on theoutside in the streets. Sharon associates comfort and warmth with Starbucks, “There is something youcan feel -- you are in a warm house, a big house and the atmosphere in there is very comfortable, verywarm, and I can say, Oh, this is my home!” For Dawn, “It‟s very warm, family .. environment. I like thisfeeling”. As Hudson comments, “(It) is like I‟m at home, my own home…I feel I‟m very free in thatplace...this is the most attractive point. That is why I come to Starbucks”.Some informants singled out the glass doors at the entrance of the Starbucks as the line of demarcation - marking the point at which they left the confusion behind and entered into a safer,quieterplace. According to Cora:We … took the two pictures of the contrast of busy life of modernsociety and the crowd, and the comfortable circumstances in Starbucks.You can see the outside and inside. Qui te different…Outside ofStarbucks there are many cars and busy walking people. So, I think this avery strong contrast...in Starbucks you can be relaxed andcomfortable…They (customers) want to change a place, changecircumstances, and go out of their office to find maybe a quiet place towork and maybe they will change their mood and makes them feel likeworking is an interesting thing.13Not only do the informants shut out the streets, but they also seek a break from the hectic pace of theirlives and find a quieter place to relax as it illustrated in this quote from Cora:In China we have a tale or story. It tells you a man in wartime, he take aboat and just go to some place….and he never saw in that place…peopleare so peaceful because it‟s so comforta ble...they just relax themselves.It‟s a strong contrast with the wartime and peace time, so he stays in theplace. I think if you see, this place is Starbucks … it made me think ofthat story most and make me forgot those things, forget everything whathas ... disturbed me, so just forget everything, I just relax myself. Andmaybe this place just provides a quiet, private place for people, intimatepeople, so I think that‟s a good relax place.Here drawing upon an ancient Chinese fable, Cora uses the metaphors of war and peace to contrastStarbucks outside and inside, and like the man in the fable who takes a boat and journeys from war topeace, she goes to Starbucks to get away from things that disturb her and finds peace and quiet. In theliterature on the meaning of home, this distinction between the inside and the outside- where the inside isprivate, safe, and relaxed and the outside is public and not within one‟s control- is integral to the meaningof home as haven (Mallett, 2004; Manzo, 2003; Sommerville, 1997). It can be traced back to Jacobeancase law that declared that “The house to everyman is to him his castle and fortesse, as well as his defenseagainst injury and violence, as for his repose” (Mallett, 2004, pp. 65). This attachment of the feelingsassociated with home to a place that is not their dwelling is consistent with research on the meaning ofhome which recognizes that while home and house are often conflated, a house is not necessarily a home。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
Starbucks’s Strategy AnalysisPart Ⅰ.IntroductionStarbucks,the premier roaster and retailer ofspecialty coffee in the world,opens its first store byHoward Schultz in Seattle’s Pike Place Market in 1971.By2009, Starbucks already has 16,706 total storesworldwide,cover more than 50 countries,includingAustralia,Canada,UK,Germany,Japan,China and many other countries.Starbucks is committed to being a deeply responsible company in the communities where it does business around the world.t he Company’s focus is on sourcing high-quality coffee, reducing its environmental impacts and contributing positively to communities.The Company’s mission is to inspire and nurture the human spirit—one person, one cup, and one neighborhood at a time.Part Ⅱ.External analysisStarbucks’s 5 forces analysisFaced with rivals of high competitivenessStarbucks,as we know, purchases and roasts high-quality whole bean coffees and sells them,along with fresh, coffees,beverages,food items,teas.In the coffee offering industry.generally,its competitors can be divided as several parts:●Coffee multiple shops.Such as the famous UK’s Costa,Japan’s Doutor,Canada’s Second Cup,which have loyal customers in their countries and regions.for example,Europeans would like to choose Costa,while Japanese may be apt to Doutor.●Retail stores.In these stores,People can buy initial coffee at a cheap price,which has cost and economic advantage.●Beverage powder manufacturers.Nestle,the famous beverage powder manufacturer,with its high quality and good service,have loyal customers buy its product,meanwhile Nestle also has a good distribution.McCafe:New entrants eager to share the cakeMcdonald's ,the world famous fast food leader, opened its first coffee store named McCafe in 1993.At fist,Mccafe’s taste is not that satisfied by itster,inspired by the success of leaderships in coffee industry, Mcdonald's put coffee machines and invited coffee making specialists in its stores in 2005,,so customers can enjoy “super cure”coffee,it proved to be a success.Mcdonald's Latte and Cino Da Pistoia beverage has bring great profit.In 2007,a report showed that some Amercians even prefer McCafe more than Starbucks.In fact, McCafe’s “super cure” coffee is really not bad than Starbucks’s.Mcdonald's has more than 14,000 stores in Amercia,which is much more than Starbucks.the Starbucks’s total stores is 16meanwhile,the Mcdonald's price is also cheaper than Starbucks.Not only Mcdonald's,other same-business companies also have the ambitions to enter the market.With the advantage of their existing equipment,the existing brand and business,they just need to provide coffee,which means small cost,so they want to have a try.A variety of SubstitutesWhen it comes to coffee’s sisters and brothers ,we think about,milk,tea,milky tea,ice cream.And people in different areas may have different appetite,for example, people in Beijng prefer Chinese tea instead of coffee.And some people can’t bear the taste of coffee, they like mike and milky tea.Under this condition,how can Starbucks gain above average returns and competitive advantages than his rivals? Starbucks has expanded its business,especially in recent years. You can enjoy Starbucks food products, such as fresh pastries,tea,milk, breakfast sandwiches and lunch items purchased from national, regional and local sources.And in order to get to know the need of people, Starbucks do research and development teams are responsible for the technical development of food and beverage products and new equipment. The Company spent approximately $6.5 million, $7.2 million and $7.0 million during fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, on technical research and development activities, in addition to customary product testing and product and process improvements in all areas of its business. Gain sustainability supply of high-quality green coffeesAs a world famous coffee store,the most important thing,of course,is the obtain of coffee bean materials. The supply of gobal coffee bean is affected by many factors,including weather,policy and economy comditions.To help ensure sustainability and future supply of high-quality green coffees and to reinforce the Company’s leadership role in the coffee industry, Starbucks operates Farmer Support Centers in CostaRica and Rwanda. The Farmer Support Centers are staffed with agronomists and sustainability experts who work with coffee farming communities to promote best practices in coffee production designed to improve both coffee quality and yields.Starbucks also buys coffee using fixed-price and price-to-be-fixed purchase commitments, depending on market conditions, to secure an adequate supply of quality green coffee. For example ,as of September 27, 2009, the Company had $238 million of purchase commitments which, together with existing inventory, expected to provide an adequate supply of green coffee through fiscal 2010.The Company depends upon its relationships with coffee producers, outside trading companies and exporters for its supply of green coffee. The Company believes, based on relationships established with its suppliers, the risk of nondelivery on such purchase commitments is remote.High price,high customer loyaltyStarbucks retail stores are typically located in high-traffic, high-visibility locations. Because the Company can vary the size and format, its stores are located in or near a variety of settings, including downtown and suburban retail centers, office buildings and university campuses. The Company also locates retail stores in select rural and offhighway locations to serve a broader array of customers outside major metropolitan markets.Its target customer are business people,white colar,and lovers who can afford a higher fee.Because of the good service,and the standard management,people like Starbucks very much,they became the loyal customers,they would like to pay high fees in Starbucks.So ,it is high price, high customer loyalty.Internal analysisStarbucks’s Licensing —Retail stores, Packaged coffee,tea,Branded productsThe Licensing —Retail stores is obviously a main component of Starbucks’s tangible assets. As part of these arrangements, Starbucks receives royalties and license fees and sells coffee, tea and related products for resale in licensed locations. Product sales to and royalty and license fee revenues from US and International licensed retail stores accounted for 50% of specialty revenues in fiscal 2009. During fiscal 2009, net licensed store openings included 35 in the US and 305 internationally.Through a licensing relationship with Kraft Fo ods, Inc. (“Kraft”), Kraft manages all distribution, marketing, advertising and promotion of these products.The Company sells packaged coffee and tea internationally both directly to warehouse club stores, such as Costco Wholesale Corporation, and to grocery stores through a licensing relationship with Kraft in Canada, the UK and other European countries.The Company’s coffees and teas are available in approximately 39,000 grocery and warehouse club stores, with 33,500 in the US and 5,500 in International markets.The Company licenses the rights to produce and market Starbucks branded products through several partnerships both domestically and internationally.Intangible assets—Patents, Trademarks, Copyrights and Domain Names The Company owns and has applied to register numerous trademarks and service marks in the US and in many additional countries throughout the world. Some of the Company’s trademarks, including Starbucks, the Starbucks logo, Frappuccino, Seattle’s Best Coffee and Tazo are of material importance to the Company. The duration of trademark registrations varies from country to country. However, trademarks are generally valid and may be renewed indefinitely as long as they are in use and/or their registrations are properly maintained.The Company owns numerous copyrights for items such as product packaging, promotional materials, in-storegraphics and training materials. The Company also holds patents on certain products, systems and designs. In addition, the Company has registered and maintains nu merous Internet domain names, including “”,“”, and “.”Capacity:the fast growing company in the worldIn the view of commerce, Starbucks is a miracle.it is one of the best growing company in the world.It can be mainly summarized as two parts:●Financial●Human resourceIt has a good performance in the security market.After the hit of 2008 financial crisis,it fastly adjusted the routinue.We can see the K trend line in the picture.The retail stores are the most important of the company’s revenue,and from 2005 to 2008,the company has expanded its stores.And when the economic crisis comes,it has a reduction in 2009.The revenues from 2005 to 2009 are also good in general.From $6.4 in 2005 to $10.4 in 2008, it has increased 40%.(you can see the net revenue graph and new opening stores graph following)The fast growing can not witout the good human resource of the company. Starbucks employed approximately 142,000 people worldwide as of September 27, 2009. In the US, Starbucks employed approximately 111,000 people, with 105,000 in Company-operated retail stores and the remainder in the Company’s administrative and regional offices,and store development,roasting and warehousing operations.Approximately 31,000 employees were employed outside of the US, with 30,000 in Company-operated retail stores and the remainder in the Company’s regional support facilities and roasting and warehousing operations. The number of the Company’s employees represented by unions is not significant.Starbucks believes its current relations with itsemployees are good.People in the company share the same mission and vision.Core competitiveness:Company culture ,reputation&brand and Starbucks experienceStarbucks employed approximately 142,000 people worldwide , Starbucks’s employees share a good sense of the company culture.they know well the mission ,that is to inspire and nurture the human spirit –one person, one cup, and one neighborhood at a time. Starbucks also committed to doing business responsibly and conducting ourselves in ways that earn the trust and respect of customers, partners and neighbors. they call this Starbucks™Shared Planet™–their commitment to doing business responsibly. Within this, they have identified three areas of focus: ethical sourcing, environmental stewardship and community involvement.Starbucks believes it has built an excellent reputation globally for the quality of its products, for delivery of a consistently positive consumer experience and for its corporate social responsibility programs. The Starbucks brand has been highly rated in several global brand value studies.The Starbucks Experience is built upon superior customer service as well as clean and well-maintained Company-operated retail stores that reflect the personalities of the communities in which they operate, thereby building a high degree of customer loyalty.When customers sit in Starbucks stores they can not only enjoy different kinds of coffee tastes,they can enjoy the culture of coffee ,the stories and tales. SWOT analysisPrat Ⅲ.Business level strategy:“this is not a cup of coffee,this is a cup of of Starbucks”—differentiationIn business level, Starbucks choose differentiation stategy to gain strategic advantage and above average returns, Starbucks’s coffee have different kinds,its severice is so considerate,and the company advocate customer experience ,which are unique in the industry, here is the Starbucks’s measures:⏹Starbucks keep high level price to meet its differentiation strategy. Starbucks has a good knowledge of its customers,business people,white colars,lovers,the groups are likely to afford high price.⏹The Company sells special coffees to meet people’s need, including the Starbucks and Seattle’s Best Coffee brands, as well as a selection of premium Tazo teas, VIA and other related products, to institutional foodservice companies that service business and industry, education, healthcare, office coffee distributors, hotels, restaurants, airlines and other retailers. The majority of the Company’s sales in this channelcome through national broadline distribution networks with SYSCO Corporation, US FoodserviceTM, and other distributors. The Company’s total foodservice operations had over 21,000 accounts, primarily in the US, at fiscal year end 2009. Revenues from foodservice accounts comprised 23% of total specialty revenues in fiscal 2009.⏹The Starbucks Card program is designed to increase customer loyalty and the frequency of store visits by cardholders. Starbucks cards can be used in all Company-operated and most licensed stores in North America, and in a growing number of international markets. The cards have no expiration date and do not have any inactivity fees.⏹Starbucks made significant investments to improve the customer experience in its stores.The store partners have made measurable improvements in service, beverage quality and store condition. As a result show, over the year2009, they already high customer satisfaction scores have increased a full 10 percentage points.⏹Starbucks applied technology to revolutionize the way they communicate with consumers through social and digital media.Starbucks has been named the most engaged consumer brand, using communities such as Facebook, Twitter and My Starbucks Idea to connect with our customers outside the store environment. They are in constant dialogue with their customers, allowing them to understand customer’s needs and stay top-of-mind in this increasingly competitive retail environment.Starbucks also launched popular iPhone applications to help customers find our stores, determine nutrition information and reload their Starbucks Cards.With the above strategies, Starbucks can do better than his competitors. Starbucks have ability of bargaining of buyers ,because they know that “this is not a cup of coffee,this is a cup of of Starbucks”Corporate level strategy:approaching to moderate to high levels of diversificationAs a beverage severice company, Starbucks itself has many shortbacks as I have noted in the SWOT analysis above,for example,the ability to afford risks,the main question of the companyis that Starbucks faces intense competition in the specialty coffee market, which could lead to reduced profitability,and Starbucks financial condition and results of operations are sensitive to, and may be adversely affected by,a number of factors, many of which are largely outside the Company’s control.In the graph ,we can see that beverages still make up the largest part of all the retails,following by food, Coffee-making equipment and other merchandise and whole bean coffee. Starbucks gian main revenue also from its beverage service.During recent years, Starbucks entered CD making business,and Beverage-related accessories, including items bearing the Company’s logos and trademarks, are produced and distributed through contracts with a number of different suppliers. The Company also purchases a broad range of paper and plastic products, such as cups and cutlery, from several companies to support the needs of its retail stores as well as its manufacturing and distribution operations,and above, Starbucks has invested a film.However,the company has not invaded in other more challenging industries yet.We know that Pepsi is a good example of diversitification in food service industry, Pepsi is a global beverage leader manufacturer,and then Pepsi began to make chips and even have the ambition to enter into fashion industry.As a conclusion,diversitification is important to Starbucks.Diversification can help the company reduce its operation risks,especially in economic recessions or some uncontrollable situations.Starbucks may can learn from Pepsi,and do better in future,not only in beverage industry.。