北京市高考英语书面表达评分标准
北京英语作文评分标准及评分细则

北京英语作文评分标准及评分细则Beijing English Composition Scoring Criteria and Scoring DetailsHi everyone! My name is Lily and I'm a 5th grade student in Beijing. Today I want to talk to you about how English compositions are scored here. It's really important to understand the scoring criteria and details so you can do your best on these assignments.First off, what even is an English composition? It's a piece of writing we have to do for school where we write a few paragraphs in English about a certain topic or prompt the teacher gives us. The compositions let our teachers see how well we can write and express ourselves in English.In Beijing, all our English compositions get scored based on the same big criteria - there are five main things the teachers look at. Those five criteria are: 1) Task Completion, 2) Coherence, 3) Lexical Resource, 4) Grammatical Range and Accuracy, and 5) Mechanics. Each one gets a separate score from 1 to 5.Task Completion is about how well you did the assignment and responded to the prompt. If you went totally off-topic and wrote something completely different than what you weresupposed to, you'll get a low score for Task Completion. But if you really understood the prompt and your writing responded to it fully, you'll get a high score.Coherence looks at whether your writing flows logically and is easy to follow and understand. You need to use good transitions and connecting words like "first," "next," "in addition," etc. The ideas should link together smoothly instead of jumping around randomly. Having a clear intro, body and conclusion helps too.Lexical Resource means using lots of advanced vocabulary words instead of just simple words a little kid would use. The more impressive and higher-level words you include, the better your lexical resource score will be. But don't just randomly throw in big words you don't understand - that's not good!For Grammatical Range and Accuracy, this portion of the score looks at your English grammar skills. If you make a ton of basic grammar mistakes with things like subject-verb agreement, tenses, prepositions, articles, etc. your score will be low. But if you can use advanced grammar constructions like perfect tenses, passive voice, conditionals, and more complex sentences correctly, you'll earn a higher score.Finally, Mechanics refers to things like spelling, punctuation, capitalization, formatting and general writing conventions. Make sure you spell words correctly, use appropriate end punctuation, capitalize proper nouns, have indented paragraphs, and so on. Silly little mechanical errors can lose you points.Each of those five criteria gets a rating from 1 to 5, where 5 is the best score. So the highest total score you can get on a composition is 25 out of 25 - a perfect 5 in all five areas. In general, a total score of 20+ is considered excellent, 15-19 is good, 10-14 is okay, and below 10 needs more work.There are also some more specific details and guidelines for each score level that teachers use. For example, to get a 5 for Task Completion, your response has to be "fullyaddressed and highlyrelevant to the task." A 4 means it's "addressedand relevantto thetask," while a 3 is "somewhataddressedand/orrelevanttothetask." And so on down to a 1 which means "responsesaresnothin relevanttothetask."For Coherence, a top score of 5 requires your writing to have "excellentunityandfullycohesive form" with "sophisticated connections" between ideas. I'm not totally sure what that means yet since I'm still learning, but it sounds really advanced!With Lexical Resource, a 5 is for using "awide range of vocabulary" with "rarelymistakes" andusing "idiomatic language" which means like common expressions native speakers would say. But a 1 is having just"averynarrowlexicon" ofwords and "forcedtranslationsfromnative language."I think you get the idea - there are specific criteria distinguishing each score level from 1 to 5 for all the categories. It can feel。
2023年北京高考英语书面表达评分标准

2023年北京高考英语书面表达评分标准全文共3篇示例,供读者参考篇12023 Beijing High School English Written Expression Scoring CriteriaThe Beijing high school English written expression scoring criteria for the 2023 college entrance examination (also known as the Gaokao) evaluates students' ability to communicate effectively in written English. This document outlines the key criteria used by examiners to assess students' writing skills and assign scores accordingly.1. Task Achievement (30 points)Candidates are assessed on their ability to accurately address the prompt or question given. They should clearly present their ideas and provide relevant examples to support their arguments. The response should demonstrate a clear understanding of the topic and show a logical progression of ideas.2. Coherence and Cohesion (20 points)Coherence refers to the overall clarity of the writing, including the organization of ideas, logical flow, and transitions between paragraphs. Candidates should use appropriate linking words and phrases to connect their ideas and maintain cohesion throughout the text.3. Vocabulary and Grammar (20 points)Candidates are expected to demonstrate a wide range of vocabulary and accurate use of grammar and sentence structures. They should use varied and precise vocabulary to convey their ideas effectively. Grammar errors should be minimal, and sentence structures should be varied to enhance the overall quality of the writing.4. Register and Style (15 points)Candidates should use appropriate register and style for the given task, whether formal, informal, or neutral. The tone of the writing should be consistent throughout, and students should demonstrate an understanding of different styles of writing, such as persuasive, descriptive, or narrative.5. Creativity and Originality (15 points)Candidates are encouraged to showcase their creativity and originality in their writing. This includes the use of imaginativeideas, unique perspectives, and engaging language. Awell-crafted introduction and conclusion can also enhance the overall impact of the writing.Overall, the Beijing high school English written expression scoring criteria for the 2023 college entrance examination emphasizes students' ability to communicate effectively in written English while demonstrating a wide range of language skills and creativity. By adhering to these criteria, students can improve their writing performances and achieve higher scores on the exam.篇2Beijing College Entrance Examination English Writing Evaluation Criteria 2023Introduction:The Beijing College Entrance Examination (commonly known as Gaokao) is a crucial assessment for Chinese students, determining their eligibility for enrollment in universities and colleges. The English writing section plays a significant role in assessing students' language proficiency and communication skills. In order to ensure fair and accurate evaluation, clear anddetailed criteria are essential. Here are the evaluation standards for the 2023 Beijing Gaokao English writing section:1. Content and Organization:- Relevant Content: The essay should address the given topic with relevant information and ideas. Tangential or off-topic responses will be penalized.- Thesis Statement: A clear thesis statement that presents the main argument or viewpoint of the essay is required.- Logical Structure: The essay should have a clear introduction, body paragraphs supporting the thesis, and a conclusion summarizing the main points.- Cohesiveness: Transitions between paragraphs and ideas should be smooth, ensuring a coherent flow of thoughts.2. Language Use:- Vocabulary: Varied and appropriate use of vocabulary to convey ideas effectively.- Grammar: Accurate use of grammar, including proper verb tense, subject-verb agreement, and sentence structure.- Sentence Variety: Utilization of different sentence structures (simple, compound, complex) to enhance the overall quality of writing.- Idiomatic Expressions: Use of idiomatic expressions and phrasal verbs to demonstrate a nuanced understanding of the English language.3. Development and Support:- Examples and Evidence: Incorporation of relevant examples, evidence, and details to support arguments and ideas.- Analysis: Critical analysis of the topic or issue, showcasing the ability to evaluate and interpret information.- Counterarguments: Addressing counterarguments and opposing viewpoints to demonstrate a balanced perspective.4. Clarity and Coherence:- Clarity: Clear and concise expression of ideas, avoiding ambiguity or confusion.- Coherence: Logical progression of ideas and arguments, with connections between sentences and paragraphs.- Consistency: Consistent tone and style throughout the essay, maintaining a coherent voice.5. Task Fulfillment:- Adherence to Prompt: Addressing all aspects of the given prompt and fulfilling the requirements of the task.- Length: Writing a sufficient number of words to meet the minimum word count specified for the essay.- Relevance: Ensuring that the content of the essay is directly related to the topic and is not irrelevant or off-topic.Conclusion:The 2023 Beijing Gaokao English writing evaluation criteria aim to provide clear guidelines for assessing students' writing skills and language proficiency. By focusing on content, language use, development, clarity, coherence, and task fulfillment, examiners can evaluate essays effectively and fairly. Students should familiarize themselves with these standards and strive to meet them in their writing to achieve success in the Beijing College Entrance Examination. Good luck to alltest-takers in 2023!篇32023 Beijing College Entrance Examination English Writing Evaluation CriteriaIntroductionThe Beijing College Entrance Examination, also known as the Gaokao, is the most important academic assessment for high school students in China. Among all the subjects tested during the Gaokao, English writing is considered as one of the essential components for evaluating students' language proficiency and writing skills. In the year 2023, the evaluation criteria for the English writing section of the Beijing Gaokao will be designed to assess students' ability to express their ideas clearly and coherently, use appropriate vocabulary and grammar, and organize their writing effectively.Evaluation CriteriaThe following are the key evaluation criteria that will be used to assess students' performance in the English writing section of the 2023 Beijing Gaokao:1. Task Fulfillment: Students will be evaluated based on their ability to address the given topic and task requirements in a comprehensive and logical manner. Their writing should clearly demonstrate an understanding of the topic and relevance to the task.2. Content and Development: Students will be assessed on the quality and depth of their ideas, arguments, and examples. They should be able to develop their points effectively and provide relevant supporting details to strengthen their arguments.3. Organization: Students' writing should have a clear and coherent structure with well-connected paragraphs and appropriate transitions. They should demonstrate effective use of introduction, body, and conclusion in their writing.4. Language Use: Students will be evaluated based on their ability to use a variety of vocabulary and sentence structures accurately and appropriately. They should demonstrate control over grammar, punctuation, spelling, and word choice.5. Style and Tone: Students should demonstrate an appropriate style and tone in their writing, depending on the given topic and task requirements. They should use language that is formal, academic, and suitable for the purpose of their writing.6. Creativity and Originality: Students will be encouraged to demonstrate creativity and originality in their writing by presenting unique perspectives, innovative ideas, or personal experiences that add depth and interest to their composition.Scoring SystemThe scoring system for the English writing section of the 2023 Beijing Gaokao will be based on a holistic approach, taking into consideration the overall quality of students' writing in terms of task fulfillment, content and development, organization, language use, style and tone, and creativity and originality. Each criterion will be assigned a specific weightage, and students will be scored on a scale of 0-100 based on their performance in each criterion.ConclusionThe 2023 Beijing Gaokao English writing evaluation criteria are designed to assess students' ability to communicate effectively in written English and demonstrate their language proficiency and writing skills. By focusing on task fulfillment, content and development, organization, language use, style and tone, and creativity and originality, the evaluation criteria aim to provide a comprehensive assessment of students' writing abilities and help them prepare for higher education and future academic endeavors.。
高考英语书面表达全国卷评分标准

高考英语书面表达全国卷评分标准评分标准本题总分为25分,按5个档次给分。
评分时,先根据文章的内容和语言初步确定其所属档次,然后以该档次的要求来衡量,确定或调整档次,最后给分。
词数少于80和多于120的,从总分中减去2分。
评分时应注意的主要内容为:内容要点、应用词汇和语法结构的数量和准确性及上下文的连贯性。
拼写与标点符号是语言准确性的一个方面。
评分时应视其对交际的影响程度予以考虑。
英、美拼写及词汇用法均可接受。
评分原则第五档(21-25分):完全完成了试题规定的任务,覆盖所有内容要点。
应用了较多的语法结构和词汇。
语法结构或词汇方面有些许错误,但为尽力使用较复杂结构或较高级词汇所致;具备较强的语言运用能力。
有效地使用了语句间的连接成分,使全文结构紧凑。
第四档(16-20分):完全完成了试题规定的任务,达到了预期的写作目的。
虽漏掉1、2个次重点,但覆盖所有主要内容。
应用的语法结构和词汇能满足任务的要求。
语法结构或词汇方面应用基本准确,些许错误主要是因尝试较复杂语法结构或词汇所致。
应用简单的语句间的连接成分,使全文结构紧凑。
第三档(11-15分):基本完成了试题规定的任务,整体而言,基本达到了预期的写作目的。
虽漏掉一些内容,但覆盖所有主要内容。
应用的语法结构和词汇能满足任务的要求。
有一些语法结构或词汇方面的错误,但不影响理解。
应用简单的语句间的连接成分,使全文内容连贯。
第二档(6-10分):未恰当完成试题规定的任务,信息未能清楚地传达给读者。
漏掉或未描述清楚一些主要内容,写了一些无关内容。
语法结构单调、词汇项目有限。
有一些语法结构或词汇方面的错误,影响了对写作内容的理解。
较少使用语句间的连接成分,内容缺少连贯性。
第一档(1-5分):未完成试题规定的任务,信息未能传达给读者。
明显遗漏主要内容,写了一些无关内容,原因可能是未理解试题要求。
语法结构单调、词汇项目有限。
较多语法结构或词汇方面的错误,影响对写作内容的理解。
高考英语书面表达阅卷标准

高考英语书面表达阅卷标准了解高考英语书面表达的阅卷标准,你就会更加清楚该往哪个方向努力。
下面是店铺给大家整理的高考英语书面表达阅卷标准,供大家参阅!高考英语书面表达全国卷评分标准(一)评分原则:1、本题总分为25分,按5个档次给分。
2、评分时,先根据文章的内容和语言初步确定其所属档次,然后以该档次的要求来衡量,确定或调整档次,最后给分。
3、词数少于80和多于120的,从总分中减去2分。
4、评分时应注意的主要内容为:内容要点、应用词汇和语法结构的数量和准确性及上下文的连贯性。
5、拼写与标点符号是语言准确性的一个方面。
评分时应视其对交际的影响程度予以考虑。
英、美拼写及词汇用法均可接受。
(二)评分标准:第五档(21-25分):完全完成了试题规定的任务,完全达到了预期的写作目的——覆盖所有内容要点。
——应用了较多的语法结构和词汇。
——语法结构或词汇方面有些许错误,但为尽力使用较复杂结构或较高级词汇所致;具备较强的语言运用能力。
——有效地使用了语句间的连接成分,使全文结构紧凑。
第四档(16-20分):完全完成了试题规定的任务,达到了预期的写作目的——虽漏掉1、2个次重点,但覆盖所有主要内容。
——应用的语法结构和词汇能满足任务的要求。
——语法结构或词汇方面应用基本准确,些许错误主要是因尝试较复杂语法结构或词汇所致。
——应用简单的语句间的连接成分,使全文结构紧凑。
第三档(11-15分):基本完成了试题规定的任务,整体而言,基本达到了预期的写作目的——虽漏掉一些内容,但覆盖所有主要内容。
——应用的语法结构和词汇能满足任务的要求。
——有一些语法结构或词汇方面的错误,但不影响理解。
——应用简单的语句间的连接成分,使全文内容连贯。
第二档(6-10分):未恰当完成试题规定的任务,信息未能清楚地传达给读者——漏掉或未描述清楚一些主要内容,写了一些无关内容。
——语法结构单调、词汇项目有限。
——有一些语法结构或词汇方面的错误,影响了对写作内容的理解。
北京英语作文评分标准

北京英语作文评分标准Beijing English Composition Scoring Criteria。
Beijing, the capital city of China, has a rich history and culture, and is a city that is constantly evolving. As the center of politics, culture, and economy in China, Beijing is an important city that attracts people from all over the world. In order to evaluate the quality of English compositions about Beijing, the following scoring criteria are provided for reference.Content (40 points)。
The content of the composition should be rich and informative, covering various aspects of Beijing such asits history, culture, landmarks, and development. The composition should demonstrate a deep understanding of Beijing and provide interesting and relevant information that engages the reader. It should also reflect thewriter's personal thoughts and feelings about Beijing, andconvey a sense of passion and enthusiasm for the city.Language (30 points)。
北京高考英语作文评分标准

北京高考英语作文评分标准北京高考英语作文评分标准是考生备考的重要内容之一,了解评分标准对于提高作文水平和应对高考作文题目至关重要。
下面将详细介绍北京高考英语作文评分标准,希望对广大考生有所帮助。
首先,北京高考英语作文评分标准要求考生在表达上要准确。
这意味着考生需要避免语法错误、词汇错误和句子结构错误。
在写作时,考生应尽量避免使用一些不熟悉的词汇和句型,以免出现错误。
另外,考生在表达观点时要清晰明了,避免模棱两可的表达,以免影响阅卷老师的理解。
其次,北京高考英语作文评分标准要求考生在内容上要有深度。
这就要求考生在写作时要有自己的独特见解,不仅仅是简单地罗列事实和观点,更要有深入的分析和思考。
考生可以通过举例、对比、引用名人名言等方式来增加作文的深度,展现出自己的思考和理解能力。
再次,北京高考英语作文评分标准要求考生在结构上要合理。
这意味着考生在写作时要有清晰的逻辑结构,避免内容杂乱无章,让阅卷老师能够顺利理解和阅读。
考生可以通过使用段落、连接词、过渡句等手段来构建作文的结构,使整篇文章通顺流畅。
最后,北京高考英语作文评分标准要求考生在语言上要生动。
这就要求考生在写作时要有生动的语言表达,避免平淡乏味的表达方式。
考生可以通过使用形象生动的词语、修辞手法、比喻等方式来增加作文的生动性,吸引阅卷老师的注意力。
综上所述,北京高考英语作文评分标准对考生的要求是全面的,不仅要求考生在语言表达上准确、生动,还要求考生在内容深度和结构合理上有所突破。
希望广大考生能够在备考时重视作文评分标准,不断提高自己的写作水平,取得优异的成绩。
高考英语书面表达全国卷评分标准

高考英语书面表达全国卷评分标准(一)评分原则:1、本题总分为25分,按5个档次给分。
2、评分时,先根据文章的内容和语言初步确定其所属档次,然后以该档次的要求来衡量,确定或调整档次,最后给分。
3、词数少于80和多于120的,从总分中减去2分。
4、评分时应注意的主要内容为:内容要点、应用词汇和语法结构的数量和准确性及上下文的连贯性。
5、拼写与标点符号是语言准确性的一个方面。
评分时应视其对交际的影响程度予以考虑。
英、美拼写及词汇用法均可接受。
(二)评分标准:第五档(21-25分):完全完成了试题规定的任务,完全达到了预期的写作目的——覆盖所有内容要点。
——应用了较多的语法结构和词汇。
——语法结构或词汇方面有些许错误,但为尽力使用较复杂结构或较高级词汇所致;具备较强的语言运用能力。
——有效地使用了语句间的连接成分,使全文结构紧凑。
第四档(16-20分):完全完成了试题规定的任务,达到了预期的写作目的——虽漏掉1、2个次重点,但覆盖所有主要内容。
——应用的语法结构和词汇能满足任务的要求。
——语法结构或词汇方面应用基本准确,些许错误主要是因尝试较复杂语法结构或词汇所致。
——应用简单的语句间的连接成分,使全文结构紧凑。
第三档(11-15分):基本完成了试题规定的任务,整体而言,基本达到了预期的写作目的——虽漏掉一些内容,但覆盖所有主要内容。
——应用的语法结构和词汇能满足任务的要求。
——有一些语法结构或词汇方面的错误,但不影响理解。
——应用简单的语句间的连接成分,使全文内容连贯。
第二档(6-10分):未恰当完成试题规定的任务,信息未能清楚地传达给读者——漏掉或未描述清楚一些主要内容,写了一些无关内容。
——语法结构单调、词汇项目有限。
——有一些语法结构或词汇方面的错误,影响了对写作内容的理解。
——较少使用语句间的连接成分,内容缺少连贯性。
第一档(1-5分):未完成试题规定的任务,信息未能传达给读者——明显遗漏主要内容,写了一些无关内容,原因可能是未理解试题要求。
高考英语书面表达全国卷评分标准

高考英语书面表达全国卷评分标准(一)评分原则:1、本题总分为25分,按5个档次给分。
2、评分时,先根据文章的内容和语言初步确定其所属档次,然后以该档次的要求来衡量,确定或调整档次,最后给分。
3、词数少于80和多于120的,从总分中减去2分。
4、评分时应注意的主要内容为:内容要点、应用词汇和语法结构的数量和准确性及上下文的连贯性。
5、拼写与标点符号是语言准确性的一个方面。
评分时应视其对交际的影响程度予以考虑。
英、美拼写及词汇用法均可接受。
(二)评分标准:第五档(21-25分):完全完成了试题规定的任务,完全达到了预期的写作目的——覆盖所有内容要点。
——应用了较多的语法结构和词汇。
——语法结构或词汇方面有些许错误,但为尽力使用较复杂结构或较高级词汇所致;具备较强的语言运用能力。
——有效地使用了语句间的连接成分,使全文结构紧凑。
第四档(16-20分):完全完成了试题规定的任务,达到了预期的写作目的——虽漏掉1、2个次重点,但覆盖所有主要内容。
——应用的语法结构和词汇能满足任务的要求。
——语法结构或词汇方面应用基本准确,些许错误主要是因尝试较复杂语法结构或词汇所致。
——应用简单的语句间的连接成分,使全文结构紧凑。
第三档(11-15分):基本完成了试题规定的任务,整体而言,基本达到了预期的写作目的——虽漏掉一些内容,但覆盖所有主要内容。
——应用的语法结构和词汇能满足任务的要求。
——有一些语法结构或词汇方面的错误,但不影响理解。
——应用简单的语句间的连接成分,使全文内容连贯。
第二档(6-10分):未恰当完成试题规定的任务,信息未能清楚地传达给读者——漏掉或未描述清楚一些主要内容,写了一些无关内容。
——语法结构单调、词汇项目有限。
——有一些语法结构或词汇方面的错误,影响了对写作内容的理解。
——较少使用语句间的连接成分,内容缺少连贯性。
第一档(1-5分):未完成试题规定的任务,信息未能传达给读者——明显遗漏主要内容,写了一些无关内容,原因可能是未理解试题要求。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
高考英语书面表达评分标准
高考英语书面表达题所要求的技能:
1、根据不同文体,使用恰当的语言形式完成书面交际任务;
2、运用恰当的句式、词汇和语法叙述、描述、表达观点和态度;
3、做到文章扣题、内容充实、结构完整、逻辑性强、语意连贯。
一、情景作文
(一)评分原则
1、本题总分为20分,按5个档次给分。
2、评分时,先根据文章的内容和语言初步确定其档次,然后以该档次的要求衡量,确定或调整档次,最后给分。
3、评分时应考虑:内容要点的完整性、上下文的连贯、词汇和句式的多样性及语言的准确性。
4、拼写、标点符号或书写影响内容表达时,应试其影响程度予以考虑。
英、美拼写及词汇用法均可接受。
5、词数少于60,从总分中减去1分。
(二)各档次的给分范围和要求:
开放作文(15分)
(一)评分原则:
本题总分为15分,按4个档给分。
评分时,先根据文章的内容和语言质量初步确定其档次,然后以该档次的要求来衡量,确定或调整档次,最后给分。
评分时应考虑:文章是否扣题,结构是否完整,内容是否充实、健康,思维是否活跃,逻辑是否清晰,语言是否准确,交际是否得体。
拼写、标点符号或书写影响内容表达时,应视其影响程度予以考虑。
英美拼写及词汇用法均可接受。
词汇少于50,从总分中减去1分。
(二)各档次的给分范围和要求:。