雅思阅读材料之人类少吃肉对环境有好处
雅思阅读材料之人类少吃肉对环境有好处?智课网IELTS 备考资料雅思阅读材料之人类少吃肉对环境有好处?出国英语考试有哪些雅思6.5是什么水平雅思阅读评分标准托福阅读评分标准雅思和托福的区别A new study says one of the best ways to curb greenhouse gas emissions is to eat less meat. In fact, the study says meat consumption in the developed should be cut by 50 percent per person by 2050.一份新的研究说，遏制温室气体排放最好的办法之一是少吃肉。
事实上，研究说，已开发国家每人的肉类消费量应该在2050年前减少50%。
Meat production and consumption are expected to soar by 2050. That’s because the global population is projected to grow from the current 7 billion to 9 billion. But also, the diets of people in many developing countries are changing. Countries with emerging economies are seeing a sharp rise in protein consumption, especially red meat.肉类生产和消费将在2050年前上升，这是因为全球人口预计从目前70亿增加到90亿。
但同时，许多发展中国家人民的饮食正发生变化。
新兴经济体对蛋白质，尤其是红肉的消费急剧上升。
Dr. Eric Davidson said changing how people eat can have a dramatic effect on greenhouse gas emissions. People in developed countries, he said, already eat much more protein than the daily minimum requirement.艾瑞克. 大卫森博士说，改变人们的饮食会对温室气体排放有显著影响。
他说，已开发国家人们吃的蛋白质已经远超过每日所需。
“In the developed world there’s considera ble room for us to manage our portion sizes and the frequency with which we eat meat. We’re not talking about everybody suddenly needing to become a vegetarian. Rather it’s kind of reversing the supersize trend and being more mindful of the impacts of the amount of meat and the types of meat, both for the environment and our own health,” he said.大卫森说：“在已开发国家，我们吃肉的份量和频率还有很大的改变空间。
我们不是说每个人要突然变成素食者。
而是说，要扭转超大份量的趋势，更注意肉类的份量和种类对环境和自身健康的影响。
”Davidson is the president and senior scientist at the Woods Hole Research Center in Massachusetts.麻萨诸塞州伍德霍尔研究中心的主席和资深科学家大卫森说：Meat, manure and gas“If there is a growing demand for meat, which of course there is, that is going to end up requiring use of morenitrogen fertilizer and production of more livestock manure, both of which end up resulting in unintentional releases of various forms of nitrogen to the environment, including nitrates to groundwater and surface water and alsogreenhouse gases such as nitrous oxide to the atmosphere,” he said.“如果对肉的需求增加--确实也有所增加，那么就需要使用更多氮肥和制造更多粪肥，两个都会无意间对环境释放出不同形态的氮，包括向地下水和地表水排放硝酸盐，同时将氧化亚氮等温室气体排到空气中。
”Davidson looked for ways to ease the effects of climate change that would support an aggressive strategy laid out by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In particular, the effects of nitrous oxide, described as the third biggest contributor to climate change after carbon dioxide and methane.大卫森寻找缓解气候变迁影响的方式，来支持政府间气候变迁小组所制定的一份积极策略。
他说，特别是氧化亚氮产生的影响，氧化亚氮被形容是二氧化碳和甲烷之外促成气候变迁的第三大因素。
But while nitrous oxide ranks number three in greenhouse gases, it is considered the most potent. It’s much better at absorbing infrared radiation. In other words, the sun’s energy passes through the Earth’s atmosphere,heats things up and is then released through infrared radiation. But that radiation then hits the greenhouse gases in the atmosphere and goes no further.虽然氧化亚氮在温室气体中排名第三，但它被认为是最有力的。
它对红外幅射的吸收力更强。
换句话说，太阳能穿透地球的大气层、加温、然后通过红外幅射释放。
但当幅射在气层遇到这个温室气体后就无法再散出去。
Davidson has a simple analogy.大卫森作了一个类比说：“It’s sort of the same idea as a parked car. The energy goes through the windshield of a car pretty easily. It’sabsorbed on the car seat. Gets the car seat hot. Re-radiates out and it cannot escape the windshield on the way out. This infrared radiation cannot escape the windshield and so the inside of the car heats up. The physics is pretty well understood for climate change. I think we’d probably have better acceptance of it if we called it the parked car effect instead of the greenhouse g as effect,” he said.“这有点象停着的车。
能量能轻易穿透车窗，被车内的座椅吸收，让椅子变热。
然后它重新向外散发时却无法穿过车窗，所以车内变热。
这个物理学很能解释气候变迁。
我想，如果我们称它车子效应而不是温室气体效应会比较容易接受。
”And nitrous oxide stays in the atmosphere a very long time before breaking down. It can take over a hundred years to break down one molecule of the gas. The main sources of nitrous oxide are synthetic nitrogen fertilizers and storage and use of livestock manure.氧化亚氮在分解前会在空气中停留很长一段时间。
分解一个气体分子可能花超过一百年。
氧化亚氮的主要来源是合成氮肥以及粪肥的储存和使用。
Start nowDavidson says farmers should be given incentives to use fertilizers and manure more judiciously.大卫森说，应该给农夫诱因让他们更明智地使用肥料和粪肥。
“If we want to meet the m ost ambitious and optimistic goal of these scenarios of bringing harmful climate change under control, we need to improve the efficiency with which we use fertilizers in agriculture. We need toimprove the efficiency of the management of manure. And we also need to consider changes in dietary patterns. And that means hopefully better diets in the developing world and better balanced diets in the developed world,” he said.大卫森说：“如果我们想要达到控制气候变迁的有野心而乐观的目标，我们要改善农业使用肥料的效率。
人们不应该吃肉雅思作文
人们不应该吃肉雅思作文英文回答：I believe that people should not eat meat for several reasons. Firstly, consuming meat contributes to environmental degradation. Livestock farming requires vast amounts of land, water, and feed, leading to deforestation, water pollution, and overuse of resources. By reducing meat consumption, we can help mitigate these environmental issues.Secondly, eating meat is detrimental to our health. Numerous studies have shown that excessive meat consumption is linked to various health problems, including heart disease, obesity, and certain types of cancer. On the other hand, a plant-based diet has been proven to lower the risk of these diseases and promote overall well-being.Furthermore, the ethical aspect cannot be overlooked. Animals raised for meat often endure cruel conditions infactory farms, where they are confined to small spaces, subjected to unnecessary antibiotics and hormones, and slaughtered inhumanely. By choosing not to eat meat, we can show compassion towards animals and support more humane farming practices.In addition to these reasons, there are also economic benefits to reducing meat consumption. Livestock farming requires significant resources and subsidies, which could be redirected towards more sustainable and equitable agricultural practices. Moreover, plant-based diets tend to be more affordable and accessible for a larger population.Overall, not eating meat is a responsible choice that benefits the environment, our health, and animal welfare. By adopting a plant-based diet, we can contribute to a more sustainable and compassionate world.中文回答：我认为人们不应该吃肉，有几个原因。
关于吃素对环境的影响英语阅读
关于吃素对环境的影响英语阅读Adopting a vegetarian diet can significantly reduce one's carbon footprint. The meat industry is a major contributor to greenhouse gas emissions, and by choosing plant-based foods, we can lessen our environmental impact.The production of meat requires vast amounts of water and land, often leading to deforestation and habitat loss. Vegetarianism promotes sustainable agriculture by reducing the demand for these resources, thus preserving ecosystems and biodiversity.Nutrient pollution is another environmental concern, with livestock farming contributing to the runoff of harmful substances into waterways. A shift towards plant-based diets can help mitigate this issue, protecting aquatic life and water quality.Moreover, the energy efficiency of plant-based food production is higher than that of meat production. Producing the same amount of protein from plants requires less energy, making vegetarian diets more environmentally friendly.However, it's important to note that not all plant-based foods are created equal. The environmental impact of certain crops can vary, and a well-planned vegetarian diet should consider the sustainability of the food choices.In conclusion, embracing a vegetarian lifestyle is a powerful way to contribute to environmental conservation. It's a conscious decision that aligns with the goals of reducing pollution, conserving resources, and promoting a healthier planet for all living beings.。
雅思小作文模板肉类消耗
雅思小作文模板肉类消耗英文回答：Meat Consumption Essay。
Meat consumption has been a topic of much debate in recent years, with both proponents and opponents citing a variety of arguments to support their respective stances. On the one hand, meat provides essential nutrients such as protein, iron, and vitamin B12, and it can be a valuable part of a healthy diet. On the other hand, meat production has been linked to environmental damage, animal welfare concerns, and health risks for humans.Environmental Impact。
One of the most significant concerns associated with meat consumption is its environmental impact. The raising of livestock for food requires vast amounts of land, water, and feed, all of which can contribute to environmentaldegradation. In particular, the clearing of forests for grazing land has been a major driver of deforestation, particularly in the Amazon rainforest. Additionally, the production of meat generates significant amounts of greenhouse gases, including methane and nitrous oxide, which contribute to climate change.Animal Welfare。
吃肉对环境的好处英语辩论
吃肉对环境的好处英语辩论As the debate over the benefits of a plant-based diet to the environment continues, there are those who believe that eating meat can have positive effects on the environment. While there are challenges with meat production, it is possible to produce meat in a sustainable way that does not harm the environment. In this article, we will explore the arguments for why eating meat can have a positive impact on the environment.First of all, meat production can help maintain biodiversity. Grazing animals play an important role in maintaining the balance of grasslands, which are a habitatfor many species of wildlife. For example, grazing cattle can contribute to the maintenance of vegetation and the preservation of habitats for birds and insects. Additionally, livestock farmers are often committed to protecting the environment, so they are motivated to manage their land in a sustainable way.Secondly, there is the issue of food waste. Meat is a highly nutritious and valuable food source, and eating meat can help reduce food waste. By eating meat that is produced using sustainable methods, we can ensure that we are consuming food that has been produced with care and consideration, and in a way that does not cause avoidable harm to the environment.Third, livestock farming can be an important source of income for rural communities. Many livestock farmers work in some of the poorest regions of the world, and theirlivelihoods are dependent on their ability to raise livestock. In many cases, sustainable livestock farming can be an important driver of economic growth, and a vital source of income for rural communities.However, it is important to acknowledge the challenges associated with meat production. Large-scale industrialfarming can have negative impacts on the environment,including deforestation, pollution, and greenhouse gas emissions. Ensuring that we eat meat that is produced in a sustainable way is crucial if we want to reduce the negative impacts of meat production on the environment.In conclusion, while we must acknowledge the challenges associated with meat production, we should also recognizethat sustainable meat production can have positive benefitsfor the environment. Eating meat can help maintain biodiversity, reduce food waste, and support rural communities. The key is to find ways to produce meat in a sustainable way that does not harm the environment. By doing so, we can enjoy the benefits of meat while also protectingthe environment for future generations.。
研究：少吃肉既健康又环保51
研究：少吃肉既健康又环保Cutting meat production and consump-tion by 30 percent would help to reduce carbon emissions and improve health in the most meat-loving nations, scientists said recently.Using prediction models, British and Australian researchers found that improving efficiency, increasing carbon capture and reducing fossil fuel dependence in farming would not be enough to meet emissions targets. But combining these steps with a 30 percent reduction in livestock production in major meat-producing nations and a similar cut in meat-eating, would lead to “substan tial population health benefits”and cut emissions, they said.The study found that in Britain, a 30 percent lower intake of animal-source saturated fat by adults would reduce the number of premature deaths from heart disease by some 17 percent—equivalent to 18,000 premature deaths averted in one year.In San Paulo, Brazil, it could mean as many as 1,000 premature deaths averted in a year, they said.According to the United Nations Food and Agricultural Organization, 18 percent of all greenhouse gas emissions are from meat production and experts say rising demand for meat, particularly in countries with growing economies, could drive live-stock production up by 85 percent from 2000 levels by 2030.The scientists said global action was needed to maximize the benefits of cutting meat production and consumption, and that the environmental advantages “may apply only in those countries that currently have high production levels”.In a second study, British scientists found that increased walking and cycling, and fewer cars,would have a much greater impact on health than low-emission vehicles in rich and middle-income countries.科学家最近称，如果将最爱食肉国家的肉类生产和消费量减少30%，那么将有助于减少碳排放和改善人们的健康状况。
少吃肉的英文作文
少吃肉的英文作文英文：As someone who has recently started to eat less meat, I can say that it has been a positive change for me. Not only do I feel better physically, but I also feel better about my impact on the environment. Cutting back on meat consumption is a simple and effective way to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and conserve resources.One of the biggest challenges I faced when reducing my meat intake was finding satisfying and nutritious alternatives. However, I have discovered that there are plenty of delicious plant-based options available, such as lentils, beans, tofu, and tempeh. These ingredients can be used in a variety of dishes, from stir-fries to salads to soups.Another benefit of eating less meat is that it can be more budget-friendly. Plant-based proteins tend to be lessexpensive than animal proteins, which can help save moneyon grocery bills. Additionally, reducing meat consumption can lead to a more diverse and interesting diet, as it encourages individuals to try new foods and experiment with different recipes.Of course, everyone's dietary needs and preferences are different, and there is no one-size-fits-all approach to eating. However, I believe that reducing meat consumption can have a positive impact on both personal health and the health of the planet.中文：作为最近开始少吃肉的人，我可以说这对我来说是一个积极的变化。
新托福阅读材料：吃肉与环保
新托福阅读材料：吃肉与环保In a new book, British farmer and former editor Simon Fairlie says eating meat in moderation may be good for the environment。
Countless studies claim that eating meat harms the planet and contributes to global warming. The U.N.'s 2006 Food and Agriculture Organization report states that meat produces 18% of the world's carbon emissions — more than the global transport infrastructure. But in his new book, Meat: A Benign Extravagance, Simon Fairlie, a British farmer and former editor of the Ecologist magazine, tears apart the theory that being carnivorous is bad for the planet — and says that eating moderate amounts of meat could be greener than going vegan.Simon Fairlie 是英国的一个农场主，曾是《生态学家》杂志的编辑，在一本新书中他介绍道食用食量的肉类有益于环境。
无数的研究都表明吃肉危害地球，推动了全球变暖。
联合国粮农组织2006年的报告称肉类生产时的碳排放量达到了世界总量的18%，这比全球基础交通运输的碳排量还要高。
carnivore 雅思阅读文章
Carnivore 雅思阅读文章近年来，人们对动物饮食习惯的兴趣逐渐增加，特别是对于肉食动物。
在雅思阅读文章中，常常涉及与肉食动物相关的话题，包括其生态角色、行为习性、适应能力等方面。
本文将针对这一主题展开阐述，希望能够帮助读者更好地理解肉食动物在自然界中的重要性及作用。
1. 肉食动物在生态系统中的作用肉食动物在生态系统中扮演着重要的角色，它们通过捕食其他动物来控制猎物数量，从而维持生态平衡。
猛禽类（如老鹰、隼等）在食物链的顶端，它们捕食小型哺乳动物、鸟类和昆虫，起着对猎物种裙数量的控制作用。
如果没有肉食动物的存在，猎物的数量可能会急剧增加，导致食物链中下层生物数量下降，甚至引发生态系统的崩溃。
2. 肉食动物的行为习性肉食动物通常具有狩猎和捕食的行为习性。
它们会利用敏锐的感知能力和快速的反应能力，捕捉并杀死猎物。
一些肉食动物还会展现出社会性行为，如狮子、豺狼等有团体生活的动物会通过集体协作来狩猎和分食猎物。
这种行为习性在雅思阅读文章中常常成为阐述的重点，因为它们体现了肉食动物在生态系统中的特殊地位。
3. 肉食动物的适应能力肉食动物在生存环境中展现出了出色的适应能力，这也是它们能够在各种生态系统中生存和繁衍的重要原因之一。
豹子拥有强大的爬树能力，能够在树上伺机捕捉猎物；狐狸在各种气候条件下都能生存，适应性强。
这些适应能力不仅为肉食动物在自然界中的生存打下了基础，也丰富了生态系统的多样性。
4. 肉食动物对人类的影响肉食动物与人类的关系也是雅思阅读文章中探讨的热点之一。
人类通过对肉食动物的研究和观察，不断深化对自然界的认识，推动了生态学、动物行为学等领域的发展；另人类的活动也对肉食动物造成了一定程度的影响，例如狩猎、栖息地破坏、气候变化等因素都对肉食动物的生存造成了威胁。
人类与肉食动物之间的关系也是雅思阅读文章探讨的重要议题之一。
5. 结语通过对肉食动物在生态系统中的作用、行为习性、适应能力以及与人类的关系等方面展开阐述，我们可以更加深入地理解肉食动物在自然界中的地位和作用。
吃肉带来的好处英语作文
吃肉带来的好处英语作文英文：Eating meat has many benefits for the human body. Firstly, meat is a great source of protein, which is essential for building and repairing tissues in the body.As a fitness enthusiast, I always make sure to include a good amount of meat in my diet to support my muscle growth and recovery after workouts. In addition to protein, meat also provides important nutrients such as iron, zinc, and B vitamins, which are crucial for overall health and well-being.Another benefit of eating meat is its satiating effect. As the saying goes, "meat sticks to your ribs," meaningthat it keeps you feeling full and satisfied for longer periods of time. This is especially helpful for those who are trying to manage their weight or control their appetite. Personally, I find that including meat in my meals helps me stay full and avoid unnecessary snacking throughout the day.Furthermore, meat can be a great source of energy. When I have a busy day ahead of me, I always make sure to have a hearty meal with a good portion of meat to keep me energized and focused. The high-quality protein and fats in meat provide a sustainable source of energy that keeps me going throughout the day.In conclusion, the benefits of eating meat are undeniable. From providing essential nutrients to supporting muscle growth and keeping us full and energized, meat plays a valuable role in a balanced diet.中文：吃肉对人体有很多好处。
少吃一口牛肉就能保护地球？有这么简单吗
少吃一口牛肉就能保护地球？有这么简单吗家牛（Bos taurus），牛科牛属，肉可食，做法丰富，味道鲜美，长期占据本人最喜爱肉类排行榜第一名……好了，不假装自己在写餐桌物种日历的稿子了。
今天我不是来跟大家（又一次）介绍家牛这个物种的，而是想从牛肉出发，聊聊生活方式和环境保护之间的一些微妙联系。
先放碗牛肉面抚慰一下心灵。
图片：Pixabay在很长一段时间里，我只用“好不好吃”和“贵不贵”两种标准来判断要不要常吃某种食物。
牛肉凭借着好吃又不算太贵的双重优势，三天两头就出现在我的餐桌之上。
但在我抛弃工作、回归学校之后，这一情况发生了改变。
改变的缘起，是食堂里的一张图：食堂墙上的这张图，让我考虑起了选择食物的第三条标准：碳排放。
图片：Calo从蔬果主食到各种肉类，这张图列出了常见食材的“环境成本”——平均生产1千克食材，相当于要排放多少千克二氧化碳。
生产肉类的碳排放高于蔬菜水果。
而在鸡鱼猪羊牛这几类肉里头，牛羊肉的碳排放又远高于其他。
一块牛排，肥美多汁，生产它需要排放大量二氧化碳。
图片：needpix作为总结，条形图上方标着一句“你的食物选择影响着气候”，大有一种“就看少年你怎么选了”的意思。
老实说，我向来对这种既不做道德绑架，也不替你拿主意的宣传方式甚是买账。
但在看了个图就接受感召之前，我们总是要先问，这些真的有影响吗？少吃牛肉，能减少碳排放吗？食堂那张图里的数据出自2017年发表的一篇系统综述。
它网罗之前的研究，分析了生产168种新鲜农产品对气候变化的影响，并用生产每千克该农产品所需排放的温室气体的“二氧化碳排放当量”（Carbon Dioxide Equivalent）表示出来。
以中位数计，生产1千克鸡肉的二氧化碳当量为3.49千克。
相比之下，生产1千克大豆的二氧化碳当量是0.49千克，牛肉的却高达26.61千克。
（注：条形图里用的是算术平均数，所以数值上稍有差别）。
考虑到能量转化效率和牛自己的“排放”，生产牛肉比其他肉类要更“不环保”。