SCI 审稿意见回复范文

合集下载

SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板大全

SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板大全

SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板大全尊敬的审稿人:非常感谢您对我们的稿件给予了宝贵的指导意见和建设性的批评。

我们已经认真阅读并且针对您的意见进行了修改,现在向您提交修改后的版本,希望能够满足您的要求。

以下是我们对每一条意见的具体回答和修改情况:回答1:感谢审稿人对研究方法的关注。

我们在修改后的版本中已经全面描述了论文的研究方法,并提供了详细的解释。

我们进一步完善了实验设计,并添加了实验步骤、数据处理和分析方法等细节,以确保论文的可靠性和可重复性。

回答2:感谢审稿人对文献支持的指导。

我们在修改后的版本中已经增加了更多的文献引用,并且通过对现有文献的分析和讨论,进一步加深了对研究问题的理解和认知。

我们相信这些新的引用将能够增强论文的学术价值和可信度。

回答3:感谢审稿人对语法和表达问题的指导。

我们在修改后的版本中仔细检查了论文的语法和表达,并进行了适当的修改和润色。

我们相信这些修改将会使论文更加清晰易读,增强论文的表达效果。

回答4:感谢审稿人对实验数据解释的意见。

我们已根据您的建议重新阐述和说明了相关数据的结果。

我们补充了对数据的详细分析和解释,并进一步讨论了数据与论文研究问题之间的关系。

我们相信这些改善将能够使读者更好地理解和评估论文的实验数据。

意见5:论文结构和框架需要进一步完善,以提升论文的逻辑性和连贯性。

回答5:感谢审稿人对论文结构和框架的指导。

我们在修改后的版本中对论文的结构和框架进行了进一步完善,以提升论文的逻辑性和连贯性。

我们重新组织了论文的章节顺序,增加了合适的标题和副标题,并提供了更清晰明了的段落和段落间的过渡。

我们相信这些修改将使论文的结构更加紧凑和清晰。

再次感谢您对我们的审稿意见和建议。

我们真诚希望通过我们的修改和努力,能够满足您的需求和要求。

如果还有其他问题或建议,请随时向我们提出。

谢谢您的时间和耐心阅读!顺祝工作顺利!此致。

sci审稿意见回复模板 -回复

sci审稿意见回复模板 -回复

sci审稿意见回复模板-回复【sci审稿意见回复模板】以中括号内的内容为主题,写一篇1500-2000字文章,一步一步回答【引言】尊敬的编辑,非常感谢您对我们提交的科研论文的认真审稿和宝贵意见。

我们在本文中将一步一步解答您提出的问题,并对您的建议进行逐个回复。

【问题一】您在审稿意见中提到了XXX,请作者详细解释原因。

【回答问题一】非常感谢您对我们研究中的XXX问题的关注。

我们认真回复如下:XXX是我们研究的一个重要方面,由于特殊的实验条件/数据收集问题/方法限制,我们在论文中所给的解释可能欠缺充分。

在未来的研究中,我们将进一步深入探讨XXX的原因,并提供更详细的解释。

【问题二】您提到在我们的研究中存在一些方法上的不足,感觉方案存在潜在的问题,请作者解释或改进。

【回答问题二】我们非常感谢您对我们的方法进行了仔细的审查。

我们认真考虑了您的意见,并经过进一步的探讨,我们决定采纳您的建议并进行改进。

我们将在下一个版本的论文中,对现有方法进行更详细的描述,并加入对可能存在的潜在问题的讨论。

我们还会进行更多的实验,以充分验证我们的方案的有效性和可靠性。

【问题三】您对我们研究中的统计分析方法提出了一些疑问,请作者进行解释。

【回答问题三】感谢您对我们论文中的统计分析方法进行了详细的评估。

我们认真考虑了您的意见,并经过再次验证,我们发现在某一个具体的环节确实存在一些问题。

我们将在下一个版本的论文中,加入更多的详细统计数据和分析结果,以充分支持我们的结论,并对相关的统计分析方法进行更深入的解释和讨论。

同时,我们将请相关领域的专家参与,以确保我们的统计方法的可信度和准确性。

【问题四】您对我们研究的创新点提出了质疑,请作者解释并提供更多实证支持。

【回答问题四】非常感谢您对我们研究的创新点进行评价和质疑。

我们理解您的担忧,并将采纳您的建议来加强我们的创新点。

我们将在下一个版本的论文中,加入更多的实证支持材料,包括额外的实验数据、模型验证结果等,以更充分地展示我们的创新点的可行性和有效性。

回复审稿人意见模板sci

回复审稿人意见模板sci

回复审稿人意见模板sci编辑同学,我已经仔细阅读了您提交的审稿意见,并根据您的建议进行了相应的修改。

以下是我对每一条审稿意见的回复和相应的修改情况。

意见一:在文章的引言部分,需要更清晰地阐述研究的目的和意义。

回复:非常感谢您的指导意见。

在经过修改后,我在引言部分进一步明确了本研究的目的和意义,以便读者更好地理解研究的背景和重要性。

意见二:方法部分应该更详细地描述实验设计和数据处理。

回复:非常感谢您的建议。

我已经对方法部分进行了进一步的修改,增加了关于实验设计和数据处理的详细描述,以确保读者能够更好地理解研究的过程和数据的处理方法。

意见三:结果部分应提供更多的统计分析和图表,以更好地支持研究结果的可靠性。

回复:感谢您对结果部分的关注。

根据您的建议,我已经增加了更多的统计分析和图表,以更全面地展示研究结果的可靠性。

意见四:在讨论部分,需要进一步解释和解读研究结果,并与现有的文献进行比较和讨论。

回复:非常感谢您的指导意见。

我已经对讨论部分进行了修改,进一步解释和解读了研究结果,并与现有的文献进行了比较和讨论,以提供更深入的分析和解释。

意见五:在结论部分,需要对研究的局限性进行说明。

回复:感谢您对结论部分的指导。

在经过修改后,我已经在结论部分对研究的局限性进行了明确的说明,以确保读者了解到我们研究的限制和潜在的改进方向。

针对您给出的审稿意见,我认真对待并进行了相应的修改,以确保文章更加完善和准确。

再次感谢您花费时间仔细审阅我的稿件,并给予宝贵的指导意见。

我非常感激您对这项研究的关注和支持。

祝好,[您的名字]。

sci审稿人回复模板

sci审稿人回复模板

sci审稿人回复模板尊敬的作者,感谢您将您的研究成果提交到我们的期刊。

我们认真评审了您的论文,并收到了两位匿名审稿人的审稿意见。

根据审稿人的意见,我们对您的论文做出了如下的回复和修改建议。

审稿人1认为您的研究具有一定的创新性和重要性,但同时也提出了一些需要改进的方面。

首先,审稿人1认为您的理论基础不够扎实,建议您在文献综述部分增加一些相关研究的引用,并进一步探讨和分析这些研究的结果。

此外,审稿人1还建议您在方法部分更加详细地描述您的实验设计,以便其他研究人员可以重复您的实验并验证您的结果。

最后,审稿人1提出了一些对实验结果的质疑,并认为您的数据分析方法可以进一步改进,以提高结果的可靠性和可重复性。

审稿人2对您的研究方法和结果表示了肯定,但也提出了一些需要改进的意见。

首先,审稿人2认为您的论文在讨论和结论部分的解释和推论过于主观,建议您进一步分析和解释实验结果,以便读者能够更好地理解您的研究成果。

此外,审稿人2还指出您的论文在语言表达和逻辑结构上存在一些问题,建议您重新组织论文结构,并在写作上进行一些修正和改进。

基于以上审稿人的意见,我们建议您对您的论文进行如下的修改和完善:1. 在文献综述部分增加一些相关研究的引用,并进一步讨论和分析这些研究的结果,以加强您的理论基础和研究创新性的论述。

2. 在方法部分更加详细地描述您的实验设计,包括实验步骤、材料和设备的详细信息,以便其他研究人员可以重复您的实验并验证您的结果。

3. 对于审稿人1对实验结果的质疑,您可以重新进行数据分析,采用更加可靠和精确的方法,以提高结果的可信度和可重复性。

4. 在讨论和结论部分,您可以进一步分析和解释实验结果,阐述您的研究成果对该领域的贡献,以及未来的研究方向和潜在的应用价值。

5. 在论文的写作上,您需要重新组织论文结构,提高语言表达的准确性和逻辑结构的清晰性。

您可以寻求专业的语言编辑服务来帮助您修正和改进论文的写作。

希望以上修改建议对您有所帮助。

sci审稿人回复意见

sci审稿人回复意见

sci审稿人回复意见英文回答:Thank you for your thoughtful review and helpful suggestions. We have carefully considered your comments and made the following revisions to our manuscript:1. In the Introduction, we have expanded our discussion of relevant literature to include the studies you suggested. We have also added a more detailed explanation of our research question and its significance in the field.2. In the Methods section, we have provided more information about our data collection and analysis procedures. We have also clarified our inclusion and exclusion criteria for the study participants.3. In the Results section, we have added a table that summarizes the key findings of our study. We have also included additional figures and graphs to illustrate ourresults more clearly.4. In the Discussion section, we have addressed the potential limitations of our study and discussed the implications of our findings for future research. We have also added a more detailed conclusion that summarizes our main findings and their significance.We believe that these revisions have significantly improved the quality of our manuscript. We are grateful for your constructive feedback and guidance.中文回答:感谢您提供的周到审阅和宝贵建议。

sci回复审稿人意见模板 -回复

sci回复审稿人意见模板 -回复

sci回复审稿人意见模板-回复尊敬的审稿人,非常感谢您对我们的稿件进行审阅,并提供了宝贵的意见和建议。

根据您的反馈,我们对您提出的问题逐一进行了回答,以便进一步改善和完善我们的研究成果。

[问题1:请解释清楚为什么选择该研究主题。

]我们选择这个研究主题是因为它与当前科学社会的重要问题密切相关。

该主题基于对地球气候变化以及环境持续变化的探索。

目前,环境问题受到了人们越来越多的关注,其中气候变化是其中最紧迫且引人注目的问题之一。

我们希望通过研究来深入了解气候变化的根本原因以及与之相关的因素,以帮助我们更好地应对这个全球性的挑战。

[问题2:请更加详细地解释您所使用的研究方法并说明其可靠性。

]在我们的研究中,我们采用了XX方法来分析和解读数据。

这种方法已经被广泛用于类似的研究,并已被科学界公认为有效和可靠的分析工具。

我们通过仔细收集和整理相关数据,并运用适当的统计方法来得出结论。

此外,我们还进行了多次重复实验,以增加结果的可靠性和重复性。

在数据分析方面,我们采用了严格的统计学方法来检验结果的显著性和可信度。

总体来说,我们相信我们所使用的研究方法是可靠的,并能够有效地支持我们的研究结论。

[问题3:请进一步讨论您的研究结果对该领域的意义和影响。

]我们的研究结果对于该领域具有重要的意义和影响。

首先,我们的结果可以帮助科学家和政策制定者更好地了解气候变化的机理和动力学过程。

这种理解是制定有效的气候变化应对策略所必需的。

其次,我们的结果还可以为相关领域的进一步研究提供有价值的参考和基础。

我们的发现可能有助于揭示与气候变化相关的其他未知因素,并为深入研究提供新的思路和方向。

最后,我们的研究结果还对公众有重要意义,因为它可以提高人们对气候变化问题的认识,并推动人们采取积极的环保行动来减轻其影响。

[问题4:请回答如何应对审稿人提出的其他一些具体问题和建议。

]根据您提供的其他建议,我们将按照以下方式来应对:a. 针对您提出的统计方法方面的疑问,我们将进一步详细描述我们所采用的方法,并解释其适用性和优势。

SCI论文全攻略之审稿回复实例

SCI论文全攻略之审稿回复实例

SCI论文全攻略之审稿回复实例致评审专家:非常感谢您对我们提交的论文《XXX》所提出的宝贵意见和建议。

在您的指导下,我们深入地思考和修改了论文,希望您能认可我们的努力。

以下是对您的审稿意见的回复:1.关于XXX问题您提到了XXX问题在整个论文中未得到充分讨论和解释。

经过我们的重新审视和修改,我们在论文中增加了相关内容,并扩展了对XXX问题的讨论。

我们添加了XXX的相关研究和数据,并进行了更为深入的分析,以弥补此前的不足之处。

我们相信这些改进能够使我们的研究更为完整和有说服力。

2.关于XXX实验的误差分析您对我们的实验数据和结果提出了一些疑问,特别是关于XXX实验中的误差分析。

在您的建议下,我们重新对实验过程进行了检查,并对实验方法和操作细节做出了进一步的解释和说明。

我们还对实验的准确性和可靠性进行了更加严格的验证,以确保数据的真实性和可信度。

我们相信这些措施可以使我们的实验结果更具说服力,并得到您的认可。

4.关于结论部分的进一步完善您提到我们的结论部分的总结和展望不够明确和有力,建议我们进一步强调和突出我们的研究成果和意义。

在您的指导下,我们对结论部分进行了重新调整和修改,强调了我们研究的创新性和学术贡献,并对未来的研究方向进行了进一步展望。

我们相信这些改进能够使我们的结论更为精炼和有力,展示出我们的研究的重要性和价值。

总之,我们非常感谢您的耐心和细致的审阅,并对我们的研究提出宝贵的意见和建议。

在您的指导下,我们对论文进行了全面的修订和完善,希望您能再次审阅我们的工作,并给予肯定和认可。

我们将继续努力,争取在您的帮助下创作出更好的学术作品。

再次感谢您的支持和指导!诚挚地。

sci修回意见回复模板 -回复

sci修回意见回复模板 -回复

sci修回意见回复模板-回复“sci修回意见回复模板”回复模板尊敬的审稿人/编委/编辑:首先,感谢您对我们的研究工作给予的重视并提出了宝贵的意见和建议。

我们非常重视您的意见,经过认真研究和讨论,我们对您提出的问题进行了深入分析,并做出了相应的修订。

现针对您的意见逐一进行回复如下:1. Thank you very much for your insightful comments. We have carefully considered your suggestions and made the necessary revisions accordingly.非常感谢您的深入评论。

我们已经仔细考虑了您的建议,并相应地进行了修订。

2. We agree with your point that the research could be strengthened by providing more experimental data. Therefore, we have conducted additional experiments on [specific aspect or parameter], and the new data are included in the revised manuscript.我们同意您的观点,即通过提供更多的实验数据可以进一步加强研究的可信度。

因此,我们针对[具体方面或参数]进行了额外的实验,并将新数据包含在修订后的论文中。

3. We appreciate your suggestion to expand the literature review to include more recent studies. In response, we have conducted a thorough review of the most relevant and up-to-date literature in the field and have included the key findings in the revised manuscript.对于您建议加强文献综述部分以包括更多最新研究的建议,我们表示感谢。

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

论文题目:Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies on the antivirus effects of A (一种中草药) against virus B (一种病毒)所投杂志:Life Sciences投稿结果:这次大修后又经过一次小修,被接受发表编辑信内容(注:有删节):Dear Mr. XXX,Your manuscript has been examined by the editors and qualified referee . We think the manuscript has merit but requires revision before we can accept it for publication in the Journal. Careful consideration must be given to the points raised in the reviewer comments, which are enclosed below.If you choose to submit a revision of your manuscript, please incorporate responses to the reviewer comments into the revised paper. A complete rebuttal with no manuscript alterations is usually considered inadequate and may result in lengthy re-review procedures.A letter detailing your revisions point-by-point must accompany the resubmission.You will be requested to upload this Response to Reviewers as a separate file in the Attach Files area.We ask that you resubmit your manuscript within 45 days. After this time, your file will be placed on inactive status and a further submission will be considered a new manuscript.To submit a revision, go to /lfs/ and log in as an Author.You will see a menu item called Submission Needing Revision. You will find your submission record there.Yours sincerely,Joseph J. Bahl, PhDEditorLife SciencesFormat Suggestion: Please access the Guide to Authors at our website to check the format of your article. Pay particular attention to our References style.Reviewers' comments:Reviewer #1:XXXXX (略)Reviewer #2:XXXXX (略)Editors note and suggestions: (注:编辑的建议)Title: Re-write the title to read more smoothly in contemporary English>>>Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies of the antiviral effects of A against virus B.Abstract: Re-write the abstract to read more smoothly.A, an alkaloid isolated from C (注:一种中草药), was tested for antiviral activity against virus B. Both in vitro and in vivo assays along with serum pharmacological experiments showed A to have potent antiviral activity. The pharmacokinetic profile of A in Sprague/Dawley rat plasma after oral administration was measured by HPLC. Blood samples taken at selected time points were analyzed to study potential changes in antiviral pharmacodynamics as measured by infectivity of viruses. From the similarity of the serum concentration profiles and antiviral activity profiles it is concluded that A it self, rather than a metabolite, exerted the effect against the virus prior to bioinactivation. The need for effective clinical agents against virus B and these results suggest the possibility of benefit from further experiments with A.The authors should check to be sure that the terms blood samples, plasma and serum are always used appropriately throughout the abstract and text.Introduction: some sentences can be made less passive. example 1st paragraph >>>> A appears to be the most important alkaloid isolated from the plant, its structural formula is shown in Fig 1. ... While it produced a general inhibition of antibody production lymphocyte proliferation was stimulated (Xia and Wang, 1997). These pharmacological properties suggest a potential use in the treatment of viral myocarditis against virus B that could be studied in experiments in cell culture and animals.>>>The authors should check the entire manuscript for spelling errors (example given: in your text alkaloid is incorrectly spelled alkaloid)>>>The authors should read the guidelines to the authors and not include the first name of the authors being cited in the text. In the reference section the first name should be abbreviated as shown in the guideline to authors (thus the earlier text reference should be (Liu et al., 2003)and the remaining one should be (Chen et al., 2002)>>>>>The authors instead of directly answering the first complex question of reviewer #1 may include the three questions as future research aim in the discussion section.>>>>>>Rather than redrawing figure the authors may choose to amend the wording of the statistical analysis section to state that the result of tables are means+-SEM and for figures are +- SD.>>>>> reviewer #1 comment number 8 and reviewer # 2 comment 3 might be satisfied by inclusion of a representative photo of cells and heart showing CPE. Remember most readers of the journal have never seen what you are trying to describe.Because I think that you can deal with all of the points raised I am hoping to see a revised manuscript that you have carefully checked for errors. If you have questions or do not know how to respond to any of the points raised please contact me at **************.eduJosephBahl,PhDEditor2LifeSciences作者回复信原稿:Dear Dr. Bahl,I’m (注:正式信函不要简写)very appreciate (注:不适合作为给编辑回信的开始,同时有语法错误)for your comments and suggestions.I (注:实际上是学生做的)have conducted in vivo antivirus experiments again (注:要表明是应审稿人或编辑建议而作). Mice were sacrificed on 15 days and 30 days after infection. Death rate, heart weight to body weight ratio (HW/BW), virus titers and pathologic slices (注:用词错误)were calculated(注:用词不当). Production of mRNA of IL-10, IFN-γand TNF-αwere (注:语法错误)measured by RT-PCR.I have revised this manuscript and especially paid much attention to your comments and suggestions. I would like to re-submit it to LIFE SCIENCE. Title of manuscript has been changed to “The antivirus effects of A against virus B and its pharmacokinetic behaviour in SD rats serum” to make it more clear and smooth.Answers to Reviewers’questions were as follows: (注:可附在给编辑的回复信后)Reviewer #1:XXXXXReviewer #2:XXXXXEditors note and suggestions:Title: Re-write the title to read more smoothly in contemporary EnglishAnswer: I have rewrite the title to “The antivirus effects of A against virus B and its pharmacokinetic behaviour in SD rats serum”to make it more clear and smooth (注:多处语法错误).Abstract: Re-write the abstract to read more smoothly.Answer: I have revise the abstract carefully to make it more smooth and informative(注:语法错误).The authors should check to be sure that the terms blood samples, plasma and serum are always used appropriately throughout the abstract and text.Answer: I have paid attention to this question and it is clearer (注:不具体).Introduction:some sentences can be made less passive.Answer: I have revise the whole paper to make sentences less passive and obtained help of my colleague proficient in English (注:语法错误,句子不通顺).The authors should check the entire manuscript for spelling errorsAnswer: I’m very sorry to give you so much trouble for those spelling errors (注:不必道歉,按建议修改即可). I have carefully corrected them.The authors should read the guidelines to the authors and not include the first name of the authors being cited in the text. In the reference section the first name should be abbreviated as shown in the guideline to authors (thus the earlier text reference should be (Liu et al., 2003) and the remaining one should be (Chen et al., 2002)Answer: I changed the style of references.Rather than redrawing figure the authors may choose to amend the wording of the statistical analysis section to state that the result of tables are means +-SEM and for figures are +- SD.Answer: (注:作者请编辑公司帮回答)reviewer #1 comment number 8 and reviewer # 2 comment 3 might be satisfied by inclusion of a representative photo of cells and heart showing CPE. Remember: most readers of the journal have never seen what you are trying to describe.Answer: Thank you for your suggestions. I have supplemented pictures of cardiac pathologic slices in the paper (Fig2).I have to apologize for giving you so much trouble because of those misspelling and confusing statements (注:一般不是延误或人为失误,不必轻易道歉,按建议修改即可). Your comments and suggestions really helped me a lot. I have put great efforts to this review. I wish it can be satisfactory.If there’s (注:正式信函不要简写)any information I can provide, please don’t hesitate to contact me.Thank you again for your time and patience. Look forward to hear (注:语法错误)from you.Yours SincerelyXxxx Xxxx (通讯作者名)建议修改稿:Dear Dr. Bahl,Thanks you very much for your comments and suggestions.As suggested, we have conducted in vivo antivirus experiments. Mice were sacrificed on 15 days and 30 days after infection with virus B. Mortality, heart weight to body weight ratio (HW/BW), virus titers and pathologic scores were determined. In addition, mRNA expression of IL-10, IFN-γ and TNF-α were measured by RT-PCR.We have revised the manuscript, according to the comments and suggestions of reviewers and editor, and responded, point by point to, the comments as listed below. Since the paper has been revised significantly throughout the text, we feel it is better not to highlight the amendments in the revised manuscript (正常情况最好表明修改处).The revised manuscript has been edited and proofread by a medical editing company in Hong Kong.I would like to re-submit this revised manuscript to Life Sciences, and hope it is acceptable for publication in the journal.Looking forward to hearing from you soon.With kindest regards,Yours SincerelyXxxx Xxxx (通讯作者名)Replies to Reviewers and EditorFirst of all, we thank both reviewers and editor for their positive and constructive comments and suggestions.Replies to Reviewer #1:Xxxxx (略)Replies to Reviewer #2:Xxxxx (略)Replies to the Editors note and suggestions:Title: Re-write the title to read more smoothly in contmeporary EnglishAnswer: I have rewrite the title to “The antivirus effects of Sophoridine against Coxsackievirus B3 and its pharmacokinetics in rats” to make it more clear and read more smoothly.Abstract: Re-write the abstract to read more smoothly.Answer: I have rewritten the abstract to make it more informative and read more smoothly.The authors should check to be sure that the terms blood samples, plasma and serum are always used appropriately throughout the abstract and text.Answer: I have paid attention to this issue, and they are now used appropriately throughout the abstract and text in the revised manuscript.Introduction:some sentences can be made less passive.Answer: I have revised the whole paper to make sentences less passive with the help of the editing company.The authors should check the entire manuscript for spelling errorsAnswer: This has been done by us as well as the editing company.The authors should read the guidelines to the authors and not include the first name of the authors being cited in the text. In the reference section the first name should be abbreviated as shown in the guideline to authors (thus the earlier text reference should be (Liu et al., 2003) and the remaining one should be (Chen et al., 2002)Answer: I have changed the style of references according to the journal.Rather than redrawing figure the authors may choose to ament the wording of the statistical analysis section to state that the result of tables aremeans +-SEM and for figures are +- SD.Answer: SD has been used throughout the text, and shown in the Figs. 3 and 4 in the revised manuscript.reviewer #1 comment number 8 and reviewer # 2 comment 3 might be satified by inclusion of a representative photo of cells and heart showing CPE. Remember: most readers of the journal have never seen what you are trying to describe.Answer: Thank you very much for the suggestion. I have added pictures of cardiac pathologic changes in the revised manuscript (Fig. 2). 论文题目:Clinical implications of XXXX (一种病理指标) in X cancer所投杂志:BMC Cancer.结果:这次大修后被接受发表(同时编辑在接受信中提出课题是否得到伦理委员会同意的问题。

相关文档
最新文档