19世纪的美国家庭生活

合集下载

从家屋社会到政治社会——评摩尔根《美洲土著的房屋和家庭生活》

从家屋社会到政治社会——评摩尔根《美洲土著的房屋和家庭生活》

从家屋社会到政治社会——评摩尔根《美洲土著的房屋和家庭生活》摩尔根的《美洲土著的房屋和家庭生活》是19世纪中叶美国人类学家和考古学家摩尔根对美洲土著社会的研究成果,通过对土著房屋和家庭生活的考察,摩尔根揭示了房屋和家庭在社会发展中的重要地位。

本文将结合摩尔根的研究成果,从家屋社会到政治社会的角度来评述并展开讨论。

首先,摩尔根通过对美洲土著的房屋和家庭生活的考察,提出了“家屋社会”的概念。

他发现,土著社会的房屋和家庭是社会关系的核心和基础,具有很强的经济、社会和政治意义。

土著族群通过家庭和房屋的组织和建设,形成了清晰的社会等级和分工,家族间的关系也非常密切。

摩尔根认为,家庭和房屋是土著社会内外联系的纽带,对土著社会的稳定和发展起到了重要的作用。

其次,摩尔根将研究范围扩展到政治生活领域,提出了“政治家庭”的概念。

他认为,家庭的组织和房屋的建设不仅仅是满足物质层面的需求,更是体现了土著族群政治生活的特点和表现形式。

摩尔根注意到,土著社会的政治生活与家庭和房屋的组织紧密相关,政治权力和地位主要通过家庭的继承和传承来决定。

因此,家庭和房屋不仅仅是居住的场所,更是政治权力的象征。

摩尔根的研究成果对后来的社会学和人类学研究产生了深远的影响。

他的《美洲土著的房屋和家庭生活》为我们理解社会发展和政治生活提供了重要的思路和框架。

通过对家庭和房屋的研究,我们可以更好地把握社会结构和组织的原理,理解不同社会群体的相互关系和社会差异。

然而,摩尔根的研究也存在一些局限和问题。

首先,在研究对象的选择上,摩尔根主要关注的是美洲土著社会,这在一定程度上限制了他的研究视野和推广性。

其次,在理论框架的构建上,摩尔根主要采用了演化主义的思维方式,将社会发展看作是一个线性的过程,这种简化和概括的思维可能忽略了社会发展的多样性和复杂性。

综上所述,摩尔根的《美洲土著的房屋和家庭生活》通过对土著社会的研究,揭示了家屋社会和政治社会之间的联系和转变。

从女性主义文学批评角度看凯特·肖邦的《觉醒》

从女性主义文学批评角度看凯特·肖邦的《觉醒》

文学评论·外国文学从女性主义文学批评角度看凯特•肖邦的《觉醒》宋付霞 吉林大学公共外语教育学院摘 要:美国女作家凯特·肖邦的长篇小说《觉醒》是一部美国文学史上的经典之作,标志着妇女文学崭新时代的到来。

小说谈及了一位女性主体意识觉醒的心路历程,包括精神觉醒和性觉醒。

本文将从女性主义文学批评的视角出发,深入剖析女主人公艾德娜自我意识觉醒与困惑的过程,并结合对一些象征和意象的分析,揭示她渴望自由、追求独立人格的内在精神。

关键词:凯特·肖邦;《觉醒》;女性主义文学批评作者简介:宋付霞(1990-),女,汉族,山东省临沂市人,吉林大学公共外语教育学院外国语言学及应用语言学专业硕士研究生。

[中图分类号]:I106 [文献标识码]:A[文章编号]:1002-2139(2017)-14-114-02凯特·肖邦(Kate Chopin, 1850-1904) 是美国19世纪著名的女性主义作家,被誉为“美国女性的先驱者”。

[1]1899年,她的长篇小说《觉醒》(The Awakening) 问世,在当时美国文化界掀起了一场轩然大波。

它描述了女性自我意识的觉醒,鼓励女性摆脱男权社会的桎梏去追求独立自由的生活。

因此,不仅被一些评论家和报刊杂志大肆抨击,认为它伤风败俗,而且图书馆不予收藏,视其为禁书。

直到20世纪50年代后,第二次女权运动的兴起,《觉醒》和它的作者凯特·肖邦才被重新发掘并得以重见天日。

法国评论家西里尔·阿纳翁(Cyrille Arnavon)于1953年率先将其译为法文,认为它运用写实主义手法坦诚严肃地描写了婚姻和性的问题,足以媲美《包法利夫人》。

[2]另外,挪威人佩尔·赛耶斯特德(Per Seyersted) 在1969年为凯特·肖邦作传,以崭新的角度诠释了书中“女性对自我的肯定与追求”。

[3]如今,它已经被公认为美国文学史上的一部经典之作,标志着女性主义文学新时期的开始。

第五章 美国人的家庭和家庭婚姻观

第五章 美国人的家庭和家庭婚姻观

(8)群居(communal living)
1960年代性解放运动之后,婚姻家庭神圣性被扫 荡一空,男女性爱的秘密被揭露,对一切都显得无 所谓的西方年轻一代,其中有相当一部分再也不愿 意像父辈那样自我约束、小心谨慎地过日子,他们 从家庭里走出来,自发地聚集在一起,组成了一个 又一个现代人群居部落。 这种单身群体生活试验在70年代形成高峰,90年 代开始进入低潮,但是依然没有完全消失。 群居村试验者自己在面对情感、性爱、生育、子女 抚养,以及父子关系确立等一系列复杂问题时也是 束手无策。
(2)对妇女的影响
美国当代妇女确实争得了更多的自由和更大 的权力,但却并未得到相应的幸福。 从经济上看,研究显示,离婚会导致家庭的 收入减少和贫困风险的加大。 单亲家庭尤其是单亲母亲家庭的贫困率非常 高。 家庭和婚姻模式的变动对成年人的情感和生 理的影响也越来越多得到研究成果的证实。
四、当代美国人家庭与婚姻模式演变原因及 其影响
1、影响美国人家庭与婚姻模式变化的因素: (1)价值观的变化。 (2)物质至上主义与竞争性环境的影响。 (3)婚姻和家庭中性别角色的转变。 (4)社会的认同与法律的更改。 (5)房地产业的发展。
(1)价值观的变化
个人主义和享乐主义开始盛行,这些对美国 人强调责任、利他和自我约束的传统价值观 造成极大的破坏,也对美国人的家庭与婚姻 模式产生了巨大冲击。 个人主义和享乐主义是核心家庭减少、离婚 率和非婚同居等现象上升的重要原因。
第五章 美国人的家庭和家庭婚姻观
一、美国家庭的历史演变 二、现代美国家庭婚姻及家庭婚姻观 三、现代美国家庭结构和婚姻模式的变化 四、当代美国人家庭与婚姻模式演变原因及其影 响
一、美国家庭的历史演变
1、工业化前的美国家庭 农业社会里,农场家庭既是生产单位、生育单位 (繁衍后代)、生活单位,又是教育单位、分配单 位。 家庭结构:扩大家庭(extended family):几 代同堂、家庭人口众多、生育率高。 家庭成员之间的关系以父权为中心。 婚姻基础:主要是物质上的依赖、父母的意志、双 方经济条件和宗教信仰。(男女之间感情较少)

小妇人的读书心得笔记

小妇人的读书心得笔记

小妇人的读书心得笔记1、小妇人的读书心得笔记《小妇人》是一本带有自传性质的家庭小说,它的是美国的路易莎·奥尔科特。

小说以19世纪末期的美国家庭生活为题材,生动的描述了马奇一家四姐妹从懵懂少女变成小妇人的成长经历。

《小妇人》中描写的故事围绕家庭生活展开,给读者讲述了生活中平凡的小事,我们能从其中找到最真实的自己。

文中,有一件事给了我很大的启发。

马奇先生从军队寄来了信,在艰辛的岁月里,几乎每封书信都会勾起人们的伤感。

而马奇这封信中却很少提到困苦、危险、想、思乡,这是一封充满了希望、喜悦的书信,很多内容是对军队生活的描述,只有信末,写信人才将自己对家中女儿们的爱与关怀寄托于文字之中。

从信中可以看出马奇先生是一个乐观向上、不怕困难的人,他很想念女儿和妻子,他爱女儿也爱家,只字未提自己的困苦,把关爱充分的表现出来,父亲的信给了孩子们很大的鼓励,让他们能成功的认识到自己的价值。

有一段时间,大姐玛格丽特去安妮·莫法特家中参加了两个礼拜的游乐,其中有舞会,回来后,她变成了爱慕虚荣的女孩。

文中有这么一段话“只要这种喜欢不变成一种癖好,引导你去做愚蠢或不害臊的事,那么这样的心态就十分正常,玛格丽特,你要学着去认识,去珍视那些值得拥有的赞美,更要在美貌之外,凭借娴熟质朴的德行去赢取赞美。

”引导我们不去追求那些华而不实的东西,去寻找心灵的真善美,女孩子喜欢精致漂亮的东西可以,但是不能一味的追求这种无用的东西,要做好本质的自己。

在文章最后,除了贝斯的去世,所有人都拥有了美满的家庭,过上了幸福的生活,这天伦之爱让我深受感动,她的脸庞上、声音里洋溢着慈母的关爱和谦逊。

“哦!我的孩子们,无论这一生有多长,但愿你们能永远的如此幸福快乐。

”小说的结局很美好。

一家十二个人其乐融融的在一起,永远快乐。

这四个女孩是世间所有少女的缩影,从他们身上,我们既能看到情窦初开的少女对美好爱情的执着追求,也能感受到纤弱少女为理想而努力奋斗的的坚韧。

当代美国人家庭与婚姻模式的演变及其影响

当代美国人家庭与婚姻模式的演变及其影响

当代美国人家庭与婚姻模式的演变及其影响一、美国人家庭模式的演变一般认为,20世纪60年代以前,美国人的家庭经历了从大家庭(extented family,指至少由三代人组成的家庭)到核心家庭(nuclear family,指由已婚夫妇和未满18岁的孩子所组成的家庭)的演变。

①大家庭是北美殖民地开发初期到19世纪工业化这段时间的主要家庭模式。

19世纪中、后期,随着工业化、城市化的迅速发展和人口流动的加速,核心家庭如雨后春笋般地出现,逐渐取代了大家庭的主导地位。

进入20世纪60年代后,美国人的价值观偏向于个人主义和性开放,加上反传统、反权威、反理性风潮抬头和女权运动的兴起,美国核心家庭受到巨大的冲击,家庭模式趋向于多元化,具体表现在以下方面:――双亲家庭(即核心家庭)比例下降。

以前作为主体的双亲家庭在所有家庭类型中的比例在近几十年里急剧下降。

具体地说,亚太裔和白人中的双亲家庭所占比例较高,西班牙语裔(以下简称“西裔”)、印第安人与阿拉斯加土著(归为一种类型,后同)中的双亲家庭所占比例次之,黑人中的双亲家庭所占比例则最低。

――单亲家庭数量增多。

单亲家庭尤其是女性单亲家庭数量明显增长。

在各族裔中,黑人单亲家庭比例最高,其女性单亲家庭比例高达45.1%;印第安人与阿拉斯加土著、西裔次之;亚太裔和白人单亲家庭比例最低。

――单身户增多。

自20世纪60年代以来,美国单身户数量不断增加,40余年间增长了3.27倍。

1960年,美国的单身户为689.6万户,占总户数的13.1%;到1980年和2003年,美国的单身户分别增长到1829.6万户和2943.1,万户,分别占总户数的15.4%和17.7%。

其他家庭模式还包括非婚同居家庭、同性恋家庭等,详见本文第二部分。

另外,当代美国人的家庭户和非家庭户的规模也在日益缩小。

1970-2000年间,5人及5人以上的住户所占比例从20.9%减少到10.4%,而1人和2人的住户所占比例却分别从17.1%和28.9%增长到25.5%和33.1%。

19世纪美国黑奴文化的产生与发展

19世纪美国黑奴文化的产生与发展

19世纪美国黑奴文化的产生与发展19世纪中叶,美国南方12个州的奴隶数量高达400万,占到全国人口的四分之一。

这些黑人奴隶遭受着残酷的奴役和压迫,生活在黑暗的角落里。

但他们在劳动、生活、信仰等方面形成了自己的文化,正是这种文化促进了黑人奴隶从压迫中走向解放和进步。

一、生活中的黑奴文化生活中的黑奴文化来源于黑奴对生活的感受,表现出的天真、朴实、虔诚以及情感的丰富。

在奴隶社会中,黑人奴隶的生活常常被其奴主控制和约束。

为了维护个性和自尊心,黑人奴隶们把心灵倾注在生活中细节的创造和经验上,形成了自己独特的文化。

1.音乐文化音乐是19世纪黑人奴隶文化的最重要的表现。

在奴隶制度下,有许多禁令,奴主们禁止黑人奴隶们学习阅读、写作以及弹奏乐器。

但这并没有扼灭奴隶们对音乐艺术的热爱和创造欲望。

奴隶们用手拍腿,用嘴唱歌,用尽力气扮演各种乐器,将他们的情感表达出来。

类似拍板舞、摇摆舞、大步舞等传统舞蹈,都是黑人奴隶自己创造并流传下来的。

因此,音乐艺术是奴隶文化的重要标志和灵魂。

2.口头文化口头传统的文化是指通过口非书面传承的文化。

在奴隶主高压下,黑人奴隶只能通过口头流传来交流娱乐、获取信息。

在这种情况下,黑人奴隶口头文化的传承变得格外重要。

奴隶们以叙故事、谚语、俚语、祷文等形式,记录并传承了自己对生活的理解,表达了对人生价值和意义的简洁而深刻的理解。

这一口头文化的传承延续到了现代,并成为了美国黑人文化的重要组成部分。

二、基督教信仰黑人奴隶的历史是一个长久痛苦的抗争史,然而,正是基督教的信仰,给黑人奴隶们带来了安慰,照亮了他们的未来。

在奴隶主和州政府的压迫下,黑人奴隶们找到了自己的信仰,形成了独特的宗教文化。

奴隶们在随地举行的唱诗班、祷告会中寻求心灵抚慰,将基督教的慈爱之神作为自己信仰的本源。

越来越多的黑人奴隶开始加入教会,并找到了对抗奴隶制和压迫的方式。

三、黑人奴隶文化的历史地位在19世纪,黑人奴隶文化的地位是非常独特的。

19世纪下半叶美国南部黑人妇女的生活及其社会地位

19世纪下半叶美国南部黑人妇女的生活及其社会地位

19世纪下半叶美国南部黑人妇女的生活及其社会地位【摘要】19世纪下半叶,美国南部黑人妇女的生活及社会地位经历了极大的变化。

在奴隶制度下,她们承受着残酷的剥削和压迫,无法享有人身自由和权利,劳动生活极为艰辛。

但随着奴隶制度的废除,黑人妇女获得了自由,开始融入社会,努力改善家庭生活和劳动条件。

教育和文化的发展也为她们提供了更多机会。

社会地位的变迁使得黑人妇女逐渐获得了更多的尊重和平等待遇。

在当时的社会中,她们扮演着重要的角色,为社会的进步和发展作出了巨大贡献。

这段历史给我们带来了启示,让我们更加珍惜现在的平等和自由,以及尊重和支持所有人的努力和付出。

【关键词】19世纪、美国南部、黑人妇女、奴隶制度、解放、劳动、家庭生活、教育、文化、社会地位、变迁、重要性、启示。

1. 引言1.1 背景介绍19世纪下半叶美国南部黑人妇女的生活及其社会地位,是一个备受关注的议题。

在这个时期,美国南部地区的种植园经济主要依靠奴隶劳动,黑人妇女作为奴隶的一部分,承担了重要的劳动任务。

她们不仅要从事繁重的农田劳动,还要负责家庭的日常事务,如烹饪、清洁和照顾子女。

随着南方奴隶制度的废除,黑人妇女的生活状况有了一定程度的改善,但仍然面临着许多挑战。

她们在劳动方面仍然处于劣势地位,往往只能从事粗重的体力劳动,收入微薄,生活贫困。

受到种族歧视的影响,黑人妇女往往无法获得良好的教育和文化资源,限制了她们的社会发展。

随着社会的变迁和种族关系的演变,黑人妇女的社会地位逐渐得到提升。

她们开始参与社会运动和政治活动,争取平等权利和地位。

在今日社会,我们可以从19世纪下半叶美国南部黑人妇女的生活经历中,看到她们在社会中的重要性,以及对我们的启示。

1.2 研究意义19世纪下半叶美国南部黑人妇女的生活及其社会地位是一个备受关注的话题。

研究这一主题的意义在于深入探讨黑人妇女所面临的困境和挑战,以及她们在社会中的地位和作用。

通过对黑人妇女生活的研究,我们可以更好地了解奴隶制度和种族隔离对她们的影响,揭示她们在家庭、劳动和教育领域的种种困境,以及她们如何通过抗争和努力来争取平等权利。

当代美国家庭的多元化趋势

当代美国家庭的多元化趋势

当代美国家庭的多元化趋势刘军怀*【内容提要】 美国进入后工业社会后,离婚、同居、未婚生育和同性恋人数剧增,结婚率和生育率大幅度下降。

随之出现的单亲家庭、继父母家庭、丁克家庭、异族通婚家庭、领养家庭、同性恋家庭等,使美国家庭模式呈现出多元化趋势。

 2001年9月24日,也就是9月的第四个星期一,是美国家庭史上一个具有历史意义的日子,美国总统布什郑重向全国人民宣布这一天为“家庭日”。

“家庭日”的设立也许是美国历史上家庭得到的最高级别的重视,而美国在新千年伊始就如此关注家庭,同20世纪末期美国家庭所经历的巨大变化和出现的严峻问题不无关系。

美国家庭的变迁家庭是社会的重要组成部分,是政治、经济和文化发展必不可少的一个环节,社会的发展变化必然会影响社会中的个人和家庭,并带动家庭的变迁。

自从第一批欧洲殖民者来到新大陆以来,美国的家庭结构就一直处于不断变化之中。

从殖民时代开始,在农业经济向工业经济转型之前,垦荒、放牧和家庭手工业是主要的生产活动。

由至少三代人组成的扩展家庭顺应了时代的要求,极大地满足了人们的各种需求,成为较长时期内美国主要的家庭模式。

然而,美国人并没有世世代代只生息在最初建立的家园里,西部丰富的资源不断吸引着大批人背井离乡去那里寻找新的机会。

久而久之,亲属关系被削弱,扩展家庭逐渐走向了碎裂。

开始于19世纪初的美国工业革命给美国经济注入了活力,同时也激起了新的更大规模的人口流动,传统的扩展家庭遭遇了前所未有的挑战。

伴随着工业化和城市化进程,美国社会进入了工业时代,从而动摇了扩展家庭在美国的主导地位,取而代之的核心家庭如雨后春笋般地出现。

扩展家庭向核心家庭的转变,使家庭生活“减少了独裁性而增加了民主性” ,“个人有了更多的自由和流动性” 。

于是,这种由一对夫妇和他们的子女两代人构成的核心家庭,在一段时期内被视为理想的美国家庭模式。

同上书,第395页。

戴维・波普诺:《社会学》,中国人民大学出版社1999年版,第635页。

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

Family Life, 19th-Century FamiliesOnly in the late 18th and early 19th centuries did ideas of affectionate marriages and loving, sentimental relations with children become dominant in American family life. These attitudes first took hold among the urban, educated wealthy and middle classes, and later spread to rural and poorer Americans. This change was due to the growth and increasing sophistication of the economy, which meant that economic issues became less pressing for families and production moved outside the home to specialized shops and factories. With more leisure time and greater physical comfort, people felt that happiness, rather than simple survival, was possible. English philosopher John Locke’s theory that human beings are born good, wi th their minds as blank slates, contrasted with traditional Christian beliefs that children were sinful by nature. If this blank-slate theory is correct, then goodness can be instilled in children by showering them with kindness and love and by shielding them from the bad things in this world.Additionally, the psychological theory of sensibility, another 18th-century idea, argued that positive feelings such as friendship, happiness, sympathy, and empathy should be cultivated for a civil life of reason. By the 19th century, romanticism and sentimentality put even more emphasis on emotional attachment and the cultivation of feeling. New ideas about human equality and liberty undermined older notions of hierarchy and order. Americans applied the political ideal of “Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness” espoused in the Declaration of Independence to family life. Husbands were to rule, but with affection and with their wives’ interests at heart. Wives obeyed, not out of force, but out of love. Parents sought the affection of their children, not their economic contributions. This was the new ideal, but old habits died slowly. Authority, inequality, and violence declined but never entirely disappeared.By the end of the 18th century and into the 19th century, marriage was undertaken for affection, not for economic reasons. Courtship became more elaborate and couples had more freedom. They attended dances, church socials, picnics, and concerts, and got to know one another well. After the wedding, couples went on honeymoons to have a romantic interlude before settling down to daily life. Raising children became the most important job a wife performed, and children were to be loved and sheltered. Physical punishment of children did not disappear, but it became more moderate and was combined with encouragement and rewards.Servants, apprentices, and others gradually dropped out of the definition of family. Servants no longer slept within the same house as the family, and apprentices rented rooms elsewhere. By the 19th century, the nuclear family, consisting of a father and mother and their dependent children, had become the model. The ideal, loving family could be found in magazines, poems, and religious tracts. Novels promoted romantic courtship and warned readers of insincere fortune hunters or seducers when seeking a husband or wife. Love and sincerity were advocated. Still, economic considerations did not entirely disappear. Wealthy women married wealthy men; poorer men married poorer women.The economic transformations of the Industrial Revolution in the 19th century brought about further changes in men’s and women's roles. Work was less likely to be done in the home, asfewer and fewer Americans lived on farms, and men left the home to work in offices and factories. Men assumed sole responsibility for the financial support of the family, becoming the breadwinners, a term coined in the early 19th century. Married women were not supposed to work for wages, and were considered too pure and innocent to be out in the working world. Women were supposed to devote themselves to domestic duties, and children were seen as young innocents who needed a mother's protection. Fathers had less and less to do with raising their children.Although the 19th-century ideal held that married women were not supposed to work, women did contribute to the family’s well-being. Wealthy women planned formal dinners, balls, and other social gatherings that were crucial to their husbands’ political and business success. Middle-class women sewed for what they called pin money, small amounts that frequently balanced the family budget. Married women in the middle and working classes took in boarders, sold hot lunches or pastries to neighbors, and saved money by doing their own baking, brewing, gardening, and other chores. It was also common in middle- and working-class families for sons to be sent to school, while their teenage sisters supported this schooling by working in a factory, teaching in elementary schools, or taking in sewing. Such work was considered acceptable as long as it was either done in the house or by unmarried young women.Many 19th-century American families did not fit into this nuclear family ideal, as it was expensive. High housing costs meant more people than just the nuclear family often lived under one roof. Extended families, including grandparents and other relatives, were most numerous in the mid-19th century. Immigrants clung to traditional extended-family forms, and poorer families often included grandparents, grandchildren, and sometimes aunts and uncles in order to maximize sources of income and save on rent. Men, women, and children worked long hours for low wages in dirty, cramped surroundings in the sweatshops of major cities. Although the ideal woman was supposed to be pure, innocent, and domestic, most poor women had to work. Taking in boarders, such as young men and women working in local factories, was another way that families earned money, although they gave up family privacy.Low wages during the early stages of the Industrial Revolution, in the first half of the 19th centurymeant that even young children sometimes had to work instead of being sheltered at home. In the poorest families, and particularly among newer immigrants, children younger than 12 often worked in factories or sold newspapers and trinkets on the streets. School was a luxury for some poor families because they needed the children’s income. Because of this, illiteracy rates actually rose during the early stages of the Industrial Revolution, even though public schools were more widely available.When husbands died or abandoned their families, women had no choice but to work, opening a shop if they had the capital or working in a sweatshop if they did not. Wages for women’s work were low, and prostitution, which offered more money, flourished in towns big and small. It was very difficult for a single mother or father to work and raise children, and children of single parents were often left at orphanages or simply abandoned to the streets. This was before Social Security, workers’ compensation, unemployment insurance, retirement funds, health insurance,and other private and public programs existed to aid families in times of crisis.American families made a variety of compromises in the face of economic hardship. In many southern and eastern European immigrant families, where it was more important for married women to stay at home, children were withdrawn from school and sent to work so their mother could run the household. Among African Americans living in the North, educating their children was the most important family goal, so wives joined their husbands in the workforce to enable children to stay in school. In some families, men had total control over finances; in others, wives handled the husband’s paycheck. In some families, resources went to the eldest son, so he could make money and later support his parents and siblings. In other families, all boys were treated equally or all boys and girls were equal. Some families valued close ties and insisted that older children settle near their parents, while others sent their sons out West, to the cities, or simply on the road in hopes of a better future.During the 19th century, the majority of Americans continued to live on farms where everyone in the family worked, even if it was in and around the house. Women on farms still worked as they had during colonial times, although by the 19th century, they were producing butter, eggs, cheese, and other goods to sell in the nearest city rather than to trade to neighbors. Sharecroppers and tenant farmers worked long and hard for only a fraction of their produce. School was out of the question for poor children in these circumstances. In the West, the difficulties of pioneering often meant that all members of the family worked. For most Americans, these alternate family arrangements were less than desirable. Most Americans sought the private, affectionate, comfortable family life with domestic wives, breadwinning husbands, and well-educated children.The dominance of the family ideal is only one aspect of life in the 19th century. The constant emphasis on family, domesticity, and children could be confining, so men and women developed interests outside of the home. The 19th century was a great age of organizations only for men, and fraternal groups thrived. Taverns and barrooms provided a space for men to make political deals, secure jobs, and be entertained. Men formed literary and scientific societies, labor organizations, reform groups, Bible study groups, and sports leagues.The 19th century was also a period of change for women. Married women in the 19th century, who had more education and fewer children than their predecessors, founded reform groups, debating societies, and literary associations. They involved themselves in school reform, health issues, women’s rights, temperance, child labor, and other public-policy issues. A few states in the West granted women full political rights. A women’s movement demanding equal rights, including the vote, gained strength after 1848. In the first half of the century, public education extended basic literacy to many poorer Americans, and in the second half of the century women's high schools and colleges were founded, along with coeducational colleges in the Mi dwest and West. Women’s occupational choices began to expand into the new fields of nursing, secretarial work, department store clerking, and more, although work was something a young woman did only until she married. Women who wanted a career had to forgo marriage.By the middle of the 19th century, many states had passed laws allowing women control over their possessions and wages. A few states allowed divorce on the grounds of physical abuse. New stereotypes appeared at the same time. In child custody cases, women, rather than fathers, were now given control of their children because women were considered natural child rearers. This practice would persist until the late 20th century, when shared custody arrangements became common.The rise of labor unions during the 19th century was instrumental in changing the nature of work and the shape of families in America. By the end of the century unions were demanding higher wages for men, so that they could provide the sole support for their families. The unions argued that women and children should refrain from paid labor rather than become unionized and press for higher wages. Behind these demands was the ideal of the breadwinner husband and the domestic wife. Unions also sought shorter workweeks to allow men to spend more time with their families.Family Life, African American Families under SlaveryAfrican family traditions, which varied according to national origin and religion, could not be replicated in the New World after Africans were forced into slavery. The slave trade was responsible for breaking up African families, and husbands, wives, and children were liable to be sold separately because U.S. law did not legally recognize their families.Enslaved Americans were denied a secure family life. Because enslaved men and women were property and could not legally marry, a permanent family could not be a guaranteed part of an African American slave’s life. They had no right to live or stay together, no right to their own children, and it was common for slave parents and children to live apart. Parents could not protect their children from the will of the master, who could separate them at any time. About one-third of slave families suffered permanent separation caused by the sale of family members to distant regions. This might occur to punish some infraction of plantation rules, to make money, to settle an estate after a death in the owner’s family, or to pay back a debt.For the majority of slaves, who lived on small plantations with only a few other enslaved people, marriage partners had to be found on other farms. Meetings between a husband and a wife could occur only with the permission of the husband’s owner. Children stayed with their mothers. Schooling was not an option for enslaved children, and in most states it was illegal to teach slaves to read and write. The most common reason for slaves to run away was to see family members, if only briefly, although slave women rarely took to the roads both because it was not safe for women to travel alone and because it was difficult to travel with young children. For enslaved people on large plantations, it might be possible to find a partner owned by the same master, although couples could be assigned to different parcels of land or different areas of the plantation, or even to the vacation or city homes of the owner. The Christmas holiday, the onebreak from work during the year for slaves, was anticipated with excitement because it allowed separated family members to meet and spend a week together. Despite the fragility of familial bonds under slavery, enslaved men and women considered themselves married, recognized their kin in the names they gave their children, looked after their relatives and friends in cases of separation, and protected each other as much as possible.Slavery and servitude was virtually abolished between the 1770s and the 1830s in the Northern states. This meant that African Americans could legally establish families in the North. Black churches married couples, baptized their children, and recorded the new surnames that former slaves chose for themselves. Benevolent societies looked out for their members' welfare. Slaves who escaped from slaveholding areas were sheltered and moved to safer locations. Mothers and fathers both worked so their children could become educated. Although African American families in the North faced discrimination and poverty, and worried about being kidnapped by slave catchers, they had hope of maintaining their family ties.。

相关文档
最新文档