供应商企业社会与环境责任行为规则(中英文)
供应商遵守RBA行为准则承诺书
供应商遵守社会责任RBA行为准则承诺书
本公司理解、同意、支持、配合ABC（惠州）有限公司的要求，承诺遵守国家劳动法规、遵守国际劳工标准、其它适用的国际公约、环境法律法规及RBA 所有标准，持续改善工作条件和员工福利，公司建立、实施和维持良好的社会责任管理体系,并将这一体系要求延伸到供货商和分包商。
公司声明：
●禁止使用童工、监狱劳工、债役工，保护未成年工。
●禁止使用或支持使用强迫劳动。
●改善工作和生活条件，保障员工的健康和安全。
●推动劳资合作，尊重员工的结社自由和集体谈判权。
●公平对待每一名员工，严禁歧视和性骚扰。
●尊重员工的基本人权，严禁虐待或侮辱员工。
●严格控制加班加点，合理安排工作和休息时间。
●支付合理的工资报酬，奖励员工的贡献。
●遵守环境的法律、法规和准则。
●节能减排，再相关法规允许的条件下，鼓励使用再生材料和或翻新部件。
●诚信经营、无不正当利益、信息公开、公平竞争、保护知识产权。
●定期向相关方通报公司推行RBA方面的业绩和不足之处。
●在本公司影响范围内积极推广社会责任标准和RBA标准。
●接受客户或第三方就RBA劳工、道德、环境、健康与安全、管理体系的审核，
并持续改进。
供货商签章：
供应商代表签名：
日期：。
Tchibo 社会责任行为守则
Tchibo 社会责任行为守则社会责任行为守则（（SCoC ）2006年7月人类共存的基本原则是尊重人权。
漠视人权的工作环境及条件是与此原则相悖的。
在我们的发展构思及持续计划中，我们一直为满足最基本的社会责任标准而努力。
我们了解作为一家全球性企业的责任，并希望在我们能力所及的范围内推进并保证人权的实现。
范围范围：：Tchibo 对与我们的商业伙伴（供应商、其分供应商及分包商）的基本要求是，不管是直接雇员或是合作伙伴的雇员，都应尊重及保护雇员最基本的权利。
合法合法性性：Tchibo 的商业伙伴应满足所有的当地法律及国际的劳工法规，并遵守此守则的各项条款。
此社会责任行为守则是基于国际劳工组织（ILO ）及美国人权法制定的。
此守则建立了保护及推进员工基本人权的最低标准。
如与当地及国际法律、特定的行业标准不一致，则以能最大化地保护员工权利的标准为准。
信息/沟通沟通：：Tchibo 的供应商，分供应商及分包商必须将此守则翻译成当地语言，并张贴在主要的生产车间，保证全体员工对守则的了解，并告知此守则及相关法律所规定的员工权利。
Tchibo 的供应商还必须与其分供应商及分包商就此守则进行沟通，保证其能满足此守则的各项要求。
作为Tchibo 的供应商、分供应商及分包商，必须指定一名高级管理人员来负责监督此守则的实施。
检查及监控:所有的商业伙伴都必须遵守此守则及当地或国际法规的要求。
其符合性会由Tchibo 的审核员及/或独立的外部审核机构进行确认。
无论任何时间，商业伙伴都必须允许审核员进入其厂区进行审核。
所有违反此守则或法律的行为均要进行改善，并在跟进审核中对改善情况进行确认。
如果未能在合理时期内提供合适的解决措施并得到Tchibo 的同意，其合作关系 将会被终止。
发展:Tchibo的供应商、分供应商及分包商都应在社会责任标准上做到持续改善。
如由Tchibo向商业伙伴提供支持与建议，会要求其在适当的时间内完成改善工作。
供应商社会环境责任之行为守则知会函中文版
富士康科技集團鴻海精密股份有限公司主旨: 供應商社會環境責任之行為守則知會函尊敬的供應商,富士康科技集團，鴻海精密工業股份有限公司在此鄭重宣布：我們將全力配合并積極參與電子工業行為守則。
為實現我們的承諾，我們已成立社會環境責任(SER)專案小組，旨在其組織內及富士康供應鏈內努力推行環境和社會關注事項，內容參見附件。
我們相信，我們的承諾及行動不僅會使我們在商業活動及日常生活中對社會責任和環境問題的基本原則有更深入的理解，同時還將構筑一個更清潔、更安全及更健康的工作環境，并因此提升及改善全球狀況和人類的生活質量。
只有通過我們大家的共同努力，我們才能在供應鏈中形成一個更好的合作伙伴關系。
正因為如此，我們希望我們的供應商能協同我們一起來營建一個流暢有效的行事方法，如供應商調查、報告方式、稽核工具、風險評估等，來提高供應商整體水平，從而幫助我們大家更流暢地實施要求并易于驗証績效。
我們堅信，我們的任何商業行為均符合所在國家和城市的法律法規。
同時我們也希望，我們所有的供應商能理解并在以下領域執行此行為規范：勞動、健康、安全、環境、管理體系和道德規范。
我們忠誠地期盼能與貴公司達成共識攜手并進。
順頌商祺!______________________________________(採購部門主管)富士康科技集團鴻海精密工業股份有限公司-----------------------------Acknowledgement Area-------------------------- 供應商名稱: ___________________________________________SER負責人: _________________________日期 : ________________________。
供应商行为准则
供应商行为准则本准则描述了社会责任和环境管理活动要求，适用于XX 公司的所有供应商。
供应商应积极采取行动，确保遵守这些要求，从而提升公司的整体形象，创造更大的效益。
我们鼓励供应商比这些行为准则的要求做得更好。
一、守法经营1.供应商应遵守国家及当地的法律法规及适用的要求，这些要求可能来自国际相关组织。
2.供应商应同样地对其供应链施加影响，履行应尽的社会责任。
3.在法律允许的情况下，供应商应保留遵守适用法律法规的记录。
二、童工供应商不得雇用未满16岁的人员，除非经国家或当地法律允许并符合国际劳动组织纲领。
供应商雇用已满16岁未满18岁的员工时，应确保其工作环境和工作时间符合国家或当地法律规定。
供应商应将每位员工的出生年月归档，或者使用合法方式确定每位雇员的年龄。
1.供应商应遵守有关最低工作年岁的法律法规。
禁止违反当地有关最低工作年岁以及强制受教育年岁的划定而雇用包括学徒或技校生在内的任何年岁的员工。
2.如果没有独立的文件，供应商须通过其它合法、牢靠的路子肯定员工的年岁。
三、薪酬供应商应根据适用法律的要求公正地支付工资并提供福利给所有员工，并不得有失公允。
1.供应商应确保所有支付的工时工资至少满足最低合法工资或相对较高的当地行业薪酬最低标准。
2.供应商应按法律要求支付加班费及奖金。
3.供应商应支付所有法律划定的福利，不得不法扣减。
4.供应商应以口头或书面形式与所有员工沟通其在适用法律及在该工作场合有权所获得的人为、奖励、福利和奖金。
四、公平、同等报酬供应商不得进行身体、性、心理、口头或其它方面的伤害行动。
此外，所有员工应受到尊重和尊严待遇。
供应商的雇佣条款，包括聘用、培训、工作条件、薪酬、福利、升职、纪律、合同终止或退休，应建立在个人的资质、表现、技能和经验之上。
1.供应商应保证工作场所不得出现基于种族、年龄、性别、阶层、政治立场、宗教、婚姻状况、性取向、残疾、怀孕，或其它与工作能力无关的歧视。
2.供应商应遵守所有关于纪律的适用法律。
供应商SER社会及环境责任行为守则
修订页目录(Table of Contents)(目录和修订记录) 主要内容1.0 Purpose 目的2.0 Scope 适用范围3.0 Codeofconductdefinition 行为守则定义4.0 Responsibility 责任5.0 Code of Conduet Instruction 行为守则内容5.1 Labor 劳工5.2 Health and Safety 健康与安全5.3 Environmental 环境5.4 Managent System 管理系统5.5 Ethics 伦理道德6.0 References 参考资料1.0目的Purpose：本规范定义了百腾供应商就社会及环境责任所须遵循的行为守则。
2.0适用范围Scope：适用于所有与百腾有交易的供应商（包括内外部供应商及相关的服务机构）。
3.0行为守则定义Codeofconductdefinition：3.1此守则概述了一个标准，以保证供应链中所有厂商的工作环境安全，员工得到尊重，以及制造过程中对环境负责。
3.2考虑到作为工业管理中不可或缺的一部分，本守则旨在规范产品生产过程中的设计，销售，制造或提供货物乃至服务的）EMS，EＭＳ公司，ＯＤＭ，包括合约员工。
本守则应当自愿地被各供应商接受并应用到其供应链和供应商中。
4.0责任Responsibility：4.1为了表示接收并遵循此守则，供应商应当宣布支持本守则，并通过相应的管理体系符合本守则和标准的要求；4.2接受本守则的基础是公司所有活动都必须遵守其所在国家的法律，法规，并希望要求其下级供应商了解及实施本守则；4.3本守则鼓励供应商不仅遵守法律，也导入国际公认的标准以提升自身的社会责任，当然各供应商可以依照实际状况增加一些特别的商业条款。
5.0行为守则内容Code of Conduet Instruction：本守则由5部分组成：1,2,3三部分分别概述了劳工,健康和安全,环境标准；4部分概述了管理体系的基本要求以符合本守则,5部分为有关商业道德的标准.5.1劳工Labor(1)供应商应当按照国际社会放可的方式维护员工的人权并遵重他们;(2)本守则参考了公认的UDHR,SAI和ETI标准,同时可视这此标准为一种有用的外来资讯源.相关劳工标准有:5.1.1自由择业Freely Chosen Employment(1) 禁用被强迫,抵押,契约约束或非自愿监狱劳工。
企业社会责任英文原文加翻译
企业社会责任英文原文加翻译一(英文原文Moral Discourse and Corporate Social Responsibility ReportingBy MaryAnn Reynolds, Kristi YuthasABSTRACTThis paper examines voluntary corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting as a form of moral discourse. It explores how alternative stakeholder perspectives lead to differing perceptions of the process and content of responsible reporting. We contrast traditional stakeholder theory, which views stakeholders as external parties having a social contract with corporations, with an emerging perspective, which views interaction among corporations and constituents as relational in nature. This moves the stakeholder from an external entity to one thatis integral to corporate activity. We explore how these alternative stakeholder perspectives give rise to different normative demands for stakeholder engagement, managerial processes, and communication. We discuss models of CSR reporting and accountability: EMAS, the ISO 14000 series, SA8000, AA1000, the Global Reporting Initiative, and the Copenhagen Charter. We explore how these models relate to the stakeholder philosophies and find that they are largely consistent with the traditional atomistic view but fall far short of the demands for moral engagement prescribed by a relational stakeholder perspective. Adopting a relational view requires stakeholder engagement not only inprescribing reporting requiremenu, but also in discourse relating to core aspects of the corporation such as mission,values,and management systems, Habermas' theory of communicative action provides guidelinesfor engaging stakeholders in this moral discourse.KEY WORDS: stakeholder engagement, stakeholder reporting, relational stakeholder perspective, corporate social responsibility,Theoryof Communicative Action,discourse ethicsIntroductionThroughout this paper, we use Habermas' theory of communicative action (1984, 1987, 1990) as a means through which to critique current approaches corporate the degree menu forsocial responsibility reporting in terms to which these reports embody require moral discourse. We provide a brief introduction to key elements of the theory and ground it in social theory. We then discuss the details as they apply to CSR reporting.Our analysis is conducted in two stages, relying on different portions ofHabermas' theory. In the first part, we examine the conditions that allow for basic communicative understanding. These conditions are the unspoken assumptions underlying communication. In normal communication, four basic universal assumptions are made: that the speaker is telling the truth, that he means what he says, and that what he says is appropriate in its context, and that it is understandable to the listener. In the first part of the paper, we show how models orframeworks for CSR reporting, taken together, address these assumptions and contribute to the effectiveness of CSR reports as a form of communication.In the second part of our analysis, we rely upon the ethical aspects of Habermas' theory as a means through which to provide a normative critique of the body of CSR reporting frameworks. The theory of communicative action suggests that social progress can be accomplished through rational discourse under specific conditions. The discourse must be inclusive, democratic, and free of power asymmetries. Apel (1980) has suggested that the ethical nature of an agreement derives from theprocess used to arrive at that agreement (rather than universal or externally-imposed ethical standards).We use Habermas' principles as a means to examine the extent to corporate communication is reflective of moral discourse.We find that while the frameworks generally promote stakeholder consultation,they fall short of providing other conditions needed for moral discourse. In particular, they fail to provide mechanisms that allow stakeholders with differing resources to participate democratically in discourse.The paper is organized as follows. First,we introduce social responsibility and corporate disclosure concepts related to CSRreporting.Next,we explore widely-used frameworks associated with corporate accountability in the CSR realm. Then, as noted above, we provide a 2-part analysis of how concepts from Habermas' theory of communicative action are currently realized in guidance provided by CSR reporting models. We close with concluding rem arks.Background: social responsibility and corporate disclosureCorporate social responsibility is addressed in current business, accounting and ethics literature. The issue was widely discussed in the seventies and early eighties and then dropped out of sight. The current re-energized focus includes social, environmental and ethical reporting by corporations. The notion of corporate social disclosure arises from a view of social theory which holds that the corporation owes a duty to the society; or has a social contract. One widely cited quotation comes from Shocker and Sethi (1974, p.67):"Any social institution一and business in no exception一operates in societyvia a social contract, expressed or implied, whereby its survival and growth are based on:1 .The delivery of some socially desirable ends to society ingeneral and,2. The distribution of economic, social or political benefits to groups from which it derives its power.In a dnamic society, neither the sources of institutional power nor the needs for its services are permanent. Therefore, an institution must constantly meet the twintests of legitimacy and relevance by demonstrafing that society requires its services and that the groups benefiting from its rewards have society's approval."Carroll and Bucholtz offer a four part definition of corporatesocial responsibility, "The social responsibility of business encompasses the economic, legal,ethical, and discretionary (philanthropic) expectadons that society has of organizations at a given point in time (2006, p. 35)." This definition reflects current thinking on corporate social responsibility and acknowledges the need to note shifts in social environment, these may be social, legal, or political.Corporate investors are questioning the adequacy of this communication approach and have called for increased reporting on issues of broad societal interest. Presently it is estimated that trillions of dollars are allocated to investments based on some social criteria (Sparkes and Cowton, 2004). Confulion may arise with the lack of comparable reporting.Implementable guidelines have consequently been developed by groups proposing models or frameworks for reporting (communicating) and auditing (verifying). Leading examples in order they were first issued are:EMAS (European, particularly German environmental management and audit)ISO 14001(Internationally recognized environmental managementcertification)SA 8000 (Social Accountability Internationallabor standard).AA1000 (International accountability assurante reporting standard).Copenhagen Charter(International standard involving stakeholdercommunications).GRI (Global Reporting Initiative) 2000 (International sustainability report).Models for corporate social responsibility reportingApproaches to social and natural environmental accountability have been developed for various purposes. Classifying them under the umbrella of CSR reporting we will discuss some widely used models and introduce a less well-known model, which may provide additional benefit.Eco-Management and Audit Scheme ( EMAS, 1995,2001)The European Commission set down the basic principles underlying the EMAS scheme in Council Regulation 1836/93 -EMAS of the European Commission. The purpose was improvement of environmental performance and was initially directed at manufacturing firms. This has since been extended to allow broad participation by any public or private entity wishing to participate. The regulation calls for an environmental statement from the entity and requires auditing.Further,there is a continual requirement to document ongoing continual improvement through the of implementation policies, programmes and management systems by a systematic, objective, and periodic evaluation of performance. There is also an obligation to inform the public of the results of the evaluation.The article on participation states that the scheme is open topublic or privateentities operating in the EU or the European Economic Area (EEA).The site may be registered if the site has an environmental policy, asite review, an environmental audit,objectives for continuousimprovement, a statement from each site, verification covering poficy, programmes, the management system, the review and audit procedure, and the statement provided. The validated environmental statement is then forwarded to the competent body in the Member State. The statement is also disseminated to the public after the registration of the site has been completed. The statement should be a concise, comprehensible description of activities at the site; with an assessment of significant relevant environmental issues, including: emissions, waste generation, consumption of raw materials, energy and water, noise and other significant aspects; a presentation of the company's environmental poficy, programme and management system at the site, the deadline for the next statement, and the name of the accredited environmental verifier. The EMAS 2001 was strengthened by requiring ISO 14001 as the environmental management system.Council on Economic Priorities Accreditation Agency Social Accountability Standard (SA8000, 1998)/renamed Social Accountability International (SAI)This standard has a change in focus and is concerned with fair labor practices world wide. It is divided into purpose and scope, normative elements and their interpretation, definitions,and social accountability requirements.The social accountability requirements include: child labor,forced labor, health and safety, freedom of associanon and right to collective bargaining, discrimination, disciplinary practices, working hours,compensation, management systems, management review,company representatives,planning and implementation, control of suppliers, addressing concerns and taking corrective action, outside communication, access for verification and anizationschoosing to adopt this standard are encouraged to require theirsuppliers to comply with its requirements also. This extends it widelyinto global society. Organizations can adopt these standards voluntarily and may disclose their tompliance with the provisions of the standard as part of other statements issued.Institute of Social and Ethical Accountability Standard AA1000 (1999) The first standard for building corporate accountability and trustwas issued in November 1999 by the Institute of Social and Ethical Accountability (ISEA).The ISEA states that the AA 1000standard“provides both a framework that organizationscan use to understand and improve their ethical performance and a means to judge the validity of ethical claims made." The AA1000 standardis described as:an Accountability standard, focused on quality of social and ethical accounting,reporting. securing the auditing and reporting”AA1000 comprises principles (the characteristics of anquality process) and a set of process standards. Thebprocess standards cover planning, accounting,auditing and reporting, embedding, and stakeholder engagement (AA1000, 1999, p. 1).The focus is on improving overall performance through measurement, quality management, recruitment and retention of employees, external stakeholder engagement, partnership, risk management, investors,governance, government and regulatory relations and training (AA1000, 1999, pp. 3-4).Auditing and quality assurance are required as a part of the system. The users of AA1000 are expected to include adopting organizations, stakeholders, service providers, and standards developers. Thus we see the inclusion of societal stakeholders as constituents.Concluding remarksIn this paper, we have adopted the relational view of stakeholders suggested by the theory of pragmatism.Under this perspective, CSR reporting becomes part of an ongoing discourse between a corporation and its stakeholders, rather than one-way communication about past performance. We use Habermas' theory of communicative action to provide guidance on how this discourse can be conducted in a manner that leadsto morally justifiable outcomes. We examine how Habermasian principles are approximated in existing reporting models such as EMAS,ISO, SA 8000, AA 1000, and The Copenhagen Charter.The widespread voluntary adoption of various reporting models allows decision makers interested in social responsibility to evaluate corporations using this information in the context of a perceived social contract. The use of frameworks that approximate principles of communicative action allows investigation not only of reported outcomes, but also of the processes involved.Based on our examination of corporate social responsibilityreporting models currently in use, we conclude that progress is being made in CSR reporting, and communication. Models exist that enablecorporations to report on their social, environmental, and ethical performance. The existing models discussed in this paper offer opportunity for some transparency and greatly enhance the ability for broader stakeholders to compare companies and their performance in these critical arenas. However,the models do not quite move to the level of ethical discourse through which social progress might be achieved. We believe that a different philosophical perspective, making stakeholders an intrinsic part of the discourse rather than peripheral to the process,and engaging them in discourse that is open, fair, and democratic would move society toward moral corporate discourse.Several of the models examined offer aspects that lead in this direction. Modifications of frameworks and frameworks in progress, such as the SA1000 Stakeholder Engagement Standard, provide evidence that corporations and their constituents recognize that corporate accountability is supported by effective stakeholder engagement. As reporting on CSR performance encourages performance improvements,we believe that the same holds for moral discourse.Ascompanies move toward greater transparency in the processes and outcomes of stakeholder discourse, we expect movement toward ideal speech and moral communicative outcomes.。
供应商社会环境责任之行为守则知会函
XX有限公司供应商社会环境责任之行为守则知会函尊敬的供应商：XX有限公司在此郑重宣布：我们将全力配合并积极参与电子工业行为守则。
为实现我们的承诺，公司每一位员工都从自我做起，做到诚信与重视社会责任。
同样我们也希望我们的供应商在这一点上能够与我们达成共识，共同努力推行环境和社会关注事项。
我们相信，我们的承诺及行动不仅会使我们在商业活动及日常生活中对社会责任和环境问题的基本原则有更深入的理解，同时还将构筑一个更清洁、更安全及更健康的工作环境，并因此提升及改善全球状况和人类的生活质量。
只有通过我们大家的共同努力，我们才能在供应链中形成一个更好的合作伙伴关系。
正因为如此，我们希望我们的供应商能协同我们一起来营建一个流畅有效的行事方法，如供应商调查、报告方式、稽核工具、风险评估等，来提高供应商整体水平，从而帮助我们大家更流畅地实施要求并易于验证绩效。
我们坚信，我们的任何商业行为均符合所在国家和城市的法律法规。
同时我们也希望，我们所有的供应商能理解并在以下领域执行此行为规范：劳动、健康、安全、环境、管理体系和道德规范。
我们忠诚地期盼能与贵公司达成共识携手并进。
顺颂商祺!XX有限公司供应商管理部：；日期：________________________；-----------------------------Acknowledgement Area-------------------------- 供应商名称: ___________________________________________；SER负责人: _________________________；日期 : ________________________；。
供应商社会责任合规声明
供应商社会责任合规声明背景介绍我们公司致力于推动可持续发展和社会责任，以确保我们的供应链遵守道德和法律的要求。
本文档旨在明确我们对供应商社会责任合规的要求和期望，以确保我们的供应商也积极履行社会义务。
合规要求1. 遵守法律法规我们要求我们的供应商严格遵守所有适用的国家和地区法律法规。
他们应该合法经营，并遵循环境、健康、安全和劳动法规。
供应商必须确保其产品和服务符合法律要求。
2. 人权保护我们坚决反对任何形式的人权侵犯和不公正待遇。
供应商必须尊重和保护其员工的基本人权，包括但不限于、工作自由选择、禁止强迫劳动和儿童劳动等。
3. 劳工权益我们要求供应商提供公正、合理的工作条件和待遇。
雇佣关系必须是自愿的，不得使用强迫劳动或剥削工人劳动的行为。
供应商应该支付合理工资，提供安全健康的工作环境，并保障员工的劳动权益。
4. 环境保护我们鼓励供应商采取环境友好型的做法，并致力于可持续发展。
供应商应该合规处理废弃物和有害物质，并采取减少能源消耗和减少碳排放等环保措施。
5. 公平竞争我们要求供应商遵守公平竞争的原则，不得从事任何形式的腐败行为、非法垄断或欺诈行为。
供应商必须遵守所有适用的反垄断和反腐败法律法规。
6. 透明度和合规报告供应商应该提供有关其社会责任合规行为的透明和准确的信息。
我们保留随时进行合规审核的权利。
我们期望供应商能够配合和提供必要的文件和证明材料。
结论我们公司致力于与社会负责任的供应商合作。
通过遵守社会责任合规要求，我们相信可以共同保护环境、促进劳工权益和推动可持续发展。
我们期待我们的供应商积极配合和履行其社会责任。
日期：[填写日期]。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
1.目的Purpose本文件定义系统电子供货商在社会与环境责任所应遵循的行为准则。
制订本“行为准则”是为了保护人权，促进公平的雇用条件、安全的工作条件，对环境问题进行负责任的管理，树立高道德标准。
This Code of Conduct has been developed for the purpose of protecting human rights, promoting fair employment conditions, safe working conditions, responsible management of environmental issues, and high ethical standards.2.范围Scope本《行为准则》应适用于所有供应系统电子产品或材料的供货商。
The Code of Conduct applies throughout the suppliers that doing business of products or material with SYSGRATION.3.权责Responsibility所有供货商必须遵循系统电子对于社会与环境责任要求的行为准则。
All suppliers must comply with high social and environmental requirements as set out in the SYSGRATION’s Code of Conduct, which also apply to our global operations.4.作业规范Operation Specification供货商社会与环境责任行为准则Supplier Social and Environmental Code of Conduct4.1劳工权益Labor Rights尊重每一位员工的尊严、信守营业据点之当地法令及联合国人权宣言等规范；订定以下守则作为劳工权益议题之具体指南。
Respect for the dignity of every employee; abide by local laws of business location and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. We set the following code as specific guidelines of labor rights issues.4.1.1自由选择职业。
不使用强迫、抵债、契约束缚或非自愿的监狱劳工。
Free choice of occupation. Forced bonded or indentured labor or involuntary prison labor isnot to be used4.1.2不用童工Child Labor Avoidance.不得雇用低于营运当地法令规定最低雇用年龄的童工参与任制造工序。
最低年龄通常指完成当地义务教育的年龄；但若营运当地有相关法令明确规范，则依照当地之规范。
Child labor is not to be used in any stage of manufacturing. The term “child” refers to anyperson employed under the minimum age for employment in the county, or under age forcompleting compulsory education.4.1.3工作时间Working Hours工作时数应在当地法令规定的限度之内。
所有加班都应属自愿，除非是紧急或异常情况，加班之时数也不应超过法令规定。
All overtime working hours shall be voluntary and compliant with national regulations andlaws. Work weeks are not to exceed the maximum set by law, including overtime, expect inemergency or unusual situations.4.1.4薪资与福利Wages and Benefits根据当地法令制订员工薪酬与福利政策，包括最低工资、加班费和法定福利等。
Compensation paid to employees shall comply with all applicable wage laws, including thoserelating to minimum wages, overtime hours and legally mandated benefits.4.1.5人道的待遇Humane Treatment不以残暴、侮辱、虐待等不人道方式对待员工，包括任何形式的性骚扰、体罚、精神或身体压迫、口头辱骂及恐吓。
There is to be no harsh and inhumane treatment, including any sexual harassment, corporalpunishment, mental or physical coercion, verbal abuse or threat of employees.4.1.6不歧视Non-Discrimination每位求职者或员工，都有平等的工作机会，不因人种、肤色、年龄、性别、性倾向、种族、残疾、怀孕、信仰、政治派别、社团成员或婚姻状况等，在雇用及实际工作（包括晋升、奖励和培训等）而被歧视对待。
All employees or potential employees have equal job opportunities. Companies shall notengage in discrimination based on race, color, age, gender, sexual orientation, ethnicity,disability, pregnancy, religion, political affiliation, union membership or marital status inhiring and employment practices such as promotions, rewards and access to training.4.1.7自由结社Freedom of Association所有员工能在营运当地法令允许的情况下，自由结社、选择加入或不加入工会或类似的外部组织；不必担心被报复、威胁或骚扰的情况下，公开地就工作条件与管理层沟通。
Employees have the rights to associate freely, join employees’ councils in accordance withlocal laws. Employees should be able to communicate openly with management regardingworking conditions without fear of reprisal intimidation or harassment.4.1.81234.2健康与安全(HEALTH and SAFETY)「员工才是公司最珍贵的资产」一直是系统电子营运上最重要的信念，供货商需提供员工安全的工作场所、避免伤亡，本部分参酌OHSAS 18001相关规范，订定以下守则作为具体指南。
SYSGRATION’s suppliers have to provide the safe workplace to avoid accident, because we think “Our employees are our most important asset”. It is always based on the fundamental principle.Recognized management systems such as OHSAS 18001 Guidelines on Health and Safety were used as reference in preparing the code. Therefore, we set the following code as specific guidelines.4.2.1作业安全与卫生Occupational Safety and Hygiene凡有危害员工之安全或健康的作业，对于机器设备部分，应提供符合法规的安全防护装置；对于作业内容部分，该作业主管应透过作业流程的设计以及不断的检讨改善，以让员工能避免在工作场所中遇到任何潜在的危险。
若无法透过流程改善有效控制危险发生，应提供从业人员有效的防护装备，并给予充分有效的训练、或者给予工作轮调、较长的休息时间，以避免对于员工身心造成不可逆的伤害。
Worker exposure to potential safety hazards are to be controlled through proper design,engineering and administrative controls, preventative maintenance and safe work procedures.Where hazards cannot be adequately controlled by these means, employees are to be providedwith appropriate personal protective equipment. Employees shall not be disciplined forraising safety concerns. On the other hand, we have to hold a worker training and drills andgive enough time rest to avoid accident happen.4.2.2环境安全与卫生Environmental Safety and Health提供员工一个既干净又安全的工作环境，对于饮用水、相关设施及作业上使用有害员工健康之物品等，都必须依照相关法令之规定，定期检查确保所有员工身体安全健康。