Nucleofection and adoptive transfer of primary mouse T lymphocytes

合集下载

大学精品课件:chapter 11(Heat Transfer.J.P.Holman )

大学精品课件:chapter 11(Heat Transfer.J.P.Holman )

Opposite direction
College of Nuclear Science and Technology
8
Chapter 11 Mass Transfer
Single direction diffusion
Definition As the water evaporates,it will diffuse upward through the air,while the air can not reach the water surface.
the Comparision of three transfer processes
Transfer process
Heat diffusion
Momentum diffusion
Mass diffusion
Dynamic
temperature difference
velocity difference
liquids and solids is much smaller than for
gases,primarily because of larger molecular force fields.
College of Nuclear Science and Technology
10
Chapter 11 Mass Transfer
But diffusion in solids is complex because of the strong influence of molecular force fields on the process.
The numerical value of the diffusion coefficient for

扭曲分子内电荷转移的英文全称

扭曲分子内电荷转移的英文全称

扭曲分子内电荷转移的英文全称The phenomenon of charge transfer within molecules can be quite complex, and when it occurs in a distorted manner, itis referred to as "Torsional Charge Transfer" in thescientific community.This process involves the movement of electrons from one part of a molecule to another, often resulting in a change in the molecule's overall charge distribution. It plays apivotal role in various chemical reactions and the behavior of materials.Torsional Charge Transfer is characterized by therotation of certain molecular bonds, which can lead to an altered electronic structure. This can be observed in many organic compounds and is studied extensively in the field of quantum chemistry.Understanding the mechanisms of Torsional Charge Transfer is crucial for the development of new materials with specific electronic properties, such as semiconductors and organic conductors.In molecular systems, the degree of distortion and the subsequent charge transfer can significantly influence the molecule's reactivity and stability. Researchers are continuously exploring the relationship between these factors to enhance our knowledge of molecular interactions.The study of Torsional Charge Transfer also has implications in the design of pharmaceuticals, where the electronic properties of drug molecules can affect their efficacy and safety.Moreover, this concept is not limited to organic chemistry; it is also applicable in the realm of inorganic compounds, where the transfer of charges can lead to unique physical and chemical properties.In summary, Torsional Charge Transfer is a fundamental concept in chemistry that helps us understand the behavior of molecules under various conditions and contributes to advancements in material science and pharmaceuticals.。

免疫学治疗 基因治疗

免疫学治疗 基因治疗

Germ Line Therapy 生殖细胞治疗
Somatic Gene Therapy 体细胞治疗
Introduction of a nucleic acid or target
gene (transgene) directly into cells is
referred to as transfection(转 染).
gamma c, to cells of the
immune system. This treatment appeared very
successful, restoring
immune function to most of the children who received it.
1999,9,17,18岁(8,16)美 国青年Jesse Gelsinger:鸟氨 酸氨甲酰基转移酶(OTC) (-)遗传性疾病,而在美国宾 夕法尼亚州大学人类基因治 疗中心接受基因治疗时不幸 死亡,成为被报道的首例死 于基因治疗中的患者。
(四)基因传递和基因导向技术
inherent advantages (优势): 1 integrating (整合) the therapeutic gene into the chromosomal DNA of a target cell,
2 deliver the therapeutic gene to large numbers of target cells.
乳腺癌
上颌窦癌 肾母细胞瘤
MDR的分子机制
肿瘤的MDR(multiple drug resistance)
自杀基因 (suicide gene) :
编码对肿瘤细胞有害的酶类(+相应的原药 )

英语演讲,转基因技术

英语演讲,转基因技术

21
The safety of transgenic products

Transgenic issues may lead to some irreversible damages. when you find a flaw, it's quite large. So we should pay close attention to transgenic security.
12
Applications
Increase production
13
Applications
Improve the nutritional content
14
Applications
As Pets
15
Although transgenic products and transgenic crops are not omnipotent.But to satisfy people's food supply, improve the quality of the food, we must rely on science and technology.
Agriculture hihnology
硕生化X班
QL
学号XXXXXX
1
Key words
transgenic [trænz‘dʒenik] 转基因的 food scarcity [‘skεəsəti] 食物短缺 trait [trei, treit] 性状,特征 fluorescence [fluə‘resns] 荧光 jellyfish [‘dʒelifiʃ] 水母 omnipotent [ɔm‘nipətənt] 无所不能的 conceivable [kən‘si:vəbl] 可能的;想得到的 hazard ['hæzəd] 危险

微生物学 双语教学Chapter 8 Microbial genetics

微生物学 双语教学Chapter 8 Microbial genetics
为大人带来形象的羊生肖故事来历为孩子带去快乐的生肖图画故事阅读
Microbial genetics
Cha and Mutants 8.2 Genetic Recombination 8.3 Genetic Transformation 8.4 Transduction 8.5 Conjugation 8.6 Plasmids 8.7 Transposons and Insertion Sequences 8.8 Comparative Prokaryotic Genomics 8.9 Genetics in Eukaryotic Microorganisms
Genetic Recombination
Genetic recombination involves the physical exchange of genetic material between genetic elements.
Homologous recombination results in genetic exchange between homologous DNA sequences from two different sources. This type of recombination is extremely important to all organisms. However, it is also very complex. Even in the bacterium Escherichia coli there are at least 25 genes involved.
WORKING GLOSSARY
Auxotroph an organism that has developed a nutritional requirement through mutation Cloning vector genetic element into which genes can be recombined and replicated Conjugation transfer of genes from one prokaryotic cell to another by a mechanism involving cell-to-cell contact and a plasmid Diploid a eukaryotic cell or organism containing two sets of chromosomes Electroporation the use of an electric pulse to induce cells to take up free DNA Gene disruption use of genetic techniques to inactivate a gene by inserting within it a DNA fragment containing an easily selectable marker. The inserted fragment is called a cassette, and the process of insertion, cassette mutagenesis

Photoelectrochemical DNA Biosensors

Photoelectrochemical DNA Biosensors
© XXXX American Chemical Society
A
/10.1021/cr500100j | Chem. Rev. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX
Chemical Reviews
Review
articles about the DNA biosensors that are based on different techniques such as electrochemical method have been published,8,9 whereas to date there have been no efforts addressing specifically the survey of this dynamically developing area of PEC DNA biosensors. Given the pace of advances in this area, the PEC routes for monitoring the DNA biorecognition events are the subject of the present review. In more detail, for the first time, this review surveys the methodology related to the PEC DNA biosensor construction, the interactions to be addressed, and the inventive detection principles. The recent progress, current directions, and future prospects in this area are also evaluated and discussed, with the aim to provide an accessible introduction to PEC DNA biosensors for any scientistchemical DNA Biosensors

细菌双组分调节系统 Two-Component Regulatory System

细菌双组分调节系统 Two-Component Regulatory System
四种常用抗生素对大肠杆菌sos反应的诱导意义?是细菌的一种普遍而又重要的信号传递系统也是一个基因表达的调节系统?理论意义就在于阐明了细菌对环境变化做出反应的基本过程为深化细菌行为生态生理生化的基本过程为深化细菌行为生态生理生化研究奠定了基础?二元信号传递的作用对象是那些赋予细菌具有特殊功能行为的基因
TCSTS)
Two-component regulatory systesms
1. 基本所有细菌都 有: 1% of genome 2. 有信号识别和传导 (激酶)两部分 3. RR通常为转录 调节蛋白
HPK是一种跨膜蛋白,几乎所有的HPK都含有2个 跨膜区(TM1、TM2)。HPK的N-端有一个能感受 外界信号的输入区,C-端有一个由约250个氨基酸 残基组成的转导区,该区具有自主磷酸激酶的功能, 磷酸化的位点一般是保守的His残基(H)。此外, 转导区中还含有5个由5~10个氨基酸残基组成的高 度保守区域。
本节内容总结
腺苷脱腺苷控制谷氨酰胺合成酶(GS)活性。氮信号被腺(尿)苷酰转移酶(ATase或 UTase)识别。低氮激活UTase,尿苷酰化的PII协助ATase对GS-AMP 去腺苷酰化。
细菌群体感应
抗生素诱细菌SOS反应
Kohanski MA, 201
细菌的SOS 反应
ቤተ መጻሕፍቲ ባይዱ
四种常用抗生素对大肠杆菌SOS反应的诱导
SOS反应诱导错误倾向的DNA复制,大大 提高碱基自发突变率,导致产生多重抗生素 耐药性; SOS反应通过诱导整合子重组,促进溶源 性噬菌体的裂解,加速了耐药基因在细菌间 的水平转移[18]。 另外,SOS反应诱导蛋白可以提高细菌对 抗生素的耐药性,比如链球菌 (Streptococcus pneumoniae)热休克蛋白 ClpL的诱导表达可以增强链球菌对青霉素的 耐药性。

荧光偏振转移实验技术

荧光偏振转移实验技术

荧光偏振转移实验技术英文回答:Fluorescence polarization transfer (FPT) is a technique used to study the transfer of polarization between two fluorophores. It is commonly used in the field of biophysics and biochemistry to investigate the dynamics and interactions of biomolecules.In FPT experiments, two fluorophores are used: a donor fluorophore and an acceptor fluorophore. The donor fluorophore is excited by a polarized light source, and its emission is detected. The acceptor fluorophore, which is in close proximity to the donor fluorophore, can receive the polarization from the donor fluorophore through various energy transfer mechanisms. The polarization of the acceptor fluorophore's emission is then measured.The transfer of polarization between the donor and acceptor fluorophores can provide valuable informationabout the spatial orientation and dynamics of the molecules involved. For example, if the donor and acceptor fluorophores are attached to different parts of a protein, the FPT experiment can reveal how the protein moves and changes conformation.To perform an FPT experiment, several steps are involved. First, the donor and acceptor fluorophores need to be selected based on their spectral properties and compatibility with the sample being studied. Then, the fluorophores are attached to the molecules of interest, either through chemical labeling or genetic engineering techniques.Next, the sample is excited with polarized light, and the emission from both the donor and acceptor fluorophores is measured using appropriate detection methods. The polarization of the emission is calculated using specialized software, which takes into account factors such as the orientation factor and the anisotropy of the fluorophores.FPT experiments can be carried out in various experimental setups, such as steady-state measurements or time-resolved measurements. Each setup has its advantages and limitations, depending on the specific research question and the characteristics of the sample.In conclusion, fluorescence polarization transfer is a powerful technique for studying the dynamics and interactions of biomolecules. It provides valuable information about the spatial orientation and conformational changes of molecules, and can be applied to a wide range of biological systems.中文回答:荧光偏振转移(Fluorescence polarization transfer,FPT)是一种用于研究两个荧光物质之间偏振转移的技术。

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

Nucleofection and adoptive transfer of primary mouse T lymphocytes Lequn Li , Transplantation Biology Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02129Vassiliki Boussiotis , Department of Medicine Division of Hematology and Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02129Related Journal & Article InformationJournal: Nature ImmunologyArticle Title: A pathway regulated by cell cycle inhibitor p27Kip1 and checkpoint inhibitor Smad3 is involved in the induction of T cell toleranceIntroductionTransfection of primary mouse T cells represents a major breakthrough in addressing research areas as T cell function, activation, and signaling in in vitro systems. In this study, we show transient transfection of genes into naïve mouse T cells using nucleofection, a modified electroporation technique. Using this approach, we knocked down endogenous Smad3 by efficient delivery of Smad3 shRNA into antigen-specific naïve T cells isolated from TCR-transgenic mice. The resultant transfected T cells could be safely adoptively transferred into syngeneic recipients and were fully capable of responding to TCR-mediated activation in vivo. This protocol offers the possibility for rapid functional in vivo studies of targeted genes in primary mouse T cells.Gene transfer technologies are a crucial tool to study gene regulation as well as for the analysis of the expression and function of proteins in T cells. Most commonly, standard cell lines are used for studies in these fields because gene transfer into these cells is easy. However, they show cancer-like growth pattern and often these cell lines have deviated from the cell type they originated from. Manipulation of gene expression in T cell lines and clones by the introduction, deletion, or mutation of specific genes, has enabled dissection of molecular requirements for T cell activation, signaling and function. However, these cultured cell lines do not represent the physiologic state of normal non-transformed T cells.In mice and rats, in vivo modulation of gene expression by transgenesis as well as knockout and knock-down technologies has been important for unraveling of functions of specific genes and pathological processes. However, these approaches are costly andtime-consuming and are particularly problematic for genes that affect T cell development [1-3] or in naïve T cell differentiation [4], as viable animals may not develop. To overcome these limitations, attempts have been made to engineer gene expression in mature, naïve T lymphocytes. Early, murine leukemia virus-based vectors have been used to transfect genes into in primary mouse T cells activated with mitogens, anti-CD3/anti-CD28 antibodies, or antigens [5-8], resulting in infection efficencies ranging from 10% to 20%, and 40% to 90%. There are significant limitations to this approach, as resting T cells are not permissive to infection by murine leukemia viruses. Although adenoviral vectors are widely used for gene delivery into adherent cell lines, primary cells of the lymphoid lineage are largely refractory to adenoviral transduction [9]. Furthermore, viral transduction approaches carry the considerable disadvantages of limited transgene size, time-consuming vector construction, and viral stock generation, in addition to the biohazard risk [10].Recently, non-retroviral-mediated gene delivery systems, such as electroporation have been widely adapted to transfection of primary human T lymphocytes. Electroporation has been shown to efficiently introduce DNA into activated, and even freshly isolated human T cells [11-13], with transfection efficiencies of 32% in primary human T cells [14]. In contrast, resting mouse T cells are resistant to DNA uptake via conventional electroporation [15,16]. Years ago, Amaxa set the first milestone in overcoming this obstacle with the Nucleofector Technology. It is a major improvement of the electroporation technology. Using this new technology, it has been shown that naïve CD4 positive T cells exhibited transfection efficiency of 6-12%, resting memory CD4 positive T cells exhibited substantially higher transfection efficiency (23% to 25%), and effector cells displayed the highest transfection efficiency (35%) [17]. Recently, the Goffinet et al study demonstrated high-level non viral gene delivery in all major classes of primary lymphocytes from rodents [10].In the present study, we combined the Amaxa nucleofection technology and adoptive transfer, to successfully knock-down endogenous Smad3 protein by using Smad3 shRNA. By using the resultant transfected cells we further demonstrated that Smad3 is involved in the regulation of antigen-specific T cell responses and in the induction of T cell tolerance by costimulation blockade.MaterialsReagentsMice BALB/c mice, 6 to 8 weeks old can be purchased from Charles River Laboratory and used as syngeneic recipients.DO11.10 TCR transgenic Rag2-deficient mice (DO11.10Rag2 minus/minus) can be purchased from Taconic.Maintain mice in a breeding colony and care for in accordance with NIH and institutional guidelines (MGH Subcommittee on Research Animal Care-OLAW Assurance # A3596-01). Smad3 shRNA : please see REAGENT SETUPCulture medium: RPMI 1640 medium, supplemented with 100U ml-1 penicillin–streptomycin and 10mM HEPES (GIBCO–BRL).Standard MACS® separation buffer: phosphate buffered saline (PBS) without calcium and magnesium (Mediatech, Inc.), supplemented with 0.5% of bovine serum albumin (BSA) (Sigma) and 2mM of EDTA (Boston BioProducts).Mouse CD4 T cell isolation kit (MACS)Mouse T cell Nucleofector Kit (Amaxa biosystems) which includes the following components: mouse T cell nucleofector solution (see REAGENT SETUP), mouse T cell nucleofector medium (see REAGENT SETUP), cuvettes, plastic pipettes.OVA323–339 peptideIncomplete Freund’s Adjuvant (IFA) (Sigma) : please see REAGENT SETUP.KJ1–26 mAb (Caltag)CD40L (Bioexpress Cell culture Services, West Lebanon, NH)CTLA4–Ig (Bioexpress Cell culture Services, West Lebanon, NH)Reagent SetupSmad3 shRNA:To generate plasmid expressing Smad3 shRNA, the following specific oligonucleotides: Upper:5’GATCCACCTGAGTGAAGATGGAGATTCAAGAGATCTCCATCTTCACTCAGGTTTTTTTACGCGTG 3’Lower: 3’AATTCACGCGTAAAAAAACCTGAGTGAAGATGGAGATCTCTT GAATCTCCATCTTCACTCAGGTG 5’should be cloned under the control of the U6 promoter into the pSIREN–DNR–DsRed expression vector (Clontech, BD). As control, use a vector expressing shRNA for luciferase. This approach provides the advantage of detecting transfecting cells by flow cytometry. Plasmid preparation can be done with EndoFree® plasmid maxi kit (Qiagen).Preparation of mouse T cell nucleofector solution:Add 0.5 ml Mouse T Cell Nucleofector Solution Supplement to 2.25 ml Mouse T Cell Nucleofector Solution. Note the date of mixture preparation on the vial. The nucleofector solution is stable for 3 mon ths at 4˚C.Preparation of mouse T cell nucleofector medium:To 100 ml Mouse T Cell Nucleofector Medium (provided with the kit) add 5ml FCS (Sigma), 1 ml 200mM glutamine, 1 ml of Medium Component A and B (provided with the kit). We recommend preparing fresh nucleofector medium for each experiment.Immunization solution:100 µg OVA323–339 peptide per mouse emulsified in IFAEquipmentFine point forceps (1)Small scissors40µm Nylon cell strainers (BD Falcon)MidiMACS TM separation unit with LS columnNucleofector I TM12–well platesInterchangeable glass syringesSterile three–way stopcockFlow cytometryTime TakenProcedurePreparation of single-cell suspension from DO11.10Rag2-/- mice1. Excise spleens from 8–12 week old mice using fine forceps and scissors. Place the spleen into a 40 µm pore size nylon cell strainer on the top of 50 ml Falcon tube. Use plunger from 3 ml syringe to crush the spleen and force as much as tissue as possible through the cell strainer.2. Loose cell strainer from top of Falcon tube to facilitate rinsing. Rinse plunger and cell strainer with 10 ml PBS–0.5% BSA into tube and transfer the whole cell suspension into a 15 ml Falcon tube. (The use of 15 ml Falcon tubes for centrifugation steps will lead to lower cell loss during removal of supernatant).3. Centrifuge the cell suspension at 300 x g for 10 min.4. Carefully remove supernatant, resuspend pellet in 10 ml PBA–BSA. Count the cells and centrifuge the cell suspension at 300 x g for 10 min.Purification of CD4 positive T cells using mouse CD4 T cell isolation kit.1. Pipette off supernatant completely and resuspend cell pellet in 40 µl of buffer per 107 totalcells.2. Add 10 µl of Biotin-antibody cocktail (provided by the kit) per 107 total cells.3. Mix well and incubate for 10 min at 4°–8°C.4. Add 30 µl of buffer and 20 µl of anti–Biotin MicroBeads (provided by the kit) per 107 total cells.5. Mix well and incubate for additional 15 min at 4°–8°C.6. Wash cells with buffer by adding 10 x labeling volume and centrifuge at 300 x g for 10 min.7. Pipette off supernatant completely.8. Resuspend cell pellet in 500 µl of buffer per 108 total cells.9. Place a LS column in the magnetic field of MidiMACS TM separator.10. Prepare the column by rinsing with 3 ml of buffer.11. Apply cell suspension onto the column. Allow the cells to pass through and collect effluent as fraction with unlabeled cells, representing the enriched CD4 positive T cell fraction. 12. Wash column with 3 × 3 ml of buffer and collect the entire effluent in the same tube as effluent of step 11.13. Count the cells and centrifuge the cells at 300 x g 10 min. The cells are now ready for nucleofection.Nucleofection protocol1. Pre-warm the supplemented Nucleofector solution to room temperature.2. Prepare 12–well plates by filling 1.5 ml fully supplemented Mouse T Cell Nucleofector Medium per well and pre–equilibrate plates in a humidified 37˚C–5% CO2 incubator for at least 30 min.3. Count the isolated CD4 positive T cells in PBA–0.5% BSA.4. Resuspend the cell pellet in room temperature supplemented Nucleofector Solution to a final concentration of 3 × 106 purified CD4 positive T cells per 100 µl. Add 3 µg Smad3 shRNA or Luciferase shRNA.5. Immediately transfer the sample into an Amaxa cuvette. This step should take no longer than 15 min otherwise, cell viability and gene transfer efficiency is significantly compromised. Avoid air bubbles while pipetting. Close cuvette with the blue cap.6. Select X–01 Nucleofector program. Insert cuvette into the cuvette holder and pre ss the “X” button to start the program.7. To avoid damage to the cells remove the samples from the cuvette immediately after the program has finished (display showing OK). Take the cuvette out of the holder. Add an aliquot (approximately 500 µl) of the pre–equilibrated, fully supplemented Mouse T Cell Nucleofector Medium to the cell suspension in the cuvette, then immediately remove the sample from the cuvette using a plastic pipette (provided with kit) and transfer to the prepared 12–well plate.8. Press the “X” button to reset the Nucleofector.9. Incubate cells in humidified 37˚C–5% CO2 incubator for 3 hours.Adoptive transfer of T cells into syngeneic recipients.1. The cells are collected after 3 hours of culture, counted and immediately transferred into syngeneic recipients (3 × 106 cells/mouse intravenously using 281/2 gauge needle). Immunizations1. For priming immunization, three hours after adoptive transfer of T cells, the mice are immunized subcutaneously with OVA323–339 peptide emulsified in IFA.2. For tolerizing immunization, three hours after adoptive transfer T cells, the mice are immunized subcutaneously with OVA323–339 peptide emulsified in IFA along with administration of anti-CD40L (250 µg/mouse) plus CTLA4-Ig fusion protein (250 µg/mouse). Analysis of transfection efficiency1. Five days after immunization, isolate lymphocytes from spleens and perform FACS analysis to determine transfection efficiency and in vivo expansion of TCR transgenic (KJ1-26+) T cells.TroubleshootingCritical StepsAnticipated ResultsHigh level transfection efficiency in primary mouse T cells is the ultimate aim of nculeofection technology. In our studies, the range of transfection efficiency in various experiments was 60% to 75% (Fig. 1). Applying Smad3 shRNA resulted in detectable molecular and functional outcomes. Expression of Smad3 shRNA reduced endogenous Smad3 levels about 70% to 90% after a single transfection (Fig. 2). This degree of down-modulation is within the range previously reported for other primary cell systems [18] and is sufficient to induce a clear functional phenotype in our model system. Our studies showed that elimination of endogenous Smad3 by Smad3 shRNA resulted in augmented responses after priming and resistance to tolerance induction after tolerizing immunization in vivo (Fig. 3).We have found that the following factors are critical in this protocol in order to achieve high transfection efficiency. First, intact cell viability prior to nucleotransfection is required. We strongly recommend avoiding an erythrocyte lysis step during cell preparation, as this will decrease cell viability. For enrichment or purification of the targeted population use negative selection methods (untouched methods) which reduce the risk of activating cells and increasing cell mortality. Second, the transfected cells should be cultured insupplement–enriched and conditioned culture medium for a period of time. Using other types of medium will most likely result in low cell viability and low level transfection efficiency. In our experiments, after 3 hours of culture, viability of the transfected cells was above 80%. Third, the optimized in vivo immunization protocol was required for high–level transfection and transgene expression. In our in vivo study model, the mice were immunized with antigen three to eight hours after intravenous injection of transfected TCR trensgenic cells and this approach resulted in high transfection efficiency of antigen-specific cells (above 60%). In contrast, when transfected cells were left in culture medium in vitro, transfection efficiency at 12 and 24 hours of culture was 10–15% consistent with previous reports in naïve T cells [17]. Collectively, nucleotransfection technology provides great promise as a tool for a rapid and simple pre-validation strategy for in vivo knockdown and transgene approaches. This technology requires various steps and investigators may wish to perform preliminary studies to optimize the conditions required for best transfection efficiency in their experimental systems.References1. Clements,J.L. et al. Requirement for the leukocyte-specific adapter protein SLP-76 for normal T cell development. Science281, 416-419 (1998).2. Molina,T.J. et al. Profound block in thymocyte development in mice lacking p56lck. Nature357, 161-164 (1992).3. Negishi,I. et al. Essential role for ZAP-70 in both positive and negative selection of thymocytes. Nature376, 435-438 (1995).4. Peng,S.L., Gerth,A.J., Ranger,A.M. & Glimcher,L.H. NFATc1 and NFATc2 together control both T and B cell activation and differentiation. Immunity14, 13-20 (2001).5. Burr,J.S. et al. Cutting edge: distinct motifs within CD28 regulate T cell proliferation and induction of Bcl-XL. J Immunol166, 5331-5335 (2001).6. Randolph,D.A., Huang,G., Carruthers,C.J., Bromley,L.E. & Chaplin,D.D. The role of CCR7 in TH1 and TH2 cell localization and delivery of B cell help in vivo. Science286, 2159-2162 (1999).7. Van Parijs,L. et al. Uncoupling IL-2 signals that regulate T cell proliferation, survival, and Fas-mediated activation-induced cell death. Immunity11, 281-288 (1999).8. Walker,J. & Green,J.M. Structural requirements for CD43 function. J Immunol162, 4109-4114 (1999).9. Volpers,C. & Kochanek,S. Adenoviral vectors for gene transfer and therapy. J Gene Med6 Suppl 1, S164-S171 (2004).10. Goffinet,C. & Keppler,O.T. Efficient nonviral gene delivery into primary lymphocytes from rats and mice. FASEB J20, 500-502 (2006).11. Hughes,C.C. & Pober,J.S. Transcriptional regulation of the interleukin-2 gene in normal human peripheral blood T cells. Convergence of costimulatory signals and differences from transformed T cells. J Biol Chem271, 5369-5377 (1996).12. Solomou,E.E., Juang,Y.T., Gourley,M.F., Kammer,G.M. & Tsokos,G.C. Molecular basis of deficient IL-2 production in T cells from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Immunol166, 4216-4222 (2001).13. Solomou,E.E., Juang,Y.T. & Tsokos,G.C. Protein kinase C-theta participates in the activation of cyclic AMP-responsive element-binding protein and its subsequent binding to the -180 site of the IL-2 promoter in normal human T lymphocytes. J Immunol166,5665-5674 (2001).14. Herndon,T.M. et al. Direct transfer of p65 into T lymphocytes from systemic lupus erythematosus patients leads to increased levels of interleukin-2 promoter activity. Clin Immunol103, 145-153 (2002).15. Bell,M.P., Huntoon,C.J., Graham,D. & McKean,D.J. The analysis of costimulatory receptor signaling cascades in normal T lymphocytes using in vitro gene transfer and reporter gene analysis. Nat Med7, 1155-1158 (2001).16. Cron,R.Q., Schubert,L.A., Lewis,D.B. & Hughes,C.C. Consistent transient transfection of DNA into non-transformed human and murine T-lymphocytes. J Immunol Methods205, 145-150 (1997).17. Lai,W., Chang,C.H. & Farber,D.L. Gene transfection and expression in resting and activated murine CD4 T cell subsets. J Immunol Methods282, 93-102 (2003).18. Phanish,M.K., Wahab,N.A., Colville-Nash,P., Hendry,B.M. & Dockrell,M.E. The differential role of Smad2 and Smad3 in the regulation of pro-fibrotic TGFbeta1 responses in human proximal-tubule epithelial cells. Biochem. J393, 601-607 (2006).AcknowledgementsKeywordslymphocytes, transfection, knockdownFigure 1Transfection efficiency.DO11.10 T cells were transfected with either control shRNA (control–KD) or Smad3 shRNA (Smad3–KD) and adoptively transferred into syngeneic wild–type recipients that received priming treatment. Lymphocytes were harvested on d5 after treatment, and transfection efficiency of DO11.10 cells (KJ1–26+) was examined by FACS analysis. Results represent six independent experiments. The same pattern of results was observed for all transfected populations and the range of transfection efficiency in various experiments was 60–75%.Figure 2Downregulation of Smad3 expression by shRNA.Cell lysates were prepared from DO11.10 T cells transfected with either control shRNA (control–KD) or Smad3 shRNA (Smad3–KD) and were analyzed by immunoblot for Smad3 expression, followed by immunoblot with β-actin–specific antibody to confirm that equal protein loading. Results represent four independent experiments.Figure 3Knockdown of Smad3 enhances T cell immune responses.Smad3, a transcription factor that mediates gene transcription by TGF–β superfamily members, is a well–known inhibitor of T cell activation. DO11.10 T cells were transfected with either control shRNA (control–KD) or Smad3 shRNA (Smad3–KD) using nucleofection and were adoptively transferred into syngeneic recipients that subsequently received priming or tolerizing treatment. Lymphocytes were harvested on d5 after treatment and cultured withantigen presenting cells loaded with antigen. Proliferation was measured at d3 of rechallenge culture and is expressed as stimulation index (S.I.).。

相关文档
最新文档