改革现行的高考制度 Reform Our Current College Entrance Examination System
高考改革的英语作文
First and foremost, the reform of the Gaokao has diversified the evaluation criteria for students. In the past, the exam heavily focused on rote memorization and test-taking skills, leaving little room for creativity and critical thinking. However, the new reform emphasizes multiple measures of student performance, including not only exam scores but also evaluations of students' comprehensive abilities, personal qualities, and potential. This change is significant because it allows students to demonstrate their abilities in a more holistic way, rather than being judged solely based on their exam scores.
2020届高考英语3500词汇读练测精品系列(基础训练)17
2020届高考英语3500词汇读练测精品系列(基础训练)17一、选词填空(从晨读材料中选用恰当的词并用其正确的形式填空)1.A child should be receiving __________ meat or eggs daily, preferably both.【答案】either【句意】孩子应该每日食用肉类或蛋类，最好两种都吃。
2.The wedding dress of the princess is noble and __________. Such is the beauty of this style that it will be popular with young women.【答案】elegant【句意】公主的婚纱很高贵很优雅这种风格是这么的美以至于它会很快受到年轻女士的欢迎。
3.If given __________ time, we would certainly have done the job much better.【答案】enough【句意】如果给我们足够的时间，我们本可以把工作做得更好。
4.There’re more than 100 __________ found in nature, most of which are metals.【答案】elements【句意】自然界中已经发现的100种元素中大部分是金属元素。
5.There was not an __________ seat anywhere in the concert hall at last Thursday’s event, although it was an extremely cold night.【答案】empty【句意】上周四的活动中，音乐大厅里一个空座都没有，尽管那是一个寒冷的夜晚。
6.Many people fixed their eyes on me when I made that silly mistake, which made me rather __________.【答案】embarrassed【句意】当我犯这种愚蠢的问题时，很多人眼睛盯着我，这让我相当尴尬。
英语高考改革英语作文
英语高考改革英语作文The reform of the English high school entrance examination has sparked widespread debate and controversy. Many people believe that the current examination system is too focused on rote memorization and fails to adequately assess students' actual language skills. Others argue that the proposed changes will lower the overall standard of English education and make it easier for students to pass without truly mastering the language.Personally, I think that the reform is a step in the right direction. The current examination system places too much emphasis on memorizing vocabulary and grammar rules, rather than on developing practical communication skills. This not only puts unnecessary pressure on students, but also fails to prepare them for real-world situations where they need to use English in a natural and spontaneous way.Furthermore, the proposed changes will encourage a more holistic approach to English education, focusing onlistening, speaking, reading, and writing skills. This will better reflect the true proficiency of students in the language, rather than just their ability to regurgitate information from textbooks.However, it is important to note that the success of the reform will ultimately depend on the implementation and execution of the new examination system. Teachers will need to be adequately trained to assess students' languageskills in a fair and accurate manner, and the examination itself will need to be carefully designed to effectively measure students' abilities in all areas of English proficiency.In conclusion, while the reform of the English high school entrance examination may not be without its challenges, I believe that it is a necessary and positive step towards improving the overall quality of English education in our schools. By placing a greater emphasis on practical communication skills, the new examination system has the potential to better prepare students for usingEnglish in the real world, ultimately leading to a more proficient and confident generation of English speakers.。
教育部关于进一步深化普通高等学校招生考试制度改革的意见-教学[1999]3号
![教育部关于进一步深化普通高等学校招生考试制度改革的意见-教学[1999]3号](https://img.taocdn.com/s3/m/9b24ef6b03768e9951e79b89680203d8ce2f6a10.png)
教育部关于进一步深化普通高等学校招生考试制度改革的意见正文：---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 关于进一步深化普通高等学校招生考试制度改革的意见（教学〔１９９９〕３号）各省、自治区、直辖市教育委员会，教育厅、高校招生委员会，广东省高教厅，部属各高等学校：普通高校招生考试制度自１９７７年恢复以来，在改革中发展并逐步走向完善。
二十余年来，在科目设置、考试内容、考试形式、录取办法、计算机管理等方面，经历了较大的变化。
高考制度的改革为高等学校科学、合理、有效地选拔人才，为引导中学全面贯彻教育方针，为考生提供相对公正、公平、公开的竞争方式创造了良好的条件，发挥了积极的作用。
但是，也还存在着一些亟待解决的矛盾。
面对二十一世纪科学技术突飞猛进的发展和知识经济初见端倪的新形势，面对在实施科教兴国战略中加大教育的贡献力度迫切要求，教育必须进一步深化改革，以改革促发展。
相应地，高校招生考试制度必须坚持改革，主动适应时代的特点及其对人才素质能力结构的要求。
着力引导人才全面素质的提高和创新人才的培养，使高考的作用进一步完善。
教育部学生司、基础教育司和考试中心在近一年联合调研的基础上提出了进一步深化普通高等学校招生考试制度改革的意见，已经教育部党组讨论通过并报经中央领导同志原则同意。
关于进一步深化普通高等学校招生考试制度改革的意见如下：一、高度改革的指导思想在改革中要始终坚持有助于高等学校选拔人才、有助于中学实施素质教育、有助于高等学校扩大办学自主权的三项原则，把高校招生考试工作提高到一个新水平。
二、深化高考改革的主要内容１、高考科目设置改革。
用三年左右的时间推行“３＋Ｘ”科目设置方案。
Gaokao Reform高考体制改革英文
• The decision has aroused a heated discussion among Shanghai educators and parents who doubted the reform would reduce the burden of learning English or if the substitute test could reflect a student’s English skills and help students learn English better. • “The reform shows China is learning from the West to give students more test-taking chances. But more chances might become more of a burden since Chinese students are likely to repeat the test until they get the highest score,” • As far as I see, the reform doesn’t mean English is no longer important for Chinese students after it will be excluded from the unified college entrance exam • In a way, English is even more important than before since the test would only serve as reference, while every college and university, even every major, can have different requirements of a student’s English skills under a diverse evaluation system
高考改革英语作文双语
高考改革英语作文双语The recent reforms in the National College Entrance Examination, commonly known as the Gaokao, have been a topicof intense debate among educators and students alike. One of the most significant changes has been the shift in the approach to English language testing.The traditional Gaokao English exam has been criticized forits focus on rote memorization and grammar rules, rather than on practical language skills. In response to these criticisms, the reform has introduced a more communicative andinteractive approach to English language assessment.The new format includes a greater emphasis on listening and speaking skills, which are essential for effective communication in today's globalized world. Additionally, the written section has been restructured to encourage more creative and analytical thinking, rather than just the regurgitation of memorized content.Moreover, the integration of technology in the examination process is another innovative aspect of the reform. Online platforms and digital tools are being used to facilitate more engaging and dynamic learning experiences.However, these changes have not been without their challenges. Some educators argue that the new format may not be suitable for all students and could lead to a disparity in performance.Others express concerns about the feasibility of implementing such reforms on a large scale.Despite these concerns, the overall sentiment is that the reform is a step in the right direction. It aims to better prepare students for the demands of the modern world and to cultivate a more well-rounded understanding of the English language.In conclusion, the reform of English in the Gaokao is a reflection of the evolving educational landscape. It seeks to move away from a rigid, exam-focused approach to a more holistic and practical method of language learning.双语作文近年来，全国高考改革一直是教育界激烈讨论的话题。
高考改革 英语作文
高考改革英语作文The reform of the college entrance examination, also known as the Gaokao, has been a hot topic in China in recent years. People have different opinions on this issue. Some believe that the reform will help reduce students' pressure and give them more opportunities to develop their talents. However, others worry that the reform may lower the academic standards and make it easier for students to get into prestigious universities.Personally, I think the reform of the Gaokao is a positive step. It will not only reduce the heavy burden on students, but also encourage them to explore theirinterests and potentials. With the new policy, studentswill have more choices in terms of subjects and majors, which will benefit their personal development in the long run.In addition, the reform will also promote fairness and equity in the education system. By diversifying theevaluation criteria and offering more options for students, the reform will help level the playing field for all students, regardless of their backgrounds or circumstances. This will create a more inclusive and just educational environment for everyone.Moreover, the reform will also encourage innovation and creativity in education. With the emphasis on comprehensive abilities and qualities, students will be encouraged to think critically, solve problems independently, and communicate effectively. This will not only benefit their academic performance, but also prepare them for the challenges of the real world.Overall, the reform of the Gaokao is a significant and positive change for the education system in China. It will not only reduce students' pressure, but also promote fairness, equity, and innovation in education. I believe that the reform will bring about positive outcomes for both students and the society as a whole.。
高考改革政策英语作文
高考改革政策英语作文高考改革政策英语作文下面是整理的关于高考英语改革的英语作文，以供大家学习参考。
关于高考英语改革的英语作文1：从年起，山东将在高考中取消英语听力测试。
消息一出，争议声四起。
请根据以下提示，写一篇120-150词的短文，并谈谈你自己的看法。
1、赞成者认为，此举将减轻考生负担、避免高考群体性事件、照顾城乡差距。
2、反对者认为，这个决策将直接影响到我国中小学英语教学，或导致“聋子英语”“哑巴英语”严重回潮。
3、减负并不是取消，而是如何进行高考英语改革，比如，针对英语的特点，高考英语或一年考多次，实现更大公平，为学生提供更多出彩的机会。
参考词汇：高考改革 College Entrance Examination Reform 取消 cancel 缩小城乡差距reduce the city and countryside disparity 引起 trigger 【参考范文】It is reported that the listening test will have been canceled in the English College Entrance Examination of Shandong province since . The news triggers a heated discussion among the people who are concerned about the most important examination. Some people hold that the burden of the students will be reduced without listening. Also, it tends to avoid suchpublic affairs as happened among the examinees and help to reduce the city and countryside disparity. There are other people, however, who are against this decision on this reform. They argue that this policy may influence negatively the English teaching method of senor or junior middle schools and even primary schools all over the country, for it is most likely to result in rebirth of “Deaf English” or “Dumb English”.In my opinion, college entrance examinationis supposed to examine all aspects of English learning including listening,speaking, reading and writing. It is hardly possible for an examination without listing to assess students overall language ability. As to reducing studentsburden, what matters is how to reform the way to test students ability in College Entrance Examination instead of simply canceling the listening section. For example,a student can have several chances to do listening test for College Entrance Examination.关于高考英语改革的英语作文2最近教育部发出高考改革信息，英语将不再成为高考时统一考试的科目，考生将参加社会组织的英语水平考试，一年可以多考，而且成绩可能从原来的150分调低为120分或100分。
高考英语改革 英语作文
高考英语改革英语作文The reform of the English college entrance examination has sparked heated discussions among students, parents, and educators. Many people believe that the current exam system places too much emphasis on memorization and test-taking skills, rather than on practical language proficiency. They argue that the reform will help students develop a deeper understanding of the language and improve their communication skills.Some students are concerned that the new exam format may be more challenging, as it will require them to think critically and express their ideas more fluently. However, others see it as an opportunity to break away from the traditional rote learning and embrace a more interactive and engaging approach to language learning.Parents, on the other hand, worry about the potential impact of the reform on their children's academic performance and future prospects. They fear that thetransition to a new exam system may create additional stress and anxiety for students, especially those who are already struggling with the existing curriculum.Educators are divided in their opinions about the reform. Some believe that it will encourage more creative and independent thinking, while others are concerned that the focus on practical language skills may undermine the importance of literary and cultural knowledge in English education.Overall, the reform of the English college entrance examination is a complex and contentious issue that requires careful consideration and thoughtful discussion. It has the potential to bring about positive changes in the way English is taught and learned in China, but it also poses challenges and uncertainties for students, parents, and educators alike. Only time will tell whether the reform will succeed in achieving its goals and improving the quality of English education in China.。
高考改革的英文作文
高考改革的英文作文The reform of the college entrance examination in China has been a hot topic in recent years. Many people have different opinions on this issue. Some people think that the reform is necessary because the current examination system puts too much pressure on students, while others believe that the reform may lead to unfairness and inequality in the admission process.The college entrance examination, also known as Gaokao, is a crucial event for millions of Chinese students. The high-stakes nature of the exam puts immense pressure on students, often leading to mental health issues and a narrow focus on exam-oriented learning. Therefore, it is important to consider the mental well-being of students when discussing the reform of the examination system.On the other hand, the reform of the college entrance examination should also take into account the issue of fairness and equality. Some people argue that the currentsystem, which heavily relies on a single exam, may not accurately reflect the true abilities and potential of students. However, any reform must ensure that the admission process remains fair and transparent for all students, regardless of their background or socioeconomic status.Moreover, the reform of the college entrance examination should also consider the need for a more holistic approach to evaluating students' abilities and potential. Instead of solely relying on exam scores, the new system could take into account students' extracurricular activities, personal achievements, and unique talents, in order to provide a more comprehensive assessment of their abilities.In conclusion, the reform of the college entrance examination in China is a complex and multifaceted issue. While it is important to address the pressure and mental health issues caused by the current exam-oriented system, any reform must also ensure fairness, equality, and a more holistic approach to evaluating students' abilities. It iscrucial to strike a balance between reducing the pressure on students and maintaining a fair and transparent admission process.。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
改革现行的高考制度 Reform Our Current College Entrance
Examination System
Directions:
A. Title: How To Improve Or Reform Our Current College Entrance Examination System.
B. Time limit: 40 minutes
C. Word limit: about 200 words
D. Your essay should be written clearly on ANSWER SHEET II.
E. Your essay should be based on the information given below.
目前我国高考竞争愈演愈烈。
每年考生人数近300万，而录取率在40%以下，多数考生肯定要落选。
这给考生、考生的家庭和学校，乃至整个社会，都造成了很大的压力，引发了一些社会问题。
此外，不同类型或特点的考生用同一模式和难度的试卷，有欠公允；三天的考试成绩便决定一个人的未来命运，亦不够合理。
如何解决这些问题，改革现行的高考制度？我的意见是…。
Statistics show that no more than 40% of people who take the college entrance exams pass. Because a college education is regarded as the key to a successful career, this puts enormous pressure on the applicants. It also causes social problems, as those who fail consider that they have disgraced their families.
统计数据表明,不超过40%的人通过参加高考。
因为大学教育被认为是事业成功
的关键,这使得申请人有着巨大的压力。
它也会导致社会问题,因为那些没考上的人会觉得自己让家人蒙羞。
It seems to me that the exams are unfair, for three reasons: First, applicants with different abilities are faced with the same type of exam paper, Second, the results of a mere three days of examination affect the applicant's whole future; and third, applicants who can afford private tutors usually score higher marks than those who are poorer, but perhaps more intelligent.
在我看来,考试是不公平的,原因有三:第一,具有不同能力的申请人却做着同样
的试卷,第二,短短三天的考试结果却影响申请人的整个未来;第三,可以负担得
起私人家教的申请人通常分数会比那些贫穷的人更高,但也有可能是他们更聪明。
To improve the system of college entrance exams, I suggest the following steps: the exam papers should be graded to take into account the different levels of ability and the different backgrounds of the applicants; in addition to the actual exam, a complete assessment of the applicant's educational achievements should be made; and tutoring in examination techniques should be made available to all.
为了提高大学入学考试制度,我建议以下步骤:制定考试卷子应该考虑到不同能力和不同背景的申请者；此外，除了考试本身，应该制定完整的申请人教育成果评估;有助于考试的技巧应传授给所有人。