剑桥雅思12Test8雅思写作Task2真题+参考范文
剑桥雅思12Test8雅思写作Task2真题+参考范文
推荐：剑桥雅思12Tes8雅思写作Task1真题+参考范文
题目：Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters (such as food, clothes and entertainment) is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. Other people believe that it is important for children to make decisions about matters that affect them.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
题目分析，包括写作中需要讨论的观点以及考生可能对题目产生的错误理解。
? ? 要点
1.考生需要分析孩子在生活中对自己的小事做决定的好处和坏处;
2.考生需要分析这种教育方式与一个人人只考虑自己意愿的社会有何关联。
? ? 错误理解
1.考生可能会在举例子的时候误把生活中的小事写成生活中的大事;
2.考生可能只讨论让孩子自己做决定的坏处，而无法说明题干中的“为什么会导致一个人人只考虑自己的社会”。
参考范文
A glimpse into the future of a child and a society is available in daily life. Some children are encouraged to make their own decisions about daily matters affecting them, but others are concerned that this may make a society where people only think about their own wishes.
Allowing children to make their own choices in daily matters may be based on the brief that overly protective parents tend to have overly dependent offspring. This isn t good for the children's growth or for the parents. We often hear about dangers for children who always turn to their parents if there's a problem or decision, and who expect their parents to meet all their needs. However, we do not hear as much about how parents* lives can be restricted by these needs. Adult children who cling to unrealistic expectations of what their parents should do for them might make their own lives and their parent's lives difficult.
However, there are also some pessimists about freedom of children. They may think if young children are always given the freedom to make their own choices, such as selecting a favourite clothes or a particular flavor of ice cream, they may gradually become a person who only cares about their own feelings or desires. This means when they grow up there would be many self-centred adults who only care about themselves
and do everything only for their own interests.They would do this because they are taught this when they are young. This is not good for the development of our society and dearly, this is not a society we want to become.
From my perspective, children should be given some freedom to make their own decisions about daily matters because this is important for their independence and also good for their parents. But it does not mean that parents should never intervene. They should give some suggestions to their children and help them take into account the possible consequences of their actions.
参考译文
对孩子和社会未来的一瞥可以反映在日常生活中。
一些孩子被鼓励对自己的日常琐事做决定，但是其他人担忧，这可能会造成我们的社会每个人都只考虑自己的意愿。
允许孩子每天在自己的事情上自己做决定是因为对孩子过度保护的家长往往会使得孩子过度依赖.这对孩子的成长以及对家长本身并不是有利的。
我们经常听到当遇到困难或需要做决定的时候，孩子总是求助于父母并希望父母满足他们所有的要求的种种危害，但是我们不曾听到父母的生活会被这些孩子的要求所限制。
长大后的孩子总是期望父母为他们做一些不现实的事情，这不仅使得他们自己也使得他们父母的生活非常痛苦。
然而，也有人对孩子的这种自由决定权表示悲观。
他们认为如果小孩子被给予太多自由，比如选择最喜欢的衣服或最喜欢的冰激凌味道，他们可能逐渐成为一个只在乎自己感受的人。
这就意味着，当他们长大后，有很多自我为中心的人，他们只在乎自己，或做的每一件事情都只为了自己的利益，因为他们从小就是这样被教导的。
这对我们的社会发展并不利，也不是我们想要看到的社会。
我认为孩子应该被给予自由去对他们自己每天的事情做决定，因为这对他们的独立性很有帮助，也对他们的父母是有利的。
但这并不意味着父母永远都不介入，父母也可以给孩子一些建议，来帮助他们考虑到一些事情可能发生的结果。
剑桥雅思12pdf+听力mp3下载！。
雅思写作Task2考官范文
雅思写作Task2考官范文为了帮助考生们更好地复习考试,特地为大家了一些优秀的雅思作文范文，以供大家学习、参考。
Children who are brought up in the family that do not have a lot of money are better prepared to deal with problems when they bee adults than children who are brought up by wealthy parent.Do you agree or disagree with this statement?Over the past few decades, along with growing interest in child education, people's attention to the family environment where a child is brought up has also significantly increased. Some people have begun to feelthat a child who has grown up in a poor family tend to be better prepared to deal with problems. In my opinion, however, family environment alone does not much influence a child's ability to solve problems.A child who was born into a poor family would have had more situations where they had to solve a problem or make a decision on their own. This is because in most unfortunate families, both parents are usually working and children are put into situations where they have to take care of themselves. By contrast, due to their wealth, rich children can experience and learn things that unfortunate children cannot. For example, they usually go to the best schoolsand receive a higher education there, which prepares them better for solving problems in their life.However, few would disagree with the fact that each individual is different. That is, problem solving skills e more from life experience. That is, the more a person experiences in life, the more they can use these experiences to adjust, to adapt and to solve problems they encounter. Personality also can be a factor in dealing with problems. A person who is optimistic, outgoing, confident and open-minded can look at and solve problems more effectively.As discussed above, nature and nurture have an equal influence on a child's ability to face challenges. Parents should spare no effort to figure out how they can helptheir children to be independent. I hope that in the future the next generation will grow up as mature citizens.When people need to plain about a product or poor service, some prefer to plain in writing and others prefer to plain in person.Which way do you prefer?It is rather difficult for me to answer the question how I prefer to plain: in writing or in person because sometimes I just do not have a choice. For example, if I order a product using the Inter from another state or even country, I will more likely have the opportunity to speakto a representative of a pany in person. So, in some cases I choose to speak in person and in others I prefer to plain in writing. However, I believe that every option has its advantages.From the one side, plaining in writing brings many benefits. First of all, one does not have to spend his precious time driving, waiting for his turn and talking with a representative. He can just send mail or e-mail and get all explanation he needs. Second of all, I think it is the best way to avoid an unpleasant conversation. Personally, I do not like to plain about anything especially, in person. Finally, sometimes it is impossible to have a face-to-face conversation because a pany which provided a poor product or service is too far away.From the other side, plaining in person has some benefits too. First, this type of plaining provides an immediate feedback. So, if I have some plains about pany's products I will receive all information and explanation right away. However, sending a pany a letter and getting a feedback can take more then a month. Second, face-to-face conversation is often more effective. People talk to each other, see each other facial gestures and body movements, which can tell a lot about a person. In addition to these practical benefits, in the case if one can not receive creditable explanation from one representative he alwayscan require to talk to another person. For instance, my husband recently had some extra withdraws from his aount by his bank and he was not aware of it. So, he went to the bank and explained to the bank's representative the situation and they together found the solution and that money was given back to my husband's aount. I think, inthis case face-to-face conversation is the best way toplain and get feedback fast.In conclusion, I think that if I have to plain about a product or poor service I will do it in person. However, if face-to-face conversation is impossible I think I have nothing left but to send a letter or write an e-mail there.Is freedom of speech necessary in a free society?In the last decade, there has been considerable debate over the role of free speech in a free society. Some object to absolute freedom of speech. Others advocate free speech, arguing that the freedom of speech is the single most important political right of citizens in a civilized society. Whilst I believe that there are strong arguments on both sides, I would suggest that freedom of speech should be protected in all but extreme circumstances.The freedom of speech is important at all levels in a society. Yet it is most important for the governments. A government which does not know what the people feel and think is in a dangerous position. This is how the munistregimes of Eastern Europe were toppled in the 1980s. The same is happening again in other regions of the world today. The governments that muzzle free speech run a risk of pushing their people to behave destructively or to rebel.Furthermore, without free speech no political action is possible and no resistance to injustice and oppression is possible. Without free speech elections would have no meaning at all. Policies of contestants bee known to the public and bee responsive to public opinion only by virtueof free speech. Between elections the freely expressed opinions of citizens help restrain oppressive rule. Without this freedom it is futile to expect political freedom or consequently economic freedom.In conclusion, I believe that the importance of free speech as a basic and valuable characteristic of a free society cannot be underestimated. It may be challenging for society to allow differences of opinion out into the open; however, the consequences of restricting free speech are likely to be more damaging in the longer term.。
雅思剑雅8t1大作文
雅思剑雅8t1大作文IELTS Writing Task 2 Sample Essay Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that schoolis the place to learn this. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. The debate surrounding the responsibility of instilling good citizenship inchildren is a multifaceted one, with proponents on both sides passionately advocating for the primacy of either the family or the school environment. While parents undeniably play a crucial role in shaping a child's character and moral compass, the structured learning environment of a school offers uniqueopportunities for developing social responsibility and civic engagement. Parents, as the primary caregivers and role models, exert a profound influence on their children's early development. From a tender age, children observe and internalize the values and behaviors exhibited by their parents, learning about respect, empathy, and responsibility through daily interactions and family traditions. The home environment provides a safe and nurturing space for children to practicesocial skills, learn conflict resolution, and develop a sense of belonging withina family unit. These foundational experiences lay the groundwork for understanding the importance of cooperation and contributing to a larger community. However, the role of the school in fostering good citizenship cannot be underestimated. Schools provide a structured environment where children interact with peers from diverse backgrounds, fostering tolerance, understanding, and the ability to navigate social differences. Curriculum incorporating civic education, community service projects, and extracurricular activities like student government provide practical opportunities for students to apply their knowledge, develop leadership skills, and actively participate in their communities. This hands-on experience, coupled with guidance from educators, equips students with a deeper understanding of their rights and responsibilities as citizens. Moreover, schools offer a broader perspective beyond the immediate family circle. Exposure to historical events, different cultures, and global issues through classroom discussions and educational resources encourages critical thinking and develops informed perspectives on societal challenges. The emphasis on collaboration and teamwork in school projects promotes a sense of collective responsibility, highlighting theinterconnectedness of individual actions and their impact on the wider community. It is crucial to acknowledge that the responsibility for nurturing responsible citizens does not solely rest with either parents or schools but necessitates a collaborative approach. Open communication and partnership between families and educational institutions can create a synergistic environment where valuesinstilled at home are reinforced and broadened within the school setting. Parents can actively engage with their children's education, supporting their involvement in school activities and reinforcing the importance of civic participation. Ultimately, both parents and schools share the vital responsibility of shaping young minds and instilling values of good citizenship. While the home environment provides the foundation for character development, schools offer a structured platform for expanding social awareness, developing civic skills, and fostering a sense of responsibility towards the community and the world at large. A collaborative effort between these two crucial influences is paramount to ensure that future generations are equipped to contribute meaningfully to society.。
IELTS写作task2--9分范文(26篇)
001Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents. Others, however, believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.001People have differing views with regard to the question of how to make our roads safer. In my view, both punishments and a range of other measures can be used together to promote better driving habits.On the one hand, strict punishments can certainly help to encourage people to drive more safely. Penalties for dangerous drivers can act as a deterrent, meaning that people avoid repeating the same offence. There are various types of driving penalty, such as small fines, licence suspension, driver awareness courses, and even prison sentences. The aim of these punishments is to show dangerous drivers that their actions have negative consequences. As a result, we would hope that drivers become more disciplined and alert, and that they follow the rules more carefully.On the other hand, I believe that safe driving can be promoted in several different ways that do not punish drivers. Firstly, it is vitally important to educate people properly before they start to drive, and this could be done in schools or even as part of an extended or more difficult driving test. Secondly, more attention could be paid to safe road design. For example, signs can be used to warn people, speed bumps and road bends can be added to calm traffic, and speed cameras can help to deter people from driving too quickly. Finally, governments or local councils could reduce road accidents by investing in better public transport, which would mean that fewer people would need to travel by car.In conclusion, while punishments can help to prevent bad driving, I believe that other road safety measures should also be introduced.002Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree?002Some people argue that it is pointless to spend money on the protection of wild animals because we humans have no need for them. I completely disagree with this point of view.In my opinion, it is absurd to argue that wild animals have no place in the 21st century. I do not believe that planet Earth exists only for the benefit of humans, and there is nothing special about this particular century that means that we suddenly have the right to allow or encourage the extinction of any species. Furthermore, there is no compelling reason why we should let animals die out. We do not need to exploit or destroy every last square metre of land in order to feed or accommodate the world’s population. There is plenty of room for us to exist side by side with wild animals, and this should be our aim.I also disagree with the idea that protecting animals is a waste of resources. It is usually the protection of natural habitats that ensures the survival of wild animals, and most scientists agree that these habitats are also crucial for human survival. For example, rainforests produce oxygen, absorb carbon dioxide and stabilise the Earth’s climate. If we destroyed these areas, the costs of managing the resulting changes to our planet would far outweigh the costs of conservation. By protecting wild animals and their habitats, we maintain the natural balance of all life on Earth.In conclusion, we have no right to decide whether or not wild animals should exist, and I believe that we should do everything we can to protect them.003Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment. What can governments do to address these problems? What can individual people do?003Humans are responsible for a variety of environmental problems, but we can also take steps to reduce the damage that we are causing to the planet. This essay will discuss environmental problems and the measures that governments and individuals can take to address these problems.Two of the biggest threats to the environment are air pollution and waste. Gas emissions from factories and exhaust fumes from vehicles lead to global warming, which may have a devastating effect on the planet in the future. As the human population increases, we are also producing ever greater quantities of waste, which contaminates the earth and pollutes rivers and oceans.Governments could certainly make more effort to reduce air pollution. They could introduce laws to limit emissions from factories or to force companies to use renewable energy from solar, wind or water power. They could also impose ‘green taxes’ on drivers and airline companies. In this way, people would be encouraged to use public transport and to take fewer flights abroad, therefore reducing emissions.Individuals should also take responsibility for the impact they have on the environment. They can take public transport rather than driving, choose products with less packaging, and recycle as much as possible. Most supermarkets now provide reusable bags for shoppers as well as ‘banks’ for recycling glass, plastic and paper in their car parks. By reusing and recycling, we can help to reduce waste.In conclusion, both national governments and individuals must play their part in looking after the environment.004Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people. Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages, while others believe that would be a waste of money.Discuss both these views and give your opinion.004It is true that some minority languages may disappear in the near future. Although it can be argued that governments could save money by allowing this to happen, I believe that these languages should be protected and preserved.There are several reasons why saving minority languages could be seen as a waste of money. Firstly, if a language is only spoken by a small number of people, expensive education programmes will be needed to make sure that more people learn it, and the state will have to pay for facilities, teachers and marketing. This money might be better spent on other public services. Secondly, it would be much cheaper and more efficient for countries to have just one language. Governments could cut all kinds of costs related to communicating with each minority group.Despite the above arguments, I believe that governments should try to preserve languages that are less widely spoken. A language is much more than simply a means of communication; it has a vital connection with the cultural identity of the people who speak it. If a language disappears, a whole way of life will disappear with it, and we will lose the rich cultural diversity that makes societies more interesting. By spending money to protect minority languages, governments can also preserve traditions, customs and behaviours that are part of a country’s history.In conclusion, it may save money in the short term if we allow minority languages to disappear, but in the long term this would have an extremely negative impact on our cultural heritage.005Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career, while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school.Discuss both views and give your opinion.005When they finish school, teenagers face the dilemma of whether to get a job or continue their education. While there are some benefits to getting a job straight after school, I would argue that it is better to go to college or university.The option to start work straight after school is attractive for several reasons. Many young people want to start earning money as soon as possible. In this way, they can become independent, and they will be able to afford their own house or start a family. In terms of their career, young people who decide to find work, rather than continue their studies, may progress more quickly. They will have the chance to gain real experience and learn practical skills related to their chosen profession. This may lead to promotions and a successful career.On the other hand, I believe that it is more beneficial for students to continue their studies. Firstly, academic qualifications are required in many professions. For example, it is impossible to become a doctor, teacher or lawyer without having the relevant degree. As a result, university graduateshave access to more and better job opportunities, and they tend to earn higher salaries than those with fewer qualifications. Secondly, the job market is becoming increasingly competitive, and sometimes there are hundreds of applicants for one position in a company. Young people who do not have qualifications from a university or college will not be able to compete.For the reasons mentioned above, it seems to me that students are more likely to be successful in their careers if they continue their studies beyond school level.006Some people think that museums should be enjoyable places to entertain people, while others believe that the purpose of museums is to educate.Discuss both views and give you own opinion.006People have different views about the role and function of museums. In my opinion, museums can and should be both entertaining and educational.On the one hand, it can be argued that the main role of a museum is to entertain. Museums are tourist attractions, and their aim is to exhibit a collection of interesting objects that many people will want to see. The average visitor may become bored if he or she has to read or listen to too much educational content, so museums often put more of an emphasis on enjoyment rather than learning. This type of museum is designed to be visually spectacular, and may have interactive activities or even games as part of its exhibitions.On the other hand, some people argue that museums should focus on education. The aim of any exhibition should be to teach visitors something that they did not previously know. Usually this means that the history behind the museum’s exhibits needs to be explained, and this can be done in various ways. Some museums employ professional guides to talk to their visitors, while other museums offer headsets so that visitors can listen to detailed commentary about the exhibition. In this way, museums can play an important role in teaching people about history, culture, science and many other aspects of life.In conclusion, it seems to me that a good museum should be able to offer an interesting, enjoyable and educational experience so that people can have fun and learn something at the same time.007Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree?007In my opinion, men and women should have the same educational opportunities. However, I do not agree with the idea of accepting equal proportions of each gender in every university subject.Having the same number of men and women on all degree courses is simply unrealistic. Studentnumbers on any course depend on the applications that the institution receives. If a university decided to fill courses with equal numbers of males and females, it would need enough applicants of each gender. In reality, many courses are more popular with one gender than the other, and it would not be practical to aim for equal proportions. For example, nursing courses tend to attract more female applicants, and it would be difficult to fill these courses if fifty per cent of the places needed to go to males.Apart from the practical concerns expressed above, I also believe that it would be unfair to base admission to university courses on gender. Universities should continue to select the best candidates for each course according to their qualifications. In this way, both men and women have the same opportunities, and applicants know that they will be successful if they work hard to achieve good grades at school. If a female student is the best candidate for a place on a course, it is surely wrong to reject her in favour of a male student with lower grades or fewer qualifications.In conclusion, the selection of university students should be based on merit, and it would be both impractical and unfair to change to a selection procedure based on gender.008Some people believe that hobbies need to be difficult to be enjoyable.To what extent do you agree or disagree?008Some hobbies are relatively easy, while others present more of a challenge. Personally, I believe that both types of hobby can be fun, and I therefore disagree with the statement that hobbies need to be difficult in order to be enjoyable.On the one hand, many people enjoy easy hobbies. One example of an activity that is easy for most people is swimming. This hobby requires very little equipment, it is simple to learn, and it is inexpensive. I remember learning to swim at my local swimming pool when I was a child, and it never felt like a demanding or challenging experience. Another hobby that I find easy and fun is photography. In my opinion, anyone can take interesting pictures without knowing too much about the technicalities of operating a camera. Despite being straightforward, taking photos is a satisfying activity.On the other hand, difficult hobbies can sometimes be more exciting. If an activity is more challenging, we might feel a greater sense of satisfaction when we manage to do it successfully. For example, film editing is a hobby that requires a high level of knowledge and expertise. In my case, it took me around two years before I became competent at this activity, but now I enjoy it much more than I did when I started. I believe that many hobbies give us more pleasure when we reach a higher level of performance because the results are better and the feeling of achievement is greater.In conclusion, simple hobbies can be fun and relaxing, but difficult hobbies can be equally pleasurable for different reasons.009Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make? Has this been a positive or negative development?009It is true that new technologies have had an influence on communication between people. Technology has affected relationships in various ways, and in my opinion there are both positive and negative effects.Technology has had an impact on relationships in business, education and social life. Firstly, telephones and the Internet allow business people in different countries to interact without ever meeting each other. Secondly, services like Skype create new possibilities for relationships between students and teachers. For example, a student can now take video lessons with a teacher in a different city or country. Finally, many people use social networks, like Facebook, to make new friends and find people who share common interests, and they interact through their computers rather than face to face.On the one hand, these developments can be extremely positive. Cooperation between people in different countries was much more difficult when communication was limited to written letters or telegrams. Nowadays, interactions by email, phone or video are almost as good as face-to-face meetings, and many of us benefit from these interactions, either in work or social contexts. On the other hand, the availability of new communication technologies can also have the result of isolating people and discouraging real interaction. For example, many young people choose to make friends online rather than mixing with their peers in the real world, and these ‘virtual’ relationships are a poor substitute for real friendships.In conclusion, technology has certainly revolutionised communication between people, but not all of the outcomes of this revolution have been positive.010We cannot help everyone in the world that needs help, so we should only be concerned with our own communities and countries.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?010Some people believe that we should not help people in other countries as long as there are problems in our own society. I disagree with this view because I believe that we should try to help as many people as possible.On the one hand, I accept that it is important to help our neighbors and fellow citizens. In most communities there are people who are impoverished or disadvantaged in some way. It is possible to find homeless people, for example, in even the wealthiest of cities, and for those who are concerned about this problem, there are usually opportunities to volunteer time or give money tosupport these people. In the UK, people can help in a variety of ways, from donating clothing to serving free food in a soup kitchen. As the problems are on our doorstep, and there are obvious ways to help, I can understand why some people feel that we should prioritise local charity.At the same time, I believe that we have an obligation to help those who live beyond our national borders. In some countries the problems that people face are much more serious than those in our own communities, and it is often even easier to help. For example, when children are dying from curable diseases in African countries, governments and individuals in richer countries can save lives simply by paying for vaccines that already exist. A small donation to an international charity might have a much greater impact than helping in our local area.In conclusion, it is true that we cannot help everyone, but in my opinion national boundaries should not stop us from helping those who are in need.011In the developed world, average life expectancy is increasing. What problems will this cause for individuals and society? Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce the impact of ageing populations.011It is true that people in industrialised nations can expect to live longer than ever before. Although there will undoubtedly be some negative consequences of this trend, societies can take steps to mitigate these potential problems.As people live longer and the populations of developed countries grow older, several related problems can be anticipated. The main issue is that there will obviously be more people of retirement age who will be eligible to receive a pension. The proportion of younger, working adults will be smaller, and governments will therefore receive less money in taxes in relation to the size of the population. In other words, an ageing population will mean a greater tax burden for working adults. Further pressures will include a rise in the demand for healthcare, and the fact young adults will increasingly have to look after their elderly relatives.There are several actions that governments could take to solve the problems described above. Firstly, a simple solution would be to increase the retirement age for working adults, perhaps from 65 to 70. Nowadays, people of this age tend to be healthy enough to continue a productive working life. A second measure would be for governments to encourage immigration in order to increase the number of working adults who pay taxes. Finally, money from national budgets will need to be taken from other areas and spent on vital healthcare, accommodation and transport facilities for the rising numbers of older citizens.In conclusion, various measures can be taken to tackle the problems that are certain to arise as the populations of countries grow older.012Some people regard video games as harmless fun, or even as a useful educational tool. Others, however, believe that videos games are having an adverse effect on the people who play them. In your opinion, do the drawbacks of video games outweigh the benefits?012Many people, and children in particular, enjoy playing computer games. While I accept that these games can sometimes have a positive effect on the user, I believe that they are more likely to have a harmful impact.On the one hand, video games can be both entertaining and educational. Users, or gamers, are transported into virtual worlds which are often more exciting and engaging than real-life pastimes. From an educational perspective, these games encourage imagination and creativity, as well as concentration, logical thinking and problem solving, all of which are useful skills outside the gaming context. Furthermore, it has been shown that computer simulation games can improve users’ motor skills and help to prepare them for real-world tasks, such as flying a plane.However, I would argue that these benefits are outweighed by the drawbacks. Gaming can be highly addictive because users are constantly given scores, new targets and frequent rewards to keep them playing. Many children now spend hours each day trying to progress through the levels of a game or to get a higher score than their friends. This type of addiction can have effects ranging from lack of sleep to problems at school, when homework is sacrificed for a few more hours on the computer or console. The rise in obesity in recent years has also been linked in part to the sedentary lifestyle and lack of exercise that often accompany gaming addiction.In conclusion, it seems to me that the potential dangers of video games are more significant than the possible benefits.013Some people think that all teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help the local community. They believe this would benefit both the individual teenager and society as a whole.Do you agree or disagree?013Many young people work on a volunteer basis, and this can only be beneficial for both the individual and society as a whole. However, I do not agree that we should therefore force all teenagers to do unpaid work.Most young people are already under enough pressure with their studies, without being given the added responsibility of working in their spare time. School is just as demanding as a full-time job, and teachers expect their students to do homework and exam revision on top of attending lessons every day. When young people do have some free time, we should encourage them to enjoy it with their friends or to spend it doing sports and other leisure activities. They have many years of workahead of them when they finish their studies.At the same time, I do not believe that society has anything to gain from obliging young people to do unpaid work. In fact, I would argue that it goes against the values of a free and fair society to force a group of people to do something against their will. Doing this can only lead to resentment amongst young people, who would feel that they were being used, and parents, who would not want to be told how to raise their children. Currently, nobody is forced to volunteer, and this is surely the best system.In conclusion, teenagers may choose to work for free and help others, but in my opinion we should not make this compulsory.014Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.014People have different views about the funding of creative artists. While some people disagree with the idea of government support for artists, I believe that money for art projects should come from both governments and other sources.Some art projects definitely require help from the state. In the UK, there are many works of art in public spaces, such as streets or squares in city centres. In Liverpool, for example, there are several new statues and sculptures in the docks area of the city, which has been redeveloped recently. These artworks represent culture, heritage and history. They serve to educate people about the city, and act as landmarks or talking points for visitors and tourists. Governments and local councils should pay creative artists to produce this kind of art, because without their funding our cities would be much less interesting and attractive.On the other hand, I can understand the arguments against government funding for art. The main reason for this view is that governments have more important concerns. For example, state budgets need to be spent on education, healthcare, infrastructure and security, among other areas. These public services are vital for a country to function properly, whereas the work of creative artists, even in public places, is a luxury. Another reason for this opinion is that artists do a job like any other professional, and they should therefore earn their own money by selling their work.In conclusion, there are good reasons why artists should rely on alternative sources of financial support, but in my opinion government help is sometimes necessary.015Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits tohumanity.Discuss both views and give your own opinion.015It is true that medicines and other products are routinely tested on animals before they are cleared for human use. While I tend towards the viewpoint that animal testing is morally wrong, I would have to support a limited amount of animal experimentation for the development of medicines.On the one hand, there are clear ethical arguments against animal experimentation. To use a common example of this practice, laboratory mice may be given an illness so that the effectiveness of a new drug can be measured. Opponents of such research argue that humans have no right to subject animals to this kind of trauma, and that the lives of all creatures should be respected. They believe that the benefits to humans do not justify the suffering caused, and that scientists should use alternative methods of research.On the other hand, reliable alternatives to animal experimentation may not always be available. Supporters of the use of animals in medical research believe that a certain amount of suffering on the part of mice or rats can be justified if human lives are saved. They argue that opponents of such research might feel differently if a member of their own families needed a medical treatment that had been developed through the use of animal experimentation. Personally, I agree with the banning of animal testing for non-medical products, but I feel that it may be a necessary evil where new drugs and medical procedures are concerned.In conclusion, it seems to me that it would be wrong to ban testing on animals for vital medical research until equally effective alternatives have been developed.016When choosing a job, the salary is the most important consideration. To what extent do you agree or disagree?016Many people choose their jobs based on the size of the salary offered. Personally, I disagree with the idea that money is the key consideration when deciding on a career, because I believe that other factors are equally important.On the one hand, I agree that money is necessary in order for people to meet their basic needs. For example, we all need money to pay for housing, food, bills, health care, and education. Most people consider it a priority to at least earn a salary that allows them to cover these needs and have a reasonable quality of life. If people chose their jobs based on enjoyment or other non-financial factors, they might find it difficult to support themselves. Artists and musicians, for instance, are known for choosing a career path that they love, but that does not always provide them with enough money to live comfortably and raise a family.Nevertheless, I believe that other considerations are just as important as what we earn in our jobs.。
雅思写作Task 2 范文
一．Some people contend（认为）that advertising has positive impact on society while others think it also has negative influence. Discuss.开头段⑴Advertising has become prevalent in the contemporary society and vast billboards, TV commercials and leaflets（传单）are all exerting profound impact on modern life. ⑵In the meantime, whether advertising is a blessing or a curse has sparked spirited (激烈的)debate. ⑶Some people argu e （认为）that advertising has only beneficial influence on our lives while many others contend that it has detrimental （有害的）effect as well. （改写原题观点，如果原题中只有一个观点，最好把相反的观点写出来。
）⑷Personally, I am in favor of the former (latter) view. （表示自己的观点）表示利与弊的英文：advantages and disadvantages strengths and weaknesses the upside and the downside / pros and cons / boons and banes主体段1Admittedly, advertising may also carry considerable potential drawbacks. ⑴To begin with, a vast number o f online advertisements may harm the Internet users’ lives. ⑵To illustrate, email spamming （群发）may fill up one’s email box with junk emails and worse yet, （递进）many of these junk emails could destroy PCs with viruses or Trojan horses. ⑶Moreover, a high percentage of advertisements in the media are misleading ones. ⑷Today, it seems that many drug companies give false information about their products, which has rendered （让……变成什么状态）a host of customers afraid to buy medicine.主体段2Despite this, advertising has brought numerous benefits. ⑴In the first place, advertisements inform us about the latest products on the market. ⑵In general, with the help of ads, customers can make shopping more economical and less time-consuming.⑶In the second place, elaborate （包含了很多劳动，变成了精心制作）advertisements can be a genuine art form. ⑷Indeed, instead of wasting our time, creative ads can afford us diverse amusements, thereby （后面是动名词）immensely brightening up our lives. ⑸Last but not least, some advertising in the media can motivate people to contribute to charities. ⑹As a matter of fact, I would be hard-pressed to imagine how charities can get enough funds without the help of non-profit ads. （我很难想象相反的事情发生）结尾段⑴In the final analysis, I concede that the proliferation （扩散）of the advertising industry does not come without any adverse effects. (概括让步段的观点)⑵However, the benefits created by advertising far outweigh the disadvantages. （说清楚自己更倾向的观点）⑶Overall, I am convinced that we should further promote the development of advertising and meanwhile get this industry better-regulated.二．Today PC games are very popular among teenagers. But some parents consider that these games are not instructive and that teenagers should be kept away from them. What do you think?As one of the products of modern technology, PC games have definitely become an indispensable part of most teenagers’ lives. Statistics show that teenagers are spending more time and money on entertainment items such as PC games than they did ten years ago. However, in my opinion, although PC games have certain positive effects such as giving teenagers relaxation and activating their imaginations, they have certain negative effects.First, PC games occupy the time when teenagers should be sitting in the classroom or studying in the library. The colorful pictures and vivid characters of PC games are far more exciting than the dull black letters in textbooks. Therefore, addiction to PC games is often accompanied by poor academic work.Furthermore, far from being instructive, some PC games contain violence and pornography, which are extremely harmful for the healthy growth of teenagers. It is said that most juvenile delinquents commit crimes just because their PC game heroes do so in a virtual-reality world.In addition, speaking from the physical aspect, PC games have contributed a lot to failing eyesight among teenagers in recent years.To sum up, despite their entertainment and relaxation values, PC games interfere with the education of teenagers. It would be better if teenagers could use such games in a more rational and controlled way, perhaps under the supervision of their parents.雅思考官九分范文Writing Task 2You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Write about the following topic: Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish. Why do you think this is happening? What can governments do to reduce the amount of rubbish produced?It is true that in almost every country today each family produces a large amount of waste every week. Most of the rubbish comes from the packaging of the things we buy, such as processed food. However, even if we buy food without packaging, we still produce rubbish from the plastic bags that are used everywhere.The first reason why we have so much packaging is that we consume so much more every day than families did in the past. Also, convenience is very important in modern life; therefore, we buy packaged food that can be transported over long distances and store it until we need it, at first in the supermarket, then at home.Further, the amount of waste produced is also a result of our habit of using something once and throw it away. We forget that even the cheapest plastic bag has used valuable resources and energy. Above all, we also forget that it is a source of pollution and difficult to dealwith.Therefore, I think that governments need to raise this awareness in the general public. Children should be educated about environmental issues at school while adults need to take action. Governments can encourage such action by collecting taxes on packaging, such as plastic bags and fining families and shops that do not try to recycle their Waste.。
雅思剑8作文task2
雅思剑8作文task2In recent years, there has been a growing trend of people living alone. This phenomenon has sparked a heated debate among individuals, with some arguing that living alone is a positive development, while others believe it has negative implications. From my perspective, living alone can have both advantages and disadvantages, and it ultimately depends on an individual's personal preferences and circumstances.On the one hand, living alone provides individuals with a sense of independence and freedom. When living alone, one has the freedom to make decisions without having to consider the preferences or needs of others. This can be particularly liberating for individuals who value their personal space and enjoy solitude. Moreover, living alone allows individuals to establish their own routines and take full control of their lives. They can come and go as they please, without having to compromise with roommates or family members. This independence can foster personalgrowth and self-discovery, as individuals have the opportunity to explore their own interests and developtheir own identities.On the other hand, living alone can also have negative implications, particularly in terms of social isolation and loneliness. Humans are social creatures, and we thrive on social interactions and connections with others. Living alone can sometimes lead to feelings of loneliness and isolation, especially for individuals who lack a strong support network or have difficulty establishing new relationships. Furthermore, living alone can also posesafety concerns, as there is no one to rely on in case of emergencies or accidents. This can be particularly worrisome for older individuals or those with health issues, who may require assistance and support on a regular basis.In addition, living alone can have financial implications. Sharing living expenses with others can significantly reduce the financial burden, making it more affordable for individuals to live in expensive urban areas. On the other hand, living alone means shouldering all theexpenses on one's own, which can be challenging for individuals with limited financial resources. This can lead to financial strain and may limit one's ability to enjoy a certain quality of life. Moreover, living alone also means taking on all the household chores and responsibilities, which can be time-consuming and exhausting.Despite the potential drawbacks, living alone can also provide individuals with a sense of empowerment and personal growth. It forces individuals to become self-reliant and develop important life skills, such as budgeting, cooking, and managing household tasks. Moreover, living alone can also provide individuals with a sense of privacy and peace, allowing them to recharge and rejuvenate after a long day. This can be particularly beneficial for individuals who have demanding jobs or busy lifestyles.In conclusion, living alone has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. While it can provide individuals with a sense of independence and freedom, it can also lead to social isolation and financial challenges. Whether living alone is a positive or negative developmentultimately depends on an individual's personal preferences and circumstances. It is important to carefully consider the pros and cons before making a decision about living alone.。
剑桥雅思真题8-写作(Test 2 附高分范文)
剑桥雅思真题8—写作（Test 2 附高分范文）Writing Task 1You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.Write at least 150 words.参考范文1：The three pie charts present the trend of annual expenditure in an UK school in 1981, 1991, 2001. At first glance, teachers' salaries remained the largest percentage of the total expenditure.The teacher's salaries were fluctuated across the period. It started from 40% in 1981, followed by 50 % in 1991 and reduced to 45% in 2001. Resources such as books experienced a similar pattern. In 1981, it occupied 15% of the spending and it rose to one fifth in 1991 before dropping to 9% in 2001.Other workers' salaries had been decreasing over last three decades, which reduced from 288% in 1981 to only 15% in 2001. On the other hand, more money had spent on insurance. It first rose by 1% to 3 % in 1991 and then dramatically climbed to 8% in 2001. Furniture and equipment also increased from 15% in 1981 to 23% in 2001, despite the fact that it declined by 10% in 1991.Overall, teachers and other workers’ salaries, furniture and equipment were the highest expenses of the school for the last 30 years.参考范文2：The charts compare changes in the shares of five different items which comprised the yearly expenses of a British school between 1981 and 2001.Overall, while the shares of three items experienced rises, there were declines in the remaining two. Moreover, academic staff salaries contributed the largest proportion of expenditure throughout the survey, whereas insurance had the smallest share.Wages paid to the teaching staff accounted for the most significant proportion of expenditure in 1981 (40%) and went up by a quarter before declining slightly. In comparison, the salaries of non-academic employees were responsible for less than a third of all expenses in 1981, but their share dipped substantially by 13% over the course of these 20 years.The share of furniture and equipment was initially as high as that of educational resources (15%), but while the former dropped by 2/3 before rising fivefold, the latter experienced a marked rise after which it halved, reaching just below 10%.The contribution of insurance had risen minimally from 2% to 3% by 1991, before climbing almost threefold in 2001.参考范文3（考官范文）：The charts show how much a UK school spent on different running costs in three separate years: 1981, 1991 and 2001.In all three years, the greatest expenditure was on staff salaries. But while other workers’ salaries saw a fall from 28% in 1981to only 15% of spending in 2001, teachers’ pay remained the biggest cost, reaching 50% of total spending in 1991 and ending at 45% in 2001.Expenditure on resources such as books had increased to20% by 1991 before decreasing to only 9% by the end of the period. In contrast, the cost of furniture and equipment saw an opposite trend. This cost decreased to only 5% of total expenditure in 1991 but rose dramatically in 2001 when it represented 23% of the school budget. Similarly, the cost of insurance saw arising trend, growing from only 2% to 8% by 2001.Overall, teachers’ salaries constituted the largest cost to the school, and while spending increased dramatically for equipment and insurance, there were corresponding drops in expenditure on things such as books and on other workers’ salaries.Writing Task 2You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.Write about the following topic:Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge orexperience.Write at least 250 words.参考范文：It is true that new technologies have had an influence on communication between people. Technology has affected relationships in various ways, and in my opinion there are both positive and negative effects.Technology has had an impact on relationships in business, education and social life. Firstly, telephones and the Internet allow business people in different countries to interact without ever meeting each other. Secondly, services like Skype create new possibilities for relationships between students and teachers. For example, a student can now take video lessons with a teacher in a different city or country. Finally, many people use social networks, like Facebook, to make new friends and find people who share common interests, and they interact through their computers rather than face to face.On the one hand, these developments can be extremely positive. Cooperation between people in different countries was much more difficult when communication was limited to written letters or telegrams. Nowadays, interactions by email, phone or video are almost as good as face-to-face meetings, and many of us benefit from these interactions, either in work or social contexts. On the other hand, the availability of new communication technologies can also have the result of isolating people and discouraging real interaction. For example, many young people choose to make friends online rather than mixing with their peers in the real world, and these ‘virtual’ relationships are a poor substitute for real friendships.In conclusion, technology has certainly revolutionised communication between people, but not all of the outcomes of this revolution have been positive.。
雅思第八套作文模板
雅思第八套作文模板英文回答：Task 1:Bar Chart:The bar chart compares the weekly expenditure of two families, the Smiths and the Joneses, on various categories such as groceries, entertainment, transportation, and others.Observations:Both families spend the most on groceries, with the Smiths spending slightly more than the Joneses.The Joneses allocate a significantly larger portion of their budget to entertainment than the Smiths.The Smiths spend more on transportation than the Joneses.The Smiths have a higher expenditure on "other" categories, which could include items such as healthcare, utilities, or personal care.Conclusion:The Smiths and Joneses have different spending patterns, with the Joneses focusing more on entertainment and the Smiths prioritizing groceries and transportation.Task 2:Discuss the advantages and disadvantages ofspecializing in a particular field.Advantages:Increased Expertise: Specialization allows individualsto develop a deep understanding and expertise in theirchosen field.Career Advancement: Specialization can enhance career prospects by making individuals more competitive in their field and qualifying them for higher-level positions.Higher Earning Potential: Specialized professionals often command higher salaries due to their in-demand skills and knowledge.Greater Job Satisfaction: Specializing can lead to greater job satisfaction as individuals can focus on work that aligns with their interests and abilities.Disadvantages:Limited Career Options: Specialization can limit career options as individuals may become too narrowly focused in their field.Job Market Vulnerability: Changes in industry trends or technological advancements can impact job security forspecialized professionals.Missed Opportunities: By specializing in one area, individuals may miss out on opportunities to explore other interests or develop new skills.Burnout: Intense focus on a particular field can lead to burnout and decreased motivation.Conclusion:Specializing in a particular field offers both advantages and disadvantages. Individuals should carefully consider their career goals, interests, and the potential risks before making a decision about specialization.中文回答：图表段落：条形图比较了两家家庭，史密斯一家和琼斯一家的每周开支，包括食品、娱乐、交通和其他类别的开支。
剑桥雅思12第八套题小作文
剑桥雅思12第八套题小作文In the realm of education, the contentious subject of streaming students based on their academic abilities has sparked fervent debates for decades. Proponents of streaming extol its virtues, arguing that it fosters a more tailored and efficient learning environment, while detractors decry it as an inequitable system that exacerbates existing social and economic disparities. This essay delves into the multifaceted arguments surrounding streaming, exploring its potential benefits and drawbacks with a nuanced perspective. Streaming advocates maintain that itenables students to learn at their own pace, surrounded by peers with similar academic aspirations. They contend that this homogeneous grouping fosters a sense of belonging and camaraderie, creating an environment where students feel comfortable asking questions and actively participating in class discussions. Moreover, they argue that streaming allows teachers to tailor their instruction to the specific needs of each group, enabling them to challenge high-achieving students with more rigorous material while providing additional support to those who may be struggling. Opponents of streaming, however, raise concerns about its potential to perpetuate and exacerbate existing inequalities. They argue that streaming often mirrors socioeconomic divisions, with students from disadvantaged backgrounds disproportionately placed in lower streams. This can lead to a self-fulfilling prophecy, where students from these lower streams receive a less challenging education, reinforcing their perceived lower abilities and limiting their future opportunities. Furthermore, critics contend that streaming canstifle creativity and diversity of thought. By segregating students based on their academic performance, streaming may create a narrow and rigid educational system that values conformity over independent thinking. This, they argue, can hinder the development of well-rounded individuals who are able to think critically and solve problems effectively. Another concern raised by opponents of streaming is its impact on student motivation. Students placed in lower streams may feel discouraged and disengaged, believing that their academic potential is limited. This can lead to a decline in their overall academic performance and a loss of interest in learning. Conversely, students in higher streams may become complacent, believing that their success is guaranteed and thus reducing their effort andmotivation. In conclusion, the debate over streaming students based on their academic abilities is complex and multifaceted. While streaming may offer certain advantages, such as tailored instruction and a sense of belonging for students, it also raises concerns about equity, creativity, motivation, and the potential to perpetuate existing social and economic disparities. A nuanced understanding of these arguments is essential for educators and policymakers tasked with making decisions about the future of streaming in educational systems.。
雅思剑桥8 test 2 小作文
雅思剑桥8 test 2 小作文In recent years, the issue of environmental pollution has become a major concern for people all over the world. This problem is particularly acute in urban areas, where industrialization and urbanization have led to a significant increase in air and water pollution. In this essay, I will explore the causes and effects of environmental pollution in urban areas, as well as potential solutions to this pressing issue.One of the primary causes of environmental pollution in urban areas is industrialization. As cities grow and develop, they often become home to a large number of factories and industrial plants. These facilities emit a wide range of pollutants into the air and water, including carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, and heavy metals. Additionally, the use of fossil fuels for energy production and transportation further contributes to air pollution in urban areas.Another major cause of environmental pollution in urban areas is urbanization itself. As more people move to cities in search of employment and a better quality of life, the demand for housing, transportation, and consumer goods increases. This leads to the expansion of urban areas, deforestation, and the destruction of natural habitats. As a result, urbanization has a significant impact on air and water quality, as well as the overall health of the environment.The effects of environmental pollution in urban areas are wide-ranging and severe. Air pollution, for example, has been linked to a variety of respiratory illnesses, including asthma and bronchitis. In addition, the presence ofpollutants in the air can lead to a range of cardiovascular problems, such as heart attacks and strokes. Water pollution, on the other hand, can have devastating effects on aquatic ecosystems and the health of people who rely on contaminated water sources for drinking and sanitation.In order to address the issue of environmental pollution in urban areas, it is essential to implement a range of solutions at the local, national, andinternational levels. One potential solution is to invest in cleaner and more sustainable technologies for energy production and transportation. This could involve the development of renewable energy sources, such as solar and wind power, as well as the promotion of public transportation and electric vehicles.Another important solution is to improve waste management practices in urban areas. This could involve the implementation of recycling programs, the construction of modern landfills, and the enforcement of strict regulations on industrial waste disposal. Additionally, efforts should be made to raise public awareness about the importance of reducing, reusing, and recycling waste in order to minimize the impact of urbanization on the environment.In conclusion, environmental pollution is a significant problem in urban areas, with far-reaching effects on public health and the environment. However, by implementing a range of solutions, such as investing in cleaner technologies and improving waste management practices, it is possible to mitigate the impact of pollution and create a more sustainable urban environment for future generations.It is essential for governments, businesses, and individuals to work together to address this pressing issue and ensure a healthier and cleaner future for urban areas.。
雅思写作八大话题范文 IELTS WRITING TASK 2 SAMPLE_gender issues
雅思写作八大话题范文 IELTS W RITING T ASK 2 S AMPLE#8 G ENDER I SSUESGOVERNMENT/MODERN S OCIETY/TECHNOLOGY/EMPLOYMENT/ENVIRONMENT/EDUCATION/PARENT o r C HILDREN/GENDER I SSUES更多范文，请移步我的文库下载（lavin1988），祝各位考试顺利。
:pMany people believe that women make better parents than men and that this is why they have the greater role in raising children in most societies. Others c laim t hat m en a re j ust a s g ood a s w omen a t p arenting.Write a n e ssay e xpresing y our p oint o f v iew.You s hould w rite a t l east 250 w ords.You s hould s pend a bout 40 m inutes o n t his t ask.model a nswer:The view that women are better parents than men has shown itself to be true throughout history. This is not to say that men are not of importance in child-‐ rearing indeed, they are most necessary if children are to appreciate fully the roles of both sexes. But women have proven themselves superior parents as a result of their conditioning, their less aggressive natures and their generally better c ommunication s kills.From t he t ime t hey a re l ittle g irls, f emales l earn a bout n urturing. F irst w ith d olls and later perhaps with younger brothers and sisters, girls are given the role of carer. Girls see their mothers in the same roles and so it is natural that they identify this as a female activity. Boys, in contrast, learn competitive roles far removed from what it means to nurture. While boys may dream of adventures, girls' c onditioning m eans t hey t end t o s ee t he f uture i n t erms o f r aising f amilies.Girls also appear to be less aggressive than boys. In adulthood, it is men, not women, w ho p rove t o b e t he a ggressors i n c rime a nd i n w ar. O bviously, i n r aising children, a more patient, gentle manner is preferable to a more aggressive one. Although there certainly exist gentle men and aggressive women, by and large,females a re l ess l ikely t o r esort t o v iolence i n a ttempting t o s olve p roblems.Finally, women tend to be better communicators than men. This is shown is intelligence t ests, w here f emales, o n a verage, d o b etter i n v erbal c ommunication than males. Of course, communication is of utmost importance in rearing children, as children tend to learn from and adopt the communication styles of their p arents.Thus, w hile i t i s a ll v ery w ell t o s uggest a g reater r ole f or m en i n r aising c hildren, let u s n ot f orget t hat w omen a re g enerally b etter s uited t o t he p arenting r ole.。