网络犯罪论文：网络犯罪刑事管辖研究

网络犯罪论文：网络犯罪刑事管辖研究【中文摘要】网络的出现,扩大了人们生活的领域,给人类社会带来了很多的便利,但它在给人们享受新奇的同时,也带来了不小的冲击。

比如发生在网络虚拟空间中的网络犯罪就让人们措手不及。

网络犯罪是新的犯罪类型,网络空间的全球化和虚拟化特点造就了网络犯罪的智能性、隐蔽性和广域性,而网络空间的特点也恰好是网络犯罪的刑事管辖权难以解决的症结所在。

传统的刑事案件中一般都能找到一个稳定的连接点来确定管辖权问题,但在网络犯罪中却很难找到这一稳定的因素来确定管辖权,网络犯罪在适用传统的刑事管辖权的问题上出现了困惑。

社会的不断进步和科技的更快发展,人们对网络产生依赖,网络犯罪会日益猖獗,也将带来的司法管辖冲突,这一问题如果不能得到很好的解决,其后果的严重性将不堪设想。

面对网络犯罪带来的严重危害,很多国家有了相关的立法来加以规范,也出现了第一部针对网络犯罪行为所制订的国际公约。

我国在实践的基础上形成的对于网络犯罪管辖权的主流观点是将犯罪地做扩大解释来实现管辖,即网络服务提供者的网站所在地、下载地、操作计算机地都可视为犯罪地。

但技术的滞后和法律的缺失还是让我国在网络犯罪的打击方面显得力不从心,国家和个人时刻处于危险之中。

针对网络犯罪的刑事管辖权的确定问题,学界也出现了一些理论,如：新主权理论、管辖权相对论、最低限度联系原则、网址来源国理论、属地管辖权的扩大原则、有限保护论等。

这些理论是学者们智慧的结晶,在实践中都具有一定的可采性,但各理论中存在的问题也是显而易见的,在实践中如何适用也没有清晰和统一的说明,无法有效指导现实的司法工作,这对刑事案件管辖权问题的解决是毫无帮助的。

笔者认为在确立网络犯罪案件的刑事管辖权时,要立足于法律的稳定性,坚持以属地管辖为基础,在实践中扩大解释犯罪地以便于有效适用；增加管辖权行使的依据,实务中提升级别管辖层次；在处理区际和跨境案件时加强合作,基本能够解决现阶段网络犯罪的管辖权问题。

据此,本文在理论分析的基础上,结合案例提出解决网络犯罪管辖权的建议。

【英文摘要】With the development of the cyber, which expand life field, and brings enormous convenience for human society. But at the same time it gives people to share the strange, also has brought an unprecedented impact. For example, it is unprepared. for the cyber crime that happened in cyber virtual space. It is a new type for the cyber crime. Because of the characteristics of the globalization and virtualization in cyber space, which bring up the intelligent, concealment and wide performance in the cyber crime. However the characteristics of cyber space is just right the different problem of the criminal jurisdiction over cyber crimes. With traditional criminal cases, we can find a steady connections to define the question of jurisdiction, but it is very difficult to find a steady factors defining the question of jurisdiction.It grows perplexity with using traditional criminal jurisdiction. With the social constantly progress and technology rapid development, the people produce rely on network. The cyber crime is constantly rampant in increasingly, which bring up more jurisdiction conflicts. If the problem cann’t be solved, the consequence is unimaginable. Facing the serious harm which bring up of the cyber crime, many countries use related legislation to standard. Also it appears the first international convention according to cyber crime behavior. My country based on the practice to form the mainstream view for the cyber crime jurisdiction is to expand explaining crime place to realize jurisdiction. Maybe the web site of the network service providers, download, operating computer place, which are as crime place. But because of the lag of the technology and the lack of law, or make our country cann’t blow cyber crime greatly, and the country and personal are in danger at the moment. According to sure problem of the criminal jurisdiction in cyber crime, it grows some theory in academic. For example, the new sovereignty theory,the jurisdiction relativity, the new sovereignty theory, the jurisdiction relativity, the minimum relationship principle, the site sources theory, the principle of territoriality expanding jurisdiction, thelimited protection theory and so on. The theory is crystallization of scholars’ wisdom. It has certainly admissibility in practice. But also it is obvious of the problem in each theory. In practice how to apply also have no clear and unity explain. It make us can’t guidance reality judicial work effectively. It is unhelpful for solving the problem about criminal jurisdiction. The author think to establish cyber crime cases about criminal jurisdiction, we must based on the stability of the laws, and insist on to basis of dependency jurisdiction. To expand interpret crime in practice so that apply it effectively. To increase the base about the jurisdiction exercise. To promote the grade jurisdiction levels in practice. And to strengthen cooperation when processing interregional and cross-border cases, which can solve the jurisdiction problem at present about cyber crime. According to the text in analysis basis, and combined with cases to put forward suggests about solving cyber crime jurisdiction.【关键词】网络犯罪管辖冲突对策【英文关键词】Cyber Crime Jurisdiction Conflict Countermeasures【目录】网络犯罪刑事管辖研究内容摘要6-7Abstract7-8目录9-11引言11-12一、案情介绍12二、案件焦点与分歧意见12-13(一) 案件焦点12(二) 分歧意见12-13三、法理分析13-22(一) 网络犯罪概述13-15 1. 网络犯罪的基本内涵13-14 2. 网络犯罪的特点14-15(二) 网络犯罪对传统刑事管辖权的冲击15-17 1. 网络犯罪对犯罪行为地的判断形成冲击15-16 2. 网络犯罪对刑事法律适用形成冲击16 3. 网络犯罪对刑事案件的审判管辖形成冲击16-17 4. 网络犯罪对刑事案件的保护管辖权形成冲击17(三) 网络犯罪刑事管辖权的理论之争17-20 1. 新主权理论17-18 2. 管辖权相对论18 3. 网址来源国理论18-19 4. 属地管辖理论19 5. 最低限度联系论19-20 6. 有限保护理论207. 传统管辖权理论20(四) 国际社会关于网络犯罪刑事管辖权的立法探索20-22四、本案及相似案例的法律适用评析22-29(一) 本案的法律适用评析22-25(二) 构建符合我国国情的网络犯罪刑事管辖模式25-29 1. 增加管辖权行使的依据,提升网络犯罪级别管辖的层次25-26 2. 以属地管辖为基础确立网络犯罪案件刑事管辖权26 3. 区际网络犯罪案件管辖权的确定26-27 4. 涉及外国的网络犯罪跨境案件的管辖权的确定27-28 5. 国际网络犯罪管辖权的确定28-29结语29-30致谢30-31参考文献31-32【备注】索购全文在线加好友QQ：139938848同时提供论文写作一对一指导和论文发表委托服务。