Quantum mechanics on noncommutative Riemann surfaces

合集下载

[精彩]量子力学英语词汇

[精彩]量子力学英语词汇

1、microscopic world 微观世界2、macroscopic world 宏观世界3、quantum theory 量子[理]论4、quantum mechanics 量子力学5、wave mechanics 波动力学6、matrix mechanics 矩阵力学7、Planck constant 普朗克常数8、wave-particle duality 波粒二象性9、state 态10、state function 态函数11、state vector 态矢量12、superposition principle of state 态叠加原理13、orthogonal states 正交态14、antisymmetrical state 正交定理15、stationary state 对称态16、antisymmetrical state 反对称态17、stationary state 定态18、ground state 基态19、excited state 受激态20、binding state 束缚态21、unbound state 非束缚态22、degenerate state 简并态23、degenerate system 简并系24、non-deenerate state 非简并态25、non-degenerate system 非简并系26、de Broglie wave 德布罗意波27、wave function 波函数28、time-dependent wave function 含时波函数29、wave packet 波包30、probability 几率31、probability amplitude 几率幅32、probability density 几率密度33、quantum ensemble 量子系综34、wave equation 波动方程35、Schrodinger equation 薛定谔方程36、Potential well 势阱37、Potential barrien 势垒38、potential barrier penetration 势垒贯穿39、tunnel effect 隧道效应40、linear harmonic oscillator线性谐振子41、zero proint energy 零点能42、central field 辏力场43、Coulomb field 库仑场44、δ-function δ-函数45、operator 算符46、commuting operators 对易算符47、anticommuting operators 反对易算符48、complex conjugate operator 复共轭算符49、Hermitian conjugate operator 厄米共轭算符50、Hermitian operator 厄米算符51、momentum operator 动量算符52、energy operator 能量算符53、Hamiltonian operator 哈密顿算符54、angular momentum operator 角动量算符55、spin operator 自旋算符56、eigen value 本征值57、secular equation 久期方程58、observable 可观察量59、orthogonality 正交性60、completeness 完全性61、closure property 封闭性62、normalization 归一化63、orthonormalized functions 正交归一化函数64、quantum number 量子数65、principal quantum number 主量子数66、radial quantum number 径向量子数67、angular quantum number 角量子数68、magnetic quantum number 磁量子数69、uncertainty relation 测不准关系70、principle of complementarity 并协原理71、quantum Poisson bracket 量子泊松括号72、representation 表象73、coordinate representation 坐标表象74、momentum representation 动量表象75、energy representation 能量表象76、Schrodinger representation 薛定谔表象77、Heisenberg representation 海森伯表象78、interaction representation 相互作用表象79、occupation number representation 粒子数表象80、Dirac symbol 狄拉克符号81、ket vector 右矢量82、bra vector 左矢量83、basis vector 基矢量84、basis ket 基右矢85、basis bra 基左矢86、orthogonal kets 正交右矢87、orthogonal bras 正交左矢88、symmetrical kets 对称右矢89、antisymmetrical kets 反对称右矢90、Hilbert space 希耳伯空间91、perturbation theory 微扰理论92、stationary perturbation theory 定态微扰论93、time-dependent perturbation theory 含时微扰论94、Wentzel-Kramers-Brillouin method W. K. B.近似法95、elastic scattering 弹性散射96、inelastic scattering 非弹性散射97、scattering cross-section 散射截面98、partial wave method 分波法99、Born approximation 玻恩近似法100、centre-of-mass coordinates 质心坐标系101、laboratory coordinates 实验室坐标系102、transition 跃迁103、dipole transition 偶极子跃迁104、selection rule 选择定则105、spin 自旋106、electron spin 电子自旋107、spin quantum number 自旋量子数108、spin wave function 自旋波函数109、coupling 耦合110、vector-coupling coefficient 矢量耦合系数111、many-partic le system 多子体系112、exchange forece 交换力113、exchange energy 交换能114、Heitler-London approximation 海特勒-伦敦近似法115、Hartree-Fock equation 哈特里-福克方程116、self-consistent field 自洽场117、Thomas-Fermi equation 托马斯-费米方程118、second quantization 二次量子化119、identical particles全同粒子120、Pauli matrices 泡利矩阵121、Pauli equation 泡利方程122、Pauli’s exclusion principle泡利不相容原理123、Relativistic wave equation 相对论性波动方程124、Klein-Gordon equation 克莱因-戈登方程125、Dirac equation 狄拉克方程126、Dirac hole theory 狄拉克空穴理论127、negative energy state 负能态128、negative probability 负几率129、microscopic causality 微观因果性本征矢量eigenvector本征态eigenstate本征值eigenvalue本征值方程eigenvalue equation本征子空间eigensubspace (可以理解为本征矢空间)变分法variatinial method标量scalar算符operator表象representation表象变换transformation of representation表象理论theory of representation波函数wave function波恩近似Born approximation玻色子boson费米子fermion不确定关系uncertainty relation狄拉克方程Dirac equation狄拉克记号Dirac symbol定态stationary state定态微扰法time-independent perturbation定态薛定谔方程time-independent Schro(此处上面有两点)dinger equati on 动量表象momentum representation角动量表象angular mommentum representation占有数表象occupation number representation坐标(位置)表象position representation角动量算符angular mommentum operator角动量耦合coupling of angular mommentum对称性symmetry对易关系commutator厄米算符hermitian operator厄米多项式Hermite polynomial分量component光的发射emission of light光的吸收absorption of light受激发射excited emission自发发射spontaneous emission轨道角动量orbital angular momentum自旋角动量spin angular momentum轨道磁矩orbital magnetic moment归一化normalization哈密顿hamiltonion黑体辐射black body radiation康普顿散射Compton scattering基矢basis vector基态ground state基右矢basis ket ‘右矢’ket基左矢basis bra简并度degenerancy精细结构fine structure径向方程radial equation久期方程secular equation量子化quantization矩阵matrix模module模方square of module内积inner product逆算符inverse operator欧拉角Eular angles泡利矩阵Pauli matrix平均值expectation value (期望值)泡利不相容原理Pauli exclusion principle氢原子hydrogen atom球鞋函数spherical harmonics全同粒子identical partic les塞曼效应Zeeman effect上升下降算符raising and lowering operator 消灭算符destruction operator产生算符creation operator矢量空间vector space守恒定律conservation law守恒量conservation quantity投影projection投影算符projection operator微扰法pertubation method希尔伯特空间Hilbert space线性算符linear operator线性无关linear independence谐振子harmonic oscillator选择定则selection rule幺正变换unitary transformation幺正算符unitary operator宇称parity跃迁transition运动方程equation of motion正交归一性orthonormalization正交性orthogonality转动rotation自旋磁矩spin magnetic monent(以上是量子力学中的主要英语词汇,有些未涉及到的可以自由组合。

The Quantum Mechanics of Nanostructures

The Quantum Mechanics of Nanostructures

The Quantum Mechanics ofNanostructures在二十世纪初期,科学家们开始探索微观世界,发现物质不是像人们过去认为的那样实体的,而是由无数微小的基本粒子组成的。

这一发现彻底颠覆了过去的认知,引发了科学领域的革命。

随着科技的进步,人们发现微观世界的可塑性和变化性越来越重要,特别是在纳米结构研究中。

量子力学是研究微观物质的分支学科。

在纳米结构中,由于尺寸的微小和表面的高度变化,量子力学的效应变得尤为显著。

实际上,纳米尺度下的物理现象是非常不同于宏观世界的,要求我们开展全新的理论和方法。

在纳米材料的研究中,量子力学的应用广泛存在。

举个例子,纳米颗粒中的量子点对光的吸收和发射起着至关重要的作用。

在一个纳米结构中的电子不能回避任一本质上的受限束缚,其运动从单一的粒子系统变成了固体晶体系统中的波函数。

这种类似波动的运动和其他微观量子效应,如局域化和微观隧道效应,导致纳米材料的复杂性和变化性增加。

因此,我们需要量子力学的方法来描述这种动力学过程。

随着纳米科技的进步和发展,人们已经发现,许多量子力学效应对纳米结构和器件的性质和功能具有重要作用。

例如,纳米线和二维材料的表面态密度高,电荷输运现象变得更为复杂,需要借助量子力学来建模和描述。

同时,在加工成像等领域,人们也发现量子力学的应用可以提供更精确的解决方案。

使用电子和其他粒子来探测纳米结构的表面,电子显微镜等技术已经成为普遍地工具,这些技术通常需要使用量子力学的方法。

通过计算纳米电子学的电子输运,设计高效的器件也成为了可行和实现的了。

总之,量子力学已经成为了纳米领域的基础,不断发展和完善的量子力学方法可以帮助我们更好地理解纳米结构的物质行为和复杂性。

这一发现和理论将在我们未来的纳米技术,制造和生物医学领域发挥重要的作用,改变我们生活的方方面面。

量子力学英语词汇

量子力学英语词汇

量子力学专业英语词汇1、microscopic world 微观世界2、macroscopic world 宏观世界3、quantum theory 量子[理]论4、quantum mechanics 量子力学5、wave mechanics 波动力学6、matrix mechanics 矩阵力学7、Planck constant 普朗克常数8、wave-particle duality 波粒二象性9、state 态10、state function 态函数11、state vector 态矢量12、superposition principle of state 态叠加原理13、orthogonal states 正交态14、antisymmetrical state 正交定理15、stationary state 对称态16、antisymmetrical state 反对称态17、stationary state 定态18、ground state 基态19、excited state 受激态20、binding state 束缚态21、unbound state 非束缚态22、degenerate state 简并态23、degenerate system 简并系24、non-deenerate state 非简并态25、non-degenerate system 非简并系26、de Broglie wave 德布罗意波27、wave function 波函数28、time-dependent wave function 含时波函数29、wave packet 波包30、probability 几率31、probability amplitude 几率幅32、probability density 几率密度33、quantum ensemble 量子系综34、wave equation 波动方程35、Schrodinger equation 薛定谔方程36、Potential well 势阱37、Potential barrien 势垒38、potential barrier penetration 势垒贯穿39、tunnel effect 隧道效应40、linear harmonic oscillator 线性谐振子41、zero proint energy 零点能42、central field 辏力场43、Coulomb field 库仑场44、δ-function δ-函数45、operator 算符46、commuting operators 对易算符47、anticommuting operators 反对易算符48、complex conjugate operator 复共轭算符49、Hermitian conjugate operator 厄米共轭算符50、Hermitian operator 厄米算符51、momentum operator 动量算符52、energy operator 能量算符53、Hamiltonian operator 哈密顿算符54、angular momentum operator 角动量算符55、spin operator 自旋算符56、eigen value 本征值57、secular equation 久期方程58、observable 可观察量59、orthogonality 正交性60、completeness 完全性61、closure property 封闭性62、normalization 归一化63、orthonormalized functions 正交归一化函数64、quantum number 量子数65、principal quantum number 主量子数66、radial quantum number 径向量子数67、angular quantum number 角量子数68、magnetic quantum number 磁量子数69、uncertainty relation 测不准关系70、principle of complementarity 并协原理71、quantum Poisson bracket 量子泊松括号72、representation 表象73、coordinate representation 坐标表象74、momentum representation 动量表象75、energy representation 能量表象76、Schrodinger representation 薛定谔表象77、Heisenberg representation 海森伯表象78、interaction representation 相互作用表象79、occupation number representation 粒子数表象80、Dirac symbol 狄拉克符号81、ket vector 右矢量82、bra vector 左矢量83、basis vector 基矢量84、basis ket 基右矢85、basis bra 基左矢86、orthogonal kets 正交右矢87、orthogonal bras 正交左矢88、symmetrical kets 对称右矢89、antisymmetrical kets 反对称右矢90、Hilbert space 希耳伯空间91、perturbation theory 微扰理论92、stationary perturbation theory 定态微扰论93、time-dependent perturbation theory 含时微扰论94、Wentzel-Kramers-Brillouin method W. K. B.近似法95、elastic scattering 弹性散射96、inelastic scattering 非弹性散射97、scattering cross-section 散射截面98、partial wave method 分波法99、Born approximation 玻恩近似法100、centre-of-mass coordinates 质心坐标系101、laboratory coordinates 实验室坐标系102、transition 跃迁103、dipole transition 偶极子跃迁104、selection rule 选择定则105、spin 自旋106、electron spin 电子自旋107、spin quantum number 自旋量子数108、spin wave function 自旋波函数109、coupling 耦合110、vector-coupling coefficient 矢量耦合系数111、many-particle system 多子体系112、exchange forece 交换力113、exchange energy 交换能114、Heitler-London approximation 海特勒-伦敦近似法115、Hartree-Fock equation 哈特里-福克方程116、self-consistent field 自洽场117、Thomas-Fermi equation 托马斯-费米方程118、second quantization 二次量子化119、identical particles 全同粒子120、Pauli matrices 泡利矩阵121、Pauli equation 泡利方程122、Pauli’s exclusion principle泡利不相容原理123、Relativistic wave equation 相对论性波动方程124、Klein-Gordon equation 克莱因-戈登方程125、Dirac equation 狄拉克方程126、Dirac hole theory 狄拉克空穴理论127、negative energy state 负能态128、negative probability 负几率129、microscopic causality 微观因果性。

八卦一下量子机器学习的历史

八卦一下量子机器学习的历史

八卦一下量子机器学习的历史人工智能和量子信息在讲量子机器学习之前我们先来八卦一下人工智能和量子信息。

1956,达特茅斯,十位大牛聚集于此,麦卡锡(John McCarthy)给这个活动起了个别出心裁的名字:“人工智能夏季研讨会”(Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence),现在被普遍认为是人工智能的起点。

AI的历史是非常曲折的,从符号派到联结派,从逻辑推理到统计学习,从经历70年代和80年代两次大规模的政府经费削减,到90年代开始提出神经网络,默默无闻直到2006年Hinton提出深层神经网络的层级预训练方法,从专注于算法到李飞飞引入ImageNet,大家开始注意到数据的重要性,大数据的土壤加上计算力的摩尔定律迎来了现在深度学习的火热。

量子信息的历史则更为悠久和艰难。

这一切都可以归结到1935年,爱因斯坦,波多尔斯基和罗森在“Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete?”一文中提出了EPR悖论,从而引出了量子纠缠这个概念。

回溯到更早一点,1927年第五次索尔维会议,世界上最主要的物理学家聚在一起讨论新近表述的量子理论。

会议上爱因斯坦和波尔起了争执,爱因斯坦用“上帝不会掷骰子”的观点来反对海森堡的不确定性原理,而玻尔反驳道,“爱因斯坦,不要告诉上帝怎么做”。

这一论战持续了很多年,伴随着量子力学的发展,直到爱因斯坦在1955年去世。

爱因斯坦直到去世也还一直坚持这个世界没有随机性这种东西,所有的物理规律都是确定性的,给定初态和演化规律,物理学家就能推算出任意时刻系统的状态。

而量子力学生来就伴随了不确定性,一只猫在没测量前可以同时“生”和'死',不具备一个确定的状态,只有测量后这只猫才具备“生”和'死'其中的一种状态,至于具体是哪一种状态量子力学只能告诉我们每一种态的概率,给不出一个确定的结果。

Introduction to quantum mechanics

Introduction to quantum mechanics
1
¯ @ h (x, t) i @x
(.6)
Bounded system means that the potential renders the particle to be localized at a region of finite volume. For unbounded systems, di↵erent convention for normalization is used.
is conserved (given that the potential is time independent) and is equal to the energy. Macroscopic objects we experience in our daily life appear to be governed by the Classical Mechanics described above, and no one doubted its validity until the early 20th century. It was accepted as fact that the Classical Mechanics can describe the behavior of even the smallest particle imaginable such as electron. However, with the progress of experimental capability in the beginning of the 20th century, puzzling evidences were reported, which could not be explained by the Classical Mechanics at all. Thanks to brilliant e↵orts put forth by the pioneers such as Planck, Schr¨ odinger, Bohr, Heisenberg, Born, Pauli, Dirac, the secret of the physics governing the microscopic world, now known as Quantum Mechanics, was uncovered in the early 20th century. Three important findings that led to the formulation of QM can be summarized as follows. (i) Quantization of light energy Elight = nh⌫, where h = 6.626 ⇥ 10

Quantum Computing for Computer Scientists

Quantum Computing for Computer Scientists

More informationQuantum Computing for Computer ScientistsThe multidisciplinaryfield of quantum computing strives to exploit someof the uncanny aspects of quantum mechanics to expand our computa-tional horizons.Quantum Computing for Computer Scientists takes read-ers on a tour of this fascinating area of cutting-edge research.Writtenin an accessible yet rigorous fashion,this book employs ideas and tech-niques familiar to every student of computer science.The reader is notexpected to have any advanced mathematics or physics background.Af-ter presenting the necessary prerequisites,the material is organized tolook at different aspects of quantum computing from the specific stand-point of computer science.There are chapters on computer architecture,algorithms,programming languages,theoretical computer science,cryp-tography,information theory,and hardware.The text has step-by-stepexamples,more than two hundred exercises with solutions,and program-ming drills that bring the ideas of quantum computing alive for today’scomputer science students and researchers.Noson S.Yanofsky,PhD,is an Associate Professor in the Departmentof Computer and Information Science at Brooklyn College,City Univer-sity of New York and at the PhD Program in Computer Science at TheGraduate Center of CUNY.Mirco A.Mannucci,PhD,is the founder and CEO of HoloMathics,LLC,a research and development company with a focus on innovative mathe-matical modeling.He also serves as Adjunct Professor of Computer Sci-ence at George Mason University and the University of Maryland.QUANTUM COMPUTING FORCOMPUTER SCIENTISTSNoson S.YanofskyBrooklyn College,City University of New YorkandMirco A.MannucciHoloMathics,LLCMore informationMore informationcambridge university pressCambridge,New York,Melbourne,Madrid,Cape Town,Singapore,S˜ao Paulo,DelhiCambridge University Press32Avenue of the Americas,New York,NY10013-2473,USAInformation on this title:/9780521879965C Noson S.Yanofsky and Mirco A.Mannucci2008This publication is in copyright.Subject to statutory exceptionand to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements,no reproduction of any part may take place withoutthe written permission of Cambridge University Press.First published2008Printed in the United States of AmericaA catalog record for this publication is available from the British Library.Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication dataYanofsky,Noson S.,1967–Quantum computing for computer scientists/Noson S.Yanofsky andMirco A.Mannucci.p.cm.Includes bibliographical references and index.ISBN978-0-521-87996-5(hardback)1.Quantum computers.I.Mannucci,Mirco A.,1960–II.Title.QA76.889.Y352008004.1–dc222008020507ISBN978-0-521-879965hardbackCambridge University Press has no responsibility forthe persistence or accuracy of URLs for external orthird-party Internet Web sites referred to in this publicationand does not guarantee that any content on suchWeb sites is,or will remain,accurate or appropriate.More informationDedicated toMoishe and Sharon Yanofskyandto the memory ofLuigi and Antonietta MannucciWisdom is one thing:to know the tho u ght by which all things are directed thro u gh allthings.˜Heraclitu s of Ephe s u s(535–475B C E)a s quoted in Dio g ene s Laertiu s’sLives and Opinions of Eminent PhilosophersBook IX,1. More informationMore informationContentsPreface xi1Complex Numbers71.1Basic Definitions81.2The Algebra of Complex Numbers101.3The Geometry of Complex Numbers152Complex Vector Spaces292.1C n as the Primary Example302.2Definitions,Properties,and Examples342.3Basis and Dimension452.4Inner Products and Hilbert Spaces532.5Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors602.6Hermitian and Unitary Matrices622.7Tensor Product of Vector Spaces663The Leap from Classical to Quantum743.1Classical Deterministic Systems743.2Probabilistic Systems793.3Quantum Systems883.4Assembling Systems974Basic Quantum Theory1034.1Quantum States1034.2Observables1154.3Measuring1264.4Dynamics1294.5Assembling Quantum Systems1325Architecture1385.1Bits and Qubits138viiMore informationviii Contents5.2Classical Gates1445.3Reversible Gates1515.4Quantum Gates1586Algorithms1706.1Deutsch’s Algorithm1716.2The Deutsch–Jozsa Algorithm1796.3Simon’s Periodicity Algorithm1876.4Grover’s Search Algorithm1956.5Shor’s Factoring Algorithm2047Programming Languages2207.1Programming in a Quantum World2207.2Quantum Assembly Programming2217.3Toward Higher-Level Quantum Programming2307.4Quantum Computation Before Quantum Computers2378Theoretical Computer Science2398.1Deterministic and Nondeterministic Computations2398.2Probabilistic Computations2468.3Quantum Computations2519Cryptography2629.1Classical Cryptography2629.2Quantum Key Exchange I:The BB84Protocol2689.3Quantum Key Exchange II:The B92Protocol2739.4Quantum Key Exchange III:The EPR Protocol2759.5Quantum Teleportation27710Information Theory28410.1Classical Information and Shannon Entropy28410.2Quantum Information and von Neumann Entropy28810.3Classical and Quantum Data Compression29510.4Error-Correcting Codes30211Hardware30511.1Quantum Hardware:Goals and Challenges30611.2Implementing a Quantum Computer I:Ion Traps31111.3Implementing a Quantum Computer II:Linear Optics31311.4Implementing a Quantum Computer III:NMRand Superconductors31511.5Future of Quantum Ware316Appendix A Historical Bibliography of Quantum Computing319 by Jill CirasellaA.1Reading Scientific Articles319A.2Models of Computation320More informationContents ixA.3Quantum Gates321A.4Quantum Algorithms and Implementations321A.5Quantum Cryptography323A.6Quantum Information323A.7More Milestones?324Appendix B Answers to Selected Exercises325Appendix C Quantum Computing Experiments with MATLAB351C.1Playing with Matlab351C.2Complex Numbers and Matrices351C.3Quantum Computations354Appendix D Keeping Abreast of Quantum News:QuantumComputing on the Web and in the Literature357by Jill CirasellaD.1Keeping Abreast of Popular News357D.2Keeping Abreast of Scientific Literature358D.3The Best Way to Stay Abreast?359Appendix E Selected Topics for Student Presentations360E.1Complex Numbers361E.2Complex Vector Spaces362E.3The Leap from Classical to Quantum363E.4Basic Quantum Theory364E.5Architecture365E.6Algorithms366E.7Programming Languages368E.8Theoretical Computer Science369E.9Cryptography370E.10Information Theory370E.11Hardware371Bibliography373Index381More informationPrefaceQuantum computing is a fascinating newfield at the intersection of computer sci-ence,mathematics,and physics,which strives to harness some of the uncanny as-pects of quantum mechanics to broaden our computational horizons.This bookpresents some of the most exciting and interesting topics in quantum computing.Along the way,there will be some amazing facts about the universe in which we liveand about the very notions of information and computation.The text you hold in your hands has a distinctflavor from most of the other cur-rently available books on quantum computing.First and foremost,we do not assumethat our reader has much of a mathematics or physics background.This book shouldbe readable by anyone who is in or beyond their second year in a computer scienceprogram.We have written this book specifically with computer scientists in mind,and tailored it accordingly:we assume a bare minimum of mathematical sophistica-tion,afirst course in discrete structures,and a healthy level of curiosity.Because thistext was written specifically for computer people,in addition to the many exercisesthroughout the text,we added many programming drills.These are a hands-on,funway of learning the material presented and getting a real feel for the subject.The calculus-phobic reader will be happy to learn that derivatives and integrals are virtually absent from our text.Quite simply,we avoid differentiation,integra-tion,and all higher mathematics by carefully selecting only those topics that arecritical to a basic introduction to quantum computing.Because we are focusing onthe fundamentals of quantum computing,we can restrict ourselves to thefinite-dimensional mathematics that is required.This turns out to be not much more thanmanipulating vectors and matrices with complex entries.Surprisingly enough,thelion’s share of quantum computing can be done without the intricacies of advancedmathematics.Nevertheless,we hasten to stress that this is a technical textbook.We are not writing a popular science book,nor do we substitute hand waving for rigor or math-ematical precision.Most other texts in thefield present a primer on quantum mechanics in all its glory.Many assume some knowledge of classical mechanics.We do not make theseassumptions.We only discuss what is needed for a basic understanding of quantumxiMore informationxii Prefacecomputing as afield of research in its own right,although we cite sources for learningmore about advanced topics.There are some who consider quantum computing to be solely within the do-main of physics.Others think of the subject as purely mathematical.We stress thecomputer science aspect of quantum computing.It is not our intention for this book to be the definitive treatment of quantum computing.There are a few topics that we do not even touch,and there are severalothers that we approach briefly,not exhaustively.As of this writing,the bible ofquantum computing is Nielsen and Chuang’s magnificent Quantum Computing andQuantum Information(2000).Their book contains almost everything known aboutquantum computing at the time of its publication.We would like to think of ourbook as a usefulfirst step that can prepare the reader for that text.FEATURESThis book is almost entirely self-contained.We do not demand that the reader comearmed with a large toolbox of skills.Even the subject of complex numbers,which istaught in high school,is given a fairly comprehensive review.The book contains many solved problems and easy-to-understand descriptions.We do not merely present the theory;rather,we explain it and go through severalexamples.The book also contains many exercises,which we strongly recommendthe serious reader should attempt to solve.There is no substitute for rolling up one’ssleeves and doing some work!We have also incorporated plenty of programming drills throughout our text.These are hands-on exercises that can be carried out on your laptop to gain a betterunderstanding of the concepts presented here(they are also a great way of hav-ing fun).We hasten to point out that we are entirely language-agnostic.The stu-dent should write the programs in the language that feels most comfortable.Weare also paradigm-agnostic.If declarative programming is your favorite method,gofor it.If object-oriented programming is your game,use that.The programmingdrills build on one another.Functions created in one programming drill will be usedand modified in later drills.Furthermore,in Appendix C,we show how to makelittle quantum computing emulators with MATLAB or how to use a ready-madeone.(Our choice of MATLAB was dictated by the fact that it makes very easy-to-build,quick-and-dirty prototypes,thanks to its vast amount of built-in mathematicaltools.)This text appears to be thefirst to handle quantum programming languages in a significant way.Until now,there have been only research papers and a few surveyson the topic.Chapter7describes the basics of this expandingfield:perhaps some ofour readers will be inspired to contribute to quantum programming!This book also contains several appendices that are important for further study:Appendix A takes readers on a tour of major papers in quantum computing.This bibliographical essay was written by Jill Cirasella,Computational SciencesSpecialist at the Brooklyn College Library.In addition to having a master’s de-gree in library and information science,Jill has a master’s degree in logic,forwhich she wrote a thesis on classical and quantum graph algorithms.This dualbackground uniquely qualifies her to suggest and describe further readings.More informationPreface xiii Appendix B contains the answers to some of the exercises in the text.Othersolutions will also be found on the book’s Web page.We strongly urge studentsto do the exercises on their own and then check their answers against ours.Appendix C uses MATLAB,the popular mathematical environment and an es-tablished industry standard,to show how to carry out most of the mathematicaloperations described in this book.MATLAB has scores of routines for manip-ulating complex matrices:we briefly review the most useful ones and show howthe reader can quickly perform a few quantum computing experiments with al-most no effort,using the freely available MATLAB quantum emulator Quack.Appendix D,also by Jill Cirasella,describes how to use online resources to keepup with developments in quantum computing.Quantum computing is a fast-movingfield,and this appendix offers guidelines and tips forfinding relevantarticles and announcements.Appendix E is a list of possible topics for student presentations.We give briefdescriptions of different topics that a student might present before a class of hispeers.We also provide some hints about where to start looking for materials topresent.ORGANIZATIONThe book begins with two chapters of mathematical preliminaries.Chapter1con-tains the basics of complex numbers,and Chapter2deals with complex vectorspaces.Although much of Chapter1is currently taught in high school,we feel thata review is in order.Much of Chapter2will be known by students who have had acourse in linear algebra.We deliberately did not relegate these chapters to an ap-pendix at the end of the book because the mathematics is necessary to understandwhat is really going on.A reader who knows the material can safely skip thefirsttwo chapters.She might want to skim over these chapters and then return to themas a reference,using the index and the table of contents tofind specific topics.Chapter3is a gentle introduction to some of the ideas that will be encountered throughout the rest of the ing simple models and simple matrix multipli-cation,we demonstrate some of the fundamental concepts of quantum mechanics,which are then formally developed in Chapter4.From there,Chapter5presentssome of the basic architecture of quantum computing.Here one willfind the notionsof a qubit(a quantum generalization of a bit)and the quantum analog of logic gates.Once Chapter5is understood,readers can safely proceed to their choice of Chapters6through11.Each chapter takes its title from a typical course offered in acomputer science department.The chapters look at that subfield of quantum com-puting from the perspective of the given course.These chapters are almost totallyindependent of one another.We urge the readers to study the particular chapterthat corresponds to their favorite course.Learn topics that you likefirst.From thereproceed to other chapters.Figure0.1summarizes the dependencies of the chapters.One of the hardest topics tackled in this text is that of considering two quan-tum systems and combining them,or“entangled”quantum systems.This is donemathematically in Section2.7.It is further motivated in Section3.4and formallypresented in Section4.5.The reader might want to look at these sections together.xivPrefaceFigure 0.1.Chapter dependencies.There are many ways this book can be used as a text for a course.We urge instructors to find their own way.May we humbly suggest the following three plans of action:(1)A class that provides some depth might involve the following:Go through Chapters 1,2,3,4,and 5.Armed with that background,study the entirety of Chapter 6(“Algorithms”)in depth.One can spend at least a third of a semester on that chapter.After wrestling a bit with quantum algorithms,the student will get a good feel for the entire enterprise.(2)If breadth is preferred,pick and choose one or two sections from each of the advanced chapters.Such a course might look like this:(1),2,3,4.1,4.4,5,6.1,7.1,9.1,10.1,10.2,and 11.This will permit the student to see the broad outline of quantum computing and then pursue his or her own path.(3)For a more advanced class (a class in which linear algebra and some mathe-matical sophistication is assumed),we recommend that students be told to read Chapters 1,2,and 3on their own.A nice course can then commence with Chapter 4and plow through most of the remainder of the book.If this is being used as a text in a classroom setting,we strongly recommend that the students make presentations.There are selected topics mentioned in Appendix E.There is no substitute for student participation!Although we have tried to include many topics in this text,inevitably some oth-ers had to be left out.Here are a few that we omitted because of space considera-tions:many of the more complicated proofs in Chapter 8,results about oracle computation,the details of the (quantum)Fourier transforms,and the latest hardware implementations.We give references for further study on these,as well as other subjects,throughout the text.More informationMore informationPreface xvANCILLARIESWe are going to maintain a Web page for the text at/∼noson/qctext.html/The Web page will containperiodic updates to the book,links to interesting books and articles on quantum computing,some answers to certain exercises not solved in Appendix B,anderrata.The reader is encouraged to send any and all corrections tonoson@Help us make this textbook better!ACKNOLWEDGMENTSBoth of us had the great privilege of writing our doctoral theses under the gentleguidance of the recently deceased Alex Heller.Professor Heller wrote the follow-ing1about his teacher Samuel“Sammy”Eilenberg and Sammy’s mathematics:As I perceived it,then,Sammy considered that the highest value in mathematicswas to be found,not in specious depth nor in the overcoming of overwhelmingdifficulty,but rather in providing the definitive clarity that would illuminate itsunderlying order.This never-ending struggle to bring out the underlying order of mathematical structures was always Professor Heller’s everlasting goal,and he did his best to passit on to his students.We have gained greatly from his clarity of vision and his viewof mathematics,but we also saw,embodied in a man,the classical and sober ideal ofcontemplative life at its very best.We both remain eternally grateful to him.While at the City University of New York,we also had the privilege of inter-acting with one of the world’s foremost logicians,Professor Rohit Parikh,a manwhose seminal contributions to thefield are only matched by his enduring com-mitment to promote younger researchers’work.Besides opening fascinating vis-tas to us,Professor Parikh encouraged us more than once to follow new directionsof thought.His continued professional and personal guidance are greatly appre-ciated.We both received our Ph.D.’s from the Department of Mathematics in The Graduate Center of the City University of New York.We thank them for providingus with a warm and friendly environment in which to study and learn real mathemat-ics.Thefirst author also thanks the entire Brooklyn College family and,in partic-ular,the Computer and Information Science Department for being supportive andvery helpful in this endeavor.1See page1349of Bass et al.(1998).More informationxvi PrefaceSeveral faculty members of Brooklyn College and The Graduate Center were kind enough to read and comment on parts of this book:Michael Anshel,DavidArnow,Jill Cirasella,Dayton Clark,Eva Cogan,Jim Cox,Scott Dexter,EdgarFeldman,Fred Gardiner,Murray Gross,Chaya Gurwitz,Keith Harrow,JunHu,Yedidyah Langsam,Peter Lesser,Philipp Rothmaler,Chris Steinsvold,AlexSverdlov,Aaron Tenenbaum,Micha Tomkiewicz,Al Vasquez,Gerald Weiss,andPaula Whitlock.Their comments have made this a better text.Thank you all!We were fortunate to have had many students of Brooklyn College and The Graduate Center read and comment on earlier drafts:Shira Abraham,RachelAdler,Ali Assarpour,Aleksander Barkan,Sayeef Bazli,Cheuk Man Chan,WeiChen,Evgenia Dandurova,Phillip Dreizen,C.S.Fahie,Miriam Gutherc,RaveHarpaz,David Herzog,Alex Hoffnung,Matthew P.Johnson,Joel Kammet,SerdarKara,Karen Kletter,Janusz Kusyk,Tiziana Ligorio,Matt Meyer,James Ng,SeverinNgnosse,Eric Pacuit,Jason Schanker,Roman Shenderovsky,Aleksandr Shnayder-man,Rose B.Sigler,Shai Silver,Justin Stallard,Justin Tojeira,John Ma Sang Tsang,Sadia Zahoor,Mark Zelcer,and Xiaowen Zhang.We are indebted to them.Many other people looked over parts or all of the text:Scott Aaronson,Ste-fano Bettelli,Adam Brandenburger,Juan B.Climent,Anita Colvard,Leon Ehren-preis,Michael Greenebaum,Miriam Klein,Eli Kravits,Raphael Magarik,JohnMaiorana,Domenico Napoletani,Vaughan Pratt,Suri Raber,Peter Selinger,EvanSiegel,Thomas Tradler,and Jennifer Whitehead.Their criticism and helpful ideasare deeply appreciated.Thanks to Peter Rohde for creating and making available to everyone his MAT-LAB q-emulator Quack and also for letting us use it in our appendix.We had a gooddeal of fun playing with it,and we hope our readers will too.Besides writing two wonderful appendices,our friendly neighborhood librar-ian,Jill Cirasella,was always just an e-mail away with helpful advice and support.Thanks,Jill!A very special thanks goes to our editor at Cambridge University Press,HeatherBergman,for believing in our project right from the start,for guiding us through thisbook,and for providing endless support in all matters.This book would not existwithout her.Thanks,Heather!We had the good fortune to have a truly stellar editor check much of the text many times.Karen Kletter is a great friend and did a magnificent job.We also ap-preciate that she refrained from killing us every time we handed her altered draftsthat she had previously edited.But,of course,all errors are our own!This book could not have been written without the help of my daughter,Hadas-sah.She added meaning,purpose,and joy.N.S.Y.My dear wife,Rose,and our two wondrous and tireless cats,Ursula and Buster, contributed in no small measure to melting my stress away during the long andpainful hours of writing and editing:to them my gratitude and love.(Ursula is ascientist cat and will read this book.Buster will just shred it with his powerful claws.)M.A.M.。

Quantum Mechanics

Quantum Mechanics

Quantum MechanicsQuantum mechanics is a fascinating and complex field of physics that has revolutionized our understanding of the fundamental laws governing the universe. At its core, quantum mechanics deals with the behavior of particles at the smallest scales, where classical physics no longer applies. This branch of physics has given rise to a multitude of mind-bending concepts that challenge ourintuition and push the boundaries of what we thought was possible. One of the most fundamental principles of quantum mechanics is the concept of superposition. This idea states that a particle can exist in multiple states simultaneously until it is measured, at which point it collapses into a single state. This concept is famously illustrated by Schr?dinger's thought experiment involving a cat in a box, which is both alive and dead until the box is opened. The implications of superposition are profound and have led to the development of technologies such as quantum computing, which harnesses the power of superposition to perform calculations at speeds far beyond what classical computers can achieve. Another key concept in quantum mechanics is entanglement, which Einstein famously referred to as "spooky action at a distance." Entanglement occurs when two particles become linked in such a way that the state of one particle is instantaneously correlated with the state of the other, regardless of the distance between them. This phenomenon has been experimentally verified and has profound implications for the nature of reality, suggesting that particles can communicate with each otherfaster than the speed of light. The uncertainty principle, formulated by Werner Heisenberg, is another cornerstone of quantum mechanics that states that it is impossible to simultaneously know both the exact position and momentum of a particle. This principle introduces a fundamental indeterminacy into the behavior of particles at the quantum level, challenging our classical notions of determinism and causality. The uncertainty principle has profound implications for our understanding of the nature of reality and has inspired philosophical debates about the nature of free will and the limits of human knowledge. Quantum mechanics also introduces the concept of wave-particle duality, which suggeststhat particles such as electrons and photons exhibit both wave-like and particle-like behavior depending on how they are observed. This duality is exemplified bythe famous double-slit experiment, where particles exhibit interference patterns characteristic of waves when not observed, but behave like particles when observed. This phenomenon challenges our classical intuitions about the nature of particles and has led to the development of quantum field theory, which describes particles as excitations of underlying quantum fields. Despite its incredible success in explaining the behavior of particles at the quantum level, quantum mechanics remains a deeply mysterious and enigmatic theory. The probabilistic nature of quantum phenomena, where the outcome of a measurement is inherently uncertain, has led to debates about the role of consciousness in collapsing the wave function and determining the outcome of experiments. This has sparked discussions about the nature of reality and the limits of human knowledge, with some arguing that quantum mechanics reveals a fundamentally subjective aspect of the universe. In conclusion, quantum mechanics is a rich and multifaceted field that challenges our classical intuitions and pushes the boundaries of what we thought was possible. From the concept of superposition to the phenomenon of entanglement, quantum mechanics has revolutionized our understanding of the fundamental laws governing the universe. While the theory remains deeply mysterious and enigmatic, its implications for technology and our understanding of reality are profound. As we continue to explore the implications of quantum mechanics, we are sure to uncover even more mind-bending phenomena that will reshape our understanding of the universe.。

Contemporary Mathematics

Contemporary Mathematics

Contemporary MathematicsDudley Ernest LittlewoodAlun O MorrisDudley Ernest(D.E.)Littlewood was born in London on September7th1903, the only son of Harry Bramley Littlewood,a Solicitor’s Clerk,and Ada Piper. He must have shown early promise,for on completion of his school education at Tottenham County School,he obtained a highly coveted place at Trinity College, Cambridge supported by a major open entrance scholarship in addition to a state scholarship.Significantly,due to later developments,fellow students in Cambridge were Philip Hall and W.V.D.Hodge;all three graduated as Wranglers in1925.His Director of Studies in Trinity was J.E.Littlewood(no relation)who in a testimonial perceptively commented that‘his has always been an unusual type of mind’. D.E.Littlewood did commence on research in analysis in the strong research school headed by J.E.Littlewood with S.Pollard as his research supervisor.However,he did not take to the rigour of research in analysis and so,after a year he withdrew -there were alsofinancial reasons.For the following two years he took up a number of temporary positions as a schoolteacher,including a short period at Christ’s Hospital School.Again,this was not really to his taste,he even claimed in the farewell dinner on his retirement that he had been dismissed from one position due to problems with class discipline. However,in1928he had in view of his subsequent career,the great good fortune to be appointed as a temporary part-time Lecturer at University College,Swansea a constituent college of the University of Wales.This was where A.R.Richardson, one of a few algebraists in the U.K.at that time,was Professor of Mathematics and whom Littlewood found was‘bursting with problems’.Thus commenced in the early years a fruitful collaboration and then a long career of highly imaginative innovative research.Littlewood was to stay in Swansea until1947,except for a short period in1930as a full-time assistant in Dundee.Richardson must have immediately appreciated his potential for he ensured his return through his appointment to an Assistant Lectureship in1930and promotion to a Lectureship in1934.In1930,Littlewood had married Muriel Dyson and in1935their only child Malcolm was born.Although the family were very happy in Swansea,Littlewood was keen to return to Cambridge.In1947his wish was fulfilled through his ap-pointment as a University Lecturer,but he had no college attachment.This meant that he had no tutoring duties,but also that he had no office.However,his ear-lier student colleague,Hodge,came to the rescue and allowed Littlewood to use a second room he had in the Arts School where,for example,Littlewood met upc 0000(copyright holder)12ALUN O MORRISwith his postgraduate students J.A.(Sandy)Green and G.E.(Tim)Wall.But he and his family were not happy in Cambridge and so he was extremely pleased to return to Wales in1948tofill the vacant Chair of Mathematics at the University College of North Wales,Bangor-another constituent college of the University of Wales.This is where he spent the following22years up to his retirement in1970. He lived with his family in a neighbouring coastal resort Llandudno some twenty miles away from where he travelled by train to work on three days every week.He died at home on6th October1979a few weeks after breaking a leg.Although Littlewood claimed that some of the early problems which Richardson presented to him did notfire his imagination,a recent historical note[2]suggests that his paper[6]was equally significant with those of O.Ore and J.H.M.Wed-derburn in extending the concept of quotient rings to noncommutative rings-he considered amongst other things what is now called thefirst Weyl algebra.Sig-nificantly the motivation came from the direction of mathematical physics and in particular Dirac’s classic book on quantum mechanics,an interest that persisted throughout his life.Also,Patrick du Val credited Littlewood[5]as being thefirst to identify the quaternion groups T and I with the vertices of the regular polytopes {3,4,3}and{3,3,5}.But Richardson’s greatest favour to Littlewood was to point him in the direction of the work of the German mathematicians F.G.Frobenius and I.Schur and also Alfred Young who curiously Littlewood never met.It was this which lead to his most significant contributions.Thefirst of these appeared in what is now regarded as a classic paper,the joint paper with A.R. Richardson,[9].This is where they re-discovered Schur functions,or as they named them,S-functions-they were disappointed that these already appeared in the work of I.Schur and indeed even prior to him in C.G.Jacobi work almost a century earlier.Also,this is where immanants appeared for thefirst time and where the connection of Schur functions with invariant matrices was noticed.But as H.W. Turnbull[14]indicated in his Obituary to A.R.Richardson,There was atfirst perhaps a feeling of disappointment for thecollaborators that Schur had anticipated them to some extent,but the new insight,that these immanants and S-functions(asthey came to be called in honour of Schur)were related to in-variant matrices was indeed worth the loss of precedence;and asLittlewood has said,‘It was quite marvellous to see the intricatetheory taking shape under our hands’.But the most celebrated of all the results in this paper is their so-called Littlewood-Richardson Rule for multiplying Schur functions whose significance seem to grow with the years.(A recent Google search showed up2080hits).In fact,at that stage this was basically a conjecture,although a‘proof’appeared in Littlewood’s classic book[7]attributed to G.de B.Robinson.Rigorous proofs did not appear until the late1970’s,by now there are numerous proofs from various directions but the most satisfying in many respects is the one given by I.G.Macdonald in his book[10]in that it‘rescued’the one presented by Littlewood and kept theflavour.This is not the place to give a full account of Littlewood’s subsequent work. More details about his research and other contributions may be found in the Obit-uary[1].This will relate his massive contribution to the use of Schur functions in invariant theory which has not been properly acknowledged,his many strikingD E LITTLEWOOD3 Schur function identities,the introduction to plethysms of Schur functions,his pa-per on modular representations of the symmetric groups and even his contributions to theoretical physics,especially those in his latter years.What will,however,be attempted will be to give the background to his dis-covery of the Hall-Littlewood symmetric functions or polynomials as these were his last contribution in this area and were the subject of this conference.It was in late1956that he presented me with my Ph D problem of determining what he called the spin representations of the symmetric groups suggesting that I should approach this by restricting the spin representation of the orthogonal groups to the symmetric groups.Some progress was made;but sometime in the summer of1958Littlewood met up with Sandy Green who was then a lecturer at the University of Manchester.Green asked Littlewood what he was working on and Littlewood presumably answered(for that was his attitude by that time)that by then that he did little himself and worked mainly through his research students. So Littlewood told him about my work-Green immediately responded by asking him whether he knew about I.Schur’s monumental tour-de-force where he already had determined the irreducible projective representations of the symmetric groups in his1911paper[13].Green was rather pleased with himself in that he had been able to catch Littlewood out in this way for Littlewood thought that he was quite expert on the works of Frobenius and Schur.It was in this paper,of course,that Schur had introduced what are now referred to as Schur Q-functions which play the same role for projective representations as the usual Schur functions play for the ordinary representations of the symmetric groups.Littlewood was already aware of Green’s own remarkable tour-de-force in1955where he had solved the problem of determining the irreducible characters of the general linear groups[3].(Indeed, Littlewood had given another research student,Ivor Morris,the impossible problem of simplifying Green’s work!).In that paper,Green made crucial use of the so-called Hall polynomials introduced by Phillip Hall in some unpublished work.There,a family of symmetric functions Pλ(x,t)had been defined in an indirect way.(See the account on Philip Hall’s work for more details).However,Littlewood in typical fashion very quickly responded by defining a new class of symmetric functions which he claimed are the same as those due to Hall of which Schur and Schur Q-functions are special cases.In October1958he presented his new results to his research students in three lectures.It even meant a totally new and uniform way of getting to Schur and Schur Q-functions.He immediately wrote the work up for publication and submitted it on10th December 1958to the Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society.Although he did not share this information with his research students,he must have been more than disappointed in early1959when his paper was summarily rejected.This must have confirmed his feeling by then that his work was not properly appreciated or understood.The referee was clearly ignorant on the background and certainly had no inkling of what had truly been achieved.The paper was,of course,hard to follow and may have lacked rigour,especially in its original form.But Littlewood had sent Green a copy and Green immediately realised what had been achieved -indeed Littlewood had solved a conjecture made by Ian Macdonald who was a colleague of Green at Manchester at that time and who had been introduced to Hall’s work.In due course,Green was astonished to hear about the rejection and remarkably he was somehow able to persuade the Society to recall the paper.The4ALUN O MORRISrevised version,with a few minor changes,was submitted on20th May1960and was immediately accepted[8]-this is reprinted below.In fact,as mentioned above,Littlewood claimed that his symmetric functions Qλ(x,t)‘are the same as those defined by Hall in some unpublished...’,in fact they are different but are related by the relation Qλ(x,t)=bλ(t)Pλ(x,t).The initial proof of this was complicated and depended on some heavy calculations involving the characters of the general linear groups and their orthogonality relations obtained by Green[4].A more direct proof was given by the author[11]in1963.In fact, Littlewood got his due recognition when Ian Macdonald re-christened them Hall-Littlewood functions in his book[10]in1979.Indeed,it was through this book that not only did these functions get their due recognition,but indeed a great deal of Littlewood’s earlier work was expounded in a more rigorous and understandable way.As mentioned earlier,Littlewood did not publish further in this area.As quoted in his Obituary,in a letter to W.Ledermann he said‘I was writing(in the1950’s) lots of mathematical papers of which nobody took any notice and I wondered what was the point of it all.So I stopped writing them except in connection with work for research students’.Not only am I grateful that he wrote this one,but the numerous references in the last quarter century makes it clear that others would feel in the same way.It is sad that he did not live to see the world-wide recognition of his work by now.In fact,he will be one of the few recognised by his inclusion in the New Oxford Dictionary of National Biography.Again,for a more detailed appraisal of Littlewood,both of his work and of him as a person,I refer to the Obituary[1].As mentioned there,he was a very shy per-son who mixed very little with others.There is no record of how he interacted with his fellow students as an undergraduate.Although,their work eventually coincided through the Hall-Littlewood polynomials named after them,it seems that Little-wood never subsequently interacted with Philip Hall.Both of them were lonely figures in algebra in the U.K.in the1930’s,in Hall’s Obituary[12]it is claimed that‘For many years he was the only algebraist working in England’.There were others in the U.K.of course,but they,like Littlewood were in Wales or in Scotland where H.W.Turnbull and A.C.Aitken were pre-eminent.Philip Hall however was also‘not gregarious,and cared little for large gatherings or formal occasions; he was reticent rather than shy’.With both of them sharing these qualities,it is perhaps not unsurprising that they never met.But the main reason for this was their totally different approach or attitude to mathematics,and Littlewood possibly fell into the category‘He was not always so helpful to others with whom he was in serious disagreement’.Littlewood was also totally isolated from other contemporaries.He did corre-spond with others such as van der Waerden,A.Young and A.C.Aitken.He never met G.de B.Robinson but had met H.W.Turnbull,but only because he was an External Examiner in the University of Wales.Littlewood never attended math-ematical meetings or conferences.However in the summer of1958,he was asked by the Senate of his University to officially represent them at the meeting of the International Congress of Mathematics in Edinburgh.It is claimed that he spent his whole time there asking‘Have you seen Aitken?’-it is not known whether they actually did meet.D E LITTLEWOOD5After my appointment to a lectureship at Aberystwyth,I invited Littlewood on three occasions to visit and to give seminars,but he refused on each occasion. Thefirst time,his reason for not coming was that his dog was ill;the second time that his mother-in-law was ill;the third time that his wife was unwell.My belief is that his wife was not too keen to see him travel.There is no evidence to confirm that she was a real invalid-she did outlive him by a number of years.While at Bangor,he claimed that the only time that he found for research was on his train journeys on three days per week between Llandudno and Bangor for at home he had too many household chores to deal with.Littlewood may have complained about the lack of interest in his work,but possibly he was largely responsible for this in that he did not realise that publication alone is not sufficient and other avenues must also be taken to‘sell’one’s work.References[1] C.C.H.Barker and A.O.Morris,Obituary-Dudley Ernest Littlewood,Bull.London Math.Soc.,15(1983),56-69.[2]S.C.Coutinho,Quotient rings of noncommutative rings in thefirst half of the20th century,Arch.Hist.Exact Sci.,58(2004),255-281.[3]J.A.Green,The characters of thefinite general linear groups,Trans.Amer.Math.Soc.80,(1955),402-447.[4]J.A.Green,Les polynomes de Hall et les caract`e res des groupes GL(n,q),Colloque d’alg`e bresup´e rieure,(Brussels,1956),206-217.[5] D.E.Littlewood,The groups of the regular solids in n-dimensions,Proc.London Math.Soc.(2)32,(1931),10-20.[6] D.E.Littlewood,On the classification of algebras,Proc.London Math.Soc.(2)35,(1933),200-240.[7] D. E.Littlewood,The theory of group characters and matrix representations of groups(Clarendon Press,Oxford)1940.[8] D.E.Littlewood,On certain symmetric functions,Proc.London Math.Soc.(3)11,(1961),485-498.[9] D.E.Littlewood and A.R.Richardson,Group characters and algebra,Phil.Trans.Roy.Soc.London Ser.A233(1934),99-141.[10]I.G.Macdonald,Symmetric functions and Hall polynomials(Clarendon Press,Oxford)1979.[11] A.O.Morris,The multiplication of Hall functions,Proc.London Math.Soc.(3)13,(1963),733-742.[12]J.E.Roseblade,J.G.Thompson and J.A.Green,Obituary-Philip Hall,Bull.LondonMath.Soc.16(1984),603-626[13]I.Schur,¨Uber die Darstellung der symmmetrischen und der alternierenden Gruppe durchgebrochene lineare Substitutionen.J.reine angew.Math.139,(1911),155-250.[14]H.W.Turnbull,Obituary-Archibald Read Richardson,J.London Math.Soc.,31(1956),376-384.Institute of Mathematics and Physics,University of Wales,Aberystwyth,Ceredi-gion SY232HAE-mail address:alun@。

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
We also discuss the energy spectrum. Unlike the usual Landau levels on the plane, for commutative AdS2 the Hamiltonian has both a discrete spectrum and a continuum. Semi-classically this can be understood as follows: on a plane, for any finite energy the classical orbits are closed and single valuedness of the wave function phase around the orbit leads to a quantization of the energy. On AdS2, if the energy is above a threshold, we have open trajectories and no quantization of the energy. The spectrum for noncommutative AdS2 is similar, except that for a magnetic field above a critical
a, bDepartment of Physics, Rockefeller University New York, NY 10021, USA
b Physics Department, University of Ioannina 45110 Ioannina, Greece
E-mail: morariu@, poly@teorfys.uu.se
by modding AdS2 by a discrete subgroup of SO(2, 1) which defines the cycles of a genus-g surface. Gauging of this discrete subgroup is just the requirement that the Hilbert space is projected to states that transform trivially under the action of the subgroup, which corresponds to invariance of (scalar) wavefunctions around the cycles, up to gauge transformations and vacuum angles. We show that this gauging requires a certain quantization condition for the magnetic field and demonstrate that in the commutative limit this condition reduces to the standard Dirac quantization of the flux. The Landau level spectrum for a noncommutative Riemann surface is the same as that of AdS2 but with finite degeneracy. One also expects a discrete spectrum above the threshold, but little is known about this even in the commutative case. A partial list of studies of the same problem on a commutative Riemann surface is [24, 25]. The concept of a noncommutative Riemann surface was also discussed in [26].
Abstract We study the quantum mechanics of a charged particle on a constant curvature noncommutative Riemann surface in the presence of a constant magnetic field. We formulate the problem by considering quantum mechanics on the noncommutative AdS2 covering space and gauging a discrete symmetry group which defines a genusg surface. Although there is no magnetic field quantization on the covering space, a quantization condition is required in order to have single-valued states on the Riemann surface. For noncommutative AdS2 and sub-critical values of the magnetic field the spectrum has a discrete Landau level part as well as a continuum, while for over-critical values we obtain a purely noncommutative phase consisting entirely of Landau levels.
1
value Bcrit = 1/θ all motion is bounded and there is only a discrete spectrum. In Section 4 we construct quantum mechanics on a noncommutative Riemann surface
In this paper we generalize this to higher genus noncommutative Riemann surfaces. In Section 2 we review noncommutative U(1) gauge theory on AdS2 . We study the quantum mechanics of a charged particle on noncommutative Euclidean AdS2 in a constant magnetic field in Section 3. This problem has also been considered in [23]; however, because only representations of the Lie algebra sl(2, R) which integrate to representations of the group SL(2, R) were used, a quantization of the magnetic field resulted. Such a quantization is certainly not observed in the commutative limit, since the topology of AdS2 is trivial. We show that more general representations are allowed such that the magnetic field is not quantized.
∗On leave from Theoretical Physics Dept., Uppsala University, Sweden
1 Introduction
Noncommutative quantum field theories have been studied very intensely over the last few years especially because of their relation to M-theory compactifications [1] and string theory in nontrivial backgrounds [2, 3, 4]. They are esting because they preserve some of the nonlocal properties inherent in string theory. For example, T-duality is a manifest symmetry [5, 6]. (For recent reviews of noncommutative gauge theory see [7].) Recently, noncommutative Chern-Simons was shown to give an alternative description of the fractional quantum Hall effect [8, 9, 10, 11, 12].
January 2002
RU-02-1-B
arXiv:hep-th/0201070v2 1 May 2002
Quantum Mechanics on Noncommutative Riemann Surfaces
Bogdan Morariua and Alexios P. Polychronakosb,∗
At low enough energies the single-particle sector becomes relevant and thus it is enough to consider noncommutative quantum mechanics. (For early studies of noncommutativity in quantum mechanics see [13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18].) In particular, one can consider the quantum mechanics of a charged particle moving on a two dimensional noncommutative surface in the presence of a constant magnetic field. The problem on the plane and the sphere has been considered in [19, 20, 21], on the noncommutative torus in [22] and on noncommutative AdS2 in [23].
相关文档
最新文档