美英报刊阅读教程Lesson 34 课文
课文翻译 英美报刊阅读教程中级精选本 第五版 端木义万 Lesson20

Lesson 20 East Versus West东西方观念和思维的差异classmates chime in.同学插话。
That kind of collectivism confirms the commonly held belief that learning by organic induction is more effective than rote memorization.这种集体主义证实了有机归纳学习比死记硬背更有效的普遍信念。
Why do you find, in a music conservatory, a lot of Asian would-be concert pianists but comparatively few Asian opera-singers-in-training?为什么在音乐学院会有很多想成为钢琴家的亚洲人,而受训的亚洲歌剧演员却相对较少?There's a physical limit to how many hours a day a person can sing, Nisbett says, but not to how many hours one can practice sonatas.尼斯贝特说,一个人每天唱歌的时间有生理上的限制,但练习奏鸣曲的时间没有生理上的限制。
He attributes these differences to history.他将这些差异归因于历史。
East Asian agriculture was a communal venture in which tasks like irrigation and crop rotation had citizens acting in concert.东亚农业是一种公共事业,其中灌溉和作物轮作等任务需要公民协同行动。
In contrast, Western food production led to more lone-operator farmers and herdsmen. 相比之下,西方食品生产导致了更多的孤独的农民和牧民。
美英报刊阅读教程课文翻译

美英报刊阅读教程课文翻译第一篇它在1967年以美国139年获得100万人,而只有52年再增加1亿美元,返现,10月的一天,之后只有39的间隔年,美国将声称300多万灵魂。
瞬间将被喻为美国的无限活力和独特的生命力的又一象征。
它是这样的,当然。
不过,这也是事实美国已经成长人口普查局已经采取了测量,开始于1790年,当时创始人计数今天纽约市的人口不足4百万的同胞的,大约有一半的人口每天的时间。
最近的增长飙升已经不同凡响。
自2000年以来单,国家已经增加了20万人。
与西欧相比,出生率暴跌,还是日本,其人口萎缩,美国只知道增长,增长,更多的增长。
它现在拥有的第三大人口在世界上,中国和印度之后。
“经济增长是一个问题,我们必须要管理,说:”肯尼思・普鲁伊特,人口普查局前负责人,“但它更易于管理比失去你的人口。
”仔细检查号码,三大趋势出现。
首先是迁移。
由于工业基地东北部和中西部的下降,数以百万计的美国人已经转移到南部和西部,现在家里一半以上的人口和不断增长强劲。
移民是下一个。
在过去的四十年里,移民,主要来自墨西哥和拉丁美洲,已经重塑了国家的民族构成;的最新亿美国人,根据皮尤拉美裔中心的杰弗里・帕塞尔,53%要么是移民或他们的后代。
最后是大肆宣传的婴儿潮一代,现在许多人对退休的风口浪尖。
美国说,非营利性的人口资料局,“越来越大,年龄大了,更加多样化。
”的影响都是巨大而多样,影响美国的文化,政治,和经济性。
一个明显的例子就是对移民问题的辩论狂风暴雨涌动大会。
另:由于人口流动不断,国会选区重划会随之而来,引爆电力的地域平衡。
一个显着的年龄较大的美国也将对政府开支,所有这三个问题提供了新国会产生深远的影响,并太久,一个新总统之前,大量的思考。
THE NEW迁移博伊西,落基山山麓之间爱达荷州坐向东北和大盆地沙漠南,大天空和沙漠尘土飞扬之间,博伊西一直是先锋镇。
在19世纪初,传说,法裔加拿大毛皮捕手来到一个树丛,并惊呼“莱斯布瓦!” - 树林。
美英报刊阅读教程课件 Lesson12

Lesson 12
5. To the author’s mind, the best way to search for a fitter lifestyle is to ____.
A. ban car use in communities B. return to the inconvenient past C. do 90 minutes of physical activity per day D. move step by step towards a life with physical activity
4. If you can’t maintain a conversation and your heart is beating rapidly, then you’ve probably crossed into vigorous (Line 2-4, Para. 10) —如果你无法正常说话 或者心跳加速,那么你的运动很可能(超出适度)而进 入强度大的范畴 (completely; entirely )
2. Which of the following statements is FALSE ____?
A. People in the past worried little about their waistlines B. Physical inactivity is largely overlooked in America C. Exercises help people in more ways than controlling weight D. The energy-balance equation has been the focus of public attention for a long time.
新概念英语第二册lesson34

straight
adj./adv.径直 (1)go straight on:笔直往前走 straight line:直线 straight face:无表情的脸
shortly
adv.很快,不久 shortly=soon,in a short time afterwards adv.以后,后来 =later: shortly afterwards 不久以后:
fright batteredshortly /fraIt/ /5bAt[d/ /5FC:tli/
shortly
afterwards /5B:ft[w[dz/
afterwards
station
1) n.(政府机关等) 局、所、中心; 供应站; 广播)电台 a police station警察局 a fire station 消防局 a power station 供电局 a filling station加油站 a broadcasting station 广播电台 TV station 电视台 The thief was brought to the near police station. 小偷被带到附近的派出所。 I don't like the program. What's on the other station? 我不喜欢这个节目。另外那个台在上演什么?
(3) regret doing sth.很后 悔做了.
I regret telling him the news.我真后悔告诉他这个 消息。(已经说了)
(4)regret that +从句
battered
ad j.撞坏的,被撞变形的;
rush
v.冲 rush into 冲进
课文翻译 英美报刊阅读教程中级精选本 第五版 端木义万 Lesson19

Lesson 19 It's a Glad, Sad, Mad World主观幸福感Where you live, as much a show you live, is a key influence on the feel-good factor你住在哪里,就像你在现场表演一样,是影响你感觉良好的关键因素By Walter KirnIt's almost impossible for most people in well-off countries to begin to understand how it feels to live in the extreme poverty of Calcutta, surviving in India's third largest city in a shack, or on the street with little access to clean water,food or health care.对于生活在富裕国家的大多数人来说,他们几乎不可能开始理解生活在印度第三大城市加尔各答的极度贫困中是什么感觉,在一个简陋的棚子里生存,或者在没有干净的水、食物或医疗保健的街道上生存。
The filth. The crowds. The disease.污秽、人群、疾病。
From the perspective of the comfortably housed and amply fed, these conditions sound hopeless, and the suffering they must breed seems unimaginable.从那些住得舒舒服服、吃得饱的人的角度来看,这些条件听起来让人绝望,它们所带来的痛苦似乎难以想象。
But not as unimaginable as this: according to a researcher who employs a method of ranking human happiness on a scale of 1 to 7, poor Calcuttans score about a 4, meaning they' reslightly more happy than not.但没有这么不可思议:根据一位研究人员使用一种方法给人类幸福打分,分值从1到7,贫穷的Calcuttans给出的了4分,表示他们的幸福程度稍微高一些。
新概念英语第二册第34课课文

新概念英语第二册第34课课文
摘要:
一、课文概述
1.文章主题:描述一个关于一位年轻女子Joanna的日常生活和兴趣爱好
2.文章结构:分为三个段落,分别介绍Joanna的早晨、下午和晚上活动
二、详细内容
1.早晨部分
a.Joanna起床时间及早晨习惯
b.早餐内容
c.前往工作地点的交通方式
2.下午部分
a.工作内容
b.下午茶的享用
c.下班后的购物活动
3.晚上部分
a.与朋友共进晚餐
b.晚间娱乐活动:看电影、跳舞
c.回家后的阅读习惯
正文:
新概念英语第二册第34课课文以一位名叫Joanna的年轻女子为主人公,生动地描绘了她的日常生活和兴趣爱好。
在早晨,Joanna会在7:30起床,然后进行简单的晨练,如做一些伸展运动。
接着,她会为自己准备一顿丰盛的早餐,包括牛奶、麦片、水果和面包。
之后,她乘坐公共汽车前往工作地点。
在下午,Joanna会开始她忙碌的工作,这包括处理文件、接听电话以及与同事讨论项目。
下午茶时间,她会品尝美味的蛋糕和红茶,以此放松自己。
下班后,Joanna喜欢去商场购物,为自己添置一些衣物和日用品。
晚上,Joanna有时会与朋友共进晚餐,谈论彼此的近况。
之后,她们可能会去看一场电影,或者去舞厅跳舞。
尽情娱乐之后,Joanna会在晚上10:30左右回到家中,在睡前进行一段阅读,以此结束她充实的一天。
这篇课文通过描述Joanna的日常生活,向我们展示了她健康、充实的生活方式。
美英报刊阅读教程课件 Lesson36

Lesson 36
By the numbers: There are 643,067 people experiencing homelessness on any given night in the United States. Of that number, 238,110 are people in families, and 404,957 are individuals. 17 percent of the homeless population is considered "chronically homeless," and 12 percent of the homeless population - 67,000 - are veterans.
Lesson 36
5. But the success of such programs brings the risk that they give the Federal Government an excuse to applaud the local initiatives and then bow out. (Line1, Para. 17) —然而,此类计划的成功也带来了风险, 那就是给联邦政府提供了称赞地方政府的努力而自 身不予介入的借口。(bow out: to stop taking part in an activity)
There are some rural areas with very high rates of homelessness, and two of the highest rates in the country are in rural communities. However, the rates of homelessness within the rural category vary widely (more widely than any other category), and as a group, rural areas have a rate only half that of urban areas.
新冀教版九年级全一册英语Lesson 34 The Fisherman and the Goldfi

Goldfish:No problem. You will have a new house very
soon.
Scene 4:A New House (The wife is looking around the new house. The fisherman enters.) Wife:How stupid you are! Look at me! I have no
Queen of the Sea? She also wants all the fish to serve her.
(There is no reply—only the sound of the waves crashing on the coast. The lights go on. The fisherman's wife is back in the old house wearing poor clothes again.)
第十五页,共二十六页。
新课讲解
eg: Stop asking such silly questions!
别再问这样傻的问题了!
He is foolish to throw away such a chance. 他真蠢,失去了这么一个机会。 Mary made a stupid mistake. 玛丽犯了一个愚蠢的错误。
is taken
see the
away.
goldfish?
□Once. □Twice. □Three times.
√
第九页,共二十六页。
新课讲解
2 Fill in the blanks with correct prepositions or adverbs.
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
Lesson 34 Out of the BlueOn a picture-perfect Texas morning, the shuttle Columbia was heading home when tragedy struck, leaving America and the world wondering what went wrong-and honoring the lives of seven brave astronauts.By Evan Thomas1) Tony Beasley, an astronomer at the California Institute of Technology, got up early, along with his wife and mother-in-law, to watch the space shuttle fly overhead. It was a little after 5:45 a.m., California time, 7:45 a.m. at Mission Control1 in Houston, 8:45 a.m. at Cape Canaveral in Florida. Beasley could see the bright glow of the shuttle as it came over California’s Owens Valley, bound for a Florida landing, still 60 miles high, traveling at about 20 times the speed of sound. Then he noticed some bright flashes, just small ones at first. Beasley idly wondered if the shuttle was shedding some debris as it entered the atmosphere. He didn’t make much of it;2 he thought he recalled that space shuttles sometimes lost a few tiles as the craft burned into the atmospnere. But then he noticed a large pulse of light. “It was like a big flare being dropped from the shuttle,” he told Newsweek. “It didn’t seem normal.”2) A few minutes later, a few hundred miles to the east in Red Oak, Texas, Trudy Orton heard a boom as she stood on her front porch in the brightening morning. She thought it was a natural-gas explosion. “My house shook and windows rattled.” Her dog ran into the house and hid. A neighbor, loading her car, looked up and asked, “What on earth was that?” Orton lo oked up and saw a white streak of smoke across the sky. “It wasn’t a sleek little straight line like the jets make. It was billowing like a puffy cloud.”3) At the Kennedy Space Center at 9 a.m., ET, the festive crowd-NASA officials, family members of the astronauts, local dignitaries and politicians, even a representative of the Israeli government, on hand to honor Israel’ s first astronaut, Col. Ilan Ramon-eagerly listened for the familiar sonic boom, heralding the arrival of the returning shuttle. But as the skies remained silent, the burble of chatter died down, then grew anxious. At about 9:05, mobile phones began to ring. Suddenly, officials were herding family members into buses. The countdown clock continued to wind down to the scheduled 9:16 landing. But the crowd was already gone.4) The specialists inside Mission Control were well aware that the complex machines they put into space and then hope to bring home again are potential deathtraps. The rest of us forget, until a tragedy occurs, and the nation and the world are left mourning the loss of the astonishing array of hope and talent that routinely fly aboard the shuttles-113 trips, so far. When the shuttle Columbia disintegrated over Texas last Saturday morning, it took with it an Air Force colonel and test pilot3 (whose last job had been chief of safety for the astronaut office); a former Eagle Scout fighter jock4 (second in his class at Annapolis); a veteran African-American astronaut making his second trip into space; an India-born woman with a Ph.D. who enjoyed flying aerobatics5; a medical doctor who had performed in the circus as an acrobat; another medical doctor who was a mother, and an Israeli Air Force hero who had bombed Iraq’ s Osirak nuclear reactor in 1981.5) The seven crew members of the Columbia were finishing a 16-day mission that had gone off without a hitch6, hi between conducting dozens of scientific experiments, there had been plenty of time for stargazing. Astronaut Kalpana Chawla had told reporters how much, on a prior shuttle mission, she had enjoyed “watching the continents go by, the thunderstorms shimmering in theclouds, the city lights at night.” She flew over her native India and saw the Himalayas for the last time less than an hour before she died.6) By about 7 a.m. Eastern time, the astronauts had just about finished up the chore of checking the hundreds of switches in the crew module, verifying that they were in the right position for re-entry. In Florida, early-morning fog still shrouded the runway at Cape Canaveral, but NASA officials were confident the haze would burn off.7 The weather had been perfect for the launch; the forecast was blue skies at the landing.7) Launches are the most frightening part of space-flight. “On re-entry you have some elevated appreh ension, but nowhere near what you feel on launch,” says retired astronaut Mike Mullane. “Because you don’ t have any engines running, it’ s a much more passive event; you don’ t have the same threat of death hanging over you that you do on launch.” Even so, re-entry is perilous. Engineers talk about “the exchange of energy8.” The space shuttle stores up tremendous kinetic energy when it blasts off and circles the globe. It must dissipate that energy to slow down enough to return to Earth.In essence, speed is exchanged for heat. The orbiter begins to make sweeping S-rurns as it enters the Atmosphere. At the moment of maximum friction, the temperature around the orbiter is 3,000 degrees. To reflect the heat and protect its metal frame, the shuttle has about 20,000 hand-laid tiles on its nose and underside. These ceramic tiles are light-like a piece of Styrofoam-but they are rock-hard. As the shuttle enters the atmosphere, it must be at just the right attitude, or angle of attack. The nose is tilted up sharply.9 If the orbiter pitches forward or jerks sideways, the metal will start melting and the airframe will come apart.9) The Columbia’s two-minute, 38-second “de-orbit burn” -firing its rockets to brake (for) its initial descent-went off right on schedule at 8:15 a.m.,10 ET. At the tune, the shuttle was flying upside down and backward, its tail pointed in the direction of travel, some 175 miles above the Indian Ocean, just west of Australia. Its onboard computers began to swing the orbiter around into its nose-up position.” At 8:44 a.m., the orbiter began what is known as “entry interface.” The protective tiles on the belly glowed red-hot as the plane began to bounce off the upper fringes of the atmosphere.10) At 8:46 a.m., ET, the Columbia made landfall in California. This was just about the time when Tony Beasley and his wife began noticing odd things happening to the shuttle as it raced across the heavens. Inside the orbiter, and down at Mission Control, everything still seemed A-OK. The first sign that anything might be amiss did not come until 8:53. A sensor measuring temperatures on the left wing suddenly blinked out. By itself, this was not alarming. Sensors often cut out because of a minor malfunction.12 Mission Control did not even bother to inform the crew. Then at 8:56, the heat sensors in the left main tire well spiked up.13 A couple of minutes later, more sensors went out, this time in the body of the craft itself, along its left side. At 8:59, the temperature and tire-pressure gauges on the left side failed to register. By this time, Houston and the crew of Columbia were beginning to discuss the glitch. At 9 a.m., the Houston controller said, “Columbia, Houston, we see your tire-pressure messages and we did not copy your last.”11) Aboard the Co lumbia, the mission commander, Col. Rick Husband, said calmly, “Roger, buh…”12) Silence for several seconds.13) Then static and some clicking.14) By now Mission Control was getting anxious. In itself, the loss of communication was notentirely ominous. Spacecraft lose contact with ground control from time to time. But too many sensors-unconnected to any single source-were on the fritz. Chief flight director Milt Heflin later gloomily but laconically described the atmosphere in Mission Control: “The te am was beginning to know we had a bad day.”15) Some 200,000 feet above Texas, the astronauts were already dead, if they were lucky. When the space shuttle Challenger blew up in 1986, the command module survived the initial blast. The astronauts inside survived a gruesome two-minute, 45-second ride to a watery grave in the Atlantic. Traveling at 18 times the speed of sound, the command module14 of the Columbia may have blown apart, instantly killing the crew. But judging from the TV camera shots of the spacecraft as it came apart in the Texas sky, a large chunk-possibly the command module-stayed intact for many seconds.16) The debris of the Columbia landed in at least three states-Texas, Arkansas, and Louisiana- and possibly a couple more. On one Texas field, wisps of gray smoke rose from a huge patch of blackened grass. Nacogdoches County reported some 1,000 pieces of debris-twisted metal, evil-looking shards still steaming with highly toxic propellants15. There were tales of near misses- one piece suppos edly plunged into an empty dentist’ s chair-but no deaths or injuries were reported in the first few hours after the disaster.17) The second-guessing will start soon enough. By Saturday night, the whistle-blowers were already beginning to toot on the Internet and on the talking-head shows, claiming they had been predicting disaster for years.16 One San Diego professor held a press conference to assert that he had long raised alarms about the fragility of the tiles. Having been through the Challenger tragedy, NASA knows that the inquiries will be long and the scrutiny harsh. Indeed, NASA has already called for an independent commission.18) It is entirely possible that neither faulty heat tiles nor the insulation breaking over the wing on launch had anything to do with the tragedy.17 NASA officials are hoping that the disaster was what they call a “one-off’ – a one-time accident and not the result of some deeper structural flaw. The Challenger was brought down by faulty O-rings, a kind of giant plastic washer placed between the joints of the booster rocket.18 It took NASA two years to find and correct his structural flaw. No shuttle flew for 32 months.19) The shuttle program cannot afford the wait that long. Three of the loneliest members of the human race have to be the crew of the International Space Station. Navy Capt. Kenneth D. Bowersox, mission commander; Los Alamos scientist Donald Pettit, and flight engineer Russian cosmonaut Nikolai Budarin were expecting to be whisked back to Earth by the space shuttle Atlantis in March. With all shuttles grounded, they may be stranded. NASA says the space-station astronauts have enough food and provisions to hold out until June. But then they may have to climb into the Russian Soyuz19 “lifeboat” to make their esca pe, or possibly wait for the Russians to launch a rescue mission. Space is a perilous place. The fall of Columbia reminds us of those dangers-and of the bravery of the men and women who defy them.From Newsweek, February 10, 2003。