Quantum Manifestations of Classical Stochasticity in the Mixed State

合集下载

量子反复叠加形成物质

量子反复叠加形成物质

量子反复叠加形成物质英文回答:Quantum superposition, the state in which a quantum system can simultaneously exist in multiple states, plays a fundamental role in the formation of matter. When a quantum system is in superposition, its wave function, which describes the state of the system, is a linear combination of wave functions representing each of the possible states. This means that the system is not in any one state, but rather in a superposition of all possible states, with a certain probability associated with each state.As the system evolves over time, the superposition of states can lead to the formation of matter. For example, in the case of an electron and a proton, the superposition of states can result in the formation of a hydrogen atom. The electron and proton are initially in separate states, but when they come together, their wave functions overlap and form a new wave function that represents the bound state ofthe hydrogen atom.The superposition of states is also responsible for the properties of matter. For example, the superposition of electron spin states in a material can lead to theformation of magnetism. Similarly, the superposition of energy states in a material can lead to the formation of different colors.中文回答:量子迭加,即量子系统可以同时存在于多个状态的状态,在物质的形成中起着至关重要的作用。

量子科学英语

量子科学英语

量子科学英语量子科学的英语是:Quantum Science。

例句:1.The field of quantum science is revolutionizing computing as researchers develop quantum algorithms capable of solving complex problems exponentially faster than classical methods.翻译:量子科学领域正在经历一场革命,随着研究人员开发出能够以比经典方法指数级更快的速度解决复杂问题的量子算法,它正在彻底改变计算机科学。

2.In quantum science, entanglement is a phenomenon where two particles become correlated in such a way that the state of one instantly influences the state of the other, regardless of the distance between them.翻译:在量子科学中,纠缠是一种现象,两个粒子以某种方式相互关联,以至于一个粒子的状态会立即影响到另一个粒子的状态,无论它们之间相隔多远。

3.Quantum cryptography harnesses the principles of quantum mechanics to develop unbreakable encryption methods, providing unprecedented levels of security for data transmission in the realm of quantum science."翻译:量子密码学利用量子力学原理开发出不可破解的加密方法,在量子科学领域为数据传输提供了前所未有的安全级别。

Quantum Mechanics

Quantum Mechanics

Quantum MechanicsQuantum Mechanics is the branch of physics that deals with the behavior of matter and energy at a microscopic level. It is a complex andfascinating subject that has revolutionized our understanding of the universe. Quantum Mechanics is based on the principles of quantum theory, which describes the behavior of particles at the subatomic level.One of the most important concepts in Quantum Mechanics is the wave-particle duality. This principle states that particles can behave as both waves and particles at the same time. This means that electrons, for example, can exist in multiple places at once and can interfere with themselves. This idea is fundamental to Quantum Mechanics and has led to many of its most important discoveries.Another important concept in Quantum Mechanics is the uncertainty principle. This principle states that it is impossible to know both the position and momentum of a particle at the same time. The more precisely we know the position of a particle, the less precisely we can know its momentum, and vice versa. This principle has important implications for the behavior of particles at the subatomic level.Quantum Mechanics has many practical applications, including in the development of new technologies such as transistors and lasers. It is also important in the study of materials and the behavior of atoms and molecules. Quantum Mechanics has led to many breakthroughs in our understanding of the universe and has helped us to develop new technologies that havetransformed our world.However, Quantum Mechanics is also a subject that is often misunderstood and can be difficult to grasp. The concepts involved are very different from our everyday experience, and the mathematics can be complex and abstract. This can make it challenging for students to learn and for researchers to make progress in the field.One of the challenges of Quantum Mechanics is that it seems to contradict our everyday experience of the world. For example, the idea that particles can exist in multiple places at once seems to go against our intuition. However, this is a fundamental principle of Quantum Mechanics, and experiments have shown that it is true.Another challenge of Quantum Mechanics is that the mathematics involved can be very complex and abstract. This can make it difficult for students to learn and for researchers to make progress in the field. However, the mathematics is essential for understanding the behavior of particles at the subatomic level, and it has led to many important discoveries in the field.Despite the challenges, Quantum Mechanics is a fascinating subject that has revolutionized our understanding of the universe. It has led to many important discoveries and has helped us to develop new technologies that have transformed our world. While it may be difficult to grasp at first, with time and effort, anyone can learn about this important field of physics.。

量子点具有量子力学的

量子点具有量子力学的

量子点具有量子力学的英文回答:Quantum dots exhibit quantum mechanical effects due to their nanoscale dimensions. These effects include:Quantization of energy levels: The energy levels of electrons in quantum dots are discrete, meaning they can only occupy certain specific energies. This is in contrast to the continuous energy levels of electrons in bulk materials.Tunable bandgap: The bandgap of a quantum dot is the energy difference between the valence band and the conduction band. The bandgap of a quantum dot can be tuned by changing the size of the dot. This allows quantum dots to be used in a variety of optoelectronic applications.Enhanced optical properties: Quantum dots have enhanced optical properties, such as high photoluminescenceefficiency and narrow emission spectra. These properties make quantum dots ideal for use in applications such as light-emitting diodes (LEDs), lasers, and solar cells.中文回答:量子点由于其纳米尺度的尺寸而表现出量子力学效应。

Classical and quantum self-reference systems

Classical and quantum self-reference systems

Classical and quantum self-reference systems in physics and mathematics.Dainis ZEPS∗†AbstractSystematic use of the concept of self-reference system is suggested to apply in mathematics and physics.We enter concept of quan-tum self-references,which describe our most general mathematicaldistinctions,abstractions.We argue that in nature there are onlyself-reference systems,that we may distinct properly,and that ournatural way of thinking is mathematical.1IntroductionWe see world via pictures.Scientists would say,that we see world as3D moving picture of the manifold of reality.How far do we see in the world using our visional ability?As far as beautiful star picture in the night sky? But there exists another tool for seeing,and it reaches much further,until the farthest stars,until quarks.This tool is used by mathematics,and its name is distinction.Picture and distinction are opposite notions,one given to us by God with the support of two other things,namely,time and space,to enjoy the world via pictures,ourselves being as if participants of these moving pictures,but mainly to procure our existence here on Earth,similarly as cats aptness to catch mice is given for,but the other one is given to procure another our ability,sometimes left without any use-to think.Mathematics makes use of the other.Even more,mathematics can do without thefirst,even without its supporters,time and space.Let us show this.Many physicists up to now have tried to exclude time and space from the picture of reality[1,13,26,41],i.e.in fact,trying to do the same what many idealistic philosophers[21]have tried to do before them.We believe that time and space should be objects of the same nature as all othersthat should be built from somewhat,i.e.,they should be constructed,or be reconstructible,that should mean the same.Any mathematical space should be constructed from the objects that live within it,and time and space can’t be some exception from this general rule of nature.We are going to build a very simplified model of the universe without time and space, i.e.universe comprised by causal causes,and consider it both in classical and quantum outline.We are going to use this model universe not only to characterize general causal relations in nature,but to characterize our cognitive capability in most general sense too.We are going to endow our toy universe with some aspect of thinking calling it cogitans ergo existens-universe model.2Definition of the self-reference systemLet us call self-reference system a system,which is closed in itself excluded from outer world,unless for a while,when it interchanges some informa-tion with the outer world.Other word for self-reference systems could be self-ontology systems,which as well would describe good the notion of the interest.Let us call an oracle system a self-reference system where the outer world does not exist in the sense,that an exchange of information with anything,that could stand for this outer world,does not take place. For self-reference systems we also use another word-idems,pronounced ’aidems.The best way to model self-reference systems in our sense is to depict them as movement of particles in the space with collisions,where each particle is considered as a distinct self-reference system or idem.For any particle=idem we may differentiate two possible states:1)between collisions,particle is closed in itself;we would say that it is in the state particula in se or simply in se;2)when colliding,we say that through this occurrence it learns about the existence of some other particle(it is in state particula collidens)and may receive some qualified information from the outer world.Sometimes,we would like to add one more aspect to the self-reference system.In the state particula in se,we would like to imagine the particle be without any notion of time,for example,let us choose a model for such being without time,exempli gratia,that of Descartes Cogito ergo sum[7,6] existence where cogitatio is the precondition of the state of essens,i.e.our particle is as if in state of thinking,meditation,but not directly in time2duration’s aspect,but without any precondition,where the thinking itself is the base of the existence with no presence of time’s duration whatsoever. Thus,our particle in the state particula in se,is as if particula in se meditans, or particula in se cogitans ergo existens.We would like to differentiate this state of particle by speaking either merely of particula in se or particula in se meditans.We are going to use this notion of the self-reference system or idem in the most general sense to describe a notion corresponding to an aspect of any thing in the observable world to be closed in itself.Each thing in the nature or a notion that describes the nature’s some aspect can be thus in two predictable states,namely,within itself(particula in se state)and in interplay with the outer world(paricula collidens state). One may argue that both may occur simultaneously.We are interested to look more generally,namely,not confining occurrences only with time durability’s distinctions,but rather with conceptual ones.Then for a self-reference may stand a simpler aspect of any higher complexity,imagining this simpler aspect to be particula in se and sometimes in collision,being in the state particula collidens[where somewhere there are particulae colliden-dae]which refers to the higher complexity.We come to the distinctiveness as a framework notion of hierarchically organized cognitively recognizable references.In this article we are interested in what these simple notions cold give to physics and mathematics.We are going to claim that mathe-matics on the whole actually is built and can be rebuilt,and actually is in dynamics of rebuilding of a structuring of self-reference systems or idems.Let us consider the simplest cases of self-reference systems in physics, mathematics,programming,i.e.,in nature’s imitation by humans,and in nature in general.3Self-reference systems in physicsWe are going to start with physics,showing that self-reference systems exist in the nature in the most natural way.Let us see picture1.Any object,e.g.,stone,in nature is as if closed in se and does not know what goes on around it,because it is,as we are used to say,unconscious,i.e.,it does not possess consciousness.Actually, we must discern that,whenever we are trying to start to think about that what,say,stone knows or doesn’t know,it is our understanding of the world around us.Thinking physically,as a physicist should do,when he/she is3pondering about what goes on in the physical world,he/she is discerning things in the world,organize them in certain ordered patterns,and end up with the picture of the whole universe where this picture should stand for the opposite of what could be imaginable as being possible to appear from somewhere as a whole.Thus,really,what goes on in the world,we may capture in terms how we discern the very basic things in nature.Scientist does not have any extra access to what goes on,except through these his/her senses given to him/her,where the notion sense we use in deeper sense,more meaning by it distinction in general then,say,any of physical senses,vision,or hearing, or taste,or else.It is argued here that actually a human being sees the world with the distinctions,and,as a consequence,with mathematical eyes. And this ability starts with someone to be able to discern any object in the world as if possessing the faculty(or imagination)to be in the place of this thing,to get in the particula in se state.Philosophically maybe we should refer the reader to the man who was closest to this way of thinking,namely, Johann Gottlieb Fichte.I-subject,what I am actually,and any of us,sees the world.But we may in similarly attribute this faculty of seeing to any thing in the world.Further,we may make philosophies and whatever sciences around what makes sense to attribute to stone this faculty of being in itself,but math-ematically attributing to the stone this faculty gives us way to productive thinking paradigm with enormous power.It turns out to be one of basic truths that a scientist at a time may turn its interest only to one thing and then this should work as a principal limit for human beings,but it can and should be made a proper tool of investigation as possible,and then it itself works as an excellent principle of our scientific epistemology.Maybe it is our fault to discern things in nature only via distinctions[not in some godlike way],but it turns out to be our achievement when we apply this as a cleverly chosen principle as properly as possible.Mathematics does it. Let us have a closer look.3.1Classical caseLet us consider the simplest case when a pair of particles collide,and con-sider one/any of them as a self-reference system(see pict.1).Let us have manifold which locally is space R3·V2,i.e.,space R3,where our particle in se lives,multiplied with the pair of vectors from V2,describing the state particula collidens where V1and V2are directions wherefrom and where5the other particle(or whatsoever),that caused interaction,come and go to. Thus,our particle lives in three dimensional Euclid space and interaction comes from somewhere outside in the form of possibility of being some other (maybe)particle in the state particula collidens,describing here this as pair of vectors,showing directions of this other particle(or interaction)coming from and going to somewhere.Our particle lives essentially(and ontologically,if you like)in this5D space in classical sense,moving along zigzag path and in every fracture point of movement exchanges some information with another particle(interac-tion).All possible points of the particle in the5D manifold reconstructs(or construct in this only sense)this space which may be called a living space of our particle,which then could be another name(and not only)for this 5D manifold.We would say that there exists a multiparticle that recon-structs all states,as superposition of all states,and now this multiparticle reconstructs its living space,this5D manifold.Let us call this multiparticle CM5(classical multiparticle in5D space).Let us look at the multiparticle CM5from combinatorial point of view2. One particle’s interaction with other particles can be simply characterized as combinatorial structure called combinatorial map or more general struc-ture-constellation[14,15,8,31,3,4,36,35,37,38,39,2,18].But we know that constellation may guide such general mathematical structures as Rie-mann surfaces and ramified coverings[18]used in descriptions of Riemann surfaces.Speaking on very general level,a constellation always guides in any Riemann surface pieces of monotone functions(states in se),of what-ever complexity Riemann surface could be,with ramifications of whatever complexity.The constellation is just thefitting combinatorial structure, that is sufficient for this binatorial map is a special case of the constellation[18],andfits for description of synchronized events.This gives to us one simple clue,i.e.,multiparticle CM5may be characterized by combinatorial map,say,cm5,and it may be a part,or guiding it,if you like, of some manifold,which we would like to call manifold of reality,which is holomorphic function[18].Essential fact is that neither time,nor space are present in these descriptions of reality,but this description is,in it’s very essence,completely multicausal.We can’t get this conviction from the classical particle,even if we would be forced to call BB for because of our understanding of causality in general.Let us try to construct am quantum picture of this and see what we get in that case.Let us consider the multiparticle CM5,which can be considered as a single self-reference system and/or as one-particle,as a model of universe6what is built merely from causal dependences.If we take into account that in the quantum electrodynamic interaction between electron and photonmay be considered as a general pattern of interaction between the forms ofmatter,then the suggested model of universe is only slight simplification of the picture of universe that gives QED[9].It is easy to see that the modelof universe,suggested by us,is cyclical.That causes some general invariantson,e.g.,number of hitting balls in the representation given here.Our model being cyclical means that we have to do with causal cycles.How to inter-pret them?First of all we have to do with multidirectional causality what in case of time aspect being present would mean multidirectional time.As aconsequence,our usual universe cyclicity would mean that BB is connectedwith Big Crutch,but in case of multidirectionality we do not neither be-ginning nor end.More interesting development of idea is to try to connectcausal cycles with matter directly trying to interpret matter interactionsgeometrically.We have at least two models in this direction,i.e.model of Rueda and Haisch[quantum vacuum inertia hypothesis[26]]and model ofLisa Randall and[28],where we have to imagine that gravitational forces are these thatflow through causal cycles.The model we are discussing weare going to call in se universe model.Even more interesting is to look on the model which we have built with adding the aspect of thinking to the self-reference systems which comprisethe model universe,i.e.with particula in se meditans particles.The multi-particle CM5now can now be considered as a self-reference system itself that is being in the state in se cogitans ergo existens.This model we are goingto call meditans in se model or cogitans ergo existens model of universe.Our thinking universe turns out to be cyclical but we must remind our-selves that it is crucially multicausal.Further,if for one particle the attributemeditans may seem without much sense,then for CM5,if we besides think of some real universe model with immense number of causalities,our toyuniverse can turn to be very interesting one.3.2Quantum-like caseLet us consider a path of this particle from5D-point a to5D-point b in its living space.Further,let us consider the path integral[9](sum overall possible paths)from a to b,and denote itℑ(a,b).Let us consider the multiparticle over all possible pairs(a,b),i.e.,over all manifold: ℑ(a,b), the same particle not accounting more then once.Does this multiparticlediffer from the previous one CM5?In classical sense-no.7£¡1£¡2£¡3£¡42432143311242132341:24323:142424:23132:14331Figure 2:Let bookkeeping of 4balls’hitting history be depicted in the multigraph.on the right the same multigraph is shown,but in more gen-eral outline,i.e.,as if without knowing which events are to be connected,i.e.,as if without synchronization of events.Picture on the right corre-sponds to eventuality,noncausalities to be present locally,meanwhile in the picture on the left noncausalities are solved with help of synchronization of events.Picture on the left can be characterized with combinatorial maps,but on the right -requires their generalization,constellations [18].Either our manifold of reality,i.e.,corresponding holomorphic function,is guided by combinatorial map,or by constellation[18],is the same question -do we live in monocausal or multicausal universe.Here cyclicity of histories of events is as if ignored,but if we live in the Newtonian world,without time limits whatsoever,then the connection of the past with future is a mere fact of imagination.Quantum mechanical interpretation of this picture may bring here some essential corrections.8Let us ask the same,but now try to attribute to this picture some quantum mechanical sense.Let us the QM interpretation’s air connectwith Feynman path’s integral interpretation.Then we atribute toℑ(a,b)one reference system,that of quantum life(actually on single(quantum) path)of our particle,which was in one summary interconnection with themembers of ℑ(a,b)via vector pairs in V2.What do we get for all these integral paths in manifold?We get as if one multiparticle not in the sense CM5,but as one reference system actually,i.e.,it is the same particle,butvaried at all ends where whatever starting point should be chosen from some kind of actualization(or measurement?),where the initial information must be known by something(or someone)that guides all the process,keeping all the necessary information in the form of some initial(or border)conditions. Let us have a look in detail.We get instead of classical multiparticle a single particle,self-reference system,to what notion quantum particle can be attributed,i.e.,quantum one-particle with varied ends.We discern it as a self-reference system and say that now it is another problem,how to look it at or tackle otherwise,because,looking at it(in classical sense), it should somewhere commence,but now this self-reference system is the variation over all ends(to all ends)in the living space.Trying to”measure”this particle one should break down this self-reference system.It is not only a trick to name things.Our quantum one-particle does not know about time sequences principally,except causal sequences of collisions on separate mono threads in one-particle life,that is,our particle does not know one(world)time,rather it is multicausal.[From global point of view we do not see difference from what we saw in the previous case,but maybe this point is crucial,because quantum picture should not give another world picture except when we see the world divided.]When we try to separate possible models in physical world picture from many mathematical opportunities then we mostly choose these with one world time as being in correspondence with our everyday experience.But it does not give us right to choose only such self-reference systems,which support one world times,as physically comprehensible from those that do not support this.It concerns the cases[and our case]where models without one world time give more comprehensive world picture,than those being in use before[maybe out of use for future].But now,if we choose the combinatorial model2of CM5then our uni-verse turns out to be cyclical and the question about initial conditions falls off.Of course,big bang and big crunch unification is mere play of imagina-tion if we can not put there any new sense.But as we saw higher,there are9Figure3:Idem0=particles movement in Euclid space.idem1=particles movement infield along geodesic.idem2=multiparticle simulating action of thefield.Considered as quantum particle,i.e.,one-particle,it comprises abstraction of the action of thefield.plenty of possibilities to put interesting interpretations there.What additional sense could be attached to the fact that we are drawing quantum mechanical picture of our particle CM5?We get one-particle.If we look on it from combinatorial universe model point of view,then com-binatorial picture of our particle may be replaced with that of Riemann geometry,and say that our one-particle is the holomorphic function,the manifold of reality which takes into account all causal dependences because the corresponding holomorphic function is guided by the corresponding con-stellation[18].We get the model of one-particle that in the same time is the model of the whole universe-the manifold of reality.Our quantum particle being the whole universe is much in resemblance with Wheeler’s one electron idea[10].Let us have a look at a simpler example.See picture3.Particle is moving in thefield along geodesic.This physical picture may be described by three idems:idem0is a self-reference system of a free particle,say,in Euclid space.idem1is a reference system of a particle’s movement in the physical field along some geodesic now,say,in Riemann space.Then we may discern third idem3that should be a reference system of thefield itself,but let us10imagine in this example the idem3as consisting from many particles along geodesic,which acting on our main particle gives impression of the physical field.Is this only an occasional,convenient scheme,say,to explain action of some physicalfield to students?Not that.It turns out that mathematics more and more supports distinction of such reference systems where these reference systems can be joined together through convenient mathematical description.In this case a vector bundle with connection of space,imitating afield,is the right description.Even more,looking at such pictures we may even try to simplify these vector bundle pictures,introducing corresponding notions that directly communicate the idea with the mathematical model. This is the expectable eventuality,giving productive models in mathematics, in case most correct self-reference systems are detected in our problems. The mathematicians work in those directions,and we do not see any limits there.We think mathematically in the sense that it is our naturally given gift through world phenomena distinctiveness.In order to go deeper in the idea let us look at even simpler example and tackle the problem of calculus,compute function of one variable f(x) or some other manipulation with it.See pict.4.We can differentiate three idems,namely,idem0that of the constant function,i.e.,no change at all. This idem is interacting with the idem of some change,that together makes resulting idem of the graph of the function f(x).We think even further and apply to this case and the previous one,the particle in thefield,what follows.In these cases we were thinking classically,i.e.we had multiparticle, that imitated geodesic in thefield and the change of one argument function. Let us try to look at these problems,say,quantum mechanically,let us say that we are going to tackle these problems as if one generalized problem with one single quantum particle instead of this multiparticle[imitating change].What do we have?When we discover mathematical truths we discover just these quantum-mechanical self-reference systems,not those broken down in particular computations.Of course,we end up with broken down machines in order to do practical computations,e.g.,when drawing particular functions’graphs.These examples from physics give us a pattern of what we could call quantum self-reference system;i.e.,if problem tackling forces us to introduce multi idems then,generalizing this problem in mostly natural way it leads us to one generalized idem,that stands for one quantum idem or quantum self-reference system.11f(x)xFigure4:f0(x)=Const is idem F x0,which collides with the change causing multiparticle Ch;idem F x is particula collidens,which in thefield of change collides,moves along the graph of the function f(x).If in quantum aspect we could see all the problems of the same type as one,then multiparticle would change in one particle:then F x0:Ch=>F x interacting with Ch gives F x.All this problem tackling is one self-reference,which breaks down whenever we tackle individual problem,calculate f(x),find derivation etc.124Self-reference systems in mathematics and computer programmingLet us turn directly to mathematics,butfirst consider computer program-ming and what relates to them both as cognitive activity and computational process,and mathematical machines’construction.Let us look at a program which on some set of data S gives result set R .We know from computer science that there is invariant I of the program that gives S from R,whenever proving and gives R from S,whenever com-puting.We may break the invariant into as many invariants,say,as many procedures(or even instructions)there are in this program.Let us look at any single procedure in the program.It may be considered as self-reference system with the state in se,or even in se meditans which constitutes all actions that procedure does within itself and the state particula collidens, when procedure turns to other procedures,interchanging data,i.e.,is in interaction with outer program’s body.We know that each program cy-cle in the program has corresponding cycle’s invariant,that,of course,is self-reference system,which corresponds to this cycle action and comprise its logical action.The global invariant I is a self-reference system built from these smaller invariants-idems.Thus,all program is one single idem, built from many other idems.We by programming discover or discern these idems and write them down[read break them down]into program codes, and so on.Quantum reference systems should be all on paradigmatic level in computer programming.Only thus programs work and turn out to be more general,than were projected initially.Good programmers do know this,programming directors should know this.We may see that programming paradigm very well demonstrates our idea in the particula in se meditans aspect.Any large programm is very good pattern of our cogitants ergo existens universe model.Today,a branch of computer science is developing using the term-on-tology[12,24],but not in the sense philosophers are used to do.It,in its essence,is typed and classified mathematical distinction,i.e.a self-reference system,which their authors call the framework for building models.It only depends on how we use this term:it turns out to be the same self-reference system,but applicable to some predictablefield of interest with the effect of being conveniently deposable in common knowledge base with the possi-bility to be easy retrieved and applied.Because of the rapid development of thisfield we see here additional possibility to give computer scientists the13necessary theoretical background,i.e.,if our attitude is right,there should never be any limits for our desire to implement whatever mathematical theories in the frameworks of eventual ontologies.All is but tofind appro-priate mathematical distinctions,i.e.,idems.There is a point where these attitudes work one against other.Ontologies’bases are hierarchical and depend on ground decisions in their basic choices.But it is only a question of how proper mathematical distinctions are made that they should work eventually good even in cases of human made knowledge databases based on particular choices.Some people from otherfields teach us how to do this [18,22].Let us turn to mathematics where we should encounter examples of real quantum self-references.We may start with one beautiful example,e.g.,the group theory[25].We see that the group theory is self-reference system; when we work within the theory we apply theorems within it and develop it and applying the group theory outside itself we come to the state particula collidens.But this situation is already too general.We see that we have to do with quantum self-reference system,when we speak about already ready theory,say,the group theory that comprise in some way the tackling of many general problems at once in a great abundance.This even should turn to be right for a single theorem as a quantum self-reference system..4.1Can mathematics be built from self-reference sys-tems?All mathematics is built[or can be built]from idems where one set of idems makes others,are there limits to it?When we come to this idea we may ask two questions:can actually all mathematics be built from idems?or,is there anything in building of mathematics or applying of mathematics that can’t be recognized as idem,where we do not think this only nominally, namely,when all theorems designing with names and designating them as self-reference systems,but asking if there really could be anything princi-pally that doesn’t break down in simpler idems and so on.If we remember Descartes,who suggested to build all mathematics from simpler facts.If all mathematics is Cartesian in this very sense then our idea works with greatest expectancy and correlation in support of this hypothesis.Another statement against our idea may be,that it does not mean any-thing in those directions of what we are here around because the idea of self-reference is too weak to draw such conclusions as we are going to.Our argument against it could be:if we come to conclusion that each mathemat-14。

量子计算机 经典问题

量子计算机 经典问题

量子计算机经典问题【中英文版】Title: Quantum Computers and Classical QuestionsTitle: 量子计算机与经典问题The phrase "quantum computer" often evokes images of futuristic technology, capable of solving complex problems beyond the scope of classical computers.However, the concept of quantum computing also raises classical questions in the field of computer science.“量子计算机”这一词汇常引发人们对未来科技的想象,能够解决传统计算机难以应对的复杂问题。

然而,量子计算的概念在计算机科学领域也引发了经典问题。

One of the classical questions in computer science is the "halting problem," which asks whether it is possible to determine, for an arbitrary program, whether it will eventually halt.This problem is known to be undecidable in the classical computing paradigm.However, quantum computing offers a potential solution to this problem.计算机科学中的一个经典问题是“停机问题”,它询问是否可以确定任意程序最终是否会停止。

这个问题在传统计算范式中已知是不可判定的。

中学物理,普通物理与四大力学重复

中学物理,普通物理与四大力学重复

中学物理,普通物理与四大力学重复1.物理是研究物质运动规律和物质结构的科学。

Physics is the science that studies the laws of motion and the structure of matter.2.常见的物理学分支包括力学、热力学、电磁学、光学和量子力学等。

Common branches of physics include mechanics, thermodynamics, electromagnetism, optics, and quantum mechanics.3.学习物理可以帮助我们更好地理解自然界的现象和规律。

Studying physics can help us better understand the phenomena and laws of nature.4.普通物理是中学物理的一部分,重点介绍了物质的基本性质和运动规律。

General physics is a part of middle school physics, focusing on the basic properties and motion laws of matter.5.会议结束后,学生们通过实验加深了对普通物理的理解。

After the meeting, the students deepened their understanding of general physics through experiments.6.中学物理是普通物理的综合应用,旨在培养学生的科学素养和实践能力。

Middle school physics is the comprehensive application of general physics, aiming to cultivate students' scientific literacy and practical ability.7.学习中学物理,首先要了解四大力学的基本概念和作用。

量子力学英文读物

量子力学英文读物

量子力学英文读物以下是一些关于量子力学的英文读物推荐:1. "Quantum: Einstein, Bohr, and the Great Debate about the Nature of Reality" by Manjit Kumar2. "The Elegant Universe: Superstrings, Hidden Dimensions, and the Quest for the Ultimate Theory" by Brian Greene3. "The Quantum World: Quantum Physics for Everyone" by Kenneth W. Ford4. "Quantum Mechanics: Concepts and Applications" by Nouredine Zettili5. "Quantum Physics: A Beginner's Guide" by Alastair Rae6. "Quantum Computing for Computer Scientists" by Noson S. Yanofsky and Mirco A. Mannucci7. "Quantum Physics for Babies" by Chris Ferrie (a simplified introduction for children and adults)8. "The Strange World of Quantum Mechanics" by Daniel F. Styer这些书籍从不同的角度介绍了量子力学的基本原理、应用、历史以及相关的思想争论。

根据你的兴趣和程度,选择适合你的读物开始探索量子世界吧!。

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

a rX iv:n lin/03112v1[nli n.CD]14Jan231Quantum Manifestations of Classical Stochasticity in the Mixed State Victor P.Berezovoj ,Yuri L.Bolotin ,Vitaliy A.Cherkaskiy Institute for Theoretical Physics National Science Center “Kharkov Institute of Physics and Technology”61108Kharkov,Ukraine We investigate the QMCS in structure of the eigenfunctions,corresponding to mixed type classical dynamics in smooth potential of the surface quadrupole oscillations of a charged liquid drop.Regions of different regimes of classical motion are strictly separated in the configuration space,allowing direct observation of the correlations between the wave function structure and type of the classical motion by comparison of the parts of the eigenfunction,corresponding to different local minima.§1.Introduction The deformation potential U (a 0,a 2)= m,n C mn (a 20+2a 22)m a n 0(6a 22−a 20)n (1.1)where a 0and a 2are the internal coordinates of the drop surface R (θ,ϕ)=R 0{1+a 0Y 2,0(θ,ϕ)+a 2[Y 2,2(θ,ϕ)+Y 2,−2(θ,ϕ)]}(1.2)Fig.1.The potential shape for W =18.describes surface quadrupole oscilla-tions of a charged liquid drop of any nature,including atomic nuclei 1)and metal clusters,2)containing specific character of the interaction only in the coefficients C mn .Expanding (1.1)to fourth order in deformation variables x =√3C 01a 0,y =√3C 01a 2(1.3)and assuming equality of masses for thetwo independent directions,we get theone-parametric C 3v -symmetric Hamil-tonianH =p 2x +p 2y2W (x 2+y 2)+xy 2−12Berezovoj,Bolotin,Cherkaskiywhere W =9C 201/(C 10C 20).The potential (1.5)is a generalization of the well-known Henon-Heiles potential 3)with one important difference:motion in (1.5)is finite for all energies,assuring ex-istence of the stationary states in quantum case.For W >16the potential energy surface has seven critical points:four minima (one central and three peripheral)and three saddles.We consider in detail the case W =18,when all four minima have the same depth E =0and the saddle energies are E S =1/20736.Critical energy of transition to chaos equals E S for the peripheral and roughly E S /2for the central minimum,so we will be interested in the energy range E S /2<E <E S ,where the classical motion is chaotic in the central and purely regular in peripheral minima,resulting in what we shall call the mixed state.4),5)We find numerically the spectrum E n and the eigenfunctions ψn (x,y )for the Hamil-tonian (1.4)by the spectral method,6),7)which implies the numerical solution of the time-dependent Schr¨o dinger equationi ∂ψ(x,y,t )2m +U (x,y,W ) ψ(x,y,t )(1.6)with the symmetrically split operator algorithm 8)ψ(x,y,t +∆t )=e i ∆t ∇24m ψ(x,y,t )+O (∆t 3)(1.7)where exp (i∆t ∇2/4m )ψ(x,y,t )is efficiently calculated using the fast Fourier trans-form.Initial wave functionψ(x,y,t =0)=n a n ψn (x,y )(1.8)is chosen to assure the convergence of ψ(x,y,t )in both the coordinate and reciprocal spaces and to avoid the degenerate states in the decomposition (1.8).Having calculated ψ(x,y,t )for 0<t <T ,we obtain the spectrum E n as the local maxima ofP (E )=1T T 0dtψ(x,y,t )w (t )e iE n t (1.10)whereP (t )= dxdyψ∗(x,y,t =0)ψ(x,y,t )(1.11)δT (E −E n )=1QMCS in the Mixed State3§2.QMCS in the eigenfunction structureQuantum manifestations of classical stochasticity can be expected in the form of some peculiarities of concrete stationary state9)–11)or in the whole group of states close in energy.12)–21)Of course,it is not excepted that such alternative does not exist at all,i.e.the manifestations of the classical chaos can be observed both in the properties of separate states and in their sets.For example,comparing the eigen-functions,corresponding to energy levels below the critical energy of transition to chaos E c,with those corresponding to energy levels above E c,drastic changes in the eigenfunction structure can be easily seen and analyzed.However,a question can arise if those changes are due to change in the type of classical motion or they are just a result of the quantum numbers change.Instead of comparing the eigenfunc-tions corresponding to different states,we propose to look for QMCS in the single quantum mechanical object—the eigenfunction of the mixed state.C3v-symmetric Hamiltonian(1.4)is invariant under rotation of2π/3in the(x,y) plain and under reflection through x axis,so according to the transformation prop-ertiesψ(r,ϕ+2π/3)=Rψ(r,ϕ)(2.1)ψ(r,−ϕ)=σψ(r,ϕ)(2.2) the eigenfunctions can be divided into three types of different symmetry:A1(R= 1,σ=1),A2(R=1,σ=−1),and double degenerate E(R=exp(±2π/3),σ=±1). The initial wave function(1.8)was chosen to excite only A1-type states,and we computed the energy levels and the eigenfunctions for(1.4)with W=18and m= 1010,which corresponds to the main quantum numbers of order102in the energy range E S/2<E<E putations were made on a1024×1024grid of length0.6 (distance from the central minimum to saddles was1/12and1/6to the peripheral minima),number of time steps was16384with increment∆t=104.Isolines of probability density and nodal curves for the eigenfunction corresponding to E n=0.444×10−4=0.92E S are presented in Fig.2,3.As we did not compute the entire spectrum,we cannot point out the number n exactly,but we estimate it to be about200.Correlations between the character of classical motion—developed chaos in the central minimum and pure regularity in the peripheral ones—can be easily seen comparing the parts of the eigenfunction corresponding to different local minima.§3.ConclusionWe considered the quantum manifestations of classical stochasticity in the struc-ture of eigenfunction in the coordinate representation,corresponding to the mixed state in the potential of surface quadrupole oscillations of a charged liquid drop. Correlations between character of classical motion and structure of the eigenfunc-tion parts,corresponding to local minima with different type of classical motion, was observed in the shape of the probability density distribution and in the nodal curves structure,which gives direct and natural way to study the QMCS in smooth4Berezovoj,Bolotin,CherkaskiyFig.2.The eigenfunction shape。

相关文档
最新文档