How to Write Scientific Paperin English 10
How to write a scientific paper
What is a scientific paper?
A paper is an organized description of hypotheses, data and conclusions, intended to instruct the reader
What is your objective as a researcher?
Use the active voice whenever possible.
Complete all comparisons.
• Type all papers doublespaced (not singleor oneandahalfspaced), and leave two spaces after colons, and after periods at the end of sentences. Leave generous margins. Do not translate Chinese to English directly! Use professional help as much as possible, especially if you are not short of fund.
What was measured (data)? What were the results (reduced data)? What does it all mean? What hypotheses were proved or disproved? What did I learn? Why does it make a difference?
The word "this" must always be followed by a noun, so that its reference is explicit.
How to Write a Scientific Paper(怎么写科技论文)
How to Write a Scientific Paper*By George M. WhitesidesDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University,Cambridge, MA 02138, USAWhat is a scientific paper? A paper is an organized description of hypotheses, data and conclusions, intended to instruct the reader. Papers are a central part of research. If your research does not generate papers, it might just as well not have been done. “Interesting and unpublished” is equivalent to “non-existent.”什么是科技论文？科技论文是集假说、数据和结论为一体的概括性描述，以此向读者论述。
论文是研究工作的中心部分。
如果你的研究没有写成论文，也就等同于没有做研究。
有意义但没有发表，等同于不存在。
Realize that your objective in research is to formulate and test hypotheses, to draw conclusions from these tests, and to teach these conclusions to others. Your objective is not to “collect data.”要意识到研究的目的是为了形成并证实假说，从一些测试中得出结论，并把结论传授给别人。
你的研究目的不是简单的收集数据。
How to Write Scientific Paper
How Do I Write A Scientific Paper?A scientific paper is a written report describing original research results whose format has been defined by centuries of developing tradition, editorial practice, scientific ethics and the interplay with printing and publishing services. The result of this process is that virtually every scientific paper has a title, abstract, introduction, materials and methods, results and discussion.科技论文是描述原创研究结果的书面报告，它的格式由数世纪的发展传统，编辑实践，科学道德所确定，并且受印刷和出版服务的影响。
这个过程的结果是，几乎每一篇科学论文都有一个标题，摘要，前言，材料和方法，结果和讨论。
It should, however, be noted that most publications have rules about a paper's format: some divide papers into these or some of these sections, others do not, and the order may be different in different publications. So be prepared to revise your paper in to a publication's format when you are ready to submit.然而，应该注意的是，大多数出版物对文章的格式有规则：一些出版物会把文章分成一些章节，另外一些出版物则不会，并且不同的出版物规则是不同的。
如何科研英文作文
如何科研英文作文Writing a scientific research paper in English requires attention to several key elements to ensure clarity, coherence, and effectiveness in conveying your findings. Here's a structured approach to writing a research paper:1. Title: Begin with a concise and descriptive titlethat accurately reflects the content of your research.2. Abstract: Write a brief summary of your research, including the objectives, methods, results, and conclusions. Keep it concise but informative, typically around 150-250 words.3. Introduction:Start with a general introduction to the topic, providing background information and context for your research.Clearly state the research question or objective.Review relevant literature to demonstrate the gap your research aims to fill.End with a clear statement of the purpose or hypothesis of your study.4. Methods:Describe the experimental design, materials, and procedures in detail.Include enough information for other researchers to replicate your study.Use subsections to organize different aspects of your methodology, such as Participants, Instruments, Procedure, etc.5. Results:Present your findings in a clear and logical manner.Use tables, figures, and graphs to illustrate data when appropriate.Avoid interpreting the results in this section; simply report the facts objectively.6. Discussion:Interpret your results and explain their significance.Compare your findings with previous studies and discuss any discrepancies or similarities.Address the limitations of your study and suggest areas for future research.Emphasize the broader implications of your findings within the field.7. Conclusion:Summarize the main findings of your study.Restate the significance of your research and its contribution to the field.Avoid introducing new information in the conclusion.8. References:List all the sources cited in your paper accordingto the preferred citation style (e.g., APA, MLA).Ensure accuracy and consistency in formatting.9. Proofreading and Revision:Carefully proofread your paper for grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.Revise for clarity, coherence, and organization ofideas.Seek feedback from colleagues or mentors to improve the quality of your writing.By following these steps and paying attention to detail, you can effectively communicate your research findings in English. Remember to maintain a formal tone and use precise scientific language throughout the paper.。
如何写一篇科学文献(英文)
- “In conclusion…” (biggest mensage, return to Intro, avoid speculation, avoid “need more work”
Use and Misuse of English
• Tense - Previously published work: present tense
Methods Section
• Enough information for an experienced
investigator to repeat your work • Avoid tiresome detail • Cut-and-paste from previous work of the author(s), not somebody else’s • It is the first section of the paper in which subheadings should be used
- Short words - One word vs many
Simplify
a majority of = most at the present time = now give rise to = cause in some cases = sometimes is defined as = is it is believed that = I think on the basis of = by pooled together = pooled subsequent to = after with the result that = so that
how to write a paper in scientific journal style and format如何在按照杂志要求合理的写文章
How to Write A Paper in Scientific Journal Style andFormatAbout This GuideThis guide has been compiled, edited, and revised by Greg Anderson and is intended to provide general content, style, and format guidelines for biology students learning to write papers in a standard, scientific journal style and format that can be easily adapted to specific journal requirements or disciplinary conventions. Much of the specific content has been shaped by the particular needs of the beginning scientific writers in our biology program. We therefore make no claims about completeness or depth for more advanced writers in the biological sciences, or those in other science disciplines. The guidelines presented here are largely based upon Huth et al (1994), and we provide suggestions as to other useful published writing guides.How to Use This GuideWe provide this website as a introductory guide for writing a journal-style scientific paper in a standard format acceptable for most courses in the Biology Department. We suggest that you either have this document running in your browser while you are writing to provide quick answers regarding style and format, or to print a copy for easy reference anytime. To print hardcopy of the information use the File, Print option in your browser.Each section is accessed from the Table of Contents and within each section you will find links to other relevant information. Link menus are provided at the top of each page to facilitate rapid access of the information for which you are looking. A menu at the bottom of each page allows quick return to the Table of Contents or to theOn-Line Resources home page.ReferencesHuth J, Brogan M, Dancik B, Kommedahl T, Nadziejka D, Robinson P, Swanson W.1994. Scientific format and style: The CBE manual for authors, editors, and publishers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 825 p.AcknowledgmentsMany thanks to Seri Rudolph, the Coordinator of Scientific Writing at the Bates College Writing Workshop for her invaluable comments that have greatly improved this guide during its most recent revision. This guide was originally inspired by a document which came to Bates College from Adelle Binning, a visiting facultymember in Biology at Bates College (1987-88), who excerpted it from a document written by William S. Brooks of Ripon College. Some material was patterned on a similar guide prepared by E.H.Williams of Hamilton College. I am grateful to Kathleen O'Connor and her students in the Bowdoin College Writing Fellows program who graciously critiqued an early version of this document and whose comments have improved it greatly. My wife, Patsy Dickinson, of the Bowdoin College Department of Biology, has provided invaluable critical feedback at many stages in its development. Finally, many thanks to the primary user group, the Biology students at Bates College who continually provide invaluable feedback on the organization, content, and utility of this guide.I welcome and encourage feedback from others who may use this guide and ask that it be directed to:Greg AndersonDept. of Biology44 Campus Avenue,Bates College, Lewiston, ME 04240/~ganderso/email: ganderso@Introduction to Journal-Style Scientific Writing OverviewA critical aspect of the scientific process is the reporting of new results in scientific journals in order to disseminate that information to the larger community of scientists. Communication of your results contributes to the pool of knowledge within your discipline (and others!) and very often provides information that helps others interpret their own experimental results. Most journals accept papers for publication only after peer review by a small group of scientists who work in the same field and who recommend the paper be published (usually with some revision).The format and structure presented here is a general one; the various scientific journals, and oftentimes specific disciplines, utilize slightly different formats and/or writing styles. Mastery of the format presented here will enable you to adapt easily to most journal- or discipline-specific formats. While this guide (a others like it) is a necessary tool of learning the scientific writing style and format, it is not sufficient, by itself, to make you an accomplished writer. This guide will not teach you how to write in the English language, i.e., it is not a grammar book. You, the writer, must practice writing and thinking within this structure, and, learn by example from the writings of others; learning the nuances of this style and format will be enhanced as you read the scientific literature - pay attention to how professional scientistswrite about their work. You will see improvement in your own scientific writing skills by repeatedly practic ing reading, writing, and critiquing of other’s writing.The guide addresses four major aspects of writing journal-style scientific papers:(1) fundamental style considerations; (2) a suggested strategy for efficiently writing up research results; (3) the nuts and bolts of format and content of each section of a paper (part of learning to write a scientific paper is learning how to follow instructions precisely), and, (4) basic information regarding peer critiques of scientific writing. ALL journals have a set of instructions for authors which explicitly state how their paper should be formatted for submission. Consider this guide to be your instructions when writing lab reports for Bio 201, 270, and s42. We encourage you to follow the directions carefully and to make full use of this guide and the writing support system (TWAs, instructors, and Writing Workshop staff tutors) as you prepare your papers. Please ask for help if you have questions about format, style, or content. Above all, remember to write with precision, clarity, and economy.Getting StartedThe first task to accomplish as you begin the process of writing is to order and organize the information you wish to present. Some people work well from an outline, others do not. Some people write first to discover the points, then rearrange them using an after-the-fact outline. Whatever process you may use, be aware that scientific writing requires special attention to order and organization. Because the paper will be divided into sections, you need to know what information will go into each. If you don't normally work from an outline, this may be an occasion when you'll at least want to develop a list of the major points to be included in each section, before you begin to write. If the paper has multiple authors, then this is a good time to work (and negotiate!) with your collaborators to insure that all the points the group wants to make get listed.Audience: Who will be reading your paper? Usually you will be writing to your peers. Simple advice: address your paper to another interested biology student, or lab group, in this course or major, and assume they have at least the same knowledge and expertise base as you. Knowing your audience helps you to decide what information to include--you would write a very different article for a narrow, highly technical, disciplinary journal vs. one that went out to a broad range of disciplines. Similarly, you would write a paper for an audience of other biology majors very differently than one you would write for a cross section of the college. Do not write your paper specifically for your instructor.ProseYour writing should be in complete sentences and easily understood. It shouldconform to the conventions of standard written English (sentence form, grammar, spelling, etc.). Your ideas will have little impact, no matter how good the research, if they are not communicated well. Remember always that scientific terminology very often has precise meaning. Be certain you choose your words correctly and wisely.It is important to write clearly and concisely. Make sure that every paragraph hasa clear topic sentence and that the paragraph content supports the topic. Thegoal is to report your findings and conclusions clearly, and with as few words asnecessary. Your audience (other scientists usually) are not interested in flowery prose, they want to know your findings. Remember: Writing and thinking are closelylinked enterprises - many people have noted that, "fuzzy writing reflects fuzzythinking." When people have difficulty translating their ideas into words, theygenerally do not know the material as well as they think.Style ConsiderationsBe clear and concise: Write briefly and to the point. Say what you mean clearly and avoid embellishment with unnecessary words or phrases. Brevity is very important.Use of the active voice alone shortens sentence length considerably.Precise word use is critical: Scientific terminology carries specific meaning - learn to use it appropriately and use it consistently. A critical function of technicalterminology is to say a lot with a few words, i.e., economy. This applies as well to appropriate acronyms (e.g., PCR) and abbreviations. Direct your paper toward the average reader in your intended audience. If writing for a highly technical journal, you will necessarily use the technical jargon. If writing for a general science audience you would limit the jargon.Some things to avoid:•You do not have to try to impress people by using words most people have never heard of.Many published articles are like this, and they are poor papers on account of it.•Do not use colloquial speech, slang, or "childish" words or phrases.•Do not use contractions: for example, "don't" must be "do not" and "isn't" must be "is not" etc.Abbreviations: Do not use abbreviations in the text except for units of measure.Always abbreviate these when using them with data (2 mm; 10 min.). Except fortemperature units (F,C, K) never abbreviate units of measure when using them in a non-data context (e.g., "we measured length in millimeters"; "time was recorded in minutes"; "temperature was measured in F (or C)"; "100 years have passed sinceMendel did..."). A list of common abbreviations and conversions is provided.Use Past Tense: Research papers reflect work that has been completed, therefore use the past tense throughout your paper (including the Introduction) when referring to the actual work that you did, including statements about your expectations or hypotheses. Use the past tense, as well, when referring to the work of others that you may cite.First vs. Third Person: If there is one stylistic area where scientific disciplines and journals vary widely, it is the use of first vs. third person constructions. Some disciplines and their journals (e.g., organismal biology and ecology) have moved away from a very strict adherence to the third person construction, and permit limited use of the first person in published papers. Other disciplines, especially the biomedical fields, still prefer the third person constrcution. Limit your use of first person construction (i.e., " I (or we) undertook this study ....): usually it is most acceptable in the Introduction and Discussion sections, and then only to a limited extent. Use first person in the methods sparingly if at all, and avoid its use in the results.Use Active Verbs: Use active verbs whenever possible; writing that overly uses passive verbs (is, was, has, have, had) is deadly to read and almost always results in more words than necessary to say the same thing.ACTIVE: "the mouse consumed oxygen at a higher rate..."PASSIVE: "oxygen was consumed by the mouse at a higher rate.."The clarity and effectiveness of your writing will improve dramatically as you increase the use of the active voice.Other specific comments on style are also included for each section of the paper. Remember: precise word use, past tense, active voice, brevity.References References to the research findings of others are an integral component of any research paper. The usual practice is to summarize the finding or other information in your own words and then cite the source. Any ideas or other information that are not your own must be substantiated by a reference that is cited in the text. As a rule, in research papers, direct quotation and footnoting are not practiced - simply restate the author's ideas or findings in your own words and provide a citation.Ladd Library links:Citation & Style Guides--Plagiarism (use of others words, ideas, images, etc. without citation) is not to be tolerated and can be easily avoided by adequately referencing any and all information you use from other sources. In the strictest sense, plagiarism is representation of the work of others as being your work. Paraphrasing other's words too closely may be construed as plagiarism in some circumstances. In journal style papers there is virtually no circumstance in which the findings of someone else cannot be expressed in your own words with a proper citation of the source. Refer to: The Bates College Statement On Plagiarism and a Guide to Source Acknowledgment.) If you are unclear about what constitutes plagiarism, please confer with your instructor.A Strategy for Writing Up Research ResultsGet Organized: Lists, Outlines, Notecards, etc. Before starting to write the paper, take the time to think about and develop a list of points to be made in the paper. As you progress, use whichever strategy works for you to begin to order and to organize those points and ideas into sections.A. Balanced Review of the Primary Research Literature: Do an in-depth, balanced review of the primary research literature relevant to your study prior to designing and carrying out the experiments. This review will help you learn what is known about the topic you are investigating and may let you avoid unnecessarily repeating work done by others. This literature will form the basis of your Introduction and Discussion. Training in on-line searches is available through the librarians and is included in Biology 201. Do your search early enough to take advantage of the Interlibrary Loan System if need be.B. Write the Introduction: Once your hypothesis has been refined for testing, you will draft the Introduction to your paper. In PI courses you will bring the Introduction to lab the day of the experiment for critique by an instructor or TWA (Technical Writing Assistant).C. Design and Conduct the Experiment: Keep careful notes on procedures used during the experiment . You should write the Materials and Methods section upon completion of the experiment.D Analyze and Interpret the Results: Once the data are collected, you must analyze and interpret the results. Analysis will include data summaries (e.g., calculating means and variances) and statistical tests to verify conclusions. Most scientists lay out their Tables and Figures upon completion of the data analysis before writing theResults section. Write the Table and Figure legends. It is good practice to note the one or two key results that each Table or Figure conveys and use this information as a basis for writing the Results section. Sequence and number the Tables and Figures in the order which best enables the reader to reach your conclusions.E. Write the Results Section: Remember that the Results section has both text and illustrative materials (Tables and Figures). Use the text component to guide the reader through your key results, i.e., those results which answer the question(s) you investigated. Each Table and Figure must be referenced in the text portion of the results, and you must tell the reader what the key result(s) is that each Table or Figure conveys.F. Write the Discussion: Interpretation of your results includes discussing how your results modify and fit in with what we previously understood about the problem. Review the literature again at this time. After completing the experiments you will have much greater insight into the subject, and by going through some of the literature again, information that seemed trivial before, or was overlooked, may tie something together and therefore prove very important to your own interpretation. Be sure to cite the works that you refer to.G. Write the Abstract and Title: The Abstract is always the last section written because it is a concise summary of the entire paper and should include a clear statement of your aims, a brief description of the methods, the key findings, and your interpretation of the key results. The Title will probably be written earlier, but is often modified once the the final form of the paper clearly known.H. Self-Revise Your Paper: Most authors revise their paper s at least 2-3x before giving it out for peer review. Go back over your paper now and read it carefully; read it aloud. Does it say what you wanted it to say? Do any ideas, experiments, or interpretations need to be moved around within the text to enhance the logical flow of your arguments? Can you shorten long sentences to clarify them?Can you change passive verbs to active forms? Do the Tables and Figures have sufficient information to stand alone outside the context of the paper? Use your dictionary to correct spelling and your spell checker to catch typos.I. Peer Review: Have knowledgable colleagues critique your paper. Use their comments to revise your paper yet again.Making Effective Comments on Peer ReviewsPeer Review Form.J. Prepare the Final Draft: Carefully proof-read your final draft to make sure its as well done as possible. Double check that you've properly cited all your sources in the text and in the Literature Cited. Check the formatting one last time. The instructorsLOVE to give full credit for format issues whenever possible, but will not hesitate to take points off for sloppy work.Other Useful ResourcesThe content of this website is not exhaustive, and many topics related to writing research articles have not been discussed. The references listed below are a sampling of the numerous published resources on the topic of researching, writing and critiquing research papers.Hult, Christine A. 1996. Researching and Writing in the Sciences and Technology. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA. 168 pp.ISBN 0-205-16840-XMcMillan, V.E. 1997. Writing Papers in the Biological Sciences. 2nd Ed. Bedford Books, Boston 197 pp.ISBN0-312-11504-0Helpful Hints for Effective Peer Reviewingby Seri RudolphCoordinator of Scientific WritingThe Writing Workshop, Bates CollegeOne of the hardest things about getting started with peer reviewing is dealing with your reluctance to give negative feedback. After all, we’re all socialized not to say mean things to peop le, and purely negative commentary usually doesn’t end up helping the writer anyway. The purpose of this document is to help you find ways to get around this problem by1) remembering to give positive commentary where a writerhas done well, and by,2) turning negative feedback into productive feedback.1. When reviewing, it is always important to note a paper’s strengths, so that the author will not lose these in the process of revision. Never assume an author will automatically know which parts of a paper work well... remember, they have been immersed in it too long to be objective. The peer review form asks you to list the three major strengths of the paper in section VIIc - but remember to do this throughout the paper too, writing marginal comments like “good paragraph” when you read a part that flows well.2. But how to deal with the parts that really do have problems? The key is to make sure the comments you write are substantive comments. As we read, we all have reactions to problematic parts of a paper: “Huh? This is unclear”... “Gosh, this is disorganized!”... “ What is this person trying to say here”. But these reactions are only the first step in the process of constructing helpful commentary, and writing down these initial reactions as comments is not usually useful to the writer.How can you turn these unhelpful comments into helpful ones? You need to go a step beyond your initial reaction, and ask yourself why you are reacting negatively to that sentence or paragraph. Why, for instance, does a paragraph seem disorganized? Are several topics mixed together in one paragraph? Or is a single topic treated, but presented out of logical sequence, so that the reader is constantly grasping for information not yet given? Or does the writer seem to start with oneidea or position, but then reverse him/herself later in the paragraph?You can see that this process will take some work on your part, because you need to reflect on your reactions and read in a very involved way. Below are some examples of unhelpful “reaction-type” comments that have been turned into helpful comments by this process of reflection.Example 1:Unhelpful comment: "This section needs work."Helpful Comment: Combine the related actions into a single sentence in Methods, eg, "Flies were assigned randomly to 5 treatment groups of 25, and were weighed, sexed, and marked with non-toxic paint before behaviorial trials began"Example 2:Unhelpful comment: "Disorganized!"Helpful Comment:"This section discusses both animal-rearing conditions and experimental methods, but the two are mixed together. Could you separate each into its own paragraph?"Example 3:Unhelpful comment: "How are these references relevant?"Helpful Comment: "The background and references given in poaragraph 2 don't seem directly relevant to our hypothesis. I think we need references on how light has been shown to affect flowering (in sunflower or any species), and less on other factors that promote or inhibit flowering."Example 4:Unhelpful comment: "Unclear."Helpful Comment: "I'm not sure what your interpretation is after these two paragraphs: does the experiment show that mung beans cure cancer, or not? Which are we concluding? If the sample size is too small, we need to discuss that when we suggest future research, but that does not change our results here."Revising Your PaperSelf-Revision by the Author(s)Revision of your writing is an on-going process from the time you begin until the final copy is submitted. A strategy that works for many people is to write out an initial draft in total without substantial revision and then let it sit for a day. Come back to it then and begin revising your paper working from a global perspective (overall organization) to paragraph content and organization and finally down to sentence level line editing. Implicit in these instructions is the assumption that you are checking the content for scientific correctness and accuracy.•GLOBALo check the sequence of ideas/background/content in each section for logical progression (your topic sentences should do this).o check for a strong relationship of ideas between the Introduction (what we knew before our study) and the Discussion (how our study changes or supports our previous understanding).•PARAGRAPHo check that each paragraph has a coherent topic sentence, most often as the lead sentence.o in each paragraph do the other sentences support the topic sentence? o check the transitions between paragraphs to ensure they are logical and smooth.•LINE EDITINGo check for consistent and correct use of terminology.o can you change a passive verb construction to an active verb?o eliminate superfluous lead phrases (Once that was done, ..).o remove all colloquial language.o check for redundancy(i.e., places where you repeat what you have said elsewhere).o read each senetence closely for clarity and brevity. Can you say the same thing with fewer words?o READ THE PAPER ALOUD to find those quirky sentences that you wrote while still half asleep - if doesn't sound correct when spoken aloud, it will readeven more oddly.•MISCELLANEOUSo check that all of your sources are cited correctly in the text.o check the numbering sequence of your tables and figures.o check the Literature Cited for completeness and correct format.o check the line spacing between headings and text, and Tables and Figures and text.o check the page breaks to make sure you do not split tables or figures. o are the authors' names spelled correctly?o run spell check on the document to find typographical errors and read carefully for spelling and grammatical errors.o check your main headings and subheadings for proper case and placement.Revision After Peer CritiqueAfter reading carefully the comments and suggestions to improve your paper, discuss them with the reviewer (when possible) to get clarification or to argue your point, if you should disagree. In general, you will make the changes as suggested by the reviewer unless you have good, and justifiable, reasons not to.Once you are clear on the changes to be made, approach the revision using the same global, paragraph, line editing strategy.•Make the global changes first and recheck the items listed previously. •Make the paragraph level changes and recheck list.•Make the line edit changes and recheck the list.•Recheck the miscelleaneous items.Final RevisionIf possible, have your reviewer examine the paper again (cookies help!) one last time. For PI courses, this is the opportunity for co-authors to check the final draft to make sure it satisfies their expectations. If all the changes have been made to everyone's satisfaction, make one last check of overall appearance of the document to catch recalcitrant page breaks, etc.The Structure, Format, Content, and Style of aJournal-Style Scientific PaperWhy a Scientific Format?The scientific format may seem confusing for the beginning science writer due to its rigid structure which is so different from writing in the humanities. One reason for using this format is that it is a means of efficiently communicating scientific findings to the broad community of scientists in a uniform manner. Another reason, perhaps more important than the first, is that this format allows the paper to be read at several different levels. For example, many people skim Titles to find out what information is available on a subject. Others may read only titles and Abstracts. Those wanting to go deeper may look at the Tables and Figures in the Results, and so on. The take home point here is that the scientific format helps to insure that at whatever level a person reads your paper (beyond title skimming), they will likely get the key results and conclusions.The Sections of the PaperMost journal-style scientific papers are subdivided into the following sections: Title, Authors and Affiliation, Abstract, Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, Acknowledgments, and Literature Cited, which parallel the experimental process. This is the system we will use. This website describes the style, content, and format associated with each section.The sections appear in a journal style paper in the following prescribed order:Section Headings:Main Section Headings: Each main section of the paper begins with a heading which should be capitalized, centered at the beginning of the section, and double spaced from the lines above and below. Do not underline the section heading OR put a colon at the end.Example of a main section heading:INTRODUCTIONSubheadings: When your paper reports on more than one experiment, usesubheadings to help organize the presentation. Subheadings should be capitalized (first letter in each word), left justified, and either bold italics OR underlined.Example of a subheading:Effects of Light Intensity on the Rate of Electron TransportTitle, Authors' Names, and Institutional Affiliations1. Function: Your paper should begin with a Title that succinctly describes thecontents of the paper. Use descriptive words that you would associate strongly with the content of your paper: the molecule studied, the organism used or studied, the treatment, the location of a field site, the response measured, etc. A majority ofreaders will find your paper via electronic database searches and those search engines key on words found in the title.2. Title FAQs3. Format:•The title should be centered at the top of page 1 (DO NOT use a title page - it is a waste of paper for our purposes); the title is NOT underlined or italicized.•the authors' names(PI or primary author first) and institutional affiliation are double-spaced from and centered below the title. When more then two authors, the names are separated by commas except for the last which is separated from the previous name by the word "and".For example:Ducks Over-Winter in Colorado Barley Fields in Response toIncreased Daily Mean TemperatureIma Mallard, Ura Drake, and Woodruff DucqueDepartment of Wildlife Biology, University of Colorado - BoulderThe title is not a section, but it is necessary and important. The title should be short and unambiguous, yet be an adequate description of the work. A general。
paper writing
What to publish?
• Research that is
– Original – Significant – Improvement on current knowledge
Start writing early – helps clarify study and can determine study direction
文章标题是文章主旨的直接反映，其基本要求就是简明扼 要，用最少的单词准确无误地描述论文主要内容。标题通 常不是一个完整的句子。
标题的写法
1、 对于研究性论文，可以使用描述性写法，即说明论文 的性质和研究的内容，乃至使用的手段等。论文用什么形式， 标题中一定要包含关键词。标题字符的大小写根据刊物而定， 有些刊物全部用大写字符，有的仅标题第一个字符大写，其 余全部小写，还有的除介词外。每一个单词第一个字符都大 写。 2、 如果一个标题太长，或涵盖相互独立的内容太多，也可 以使用副标题，标题多半是对主题的补充。（不建议！） Example 1 Synthesis and biological activities of aldose reductase inhibitors bearing acyl benzenesulfonamides as carboxylic acid surrogates aldose reductase inhibitor / diabetic complication / carboxylic acid surrogate / acyl benzenesulfonamide / alrestatin
Why Write Scientific Papers?
“Scientists are motivated by two things: (1) to understand the world, (2) to get credit from it” • • • • • A scientific career is all about expansion of human knowledge In the academic and public sectors, scientific papers ARE the means for this expansion. “Publish or Perish” should indeed be the rule for scientists working as individuals - scientific papers ARE your professional contribution. You don’t publish, you’re out. Quantity doesn’t matter beyond an expected number – quality is what matters What determines the perceived quality of a scientific paper? (now routinely- perhaps unfortunately – measured by the citation index)
How to Write Scientific Papers
Qinyuan Lou 3.11.2011
1. 2. 3.
Individual Sections Submission Modern English Writing Concepts
Individual Sections
Abstract Title Introduction Materials & Methods Discussion Conclusion Acknowledgments References
2．欠缺 (Gap) ．
在介绍背景之后，要指出该研究领域中的欠缺点，以铺 垫进行本次研究的理由。下列为常见表达语句： （1）The mechanism … is yet to be fully elucidated. （2）The causes … are not entirely known. （3）Although …, yet its impact is presently unknown.
1317 – 1321)
Initiating and Intensifying Insulin Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (The AJM Volume 121, Issue 6, Supplement 1, June 2008, Pages
S20-S29)
Beyond Pay for Performance — Emerging Models of Provider-Payment Reform (The New
England Journal of medicine Volume 359:1197-1200)
(3) 句子型 (Sentence type)：强有力 ： 地传递信息
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
2 Structure Of the Paper
致谢语(Acknowledgement) 致谢语一般单独成段放在结论之后，它不是论文的必要 部分。致谢是用来对在撰写论文过程中给予过支持和帮 助的人表示感谢。 参考文献(References) 参考文献是一篇正规论文的重要组成部分，一般不应忽略。 引用参考文献时，要按照国际或国家标准，使标引的各项 信息齐全。
2 Structure Of the aper正文(Text) 正文是论文的主体，要对论文内容展开说明。这一部分 所占篇幅较长，是论文的核心部分。正文通常包括研究 的对象、方法、结果和评论几个部分。 结论或结束语(Conclusion/ Summary) 结论是整篇文章的最后总结。应简要回顾论文的主要内 容，取得的成果，然后做出结论或进一步讨论。还应指 出存在的问题或有待于解决的问题，并对以后的研究进 行展望，讨论结果层次一定要清楚，可用序号列出。
2 Structure Of the Paper
标题(Title)
标题是对论文中重要内容的高度概括，因此它既要有概括 性，又要简洁，不宜过长。 若标题实在过长，可归纳出简短的主标题，再以副标题加 以说明。 摘要(Abstract) 论文摘要是对论文主要内容的精练概括，重点应放在研究 成果及结论。常采用第三人称撰写，可分陈述型 (descriptive)和信息型(informational)摘要，陈述型只说明 主题，信息型要对主要观点及各论点核心内容进行介绍。
2 Structure Of the Paper
关键词(Key Words) 关键词是科技论文的文献检索标识，也是表达文献主题 概念的自然语言词汇。每篇科技论文应选取3-8个能反映 文章核心内容的专业术语作为关键词，之间采用分号隔 开排在一行，一般排在摘要的下方。 引言(Introduction) 引言(也称前言、序言、导言)经常作为科技论文的开端， 阐明论文的主题、目的、特点、意义以及是否存在有待 于解决的问题。
powerpoint制作报告需遵循的原则
投影片上的文字不应该太多，字体不应该太 小 一张投影片如果信息过多，会让人抓不住重 点，如坠入五里雾中。一张投影片，一个概 念，图样尽量不要多于三或4个 投影片的格式和外观要注意结构性和专业感
如何进行报告
导言：开场白，内容概括 主体 结论 提问与回答 报告中应注意问题
3 Notes on Paper Writing
论文编写格式要符合国家标准（GB）、国际标准和 SCI、Ei有关规定和国际检索系统对论文格式的要求， 至少应包括： Title（题名）、 Author’s Name in Chinese Spelling（作者姓名的汉语 拼音）、 Author’s Working Unit（作者工作单位）、 Abstract（论文摘要）、 Literature Sources（文献出处）、 Bibliography（参考文献）。
How to Write Scientific Paper in English
1 Writing Procedures
选定课题(Choosing topic) 通过调研或科技文献检索搜集适当的材料(Collecting Appropriate information) 拟写书目提要(Preparing the Working Bibliography) 做好详细摘录(Taking Notes) 正确分析材料(Analyzing Your information／Materials) 理清思路，列出大纲(Organizing ideas and Working out an Outline) 写出初稿(Writing the First Paper) 列出引证材料(Documenting the Paper) 修改草稿，完成论文(Revising the Draft and Finishing the Paper)
Making presentations in English
准备报告
1 报告内容的准备与选择 听众， 时间 2 准备投影片 时间的掌控 会议报告大纲： Title/author/affiliation Forecast Outline Background Methods Results Summary Future Work