翻译

Storylines Framing Planning in Urban Green AreasAll the actors included in the study adhere to what we have called a ‘protectiondiscourse’ where focus is on conservation of what are deemed as natural and culturalvalues of exceptional quality. This storyline has a hegemonic position in the local discourse, and no one questions why these qualities are considered to be valuable or why they should be protected. How has the protection discourse been created? And why has it become so influential?According to Ernstsson and Sörlin (2009, p. 1461) the articulation of values by knowledge elites through social arenas often precedes the designation of certain sites or landscapes as protected areas, reserves, or national parks. Collective entities are transformed into symbolic artefacts that are imparted by knowledge elites such as scientists, artists, etc. This creates a shared understanding of these artefacts’ importanceand in turn creates a will to safeguard them. In the Moss case, the collective entities that are at play are either recreational idylls frequently visited by the citizens (the pond and the hill) or places with a history attached to them (the Royal road and the execution site). The value of these entities has been communicated by authoritative sources such as the environmental and cultural authority at the regional level as well as by knowledgeable local actors. Municipal plans and scientific reports ordered by Action Mosseskogen have supported the protection arguments.However, underneath the seemingly total consensus of the protection discourse, two distinct discourses with competing world views can be identified; a reductionist discourse and a comprehensive discourse. The reductionist discourse orders the forest according to the properties of its parts by arranging sites and species through an288 H. Hofstad et al.Downloaded by [Zhejiang University] at 00:20 03 April 2015assessment of their value according to predefined qualities in an ecological, historical or cultural sense. This opens the way for development in the forest as some properties of the forest are seen as more valuable than others. The comprehensive discourse sees the forest as one coherent whole where the quality of the forest as a whole supersedes the unique qualities it hosts. Hence, the whole is more than, or different from, the sum of the parts. The weight is put on the interdependence and interaction between different parts and qualities in the forest.We find resemblances of a reductionist view among public authorities and property owners. However, their approach to reductionism differs. The public authorities at the regional and local level put weight on the combination of public transport and land use which is at the core of an urban development discourse. A core storyline in this discourse is that development around transport nodes—preferably railway stations—enables sustainable travel at the same time as it secures customers to local transportation. Urban development in Moss, as well as in other municipalities (Hofstad, 2012), is polycentric in the sense that development shall be concentrated in predefined development nodes where railway stations are one important element. As we have seen, the applicability of potential development areas in such a scheme is decisive for their final planning status. In the environmental impact assessment of Northern Moss it isvisible that urban development has pre-eminence over the concern for natural, cultural and recreational values (Moss Municipality, 2011b; Rambøll, 2011). If an object or area of value is far from existing built-up areas or (especially) if it lies at a distance from public transport, the object or area gets protection. However, if it is the other way around, the urban development principles have precedence.城市绿地规划的故事框架所有的演员包括在研究中坚持我们所谓的“protectiondiscourse”，重点是对什么都视为自然和文化遗产的保护特殊品质的价值。

这个故事在当地的一个霸主地位话语，并没有人质疑为什么这些品质被认为是有价值的或为什么他们应该受到保护。

保护的话语是如何被创造出来的？和为什么它会变得如此有影响力？据厄斯特森和öRLIN（2009，p. 1461）通过价值观的表达通过社交场所的知识精英往往先于某些网站的指定或景观保护区，保护区，或国家公园。

集体实体由知识精英所传授的象征性的艺术品，如科学家，艺术家，等等，这创造了一个共同的理解这些文物的重要性并反过来创造一个将保护他们。

在苔藓的情况下，集体实体这是在玩或者休闲田园诗经常访问的公民（池塘和山）或地方与历史连接到他们（皇家道路和执行站点）。

这些实体的价值已通过权威的在区域一级的环境和文化权力的来源，以及由知识渊博的本地演员。

行动计划和科学报告mosseskogen支持保护参数。

然而，在看似完全一致的保护性话语的共识之下，不同的话语与竞争的世界观可以被识别；还原论语篇与综合语篇。

还原论的话语秩序的森林根据其部分的性质，通过设置站点和物种通过288小时hofstad等人。

下载[浙江大学]在00:20 03四月2015根据预定义的质量，在生态，历史或评估他们的价值文化意识。

这开辟了道路的发展，在森林中的一些性质森林被认为比其他人更有价值。