审计学一种整合方法第12版英文版Chapter13PPT课件

合集下载

审计学:一种整合方法 阿伦斯 英文版 第12版 课后答案 Chapter 13 Solutions Manual

审计学:一种整合方法 阿伦斯 英文版 第12版 课后答案  Chapter 13 Solutions Manual

Chapter 13Overall Audit Plan and Audit ProgramReview Questions13-1The five types of tests auditors use to determine whether financial statements are fairly stated include the following:Risk assessment proceduresTests of controlsSubstantive tests of transactionsAnalytical proceduresTests of details of balancesWhile risk assessment procedures (procedures to gain an understanding of the entity and its environment, including internal control) help the financial statement auditor obtain information to make an initial assessment of control risk, tests of controls must be performed as support of an assessment of control risk that is below maximum. The purpose of tests of controls is to obtain evidence regarding the effectiveness of controls, which may allow the auditor to assess control risk below maximum. If controls are found to be effective and functioning, the substantive evidence may be reduced. Substantive evidence is obtained to reduce detection risk. Substantive evidence includes evidence from substantive tests of transactions, analytical procedures, and tests of details of balances.For audits of internal control over financial reporting, the auditor only performs the first two types of audit tests: procedures to obtain an understanding of internal control and tests of controls. Because a public company auditor must issue a report on internal control over financial reporting, the extent of the auditor’s tests of controls must be sufficient to issue an opinion about t he operating effectiveness of those controls. That generally requires a significant amount of testing of controls over financial reporting.13-2Risk assessment procedures are performed to assess the risk of material misstatement in the financial statements. Risk assessment procedures include procedures performed to obtain an understanding of the entity and its environment, including internal controls. Auditors use the results of the risk assessment procedures to design and perform further audit procedures. Further audit procedures (not risk assessment procedures) provide the auditor sufficient appropriate evidence, required by the third GAAS fieldwork standard.13-3Tests of controls are audit procedures to test the operating effectiveness of control policies and procedures in support of a reduced assessed control risk. Tests of controls provide the primary basis for a public company auditor’s report on internal controls over financial reporting. Specific accounts affected by performing tests of controls for the acquisition and payment cycle include the following: cash, accounts payable, purchases, purchase returns and allowances, purchase discounts, manufacturing expenses, selling expenses, prepaid insurance, leasehold improvements, and various administrative expenses.13-4Tests of controls are audit procedures to test the operating effectiveness of control policies and procedures in support of a reduced assessed control risk. Examples include:1. The examination of vendor invoices for indication that they havebeen clerically tested, compared to a receiving report and purchaseorder, and approved for payment.2. Examination of employee time cards for approval of overtime hoursworked.3. Examination of journal entries for proper approval.4. Examination of approvals for the write-off of bad debts.Substantive tests of transactions are audit procedures testing for monetary misstatements to determine whether the six transaction-related audit objectives have been satisfied for each class of transactions. Examples are:1. Recalculation of amounts (quantity times unit selling price) onselected sales invoices and tracing of amounts to the sales journal.2. Examination of vendor invoices in support of amounts recorded inthe acquisitions journal for purchases of inventories.3. Recalculation of gross pay for selected entries in the payroll journal.4. Tracing of selected customer cash receipts to the accountsreceivable master file, agreeing customer names and amounts.13-5 A test of control audit procedure to test that approved wage rates are used to calculate employees' earnings would be to examine rate authorization forms to determine the existence of authorized signatures.A substantive test of transactions audit procedure would be to compare a sample of rates actually paid, as indicated in the earnings record, to authorized pay rates on rate authorization forms.13-6The auditor resolves the problem by making assumptions about the results of the tests of controls and performing both the tests of controls and substantive tests of transactions on the basis of these assumptions. Ordinarily the auditor assumes an effective system of internal control with few or no exceptions planned. If the results of the tests of controls are as good as or better than the assumptions that were originally made, the auditor can be satisfied with the substantive tests of transactions, unless the substantive tests of transactions themselves indicate the existence of misstatements. If the tests of controls results were not as good as the auditor assumed in designing the original tests, expanded substantive tests must be performed.13-7The primary purpose of testing sales and cash receipts transactions is to evaluate the internal controls so that the scope of the substantive tests of the account balances may be set. If the auditor performs the tests of details of balances prior to testing internal controls, no benefit will be derived from the tests of controls. The auditor should attempt to understand the entity and its environment, including internal controls, as early as practical through the analysis of the accounting system, tests of controls, and substantive tests of transactions. 13-8When the results of analytical procedures are different from the auditor's expectations and thereby indicate that there may be a misstatement in the balance in accounts receivable or sales, the auditor should extend the tests to determine why the ratios are different from expectations. Confirmation of accounts receivable and cutoff tests for sales are two procedures that can be used to do this. On the other hand, if the ratios are approximately what the auditor expects, the other tests can be reduced. This means that the auditor can satisfy the evidence requirements in different ways and that analytical procedures and confirmation are complementary when the results of the tests are both good.13-9Substantive tests of transactions are performed to verify the accuracy of a client's accounting system. This is accomplished by determining whether individual transactions are correctly recorded and summarized in the journals, master files, and general ledger. Substantive tests of transactions are also concerned with classes of transactions, such as payroll, acquisitions, or cash receipts. Tracing amounts from a file of vouchers to the acquisitions journal is an example of a substantive test of transactions for the acquisition and payment cycle. Tests of details of balances verify the ending balance in an individual account (such as inventory, accounts receivable, or depreciation expense) on the financial statements. An example of a test of details of balances for the acquisition and payment cycle is to physically examine a sample of the client's fixed assets.13-10 1. Control #1 -- Comput er verification of the customer’s credit limit.The presence of strong general controls over software programs and master file changes can significantly reduce the auditor’s testing of automated controls such as control #1. Once it is determined that control #1 is functioning properly, the auditor can focus subsequent tests on assessing whether any changes have occurred that would limit the effectiveness of the control. Such tests might include determining whether any changes have occurred to the program and whether these changes were properly authorized and tested prior to implementation. These are all tests of general controls over software programs and master file changes.2. Control #2 –The accounts receivable clerk matches bills of lading,sales invoices, and customer orders before recording in the sales journal.This control is not an automated control, but is rather a manual control performed by an employee. General controls over software programs and master file changes would have little effect on the auditor’s testing of control #2. If the auditor identifies control #2 as a key control in the sales and collection cycle, he or she would most likely examine a sample of the underlying documents for the accounts receivable clerk’s initials and reperform the comparisons.13-11 The audit of fixed asset additions normally involves the examination of invoices in support of the additions and possibly the physical examination of the additions. These procedures are normally performed on a test basis with a concentration on the more significant additions. If the individual responsible for recording new acquisitions is known to have inadequate training and limited experience in accounting, the sample size for the audit procedures should be expanded to include a larger sample of the additions for the year. In addition, inquiry as to what additions were made during the year may be made by the auditor of plant managers, the controller, or other operating personnel. The auditor should then search the financial records to determine that these additions were recorded as fixed assets.Care should also be taken when the repairs and maintenance expense account is analyzed since lack of training may cause some depreciable assets to be expensed at the time of acquisition.13-12 The following shows which types of evidence are applicable for the five types of tests.13-13Going from most to least costly, the types of tests are:Tests of details of balancesSubstantive tests of transactionsTests of controlsRisk assessment proceduresAnalytical procedures13-14 C represents the auditor's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control. C3 represents the idea that internal controls are ineffective and no assurance can be obtained from controls and all assurance must come from substantive testing. This would not represent the audit of a public company’s financial statements.Tests of controls at the C1 level would provide minimum control risk.This would require more testing of the controls than would be required at either C2 or C3. Testing controls at the C1 level allows the auditor to obtain assurance from the controls, thereby allowing for a reduction in the13-14 (continued)amount of substantive testing which must be performed to meet the level of acceptable audit assurance. C1reflects the level of testing of controls necessary for the audit of internal controls over financial reporting required by PCAOB Standard 2.It would be a good decision to obtain assurance from tests of controls at point C1especially if the cost of substantive testing is considerably greater than tests of controls.At point C2, the auditor performs some tests of controls and is able to reduce control risk below maximum. Point C2 would be appropriate if it is cost beneficial for the auditor to obtain assurance at a level between the two extremes mentioned above (C1 and C3).13-15By identifying the best mix of tests the auditor can accumulate sufficient appropriate evidence at minimum cost. The auditor can thereby meet the standards of the profession and still be cost effective and competitive.13-16The four-step approach to designing tests of controls and substantive tests of transactions is as follows:1. Apply the transaction-related audit objectives to the class oftransactions being tested.2. Identify specific control policies and procedures that should reducecontrol risk for each transaction-related audit objective.3. Develop appropriate tests of controls for each key control.4. Design appropriate substantive tests of transactions consideringdeficiencies in internal control and expected results from 3 above. 13-17 The approach to designing tests of controls and substantive tests of transactions (Figure 13-4) emphasizes satisfying the transaction-related audit objectives developed in Chapters 6 and 10. Recall that these objectives focus on the proper functioning of the accounting system.The methodology of designing tests of details of balances (Figure 13-6) emphasizes satisfying the balance-related audit objectives developed in Chapter 6. The primary focus of these objectives is on the fair presentation of account balances in the financial statements.13-18 It is desirable to design tests of details of balances before performing tests of controls and substantive tests of transactions to enable the auditor to determine if the overall planned evidence is the most efficient and effective in the circumstances. In order to do this, the auditor must make assumptions about the results of the tests of controls and substantive tests of transactions. Ordinarily the auditor will assume no significant misstatements or control problems in tests of controls and substantive tests of transactions unless there is reason to believe otherwise. If the auditor determines that the tests of controls and substantive tests of transactions results are different from those expected, the amount of testing of details of balances must be altered.13-19 If tolerable misstatement is low, and inherent risk and control risk are high, planned tests of details of balances which the auditor must perform will be high. An increase in tolerable misstatement or a reduction of either inherent risk or control risk will lead to a reduction in the planned tests of details of balances.13-20 The nine balance-related audit objectives and related procedures are as follows:13-21 Auditors frequently consider it desirable to perform audit tests throughout the year rather than waiting until year-end because of the CPA firm's difficulty of scheduling personnel. Due to the uneven distribution of the year-end dates of their clients, there is a shortage of personnel during certain periods of the year and excess available time at other periods. The procedures that are performed at a date prior to year-end are often dependent upon adequate internal controls and when the client will have the information available. Additionally, public company auditors must begin their testing of controls earlier in the year to ensure they are able to test a sufficient sample of controls for operating effectiveness. Some controls may only be performed monthly or quarterly. Thus, the public company auditor must begin testing early in the year so that there is a sufficient number of months or quarters to test.Procedures that may be performed prior to the end of the year are:1. Update fixed asset schedules.2. Examine new loan agreements and other legal records.3. Vouch certain transactions.4. Analyze changes in the client's accounting systems.5. Review minutes of board of directors' meetings.6. If the client has strong internal control, the following proceduresmay be performed with minor review and updating at year-end:(a) Observation of physical inventories;(b) Confirmation of accounts receivable balances;(c) Confirmation and reconciliation of accounts payablebalances.Multiple Choice Questions From CPA Examinations13-22 a. (2) b. (2) c. (3) d. (1)13-23 a. (2) b. (4) c. (1) d. (3)13-24 a. (4) b. (3)Discussion Questions and Problems 13-2513-2613-11* The primary concern in these two items is the separation of duties rather than the existence of the deposit slip and prelisting. The primary test of control procedure must therefore be observation.* The objectives satisfied depend upon what she examines. She might for example examine supporting documents for accuracy and even for account classification. In that event, those two objectives would be added.13-2913-1213-1413-30a. 1. Automated control embedded in computer software2. Manual control whose effectiveness is based significantly onIT-generated information3. Automated control embedded in computer software4. Manual control whose effectiveness is based significantly onIT-generated information5. Manual control whose effectiveness is not significantly relianton IT-generated informationb. 1. The extent of testing of this control could be significantlyreduced in subsequent years if effective controls overprogram and master file changes are in place. Such controlswould increase the likelihood that the inventory softwareprogram that contains the automated control and the relatedinventory master file are not subject to an unauthorizedchange. If the auditor determines that no changes havebeen made to the automated control, the auditor can rely onprior year audit tests of the controls as long as the control istested at least once every third year audit. If the controlmitigates a significant risk, the control must be tested in thecurrent year’s audit.2. The extent of testing of this control could be moderatelyreduced in subsequent years if effective controls overprogram and master file changes are in place. Such controlswould increase the likelihood that the printout of pricesaccurately reflects actual prices used by the system torecord inventory transactions. Adequate controls over themaster file would decrease the likelihood that pricesapproved by the sales and purchasing department managershave been changed without authorization. However,because this control is also dependent on manager review ofcomputer generated output (e.g., a human process subjectto error), some testing may be required each year, althoughthe amount of testing may be reduced by strong generalcontrols.3. The extent of testing of this control could be significantlyreduced in subsequent years if effective controls overprogram and master file changes are in place. Such controlswould increase the likelihood that the inventory softwareprogram that processes the automatic purchase order andthe related inventory master file of product numbers are notsubject to an unauthorized change.4. The extent of testing of this control could be moderatelyreduced in subsequent years if effective controls overprogram changes are in place. Such controls would increasethe likelihood that the purchasing system software programthat identifies purchases exceeding $10,000 per vendorfunctions accurately. However, because this control is alsodependent on manager review of the computer generated exception listing, some testing may be required each year.13-30 (continued)5. Because this control is not dependent on technologyprocesses, the strength of general controls over programand master file changes is likely to not have an impact onthe extent of testing of this review by the sales departmentmanager.13-31a. The performance of interim tests of controls and substantive tests of transactions is an effective means of keeping overtime to aminimum where many clients have the same year-end date.However, this approach requires additional start-up time each timethe auditor enters the field to perform additional tests duringdifferent times of the year. In the case of a small client, start upcosts and training time may require more total time than waitinguntil after December 31.b. Schaefer may find that it is acceptable to perform no additionaltests of controls and substantive tests of transactions work as apart of the year-end audit tests under the following circumstances:1. The results of the tests of the interim period indicate theaccounting system is reliable.2. Inquiries concerning the remaining period may indicate therewere no significant changes in internal control andaccounting procedures.3. The transactions occurring between the completion of thetests of controls and substantive tests of transactions andthe end of the year are not unusual compared to thetransactions previously tested and to the normal operationsof the company.4. Other tests performed at the end of the year do not indicatethat the internal controls are less effective than the auditorhas currently assessed.5. The remaining period is not too long in the circumstances.(Some consensus exists in the profession requiring theremaining period to be three months or less, dependingupon the circumstances.)6. Other matters of concern to the auditor indicate that thelimitation of interim testing is appropriate (i.e., risk ofexposure to legal sanction is not too great; the auditor willprobably be familiar with the client's operations and willdetermine that a reduced control risk is justified; the auditorhas appropriate confidence in the competence of personneland the integrity of management).7. All key controls related to financial reporting are testable atinterim periods by the auditor of a public company who mustissue an opinion on internal controls over financial reporting.(Some key controls may only be performed by the client aspart of the year-end closing process and thus can only betested by the auditor at year end).c. If Schaefer decides to perform no additional tests of controls andsubstantive tests of transactions, depending upon thecircumstances, she may wish to perform analytical procedures,such as reviewing interim transactions for reasonableness ortracing them to their source, comparing balances to previousperiods, or other such procedures, for the remaining period to year-end.d. If Schaefer is auditing a public company, she must performsufficient tests of controls to provide her a basis for issuing anopinion on the operating effectiveness of those controls overfinancial reporting. Schaefer’s approach to performing interim testsof controls in August through November would be appropriate forthe audit of internal control over financial reporting. Schaefer needsto begin testing early enough in the year to ensure that she can testcontrols enough to provide a sufficient basis for reporting oninternal controls over financial reporting. Because some keycontrols may only be performed by the client as part of the year-endclosing process, Schaefer may have to extend her testing beyondNovember since year-end closing controls can only be tested bythe auditor at year end.13-32 a. The sequence the auditor should follow is:3. Assess control risk.1. Determine whether it is cost effective to perform tests ofcontrols.4. Perform tests of controls.2. Perform substantive tests of details of balances.The only logical sequences for parts b through e are shown as follows:EFA B DG H DC DAny other sequence is not cost effective or incorrect. For example: E,A, G, C would be the sequence when there is planned reducedassessed control risk and effective results of tests of controls.b. The sequence is E, A, H, D. The logic was reasonable. The auditorbelieved the internal controls would be effective and it would be costeffective to perform tests of controls. In performing the tests ofcontrols the auditor concluded the controls were not effective.Therefore, expanded substantive tests of details of balances wereneeded.c. The sequence is E, B, G, C. The auditor concluded the internalcontrols may be effective, but it was not cost effective to reduceassessed control risk. The auditor should not have performed tests ofcontrols. It would have been more cost effective to skip performingtests and instead follow the sequence E, B, D.d. The sequence is F, A, G, C. The logic is not reasonable. When theauditor concluded the controls were not effective he or she shouldhave gone immediately to D and performed expanded substantivetests of details of balances.e. The sequence is F, D. The logic was reasonable. The auditorconcluded that internal controls were not effective, therefore theauditor went directly to substantive tests of details of balances andperformed expanded tests.13-33AUDIT PROCEDURES TOOBTAIN ANUNDERSTANDINGOF INTERNALCONTROLTESTS OFCONTROLSSUBSTANTIVETESTS OFTRANSACTIONSANALYTICALPROCEDURESTESTS OFDETAILSOFBALANCES1 E E S E S2 M N S M E3 E E M E S, E*E = Extensive amount of testing.M = Medium amount of testing.S = Small amount of testing.N = No testing.S,E* = Small amount of testing for the gross balance in accounts receivable; extensive testing done for the collectibility of theaccounts.a. For audit 1 the recommended strategy is to maximize the testing ofinternal controls and minimize the testing of the details of all endingbalances in inventory. The most important objective would be tominimize the number of locations that need to be visited. Thejustification for doing this is the quality of the internal controls andthe results of prior years' audits. Assuming that some of thelocations have a larger portion of the ending inventory balance thanother locations, the auditor can likely completely eliminate tests ofphysical counts of some locations and emphasize the locations withlarger dollar balances. The entire strategy is oriented to minimizingthe need to visit locations.b. Audit risk for this audit should be low because of the plans to sellthe business, severe under-financing and a first year audit. Thelack of controls over accounts payable and the large number ofadjusting entries in accounts payable indicate the auditor cannotconsider the internal controls effective. Therefore the plan shouldbe to do extensive tests of details of balances, probably throughaccounts payable confirmation and other end of year procedures.No tests of controls are recommended because of the impracticalityof reduced assessed control risk. Some substantive tests oftransactions and analytical procedures are recommended to verifythe correctness of acquisitions and to obtain information about thereasonableness of the balances.c. The most serious concern in this audit is the evaluation of theallowance for uncollectible accounts. Given the adverse economicconditions and significant increase of loans receivable, the auditormust be greatly concerned about the adequacy of the allowance foruncollectible accounts and the possibility of uncollectible accountsbeing included in loans receivable. Given the internal controls,the auditor is not likely to be greatly concerned about the grossaccounts receivable balance, except for accounts that need to bewritten off. Therefore, for the audit of gross accounts receivablethere will be a greatly reduced assessed control risk and relativelyminor confirmation of accounts receivable. In evaluating theallowance for uncollectible accounts, the auditor should test thecontrols over granting loans and following up on collections.However, given the changes in the economy, it will be necessary todo significant additional testing of the allowance for uncollectibleaccounts. Therefore an "S" is included for tests of details ofbalances for gross accounts receivable and an "E" for the tests ofnet realizable value.13-34a. Factors which could explain the difference in the amount of evidence accumulated in different parts as well as the total time spent on the engagement are:1. Internal control2. Materiality of the account balance3. Size of the populations4. Makeup of populations5. Initial vs. repeat engagement6. Results of the current and previous audits7. Existence of unusual transactions8. Motivation of the client to misstate the financial statements9. Degree of client integrity10. Reliance by third parties on the audited financial statementsFor an example, in the first audit, the partner has apparently made the decision to emphasize tests of controls and substantivetests of transactions and minimize tests of details of balances. Thatimplies effective internal controls and a low expectation ofmisstatement (low inherent and control risk.) In the third audit, thepartner apparently has a high expectation of misstatements, andtherefore believes it is necessary to do extensive tests of controlsand substantive tests of transactions, as well as extensive tests ofdetails of balances. Audit two is somewhere between audit one andthree.。

审计学:一种整合方法_第12版_英文版Chapter01-46页精选文档

审计学:一种整合方法_第12版_英文版Chapter01-46页精选文档

©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder
1 - 10
Distinguish Between Auditing and Accounting
Accounting is the recording, classifying, and summarizing of economic events for the purpose of providing financial information used in decision making.
Auditing should be done by a competent, independent person.
©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder
1-4
Information and Established Criteria
The competence of the individual performing the audit is of little value if he or she is biased in the accumulation and evaluation of evidence.
©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder
1 - 12
Economic Demand for Auditing
Information risk reflects the possibility that the information upon which the business risk decision was made was inaccurate.

审计学一种整合的方法课件

审计学一种整合的方法课件
审计师负责对财务报表进行审计,评估内部控制 的有效性和治理过程的合理性,以帮助利益相关 者做出明智的决策。
审计准则与审计标准
01 审计准则
审计准则是审计师在执行审计工作时必须遵循的 规范和原则,以确保审计质量和信誉。
02 审计标准
审计标准是衡量财务报表、内部控制和治理过程 可靠性的尺度,包括国际审计准则和国内审计准 则。
方法
采用生命周期评估方法, 从产品的设计、生产、使 用到废弃的整个过程进行 环境审计。
信息安全审计
定义
信息安全审计是一种对组织的信 息系统安全进行的审计,旨在评 估组织对信息安全的控制能力和
效果。
目的
确保组织的信息系统安全,防止信 息泄露、篡改或损坏,提高组织的 竞争力。
方法
采用风险评估方法,识别潜在的安 全风险,提出应对措施,并定期进 行安全审计。
国际化与本土化相结合
1 2 3
国际化趋势
随着经济全球化的不断发展,审计学逐渐走向国 际化,国际审计标准和准则逐渐成为各国审计的 基础。
本土化需求
各国在引进国际审计标准和准则的同时,也需要 根据本国实际情况进行适当的调整和修改,以适 应本土市场需求和发展。
国际化与本土化的平衡
各国在实现审计国际化的同时,要充分考虑本土 化需求,实现国际化和本土化的有机融合。
信息技术提高审计效率
随着信息技术的不断发展,审计学可以利用大数据、人工智能等 技术提高审计效率,减少人工操作,降低审计成本。
信息技术拓展审计范围
信息技术可以帮助审计学扩大数据来源和样本数量,从而更全面地 评估被审计单位的风险状况。
信息技术提高审计质量
通过信息技术,可以实现数据的实时监控和分析,及时发现潜在风 险,提高审计质量。

审计学一种整合的方法

审计学一种整合的方法

statements and internal control
from the auditor’s responsibility
for verifying the financial
statements and effectiveness
of internal control.
PPT文档演模板
审计学一种整合的方法
审计学一种整合的方法
Transaction Flow Example
•Transactions •Sales
•Cash •receipts
•Journals •Sales •journal
•Cash receipts •journal
•Ledgers, •Trial Balance, •and Financial
➢ Material versus immaterial misstatements ➢ Reasonable assurance ➢ Errors versus fraud ➢ Professional skepticism ➢ Fraud resulting from fraudulent financial reporting versus misappropriation of assets
•Sales and •collection
•cycle
•Acquisition •and payment
•cycle
•Payroll and •personnel
•cycle
•Inventory and •warehousing
•cycle
PPT文档演模板
审计学一种整合的方法
Learning Objective 5
•Payroll •journal

审计学:一种整合方法_第12版_英文版Cha(1)

审计学:一种整合方法_第12版_英文版Cha(1)

Accumulating Evidence and Evaluating Evidence
Evidence is any information used by the auditor to determine whether the information being audited is stated in accordance with the established criteria.
Determines correspondence
Report on results
Report on tax deficiencies
Established criteria
Internal Revenue Code and all
interpretations
Learning Objective 2
Auditing is determining whether recorded information properly reflects the economic events that occurred during the accounting period.
Learning Objective 3
The final stage in the auditing process is preparing the Audit Report, which is the communication of the auditor’s findings to users.
Audit of a Tax Return Example
Learning Objective 1
Describe auditing.
Nature of Auditing

审计学:一种整合方法_第12版_英文版Chapter18-32页PPT资料

审计学:一种整合方法_第12版_英文版Chapter18-32页PPT资料

18 - 5
Accounts in the Payroll and Personnel Cycle
In most systems the accrued wages and salaries account is used only at the end of an accounting period.
©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder
18 - 9
Timekeeping and Payroll Preparation
Time Card Job Time Ticket Payroll Transaction File Payroll Journal
Begins Ends
Hiring of personnel Payments
©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder
18 - 8
Personnel and Employment
Personnel records Deduction authorization form Rate authorization form
Accounts in the Payroll and Personnel Cycle
The overall objective in the audit of the payroll and personnel cycle is to evaluate whether the account balances affected by the cycle are fairly stated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

审计学一种整合方法课件

审计学一种整合方法课件

Sarbanes-Oxley Act
This Act requires the auditor of a public company to attest to management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.
3. Auditor agrees with a departure from promulgated accounting principles
4. Emphasis of a matter
5. Reports involving other auditors
Substantial Doubt About Going Concern
Conditions for Standard Unqualified Audit Report
4. The financial statements are presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Leare the five circumstances • when an unqualified report with • an explanatory paragraph or • modified wording is appropriate.
1. Significant recurring operating losses or working capital deficiencies.
2. Inability of the company to pay its obligations as they come due.

审计学:一种整合方法_第12版_英文版Chapter01

审计学:一种整合方法_第12版_英文版Chapter01

1 - 15
Causes of Information Risk
➢ Remoteness of information ➢ Biases and motives of the provider ➢ Voluminous data ➢ Complex exchange transactions
©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder
©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder
1 - 18
Assurance Services
An assurance service is an independent professional service that improves the quality of information for decision makers.
1 - 13
Economic Demand for Auditing
Information risk reflects the possibility that the information upon which the business risk decision was made was inaccurate.
The competence of the individual performing the audit is of little value if he or she is biased in the accumulation and evaluation of evidence.
  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

AUDIT ASSURANCE
Acceptable assurance
C3
Audit assurance
C2
from control risk assessment and
tests of control
C1
No assurance
Audit assurance from substantive tests
Tests of details of balances
©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Eldetween Further Audit Procedures and Evidence
Select the appropriate types of audit tests.
©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder
13 - 7
Relationship Between Further Audit Procedures and Evidence
Analytical procedures
Tests of details of balances
©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder
13 - 9
Audit Assurance at Different Levels of Internal Control Effectiveness
Cash in Bank
Sales transactions
Cash receipts transactions
Audited by TOC, STOT, and AP
Audited by TOC, STOT, and AP
Ending balance
Ending balance
Audited by AP and TDB
A
C
B
INTERNAL CONTROL EFFECTIVENESS
Weak control
Strong control
©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder
13 - 2
Types of Tests
➢ Risk assessment procedures ➢ Further audit procedures
©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder
13 - 5
Role of All Audit Tests in the
Sales and Collection Cycle
Sales
Accounts Receivable
Overall Audit Plan and Audit Program
Chapter 13
©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder
13 - 1
Learning Objective 1
Use the five types of audit tests to determine whether financial statements are fairly stated.
Type of Evidence
Inquiries of the Client Reperformance Analytical Procedures Recalculation
Further Audit Procedures
Tests of controls
Substantive tests of transactions
TOC + STOT + AP + TDB = Sufficient appropriate evidence per GAAS
©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder
13 - 6
Learning Objective 2
= PDR
Tests of controls
Substantive
+ tests of + transactions
Analytical procedures
+
Tests of details of balances
Sufficient
=
competent evidence
per GASS
Further audit procedures
©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder
13 - 3
Further Audit Procedures and the Audit Risk Model
Audit risk model
AAR IR × CR
©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder
13 - 4
Risk Assessment Procedures
A major part of these procedures are done to obtain an understanding of internal control.
Type of Evidence
Physical examination Confirmation Documentation Observation
Further Audit Procedures
Tests of controls
Substantive tests of transactions
Analytical procedures
相关文档
最新文档