OCIMF Publications
国外优秀科技著作出版专项基金
国外优秀科技著作出版专项基金是指用于资助国外优秀科技著作在我国出版的专项基金，旨在引进和推广国外优秀科技著作，促进国内科技出版业的发展，提高国内读者对国外科技著作的接触和了解。
该基金由相关部委、机构或组织设立，并根据实际情况确定资助范围、标准和程序。
下面我们将就该基金的设立背景、资助方式和效果进行详细介绍。
一、设立背景1. 国内科技著作发展状况目前，国内科技著作的数量和质量与国外相比存在一定差距。
虽然国内也有不少优秀科技著作，但相对国外来说，在国际上的影响力和知名度有限。
这种情况既影响了国内读者学习和了解最新科技成果的渠道，也制约了我国科技出版业的发展和国际交流。
2. 引进国外优秀科技著作的必要性为了填补国内科技著作的发展差距，引进国外优秀科技著作至关重要。
通过引进国外优秀科技著作，不仅可以让国内读者更加全面地了解国际科技前沿，还可以提升国内科技著作的水平和品质，促进我国科技出版业与国际接轨。
3. 设立基金的意义为了更好地引进和推广国外优秀科技著作，相关部委、机构或组织决定设立国外优秀科技著作出版专项基金。
该基金将为国外优秀科技著作的出版提供资金支持，以及一系列帮助和服务，促进国外优秀科技著作更好地在我国传播和推广。
二、资助方式1. 资助对象国外优秀科技著作出版专项基金主要资助对象为那些具有国际影响力、内容丰富、思想前卫、符合国内读者需求的国外优秀科技著作。
这些著作可能包括科技前沿、技术创新、科学普及、学术研究、科技史等内容，形式可能是专著、论文集、科普读物、科技报告、学术期刊等。
2. 资助方式国外优秀科技著作出版专项基金的资助方式灵活多样，主要包括资金支持、编辑审校、翻译服务、市场推广、宣传推介等。
具体来说，资助方式可以有以下几种形式：（1）资金支持基金可对符合条件的国外优秀科技著作进行资金补贴，用于出版、印刷、装帧等费用。
（2）编辑审校基金可派遣专业编辑人员对国外优秀科技著作进行审阅、编辑、润色，以确保内容的准确性和语言的流畅性。
免疫细胞功能状态量化检测评估与临床应用专家共识
· 指南与共识·免疫细胞功能状态量化检测评估与临床应用专家共识中国医疗保健国际交流促进会肝脏移植学分会 中国医疗保健国际交流促进会肾脏移植学分会 中国医药生物技术协会生物诊断技术分会 【摘要】 免疫系统是维持机体器官功能健康和预防疾病的重要保障，免疫健康管理和疾病免疫治疗目标是恢复免疫系统的正常功能状态。
免疫学领域研究解决了如何抑制或提高免疫状态的技术性难题，随之带来亟需回答的问题是如何全面地检测和量化评估免疫状态，这是下一个挑战，目前国际上尚无成熟解决方案。
免疫状态量化检测与可视化评估对疾病防控、亚健康状态管理和疾病免疫治疗均具有重要意义。
本专家共识针对正常免疫状态定义和免疫细胞功能状态（免疫力）全面量化评估及可视化评分技术手段等问题进行了初步讨论，提出了正常免疫状态相关的基础概念和思考，探讨免疫细胞功能状态量化检测评估方向和原则，并以此为契机，推动免疫力解码以及免疫健康领域基础课题和临床试验的深入研究。
【关键词】 免疫力；免疫细胞；免疫评估；免疫治疗；健康管理【中图分类号】 R617, R392.4 【文献标志码】 A 【文章编号】 1674-7445（2024）04-0005-10Expert Consensus on quantify monitoring and assessment of immune cell function status and clinical application China International Exchange and Promotive Association for Medical and Health Care (CPAM), Society of Liver Transplantation ，Society of Kidney Transplantation; China Medicinal Biotech Association （CMBA ）, Society of Biological Diagnostics.Corresponding authors: He Qiang, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China, Email:*******************Li Xianliang, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China, Email:***********************【Abstract 】 The immune system is the important guarantee for maintaining the health of organ function and preventing diseases. The goal of immune health management and immune treatment is to restore the normal function of the immune system. The technical problems of how to inhibit or enhance the immune status has been solved in the field of immunology, but how to comprehensively detect and quantitatively evaluate the immune status is still a challenge. There is no mature solution at present. The quantification detection and visualization evaluation of immune status are of great significance for disease prevention and control, sub-health status management, and immune treatment. This expert consensus has carried out preliminary discussions on the definition of normal immune status and the comprehensive quantitative evaluation and visual scoring techniques of immune cell function status (immune function), put forward the basic concepts and thinking related to normal immune status, discussed the direction and principles of quantitative detection and evaluation of immune cell function status, and taken this as an opportunity to promote the decoding of immunity and the study of basic and clinical trials in the field of immune health.【Key words 】 Immunity; Immune cell; Assessment of immunity; Immunotherapy; Health managementDOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7445.2024078基金项目：国家自然科学基金（82370665）；北京市自然科学基金（7232068、7232065）通信作者单位： 100020 北京，首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院（贺强、李先亮）通信作者：贺强，Email ： *******************；李先亮，Email ： ***********************第 15 卷 第 4 期器官移植Vol. 15 No.4 2024 年 7 月Organ Transplantation Jul. 2024 免疫系统是人类健康的基石，大多数疾病和健康状况与免疫状态密切相关，因此免疫状态管理是健康核心问题。
欧洲科研诚信行为准则 allea 2023
欧洲科研诚信行为准则allea 2023摘要：1.欧盟将启用新版《欧洲科研诚信行为准则》2.新准则的目的和宗旨3.中国对科研诚信问题的关注和相关规定4.医学科研诚信和相关行为规范5.科研诚信对于科学研究和社会的重要性正文：欧盟将启用新版《欧洲科研诚信行为准则》欧洲科学院联盟（allea）近日向欧委会呈交新的《欧洲科研诚信行为准则》（european code of conduct for research integrity）。
新准则是在广泛征求各方意见的基础上由allea 和欧委会合作完成，其根本宗旨是推行负责任的科研行为，提高科研活动的质量和可靠性。
新准则的目的和宗旨新版《欧洲科研诚信行为准则》旨在确保科研活动的公正、透明和诚信，促进科学研究的健康发展。
准则明确了科研人员的行为规范，包括科研数据的真实性、研究结果的准确性和学术论文的诚信性等方面，并对科研不端行为进行了明确的界定和处罚措施。
中国对科研诚信问题的关注和相关规定我国高度重视科研诚信问题，制定了一系列相关规定，如《中华人民共和国科学技术进步法》、《中华人民共和国著作权法》、《中华人民共和国人类遗传资源管理条例》等。
此外，我国还出台了《关于进一步加强科研诚信建设的若干意见》、《关于进一步弘扬科学家精神加强作风和学风建设的意见》等文件，旨在加强科研诚信建设，提高科研人员的职业道德修养，预防科研不端行为。
医学科研诚信和相关行为规范为践行社会主义核心价值观，加强医学科研诚信建设，提高医学科研人员职业道德修养，预防科研不端行为，我国制定了《医学科研诚信和相关行为规范》。
该规范明确了医学科研行为的基本要求，对科研数据的真实性、研究结果的准确性等方面进行了详细规定，并为医学科研不端行为设立了明确的处罚措施。
科研诚信对于科学研究和社会的重要性科研诚信是科学研究的基石，对于确保研究质量和可靠性具有重要意义。
一个诚信的科研环境能够促进学术交流和合作，推动科学研究的发展。
美国国家科学基金
美国国家科学基金会的《设备监管指南》(一)相关介绍1．背景与合理性在所有联邦机构中，国家科学基金会(NSF)是为学术界提供所需先进使用仪器的方面的领先者，用以研究先进技术，教育下一代的科学家、工程师和技术工人。
由这些器械而产生的知识维持着美国在科学和工程(S＆E)方面的领导地位，为美国经济提供动力，保障美国的未来。
国家科学基金会的职责是确保研究和教育界能够利用这些资源，提供支持服务以达到最佳使用效果，并且及时进行设备升级。
先进仪器设备的范围比较广泛，既有小型研究设备，也有可供全体社会使用的共享资源和设备。
伴随着科学发现的增多，人们对这些先进使用设备的需求日益增长。
尤其是对大型设备和共享基础设施的需求特别高。
在过去的10年中，国家科学基金会在大型设备和基础设施方面的投资已经翻了一倍多，截至2002年，已经达到了550000000美元。
随着研究和教育人员数量的增加，他们依靠这些大型设备、仪器和数据库来帮助理解，以实现下一次知识飞跃，这种趋势在未来将会日益增强。
国家科学基金会授权外部实体，主要大学，大学联合会或其他非盈利组织承担设备的建造、管理和运作事宜。
除南极站外，国家科学基金会并不直接涉及设备的建造或运营。
国家科学基金会保留了其监视项目发展，管理和成功运营的职责。
这种方式提供了划算的、高效监管的同时，保证了能够适应科学技术变化的弹性。
国家科学基金会目前主要基于两个主要账户为设备建造提供支持：大型科研设备及器械账户(MREFC)，与研究与相关活动账户(R＆RA)。
大型设备及器械账户创立于1995年，是一个独立的预算项目，为各政府机构提供了一种机制，允许政府成员在不严重违反项目预算的情况下，承担从价值千万美元到数亿美元的大型设备项目。
而价值在百万到千万的建造项目依然是由研究及相关活动账户(R＆RA)提供支持。
这两个账户之间的进一步区别在于大型科研设备及器械账户(MREFC)为设备的建造和购置提供资金支持——这些活动的资金与那些慢性资金不同——而其他活动，如规划，设计，发展，运营和维护保养都是由研究与相关活动账户(R＆RA)提供资金支持。
美国反舞弊性财务报告委员会发起组织的报告【外文翻译】
本科毕业论文（设计）外文翻译外文题目Committee of sponsoring organizationsof the treadway Commission 外文出处Enterprise risk management外文作者Committee of sponsoring organizations 原文：Committee of sponsoring organizations of the treadway commission Organizational overviewCOSO was formed in 1985 to sponsor the National Commission on Fraudulent Financial Reporting (the Treadway Commission). The Treadway Commission was originally jointly sponsored and funded by five main professional accounting associations and institutes headquartered in the United States: the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), American Accounting Association (AAA), Financial Executives International (FEI), Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) and the Institute of Management Accountants(IMA). The Treadway Commission recommended that the organizations sponsoring the Commission work together to develop integrated guidance on internal control. These five organizations formed what is now called the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.The original chairman of the Treadway Commission was James C. Treadway, Jr., Executive Vice President and General Counsel, Paine Webber Incorporated and a former Commissioner of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Hence, the popular name "Treadway Commission". Currently, David L. Landsittel replaced Larry E. Rittenberg as the COSO Chairman.HistoryDue to questionable corporate political campaign finance practices and foreigncorrupt practices in the mid -1970s, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the U.S. Congress enacted campaign finance law reforms and the 1977 Foreign Corrupt Practices Act(FCPA) which criminalized transnational bribery and required companies to implement internal control programs. In response, the Treadway Commission, a private-sector initiative, was formed in 1985 to inspect, analyze, and make recommendations on fraudulent corporate financial reporting.The Treadway Commission studied the financial information reporting system over the period from October 1985 to September 1987 and issued a report of findings and recommendations in October 1987 titled Report of the National Commission on Fraudulent Financial Reporting. As a result of this initial report, the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) was formed and it retained Coopers & Lybrand, a major CPA firm, to study the issues and author a report regarding an integrated framework of internal control.In September 1992, the four volume report entitled Internal Control— Integrated Framework was released by COSO and later re-published with minor amendments in 1994. This report presented a common definition of internal control and provided a framework against which internal control systems may be assessed and improved. This report is one standard that U.S. companies use to evaluate their compliance with FCPA. According to a poll by CFO Magazine released in 2006, 82% of respondents claimed t hey used COSO’s framework for internal controls. Other frameworks used by respondents included COBIT, AS2 (Auditing Standard No. 2, PCAOB), and SAS 55/78 (AICPA).Internal control - integrated frameworkKey concepts of the COSO frameworkThe COSO framework involves several key concepts:∙Internal control is a process. It is a means to an end, not an end in itself.∙Internal control is affected by people. It’s not merely policy, manuals, and forms, but people at every level of an organization.∙Internal control can be expected to provide only reasonable assurance, not absolute assurance, to an entity’s management and board.Internal control is geared to the achievement of objectives in one or more separate but overlapping categories.Use of the capability maturity modelThe capabilities of an organization in relation to the COSO model could be assessed based on universal states or plateaus that organizations typically target. The descriptions are incremental.The capability descriptions are based on evolution toward generally recognized best practices. Each organization determines which level of "maturity" would be the most appropriate in support of its business needs, priorities and availability of resources. A rating system of “0” to “5” is used. A rating of “5” does not necessarily mean “goodness”, but rather, maturity of capability. The ideal maturity rating for any area is dependent on the needs of the organization. The different and progressive plateaus are: 0 Non-existent when:The organization lacks procedures to monitor the effectiveness of internal controls. Management internal control reporting methods are absent. There is a general unawareness of IT operational security and internal control assurance. Management and employees have an overall lack of awareness of internal controls.1 Initial/Ad Hoc when:Management recognizes the need for regular IT management and control assurance. Individual expertise in assessing internal control adequacy is applied on an ad hoc basis. IT management has not formally assigned responsibility for monitoring the effectiveness of internal controls. IT internal control assessments are conducted as part of traditional financial audits, with methodologies and skill sets that do not reflect the needs of the information services function.2 Repeatable but Intuitive when:The organization uses informal control reports to initiate corrective action initiatives. Internal control assessment is dependent on the skill sets of key individuals. The organization has an increased awareness of internal control monitoring. Information service management performs monitoring over the effectiveness of what it believes are critical internal controls on a regular basis. Methodologies and tools formonitoring internal controls are starting to be used, but not based on a plan. Risk factors specific to the IT environment are identified based on the skills of individuals.3 Defined when:Management supports and institutes internal control monitoring. Policies and procedures are developed for assessing and reporting on internal control monitoring activities. An education and training program for internal control monitoring is defined. A process is defined for self-assessments and internal control assurance reviews, with roles for responsible business and IT managers. Tools are being utilized but are not necessarily integrated into all processes. IT process risk assessment policies are being used within control frameworks developed specifically for the IT organization. Process-specific risks and mitigation policies are defined.4 Managed and Measurable when:Management implements a framework for IT internal control monitoring. The organization establishes tolerance levels for the internal control monitoring process. Tools are implemented to standardize assessments and automatically detect control exceptions. A formal IT internal control function is established, with specialized and certified professionals utilizing a formal control framework endorsed by senior management. Skilled IT staff members are routinely participating in internal control assessments. A metrics knowledge base for historical information on internal control monitoring is established. Peer reviews for internal control monitoring are established.5 Optimized when:Management establishes an organization wide continuous improvement program that takes into account lessons learned and industry best practices for internal control monitoring and reporting. The organization uses integrated and updated tools, where appropriate, that allow effective assessment of critical IT controls and rapid detection of IT control monitoring incidents. Knowledge sharing specific to the information services function is formally implemented. Benchmarking against industry standards and good practices is formalized.Definition of internal control and framework objectivesThe COSO framework defines internal control as a process, effected by an entity’sboard of directors, management and other personnel, designed to provide "reasonable assurance" regarding the achievement of objectives in the following categories: ∙Effectiveness and efficiency of operations∙Reliability of financial reporting∙Compliance with applicable laws and regulationsThe five framework componentsThe COSO internal control framework consists of five interrelated components derived from the way management runs a business. According to COSO, these components provide an effective framework for describing and analyzing the internal control system implemented in an organization as required by financial regulations (see Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Section 240 15d-15). The five components are the following:Control environment:The control environment sets the tone of an organization, influencing the control consciousness of its people. It is the foundation for all other components of internal control, providing discipline and structure. Control environment factors include the integrity, ethical values, management's operating style, delegation of authority systems, as well as the processes for managing and developing people in the organization.Risk assessment:Every entity faces a variety of risks from external and internal sources that must be assessed. A precondition to risk assessment is establishment of objectives and thus risk assessment is the identification and analysis of relevant risks to the achievement of assigned objectives. Risk assessment is a prerequisite for determining how the risks should be managed.Control activities: Control activities are the policies and procedures that help ensure management directives are carried out. They help ensure that necessary actions are taken to address the risks that may hinder the achievement of the entity's objectives. Control activities occur throughout the organization, at all levels and in all functions. They include a range of activities as diverse as approvals, authorizations, verifications, reconciliations, reviews of operating performance, security of assets and segregation of duties.Information and communication:Information systems play a key role in internal control systems as they produce reports, including operational, financial and compliance-related information, that make it possible to run and control the business. In a broader sense, effective communication must ensure information flows down, across and up the organization. For example, formalized procedures exist for people to report suspected fraud. Effective communication should also be ensured with external parties, such as customers, suppliers, regulators and shareholders about related policy positions.Monitoring: Internal control systems need to be monitored—a process that assesses the quality of the system's performance over time. This is accomplished through ongoing monitoring activities or separate evaluations. Internal control deficiencies detected through these monitoring activities should be reported upstream and corrective actions should be taken to ensure continuous improvement of the system. LimitationsInternal control involves human action, which introduces the possibility of errors in processing or judgment. Internal control can also be overridden by collusion among employees (see separation of duties) or coercion by top management.CFO magazine reported that companies are struggling to apply the complex model provided by COSO. “One of the biggest problems: limiting internal audits to one of the three key objectives of the framework. In the COSO model, those objectives are applied to five key components (monitoring, information and communication, control activities, risk assessment, and control environment). Given the number of possible matrices, it's not surprising that the number of audits can get out of hand.” CFO magazine continued by stating, that many organization are creating their own risk-and-control matrix by taking the COSO model and altering it to focus on the components that relate directly to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.Source：Enterprise risk management,2004.译文：美国反舞弊性财务报告委员会发起组织的报告组织概述COSO是成立于1985年的美国反虚假财务报告委员会（特雷德韦委员会）的发起组织委员会。
美国国家科学基金会
美国国家科学基金会（National Science Foundation，NSF）是美国联邦政府下属的一家研究资助机构，成立于1950年。
该机构的使命是通过资助基础研究和教育项目，促进科学和工程的进步，提高美国的全球竞争力，增强国家的安全性。
NSF在全国范围内拥有研究大学和科技机构的紧密合作关系，是美国科技研究的重要支柱之一。
NSF在其成立的70年里一直致力于推动科学和工程的发展和创新。
该机构的资助范围广泛，涵盖自然科学、社会科学、数学、工程、教育、计算机科学和人文科学等多个领域，资助项目包括基础研究、人才培养、设施建设、教育改革和国际合作等多个方面。
NSF的研究资助旨在培养新的科学和技术发现，同时提供技术支持和知识转移，以帮助解决全球性的挑战和问题。
NSF的研究资助项目是经过严格的科学评审程序的，资助的项目需要符合其提供的研究目标和科学标准。
NSF鼓励创新和高风险的项目，尤其是那些跨学科和前沿领域的项目。
该机构还非常注重教育和人才培养，资助很多针对学生和教育者的研究和培训项目，以培养新一代的科学家和工程师。
NSF的资助影响不仅限于美国境内，该机构还积极参与国际科技合作。
近年来，NSF和其他国际机构进行了多项战略性的合作，建立了国际中心和跨境研究计划，以应对全球性挑战。
例如，NSF与欧洲研究机构合作，开展了气候变化、地球物理和数据管理等方面的联合研究项目，推进了全球科学合作。
NSF的贡献还表现在它对美国科技发展的影响上。
许多重要科技领域的成就都直接或间接得益于NSF的研究资助，例如计算机科学、材料科学、生命科学、天文学等。
NSF资助的研究项目还对美国经济增长和国家安全起到了重要作用。
NSF的资助项目涉及的技术和知识转移也为美国的企业和政府部门提供了技术支持和创新思路。
总之，NSF是一个重要的科技资助机构，其资助的项目对于美国科技发展和全球科学研究都具有极为重要的作用。
在未来，NSF将继续致力于推动科学和工程的发展和创新，培养新一代的科学家和工程师，以应对全球性的挑战和问题。
财务舞弊 识别 检测 国内外 学术 梳理
财务舞弊识别检测国内外学术梳理
《财务舞弊识别与检测的国内外学术梳理》
财务舞弊在现代商业社会中屡见不鲜，给企业和社会带来巨大的损失。
因此，识别和检测财务舞弊成为了学术界和实务界关注的焦点之一。
国内外的学者们针对财务舞弊的识别和检测进行了大量的研究，提出了各种各样的方法和模型。
在国内，相关的学术研究主要集中在财务和会计领域。
一些研究者通过分析财务报表以及公司内部的财务数据，提出了一些指标和模型，用于识别潜在的财务舞弊。
另外一些学者则着重于利用数据挖掘和机器学习的方法，构建财务舞弊的检测模型。
这些研究成果为国内企业提供了一定的参考和指导。
国外的学术研究也在财务舞弊识别和检测方面做出了一定的贡献。
一些研究者提出了各种统计学方法和财务比率分析，用于准确地识别财务舞弊。
另外一些学者则利用大数据和深度学习的技术，建立了更加复杂和精准的财务舞弊检测模型。
这些研究成果为全球范围内的企业提供了有效的防范和治理手段。
总的来说，国内外的学术界对财务舞弊识别与检测进行了大量深入的研究，提出了各种各样的方法和模型。
随着技术的不断进步和经验的丰富积累，相信财务舞弊的识别和检测会变得更加准确和有效。
Q88---QUESTIONNAIRE-88-(Version-3)修改版
（排水量）
1.41
Ownership and Operation（所有权和经营权）
1.42
Registered owner - Full style:（所有人）
1.43
Technical operator - Full style:（技术操作员）
2.11
U.S.Certificate of Financial Responsibility (COFR):
（财务责任证书）
2.13
Certificate of Fitness (Gas):（天然气适装证书）
2.14
Certificate of Class:（入级证书）
（国际船舶保安证书）
（国际防止污染证书）
1.19
Date / place of last dry-dock:（上次进港时间、地点）
1.20
Date next dry dock due（预定靠港时间）
1.21
Date of last special survey / next survey due:（上次/下次审核时间）
1.22
Date of last annual survey:（上次年审时间）
INTERTANKO’SSTANDARD TANKERCHARTERINGQUESTIONNAIRE88 (Q88)
(独立油轮船东协会标准化租船问卷)Version 3
1.
VESSEL DESCRIPTION（油船资料）
1.1
Date updated:（更新日期）
1.2
Vessel’s name:（船舶名）
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
Anchoring Systems and Procedures2nd Edition 2010 OCIMF Barge Safety (Liquefied Cargoes in Bulk)1st Edition 1999 OCIMF
Best Management Practices for Protection against Somalia Based Piracy (BMP4) 2011 OCIMF and other
industry
organisations
Clean Seas Guide for Oil tankers4th Edition 1994 ICS/OCIMF
Competence Assurance Guidelines for F(P)SOs1st Edition 2009 OCIMF
Contingency Planning and Crew Response Guide for Gas
Carrier Damage at Sea and in Port Approaches
3rd Edition 1999 ICS/OCIMF/SIGTTO Design and Construction Specification for Marine Loading Arms3rd Edition 1999 OCIMF
Disabled Tankers - Report of Studies on Ship Drift and Towage1st Edition 1981 OCIMF
Drift Characteristics of 50,000 to 70,000 DWT Tankers1st Edition 1982 OCIMF
Effective Mooring3rd Edition 2010 OCIMF
F(P)SO Poster1st Edition OCIMF
Guide to Contingency Planning for the Gas Carrier Alongside
and Within Port Limits
2nd Edition 1999 ICS/OCIMF/SIGTTO
Guide to Manufacturing and Purchasing Hoses for Offshore
Moorings (GMPHOM)
5th Edition 2009 OCIMF
Guidelines for the Design, Operation and Maintenance of Multi
Buoy Moorings (MBM)
1st Edition 2010 OCIMF Guidelines for the Purchasing and Testing of SPM Hawsers1st Edition 2000 OCIMF
Hawser Test Report1st Edition 1982 OCIMF International Safety Guide for Inland Navigation Tank-Barges
and Terminals (ISGINTT)
2010
International Safety Guide for Oil Tankers and Terminals
(ISGOTT)
5th Edition 2006 IAPH/ICS/OCIMF Jetty Maintenance and Inspection Guide1st Edition 2008 OCIMF/SIGTTO Manifold Recommendations for Liquefied Gas Carriers1st Edition 2011 SIGTTO/OCIMF
Marine Terminal Management and Self Assessment (MTMSA)1st Edition 2012 OCIMF
Marine Terminal Operator Competence and Training Guide
(MTOCT)
1st Edition 2013 OCIMF Mooring Equipment Guidelines (MEG3)3rd Edition 2008 OCIMF
Offshore Loading Safety Guidelines with special relevance to
harsh weather zones
1st Edition 1999 OCIMF Offshore Vessel Management and Self Assessment (OVMSA)1st Edition 2012 OCIMF Peril at Sea and Salvage A Guide for Masters (ebook only)5th Edition 1998 ICS/OCIMF Piracy and Armed Robbery Against Ships.1st Edition 2000 OCIMF Prevention of Oil Spillage Through Pumproom Sea Valves2nd Edition 1991 ICS/OCIMF Recommendations for Equipment Employed in the Bow
Mooring of Conventional Tankers at Single Point Moorings
4th Edition 2007 OCIMF
Recommendations for Oil Tanker Manifolds and Associated
Equipment
4th Edition 1991 OCIMF
Safe Transfer of Liquefied Gas in an Offshore Environment
(STOLGOE)
1st Edition 2010 OCIMF Ship to Ship Service Provider Management1st Edition 2011 OCIMF
Ship to Ship Transfer Guide for Petroleum, Chemicals and Liquefied Gases 1st Edition 2013 OCIMF, CDI, ICS,
SIGTTO
Single Point Mooring Maintenance and Operations Guide2nd Edition 1995 OCIMF
SPM Hose System Design Commentary (ebook only)2nd Edition 1993 OCIMF Survival Craft - A Seafarers' Guide1st Edition 2009 OCIMF
Tandem Mooring and Offloading Guidelines for Conventional
Tankers at F(P)SO Facilities
1st Edition 2009 OCIMF
Tanker Management and Self Assessment - A Best Practice
Guide for Vessel Operations
2nd Edition 2008 OCIMF
The Use of Large Tankers in Seasonal First-Year Ice and
Severe Sub-Zero Conditions
1st Edition 2010 OCIMF。