实验报告英文
实验报告模板英文

Title:[Experiment Title]Student Name:[Your Full Name]Student ID:[Your Student ID]Course Name:[Course Name]Course Number:[Course Number]Date of Experiment:[Date of Experiment]Introduction:[Provide a brief background on the experiment. Explain the purpose, the significance of the study, and any relevant theories or concepts that will be tested.]Objective:[State the specific objectives of the experiment. What do you aim to achieve or find out?]Materials and Methods:[Describe the materials used and the methods employed in the experiment. Include details such as the following:]1. Materials:- List all the equipment, chemicals, samples, or other materials used in the experiment.- Provide descriptions of any specialized equipment or apparatus used, including specifications.2. Apparatus:- Describe the setup of the experiment, including the arrangement of equipment and the sequence of operations.3. Procedures:- Outline the step-by-step procedures followed during the experiment.- Include any safety precautions or measures taken.4. Data Collection:- Explain how data was collected during the experiment.- Include details on measurements, observations, and any other data points recorded.5. Variables:- Identify the independent and dependent variables in the experiment.- Describe how the variables were controlled or manipulated.Results:[Present the data collected during the experiment. Include tables, graphs, and figures as appropriate. Discuss the following:]1. Raw Data:- Present the raw data in tables or figures.- Include all relevant measurements, observations, and calculations.2. Analysis:- Analyze the data collected.- Discuss any patterns, trends, or relationships observed.3. Discussion of Results:- Interpret the results in the context of the experiment's objectives and background information.- Compare the results with theoretical predictions or previous studies.Conclusion:[Summarize the findings of the experiment. Address the following:]1. Summary of Results:- Restate the key findings and their significance.2. Objective Achievement:- Discuss whether the experiment achieved its objectives.3. Limitations:- Identify any limitations of the experiment, including potential sources of error or biases.4. Future Work:- Suggest areas for future research or improvements to the experiment.Discussion:[Provide a more in-depth analysis of the experiment. Include the following:]1. Comparison with Theoretical Predictions:- Compare the results with theoretical predictions or existing literature.2. Errors and Sources of Uncertainty:- Discuss any errors or sources of uncertainty in the experiment.3. Alternative Methods:- Consider alternative methods that could be used to achieve similar results.4. Practical Applications:- Discuss the potential practical applications of the experiment's findings.References:[List all the sources cited in the report, including books, journal articles, online resources, etc. Follow the appropriate citation style as required by your institution.]Appendices:[Include any additional information or data that is relevant to the experiment but not included in the main body of the report. This may include raw data tables, detailed calculations, or additional figures.]---Note: This template is a guide and should be adapted to fit the specific requirements of your experiment and the course. The length of the report will vary depending on the complexity of the experiment and the depth of analysis required.。
临床实验报告_英文

Title: Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Antidepressant in Major Depressive DisorderIntroduction:Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common mental health condition characterized by persistent feelings of sadness, loss of interest, and decreased energy. Current treatments for MDD include selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin-norepinephrine reuptakeinhibitors (SNRIs), and tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs). However, some patients may not respond adequately to these treatments or experience adverse effects. This clinical trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel antidepressant, known as NovelAntidepressant (NA), in the treatment of MDD.Methods:The study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted at three academic medical centers in the United States. Participants were diagnosed with MDD according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) criteria. Inclusion criteria were age 18-65 years, a minimum Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) score of 17, and a history of inadequate response to at least one antidepressant treatment. Exclusion criteria included pregnancy, active substance abuse, and contraindications to the study medication.A total of 120 participants were randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups: Group A (NA 50 mg/day), GroupB (NA 100 mg/day), GroupC (NA 150 mg/day), and GroupD (placebo). Participants were treated for12 weeks, with follow-up assessments at weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12. The primary outcome measure was the change in HDRS score from baseline to week 12. Secondary outcome measures included the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS), and the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC).Results:A total of 113 participants completed the study. The mean age of the participants was 38.2 ± 11.7 years, and 57.5% were female. There were no significant differences in demographic or clinical characteristics between the treatment groups at baseline.At week 12, the HDRS score improved significantly in all treatment groups compared to the placebo group (p < 0.001). The mean HDRS score change from baseline to week 12 was as follows: Group A (-14.2 ± 6.1), Group B (-15.8 ± 5.9), Group C (-16.5 ± 5.7), and Group D (-6.2 ±6.5). The between-group differences in HDRS score change were not statistically significant.Similarly, the MADRS and SDS scores also improved significantly in all treatment groups compared to the placebo group (p < 0.001). The mean change in MADRS score from baseline to week 12 was as follows: Group A (-10.5 ± 4.2), Group B (-11.8 ± 3.9), Group C (-12.2 ± 3.7), and Group D (-4.8 ± 4.5). The mean change in SDS score from baseline to week 12 was as follows: Group A (-8.3 ± 3.2), Group B (-9.1 ± 2.8), Group C (-9.8 ± 2.6), and Group D (-3.4 ± 3.1).The PGIC showed a significant improvement in all treatment groups compared to the placebo group (p < 0.001). The percentage ofparticipants with a "much improved" or "very much improved" rating was as follows: Group A (75%), Group B (80%), Group C (85%), and Group D (45%).Regarding safety, the most common adverse events reported were headache, nausea, and dry mouth. These adverse events were generally mild to moderate in severity and did not lead to discontinuation of the study medication in any of the treatment groups.Conclusion:The results of this clinical trial indicate that the novel antidepressant, NA, is effective and safe in the treatment of MDD. NA demonstrated significant improvements in HDRS, MADRS, and SDS scores, as well as PGIC, compared to placebo. The adverse event profile was consistent with the known side effects of SSRIs and SNRIs. Furtherresearch is needed to confirm the long-term efficacy and safety of NA in the treatment of MDD.Keywords: Major depressive disorder, NovelAntidepressant, efficacy, safety, randomized controlled trial, HDRS, MADRS, SDS, PGIC.。
实验报告 英文

实验报告英文Title: An Experimental Report: Unveiling the Secrets of Language Acquisition Introduction:Language acquisition is a fascinating field that has intrigued researchers for centuries. How do we learn languages? What factors influence our ability to acquire new languages? In this experimental report, we delve into the intricacies of language acquisition and explore the role of various factors in shaping our linguistic abilities.Experiment 1: The Impact of Age on Language AcquisitionIn this experiment, we examined the relationship between age and language acquisition. Participants from different age groups were exposed to a new language for a period of six months. The results revealed that younger participants demonstrated a higher proficiency in language acquisition compared to older participants. This finding suggests that there is a critical period for language acquisition during early childhood.Experiment 2: The Influence of Environment on Language AcquisitionTo investigate the impact of environment on language acquisition, we conducted a study comparing individuals raised in bilingual households and monolingual households. The results indicated that individuals exposed to multiple languages from an early age exhibited enhanced language acquisition skills. This suggests that the linguistic environment plays a crucial role in shaping language acquisition abilities.Experiment 3: The Role of Motivation in Language AcquisitionMotivation is a significant factor in language learning. In this experiment, we explored the relationship between motivation and language acquisition by comparing two groups of participants: one with high motivation and the other with low motivation. The findings revealed that individuals with high motivation achieved greater proficiency in language acquisition compared to those with low motivation. This highlights the importance of intrinsic motivation in language learning.Experiment 4: The Effect of Instructional Strategies on Language AcquisitionIn this experiment, we examined the effectiveness of different instructional strategies on language acquisition. Participants were divided into three groups: one group received traditional classroom instruction, another group engaged in immersive language learning, and the third group had a combination of both. The results demonstrated that the immersive language learning approach yielded the highest language acquisition outcomes. This suggests that hands-on, real-life experiences facilitate language acquisition more effectively than traditional classroom methods.Conclusion:Language acquisition is a complex process influenced by various factors. Our experiments shed light on the critical role of age, environment, motivation, and instructional strategies in shaping language acquisition abilities. Understanding these factors can help educators and language learners optimize their languagelearning experiences. Further research is necessary to explore additional variables and refine language acquisition theories. By unraveling the secrets of language acquisition, we can unlock new possibilities for effective language education and cross-cultural communication.。
英文实验报告

英文实验报告Experimental Report。
Introduction。
The purpose of this experiment was to investigate the effects of different temperatures on the rate of enzyme activity. Enzymes are biological catalysts that speed up chemical reactions in living organisms. They are sensitive to changes in temperature, and this experiment aimed to explore how temperature affects the activity of the enzyme catalase.Materials and Methods。
To conduct this experiment, a solution of hydrogen peroxide was prepared and divided into several test tubes. Each test tube was then placed in a water bath at a specific temperature (5°C, 25°C, 45°C, and 65°C). A small piece of liver was added to each test tube, and the rate of oxygen production was measured using a gas syringe.Results。
The results of the experiment showed that the rate of enzyme activity increased as the temperature rose from 5°C to 45°C. However, at 65°C, the enzyme activity decreased significantly, and the reaction rate slowed down. This indicates that there is an optimal temperature for enzyme activity, and beyond this point, the enzyme becomes denatured and loses its function.Discussion。
实验报告的英文

实验报告的英文Experimental Report in EnglishIntroduction:In the realm of scientific research and academia, experimental reports play a crucial role in documenting and communicating the findings of various studies. These reports serve as a means to present the objective, methods, results, and conclusions of an experiment in a clear and concise manner. This article aims to explore the structure and key components of an experimental report, highlighting the importance of effective communication in scientific research. Objective:The objective section of an experimental report outlines the purpose and goal of the study. It provides readers with a clear understanding of what the researchers aimed to achieve through their experiment. This section often starts with a brief background, highlighting the significance of the research topic and the knowledge gap that the study intends to address.Methods:The methods section is a crucial part of an experimental report as it details the procedures and materials used in the study. It allows other researchers to replicate the experiment and verify the results. This section should include the experimental design, sample size, data collection methods, and any statistical analyses performed. Clear and concise descriptions are essential to ensure reproducibility and transparency.Results:The results section presents the findings of the experiment. It should be organized logically, using tables, graphs, or figures to represent the data collected. The results should be described objectively, avoiding any interpretation or speculation. It is important to include both quantitative and qualitative data, providing a comprehensive overview of the study's outcomes. Discussion:The discussion section provides an opportunity to interpret and analyze the results obtained. Here, researchers can compare their findings with existing literature, identify patterns or trends, and discuss the implications of their results. It is crucial to relate the findings back to the objective of the study and address any limitations or potential sources of error. This section should also highlight the significance of the research and suggest future directions for further investigation.Conclusion:The conclusion section summarizes the main findings of the experiment and reiterates their significance. It should be concise and avoid introducing any new information. This section plays a crucial role in reinforcing the key takeaways of the study and highlighting its contribution to the field of research. References:In an experimental report, it is essential to provide a list of references to acknowledge the sources of information and studies cited throughout thedocument. This section should follow a specific citation style, such as APA or MLA, and include all the necessary details for each reference.Appendices:Depending on the complexity of the study, additional information such as raw data, calculations, or supplementary materials may be included in the appendices. These should be clearly labeled and referenced within the main body of the report when necessary.Conclusion:In conclusion, an experimental report serves as a vital tool for researchers to communicate their findings and contribute to the scientific community. By adhering to a structured format and including key components such as objectives, methods, results, discussion, and conclusions, researchers can effectively present their work. The clarity and accuracy of the report are crucial for other scientists to understand, replicate, and build upon the findings. Therefore, mastering the art of writing an experimental report is essential for any aspiring researcher.。
英文实验报告的格式和写法

英文实验报告的格式和写法英文实验报告的格式和写法一份最标准的实验报告的格式:1. Abstract2. Introduction3. Method4. Results5. Discussion6. Conclusion7. ReferenceAbstract摘要摘要,就是整篇文章摘出来的要。
强烈建议整篇文章写完后再写摘要。
把文章每个部分选一些句子出来就可以拼凑成一个abstract了。
一个abstract 的模板:1 一两句话说明这个实验的主要理论依据,或者实验需要证明的假说。
2 一两句话说一下这个理论或者假说的相关的研究。
3 两三句话描述一下实验4 两三句话概括一下实验结果5 一句话说一个结论,解释一下这个实验的意义或结果的重要性转一个别人的example:Does a child’s focus correlate with barometr ic pressure? if so, does it correlatepositively or negatively? Tucker (1999) hypothesized a negative correlation, but this assertion has never been tested. Our team used the MISHA CPT to measure the focus of a group of 150 third-grade students. we dividedthe students into three groups of 50 students. one group took the MISHA CPT when barometric pressure was low, another group took it when barometric pressure was neutral, and the final group took it when barometric pressure was high. the results found that children focused significantly better when barometric pressure was low than when barometric pressure was neutral or high. the results suggest that when diagnosing ADHD, practitioners should give the CPT when barometric pressure is neutral.IntroductionIntroduction以实验目的为开头,解释一下这个实验需要证明的东西。
实验报告英文版

The determination of nitrogen content in the ammonium salt(Formaldehyde method)一、The experiment purpose1、To study the application of acid-base titration2、Master the formaldehyde method principle and the method for determination of nitrogen content in the ammonium salt3、The use of master the volumetric flask and pipet二、The experimental principleBecause NH4 acid is too weak to directly with NaOH standard solution titration, we usually using formaldehyde is transformed into titratable acid:4NH4++6HCOH=(CH2)6N4H++3H++6H2OProducts, hydrogen ions and (CH2)6N4H+ can be directly for accurate titration,titration product (CH2)6N4 is weak alkaline, so using phenolphthalein as indicator.According to the volume of the consumption of sodium hydroxide, may be calculated in proportion of nitrogen content in the ammonium salt:w(N)=C(NaOH)·V(NaOH)·M/m×100%三、Instruments and reagentsEquipment and materials:The alkali type buret(50ml),Conical flask(250ml),Volumetric flask(100ml),pipette(20ml),Measuring cylinder(10ml),A beaker(100ml),Analytical balance,Glass rodDrugs and reagents:Sodium hydroxide standard solution(0.1083mol/L),formaldehyde(40%),phenolphthalein(2g/L ethanol solution),Samples of ammonium sulfate(S).四、The experimental steps1、Accurately according to 0.60 ~ 0.85 g samples of ammonium sulfate in 50 ml beaker, add right amount water dissolves directly transferred to the 100 ml volumetric flask and constant volume, shake a backup.2、Assimilation in sodium hydroxide standard solution to Alkali type buret after wash and embellish it.3、Accurately move 20 ml of the solution into the clean conical flask, add 10 ml of neutral formaldehyde solution and 1 drop of phenolphthalein indicator,shake the solution and let stand for 1 minutes, to the solution with sodium hydroxide standard solution titration is not fade reddish and maintain half minutes,as it to the end.4、Observe and record the volume of consumption of sodium hydroxide5、Parallel determination of three times, calculate the nitrogen content in the sample and the relative average deviation dr(≤0.3%)W(N)=(20.99%+21.01%+21.01%)/3=21.00%d=(0.01%+0.01%+0.01%)/3=0.01%dr=d/w(N)=0.01%/21.00%×100%=0.05%.。
英文实验报告范例模板

Title:Investigation of [Experiment Name]Introduction:The purpose of this experiment is to [briefly describe the objective of the experiment]. This report outlines the methodology used, the results obtained, and the conclusions drawn from the experiment.Objective:To [state the specific objective of the experiment].Materials and Methods:1. Materials:- [List all the materials used in the experiment, e.g., chemicals, equipment, samples, etc.]2. Methods:- Step 1: [Description of the first step in the procedure]- Step 2: [Description of the second step in the procedure]- Step 3: [Description of the third step in the procedure]- ...- Step n: [Description of the final step in the procedure]Procedure:1. [Detailed description of the experimental procedure, including any measurements taken, observations made, or data recorded]2. [Any additional steps or modifications to the procedure]3. [Finalization of the experiment]Results:1. Data Collection:- [Present the data collected during the experiment in tables, figures, or graphs]- [Include raw data and any calculations performed]2. Analysis:- [Discuss the analysis of the data, including any statistical methods used]- [Present the results of the analysis]3. Discussion:- [Interpret the results in the context of the experiment's objective]- [Compare the results with existing literature or theories]- [Identify any unexpected results and possible explanations]Conclusion:Based on the results of this experiment, [state the main conclusion(s)]. The experiment [supported/refuted] the hypothesis that [briefly state the hypothesis]. Further research is needed to [suggest any additional studies or investigations].Discussion:1. Limitations:- [Discuss any limitations of the experiment, such as equipment limitations, sample size, or procedural issues]2. Recommendations:- [Suggest improvements to the experiment, such as using different equipment, modifying the procedure, or expanding the scope of the study]Appendices:- [Include any additional information, such as detailed data tables, code, or additional figures that support the experiment]References:- [List all the references cited in the report, following the appropriate citation style]Acknowledgments:- [Thank any individuals, institutions, or organizations that contributed to the experiment or report]Author Information:- [Include the author's name, affiliation, and contact information]---Note: This template is a general guideline and should be adapted to fit the specific requirements of the experiment and the reporting guidelines of the institution or journal.。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
determination of heavy metals in soil by atomic absorption spectrometry(aas) name: xufei group: the 3rd group date: sep. 20th 2012part 1 the introduction1.1the purposes(1)learn how to operate the atomic absorption spectrometry;(2)learn how to do the pretreatment of soil samples;(3)get familiar with the application of atomic absorption spectrometry.1.2the principlesatomic absorption spectrometry (aas) is a technique for measuring quantities ofchemical elements present in environmental samples by measuring the absorbedradiation by the chemical element of interest. this is done by reading the spectraproduced when the sample is excited by radiation. the atoms absorb ultraviolet orvisible light and make transitions to higher energy levels . the concentration is calculated based on the beer-lambert law. absorbance isdirectly proportional to the concentration of the analyte absorbed for the existingset of conditions. the concentration is usually determined from a calibration curve,obtained using standards of known concentration. calibration curve method: preparestandard solutions of at least three different concentrations, measure the absorbanceof these standard solutions, and prepare a calibration curve from the values obtained.then measure the absorbance of the test solution adjusted in concentration to ameasurable range, and determine the concentration of the element from the calibrationcurve. part 2 the materials and apparatus part 3 the procedure3.1 operating procedure for aas (2) install required hollow cathode lamp. select “t” before turning to the powerand hollow cathode lamp. then select appropriate la mp current and preheat for 30min.(3) make sure electrical meter to point to zero and then turn on high-voltagepower.(4) select appropriate slit width.(5) rotate monochromator and select required wavelength. if the power meter istoo high or low, adjust negative high voltage until the meter reads full scale.(6) adjust light point and wavelength so that the meter represents the maximumvalue.(8) inject distilled water into the flame and continue to preheat the burner.inject distilled water into the flame after each sample.(9) select “e”, inject blank solution into the flame and adjust the meter tozero.(10) optimize analysis conditions and measure standard solution and samples.(12) select “t” before turning off high voltage power, decrease lamp currentand then turn off the lamp. at the same time, all buttons should be on originalpositions.(13) check the equipment before leaving the laboratory.3.2 determination of soil samples (1) preparation of extracting solution (0.05 mol/l edta solution) 18.6 g of edta is dissolved with water in a beaker (500 ml). the ph is adjustedto 7.0 using dilute ammonia. the mixture is transferred into a volumetric flask(1000ml), dilute to the mark and mixed well.(2) treatment of soil samples 2.50 g of air-dried soil (60- 100 mesh) is put into an erlenmeyer flask withstopper (100 ml). 12.5 ml of edta solution is added. the mixture is shaken for 1hand then filtered. the filtrate is preserved for analysis.(3) preparation of cu standard stock solution 0.10 g of cu is dissolved in 15 ml of (1:1) nitric acid solution. the mixtureis transferred into a volumetric flask (1000 ml) and diluted to the mark withre-distilled water. the concentration of the stock standard solution is 100g/ml. (theconcentration should be calculated according to the mass of cu).the working custandard solution (10μg/ml) is obtained by diluting 10 ml of cu standard stocksolution to 100 ml with re-distilled water.(4) plotting of the standard curve 0 ml, 1 ml, 2 ml, 3 ml, 4 ml and 5 ml of cu standard solution (10μg/ml) are addedrespectively to 6 volumetric flask (10 ml) with 1 ml of 5 mol/l hydrochloric acid.the mixture is diluted with re-distilled water and mixed well to give 0μg/ml, 1.00μg/ml,2.00μg/ml, 3.00μg/ml, 4.00μg/ml, 5.00μg/ml of cu, respectively. theabsorbance is measured at wavelengths of 3247 ?. the standard curve is constructedby plotting absorbance vs. concentration.(5) determination of samples the sample solution is analyzed using the same procedure and conditions as forthe standard curve. the concentration of cu is obtained from the standard curve basedon the absorbance.part 4 the results4.1 the raw data 4.2 aas standard curve 4.3 calculationthe absorbance of sample is 0.0511. according to the formula above :y=0.0446x+0.0024,r2=0.9997 the concentration of cu in the sample is:1.091mg/l. part 5 discussionin this experiment, we use the aas to determine cu in soil. i learn how to operatethe aas and the limitation. in the experimental process, standard solution wasprepared in strict accordance with the experimental requirements and i learn how todeal with the data. finally we get the standard curve, then, the sample concentrationis calculated according to the absorbance of the sample. ultimately, we get the linear formula is y = 0.0446x + 0.0024 and r2=0.9997. fromaccording to the formula and the absorbance of cu in the sample is 0.0511, we drawthe concentration of cu in the sample is 1.091μg/ml. we have known that theconcentration of test sample measured by instrument is 1.091mg/l. we can say our result of experiment is so very accurate from the standard curveof cu and the value of r(r2=0.09997). the accurate data is due to the efforts of weeveryone. thanks for every members of our group.i have some suggestions for our experiments. firstly when we’ll do an experiment,we must prepare our pre-lab by ourselves and translate it into chinese .only do likethis, we can understand the experiment well. secondly we should prefer to solute theproblems in the experiment rather than ask for ta. finally, everyone should understandhis own task in the experiment.篇二:英文实验报告的格式和写法英文实验报告的格式和写法【转】2010-10-04 06:03 一份最标准的实验报告的格式:1. abstract2. introduction3. method4. results5. discussion6. conclusion7. reference分别来分享下近来学到的。