技术性贸易壁垒文献综述及外文文献资料

合集下载

《技术性贸易壁垒研究》范文

《技术性贸易壁垒研究》范文

《技术性贸易壁垒研究》篇一一、引言随着全球化进程的推进,技术性贸易壁垒逐渐成为国际贸易中的重要问题。

技术性贸易壁垒,主要指一国通过实施各种技术性措施,来限制或控制其他国家商品进入本国市场,以达到保护本国产业、环境和人类健康等目的。

这种非关税性质的贸易限制措施对国际贸易的影响日益凸显,对企业的国际化经营也提出了新的挑战。

本文将对技术性贸易壁垒的成因、类型、影响及应对策略进行研究分析。

二、技术性贸易壁垒的成因及类型1. 成因技术性贸易壁垒的产生,一方面源于各国对产品安全、环保、健康等方面的关注度不断提高,希望通过设立技术标准、认证制度等手段保护本国消费者利益;另一方面,也是国际贸易竞争激烈的结果,一些国家通过设置技术性贸易壁垒来保护本国产业免受外来竞争的冲击。

2. 类型技术性贸易壁垒主要包括技术法规、技术标准、合格评定程序、检验检疫措施等类型。

其中,技术法规主要规定产品的性能、安全、环保等方面的要求;技术标准则是对技术法规的具体化,为产品生产和检验提供依据;合格评定程序则是对产品是否符合技术标准进行评估和认证的程序;检验检疫措施则是对进口产品进行检验检疫,以保护本国安全和健康。

三、技术性贸易壁垒的影响技术性贸易壁垒对国际贸易的影响主要体现在以下几个方面:1. 增加企业成本:企业需要满足进口国的技术标准、认证制度等要求,需要投入更多的资源进行产品研发、检测和认证,从而增加企业的成本。

2. 限制市场准入:技术性贸易壁垒可能使一些不符合进口国标准的企业和产品被排除在市场之外,限制了企业的市场准入。

3. 引发贸易争端:由于各国技术性贸易壁垒的设置存在差异,容易引发贸易争端和摩擦。

4. 促进技术创新:在应对技术性贸易壁垒的过程中,企业需要加强技术创新和研发,提高产品的质量和竞争力,从而推动产业升级和经济发展。

四、应对技术性贸易壁垒的策略面对技术性贸易壁垒,企业应采取以下策略:1. 加强技术研发和产品创新:企业应加大技术研发和产品创新的投入,提高产品的质量和竞争力,以满足进口国的技术标准和市场需求。

技术性贸易壁的垒对出口的影响文献综述

技术性贸易壁的垒对出口的影响文献综述

题目:技术性贸易壁垒对出口旳影响一、引言技术性贸易壁垒具有内容复杂,实行隐蔽灵活,近年来成为发达国家对发展中国家实行保护主义旳一项重要手段。

其对我国出口具有极大影响,一直是我国贸易研究领域旳热点问题。

为了更好地理解近几十年来技术性贸易壁垒旳研究水平,本文重要论述了国内外技术性贸易壁垒旳研究现实状况和技术性贸易壁垒旳研究展望,尤其是我国各个行业怎样应对技术性贸易壁垒旳负面影响值得我们思索和研究。

二、技术性贸易壁垒旳研究现实状况(一)技术性贸易壁垒涵义“贸易技术壁垒(Technical Barriers To Trade—TBT)”一词,正式出现于世界贸易组织旳《贸易技术壁垒协定》(WTO/TBT协议)中,其作用是:“期望保证技术法规和原则,包括对包装、标志和标签旳规定,以及对技术法规和原则旳合格评估程序不给国际贸易制造不必要旳障碍。

”目前国内对TBT概念旳争论重要可概括两种观点(金祥荣,2023):一是认为技术性贸易壁垒是一种贸易障碍,扭曲了国际贸易,是与贸易自由化相背离旳。

另一种观点(朱钟棣,2023)则是认为技术性贸易壁垒与技术性贸易措施是等同概念,与否对贸易导致消极影响应详细分析。

狭义旳TBT所采用旳技术性措施大都能用数量指标量化或通过明细旳操作规程来实现,重要包括技术规章与规范、产品检查、检疫制度与措施、包装和标签规定以及绿色壁垒。

而在广义范围内,现代旳TBT既包括老式旳以数量指标量化和明细操作规程为主旳技术性贸易措施,也包括以劳工原则等社会条款为主旳贸易措施。

技术性贸易壁垒旳本质是政府调整贸易利益旳重要手段,是政府调控和规范市场旳手段,也是高新技术产品新旳竞争手段,各国采用技术性贸易壁垒旳主线目旳是维护本国利益。

当真正意义上旳全球经济一体化实现后,产品生产链旳各个环节将分布于不一样国家,各利益方为减少贸易障碍,通过经济手段互相影响和渗透,有助于减弱聊对生产环节旳影响,关税与其他非关税壁垒旳趋弱与消灭就符合这样旳趋势。

《技术性贸易壁垒研究》范文

《技术性贸易壁垒研究》范文

《技术性贸易壁垒研究》篇一一、引言在当今的全球经济体系中,贸易自由化进程虽然取得了一定的进展,但同时各国的贸易壁垒仍然普遍存在。

技术性贸易壁垒(Technical Barriers to Trade,TBT)是这些贸易壁垒中重要的一类。

它们主要涉及产品标准、质量、安全、环保等方面的规定,对国际贸易产生深远影响。

本文旨在深入探讨技术性贸易壁垒的成因、影响及其应对策略。

二、技术性贸易壁垒的成因技术性贸易壁垒的产生主要由两方面原因构成。

首先,各国的法规和标准制定具有一定的自主性,为了保护本国消费者和环境等利益,各国的政策制定者往往会设置一定程度的标准,以此来规范进口商品的质量和安全。

其次,国际贸易中的竞争压力和不确定性使得一些企业会利用技术性贸易壁垒来保护自身利益,以应对外来竞争压力。

三、技术性贸易壁垒的影响技术性贸易壁垒对国际贸易的影响是多方面的。

首先,它们可能增加贸易成本,降低贸易效率。

由于各国的技术标准、法规和认证程序不同,企业需要投入更多的资源来满足不同国家的要求,这无疑增加了企业的运营成本和贸易难度。

其次,技术性贸易壁垒可能引发贸易争端和冲突。

由于一些技术性贸易壁垒的设置可能被视为不公平或歧视性的,因此可能引发国际贸易摩擦和冲突。

最后,技术性贸易壁垒也可能影响全球供应链的稳定性和效率。

四、技术性贸易壁垒的应对策略面对技术性贸易壁垒,企业应采取积极的应对策略。

首先,企业应加强技术研发和创新,提高产品的质量和安全性,以满足不同国家的技术标准和法规要求。

其次,企业应积极参与国际标准的制定和修订工作,以影响国际标准的制定方向和内容。

此外,企业还应加强与各国认证机构的合作和交流,以便更顺利地完成产品认证工作。

最后,政府在面对技术性贸易壁垒时也应采取相应措施,如推动多边和双边贸易谈判,争取减少或消除不合理的技术性贸易壁垒。

五、案例分析以某国针对进口电子产品设置的技术性贸易壁垒为例,该国对进口电子产品的安全性能、电磁兼容性等有严格的规定和要求。

国际贸易中的技术性贸易壁垒研究综述

国际贸易中的技术性贸易壁垒研究综述

定” 提供理论支持咖 。其 次 , 用数理方法研究技术性贸易壁垒
政策“ 是什_ / 厶” 以及 “ 是 如何产生 的” H , 主要通过对 经济系统 中相互依存 的变量 建立数学模型 , 通过求解 目标 函数 的最大 化解或是博弈 均衡解 , 来研究技术性贸易壁垒政策决策 的过
程与机制 。
贸易保护体 系已 经不适应中国对外 贸易和 经济发展 的需要 , 尽快规 范和完善 中国的技 术性 贸易 保 护体 系 和 应对措施 已
经成 为当务之急。 同时 , 这也为再加入 WT O后政府 的经济管理职能提 出了新的研 究课题 。 关键词 : 技 术贸易壁 垒; 基本历程 ; 主要 内容 ; 反思
定程序 、 卫生措施等多个角度 。如高文 书认为所谓贸易技术
壁垒就是指 , 由于各 国的标 准 、 技术法规 、 合格评 定程序 、 检
验检疫措施等技术性贸易措施 的体系不同, 或水平不 同, 或信 息不 足 , 或 不能相互协 调 , 或歧视性制定 和实施而 给 国际 贸 易造成 的障碍目 。王荣艳认为所谓贸易技术壁垒是指进 口国 为了维护本 国利益 和经济安全 、 国民健康 以及环境保护制定

要: 中国在加入世界 贸易组织后 , 世界 贸 易组织的经济活动了诸 多的挑 战。 其 中, 技 术性 贸易壁 垒给 中国对外贸 易带来了许 多消极的影响。 在 3代 - 国际经济贸易发 " 展 中, 技 术 贸易壁 垒正扮演着也来越重要的 角色, 当前在 国外技术性 贸易壁 垒措施不断强化的形势下 , 中国的技 术I } 生
致外 国企业 的成本增加 高于国内企业 , 因此 自由化应是 降低
外国企业在证 明其 产品符合 进 口国规范时面临的过度成本 。 也就是说 , 技术性贸易壁垒 自由化就是要求政府 的政策设计 既能满足社会对一定社会公共 目标 的需求 , 同时又不会对 国

技术性贸易壁垒的文献综述

技术性贸易壁垒的文献综述

文献综述一、国外研究现状20 世纪70 年代以来,在西方学者的一些研究中开始涉及技术性贸易壁垒,,进入20 世纪90 年代,由于乌拉圭回合对技术性贸易壁垒的高度重视,西方学者对这一问题的研究开始大量出现。

比较有代表性的有Victor Ginsburg,Michel Keizer;Outskirt,Wilson J S等。

后来的学者从经济理论角度对技术性贸易壁垒进行了较为深入的研究。

Dong-hyu Kima,Heejin Leea,Jooyoung Kwakb,DongBack Seoc(2014)研究了标准的贸易保护效果,结论是政府制定的最小标准即使表面非歧视,也是贸易保护的。

在实证研究方面,Yuan Li,John C.Beghin.(2012)也做了探索,调查收集了大量的行业数据,并据以分析技术性贸易壁垒影响贸易成本的程度,结论是达到OECD成员国不同的技术法规与标准所需要支出的成本,加上测试与认证成本,占到企业总生产成本的2%到10%。

从上面的文献综述可以看出,国外研究者在技术性贸易壁垒定性、定量研究上积累了不少成果,但研究对象的复杂性导致研究的准确程度还有待提高,与关税壁垒相对成熟的研究相比,国外技术性贸易壁垒研究有待进一步深化。

二、国内研究现状20 世纪90 年代初期,随着技术性贸易壁垒问题的凸现,国内学者开始对技术性贸易壁垒问题进行研究,最初的研究主要集中在对GATT 的标准守则、TBT 概念、来源及发达国家TBT 概况等做框架性的分析与描述。

进入21 世纪,中国加入世界贸易组织后,技术性贸易壁垒日益成为中国对外贸易的重要问题,大量文献开始涌现。

徐璐(2015)从标准化角度分析了技术性贸易壁垒问题,对标准守则的形成、技术性贸易壁垒的概念与基本内容做出了框架性的分析。

高戈(2015)研究认为,在技术性贸易壁垒现象的影响下传统的电子产品产业出口模式已经无法满足当代社会的发展需求,因而在此背景下为了推动对外贸易的快速发展,要求各大贸易企业在发展的过程中应依据自身发展现状来不断完善自身经营中的技术性贸易壁垒预警机制,以此来避免贸易风险的产生影响到贸易活动的有序开展;从技术性贸易壁垒对中国电子产品出口的突出影响分析入手,并详细阐述了应对技术性贸易壁垒的策略,旨在其能推动当前贸易活动的有序开展。

技术性贸易壁垒分析论文(全文)

技术性贸易壁垒分析论文(全文)

技术性贸易壁垒分析论文一、什么是技术性贸易壁垒技术性贸易壁垒是非关税壁垒的一个组成部分。

通常是指一国或以维护GJ安全、保护人类、动植物生命及健康、阻止欺诈、保护环境、保证产品质量为目的,或以贸易保护为目的所采取的种种技术性限制措施。

这些措施若标准过高,超出了实际需要;或者在制定技术规格时带有偏见,不合理地优待本国产品或某些特定来源的进口产品时,则会变成不合理的贸易壁垒,在主观或客观上成为自由贸易的障碍。

随着经济全球化的迅猛进展,国际贸易中的关税壁垒正被逐步取消,传统的非关税壁垒活动空间也日益缩小,以人类健康、生态环境保护、消费者权益保护面貌出现的技术性贸易保护主义逐渐抬头。

世界贸易组织的《技术性贸易壁垒协议》(greementonTechniclBrrierstoTrde简称TBT协议)也积极鼓舞协议的各参加国制订技术法规和标准,并推行评审制度,来推动技术进步和产品质量的提高,从而出现了国际贸易中商品的进出由价格、关税调节变成了由技术指标或技术指数或法律、法规来调节的趋向。

作为世界最大的进展ZG家和第九大出口贸易国,我国出口正面临着越来越多的技术性贸易壁垒。

二、发达GJ对我国出口商品实施技术性贸易壁垒的具体表现我国目前对美国、日本、欧盟等国的出口占我出口总额的47.8%。

由于这些GJ科技发达、技术水平高,客观上对我出口产品形成技术性贸易壁垒压力。

实际上,早在1980年,美国食品与药品治理局(FD)就开始限制和禁止我国中草药进口,而进入90年代后,发达GJ对我出口实施技术性贸易壁垒更是愈演愈烈,主要表现为:1.涉及出口商品品种多、范围广。

我国的出口商品中,不论是传统的农产品、纺织品、玩具,还是新近开发的高新技术产品,都不同程度、不同内容地面临着技术性贸易壁垒,且技术性贸易壁垒已从原来的商品流通领域扩大到生产、加工领域。

现在越来越多的GJ意识到,应从商品生产的全过程来操纵质量,防止污染,有效利用资源,要加强生产过程的质量操纵、环境保护与认证工作,所以要求进口商品的生产加工方法也必须符合本国的有关法规和标准,以保护本国的相关产业。

技术性贸易壁垒文献综述及外文文献资料

技术性贸易壁垒文献综述及外文文献资料

技术性贸易壁垒文献综述及外文文献资料本份文档包含:关于该选题的外文文献、文献综述一、外文文献标题: THE IMPACT OF TECHNICAL BARRIER TO TRADE ON PAKISTAN TEXTILE 作者: Shah M.期刊: Pakistan Journal of Science, 卷: 66;期: 2;页:130-137;年份: 2021THE IMPACT OF TECHNICAL BARRIER TO TRADE ON PAKISTAN TEXTILEINDUSTRYABSTRACT: During the last three decades, trade barriers have been drastically reduced under obligations of WTO. Due to freedom in trade, competition has increased, forcing industries to improve their productivity to compete in this free market. However there are still some trade barriers which are used to block market access. Technical Barrier to Trade (TBT) is one of such barriers. In this study the impact of TBT on export performance of Pakistan textile industry has been empirically evaluated. A model was framed which represented TBT and export performance as variables. Primary data was collected from top textile firms of Pakistan. Multiple regression analysis was applied on the primary data. Results indicated that TBT has positively affected the performance of Pakistan textile industry.Keywords: WTO, TBT, export performance, textile industry, Pakistan. INTRODUCTIONTrade liberalization is considered as catalyst which stimulates economic activity in a progressive economy. It opens up market economy to flourish and prosper. In poor countries, trade liberalization improves the economy and helps reduce poverty (Dollar and Kraay, 2001, World Bank Report, 1987). Contrary to this, there are studies which indicate that there is not enough evidence to support relationship between economic growth and trade liberalization (Grossman and Helpman, 1991, Rodriguez, and Rodrik, 2000).The conviction that an outward looking trade policy is better than an inward-lookingor shelter view^ias been enthusiastically discussed in the economic enhancement literature(Krueger, 1978, Dollar, 1992, Sachs and Warner, 1995). Whereas the belief that exports are good for economic development is well established, but the ways to export production have been challenged in thetrade and industry literature. The experience of East Asian countries has revealed that the route to export production is certainly via importsubstitution (Amsden, 1989, Wade, 1990), Ocampo and Taylor, 1998).During 1990-2021, trade liberalization was an obligation for Pakistan.This opening of trade was largely enforced by the IMF and World Bank during structural adjustment srogram (Kardar, 1997).Pakistan is a developing economy and her major source of revenue is from services and agriculture. The contribution of production, construction, retail trade services and wholesale, in Pakistan's GDP, has gone down gradually (Weisbrot and Baker, 2002).Textile forms60% of Pakistan's total exports. It has faced market access challenges due to discriminating trade barriers by developed countries. For developing countries, main hindrance to market access is non tariff measures (NTM) which include TBT. Open trade is supposed to help greater market access by reducing negative market indicators and boosting productivity in the local market and fair distribution of resources. Pakistan has gradually shifted its exports from raw to finished products (Pakistan Economic Survey, 2001). However in case of textile, Pakistan can not appreciably shift its products from primary goods to finished commodities due to low market access because of presence of NTM.In this study, author has analyzed the impact of TBT, which is part of NTM, on productivity of Pakistan textile industry.The research question developed on the basis of arguments in previous section is as follows:How much and to what extent have the trade barriers as TBT, influenced export performance and the productivity of textile industry of Pakistan,during the period 1990 to 2021?The purpose of the study was to evaluate empirically the impact of TBT on the exportperformance and productivity of textile Industry of Pakistan.This study is beneficial for the policy makers of the Government of Pakistan, textile firms operating in Pakistan, research scholars, research organizations, universities as well as foreign research organizations who want to enhance their understanding regarding effects of trade barriers on thetextile industry of Pakistan.TBT refers to different measures which countries use to control the markets, defend their consumers and protect natural resources. However, it may additionally discriminate against imports in favor of domestic products (Geoffrey, 1997). There is persistent fear among small developing countries about the rate at which new and possibly more complex standards and regulations are being introduced into the global markets (Broberg, 2021).Market-driven voluntary standards usually do not threat market access, but failure to observe these standards or technical rules in different national and international laws will result in refusal of merchandise at points of entry by the customs. A certain commodity can sustain positive and negative impacts by standards and regulations through labeling and packaging laws, the food safety rules and the inspection and certification rules. Those countries which are allowed a duty-free access to the European market, cannot guarantee their permanent presence in this market, as they can be blocked by some technical requirements. TBTs result in enhanced cost for exporter in market access. Even inside the European Union, around 10% of overall expenditurefalls on merchandise from different European Union countries.Local regulations and standards can present multiple barriers to trade depending upon their aim and also the structural amendments and behavioral responses. MATERIALS AND METHODSIn this study, author formulated a mathematical research model to represent association of TBT with the export performance of the textile industry of Pakistan. Primary data was collected by means of a structured questionnaire. Author developed a questionnaire that comprised of questions which were adopted from the research studies of (Pricewaterhouse, 2001, MAIA and IFM, 2021).Questionnaire included two parts. First part asked respondents questions about demographics of the firm andsecond part asked respondents questions about the variables of the study.We collected primary data from selected textile firms based on their export revenue. The top 50 export oriented textile firms, operating in Pakistan, were selected from Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) dataand sent questionnaire to all of these firms. The mathematical model of the study was tested by the application of multiple regression analyses.The research model of the study comprised of two variables (oneIndependent Variable - IV and one Dependent Variable - DV) which are represented in the model presented below as Figure-1:Mathematical Model of the Study: The mathematical model of the study is as follows: EP^sub rexIn, t^ = α^sub o^ + β^sub 1^ TBT^sub Texin, t^ T η^sub Texin, t^ Where, symbolic expressions in above mathematical model have the following meanings:EPrexin, t = Export Performance (EP) of the textile industry in the time't'TBTTexin, t = Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) related to the textile industry in the time 't'a0 = Model Constantβ1= It is the coefficient of the independent variable included in the model STexin, t = Model error termThis mathematical model was formulated to evaluate the impact of independent variables on the dependent variable in the textile industry of Pakistan. This model has been tested by applying multiple regression analyses on the collected data by using statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS). RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONThe reliability of the instrument was checked by applying Cronbach's alpha which resulted in a score of .856 and validity of the instrument was assessed by applying factor analyses which showed values of all the items of the instrument greater than the 0.50 cutoff value.In this study Confirmatory Factor Analysis has been employed to access the construct validity of the research instrument of (Hafiz andShaari2021, Hair et. al. 2021) thatvalidity is a measure that correctly defines the concept of the study. Moreover, (Hair et. al. 1995) reported that the factor loadings must begreater than 0.5 cutoff value. The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of the constructs of the study has been presented in table 1 below:Table 2 shows that TBT was taken as single independent variable and EP as single dependent variable. Beta coefficient (?=.198) for TBT was positive and significant as p-value (0.024<0.05). Value of standard error (error=.077) forTBT was lower which confirmed increase level of predictability of TBT used as independent variables in the study. The t-value (t=2.561) for TBT was significantly higher, which confirmed higher level of association between TBT and EP of textile firms taken as sample. Lower p-value (0.024<0.05) resulted in the acceptance of the hypothesis of the study and established that the TBT during period 1990 to 2021 had positively affected the EP of Pakistan'stextile industry. TBT as independent variable has explained 33.5% variance in EP taken as dependent variable in the study. Moreover, F statistics (F=6.557) was significant for p-value (0.024<0.05) which showed higher strength of the research model. Hence, the regression results showed that there was a significant level of relationship between TBT with EP variable. Here, in the case of Pakistan, TBT had positively impacted the export performance of Pakistan's textile industry.TBT consists of three fields as, technical rules, standards, and conformity procedures. The ordinary principals and rules that are appropriate, were, non discrimination (Most Favored Nation and National Treatment), the avoidance of unwanted obstacles to international trade, harmonization, use of international standards, equivalence and mutual recognition, and transparency. Harmonization was basically the back bone of TBT. It was required that members actively participate in the making of standards. They also implement the international standards as the foundation for international standards and rules. In addition to that they also ought to prepare guide and proposals for conformity assessment procedures. It was mandatory for the members to publish or create obtainable technical rules, standards, and conformity assessment procedures to differentiate other members.Obligatory standards and technical rules plus international standards were vital factors感谢您的阅读,祝您生活愉快。

关于技术性贸易壁垒研究文献的综述

关于技术性贸易壁垒研究文献的综述

对于技术性贸易壁垒研究文件的综述摘要技术性贸易壁垒是今世国际贸易理论与政策研究的前沿课题,为从根本上理清技术性贸易壁垒的本质,有必需对其理论研究的发展脉络做一梳理。

本文从技术性贸易壁垒的观点及性质界定、形成体制、自由化方面对技术性贸易壁垒的有关文件进行了逐个梳理与剖析,试图成立起一个有关技术性贸易壁垒的剖析框架。

重点词:技术性贸易壁垒,两重性质,形成体制,贸易自由化跟着多边贸易系统对关税和传统非关税壁垒的连续成功减少,入口国转向其余新式非关税壁垒作为代替品以保持必定的贸易限制水平,技术性贸易壁垒因其名义上的合理性与形式上的合法性成为目前国际贸易领域中发展最为快速的非关税壁垒之一。

回首重商主义以来的国际贸易保护理论,既有形成贸易保护主流的天真家产论、战后现代贸易保护理论的凯恩斯重商主义,今世贸易保护的新理论战略性贸易政策论,也有其余非主流的贸易保护理论。

如普林维什的中心—外头论,公正贸易论,管理贸易论等。

但不论是哪一种理论,作为贸易保护手段概括起来主假如两种:一种是关税壁垒,一种是非关税壁垒。

作为技术性贸易壁垒,已有的贸易保护理论并无特意阐述。

一、技术性贸易壁垒观点界定经济学界对技术性贸易壁垒的观点界定其实不一致,以致于 Hillman(1991) 以为观点界定的杂乱是有关技术性贸易壁垒经济影响的研究进展迟缓的主要原由之一。

有学者从政策工具属性界定或形式归类的方式来定义技术性贸易壁垒。

比如R.Baldwin 在 1970 年发布的《国际贸易的非关税歪曲》中以为,“技术与管理法例,往常与健康、安全或其余一些重要的公共利益有关,常常成为不用要的贸易阻碍。

”但 Baldwin 仅是对技术性贸易壁垒作为非关税壁垒的一种形式做了简单描绘。

Hillman(1991) 最早以英国的疯牛病引致的英法贸易矛盾为例,提到“国家发现除传统的关税之外的贸易保护工具来限制国际贸易中农产品的流动,这些工具被称为技术壁垒” ,指出技术性贸易壁垒属于非关税壁垒,其形式表现为检疫与卫生法例。

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

本份文档包含:关于该选题的外文文献、文献综述一、外文文献标题: THE IMPACT OF TECHNICAL BARRIER TO TRADE ON PAKISTAN TEXTILE作者: Shah M.期刊: Pakistan Journal of Science, 卷: 66;期: 2;页:130-137;年份: 2014THE IMPACT OF TECHNICAL BARRIER TO TRADE ON PAKISTAN TEXTILEINDUSTRYABSTRACT: During the last three decades, trade barriers have been drastically reduced under obligations of WTO. Due to freedom in trade, competition has increased, forcing industries to improve their productivity to compete in this free market. However there are still some trade barriers which are used to block market access. Technical Barrier to Trade (TBT) is one of such barriers. In this study the impact of TBT on export performance of Pakistan textile industry has been empirically evaluated. A model was framed which represented TBT and export performance as variables. Primary data was collected from top textile firms of Pakistan. Multiple regression analysis was applied on the primary data. Results indicated that TBT has positively affected the performance of Pakistan textile industry.Keywords: WTO, TBT, export performance, textile industry, Pakistan. INTRODUCTIONTrade liberalization is considered as catalyst which stimulates economic activity in a progressive economy. It opens up market economy to flourish and prosper. In poor countries, trade liberalization improves the economy and helps reduce poverty (Dollar and Kraay, 2001, World Bank Report, 1987). Contrary to this, there are studies which indicate that there is not enough evidence to support relationship between economic growth and trade liberalization (Grossman and Helpman, 1991, Rodriguez, and Rodrik, 2000).The conviction that an outward looking trade policy is better than an inward-lookingor shelter view^ias been enthusiastically discussed in the economic enhancement literature(Krueger, 1978, Dollar, 1992, Sachs and Warner, 1995). Whereas the belief that exports are good for economic development is well established, but the ways to export production have been challenged in the trade and industry literature. The experience of East Asian countries has revealed that the route to export production is certainly via import substitution (Amsden, 1989, Wade, 1990), Ocampo and Taylor, 1998).During 1990-2005, trade liberalization was an obligation for Pakistan. This opening of trade was largely enforced by the IMF and World Bank during structural adjustment srogram (Kardar, 1997).Pakistan is a developing economy and her major source of revenue is from services and agriculture. The contribution of production, construction, retail trade services and wholesale, in Pakistan's GDP, has gone down gradually (Weisbrot and Baker, 2002).Textile forms60% of Pakistan's total exports. It has faced market access challenges due to discriminating trade barriers by developed countries. For developing countries, main hindrance to market access is non tariff measures (NTM) which include TBT. Open trade is supposed to help greater market access by reducing negative market indicators and boosting productivity in the local market and fair distribution of resources. Pakistan has gradually shifted its exports from raw to finished products (Pakistan Economic Survey, 2001). However in case of textile, Pakistan can not appreciably shift its products from primary goods to finished commodities due to low market access because of presence of NTM.In this study, author has analyzed the impact of TBT, which is part of NTM, on productivity of Pakistan textile industry.The research question developed on the basis of arguments in previous section is as follows:How much and to what extent have the trade barriers as TBT, influenced export performance and the productivity of textile industry of Pakistan, during the period 1990 to 2005?The purpose of the study was to evaluate empirically the impact of TBT on the exportperformance and productivity of textile Industry of Pakistan.This study is beneficial for the policy makers of the Government of Pakistan, textile firms operating in Pakistan, research scholars, research organizations, universities as well as foreign research organizations who want to enhance their understanding regarding effects of trade barriers on the textile industry of Pakistan.TBT refers to different measures which countries use to control the markets, defend their consumers and protect natural resources. However, it may additionally discriminate against imports in favor of domestic products (Geoffrey, 1997). There is persistent fear among small developing countries about the rate at which new and possibly more complex standards and regulations are being introduced into the global markets (Broberg, 2009).Market-driven voluntary standards usually do not threat market access, but failure to observe these standards or technical rules in different national and international laws will result in refusal of merchandise at points of entry by the customs. A certain commodity can sustain positive and negative impacts by standards and regulations through labeling and packaging laws, the food safety rules and the inspection and certification rules. Those countries which are allowed a duty-free access to the European market, cannot guarantee their permanent presence in this market, as they can be blocked by some technical requirements. TBTs result in enhanced cost for exporter in market access. Even inside the European Union, around 10% of overall expenditure falls on merchandise from different European Union countries.Local regulations and standards can present multiple barriers to trade depending upon their aim and also the structural amendments and behavioral responses. MATERIALS AND METHODSIn this study, author formulated a mathematical research model to represent association of TBT with the export performance of the textile industry of Pakistan. Primary data was collected by means of a structured questionnaire. Author developed a questionnaire that comprised of questions which were adopted from the research studies of (Pricewaterhouse, 2001, MAIA and IFM, 2004).Questionnaire included two parts. First part asked respondents questions about demographics of the firm andsecond part asked respondents questions about the variables of the study.We collected primary data from selected textile firms based on their export revenue. The top 50 export oriented textile firms, operating in Pakistan, were selected from Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) dataand sent questionnaire to all of these firms. The mathematical model of the study was tested by the application of multiple regression analyses.The research model of the study comprised of two variables (one Independent Variable - IV and one Dependent Variable - DV) which are represented in the model presented below as Figure-1:Mathematical Model of the Study: The mathematical model of the study is as follows: EP^sub rexIn, t^ = α^sub o^ + β^sub 1^ TBT^sub Texin, t^ T η^sub Texin, t^ Where, symbolic expressions in above mathematical model have the following meanings:EPrexin, t = Export Performance (EP) of the textile industry in the time 't' TBTTexin, t = Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) related to the textile industry in the time 't'a0 = Model Constantβ1= It is the coefficient of the independent variable included in the modelSTexin, t = Model error termThis mathematical model was formulated to evaluate the impact of independent variables on the dependent variable in the textile industry of Pakistan. This model has been tested by applying multiple regression analyses on the collected data by using statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS).RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONThe reliability of the instrument was checked by applying Cronbach's alpha which resulted in a score of .856 and validity of the instrument was assessed by applying factor analyses which showed values of all the items of the instrument greater than the 0.50 cutoff value.In this study Confirmatory Factor Analysis has been employed to access the construct validity of the research instrument of (Hafiz andShaari2013, Hair et. al. 2010) thatvalidity is a measure that correctly defines the concept of the study. Moreover, (Hair et. al. 1995) reported that the factor loadings must be greater than 0.5 cutoff value. The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of the constructs of the study has been presented in table 1 below:Table 2 shows that TBT was taken as single independent variable and EP as single dependent variable. Beta coefficient (ß=.198) for TBT was positive and significant as p-value (0.024<0.05). Value of standard error (error=.077) for TBT was lower which confirmed increase level of predictability of TBT used as independent variables in the study. The t-value (t=2.561) for TBT was significantly higher, which confirmed higher level of association between TBT and EP of textile firms taken as sample. Lower p-value (0.024<0.05) resulted in the acceptance of the hypothesis of the study and established that the TBT during period 1990 to 2005 had positively affected the EP of Pakistan's textile industry. TBT as independent variable has explained 33.5% variance in EP taken as dependent variable in the study. Moreover, F statistics (F=6.557) was significant for p-value (0.024<0.05) which showed higher strength of the research model. Hence, the regression results showed that there was a significant level of relationship between TBT with EP variable. Here, in the case of Pakistan, TBT had positively impacted the export performance of Pakistan's textile industry.TBT consists of three fields as, technical rules, standards, and conformity procedures. The ordinary principals and rules that are appropriate, were, non discrimination (Most Favored Nation and National Treatment), the avoidance of unwanted obstacles to international trade, harmonization, use of international standards, equivalence and mutual recognition, and transparency. Harmonization was basically the back bone of TBT. It was required that members actively participate in the making of standards. They also implement the international standards as the foundation for international standards and rules. In addition to that they also ought to prepare guide and proposals for conformity assessment procedures. It was mandatory for the members to publish or create obtainable technical rules, standards, and conformity assessment procedures to differentiate other members.Obligatory standards and technical rules plus international standards were vital factorsthat had an effect on domestic sales and therefore the ability to export. Production and investment costs had a tendency to be higher for companies that face technical regulations, and therefore the investment for conformity was usually up to 10% of the entire investment expenditure. At firm level, the restricted access to credits and low demand were the foremost crucial obstruction to business among each exporting and non-exporting company. Product quality and presence of excessive demand were major factors to enhance the ability to export. Technical regulations and standards had an effect on trade in many ways: assisting exchange by defining product features and improving compatibility and utility, enhance domestic social aims like implementing standards and safety needs, public health and enhance protectionist policies.It was compulsory for the members to make sure that technical rules and standards do not limit trade. However it was arguable that domestic regulations were a form of protectionism. Developing countries argued that they have a very little influence in the formulation of the standards and that the developed countries mostly have the say which give them an unfair advantage. This was also referred as techno-imperialism. TBT is being used as a barrier to imports. The developing countries face problems to invest in domestic economy to improve it to satisfy the international and national standards of developed countries, because they have less technical know-how and lack of assessing and standardizing laboratories. Resultantly they are denied market access. To overcome this, the exporting firms have to increase their efficiency by conforming to international standards.The positive impact of trade barriers on export performance of textile industry of Pakistan is in line with the study of (Weisbrot and Baker, 2002). It reported that TBT had a positive impact on the productivity and export performance of textile industry of Pakistan.Conclusion: Considering Table-2, the study has established positive impact of TBTon the export performance of the textile industry of Pakistan during period 1990 to 2005.二、文献综述技术性贸易壁垒国内研究综述摘要技术性贸易壁垒已成为当前国际贸易领域理论与政策研究的重要课题。

相关文档
最新文档