青少年鼻咽癌治疗
15岁男孩确诊鼻咽癌晚期

龙源期刊网
15岁男孩确诊鼻咽癌晚期
作者:
来源:《健康博览》2016年第09期
浙江丽水阿阳
我侄子15岁,被确诊为鼻咽癌晚期,特来咨询,这么小的孩子怎么也会得这样的病?
杭州市第一人民医院李勇主任医师
鼻咽癌这种疾病在成人当中比较常见,儿童发病率约在十万到二十万分之一,非常少见。
研究表明,儿童及青少年鼻咽癌患者具有发病率低,疾病期偏晚,但预后较好的特点。
放射治疗效果好,早期放射反应出现的比例高,时间早。
治疗失败出现远处转移后,继续予以相应的治疗,仍可取得较好的疗效。
另外,儿童及青少年鼻咽癌临床上多以颈部肿块为主要症状,比例高达76% ~92%,局部晚期常见,占81.5%~92.2%,明显高于成人,但预后并不差于成人。
据目前报道,儿童及青少年鼻咽癌的5年总生存率为21%~79%。
鼻咽癌的早期症状主要有:涕中带血,早晨起床时,经常流鼻血,或是鼻涕呈淡粉色,有时带血丝;耳鸣,听力减退,耳内闭塞感;头痛,单侧顽固性头痛,偏头痛多发生在颞顶部;颈部淋巴结肿大;鼻塞。
因为青少年鼻咽癌早期症状不典型,易被误诊为鼻炎、中耳炎、颈部淋巴结结核及颈部淋巴结炎。
虽然鼻咽癌早期症状不典型,不易早期发现,且在儿童及青少年中发病率低,但是需要引起注意的是儿童也是会有鼻咽癌的,如儿童患有鼻炎、中耳炎、及颈部肿块等应及时就医,不可讳疾忌医。
如迁延不愈、反复发作应引起重视,去医院做进一步检查。
同时也要注意少食含盐量高的腌制食品,比如咸鱼、泡菜等。
放疗

鼻咽癌的放射治疗●鼻咽的解剖●鼻咽癌的病理类型中、高分化鳞癌 5%低分化鳞癌、未分化癌,淋巴上皮癌,大园细胞癌,泡状核细胞癌 90%其他< 5%●鼻咽癌的诊断1. 七大症状三大体征•鼻堵、血涕、耳鸣、听力减退、头痛、面麻、复视•鼻咽肿物、颈部肿块、颅神经损害2、鼻咽癌临床上可能出现的危象•出血•静脉/淋巴管受阻•气道阻塞•视力障碍、失明3、既往病史,临床检查病灶局部检查麻醉下内镜检查,组织学检查(病理确诊)实验室检查:肝、肾和骨髓功能肿瘤标记物 EBV、SCC、CYFRA 21-1影像学检查:颈部超声、颅底至锁骨上CT/MRI、胸片、腹部超声和必要时骨扫描●鼻咽癌的诊疗明确鼻咽癌诊断(病理学诊断)↓确定病变范围(CT/MRI)↓临床分期(2008分期)↓患者Karnofsky评分↓选择治疗方式→Karnofsky<60;远处转移→姑息放疗或化疗↓根治性治疗(根治性放疗;同期放化疗)●鼻咽癌分期(2008分期)1、 TN分期•T分期T1 :局限于鼻咽 T2: 侵犯鼻腔、口咽、咽旁间隙 T3:侵犯颅底、翼内肌T4:侵犯颅神经、鼻窦、翼外肌及以外的咀嚼肌间隙、颅内(海绵窦、脑膜等)•N分期N0:影像学及体检无淋巴结转移证据 N1a:咽后淋巴结转移N1b:单侧Ib、II、III、Va区淋巴结转移且直径≤3cm N2:双侧Ib、II、III、Va 区淋巴结转移;或直径>3cm,或淋巴结包膜外侵犯 N3: IV、Vb区淋巴结转移鼻咽癌分期2、临床分期 TNM分期•I 期: T1N0M0II 期: T1N1a-1bM0,T2N0-1bM0III 期: T1-2N2M0,T3N0-2M0IVa 期: T1-3N3M0,T4N0-3M0IVb 期:任何T、N和M1●鼻咽癌的治疗1、 I、II期鼻咽癌方案一:单纯放疗根治性放疗●方案二:放疗+辅助化疗(放疗后不能达到CR)根治性放疗5-Fu+CBP化疗2-3周期后评价方案三:放疗+手术(残存颈部淋巴结在放疗后2-3个月不能消退)根治性放疗残存淋巴结手术切除III、IV期鼻咽癌方案一:同期放、化疗5-Fu+PDD化疗3周期根治性放疗在化疗第1天开始方案二:诱导化疗+放疗(青少年鼻咽癌)5-Fu+PDD化疗2周期根治性放疗在化疗第27天开始方案三:辅助化疗(放、化疗后不能达到CR)5-Fu+CBP化疗2-3周期后评价方案四:辅助化疗(放、化疗后不能达到CR)Taxol+PDD化疗2-3周期后评价放疗技术•常规放疗•适形放疗(CRT)/调强适形放疗(IMRT)•立体定向放射治疗/手术(SRT/SRS)2、鼻咽癌根治性治疗•放疗流程:确定病变范围和临床分期↓选择治疗方式↓确定放疗照射技术(常规、适形、调强)↓体位固定→模拟定位机拍片或做CT定位↓定位片上勾划照射野形状或CT定位图像上勾划靶区↓制作整体铅模或多叶准直器参数↓复位→拍验证片→验证↓实际测量并计算处方剂量→放射治疗•放疗靶区定义GTV:肿瘤区(gross tumor volume)指肿瘤的临床灶,为一般诊断手段(包括临床检查、CT/MRI/PET)能够诊断出的、可见的、具有一定形状和大小的恶性病变的范围。
鼻咽癌疾病研究报告

鼻咽癌疾病研究报告疾病别名:鼻咽癌所属部位:鼻就诊科室:肿瘤科,耳鼻喉科病症体征:鼻出血,鼻衂,鼻塞,鼻咽癌的远处转移,鼻咽腔狭窄,腭部穿孔,耳鸣,耳内闭塞感疾病介绍:鼻咽癌是什么?鼻咽癌是发生于鼻咽粘膜的恶性肿瘤,中国的广东,广西,福建,湖南等地为多发区,男多于女,发病年龄大多为中年人,亦有青少年患病者,病因与种族易感性(黄种人较白种人患病多),遗传因素及EB病毒感染等有关,鼻咽癌恶性程度较高,早期即可出现颈部淋巴结转移症状体征:鼻咽癌有哪些症状?(一)回吸性涕血:早期可有出血症状,表现为吸鼻后痰中带血或擤鼻时涕中带血。
早期痰中或涕中仅有少量血丝,时有时无。
晚期出血较多,可有鼻血。
(二)耳鸣、听力减退、耳内闭塞感:鼻咽癌发生在鼻咽侧壁,侧窝或咽鼓管开口上唇时,肿瘤压迫咽鼓管可发生单侧性耳鸣或听力下降,还可发生卡他性中耳炎。
单侧性耳鸣或听力减退、耳内闭塞感是早期鼻咽癌症状之一。
(三)头痛:为常见症状,占68.6%。
可为首发症状或唯一症状。
早期头痛部位不固定,间歇性。
晚期则为持续性偏头痛,部位固定。
究其原因,早期病人可能是神经血管反射引起,或是对三叉神经第一支末梢神经的刺激所致。
晚期病人常是肿瘤破坏颅底,在颅内蔓延累及颅神经所引起。
(四)复视:由于肿瘤侵犯外展神经,常引起向外视物呈双影。
滑车神经受侵,常引起向内斜视、复视,复视占6.2%~19%。
常与三叉神经同时受损。
(五)面麻:指面部皮肤麻木感,临床检查为痛觉和触觉减退或消失。
肿瘤侵入海绵窦常引起三叉神经第1支或第2支受损;肿瘤侵入卵圆孔、茎突前区、三叉神经第3支常引起耳廓前部、颞部、面颊部、下唇和颏部皮肤麻木或感觉异常。
面部皮肤麻木占10%~27.9%。
(六)鼻塞:肿瘤堵塞后鼻孔可出现鼻塞。
肿瘤较小时,鼻塞较轻,随着肿瘤长大,鼻塞加重,多为单侧性鼻塞。
若肿瘤堵塞双侧后鼻孔可出现双侧性鼻塞。
(七)颈部淋巴结转移症状:鼻咽癌容易发生颈部淋巴结转移,约为60.3%~86.1%,其中半数为双侧性转移。
老中医分享中医药治疗鼻咽癌心得体会

鼻咽癌是一种发生于鼻咽腔或上咽喉部的癌症,是非常常见的一种癌症,发病以中年人为主,慢慢有青少年化的趋势。
对于鼻咽癌患者来说,最重要的就是治疗。
中医作为我国的传统医学,已经有数千年的历史,在治疗鼻咽癌方面也发挥着非常重要的作用,不仅可以有效抑杀大量的癌细胞,缩小瘤体,还能控制癌肿发展,减轻患者的痛苦,并延长患者的生存期,但是还是有很多人对中医了解不深,今天就邀请一位老中医为我们分享一下中医药治疗鼻咽癌的心得体会。
老中医袁希福介绍袁希福,出身于中医世家,据《袁氏族谱》记载,袁氏从清朝乾隆年间开始行医,到嘉庆年间已经远近闻名,独成一派,尤其善治疑难杂症。
袁希福祖上名医袁积德等多次奉召进京,为皇亲国戚治病。
同治十年、光绪元年,皇帝先后颁发圣旨,诰封袁积德为“奉直大夫”,两幅圣旨及诸多医书秘本传至袁希福手中,至今已整整八代。
袁积德著述甚多,《袁氏医方》等手写本真迹价值连城,直到一偶然机会,才被新闻媒体传播。
几年来,日本、泰国、新加坡等国以及香港、深圳等地多家医疗研究机构和制药公司,先后派人前来洽谈,欲出巨资购买《袁氏医方》等珍贵资料,有的甚至开出了上千万元的天价,均被袁氏第八代传人袁希福婉言回绝。
如今袁氏第八代传人、郑州希福中医肿瘤医院院长袁希福,铭记先祖遗训,秉承先人遗志,继承祖业,经过三十余年的潜心钻研和临床实践,在先人基础上独创的“三联平衡疗法”,有效救治了一位又一位海内外肿瘤患者,使《袁氏医方》进一步发扬光大,造福人民。
老中医袁希福治疗鼻咽癌的心得体会1、不走弯路就是捷径临床上有很多鼻咽癌患者由于不当的治疗导致病情延误,错过了治疗的最佳时机,这时不仅会影响患者的生存质量还会直接影响患者的生存期,网上有非官方统计数据称,临床上大约三分之一的鼻咽癌患者是死于不科学、不合理的杀伤性治疗。
所以“不走弯路就是捷径”是老中医袁希福几十年来的临床工作的重要体会。
有很多鼻咽癌患者在治疗中最常见的弯路就是坐等复查失良机,而不走弯路其实在治病中预防的思想要有所体现。
鼻咽癌的鉴别诊断:反复鼻出血VS鼻咽癌

鼻咽癌的鉴别诊断:反复鼻出血VS鼻咽癌作者:齐文颖贾玫来源:《家庭医学·下半月》2021年第10期几年前,老戏骨李雪健、韩国明星金宇彬、香港演员成奎安患上鼻咽癌的消息备受大家关注。
2020年,随着香港导演陈木胜因鼻咽癌逝世的消息在网上传开,如何预防鼻咽癌的发生再次成为一个热门话题。
其实,鼻咽癌具有明显的地域和人种差异,黄种人为高发人群,中国东南地区如广东、广西发病率最高,北方地区少见。
移民到低发病地区的后代移民仍具有高发病率倾向。
2020年全球鼻咽癌新发病例13.3万,死亡病例8万,其中我国的发病和死亡人数就将近占到全球的一半。
因此,鼻咽癌还得到一个外号——“广东癌”。
鼻咽癌是指发生于鼻咽腔顶部和侧壁的恶性肿瘤。
发病原因与EB病毒感染明确相关。
当然,还有其他致病因素不容忽视。
早期鼻咽癌患者接受单纯放疗的预后较好,其5年生存率可达90%。
但是由于鼻咽癌早期症状隐匿,不易被发现,75%~90%的鼻咽癌患者就诊时已属晚期,而晚期患者即使采用放化疗、靶向治疗、免疫治疗等综合治疗,5年生存率也仅在50%左右。
因此,对鼻咽癌早发现、早诊断、早治疗,是提高患者预后、降低死亡率的关键所在。
由于鼻咽的位置十分特殊,就像一间位于鼻腔与口咽之间隐蔽的“密室”,鼻咽发生癌变的症状也因其不典型而被其他疾病所“蒙蔽”,故而极易被漏诊和误诊。
等到患者真正确诊为鼻咽癌时,往往已经错过了最佳治疗时机。
如何在早期察觉鼻咽癌的“来袭”呢?这就需要我们在鼻咽癌露出“马脚”时,及时捕捉,及时就医确诊并接受规范的治疗。
鼻咽癌共有七大主要症状鼻咽癌的七大主要症状是(1)回缩性血涕,即清晨回吸鼻腔,经口吐出的鼻涕中带有血丝;(2)鼻塞,多为单侧,但也有双侧鼻塞者;(3)无痛的颈部肿块;(4)面部麻木;(5)頭痛;(6)耳鸣及听力下降;(7)视物模糊甚至复视等。
其中最容易被发现、最具代表性的症状,就是鼻部肿物压迫带来的鼻塞。
但是,我们需要知道的是,出现了以上症状不一定是鼻咽癌,有可能是其他疾病在“混淆视听”。
鼻咽癌的分期与分型标准

鼻咽癌的分期与分型标准鼻咽癌是一种在鼻咽部发生的恶性肿瘤,属于上咽喉的一部分。
它的发病率在全球范围内呈现上升趋势,尤其在东南亚地区常见。
准确的分期与分型标准对于鼻咽癌的临床诊断、治疗和预后评估非常重要。
下面将介绍鼻咽癌的常用分期与分型标准。
一、鼻咽癌的分期标准1. 美国TNM分期系统美国TNM分期系统是指通过对肿瘤(Tumor)、淋巴结(Lymph Node)和远处转移(Metastasis)的评估,将鼻咽癌分为不同阶段。
具体的分期标准如下:- T分期:根据原发肿瘤的大小和侵犯范围进行评估,分为T0至T4期,T0表示无原发肿瘤,T4表示原发肿瘤侵犯颅底、眶内或颞下窝等区域。
- N分期:根据颈部淋巴结的受累情况进行评估,分为N0至N3期,N0表示无颈部淋巴结转移,N3表示颈部淋巴结转移高度明显。
- M分期:根据是否存在远处转移进行评估,分为M0和M1期,M0表示无远处转移,M1表示存在远处转移。
2. 中华人民共和国第四版分期及分类标准中华人民共和国第四版分期及分类标准是中国国内常用的鼻咽癌分期标准,具体的分期标准如下:- 分期Ⅰ期:原发肿瘤限于鼻咽部,没有颈部淋巴结转移。
- 分期Ⅱ期:原发肿瘤侵犯邻近组织,没有颈部淋巴结转移。
- 分期Ⅲ期:原发肿瘤侵犯邻近组织,存在单侧颈部淋巴结转移。
- 分期Ⅳ期:原发肿瘤侵犯周围组织和器官,或存在双侧颈部淋巴结转移。
二、鼻咽癌的分型标准1. WHO分型系统WHO分型系统是国际上常用的鼻咽癌分类方法之一,根据肿瘤细胞的类型和形态特点进行分类,具体的分型标准如下:- 鼻咽鳞状细胞癌(NPC-I型):占鼻咽癌的大部分,细胞形态呈鳞状,有角化现象。
- 鼻咽未分化癌(NPC-III型):细胞变异严重,无明显分化,通常具有较高的侵袭性和转移能力。
- 鼻咽非鳞状上皮细胞癌(NPC-II型):细胞分化程度较高,比NPC-III型肿瘤预后良好。
2. WHO-EBV谱系分类系统WHO-EBV谱系分类系统是基于肿瘤细胞对EB病毒感染的差异进行的分类,包括以下四种类型:- 鼻咽鳞癌非角化型(WHOⅠ型):与鼻咽鳞状细胞癌(NPC-I型)相似,但不具有明显的角化现象。
鼻咽癌83例外照射加近距离放疗体会

l 临 床 资 料
1 1 一般 情 况 男 5 . 6例 , 2 女 5例 ; 龄 1 ~ 7 年 3 8 岁, 均 4 平 5岁 。首程 收治 鼻 咽癌 8 3例 , 经病 理 证 实 为鳞 状 细胞 癌 。采 用 1 9 9 2年 全 国鼻 咽癌 福 州会 议
10 3 北京 007 海军总医院 康静 波 聂 青 李进 让 郭红 光 袁 卓 庭
外 放 疗是 治 疗 鼻 咽 癌 的 主要 方 法 之 一 , 果 尚 效 佳 。为 进 一步 提 高疗 效 , 们 于 1 9 ~1 9 我 9 2 9 7年 对 我
行 鼻 咽镜 及 C 检 查 示 鼻 咽 局 部 病 灶 基 本 消 失 4 T 5 例, 不再 进 行 放疗 , 咽 内仍 有 病灶 残 存 3 鼻 8例 , 腔 行 内后 装 近距 离 放 疗 ( 用 智 力 公 司 生 产 的 HD 8 采 R 1 型后 装 机 ) 。鼻 咽施 源 器 为 橡 胶 软 管 内套 硬 塑 料 管
内插 入 带有 标 尺 的模 拟 源 , 拍正 、 侧位 X 线 片 , 以验 证 其 位 置是 否 合适 , 准确 定位 后 以 X 线 片显 示 的模
拟 源 ( 表 施 源 管 ) 对 称 轴 , 正 、 位 X 线 片 上 代 为 在 侧 画 出临 床上 所 需要 的治疗 体 积 , 标定 剂 量 监控 点 , 设
制 定 的鼻 咽癌 分 期 方 案 进 行 分 期 , I期 ( M。 8 T N。 )
纱布 条 不要 超 过 后 鼻 孔 , 免 阻 塞 口咽 , 响 呼 吸 。 以 影
施 源 器 置人 完 毕后 , 行 位置 验证 , 进 方法 为 在施 源 管
【鼻咽健康疾病常识】鼻咽癌5

鼻咽癌患者的康复指导1 心理指导肿瘤患者身心承受了较大的痛苦与磨难,存在着不同程度的恐惧心理,对治疗失去信心,因此护士应具备高尚的同情心和责任感,关怀尊重患者,取得患者的信任。
了解每一个患者的心理状态及家庭环境,帮助患者尽快适应医院环境,增强生活能力,达到最佳康复状态。
2 饮食指导由于鼻咽癌患者受其疾病的影响,心理负担重,食欲差,抵抗力低,所以要指导家属鼓励患者进食,且给予高蛋白、高维生素、低脂肪、易消化的食物。
如豆类、牛奶、木耳、胡萝卜等。
告诉患者戒烟酒、忌生冷和硬食、忌辛辣、忌食霉变食物。
同时指导家属要为患者创造一个清洁、舒适的进食环境,注意色香味,为患者提供可口的食品,为患者提供丰富的营养。
3 口腔卫生指导3.1 口腔保洁告诉患者及家属口腔保洁的重要性。
具体措施:晨起、睡前、饭后用软毛刷刷牙,饭前用清水或生理盐水漱口。
告诉患者口干时用1%甘草液漱口或用麦冬、金银花、胖大海泡服。
告诉患者及家属2a~3a内不宜拔牙,可以补牙。
以后如需拔牙,应向牙医提供放疗既往史,医生常规在拔牙前后3d~7d给予抗生素,以预防放射性骨髓炎的发生。
3.2 张口训练每日做最大幅度张口训练,再练习咀嚼、鼓腮、微笑、屏气5次/d~6次/d,5min/次~15min/次。
可以咀嚼口香糖3次/d~5次/d。
练习伸舌、后缩、卷动等每日数次,并配合头向左右侧弯、旋转,动作宜缓慢,幅度不宜过大。
告诉患者及家属出院后继续住院期间的康复训练。
4.保持局部皮肤的完整性告诉患者及家属,放疗结束后局部皮肤仍需保护至少1个月。
指导家属用温水或软毛巾轻轻沾洗,禁用肥皂擦洗,忌用酒精、碘酒、胶布、膏药等刺激。
告诉患者禁止剃毛,宜用电剃须刀,防止损伤造成局部感染。
嘱咐患者外出时防止日光直射,应予以遮挡。
告诉患者及家属局部皮肤不要抓挠,可以轻轻拍打,以止痒。
5 用药指导告诉患者及家属放疗期间随时与医生联系,多数患者会出现恶心、呕吐,轻者可根据医嘱给予健胃、镇静药,症状重者要及时与医生联系,必要时根据医嘱给予补液治疗。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
Multimodal Treatment,Including Interferon Beta,of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in Children and Young Adults Preliminary Results From the Prospective,Multicenter Study NPC-2003-GPOH/DCOGMartina Buehrlen,MD1;Christian Michel Zwaan,MD,PhD2,3;Bernd Granzen,MD3,4;Lisa Lassay,MD1;Peter Deutz,MD1;Peter Vorwerk,MD,PhD5;Gundula Staatz,MD,PhD6;Gu¨nther Gademann,MD,PhD7;Hans Christiansen,MD,PhD8;Foppe Oldenburger,MD3,9;Miriam T amm,MSc10;and Rolf Mertens,MD,PhS1BACKGROUND:The authors report preliminary results from a prospective multicenter study(Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma[NPC]2003 German Society of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology/German Children’s Oncology Group[NPC-2003-GPOH/DCOG]).METHODS: From2003to2010,45patients(ages8-20years),including1patient with stage II NPC and44patients with stage III/IV NPC,were recruited to the study.The patient with stage II disease received radiotherapy(59.4grays[Gy]).The patients with stage III/IV disease received3courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin,5-fluorouracil,and folinic acid.The cumulative irradiation dose was 54Gy in5patients,who achieved complete remission after neoadjuvant chemotherapy,and59.4Gy in the remaining40patients.All patients received concomitant cisplatin during the first week and last week of irradiation.After irradiation,all patients received inter-feron beta for6months.Tumor response was evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging studies and positron emission tomography scans.RESULTS:After the completion of treatment,43of45patients were in complete remission.In2patients,only a partial response was achieved,followed by distant metastases(1patient)or local progression and distant metastases(1patient),6months and10months after diagnosis,respectively.Another patient developed a solitary pelvic bone metastasis21months after diagnosis.After a median follow-up of30months(range,6-95months),the event-free survival rate was92.4%,and the overall survival was97.1%.Acute toxicity consisted mainly of leucopenia,mucositis,and nausea;and late toxicity consisted of hearing loss and hypothyr-oidism.CONCLUSIONS:Combined therapy with neoadjuvant chemotherapy,radiochemotherapy,and interferon beta was well toler-ated and resulted in a very good outcome that was superior to the outcomes of published results from all other pediatric NPC study groups.Cancer2012;000:000–000.V C2012American Cancer Society.KEYWORDS:nasopharyngeal carcinoma,children,interferon beta,chemotherapy,positron emission tomography scan. INTRODUCTIONNasopharyngeal carcinoma(NPC)is a rare malignant tumor in childhood that arises from the epithelial cells that cover the nasopharynx.The incidence varies with age,geographic factors,and ethnic factors,indicating that both genetic and environmental factors contribute to tumor development.NPC is relatively common in China,South-East Asia,Alaska, North Africa,and parts of the Mediterranean basin.In Europe and the United States,it represents only approximately 1%of all childhood cancers.1The World Health Organization(WHO)recognizes3NPC subtypes:type1,squamous cell carcinoma;type2,non-keratinizing carcinoma;and type3,undifferentiated carcinoma.The most common subtype in children is type3,and few patients have type2.2Because of their localization,small tumors usually are asymptomatic,and early symptoms are unspe-cific;therefore,most patients present with advanced locoregional disease.Distant metastases occur in bones,lungs,bone-marrow,mediastinum,and liver.3NPC is strongly associated with Epstein-Barr virus(EBV)infection.4It is a very radiosensitive and chemosensitive tumor.For adults with early stage NPC,radiation therapy remains the mainstay of treatment.5-7For patients with advanced disease,the benefit of additional chemotherapy has been demonstrated.1,8,9Children and adolescents usually Corresponding author:Martina Buehrlen,MD,Universita¨tsklinikum Aachen,Klinik fu¨r Kinder-und Jugendmedizin,Pauwelsstrasse30,52074Aachen,Germany; Fax:(011)0049-241-8082481;mbuehrlen@ukaachen.de1Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine,University Hospital Aachen,Aachen,Germany;2Department of Pediatric Oncology,Erasmus Medical Center/ Sophia Children’s Hospital,Rotterdam,Netherlands;3Dutch Childhood Oncology Group,Den Haag,Netherlands;4Department of Pediatrics,University Hospital Maastricht,Maastricht,Netherlands;5Department of Pediatric Oncology,University Hospital Magdeburg,Magdeburg,Germany;6Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology,University Medical Center Mainz,Mainz,Germany;7Radiotherapy Department,University of Magdeburg,Magdeburg,Germany;8Depart-ment of Radiotherapy and Radio-Oncology,University Hospital Goettingen,Goettingen,Germany;9Department of Radiation Oncology,Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam,Netherlands;10Department of Medical Statistics,University Hospital Aachen,Aachen,GermanyFax:(011)0049-241-8082481DOI:10.1002/cncr.27395,Received:August26,2011;Revised:November10,2011;Accepted:November18,2011,Published online in WileyOnline Library()present with advanced stage disease.10-12In recent years, most pediatric patients with NPC have received a combi-nation of chemotherapy and radiotherapy with various regimens worldwide,usually containing cisplatin and of-ten5-fluorouracil.Reported survival rates vary between 55%and90%for overall survival(OS)and between 60.6%and77%for disease-free survival(DFS)and event-free survival(EFS).10,12-23From1992to2002,the first prospective NPC trial by the German Society of Pedi-atric Oncology and Hematology(NPC-91-GPOH),in which chemotherapy,radiotherapy,and interferon beta (IFN-b)were combined,was conducted within the GPOH.After a median follow-up of48months,an OS rate of95%and an EFS rate of91%were achieved,and the level of toxicity was acceptable.11Encouraged by these promising results,the next prospective trial,NPC-2003-GPOH,was started pared with the NPC-91-GPOH study,chemotherapy was reduced in NPC-2003-GPOH by omitting methotrexate in the induction chemo-therapy courses with the intention of reducing the rate of severe mucositis.The irradiation dose was reduced in the patients who achieved a complete response after neoadju-vant chemotherapy to reduce late effects.To compensate for these reductions,additional cisplatin was applied con-comitantly with irradiation.Moreover,the preparation of IFN-b was changed during the course of the studies.In NPC-1991,the patients received CHO-beta(Rentschler, Laupheim,Germany)or Fiblaferon(Biosyn,Fellbach, Germany).In NPC-2003,the patients received Fiblaferon or Rebif(Merck Serono,Geneva,Switzerland). MATERIALS AND METHODSPatientsFrom2003to2010,after approval of the protocol was obtained from the Ethical Committee of the University of Aachen and local ethical approval was obtained from the participating sites,53patients from27centers in Germany (n¼45),Austria(n¼2),and the Netherlands(n¼6) were recruited for the current study.Forty-five of those patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria(histologically proven NPC and age25years)without having any exclusion cri-teria(keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma,distant metas-tases,NPC as secondary malignoma,cytostatic treatment before entering the study,and pregnancy).Eight patients had to be excluded for the following reasons:Two patients had a primary mediastinal tumor with distant metastases and no nasopharyngeal tumor but a histologic diagnosis of NPC.One patient had typical NPC but with evidence of distant metastases.Four patients received treatment with major deviations from the study protocol,and1patient had NPC as a secondary malignoma after receiving therapy for Hodgkin’s disease. StagingStaging was performed according to the American Joint Committee of Cancer(AJCC)Cancer Staging Manual, fourth edition(1993).24The low-risk group was defined as stage I(T1N0M0)or stage II(T2N0M0),and the high-risk group included stage III(T3N0M0or T1-T3N1M0) and stage IV(T4N0-N3M0and T1-T4N2-N3M0). Diagnostic ImagingPretreatment evaluations included computed tomography (CT)scans or magnetic resonance imaging(MRI)studies of head and neck,CT scans of the chest,abdominal ultra-sound studies(or,if any doubt,CT scans of the abdo-men),bone scans,and positron emission tomography (PET)scans(when available).Tumor response was eval-uated on CT/MRI studies obtained after3cycles of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy,6weeks after the end of radiochemotherapy,and at the end of IFN treatment. PET scans were obtained from30patients,20patients, and14patients at those respective time points. Response CriteriaResponse criteria were defined as follows(according to WHO guidelines from197925):A complete response (CR)was defined as no evidence of disease;a partial response(PR)was defined as a decrease!50%in the sum of the greatest dimensions of target lesions,no evidence of new lesions,or progression of any lesion;stable disease (SD)was defined as small changes that did not meet criteria for PR or progressive disease(PD);PD was defined as an increase!25%in the sum of the greatest diameters of tar-get lesions or the appearance of new lesions.In addition to these criteria,a very good PR(VGPR)was defined as no evidence of measurable disease but asymmetry of the tumor region or contrast medium enhancement.Monitoring of ToxicityBefore treatment,a complete history and physical exami-nation were performed along with full blood counts and serum biochemistry tests,endocrine evaluation,an audio-gram,and electrocardiography and echocardiography. These evaluations were recommended after each cycle of chemotherapy for monitoring toxicity.TherapyTreatment was started after informed consent was obtained from the patient and/or the parents.The low-risk group included patients with stage I or II disease. These patients received no neoadjuvant chemotherapy but did receive radiotherapy with concomitant cisplatin.The high-risk group included all patients with stage III and IV disease.Treatment for the high-risk group included 3cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy with concomitant cisplatin.After the com-pletion of radiotherapy,all patients received IFN-b for 6months.The treatment protocol is provided in Figure 1.ChemotherapyPatients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy in 3cycles at intervals of 3weeks (chemotherapy A (ChA)).Each cycle contained cisplatin 100mg/m 2given as an infusion over 6hours.Immediately after the cisplatin infusion,leucovorin 25mg/m 2was given as an intravenous bolus infusion ev-ery 6hours for 6doses.Thirty minutes after the first leu-covorin bolus,5-fluorouracil (5-FU)1000mg/m 2per day as a continuous infusion over 5days was started.Support-ive therapy included adequate hydration and mannitol before,during,and after cisplatin.In case of ototoxicity grade !2according to Common Toxicity Criteria or nephrotoxicity with a creatinine clearance <50mL/mi-nute/1.73m 2,cisplatin was replaced by carboplatin 500mg/m 2intravenously over 1hour.Patients with severe mucositis (grade 4)received a reduced 5-FU dose in the subsequent courses (1000mg/m 2per day over 4days).RadiotherapyThe clinical target volume included the primary tumor region and all visible,macroscopic lymph node metastases with a 1-cm safety margin,the whole nasopharynx,the parapharyngeal lymph nodes,and the level II cervical lymph nodes;in addition,for patients with stage III and IV disease,the clinical target volume also included lymph node levels III,IV,and V as well as the supraclavicular regions.Patients with stage I and II disease received irradi-ation to the nasopharynx and respective cervical lymph nodes with a total dose of 45grays (Gy)in single daily doses of 1.8Gy followed by a 14.4-Gy boost of irradiation to the tumor.Patients with stage III and IV disease received irradiation to the nasopharynx and respective re-gional lymph nodes,including the whole jugular group and the supraclavicular region,with the same total dose of 45Gy and single daily doses of 1.8Gy.The prescribed boost dose to the primary tumor and lymph nodes metas-tases was 14.4Gy,and this was reduced to 9Gy in patients who were in complete remission after neoadju-vant chemotherapy.Concomitant cisplatin 20mg/m 2/day on 3consecutive days was given during the first and last week of irradiation (chemotherapy B(ChB)).Figure 1.The treatment protocol for the study 2003German Society of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology/German Children’s Oncology Group nasopharyngeal carcinoma study (NPC-2003-GPOH/DCOG)is illustrated.RT indicates radiotherapy;Gy,grays;IFN-b ,interferon beta;Ch B,chemotherapy B;CR þ,patients in complete remission;CR À,patients not in complete remission;Ch A,chemotherapy A;5-FU,5-fluorouracil;MTX,methotrexate.NPC-2003-GPOH/DCOG—Preliminary Results/Buehrlen et alInterferon TreatmentAfter they completed chemotherapy and radiochemother-apy,all patients received IFN-b.Up to2010,the GPOH patients received the natural INF-b Fiblaferon,whereas the Dutch patients received the recombinant Rebif.Fibla-feron is no longer available;thus,since2010,all patients have received Rebif.Like in the study NPC-1991-GPOH,11patients received Fiblaferon at a dose of 100,000IU/kg intravenously over30minutes3days per week,usually Monday,Wednesday,and Friday,and the maximum single dose was5million IU for patients with abody weight>50kg.This regimen originally was derived from dose-finding studies by Treuner et al.26Patients received Rebif at the same dose and regimen subcutane-ously with a maximum single dose of6million IU.In most patients,injection of Rebif was performed by the patients themselves or their parents.Statistical AnalysisNPC-2003-GPOH is a prospective,multicenter cohort study.The primary objective is EFS,which we defined as the time from diagnosis to the first progression at any site, relapse,or death from any cause(this was referred to as DFS in our previous article11but was defined in the same way).Patients who remained alive without disease pro-gression or relapse were censored at the date of their last follow-up.OS,toxicity,and the response rate to neoadju-vant chemotherapy are secondary endpoints to the study. For OS,the time from diagnosis to death was calculated. All deaths were counted regardless of cause,and the patients who remained alive were censored at the date of their last follow-up.EFS and OS were estimated according to the Kaplan-Meier method.27We determined95%con-fidence intervals(CIs)for EFS and OS at a median follow-up time based on log-log transformation,as suggested by Kalbfleisch and Prentice.28The calculation of the median follow-up was based on the patients who were without relapse,disease progression,or death.Statistical analyses were performed using the software package SAS(version 9.2;SAS Institute,Inc.,Cary,NC).29The figures were cre-ated by using the software package R(version2.12.1;R Foundation for Statistical Computing,Vienna,Austria).30 RESULTSPatient CharacteristicsThere were45patients enrolled in the study,and there was a predominance of males(31males[69%],14females [31%]).The median age at diagnosis was15years(range, 8-20years).Of the45patients,only1patient had stage I disease and could be assigned to the low-risk group.The remaining44patients had stage III or IV disease and were assigned to the high-risk group.TNM staging of the patients is summarized in Table1.Tumor histology was NPC WHO type3in42 patients and type2in3patients.The presence of EBV antigen or DNA in tumor tissue was positive in28 patients,negative in5patients,and no information was available about EBV in tumor tissue for12patients.An initial PET scan was performed in36patients, and35patients had abnormal uptake of fluorine-18fluo-rodeoxyglucose(18F-FDG).One patient had his NPC diagnosed by adenotomy,the tumor was subtotally resected,and the initial PET scan was negative.In sum-mary,all patients with detectable NPC had a positive PET scan at diagnosis.Treatment ResponseThe patient with low-risk NPC achieved a good PR with a small,distinct residual tumor5weeks after end of radio-therapy and had a CR3months after the end of radiother-apy and2months after starting IFN-b treatment.In the 44high-risk patients,response after3cycles of neoadju-vant chemotherapy was evaluated on MRI studies in41 patients and on PET/PET-CT scans in30patients.MRI studies indicated that5of41patients(12.2%)achieved a CR,12patients(29.3%)had a VGPR,23patients (56.1%)had a PR,and1patient(2.4%)had SD.Tumor progression was not observed in any patient.In the3 remaining patients,a PR was documented on PET/PET-CT scans.The overall response rate to neoadjuvant chem-otherapy was43of44patients(98%).MRI studies and PET scans at the same time point after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were available for28 patients.The results from PET scans in relation to MRI studies are provided in Table2.All4patients who had achieved a CR on MRI studies also had negative PET scans, and all patients who had a VGPR or a PR had negative(n¼12)or weakly positive(n¼12)PET scans.MRI results dur-ing the course of further treatment are provided in Table3. Table1.TNM Classification in the Study Patients aTNM Status:No.of Patients Tumor Classification N0N1N2N3T11050 T20160 T312101 T403150 a T1N0and T2N0disease was defined as low risk,and all other disease was defined as high risk.Original ArticleOne patient who had SD after neoadjuvant therapy achieved a VGPR after radiotherapy and had a CR at end of IFN treatment.One of the 2patients who had PD at end of IFN treatment developed metastatic disease.One patient had the appearance of tumor progression on an MRI study at end of therapy,but the biopsy taken had no evidence of tumor during further follow-up,and the patient maintained a CR without further treatment.In summary,a CR or a VGPR was achieved by 41.5%of the documented patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and in 79%after radiotherapy.At the end of IFN treatment,all but 2patients had a CR or a VGPR,and 10patients still had slight changes on MRI studies.During further follow-up,these changes subsided in some of the patients and persisted without progression in others.The EFS and OS rates after a median follow-up of 30months (range,6-95months)were 92%(95%CI,77.9%-97.5%)and 97%(95%CI,80.9%-99.6%),respectively (Fig.2).Comparison Between Positron EmissionTomography and Magnetic Resonance ImagingPET scans were obtained from 30patients after neoadju-vant chemotherapy,from 20patients 6weeks after radio-therapy,and from 14patients after IFN treatment.Acomplete metabolic response was observed in 15patients (75%)after radiotherapy and in 11patients (78%)after IFN treatment.A partial metabolic response was observed in 4patients (20%)after the end of radiotherapy and in 2patients (14%)after the end of IFN treatment.None of these patients experienced a subsequent relapse.One patient had suspicious FDG uptake in a PET scan obtained at the end of the therapy,but the biopsy taken had no evidence of tumor.In 2of the 3patients who developed a relapse,there was abnormal FDG uptake at the site/sites of relapse;and,in the third patient,a PET scan was not obtained at relapse.Relapsed/Refractory PatientsIn 2patients who had extensive primary tumors (T4N2),there was only a PR at the primary site,and distant metas-tases occurred 6months and 10months after diagnosis.One of these patients received palliative treatment and died 10months after relapse,and the other patient is stillTable 2.Positron Emission T omography Results in Relation to Magnetic Resonance Imaging Results After Neoadjuvant ChemotherapyPET Results:No.of PatientsMRI ResultsNegativeWeakly Positive/Partial Metabolic ResponsePositiveCR 400VGPR 450PR 870SDAbbreviations:CR,complete response;MRI,magnetic resonance imaging;PD,progressive disease;PET,positron emission tomography;PD,progres-sive disease;PR,partial response;SD,stable disease;VGPR,very good partial response.Table 3.Magnetic Resonance Imaging Results During the Course of TreatmentMRI Results:No.of PatientsAssessment PointNot Done/No InformationCRVGPRPRSDPDTotalAfter neoadjuvant chemotherapy a 3b 5122310446Wk after the end of radiotherapy 7171380045After the end of interferon therapy82510245Abbreviations:CR,complete response;MRI,magnetic resonance imaging;PD,progressive disease;PR,partial response;SD,stable disease;VGPR,very good partial response.aThis assessment included only high-risk patients.bPR was determined by positron emission tomography or positron emission/computed tomographyscan.Figure 2.This Kaplan-Meier curve illustrates event-free and overall survival.Asterisks indicate censored observations.NPC-2003-GPOH/DCOG—Preliminary Results/Buehrlen et alreceiving treatment.Another patient(also with a T4N2 tumor)achieved complete remission but developed a sin-gle pelvic bone metastasis21months after diagnosis.This patient received relapse treatment with chemotherapy (5-FU,carboplatin,and docetaxel)and irradiation of the metastasis with59.4Gy and was still in secondary com-plete remission2years after relapse.ToxicityAcute,severe toxicity(WHO grade3/4)from neoadjuvant chemotherapy was observed mainly as mucositis(after53% of ChA cycles(see above)),nausea(after36%of ChA cycles),and neutropenia(after63%of ChA cycles).Severe infections occurred after8%of ChA cycles,and none of them were lethal.During chemoradiotherapy,severe mucositis was observed in42%of patients.Grade3or4 ototoxicity was noted after16%of ChA cycles and after 19%of ChB cycles.Grade1nephrotoxicity occurred after 8.6%of ChA cycles and was reversible in all but1patient, who had persistent,mild creatinine elevation.Central neu-rotoxicity was observed in3patients and was completely re-versible in all patients.Concerning cardiotoxicity,a mild reduction of the shortening fraction was observed in2 patients and was reversible in both.During IFN treatment,grade3leucopenia was observed in11patients(10received Fiblaferon,and 1received Rebif),and grade4leucopenia was observed in 1patient(Fiblaferon).Eight patients experienced low-grade fever that was easily prevented with paracetamol in subsequent administrations.IFN treatment was termi-nated because of leucopenia in1patient,and the dose was reduced to twice weekly in another patient.Severe infec-tions caused by leucopenia were not observed.Late effects concern mainly ototoxicity(14%)and hypothyroidism(25%).In addition,there were single epi-sodes reported of mild,persistent creatinine elevation; osteonecrosis of the femur and tibia;hyperprolactinemia; and growth retardation.DISCUSSIONIn this preliminary evaluation of the NPC-2003-GPOH study,promising results from the NPC-91-GPOH study can be confirmed.In accordance with other pediatric col-lectives,10-12,14these patients presented with advanced tumors.We used a relatively old version of the AJCC stag-ing system(the fourth edition from1993).It is important to note that the AJCC staging system underwent signifi-cant changes in subsequent versions.Four patients of our current series would have been classified with stage II disease(T2N0or T1-T2N1)according to the current seventh edition31but were classified with stage III diseaseand,thus,were considered high-risk patients according tothe fourth edition.Because pediatric patients with earlystage NPC are very rare,treatment guidelines are derivedfrom adult protocols.For adults with stage I NPC withoutlymph node involvement,radiotherapy alone remains thestandard treatment.For patients who have primarytumors classified as T2b and higher or who have positivelymph nodes,additional chemotherapy improves the out-come.32Corresponding to these findings,the AJCCfourth edition is still adequate to distinguish between low-risk and high-risk patients when studying children.According to the AJCC seventh edition,for pediatricpatients,only those with stage I NPC should be treated aslow-risk patients.CT and MRI scans are the established diagnostictools for staging,response evaluation,and detection of localrelapse in patients with NPC.In recent years,PET scansand PET-CT scans also have been described as prognostictools in NPC.33-35Chan et al reported a positive correla-tion between metabolic parameters in PET-CT and T-clas-sification at diagnosis.33Gordin et al demonstrated a betterdiagnostic performance with PET-CT scans comparedwith stand-alone PET scans or conventional diagnosticimaging studies.34The possible prognostic value of high 18F-FDG uptake before therapy and the metabolic response after radiotherapy was reported by Xie et al.36Our data demonstrate a gradual tumor response totreatment measured by MRI studies in the majority ofpatients.This does not predict a negative outcome.Theremaining mass observed on MRI may or may not be via-ble tumor.Because no further surgery is performed afterdiagnostic biopsy,information about the vitality of theremaining tissue can be obtained only indirectly by diag-nostic imaging studies.PET/PET-CT scans produced no false-negativeresults in any patient and produced only1false-positiveresult at the end of therapy(no evidence of tumor in thebiopsy taken;the patient remained in remission withoutfurther treatment).Among the patients who had only aPR observed on an MRI study after neoadjuvant chemo-therapy,there was a complete metabolic response in8patients and a partial metabolic response in7patients.These data suggest that,in the subset of patients who hadonly a PR on MRI studies but had a complete metabolicresponse on PET-CT scans,the remaining tumor on MRImay not have represented viable malignant tissue.We conclude that PET/PET-CT scanning is a usefuldiagnostic tool in addition to the well established MRIevaluation in children and young adults with NPC.ScansOriginal Articlerevealed abnormal FDG uptake in all patients who had tumor present at first diagnosis or at relapse and appeared to be better at distinguishing between good and partial chemotherapy responses during treatment.However,a PR after chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy was not associated with an increased risk of relapse.A secondary increase in FDG-uptake certainly needs to be clarified by biopsy but is not necessarily associated with relapse.Another option for follow-up of NPC patients is an endoscopic examination of the nasopharynx with biopsies taken of any suspicious lesion.This is commonly per-formed in adults.In children,noninvasive procedures like MRI,CT,and PET usually are preferred.In our cohort, endoscopy and biopsy were only performed in patients who had suspicious MRI and/or PET findings.Treatment results from pediatric patients with NPC that have been published in the literature during the past 10years were mostly from retrospective analyses at single centers,and the patients received different therapy regi-mens,all of which included radiotherapy and most of which also included chemotherapy.10,13-22The results vary between55%and87%for OS and60.6%and77% for EFS or DFS,and the median length of observation for these cohorts was between3.5years and15years.Varan et al reported10retrospectively analyzed patients who received the same regimen(4cycles of docetaxel/cisplatin plus irradiation59.4Gy)23:After a median observation of 2years,the OS rate was90%,and the EFS rate was70%. There are2reported prospective studies about NPC treat-ment in children and adolescents.Rodriguez-Galindo et al reported17patients(1low risk and16high risk).12 The high-risk patients received4cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and irradiation with a total dose of50.4 Gy to the target volume and61.2Gy to the primary tu-mor and involved lymph nodes.The cumulative doses of chemotherapeutic agents were480mg/m2methotrexate, 400mg/m2cisplatin,600mg leucovorin,and12,000 mg/m25-FU.In this group,the4-year EFS and OS rates were77%and75%,respectively.Another prospective, multicenter study(NPC-91-GPOH)was conducted within the GPOH11in which59patients(1low risk and 58high risk)received3cycles of methotrexate,cisplatin, leucovorin,and5-FU along with irradiation(45Gy to the target volume,59.4Gy tumor boost)and also received IFN-b for6months.The cumulative chemotherapy doses were360mg/m2methotrexate,300mg/m2cisplatin,450 mg/m2leucovorin,and15,000mg/m25-FU.The sur-vival rates exceeded all other reported results with an OS rate of95%and an EFS rate of91%after a median fol-low-up of48months.Since then,8patients were lost tofurther follow-up27to57months after diagnosis.All other patients were observed for at least5years and up to 16years.In our cohorts(104patients from1992to2010) and in other publications about pediatric NPC,relapses usually occurred within the first2years after diagno-sis.3,10,12,13Therefore,it is unlikely that further relapses developed in those patients who were lost to follow-up.This subsequent NPC-2003-GPOH/DCOG study confirms the positive results from the NPC-91-GPOH study after slight changes were made to the therapy regi-men.The outcomes after a median follow-up of30 months have resulted in an OS rate of97%and an EFS rate of92%,which are similar to the rates reported for NPC-91-GPOH.The omission of methotrexate in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen did not have an impact on prognosis and did not lead to the intended reduction in the rate of severe mucositis.All patients received45-Gy radiation to the nasophar-ynx and regional lymph nodes,as described above,and the tumor boost generally was14.4Gy but was reduced to9Gy in5patients who were in complete remission after neoadju-vant chemotherapy.None of these patients experienced a relapse.These results indicate that,in a well defined group,a reduction in the irradiation dose is feasible to reduce long-term toxicity.Although this difference in dose is relatively small,it may especially diminish long-term complications, such as xerostomia,hearing loss,and endocrine deficits.Fol-low-up will be continued to consolidate these data concern-ing survival rates as well as late toxicities.To our knowledge,the outcome achieved with the NPC-GPOH studies is superior to all other reported results.The main difference in the treatment between the GPOH studies and others is the addition of IFN-b for6 months after the completion of chemotherapy and radio-therapy.The best comparable study is that by Rodriguez-Galindo et al.12A similar chemotherapy regimen has been used in both cohorts with only slight differences in cumu-lative doses of chemotherapy and radiotherapy(for details,see above).The relapse rates for different groups indicate that minimal residual tumor still was present in some patients after chemotherapy and radiotherapy.We conclude that IFN-b can provide a substantial benefit for the outcome of pediatric patients with NPC.It has been demonstrated that EBV-positive patients have a profound impairment in long-term T-cell immunity to EBV.The antiviral and antitumoral properties of IFN-b have been discussed in detail by Mertens et al.37Wolff et al also reported on6adults with undiffer-entiated NPC who were treated according to the NPC-GPOH protocols,including IFN-b.38The treatment was NPC-2003-GPOH/DCOG—Preliminary Results/Buehrlen et al。