安乐死_baidu翻译_英语辩论
高中精华双语文章：安乐死引发的争议
高中精华双语文章：安乐死引发的争议荷兰病人齐斯·范·温德尔在承受医生注射致命最后一针前的三个月的生活被拍成了电影并在各个国家放映。
每一次的放映，都引起该国人民对安乐死的剧烈争论。
选择死亡或者生存的权利属于个人，那么安乐死该支持还是反对呢？[来源:学,科,网Z,X,X,K]The Debate on the Euthanasia安乐死引发的争议"We mustn't delay any longer … swallowing is difficult … and breathing, that's a lso difficult. Those muscles are weakening too … we mustn't delay any longer." "我们再也不能耽误了，……我难以咽下食物……呼吸也有困难……，浑身疲惫无力，……不要再拖了。
"These were the words of Dutchman Cees van Wendel de Joode asking his doctor to help him die. Affected with a serious disease, van Wendel was no longer able to speak clearly and he knew there was no hope of recovery and that his condition was rapidly deteriorating.荷兰人齐斯·范·温德尔临死前恳求医生帮助他一死了之时说了这番话。
他因身患重病，说话已经不很清楚，他知道自己毫无康复的希望了，而且病情正在迅速恶化。
Van Wendel's last three months of life before being given a final, lethal injection by his doctor were filmed and first shown on television last year in the Netherlands. The program has since been bought by 20 countries and each time it is shown, it starts a nationwide debate on the subject.在承受医生注射那致命的最后一针之前，范·温德康最后三个月的生活被拍成了电影，去年在荷兰的电视台首次播出。
安乐死_英语作文（优秀范文五篇）
安乐死_英语作文（优秀范文五篇）第一篇：安乐死_英语作文The euthanasia The fast advance of medicine and life–extending technologies enable life to be prolonged.The euthanasia has been becoming the hot topic around the world, and questioned discussion about its legalization occurs at home and abroad.In my opinion, the euthanasia is mercy.It can help hopeless ill patients to dead qucikly，relieve them from the pain , For these people，the quality of life is the foundation value of life.For these patients who can never be cured, death is unavoidable to them, so the euthanasia is the best way to let them away from great pain.And these patients have to suffer from the pain, at the same time, their family members have to stand the expensive medical expenses and the great hurt mentally，“We mustn't delay any longer … swallowing is difficult … and breathing, that's also difficult.Those muscles are weakening too … we mustn't delay any longer.”the words from a Dutchman asked his doctor to help him die.At that time ,he was no longer able to speak clearly and he knew there was no hope of recovery and that his condition was rapidly get worse.Therefore,it's merciful for the doctors to help these patience come to an end of their life with the euthanasia.In addition, to reduce the pain of the patients is one of the doctors' duty, so euthanasia.is moral.To be frank, everyone has the right and freedom to manage their own final destiny, such as refuse any cure.And thus right also includes the freedom of choosing to die as well as the ways of death, even when it's necessary to ask somebody else to end their life.In a word.I want to call on the legitimization of the euthanasia.let the patients get rid of thestruggle between life and death as soon as possible.第二篇：英语作文：安乐死（1）有利于病人的自身利益。
英语安乐死辩论
英语安乐死辩论Good morning ,everyone ; my name is Yang .I am the first debater on positive side. Here are my opinions.1 First I will state the definaton of euthanasia,that is people who are attacked by incurable disease can’t surffer from the pains and decide to employ a humane way to end their lives without pain.2 Second, as with survival, death is a kind of human rights. When he felt happier than survival of death, he has the right to choose death, society should meet the people's needs, and give every person who is suffering incurable disease to choose the right euthanasia .So citizens have the right to choose the way of death. It is another case of freedom of choice.3 Third , for mortally ill patients, long life actually only means extend pain. For them to end their lives is a kind of happiness, It provides a way to relieve extreme pain, and this conforms to humanism.4 Fouth , this way can free up medical funds to help other people and reduce the burden of family and society. In this regard,it takes family members’ interest and supplies a lot of benefits to society.5 so according to the previous paper, we have reasons to believe that euthanasia is a proper way, not only does it respect personal dignity,but also helps with social development. And it is the performance of human civilization progress too.That’s all my ideas ,thank you。
安乐死英语辩论
安乐死英语辩论第一篇：安乐死英语辩论(!)Euthanasia is to kill people.Life is so important for every one.People don’t only live for themselves, but they also live for their families and the society.If they choose to leave the world, they are not responsible for themselves, their families and the society.Euthanasia is disparagement of life.Life is so precious.Patients should cherish their life.They should try their best to prevail incurable disease.Everyone should show basic respect for life.No matter what happens, we should face up to the facts, we should live on with great courage, we should believe in wonder.Nothing is impossible.so we view that Euthanasia should not be legeled(!)Euthanasia stops the medicine developing.If the patients require using euthanasia, doctors won’t try their best to save patients.The medicine will stop progress.If making euthanasia is made legal, patients who use euthanasia will be protected by law.The doctors’ right will be obvious.Doctors are given too much power, and can be wrong or unethical.Patients put their faith and trust in the opinions of their doctor.people abuse euthanasia when it is legalized, it can harm people lives.In the name of euthanasia, carry out committing suicide.Miracle cures or recoveries can occur.You can never underestimate the power of the human spirit.It demeans the value of human life.In this country, human life means something.It could open the floodgates to non-critical patient suicides and other abuses.Any loosening of the assisted-suicide laws could eventually lead to abuses of the privilege.Many religions prohibit suicide and the intentional killing of others.The most basic commandment is “You shall not kill”.Insurancecompanies may put undue pressure on doctors to avoid heroic measures or recommend the assisted-suicide procedure.Health insurance providers are under tremendous pressure to keep premiums down.Euthanasia can become a means of health care cost containment..Physicians and other medical care people should not be involved in directly causing death.Mercy killing is morally incorrect and should be forbidden by law.It's a homicide and murdering another human cannot be rationalized under any circumstances.Human life deserves exceptional security and protection.Advanced medical technology has made it possible to enhance human life span and quality of life.Palliative care and rehabilitation centers are better alternatives to help disabled or patients approaching death live a pain-free and better life.Family members influencing the patient's decision into euthanasia for personal gains like wealth inheritance is another issue.There is no way you can be really sure if the decision towards assisted suicide is voluntary or forced by others.Mercy killing would cause decline in medical care and cause victimization of the most vulnerable society.Would mercy killing transform itself from the “right to die” to “right to kill”? How would one assess whether a disorder of mental nature qualifies mercy killing? What if the pain threshold is below optimum and the patient perceives the circumstances to be not worthy of living? How would one know whether the wish to die is the result of unbalanced thought process or a logical decision in mentally ill patients? What if the individual chooses assisted suicide as an option and the family wouldn't agree? As to face the parting, helplessness, loss of self-control, fear of death and sorrow and so the majority of patients will experience mental suffering.In this psychological requirement under the “Euthanasia”, we can say that he isreasonable? “According to the study of suicide, suicide and treatable mental illness is intrinsically related, but not the fatal disease, a study found that in 44 patients with advanced cancer, only three thought about suicide, but are there is a serious depression.Another study shows that 85 suicides, only one person suffering from terminal illness, and 90-100% of the suicides were suffering from obvious mental illness.Undeniably, the modern medical practice slow death process, often cited the loss of personal characteristics of patients Mei, dignity, independence and autonomy.However, the expression of active euthanasia as acts of personal autonomy, it is wrong.Reasons:(a)Since active euthanasia need help, then it is not an individual matter, but the open or in the public thing.(B)under the public recognition to self-defense, capital punishment and justice in the form of war, murder, only to defend the life for everyone, not to the benefit of those killed.So, even if death is painful relief, can not be lightly taken away the right to life committed to personal.(C)even if the person's self-determination recognized the right to choose to die, that does not mean the right to ask others to kill themselves, does not include the right to authorize self to kill others.(D)autonomy, including the right of slavery has never been their own, in other words, the right to freedom does not mean the right not to freedom.So to maintain the autonomy, the need to protect life, to give others their right to life is not trampling the principle of maintaining independence.Therefore, individual autonomy and social need and public objectives and values to be consistent.结尾active euthanasia may gradually lose its spontaneity, and thus out of(i)”secret euthanasia“, meaning that without their own consent, to be a doctor euthanized.(Ii)”forced euthanasia“,meaning patients suffering from terminal illness would be coercion to lure choose euthanasia to relieve their families in the economic and psychological pressures, and save limited resources of society, the patients chose to die, do not feel life is a burden or tired of life, but he felt the burden of someone else, and that others dislike.(Iii)”Deputy euthanasia“ means to allo w patients who lack capacity to self-determination by the people ”proxy decision“ to euthanasia.(Iv)”Discrimination against euthanasia,“ the crisis is the number of types of patients such as the poverty stricken or belonging to ethnic minorities, may be ”clever“ to force that ”euthanasia“ requirement, the mercy of others.Made ill patients caught in the dilemma of both the opposition between the yield, resulting in additional unnecessary fear and anxiety.The information may be heard: ”Death is terrible!Your best choice of euthanasia.“ of the slip waves, is once the ”euthanasia“ is legalized, its use will inevitably extend to other types of patients but not the dying, if not cure patients, but not incurable disease, then the risk of Alzheimer's disease or brain degradation, even those born with severe disabilities Down syndrome baby..And so on.So, if this argument, once established, will only create panic and fear that they will be forcibly sent to ”euthanasia“ in the ranks.Therefore, I agree Frasen say, ”human life, merely the possibility of error, is enough to completely reject the“ euthanasia.” "第二篇：安乐死_英语辩论(!)Euthanasia is to kill people.Life is so important for every one.People don’t only live for themselves, but they also live for their families and the society.If they choose to leave the world, they are not responsible for themselves, their families and the society.Euthanasia is disparagement of life.Life is soprecious.Patients should cherish their life.They should try their best to prevail incurable disease.Everyone should show basic respect for life.No matter what happens, we should face up to the facts, we should live on with great courage, we should believe in wonder.Nothing is impossible.so we view that Euthanasia should not be legeled(!)Euthanasia stops the medicine developing.If the patients require using euthanasia, doctors won’t try their best to save patients.The medicine will stop progress.If making euthanasia is made legal, patients who use euthanasia will be protected by law.The doctors’ righ t will be obvious.Doctors are given too much power, and can be wrong or unethical.Patients put their faith and trust in the opinions of their doctor.people abuse euthanasia when it is legalized, it can harm people lives.In the name of euthanasia, carry out committing suicide.Miracle cures or recoveries can occur.You can never underestimate the power of the human spirit.It demeans the value of human life.In this country, human life means something.It could open the floodgates to non-critical patient suicides and other abuses.Any loosening of the assisted-suicide laws could eventually lead to abuses of the privilege.Many religions prohibit suicide and the intentional killing of others.The most basic commandment is “You shall not kill”.Insurance companies may put undue pressure on doctors to avoid heroic measures or recommend the assisted-suicide procedure.Health insurance providers are under tremendous pressure to keep premiums down.Euthanasia can become a means of health care cost containment..Physicians and other medical care people should not be involved in directly causing death.Mercy killing is morally incorrect and should be forbidden by law.It's a homicide and murdering another human cannot be rationalized under anycircumstances.Human life deserves exceptional security and protection.Advanced medical technology has made it possible to enhance human life span and quality of life.Palliative care and rehabilitation centers are better alternatives to help disabled or patients approaching death live a pain-free and better life.Family members influencing the patient's decision into euthanasia for personal gains like wealth inheritance is another issue.There is no way you can be really sure if the decision towards assisted suicide is voluntary or forced by others.Mercy killing would cause decline in medical care and cause victimization of the most vulnerable society.Would mercy killing transform itself from the “right to die” to “right to kill”? How would one assess whether a disorder of mental nature qualifies mercy killing? What if the pain threshold is below optimum and the patient perceives the circumstances to be not worthy of living? How would one know whether the wish to die is the result of unbalanced thought process or a logical decision in mentally ill patients? What if the individual chooses assisted suicide as an option and the family wouldn't agree? As to face the parting, helplessness, loss of self-control, fear of death and sorrow and so the majority of patients will experience mental suffering.In this psychological requirement under the “Euthanasia”, we can say that he is reasonable? “According to the study of suicide, suicide and treatable mental illness is intrinsically related, but not the fatal disease, a study found that in 44 patients with advanced cancer, only three thought about suicide, but are there is a serious depression.Another study shows that 85 suicides, only one person suffering from terminal illness, and 90-100% of the suicides were suffering from obvious mental illness.Undeniably, the modern medical practice slow death process, often cited theloss of personal characteristics of patients Mei, dignity, independence and autonomy.However, the expression of active euthanasia as acts of personal autonomy, it is wrong.Reasons:(a)Since active euthanasia need help, then it is not an individual matter, but the open or in the public thing.(B)under the public recognition to self-defense, capital punishment and justice in the form of war, murder, only to defend the life for everyone, not to the benefit of those killed.So, even if death is painful relief, can not be lightly taken away the right to life committed to personal.(C)even if the person's self-determination recognized the right to choose to die, that does not mean the right to ask others to kill themselves, does not include the right to authorize self to kill others.(D)autonomy, including the right of slavery has never been their own, in other words, the right to freedom does not mean the right not to freedom.So to maintain the autonomy, the need to protect life, to give others their right to life is not trampling the principle of maintaining independence.Therefore, individual autonomy and social need and public objectives and values to be consistent.结尾active euthanasia may gradually lose its spontaneity, and thus out of(i)”secret euthanasia“, meaning that without their own consent, to be a doctor euthanized.(Ii)”forced euthanasia“, meaning patients suffering from terminal illness would be coercion to lure choose euthanasia to relieve their families in the economic and psychological pressures, and save limited resources of society, the patients chose to die, do not feel life is a burden or tired of life, but he felt the burden of someone else, and that others dislike.(Iii)”Deputy euthanasia“ me ans to allow patients who lack capacity to self-determination by the people ”proxy decision“ to euthanasia.(Iv)”Discriminationagainst euthanasia,“ the crisis is the number of types of patients such as the poverty stricken or belonging to ethnic minorities, may be ”clever“ to force that ”euthanasia“ requirement, the mercy of others.Made ill patients caught in the dilemma of both the opposition between the yield, resulting in additional unnecessary fear and anxiety.The information may be heard: ”Death is terrible!Your best choice of euthanasia.“ of the slip waves, is once the ”euthanasia“ is legalized, its use will inevitably extend to other types of patients but not the dying, if not cure patients, but not incurable disease, then the risk of Alzheimer's disease or brain degradation, even those born with severe disabilities Down syndrome baby..And so on.So, if this argument, once established, will only create panic and fear that they will be forcibly sent to ”euthanasia“ in the ranks.Therefore, I agree Frasen say, ”human life, merely the possibility of error, is enough to completely reject the“ euthanasia.” “ Euthanasia is humane because it helps to hasten the death of terminally ill patient.Death, as natural as birth, is sometimes a hard process that requires assistance, and euthanasia is part of such assistance.People have the right to die.It is unnecessary to maintain life artificially beyond the point when people will never regain consciousness.Extending an incurably ill patient’s life means the same as aggravating his pain.Efforts should not be made to perpetuate what has become a meaningless existence.Euthanasia can bring mental and physical release to the patient and his family when he is terminally ill and has no prospect of recovering.Mercy killing is motivated by nothing but love and sympathy for the dying patient.Most of the terminally ill patients themselves want to die with dignity and peace instead of agony and degradation.Medical treatment for a comatosepatient cause great burden economically for the hospital and the patient’s family.It is inhumane to perform euthanasia no matter how painless the process is.Anyone who voluntarily, knowingly or premeditatedly takes the life of another, even one minute prior to death, is a killer.Euthanasia is a criminal offense because it involves the killing of a person.Legalized euthanasia will invite abuse of human life because any form of murder many be conveniently dubbed “mercy killing ”by unscrupulous people.Euthanasia raises many moral issues since it implies that active measures are taken to terminate human life.Doctors and nurses should do everything they can to save dying patients instead of hastening their death by active measures.The instinct for self-preservation is the strongest instinct that human beings possess.It is untrue that any patient himself should want to die.Doctors and nurses involved in euthanasia have discredited their profession, for euthanasia is a violation of the fundamental medical principle to save human life.Mercy killing is one of the most controversial issues in the world of medicine.As the picture given above depicts, A late sick mother desperately ill son request for euthanasia.But the son was cut for this。
安乐死 英语作文
安乐死英语作文Euthanasia is a highly controversial topic that has sparked heated debates and discussions around the world. Also known as assisted suicide or mercy killing, euthanasia is the act of intentionally ending a person's life to relieve them from suffering. While some argue that euthanasia is a compassionate and humane act, others believe that it goes against the sanctity of life and raises ethical and moral concerns.Proponents of euthanasia argue that it is a compassionate way to end the suffering of terminally ill patients who are in unbearable pain. They believe that individuals should have the right to die with dignity and that euthanasia provides a peaceful and painless way to end their suffering. Furthermore, they argue that allowing euthanasia gives individuals the autonomy to make decisions about their own lives and deaths, and that it can provide comfort to both the patients and their families.On the other hand, opponents of euthanasia argue thatit goes against the fundamental principle of the sanctityof life. They believe that every human life is valuable and should be protected, and that euthanasia undermines the value of life. Additionally, they raise concerns about the potential for abuse and coercion in euthanasia cases, and the slippery slope that could lead to the devaluation of human life.In many countries, euthanasia is illegal and considered a criminal act. However, there are some countries andstates that have legalized euthanasia under certain circumstances. For example, in the Netherlands and Belgium, euthanasia is legal under strict regulations and guidelines, and patients must meet specific criteria in order toqualify for euthanasia. In the United States, severalstates have also legalized euthanasia, with Oregon beingthe first to do so in 1997.The legalization of euthanasia has sparked intense debates and discussions about the ethical, moral, and legal implications of this controversial practice. While someargue that euthanasia provides a compassionate and humane way to end the suffering of terminally ill patients, others believe that it goes against the sanctity of life and raises concerns about potential abuse and coercion.In conclusion, euthanasia is a complex and contentious issue that raises important ethical, moral, and legal questions. While proponents argue that it provides a compassionate way to end the suffering of terminally ill patients, opponents raise concerns about the value of life and the potential for abuse. As the debate over euthanasia continues, it is important to consider the perspectives of all stakeholders and carefully weigh the ethical, moral, and legal implications of this controversial practice.。
安乐死的看法英语作文
安乐死的看法英语作文关于安乐死的看法英语作文Directions： For this part you are allowed thirty minutes to write a composition on the topic Should Euthanasia Be Legalized? You should write no less than 150 words and base your composition on the outline （given in Chinese） below：1、有的人赞成实行安乐死2、有的人反对安乐死合法化3、我的看法。
范文：Euthanasia, a quiet and easy death, or “mercy killing” as we call it recently has made the headlines frequently. Many people applaud it and argue that euthanasia should be legalized.As is pointed out, to practise euthanasia can benefit both the patient and his family. To a terminally ill person who is suffering excruciating pains day and night or living “like a vegetable”, to be allowed to end his life painlessly is a good release. To his family it is also a big relief considering the financial and emotional drain on them that having to sustain his life entails. However, the legalization of euthanasia may also bring with it problems our society has not previously faced. Is it humane, for example, that a terminally ill patient is thus caused to feel guilty for remaining alive because he does not want to die? Is it wise that a patient is killed alive simply because of a mistaken terminal diagnosis? And is it possible that euthanasia could be taken advantage of for some ulterior or even criminal purposes?Since the legalization of euthanasia will raise serious moral and social issues, the decision our society makes about euthanasia will undoubtedly have tremendous consequences insociety.单词：1. euthanasia：adj. 安乐死2. mercy：n. 仁慈，宽容；怜悯；幸运；善行3. headline：n. 大标题；内容提要；栏外标题；头版头条新闻4. applaud：vt. 赞同；称赞；向…喝采5. legalized：adj. 合法的6. benefit：vt. 有益于，对…有益7. terminally：adv. 处于末期症状上8. excruciating：adj. 折磨人的；使苦恼的`9. painlessly：adv. 无痛苦地，不费力地10. relief：n. 减轻，解除；安慰11. drain：n. 消耗12. sustain：vt. 维持13. legalization ：n. [法] 合法化；法律认可14. guilty：adj. 有罪的；内疚的15. diagnosis：n. 诊断16. ulterior：adj. 隐秘不明的17. criminal：adj. 刑事的；犯罪的；罪恶的18. purpose：n. 目的；用途19. moral：adj. 道德的20. issue：n. 问题21. undoubtedly：adv. 确实地，无庸置疑地22. tremendous：adj. 极大的，巨大的；惊人的23. consequence：n. 结果词组：1. point out：指出2. day and night：日以继夜3. like a vegetable：像一个植物人4. be allowed to do sth.：被允许做某事5. take advantage of：利用句子分析：To a terminally ill person who is suffering excruciating pains day and night or living “like a vegetable”, to be allowed to en d his life painlessly is a good release.1）who is suffering excruciating pains day and night or living “like a vegetable”做定语修饰a terminally ill person 2）to be allowed to end his life painlessly为整句句子的主语，his life指的是a terminally ill person’s life，所以整句句子的中心意思在最后，即：to be allowed to end his life painlessly is a good release。
安乐死英文精选全文
30%
recent years.
20%
10%
0%
1947
1973
1983 recent
years
Part 3:But at the same time there
are many people disagree this
They keesonal
die happily.
Phenomenon
Reasons for support Another attitude Summary
Phenomenon
• Now there are a lot of people have an incurable disease. They want to be part of people with euthanasia over his own life. But it is not allowed ……
安乐死辩论
安乐死辩论英文回答：The debate on euthanasia, often referred to as assisted dying or mercy killing, has sparked a myriad of ethical, legal, and societal considerations that have engrossed philosophers, politicians, and the general public alike. At the heart of the debate lies the question of whether individuals have the right to end their own lives with the assistance of a medical professional.Proponents of euthanasia argue that individuals should have autonomy over their own bodies and should be able to make decisions regarding their own deaths. They contendthat euthanasia is a compassionate and humane option for terminally ill patients who are suffering from unbearable pain or who have lost their quality of life. Advocates often cite examples of individuals who have suffered from debilitating conditions such as motor neuron disease or Alzheimer's disease, where euthanasia has provided themwith a dignified end.Opponents of euthanasia, on the other hand, raise concerns about the potential for abuse and the slippery slope argument. They argue that legalizing euthanasia could lead to a devaluation of life and that vulnerable individuals may be coerced into ending their lives against their will. Opponents also express worries about the possibility of mistakes being made in the assessment of a patient's condition or prognosis. As an example, they point to cases where patients who were initially diagnosed with a terminal illness were later found to have misdiagnoses and went on to live for many years.The euthanasia debate is complex and multifaceted, with strong arguments on both sides. Ultimately, the decision of whether or not to legalize euthanasia is a matter of public policy that must be carefully considered by each society.中文回答：安乐死争论，又称协助死亡或仁慈杀人，引发了无数的伦理、法律和社会考量，吸引了哲学家、政治家和普通民众的关注。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
（！）安乐死是杀人。
每一个生命是如此的重要。
人不能只为自己而活，但他们也活在他们的家庭和社会。
如果他们选择离开这个世界，他们不为自己负责，他们的家庭和社会。
安乐死是轻视生命。
生命是如此的珍贵。
患者应该珍惜自己的生命。
他们应该尽力战胜绝症。
每个人都应该表现出对生命的基本尊重。
无论发生什么，我们应该面对事实，我们应该生活在巨大的勇气，我们应该相信奇迹。
没有什么是不可能的。
我们认为，安乐死不应legeled（！）安乐死停药的发展。
如果患者需要使用安乐死，医生不会尽力挽救病人。
这药会停止进步。
如果安乐死合法化，安乐死的病人使用将受到法律保护。
医生的权利将是显而易见的。
医生有太多的权力，可以是错误的或不道德的。
病人把自己的信仰和信任医生的意见。
人们滥用安乐死合法化时，它会危害人的生命。
在安乐死的名义，进行自杀。
能发生奇迹般的治疗或复苏。
你永远不能低估了人的精神力量。
它把人的生命价值。
在这个国家，人的生命意味着什么。
它可以打开闸门非危重病人自杀和滥用。
任何松动的协助自杀的法律最终可能导致特权的滥用。
许多宗教禁止自杀和他人的故意杀人。
最基本的戒律是“不可杀人”。
保险公司可以把不必要的压力，避免孤注一掷的措施或建议医生协助自杀的过程。
健康保险提供者保持保费下降在巨大的压力下。
安乐死可以成为一种手段，遏制医疗成本。
医生和其他医护人员不应参与直接导致死亡。
安乐死在道德上是不正确的，应该被法律所禁止的。
这是一个杀人和杀害别人不能合理化在任何情况下。
人的生命是特殊的安全保护。
先进的医疗技术已经使得有可能提高人类的寿命和生活质量。
姑息治疗和康复中心是更好的选择来帮助残疾人或病人接近死亡生活的痛苦自由和更好的生活。
家庭成员的影响病人的决定为安乐死以权谋私喜欢财富传承是另一个问题。
你是没有办法可以知道是否真的对协助自杀是自愿或被迫由别人决定。
安乐死会导致医疗保健和最脆弱的社会造成受害下降。
将安乐死将自己从“死的权利”，“杀”吗？如何评估是否有心理性障碍使安乐死？如果疼痛阈值低于最优和病人感知的情况下是不值得活吗？如何知道死的愿望是不平衡的思维过程或精神病患者的逻辑决定的结果？如果个人选择协助自杀作为一种选择和家人不同意吗？面对离别，无奈，失去自控，死亡和悲伤，恐惧，所以多数患者会经历精神上的痛苦。
在这种心理需求下的“安乐死”，我们可以说他是合理的吗？”根据研究自杀，自杀和治愈的精神疾病本质上是相关的，但不是致命的疾病，研究发现，在44例晚期癌症患者，只有三想过自杀，但有一个严重的抑郁症。
另一项研究表明，85的人自杀，只有一个人患了绝症，和90-100%的自杀都患有明显的心理疾病。
不可否认，现代医学实践中缓慢死亡的过程中，经常提到的病人梅，尊严个人特色的丧失，独立性和自主性。
然而，安乐死是个人的自主行为表达，这是错误的。
原因：（一）自主动安乐死需要帮助，那么它就不是一个人的事情，而是开放的或公共的东西。
（b）在公开承认自卫，战争的形式正义，死刑和谋杀，只为大家保卫生命，不被杀死的人的利益。
所以，即使死亡是痛苦的解脱，不能轻易带走生命权致力于个人。
（C）即使人的自决权确认选择死亡，这并不意味着权利要求别人杀死自己，并不包括有权授权自杀别人。
（D）自治，包括奴隶制的权利从来不是自己的，换句话说，这(!)Euthanasia is to kill people. Life is so important for every one. People don’t only live for themselves, but they also live for their families and the society. If they choose to leave the world, they are not responsible for themselves, their families and the society.Euthanasia is disparagement of life. Life is so precious. Patients should cherish their life. They should try their best to prevail incurable disease. Everyone should show basic respect for life. No matter what happens, we should face up to the facts, we should live on with great courage, we should believe in wonder. Nothing is impossible.so we view that Euthanasia should not be legeled(!)Euthanasi a stops the medicine developing. If the patients require using euthanasia, doctors won’t try their best to save patients. The medicine will stop progress. If making euthanasia is made legal, patients who use euthanasia will be protected by law. The doctors’ right will be obvious. Doctors are given too much power, and can be wrong or unethical. Patients put their faith and trust in the opinions of their doctor.people abuse euthanasia when it is legalized, it can harm people lives. In the name of euthanasia, carry out committing suicide. Miracle cures or recoveries can occur. You can never underestimate the power of the human spirit.It demeans the value of human life. In this country, human life means something.It could open the floodgates to non-critical patient suicides and other abuses. Any loosening of the assisted-suicide laws could eventually lead to abuses of the privilege.Many religions prohibit suicide and the intentional killing of others. The most basic commandment is "You shall not kill".Insurance companies may put undue pressure on doctors to avoid heroic measures or recommend the assisted-suicide procedure. Health insurance providers are under tremendous pressure to keep premiums down.Euthanasia can become a means of health care cost containment..Physicians and other medical care people should not be involved in directly causing death.Mercy killing is morally incorrect and should be forbidden by law.It's a homicide and murdering another human cannot be rationalized under any circumstances.Human life deserves exceptional security and protection. Advanced medical technology has made it possible to enhance human life span and quality of life. Palliative care and rehabilitation centers are better alternatives to help disabled or patients approaching death live a pain-free and better life. Family members influencing the patient's decision into euthanasia for personal gains like wealth inheritance is another issue. There is no way you can be really sure if the decision towards assisted suicide is voluntary or forced by others.Mercy killing would cause decline in medical care and cause victimization of the most vulnerable society. Would mercy killing transform itself from the "right to die" to "right to kill"?How would one assess whether a disorder of mental nature qualifies mercy killing? What if the pain threshold is below optimum and the patient perceives the circumstances to be not worthy of living? How would one know whether the wish to die is the result of unbalanced thought process or a logical decision in mentally ill patients? What if the individual chooses assisted suicide as an option and the family wouldn't agree?As to face the parting, helplessness, loss of self-control, fear of death and sorrow and so the majority of patients will experience mental suffering. In this psychological requirement under the "Euthanasia", we can say that he is reasonable? "According to the study of suicide, suicide and treatable mental illness is intrinsically related, but not the fatal disease, a study found that in 44 patients with advanced cancer, only three thought about suicide, but are there is a serious depression. Another study shows that 85 suicides, only one person suffering from terminal illness, and 90-100% of the suicides were suffering from obvious mental illness.Undeniably, the modern medical practice slow death process, often cited the loss of personal characteristics of patients Mei, dignity, independence and autonomy.However, the expression of active euthanasia as acts of personal autonomy, it is wrong. Reasons: (a) Since active euthanasia need help, then it is not an individual matter, but the open or in the public thing. (B) under the public recognition to self-defense, capital punishment and justice in the form of war, murder, only to defend the life for everyone, not to the benefit of those killed. So, even if deathis painful relief, can not be lightly taken away the right to life committed to personal. (C) even if the person's self-determination recognized the right to choose to die, that does not mean the right to ask others to kill themselves, does not include the right to authorize self to kill others. (D) autonomy, including the right of slavery has never been their own, in other words, the right to freedom does not mean the right not to freedom.So to maintain the autonomy, the need to protect life, to give others their right to life is not trampling the principle of maintaining independence. Therefore, individual autonomy and social need and public objectives and values to be consistent.所以要保持自主性，需要保护的生命，给他人的生命权是不践踏独立自主的原则。