《会计政策的披露——对〈国际会计准则第1号〉和〈国际财务报告准则实务公告第2号〉的修订建议》(英文)

合集下载

国际会计准则第1号-财务报表的列报

国际会计准则第1号-财务报表的列报

《国际会计准则第1号-财务报表的列报》代替准则5号《国际会计准则第1号-财务报表的列报》 (1)概述 (2)目的 (2)范围 (3)财务报表的目的 (3)对财务报表的责任 (4)财务报表的组成 (4)总体要求 (4)结构和内容 (10)资产负债表 (11)收益表 (16)现金流量表 (19)财务报表附注 (19)生效日期 (22)概述∙∙∙∙本条目为官方文献,除调整排版外请不要随意更改内容![编辑]目的本准则的目的在于规定通用财务报表编制的基础,以确保企业自身的财务报表与其前期的财务报表以及其他企业的财务报表相互可比。

为达到该目的,本准则提出了财务报表列报的总体要求,提供了有关财务报表结构的指南,还提出了财务报表列报内容的最低要求。

具体交易和事项的确认、计量和披露在其他国际会计准则中规定。

[编辑]范围1.本准则适用于根据国际会计准则编报的所有通用财务报表的列报。

2.通用财务报表,指意在满足那些不能要求报告符合其特定信息需求的使用者需要的那类财务报表。

通用财务报表包括单独提供或含在公开文件(如年度报告或招股说明书)中的财务报表。

本准则对简明的中期财务信息不适用。

本准则一视同仁地适用于单个企业的财务报表和企业集团的合并报表。

不过,只要在会计政策说明中清楚地披露合并财务报表和母公司财务报表各自的编制基础,本准则并不阻止在同一份文件中,依据国际会计准则列报合并报表,而依据国家会计准则要求列报母公司财务报表。

3.本准则适用于包括银行和保险企业在内的所有类型的企业。

与本准则的要求一致且针对银行和类似金融机构的附加披露要求,在《国际会计准则第30号-银行和类似金融机构财务报表中的披露》中规定。

4.本准则使用适合以盈利为目的的企业的术语,因而公共部门经营企业可运用本准则的要求。

打算运用本准则的非盈利、政府和其他公共部门企业,可能需要补充对财务报表中某些特定项目以及对财务报表本准则的说明。

这类企业也可能需要提供一些财务报表的额外信息。

财政部会计司关于就国际会计准则理事会发布的权益法会计征求意见稿公开征求意见的函

财政部会计司关于就国际会计准则理事会发布的权益法会计征求意见稿公开征求意见的函

财政部会计司关于就国际会计准则理事会发布的权益法会计征求意见稿公开征求意见的函
文章属性
•【公布机关】财政部
•【公布日期】2024.09.30
•【分类】征求意见稿
正文
关于就国际会计准则理事会发布的权益法会计征求意见稿公
开征求意见的函
财会便函〔2024〕47号各有关单位:
2024年9月19日,国际会计准则理事会(IASB)发布了《权益法会计(征求意见稿)》(以下简称征求意见稿),拟对《国际会计准则第28号——对联营企业和合营企业的投资》等相关国际财务报告会计准则进行修订并向全球利益相关方公开征求意见。

为深入参与国际财务报告会计准则制定,使国际财务报告会计准则的修订完善更好地满足我国利益相关方需要,请贵单位组织对征求意见稿提出意见,并于2024年11月8日前将书面意见反馈我们。

反馈意见请针对征求意见稿中所列问题,结合我国的实际情况,提出意见和建议。

我们将在整理、汇总和分析各方意见的基础上,向国际会计准则理事会反馈意见。

征求意见稿的英文原文和中文简介可在财政部网站会计司子频道
()“工作通知”栏目以及会计准则委员会官方网站
()下载。

中文简介仅供参考,如有与英文原文不一致之处,请以英文原文为准。

联系人:会计准则委员会董笑宏
联系电话:************
通讯地址:北京市西城区月坛南街14号月新大厦2层
(邮编:100045)
电子邮箱:*****************.cn
附件:1.《权益法会计(征求意见稿)》英文原文
2.《权益法会计(征求意见稿)》中文简介
财政部会计司
2024年9月30日。

企业会计准则新旧政策比较专题[五篇范文]

企业会计准则新旧政策比较专题[五篇范文]

企业会计准则新旧政策比较专题[五篇范文]第一篇:企业会计准则新旧政策比较专题企业会计准则新旧政策比较专题第一部分新企业会计准则改革背景及主要变化一、企业会计准则体系基本内容和框架1.我国会计核算体系改革历程(1)20世纪90年代初(1992年),以两则两制为标志开始实施准则制定的工作。

(20世纪90年代初到现在都是会计准则和制度并存时期)(2)1997.5.22,发布第一个具体会计准则《关联方关系及其交易》。

(3)1997年—2001年,陆续发布了16个具体会计准则(简称旧准则)。

(4)2000年12月29日,发布企业会计制度,推出企业会计制度体系。

(5)2006年2月15日,发布企业会计准则体系(简称新准则)。

(6)2007年1月1日,新会计准则体系在上市公司的范围内实施,同时鼓励其他企业执行。

2.我国企业会计法律规范的层次第一层次:法律——中华人民共和国会计法第二层次:行政法规——企业财务会计报告条例第三层次:行政部门规章(1)基本会计准则(2)财务通则(两个版本均有效)①财政部第4号令,1992.11.30发布,1993.7.1开始执行②财政部第41号令,2006.12.4发布,2007.1.1开始执行(要求国有企业及国有控股公司执行)第四层次:行政部门规范性文件——具体会计准则体系和企业会计制度体系(1)老准则——16项(2)新准则——38项(3)企业会计制度体系(3个)3.新企业会计准则体系的基本内容实施新会计准则体系的基本目标:建立起与我国社会主义市场经济发展进程相适应,与国际财务报告准则相趋同,涵盖各类企业各项经济业务,可独立实施的会计准则体系。

(两个目标)2006年具体事件:发布了22项新的具体会计准则,修订了现行的基本准则,修改了过去的16项准则,发布了会计准则的应用指南。

新会计准则体系的分类:(1)一般业务准则:存货、长期股权投资、投资性房地产、固定资产、无形资产、非货币性资产交换等。

国际会计准则解读

国际会计准则解读

国际会计准则解读一、引言国际会计准则是全球范围内被广泛接受和应用的会计规范体系,旨在确保企业财务报告具有高度透明度和可比性。

本文将对国际会计准则进行详细解读,帮助读者更好地理解其背后的理念和原则。

二、国际会计准则的概述国际会计准则是国际会计准则理事会(IASB)颁布的一系列法规和准则,为各国企业提供了一个统一的会计框架。

这些准则涵盖了各种会计事项,包括财务报告的编制和披露、资产和负债的识别和计量,以及利润和损益的确认方式等。

三、国际会计准则的原则1. 公允价值原则:根据国际会计准则,资产和负债应当以公允价值计量,即反映市场上的交易价格。

2. 全面收益原则:国际会计准则要求,在财务报告中全面反映企业的经济利益,包括经营活动、投资活动和筹资活动的影响。

3. 持续经营原则:企业应当基于持续经营的假设编制财务报告,即认为企业将来会继续经营下去。

4. 一致性原则:企业应当保持一致的会计政策,以确保财务报告在不同时间段和企业之间具有可比性。

5. 充分揭示原则:财务报告应当充分揭示企业的财务状况、经营成果和现金流量,让用户能够全面理解企业的情况。

四、国际会计准则的应用国际会计准则适用于所有上市公司、金融机构以及其他一些特定的中小型企业。

遵循国际会计准则的企业可以确保其财务报告更加透明、准确和可比,从而提高对投资者和利益相关者的吸引力。

五、国际会计准则的影响1. 全球一体化:国际会计准则的应用促进了全球财务报告的一体化,使得不同国家和地区的企业可以更容易地进行财务比较和分析。

2. 投资者保护:国际会计准则的使用提高了投资者对企业财务状况的认知和保护水平,减少了信息不对称的风险。

3. 跨国交易便利:国际会计准则的统一规范使得跨国交易更为便利,减少了财务报告的调整和审核成本。

4. 国家监管:国际会计准则的引入也为各国的监管机构提供了一个标准,使得监管更加规范和一致。

六、国际会计准则的发展趋势国际会计准则的发展一直在不断演进,以适应全球经济环境的变化和需求。

国际会计 机考资料

国际会计 机考资料

A
B
关于会计协调化,下列理解正确的是( )
C
B
C
D
税法对会计影响较大的国家有( )
A
B
美国的财务会计准则委员会(FASB,1973年至今)发表的有关会计准则由( )所构成的
A
D
在荷兰会计准则和实务以( )等法律规定为基础
A
C
D
地域性会计职业界的国际组织有主要有( )
A
G4+1集团开创的在制定准则过程中的协调行动所谓
45 人利益会计模式最典型的国家是( )
A
按阿伦对会计模式的国际分类,强调公司应按“真实
和公允”的观点提供财务报告,主要是为了保护(
46 ) 的利益
B
47 德国会计服从于法律要求不包括( )
C
美国的证券交易委员会通过它的( ),对它认为必
须立即制定准则的会计问题或它不同意民间准则制定
机构的见解的会计问题,正面阐明自己的立场,来干
个职业会计团体发起,在( )成立了国际会计准则委
员会。
B
美国齐默曼教授在1968年给国际会计定义中认为国际
会计是最高层次会计的抽象,其目的在于打破国界,
发展世界性的( )并在任何一个国家的会计中加以
应用
D
会计模式所描述的是会计实务,但实际上,不同模式
的会计实务都体现了特定的( )
D
强调公司应按“真实和公允”的观点提供财务报告,主要是C为了保护投资人和债权人利益的模式的主要代表是(
)根据避税港的定义和特征,避税港具体包括的是(
C

D
金融工具可分为( )两类
A
题目
选项
A
B 会计职业界的国际组织有( )

会计的国际会计准则和国际财务报告准则

会计的国际会计准则和国际财务报告准则

会计的国际会计准则和国际财务报告准则国际会计准则(International Accounting Standards,IAS)以及国际财务报告准则(International Financial Reporting Standards,IFRS)是全球范围内规范会计准则与财务报告的重要标准。

这些准则为企业提供了指导,确保其财务报告的准确性、一致性和可比性。

本文将对国际会计准则和国际财务报告准则进行详细介绍,并探讨其在全球范围内的应用和意义。

一、国际会计准则(IAS)国际会计准则是国际会计准则委员会(International Accounting Standards Board,IASB)制定的一系列会计准则。

这些准则旨在为全球企业提供一个统一的会计规则框架,以确保财务报告的准确性和可比性。

国际会计准则的制定过程严格遵循透明、公正、可复制和可公众接受的原则。

每个准则都经过广泛的民意征询和专家评审,以确保其代表了全球会计界的共识和最佳实践。

国际会计准则主要关注以下几个方面:1. 会计政策选择和会计估计的准确性和一致性。

2. 财务报表项目的定义、计量和披露。

3. 财务报表的格式和布局。

4. 各类交易、资产和负债的计量和确认。

国际会计准则的持续演进和修订使得其具备了更强的适应性和灵活性。

随着全球经济的快速发展,新的会计问题也不断涌现,因此国际会计准则需要不断地进行修订和更新,以满足新的业务需求和挑战。

二、国际财务报告准则(IFRS)国际财务报告准则是国际财务报告准则基金会(International Financial Reporting Standards Foundation,IFRS Foundation)制定的财务报告准则。

与国际会计准则不同,国际财务报告准则更加注重财务报告的内容和披露要求。

国际财务报告准则致力于提升财务报告的质量和透明度,以满足全球投资者的需求。

它规范了财务报告的核心要素、报告周期、信息披露和报表附注等方面,确保报告的准确性和一致性。

【会计】中国会计规定与国际财务报告准则及香港财务报告准则的比较

【会计】中国会计规定与国际财务报告准则及香港财务报告准则的比较

【关键字】会计中国会计规定与国际财务报告准则及香港财务报告准则的比较随着中国加入世界贸易组织﹐各界正积极就新机遇和挑战作出准备。

会计﹐有必要不断的更新以配合国内经济发展的步伐﹐但作为国际通用的商业语言﹐又不可与国际惯例有重大偏离。

为此﹐中华人民共和国财政部(以下简称“财政部”)不断就此方向作出努力﹐并取得了重大成果。

在1993年﹐财政部以世界银行的拨款﹐开始发展约30项适用于中国发展中社会主义市场经济的会计准则﹐旨在使中国的会计及财务编报实务能与国际接轨。

在1994年至1996年3年间﹐相关准则的征求意见稿已分批发出。

在2000年发展约17项会计准则﹐当中主要是国际会计准则委员会正在处理的项目及一些特殊行业的会计准则。

直至现时为止﹐共有16项《企业会计准则》(以下简称“具体准则”) 已经发出﹐而其它准则仍在制订中。

除了制定具体准则有长足进展外﹐在2000年底﹐财政部发布了新的《企业会计制度》(以下简称“新制度”)﹐并自应用在所有股份有限公司上。

新制度的施行使中国会计与国际惯例更具可比性﹐当中较为重要的是全面要求对发生减值的资产确认减值损失。

于﹐新制度扩展至适用于所有外商投资企业。

于2003年3月﹐财政部进一步扩展《企业会计制度》的涵盖范围﹐要求所有于或以后成立的企业(小企业及金融机构除外)全面执行《企业会计制度》。

长远而言﹐财政部拟将新制度应用于所有大、中型企业﹐将以往不同行业或不同类型企业各自不同的会计处理方法统一起来﹐以加强报表的可比性。

此外﹐财政部亦就金融企业及小企业的特点和需要﹐分别制定新的《金融企业会计制度》及《小企业会计制度》。

新的《金融企业会计制度》于于所有上市及外商投资金融企业施行﹐并自扩展到非上市的非外商投资证券公司。

而《小企业会计制度》将于对指定的小企业生效。

一般而言(不包括金融企业及小企业)﹐《企业会计制度》、《企业会计准则》及相关的会计公告(一般名为“财会”的通知)构成现时中国会计的基础规定。

可持续发展报告中双重重要性的概念、转化和评估

可持续发展报告中双重重要性的概念、转化和评估

可持续发展报告中双重重要性的概念、转化和评估作者:吕颖菲刘浩来源:《财会月刊·上半月》2022年第08期【摘要】重要性是判断某一事项是否纳入公司报告的关键特征。

随着对ESG主题关注度的升高,利益相关者的需求正在发生改变,可持续发展报告的数量和内容也在不断增加,对重要性提出了新的要求。

2022年1月20日欧洲财务报告咨询组(EFRAG)发布了《双重重要性概念指引》工作稿,具体包括财务重要性(Financial Materiality)和影响重要性(Impact Materiality),以及二者的转化、评估等内容。

本文将在与财务报告概念框架中重要性比较的基础上,对可持续发展报告中的双重重要性进行讨论,包括双重重要性的概念、双重重要性之间的关系、双重重要性的评估等,并对重要性在我国的应用提出建议。

【关键词】双重重要性;财务重要性;影响重要性;可持续报告【中图分类号】F275 【文献标识码】A 【文章编号】1004-0994(2022)15-0071-6一、引言重要性(Materiality)是关键的信息质量特征,是各类财务和非财务报告纳入特定事项或信息并确定其优先次序的标准。

宏观层面,在气候变化以及“双碳”背景下,商业模式正经历巨大的变革,全球对人类命运共同体与可持续发展高度重视。

微观层面,除了企业财务业绩本身,企业的运营及其价值链会对人类与环境产生怎样的影响也备受关注,需要更多的ESG (环境、社会、治理)信息。

现有的财务报告中的重要性概念已不再适用这些新的信息,可持续发展报告对重要性概念提出了新的要求。

2022年1月20日,欧洲财务报告咨询组(EFRAG)下属的欧洲可持续发展报告准则项目工作组发布了欧盟可持续发展报告准则(ESRS)的第一批工作文件,其中包括《双重重要性概念指引》。

该指引基于利益相关者的信息需求,为企业判断某一事项是否纳入可持续发展报告提供了概念指导,进一步细化和拓展了重要性概念。

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

Exposure Draft Disclosure of Accounting Policies Proposed amendments to IAS 1 and IFRS Practice Statement 2Comments to be received by 29 November 2019Exposure Draft ED/2019/6 Disclosure of Accounting Policies is published by the International Accounting Standards Board (Board) for comment only. The proposals may be modified in the light of comments received before being issued in final form. Comments need to be received by 29 November 2019 and should be submitted in writing to the address below, by email to commentletters@ or electronically using our ‘Open for comment documents’ page at: https:///projects/open-for-comment/.All comments will be on the public record and posted on our website at unless the respondent requests confidentiality. Such requests will not normally be granted unless supported by good reason, for example, commercial confidence. Please see our website for details on this and how we use your personal data.Disclaimer: To the extent permitted by applicable law, the Board and the FRS Foundation (Foundation) expressly disclaim all liability howsoever arising from this publication or any translation thereof whether in contract, tort or otherwise to any person in respect of any claims or losses of any nature including direct, indirect, incidental or consequential loss, punitive damages, penalties or costs.Information contained in this publication does not constitute advice and should not be substituted for the services of an appropriately qualified professional.ISBN: 978-1-911629-36-8Copyright © 2019 IFRS FoundationAll rights reserved. Reproduction and use rights are strictly limited. Please contact the Foundation for further details at licences@.Copies of Board publications may be obtained from the Foundation’s Publications Department. Please address publication and copyright matters to publications@ or visit our webshop at http:// .The Foundation has trade marks registered around the world (Marks) including ‘I AS®’, ‘I ASB®’, the ‘IASB® logo’, ‘I FRI C®’, ‘I FRS®’, the I FRS® logo, ‘IFRS for SMEs®’, the IFRS for SMEs® logo, the ‘Hexagon Device’, ‘I nternational Accounting Standards®’, ‘I nternational Financial Reporting Standards®’, ‘I FRS Taxonomy®’ and ‘SIC®’. Further details of the Foundation’s Marks are available from the Foundation on request.The Foundation is a not-for-profit corporation under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, USA and operates in England and Wales as an overseas company (Company number: FC023235) with its principal office in the Columbus Building, 7 Westferry Circus, Canary Wharf, London, E14 4HD.D ISCLOSURE OF A CCOUNTING P OLICIES—P ROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO IAS 1 AND IFRS P RACTICES T A TEMENT 2C ONTENTSfrom page INTRODUCTION4 INVITATION TO COMMENT5 [DRAFT] AMENDMENTS TO IAS 1 PRESENTATION OF FINANCIALSTATEMENTS7 [DRAFT] AMENDMENTS TO IFRS PRACTICE STATEMENT 2 MAKINGMATERIALITY JUDGEMENTS10 APPROVAL BY THE BOARD17 BASIS FOR CONCLUSIONS ON THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO IAS 1AND IFRS PRACTICE STATEMENT 218 ALTERNATIVE VIEW OF MR MARTIN EDELMANN ON THE EXPOSUREDRAFT DISCLOSURE OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES23 [DRAFT] AMENDMENTS TO OTHER IFRS STANDARDS AND PUBLICATIONS24 [DRAFT] AMENDMENT TO THE BASIS FOR CONCLUSIONS ON IAS 130© IFRS Foundation3E XPOSURE D RAFT—A UGUST 2019IntroductionI n this Exposure Draft, the I nternational Accounting Standards Board (Board) proposes amendments to I AS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements and I FRS Practice Statement 2 Making Material ity Judgements. The proposed amendments are intended to help entities provide accounting policy disclosures that are more useful to primary users of financial statements.AS 1 requires entities to disclose their ‘significant’ accounting policies. The Board proposes to replace that requirement with a requirement to disclose ‘material’accounting policies. In addition, the Board is proposing amendments to IAS 1 and IFRS Practice Statement 2 to help entities apply the concept of materiality in making decisions about accounting policy disclosures. The proposed amendments are intended to help entities:•identify and disclose all accounting policies that provide material information to primary users of financial statements; and•identify immaterial accounting policies and eliminate them from their financial statements.The proposed amendments build on Definition of Material, issued in October 2018, which made amendments to IAS 1 and IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors.4© IFRS FoundationD ISCLOSURE OF A CCOUNTING P OLICIES—P ROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO IAS 1 AND IFRS P RACTICES T A TEMENT 2Invitation to commentThe Board invites comments on the proposals in this Exposure Draft, particularly on the questions set out below. Comments are most helpful if they:(a)respond to the questions as stated;(b)indicate the specific paragraph or paragraphs to which they relate;(c)contain a clear rationale; and(d)include any alternative(s) the Board could consider, if applicable.The Board is requesting comments only on matters addressed in this Exposure Draft. Questions for respondentsQuestion 1The Board proposes to amend paragraph 117 of IAS 1 to require entities to disclose their ‘material’ accounting policies instead of their ‘significant’ accounting policies.Do you agree with this proposed amendment? If not, what changes do you suggest and why?Question 2The proposed new paragraph 117A of IAS 1 states that not all accounting policies relating to material transactions, other events or conditions are themselves material to an entity’s financial statements.Do you agree with this proposed statement? If not, what changes do you suggest and why?Question 3The proposed new paragraph 117B of IAS 1 lists examples of circumstances in which an entity is likely to consider an accounting policy to be material to its financial statements.Do the proposed examples accurately and helpfully describe such circumstances? If not, what changes do you suggest and why?Question 4The Board proposes to add to IFRS Practice Statement 2 two examples that illustrate how the concept of materiality can be applied in making decisions about accounting policy disclosures.Are these examples useful and do they demonstrate effectively how the concept of materiality can be applied in making decisions about accounting policy disclosures? If not, what changes do you suggest and why?© IFRS Foundation5E XPOSURE D RAFT—A UGUST 2019Question 5Would any wording or terminology introduced in the proposed amendments bedifficult to understand or to translate?Question 6Do you have any other comments about the proposals in this Exposure Draft?DeadlineThe Board will consider all comments received in writing by 29 November 2019.How to commentWe prefer to receive comments electronically. However, you may submit comments using any of the following methods:Electronically Visit the ‘Open for comment’ page at:https:///projects/open-for-commentBy email Send email comments to:commentletters@By post IFRS FoundationColumbus Building7 Westferry CircusCanary WharfLondon E14 4HDUnited KingdomYour comments will be on the public record and posted on our website unless you request confidentiality and we grant your request. We do not normally grant such requests unless they are supported by a good reason, for example, commercial confidence. Please see our website for details on this and on how we use your personal data.6© IFRS Foundation[Draft] Amendments to IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements Paragraphs 7, 10, 114, 117 and 122 are amended. Paragraphs 117A–117D and 139U are added. Paragraphs 118, 119 and 121 are deleted. New text is underlined and deleted text is struck through.DefinitionsThe following terms are used in this Standard with the meanings specified:Accounting policies is defined in paragraph 5 of IAS 8 Accounting Policies,Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors and is used in this Standard with the same meaning....Complete set of financial statementsA complete set of financial statements comprises:...(e)notes, comprising significant material accounting policies and otherexplanatory information;...NotesStructure...Examples of systematic ordering or grouping of the notes include:...(c)following the order of the line items in the statement(s) of profit or loss and other comprehensive income and the statement of financialposition, such as:...(ii)significant material accounting policies applied (seeparagraph 117);...Disclosure of accounting policies An entity shall d isclose its significant material accounting policiescomprising:. Information about an accounting policy is material if, when consid ered together with other information includ ed in an entity’s financial statements, it can reasonably be expected to influence d ecisions710114117D ISCLOSURE OF A CCOUNTING P OLICIES —P ROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO IAS 1 AND IFRS P RACTICES T A TEMENT 2© IFRS Foundation 7that primary users of general purpose financial statements make on the basis of those financial statements.(a)the measurement basis (or bases) used in preparing the financial statements; and (b)the other accounting policies used that are relevant to an understanding of the financial statements.Accounting policies that relate to immaterial transactions, other events or conditions are themselves immaterial and need not be disclosed. Furthermore,not all accounting policies relating to material transactions, other events or conditions are themselves material.An accounting policy is material if information about that accounting policy is needed to understand other material information in the financial statements.For example, an entity is likely to consider an accounting policy to be material to its financial statements if that accounting policy relates to material transactions, other events or conditions and:(a)was changed during the reporting period because the entity was required to or chose to change its policy and this change resulted in a material change to the amounts included in the financial statements;(b)was chosen from one or more alternatives in an I FRS Standard, for example, the option to measure investment property at either historical cost or fair value;(c)was developed in accordance with I AS 8 in the absence of an I FRS Standard that specifically applies;(d)relates to an area for which an entity is required to make significant judgements or assumptions in applying an accounting policy anddiscloses those judgements or assumptions in accordance with paragraphs 122 and 125 of IAS 1; or (e)applies the requirements of an IFRS Standard in a way that reflects the entity’s specific circumstances, for example, by explaining how the requirements of a Standard are applied to the facts and circumstances of a material class of transactions, other events or conditions.nformation about accounting policies that focuses on how an entity has applied the requirements in IFRS Standards to its own circumstances provides entity-specific information that is more useful to users of financial statements than standardised descriptions or information that only duplicates the recognition or measurement requirements of IFRS Standards.I f an entity concludes that an accounting policy is not material, the entity shall nevertheless disclose other information required by I FRS Standards if that information is material.[Deleted]It is important for an entity to inform users of the measurement basis or bases used in the financial statements (for example, historical cost, current cost, net realisable value, fair value or recoverable amount) because the basis on which an entity prepares the financial statements significantly affects 117A 117B 117C 117D 118E XPOSURE D RAFT —A UGUST 20198© IFRS Foundationusers’ analysis. When an entity uses more than one measurement basis in the financial statements, for example when particular classes of assets are revalued, it is sufficient to provide an indication of the categories of assets and liabilities to which each measurement basis is applied.[Deleted]I n deciding whether a particular accounting policy should be disclosed, management considers whether disclosure would assist users in understanding how transactions, other events and conditions are reflected in reported financial performance and financial position. Each entity considers the nature of its operations and the policies that the users of its financial statements would expect to be disclosed for that type of entity. Disclosure of particular accounting policies is especially useful to users when those policies are selected from alternatives allowed in I FRSs. An example is disclosure of whether an entity applies the fair value or cost model to its investment property (see AS 40 Investment Property ). Some FRSs specifically require disclosure of particular accounting policies, including choices made by management between different policies they allow. For example, AS 16requires disclosure of the measurement bases used for classes of property,plant and equipment....[Deleted]An accounting policy may be significant because of the nature of the entity’s operations even if amounts for current and prior periods are not material. I t is also appropriate to disclose each significant accounting policy that is not specifically required by IFRSs but the entity selects and applies in accordance with IAS 8.An entity shall d isclose, along with its significant material accounting policies or other notes, the jud gements, apart from those involving estimations (see paragraph 125), that management has made in the process of applying the entity’s accounting policies and that have the most significant effect on the amounts recognised in the financial statements....Transition and effective date...[Draft] Discl osure of Accounting Pol icies , which amends I AS 1 and I FRS PracticeStatement 2, and was issued in [date to be decided after exposure], amended paragraphs 7, 10, 114, 117 and 122, added paragraphs 117A–117D and deleted paragraphs 118, 119 and 121. An entity shall apply the amendments to IAS 1in annual periods beginning on or after [date to be decided after exposure].Earlier application is permitted. If an entity applies those amendments for an earlier period, it shall disclose that fact. The amendments shall be applied prospectively.119121122139U D ISCLOSURE OF A CCOUNTING P OLICIES —P ROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO IAS 1 AND IFRS P RACTICES T A TEMENT 2© IFRS Foundation 9[Draft] Amendments to IFRS Practice Statement 2 Making Materiality Judgements Paragraphs 88A–88D and their heading, and Examples S and T are added. Paragraphs 117, 117A and 117D of IAS 1 are added to the Appendix. New text is underlined.Specific topicsrmation about accounting policies Paragraph 117 of IAS 1 requires an entity to disclose its material accounting policies.Accounting policies that relate to immaterial transactions, other events or conditions are themselves immaterial and need not be disclosed. Accounting policies relating to material transactions, other events or conditions are disclosed if information provided by the accounting policies is material to the financial statements.An entity assesses whether information about its accounting policies is material to its financial statements by considering whether that information,together with other information in the financial statements, could reasonably be expected to influence decisions that primary users make on the basis of those financial statements. This assessment is made in the same way as for other information—by considering qualitative and quantitative factors as described in paragraphs 44–55. The diagram below illustrates how an entity assesses whether an accounting policy is material and therefore should be disclosed.88A88B 88CE XPOSURE D RAFT —A UGUST 201910© IFRS FoundationDiagram—determining whether an accounting policy is materialParagraph 117B of I AS 1 includes examples of circumstances in which anentity is likely to consider an accounting policy to be material:…For example, an entity is likely to consider an accounting policy to be materialto its financial statements if that accounting policy relates to materialtransactions, other events or conditions and:(a)was changed during the reporting period because the entity wasrequired to or chose to change its policy and this change resulted in amaterial change to the amounts included in the financial statements;(b)was chosen from one or more alternatives in an I FRS Standard, forexample, the option to measure investment property at either historicalcost or fair value;(c)was developed in accordance with I AS 8 in the absence of an I FRSStandard that specifically applies;(d)relates to an area for which an entity is required to make significantjudgements or assumptions in applying an accounting policy anddiscloses those judgements or assumptions in accordance withparagraphs 122 and 125 of IAS 1; or 88D D ISCLOSURE OF A CCOUNTING P OLICIES —P ROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO IAS 1 AND IFRS P RACTICES T ATEMENT 2© IFRS Foundation 11E XPOSURE D RAFT—A UGUST 2019(e)applies the requirements of an IFRS Standard in a way that reflects theentity’s specific circumstances, for example, by explaining how therequirements of a Standard are applied to the facts and circumstancesof a material class of transactions, other events or conditions.Example S—making materiality judgements and focusing on entity-specific information while avoiding standardised (‘boilerplate’) account-ing policy disclosuresBackgroundAn entity operates within the telecommunications industry. It has enteredinto a number of contracts with retail customers to deliver both a mobilephone handset and data services. A typical contract is one in which theentity will provide a customer with a handset and data services over a three-year period. The entity applies IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customersand recognises revenue when, or as, it satisfies its performance obligationsin line with the terms of the contract.The entity has identified the following performance obligations and relatedconsiderations:(a)handset—the customer makes monthly payments for the handsetover three years; and(b)data—the customer pays a fixed monthly charge to use a specifiedamount of data each month for a period of three years.For the handset, the entity recognises revenue when it has satisfied theperformance obligation (ie when it provides the handset to the customer).For the provision of data, the entity recognises revenue as it satisfies theperformance obligation (ie as the entity provides data services to the custom-er over the three-year life of the contract).The entity has concluded that revenue generated from these contracts ismaterial to the reporting period.continued... 12© IFRS FoundationD ISCLOSURE OF A CCOUNTING P OLICIES—P ROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO IAS 1 AND IFRS P RACTICES T A TEMENT 2...continuedApplicationThe entity notes that for this type of contract there are two separateaccounting policies for two distinct sources of revenue:(a)revenue for the sale of handsets; and(b)revenue for the provision of data services.Having identified that revenue from contracts of this type is material to thefinancial statements, the entity assesses whether its accounting policies forrevenue from these contracts are, in fact, material.The entity evaluates the effect of disclosing the accounting policies byconsidering the presence of qualitative factors. The entity noted that itsrevenue recognition accounting policies:(a)were not changed during the reporting period;(b)were not chosen from alternatives in IFRS Standards; and(c)were not developed in accordance with IAS 8 Accounting Policies,Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors in the absence of an IFRSStandard that specifically applies.However, the entity’s revenue recognition accounting policies relate to anarea for which the entity:(a)has made significant judgements in applying its accounting policies,for example, in deciding how to allocate the transaction price to theperformance obligations; and(b)has had to consider how the requirements of the Standard apply toits own circumstances.Consequently, the entity concluded that disclosing the accounting policiesfor revenue recognition is likely to be necessary for the primary users of itsfinancial statements to understand information in the financial statementsand could reasonably be expected to influence those users’ decisions. Forexample, understanding that some revenue is recognised at a point in timeand some is recognised over time is likely to help users understand howreported cash flows relate to revenue. The entity therefore assessed informa-tion about the accounting policies for revenue recognition, includinginformation about the timing of revenue recognition, as material.© IFRS Foundation13E XPOSURE D RAFT—A UGUST 2019Example T—materiality judgements on accounting policies that onlyduplicate requirements in IFRS StandardsBackgroundIntangible assets and property, plant and equipment are material to anentity’s financial statements. In 20X1 the entity disclosed the followingaccounting policy relating to impairment of non-current assets:The carrying amounts of the group’s intangible assets and property, plant andequipment are reviewed at each reporting date to determine whether there isany indication of impairment. If any such indication exists, the asset’s recover-able amount is estimated. For goodwill and intangibles without a finite life,the recoverable amount is estimated at least annually.An impairment loss is recognised in the statement of profit or loss wheneverthe carrying amount of an asset or its cash-generating unit (CGU) exceeds itsrecoverable amount.The recoverable amount of assets is the greater of their fair value less costs tosell and their value in use. In measuring value in use, estimated future cashflows are discounted to present value using a pre-tax discount rate thatreflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risksspecific to the asset. For an asset that does not generate largely independentcash inflows, the recoverable amount is determined for the CGU to which theasset belongs.Impairment losses recognised in respect of CGUs are allocated first to reducethe carrying amount of any goodwill allocated to that CGU and then to reducethe carrying amount of the other assets in the unit on a pro rata basis.An impairment loss in respect of goodwill is not subsequently reversed. Forother assets, an impairment loss is reversed if there has been a change in theestimates used to determine the recoverable amount, but only to the extentthat the new carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount thatwould have been determined, net of depreciation and amortisation, if noimpairment loss had been recognised.continued... 14© IFRS Foundation...continued ApplicationHaving identified that assets that are subject to impairment testing arematerial to the financial statements, the entity assesses whether its account-ing policy for impairment is, in fact, material.The entity’s impairment accounting policy relates to an area for which the entity is required to make significant judgements or assumptions as descri-bed in paragraphs 122 and 125 of IAS 1.However, the entity noted that it also makes disclosures about its impair-ment assessments and its significant judgements and assumptions (forexample, the discount rate used to measure value in use) in meeting thedisclosure requirements of IAS 36 Impairment of Assets and paragraphs 122and 125 of IAS 1. The entity therefore concluded that there is no materialinformation to include in a description of its impairment accounting policythat is not disclosed elsewhere in the financial statements.The entity concluded that disclosing a separate accounting policy for impair-ment would not provide information that could reasonably be expected to influence decisions made by the primary users of the entity’s financialstatements based on those financial statements. This is because the account-ing policy does not contain entity-specific information and only duplicatesthe requirements of IFRS Standards. However, the entity is still required tocomply with the specific disclosure requirements of IAS 36 and paragraphs122 and 125 of IAS 1, and provide information about how it has appliedIAS 36 and those paragraphs of IAS 1 during the period, if that informationis material....Appendix References to the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting and IFRS Standards...Extracts from IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements...Paragraph 117Referred to in paragraphs 88A and 88C of the Practice StatementAn entity shall disclose its material accounting policies. Information about an accounting policy is material if, when consid ered together with other information includ ed in an entity’s financial statements, it can reasonably be expected to influence d ecisions that primary users of general purpose financial statements make on the basis of those financial statements.D ISCLOSURE OF A CCOUNTING P OLICIES —P ROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO IAS 1 AND IFRS P RACTICES T A TEMENT 2© IFRS Foundation 15E XPOSURE D RAFT—A UGUST 2019Paragraph 117AReferred to in paragraph 88C of the Practice StatementAccounting policies that relate to immaterial transactions, other events or conditions are themselves immaterial and need not be disclosed. Furthermore, not all accounting policies relating to material transactions, other events or conditions are themselves material.Paragraph 117DReferred to in paragraph 88C of the Practice StatementIf an entity concludes that an accounting policy is not material, the entity shall nevertheless disclose other information required by IFRS Standards if that information is material. ...16© IFRS FoundationApproval by the Board of Exposure Draft Disclosure of Accounting Policies published in August 2019The Exposure Draft Disclosure of Accounting Policies was approved for publication by 13 of 14 members of the I nternational Accounting Standards Board. Mr Edelmann voted against its publication. His alternative view is set out after the Basis for Conclusions.Hans Hoogervorst ChairmanSuzanne Lloyd Vice ‑ChairNick AndersonMartin EdelmannFrançoise FloresAmaro Luiz de Oliveira GomesGary KabureckJianqiao LuTakatsugu OchiDarrel ScottThomas ScottChungwoo SuhAnn TarcaMary TokarD ISCLOSURE OF A CCOUNTING P OLICIES —P ROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO IAS 1 AND IFRS P RACTICES T ATEMENT 2© IFRS Foundation 17Basis for Conclusions on the proposed amendments to IAS 1 and IFRS Practice Statement 2This Basis for Conclusions accompanies, but is not part of, the proposed amendments. This Basis for Conclusions summarises the considerations of the International Accounting Standards Board (Board)when developing the proposed amendments. Individual Board members gave greater weight to some factors than to others.BackgroundI n March 2017 the Board issued the Discussion Paper Disc osure Initiative—Principl es of Discl osure (Discussion Paper) to help it identify and address issues related to the disclosure of information in financial statements prepared applying I FRS Standards. One issue related to the disclosure of accounting policies.The Discussion Paper noted that:(a)users of financial statements often express concerns about how accounting policies are disclosed in the financial statements;(b)paragraph 117 of I AS 1 requires entities to disclose their significant accounting policies; and (c)stakeholders’ views differ about what constitutes a significant accounting policy.The Discussion Paper explored an approach to address the concerns describedin paragraph BC2 that would have introduced the following categories of accounting policy:Category 1—accounting policies, disclosure of which are always necessary to understand information in an entity’s financial statements, that relate to material transactions, other events or conditions;Category 2—accounting policies that are not included in Category 1, but also relate to transactions, other events or conditions that are material to an entity’s financial statements, either because of the amounts involved or because of their nature; andCategory 3—any other accounting policies used by an entity in preparing the financial statements (ie accounting policies not included in Categories 1 or 2).The Board’s preliminary view, described in the Discussion Paper, was that both Category 1 and Category 2 accounting policies should be disclosed.Many respondents supported the Board’s efforts to develop guidance forentities about which accounting policies they should disclose. However, they rejected the Board’s categorisation of accounting policies as confusing and too prescriptive.Feedback suggested that the ineffective disclosure of significant accounting policies is primarily due to difficulties in applying the concept of materiality.This feedback came from stakeholders, including users of financial statements, many of whom agreed that materiality should be the basis of anyBC1BC2BC3BC4BC5E XPOSURE D RAFT —A UGUST 201918© IFRS Foundation。

相关文档
最新文档