惩罚性赔偿的解释与比较 Punitive Damage 英语论文
惩罚性赔偿论文经济法论文:论惩罚性赔偿制度在经济法律制度中的引进

惩罚性赔偿论文经济法论文:论惩罚性赔偿制度在经济法律制度中的引进摘要:尽管我国已经构建起了惩罚性赔偿制度,但是该制度在我国并没有发挥应有的作用,其惩罚和吓阻的力度不够,导致危害消费者的事件层出不穷,这就需要我国继续完善我国的惩罚性赔偿制度。
笔者主张将惩罚性赔偿制度引入我国经济法中,这是由经济法的独立性和经济法责任的独立性决定的,同时是因为惩罚性赔偿制度与经济法保护社会整体利益的基本精神相契合的缘故。
关键词:惩罚性赔偿;经济法;过错;惩罚性赔偿一、惩罚性赔偿制度概述惩罚性损害赔偿(punitive damages),亦称示范性的赔偿(exemplary damages)或报复性的赔偿(vindictive damages)。
按美国侵权行为法重述(第二版),指“不同于补偿性损害赔偿(compensatory damages)和象征性损害赔偿(nominal damages),是为惩罚被告人邪恶行为以及防止其本人和其他人再发生类似行为判决其承担的赔偿金。
”①惩罚性赔偿制度最远可追溯到《出埃及记》第二十二章中。
公元前十八世纪的《汉漠拉比法典》中规定:如果沙马鲁从塔木卡那里取得银子后赖账,那么,“沙马鲁应按其所取得之银三倍交还塔木卡。
”反之,如果塔木卡说谎,那么他“应按彼所收回之全数,六倍偿还沙马鲁。
”②古印度的《摩奴法典》中也有类似规定。
古希腊也有惩罚性赔偿思想,如柏拉图认为:“所有小偷应该偿还两倍于所盗物品的价值。
”③罗马法时代,惩罚性赔偿制度得到了进一步发展。
大多数学者都认为,英美法中的惩罚性赔偿最初起源于1763年英国wilks v.wood④一案中的判决。
二、惩罚性赔偿制度在经济法律制度中引进的可能性和必要性1.惩罚性赔偿制度在经济法律制度中引进的可能性我国在经济法领域已经有法律规范对惩罚性赔偿制度做出规定。
这为惩罚性赔偿制度在经济法中的引进提供了制度基础。
我国的《消费者权益保护法》正式确立了惩罚性赔偿制度。
惩罚性赔偿研究

惩罚性赔偿研究引言:惩罚性赔偿(punitive damages),也被称为惩罚性赔款或罚金,是指被告在责任追究后,除了赔偿原告因为被告的过失或恶意行为所遭受的实际损失之外,还要支付额外的金额作为一种惩罚。
本文将探讨惩罚性赔偿的起源和目的,评估它在不同领域下的运用情况,并提出对于惩罚性赔偿制度的一些思考和建议。
一、惩罚性赔偿的起源和目的惩罚性赔偿的起源可以追溯到古代,古罗马法中的公益诉讼就设有类似的机制。
惩罚性赔偿最早应用于刑事案件中,作为对犯罪行为的惩罚手段之一。
后来,随着社会的发展,惩罚性赔偿开始在民事案件中得到应用,其主要目的是通过增加被告的赔偿金额,以对被告的违法行为进行惩罚,促使其改正行为,维护社会秩序。
二、惩罚性赔偿的运用情况1.医疗事故领域医疗事故中的惩罚性赔偿主要是针对医院或医生明知故犯的恶意行为而设立的。
比如,故意掺假药、错误施行手术等违法行为。
惩罚性赔偿在医疗领域的运用,可以提高医疗机构和医生的责任心和审慎程度,从而减少医疗事故的发生。
2.知识产权领域在知识产权领域,惩罚性赔偿主要是应对侵权行为过于严重、损害程度较大的情况。
例如,某企业恶意侵犯他人知识产权并获得巨额利益,对其进行罚款可以对侵权者形成有力的震慑作用。
这种制度促使企业加强知识产权保护,维护创新和正常市场秩序。
3.消费者保护领域消费者保护是惩罚性赔偿的广泛运用领域之一,一方面,通过对违法商家进行高额赔偿,保护受害消费者的合法权益;另一方面,对违法行为进行处罚,起到制约社会不良商业行为的作用。
三、对于惩罚性赔偿制度的思考和建议虽然惩罚性赔偿在某些领域下取得了显著效果,但也存在一些问题和争议。
在制定和执行惩罚性赔偿制度时,我们应该考虑以下几点:1.确定标准和程序惩罚性赔偿应该建立在明确的标准和程序之上。
目前,对于惩罚性赔偿的计算方式和数额设定存在较大的不确定性,容易引发不公正判决。
因此,应该完善相关规定,确保公正性和可操作性。
英美法律规定惩罚性赔偿(3篇)

第1篇引言惩罚性赔偿(Punitive Damages)是一种旨在惩罚违法行为并阻止类似行为的法律赔偿。
在英美法系中,惩罚性赔偿被视为一种重要的法律工具,用于保护消费者、投资者和公众免受不法行为的侵害。
本文将探讨英美法系中惩罚性赔偿的法律规定、适用范围、判定标准和法律实践。
一、惩罚性赔偿的法律规定1. 美国法在美国,惩罚性赔偿主要受州法规定,联邦法中也有相关规定。
以下是美国惩罚性赔偿的主要法律规定:- 联邦法:《民事侵权法重述》(Restatement (Second) of Torts)第908条规定,当被告的违法行为具有欺诈性、恶意或极端鲁莽时,法院可以判决惩罚性赔偿。
- 州法:各州对惩罚性赔偿的规定有所不同。
一些州要求原告证明被告的违法行为具有欺诈性、恶意或极端鲁莽,而另一些州则没有这样的要求。
2. 英国法在英国,惩罚性赔偿主要适用于侵权法领域。
以下是英国惩罚性赔偿的主要法律规定:- 《侵权法改革法案》(Reform of the Law of Damages Act 1996):该法案规定了惩罚性赔偿的适用条件和标准,要求原告证明被告的违法行为具有欺诈性、恶意或极端鲁莽。
- 《民事司法法》(Civil Justice Act 1998):该法案对惩罚性赔偿的金额进行了限制,规定惩罚性赔偿不得超过实际损失的2倍。
二、惩罚性赔偿的适用范围惩罚性赔偿适用于以下几种情况:1. 欺诈行为:当被告故意误导原告,使其遭受损失时,可以判决惩罚性赔偿。
2. 恶意行为:当被告明知自己的行为会损害原告,但仍故意为之时,可以判决惩罚性赔偿。
3. 极端鲁莽行为:当被告的行为超出合理范围,具有极大的危险性和潜在损害时,可以判决惩罚性赔偿。
4. 产品责任:当被告生产的缺陷产品造成原告严重伤害时,可以判决惩罚性赔偿。
5. 环境侵权:当被告的违法行为对环境造成严重污染和损害时,可以判决惩罚性赔偿。
三、惩罚性赔偿的判定标准1. 美国法在美国,法院在判定惩罚性赔偿时,主要考虑以下因素:- 被告的违法行为:法院会考虑被告的违法行为是否具有欺诈性、恶意或极端鲁莽。
惩罚性赔偿

惩罚性赔偿目录[隐藏]概述惩罚性赔偿的特征惩罚性赔偿的功能[编辑本段]概述惩罚性赔偿,英文对照:Punitive Damages、Examplary Damages(示范性赔偿)、Vindictive Damages(报复性赔偿)惩罚性赔偿,又称示范性赔偿或报复性赔偿,是指由法庭所作出的赔偿数额超出实际损害数额的赔偿。
惩罚性赔偿是加重赔偿的一种原则,目的是在针对被告过去故意的侵权行为造成的损失进行弥补之外,对被告进行处罚以防止将来重犯,同时也达到惩戒他人的目的;如果被告的侵权行为是基于收益大于赔偿的精心算计,也可以给予惩罚性赔偿,在这种情况下如果只同意给予补偿性赔偿,侵权人只是相当于事后通过赔偿补办手续,但没有任何风险。
关于惩罚性赔偿的起源问题,学者间存在不同的看法,一般认为,英美法系中的惩罚性赔偿起源于1763年英国法官LordCamden在HuckleV.money一案中的判决,美国是在1784年的GenayV.Norris一案中最早确认这一制度。
在18世纪,英美法系中的惩罚性赔偿主要适用于诽谤、诱奸、恶意攻击、诬告等使受害人遭受精神痛苦的案件。
其产生的根本原因在于,当时的赔偿制度难以对受害人的精神损失予以补偿,通过惩罚性赔偿制度,在赔偿受害人实际物质损失时,对受害人的精神损失也予以物化,给予与物质损失同等的金钱赔偿待遇。
可见,最初的惩罚性赔偿与今天的惩罚性赔偿有着明显不同,它是在不承认对精神损失以物质赔偿的民事责任制度中,对精神损失的一种替代赔偿,即所谓的惩罚性赔偿部分是对精神损失赔偿的替代。
延至当今社会,惩罚性赔偿从其涵义到适用范围均发生了很大变化。
其一,现在所谓的惩罚性赔偿,是在把精神损失的赔偿作为一项独立赔偿事由的前提下,将精神损失与物质损失一并计为实际损失,并在此实际损失的基础上加一定数额或比例的惩罚性赔偿,用公式可以表示为:最初的惩罚性赔偿总额=实际物质损失赔偿额+替代性的惩罚赔偿额(精神损失赔偿额);现在的惩罚性赔偿总额=实际物质损失赔偿额+精神损失赔偿额+惩罚赔偿额。
“惩罚性赔偿在美国环境侵权中适用”林业经济论文.

“惩罚性赔偿在美国环境侵权中适用”林业经济论文文章简介:内容摘要:环境侵权是一种特殊的侵权形式,对这种形式的侵权各国适用的救济方式各异,其中惩罚性赔偿是美国环境侵权司法中比较有特色的一项制度。
正是基于环境侵权的特殊性,重点研究美国的惩罚性赔偿制度,介绍此制度在美国环境侵权中的适用现状,分析其适用条件,并结合案例探究确定惩罚性赔偿金额时需要考虑的因素。
在此…内容摘要:环境侵权是一种特殊的侵权形式,对这种形式的侵权各国适用的救济方式各异,其中惩罚性赔偿是美国环境侵权司法中比较有特色的一项制度。
正是基于环境侵权的特殊性,重点研究美国的惩罚性赔偿制度,介绍此制度在美国环境侵权中的适用现状,分析其适用条件,并结合案例探究确定惩罚性赔偿金额时需要考虑的因素。
在此基础上,提出本制度在目前遇到的一些问题及其解决之道。
希望能对我国的环境侵权纠纷处理提供些许参考素材。
关键词:惩罚性赔偿同质赔偿补偿性赔偿环境侵权一、引言环境侵权问题已经提出多年,学者们围绕着传统侵权理论和现代环境问题的关系苦思冥想,试图将两者“巧妙缝合”起来。
但是从一开始我们就似乎忽视了一个本质问题——环境侵权和传统侵权究竟有什么差距。
如果说环境侵权是一种特殊的侵权类型,那么从本质上讲环境侵权仍然没能跳出侵权理论的范围。
环境侵权的体系应该构建在侵权法的体系之下。
那么,我们所要做的便是对环境侵权的特殊性进行研究,而这些特殊性中一个核心的问题便是环境侵权之后的赔偿问题。
一般情况下,民事侵权遵循同质赔偿的原则,即赔偿的数额应以受害人的实际损失为标准,不允许惩罚性赔偿的运用。
环境民事侵权是民事侵权的一种特殊形式,具体指由于环境污染或破坏而导致的对特定或不特定的人的生命、健康、财产、精神及环境权益的损害。
在大多数国家中,按照一般的民事侵权同质赔偿原则,人的生命、健康、财产的损害基本可以得到赔偿;而精神和环境权益的损害则因无法确定而被排除在赔偿之外。
这种现象的存在,一方面不利于受害者的救济和环境权益的保护;另一方面放纵了一些恶意或疏忽大意的环境侵权者。
浅议医疗损害惩罚性赔偿制度

浅议医疗损害惩罚性赔偿制度郑冬渝在2000年8月9日,Allan Navarro进入大学社区医院Carrollwood分院求诊,表现为头痛,恶心,头晕,意识混乱及双视。
病史中包括高血压、糖尿病、高血脂、及中风的家族史。
护士还注意到他行走不稳。
当他在诊断室中他曾告诉医生助理Herranz他在当天曾有突然的头痛,感到什么东西在头脑里爆炸了。
患者控告Herranz未全面采集病史与进行神经方面的检查。
患者在该院呆了约6个小时,其间作了两个CT,医生Austin以“鼻窦炎一头痛”的诊断,开了止痛药与抗生素后把他打发回家了。
第二天早上,Navar-ro头痛加剧、言语迟缓、恶心、意识混乱、行走困难,于6点左右再进行该院,仍未能准确诊断,下午转院至大学社区医院Fletcher分院,诊断为中风,进行了手术,手术期间陷入昏迷,四个月后醒来,留下了偏瘫与精神功能障碍的后遗症。
患者发起控告,医生助理Herranz、医生Austin、以及他们的雇主Carrollwood Emergency Physicians与Franklin Favata & Hulls成为被告,在2006年9月与10月,上述被告被判决承担医疗事故责任,责任包括:给予本人共1560万医疗账单、61.6万(过去及将来的)工资损失、4650万的赔偿以弥补(过去及将来的)痛苦与磨难;予其妻子5250万以弥补丈夫服务、安慰、社交、以及关注的损失;其子Scottie150万以弥补来自父亲的服务、安慰、陪伴、以及社交的损失。
总计1亿1千6百70万美元。
随后陪审团还裁决了1亿零10万美元的惩罚性赔偿,将总数额增加至2亿1千6百80万美元。
该案例涉及到医疗事故的相关问题,而处理医疗事故一般依据的是民法中的侵权法,从上述的案例中可以看出,适用于侵权法的处理体现了一种惩罚性的赔偿。
而对于我国来说,近年来医疗服务行业有了较大的进步,但仍然存在大量的医疗事故,尽管我国颁布了《医疗事故处理条例》,对正确处理医疗事故,保证医患双方的合法权益起了积极的保障作用,但是其在实施的过程中也存在不少的问题,尤其是关于赔偿制度,现行法律文件规定医疗赔偿的数额仅从受害人的实际损失为限,这对于处于弱势地位的患者是不利的。
论专利侵权中的惩罚性赔偿
论专利侵权中的惩罚性赔偿摘要:惩罚性赔偿制度起源于英美法系,是指法庭在下判决时,除了填补性赔偿外再额外判予原告的损害赔偿。
《美国专利法》在第284条中规定了专利侵权中的惩罚性赔偿条款,另外我国台湾的《专利法》中也曾出现过惩罚性赔偿制度。
鉴于专利侵权的特殊性,不少学者认为我国也应当设立专利侵权中的惩罚性赔偿制度,且在2012年的《中华人民共和国专利法修改草案》中也已初步拟定相关条款。
本文将在惩罚性赔偿制度在各国实践中的效果及该制度在我国其他法律法规中实践的效果,就该制度是否应在我国专利法中设立及如何设立进行探讨。
论文将从惩罚性赔偿制度的含义特点及其功能开始进行探讨,再以国内外已适用该制度及曾适用该制度的地区的种种实例进行分析,参照各国情形,结合我国国情提出我国专利侵权中惩罚性赔偿适用的条件及适用范围,在《专利修改草案》的基础上提出自己的建议。
关键词:专利侵权;惩罚性赔偿;赔偿金额额度;故意侵权The punitive damages of patent infringementAbstract: The punitive damages is originated in Anglo-American law, it refers to the judgment of the lower court, in addition to re-fill the additional damages awarded plaintiffs damages. "US Patent Law" stipulated in Article 284 of the patent infringement in terms of punitive damages, in addition to Taiwan's "Patent Law" has appeared in punitive damages. Given the special nature of patent infringement, many scholars believe that China should also establish a patent infringement in the system of punitive damages, and in the "People's Republic of China Patent Law Amendment Bill" in 2012 has also been tentatively related provisions. This article will, for the system should be established and whether to explore how to set up in China's patent law system of punitive damages in effect in each country practice and the system of other laws and regulations in effect in practice.Papers from the meaning of the features and functionality of punitivedamages regime began to explore, then at home and abroad have been applied to various instances of the system and the application of the system of the region was analyzed with reference to the case of the countries, with China's national conditions of China's patent infringement conditions and scope of application of punitive damages, on the basis of its own proposals, "revised draft patent" on.Keywords: patent infringement; punitive damages; Compensation amount; Infringement intentionally惩罚性赔偿制度自2009年起就在我国得到迅速发展,在《中华人民共和国食品安全法》、《中华人民共和国侵权责任法》、以及《中华人民共和国消费者权益保护法》中均有涉及,为我国的民事赔偿制度注入了新的血液。
论惩罚性赔偿制度的确立与适用(一)
论惩罚性赔偿制度的确立与适用(一)摘要:惩罚性赔偿是英美法系创造的制度,具有独特的惩罚和遏制功能。
我国《消费者权益保护法》第四十九条也有双倍赔偿的惩罚性规定,但在适用中还有许多不尽如人意之处,存在很多局限。
文章重点分析了在我国民法典中完整确立惩罚性赔偿制度的必要性,并就其适用提出了一些可行性建议。
关键词:惩罚性赔偿;民事责任;民法典;适用惩罚性赔偿制度是英美判例法所创造的,更多地被称作“惩罚性损害赔偿” (punitivedamages/exemplarydamages )。
国外法律专家对之定义为:“就是侵权行为人恶意实施该行为,或对行为有重大过失时,以对行为人实施惩罚和追求一般抑制效果为目的,法院在判令行为人支付通常赔偿金(compensatorydamages )的同时,还可以判令行为人支付高于受害人实际损失的赔偿金。
”1在]我国随着《消费者权益保护法》的出台,对该制度的研究也呈现出较繁荣的景象,但时下存在的问题和争论依然很多。
本文主要从其确立的必要性和可适用性角度论述我们的一些观点,请专家批评、指正。
一、惩罚性赔偿制度是我国规范、调整当前无序民事生活的必要选择马克思主义法学认为,一项法律制度的确立不是主观臆造或凭空产生的,它总是和一定历史阶段的发展要求相适应着。
我们主张确立惩罚性赔偿制度也正是基于该制度的独特功能非常适应当前我国社会发展的需要。
(一)我国民事生活不理想的现状由于经济发展不平衡、新道德体系没有建立、人权保护起步较晚等原因,当前在我国民事生活中侵权、欺诈等无序情状比较严重。
典型多发的情形,如:不尊重他人基本人权,凭优势地位———包括凭有权、有钱、有势或体格的强壮等随意侵犯他人;伪劣商品生产、销售屡禁不止且有愈演愈烈之势等等。
它们有的仅仅是一种羞辱,如扇个耳光;有的损害健康甚至侵害生命,如2004 年春在安徽阜阳发生的“劣质奶粉侵害婴儿案”,使上百名婴幼儿健康或生命受到伤害。
公民在生活中缺乏一定的安全和秩序感,这不能不与我们当前的民事法律制度没有发挥应有的作用或根本就不健全密切相关。
论惩罚性赔偿制度的确立及其适用
论惩处性赔偿制度的确立与适用邢海宝余浩上传时刻:2005-9-6摘要:惩处性赔偿是英美法系制造的制度,具有独特的惩处和遏制功能。
我国《消费者权益爱护法》第四十九条也有双倍赔偿的惩处性规定,但在适用中还有许多不尽如人意之处,存在专门多局限。
文章重点分析了在我国民法典中完整确立惩处性赔偿制度的必要性,并就其适用提出了一些可行性建议。
关键词:惩处性赔偿;民事责任;民法典;适用惩处性赔偿制度是英美判例法所制造的,更多地被称作“惩处性损害赔偿”(punitivedamages/ exemplary damages)。
国外法律专家对之定义为:“确实是侵权行为人恶意实施该行为,或对行为有重大过失时,以对行为人实施惩处和追求一般抑制效果为目的,法院在判令行为人支付通常赔偿金(compensatory damages)的同时,还能够判令行为人支付高于受害人实际损失的赔偿金。
”[1]在我国随着《消费者权益爱护法》的出台,对该制度的研究也呈现出较繁荣的景象,但时下存在的问题和争论依旧专门多。
本文要紧从其确立的必要性和可适用性角度论述我们的一些观点,请专家批判、指正。
一、惩处性赔偿制度是我国规范、调整当前无序民事生活的必要选择马克思主义法学认为,一项法律制度的确立不是主观臆造或凭空产生的,它总是和一定历史时期的进展要求相适应着。
我们主张确立惩处性赔偿制度也正是基于该制度的独特功能特不适应当前我国社会进展的需要。
(一)我国民事生活不理想的现状由于经济进展不平衡、新道德体系没有建立、人权爱护起步较晚等缘故,当前在我国民事生活中侵权、欺诈等无序情状比较严峻。
典型多发的情形,如:不尊重他人差不多人权,凭优势地位———包括凭有权、有钞票、有势或体格的强壮等随意侵犯他人;伪劣商品生产、销售屡禁不止且有愈演愈烈之势等等。
它们有的仅仅是一种羞辱,如扇个耳光;有的损害健康甚至侵害生命,如2004年春在安徽阜阳发生的“劣质奶粉侵害婴儿案”,使上百名婴幼儿健康或生命受到损害。
论美国侵权法上之惩罚性赔偿
第四部分是美国侵权法上之惩罚性赔偿的立法与司法,主要介绍了美国各州对侵权法上之惩罚性赔偿的立法实践与美国联邦最高法院的司法实践,并分别作了简要评价。
第五部分是美国侵权法上之惩罚性赔偿的发展,主要探讨了当代美国侵权法的改革与惩罚性赔偿制度的发展。
在本文的引言部分,主要分析了我国目前的社会实践对惩罚性赔偿制度的需求;在本文的结语部分,主要探讨了我国目前关于惩罚性赔偿的立法建议,并提出了民事责任的理念更新对于移植惩罚性赔偿制度重要意义。
关键词:美国,侵权法,惩罚性赔偿A STUDY OF THE PUNITIVE DAMAGES IN AMERICANTORT LAWABSTRACTRelative to the Civil Law system, the punitive damages in Common Law system is more mature in the theory research and legal practice. From the perspective of comparative law, there are differences in the punitive damages between American law and English law. And the differences also exist in the tort law, contract law, insurance law and bankruptcy law in the punitive damages in America. This paper mainly discussed the punitive damages of the American tort law, including five parts.Part one is about the historical evolvement of the punitive damages, introducing the course from ancient code time, Roman law time to recent English law and American law time, and its purpose is to help understand and analyze the modern punitive damages in American tort law.Part two is about the definition, nature and purpose of the punitive damages in American tort law, identifying its definition, reviewing the relation among public policy, discretion and the nature of punitive damages, and analyzing the its purposes of deterrent and punishment and its function in the litigation expenses and petty injury.Part three is about the types of tort to which punitive damages appliesin America law, mainly discussing three types from the view of fault: intentional tort, negligent tort and strict liability, and analyzing the application of the punitive damages in each type.Part four is about the legislature and justice of punitive damages of tort law in America, discussing the legislative practice in the states and the judicial practice in Supreme Court of United States, and making a brief evaluation.Part five is about the development of punitive damages in American tort law, primarily discussing the recent reform of American tort law and development of punitive damages.In the introduction part of this paper, social need for punitive damages in current China was analyzed; in the last conclusion part, legislative advice on punitive damages in China was discussed; and finally pointing out great significance of the updating of civil liability idea to the transplanting of punitive damages in China.KEY WORDS: America, Tort Law, Punitive Damages目录引言:从“欣弗”事件切入 (1)1 惩罚性赔偿的历史沿革 (5)1.1公元前的古代法典时代 (5)1.2罗马法时代 (6)1.3近现代的英国法与美国法 (7)2 美国侵权法上之惩罚性赔偿的定义、性质与目的 (13)2.1美国侵权法上之惩罚性赔偿的定义 (13)2.2美国侵权法上之惩罚性赔偿的性质 (15)2.3美国侵权法上之惩罚性赔偿的目的 (18)3 美国法上适用惩罚性赔偿的侵权行为类型 (23)3.1故意的侵权行为 (24)3.2过失的侵权行为 (31)3.3严格责任 (35)4 美国侵权法上之惩罚性赔偿的立法与司法 (38)4.1美国部分州法及其评价 (38)4.2美国联邦司法 (42)5 美国侵权法的改革与惩罚性赔偿的发展 (46)5.1美国侵权法的改革 (46)5.2惩罚性赔偿的发展 (48)代结语:惩罚性赔偿与民事责任的理念更新 (50)参考文献 (53)致谢 (56)攻读学位期间发表(或录用)的学术论文目录 (58)引言:从“欣弗”事件切入最近几年来,我国的药品质量与药品安全问题愈发凸显出来,继二零零六年四月份的“齐齐哈尔假药事件”后,八月份发生“欣弗事件”,造成多人死亡并出现众多危害人体健康的不良反应,引起国人广泛关注。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
惩罚性赔偿的解释与比较Punitive Damage Explanationand ContrastIntroduction to Punitive DamagePunitive damage is the damage which is accessed to punish any defendants for any kind of outrageous conduct to bring in reformation to the defendant and to the others who are also engaged in such outrageous conduct. It is quite similar to that of the punishments given under legal regulations. Punitive damages are also known as exemplary damages.The main objective of punitive damage is to provide compensation to the plaintiff and to make the plaintiff able to receive some kind ofpunitive damage award. Punitive damages are generally awarded if it is observed that compensatory damages are inadequate remedial options. The court can impose punitive damage award to protect the plaintiff from under-compensations.The court also allows an opportunity for redressing undetectable civil wrongs under the norms of the criminal justice system. In case of violation of any law, punitive damages seem to be most commonly used remedial options to the plaintiffs. In the cases where violations to any law are difficult to get identified, punitive damages are considered as effective. But punitive damages are awarded to any plaintiff in a country can vary from punitive damage awarded in another country.For example, in the European Court punitive damages considered in the cases where violations to any private international law or public policy doctrine take place. Punitive damage awards are generally found to be more than the provable injuries of the plaintiffs or claimants. Hence, punitive damages are only awarded in some specific cases. Punitive damages mainly observed in the case where civil wrong conducts results in loss or harm to the claimant and it is a legal obligation for the individual who has committed any kind of tortious act as per common law jurisdictions. Sometimes, financial losses, emotional distress, injuries, negligence, invasion of privacy, etc. are also considered to be civil wrongdoings under the regulations and norms of common law jurisdictions. In these cases, punitive damages are awarded to the claimants or plaintiffs. Aplaintiff is an individual initiating a lawsuit in a court to seek any kind of legal remedy. The term plaintiff is mainly used in civil cases. The legal investigation is conducted as per the instructions of the court to identify whether the claim of the plaintiff is truthful or not. The court allows punitive damages to the plaintiffs or claimants if the compensatory damages are found to be inadequate as compared to the loss suffered by the plaintiffs or claimants.Punitive damages can be defined as monetary rewards to be ordered by the court and to be paid to the plaintiff by a defendant in a lawsuit case. It is highly common for the claimant or the plaintiff to be awarded as compensation or money for any wrong committed by the defendants. The money of the compensation which is to be paid to the plaintiffs can includeproperty damage award, medical bills, and even damages to be awarded only to punish the defendants for their misconduct. The punitive damage award is paid by the defendant to the plaintiff. Punitive damages are the compensatory damages which are paid in addition to the actual loss suffered by the plaintiff or claimant. This is paid by the defendant to the plaintiff. It is also an act of giving punishment to the defendant for any kind of reckless and willful misconduct. The concept of punitive damages has been originated somewhere between 1970 and 1975.These damages are also known as exemplary damages because the monetary amount which is awarded to the plaintiffs under the norms of a civil lawsuit is paid to punish the defendants for their willful misconduct. The defendants aregiven punishments because their misconduct is willful and intentional and the consequences of such actions are adverse on the part of the plaintiffs or claimants.Punitive damages are awarded to provide an example in the society that any individual or an entity can be punished if found engaged in any wilful misconduct or wrong actions causing harm to any other individual or organization. Compensatory damages are generally paid in such cases. But when compensatory damages become inadequate to remedy the courts to apply punitive damage awards. The egregious conducts of the defendants can never be tolerated and the courts demand appropriate compensation in addition to compensatory damages to be paid to the plaintiffs by the defendants. Now our experts from OnlineAssignment Help will tell you more about the punitive damage and contract law.Punitive DamagePunitive Damage and Contract LawPunitive damages are generally awarded as additional compensation to the actual damages suffered by the claimants of plaintiffs under certain circumstances. These damages are considered as punishments and typical awards as per the discretion of the court when the behavior of the defendant is declared to be harmful. Punitive damages fundamentally not awarded in case of any breach of the claim of any contract. In the tort liability cases, the court main adopts punitive damages to be applied.The plaintiff needs to prove that the behaviors of the defendants to be intentional tort or the behaviors which are engaged in wilful and went wanton misconduct. One of the examples where punitive damages have been observed is the case between National By-Products Inc. and Searcy House Moving Company.The supreme court of Arkansas has identified that punitive damages are required to be awarded because the defendant intentionally proceeded with some unlawful behavior and actions even after knowing the fact that such actions would lead to severe injury. The features of Principal-Agent Relationship indicate that the courts are quite reluctant to declare punitive damage award on the principal for the misconduct of the agent. But there is also an exception to the norms where the principal isfound to be causing or encouraging the reckless actions of the agents. It is very important to distinguish punitive damages in the contract law. Some contracts are listed with certain liquidated damages as the consequences of any breach of contract. The court made no such clause if the liquidated damages are similar to punitive damages.Why Punitive Damages?The importance of punitive damages can be understood in one example. There can be several examples from where punitive damages could be observed to have been awarded to the plaintiffs by the defendants as per the discretion of the court. In one of the examples, it can beseen that an organization which is engaged in manufacturing and distributing dietary supplements assures its customers about the safety and effectiveness of its products in losing weight.The company has advertised its products by mentioning “all-natural” and claiming that the supplement is quite safe. One of the customers named, Amanda had believed in the claims of the company and took the product continuously for 30 days. But she became severely ill after her intake of the supplement. The doctors suggested that there was at least an ingredient or substance in the supplement which reacted with prescribed medications which Amanda was already taking or had taken for her health. Because of the presence of that particularsubstance in the supplement amount, Amanda became seriously ill.The medical bill of Amanda amounted to about $5000 which made her file a case against the company under civil lawsuit to recover the entire medical expenses because she not only lost her wages but also she could not attend the office and work due to her illness. The claims which Amanda had made had been notified to the company and from the investigation, it has been revealed that the company was aware of the content formula of the weight loss supplement.The company also knew that the particular substance could react negatively with certain prescribed medications and could put the health of the customers in a vulnerable situation.During trials, the company did not try to breach any of the regulations and laws and also declared that it did not intend to call back the products or to modify its advertising campaign. These actions proved the recklessness and negligence on the part of the company.This made the court to declare the judgment in favor of Amanda and asked the company to provide her with compensatory damages of $7000. The company had also been admonished by the court which indicated reckless and negligent actions of the company compromising with the health of its customers.Amanda has been awarded punitive damages of $100000. The punitive damage award in the case of Amanda is much more than the compensatory damages. The court declaredsuch a big amount as punitive damage award to compel the company to change the way it is marketing its product and to focus on the proactive actions the company should take to eliminate the negative consequences of such products on the population at large. Now our instant assignment help experts will explain you the differences between compensatory damages and punitive damages.Difference between Punitive and Compensatory DamagesThere is a difference between compensatory and punitive damages. Both these damages are monetary compensations which are awarded to the plaintiffs by the defendants in a civil lawsuit.Compensatory damages are found to be a most common type of damage awards because compensatory damages are provided to the plaintiffs to compensate them for any kind of loss either in terms of property or money due to the actions of the defendants. Compensatory damages can also be considered as actual damages. The actual compensations which are paid to the plaintiffs in case of any car accident or injury because of slip and fall accident or any monetary loss because of breach of contract committed by the defendant.But punitive damages or exemplary damages are awarded for wrong actions and misconducts of the defendants making the plaintiffs to incur a certain loss. Punitive damages are mainly awarded by the defendants to the plaintiffs inaddition to the compensatory damages or actual damages.The courts declared as punitive damage awards with the main objective of differing the misconduct or negative behavior of the defendants which have resulted in any civil lawsuit. The court will always award punitive damages to portray the defendant as an example to the entire society when it is believed by the court that compensatory damages are inadequate to give punishment to the defendants.An example can be used to explain the difference between compensatory and punitive damages. John while driving his truck was answering a text message. He suddenly slammed the back of another car which madesome children stop from crossing the street. Michael who was driving another car had suffered whiplash and a serious strain to his shoulder. The rear end of his car had also been crushed badly by pickup truck of John.John tried to explain to the police that Michael had stopped his car out of nowhere and the entire accident was his fault because the brake light of his car did not work properly. John refused to pay compensation for the expenses incurred by Michael. At this incident, Michael filed a civil lawsuit where he requested almost $4500 for the entire repair to his car and $3000 for his medical expenditure.The court had given a quick judgment and identified the accident had been caused because of the negligence of john. This incidentwould have taken even more severe shape and hence, john had been identified to be a defendant the court awarded Michael compensatory damages for the entire amount which Michael had requested.Furthermore, the court had also pointed out that john was not attentive while driving because he was using his cell phone which is an illegal and reckless act. This act of john could have endangered the lives of many people. Therefore, the judge had ordered john to make a punitive damage award of $10,000 to Michael which could help Michael to recover the total amount of $18,000.Therefore, in this example, it has been seen that the compensatory damage award is the monetary compensation which is paid by thedefendants to the plaintiff for the actual loss suffered by the plaintiff. The example has also debited the punitive damage which the defendant needs to pay to the plaintiff in addition to the actual loss.。