Should death penalty be abolished
Death Penalty死刑英文辩论
Death PenaltyOriginal ReportThe Original Report From Negative Side(Death Penalty Should not Exist)G ood morning, honorable judge, my dear fellow debaters ,ladies and gentleman , we are now here debating whether death penalty should exist, and we think the negative answer should be chosen.The reasons why we say so are determined by a lot of factors,which can be listed as follows:First of all, Death Penalty sends the wrong message: why killpeople who kill people to show killing is wrong.Yes, we want to make sure there is accountability for crime and an effective deterrent in place; however, the death penalty has amessage of "You killed one of us, so we'll kill you". The state is actually using a murder to punish someone who committed a murder.Does that make sense?Second, with the growth of knowledge, we can easily find that the death penalty can not be an effective deterrent for serious crimes.Stephen Nathanson, the author of “An Eye for an Eye”said, “Mountain climbers risk their lives for thrill and ad venture; cigarette smokers risk their lives for pleasure; spe eding drivers risk their lives in order to get to their de stinations a bit faster.”The same goes with criminals. Ifa criminal tends to kill somebody, He just lost his reason , Nothing can stop him ,even the death penalty.Furthermore,financial costs to taxpayers of capital punishment is2-5 times more than that of keeping someone in prison for life.Judges, attorneys and court reporters all require a substantial investment by the taxpayers. Do we really have the resources to waste?To conclude , today the abolition of the death penalty in our country, is the result of humanization, and a higher level of understanding of punishment. So, our country should abolish thedeath penalty.free debating问题一 Today's data shows that life imprisonment could achieve the same effect as the death penalty and it’s more humanity .so,my dear fellow debaters ,i would be glad to hear your opinion .that’s a good point.but i can’t entirely agree,First, the use of life imprisonment will bring enormous pressure to our country’s financial costs. Countries have to use taxpayers’ money for basic necessities of prisoners.furthermore, China is a resource- poor country.second,in fact,life imprisonment is more cruel than death penalty. You say the death penalty is inhumane, but being imprisoned for life lets the criminals live without hope, isn't it a kind of inhuman?In the view of personal point,death penalty is inhuman than life imprisonment ,but,in the view of country life imprisonment is inhuman ,don’t you think the country benefit is more important than personal benefit? thank you问题二 The abolition of the death penalty is the pursuit of human civilization. would u like to prevent the development?Thank you for your question! butwe don't think the abolition of the death penalty is the development of humancivilization.Those who make mistakes must pay theprice, so that our society can be inorder .Why should a murderer deserve to breathe the air?Why should we pay our money to keep them that way?Do you agree that ? I ‘m sure you are agree me .问题三Don’t you think death penalty will lead the criminal’s family in great trouble?Well ,yes ,butthis fact can not be a reason for abolishing the death penalty, because the victims’ families bear greater pain.And death penalty is the fair way to resolve their pain. And if a criminal isn’t sentenced to death, he still has a chance to kill while in prison, or even worse, escape and go on a crime spree. You see,the consequences of this is to bring more victims and more pain. The abolition of the death penalty on the criminals is a good choice.But it is a great hidden danger to society.So this returns to the benefit between the collective and the individual, I think there is no need to repeat.问题四:If you killed someone, do you want to have a second chance to repay community?Of course, you said very reasonable, butpremise is the murderer wants to repay community .And it is impossible to guarantee the right of all the people, so we need death penalty to protect as many people as we can.The one who invade the rights of others to an extreme degree has no standpoint to ask for equal rights. After all,we can’t make experiment with the personal safety.That’s all i want to say. thank you.conclusionGood morning, honorable judge, my dear fellow debaters ,ladies and gentleman , I'm honored to be here to make a small summary statement.Before I go any further,please let me spell out once again what my position is.we insist that death penalty should not be applied .First of all,we should have a clear understanding on killing.We as a society have to move away from the “eye for an eye”revenge mentality if civilization is to advance.Death penalty sends the wrong message :why kill people who kill people to show killing is wrong.The death penalty is a violation of our human rights.The right to live is a basic right of every human being , and no man has the right to decide when a life should be over ,even if it is our country.what is more,the purpose of death penalty is to prevent people from breaking the laws; but in fact,the effects are not as good as we expect .According to a investigation , in the nearly 20 years , the crime rate didn’t decreased but even increased .According to Stephen Nathanson, the author of “An Eye for an Eye”, the fear of de ath does not usually stop people from doing what they want to do. “Mountain climb ers risk their lives for thrill and adventure; cigarette smokers risk their lives for pleasure; speeding drivers risk their lives in order to get to their destinations a bit faster.” The same goes with criminals. If a criminal tends to kill somebody, He just lost his reason , Nothing can stop him ,even the death penalty.Thirdly , The criminal is not the only one who has to face the punishment. The prisoner’s family must suffer from seeing their loved one put to death at the same time.However,it’s unjust for his/her family to get emotional punishment .So ,from our analysis, we can say death penalty should not be applied.Thank you ! Original ReportThe Original Report From Positive Side（Death Penalty Should Exist）Good morning, honorable judge, my dear fellow debaters ,ladies and gentleman , we are now here debating whether death penalty should exist, and we think the positive answer should be chosen .Firstly, death penalty can make justice better served. The most fundamental principle of justice is that the punishment should fit the crime. When someone plans and brutally murders another person, doesn't it make sense that the punishment for the perpetrator also be death?furthermore, perhaps the biggest reason to keep the death penalty is to prevent the crime from happening again. The parole system nowadays is a joke. Even if a criminal is sentenced to life withoutpossibility of parole, he still has a chance to kill while in prison, or even worse, escape and go on a crime spree.Last but not the least important,it contributes to the problem of overpopulation in the prison system.Each additional prisoner requires a portion of a cell, food, clothing and so on.Prisons across the country face the problem of too many prisoners and not enough space & resources.When you eliminate the death penalty as an option, it means that prisoner must be housed for life. Thus, it only adds to the problem of an overcrowded prison system.Taking all the factors above into account,we do believe and strongly support that Death Penalty Should Exist.Thank you!free debating1,We think death penalty ban the criminal from making mistakes again radically, what do u think about it?that’s a good point.but i can’t entirely agree,i think we should focus on education rather than punishment.For example，Chinese authorities still face threats from groups in Xinjiang ,although we have killed many people.So,it’s clear that we can ban the criminal ,for only we educate them rather than kill them,2,If we don’t adopt death penalty,but life sentence，don’t u think it’s a waste to us to spend our taxes to raise criminals？i’m afraid you are wrong there.In fact,carrying out one death sentence costs 2-5 times more than keeping that same criminal in prison. How can this be? It has to do with the endless appeals, additional required procedures, and legal wrangling that drag the process out.What’s more , We can let them do Labor Reformation in prison, to compensate for social.so,as for which one wastes more ,i know now you are agree with me!3,we think death penalty is a development ofour civilization,let’s have your opinion.Thank you for your question! but We as a society have to move away from the "eye for an eye" revenge mentality if civilization is to advance,because it will never solve anything.Why do you think the Israeli-Palestine conflict has been going on for 60+ years? Why do you think gang violence in this country never seems to end?Because the state is actually using a murder to punish someone who committed a murder. But you know whether that make sense.4,We use the death penalty to deter crime.Don’t u thinkthe existence of death penaltymakes people too fear to do malicious things？well ,yes , but infact,the effects are not as good as u expect .first,According to a investigation , in the nearly20 years , the crime rate didn’t decreased but even increa sed .second,Stephen Nathanson, the famous authorsaid , the fear of death does not usually stop people from doing what they want to do. “Mountain climbers risk their lives for thrill and adventure.”The same goes with criminals. If a criminal tends to kill somebody, He just lo st his reason , Nothing can stop him ,even the death penal ty.That’s all i want to say. thank you.conclusionDeath penalty should exist ( conclusion )Good afternoon, honorable judge, my dear fellow debaters , ladies and gentleman ,for summary according all the factors ,we do believe that death penalty should exist.As all the nations are trying to build a law-governed society, death penalty can work as a powerful legal method to guarantee thestability of society and protect the right of the majority of people. People create law to regulate and better serve the society. Law gives the government right to end a people’s life legally with thefundamental aim to reduce crime. It is true death penalty is a way to punish criminals,death penalty exists because we want to prevent others from committing crime. All the things should have a limitation, including humanism. The statement that death penalty should be abolished is in fact a blind pursuit of humanism. It is impossible to guarantee the right of all the people, so we need death penalty to protect as many people as we can. To put an extreme criminal who does not feel sorry about what he or she has done is not against the idea of humanism, because the one who invade the rights of others to an extreme degree has no standpoint to ask for equal rights. To give up putting an extreme criminal to death so easily is against the equality of life and invades the victims’ dignity of life.We strongly support the idea that death penalty should exist. That is all, thank you.参考（有道ps...）The death penalty gives closure to the victim's families who have suffered so much. Some family members of crime victims may take years or decades to recover from the shock and loss of a loved one. Some may never recover. One of the things that helps hasten this recovery is to achieve some kind of closure. Life in prison just means the criminal is still around to haunt the victim. A death sentence brings finality to a horrible chapter in the lives of these family members.1。
死刑的利弊英文作文
死刑的利弊英文作文英文：Death penalty, also known as capital punishment, is a highly controversial topic. Some people argue that itserves as a deterrent to crime and is necessary for justice to be served, while others believe that it is inhumane and violates human rights. In my opinion, the death penalty should be abolished.Firstly, the death penalty is not a deterrent to crime. Studies have shown that the threat of death does notprevent people from committing crimes. Instead, it is more effective to focus on addressing the root causes of crime, such as poverty and lack of education.Secondly, the death penalty is irreversible and thereis always a risk of executing an innocent person. In the United States alone, there have been over 160 exonerationsof people who were wrongly convicted and sentenced to death.This is a grave injustice and cannot be undone.Furthermore, the death penalty is often applied unfairly. It is disproportionately used against people of color and those who cannot afford a good defense. This is a clear violation of human rights and goes against the principles of justice.In conclusion, the death penalty is a flawed and ineffective system that should be abolished. Instead, we should focus on addressing the root causes of crime and finding more humane and just ways to punish offenders.中文：死刑，也被称为死刑，是一个极具争议的话题。
应该废除死刑吗英语作文
应该废除死刑吗英语作文英文回答：Should the death penalty be abolished? This is a question that has sparked intense debate and controversy around the world. On one hand, proponents argue that the death penalty serves as a deterrent to crime and ensures that the most heinous criminals are permanently removed from society. On the other hand, opponents argue that the death penalty violates the right to life and that there is a risk of executing innocent individuals.Those in favor of abolishing the death penalty argue that it is a violation of human rights. Every individual has the right to life, regardless of their actions. Taking someone's life as a form of punishment is seen as a barbaric and outdated practice. Additionally, there is always the risk of executing innocent people. Mistakes can and have been made in the past, leading to the wrongful execution of individuals. This is a grave injustice thatcannot be undone.Furthermore, the death penalty does not necessarily serve as a deterrent to crime. Studies have shown that the presence of the death penalty does not significantly lower crime rates. Instead, it is more effective to focus on prevention, rehabilitation, and addressing the root causes of crime. By investing in education, social programs, and support systems, we can create a society where individuals are less likely to turn to crime in the first place.In contrast, proponents of the death penalty argue that it is necessary for justice and ensuring the safety of society. They believe that certain crimes are so heinous that the only appropriate punishment is death. The death penalty serves as a deterrent, sending a strong message to potential criminals that their actions will not be tolerated. Additionally, it provides closure to thevictims' families, knowing that the perpetrator will never be able to harm anyone else.However, despite these arguments, I believe that thedeath penalty should be abolished. It is a violation of human rights and there is always a risk of executing innocent individuals. Moreover, it does not effectively deter crime. Instead, we should focus on prevention, rehabilitation, and addressing the root causes of crime. By doing so, we can create a more just and compassionate society.中文回答：应该废除死刑吗？这个问题在世界各地引发了激烈的辩论和争议。
常用的辩论万能句型4句
常用的辩论万能句型4句英文回答：1. Opening statement: "I stand before you today to argue that..."2. Supporting point: "My first point is that..."3. Responding to an opposing argument: "While I understand the opposing viewpoint, I believe that..."4. Concluding remark: "In conclusion, I urge you to..."Example:"I stand before you today to argue that the death penalty should be abolished. My first point is that it is not a deterrent to crime. In fact, studies have shown that states with the death penalty have higher murder rates than states without it. Secondly, I believe that the deathpenalty is cruel and unusual punishment. It is irreversible, and there is always the possibility that an innocent person could be executed. Finally, I urge you to consider the cost of the death penalty. It is far more expensive than life in prison."中文回答：1. 开场陈述，"今天，我站在这里，是为了论证..."2. 支持观点，"我的第一个观点是..."3. 回应反对意见，"虽然我理解反对的观点，但我认为..."4. 总结性发言，"最后，我敦促大家..."示例："今天，我站在这里，是为了论证应该废除死刑。
死刑应不应该被废除 英语作文。我认为应该被废除
Death penalty should be abolishedThe death penalty has been one of the most controversial debates throughout history. But in modern society is a civilized society，more and more country have been abolished the death penalty, In my point of view, death penalty is a violent and brutal act that is against human moral principles and does little good for the country. Therefore, it should be abolished definitely, especially in this highly civilized society.The death penalty is a kind of punishment method, it has the general features of the punishment, but it is most the severe punishment method. On the one hands, no matter what a person did some bad things, life is the foundation of all rights, almost the rights attached to the life right. Life is precious, if a person dead, he will lose all the things. And with the development of human society, we have been entering a civil society, so abolished death penalty humanity behavior. On the other hands, this method not only bring the physical pain to the criminal, but also made them families have some emotion troubles, they will fall into suffering for a long time. We should not curb violence with violence. Maybe we can take some method to educated them to realized how important for themselves to be a good person whether for them, their children or parents. We can let those people to some hard work for society, and let them to know the value of doing good things, thus atone for themselves crime. Death penalty is cruel, though many people said death penalty is more save money than putthe person in prison, however, the value of life is not in money.I think with the development of human society and the social civilized degree enhancement, the abolition of the death penalty is inevitable.。
应该废除死刑吗英语作文
应该废除死刑吗英语作文英文回答：Should the death penalty be abolished? This is a complex and controversial question that has been debatedfor many years. Personally, I believe that the death penalty should be abolished for several reasons.Firstly, the death penalty is irreversible. Once a person is executed, there is no way to undo the punishment if new evidence emerges that proves their innocence. This has happened in numerous cases, where individuals have been wrongfully convicted and later exonerated due to DNA evidence or other factors. For example, in 2014, a man named Glenn Ford was released from death row in Louisiana after spending 30 years behind bars for a crime he did not commit. This highlights the inherent flaws and risks associated with the death penalty.Secondly, the death penalty does not deter crimeeffectively. Many studies have shown that there is no significant difference in crime rates between countries or states that have the death penalty and those that do not. For instance, the United States, which still practices capital punishment in some states, has a higher murder rate compared to many European countries that have abolished the death penalty. This suggests that the threat of death penalty does not deter individuals from committing serious crimes.Furthermore, the death penalty is often applied disproportionately to certain groups, such as racial minorities and individuals from low-income backgrounds. This raises concerns about fairness and justice in the criminal justice system. For example, a study conducted by the American Civil Liberties Union found that African Americans are more likely to be sentenced to death than white defendants, especially when the victim is white. This racial bias undermines the integrity and equality of the legal system.In addition, the death penalty is costly and a burdenon taxpayers. The lengthy appeals process and the high security measures required for death row inmates result in significant financial expenses. For example, a study conducted in California estimated that the state could save $1 billion over five years by abolishing the death penalty. These funds could be better allocated to improving education, healthcare, or other social programs thatbenefit society as a whole.In conclusion, the death penalty should be abolished due to its irreversible nature, lack of deterrence, potential for discrimination, and financial burden. It is important to focus on alternative forms of punishment that prioritize rehabilitation and justice rather than retribution. By doing so, we can create a more just and humane society.中文回答：应该废除死刑吗？这是一个复杂而有争议的问题，多年来一直存在争论。
【英文辩论】死刑应不应该被废除 Should death penalty be abolished or not？
Should death penalty be abolished or not?I think it should not be accepted because there might be people who go to jail to pay for the crimes other committed and it would be very unfair to kill someone who are innocent. I think that people who are very bad and who have such deep mental problems and kill people like Murderers should stay in Jail forever!In my opinion, it shouldn't be abolished. Those who make mistakes or 'blunders' must get paid so that our society has a good-conditioned order, just the same as the way we keep prisoners in prison from freedom. If there is any problem about it, it's the law's fault, but not the penalty itself.I believe in the death penalty. Like the saying goes, Eye for an eye. If someone intentionally does bodily harm to kill someone. Then they are giving up their right to live themselves. Why put them in jail for life and us tax payers fit the bill.I believe the death penalty should be abolished. In the Ten Commandments, it states, "Thou shall not kill". However, the government says it is all right to kill a murderer. "Do as I say not as I do"? There is no proof that the death penalty deters crime. Also, innocent people are sentenced to the death penalty and executed. I agree about the financial burdens. It has been proven that it is cheaper to sentence a criminal to life in prison than to the death penalty.I think the Death Penalty should still stand. Why keep a murderer alive after taking an innocent life? The appeals are there for the wrongfully convicted, but if they're caught at the scene, or have items leading to the murder, they should be sentenced to death, not life in prison. The longer we keep them alive, the higher our taxes become. When they appeal, the money should be out of their OWN pockets. Why should a murderer deserve to breathe the air that we do after committing such a heinous crime? WE pay to keep them alive. Why should we pay to keep them that way?In r eal life , ther e are still very serious crimes of endangering national security , endan ger public safety, civil rights violations , undermine social order . The existence of the death penalty system is conducive（有益于）to crack down（镇压）and punish these crimes , thus strongly on major interests of the state and the people be pr otected .The existence of the death penalty system is also conducive to achieving the purpose of punishment . For those who commit the most heinous criminals of various types , and only apply the death penalty ( including the reprieve ) , so that he can not or dare no t crime , special precautions so as to achieve the purpose of punishment .Does urbanization do more good than bad?。
应不应该废除死刑-英语-辩论赛
应不应该废除死刑-英语-辩论赛Debate motion: wether death penalty should be abolished or not?A(应保留): Our debate motion today is whether death penalty should be abolished or not. My side insist that it should not. Death penalty is a legal process whereby a person is put to death by the state as a punishment for a felony. As early as there is a law, death penalty has come into being. Even in modern society, it is still necessary. As all the nations are trying to build a law-governed society, death penalty can work as a powerful legal method to guarantee the stability of society and protect the right of the majority of people. A criminal may stop halfway as soon as he thinks up that death is the most likely outcome of his criminal acts.B(应废除): While the government should punish the crime,but we should not curb the violence with violence.The right to life is the most essential human rights, all of the rights are on premise of life.Criminals should enjoy life rights as the same as ordinary people.And there is no any evidence show that the incident of cases have inevitable connection with the existing of capital punishment so far. And the death penalty is not more deterrent than life imprisonment. Long terms of Imprisonment have the similar effect in In terms of crime prevention.A: My opponent say that death penalty cannot deter crime, since there is no obvious increase in crime rate after death penalty is abolished.Many variables make it hard to tell what the exact influence of death penalty has on crime rates. In addition, according to New York Times, there is only one death penalty in 300 murders. Lack of samples also makes the statistics unreliable. So there is no direct proof that can deny the deterrence of death penalty.However, those countries which banned death penalty always have a high democracy index as well as a high human development index.B: Besides being Influenced by the uncultured homomorphic revenge, death penalty has another problem---- false adjudications. False adjudications cause many innocents dead not only in abroad but also in homeland. According to New York Times' statistics,in late 20 years, about 102 innocents was sentenced to death in the U.S.Our country also has such bloody lessons during the Cultural Revolution.What’smore, there is no opportunity to remedy the consequences of misjudgment of the death penalty.A: My opponent also mention erroneous adjudications. But nothing can be perfect. We should not abolish death penalty just because a tiny possibility of erroneous adjudications. Especially when we have other ways to reduce erroneous adjudications, like to investigate more carefully or improve the law.B: Besides this aspect,every law should suit the people's wish. Abolishing death penalty is the demand of international society and the people.According a survey from china survey,65.8% netizens approved of banning,only 34.1% insisted on remaining. From all the data above,we can draw a conclusion that banning the capital punishment is not only international demand,but also the people's needs.A: Since we mention the people's needs here,we could not forget the victim and their families' needs .To give up putting an extreme criminal to death so easily is against the equality of life and invades the victims’dignity of life. It's better to protect casualty rights than protect the criminal human rights.B: If one day the death penalty has no longer necessary, it will be a new chapter of the history of human civilization. of course,it will be a long process.But now,we also need to constantly improve our laws, not to put any innocent person to death execution ground.。
他该死了300字作文英语
他该死了300字作文英语He Deserves to Die。
The phrase “he deserves to die” is often used in movies and TV shows to describe a villain or a criminal who has committed heinous crimes. However, in real life, the death penalty is a controversial topic that raises ethical, moral, and legal questions. While some argue that capital punishment is a necessary and justifiable form of punishment, others believe that it is inhumane and violates human rights. In this essay, I will explore both sides of the debate and present my own opinion on the matter.On the one hand, proponents of the death penalty argue that it serves as a deterrent to crime and ensures justice for the victims and their families. They believe that certain crimes, such as murder, rape, and terrorism, are so heinous that the only appropriate punishment is death. Moreover, they argue that the cost of keeping a person in prison for life is much higher than the cost of executingthem, and that the death penalty is a more effective way of reducing crime rates.On the other hand, opponents of the death penalty argue that it is a violation of human rights and that it does not serve as a deterrent to crime. They argue that the risk of executing an innocent person is too high, and that the death penalty is often applied unfairly, with racial and socioeconomic biases. Moreover, they argue that life imprisonment without parole is a more humane and just punishment, as it allows for the possibility of exoneration and rehabilitation.In my opinion, the death penalty should be abolished. While I understand the desire for justice and retribution, I believe that taking a life is never justified, no matter how heinous the crime. Moreover, the risk of executing an innocent person is too great, and the death penalty is often applied unfairly. Instead, I believe that our justice system should focus on rehabilitation and prevention,rather than punishment.In conclusion, the phrase “he deserves to die” may be a common sentiment in popular culture, but the reality of the death penalty is much more complex and controversial. While there are valid arguments on both sides of the debate, I believe that the death penalty should be abolished infavor of more humane and just forms of punishment.。
应不应该废除死刑 英语 正方辩论赛辩词 一辩、二辩、三辩、四辩发言稿
应不应该废除死刑英语正方辩论赛辩词一辩、二辩、三辩、四辩发言稿一辩：Ladies and gentlemen, today we are here to discuss whether the death penalty should be abolished. As the first speaker of the affirmative side, I strongly believe that the death penalty should be abolished. Firstly, the death penalty is not an effective deterrent to crime. Studies have shown that countries without the death penalty have lower crime rates than those that still practice it. In addition, many criminals who commit capital offenses do not consider the consequences of their actions, so the threat of death may not deter them.Secondly, the justice system is not perfect, and innocent people have been sentenced to death in the past. According to the Death Penalty Information Center, since 1973, over 160 people have been released from death row after evidence of their innocence was discovered. The risk of executing an innocent person is unacceptable and cannot be justified.Lastly, the death penalty is a violation of human rights. The right to life is a fundamental human right that should be protected by the state. The state should not have the power to take away someone's life, regardless of the severity of their crimes.In conclusion, the death penalty should be abolished because it is not an effective deterrent to crime, innocent people have been sentenced to death, and it is a violation of human rights.二辩：Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. As the second speaker of the affirmative side, I would like to further support the argument that the death penalty should be abolished.Firstly, the death penalty is not cost-effective. The cost of a death penalty trial is much higher than that of a non-capital trial due to the lengthy appeals process and the cost of keeping the offender on death row. This money could be better spent on improving the criminal justice system or on programs that can prevent crime. Secondly, the death penalty is often used disproportionately against certain groups, such as minorities and the poor. This is a clear violation of the principle of equal justice under the law.Thirdly, the death penalty is not necessary to protect society. Life imprisonment without parole is an adequate punishment for even the most heinous crimes.Lastly, the death penalty is not supported by most of the world's democracies. In fact, the majority of countries have abolished the death penalty, and the trend is moving towards its abolition worldwide. In conclusion, the death penalty should be abolished because it is notcost-effective, it is often used disproportionately against certain groups, it is not necessary to protect society, and it is not supported by most of the world's democracies.三辩：Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. As the first speaker of the negative side, I would like to argue that the death penalty should not be abolished.Firstly, the death penalty is a just punishment for the most heinous crimes. Some crimes, such as murder, are so egregious that they warrant the ultimate punishment. The death penalty is the only appropriate punishment for such crimes.Secondly, the death penalty serves as a deterrent to crime. Knowing that they could face the death penalty may deter potential criminals from committing capital offenses. The threat of the death penalty can also prevent convicted murderers from committing further crimes while in prison.Thirdly, the death penalty provides closure for victims' families. The families of murder victims often feel that the death penalty is the only way to achieve justice and closure for their loved one's death. Lastly, the death penalty is supported by the majority of the American public. According to a Gallup poll, 55% of Americans support the death penalty for convicted murderers.a just punishment for the most heinous crimes, it serves as a deterrent to crime, it provides closure for victims' families, and it is supported by the majority of the American public.四辩：Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. As the second speaker of the negative side, I would like to further support the argument that the death penalty should not be abolished.Firstly, the death penalty is an important tool for law enforcement. It allows prosecutors to negotiate plea bargains with defendants, which can result in valuable information that can help solve other crimes. Secondly, the death penalty provides justice for society as a whole. The punishment of the most heinous crimes sends a message that society will not tolerate such behavior and helps to maintain law and order.Thirdly, the death penalty is not cruel and unusual punishment. The Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld the constitutionality of the death penalty, and lethal injection is a painless and humane method of execution.Lastly, the death penalty is not a violation of human rights. The right to life is not an absolute right, and the state has the right to use the death penalty in certain circumstances.an important tool for law enforcement, it provides justice for society as a whole, it is not cruel and unusual punishment, and it is not a violation of human rights.。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
Should death penalty be abolished
In recent years, the death penalty has ar oused people’s attention and heated discussions towards it are right on their ways.Death penalty is the ultimate punishment in countries where such a sentence is available. Nowadays the penalty, which has existed for nearly 2000 years in human history, has become a controversy. Should it be retained as heritage, or should it be abandoned as trash?
Although the problem of keeping or abolishing death penalty has not reached an agreement in the long debate, the argument put by the two sidesalready contribute great significance. After considering the benefits and defects of death penalty, I maintain thatit should not exist, since it is actually using a murder to punish someone who committed a murder. That is absolutely out of sense.Death penalty is a passive way of prevention; it subjects the prisoner to endless darkness where the prisoner is deprived of any chance of salvation. On the other hand, through other sentences the prisoner may finally realize the brutality of the crime.
One more critical fact should be mentioned thatthere are many cases throughout the history that the innocence of civilians is proved after the execution. Death penalty cannot guarantee fairness as the judicial system may turn down a lawsuit even after the sentence is carried out. Other sentences such as life sentence allows for a complete reexamination of a case, giving chances for possible overrules.
Death penalty is the ultimate denial of human dignity and respect. Every person has the equal right to live and make mistakes. By issuing death sentences countries refuse to consider prisoners as human beings. With the growth of knowledge, we can easily find that the death penalty cannot be an effective deterrent for serious crimes.Death penalty also stands against the basic idea among all nations that life should be cherished.
Personally speaking，Death penalty should be abolished because it is outdated, defected and it denies basic human rights. Maybe under some circumstances, life-long imprisonment could be a better choice. Governments should realize the fact as the human beings are marching towards a more civilized society.。