任务型教学法(Task-based English teaching method)

合集下载

任务型教学法-Task-based-language-teaching

任务型教学法-Task-based-language-teaching
Engaging learners in task work provides a better context for the activation of learning processes than form-focused activities, and hence ultimately provides better opportunities for LL to take place
Definitions of task
Task is as a central unit of planning and teaching. It is an activity or goal that is carried out using language,
such as finding a solution to a puzzle, reading a map and giving directions, making a telephone call, writing a letter, or reading a set of instructions and assembling a toy:
vocabulary here includes the consideration of lexical phrases, sentence stems, prefabricated routines, and collocations.
“Conversation” is the central focus of language and the keystone of language acquisition: the majority of tasks proposed within
Approach: Theory of language

英语教学法课件 Unit 2 Part 2 Task-based Language Teaching(王蔷主编)

英语教学法课件 Unit 2 Part 2 Task-based Language Teaching(王蔷主编)

• “TBLT” has stressed the importance to combine form-focused teaching with communication focused teaching.
2. 1 What is a task? P27
A task is a piece of work undertaken for oneself or for others, freely or for some reward. It is meant what people do in everyday life, at work, at play, and in between. (Long 1985:89) 任务是人们在日常生活中所从事的有目的的活 任务是人们在日常生活中所从事的有目的的活 动。
Listening to a weather forecast and deciding what to wear Looking at a set of pictures and decide what should be done Responding to a party invitation Completing a banking application Describing a photograph of one’s family
3) Learner participation in class is related significantly to improvements in language proficiency. Lim (1992)
学习者积极主动的参与与语言熟练程度的提 高关系极大。 高关系极大。
4) Classrooms that were basically “communicative” for explicit grammatical instruction, were superior to both traditional classrooms that focused heavily on grammar, and to immersion programs that eschewed explicit grammatical instruction. 基本上以“交际”为导向的课堂教学, 基本上以“交际”为导向的课堂教学,但同时 也有明确的语法讲解, 也有明确的语法讲解,要比只注重语法教学或 回避语法讲解的沉浸式教学都更好。 回避语法讲解的沉浸式教学都更好。

任务型语言教学

任务型语言教学

覃桂修等(2004),岳守国(2002),袁昌 覃桂修等(2004),岳守国(2002),袁昌 寰(2002),夏纪梅(2001),丰玉芳等 寰(2002),夏纪梅(2001),丰玉芳等 (2004)等文章主要涉及到任务的界定、任 2004)等文章主要涉及到任务的界定、任 务的类型、任务教学法的定义及优势、任务 的设计原则等方面。有关任务型教学法的文 章多对任务方法持肯定态度,覃桂修等 (2004)指出了实施任务法所面临的一些困 2004)指出了实施任务法所面临的一些困 境,
21世纪教育的四大支柱: 21世纪教育的四大支柱: 学会认知 学会做事 学会共同生活 学会生存
(UNESCO 的报告《学习, 财富蕴含其中》)。 的报告《 财富蕴含其中》
任务型教学正是以这四大目标为宗旨的。
四、任务型语言教学的原则
确保适当的任务难度水平 每一课有明确的目标 使学生对于完成任务有明确的定位 确保学生在任务型课堂上积极主动 鼓励学生敢于冒险 确保学生在完成任务时主要关注的是意义 提供给学生关注语言形式的机会 要求学生评价自己的能力表现与发展
任务设计的资料来源
电视、广播和录像,新闻和体育报道 报纸、杂志和文学 学术与社交场景
六、任务型教学的课堂教学过程
PrePre-task 目标 典型技巧 Main task 目标 典型技巧 重构句子、思维,追寻语言, 减轻认知压力 培养语言意识, 培养语言意识,准备、计划 平衡、融合 语言的准确度和流利度 选择任务 控制压力
任务型教学
学生是课堂活动的主体,可以自由选择话题、控制 话题的进展,教师只担当辅助者 教师提供的课堂问题是开放性的,没有唯一的答案, 学生可以自由阐述自己的观点 教学中会安排小组活动,提供机会让学生一同协商 活动中遇到的问题 不论学生的表现好坏,教师教会对学生的观点给予 反馈 重复属于学生个人的行为,当学生认为他人的某些 观点有意义时,学生可以重复、记录和模仿。

例谈小学英语Task-Based Language Teaching

例谈小学英语Task-Based Language Teaching

学科教学探索英语任务型语言教学法(Task-Based Lan-guage Teaching Approach)是在真实语境下语言习得的现代语言教学理念。

它强调“在做中学(learning by doing)”,即学生在完成任务的过程中产生语言习得,最终达到掌握语言的目的。

任务型语言教学以具体的任务为学习动机和动力,以完成任务的过程为学习过程,以展示任务成果的方式来体现教学效果。

语言学家威利斯(Willis,1996)在《任务型学习的框架》一书中提出任务型语言教学法通常由三个教学阶段组成:前期任务(Pre-Task)、任务执行(While-Task)和后期任务(Post-Task)。

据此,我们也可以分为:布置任务,形成目标,激发兴趣;执行任务,合作学习,运用英语;完成任务,客观评价,深化学习三个教学阶段。

教学实践证明,在小学英语教学中运用任务型语言教学,让学生通过完成具体的任务学习英语,不仅可以激发学习兴趣,调动学习积极性,体现在做中学,而且还可以培养学生的合作精神和创新能力,实现以学生为主体等新的教学理念。

一、布置任务,形成目标,激发兴趣任务型语言教学主张让学生在对目标、话题、内容比较了解的情况下确立目标、提高自我效能、提供信息来源等,促进学习意愿的形成,并在此基础上投入行动。

教师在布置任务时,应对任务的特征,如所涉及的知识、重点、难点、技能策略等进行描述,形成具体而明确的目标。

确定教学目标后,教师要通过热身活动来调动并强化学生的学习兴趣。

热身活动类型很多,比如教师可以有意识地采用头脑风暴(brain storming)和思维导图(mind-map)等心理学策略来激发学生的兴趣、好奇心和积极性。

例如小学英语五年级上册Unit1My Family,教师首先布置任务,让学生每人带一幅家庭成员的照片,告诉学生收集有关家庭成员的单词,如father,mother,brother,sister, grandfather,grandmother等,准备有关家庭信息的讨论。

当代英语教学法的典型个例及特点评析

当代英语教学法的典型个例及特点评析

当代英语教学法的典型个例及特点评析
1. 交际语言教学法(Communicative Language Teaching, CLT)
交际语言教学法是以交际为中心的一种教学法,旨在帮助学生在真实的语言环境中通
过语言交流来学习英语。

该教学法的典型个例包括任务型教学法和情景教学法。

其特点是
强调学生的实际运用能力,注重学生的合作和互动,提供多样化、真实性的学习环境。

2. 自主学习法(Self-directed Learning, SDL)
自主学习法鼓励学生自主进行学习,发挥学生个体差异,培养学生的学习能力和自主
思考能力。

学生可以根据自身的学习风格和兴趣选择学习内容和方式,并对自己的学习过
程进行自我评价和反思。

其特点是注重提高学生的主动性和自我管理能力,引导学生培养
自主学习的方法和策略。

3. 任务型教学法(Task-based Language Teaching, TBLT)
任务型教学法以真实的任务为基础,通过学生们完成各种任务来促进他们的语言学习。

学生们需要运用他们已学的语言知识和技能来解决实际问题,提高他们的语言运用能力。

其特点是通过任务激发学生的学习兴趣和合作意识,培养学生的实际应用能力。

十八种常见的英语教学方法

十八种常见的英语教学方法

十八种常见的英语教学方法在英语教学中,有许多种常见的教学方法,下面列举了十八种常见的英语教学方法。

2. 组块法(Chunking):将一段较长的语言材料分割为较小的语言块,逐步学习和掌握。

3. 任务型教学法(Task-based Approach):通过完成实际生活中的任务来提高学生的语言技能。

4. 多模态教学法(Multimodal Approach):通过结合不同的感官输入(听觉、视觉、触觉等)来加深学生对语言的理解和记忆。

5. 归纳法(Inductive Learning):引导学生从具体例子中归纳出语法规则和语言现象。

6. 目的语为主(L2-centered):以英语为第二语言为学习目标,强调培养学生在英语环境下的自主交流能力。

7. 情景教学法(Situational Teaching):通过创造真实情景,让学生在实际语境中运用语言。

8. 启发式教学法(Heuristic Teaching):通过激发学生的思考和探索能力来提高学生的学习兴趣和学习效果。

9. 虚拟现实教学法(Virtual Reality Teaching):利用虚拟现实技术来创建逼真的语言环境,提供更真实的语言学习体验。

10. 影视教学法(Film and TV Teaching):利用电影和电视剧等影视资源来激发学生学习英语的兴趣。

11. 游戏化教学法(Gamification):将游戏元素融入到英语教学中,提高学生的学习积极性和参与度。

12. 合作学习法(Cooperative Learning):通过小组合作学习,培养学生的合作精神和团队合作能力。

13. 听说读写综合法(Integrated Skills Approach):综合运用听、说、读、写等各种语言技能来进行教学和学习。

14. 基于项目的学习法(Project-based Learning):通过学生参与实际项目的过程来提高学生的综合能力和解决问题的能力。

任务型教学法的理论和设计PPT课件

他们的学习策略和自主学习调好火候。ห้องสมุดไป่ตู้(6)为学习者提供恰当反馈的评估者和记录者
13
根据任务的目标,教师在任务的每个阶段所起的作用是 不一样的。
Pre-task
Introduction to topic(导入者)
Task
Task cycle
Task(提醒者) Planning (语言顾问) Report (报告主持人)
4
1.2 Theory of learning
• 1.2.1 Krashen’s acquisition theory The ability to use a language is gained through exposure to and participation in using it, that experience, not training, is necessary.
• 那么任务型教学法就是运用了交际法的强式交际观来 发展起来的。
2
1、Theory
1.1 Theory of language 1.2 Theory of learning
2、Design
2.1 Objectives 2.2 Teacher roles 2.3 Student roles 2.4 The role of teaching resources
Task-based language teaching
1
强交际观和弱交际观
• 弱交际观(the weak version)认为:语言结构和语法知 识是语言交际不可分割的组成部分,学习结构和知识 的目的是为学会使用语言进行交际。因此,学生应当 先学习结构,然后再在交际过程中发展他们使用语言 的能力,交际活动应广泛结合到语言课程中。其教学 原则是“学会使用英语”(learning to use language)

英语教学法 教材

英语教学法教材
英语教学法和教材是英语教学中非常重要的两个方面。

下面我将简要介绍一些常见的英语教学法和常用的教材。

1. 英语教学法:
- 交际法(Communicative Approach):侧重于培养学生在真实语境中运用英语进行交际的能力,注重学生的听说读写全面发展。

- 任务型教学法(Task-Based Language Teaching):通过学生完成真实的任务来促进语言学习,提供实践机会和情境。

- 听说法(Audiolingual Method):强调听和说的训练,通过模仿和重复练习来提高口语表达能力。

- 全语言教学法(Total Physical Response):强调通过动作和身体语言与语言结合,以自然而有趣的方式进行语言学习。

- 个别化教学法(Individualized Instruction):根据学生的个体差异和学习需求,灵活地调整教学内容和方法。

2. 英语教材:
- 国际英语教材:例如《New Headway》,《Interchange》,《English File》等,这些教材追求全球通用的英语标准,适用于国际交流和考试准备。

- 大学英语教材:例如《新编大学英语》,《剑桥大学四级考试》等,这些教材旨在提高学生的英语能力,涵盖听说读写各个方面。

- 职业英语教材:例如《Business English》,《English for
Specific Purposes》等,这些教材侧重于特定行业或职业领域的英语应用。

- 儿童英语教材:例如《儿童英语》,《小学英语》等,这些教材通过游戏、歌曲和趣味练习等方式激发孩子对英语学习的兴趣。

任务型教学法在初中英语教学中的应用及效果

任务型教学法在初中英语教学中的应用及效果Task-based language teaching (TBLT) has become an increasingly popular approach in middle school English education in recent years. This instructional method focuses on engaging students in meaningful communicative tasks, rather than solely emphasizing grammatical structures or vocabulary acquisition. The primary aim of TBLT is to foster the development of practical language skills that students can apply in real-world contexts. This essay will explore the application and effectiveness of TBLT in middle school English classrooms.One of the key benefits of TBLT is its ability to enhance student motivation and engagement. Traditional language teaching methods can often be perceived as dry and disconnected from students' daily lives. In contrast, TBLT presents language learning as a tool for accomplishing specific, meaningful tasks. By designing lessons around tasks that are relevant and interesting to students, teachers can capture their attention and foster a sense of purpose in thelearning process. This, in turn, can lead to higher levels of participation, increased language use, and a more positive attitude towards English learning.Moreover, TBLT aligns well with the communicative approach to language teaching, which emphasizes the importance of using language for authentic communication. In a TBLT classroom, students are given opportunities to engage in tasks that mimic real-life scenarios, such as planning a trip, negotiating a contract, or solving a problem. This not only helps students develop their linguistic skills but also their pragmatic and strategic competencies, which are essential for effective communication.Another key advantage of TBLT is its emphasis on learner-centeredness. Unlike traditional teacher-centered approaches, TBLT places the student at the heart of the learning process. Teachers act as facilitators, guiding students through the task completion process and providing feedback and support as needed. This shift in the teacher's role allows students to take a more active and autonomous role in their learning, fostering a sense of ownership and responsibility.Furthermore, TBLT encourages the integration of language skills, such as reading, writing, listening, and speaking, within the context of a meaningful task. Rather than practicing these skills in isolation,students are required to utilize them in a holistic manner to achieve the task's objectives. This approach mirrors the way language is used in real-life situations, better preparing students for the demands of authentic communication.The implementation of TBLT in middle school English classrooms has also been shown to have a positive impact on student learning outcomes. Studies have demonstrated that students taught using a TBLT approach often outperform their peers in measures of language proficiency, including fluency, accuracy, and complexity. This can be attributed to the fact that TBLT provides students with opportunities to use language in a meaningful context, which reinforces their understanding and retention of the material.Moreover, TBLT has been found to be particularly effective in addressing the diverse learning needs of middle school students. By offering a range of task types and allowing for differentiation, teachers can cater to students with varying language proficiency levels, learning styles, and interests. This flexibility helps to ensure that all students are engaged and challenged, leading to more equitable and inclusive learning experiences.However, the successful implementation of TBLT in middle school English classrooms is not without its challenges. Teachers may need to invest significant time and effort in designing and planningappropriate tasks, as well as in adapting their instructional approach to the TBLT framework. Additionally, some students may initially struggle with the increased autonomy and responsibility required in a TBLT classroom, necessitating a gradual transition from more traditional teaching methods.Despite these challenges, the benefits of TBLT make it a compelling approach for middle school English education. By fostering student engagement, developing practical language skills, and promoting learner-centered instruction, TBLT has the potential to significantly enhance the overall quality of English language teaching and learning in middle school settings.In conclusion, the application of task-based language teaching in middle school English classrooms has demonstrated numerous advantages. From enhancing student motivation and engagement to improving learning outcomes, TBLT offers a promising approach to language instruction that aligns with the communicative and learner-centered principles of modern language pedagogy. As middle schools continue to explore and implement TBLT, the positive impact on student learning and language development is likely to become increasingly evident.。

英语教学论文范文(精选6篇)(4)

英语教学论文范文(精选6篇)(4)一、任务型教学法在初中英语课堂中的应用研究摘要:随着我国英语教学改革的不断深入,任务型教学法作为一种有效的教学方法,逐渐受到广大英语教师的关注。

本文以初中英语课堂为研究对象,探讨任务型教学法在实践中的应用及其成效。

1. 任务型教学法的概述任务型教学法(Taskbased Language Teaching,简称TBLT)是一种以任务为核心的教学模式,强调学生在完成任务的过程中自然习得语言。

这种教学法主张将语言学习与实际生活相结合,让学生在真实语境中运用英语,提高他们的语言运用能力。

2. 任务型教学法在初中英语课堂的应用实例案例一:《新目标英语》七年级上册Unit 7 “How much are these socks?”(1)任务设计:教师设计了一个“购物”任务,让学生在模拟的购物场景中运用本单元所学词汇和句型进行交流。

(2)任务实施:将学生分成若干小组,每组扮演不同的角色(顾客、售货员等)。

学生在完成任务的过程中,需要运用目标语言进行沟通,达成购物目标。

(3)任务评价:教师根据学生在任务过程中的表现,评价他们的语言运用能力、团队协作能力和问题解决能力。

3. 任务型教学法在初中英语课堂的应用成效(1)提高学生的英语学习兴趣:任务型教学法将课堂知识与实际生活相结合,使学生在轻松愉快的氛围中学习英语,增强了他们的学习兴趣。

(2)培养学生的语言运用能力:通过完成各种任务,学生将所学知识应用于实际情境,提高了他们的英语口语和听力水平。

(3)增进学生之间的合作与交流:任务型教学法强调团队合作,学生在完成任务的过程中,相互帮助、共同进步,增进了彼此间的友谊。

4. 结论任务型教学法在初中英语课堂中的应用具有显著成效,有助于提高学生的英语学习兴趣和语言运用能力。

教师在实际教学中,应根据学生的实际情况和教学内容,灵活设计任务,以充分发挥任务型教学法的优势。

二、任务型教学法在初中英语课堂中的应用策略1. 注重任务的真实性在设计任务时,教师应确保任务的真实性,使其贴近学生的生活实际。

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

任务型教学法(Task-based English teaching method) 任务型教学法(Task-based English teachingmethod) IntroductionTask-based language teaching was first invented by an English linguist Allwright in the 1970s, popularized abroad in the 1980s, and introduced into China in the 1990s.The purpose of this article is to outline the principles that underlie task-based language teaching and to give examples of classroom activities within the approach. Task-based language teaching can be regarded as one particular development within the broader “communicative approach”. It is currently much discussed in many parts of the world and, indeed, is recommended in the official curriculum documents of a growing number of countries and regions. This article has five main sections. The first looks at what is meant by the term “task”. The second looks at the continuum from “focusing on form” to “focusing on meaning” with the continuum I hope to illuminate the distinction often made between “tasks” and other kinds of activity. The continuum is described and explored in more detail in the third section, which provides a range of examples from different parts of it. The fourth section presents a framework for looking at tasks in terms of how they contribute to the linguistic, cognitive and personality development of the students. The conclusion summarizes some of the main aims and benefits oftask-based learning by means of a mnemonic base on the word “task” itself.Ⅰ. What is task?Different teachers and writers use different definitions of the term “task”, such as:1�p?a piece of classroom work which involves learners incomprehending, manipulating, producing or interesting in the target language while their attention is principally focused on the meaning rather on the form. The task should have a sense of completeness, being also to stand alone as a communicative act in its own right. (Nahan, 1989,15)2�p?any structured language learning endeavor which has a particular objective appropriate contents, a specified working procedure, and range of outcomes for those who undertake the task . (Breen via Brown, 1994, 83)3�p?an activity which is designed to help achieve a particular goal . A number of dimensions of tasks influence their use in language teaching. (Richards Etal, 2000, 468)Most people would probably agree on certain basic characteristics:1�pTasks are activities in which students work purposefully towards an objective.2�pThe objective may be one that students have set for themselves or one which has been set by the teacher.3�pTasks may be carried out in competition with other or(more often) in collaboration.4�pThey may be carried out individually or (more often) in groups.5�pThe outcome may be something concrete( e.g. a report or presentation) or something intangible(e.g. agreement or the solution to a problem). The main area of disagreement revolves around the relationship between tasks and communication. Some teachers and writers do not see this relationship as crucial. They define a language learning task as including almost anythingthat students are asked (or choose) to do in the classroom, including formal learning activities such as grammar exercises and controlled practice activities, provided the objective of the activity is related to learning the language.Within this broad definition, some writers distinguish subcategories such as communication tasks and enabling tasks according to the extent to whichthey involve communication or focus on form.Many other teachers and writers use a more restricted definition. They exclude activities where the learners focus on formal aspects of the language (such as grammar, pronunciation or vocabulary) and reserve the term “task”for activities in which purpose is related to thecommunication of meanings. Willis (1996,p.23) is one writer who adoptsthis definition. In this book tasks are always activities where the target language is used by the learner for a communicative purpose (goal) in order to achieve an outcome.Activities which focus upon and practice specific elements of knowledge, skills and strategies needed for the task are called exercises. The same distinction between tasks and exercises is supported by Ellis Nunan and Skehan.Skehan, for example, describes the criteria for a task as follows: 1�pmeaning is primary; 2�pthere is some communication problem to solve ; 3�pthere is some sort of relationship to real-world activities; 4�ptask completion has some priority; 5�pthe assessment of the task is in terms of outcome .The definition reflects the method’s interaction but we can’t make a clear-cut distinction between “task” and “exercises”. This will be discussed in the next section.Ⅱ�q Communication, Tasks and Exercises.As we’ve seen, one of the key features of a communicative task is that centers focus on communicating meanings rather than learning orpracticing forms. However it is not usually simply a question of learning focusing either on meaning or on form. More often, it is a matter of degree. For example, there are some activities in which the learner may focus mainly on the production of certain forms that are being practiced, but he or she ma still be using these forms to convey meanings to somebody. This would be the case in, for example, this “Questionnaire survey” activity, in which the students needs to use “can you??” in order to fi nd classmates who can do certain things, such as: who can speak three languages/ use a computer/ make cakes/ ride a bike/swim? In this activity, although the students have a communicative purpose (to find classmates with particular skills) it is also clear that they are practicing specific forms. At other times, the emphasis on communicating meanings may increase but students may still pay attention to the forms they are producing (and which indeed, they may just have been taught). This might be the case in this role play if students are asked to perform it shortly after learning how to make enquiries and give information about hotel accommodation. Each student has one of the following role cards: student A: You arrive at a small hotel one evening. In the foyer, you meet the manager(ess) and 1. Ask if there is a room vacant. 2. Ask the price, including the breakfast. 3. Say how many nights you would like to stay. 4. Say what time you would like to have breakfast; student B: You are the manager(ess) of a small hotel that prides on itself on its friendly, homely atmosphere. You have a single and a double room vacant for tonight. The prices are: $100 for the single room, $160 for the double room. Breakfast is $15 extra per person. For guests with cars, there is a free car park. Since it is impossible to draw a clear dividing line between activities where the focus is on form (exercise) and activities where the focus is ion meaning (task), it is useful to think of a continuum with varying degrees of focus on form and/or meaning. Activitiescan then be classified according to where they lie along this continuum. The continuum is divided into five sections. From sectionⅠ to sectionⅤ , the content from forms to meaning is becoming stronger and stronger.1. Non-communicative learning.Focusing on the structures of language, how they are formed and what they mean, e.g. through exercise, “discovery” and awareness-raisingactivities. 2. Pre-communicative language practice. Practicing languagewith some attention to meaning but not communicating new messages to others,e.g. in “question- and- answer” practice. 3. Communicative language practice. Practicing language in a context where it communicates new information, e.g. information gap activities or personalizedquestions. 4. Structured communication. Using language to communicate in situations where elicit pre-learnt language but with some unpredictability,e.g. in structured role-play and simpleproblem-solving. 5. Authentic communication. Using language tocommunicate in situations where meanings are unpredictable, e.g. increative role-play, more complex problem-solving and discussion. The activities at the top are obviously “exercises”. Those at the bottom are obviously “tasks”. Those in the middle (2-4) have features of both.Ⅲ. From Non-Communicative Learning to Authentic Communication.The section will elaborate on the previous one by giving examples of activities from five parts of the continuum from “focus on form” to “focus on meaning”. In the terms discussed above, this corresponds also to a progression f rom clearly defined ‘exercises” to clearly defined “tasks”.1. Non-Communicative Learning.It is in this category that there is the least element of communication. Here, for example, students are involved in “discovering” a rule of grammar on the basis of examples. In the examples below, look carefully at theposition of the adverbs “always”, “often”, “sometimes”, “usually”, and “never”. What are the rules?A. We are usually hungry when we come home.John is always late.His parents were often tired in the evening. I never sure whether thisword is correct. B. I sometimes go to the cinema on Fridays.We never eat much in the morning. Jane often arrives at school early. They always come home late at night.C. They have never written to me again.You can always come and visit me. I will never know why he did it.Pat has often seen him with two dogs.The students are then required to apply this rule to a new set of examples: Put the adverbs into the right places in the sentence below. A. Weplay football in the evening (often).I can catch the first bus in the morning (never). Jack and Jill are very happy (always). They visit me (sometimes).You write very good English (usually). B. They have been to Jinan (often).We drink tea for breakfast (always). You are cheerful (usually).John can keep a secret (never).He has refused to speak to me (sometimes)2. Pre-Communicative Language Practice.In this category the focus is still on the practice of discrete items of language but, in order to produce the appropriate forms, the students have to pay attention to aspect of meaning. In the first activity, they have to findout what Richard and Fio na “have to do” and what they “would like to do”. Richard’s obligations are cleaning floors, washing windows and emptying the bins. His desires are to go to evening school, to get a better job and tomarry Fiona. Fiona’s obligations are typing letters, ans wering the telephone and doing photocopying. Her desires are to earn more money, to take holiday abroad and to marry her boss.The best known type of activity that belongs to this category is thefamiliar “question-and-answer practice” in which student s have to answer (and sometimes ask) questions about a situation, picture, or topic. Theanswers are already known but students have to pay attention to meaning inorder to produce them. The questions are as follows: How many students are there in the class? Are there more boys than girls? Who is sitting next to Jane? Which lesson is this now? etc.3. Communicative Language PracticeThe main difference between this category and the previous one is that there is now some kind of “information gap”, that is, the language conveys meanings that were not previously known to everybody. The question-and-answer practice just described would come into this category, if the questions elicit information that was previously unknown, e.g. what students did at the weekend or who their favorite singers are. In a task-based approach, however, the practice is more likely to be structured in some way so that there is a recognizable context, purpose and outcome. This structuring may be achieved in a variety of ways, for example, a “guessing-game” format. Another common question problem is to use simple questionnaire surveys in which the information gap is created by the students’ own individual experiences and ideas. For example, who is one’s favorite singer/actor/act ress etc.?As a written follow- up task, students may be asked (individually or in groups) to write a short report on what they have found out about their classmates’ preferences.4. Structured CommunicationIn the examples given so far, it has been possible to predict the exact language that is needed in order to perform the exercise or task. These activities therefore offer clear ways to practice specific areas of grammar. As we move to the next category along the continuum, we enter a domain in which the focus shifts further on to the communication of meanings. This means that, as we move further into this domain, it becomes感谢您的阅读,祝您生活愉快。

相关文档
最新文档