Language Learning Strategies Employed by L2 Learners Ghani
二语习得7单元 学习者策略

2. Learning strategies
2.2 Categories 2.2.1 Formulaic speech 2.2.1.1 Definition: 2.2.1.2 Characteristics
1) Used by native speakers and learners 2) Used by child and adult learners 3) Used in natural settings and classroom 4) Very common in SLA, particularly in the early stage of development 5) The particular unanalyzable chunks vary from learner to learner, but some typical ones exist 6) Be closely tied to a particular communicative goal 7) Function for creative speech 8) Involving the right hemisphere (holistic processing) of the brain rather and the left
Learner strategies
Learning ~ Production ~
Formulaic speech
Creative speech
Communication ~
2. Learning strategies
2.1 Definition:
① Learning strategies account for how learners accumulate new 12 rules and how they automatize existing ones.
二语习得(L8)

Learner processes
The universal Hypothesis and Second Language Acquisition
What is the universal Hypothesis? The ‘universal hypothesis’ states that language
insufficient匮乏
第十一页,编辑于星期六:十八点 二十七分。
What exactly are the ‘general principles that apply to all language’?
substantive universals
内容普遍现象
Universal Grammar
第八页,编辑于星期六:十八点 二十七分。
Noam Chomsky(乔姆斯基)
The year 1957 saw the publication of Noam Chomsky’s book Syntactic Structures, which started a revolution in the linguistic world and ushered in a new school--- the transformational generative linguistics
The role of linguistic universals in SLA
effect on grammar formation
effect on L1 transfer
The problems of the Universal Hypothesis
第五页,编辑于星期六:十八点 二十七分。
第十一章Learning Strategies

Metacognitive Strategies
Self-Management: Manage Your Own Learning Determine how you learn best. Arrange conditions that help you learn. Seek opportunities for practice. Focus your attention on the task.
Check your progress on the task. Check your comprehension as you use the language. Do you understand? If not, what is the problem? Check your production as you use the language. Are you making sense? If not, what is the problem?
Cognitive strategies – the learning strategies of identification, grouping, retention, and storage of language material, as well as the language use strategies of retrieval, rehearsuction of words, phrases, etc.
What is a strategy?
A strategy is a process. It involves at least the following procedures:
– – – – – – Problem identification and selective attention Analysis of task Choice of decisions Execution of plan Monitoring progress and modifying plan Evaluating result
语言迁移与二语习得-朱美慧

语言迁移与二语习得朱美慧1. 引言语言迁移问题长期以来一直是二语习得研究领域所关注的重要课题(Ellis,2000:299),这个问题贯穿在二语习得研究作为一门独立学科的40年历史中,历经起落,争议不断。
从历史背景来看,语言迁移研究可以一直追溯到几个世纪以前。
如果从其兴衰历程看,随着二语习得研究领域理论模式的转换和发展,语言迁移研究大致经历了三个阶段:第一阶段为20世纪50年代至60 年代的兴盛期,语言迁移研究在结构主义语言学和行为主义心理学的框架下以对比分析假说为主导,在二语习得理论中占据举足轻重的地位。
第二阶段为60 年代末到70 年代的衰落期,受乔姆斯基普遍语法理论的影响和中介语理论提出的影响, 行为主义语言观受到大力抨击,对比分析假设和语言迁移理论遭到抛弃,迁移在二语习得中的作用被贬低,甚至遭到否定。
第三阶段始于80 年代初并一直延续至今,在这一阶段,随着二语习得研究两大对立阵营——认知派和社会派的逐渐形成和发展,语言迁移研究得到全面拓展,从最初只针对语言本体的研究扩展到对语言学习者的研究,从认知心理、语言、社会文化、神经生理等各个角度重新认识迁移在二语学习中的作用,语言迁移研究因此再度崛起。
如果从其主要研究内容和方向来看,语言迁移研究大体可以分为四个阶段(Jarvis & Pavlenko,2008):第一阶段从19世纪中晚期到约20世纪70年代中期为止。
在这一阶段,语言迁移被视为影响其它过程如二语习得的因素,主要研究内容包括如何确定迁移发生、迁移的范围以及如何量化迁移的影响。
第二阶段从20世纪70年代中期开始持续至今。
在这一阶段,第一阶段的研究主题仍在继续,但增加了许多新的研究内容,如探讨迁移产生的原因,制约迁移的因素,迁移影响的方向性问题等等。
目前很可能正在进行从第二阶段到第三阶段的转变。
第三阶段的重要特点是,研究者开始更感兴趣于构建语言迁移的理论模型和理论框架的建设,并采用实证研究来检验模型和设想。
第二语言相关学习策略

language learning style and usual or preferred language learning strategies.
What are the Characteristics of LLS?
Although the terminology is not always uniform,
Strategies are tools for (4) the self-directed involvement necessary for developing communicative ability. (Oxford, 1992/1993, p. 18). From these definitions, a change over time may be noted: from the early focus on the product of LSS (linguistic or sociolinguistic competence), to a greater emphasis on the processes and the characteristics of LLS.
Later Mayer (1988) more specifically defined LS as
பைடு நூலகம்
"behaviours of a learner that are intended to influence how the learner processes information" (p. 11).
Clearly, LS are involved in all learning, regardless of the content and context.
二语习得(L2)

Characteristics of interlanguage
Interlanguage consists of errors. A mistake is akin to slips of the tongue. They are generally one-time-only events. An error is systematic. It is likely to occur repeatedly. By studying errors, we can see that learners are actively involved in shaping the “grammars” they are learning, and that they are “creating” their own rules.
Example
Characteristics of interlanguage The learner‟s grammar is dynamic. Learners change their grammar from time to time by adding rules, removing rules and reorganizing the whole system. This change is described as discontinuous progression “from stable plateau to stable plateau” (Selinker, 1992:226)
The order of L1 acquisition in English morphemes (abridged from Clark and Clark 1977)
英语语言学习策略
Introduction to Fundamentals
CHAPTER
Suitability
Choose textbooks that are suitable for your level of proficiency, ensuring that the content is moderately difficult and not too simple or difficult.
02
Ensure good lighting and air quality in the learning environment, which is beneficial for protecting eyes and respiratory health.
Comfortable seats and equipment
Understanding grammar through reading
Summary
Creating a collection of incorrect questions
Detailed description
Learners can create a collection of incorrect questions, record grammar errors they encounter during practice or exams, and annotate correct explanations and usage. This can help learners better grasp the prone points and avoid repeating mistakes.
Listening training
二语习得博士入学考试复习题
二语言习得考试复习题1. acquisition& learning➢The term “acquisition” is used to refer to picking up a second language through exposure, whereas the term “learning” is used to refer to the conscious study of a second language. Now most of the researchers use them interchangeably, irrespective of whether conscious or unconscious processes are involved2. incidental learning & intentional learning➢While reading for pleasure a reader does not bother to look up a new word in a dictionary, but a few pages later realizes what that word means, then incidental learning is said to have taken place.➢If a student is instructed to read a text and find out the meanings of unknown words, then it becomes an intentional learning activity. ngauage➢Language is a system of arbitrary vocal symbols used for human communication .That is to say , language is systematic (rule-governed ), symbolic and social.nguage Acquisition Device➢The capacity to acquire one’s FIRST LANGUAGE , when this capacity is pictured as a sort of mechani sm or apparatus.5.Contrastive analysis❖Under the influence of behaviorism, researchers of language teaching developed the method of contrastive analysis (CA) to study learner errors. Its original aim is to serve foreign language teaching.6.Error analysis❖Error analysis aims to 1) find out how well the learner knows a second language, 2) find out how the learner learns a second language, 3) obtain information on common difficulties in second language learning, and to 4) serve as an aid in teaching or in the preparation and compilation of teaching materials (Corder, 1981).It is a methodology of describing Second Language Learners’ language system s.7.interlanguage❖It refers to the language that the L2 learner produced .❖The language produced by the learner is a system in its own right.❖The language is a dynamic system, evolving over time.8.Krashen and His Monitor Model❖ 1. The Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis❖ 2. The Monitor Hypothesis❖ 3. The Natural Hypothesis❖ 4. The Input Hypothesis❖ 5. The Affective Filter Hypothsis9. input hypothesis❖Its claims : The learner improves and progresses along the “natural order” when s/he receives second language “input” that is one step beyond his or her current stage of linguistic competence. For example, if a le arner is at a stage “i”, then acquisition takes place when s/he is exposed to “Comprehensible Input” that belongs to level “i+1”.10. affective filter hypothesis❖The hypothesis is based on the theory of an affective filter, which states that successful second language acquisition depends on the learner’s feelings. Negative attitudes (including a lack of motivation or self-confidence and anxiety) are said to act as a filter, preventing the learner from making use of INPUT, and thus hindering success in language learning.11.Shumann’s Acculturation Model❖This model of second language acquisition was formulated by John.H.Schumann(1978), and applies to the natural context of second language acquisition where a second language is acquired without any instruction in the environment. Schumann defines acculturation as the process of becoming adapted to a new culture or rather , the social and psychological integration of the learner with the target language group.12.Universal Grammar⏹The language faculty built into the human mind consisting of principles and parameters.⏹This is the universal grammar theory associated with Noam Chomsky.⏹Universal Grammar sees the knowledge of grammar in the mind as having two components: “principles"that all languages have incommon and “parameters” on which they vary.13.M acLaughlin’s Information processing model☐SLA is the acquisition of a complex cognitive skill that must progress from controlled processing to automatic processing.14.Anderson’s ACT☐This is another general theory of cognitive learning that has been applied to SLA☐Also emphasizes the automatization process.☐Conceptualizing three types of memory:1. Working memory2. Declarative long term memory3. Procedural long-term memory15.fossilization☐It refers to the phenomenon in which second language learners often stop learning even though they might be far short of native-like competence. The term is also used for specific linguistic structures that remain incorrect for lengthy periods of time in spite of plentiful input.munication strategies⏹Communication strategies, known as CSs, consist of attempts to deal with problems of communication that have arisen in interaction.They are characterized by the negotiation of an agreement on meaning between the two parties.1.What it is that needs to be learnt in language acquisition?➢Phonetics and Phonology➢Syntax➢Morphology➢Semantics➢Pragmatics2.How experts study the children’s acquisition➢Observe young children’s learning to talk.➢Record the speech of their children➢Create a database➢Have a single hypothesis3.What are learning strategies? Give examples ?➢Intentional behaviour and thoughts that learners make use of during learning in order to better help them understand, learn or remember new information .➢Learning strategies are classified into :1. meta-cognitive strategies2. cognitive strategies3. socio-affective strategies4.What are the factors influencing the success of SLA ?●Cognitive factors :1. Intelligence2. Language aptitudenguage learning strategies●Affective factors:nguage attitudes2.Motivation5.What are the differences between the Behaviorist learning model and that of Mentalist?➢Behaviorist learning model claims that children acquired the L1 by trying to imitate utterances produced by people around them and by receiving negative or positive reinforcement of their attempts to do so. Language acquisition, therefore, was considered to be environmentally determined.6.What are the beneficial views obtained from the studies on chi ldren’s L1 acquisition?1. Children’s language acquisition goes through several stages2. These stages are very similar across children for a given language, although the rate at which individual children progress through them ishighly variable;3. These stages are similar across languages;4. Child language is rule-governed and systematic, and the rules created by the child do not necessarily correspond to adult ones;5. Children are resistant to correction;6. Children’s mental capacity limits the numb er of rules they can apply at any one time, and they will revert to earlier hypotheses when two ormore rules compete.7.What are the differences of error analysis from contrastive analysisContrastive analysis stresses the interfering effects of a first language on second language learning and claims that most errors come from interference of the first language. (Corder ,1967). However, such a narrow view of interference ignores the intralingual effects of language learning among other factors. Error analy sis is the method to deal with intralingual factors in learners’ language (Corder, 1981).it is a methodology of describing Second Language Learners’ language systems .Error analysis is a type of bilingual comparison, a comparison between learners’ interla nguage and a target language, while contrastive analysis between languages. (native language and target language)8.What are UG principles and parameters?➢The universal principle is the principle of structure-dependency, which states that language is organized in such a way that it crucially depends on the structural relationships between elements in a sentence.➢Parameters are prnciples that differ in the way they work or function from language to language. That is to say there are certain linguistic features that vary across languages.9.What role does UG play in SLA?➢Three possibilities :1. UG operates in the same way for L2 as it does for L1.2. The learner’s Core grammar is fixed and UG is no longer available to the L2 learner, particularly not to the a dult learner.3. UG is partly available but it is only one factor in the acquisition of L2. There are other factors and they may interfere with the UGinfluence.10.What are classifications of communication strategies?Faerch and Kasper characterizes CSs in the light of learners’ attempts at governing two different behaviors and their taxonomies are achievement and reduction strategies , and they are based on the psycholinguistics.➢Achievement Strategies:⏹Paraphrase⏹Approximation⏹Word coinage⏹Circumlocution⏹Conscious Transfer⏹Literal translation⏹Language switch (borrowing)⏹Mime⏹Use body language and gestures to make communication open⏹Appeal for assistance➢Reduction Strategies⏹Message abandonment(topic shift):Ask a student to answer the question :How old are you ? She must utter two orthree sentences to answer the question, but she mustn’t tell her age.⏹Topic avoidance(Silence)。
Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition Strategies 二语词汇习得策略
Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition Strategies二语词汇习得策略[摘要]词汇是构成语言的基本单位,词汇习得在语言学习中占有重要地位。
英国著名语言学家D.A. Wilkins (1972) 说过:“没有语法,人们不能表达很多东西;而没有词汇,人们则无法表达任何东西。
”这就说明了词汇在学习中的重要性。
本文旨在分析二语词汇习得策略并应用于不同水平的学习者。
学习者根据自己的水平选择正确的习得方法和策略学习词汇,从而提高学习效率和习得效果。
关键字:二语词汇习得词汇习得策略元认知策略认知策略AbstractVocabulary is the basic unit of a language. Language acquisition plays an important role in language learning. Famous linguistics D. A. Wilkins said, “Without grammar, very little can be conveyed, without vocabulary, nothing can be conveyed (Lewis, 1993:16).” It speaks volumes for the importance of vocabulary in language learning. This paper aims to analysis the second language acquisition strategies and applies to different levels of learners. According to the different levels, the learners should choose the proper methods and strategies to promote learning efficiency and acquisition effect.Key words:Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition;VocabularyAcquisition Strategies;Metacognitive strategy;Cognitive strategyIntroductionWith economic globalization and multi-polarization of the world, especially the population of the internet, English becomes more and more important, because it is considered as the tool for absorbing and communicating information. As we all known, vocabulary acquisition is one of the most noticed-question of the second language learners. “Vocabulary” appears in the area of linguists' study. Nowadays, researchers still can not give a complete and reasonable definition of vocabulary. Since 1970s, the secondlanguage vocabulary acquisition research has gradually become the hot point and important subject in the second language vocabulary acquisition research area. These researches aim to discuss the efficiency vocabulary memory strategies to promote the memory skills and vocabulary levels. Then how to acquire vocabulary become popular among the researchers. Wenden &Rubin (1987), O'Malley& Chamot (1990) refer to the content of vocabulary acquisition strategies; Rubin (1987) and Oxford (1990) classify the memory strategy to the direct cognitive strategies. Especially, CohenAphek (1981), Porte (1988), O'Malley (1990), Vann (90), Cohen (1990), etc made a basic searching of vocabulary acquisition. In a word, there are various opinions in how to acquire vocabulary. Firstly, it talks about the importance of vocabulary. Secondly, what does it mean to “acquire” a word? This paper mainly aims to the detail analysis of the vocabulary acquisition from three aspects:Meta-cognitive Strategy; Cognitive Strategy and Social or Affective Strategy. Especially, it highlights the effect of the context and rending to vocabulary acquisition. This paper talks about the applications of the vocabulary acquisition strategies. And it puts forward some problems and difficulties of vocabulary acquisition. This paper also discusses the influencing factors to the acquisition. It includes the mother tongue, age, language contact, logical thinking ability, identity degree, and academic motivationThe purpose of this paper is to rise the awareness of English learners that the importance of vocabulary in language learning and the vocabulary acquisition strategies can not be neglected, and each strategies is deeply rooted in its language. Through the analysis of the theory of study, the paper tries to draw the learner's attention to the strategies of the second language vocabulary acquisition and using the vocabulary in communication. In order to improve the acquisition efficiency, some strategies put into practice are introduced.The first presents the importance of vocabulary, some basic concepts of vocabulary and vocabulary learning, the second part tells what does it mean to know a word, the third part deals with the theory of vocabulary acquisition and presents the factors and differences influencing the vocabulary acquisition. The fourth part is detailed discussionof vocabulary acquisition strategies in different levels of learners. The last part is conclusion.Literature review1. The importance of vocabularyAs the first time, when we go to school and our English teacher will tell us that vocabulary is of great importance in learning English. After several years, we understand words gradually, especially when we study in high school. If we know a little about vocabulary, we may have poor English. That is because the listening, speaking, reading and writing show the necessary of learning vocabulary.Many researchers agree that lexis is at least as important as structure, because it is using wrong words and not wrong grammar that usually breaks down communication. Mistakes in lexis much more often lead to misunderstanding and may be less generously tolerated outside classroom than mistakes in syntax. (Carter, 1987).As Stephen Krashen remarked, “When students travel, they don't carry grammar books, they carry dictionaries.A significant role of vocabulary in both teaching and learning processes was firststated by Stephen Krashen in The Natural Approach (1985):“Vocabulary is basic for communication. If acquirers do not recognize the meaning of the key words used by those who address them they will be unable to participate in the conversation.”Words are basic tools in human communication; therefore they determine the main part of people's life-relationships between people and associations with the surrounding world that people live in. The larger one's vocabulary, the easier it is to express one's thoughts and feelings.In real communication, correctly and idiomatically used vocabulary can even decrease some structural inaccuracy and grammar errors. (Zhang Jiying, 2002). So learners should enrich and expand their knowledge of words as much as possible in order to communicate effectively in a foreign language.2. What does it mean to “know” a word?Knowing a word is not a simple phenomenon. In fact, it is quite complex and goes far beyond the word's meaning and pronunciation. (Zhang Jiying, 2002). Richards (1976) think knowing a word means also knowing the frequency of words and their likely collocates; being aware of the functional and situation limitations that apply; knowledge of the “syntactic behavior”; derivational forms and word class; associative and connotative knowledge; semantic value-breaking down words into minimal units as with componential analysis (see Katz&Fodor1963or Leech1974); knowing the other (possible) meaning associated. Nagy and Scott (2000) identify several dimensions that describe the complexity of what it means to know a word. First, word knowledge is incremental, which means that readers need to have many exposures to a word in different contexts before they “know”it. Second, word knowledge is multidimensional. This is because many words have multiple meanings and serve different functions in different function in different sentences, texts, and even conversations. Third, word knowledge is interrelated in that knowledge of one word connects knowledge of other words.What all of this means is that “knowing” a word is a matter of degree rather than an all-or-nothing proposition (Beck&Mckeown, 1991; Nagy&Scott, 2000). The degree of knowing a word are reflected in the precision with which we use a word, how quickly we understand a word, and how well we understand and use words in different modes and different purpose.Knowing a word also implies knowing how that word relates to other knowledge. Finally, knowing a word means being able to appreciate its connotations and subtleties. When we know a word at this level, we can use and recognize it in idioms, jokes, slang, and puns (Johnson, &Schlicting, 2004).3. Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition StrategiesVocabulary acquisition is the part of English learning. Since 1960s, more and more attentions and researches had been toward to vocabulary acquisition strategies. When it comes to 1980s or 1990s, the vocabulary acquisition strategies gain fruitful results. Cohen Aphek (1981), Porte (1988), O'Malley (1990), Vann (1990), Cohen (1990) made a basic discussion in vocabulary acquisition strategies.O'Malley&Chamot (1990) classify language learning strategy into three methods: Meta cognitive strategy, Cognitive strategy, and Social or Affective strategy. Meta cognitive strategy refers to strategies of advance preparation, directed attention, selective attention, self-management, self monitoring and self-evaluation. And the results indicate that the metacognitive strategy teaching is significant in developing learner autonomy, which shows prominent pros-pectin foreign language teaching. A cognitive strategy serves to support the learner as he or she develops internal procedures that enable him/her to perform tasks that are complex (Rosen shine, 1997). The use of cognitive strategies can increase the efficiency with which the learner approaches a learning task. These academic tasks can include, but are not limited to, remembering and applying information from course content, constructing sentences and paragraphs, editing written work, paraphrasing, and classifying information to be learned.The memory strategy, cognitive strategy, social strategy and metacognitve strategy are used more frequently than the affective strategy and compensative strategy.Oxford (1990) put forward a more comprehensive classification system of strategy, which includes six categories: memory strategy, cognitive strategy, compensatory strategy, metacognitive strategy, affective strategy, and social strategy. Nation (1990) put forward semantic manufacturing strategy of “what is it”. From different aspect, researchers have different classification of strategies. Stoffer (1995) made a factor analysis of 53vocabulary acquisition strategies and extract 9 factors: the strategy of practice and apply words in authentic situation; the strategy of creative learning vocabulary; the self-motivation strategy; the strategy of psychological connection; memory strategy; the strategy of audio/visual assisted learning; with the movement to the body of learning vocabulary strategy; the strategy of overcoming anxiety; the strategy of using to organize units.Schmitt (1997) composite the related language acquisition strategies upon classification, and put forward two categories of vocabulary acquisition strategy, namely discovery strategy and consolidation strategy.In china, acquisition strategies researcher, Wen Qiufang(1996) thought:English learning strategy includes concept and method. What is concept? It means the acquaint learners to how to learn English well. And the method refers to the actions that learners take to learn English well. The method can be classifying two categories: manage method and learning method. Wuxia, Wangqiang(1998) draw lessons of classification of learning strategies from O'Malley&Chamot's and thing that the majority of students can not depend on the mechanical memorizing to learn English vocabulary. Wenpeng (2000) utilize “the level of processing approach of memory” to do an empirical research on different words meaning.Willians and Burden (2000) stress metacognition is central to effective learning. Wenden(1987) says that metacognitive is “the process that underlines the efficient use of strategies and the essence of intelligent activity” (p573). Quicke (1994) similarly views that metacognitive awareness is crucial in learning strategies. In addition, most of the studies (O'Malley and Chamot1990, Wenden and Rudin 1987; Oxford andCrookall1989) founder the learners who were particularly taught metacognitive knowledge to help them assess the needs, evaluate process and give directions to their learning.After summarizing the theories of the vocabulary acquisition strategies, I express my opinions about vocabulary acquisition strategies. These theories or opinions have their merits and demerits. I am in favor of O'Malley& Chamot's theory of the classification of vocabulary acquisition strategies: metacognitive strategies, cognitive strategies, affective strategies. The metacognition represents strategies of acquiring knowledge, namely the ability to understand pour method for learning and assimilating information. It concerns “the knowledge of your thoughts”. In addition to how various factors influence psychological thought processing.As far as I am concerned, vocabulary really plays an essential role in language learning. For example, when we communicate with others, vocabulary is the basic component between your talking. Without words, without communication. In the school, every student should learn vocabulary, the more vocabulary you acquire, the more knowledge you will get. In the process of our study, every skill needsvocabulary. (Listening, speaking, reading, and writing). Especially, in the extensive reading, the vast majority vocabulary can be learned gradually through repeated exposures in various discourse contexts. However, not all methods are appropriate for all levels of learners. Thus, I deem that different levels of learners should choose different strategies of vocabulary acquisition strategies.When talking about second language vocabulary acquisition strategies, we may talk it from pro-school children. Chenhua, zhangyifang (2001) analysis the narrative approach of memory process of vocabulary. The study discovers the majority of Chinese children acquire vocabulary with repeat memory strategy. That is to say children memory Chinese meaning through the Chinese- English bilingual. When memorizing vocabulary, Chinese children seldom utilize the Keyword strategy and Semantic coding strategies. They do not use metacognitive strategy. In my opinion, children can be helped to acquire vocabulary in the form of games. Meanwhile, vocabulary acquisition of pro-children should be carried out in a real context. It has a long progress. According to different age, children acquire vocabulary in different strategies. For the lower class, children acquire the single word. For the middle class, the children begin to acquire the double or three words. When the children are nearly 6 six years old, they form a semantic system. The teacher can help children acquire vocabulary in the context or games.4. Cognitive strategy4.1 Using dictionary strategiesCheck the dictionary is the most common strategy of acquires vocabulary. And it also an important manner to learn English. It has been shown that students who use a bilingual dictionary learn more vocabulary than students who read without a dictionary (1993:263-287). However, when students turn to a dictionary for every word they do not understand, they lose sight of the meaning within the text as a whole. Teachers and textbook designers have realized this, and they argued that learning strategies such as guessing from context should be employed in order to read the text fluently and smoothly for an overview of the whole text. Researchers have commented that this movement may have gone too far, and today's literature impliesthat good language learners rely on dictionaries less than poor language learners and are more successful at employing contextual guessing strategies.These researchers found that dictionaries were used equally by both good and poor English achievers. There was, however, the notable difference in the way students used their dictionaries: Dictionary used by high achievers involved a series of questions: “Was it necessary to consult the dictionary? What information in the dictionary was relevant? Was the information worth copying down, and if so, in Chinese or in English?” Low achievers, on the other hand, followed” a relatively inflexible set of procedures for dictionary use rather than a decision0 making process”(wen, Q.,& Johnson, R. K., 1997:36 ).4.2 Semantic guessing strategyHuckin, Hnynes & Coady (1993) deeply study the context-based meaning. Guessing strategy plays an important role in acquiring vocabulary, cultivating their guessing words ability can improve their reading speed, and save time. So it can stir up their reading interests and enlarge their page views. Skills for guessing unfamiliar English words tell us how to guess words. Getting meaning from inference means that you infer, or guess, meaning from the clues provided by the context –the sentence or passage in which the word appears. There are four steps. First, decide what part of speech of speech the unfamiliar words. Next, make out what the sentence or passage is about. Then, find out the words or phrases that help you get the idea. Finally, use these clues to guess the meaning of the word. For an example:The soldiers were ordered to fire at the enemy.Questions:1.What part of speech is “fire”? _________.2.Does the sentence talk about war, business, or a bale? ___________.3.What words in the sentence helped you answer Question 2?_________and_________.4.Fire means__________a)to let someone from a jobb)to shootc)red-hot flamesThe sentence contains two clues to the meaning of “fire”. First, “fire”is a verb. Second, he sentence talks about war; the word “soldiers” and “enemy”help you understand this. You can immediately eliminate the choice “red-hotflames”, since it is a noun answer that refers to blame. Although the choice “to let someone go from a job” is a verb answer, it refers to business and should be eliminated. The choice “to shoot” is a verb answer that talks about fighting; it is the correct answer.4.3 Memory strategy of vocabulary acquisitionThe so-called memory strategy refers to various memorizing methods or skills for students, its principles are: tide up, organize and relate to the content. In China, memory method is a traditional strategy to learn vocabulary. In order to deal with the examinations, the students adopt the memory strategy. The common memory strategies are: keyword strategy, word list, context strategy.4.4 Keyword strategyThe key word strategy can benefit a wide variety of students with language needs in the areas of vocabulary, comprehension of academic language, sentence structure, organizing and explaining information, and transferring information across settings. When the strategy is routinely used, students can master its basic mechanics and key word review during direct language intervention sessions can be a foundation for increasingly complex and challenging practice and review of a variety of curriculum based language skills. Keyword strategy is put forward by Atkinson (1975). The method includes two steps: first, the learners find out the similar sounding word between the mother langue and the second language. Second, build up a metal image. Paivio (1991), Pressley (1982) think that keyword strategy is important. However, it has its limitation, which is difficulty to find the same pronunciation of each word. In China, Wangwenyu (1998) found that Chinese students seldom use the keyword strategy because of its complexity.4.5 Word listNation (1982) makes a conclusion: word list is an efficient way to accumulate large number of vocabularies in a short time. O' Malley &Chamot (1985) think that mechanical memorizing is the efficient way to memory vocabulary. Decontextualized word list have been used extensively to teach vocabulary. Presenting vocabulary inlist form is an efficient study method in which students can learn large numbers of words in a short time (Meara P.1995:8-10). Such list, however, having been stripped of context, are difficult to deal with. A majority of language learners prefer decontextualize word lists just because the application of such list seems to be more practical and much easier to deal with, saving more time.In addition to facilitating memorization and learning, word list serve another purpose in the reading class: motivation. Upon adopting a corpus-based list of the 3,000 most frequently used words. List is much more effective to help students focus on less-frequently encountered words that require more intensive study and organized review.4.6 Context strategyThe second language vocabulary acquisition can not be separate from context. Context is a main factor of vocabulary acquisition. It is an efficient method to acquire vocabulary in the context. From the semantics point of view, James Inhofe announce d the regularity of acquiring vocabulary in From Paragraph to Essay. The basic principle of acquiring vocabulary focus on the context, so that we can know the relation between the form and meaning. By Krashen's Monitor Hypothesis Theory, many researchers tend to acquire vocabulary in the context.5. Other strategiesResearchers study the other strategies to acquire vocabulary. Contact method, Semantic coding method, assimilation strategy, self-text strategy.When I was in the third year in the college, I have a lexical class. From the class, we know many strategies to acquire vocabulary:Repetition, suited for kids and primary school students. Spelling and pronunciation, suited for middle school students. Context, learning the new words in phrases, sentences, never learn it alone. Semantic: grouping words according to the meaning, sound, semantic field and so on. It is for all levels. Association: free association of antonyms, antonyms, homonyms, and homonyms. Emotion: learning words with strong emotions, or emotional sentences. Different physical surroundings:learning in one place is low efficiency than more places. Over learning: word cards or flashes: use key words cards.In a word, vocabulary acquisition plays an important role in English language learning. It is necessary for learners to command of vocabulary acquisition strategies. Because it can help us acquire vocabulary more efficient and communicate with people in life.ConclusionThis paper has attempted to provide some theories of second language vocabulary acquisition and some strategies. Such as metacognitive strategy, cognitive strategy, and social strategy. However, this paper also put forward some microcosmic strategy. As a matter of fact, vocabulary acquisition should combine the context. In addition, this paper hasn't mentioned that culture is also an important factor in vocabulary acquisition. In the study of second language vocabulary acquisition, we should pay attention to the process and the acquiring results. This paper focuses on the study of the second language vocabulary acquisition strategies.Bibliography[1] A.U. Chamot. The Learning Strategies of ESL Students. In A. L. Wenden & J.Rubin, (eds), Learner Strategies in Language Learning, 1987.[2] Cater. R. and M. McCarthy. Vocabulary and Language Teaching. New York:Longman, 1987.[3] Nation, L. S. P. Teaching and Learning Vocabulary. New Newbury HousePublishers, 1990.[4] O'Malley, J. & Chamot, A. U.. Learning Strategies in Second LanguageAcquisition [J]. Cambridge University Press, 1990:12-15.[5] Oxford, R.. Language Learning Strategies [M]. Newbury House, 1990.[6] Paivio, A. Vanadian Journal of Psychology, 1991(45).[7] Pressley, M& Levin, J. R& Delaney, H. D. Review of Educational Research,1982(52).[8] Rudin, J.. Learners strategies: theoretical assumptions, research history andtypology [A]. In A. Wenden, J. Rubin (eds). Learning Strategies in Language Learning [C]. New York: Prentice Hall. 1987.[9] Schmitt, N. & McMarthy, M. (Eds). Vocabulary: Decription Acquisition andPedagogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.[10] 陈桦,张益芳.中国儿童英语词汇记忆策略探究[J].外语学刊,2001(4).[11] 戴曼纯. 论第二语言词汇习得研究[J]. 外语教学与研究,2002(2).[12] 徐德凯.大学英语词汇教学理论与实践[M].长春:吉林出版集团有限责任公司,2009.[12] 王文宇.观念、策略与英语词汇记忆[J].外语教学与研究,1998(1).[13] 文秋芳. 英语学习策略论.上海:上海外语教育出版社,1996.[14] 吴霞,王蔷.非英语专业本科生词汇水平研究. 外语教学与研究,1998(1).[15] 张纪英.英语词汇学教学与研究[M]. 武汉:华中科技大学出版社,2007.[16] 朱厚敏. 英语词汇学习策略研究[M] 长春:吉林大学出版社,2009.。
二语习得(L7正)
Types of learner strategy
Learning strategy 学习策略 Production strategy 表达策略 Communication strategy 交际策略
Learning strategy
Learning strategies in formulaic speech learning
allowlearnersowncognitionplanningwhatdocheckinghowevaluatinghowwentmetacognitivemetacognitiveevaluating元认知策略元认知策略metametacognitivecognitive提前准备提前准备advanceorganizersadvanceorganizers集中注意集中注意directedattentiondirectedattention选择注意选择注意selectiveattentionselectiveattention自我管理自我管理selfselfmanagementmanagement事先练习事先练习advancepreparationadvancepreparation自我监控自我监控selfselfmonitoringmonitoring延迟表达延迟表达delayedproductiondelayedproduction自我评价自我评价selfselfevaluationevaluationimportancemetacognitivestrategiesimportancemetacognitivestrategiesstudentswithoutmetacognitiveapproachesessentiallylearnerswithoutdirectionprogressaccomplishmentfuturedirections
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
Language Learning Strategies Employedby L2 LearnersDr. Mamuna Ghani*AbstractLearning strategies are involved in all types of learning andteaching like science, maths, history, languages and other subjects,both in formal (classroom) and informal learning environments.Language learning strategies are the often-conscious steps orbehaviours used by language learners to enhance the acquisition,storage, retention, recall, and use of new information (Rigney, 1978;Oxford, 1990). In this paper I am going to discuss the role of languagelearning strategies which are supposed to facilitate the languagelearning process. I will also review some of the latest literaturerelated to language learning strategies. Research supports thatthere is a relationship between language learning strategies andproficiency.Learning strategies are procedures, employed by the learners, in order to make their own language learning as successful as possible. nguage learning strategies — specific actions, behaviours, steps, or techniques that students (often intentionally) use to improve their progress in developing L2 skills. These strategies can facilitate the internalization, storage, retrieval, or use of the new language. Strategies are tools for the self-directed involvement necessary for developing communicative ability. (Oxford, 1992/1993:p.18). According to O’Mallay and Chamot (1990: 43) learning strategies may include:focussing on selected aspects of new information, analysing and monitoring information during acquisition, organizing or elaborating on new information during the encoding process, evaluating the learning when it is completed, or assuring oneself that the learning will be successful as a way to allay anxiety.Learners have been found to vary considerably in both the overall frequency with which they employ strategies and also the particular types of strategies they use (O’Malley et al. 1985a; Chamot et al. 1987; 1988; Ehrman 1990). Different students adopt different behaviours or strategies to learn a new language. Some learners who are very shy and introvert learn a second language through grammar drills and sentence analysis. They do the rehearsal as much as they can in isolation. On the other hand, sociable and extrovert learners avoid grammar drills but seek out social conversation in English. They are satisfied that they can get the general meaning without knowing * Department of English, Islamia University Bahawalpur.31Journal of Research (Faculty of Languages & Islamic Studies) 2003 Vol.4every word. Some learners constantly try to build a mental model or big picture of the language. They avoid step-by-step language learning. Few of them are familiar more to the senses (movement, sound, sight, and touch) than to intuition, look for English texts that proceed one step at a time. They use flashcards, and with other classmates, they initiate “total physical response” exercises that involve all the senses.These learners use different kinds of language learning strategies, or specific actions and behaviours to help them learn. Their strategies differ greatly, at least in part because their general learning styles (overall approaches to learning and the environment) are so varied. Some students learn words by breaking them down into their components. Some of them consciously use guessing when they read. Strategies are the tools for active, self-directed involvement needed for developing L2 communicative ability (O’Malley & Chamot, 1990). There is research evidence that conscious and tailored use of such strategies is related to language achievement and proficiency. According to O’ Malley and Chamot (1990), there are three main types of strategies used by L2 learners.1. Metacognitive Strategies involve planning and thinking about learning, such as planning one’s learning, monitoring one’s own speech or writing, and evaluating how successful a particular strategy is.2. Cognitive Strategies ‘operate directly on incoming information, manipulating it in ways that enhance learning’ (1990:44). They involve conscious ways of tackling learning, such as note-taking, resourcing (use of dictionaries and other resources) and organizing information.3. Social Strategies mean learning by interacting with others, such as working with fellow students or asking the teacher’s help. The powerful social and affective strategies are found less often in L2 research. This is, perhaps, because these behaviours are not studied frequently by L2 researchers, and because learners are not familiar with paying attention to their own feelings and social relationships as part of the L2 learning process (Oxford, 1990b).Some of the strategies or group of strategies are associated with particular language skills. For example, L2 writing, like L1 writing, benefits from the learning strategies of planning, self-monitoring, deduction, and substitution. On the other hand L2 speaking demands strategies such as risk-taking, paraphrasing, circumlocution, self-monitoring, and self-evaluation. L2 listening comprehension is facilitated by strategies of elaboration, inferencing, selective attention, and self-monitoring, while reading comprehension uses strategies like reading aloud, guessing, deduction, and summarizing (Chamot & Kupper, 1989). Well tailored combinations of strategies are more effective than single strategies. There is research evidence that (see reviews by Skehan, 1989; Oxford 1989; Oxford & Crookall, 1989) successful learners have a tendency to use learning strategies that are suitable to the material, the task, and to their own32Some Principles for Designing A Communicative Course objectives, needs, and stage of learning. More proficient learners use a wider range ofstrategies in a greater number of situations than do less proficient learners, but therelationship between strategy use and proficiency is complex. Research indicates thatlanguage learners at all levels use strategies (Chamot & Kupper, 1989), but that some ormost of them are not fully aware of the strategies they use or the strategies that mightbe most helpful to use.Good language Learner Strategies. Good language learners show full involvement inlanguage learning. They appreciate teachers who are systematic, logical and clear, butprefer to treat them as ‘informants’ rather than to rely on them. (Picket 1978). Naimen etal (1978) quoted in Cook (1996) found six types of strategies which were common in(GLLs) Good Language Learners.GLL Strategy 1: find a language learning style that suits you.GLL Strategy 2: involves yourself in the language learning process.GLL Strategy 3: develop an awareness of language both as system and asCommunication.GLL Strategy 4: pay constant attention to expanding your language.•GLL Strategy 5: develop the L2 as a separate system.GLL Strategy 6: take into account the demands that L2 Learning imposes.In her teacher-oriented text, Oxford (1990a: 9) describes her view of LLS (LanguageLearning Strategies) by mentioning the following features.•expand the role of language teachers•are problem-oriented•involve many aspects, not just the cognitive•can be taught•are flexible•are influenced by a variety of factors.•allow learners to become more self-directedFactors Influencing the Choice of L2 Learning Strategies Oxford (1990a) synthesized existing research on how the following factors influence the choice ofstrategies used among students learning a second language.Motivation. Motivated students tend to use more strategies than less motivated students,and their particular reason for studying the language (motivational orientation, especiallyfor career prospects) was important in the choice of strategies.Gender. Female learners reported greater overall strategy use than male learners inmany studies (although sometimes males do better than females in the use of a particularstrategy).33Journal of Research (Faculty of Languages & Islamic Studies) 2003 Vol.4Cultural background. Rote memorization and other forms of memorization found to be more common among some Asian students than among students from other cultural backgrounds.Attitudes and beliefs. These two factors showed a positive effect on the choice of learners’ strategy use. Those with negative attitudes and beliefs often show poor strategy use or lack of orchestration of strategies.Type of task. The type of the task helps to decide the strategies employed to carry out the task.Age and L2 stage. Students of different ages and stages of L2 learning use different strategies, with certain strategies often being used by older or more advanced students.Learning style. Learning style (general approach to language learning) often helps in the choice of L2 learning strategies. For example, analytic-style students prefer strategies such as contrastive analysis, dividing words and phrases, while overall students use strategies to find meaning (guessing, scanning, predicting) and to communicate without knowing all the words (paraphrasing, gesturing).Tolerance of Ambiguity. Students who are more tolerant of ambiguity use different learning strategies in some instances than do students who are less tolerant of ambiguity. Language Learning Strategies and Second/Foreign Learning and Teaching According to Oxford (1990a:1) Language learning strategies “...are especially important for language learning because they are tools for active, self-directed involvement, which is essential for developing communicative competence”. Within ‘communicative’ approaches to language teaching a key goal for the learner is to develop communicative competence in the target language. Communication strategies are used by speakers intentionally and consciously in order to cope with difficulties in communicating in a L2/FL (Bialystok, 1990).Research supports this idea that training students to use LLS can help them to be better language learners. Naiman, Frohlich, Stern, and Todesco (1978, 1996), Rubin (1975), and Stern (1975) commenting on ‘good language learners’ suggested a number of strategies that such students employ, ranging from using an active task approach in and watching one’s L2 performance to listening to the radio in the L2 and communicating with native speakers. A study by O’Malley and Chamot (1990) also supported this fact that successful L2 learners are aware of the strategies they employ and why they use them. But an interesting argument is also raised by Skehan (1989) which suggests that “there is always the possibility that the ‘good’ language learning strategies...are also used by bad language learners, but other reasons cause them to be unsuccessful” (p.76). Vann and Abraham’s (1990:192) study answered this argument which found that both ‘good’ and ‘unsuccessful’ language learners can be active users of similar strategies, though it is important that they also discovered that their unsuccessful34Some Principles for Designing A Communicative Course learners “cked...what are often called metacognitive strategies...which would enable them to assess the task and bring to bear the necessary strategies for its completion”. All this discussion suggests that a number and mixture of strategies are important if L2 teachers help students both in learning the Second/Foreign language and in becoming good language learners.ConclusionIn this research paper we have tried to present a brief description of language learning strategies (LLS). We also tried to explain what LLS are and how different learners in different contexts use them. Relevant literature presented by latest researchers has also been reviewed in order to keep the readers up to date. Our own teaching experience shows that, using LLS in the L2 class helps learners in their language learning and also teachers to improve their teaching.ReferencesChamot, A.U., & Kupper. L. (1989). Learning strategies in foreign language instruction.“Foreign Language Annals,” 22, 13-24.Ehrman, M. & Oxford, R. (1988). “Ants and grasshoppers, badgers and butterflies: Qualitative and quantitative exploration of adult language learning styles and strategies.” Paper presented at the Symposium on Research Perspectives on Adult Language Learning and Acquisition, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. Naiman, N., Frohlich, M., Stern, H., & Todesco, A. (1978). The Good Language Learner. Research in Education Series 7. Toronto: OISE Press.O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A.U. (1990). “Learning strategies in second language acquisition.” Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Oxford, R. L. (1989). Use of language learning strategies: A synthesis of studies with implications for strategy training. “System,” 17, 235-247.Oxford, R. L., & Crookall, D. (1989). Research on language learning strategies: Methods, findings, and instructional issues. “Modern Language Journal,” 73, 404-419. Oxford, R. L. (1990a). Language learning strategies and beyond: A look at strategies in the context of styles. In S.S. Magnan (Ed.), “Shifting the instructional focus to the learner,” 35-55. Middlebury, VT: Northeast Conference on the Teaching of Foreign Languages.35Journal of Research (Faculty of Languages & Islamic Studies) 2003 Vol.4Oxford, R.L. (1990b). “Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know.”Boston: Heinle & Heinle.Oxford, R. (1992/1993). Language learning strategies in a nutshell: Update and ESL suggestions. TESOL Journal, 2(2), 18-22.Oxford, R. & Ehrman, M. (1988). Psychological type and adult language learning strategies: A pilot study. “Journal of Psychological Type,” 16, pp22-32.Picket, G. (1978) The Foreign Language Learning Process. London. The British Council. Rigney, J. W. (1978). Learning strategies: A theoretical perspective. In H.F. O’Neil, Jr. (Ed.), “Learning strategies,” pp164-205. New York: Academic Press.Skehan, P. (1989). Language learning strategies (Chapter 5). Individual Differences in Second-Language Learning (pp. 73- 99). London: Edward Arnold.V ann, R., & Abraham, R. (1990). Strategies of unsuccessful language learners. TESOL Quarterly, 24(2), 177-198.36。