老年教育和主观幸福感外文文献翻译2018-2019
国家差异主观幸福感:外向性和神经质的互动效应【外文翻译】

外文翻译原文Cities and CompetitivenessMaterial Source :China journal net Autther: MICHAEL LYNN and PIERSSTEELABSTRACT.Extraversion and neuroticism interact to a?ect subjective well-being(SWB)at the individual level of analysis,so that introverted neurotics tend to be particularly miserable.The goal of this study is to determine if this interaction can also be detected at a national level.Findings based on data from 30 countries confirmed that the interaction between extraversion and neuroticism was an extremely strong predictor of satisfaction with life and a?Neuroticism lowered satisfaction with life and a?ect among all nations,but more so among introverted nations than among extraverted ones.These findings further confirm that personality traits can be used to extend our understanding of national di?erences regarding SWB.They also further validate national SWB scores,as they relate to personality in a complex but the oretically meaningful manner.KEY WORDS:extraversion,interaction,nations,neuroticism,personality,swbINTRODUCTIONAlmost by definition,people everywhere strive for happiness populations of some nations are less successful than others inachieving these desired states.For example,the percentage of those claiming to be happy ranges from a low of 44 in Moldova to a high of 97 in Iceland,while the percentage of those claiming to be satisfied with their lives ranges from a low of 20 in Ukraine to a high of 92 in the Netherlands(Inglehart and Klingemann,2000).Although the validity of these subjective measures as well as their comparability across nations has been questioned,the available evidence suggests that the measures are reasonably valid and comparable(see Diener et al.,1995b;Veenhoven,2000a).Thus,variations in national subjective well-being(SWB)appear to be both sizable and meaningful.Recently,psychologists have begun to study the correlates/determinants of these national differences.Some researchers have examined the impact on national SWB of economic and political forces,on the grounds that these factors can facilitate or impede goal attainment,which underlies satisfaction and happiness.Consistent with this reasoning,the research indicates that national SWB increases with national income/wealth and with economic and political freedom(Diener et al.,1995a;Inglehart and Klingemann,2000;Veenhoven,2000a).Other researchers have examined the impact on national SWB of cultural values,on the grounds that cultural values influence:(1)the environments that national populations create for themselves,(2)the perceptions and evaluations that national populations have of life situations,and/or(3)the goals that national populations strive for(with some goals being more conducive to happiness and satisfaction than others).This research indicates that national SWB increases with national disapproval of power differences Still other researchers have examined the impact on national SWB of national character(orpersonality),onthe grounds that personality influences the happiness and satisfaction of individuals.Although the results of these later studies are not entirely consistent,they generally indicate that national SWB increases with national extraversion and decreases with national neuroticism and psychoticism(Arrindell et al.,1997;Steel and Ones,2002;van Hemert et al.,2002).This study extends the use of national personality to predict national SWB.Specifically,it examines for the first time the im pact on national SWB of the interaction between national extraversion(E)and national neuroticism(N).Empirical research at the individual level of analysis has already found that these personality traits interact to affect SWB.Following Eysenck(e.g.,Eysenck and Eysenck,1985),Hotard et al.(1989)argued that extraverts(who seek to increase arousal)interpret social arousal positively and seek out social interactions,while introverts(who seek to decrease arousal)interpret social arousal negatively and try to avoid social interactions.Neuroticism(or negative emotionality)amplifies the negative reactions of introverts to social stimuli,so that neurotic introverts are more socially withdrawn and less happy than the other three groups defined by the intersection of these personality traits.Consistent with the expectation regarding happiness,Hotard et al.(1989)found significant extraversion by neuroticism(E?N)interactions in three data sets with di?erent measures of extraversion,neuroticism and SWB such that neurotic introverts were particularly unhappy and dissatisfied with their lives(see also Pavot et al.,1990).However,contrary to expectations,they did not find that neurotic introverts had fewer social relationships than neurotic extraverts.This later finding challenges the role of sociability in producing the E?N interaction on SWB.Analternative explanation is that the negative emotionality of neurotics is less distressing to extraverts, whose low levels of cortical arousal and consequent need for external stimulation cause them to dwell on negative emotions less than do introverts.Thus,this E?N interaction makes sense given Eysenc k’s conceptualization of extraversion as chronically low arousal(hence,insensitivity to external stimuli).Relationships observed at the individual level may not occur at the group level(e.g.,Ostroff,1993).However,it is also possible that relationships may be even stronger at higher levels of analysis;this may occur with the E?N interaction.First,homology may occur,where the same processes exist at both levels of analysis.In this case,nations whose populations score low on extraversion and high on neuroticism may have a disproportionately large number of neurotic introverts whose dissatisfaction with their lives lowers the average SWB in those nations.Second,additionalprocesses can magnify individual level e?ects.Specifically,past research has shown evidence of emotional contagion.As summarized by Hatfield et al.(1993),‘‘People tend from moment to moment to‘catch’other people’s emotions as a result of mimicry,feedback,and resulting synchrony in social encounters’(p.96). Consequently,neurotic introverts will not only tend to be unhappy but may also make those they come in contact with less happy.Thus,it is possible that extraversion will interact with neuroticism to a?ect SWB at the national level of analysis as well as at the individual level of analysis.This possibility is examined for the first time in the following study.METHODWe re-analyze data compiled by Steel and Ones(2002)for their examination of national personality e?ects on national SWB(see Table I).Steel and Ones provide detailed information regarding the measurement equivalence of their personality and SWB data,that is,the degree to which the recorded di?erences among nations are meaningful and reflect true scores.Given a series of studies examining convergent and discriminant validity along with bilingual administration and di?erential item responding,they conclude that observed scores largely reflect true scores. Also,consistent with classical test theory,any measurement inequivalence will simply add error,which will typically attenuate observedcorrelations.Consequently,if we could measure traits and SWB perfectly,any results we obtain would likely be significantly stronger.Steel and Ones also detail how their databases were compiled,which we review only briefly here.National Subjective Well-BeingSteel and Ones(2002)obtained national scores on SWB from an international database of happiness surveys compiled by Veenhoven(2000b).These surveys were administered to different samples(e.g.,students,general population),asked di?erent questions(e.g.,‘‘how satisfied are you’’),and had di?erent numbers of response options(e.g.,1–5,1–7).To put the scales on a common metric,Veenhoven used expert opinion,which Steel and Ones supplemented with linear equating when 20 cases or more were available(see Ango?,1971).RESULTSThe means and standard deviations of each variable along witheir zero-order correlations with one another are presented Table II.Prior to analysis,the national personality scores we standardized and centered(see Aiken and West,1991).this case,each of the dependent variables–national a?ect,hapiness,and satisfaction with life–was regressed on the stadardized extraversion and neuroticism scores followed by the product in the second step.The resulting E?N interactio were further examined by performing regressions of the depe dent variables on neuroticism separately for extraverted an introverted nations,which were defined by extraversion scor greater and less than 18.3 respectively revious research has addressed some of these concerns as they relate to national EPQ scores and national SWB scores.For example,Barrett et al.(1998)demonstrated that the EPQ had a similar factor structure across 34 countries,and Diener et al.(1995b)found little evidence that response artifacts contributed to national di?erences in SWB.However,evidence supporting the validity of national extraversion,neuroticism and SWB scores is still sparse.The fact that those scores in this study were related to one another in a complex(i.e.,an interaction)but theoretically meaningful way provides additional evidence that they are valid.In turn, this evidence of measurement validity should encourage additional research on national di?erences in personality and SWB.Traits appear to be critical determinants of an important national quality and should not be.译文国家差异主观幸福感:外向性和神经质的互动效应资料来源: 中国期刊网作者:迈克尔·林恩、斯梯尔·文斯摘要:外向性和神经质是相互作用的,主观幸福在个人层面的分析让内向的神经症往往是感到特别悲惨。
老年人主观幸福感的调查分析

老年人主观幸福感的调查分析随着人口老龄化的加剧,老年人主观幸福感的研究变得越来越重要。
主观幸福感是指个体对自己生活的评价和感受,包括情感、心理和认知等方面。
提高老年人主观幸福感有助于增强其生活质量,延缓衰老进程,降低医疗保健支出。
本文将阐述老年人主观幸福感的概念、调查方法及调查结果,并分析其原因,最后提出相关建议。
老年人主观幸福感是指老年人对自己的生活满意度、快乐感、价值感和情感状态等方面的自我评价。
它是衡量老年人生活质量的重要指标,受到许多因素的影响,如身体健康、社会支持、经济状况等。
研究表明,老年人主观幸福感与心理健康、身体健康和社会稳定密切相关。
为了深入了解老年人主观幸福感的现状及其影响因素,我们采用问卷调查的方法。
在问卷设计过程中,我们充分考虑了老年人的特点,采用简明扼要、通俗易懂的表述方式,确保老年人能够理解并准确回答问题。
问卷包括老年人的基本情况、身体健康、社会支持、经济状况和主观幸福感等方面的内容。
在调查过程中,我们采取随机抽样的方式,对某城市的600名老年人进行了调查。
通过数据分析和处理,我们得出以下调查结果:总体评价:大部分老年人的主观幸福感较高,但也存在一部分老年人主观幸福感较低的情况。
影响因素:老年人主观幸福感受到多种因素的影响。
其中,身体健康状况、社会支持和经济状况对其主观幸福感影响最为显著。
身体健康状况越差,社会支持和经济状况越差的老年人,其主观幸福感越低。
变化趋势:随着年龄的增长,老年人主观幸福感呈现先降低后升高的趋势。
其中,60-70岁的老年人主观幸福感最低,80岁以后的老年人主观幸福感逐渐升高。
根据调查结果,我们发现老年人主观幸福感的变化受以下因素影响:个人因素:身体健康状况的下降会导致老年人活动受限,社交圈子变窄,进而影响其主观幸福感。
同时,经济状况也是影响老年人主观幸福感的重要因素,经济压力和担忧会对老年人的心理状态产生负面影响。
社会因素:社会支持对老年人主观幸福感有着重要影响。
教育溢价视角下老年人学习参与与主观幸福感的相关性

01
教育溢价与主观幸福感呈正相关
受教育程度越高,人们往往更容易获得较高的社会地位、经济收入和
职业发展机会,从而带来更高的生活满意度和主观幸福感。
02
教育溢价对主观幸福感的性别差异
研究发现,教育溢价与主观幸福感之间的正相关关系在女性中更为显
著,这可能与女性在教育机会和资源方面的差异更为明显有关。
03
教育溢价对主观幸福感的年龄差异
鼓励教育机构开展老年人教育课程
教育机构应该根据老年人的特点和需求,开展针对性的教育课程,如计算机基础、健康养生、传统文化等,以提高老年人 的知识水平和自我价值感。
加强老年人心理健康服务
针对老年人常见的心理问题,如孤独、焦虑等,政府和社会应该提供专业的心理健康服务,包括心理咨询、团体辅导等, 以帮助老年人建立积极的心态和生活方式。
教育溢价视角下老年人学习 参与与主观幸福感的相关性
2023-11-07
目录
• 引言 • 教育溢价与老年人学习参与 • 老年人学习参与与主观幸福感 • 教育溢价视角下老年人学习参与
与主观幸福感的相关性 • 研究结论与政策建议
01 引言
研究背景与意义
社会老龄化现象加剧,老年人的精神生活和心理健康问题受到关注。
需要关注老年人的个体差异和学习需求
不同年龄、性别、职业和文化背景的老年人具有不同的学习需求和动机,需要关注他们的 个体差异和学习需求,以提供更加精准的教育服务。
THANKS
感谢观看
随着年龄的增长,人们的主观幸福感可能会逐渐降低,但教育溢价对
于主观幸福感的影响在各个年龄段都较为显著。
老年人学习参与在教育溢价与主观幸福感之间的中介作用
学习参与的中介作用
研究发现,教育溢价通过影响学习参与进 而影响主观幸福感,这一中介作用在性别 和年龄方面也存在差异。
老年人主观幸福感的研究综述

老年人主观幸福感的研究综述作者:孟莉来源:《科教导刊》2011年第26期摘要年人主观幸福感是老年人心理卫生的一个重要课题。
研究老年人主观幸福感有助于认识和改善老年人的生活质量。
本文主要是从老年人主观幸福感的概念、近来年研究现状及影响因素三大方面进行论述,以期为今后的研究提供一些参考。
关键词年人观幸福感响因素中图分类号:B844文献标识码:AThe Review of the Old People's Subjective Well-beingMENG Li(School of Education, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215123)AbstractThe old people's subjective well-being is one of the important subjects in old people's mental health. Research the old people's subjective well-being can understand and improve the old people's quality of life. This article mainly discusses three aspects, including the concept of the old people's subjective well-being, the recent research status and influence factors, so as to provide some references for the researches in the future.Key wordsold people; subjective well-being; influence factors中国目前已进入人口老龄化社会,随着老年人口的增多和人类寿命的延长,老年人健康状况和生活质量越来越受到全社会的关注。
纳西族老年人“化躴”现状及其与主观幸福感的关联

纳西族老年人“化躴”现状及其与主观幸福感的关联何木叶【期刊名称】《湖北函授大学学报》【年(卷),期】2016(029)014【摘要】Objective:To explore the present situation of"Huacong"and the relationship between "Huacong"and the subjec-tive well-being of the Naxi elderly.Methods:129 Naxi elderly in Lijiang were interviewed and investigated by face to face in-terview with the self compiled interview outline and the Memorial University of Newfoudland Scale of Happiness.Results:The rate of Huacong participation of the Naxi elderly was 48.1%.The proportion of monthly income above 2000 yuan of the elderly who participate in Huacong was significantly higher than that of the monthly income blow 2000 yuan.The subjective well-be-ing of the elderly who often take part in the Huacong(41.20 ±4.60)was significantly higher than that of the elderly who never participated in theHuacong(36.55 ±9.77).Huacong positively predicted the Naxi elderly subjective well -being.Conclu-sions:The degree of participation of Huacong was relatively high and affected by the economicincome.Huacong was one of the factors affecting the Naxi subjective well-being of the elderly.%目的:探讨纳西族老年人“化躴”现状及其与主观幸福感的关联。
老龄化视角下的老年人主观幸福感研究

老龄化视角下的老年人主观幸福感研究摘要:老龄化主要通过老年人的生理、心理、行动能力以及社会功能状况进行体现,而老年人的生活质量通过其主观幸福感水平来反映。
因此,改善老年人的主观幸福感在实现健康老龄化方面发挥着重要作用。
本文检索了国内外相关文献,从主观幸福感的概念、相关理论、测评工具、影响因素等方面进行综述,为进一步制定改善老年人主观幸福感的措施提供参考。
关键词:老年人;主观幸福感;老龄化中国已经进入老龄化社会,60岁以上的老年人口在持续不断地增加,截至2018年已达到2.48亿人,占总人口比例的17.9%,成为一个庞大的群体。
由于生理、心理等方面的原因,老年群体在社会中是一个特殊的群体。
由于农村经济水平相对落后、基础设施不完善以及其他原因,农村老年人更是处在一个较底层的位置。
中国自古以来是一个注重孝道的国家,孝是中华民族的传统美德,因此关注老年群体的幸福感及其影响因素具有重要的现实意义。
本文主要关注对象是农村老年人,总结评述前人对农村老年人幸福感影响因素的研究,并在此基础上提出一些建议。
1 主观幸福感的定义在主观幸福感的初步研究阶段,研究者们常采用比较简单的测试方法如单项测试方法,描述老年人幸福感水平;在解释阶段,研究者们开始将理论模型与主观幸福感相结合,开展了进一步的研究;在实证性研究阶段,研究者们采用各种测量工具,测评老年人的主观幸福感水平以及影响因素,并提出相应的干预策略。
但是目前研究者们对主观幸福感概念尚未达成统一意见。
他们普遍认为,主观幸福感主要是指个体依据自己设定的标准对其生活质量所做的整体评价,体现在个体生活满意度和正、负性情感方面,具有主观性、整体性、相对稳定性特点。
由此可见,老年人的主观幸福感与生活质量有着密不可分的关系。
因此,改善老年人的主观幸福感是实现健康老龄化的重要途径。
2 农村老年人的幸福感影响因素影响农村老年人幸福感的因素多种多样,一般可分为主观和客观因素两大类,但是研究大多集中于客观因素的探究。
健康对中老年人主观幸福感的影响研究
健康对中老年人主观幸福感的影响研究摘要:本文采用中国家庭追踪调查2018年的数据,运用OLS模型实证了我国中老年人健康对主观幸福感的影响。
结果表明,样本主观幸福感整体评分较高,城市中老年人的主观幸福感、自评健康、心理健康、收入及养老保险情况均优于农村中老年人,城市中老年人的人缘关系、社会信任度、自评收入地位均低于农村中老年人。
生理健康、心理健康和社会健康均对中老年人主观幸福感存在稳健的显著影响,与中老年人的主观幸福感呈正相关关系。
因此,未来不仅要重视农村中老年人的生理健康、心理健康,也要提高城市中老年人社会层面的幸福感和对生活的满意度。
关键词:幸福经济学;主观幸福感;生活满意度;健康老龄化随着“银发浪潮”的到来,中老年人的幸福感、获得感与生活质量备受关注。
党的十九大报告中指出,要永远把人民对美好生活的向往作为奋斗目标。
2016年《“健康中国2030”规划纲要》中提到未来国家要促进健康老龄化,把健康融入所有政策。
2017年《关于制定和实施老年人照顾服务项目的意见》提到,提升老年人的获得感和幸福感是推动民生改善、促进社会和谐、积极应对人口老龄化的重要举措。
从已有的研究来看,在个体特征方面,吴芳等(2016)[1]得出,城市低龄老年人主观幸福感主要影响因素有经济状况、身体状况以及文化程度等。
侯志阳(2018)[2]的研究发现,有养老保险的公众比没有养老保险的明显幸福。
在生理健康层面,李峰等(2017)[3]认为,老人身体疼痛、日常活动能力、焦虑或抑郁状态等健康状况均对老人幸福感有影响。
傅彤(2020)[4]认为身体状况因素对老年人主观幸福感的影响显著等。
在心理健康层面,傅宏等(2017)[5]认为建立完整的老年人心理健康服务体系,有助于培养老年人的积极心理进而提升其主观幸福感。
傅瑜弘(2018)[6]认为激发个体积极情绪体验能提升老龄人口主观幸福感。
在社会因素层面,田立法等(2020)[7]对天津市的研究得出,居民的主观幸福感与政府的行为满意度、政治认同等有关。
老年人主观幸福感概述
老年人主观幸福感概述摘要:主观幸福感是老年人重要的情绪情感活动,直接关系到老年人的生活质量,是老年人心理健康的重要课题,提高老年人主观幸福感是解决老龄化社会矛盾的重要手段。
文章就老年人主观幸福感的内容、特点和现状加以陈述,对其影响因素加以剖析并分析如何采取有效措施提高老年人的主观幸福感。
关键词:老年人;主观幸福感;心理健康人的一生要经历许多不同的阶段,而老年期是人生最后也是非常重要的一个阶段。
随着感知觉器官功能的衰退、认知功能的减弱,信息加工速度的慢化以及记忆能力的衰减等,老年人对环境的适应能力减退,思想、行为和生活方式也会发生较大的改变,体内环境的稳定性降低,消极情绪增多。
主观幸福感(subjective well-being)简称SWB,是衡量个人和社会生活质量的一种重要的综合性心理指标,是人们根据自定的标准对自身在一段时间内的情感反应进行评估和生活满意感进行认知评价后而产生的一种积极心理体验,即评价者根据自定的标准对其生活质量的总体评估。
主观幸福感不仅是影响老年人生活质量高低的关键,也是心理健康的重要内容。
对生活的整体满意感程度愈高,体验到的积极情感愈多,消极情感愈少,个体的幸福感体验愈强。
幸福感强的老年人,其心理健康水平也更高。
因此,在这个老龄化严重的时代,研究老年人主观幸福感,并采取有效措施提高老年人的主观幸福感,有助于老年人改善生活质量,对提高老年人心理健康水平具有重要的理论和实践意义,也有利于社会的和谐和家庭的稳定。
一、老年人主观幸福感的内容、特点和现状老年主观幸福感是个体自我评价的幸福感,是个体对其生活的整体评估和主观体验,包含如下三个方面的内容:(1)认知评价,对生活质量的整体评估,即生活满意感;(2)正性情感,包括诸如愉快、高兴、觉得生活有意义、精神饱满等情感体验;(3)负性情感,包括忧虑、抑郁、悲伤、孤独、厌烦、难受等情感体验,不包括重性情感障碍和神经症。
主观幸福感有三个明显的特点:(1)主观性。
老年人主观幸福感研究综述
老年人主观幸福感研究综述作者:闻雯刘睿来源:《成长》2019年第01期摘要:社会经济的发展,老龄化的加速,老年人主观幸福感的探索逐渐成为多门学科的研究焦点。
本文在对国内外相关文献研究整理的基础上,回顾主观幸福感的定义、结构,归总老年人主观幸福感的影响因素,从而对如何提高老年人主观幸福感进行思考。
关键词:老年人;主观幸福感;影响因素1 引言我们来到这个世上,到底追求什么才是最重要的?哈佛大学“最受欢迎讲师”和:“人生导师”——泰勒.本一沙哈尔(TalBen Shahar)坚定地认为:幸福感是衡量人生的唯一标准,是所有目标的最终目标。
而越来越多的调查数据却显示出一种与经济发展相悖的现象,与客观福祉的提高形成比照的是主观幸福并没有呈现相应程度的上升。
这正如美国著名积极心理家埃德·迪纳所发现,人们的生活满意度会随着收入增加而提高,但其愉悦感、幸福感等积极情绪却未必因此而增长。
相反越是生活在大城市的人,越感到不幸福。
用积极心理之父马丁.塞利格曼的话来讲:“当一个国家或民族被饥饿和战争所困扰的时候,心理学的主要任务是治疗心理创伤;但在经济繁荣的和平时期,心理学的主要任务是帮助人们活着更加幸福而有意义,生活得更加美好。
”2017年年末中国大陆总人口(包括31个省、自治区、直辖市和中国人民解放军现役军人,不包括香港、澳门特别行政区和台湾省以及海外华侨人数)139008万人。
从年龄构成看,16至59周岁的劳动年龄人口为90199万人,占总人口的比重为64.9%;60周岁及以上人口24090万人,占总人口的17.3%,其中65周岁及以上人口15831万人,占总人口的11.4%。
按照联合国的最新标准是65岁老人占总人口的7%即该地区视为进入老龄化社会来说,中国已然进入“银发时代”。
基于此,社会学、心理学、老年学领域的研究者们共同聚焦于老年人主观幸福感的研究。
2 主观幸福感概述韦氏(Merriam-Webster)字典把幸福感定义为:a.一种存在的状态,在这种状态里,个体的情绪分布于从持久的满足感到激烈的愉悦感之间不等。
养老机构老年人心理健康与主观幸福感的相关性
16Peraltaarrieta I,HernUndezsotelo D,Castrocoronel Y,e#al.DNMT3B modulates the expression of cancer-related genes and downrevulates the expression of the gene VAV3via methylation+J〕.Am J Cancer Res,2017;7(1):77-87.17Qiu W,Lin J,Zhu Y,e#al.Kaempferol modulates DNA methylation and downrevulates DNMT3B in bladder cance-J〕.Cel l Physiol Biochem, 2017;41(4):1325-35.18李雅睿,王梦瑶,卢桂芳,等.DNMT3B基因在肝细胞癌中的表达及其对肝癌细胞增殖和侵袭迁移的影响〔J〕•西安交通大学学报:医学版,2017;38(3):380-3.・调查研究・19迪力夏提,金斯汗,赵倩,等・DNA甲基化酶3b多态性与乳腺癌易感性的关系+J〕•中国老年学杂志,2017;37(5):1151G.20郑春雷,鲍红光,高红•肝癌组织中CUL4A的表达及其对肝癌细胞生长的影响+J〕•中国普通外科杂志,2017;26(7):934-8. 21Bibaki E,Tsitoura E,Vasarmidi E,e#al.miR-185and miR-29a arc similarly expressed in the bronchoalveolar lavage cells in IPF and aungcanceebuicommon iaegeisDNMT1and COL1A1showdisease specific plterns+J].Mol Med Rep,2018;17(5):7105-12.[2019-12-11修回〕(编辑滕欣航)养老机构老年人心理健康与主观幸福感的相关性刘林峰1杨玲娜2王红艳2刘琴1林琴1张先庚2"3(1成都中医药大学,四川成都610075;2四川护理职业学院;3四川养老与老年健康协同创新中心)〔摘要〕目的探讨养老机构老年人心理健康状况与主观幸福感的相关性。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
老年教育和主观幸福感外文翻译2018-2019英文Grandparenting, education and subjective well-being of older Europeans Bruno Arpino, Valeria Bordone and Nicoletta Balbo AbstractWe study whether grandparenthood is associated with older people’s subjective well-being (SWB), considering the association with life satisfaction of having grandchildren per se, their number, and of the provision of grandchild care. Older people’s education may not only be an important confounder to control for, but also a moderator in the relation between grandparenthood-related variables and SWB. We investigate these issues by adopting a cross-country comparative perspective and using data from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe covering 20 countries. Our results show that grandparenthood has a stronger positive association with SWB in countries where intensive grandparental childcare is not common and less socially expected. Yet, this result is driven by a negative association between grandparenthood without grandparental childcare and SWB that we only found in countries where intensive grandparental childcare is widespread. Therefore, in accordance with the structural ambivalence theory, we argue that in countries where it is socially expected for grandparents to have a role as providers of childcare, not taking on such arole may negatively influence SWB. However, our results show that grandparental childcare (either intensive or not) is generally associated with higher SWB. Overall, we do not find support for a moderating effect of education. We also do not find striking differences by gender in the association between grandparenthood and SWB. The only noteworthy discrepancy refers to grandmothers being often more satisfied when they provide grandchild care.Keywords: Grandparenthood, Grandchild care, Subjective well-being, Education, Cross-country comparison, SHAREBackgroundIn ageing societies, where the overlapping lives of grandparents and grandchildren are longer than ever before, grandparenthood is a central stage in later life (Leopold and Skopek 2015; Margolis 2016). Grandparents’ role is also beneficial for the society in terms of integrating or substituting (costly) services offered by the market and (scarce) public provision (Hagestad 2006; Albertini et al. 2007; Mare 2011; Aassve et al. 2012; Glaser et al. 2013; Arpino et al. 2014; Di Gessa et al. 2016).Yet, research on the association between grandparenthood and grandparents’ subjective well-being (SWB) is scarce. Moreover, indirect evidence investigating health outcomes provides contradicting results. This study examines whether grandparenthood is associated with SWB. In doing so, we consider the multidimensionality of grandparenthood: (1)grandparenthood per se (i.e. being grandparent), (2) number of grandchildren, (3) grandparental childcare. SWB is measured as life satisfaction, a broad indicator of a person’s well-being at a certain point in time.In line with the conceptual work on social capital and SWB that emphasises a moderating role of social inequality (Umberson 1992), we investigate the association between grandparenthood and grandparents’ SWB across educational groups and cultural contexts. Education, as one of the individual’s major social structural characteristics, affects the outcomes of social relationships (Umberson 1992). In investigating the extent to which the association between grandparenthood and grandparents’ SWB differs across educational groups, both a positive and a negative moderating role might be at play (see also King and Elder 1998; Silverstein and Marenco 2001; Mahne and Huxhold 2015).As grandparenthood per se and grandparental childcare prevalence vary considerably across countries (Hank and Buber 2009; Leopold and Skopek 2015; Bordone et al. 2017), the moderating effect of education in its association with SWB is also expected to vary across Europe. Neuberger and Haberkern (2014) suggest that the role of grandparents can either meet or contradict social expectations and norms. These are in turn shaped by the strength of the support offered by the welfare state and can be perceived differently by individuals in different educational groups.Therefore, using a cross-country comparative approach, we account for cross-country variations to uncover the role of social norms as well as of welfare in the degree to which life satisfaction is associated with grandparenthood.The multidimensionality of grandparenthood and its association with SWBThe existing literature has mainly focused on the contribution of socio-demographic characteristics to life satisfaction among grandparents, assuming a connotation of joy to be associated with grandparenthood (Sands et al. 2005). For example, Goodman and Silverstein (2006) studied the variation in custodial grandmothers’ life satisfaction by ethnic group in the USA, showing that Latina grandmothers experience higher life satisfaction than African-American or White grandmothers. To our knowledge, only the unpublished work of Powdthavee (2011) offered a more general picture, showing that in the UK having grandchildren per se is positively associated with life satisfaction.Being grandparent may provide grandparents with a range of positive experiences, including emotional closeness and strengthened generational ties through contact with grandchildren (Silverstein et al. 1998). Using German data, Mahne and Huxold (2015) showed that contact frequency with and emotional closeness to grandchildren generally boost positive aspects of SWB.Yet, a study on subjective age in the USA (Bordone and Arpino 2016) suggested that the “grandparenthood effect” may be a compound outcome of several dimensions often ignored or investigated separately in the literature. Therefore, we first distinguish between grandparents and grandchildless respondents; among grandparents, we then differentiate in terms of number of grandchildren, and by frequency of grandparental childcare (intensive, non-intensive, or none).Considering measures of age identity, USA studies found that to a higher number of grandchildren corresponds an older feeling (Barak and Gould 1985) and a greater desired age (Kaufman and Elder 2003). This might suggest that those with more grandchildren are overwhelmed by their role as grandparents, but also somewhat more satisfied with their own ageing. However, Moore and Rosenthal (2015) found no correlation between number of grandchildren and life satisfaction among Australian non-custodial grandmothers.Directly linked to grandparenthood are informal roles of caregiving which may correlate with grandparents’ SWB according to the frequency of engagement. Drawing on the buffering hypothesis (Cohen and Wills 1985), we may assume that in the same way as social integration predicts well-being, mortality, and health outcomes (see Berkman and Glass 2000 for a review), the involvement in grandparental childcare may buffer older people’s SWB. Moore and Rosenthal (2015), for example, showedthat frequency of grandparental childcare is positively correlated with life satisfaction of Australian grandmothers. However, a study based in Barcelona (Spain) found that grandparental childcare is a source of positive emotions, independently on its intensity (Triadó et al. 2014).Also the growing number of studies investigating the impact of grandparental childcare on grandparents’ health showed mixed results. Studies on non-custodial grandchild care, both in Europe and in the USA, tend to report positive associations with health (Hughes et al. 2007; Arpino and Bordone 2014; Di Gessa et al. 2016). Negative consequences of grandparental childcare have be en found for custodial grandparents’ physical and psychological health (Minkler and Fuller-Thomson 1999; Grinstead et al. 2003). However, in a qualitative American study, Waldrop and Weber (2001) found beneficial effects of custodial grandparenting on gran dparents’ lifestyle, while Ates (2017) found no significant associations between non-custodial grandchild care and self-rated health in Germany. These heterogeneous findings might depend on the degree of involvement (Coall and Hertwig 2011) as well as on the social (Mahne and Huxhold 2015) and cultural context considered (Neuberger and Haberkern 2014).Grandparenthood and its gendered natureA vast literature shows that grandmothers provide more grandchild care than grandfathers do, attributing such gender difference to thegendered tasks, responsibilities, and expectations traditionally associated with grandparenthood (Kaufman and Elder 2003; Stelle et al. 2010; Winefield and Air 2010). Leopold and Skopek (2014) showed that such gender gap follows the North–South geographical gradient in the family–state division of caring responsibilities and the societal framing of gender roles. Investigating further such a gender gap is central in view of, for example, the increasing grandmothers’ participation in the wor kforce that will make women more likely than men to experience competing roles in later life.Mixed evidence exists on the gendered effects of grandparental childcare on health. In the USA, Hughes et al. (2007) found better self-reported health and fewer functional limitations only among grandmothers. Similarly, Grundy et al. (2012) showed that Chilean grandmothers, but not grandfathers, who provided grandparental childcare had a lower risk of depression. However, other studies did not find substantial differences by gender (e.g. Arpino and Bordone 2014 on cognitive functioning).Yet, only a few studies have directly examined the gender gap in life satisfaction linked to grandparenthood. In this respect, Grundy et al. (2012) found that Chilean grandfathers engaged in grandparental childcare were more satisfied with their lives, but such effect was not found for grandmothers. Winefield and Air (2010) suggested thatgrandmothers belonging to older generations were more satisfied in their grandparental role than grandfathers because they viewed it as an extension of their maternal role. Marital and work lifecourse characteristics might differ by gender and also contribute to the gender gap in the association between grandparenthood and SWB (Price et al. 2015).We therefore stratify the analyses by gender. Following Bordone and Arpino (2016), we argue that if a gender gap in the association between grandparenthood and SWB exists, this is mainly driven by grandparental childcare and it is larger in contexts where the responsibilities in childcare are gendered, with grandmothers more engaged in the welfare of the child (e.g. feeding, changing clothing/nappies, and bathing) and grandfathers more involved in entertaining the grandchildren.Education as selective and moderating forceIt is well established in the literature that people with lower levels of education are, on average, less satisfied with their life, partly because they are more exposed to stressors and less able to cope with them (Meeks and Murrell 2001). However, the role that education may exert, as both a selective force and a moderator, in the association between grandparenthood and SWB remains a notable gap in the literature.Education acts as a selective force into grandparenthood because the likelihood of being grandparent, having more grandchildren, andengaging in grandchild care differs according to observable (e.g. fertility history, labour market participation) and unobservable (e.g. values, preferences) factors associated with education. Educational gradients in fertility (Kravdal and Rindfuss 2008) suggest a stratification of the experience of grandparenthood as the combined outcome of fertility in successive family generations. Skopek and Leopold (2017) examined for the first time educational differences in the transition to grandparenthood among the German population born between 1933 and 1938. The likelihood of becoming a grandmother was much lower among (West) German women with higher levels of education as compared to their counterparts with lower education. No educational differences were found in the chance of becoming a grandfather and in the occurrence and timing of higher-parity transitions.Education is also selective with respect to grandparental childcare, serving as a resource that makes grandparents with higher levels of education better integrated in the family network (Eggebeen and Hogan 1990). In fact, previous studies on the same data we use have found that the likelihood of grandparental childcare is positively associated with education (e.g. Igel and Szydlik 2011; Arpino and Bordone 2014; Di Gessa et al. 2016). However, a reversed association emerged when intensity of care was considered: grandparents with higher education are less likely to provide intensive childcare. In fact, preferences for a longerparticipation in the labour market, hobbies, and social activities of grandparents with higher education tend to reduce the intensity of their childcare provision (Dimova and Wolff 2008; Arpino and Bordone 2017).Given that grandparents with higher (lower) education are likely to also have children with higher (lower) education, a higher demand for childcare to grandparents with higher education may also result from aspects linked to the higher educational attainments of their children. Education is positively associated with values that promote female employment and grandparents may be an important source of childcare, especially in contexts with weak welfare provision. However, higher education is also positively associated with externalisation of childcare to the market or the state, higher likelihood to afford market services (Arpino et al. 2014), and higher geographical mobility. This would hint to a higher demand for intensive grandparental childcare among grandparents with lower levels of education.Education may also act as a moderator of the association between grandparenthood and SWB. How grandparenthood is experienced can largely vary according to grandparents’ educational level. Education provides opportunities and knowledge that affect the actualisation and outcomes of the grandparent role (King and Elder 1998; Silverstein and Marenco 2001). One may argue in favour of a more positive association between grandparenthood and SWB for people with higher educationbecause they are better able to cope with negative life events including stress due to their grandparental role (Mahne and Huxhold 2015). Conversely, grandchildren may play a less important role in shaping the SWB of people with higher education as their SWB may be influenced by a wider range of activities both within and outside the family. For example, grandparents with higher education may face higher opportunity costs in the decision to reduce their labour market participation in favour of grandchild care.Cross-country differencesIn countries where formal childcare coverage is minimal, such as Mediterranean countries and Poland, the family bears the main care responsibilities (Saraceno and Keck 2010). There, grandparents act as a substitute for the weak childcare system and when they provide childcare they do it daily. Bordone et al. (2017) identified other two models of grandparental childcare in Europe. In Nordic countries and France, grandparents take on a secondary role, intervening when needed. Most of the Western European countries and the Czech Republic represent an intermediate model, where grandparents are involved in childcare with a lower frequency than in the first model but higher than in the second (usually on a weekly basis).Neuberger and Haberkern (2014) argued that the role of grandparents as providers of care to grandchildren may be more or lesssocially expected, depending on the context. Using the concept of structural ambivalence, defined as the contradiction between behaviour and cultural norms, they suggest that in countries where grandparental childcare is expected, not engaging in grandchild care may generate negative feelings and therefore decrease grandparents’ SWB. Conversely, in countries with low social expectations towards grandparenting, grandparents who provide grandchild care may feel obliged to do so, experiencing a lower SWB. The effects of dimensions of grandparenthood different from grandparental childcare might be similar. Indeed, being grandparent may provide grandparents with the (context-specific) satisfaction of fulfilling normative expectations (Silverstein et al. 1998).Discussion and conclusionsUsing SHARE data, this paper investigated the association of having grandchildren per se, number of grandchildren, and grandparental childcare with SWB across different countries. Additionally, we considered the moderating role of education in the relationship between grandparenthood and SWB.Our multivariate analyses indicate that grandparents are, on average, more satisfied with their lives than grandchildless people, especially if they have 3 or more grandchildren. However, this “grandparenthood effect” is mainly driven by the provision of grandchild care. Indeed,grandparents who never look after their grandchildren are less satisfied with their lives as compared to their grandchildless counterparts.Overall, we found no striking difference by gender in the association of grandparenthood and its components with SWB. The only noteworthy discrepancy refers to grandmothers who, in most countries, are found to be more satisfied when they provide grandchild care. This result might be driven by the fact that grandmothers are usually more socially expected to provide care to their grandchildren, thereby perceiving lower costs and more rewards associated with such a role.The null finding about the moderating effect of education confirms the results of Mahne and Huxhold (2015) on Germany. They find that education acts as a moderator for negative aspects of SWB such as loneliness, but not for the positive ones (e.g. life satisfaction). We argued that education may influence grandparents’ SWB according to two alternative mechanisms. On the one hand, being highly educated may imply the opportunity to engage in a variety of social activities, thereby reducing the relative importance of the role of grandparenthood on SWB or even increasing the costs associated with it. On the other hand, people with higher education may be better able to use their family ties as a barrier against any negative life event or stressor. Our findings, however, showed no moderating effect of education in the association between grandparenthood and life satisfaction. Such a result may suggest that thetwo opposite mechanisms might cancel each other out, regardless of the cultural and institutional context in which the grandparent lives. Testing separately the two possible moderating mechanisms of education will be allowed, however, only with data on grandparents’ values, preferences, and social activities. We leave it to future research.As for cross-country heterogeneities, we found unexpected differences in the association between grandparenthood and SWB by country: the (positive) association between grandparenthood and SWB is stronger in countries where intensive grandparental childcare is less common and thereby less socially expected. Yet, this result was driven by a negative association between grandparenthood without doing grandparental childcare and SWB that we found in countries where intensive grandchild care is widespread. Therefore, in accordance with the structural ambivalence theory, we argue that in countries where it is socially expected for grandparents to have a role as providers of childcare, those who do not take on such a role are likely to experience lower SWB. However, grandparental childcare (either intensive or not) was found to be associated with higher SWB in almost all countries.The present work prepares the ground for further research that may, for example, examine how other grandparenthood-related aspects (e.g. emotional relatedness, non-childcare contacts, financial transfers, etc.) are associated with SWB in different countries.Our work could be expanded by considering the economic component of grandparents’ socio-economic status. We focused on the moderating role of education and adjusted for financial resources by controlling for the net household income. Financial resources influence SWB at any age but they are particularly important in later life because of the general decline in financial capacity due to retirement and higher health-related expenses (Litwin and Sapir 2009). Education and financial resources are generally positively correlated, although in our data the correlation was not very strong (between 0.21 and 0.32 across countries). Additional analyses not controlling for income (available upon request) showed an even stronger association of education with SWB without changing the moderating effect of education. Further, financial resources could be considered as another, and independent (on education), factor that may influence grandparents’ well-being. This might shed more light on whether richer grandparents gain more from grandparenthood than their less well-off counterparts. They might, for example, transfer more resources to their (grand)children (Albertini and Kohli 2013), and this giving behaviour may increase their subjective well-being independently or in addition to the well-being gained from contacts with the younger generations. Moreover, their provision of grandparental childcare on the side of the richer might be more likely a choice than for grandparents in poorer families. We believe that exploring these aspects will be a valuablecontribution to the grandparenting literature and will complement the findings of our study.Our study contributes to the European literature on the outcomes of grandparents by showing that grandparents providing grandchild care tend to report a higher SWB as compared to grandparents who do not as well as to grandchildless individuals. This positive association holds in all countries studied and is slightly stronger for women.中文欧洲老年祖父母们,教育和主观幸福感摘要我们研究了祖父母身份是否与老年人的主观幸福感(SWB)相关联,并考虑了拥有子孙本身,其数目以及提供孙子照顾与生活满意度之间的联系。