拜伦与雪莱对比

合集下载

拜伦、雪莱与济慈

拜伦、雪莱与济慈

拜伦、雪莱与济慈三位诗人的选篇都探讨了死亡、新生、爱情、自由等主题,探讨了死亡与爱情、死亡与革命、死亡与美等之间的关系。

拜伦与雪莱的激进思想,都体现了生命燃烧的一生,短短人生却留下了追求自由和解放的激情的岁月。

1.如早年都受到主流社会的抨击,拜伦在学生时代因出版诗集《闲散的时刻》(hours of Idleness)受到攻击,后来因此事引起轰动。

最后终因离婚事件被迫离开了伦敦,到意大利定居。

雪莱则是在牛津大学读书期间,因印发无神论的必然性(The Necessity of Atheism)而被开除。

也发生过离婚事件,也被迫离开了英国,也到意大利定居。

2.都坚持追求自由(freedom)和英雄豪情。

1823年7月,拜伦前往希腊,支援希腊人们反抗土耳其统治的斗争,死于营地,比希腊人民奉为英雄。

3.强烈的政治和抒情意识体现了诗人的英雄豪情和儿女私情的完美结合,如课文选篇中的拜伦的两首诗。

She Walks in beauty一个姑娘的美丽,会是怎么样的?用哪些形容词可以描述?tender,soft, calm, pure, dear,sweet,peace,innocent.外在的美描述哪些部位?如眼睛(eye),头发(raven tress)(色调),脸庞(色调)(face),面颊(cheek),额际(brow),微笑(smile),容颜(aspect),心灵(peace)(mind and heart)1.What is the word as the central image of the second part of thepoem?2.Would you like to analyze the syntactic structure of part 2?3.The body narrative is apparent in this poem, so how do you thinkbody parts(what are they?) are narrated by Byron?4.除了对有形身体(body parts)的叙述,还有就是对无形的身体叙述。

正高级教师推荐--拜伦、雪莱和济慈

正高级教师推荐--拜伦、雪莱和济慈

英国三大诗人拜伦(1788 - 1824)拜伦是19世纪英国伟大的浪漫主义诗人,天生跛足的理想主义者,出身于没落的贵族家庭。

代表作有《恰尔德• 哈罗德游记》、《唐璜》等。

拜伦所创造的一系列“拜伦式英雄”有着鲜明的浪漫主义特色,他们都是孤傲、狂热的叛逆者,孤独苦闷的骄傲者。

雪莱(1792 - 1822)雪莱是19世纪英国最富有才华的抒情诗人之一,一个伟大的理想主义者。

雪莱的代表作主要有诗歌《解放了的普罗米修斯》、《西风颂》和《致云雀》等,其作品节奏明快,积极向上,也正因为如此,雪莱被誉为“诗人中的诗人”。

济慈(1795 - 1821)济慈是19世纪初英国浪漫派诗人代表人物之一,代表作有《夜莺颂》、《秋颂》和《希腊古瓮颂》等。

济慈是一个出身于社会底层且有着坎坷的成长经历的天才诗人,英年早逝,却有多部作品传世。

如果冬天来了,春天还会远吗?──雪莱14年级·语文·第十三课知识链接浪漫主义的兴起与衰落19世纪20-30年代,在欧洲出现了一股狂热的文学浪潮——浪漫主义运动,我们本课所讲的拜伦、雪莱、济慈都是这一运动中的先驱。

熟悉欧洲历史的同学应该知道,此时欧洲已经经历了一场从思想到制度上全面的大解放。

发生在18世纪末19世纪初的法国大革命打破了欧洲大陆上根深蒂固的封建制度,在这场大的变革之中,不可一世的路易十六成为了法国历史上第一个被送上断头台的国王。

而后来叱咤风云的军事天才拿破仑,也正是在这场大革命中崭露头角的。

然而这场大变革并没有给大多数人带来他们所渴望的自由、平等和博爱,尤其是拿破仑当政之后穷兵黩武,而其后的复辟王朝又逆行倒施。

种种复杂的情绪汇在了一起,诗歌就成了一个有力的表现武器。

在这样的背景下,浪漫主义运动揭开帷幕了。

在这场持续时间并不长久的文学浪潮中,诞生了一大批至今仍影响着人们的作家:德国的歌德、席勒,英国的拜伦、雪莱、济慈,法国的雨果、乔治桑、梅里美……正如拜伦、雪莱与济慈的诗歌一样,整个浪漫主义运动产生的文学作品都充满炽热的感情,这种炽热来源于人们积累已久的、深厚的感情。

杰出的浪漫主义诗人拜伦与雪莱

杰出的浪漫主义诗人拜伦与雪莱

2022/3/24
3
第18课 诗歌、小说与戏剧
一、十八世纪末至十九世纪初的浪漫主义 诗歌
杰出的浪漫主义诗人——拜伦和雪莱
。。
第18课 诗歌、小说与戏剧
(一)、浪漫主义兴起的背景
1789年爆发的法国大革命震撼了整个欧洲,权力从封建贵族手中逐渐转移到新兴的资 产阶级手中,欧洲资本主义发展进入到一个新的时期。但是法国大革命并没有彻底荡除笼 罩欧洲的封建制度,资产阶级革命仍在反复和曲折之中进行,当时社会各阶既对顽固的封 建统治秩序表示强烈的反抗意识,又对18世纪启蒙学派所鼓吹的自由民主思想的实践感到 失望。文学艺术是社会的反映。面对启蒙思想的幻灭和法国大革命时期欧洲动荡的社会现 实,文学家们力图从自己的想像中寻找解决社会矛盾的途径,浪漫主义的文学思潮便应运 而生。
五 呵,他们而今安在?还有你呢, 我的祖国?在无声的土地上, 英雄的颂歌如今已沉寂, 那英雄的心也不再激荡! 难道你一向庄严的竖琴, 竟至沦落到Байду номын сангаас的手里弹弄?
六 也好,置身在奴隶民族里, 尽管荣誉都已在沦丧中, 至少,一个爱国志士的忧思, 还使我在作歌时感到脸红; 因为,诗歌在这儿有什么能为? 为希腊人含羞,对希腊国落泪。
从左图可以看出拜伦“忧郁”的情绪,其作品也 时常流露这种情绪。其笔下的英雄形像总是高傲、 孤独的叛逆者,他们愤世嫉俗而又孤僻冷漠、坚 定无畏而又阴沉冷酷,因此这样的叛逆者又被称 为“拜伦式英雄”。通过这样的英雄形像,作者 表达了对罪恶社会的深刻憎恨和坚定反抗,也表 现了脱离群众的个人英雄主义的孤独与忧郁。
九 算了,算了;试试别的调门: 斟满一杯萨摩斯的美酒! 把战争留给土耳其野人, 让开奥的葡萄的血汁倾流! 听呵,每一个酒鬼多么踊跃 响应这一个不荣誉的号召!

拜伦、雪莱与济慈

拜伦、雪莱与济慈

拜伦、雪莱与济慈三位诗人的选篇都探讨了死亡、新生、爱情、自由等主题,探讨了死亡与爱情、死亡与革命、死亡与美等之间的关系。

拜伦与雪莱的激进思想,都体现了生命燃烧的一生,短短人生却留下了追求自由和解放的激情的岁月。

1.如早年都受到主流社会的抨击,拜伦在学生时代因出版诗集《闲散的时刻》(hours of Idleness)受到攻击,后来因此事引起轰动。

最后终因离婚事件被迫离开了伦敦,到意大利定居。

雪莱则是在牛津大学读书期间,因印发无神论的必然性(The Necessity of Atheism)而被开除。

也发生过离婚事件,也被迫离开了英国,也到意大利定居。

2.都坚持追求自由(freedom)和英雄豪情。

1823年7月,拜伦前往希腊,支援希腊人们反抗土耳其统治的斗争,死于营地,比希腊人民奉为英雄。

3.强烈的政治和抒情意识体现了诗人的英雄豪情和儿女私情的完美结合,如课文选篇中的拜伦的两首诗。

She Walks in beauty一个姑娘的美丽,会是怎么样的?用哪些形容词可以描述?tender,soft, calm, pure, dear,sweet,peace,innocent.外在的美描述哪些部位?如眼睛(eye),头发(raven tress)(色调),脸庞(色调)(face),面颊(cheek),额际(brow),微笑(smile),容颜(aspect),心灵(peace)(mind and heart)1.What is the word as the central image of the second part of thepoem?2.Would you like to analyze the syntactic structure of part 2?3.The body narrative is apparent in this poem, so how do you thinkbody parts(what are they?) are narrated by Byron?4.除了对有形身体(body parts)的叙述,还有就是对无形的身体叙述。

拜伦和雪莱诗歌艺术的比较研究

拜伦和雪莱诗歌艺术的比较研究

拜伦和雪莱诗歌艺术的比较研究作者:金燕来源:《文教资料》2009年第14期摘要:众多的相同将拜伦和雪莱紧密相联,然而他们的诗歌艺术却有很多不同之处。

通过对他们生平和作品的剖析,我们会发现虽然他们的诗歌都是浪漫主义的代表作品,却又各具特色。

关键词:拜伦雪莱诗歌艺术比较研究拜伦和雪莱,这两个不同的名字在许多时候都会被联系在一起。

的确,他们有太多的相同处:出身相同,经历相似,思想相通;同是英国19世纪的著名诗人,欧洲浪漫主义文学的杰出代表;都以诗歌作为武器,对当时黑暗的社会现实进行批判和嘲讽,热情歌颂自由和解放;甚至他们的婚恋也有许多相似之处。

但这么多的相同点却无法掩盖这对被称为英国浪漫主义诗歌的“双子星座”在诗歌艺术方面表现出的显著不同。

诗歌在一定程度上带着诗人的个性烙印,而个性则是在生活中形成的。

所以要比较研究拜伦和雪莱的诗歌艺术,首先应该了解他们的生平。

一、拜伦和雪莱的生平乔治·戈登·拜伦(George Gordon Byron,1788—1824)生于伦敦一个破落贵族家庭,青年时期在剑桥大学接受了启蒙思想。

大学二年级时,他就出版了第一部诗集《懒散的时刻》,表达了对现实的不满和对上流社会的鄙视。

大学毕业后去欧洲大陆旅行,有机会广泛认识社会和接触各阶层的人物,回国后发表了《恰尔德·哈洛尔德游记》,表达了对封建专制的憎恨和对资产阶级自由、民主的向往。

1812年发表了著名诗篇《〈压制破坏机器法案〉制订者颂》,愤怒揭露了英国国会反人民的本质,以及立法者的凶残面貌。

接着,他又以东方故事为题材,写了富有浪漫主义色彩的传奇诗《东方叙事诗》,塑造了不少反抗一切社会制度的叛逆者形象。

这引起了英国统治阶级极大的仇恨,他被迫永远离开英国。

在移居瑞士时,他遇到了雪莱,结为知友。

在雪莱的影响下,他写了英国诗歌史上第一首号召工人斗争的诗歌《卢德分子之歌》。

1817年他迁居意大利,与当地的秘密组织烧炭党人取得联系,积极准备起义,反对奥地利的统治。

欧洲浪漫主义文学之二:拜伦和雪莱2

欧洲浪漫主义文学之二:拜伦和雪莱2

欧洲浪漫主义文学之二:拜伦和雪莱2欧洲浪漫主义文学之二:拜伦和雪莱2长篇抒情叙事诗《恰尔德.哈罗尔德游记》(1812、1816-1817)是诗人前后两次出国游历的见闻和观感的诗体记录。

第一章主要写西班牙人民在拿破仑铁蹄下的苦难、反抗和对自由解放的渴望。

第二章主要写希腊人民的光荣历史和在土耳其奴役下的悲惨生活。

第三章主要是对拿破仑历史功过的思考和对法国大革命及其先驱者卢梭、伏尔泰的追忆。

第四章主要是通过对意大利光荣历史的歌颂,来对照在奥地利统治下的现实苦难,并激励人民为自由解放和民族统一而继续斗争。

长诗有两个抒情主人公。

一是长诗主人公哈罗尔德,一是诗人自己。

前者是个忧郁、孤独的飘泊者,对什么都感到冷漠、厌倦," 心是冰冷的" ," 眼是漠然的" ,只是孤独地" 翻山又越岭" ,对眼前所见的一切全都无动于衷。

跟前者截然不同,后者则是一个感情炽烈、纵横评点的评论家和鼓动家。

他憎恨西班牙统治者和外国侵略者对西班牙的蹂躏和奴役,赞颂西班牙人民英勇的过去和不屈的现在,对参加反侵略战争的女游击队员奥古斯丁娜热情地给予高度赞扬。

他对希腊人民的苦难处境深表哀痛,激励他们丢掉对英、法等资产阶级政府的幻想,起来斗争,以追回失去的自由。

他认为滑铁卢战争后" 神圣同盟"。

对拿破仑的胜利,只是" 打败了狮子,又向豺狼朝礼" ,主张各国人民决不应" 奴才地向皇朝屈膝" ;确信启蒙学者卢梭和伏尔泰的思想,必将把" 整个世界投入熊熊的火焰,直到所有的王国化为灰烬"。

他还无限缅怀意大利的古代光荣,衷心赞美意大利的美丽风光,并坚信奥地利的殖民统治一定会被推翻,自由的旗帜一定会迎风飘扬,战斗的号角一定会持续响亮。

总之,跟作者本人生活经历颇为相似的主人公哈罗尔德,表现了拜伦思想中始终存在的忧郁、孤独的消极面。

杰出的浪漫主义诗人拜伦与雪莱

杰出的浪漫主义诗人拜伦与雪莱

第18课 诗歌、小说与戏剧
恰尔德·哈洛尔德游记
(第一章第九二节)
啊!最早相识、最受尊敬的朋友! 我心里虽然再没有人比你更值得忆念! 虽然在这辈子永无重逢的时候, 但愿你别拒绝在梦中和我相见! 然而曙光会悄悄地使我泪痕满面, 当我从梦中醒来,重感到现实的惨酷。 而幻想却要常常盘旋在你的墓边, 知道我脆弱的身躯也回返泥土, 那时候,逝者和伤逝者就一起在地下相处。
九 算了,算了;试试别的调门: 斟满一杯萨摩斯的美酒! 把战争留给土耳其野人, 让开奥的葡萄的血汁倾流! 听呵,每一个酒鬼多么踊跃 响应这一个不荣誉的号召!
第18课 诗歌、小说与戏剧
十 你们还保有庇瑞克的舞艺, 但庇瑞克的方阵哪里去了? 这是两课,为什么只记其一, 而把高尚而坚强的一课忘掉? 凯德谟斯给你们造了字体 难道他是为了传授给奴隶?
从左图可以看出拜伦“忧郁”的情绪,其作品也 时常流露这种情绪。其笔下的英雄形像总是高傲、 孤独的叛逆者,他们愤世嫉俗而又孤僻冷漠、坚 定无畏而又阴沉冷酷,因此这样的叛逆者又被称 为“拜伦式英雄”。通过这样的英雄形像,作者 表达了对罪恶社会的深刻憎恨和坚定反抗,也表 现了脱离群众的个人英雄主义的孤独与忧郁。
…………
象你以森林演奏,请你也以我为琴, 哪怕我的叶片也象森林一样凋谢! 你那非凡和谐的慷慨激越之情,
第18课 诗歌、小说与戏剧
定能使森林和我同奏出深沉的秋乐, 悲怆却又甘洌。但愿你勇猛的精灵 竟是我的魂魄,我能成为剽悍的你!
请把我枯萎的思绪播送向宇宙, 就象你驱遣落叶催促新的生命, 请凭借我这韵文写就的符咒,
苍白,潮红,疫疠摧残的落叶无数, 四散飘舞;哦,你又把有翅的种籽 凌空运送到他们黑暗的越冬床圃;
仿佛是一具具僵卧在坟墓里的尸体, 他们将分别蛰伏,冷落而又凄凉, 直到阳春你蔚蓝的姐妹向梦中的大地

拜伦与雪莱的比较

拜伦与雪莱的比较

在英国诗歌史上,波西·比希·雪莱是和拜 伦齐名的杰出诗人。他们的诗歌都是浪漫主
义的代表作品,却又各具特色。
拜伦出生伦敦贵族家庭,父亲在拜伦3 岁时游荡而死。母亲把对丈夫的怨恨发泄在 儿子身上。拜伦天生脚,从小养成忧郁、孤 独、反抗的性格。10岁继承爵位,成年后以 世袭议员的身份进入上议院。
他是如暴风一般轰响在19世纪初叶英国 诗坛上的巨璧。他被歌德誉为“19世纪最富 天才的诗人”,普希金奉他为“思想界的君 王”。他的诗篇洋溢着民主理想和民族解放 斗争的激情。毕生为民主自由而战,是西方 文学史上用生命去殉从理想的著名代表。
拜伦深受资产阶级英雄史的影响,加之家庭生活十分不 幸,又是天生跛足,从小比较自卑、孤僻,所以他在“辛辣 讽刺现实社会,批判邪恶如狂涛厉风”之余,往往带有一种 挥之不去的孤独和忧郁情绪,也就被称之为“忧郁的浪漫主 义诗人”。
而雪莱是在受到空想社会主义思想影响,在家庭生活比 较和睦且身体没有什么缺陷的情况下进行创作的,所以作品 基调以光明、乐观为主;批判揭斯誉为“天才的预言 家”,也是读者们心中的“快乐的浪漫主义诗人”。
乔治•戈登•拜伦 (1788—1824)
波西•比希•雪莱 (1792-1822)
雪莱,英国诗人,生于贵家庭。受卢梭等的影 响,他接受资产阶级革命是想,最终与保守的 家庭决裂。他以诗歌的形式抨击压迫和强权, 召唤对于现实的变革。其最优秀的作品有评论 人间事务的长诗《仙后麦布》(1813年),描写 反封建起义的幻想性抒情故事诗《伊斯兰的反 叛》(1818年),控诉曼彻斯特大屠杀的政治诗 《暴政的行列》 (1819年),支持意大利民族解 放斗争的政治诗《自由颂》(1820年),表现革 命热情及胜利信念的《西风颂》(1819年),以 及取材于古希腊神话,表现人民反暴政胜利后 瞻望空想社会主义前景的代表诗剧《解放了的 普罗米修斯》 (1819年)等。
  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

呼伦贝尔学院学期论文题目:同一个时代的两个诗人——拜伦与雪莱人物性格比较专业:英语姓名:张颖学号:2010041328同一时代的两个诗人——拜伦与雪莱人物性格比较Tow Poets of the Same PeriodComparison Between Byron’s and Shelley’s PersonalityAbstract: Byron and Shelly are romantic poets. They have differences as well as similarities. It has not only proud and aloof Byronic heroes, but also democratic heroes fought for lower class in Byron’s poems. And Shelley, whose poems are natural, splendid and imaginative. The differences between Byron’s and Shelley’s poems due to their different personalities and values. Byron has a contradictory and complex personality, but Shelley’s character is enthusiastic and simple.Key words: Byron Shelley romanticism personalityContentsIntroduction .............................................................................................. .1 1. Pomes of Byron and Shelley ................................................................ .1 1.1 Pomes of Byron .............................................................................. ..11.2 Poem of Shelley (2)2. Differences between Byron's and Shelley's personalities (2)3. Influence of life on Byron and Shelley (5)3.1 Influence of life on Byron (6)3.2 Influence of life on Shelley (6)Conclusion (7)Bibliography (8)Tow Poets of the Same PeriodComparison Between Byron’s and Shelley’s PersonalityIntroductionByron and Shelley are famous poets of Britain 19th century. They used poems as their weapons to criticize the darkness of society. They praised the people's revolutionary struggles in their poems. They eulogized the freedom and liberty at the same time. Byron's and Shelley's poems are full of passion and strong infection. They are excellent representatives of English Romanticism. However, as the poets in the same period, Byron and Shelley have differences as well as similarities. Byron was born in 1788, one year before French Revolution. Shelley was born in 1792, three years after French Revolution. They had similar family background and common aspiration. They grew up in a same social environment. All of these caused the common point in their poems. But, there are some differences on their poems. Byron like using satire and Shelley like using lyric. Byron’s poems are full of passion, but also have pessimism. Shelley’s poems are full of optimism and hope. The differences were just caused by the differences of their personalities.1. Pomes of Byron and ShelleyByron and Shelley are both romantic poets. Their poems are full of passion and imaginative. Influenced by French Revolution, Byron and Shelley advocated freedom, liberty and struggle. All of these made they have similarities on the theme and art performance of their poems. But , they have their own features at the same time.1.1 Pomes of ByronByron is one of the most influential poets of the time. His literary career was closely linked with the struggle and progressive movements of his age. He opposed oppression and slavery, and has an ardent love for liberty. His poetry was popular at other countries as well as at Britain.Byron’s poems are like the oratory, but his description is simple and fresh and often use vivid objects in his poems. Byron combined the romantic with satire in his poems. His poems exposed the darkness of the society, satirized the hypocrisy of the up class. But, his poems expressed the anguish and hopelessness to the life at the same time.Because of the theme of fighting for common people, Byron’s poems were popular in the lower class. Protagonists in Byron’s poems fight for common people, but ignore the power of common people. They are lonely heroes without the support of people. So their story usually are tragedy. It can say that Byron’s poems have two sides and heroes in his poems also have complex characters.1.2 Pomes of ShelleyShelley is one of the leading romantic poets, an intense and original lyrical poet in the English language. As far as his lyric poems are concerned, he is regarded as one of the greatest of all English poets.Different from Byron, Shelley’s poems are full of passion and hope. His poems are also exposed the darkness of society and criticized the cruel activities of the up class. But, it brings to the readers are hope and confidence. His poems are graceful lyrics and full of imaginative. It only has the optimistic attitude to the life and future.Same as the Byron, protagonists in Shelley’s poems help the poor people to against with the hypocritical noblemen. But the difference is they are not lonely heroes, they stand together with the common people and know the importance of the common people’s power. If Byron’s poems bring the fighting will and also the pessimism to the readers, Shelley bring all the optimism and hope to the people.2.Differences between Byron’s and Shelley’s personalitiesFighting for freedom and democracy is the common theme in Byron’s and Shelley’s poems. In writing style, they all belong to romantic poets. But, there are also some differences between their poems. Byron used satire to expose the darkness of the society. Shelley combined lyric with philosophy in his poems to predict a bright future. They have different readers and have different influences on the Britishliterature. All of these is just because their different personalities. Their poems can demonstrate this well.Byron is good at satire, he wrote in Don Juan:Besides the ministers and underlings,Who must be courteous to the accreditedDiplomatists of rather wavering kings,Until their royal riddle’s fully read,They very clerks―those somewhat dirty springsOf office or the house of office fedBy foul corruption into streams―even theyWere hardly rude enough to earn their pay.And insolence no doubt is what they areEmployed for, since it is their daily labourIn the dear offices of peace or warAnd should you doubt, pray ask of your next neighbour,When for a passport or some other barTo freedom he applied (a grief and abore),If he found not this spawn of tax―born riches,Like lap dogs, the least civil sons of bitches.Byron used the poem to satire the duplicity, bully and brutality of English government. He was full of rebellion and angry. But at the same time, Byron also expressed the pessimism and his arrogant personality in his poems. Such as he wrote in the Childe Harold’s Pilgrimage:I have not loved the world, nor the world me;I have not flattered its rank breath, nor bowedTo its idolatries a patient knee,Nor coined my cheek to smiles, ―nor cried aloudIn worship of an echo; in the crowdThey could not deem me one of such―I stoodAmong them, but not of them―in a shroudOf thoughts which were not their thoughts, and still could,Had I not filed my mind, which thus itself subduedByron has a contradictory character. He was arrogant, also inferior; full of passion, also indifferent to the life. He is a radical, but has negative attitude to the world. He fought for the people who from lower class, but ignored the power of the common people. Just because his complex and contradictory personality, Byron created many Byronic heroes in his poems. All these protagonists were full of fiery passions and unbending will. They were against tyranny and injustice of the society. But they were all lone fighters without the support of the common people. Most of them had a tragic endings. There is no doubt that all the Byronic heroes have Byron’s shadow.Different from Byron, Shelley eulogized the happy life of future. He likes using lyric in his poems. He always expressed the hope for tomorrow in ends of his poems.Shelley wrote in The Revolt of IslamThese perish as the good and great of yoreHave perish, and their murderers will repent,―Yes, vain and barren tears shall flow beforeYon smoke has faded from the firmamentEven for this cause, that ye who must lamentThe death of those that made this world so fairCannot recall them now; but there is lentTo man the wisdom of a high despairWhen such can die, and he live on and linger hereIt is just because Shelley’s enthusiastic character which made Shelley wrote the poems with optimism of the life. From his poems, readers would not feel pessimism about the death of the Leons. Instead, it makes the people full of the unbending confidence for the great future. We also can learn Shelley’s optimism from his Ode to the West WindMake me thy lyre, even as the forest is:What if my leaves are falling like its own!The tumult of thy mighty harmoniesWill take from both a deep, autumnal tone,Sweet though in sadness. Be thou, Spirit fierce,My spirit! Be thou me, impetuous one!Drive my dead thoughts over the universeLike withered leaves to quicken a new birth!And, by the incantation of this verse,Scatter, as from an unextinguished hearthAshes and sparks, my words among mankind!Be through my lips to unawakened EarthThe trumpet of a prophecy! O Wind,If Winter comes, can Spring be far behind?Shelley described the destructive power of the west wind to simple that the power of common people will destroy the darkness and injustice of the society and built a new world which is beautiful, equal and hopeful. So, Shelley said in the end: If Winter comes, can Spring be far behind.Different from Byron, Shelley’s passion developed into hope and confidence for the bright future instead of abhorring to the life. All hopeful and optimistic expression of Shelley is because his pure and optimistic personality which is different from Byron.3.The influence of life on Byron and ShelleyFrom the poems, we can learn the differences personalities between Byron and Shelley. Byron and Shelley had different comments and different effects on literature in the literary history. The reason is their differences on creative personality. Their different life and experiences is the main factor which influenced their formation of character. Although they have similar family background, they have different childhood and different experiences in their adulthood. All of these cause the differences of their personalities and the differences of their poems.3.1 Influence of life on ByronByron was born in a noble family, but he had an unhappy childhood. His father died when Byron was 4 and his grumpy mother treated him very bad. Byron was often bullied by other children because of his inborn disability. All these shaped Byron into a arrogant also inferior, radical also negative man. Byron inherited the aristocracy on the House of Lords in 1809. Then Byron was proud of his title in his whole life and was more arrogant than before.Just because of this personality, many protagonists in Byron’s poems have complex characters just like Byron. They opposed with the darkness society and fought for the common people. they have the unbending belief. But they are lonely heroes without the support of people. They usually had a tragic ending. Such as the protagonist Manfred in Manfred, his anguish and hopelessness reflected the same thought of Byron. But he has commendable persistence at the same time. He yelled:“Forward! Forward! Forward!”when he was dying. The heroes in Byron’s poems just Byron himself at some point.3.2 Influence of life on ShelleySame as the Byron, Shelley was born a noble family, too. He is the son of a prosperous squire. He was supposed to be a gentleman of wealth and title. But he did not grew up as the expectation of his families. Shelley proved a good classical scholar, but he was not happy in fact. He was called mad Shelley and was known as his enthusiasm for studies in electricity, chemistry and astronomy. The persecutions which he endured and witnessed at school influenced him has a lifelong detestation of tyranny and violence.Influenced by the literature of French Revolutionary, Shelley went to Oxford with the plan for changing the system of society. He and Thomas Jefferson wrote the Necessity of Atheism in order to convinced that religious were harmful to man’s happiness. Just because of this, Shelley lost his valuable education at Oxford, and this is no doubt that it was a disaster for him.Because of influence of French Revolutionary, Shelley became an optimistic and a strong man in stead of a negative and a hopeless man. Just like his poems: QueenMab is a revolutionary poem condemning tyranny and exploitation and the unjust war waged by rich to plunder wealth. Revolt of Islam expressed his political and aesthetic ideas. Ode to the West Wind showed his optimistic attitude towards to the life.ConclusionKarl Marx said:“ The real difference between Byron and Shelley is this: those who understand them and love them rejoice that Byron died at thirty-six, because if he had lived he would become a reactionary bourgeois; they grieve that Shelley died at twenty-nine, because if he was essentially a revolutionist and he would always have been one of advanced guard of socialism.”Although Byron and Shelley are both against with the cruel and injustice society, and hope people from lower class be free and liberated. Their differences on personality is obvious. Byron was a man who has complex and contradictory personality. Shelley was a man who has a united and pure ideology. Byron satirized and exposed the darkness of the society. Shelley was full of optimistic to give readers the hope for a bright future. Just because the differences between Byron and Shelley, they could become the two most excellent poets of romanticism.呼伦贝尔学院本科学期论文Bibliography[1] 拜伦.唐璜[M].北京:人民文学出版社.1990[2] 雪莱.雪莱抒情诗集[M].北京:外文出版社.1957[3] 吴伟仁主编.英国文学史及选读(第二册)[M].北京:外语教学与研究出版社,1988.12[4] 薛金强.吴舜立.拜伦与雪莱比较论[J].外语教学第2期第22卷.2001年3月.20018。

相关文档
最新文档