3.现代英语词汇学(第三章)
现代英语词汇学教程

现代英语词汇学教程摘要:现代英语词汇学教程I.引言- 介绍现代英语词汇学教程的背景和意义- 概括本书的主要内容和结构II.英语词汇的来源和发展- 古英语时期- 中古英语时期- 现代英语时期III.英语词汇的构成和分类- 词根、词缀和词尾- 词汇的分类方法- 举例说明各类词汇的构成和特点IV.英语词汇的语义和语法功能- 词汇的语义特点和分类- 词汇的语法功能及其在句子中的运用- 举例说明词汇的语义和语法功能的应用V.英语词汇的变化和演变- 语音变化- 形态变化- 词汇的衍生和派生- 举例说明英语词汇的变化和演变VI.英语词汇的认知和教学- 认知语言学与英语词汇教学- 词汇教学的方法和策略- 举例说明英语词汇的认知和教学应用VII.结论- 总结现代英语词汇学教程的主要观点和贡献- 对英语词汇学发展的展望正文:现代英语词汇学教程现代英语词汇学教程是一门研究英语词汇的来源、构成、发展、变化、认知和教学的学科。
它对于我们了解英语词汇的演变过程、掌握英语词汇的使用方法以及提高英语词汇教学的效果具有重要意义。
英语词汇的来源和发展可以追溯到古英语时期、中古英语时期和现代英语时期。
古英语时期主要包括日耳曼语和拉丁语的词汇,其中日耳曼语词汇是英语词汇的基础。
中古英语时期主要是法语和拉丁语的词汇对英语词汇的影响,这一时期英语词汇的丰富和变化为现代英语词汇的形成奠定了基础。
现代英语时期,随着全球化的推进,英语词汇不断吸收其他语言的词汇,从而使英语词汇更加丰富和多样化。
英语词汇的构成和分类主要通过词根、词缀和词尾来实现。
词根是词汇的基本部分,决定词汇的意义。
词缀分为前缀、后缀和词内缀,它们用于改变词汇的意义、语法功能和词性。
词尾主要用于表示词汇的语法功能和词性。
英语词汇的分类方法主要包括按词义、词性、语法功能和来源等分类。
英语词汇的语义和语法功能是词汇在句子中的具体运用。
词汇的语义特点包括词汇的意义、感情色彩和语义韵等。
3.现代英语词汇学(第三章)

• •
•
1.Onomatopoeic motivation Words motivated phonetically are called onomatopoeic or phonetic or echoic words, whose pronunciation suggests the meaning. They show a close relation of sound to sense, whereas non-onomatopoeic words do not show any such relationship. Many onomatopoeic words imitate natural sounds, such as the cries of animals or the noises that resemble these associated with the object or action to be named, or that seem suggestive of its qualities.
• Here the sense is truly the echo of the sound. Examples are: the bow-wow or woof-woof of a dog, the meow-meow of a cat, the moo of a cow, the roar of a lion, the coo of a pigeon, the hiss of a serpent, the hum of bees, and quack of a duck; the boom of a cannon, the crack of a pistol shot, the clang of the firebell, the clash of weapons, the bang of a door and the rumble of thunder.
现代英语词汇学教程

现代英语词汇学教程摘要:现代英语词汇学教程I.引言- 介绍现代英语词汇学教程的背景和意义- 阐述本教程的目的和适用对象II.英语词汇的来源和发展- 古代英语词汇的起源和发展- 中古英语词汇的演变和特点- 现代英语词汇的来源和构成III.英语词汇的分类- 名词、动词、形容词、副词等基本词类的特点和用法- 派生词、复合词、缩略词等特殊词类的构成和用法IV.英语词汇的用法和搭配- 词汇的惯用搭配和固定搭配- 词汇的语境和语域用法- 常见错误和误用词汇的纠正V.英语词汇的学习和运用- 学习英语词汇的方法和技巧- 英语词汇的应用和实践- 提高英语词汇运用能力的策略和技巧正文:现代英语词汇学教程现代英语词汇学教程是一门研究英语词汇的起源、发展、分类、用法和搭配等方面的学科,旨在帮助学习者更好地理解和运用英语词汇,提高英语水平。
本教程适用于英语学习者、教师和研究者等广大读者。
英语词汇的起源和发展可以追溯到古代英语时期。
在这个阶段,英语词汇主要以日耳曼语为基础,并受到拉丁语和希腊语等外来语的影响。
中古英语时期,英语词汇发生了较大的变化,尤其是在语法和拼写方面。
随着历史的推移,现代英语词汇逐渐形成,其来源和构成更加多样化。
英语词汇可以根据词性进行分类,包括名词、动词、形容词、副词等基本词类。
此外,还有派生词、复合词、缩略词等特殊词类。
这些词汇在英语中具有不同的特点和用法,学习者需要加以区分和掌握。
英语词汇的用法和搭配是英语学习中的重要环节。
学习者需要了解词汇的惯用搭配和固定搭配,掌握词汇在特定语境和语域中的用法。
此外,学习者还需要注意纠正常见的错误和误用词汇。
学习和运用英语词汇是提高英语水平的关键。
学习者可以通过词根词缀法、联想记忆法等方法学习英语词汇,积累词汇量。
现代英语词汇学

现代英语词汇学在当今全球化的时代,英语作为一门国际通用语言,其词汇的重要性不言而喻。
现代英语词汇学,作为研究英语词汇的一门学科,对于我们深入理解和掌握英语具有极其重要的意义。
现代英语词汇的来源丰富多样。
首先,英语大量吸收了拉丁语和希腊语的词汇。
许多学术、科学和医学领域的术语都源自这两种古老的语言。
比如,“psychology”(心理学)来自希腊语,“biology”(生物学)来自拉丁语。
这不仅丰富了英语的词汇量,也使英语能够更精确地表达复杂的概念。
其次,法语对英语词汇的影响也颇为显著。
在历史上,英国曾被诺曼人征服,这使得大量的法语词汇进入英语。
像“government”(政府)、“fashion”(时尚)等词都是从法语中借用而来。
这些词汇为英语增添了优雅和精致的元素。
再者,随着全球贸易和文化交流的日益频繁,英语还从世界各地的语言中汲取词汇。
例如,“yoga”(瑜伽)来自梵语,“sushi”(寿司)来自日语。
这种跨语言的融合使英语成为了一个真正的全球性语言。
现代英语词汇的构成方式也多种多样。
合成法是常见的一种,即将两个或多个单词组合在一起形成新的词汇,如“blackboard”(黑板)、“classroom”(教室)。
派生法是通过添加前缀或后缀来改变单词的意义或词性,例如“unhappy”(不开心的)中的“un”是前缀,“happiness”(幸福)中的“ness”是后缀。
还有缩略法,将较长的单词或短语缩写成较短的形式,比如“TV”(television 的缩写)、“VIP”(very important person 的缩写)。
在现代社会,科技的飞速发展也催生了大量新的英语词汇。
在计算机领域,我们有“software”(软件)、“hardware”(硬件);在互联网领域,“website”(网站)、“email”(电子邮件)等词汇成为了人们日常生活的一部分。
这些新词汇的出现反映了社会的进步和变化,同时也不断丰富着英语词汇的宝库。
第三章 英语词汇学

3.3.2 Bound morphemes
6. Bound Morphemes —— The morphemes cannot occur as separate words. They are bound to other morphemes to form words. Bound morphemes are found in derived words. 粘附词素——它们主要粘附在别的词素上才能构成词。 粘附词素主要出现在派生词里。 e.g. recollection (re + collect + ion) collect – free morpheme re-and –ion are bound morphemes. (include bound root and affix)
词素变体有些词素根据他们在词中的位置不同可以有一个以上的不同形素实现这些不同的形素叫词素变体
Chapter 3
Word Formation Ⅰ
It seems to be generally agreed that a word is the smallest unit of a language that stands alone to communicate meaning. However, structurally, a word is not the smallest unit because many word can be separated into even smaller meaningful unit.
What is the smallest unit of a language?
3.1 Morphemes
1. Morpheme —— A morpheme is the smallest meaningful unit of a language. (The smallest functional unit in the composition of words.) 词素是最小的有意义的语言单位。(最小的功 能单位) 比较:a word is a minimal free form of a 比较 language that has a given sound and meaning and syntactic function.
英语词汇学chapter3-4 word-formation

• E.g.: Home + work homework; Pick + pocket pickpocket
– conversion (10.5%) – composition or compounding (27%)
5
• Root, stem, base
– A root is a form that is not further analyzable, either in terms of derivational or inflectional morphology.
3
Inflectional morphology
… suffix in English … in Chinese?
Morphology (word-formation)
compounding
word-formation (derivation)
derivation
affixation: prefix & suffix
Chapter Three & Four
WORD-FORMATION
1
Contents
• An overview • Three major processes
– compounding, derivation and conversinym, clipping, blending, words from proper names, back-formation, reduplication, neo-classical formation and miscellaneous
英语专业词汇学第三章课本及答案

Chapter 3 Morphological Structure of English Words We have discussed the historical, cultural and social factors that facilitate (使……容易;推动) the development of the English vocabulary. Borrowing, as we see, has been playing an active role in the expansion of vocabulary. In modern times, however, vocabulary is mainly enlarged on an internal basis. That is, we use word-building material available in English to create new words. But before we discuss the actual ways and means to make new words, we need to have a clear picture of the structure of English words and their components (成分) —word-forming elements. This chapter will discuss morphemes(语素;词素), their classification(分类) and identification(辨别), the relationship between morphemes and word-formation(构词法).3.1 MorphemesTraditionally, words are usually treated as the basic and minimal units of a language to make sentences, which are combinations of words according to syntactic rules(句法规则). Structurally, however, a word is not the smallest unit because many words can be separated into even smaller meaningful units. Take decontextualization for example. This is one word, but can be broken down into de-, con-, text, -a/ , -iz(e), -ation , each having meaning of its own. These segments (部分) cannot be furtherdivided; otherwise, none of them would make any sense. Though -ation has a number of variants (变体) such as -tion, -sion, -ion, they belong to the same suffix as they have the same meaning and grammatical function and occur owing to (因为;根据) different sound environment. These minimal meaningful units are known as morphemes (morphe is the Greek word for 'form'; -eme as in 'phoneme' (音素) means 'class of' ). In view of word-formation, the morpheme is seen as 'the smallest functioning unit in the composition of words' (Crystal 1985). Syntactically(从句法上看), however, a morpheme is the minimal form of grammatical analysis (语法分析). For instance, each of the word-forms studies, studying, studied, consists of the morpheme study + ; the forms -es in studies, -ing in studying, -ed in studied are morphemes, which express grammatical concepts (语法概念) instead of deriving new words (See Classifying Morphemes).3.2 Morphs and Allomorphs(词素变体)Morphemes are abstract units, which are realized in speech by discrete units (具体单位) known as morphs(形素). 'They are actual spoken, minimal carriers of meaning' (Bolinger and Sears 1981:43). In other words the phonetic or orthographic strings(语音串或拼写字串)or segments (切分成分;节) which realize morphemes are termed 'morphs' (Bauer 1983:15). The morpheme isto the morph what a phoneme (音位) is to a phone (音素). Most morphemes are realized by single morphs like bird, tree, green , sad, want, desire, etc. . These morphemes coincide (巧合) with words as they can stand by themselves and function freely in a sentence. Words of this kind are called mono-morphemic words. Some morphemes, however, are realized by more than one morph according to their position in a word. For instance, the morpheme of plurality {-s} has a set of morphs in different sound context, e. g. in cats /s/, in bags /z/, in matches /iz/. The alternates (作为替换的事物) /s/, /z/ and /iz/ are three different morphs. The same is true of the link verb morpheme {be}. Its past tense is realized by two distinct orthographic forms was , were, each of which happens to be a word-form, realizing {preterit} and {singular}, and {preterit} and {plural} respectively and each has its own phonetic form /woz/ or /wə:/. Therefore, both was, were and their phonetic forms /woz/ and /wə: / are morphs (See discussion in Bauer, p15).An allomorph refers to a member of a set of morphs, which represent one morpheme. Just as we class phones(音素) together as allophones (音位变体) of a single phoneme(音位), so we class morphs together as allomorphs of a single morpheme. Take the plural morpheme {-s} again. Phonetically, it is realized by /s/, /z/, /iz/, all of which are allomorphs. In English, many morphemes canhave more than one allomorph, particularly those freestanding morphemes which are functional words in their own right. Once they occur in connected speech, they may be realized by different forms, depending on whether they are accented or weakened (Look at the data in the table).Morphem e AllomorphStrong Weak{am} /aem/ /əm/, /m/{ was} /woz/ /WəZ/{have } /haev/ /həv/, /v/{would } /wud/ /wəd/, /əd/,/d/{he} /hi:/ /i:/, /i/{his} /hiz/ /iz/{for} /fo:/ /fə/{to} /tu:/ /tu/, /tə/Then what is the difference between morphs and allomorphs? The relationship can be illustrated by the diagram below.Morpheme{would}morph morph morph morph →allomorph/wud/ /wəd/ /əd/ /d/3.3 Classifying MorphemesMorphemes vary in function. Accordingly, we can classify morphemes into several general categories: free versus bound, derivational versus inflectional, and lexical versus grammatical. However, their boundaries are not as clear-cut as they appear to be due to some overlapping(重叠). For the sake of discussion, we shall define each type in terms of its characteristics.1. Free versus Bound Morphemes(自由词素与粘着词素)This is the easiest and most preferred classification in morphological studies, discussed in Hatch and Brown (1995), Crystal (1985), Fromkin and Rodman (1983), Bauer (1983), Bolinger and Sears (1981) and Matthews (2000). Morphemes which are independent of other morphemes are free. These morphemes have complete meanings in themselves and can be used as free grammatical units in sentences. They are identical with(与……完全相同) words, for example, man, earth, wind, car and anger.Morphemes which cannot occur as separate words are bound. They are so named because they are bound to other morphemes to form words or to perform a particulargrammatical function.Bound morphemes are chiefly found in derived words (派生词). Let us take recollection, idealistic and ex-prisoner for example. Each of the three words comprises three morphemes: recollection (re- collect-ion) , idealistic (ideal-ist-ic) , ex-prisoner (ex- prison -er). Of the nine morphemes, collect, ideal and prison can stand by themselves and thus are free morphemes. All the rest re-, -ion , -ist, -ic, ex-and -er are bound as none of them are freestanding units.Free morphemes are all roots, which are capable of being used as words or as word-building elements to form new words like collect, ideal, prison , whereas bound morphemes consist of either roots or affixes, most of which can be used to create new words like -dict- , -ced- (接近;去), re-, -ion, -ist, -ic and ex-(前). But there are a few affixes which can only indicate such grammatical concepts as tense, aspect, number and case, for example, the -ing in watching, -er in easier, -s in books, and -ed in worked.The English language possesses a multitude of (大量的) words made up of merely bound morphemes, e. g. antecedent, which can be broken down into ante-, -ced- and -ent. Among them, -ced- is a root meaning 'approach, go to', ante-, a prefix meaning 'before' and -ent, a noun suffix meaning 'a person, a thing', thus the whole word antecedent meaning 'something that goes before'(前例;前事;先行词;祖先). These examples show clearly that bound morphemes include two types: bound root (See Root, Stem, Base) and affix.2. Derivational versus Inflectional MorphemesMorphemes which are used to derive new words are known as derivational morphemes (派生词素) because when these morphemes are conjoined, new words are derived.In English, derivatives and compounds are all formed by such morphemes. For example, a + mor + ai, clear + ance, Life + Like and homo + gen + eous are results of such morphological processes.Inflectional morphemes(屈折词素), in contrast, indicate the syntactic relationships between words and function as grammatical markers. Inflectional morphemes are confined to suffixes. There is the regular plural suffix -s (-es) which is added to nouns such as machines, fridges, desks, radios and potatoes; the same forms can be added to verbs to indicate the simple present for the third person singular such as likes, works and goes; the form -'s is used to denote the possessive case of nouns such as the children ' s library, the man ' s role and the mother-in-law' s complaints; the suffixes -er, -est are usually attached to simple adjectives or adverbs to show their comparative or superlative degrees like happier—happiest,harder—hardest. Apart from these, there is the past tense marker -ed and progressive marker -ing added to verbs. The differences between inflectional and derivational morphemes can be summarized as follows (See Hatch and Brown, p266): Inflectional Derivational(1) Does not change meaning or part of speech of the stem (1) Changes meaning or part of speech of the stem.(2) Indicates syntactic or semantic relations between different words in a sentence.(2) Indicates semantic relations within the word.(3) Occurs with all members of some large class of morphemes.(3) Occurs with only some members of a class of morphemes.(4) Occurs at margins of words.(4) Occurs before any inflectional suffixes added.3. Content versus Grammatical MorphemesOn a semantic and syntactic basis, morphemes can fall into content and grammatical morphemes (Traugott and Pratt 1980:90; Bolinger and Sears, pp66~70; Hatch and Brown, p267). Content morphemes are lexical morphemes which are used as wesee above to derive new words, so also known as derivational morphemes. These morphemes, whether free or bound, have a lexical content, hence the name. Grammatical morphemes, on the other hand, function primarily as grammatical markers. They encompass both inflectional affixes and free morphemes such as in, and, do, have, they, -while, -where, but and that, which are traditionally called functional words.3.4 Identifying Morphemes(词素的区分)Since morphemes are the minimal distinct units, they should be identifiable by their forms, meaning and distribution. Generally speaking, lexical morphemes are easy to define:Mono-morphemic: land, skyDouble-morphemic: chill + y, mis + takeTriple-morphemic: anti + govern + ment, sports + man + shipFour-morphemic:un + friend + li + ness, morph + olog( i) + cal + lyOver-four-morphemic: inter + nation + al + iz(e) + ationIf the morphemes are always consistent in form and meaning, there should be no difficulty in identification(区分). However, thereis often mismatch(不一致)between form and meaning. Some morphemes are identical(相同的) in form but different in meaning, for instance, -er in teacher, clearer and eraser. -er in teacher means 'one who', but -er in clearer indicates 'the comparative degree', and -er in eraser denotes 'an object'. Therefore, -er in each case is a different morpheme.Some morphemes are not meaningful in isolation(单独)but acquire meaning by virtue of(通过)their connection in words (Fromkin and Rodman, p116). The classic examples are cranberry(越橘), huckleberry (黑果;乌饭树浆果)and boysenberry(博弈增莓), each seeming to be a kind of berry. But when cran-, huckle- and boysen- are isolated, they are meaningless and they are incapable of forming new words with other morphemes rather than with berry. There are other morphemes which occur in many words, but their meaning is difficult to define, for instance, -ceive in conceive (想象;设想), perceive(感觉,察觉;认为)and receive. Some forms are meaningful, but not morphemes, such as fl- meaning 'moving light' in flash , flame and flicker(闪烁,忽隐忽现), and gl-meaning 'static light' in glow(发光,燃烧),glisten (闪耀;反光)and glitter(闪光;光彩夺目). These are only sound symbols often employed by poets in their literary creation but do not qualify as morphemes.The identification of inflectional morphemes is more problematic. In most cases, an inflectional morpheme can be segmented (切分)from the stem of a word and naturally can be added to the stem like the plural morpheme {s} in gloves, tables and classes. But what is the plural morpheme in men, sheep and feet ? The same is true of the past tense morpheme {ed} , which is explicit and segmentable in walked, loaded and danced. How can we isolate the past tense morpheme from knew, taught and cut ? To solve the problem, we have to resort to other ways.3.5 Morpheme and Word-formationWe know that words can be analyzed into morphemes, which are the minimal meaningful units in the composition of words. In word-formation, however, morphemes are conventionally labeled root, stem, base and affix.1. AffixAffixes are forms that are attached to words or word elements to modify meaning or function. All affixes are bound morphemes because none of them can stand as words in their own right. According to the functions of affixes, we can divide them into inflectional affixes like -s, -ed and -ing, and derivational affixeslike pre-, ex-, de-, -less, -dom and -ic. Derivational and inflectional affixes are identical with derivational and inflectional morphemes. In view of their distribution in the formation of words, affixes can fall into prefix and suffix. Prefixes are all derivational, i.e. they are used to form new words whereas suffixes embrace(包括) both derivational suffixes and inflectional suffixes. Accordingly, the above-mentioned affixes can be further grouped into prefixes: pre-, ex- and de-y and suffixes: -less, -dom, -zc, -5, -ed and -ing.2. Root, Stem, BaseBefore we begin our actual discussion of word-building processes, there are some basic concepts that need clarifying(澄清). The processes of derivation and compounding involve different word-forming elements: affixes and root or stem or base. Indeed, some people use root or stem undiscriminatingly (不加区别地) on all occasions. But these three terms are not the same, and they denote to a greater or lesser degree different concepts despite the semantic overlapping between them.A root is the basic form of a word which cannot be further analyzed without total loss of identity (Crystal 1985). As mentioned earlier, the root, whether free or bound, generally carries the maincomponent of meaning in a word. In the word internationalists, removing inter- , -at, -ist, -s leaves the root nation. If we further divide nation as * na/tion or * at /ion, though -tion and -ion coincide with the noun suffix, the other part is meaningless and the original lexical identity is totally lost. Therefore, nation defies(使不能;使落空)further analysis. In terms of derivational and inflectional morphology, a 'root is that part of a word form that remains when all inflectional and derivational affixes have been removed' (Bauer 1983). Take internationalists again. After the removal of the inflectional affix -s and the derivational affixes -ist, -al and inter-, nation is what is left and thus is the root.A stem may consist of a single root morpheme as in iron or of two root morphemes as in a compound like handcuff. It can be a root morpheme plus one or more affixational morphemes as in mouthful, understatement. To make things more clearly, we say that the stem is used only when we deal with inflectional affixes. As Bauer defines, a stem is 'that part of the word-form which remains when all inflectional affixes have been removed' (ibid). In other words, any form to which an inflectional affix is attached is a stem. Consider the word internationalists again. Nation is a root as well as a stem as the plural -s can be added to it; national is not a root as it can be further divided, but a stem because an inflectionalaffix -s can be added to it when used as a noun; similarly, international is not a root but a stem for the same reason. This is also true of internationalist, which is a stem.A base is used in this book as an all-purpose term, referring to a form to which affixes of any kind (both derivational and inflectional) can be added. It can be a root or a stem. In the case of internationalists, nation is a base, national is a base, so are international and internationalist.nation(root, stem, base)national(stem, base)international(stem, base)internationalist (stem, base)InternationalistsIt should be noted that such an example gives the impression that a stem is just as good as a base. This is not true. In many cases, a form of word can neither be a root nor a stem, but only a base. This often happens when we deal with derivational affixes exclusively, for example impracticality(不切实际;无用;不现实). Removing the derivational affix -ity leaves only the base form impractical, and by further removing im- we have the base form practical left and by still further analysis, only practice remains.impracticalityimpractical (base)practical(base)practice(root, stem, base)Therefore, in the chapters to follow, we shall employ only the term base to refer to any basic word-building element.英语词汇学第三单元课后练习及答案Questions and Tasks1. Write the terms in the blanks according to the definitions.a. a minimal meaningful unit of a language ( )b. one of the variants that realize a morpheme ( )c. a morpheme that occurs with at least one other morpheme ( )d. a morpheme that can stand alone ( )e. a morpheme attached to a base, stem or root ( )f. an affix that indicates grammatical relationships ( )g. an affix that forms new words with a base, stem or root ( )h.what remains of a word after the removal of all affixes ( )i. that part of a word that can take inflectional affixes ( ) j. a form to which affixes of any kind can be added ( )2. What is the difference between grammatical and lexicalmorphemes, and inflectional and derivational morphemes?Give examples to illustrate their relationships.3. Analyze the words in terms of root, stem and base.individualistic undesirablesanize the following terms in a tree diagram to show their logical relationships.affix morphemederivational affix free rootbound root inflectional affixprefix free morphemebound morpheme suffix参考答案1. a. morphemeb. allomorphc. bound morphemed. free morphemee. affixf. inflectional affixg. derivational affixh. rooti. stemj. base2. Inflectional morphemes are the suffixes added to the end ofwords to denote grammatical concepts such as -s (-es) , -ed,-ing and -est (to show superlative degree of adjectives andadverbs) whereas derivational morphemes are prefixes andsuffixes added to words to form new words such as pre-, dis-, un- , -lion, -er, -ness and so on.Grammatical morphemes are those used to show grammatical concepts, including inflectional suffixes as mentioned above and functional words (prepositions, pronouns, articles,auxiliary verbs), for example, but, the, do and was; lexicalmorphemes are derivational affixes including both prefixesand suffixes.3.individualisticindividualist+ic[stem, base]individual+ist[stem, base]individu+al[stem, base]in+dividu[root, stem, base]undesirablesun+desirable[stem, base]desir+able[root, stem, base]4. morpheme free morpheme=free rootbound morpheme bound rootaffix inflectional affixderivational affix prefixsuffix。
英语词汇学教程课件第3章English Lexicology 3

Lecture Three
The Development of English
The 5000 or so languages of the world can be grouped into about 300 language families, on the basis of similarities in their basic word stock and grammars.
The early English settlers do not seem to have made much of an effort to understand the language of the Britons. They did not learn many words from the Celts. The English added only a handful of Celtic words to their language, like clout, cradle, crock, dun, slough, cumb (valley), torr (hill). Place names formed a large group. Thames, Wye and Avon are Celtic river names, and so are some city names like York, London, Kent. These words came into English as the result of daily contact between Celt and Anglo-Saxon.
Because of these and other influences, the English vocabulary changed enormously and became the largest and most complex in the world, and the grammar changed its emphasis from inflections to word order.
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
Onomatopoeic words may be subdivided into two kinds: primary onomatopoeia and secondary onomatopoeia • Primary onomatopoeia Primary onomatopoeia means the imitation of sound by sound. Here the sound is truly an “echo to the sense”: the reference itself is an acoustic experience which is more or less closely imitated by the phonetic structure of the word. The terms like crack, growl, hum, roar, squeak, squeal, whizz and a great many others fall into this category.
2. Semantic motivation Semantic motivation refers to the mental association suggested by the conceptual meaning of a word. It explains the connection between the literal sense and figurative sense of the word. When we say the mouth of a river, we associate the opening part of the river with the mouth of a human being or an animal. When we speak of the foot of the mountain, we are comparing the lower part of the mountain to the foot of a humatopoeic motivation Words motivated phonetically are called onomatopoeic or phonetic or echoic words, whose pronunciation suggests the meaning. They show a close relation of sound to sense, whereas non-onomatopoeic words do not show any such relationship. Many onomatopoeic words imitate natural sounds, such as the cries of animals or the noises that resemble these associated with the object or action to be named, or that seem suggestive of its qualities.
• Some onomatopoeic words are not completely motivated as pointed out by R. Quirk: • “…And even these (echoic words) are conventional to quite a large extent. The word mutter does not mean „mutter‟ in German or French, even though these language also have onomatopoeic words for „mutter‟: murren and marmotter respectively.If you throw a stone into water, the sound you hear is by no means as when you say „splash‟.” (Quirk 1963:43) •
• The number of such words in any language is small, but their existence is important because they show a popular desire for a sound-symbol to have as close a relation to its meaning as possible. Such a desire is present in every linguistic community. • The number of such words in any language is small, but their existence is important because they show a popular desire for a sound-symbol to have as close a relation to its meaning as possible. Such a desire is present in every linguistic community.
Some of these onomatopoeic words have certain elements in common; in Bloomfield’s words, there is “a system of initial and final root-forming morphemes, of vague significance”, with which the “intense, symbolic connotation” of such words is associated. For example, the sounds /sn / may express three types of experiences: “breath-noise” (sniff, snuff, snore, snort), “quick separation or movement” (snip, snap, snatch), and “creeping” (snake, snail, sneak, snoop). Final groups have similar functions: -are suggests “big light or noise” as in blare, flare, glare, stare; -ump suggests “protuberance” as in bump, chump, clump, dump and “heavy fall” as in dump, crump, flump, flump, pump, slump, thump.
• Here the sense is truly the echo of the sound. Examples are: the bow-wow or woof-woof of a dog, the meow-meow of a cat, the moo of a cow, the roar of a lion, the coo of a pigeon, the hiss of a serpent, the hum of bees, and quack of a duck; the boom of a cannon, the crack of a pistol shot, the clang of the firebell, the clash of weapons, the bang of a door and the rumble of thunder.
现代英语词汇学(第三章)
Motivation What is motivation? Motivation refers to the connection between word-symbol and its sense. From the point of view of motivation, the great majority of English words are non-motivated, since they are conventional, arbitrary symbols. However, there is a small number of words that can be described as motivated, that is, a direct connection between the symbol and its sense can be readily observed. Based on our textbook, motivation may arise in three major ways:
• Poets and great writers often use the sound of words to achieve very expressive effect as can be seen in the following poem: • “ The ice was here, the ice was there , • The ice was in all around: • It cracked and growled, and roared and howled, • Like noise in a swound .” • (Note: swound=woond: a bewitched state; trance)
Another interesting feature of onomatopoeia patterns is that they often work by vowel alteration. By substituting one vowel for another one can express different noises: snip—snap, sniff—snuff, flip—flap— flop. Akin to this tendency are reduplicated words and phrases like riff-raff, wishy-washy, tit for tat, ticktock, click-clack. It should be noted that many onomatopoeic forms are based on alterations of not vowels but of initial consonants: higgledy-piggledy, helter-skelter, namby-pamby, roly-poly, etc. Fairly recent onomatopoeic formations are: hi-fi, walkie-talkie, heebie-jeebies, li-lo, flower-power, hokeycokey, itsy-bitsy, swing-wing, etc.