中科院考博英语翻译写作分析及范文-8页精选文档
中科院考博英语作文模板
2.1开头段：（1）问题型There is no denying the fact that (让步,例如: A has a long tradition of ).Recently the phenomenon of has aroused great concerns from all stripes ofsociety. /However, a virtual of is taking shape in present, arousing concernsfrom all stripes of society. /Nowadays, a trend of has been becomingincreasingly clear, which . It would not be a stretch to say that .Accordingly, it is urgent to explore the causes for such , in order to avoid thisembarrassing situation.（2）争论型A: It is universally acknowledged that . Recently, a question aboutwhether A is appropriate/rational is fiercely debated, which arouse wideconcerns from all stripes of society.Some claim that ( 原因). In myperspective, however, . The reasons can be listed as follows.B: is one of the most significant decisions can make. ( 问题严重性) not only can but also . However,how/when/whether ? To , or ? I prefer to choose . Thereasons can be listed as follows.（3）发散型It is universally acknowledged that . Besides the , has gained a lotmore from it. The details contents are as follows./Numerous benefits can begiven, but the following are significant.2.2中心段：(1)问题型In the first place, is for the simple reason that . Admtting that /Conceding that , it somehow . , but .Especially in , which has an exceedingly negative influenceon .Besides, should be responsible for . Nowadays, layemphasis merely on , rather than on , which make it . Forinstance, ……(with …… / when …… / There are …… , who …… ). It is,hence, (adj for sb to do ).Last but by no means the least, ……现象(句子)……on the groundthat . In fact, , and it should be/do . After years of researches, , adistinguished scholar once stressed/ pointed that/ remarked, “ (A not only 倒装，but also ……./ It is 强调句, that……/ Barely anyone can 双重否定without ……) ”.(2)论点支持型In the first place, is beneficial to . With , one canboth and which contributes tremendously to . 陈述. It would not be astretch to say that .或: In the first place, is detrimental to . In the past time, it waspossible for to . But nowadays, . It was not , who /which达到什么效果 / 怎么样 .Besides，only after /by , are we able to , especially in . 主语is so that For instance, . If , it would be detrimental to ,even .Last but by no means the least, 现象 as a result of . Infact, , and should . After years of researches, , a distinguished scholaronce stressed/ pointed that/ remarked, “ (A not only 倒装，but also ……./It is 强调句, that……/ Barely anyone can 双重否定 without……) ”. It is,hence, (adj for sb to do ).(1)举例型举例型作文中心段建议按照条理举例，按照原因分析或支持论点的模式一条一条地进行举例论证。
考博英语作文范文和翻译
考博英语作文范文和翻译考博英语作文题目：Should Chinese Language Course Be Adopted inCollege Curricula?考博英语作文范文：The moment I saw the topic,a post originallysubmitted in Peking University BBS occurred to me.The post composed of a conversation between aChinese young man, the author, and a waiter comingfrom Japan. The author suffered frustration whenthe waiter asked him about Chinese culture.Surprisingly, the Japanese demonstrated that he got command of more Chinese culture thanmost Chinese young people. I do not know what your initial response is supposing that youwere set in the circumstance. As a matter of fact, Chinese language course has drawn scantattention among college students, for many students lay their emphasis on English learning. Iam of opinion that Chinese language course should be set in the category of compulsorycourses in college curriculum.当我看到这个题目时，我想起了北京大学电子公告栏中的消息。
北京中国科学院大学考博英语作文范文【二篇】
北京中国科学院大学考博英语作文范文【二篇】【篇一】Directions: Write an essay no less than 200 words on the topic given below. Use the proper space on your Answer Sheet. IC: “To get success, you need friends; to get huge success, you need enemies.” Do you agree with this saying or not? Why or why not?【参考范文】To get success, you need friends; to get huge success, you need enemies. As for the above statement, I do not agree that we need friends to get success while do agree that we need enemies to get huge success. The following are the reasons. With the development of economy and society, the world we live is colorful and complicated. We can not achieve a success unless we cooperation, we also get aids and concern from every direction. Friendship, that is, is crucial for us to have a success. Friends can have a positive effect upon our development. Our friends encourage us, share our anxiety and provide us with help when we are in trouble. Friends may give us advice and suggest us what should be done and what not be done. However, if we wish to have a glorious achievement, in my personal sense, we do require enemies, my reasons for this topic are as follows. To begin with, our enemies reveal our fatal shortcomings, we can become stronger and more capable by giving up these flaws. What is more, the crises come from our enemies wake us keep the consciousnessof competition, we can do every efforts to complete what we ought to do. Last but not least, we can feel the stress from our opponents; the pressure probably is converted to the dynamic that give us sustainable power to enhance ourselves. To sum up, we need enemies to achieve our ambition, they supply us vigorous power to make our dream come true.译文：要成功，你需要朋友;要获得巨大的成功，你需要敌人。
中科院考博英语 培训资料(作文范文)车的利弊
中科院考博英语培训资料（作文范文）车的利弊Advantages and disadvantages of owning a private canSample 1With the fantastic spur both in industry and in economy in China, the number of people who own private cars is on the rise. Some people have bought cars of their own, and others are planning to buy cars. But there have been two quite different views on this phenomenon.Some claim that there are many advantages brought about by cars.To begin with, the automobile industry provides jobs for countless workers and strong support for other industries. Then, if conditions permit, owning a car can make us work more efficiently. Finally, life will become more convenient. A car allows one to move freely and with a car there is no need to wait for the bus in the cold or under the burning sun.However, others strongly object to the increase in developing private cars. They hold that automobiles will give rise to a series of problems.In the first place, as more and more cars are produced and run in the street, a large volume of poisonous gas will be given off, polluting theatmosphere and causing actual harm to the health of people. Next, private cars contribute to traffic congestion so greatly that the advantages gained in comfort and freedom is often cancelled out by the frustration caused by traffic jams. The last problem is the increasing number of car accidents that have killed a lot of people ina friction of a second.In my opinion, although automobiles have been playing a vital part in the daily activities of our society, they also bring us numerous troubles such as more serious environmental pollution, more traffic accidents and more energy consumption. They drink up huge amounts of fuel and throw out huge amounts of pollutants. Traffic accidents kill thousands and thousands of people each year.Therefore I am against developing private cars.Sample 2Advantages:1) Having a car of your own means no more traveling to work oncrowded buses or subway, and you can drop off the children at school on the way.2) It also means that you can enjoy the weekends and holidaysbetter, because with a car you can go to places where theregular buses and trains do not go, and so you can find a quiet scenic spot with no crowds.Disadvantages:1) The roads are becoming more and more crowded, often making the journey to work more of a nightmare than a dream. 2) It is not cheap to run a car, as the prices of gasoline and repairs are constantly rising, not to mention the price you have to pay for your car insurance.Conclusion:The advantages of owning a car outweigh the disadvantages.Therefore, it seems to me that China should increase its output of automobiles and enlarge the private car market. The result would be that cars would become cheaper, while at the same time the extra demand would encourage the auto industry to produce more efficient vehicles.。
中科院考博英语作文材料
Kobe Bryant can be a good case of how diligence works in our life. When asked by one of his friends that what is the secret of his success, he replied with humor and implication that，"Do you know how Los Angeles looks like at 4 o'clock AM ? I know." Obviously, how could he, one of the greatest basketball players throughout the history of mankind who was once deemed not appropriate for playing basketball, have achieved unprecedented success in NBA without diligence ?科比.布莱恩特是一个证明勤奋是如何起作用的很好的例子。
当被他的一个好朋友问到他成功的秘诀的时候，他幽默而又意义深远地回答到："你知道洛杉矶凌晨四点的样子吗？我知道。
"很明显，这位曾经被认为不太适合打篮球的、人类历史上最伟大的篮球运动员之一的科比，如果没有勤奋的话，怎么可能在美职篮获得史无前例的成功呢？Thomas Edison，one of the greatest inventors and entrepreneurs throughout the history of mankind, could be best case of how persistence works in the course of pursuing success. Just imagine, having experienced thousands of times of unsuccessful attempts, how could he have succeeded in inventing the first electric lamp and changed the world without persistence?人类历史上最伟大的发明家、企业家之一的爱迪生就是坚持如何在追求成功的过程中起作用的最好的例子。
中科院博士研究生英语精读教材翻译及原文整理解读
第1课知识的悖论The Paradox of KnowledgeThe greatest achievement of humankind in its long evolution from ancient hominoid ancestors to its present status is the acquisition and accumulation of a vast body of knowledge about itself, the world, and the universe. The products of this knowledge are all those things that, in the aggregate, we call "civilization," including language, science, literature, art, all the physical mechanisms, instruments, and structures we use, and the physical infrastructures on which society relies. Most of us assume that in modern society knowledge of all kinds is continually increasing and the aggregation of new information into the corpus of our social or collective knowledge is steadily reducing the area of ignorance about ourselves, the world, and the universe. But continuing reminders of the numerous areas of our present ignorance invite a critical analysis of this assumption.In the popular view, intellectual evolution is similar to, although much more rapid than, somatic evolution. Biological evolution is often described by the statement that "ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny"--meaning that the individual embryo, in its development from a fertilized ovum into a human baby, passes through successive stages in which it resembles ancestral forms of the human species. The popular view is that humankind has progressed from a state of innocent ignorance, comparable to that of an infant, and gradually has acquired more and more knowledge, much as a child learns in passing through the several grades of the educational system. Implicit in this view is an assumption that phylogeny resembles ontogeny, so that there will ultimately be a stage in which the accumulation of knowledge is essentially complete, at least in specific fields, as if society had graduated with all the advanced degrees that signify mastery of important subjects.Such views have, in fact, been expressed by some eminent scientists. In 1894 the great American physicist Albert Michelson said in a talk at the University of Chicago:While it is never safe to affirm that the future of Physical Science has no marvels in store even more astonishing than those of the past, it seems probable that most of the grand underlying principles have been firmly established and that further advances are to be sought chiefly in the rigorous application of these principles to all the phenomena which come under our notice .... The future truths of Physical Science ate to be looked for in the sixth place of decimals.In the century since Michelson's talk, scientists have discovered much more than the refinement of measurements in the sixth decimal place, and none is willing to make a similar statement today. However, many still cling to the notion that such a state of knowledge remains a possibility to be attained sooner or later. Stephen Hawking, thegreat English scientist, in his immensely popular book A Brief History of Time (1988), concludes with the speculation that we may "discover a complete theory" that "would be the ultimate triumph of human reason--for then we would know the mind of God." Paul Davies, an Australian physicist, echoes that view by suggesting that the human mind may be able to grasp some of the secrets encompassed by the title of his book The Mind of God (1992). Other contemporary scientists write of "theories of everything," meaning theories that explain all observable physical phenomena, and Nobel Laureate Steven Weinberg, one of the founders of the current standard model of physical theory, writes of his Dreams of a Final Theory (1992).Despite the eminence and obvious yearning of these and many other contemporary scientists, there is nothing in the history of science to suggest that any addition of data or theories to the body of scientific knowledge will ever provide answers to all questions in any field. On the contrary, the history of science indicates that increasing knowledge brings awareness of new areas of ignorance and of new questions to be answered.Astronomy is the most ancient of the sciences, and its development is a model of other fields of knowledge. People have been observing the stars and other celestial bodies since the dawn of recorded history. As early as 3000 B.C. the Babylonians recognized a number of the constellations. In the sixth century B.C., Pythagoras proposed the notion of a spherical Earth and of a universe with objects in it chat moved in accordance with natural laws. Later Greek philosophers taught that the sky was a hollow globe surrounding the Earth, that it was supported on an axis running through the Earth, and chat stars were inlaid on its inner surface, which rotated westward daily. In the second century A.D., Ptolemy propounded a theory of a geocentric (Earth-centered) universe in which the sun, planets, and stars moved in circular orbits of cycles and epicycles around the Earth, although the Earth was not at the precise center of these orbits. While somewhat awkward, the Ptolemaic system could produce reasonably reliable predictions of planetary positions, which were, however, good for only a few years and which developed substantial discrepancies from actual observations over a long period of time. Nevertheless, since there was no evidence then apparent to astronomers that the Earth itself moves, the Ptolemaic system remained unchallenged for more than 13 centuries.In the sixteenth century Nocolaus Copernicus, who is said to have mastered all the knowledge of his day in mathematics, astronomy, medicine, and theology, became dissatisfied with the Ptolemaic system. He found that a heliocentric system was both mathematically possible and aesthetically more pleasing, and wrote a full exposition of his hypothesis, which was not published until 1543, shortly after his death. Early inthe seventeenth century, Johannes Kepler became imperial mathematician of the Holy Roman Empire upon the death of Tycho Brahe, and he acquired a collection of meticulous naked-eye observations of the positions of celestial bodies chat had been made by Brahe. On the basis of these data, Kepler calculated that both Ptolemy and Copernicus were in error in assuming chat planets traveled in circular orbits, and in 1609 he published a book demonstrating mathematically chat the planets travel around the sun in elliptical orbits. Kepler's laws of planetary motion are still regarded as basically valid.In the first decade of the seventeenth century Galileo Galilei learned of the invention of the telescope and began to build such instruments, becoming the first person to use a telescope for astronomical observations, and thus discovering craters on the moon, phases of Venus, and the satellites of Jupiter. His observations convinced him of the validity of the Copernican system and resulted in the well-known conflict between Galileo and church authorities. In January 1642 Galileo died, and in December of chat year Isaac Newton was born. Modern science derives largely from the work of these two men.Newton's contributions to science are numerous. He laid the foundations for modem physical optics, formulated the basic laws of motion and the law of universal gravitation, and devised the infinitesimal calculus. Newton's laws of motion and gravitation are still used for calculations of such matters as trajectories of spacecraft and satellites and orbits of planets. In 1846, relying on such calculations as a guide to observation, astronomers discovered the planet Neptune.While calculations based on Newton's laws are accurate, they are dismayingly complex when three or more bodies are involved. In 1915, Einstein announced his theory of general relativity, which led to a set of differential equations for planetary orbits identical to those based on Newtonian calculations, except for those relating to the planet Mercury. The elliptical orbit of Mercury rotates through the years, but so slowly that the change of position is less than one minute of arc each century. The equations of general relativity precisely accounted for this precession; Newtonian equations did not.Einstein's equations also explained the red shift in the light from distant stars and the deflection of starlight as it passed near the sun. However, Einstein assumed chat the universe was static, and, in order to permit a meaningful solution to the equations of relativity, in 1917 he added another term, called a "cosmological constant," to the equations. Although the existence and significance of a cosmological constant is still being debated, Einstein later declared chat this was a major mistake, as Edwin Hubble established in the 1920s chat the universe is expanding and galaxies are receding fromone another at a speed proportionate to their distance.Another important development in astronomy grew out of Newton's experimentation in optics, beginning with his demonstration chat sunlight could be broken up by a prism into a spectrum of different colors, which led to the science of spectroscopy. In the twentieth century, spectroscopy was applied to astronomy to gun information about the chemical and physical condition of celestial bodies chat was not disclosed by visual observation. In the 1920s, precise photographic photometry was introduced to astronomy and quantitative spectrochemical analysis became common. Also during the 1920s, scientists like Heisenberg, de Broglie, Schrodinger, and Dirac developed quantum mechanics, a branch of physics dealing with subatomic particles of matter and quanta of energy. Astronomers began to recognize that the properties of celestial bodies, including planets, could be well understood only in terms of physics, and the field began to be referred to as "astrophysics."These developments created an explosive expansion in our knowledge of astronomy. During the first five thousand years or more of observing the heavens, observation was confined to the narrow band of visible light. In the last half of this century astronomical observations have been made across the spectrum of electromagnetic radiation, including radio waves, infrared, ultraviolet, X-rays, and gamma rays, and from satellites beyond the atmosphere. It is no exaggeration to say chat since the end of World War II more astronomical data have been gathered than during all of the thousands of years of preceding human history.However, despite all improvements in instrumentation, increasing sophistication of analysis and calculation augmented by the massive power of computers, and the huge aggregation of data, or knowledge, we still cannot predict future movements of planets and other elements of even the solar system with a high degree of certainty. Ivars Peterson, a highly trained science writer and an editor of Science News, writes in his book Newton's Clock (1993) that a surprisingly subtle chaos pervades the solar system. He states:In one way or another the problem of the solar system's stability has fascinated and tormented asrtonomers and mathematicians for more than 200 years. Somewhat to the embarrassment of contemporary experts, it remains one of the most perplexing, unsolved issues in celestial mechanics. Each step toward resolving this and related questions has only exposed additional uncertainties and even deeper mysteries.Similar problems pervade astronomy. The two major theories of cosmology, general relativity and quantum mechanics, cannot be stated in the same mathematical language, and thus are inconsistent with one another, as the Ptolemaic and Copernicantheories were in the sixteenth century, although both contemporary theories continue to be used, but for different calculations. Oxford mathematician Roger Penrose, in The Emperors New Mind (1989), contends that this inconsistency requires a change in quantum theory to provide a new theory he calls "correct quantum gravity."Furthermore, the observations astronomers make with new technologies disclose a total mass in the universe that is less than about 10 percent of the total mass that mathematical calculations require the universe to contain on the basis of its observed rate of expansion. If the universe contains no more mass than we have been able to observe directly, then according to all current theories it should have expanded in the past, and be expanding now, much more rapidly than the rate actually observed. It is therefore believed that 90 percent or more of the mass in the universe is some sort of "dark matter" that has not yet been observed and the nature of which is unknown. Current theories favor either WIMPs (weakly interacting massive particles) or MACHOs (massive compact halo objects). Other similar mysteries abound and increase in number as our ability to observe improves.The progress of biological and life sciences has been similar to that of the physical sciences, except that it has occurred several centuries later. The theory of biological evolution first came to the attention of scientists with the publication of Darwin's Origin of Species in 1859. But Darwin lacked any explanation of the causes of variation and inheritance of characteristics. These were provided by Gregor Mendel, who laid the mathematical foundation of genetics with the publication of papers in 1865 and 1866.Medicine, according to Lewis Thomas, is the youngest science, having become truly scientific only in the 1930s. Recent and ongoing research has created uncertainty about even such basic concepts as when and how life begins and when death occurs, and we are spending billions in an attempt to learn how much it may be possible to know about human genetics. Modern medicine has demonstrably improved both our life expectancies and our health, and further improvements continue to be made as research progresses. But new questions arise even more rapidly than our research resources grow, as the host of problems related to the Human Genome Project illustrates.From even such an abbreviated and incomplete survey of science as this, it appears that increasing knowledge does not result in a commensurate decrease in ignorance, but, on the contrary, exposes new lacunae in our comprehension and confronts us with unforeseen questions disclosing areas of ignorance of which we were not previously aware.Thus the concept of science as an expanding body of knowledge that will eventually encompass or dispel all significant areas of ignorance is an illusion. Scientists and philosophers are now observing that it is naive to regard science as a process that begins with observations that are organized into theories and are then subsequently tested by experiments. The late Karl Popper, a leading philosopher of science, wrote in The Growth of Scientific Knowledge (1960) chat science starts from problems, not from observations, and chat every worthwhile new theory raises new problems. Thus there is no danger that science will come to an end because it has completed its task, clanks to the "infinity of our ignorance."At least since Thomas Kuhn published The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962), it has been generally recognized that observations are the result of theories (called paradigms by Kuhn and other philosophers), for without theories of relevance and irrelevance there would be no basis for determining what observations to make. Since no one can know everything, to be fully informed on any subject (a claim sometimes made by those in authority) is simply to reach a judgment that additional data are not important enough to be worth the trouble of securing or considering.To carry the analysis another step, it must be recognized that theories are the result of questions and questions are the product of perceived ignorance. Thus it is chat ignorance gives rise to inquiry chat produces knowledge, which, in turn, discloses new areas of ignorance. This is the paradox of knowledge: As knowledge increases so does ignorance, and ignorance may increase more than its related knowledge.My own metaphor to illustrate the relationship of knowledge and ignorance is based on a line from Matthew Arnold: "For we are here as on a darkling plain...." The dark chat surrounds us, chat, indeed, envelops our world, is ignorance. Knowledge is the illumination shed by whatever candles (or more technologically advanced light sources) we can provide. As we light more and more figurative candles, the area of illumination enlarges; but the area beyond illumination increases geometrically. We know chat there is much we don't know; but we cannot know how much there is chat we don't know. Thus knowledge is finite, but ignorance is infinite, and the finite cannot ever encompass the infinite.This is a revised version of an article originally published in COSMOS 1994. Copyright 1995 by Lee Loevinger.Lee Loevinger is a Washington lawyer and former assistant attorney general of the United States who writes frequently for scientific c publications. He has participated for many years as a member, co-chair, or liaison with the National Conference of Lawyers and Scientists, and he is a founder and former chair of the Science andTechnology Section of the American Bar Association. Office address: Hogan and Hartson, 555 Thirteenth St. NW, Washington, DC 20004.人类从古类人猿进化到当前的状态这个长久的进化过程中的最大成就是有关于人类自身、世界以及宇宙众多知识的获得和积聚。
中科院考博英文作文范文
中科院考博英文作文范文I have always been fascinated by the mysteries of the universe and the endless possibilities of scientific exploration. This curiosity and passion for knowledge have been the driving force behind my decision to pursue a Ph.D. at the Chinese Academy of Sciences.Growing up, I was constantly surrounded by books and documentaries about space, physics, and biology. I remember spending countless hours pondering the nature of black holes, the origins of life, and the potential for extraterrestrial life. These early experiences ignited a spark within me and instilled a deep-seated desire to unravel the secrets of the cosmos.Throughout my academic journey, I have been fortunate to work alongside brilliant minds who have challenged and inspired me. From conducting research on quantum mechanics to delving into the complexities of molecular biology, each experience has broadened my perspective and deepened myappreciation for the intricacies of the natural world.As I embark on this new chapter of my academic career,I am eager to contribute to the collective body ofscientific knowledge and make meaningful contributions tomy field. I am driven by a relentless pursuit of truth anda steadfast commitment to pushing the boundaries of human understanding.The prospect of conducting groundbreaking research and collaborating with esteemed scholars at the Chinese Academy of Sciences fills me with a sense of excitement and purpose.I am eager to immerse myself in a vibrant intellectual community and engage in thought-provoking discussions that challenge my preconceptions and expand my horizons.In conclusion, my decision to pursue a Ph.D. at the Chinese Academy of Sciences is driven by a deep-seated passion for scientific inquiry and a relentless pursuit of knowledge. I am eager to embark on this transformative journey and contribute to the rich legacy of discovery andinnovation at one of the world's premier research institutions.。
中科院考博英语 培训资料(作文范文) 读书的利弊
中科院考博英语培训资料（作文范文）读书的利弊Topic 1As reading is important for a good education, we should encourage our children to read whatever appeals to them.Thesis: Reading books can strongly mature your thoughts, widen you horizon and enrich your personality. The more books we read, the more knowledge we get. Hence, we should encourage our children to read more books.Good books teach and help children to do good things. Good books are children's real companions, and they are both instructive and inspiring. Children know past events from history books, study communication by language book, learn space and numbers through mathematics books. In a word, different kinds of good books can give them a large amount of ideas and knowledge.On the other hand bad books contain evil thoughts. Some books are harmful, particularly the pornographic books. In them, there might be much description about violence and sex. Let's suppose that you are in the position of a parent. Would you allow your children to read whatever appeals to them? If children read bad books, the evil thoughts would poison their mind gradually. They will be dispiritedand perhaps commit a crime.。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
中科院博士研究生英语写作分析及范文1999.32000.32001.32002.32002.102003.32003.102004.32005.3题目解析：“如何减少交通事故?”这道作文题目简洁明了，比较容易把握。
正确地理解本题最重要的是抓住题眼，也就是“如何”这个词。
本题十分明确地要求考生专门讨论解决某一现象或问题的具体措施，而有的考生没能紧紧围绕解决办法多着笔墨，而去分析交通事故这个问题背后的根源，显然无法取得理想的成绩。
范文：With the rapid development of society, more and more people in China can afford to buy a car.As a consequence, traffic accidents gradually become a serious problem and bring great inconveniences to people. In my opinion, this problem can be solved from three aspects.Firstly, our government should take drastic measures and enforce a series of effective traffic rules, which must be well acknowledged and understood by every person. Those who do not obey the rules will be punished according to the actual situation.Secondly, the Ministry of Communications should make every effort to better the poor traffic environment. We need traffic police to be responsible for their job. If our policemen can be committed to what they are doing, the traffic condition will surely be improved.Thirdly, every member of the society should realize the seriousness of traffic accidents, which not only bring mischief to the drivers themselves, but also lead their families into bitterness. As drivers, they should not drink alcohol before driving. As walkers, they should not cross the street when red light is still on.In a word, it is the task of the whole society to solve the traffic accidents. I believe the traffic accidents will be reduced through the endeavor of everyone, and our society will have a nice traffic order and environment. (220 words)2006.3题目解析：本题首先列出了一个现实生活中的现象：中国虽然拥有世界上最多的人口和大量的研究工作者，却至今没能培养出一名诺贝尔奖获得者。
针对这一现象，题目的要求是十分具体的，就是去分析这种现象背后的根源。
换句话说，对原因的挖掘是本题的重点。
范文：Nobel Prize, an international award given for achievements in various academic fields, has been a great honor to people from different countries. However, China, with the greatest population and a large number of research workers, has not produced a single Nobel Prize winner so far. In my opinion,various contributing factors can be identified as follows.First of all, though the educational system in China has fostered many researchers, it somehow hinders individuals’ creativity. Children are usually not valued by their unique way of thinking, but are encouraged to be obedient. Especially in the traditional cramming method of teaching, schools lay particular stress on memorization at the expense of comprehension, which has a very bad influence on students’ ability to solve difficult problems.Furthermore, for a long period in Chinese history, China had been isolated from the outside world. In ancient times, we were self-contained for self-pride, believing that China was at the center of the whole universe. In modem times, we were self-fettered for self-protection, afraid of the invasion of other countries. As a consequence, China has lagged behind in many fields including science development. Researchers in China have little idea about the research interests of their own areas. At the same time, discoveries by Chinese researchers cannot be made known to foreign countries. For instance, the clone technology was first explored by scientists from Chinese Academy of Sciences decades ago, but their research did not arouse international concern simply due to lack of communication.Fortunately, the situation mentioned above has been changing. Our educational system has improved a great deal and more and more opportunities to communicate with the external world have been offered. Therefore, I am sure that in the near future China will have one or moreNobel Prize winners. (298 words)中科院考博英语理念真题翻译解析2002.102003.32003.102004.32005.32005.10Translation1. 这里一是指在多大程度上我们是可以主宰自己的命运的；与之相对的是：在多大程度上我们受制于无法控制的外力。
2. 那种征服广袤无垠的荒野的开拓者精神也许与人们普遍很有信心能够选择和改变自己命运有关系。
3. 所期待、所强调的是行动、效率和成就。
自由意志具有法律的地位并受到司法保护。
4. 他们的这种宿命思想表现在他们面对失败或事故所做出的反应，此时，他们往往会说“没办法！”或“真倒霉！”，言外之意，这种不幸是命里注定的。
5. 第二种人则认为，一切事物应随其自然；如果他们看到的不是这样，他们就会下这样的结论，即：第一种人没有尊崇自然法则，那种对能做到什么或改变什么的想法是狂妄，是强求，或者是对自然秩序的不敬。
2006.3解析：虽然贫富差距不是一个新鲜话题，贫富差距日益加大却是进入21世纪以来的一个重要话题。
贫富差距所产生的影响是多方面的，原因也很复杂，但是只要共同发展还是人类的美好愿望，行之有效地解决这个问题还是指日可待的。
1)译文：全球财富中，世界上绝大多数人所能获得的份额在日益减少，而少数几个富人和富国所获得的份额却在稳步增长。
分析：本句话的重点和难点在于对两处语言点collective wealth和claimed的理解上。
考生易于把collective wealth译成“集体财富”，虽然从字面上来说是正确的，但是在这个语境中，译成“全球财富”更准确。
而claim一词最常用的含义是“声称”，但是在该句中，claim的含义为to demand or ask for as on e’s own，即“要求或寻求…归为己有”。
2)译文：贫富差异日益加大所带来的影响包括对环境的破坏：富人和富国因财力充足而过度地消费资源；穷人和穷国为求生存而不得不过度地挖掘和掠夺环境。
分析：本句结构简单，因此考生一般不会在结构分析上触礁，况且该句也没有有难度的单词，唯一影响该句翻译质量的因素就是中文表达的准确性。