HND商法导论

合集下载

HND商法导论outcome1(仅供参考)

HND商法导论outcome1(仅供参考)

1.刑法和民法的定义。

Civil Law and Criminal Law ★Criminal Law is stipulated which behaviors are commit a crime, and what punish Proper suitable for the criminals. The punishment includes imprisonment and fine and so on.Civil Law is concerned with non-criminal disputes and situations, including:The dispose of legal disputes between personal and other bodies or organizationThe payment of compensation form one party to another for loss or injuryThe setting of process to manage financial and other matters2.举出6个民事纠纷例子☆ civil dispute caseLand disputes 土地纠纷Winding up of a corporate body 公司解体纠纷Personal injury claims 人身伤害纠纷Succession disputes 遗嘱纠纷Contractual disputes 合同关系纠纷Debt recovery actions 债务清偿纠纷3.犯罪的定义。

☆ What is a crime?Crime is Social ideology identify with that is Crime is antisocial, because it is antisocial, so threatens or undermines the security of society. Criminal behavior should be punished by the State by the imposition of a prison sentence and /or fine or other sanction on the man who is convicted of guiltExamples of criminal conduct include murder, Hi jack, kidnap, fire-raising, theft and fraud4.民法和刑法的区别。

HND商法导论Outcome2 案例+答案

HND商法导论Outcome2 案例+答案

Case study 1Samir sees a set of golf clubs displayed in a shop window for £500. He enters the shop and states he will take the clubs. The shopkeeper however says the clubs are no longer for sale. Samir is demanding that he be sold the clubs and at the price displayed.Identify the essential requirements of a contract and discuss whether a contract exists here.A contract is an agreement between parties having the capacity to make it, in the form demanded by the law, to perform, on one side or both, acts which are not trifling, indeterminate, impossible or illegal, creating an obligation enforceable in a court of law. A valid contract has three essential features: there must be a agreement on all material aspects; at least two contracting parties and legal obligations.A contract consists of an offer and an acceptance. If there is no offer in the first place then there can be no contract. The basic elements of a contract include an offer and an acceptance.In the case Samir sees a set of golf clubs displayed in a shop window for £500. He enters the shop and states he will take the clubs. But shopkeeper says the clubs are no longer for sale. Samir is demanding that he be sold the clubs and at the price displayed.According to this case we can say that these is not exist a contract. In the case that a set of golf clubs are exhibited in a shop window, thus it is not an offer. Because the goods displayed in a shop window as a invitation to treat, we can know that goods displayed in a shop window (even when priced) are classed as a willingness to negotiate on the shops part. Invitations to treat also is considered to inquiry the price of goods, means a party to invite the other person to make offers. Different an offer, a willingness to negotiate only as prepared to make a contract of behavior on the issue who is not legally binding. The customer will make the offer to buy the goods which the shop are perfectly within their rights to refuse. The invitations to treat are not legally classed as offers and therefore cannot be accepted.Before the party who gave off the invitations to treat could not accept the other people’s offers they can revocation, and then the contract is not build. When Samir asked to buy the golf clubs the shopkeeper refused hin, and there was no acceptance. So when the shopkeeper refused Samir which is a set of golf clubs are not the good for sale, it just be used as ornament, and attracted the consumers interested. So an offer in this case is not found, either nor acceptance.A contract consists of an offer and an acceptance, we can know that there is on offer and there is on contract.Case study 2Tom is the top salesman for ABC Motors. He has been offered a job by a rivalcompany but is concerned because there is a clause in his contract which prevents him from working for any other car company for five years.Tom is the top salesman because he regularly tells potential customers what they like to hear rather than the facts. He has done this in relation to ages of vehicles, odometer readings and vehicle service histories.Tom recently completed a deal to buy a vintage sports car for ABC Motors from Barry.ABC now discover that Barry (not his real name) had stolen the vehicle. Question 1What is a restrictive covenant? Advise Tom as to the legality of the clause in his contract.You can refer to Bluebell Apparel Ltd v Dickinson (1980) on page 146Question 2How would you classify Tom’s statements to the customers and what are the possible consequences for Tom and ABC motors in relation to these statements?You can refer to Smith v Sim(1954) on page 161Question 3What is the legal position with regard to the vehicle which Tom has purchased from Barry?You can refer to Morrison v Robertson(1908) on page 1531 Restrictive covenant is a agreement which restrict the party liberty to work and trade. Such contracts are VOID unless the restriction can be shown to be reasonable to both parties involved and to the general public. There are three types of restrictive covenants: contracts between employer and employee, contracts between sellers and purchaser of a business and ‘solus’agreements. For all three types, the party attempting to enforce the agreement must prove that it is reasonable to both parties concerned and to the general public. If they are unable to do this then the contract will be considered void and unenforceable. (from the text bookP142-142) This contract are legality, and the restriction was fair in this contract. Because the relationship of Tom and ABC motor is employer and employee, when enter employment and employee may agree to some restriction being placed on his future employment or trade. Later the employee may feel the restriction is unfair and therefore he may break it. In such circumstances it would be up to the employer take him to court and seek an ‘interdict’ forbidding the employee to break the agreement. They will consider the factor the nature of the job the employee was doing(from the text book P142). If Tom worked for any other company within the validity period of the contract that he would be in a position to harm his ex employers.2 The 4 main causes of error are: innocent misrepresentation, fraudulent misrepresentation, negligent misrepresentation and concealment of facts. And Tom’s statements to customers classify fraudulent misrepresentation,A false and material statement which induces a party to enter into a contract this is misrepresentation. Because he regularly tells potential customers what they like to hear rather than the facts and him without caring whether it is true or false. Fraudulent misrepresentation can lead a contract being made void if it involved these points,first is fraudulent misrepresentation causes error in the substantials. Second is the other party relied on the misrepresentation and it was a major influence on them entering the contract, third is the other party can offer restitutio in integrum. So the contracts between Tom and customers is void, he relied on the misrepresentation and it was a major influence on them entering the contract, thus customers can acquire compensation. Or cancel the contract or both of them.3 Tom brought a car from Barry,but Tom discovered that Barry had stolen the vehicle. And in this contract has a error which made the contract void, the Barry stolen the car but Tom did not know before him brought, so he can not get the car’s ownership. An error concerning the identity of the parties. Barry stolen the car so he haven’t ownership of this car and sold car, therefore, he can not give ownership to Tom, and Tom does not get the car’ ownership actually. And in this case Tom can only lodge a claim to Barry.Case study 3Martina recently attended an auction for the first time. She was very keen(渴望的) on a particular painting and when the bidding commenced(开始)she got so carried away that she bid much more than she intended. Martina won the auction but with fees(费用)and commissions(佣金)added on to the price, she cannot pay the full amount for the painting.Question 1What do you understand by the term ‘breach of contract’? Give two examples. Question 2List the main remedies available for breach of contract.Question 3What is the most appropriate remedy for the auctioneer(拍卖商)in this case?1、Where one party fails to fulfil his or her legal obligation under a contract.(from the text book P183)example1Tony and Jane have a contract where Tony will pay June $100 for her car and delivery. Tony pays the $100 but Jane fails to delivery.(from the text book P197)In this case study there has been a Breach of Contract by Jane as she has failed to delivery the car.Example2Shirley and Oliva have a contract where Shirley brought a cake from Oliva for her friend and asked Oliva sent the cake to her friend on 12th December 2012 , but on that day her friend did not receive the cake.In this case study there has been a breach od contract by Oliva as she failed to sent the cake.2、If there is a breach of contract then the innocent party will have the right to seek a remedy for the breach.(from the text book P184)Damages as a remedy for breach of contract. The object of awarding damages to someone is to place them in the position they would have been in had the contract been completed.So damages are really awarded as compensation- if the party has actually lost money as a result of the breach then he will be awarded ‘substantial’ or ‘compensatory’ damages.In some cases no actually loss may have been incurred as a result of the breach. If is still possible that damages may be awarded for trouble and inconvenience-these are know as ‘nominal’damages.(from the text book P185)Specific implement as a remedy for breach of contractSpecific implement is to stop someone for acting in breach of contract. So specific implement may be positive---forcing someone who has been in breach to fulfil their obligations or negative ---forcing someone who has been in breach to stop doing something. (from the text book P191-192)Rescission as remedy for breach of contract.Rescission means cancellation . With this remedy, the innocent party has the right to rescind(cancel) the contract if the other party has been guilty of a material breach of contract.The main factor to be considered is what is meant by a material of contract. If the breach is not material but only partial then the right of rescission does not exist.Many contracts contains a number of conditions, some of which are more important than others. If the contract specifically states that some are material then breach of these will mean that rescission can be taken as a remedy.(from the text book P193-194)The Defensive Remedies for breach od contractThere are two defensive remedies that can be taken by the party who is not in breach.①Lien:If a person has possession(占有) of an article(物品) on which he has been employed to do work then he can refuse to return the article to its owner until payment is made for the work done. Example of situations where lien could be used as a remedy for breach of contract include:②Retention:This is the right to refuse to pay a debt which is due(到期的).Retention can only be used under the following two circumstances:ⅰwhere compensation can be pleaded.(债权确定、到期)ⅱwhere both claims arise under the same contract.P195-197What is the most appropriate remedy for the auctioneer(拍卖商)in this case?3、in this case the defensive remedies in the most appropriate method for the auctioneer. The defensive remedies include lien and retention, the auctioneer should take lien measure. If a person has possession of an article on which he has been employed to do work then he can refuse to return the article to its owner until payment is made for the work done.As a result of Martina won the auction but with fees and commissions added on to the price, she cannot pay the full amount for the painting, the auctioneer can keep the painting until Martina paid off the rest of money.。

HND大二商法导论复习提纲

HND大二商法导论复习提纲
议会法常常被称为statute law, 在苏格兰议会出现之前,英国议 会单独制定适用于苏格兰的法律。不过英国议会授予了苏格兰 议会在不同的法律领域制定法律的权力。
Acts of parliament
1. The Licensing (Scotland) Act 1975 2. The Divorce (Scotland) Act 1976 3. Abolition of Poindings and Warrant Sales Act 2001 4. Dog Fouling (Scotland) Act 2003 5. The Health and Satefy at Work Act 1974 6. Sale of Goods Act 1979 7. Employment Rights Act 1996 8. Protection of Children (Scotland) Act 2003
苏格兰议会制定在苏格兰实施的法律的权力来源于英国议会。 所有由苏格兰议会通过的法律都被认为是二级法律而不是主 体法例。此外应指出的是英国议会制定一个简单的条例就可 以将废除苏格兰议会。
What is a statute?
Acts of Parliament are often referred to as statute law. Until the creation of the Scottish Parliament, the Westminster Parliament alone made laws for Scotland. However, Westminster Parliament has given the scottish parliament authority in many different areas of policy to make statute law.

HND商法导论outcome3PPT课件

HND商法导论outcome3PPT课件

any act, carrying on in the usual way, bind
-
10
the firm and their partners.
Advantages :
❖ greater continuity than sole trader ❖ more possible capital contributors than
❖ There are no formal legal requirements for setting up a partnership.
❖ All partners have an equal say in the
running of the business and in decision
making. The acts of every partner who does
❖ To set up as a sole traders does not require any formalities(手续)- .They need not mak5e any business information public.
❖ 有限责任是与无限责任相对而言的,二者 是投资者对其投资企业的债务承担责任的 形式。
❖ If the business fails, the sole trader is said to have unlimited liability for all debts .
❖ Owner to find all capital
❖ Difficulty to expand because of unlimited liability.
❖ Lack of continuity
❖ Pressure from larger units.

hnd商法导论outcome3

hnd商法导论outcome3

Case Study 1◆Questions:1. List the main business organizations recognized by Scots Law.2. Given the fact that Lisa will be running the business herself and, for the time being, she is unlikely to be employing anyone, how would you classify her b usiness?3. Identify two advantages and two disadvantages of the type of business organization run by Lisa.◆KeyQuestion 1The main business organizations recognized by Scots Law are:Sole trader, Partnership, Limited partnerships, Limited liability partnerships, Private companies, Public companies.Question 2①Lisa is running a very small business, so the most appropriate form oforganization is sole trader.②According to the Companies Regulation 1992, Lisa’s organization form does notfit for the condition of private company; such a private company is limited by shares or by guarantee and need only have on member.③As a result, we can judge that the organization form of Lisa’s company is soletrader.Question 3Advantages:①very basic legal requirements to comply with②Total control over his/her business and does not have to take into account the opinions of any shareholders.③It is the simplest form of business organization recognized by Scots Law④ A sole trader is to all intents and purposes to be regarded as a self-employed person.Disadvantages:① A sole trader may find it difficult to fund an expansion of the business because she/he can not offer shares to other parties in order to raise funds.(筹集资金)②If the business fail, the sole trader is said to have unlimited liability for any debts or obligations owed to third parties.③The inclusion of new partners would force a change in the nature of business, operation by converting it into a partnership or some other form of corporate body.④(in any case), A business expansion requiring a major injection of capital might entail a loss of control over the business because new members who are a source of new finance will almost certainly demand a say in the running of the business.以上优、缺点各选两个答即可Case Study 2Question 1What are the main differences between a traditional partnership and a limited liability partnership (LLP)?PartnershipUnincorporated bodyPartners have unlimited liability in respect of partnership debtsNo need to be registered with registrar of companies and no need to supply formal documentsRegulated by Partnership Act 1890LLPCorporate bodyMembers enjoy limited liability in respect of LLP debtsMust be registered with the registrar of companies and certain documents must be suppliedRegulated by LLP Act 2000Question 2◆What are the main advantages for an existing partnership when it changes to alimited liability partnership?①The reason why many traditional partnerships try to translate to LLP is that the members can enjoy the limited responsibilities.②Further more, under the conditions of losing of privacy and greatering external regulation for the members, lots of traditional partnerships definitely hope to translate to LLP.(because of LLP…)Question 3◆What is the nature of the legal relationship between partners in firm and membersof a LLP?①There exist a fiduciary relationship in law relationship between company and partners.②举例说明公司与成员之间的忠实关系Pillans Brothers v Pillans [1908]③According to Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2000, section 6 regulations, there should be recognized to an agent’s relationship between members and LLP.④The general rule of the law agency that an agent (member) must always act in the best interest of his principal (LLP).⑤ A member is not an agent of his fellow members.Case Study 3Question 1◆What is a company’s objects clause?①Object clause 是存在于Memorandum of Association 之中的。

hnd商法导论outcome2

hnd商法导论outcome2

商法导论outcome21.s看见橱窗展示了一套高尔夫球具,他走进店要求购买该球具,店主不卖,a坚持要以展示的价格来买。

问:合同要素是什么,该案中合同存在吗?A valid contract has three essential features.Firstly,the parties must agree on the terms of the contract. For all aspects of the content of contract,the parties reach a consensus through consultation. Sencondly, the conclusion of the contract shall be attended by at least two parties, only one of the parties does not exist the problem of conclusion of the contract.Thirdly,observation of law. In concluding and performing a contract,the parties shall observe tha law and administrative regulations, respect social ethics and they disrupt public and economic order or impair public interests.In case,the contract is not established.Because the essential of contract is not incomplete. The display window demonstration is an important contract invitation merely,the n the customer could be able to walk in and demand the goods.F or example,Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots The Chemists(1952). A sales of a listed poisons must have a registered pharmacist to supervision. If the goods on the shelf is an offer,then the goods in the basket is completed by sales and this behavior is illegal. The judgment of the court is not breaking. The goods on the shelfis an invitation to offer but not an offer.2.t是汽车公司的销售员,竞争公司挖墙角,要他跳槽,但是雇佣合同中有一个条款禁止他为其他任何汽车公司工作在离职后的五年内。

HND商法导论outcome3

Case 11The main business organization recognized by scot law are: sole trader, partnership, p rivate limited company, public limited company.2Lisa do a small business so only have herself. So it is sole trader. Sole trader is someone who manages by herself and owns the business. The can take all benefits but also need face all the losses. Indeed, if the sole trader becomes insolvent his personal assets can be used to satisfy her creditors e.g. house, car etc. she is personally liable for all business debts i.e. they have unlimited liability.To set up as a sole trader does not require any formalities. They need not make any business information public.3Advantages:Sole trader is independence for ownerSole trader is Personal contact between business and customers Disadvantages:Sole trader is unlimited liabilitySole trader’s scale is difficult to expand because of limited capitalCase 21The piece of legislation which governs partnerships is the partnership Act 1890. the limited liability partnership Act 2000.Partnership have unlimited liability in respect partnership debts.Limited liability partnership members enjoy limited in respect of limited liability partnership debts traditional partnership is unincorporated body, Limited liability partnership is corporate body2The interests of limited liability is that person do not have to repay company debt.3Trust relationship. pillan brother V pillans. The court held that made in this business he had to account to the partnership for the profits.Case 31Objects of the company is outlining what type of work the company will be participat e in and can lawfully do. If it needed, staffs can change the objects clause after format ion by special resolution. The company terms should have reason, otherwise the comp any activities is invalid。

HND-商法导论 Outcome1答案

1.Sources of Scots Law are Statute Law, European Union Law, and Common Law2.the licensing (scotland)act 1975sale of goods act 1979employment rights act 1996the human rights act 1998dog fouling (scotland) act 20033.family law disputesland disputesemployment law disputes parliament is the superior legislative body .after theact of union in 1707, the new scttish parliament is not completely independent parliament is primary.5.a crme is behavior which is harmful to society.it will be punished.for example, murder, rape,theft,fraud,assault belong to crimes.6.it exists a conflict between scots and eu law ,the scottishcourts would have to obey the eu's legal system. eu is a club which has 27 member of the states.britain is a member of the club.so the britian must do its responesibility,and give up their own law.if the britain desided to quit the club ,the laws of the britain follow the domestic law .7.speaking exactly the council of ministers,with the advice of european parliament .cm and ep have the law-making powers.the european court of justice implement eu law .the eu commission can propose laws effectively.8.act of parliament are often considered as legislation . the statute is made uk parliament and the scottish parliament.9. A.Judicial Precedent is a process involves a process wherebya judge can develop a rule of law by making a decision in a test case. A test case refers to the one in which clarification of an important point of law is sought, and judges after listening to opposite legal arguments will have to make the decision about which view of the law is correct.B.Once this decision has been made, future judges and course will be expected to follow the reasoning in the test case,if they are dealing with a case with similar legal issues.C.It not every judge can make a new binding legal rule. The authority of the judge or court should be considered here, if the judge is relatively junior, he/she will be unlikely to be able to create a new rule of law. But on the other hand, if the rule comes from superior courts, this decision will be followed by the lower or inferior courts.D.Judicial precedent or case law is parts of the unwritten law of Scotland.E.Donoghue v Stevneson (1932)10. Criminal law is deals with all types of offences and crimes, concerns itself with the recognition of what amounts to a crime and the punishments suitable for these recognized crimes.Criminal conduct is the behavior which threatens the safety and security of the community. So the offender should be punished by imprisonment or fine or some other sanctions.Examples: murder, piracy, fire raising, assault, fraud, theftCivil law is concerned with non-criminal disputes and situation.The settlement of legal disputes between individuals and otherbodiesThe payment of compensation from one party to another for loss or injuryThe setting of procedures to govern financial and other matters. example divorce case.。

HND 商法导论outcome 2每题用的Case(自己总结的。)

Cases will be used for each question, including the fact and judgment of each case as well as the content from the textbook. This is just the case law party of the answers. Not the comprehensive or complete answers. DO NOT SIMPLY COPY IT,USE YOUR OWN WORDS. Some of the words follows are just a copy from our textbook.以下部分是本次考试所要使用的案例,包含了案例的概括,法院的判决,以及课本提及的相关知识点(如果你使用别的案例,请自行总结)。

这些只是题目中所需要使用的案例,并不是完整的答案。

不要只是把这些内容抄上去,请用自己的话说。

因为有些内容只是直接从书上抄下来的。

Case 1Question 1: Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co 1893Facts: the Carbolic Smoke Ball Co made an advertisement that anyone who used “smoke ball” under a right manner for a specified time and then caught the flu would get a £100 paid. Carlill did the above things and Carbolic Smoke Ball Co refused to pay the £100.Judgment: the performance of the conditions (catching flu after using the smoke ball) was acceptance enough.Area of law from textbook: offers made to general public whereby the public only have to do something to accept.Question 2: Spellman v Spellman 1961Facts: Spellmans are husband and wife. The husband purchased a car for his wife to save their marriage. However, after the car delivered to their home, the husband refused to transfer to his wife.Judgment: it was held that this was a purely domestic arrangement not intended to create any legal relations and accordingly the wife acquired no legal rights in the car.Area of law from textbook: a persona or social obligation will not usually be classed as a Legal Obligation.Question 3: Brinkibon Ltd v Stahag Stahl 1983Facts: Brinkibon Ltd, a London company, sent an acceptance to Stahag Stahl, an Australian based company in Vienna, via telex. The question at issue in this case is about where the contract was made.Judgment: instantaneous communication, the formation generally occurs in the place where the acceptance is made.Area of law from textbook: contract could be formed among parties in the place where the acceptance is made. (the Form of Acceptances)Question 4: Wolf & Wolf v Forfar Potato Co Ltd (1984)Facts: a Scottish Co offered to sell a quantity of potatoes to Dutch Co. Dutch Co called an acceptance with new conditions. The Scottish Co ignored this and were taken to court for breach of contract.Judgment: the court held that no contract was formed. The second telex sent by Dutch Co was a counter offer which makes the original offer invalid.Area of law from textbook: if the party made a count offer, the original offer had been cancelled.Case 2Question 5: Smith v Sim 1954Facts: Sim advertised his pub for sale. Smith relying on the statements concerning turnover supplied by Sim via his solicitors, bought the business for £21,600. Shortly after, Smith sued that Sim was guilty of fraud in falsely representing the turnover. This proves to be true.Judgment:the court held that it’s fraudulent misrepresentation. Smith can choose among rescind the contract, claim damages, or both rescind the contract and claim damages.Area of law from textbook: party who has relied on a fraudulent statement can claim damages as well as having the contract rescinded.Question 6 No cases applied.Question 7: Smith v Sim 1954 (see Question 5)Question 8: No cases applied.Question 9: Anderson v Pringle of Scotland 1998Facts: Mr Anderson was a current employee of Pringle of Scotland, and the company is considering that employees would be selected for redundancy on the basis of "last in first out”. However, Mr Anderson thought this method was not fair.Judgment: having regard to the terms of the interdict sought, Mr Anderson had a prima facie case for intervention. That being so, there remained the question of the balance of convenience. The Court was satisfied that this favored maintaining the status quo, by granting the interim interdict. If it was not granted, Mr Anderson would have lost his job, whereas the company was not at any immediate risk of disaster.Area of law from textbook: the legal remedies applied to an innocent party who has suffered a breach of contract is considering by what the terms are in the contract and what damage this breach of contract bring to the innocent party.Question 10: James B Fraser & Co Ltd v Denny Mott & Dickson Ltd 1944 Facts: James B Fraser & Co Ltd, a timber merchant, would buy wood from Denny and lease a timber yard with the option to buy it or take a long lease on certain terms with Denny Mott & Dikson Ltd, in 1929. In 1939, there was a Control of Timber Order released and caused further transactions between the parties became impossible from the end of September, 1939.Judgement: the court considered this as a frustration.Area of law from textbook: there is no breach of contract if that failure is due to intervening circumstances which neither party has control over. This is known as a frustration.。

HND商法导论 Assessment task 1

apply to the whole of the United Kingdom apply to Scotland
Passed by Scottish Parliament 苏格兰地方议会法
The Scotland Act 1998 means that the Scottish Parliament has the power to make laws on any topic not observed to the United Kingdom Parliament. Only one chamber. Start as a bill.
Delegated Legislation 授权立法
Also known as secondary legislation — this is law that can be made by other persons and bodies without having to introduce a Bill in Parliament and have to go through the Parliamentary process. This means that laws can be amended quickly if necessary or needed in an emergency. The power to do this comes from an Act of Parliament.
The European Parliament 欧洲议会— must be consulted(咨询) when laws are being debated(争议), etc. It shares power with the Council in that it can approve, amend and veto(批准、修改或否 决) laws. The European Court of Justice 欧盟法 院— interprets(接受) the laws drafted and debated and approved by the other institutions. The Court clarifies the law for Member States where there is a dispute and with the Commission can hear actions against natural and legal persons, etc for non-compliance(不符合) with EU Law.
  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

Judicial precedent: A judgment of a court of law cited as an authority for deciding a similar set of facts; a case which serves as authority for the legal principle embodied in its decision. The common law has developed by broadening down from precedent to precedent1.A judicial precedent is a decision of the court used as a source for future decision making. This is known as stare decisis (to stand upon decisions) and by which precedents are authoritative and binding and must be followed.In giving judgment in a case, the judge will set out the facts of the case, state the law applicable to the facts and then provide his or her decision. It is only the ratio decidendi (the legal reasoning or ground for the judicial decision) which is binding on later courts under the system of judicial precedent.2. A judicial precedent is a decision of the court used as a source for future decision making. This is known as stare decisis(to stand upon decisions) and by which precedents are authoritative and binding and must be followed.In giving judgment in a case, the judge will set out the facts of the case, state the law applicable to the facts and then provide his or her decision. It is only the ratio decidendi (the legal reasoning or ground for the judicial decision) which is binding on later courts under the system of judicial precedent.England law1. Complaints to a tribunalThe way to enforce a claim for unfair dismissal is at an employment tribunal. An employee who is dismissed may also have breach of contract claim(s), based on common law. Common law claim(s) may be brought in a county court.Employment tribunals are spread around the country, in most towns. The right to bring a case falls under Part X, Chapter 2, s.111.2.BENEFITS FOR MEMBERSNormal retirement pensionE1.—(1) A member who retires from pensionable employment at any time on or after attaining age 60 is entitled to a pension under this regulation at a yearly rate of 1/80th of final year’s pensionable pay for each complete year of pensionable service, plus the relevant daily proportion of that rate for each additional day of such service.(2) A member who stays in pensionable employment until age 75 is entitled to receive a pension under this regulation at that age even if that member does not retire from such employment. (3) Subject to paragraph (4), where a member who leaves pensionable employment on or after1st April 2008 becomes entitled to a pension under this regulation, the Scottish Ministers may discharge their liability for that pension by the payment of a lump sum of an amount consistent—(a) with the contracting-out and preservation requirements of the 1993 Act; and(b) the lump sum rule.-----------------------------------------------------The National Health Service Superannuation Scheme(Scotland) Regulations 2011 No. 1173. Possession of false identity documents etc with improper intention(1)It is an offence for a person (“P”) with an improper intention to have in P's possessi on or under P's control—(a)an identity document that is false and that P knows or believes to be false,(b)an identity document that was improperly obtained and that P knows or believes to have been improperly obtained, or(c)an identity document that relates to someone else.(2)Each of the following is an improper intention—(a)the intention of using the document for establishing personal information about P;(b)the intention of allowing or inducing another to use it for establishing, ascertaining or verifying personal information about P or anyone else.(3)In subsection (2)(b) the reference to P or anyone else does not include, in the case of a document within subsection (1)(c), the individual to whom it relates.(4)A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable, on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years or a fine (or both).------------------------Identity Documents Act (Scotland) 20104.Rules under this section may apply to short selling wholly outside the United Kingdom by persons outside the United Kingdom, but only in so far as the rules relate to UK financial instruments---------------------In the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 .131B Short selling rules5. Preliminary consultation(1)Before a Minister makes an order under section 1, he shall—(a)consult such organisations as appear to him to be representative of interests substantially affected by his proposals,(b)where his proposals relate to the functions of one or more statutory bodies, consult those bodies, or organisations which appear to him to be representative of those bodies,(c)in such cases as he considers appropriate, consult the Law Commission or the Scottish Law Commission,(d)where the provision made by the order would extend to Wales, consult the National Assembly for Wales, and(e)consult such other persons as he considers appropriate.(2)In subsection (1) “statutory body” means—(a)a body established by an enactment or by any instrument made under an enactment, or(b)the holder of any office so established.(3)If it appears to the Minister, as a result of the consultation required by subsection (1), that it is appropriate to vary the whole or any part of his proposals, he shall undertake such further consultation with respect to the variations as appears to him to be appropriate.(4)If, before the day on which this Act is passed, any consultation was undertaken which, had it been undertaken after that day, would to any extent have satisfied the requirements of subsection (1), those requirements shall to that extent be taken to have been satisfied.------------------------------------------------------Regulatory Reform Act 2001.CHAPTER 66. (a) any criminal offence in connection with a claim for a relevant social security benefit;(b) any criminal offence in connection with the receipt or payment of any amount by way of such a benefit;------------------------(benefit offence).Social Security Fraud Act 2001。

相关文档
最新文档