中美会计准则对比(中英文对照)
中美会计准则比较(最新)
中国会计准则和美国会计准则差异有哪些？想考美国注会（U.S.CPA）的同学们对中美会计准则的差异非常关注，如下内容为大家揭秘：中美两国会计准则差异。
一、中美会计准则的实质性差别rulebasedvsprinciplebased美国会计准则的模式为规则导向，更容易导致机会主义和盈余管理。
目前的USGAAP共168号（新旧放在一起）不是按要素制定的，是一种救火式的准则，哪里出了问题，立马会有相应的准则制定出来。
中国会计准则的模式为原则导向，强调实质重于形式，采购谨慎性原则、减少方法的选择、充分披露，以此来克服机会主义的盈余管理。
财政部自2006年颁布新的会计准则以来，陆续颁布了“新会计准则应用指南”以及3个解释公告。
其中，在3号解释公告里提出了综合收益的（comprehensiveincome）概念。
（Tips：如何理解comprehensiveincome？如可供出售金融资产，持有时其价值变动计入资本公积，一旦出售，就会进利润表，以综合收益的形式反映。
comprehensiveincome就是用来反映未来利润的。
新准则修订了资产的定义：经济利益很可能流入企业，金额可以可靠计量，淡化了“过去交易”，主要也是为了配合“未来”交易，如亏损合同等）。
可以这样总结，会计准则未来的发展趋势是：一是从损益满计观向资本保全管转变，反映自从萨班斯法案以来国际财务界重视资产计价的趋势（典型地，如捐赠收入，债务重组收益进利润表，不再进资本公积。
目前资本公积科目得到了净化，只含“股本溢价”和“其它”两个明细）；二是资产计价将存在两种模式：成本模式（costvalue）和公允价值模式（fairvalue）；三是反映未来信息的新趋势（典型地，comprehensiveincome）。
二、美国会计准则总体介绍（一）制定美国公认会计准则的组织证券交易委员会（SecuritiesandExchangeCommission，SEC）；美国注册会计师协会（AmericanInstituteofCertifiedPublicAccountingStandardsBoard，AICPA）；财务会计准则委员会（FinancialAccountingStandardsBoard，FASB）；政府会计准则委员会（GovermentalAccountingStandardsBoard，GASB）。
中美的会计准则制度差异英语作文
中美的会计准则制度差异英语作文Differences in Accounting Standards between China and the United StatesIntroductionThe accounting standards followed by different countries vary considerably due to differences in legal, economic, and cultural factors. China and the United States have distinct accounting frameworks, with China following the Chinese Accounting Standards (CAS) and the United States following the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). This essay will analyze the key differences between the accounting standards of China and the United States and discuss the implications of these differences on financial reporting and decision-making.Comparison of Accounting Standards1. Legal Framework: China has a civil law system that governs its accounting standards, while the United States has a common law system. This difference influences the accounting standards in terms of legal requirements, enforcement mechanisms, and the role of regulators.2. Disclosure Requirements: The CAS in China focus on protecting the interests of stakeholders, including investors,regulators, and creditors. On the other hand, the GAAP in the United States emphasize transparency and comparability in financial reporting.3. Valuation of Assets: The CAS in China allow for more subjective judgment in the valuation of assets, leading to potential differences in the reported value of assets compared to the GAAP in the United States, which require more conservative valuation methods.4. Revenue Recognition: The CAS in China allow for more flexibility in revenue recognition, which may lead to the recognition of revenue earlier than under the GAAP in the United States, where strict criteria must be met for revenue recognition.Implications of Differences in Accounting Standards1. Financial Reporting: The differences in accounting standards between China and the United States can result in inconsistencies in financial reporting, making it challenging for investors and analysts to compare the financial performance of companies across borders.2. Cost of Capital: The differences in accounting standards can impact the cost of capital for companies operating in China and the United States. Investors may perceive higher risks injurisdictions with less stringent accounting standards, leading to higher capital costs.3. Regulatory Compliance: Companies operating in both China and the United States face the challenge of complying with two different sets of accounting standards, which can be time-consuming and costly.ConclusionIn conclusion, the differences in accounting standards between China and the United States have significant implications for financial reporting and decision-making. Companies operating in both countries must navigate these differences to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements and provide accurate and transparent financial information to stakeholders. It is essential for regulators, standard-setters, and practitioners to work towards greater convergence of accounting standards to promote transparency, comparability, and efficiency in the global capital markets.。
中国会计准则与美国会计制度比较
中国会计准则与美国会计制度比较引言：在全球化的背景下，国际间的贸易、投资和合作日益频繁，不同国家的会计准则和制度成为企业跨境经营的重要考虑因素。
中国作为世界上最大的发展中国家，其会计准则与美国会计制度有着显著的差异。
本文将对中国会计准则与美国会计制度进行比较，以了解两者之间的异同和影响。
一、会计准则的体系中国会计准则：中国会计准则以《中华人民共和国企业会计准则》为核心，由财政部颁布并得到相关监管机构的认可。
同时，中国还制定了一系列行业特定会计准则和企业类型的会计准则。
美国会计制度：美国的会计准则主要由美国财务会计准则委员会（FASB）颁布，其准则以《美国通用会计准则》（US GAAP）为基础。
此外，美国还存在行业特定会计准则，如金融业会计准则和保险业会计准则。
比较分析：中国的会计准则体系相对较为复杂，由于不同行业、企业类型和财政部门的不同规定，会计准则相对分散。
而美国的会计准则更为统一，US GAAP成为了金融报告的主要依据。
这意味着在跨国业务中，与美国企业合作的中国企业需要适应或转变会计准则的要求。
二、会计报告标准中国会计准则：中国会计准则要求企业编制财务报表包括资产负债表、利润表、现金流量表和所有者权益变动表。
此外，中国的会计报告标准还要求企业披露必要的附注信息，以提供更详尽的财务信息。
美国会计制度：美国的会计报告标准同样要求企业编制资产负债表、利润表和现金流量表，但与中国不同的是，美国的会计报告标准更加详细和严格。
US GAAP要求企业进行更广泛的披露，包括管理层讨论与分析、业务风险和前景、股东权益变动等。
比较分析：美国的会计报告标准更加规范和详细，使投资者和利益相关者能够更全面地了解企业的财务状况和经营情况。
相比之下，中国的会计报告标准虽然也要求附注信息的披露，但相对较少。
中国企业与美国企业进行合作时，需要适应美国会计报告标准的要求，以满足国际投资者和监管机构的需求。
三、会计处理原则中国会计准则：中国的会计处理原则以审慎性原则为基础，侧重于保守估计和风险防范。
中美会计准则比较
IASs 1-41
• IAS 20 Accounting for government grants and disclosure of government assistance
• IAS 21 The effects of changes in foreign exchange rates • IAS 23 Borrowing costs • IAS 24 Related Party Disclosures • IAS 26 Accounting and reporting by retirement benefit plans • IAS 27 Consolidated and separate financial statements • IAS 28 Investments in associates • IAS 29 Financial reporting in hyperinflationary economics • IAS 30 Disclosures in the financial statements of banks and
中美会计准则比较
1
课程主要内容
• 中国新会计准则介绍 • 美国会计准则的总体介绍 • 美国最新法规汇编内容 • 重要准则比较 • 问题互动
2
中国新会计准则介绍
3
美国公认会计准则与中国会计准则的实质差别
美国准则模式-规则导向： 上有政策下有对策
更容易导致机会主义盈余管理
中国准则模式-原则导向： 实质重形式
26
美国会计准则的效力层次
Statement No. 162 The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
美国和中国的会计准则制度的对比英语作文
美国和中国的会计准则制度的对比英语作文Title: A Comparative Analysis of US GAAP and Chinese Accounting StandardsThe financial reporting landscape across global economies is shaped by the accounting standards adopted by each nation. Among these, the United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (US GAAP) and the Chinese Accounting Standards (CAS) stand out as two significant frameworks. This essay aims to compare and contrast the key features of US GAAP and CAS, highlighting their similarities and differences in approach to financial reporting.1. Overview of US GAAP and CASUS GAAP: Developed by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), US GAAP is a comprehensive set of accounting rules widely used in the United States for preparing and reporting financial statements.CAS: Established by the Ministry of Finance of China, CAS is designed to align with international financial reporting standards while maintaining specific provisions tailored to the Chinese economic environment.2. Convergence and International AlignmentUS GAAP: Has historically been more independent, though recent efforts have been made to converge with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).CAS: Has shown a strong commitment to convergence with IFRS, aiming to enhance comparability and transparency in financial reporting.3. Key Differences in Accounting TreatmentRevenue Recognition: US GAAP provides more detailed guidance on revenue recognition, while CAS follows a principles-based approach similar to IFRS.Inventory Valuation: Under US GAAP, companies can choose between different inventory costing methods, whereas CAS mandates the use of historical cost or market price, whichever is lower.Intangible Assets: US GAAP has stringent criteria for capitalization of intangible assets, while CAS allows for greater flexibility in this area.4. Disclosure RequirementsUS GAAP: Emphasizes extensive disclosures to provide users with a comprehensive understanding of the company's financial health.CAS: While also requiring disclosure of relevant information, may have less detailed requirements compared to US GAAP.5. Regulatory Oversight and EnforcementUS GAAP: Enforced by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and subject to rigorous auditing standards.CAS: Monitored by the Chinese regulatory authorities, with increasing emphasis on compliance and enforcement in recent years.The comparison between US GAAP and CAS reveals both commonalities and distinctions in their approaches to financial reporting. While both systems strive for accuracy and transparency, they reflect the unique contexts of their respective economies. As the world becomes increasingly interconnected, the trend towards convergence of accounting standards continues, with the potential to simplifycross-border financial analysis and investment decisions. However, it is crucial to recognize the nuances and adapt accordingly when navigating the financial statements prepared under these distinct accounting regimes.。
中美会计准则比较
中美会计准则比较中美会计准则比较中国会计准则和美国会计准则差异有哪些？想考美国注会〔U.S.CPA〕的同学们对中美会计准则的差异特别关注，如下内容为大家揭秘：中美两国会计准则差异。
一、中美会计准则的实质性差异rulebasedvsprinciplebased美国会计准则的模式为规则导向，更简单导致机会主义和盈余管理。
目前的USGAAP共168号〔新旧放在一起〕不是按要素制定的，是一种救火式的准则，哪里出了问题，立马会有相应的准则制定出来。
中国会计准则的模式为原则导向，强调实质重于形式，选购谨慎性原则、削减方法的选择、充分披露，以此来克服机会主义的盈余管理。
财政部自2006年公布新的会计准则以来，陆续公布了"新会计准则应用指南'以及3个解释公告。
其中，在3号解释公告里提出了综合收益的〔comprehensiveincome〕概念。
〔Tips：如何理解comprehensiveincome？如可供出售金融资产，持有时其价值变动计入资本公积，一旦出售，就会进利润表，以综合收益的形式反映。
comprehensiveincome就是用来反映将来利润的。
新准则修订了资产的定义：经济利益很可能流入企业，金额可以可靠计量，淡化了"过去交易'，主要也是为了协作"将来'交易，如亏损合同等〕。
可以这样总结，会计准则将来的进展趋势是：一是从损益满计观向资本保全管转变，反映自从萨班斯法案以来国际财务界重视资产计价的趋势〔典型地，如捐赠收入，债务重组收益进利润表，不再进资本公积。
目前资本公积科目得到了净化，只含"股本溢价'和"其它'两个明细〕；二是资产计价将存在两种模式：本钱模式〔costvalue〕和公允价值模式〔fairvalue〕；三是反映将来信息的新趋势〔典型地，comprehensiveincome〕。
二、美国会计准则总体介绍〔一〕制定美国公认会计准则的组织证券交易委员会〔SecuritiesandExchangeCommission，SEC〕；美国注册会计师协会〔AmericanInstituteofCertifiedPublicAccountingStandardsBoard，AICPA〕；财务会计准则委员会〔FinancialAccountingStandardsBoard，FASB〕；政府会计准则委员会〔GovermentalAccountingStandardsBoard，GASB〕。
美国会计准则与中国会计准则具体差异-列表对比解析
1.存货
表1 企业会计准则第1号—存货的差异比较
4.2 长期股权投资
表2 企业会计准则第2号—长期股权投资的差异比较
4.3 固定资产
表3 企业会计准则第4号—固定资产的差异比较
4.4 无形资产
4.5 非货币性资产交换
4.6 雇员薪酬、福利、奖励（职工薪酬、企业年金基金、股份支付）
4.7 收入
表7 企业会计准则第14号—收入的差异比较
4.8 建造合同
表8 企业会计准则第15号—建造合同的差异比较
4.9 政府补助
表9 企业会计准则第16号—政府补助的差异比较
4.10 所得税
4.11 企业合并
表11 企业会计准则第20号—企业合并的差异比较
4.12 金融工具
4.13 会计政策、会计估计变更和差错更正
表13 企业会计准则第28号—会计政策、会计估计变更和会计差错更正的差异比较
4.14 财务报表列报
表14 企业会计准则第30号—财务报表列报的差异比较
4.15 中期财务报告
表15 企业会计准则第29号—中期财务报告的差异比较
4.16 关联方披露
表16 企业会计准则第36号—关联方披露的差异比较。
中美的会计准则制度差异英语作文
中美的会计准则制度差异英语作文Accounting standards and systems play a crucial role in the financial reporting and decision-making processes of businesses around the world. In this regard, the differences between the accounting standards and systems of China and the United States are of particular interest. This article will explore the key differences between the accounting standards and systems of China and the United States, and their implications for businesses operating in these two countries.One of the key differences between the accounting standards of China and the United States is the underlying principles upon which they are based. In the United States, accounting standards are predominantly based on the principles of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), which emphasize the principles of relevance, reliability, comparability, and consistency. In contrast, China has its own set of accounting standards known as Chinese Accounting Standards (CAS), which are based on a mix of international accounting standards and Chinese regulatory requirements.Another key difference between the accounting standards of China and the United States is the level of detail and guidance provided in the standards. In general, US GAAP provides moredetailed guidance on accounting treatments and disclosures for various transactions, while CAS tends to be less prescriptive and allows for more flexibility in accounting treatments. This difference in detail and guidance can lead to differences in financial reporting practices and results between companies in China and the United States.Furthermore, the regulatory environment surrounding accounting standards and systems in China and the United States also differs. In the United States, accounting standards are set by independent standard-setting bodies such as the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which are overseen by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). In China, accounting standards are set and regulated by the Ministry of Finance (MOF) and the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC), which have a more direct role in setting and enforcing accounting standards.The differences in accounting standards and systems between China and the United States have implications for businesses operating in these two countries. For multinational companies with operations in both China and the United States, the differences in accounting standards can pose challenges infinancial reporting and compliance. Companies may need to reconcile their financial statements prepared under different accounting standards, which can be time-consuming and costly.In addition, the differences in accounting standards can also impact investors and other stakeholders who rely on financial information to make informed decisions. Investors may need to be aware of the differences in accounting standards between China and the United States when evaluating the financial performance and position of companies operating in these two countries. The differences in accounting standards can also impact the comparability of financial information across companies and countries, which can make it difficult for investors to make meaningful comparisons.Overall, the differences in accounting standards and systems between China and the United States highlight the complexity and challenges of financial reporting in a globalized economy. Businesses operating in these two countries need to be aware of the differences in accounting standards and ensure compliance with the relevant requirements. By understanding the key differences between the accounting standards and systems of China and the United States, businesses can navigate thechallenges and opportunities of operating in these two important markets.。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
第二部分：中国企业会计准则与美国会计制度比较
• Similarities共同点 • Differences不同点
Hierarchy of PRC accounting regulations中国企业会计制度的结构
Regulations on accounting and financial reporting 会计处理与财务报表编制的规范 Specific accounting standards 明确的会计准则 Revise concepts in Basic Accounting Standards for Business Enterprises (1993)企业基本会计制度 概念的更新 Accounting systems for small business enterprises小型企业会计制度
US GAAP美国会计制度
¾ Similar to PRC accounting standards. 与中国企业会计制度相似。
Accounts Receivable and Bad Debt Provision 应收帐款与坏帐准备
PRC中国企业会计制度
¾ Carried at original invoiced amount less an estimate made for doubtful receivables. 应收帐款按实际发生额入帐，并对 应收帐款的回收可能性进行评估后 计提坏帐准备。
ASBE 企业会计制度
Accounting systems for financial institutions金融机构会计制度
Guidance for various industries i.e, revenue, costing 不同行业会计制度指导（如：收入、成本等） Specific interpretation and response letter /cn
US GAAP美国会计制度
¾ Similar to PRC accounting regulations. 与中国企业会计制度相似。 ¾ Subsequent revaluations are prohibited. 不允许按重新估计的价值入帐。
Fixed Assets – Depreciation 固定资产－折旧
Similarities共同点
Basic Concepts and Qualitative Characteristics 基本概念与性质特征
PRC中国企业会计制度
¾ Validity, Accuracy, Completeness and Timeliness合法，准确，完整， 及时 ¾ Consistency 一贯性 ¾ Accrual Basis of Accounting 权责发生制 ¾ Matching Principle配比原则 ¾ Going Concern Assumption 持续经营假设
US GAAP美国会计制度
¾ Similar to PRC accounting regulations. 同中国企业会计制度相似。
Inventories存货
PRC中国企业会计制度
¾ Carried at lower of cost and net realizable value. Use of FIFO, LIFO, weighted average method, moving weighted average method and specific identification method to determine cost. 存货以成本与可变现净值孰低法入 帐，存货成本以先进先出法，后进 先出法，加权平均法，移动平均法 或个别计价法确定。
PRC中国企业会计制度
¾ Based on facts, circumstances and management judgement, enterprises can determine the estimated useful lives and salvage value of fixed assets. 企业根据固定资产的实际使用方式和性质 ，环境及管理层的合理判断确定固定资产 的使用年限及残值。 ¾ Depreciation can be made based on the straight-line method, physical use depreciation method, sum-of-the-years’ digit method, double-declining balance method, etc. 折旧方法可选择直线法、工作量法、年数 总和法或双倍余额递减法。
US GAAP美国会计制度
¾ Similar to PRC accounting regulations. In addition, the retail method is allowed. 与中国企业会计制度相似，但也允 许使用零售价法计算存货成本，
Fixed Assets – Carrying Value 固定资产－现值
US GAAP美国会计制度
¾ Similar to PRC standards 与中国企业会计制度相似
Cash and Cash Equivalents 现金与现金等价物
பைடு நூலகம்PRC中国企业会计制度
¾ Cash comprises cash on hand and demand deposits. 货币资金包括现金和银行存款。 ¾ Cash equivalents are short-term, highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash and which are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value.现金等价物指持有 的期限短、流动性强、易于转换为 已知金额的现金及价值变动风险很 小的投资。
PRC中国企业会计制度
¾ Tangible fixed assets are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. 固定资产以原值减去累计折旧后的 净值列示。 ¾ Subsequent revaluations are generally not allowed. 固定资产一般不允许按照重新估计 的价值入帐。