Nike, Cost of Capital 资本成本分析案例
如何进行企业的财务分析（以Nike为例）（英文）
如何进行企业的财务分析（以Nike为例）（英文）ContentChapter 1: Introduction (1)1.1 Background of Nike (1)1.2 Management of Nike (1)1.3 Successful Story (2)1.4 Background of Puma (3)1.5 Management of Puma (3)1.6 Successful Story (4)Chapter 2: Financial Analysis (5)2.1 Vertical Analysis (5)2.2 Trend Analysis (6)2.3 Ratio Analysis (7)2.3.1 Profitable Ratio (7)2.3.2 Liquidity Ratio (9)2.3.3 Asset management ratio (10)2.3.4 Debt Utilization Ratio (12)2.3.5 Investments (14)Chapter 3: Financial Market and Impact (17)3.1 Global Economy (17)3.2Currency Fluctuations (17)3.3 Changes in Tax (18)3.4 Rising Input Cost (18)3.5 Intense Competitive Landscape (18)3.6 Product Counterfeiting Risk (19)Chapter 4: Challenges Faced and Solutions (19)4.1 High Inventory (19)4.1.1 Solution (20)4.2 High Production Cost (20)4.2.1 Solution (20)4.3 Selling and administrative expense (21)4.3.1 Solution (21)4.4 Tax rate (21)4.4.1 Solution (22)5. Summary and Future Outlook (22)5.1 Performance in Operating (22)5.1.1 Future Outlook (22)5.2 Performance in Financial Market (23)5.2.1 Future Outlook (23)Reference (24)Appendix 1：Nike Annual Report (27)Appendix 2 ：Puma Annual Report (30)Appendix 3: Process of Calculation (33)Chapter 1: Introduction1.1 Background of NikeNike Inc., (Nike) was founded on January 25, 1964 as Blue Ribbon Sports by Bill Bowerman and Phil Knight and officially became Nike, Inc. on May 30, 1971. Headquartered in Beaverton, Oregon, Nike is the largest seller of athletic footwear and athletic apparel in the world and is traded on the New York Stock Exchange. The Company sells its products to retail accounts, through Nike owned retail stores and Internet sales, and through a mix of independent distributors and licensees, in approximately 190 countries around the world. Nike is a leader company in athletic footwear industry, which has strong corporate image and brand value delivering to its customers. Sustaining innovation lead Nike develop high technology in their effort to stay ahead of their competitors with its products (Nike Inc., 2013). Nike’s successful based on three main factors: engaged with effectivemarketing strategies, vividly advertising campaigns and outsourcing the production at low cost labor market as developing countries.1.2 Management of NikeNominating and Corporate Governance Committee of Nike the “Committee” considers and evaluates candidates for appointment or election to the Board of Directors. In evaluating potential candidates for suitability, the Committee considers many factors to identify individuals with the requisite intelligence, education, experience, and character to make significant contributions to the Board of Directors.Source From: Nike Board of Director and Executive /pages/executives1.3 Successful StoryBy the mid-1980s, Nike had slipped from its position as theindustry leader, the debut of a new signature shoe for an NBA rookie by the name of Michael Jordan in 1985 helped bolster Nike’s bottom line. In 1989, Nike built on its momentum from the ‘Revolution’ campaign with the tagline “Just Do It.” In 1990s, Nike signed the World Cup-winning Brazilian National Team began designing the team’s distinctive uniform. Nike Golf land ed named Eldrick “Tiger” Woods for a reported $5 million per year. Competitors lau ghed and critics howled at Nike’s "folly," until Tiger won the 1997 Masters by a record 12 strokes. In 2010, Nike signed Chinese tennis player Li Na, Algerian- French dancer Sofia Boutella, British hurdler Perri Shakes-Drayton, Russian-born tennis star Mar ia Sharapova, running a new project “Make Y ourself” campaign to target women customers (Roy, 2012). The Nike+ FuelBand mobile app launched in 2012, which can be seen as a transition from traditional advertising to new media there are series of interactive campaigns designed to engage consumers on a whole new level and stimulate conversation in the athletic community (Nike Inc., 2013).1.4 Background of PumaPuma AG Rudolf Dassler Sport (Puma) is a major German multinational company that produces athletic and casual footwear, as well as sportswear, headquartered in Herzogenaurach, Bavaria, Germany. The company was formed in 1924 as Gebrüder Dassler Schuhfabrik by Adolf and Ru dolf Dassler. The relationship between the two brothers deteriorated until the two agreed to split in 1948, forming two separate entities, Adidas and Puma (Puma, 2013). Both companies are currently based in Herzogenaurach, Germany. Puma is one of the world’s largest providers of sport lifestyle footwear, apparel and accessories under the leading brands such as AlexanderMcQueen, Mihara, Rudolf Dassler Schuhfabrik, and P uma the black label. The company through its subsidiaries operates in more than 120 countries globally. The company, under its Footwear segment, is engaged in the designing, manufacturing and marketing of wide range of shoes for men, women, and juniors for various sports, including football, motor sport, cricket and golf.1.5 Management of PumaBoard of Directors: consists of both internal management directors and independent directors. The two groups of directors bring benefits to Nike the different knowledge and experience contributes into management it also provides another frame of overall board in thinking. Puma’s board would b e classified as an oversight board, playing an active role with regards to management’s decisions making of strategy. On the corporate level Puma’s strategy based on the mission “to be the first truly virtual sports company” that focus on building network of independent firm, suppliers and customers instead of managing activities of the value chain through direct ownership (Puma, 2013). In order to achieve this goals Puma has decentralized its structure and develop a virtual corporate structure which supported by organizational matrix. Managing the virtual structure, Puma create the group executive committee that incorporates the functions of brand management, product, and finance and growth management, legal and organizational structure in the central part.Source From:Puma Managing Director /category/company/managingdirectors/ 1.6 Successful StoryIn 1970, Brazilian football star Pele helped Brazil to win the World Cup in mexico wearing Puma fo otball boots. Germany’s Boris Becker won Wimbledon wearing Puma shoes and playing with a Puma racket. Eight years later, Puma sold in big department stores for very little money that result in its shoes become expensive and no more competitive advantage. In 1993, Jochen Zeitz named chairman and CEO of Puma he cutting costs by 40% and then pushes Puma IPO on the German stock exchange. Shortly, Jochen Zeitz was offshoring Puma’s production from German to Asia. Due to those business movements, Puma stop losing and earned $29 million on sales in 1996 (Puma, 2013).Chapter 2: Financial AnalysisThe global economic recession resulted in a significant slow-down in international trade and a sharp rise in protectionist actions around the world. These trends are affecting many global manufacturing and service sectors, and the footwear and apparel industries, as a whole, are not immune. Companies in our industry are facing trade protectionist challenges in many different regions, and in nearly all cases we are working together to address trade issues to reduce the impact to the industry, while observing applicable competition laws. Notwithstanding our efforts, such actions, if implemented, could result in increases in the cost of our products, which may in turn adversely affect our sales or profitability and the imported footwear and apparel industry as a whole. Accordingly, we are actively monitoring the developments described below.2.1 Vertical AnalysisWe choose one year to compare this two company and we can see the figures shown in the table, Nike more profitable than Puma in 2012. Nike’s cost of revenue is 56.60%, compare to Puma’s 51.70%. This means that for every $1 in net sales, Nike got almost $0.56 in 2012, and Puma got almost 0.51% in 2012 is spent on cost of revenue. Nike’s percentage of net income to revenue is 10.5%. That means 10.5% of revenue results in profit for the company’s stockholders. On the other hand, Puma’s percentage of net income to revenue is 2.5%.Nike sells to thousands of retail accounts and operates 16 distribution centers outside of the United States. In many countries and regions, including Canada, Asia, Europe and some Latin American countries we have a futures ordering pro gram for retailers similar to the United States futures program, the common-size statement highlights Nike advantage over Puma.2.2 Trend AnalysisAssume Nike and Puma total revenues were 10,000,000 in 2009 and rose to 2,3331,000 in 2012, the base the is 2009,so thatyear’s percentage is set equal to 100 .We can see the figures shown in the table: Nike’s net sales has been continued increasing during these three years, especially year of 2012. Puma’s net sales also keep an increasing trend, but still cannot compete with Nike; Nike sells products to retail accounts, through Nike’s own direct to consumer operations, and through a mix of independent distributors, licensees and sales representatives around the world. Compare with Puma, the sales figures of Nike higher than Puma, this is weakness for puma, cannot fight with Nike to getleader industry during these three years. Puma is still a small player relative to Nike. But has crept up in recent years, and in 2011, has reached its highest Global 500 brand value, Puma has the ingredients and heritage to increase its brand value and rise up the table. Selecting the right rising athletic and sports stars, clearly differentiating themselves against Nike and Adidas, capitalizing on their sporting heritage and treading a delicate path between product innovations and continuing their success of producing more style driven, non-performance-related product lines will all play a part. We can see puma has been prepared to challenge the Nike from many ways; puma is strength of the competitor in the next few years, in response to threats, Nike also has a lot of way to meet threats and more details shown in another chapter.2.3 Ratio AnalysisWe have to say, Nike is a leader of the industry, the company compare with Puma and analysis some representative ratios to explain why Nike can be a leader in industry depend on the annual ratio result that calculated by us in sheet of excel. (All industry averages taken from “Thomson Reuters”)，2.3.1 Profitable RatioNet profit margin: Measures the percentage of each sales dollar remaining after all costs and expenses, including interest, taxes, and preferred stock dividends, Nike‘s net profit margin have been deducted. Net profit margins vary widely across industries. Puma s’ net profit margin decreased from 2010 to 2012, the problem very s e rious in 2012, Nike’s advantage over Puma during this three years.Gross profit margin: The higher the gross profit margin the better, and for the Nike has continued to decrease from 2010 to 2012. So the company got a little problem in the area of each sales dollar remaining after the firms has paid for its goods. The situation of Puma is quite good.Return on assets:Indicates how efficient management is at using its assets to generate earnings. The higher the number the better, because of the company can earn more money on less investment. For the Nike, the ratio of ROA has been increasing inthe past three years, Puma has huge decreased from 2011 to 2012, the condition is not very stability, Nike in this area got a generate earnings more than his competitors.Return on equity:measure of a corporation's profitability that reveals how much profit a company generates with the money shareholders have invested. ROE is useful for comparing the profitability of a company to other firms in the same industry. Nike made a lot of profit to theirshareholder, because of the ratio of ROE keep rising during these three years (2010-2012); Puma has huge decreased from 2011 to 2012, the condition is not very stability, the Nike has a high profitability than Puma.Overview: A class of financial metrics that are used to assess a business's ability to ge nerate earnings as compared to its expenses and other relevant costs incurred during a specific period of time. For most of these ratios, having a higher value relative to a competitor's ratio or the same ratio from a previous period is indicative that the company is doing well.so the result shown that the Nike is doing well compare to Puma.2.3.2 Liquidity RatioQuick ratio: This is a more stringent measure of liquidity than the Current Ratio because it excludes inventory. This ratio is more relevant than the Current Ratio for some industries where inventories are not liquid. The quick ratio from 2010 to 2012 there is little reduce in Nike company , puma also，but Nike’s quick ratio is above the industry average of 1.86 (Routers) being above the industry indicates that we could sell our inventory than what other companies in the industry would have to sell to meet current obli gations. Puma’s quick ratio is lower than Nik e and below the industry average of 1.86 (Routers).Cash ratio:The cash ratio is most commonly used as a measure of company liquidity. It can therefore determine if, and how quickly, the company can repay its short-term debt. Nike’s cash ratio has continued falling from year 2010 to 2012, we unexpected to see this downgrade, we would be willing to extend to the asking party. Even thought, the cash ratio of Nike is still higher than Puma.Overview: A class of financial metrics that is used to determine a company's ability to pay off its short-terms debtsobligations. Generally, the higher the value of the ratio, the larger the margin of safety that the company possesses to cover short-term debts. A company's ability to turn short-term assets into cash to cover debts is of the utmost importance when creditors are seeking payment. Bankruptcy analysts and mortgage originators frequently use the liquidity ratios to determine whether a company will be able to continue as a going concern.2.3.3 Asset management ratioTotal asset turnover: The amount of sales generated for every dollar's worth of assets. Measures a firm's efficiency at using its assets in generate sales or revenue, the higher the number the better. The ratio of asset turnover keep stable in 2010 and 2011 is 1.37, but in the 2012 has a quite changes, raised up to 1.57 .It indicates pricing strategy: Nike with low profit margins tend to have high asset turnover, while those with high profit margins have low asset turnover. There is a little distance between Nike and Puma, but Puma’s amount of asset turnover still lower than Nike.Inventory turnover:Nike’s inventory turnover of 4.56 below the industry average of 5.91 (Router).Nike’s ratio of inventory turnover decreased from year 2010 to2012, so reducinginventory turnover levels were a key initiative for Nike in fiscal year. Due to our ability to quickly turnover inventory, Nike benefits from greater cash flows, reduced storage costs, and less spoilage. In addition, quick turnover reduces Nike’s inventory of out-of-style shoes and clothing. Company management stated, "We put a considerable amount of effort into improving product buying power patterns and as a result the composition and levels of inventory resulted in improved gross margins relative to a year ago." Inventory levels are being reduced due to increased sales in the company's own branch retail stores. Puma also stay a decreased trend, but the ratio of inventory turnover is lower than Nike, for Puma is not a bad condition.Receivable turnover: An accounting measure used to quantify a firm's effectiveness in extending credit as well as collecting debts. The receivables turnover ratio is an activity ratio, measuring how efficiently a firm uses its assets. A high ratio implies either that a company operates on a cash basis or that its extension of credit and collection of accounts receivable is efficient. A low ratio implies the company should re-assess its credit policies in order to ensure the timely collection of imparted credit that is not earning interest for the firm. Nike’s A/C ratio keeps increasing from year 2010 to 2012, Nike account receivable is efficient. By maintaining accounts receivable, Nike is indirectly extending interest-free loans to their clients. Nike’s condition is still better than Puma.Overview: Asset management ratios are the key to analyzing how effectively and efficiency business is managing its assets to produce sales. Asset management ratios are also called turnover ratios or efficiency ratios. If the company has too much invested in their company's assets, operating capital will be too high. If don't have enough invested in assets, the company will lose sales and that will hurt profitability, free cash flow, and stock price. So the result shown that the Nike can easy to efficiency and effectively to managing its asset to produce sales, Nike do a quite performanc e compares to Puma. Nike is doing well compare to Puma.2.3.4 Debt Utilization RatioTotal debt ratio: What is acceptable varies by industry. A high debt/equity ratio generally means that a company has been aggressive in financing its growth with debt. This can result in volatile earnings as a result of the additional interest expense. Nike’s total debt ratio is 0.06, which is below the industry average of 0.07. The debt ratio which is dealing from year 2010 to 2012, the figures are sho wn in the table, because of previous years the company has been aggressive in financing area with debt, create a stable basis, and during this three year the debt ratio reduces is normal. New products become more and moremature than before, the brand has been known in the world. But for Puma, they have to develop new product and put new technology into products to attract more customers, they are on the raising period, so the debt ratio a little higher than Nike.Long term debt ratio:Similar to total debt ratio but focused only on long-term debt. In these three years, the long term debt ratio of Nike in a downward trend and the reason similar to debt ratio, Puma also.Interest coverage: Also known as times interest earned used to determine how easily a company can pay interest on outstanding debt. The lower the ratio, the more the company is burdened by debt expense. Nike keep increasing during these three years ，floating is not big，It is good for Nike to pay short-termdebt，the company has ability to raise money. The debt condition of Puma is not very good, the burden become more and the company cannot easy to pay interest on outstanding debt.Overview: debt utilization ratio helps company measure ability to sell inventory, collec t receivable, and pay current liabilities. We can see the figures shown in previous tables, obviously Nike’s performance quite good, the higher ability to pay their debt, create a very good reputation. Puma need some times to develop themselves.2.3.5 InvestmentsEPS（*shown in annual income statement )EPS：Nike‘s EPS which is in maintaining growth, floating is not very big, represent the company got profit and this is good for the company's stock investors. Puma is doing well compare to Nike.P/E ratio ：The price to earnings ratio (PE Ratio) is the measure of the share price relative to the annual net income earned by the firm per share. PE ratio shows current investor demand for a company share. The PE ratio has units of years, which can be interpreted as the number of years of earnings to pay back purchase price. Many factors led to the changes in the stock market, Nike’s P/E ratio has a float is normal, from year 2011 to 2012, the P/E ratio increased by two percent，A high PE ratio generally indicates increased demand because investors anticipate earnings growth in the future. Even though the P/E ratio of Puma is lower than Nike, but from 2010 to 2012, Puma keep an increase trend and performance not bad.Share price: closing prices provide a useful marker for investors to assess changes in stock prices over time, the closing price of one day can be compared to the previous closing price in order to measure market sentiment for a given security over a trading day. Stock market has four performances: the opening price, closing price, the highest and the lowest price, the closing price is most important because it is a basic data used to analysis of the stock market, only the closing price is the benchmark of profit or loss. Nike is a potential stock which is to attract people to buy. From year 2010 to 2012, Puma’s share price has beendecreased but still more higher than Nike.Dividend coverage: Measure of the ability of an organization to pay dividends. A higher or lower dividend cover may be appropriate depending on the level of stability in earnings of the organizations. Nike’s dividend coverage ratio has been decreased from year 2010 to2012; the level of earning got a big floating in a company, the dividend cover ratio is not safety of the current dividend rate of a particular stock. The condition of Puma is quite good; keep an increase trend during this three years and higher dividend than Nike.Overview: investors purchase stock to earn a return on their investment, gain or losses from selling the stock at a price, dividend which is help analysis evaluation stock investment. Puma’s performance is quite good, and the investment condition of Puma become very attract investors, so Nike need to work on so continuing to increase EPS so that it is more competitive with other companies in its industry.At the end of May 31, 2012, it appears that Nike is in an optimal financial condition. Not only does it exceed the industry averages in liquidity, solvency, and profitability, but they also have well-structured plans to combat any threat that may arise. Ni ke’s current situation showcases their ability to survive in thelong-run and grow. Nike’s cash management leaves no room for immediateliabilities to go unpaid, thus granting the company the ability to function fluidly. The bottom line is that Nike will continue to be a leader and one of the most preferred, iconic brands in its industry.Chapter 3: Financial Market and ImpactThe global economic recession resulted in a significant slow-down in international trade and a sharp rise in protectionist actions around the world. These trends are affecting many global manufacturing and service sectors, and the footwear and apparel industries, as a whole, are not immune.3.1 Global EconomyThe uncertain state of the global economy continues to impact businesses aro und the world. The current political and economic global environment has resulted in continued economic unpredictability, particularly in Europe where there are concerns regarding the increased debt levels of certain countries and their ability to meet future financial obligations, as well as the overall stability of the Euro currency (Nike Annual Report, 2012). Continuing volatility and disruption in the global capital and credit markets have led to a tightening of business credit and liquidity, a contraction of consumer credit, business failures, higher unemployment, and declines in consumer confidence and spending in many parts of the world. The economy depression direct impact on Athletic industry by influenced the purchasing power of customers that may lead Nike and Puma sales decreased, particularly to Puma which currency significant influenced by Europe economy.3.2Currency FluctuationsA majority of products of Nike and Puma are sold outside of the domestic market. As a result, companies conduct transactions in various currencies, which increase the exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates relative to the domestic currency (Nike Annual Report, 2012). International revenues and expenses generally are derived from sales and operations in foreign currencies, and these revenues and expenses could be affected by currency fluctuations.3.3 Changes in TaxThe effective income tax rate in the future could be adversely affected by a number of factors, including: changes in the mix of earnings in countries with differing statutory tax rates, changes in the valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities, changes in tax laws, the outcome of income tax audits in various jurisdictions around the world, and any repatriation of non-domestic earnings for which companies (Nike Annual Report, 2012). The trend of income tax is going up that arise the operational cost and decline the revenue of Nike and Puma.3.4 Rising Input CostThe increasing price of raw materials and labor costs could be a cause for concern to the company. The athletic industry uses raw materials including natural and synthetic rubber, nylon, leather, canvas, polyurethane films and plastic compounds. Raw material, especially rubber, is a key component in the production. The cost of rubber has been gradually increasing, owing to the increase in the oil prices. According to industry analysts, the average world natural rubber price was increased by more than two percentage points during 2009-2012 (Rubber Economist Report, 2013). With the political strife in Libya, the oil prices have soared across all markets. The entire industry faces challenges inmaintaining pricing pressure on its products due to increase raw material cost. Nike and Puma heavily dependent on Asian sourcing markets, the increased raw material costs in Asian sourcing markets may impact the growth of the companies.3.5 Intense Competitive LandscapeThe profit and market share could be impacted by the growing competition in the marketplace. With rising competition, the industry has been realizing consolidation wherein the smaller entities are being acquired by or merged with major players. The influx of private labels in the industry is also on the rise. T o survive and succeed in a stiff competitive environment, it becomes very important for companies to distinguish its product and service offerings through a clear and unique value proposition. The key players such as Nike Inc., Adidas Group, PUMA AG Rudolf Dassler Sport, Polo Ralph Lauren, Fila USA, Inc., Reebok International Ltd. and Callaway Golf Company. Some of these players enjoy a strong financial。
cost of capital acca 计算
cost of capital acca 计算成本资本是指企业为了筹集资金所要支付的利息和股息的成本。
ACCA考试中的成本资本题目主要涉及到成本资本的计算和应用。
本文将通过解释成本资本的概念、计算方法以及应用案例，详细说明ACCA考试中与成本资本有关的内容。
首先，我们来了解成本资本的概念。
成本资本是企业为了融资所要支付的成本，它是企业投入资本的机会成本。
成本资本通常由债务和股权的成本构成。
债务的成本是企业支付借款利息所产生的成本，而股权的成本则是企业支付股息所产生的成本。
企业需要知道自己的成本资本，以便在决策过程中对不同项目进行评估和决策。
其次，我们要了解成本资本的计算方法。
成本资本的计算可以采用权益成本法和加权平均成本法。
权益成本法是基于股权的成本计算方法，它通过计算股息和股权市场价格得出成本资本。
加权平均成本法是基于债务和股权的比例计算方法，它通过将债务和股权的成本加权平均得出成本资本。
在ACCA考试中，一般会给出具体的数据，要求学员使用特定的计算方法来计算成本资本。
最后，我们来看一下成本资本在实际案例中的应用。
成本资本的使用通常涉及到投资决策、资本预算和市场估值。
企业在做投资决策时需要比较项目的收益率与成本资本的大小，以判断该项目的可行性。
同时，在资本预算过程中，企业也需要考虑成本资本，以确定投资项目的优先次序。
另外，市场估值也需要考虑成本资本，投资者通常会使用成本资本来计算股票的内在价值。
在ACCA考试中，成本资本经常出现在资本预算和投资决策的题目中。
学员需要掌握成本资本的概念和计算方法，以便在考试中准确回答相关问题。
此外，了解成本资本的应用案例也能帮助学员更好地理解和应用这一概念。
总结起来，ACCA考试中的成本资本题目涉及到成本资本的计算和应用。
学员需要掌握成本资本的概念、计算方法和应用案例，以便在考试中准确回答问题。
通过学习和理解这些内容，学员可以更好地应对ACCA考试中关于成本资本的题目。
耐克公司案例中文版
耐克公司：资本成本2001年7月5日，KIMI FORD，NORTHPOINT 集团（实际是一家基金管理公司）的portforlio经理，仔细思考着分析人员关于耐克公司的积极评论。
耐克的股票价格从年初开始显著下跌。
FORD正在考虑为她管理的NORTHPOINT 大资本基金公司购买一些股份，这家基金公司主要投资财富杂志世界500强企业，其重点是价值投资。
它持有最多的股份包括埃克森公司、通用公司、麦当劳、3M及其它大企业，通常是经济历史悠久的股票。
虽然股票市场在过去18个月下跌，NORTHPOINT大资本基金公司却表现极好。
2000年，这家基金回报率20.7%，而S&P500甚至下跌了10.1%。
到2001年6月底，这家基金的YEAR-TO-DATE回报率为6.4%，而S&P500为7.3%。
一个星期前的2001年6月28日，耐克公司组织了分析人员会议，发布2001财政年度业绩（耐克的财务年度结束于每年5月份）。
不过，这次会议还有另外一个目的：耐克公司管理层希望沟通重振公司的战略。
1997年以来，耐克公司的总收入上升并稳定于90亿美元左右，而净收入从8亿美元左右下跌到5.8亿美元左右（见表一）。
耐克在美国运动鞋市场的市场份额从1997年的48%下降到2000年的42%。
此外，最近的供应链问题及美元升值的负面影响对收产生的负面影响。
会上，管理层公布了致力于既首先要关注增长，同时也注重经营成效的计划。
为了提高收入，公司将在中等价位产品类别内（这一类别的运动鞋每双售价为70-90美元）开发更多的运动鞋产品，而耐克公司近年来忽视了这一类别。
耐克公司也计划推动它的服装产品部门，这一部门在服装行业老将MINDY CROSSMAN （MINDY CROSSMAN在2000年9月加入耐克公司，她是JONES 服装集团的POLO牛崽裤部门的前任董事长及首席执行官）的领导下表现极佳。
在成本方面，耐克公司将在费用控制上作出更大努力。
Nike, Cost of Capital 资本成本分析案例 PPT
该内在价值高于股票现价42.09美元，因此，股票价格被低估。可以进行投资。
案例问题
3
• Joanna计算的WACC有哪些错误？ • 正确的计算方法是什么？ • 计算正确的WACC • 计算每股的内在价值
什么是WACC
4
加权平均资本成本：英文Weighted Average Cost of Capital的缩写。WACC代表公司整体平均资金 成本，
Joanna的错误有哪些？
正确的WACC算法
7
其中，T取38%，则可计算得： RWACC=90%*7.661%+10%*7.167%*(1-38%)=7.333%
每股内在价值
8
每股的内在价值需要先计算出公司的内在价值，扣除负债得到股东权益价值， 再通过股东权益价值除去流通股数量。 本案例报告使用现金流量法来估算NIKE公司的内在价值。
1 Nike,inc:cost of cApital
案例背景
2
NorthPoint集团是美国一家基金公司，主要投资 于财富杂志评出的世界500强企业。Kimi Rord是 NorthPoint集团的一名证券投资部经理, 正在考 虑是否投资Nike公司的股份。Joanna Cohen, 作 为Kimi的助理，向Kimi提交了她的资本成本评估 报告。
Nike 1964年由Philip H. Knight在奥勒冈州 （Beaverton,Oregon.）创立，是一家美国体育用 品生产商，主要生产运动鞋、运动服装、体育 用品，以自己的品牌销售，分销商遍布全球。 Nike成立以来发展迅速，已成为全球体育用品的 代表性品牌。但1997年-2001年以来，公司经营 业绩较差，因此部分投资者持观望态度。
Cost of Capital资金成本
4 Steps to calculate IRR: ① Identify cash flows. From issuer point of view, interest payment should be included net of tax, but from investor point of view, tax is not deducted. ② Estimates the IRR ③ Calculate two NPVs (one –ve and one +ve) ④ Calculate the IRR
The Cost of Equity – ke
3
The Cost of Equity – ke
4
The Cost of Equity – ke
5
The Cost of Equity – ke
6
The Cost of Debt – kd
The cost of debt is the rate of return that debt providers require on the funds that they provide. The value of debt is assumed to be the present value of its future cash flows. Features: 1. Debt is tax deductible and hence interest payment are made net of tax 2. Debt is always quoted in $100 nominal units or blocks. 3. Interest paid on the debt is stated as a percentage of nominal value. This is known as coupon rate (not the cost of debt). Interest payable = coupon rate * nominal value of the debt 4. Debt is normally redeemable at par (nominal value) or at a premium or discount. 5. Interest can be either fixed or floating (variable) on borrowings, but bonds normally pay fixed rate interest.
Nike Inc., Cost of Capital案例原文
Graduate School of Business Administration University Version 2.0 of VirginiaUVA-F-1353 Version 2.0Nike, Inc.: Cost of Capital On July 5, 2001, Kimi Ford, a portfolio manager at NorthPoint Group, a mutual fund management firm, pored over analyst write-ups of Nike, Inc., the athletic shoe manufacturer. Nike’s share price had declined significantly from the start of the year. Kimi was considering buying some shares for the fund she managed, the NorthPoint Large-Cap Fund, which invested mostly in Fortune 500 companies with an emphasis on value investing. Its top holdings included ExxonMobil, General Motors, McDonald’s, 3M and other large-cap, generally old-economy stocks. While the stock market declined over the last 18 months, NorthPoint Large-Cap had performed extremely well. In 2000, the fund earned a return of 20.7 percent even as the S&P 500 fell 10.1 percent. The fund’s year-to-date returns at the end of June, 2001 stood at 6.4 percent versus the S&P 500’s minus 7.3 percent. Only a week ago, on June 28, 2001, Nike held an analysts’ meeting to disclose its fiscal year 2001 results1. However, the meeting had another purpose: Nike management wanted to communicate a strategy for revitalizing the company. Since 1997, Nike’s revenues had plateaued at around $9 billion, while net income had fallen from almost $800 million to $580 million (see Exhibit 1). Nike’s market share in U.S. athletic shoes had fallen from 48 percent in 1997 to 42 percent in 2000.2 In addition, recent supply-chain issues and the adverse effect of a strong dollar had negatively affected revenue. At the meeting, management revealed plans to address both top-line growth and operating performance. To boost revenue, the company would develop more athletic shoe products in the mid-priced segment3 – a segment that it had overlooked in recent years. Nike also planned to push its apparel line, which, under the recent leadership of industry veteran Mindy Grossman4 had performed extremely well. On the cost side, Nike would exert more effort on expense control. Finally, company executives reiterated their long-term revenue growth targets of 8-10 percent, and earnings growth targets of above 15 percent.Nike’s fiscal year ended in May. Robson, Douglas, “Just Do…Something: Nike’s insularity and foot-dragging have it running in place”, Business Week, July 2, 2001 3 Sneakers in this segment sold for $70-$90 a pair. 4 Mindy Grossman joined Nike in September 2000. She was the former president and chief executive of Jones Apparel Group's Polo Jeans division.2 1This case was prepared from publicly available information by Jessica Chan under the supervision of Professor Robert F. Bruner. The financial support of the Batten Institute is gratefully acknowledged. This case was written as a basis for class discussion rather than to illustrate effective or ineffective handling of an administrative situation. Copyright 2001 by the University of Virginia Darden School Foundation, Charlottesville, VA. All rights reserved. To order copies, send an e-mail to dardencases@. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, used in a spreadsheet, or transmitted in any form or by any means— electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise—without the permission of the Darden School Foundation. Rev. 10/02.-2-UVA-F-1353Analyst reactions were mixed. Some thought the financial targets to be too aggressive; others saw significant growth opportunities in apparel and in Nike’s international businesses. Kimi Ford read all the analyst reports that she could find about the June 28 meeting, but the reports gave her no clear guidance: a Lehman Brothers report recommended a ‘Strong Buy’ while UBS Warburg and CSFB analysts expressed misgivings about the company and recommended a ‘Hold’. Kimi decided instead to develop her own discounted-cash-flow forecast to come to a clearer conclusion. Her forecast showed that at a discount rate of 12 percent, Nike was overvalued at its current share price of $42.09 (see Exhibit 2). However, she had done a quick sensitivity analysis that revealed Nike was undervalued at discount rates below 11.2 percent. Since she was about to go into a meeting, she requested her new assistant, Joanna Cohen, to estimate Nike’s cost of capital. Joanna immediately gathered all the data she thought she might need (Exhibits 1 through 4) and set out to work on her analysis. At the end of the day, she submitted her cost of capital estimate and a memo (Exhibit 5) explaining her assumptions to Ms. Ford.-3-UVA-F-1353Exhibit 1 Nike, Inc.: Cost of Capital Consolidated Income StatementsYear Ended May 31 (In millions except per share data) Revenues Cost of goods sold Gross profit Selling and administrative Operating income Interest expense Other expense, net Restructuring charge, net Income before income taxes Income taxes Net income Diluted earnings per common share Average shares outstanding (diluted) Growth (%) Revenue Operating income Net income Margins (%) Gross margin Operating margin Net margin Effective tax rate (%)* 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 20014,760.8 2,865.3 1,895.6 1,209.8 685.8 24.2 11.7 649.9 250.2 399.7 1.36 294.06,470.6 3,906.7 2,563.9 1,588.6 975.3 39.5 36.7 899.1 345.9 553.2 1.88 293.69,186.5 5,503.0 3,683.5 2,303.7 1,379.8 52.3 32.3 1,295.2 499.4 795.8 2.68 297.09,553.1 6,065.5 3,487.6 2,623.8 863.8 60.0 20.9 129.9 653.0 253.4 399.6 1.35 296.08,776.9 5,493.5 3,283.4 2,426.6 856.8 44.1 21.5 45.1 746.1 294.7 451.4 1.57 287.58,995.1 5,403.8 3,591.3 2,606.4 984.9 45.0 23.2 (2.5) 919.2 340.1 579.1 2.07 279.89,488.8 5,784.9 3,703.9 2,689.7 1,014.2 58.7 34.1 921.4 331.7 589.7 2.16 273.335.9 42.2 38.442.0 41.5 43.94.0 (37.4) (49.8)(8.1) (0.8) 13.02.5 15.0 28.35.5 3.0 1.839.6 15.1 8.5 38.540.1 15.0 8.7 38.636.5 9.0 4.2 38.837.4 9.8 5.1 39.539.9 10.9 6.4 37.039.0 10.7 6.2 36.0*The U.S. statutory tax rate was 35%. The state tax varied yearly from 2.5% to 3.5%. Source: Company's 10-K SEC filing, UBS Warburg-4Exhibit 2 Nike, Inc.: Cost of Capital Discounted Cash Flow Analysis2002 Assumptions: Revenue growth (%) COGS/Sales (%) S&A/Sales (%) Tax rate (%) Current assets/Sales (%) Current liabilities/Sales (%) Yearly depreciation and capex equal each other. Cost of capital (%) Terminal value growth rate (%) Discounted Cash Flow Operating income Taxes NOPAT Capex, net of depreciation Change in NWC Free cash flow Terminal value Total flows Present value of flows Enterprise value Less: current outstanding debt Equity value Current shares outstanding Equity value per share at 12% Sensitivity of equity value to discount rate: Discount rate 8.00% 8.50% 9.00% 9.50% 10.00% 10.50% 11.00% 11.17% 11.50% 12.00% 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009UVA-F-1353201020117.0 60.0 28.0 38.0 38.0 11.5 12.0 3.06.5 60.0 27.5 38.0 38.0 11.56.5 59.5 27.0 38.0 38.0 11.56.5 59.5 26.5 38.0 38.0 11.56.0 59.0 26.0 38.0 38.0 11.56.0 59.0 25.5 38.0 38.0 11.56.0 58.5 25.0 38.0 38.0 11.56.0 58.5 25.0 38.0 38.0 11.56.0 58.0 25.0 38.0 38.0 11.56.0 58.0 25.0 38.0 38.0 11.51,218.4 463.0 755.4 8.8 764.1 764.1 682.3 11,415.7 1,296.6 10,119.1 271.5 $ 37.271,351.6 513.6 838.0 (174.9) 663.1 663.1 528.61,554.6 590.8 963.9 (186.3) 777.6 777.6 553.51,717.0 652.5 1,064.5 (198.4) 866.2 866.2 550.51,950.0 741.0 1,209.0 (195.0) 1,014.0 1,014.0 575.42,135.9 811.7 1,324.3 (206.7) 1,117.6 1,117.6 566.22,410.2 915.9 1,494.3 (219.1) 1,275.2 1,275.2 576.82,554.8 970.8 1,584.0 (232.3) 1,351.7 1,351.7 545.92,790.1 1,060.2 1,729.9 (246.2) 1,483.7 1,483.7 535.02,957.5 1,123.9 1,833.7 (261.0) 1,572.7 17,998.7 19,571.5 6,301.5Current share price:$42.09Note: Terminal value is estimated using the constant growth model: Equity value $ 75.80 67.85 61.25 55.68 50.92 46.81 43.22 42.09 40.07 37.27 TV = FCF10 * (1 + Terminal value growth rate) WACC - g TV = $1,572.7 * (1.03) 12% - 3%-5Exhibit 3 Nike, Inc.: Cost of Capital Consolidated Balance SheetsMay 31, As of (In millions) Assets Current Assets: Cash and equivalents Accounts receivable Inventories Deferred income taxes Prepaid expenses Total current assets Property, plant and equipment, net Identifiable intangible assets and goodwill, net Deferred income taxes and other assets Total assets Liabilities and shareholders' equity Current Liabilities: Current portion of long-term debt Notes payable Accounts payable Accrued liabilities Income taxes payable Total current liabilities Long-term debt Deferred income taxes and other liabilities Redeemable preferred stock Shareholders' equity: Common stock, par Capital in excess of stated value Unearned stock compensation Accumulated other comprehensive income Retained earnings Total shareholders' equity Total liabilities and shareholders' equity 2000 2001UVA-F-1353$254.3 1,569.4 1,446.0 111.5 215.2 3,596.4$304.0 1,621.4 1,424.1 113.3 162.5 3,625.31,583.4 410.9 266.2 $ 5,856.91,618.8 397.3 178.2 $ 5,819.6$50.1 924.2 543.8 621.9 2,140.0 470.3 110.3 0.3$5.4 855.3 432.0 472.1 21.9 1,786.7 435.9 102.2 0.32.8 369.0 (11.7) (111.1) 2,887.0 3,136.0 $ 5,856.92.8 459.4 (9.9) (152.1) 3,194.3 3,494.5 $ 5,819.6Source: Company 10-K SEC filing.-6-UVA-F-1353Exhibit 4 Nike, Inc.: Cost of Capital Capital Market and Financial Information On or Around July 5, 2001Current yields on U.S. Treasuries 3-month 6-month 1-year 5-year 10-year 20-year 3.59% 3.59% 3.59% 4.88% 5.39% 5.74%Nike Share Price Performance Relative to S&P500: January 2000 to July 5, 20011.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 Feb-00 Aug-00 May-00 Sep-00 Feb-01 May-01 Nov-00 Jan-00 Jun-00 Jan-01 Jun-01 Jul-00 Mar-00 Apr-00 Mar-01 Dec-00 Oct-00 Apr-01 Jul-01Historical Equity Risk Premiums (1926-1999) Geometric mean 5.90% Arithmetic mean 7.50% Current Yield on Publicly Traded Nike Debt* Coupon 6.75% paid semi-annually Issued 07/15/96 Maturity 07/15/21 Current Price $ 95.60 Nike Historic Betas 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 YTD 06/30/00 AverageNikeS&P 5000.98 0.84 0.84 0.63 0.83 0.69 0.80Nike share price on July 5, 2001: Dividend History and Forecasts Paymt Dates 31-Mar 30-Jun 1997 0.10 0.10 1998 0.12 0.12 1999 0.12 0.12 2000 0.12 0.12 2001 0.12 0.12$42.0930-Sep 0.10 0.12 0.12 0.1231-Dec 0.10 0.12 0.12 0.12Total 0.40 0.48 0.48 0.48Consensus EPS estimates: FY 2002 FY 2003 $ 2.32 $ 2.67Value Line Forecast of Dividend Growth from '98-00 to '04-'06: 5.50%* Data have been modified for teaching purposes. Sources of data: Bloomberg Financial Services, Ibbotson Associates Yearbook 1999, Value Line Investment Survey, IBES-7Exhibit 5 Nike, Inc.: Cost of Capital Joanna’s Analysis TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Kimi Ford Joanna Cohen July 6, 2001 Nike’s Cost of CapitalUVA-F-1353Based on the following assumptions, my estimate of Nike’s cost of capital is 8.4 percent: I. Single or Multiple Costs of Capital? The first question I considered was whether to use single or multiple costs of capital given that Nike has multiple business segments. Aside from footwear, which makes up 62 percent of revenue, Nike also sells apparel (30 percent of revenue) that complement its footwear products. In addition, Nike sells sport balls, timepieces, eyewear, skates, bats, and other equipment designed for sports activities. Equipment products account for 3.6 percent of revenue. Finally, Nike also sells some non-Nike branded products such as Cole-Haan dress and casual footwear, and ice skates, skate blades, hockey sticks, hockey jerseys and other products under the Bauer trademark. Non-Nike brands account for 4.5 percent of revenue. I asked myself whether Nike’s business segments had different enough risks from each other to warrant different costs of capital. Were their profiles really different? I concluded that it was only the Cole-Haan line that was somewhat different; the rest were all sports-related businesses. However, since Cole-Haan makes up only a tiny fraction of revenues, I did not think it necessary to compute a separate cost of capital. As for the apparel and footwear lines, they are sold through the same marketing and distribution channels and are often marketed in "collections" of similar design. I believe they face the same risk factors, as such, I decided to compute only one cost of capital for the whole company. II. Methodology for Calculating the Cost of Capital: WACC Since Nike is funded with both debt and equity, I used the Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) method. Based on the latest available balance sheet, debt as a proportion of total capital makes up 27.0 percent and equity accounts for 73.0 percent:-8Capital sources Book Values Debt Current portion of long-term debt $ 5.4 Notes payable 855.3 Long-term debt 435.9 $ 1,296.6 Equity III. Cost of Debt $3,494.5UVA-F-135327.0% of total capital 73.0% of total capitalMy estimate of Nike’s cost of debt is 4.3 percent. I arrived at this estimate by taking total interest expense for the year 2001 and dividing it by the company’s average debt balance.5 The rate is lower than Treasury yields but that is because Nike raised a portion of its funding needs through Japanese yen notes, which carry rates between 2.0 percent to 4.3 percent. After adjusting for tax, the cost of debt comes out to 2.7 percent. I used a tax rate of 38 percent, which I obtained by adding state taxes of 3 percent to the U.S. statutory tax rate. Historically, Nike’s state taxes have ranged from 2.5 percent to 3.5 percent. IV. Cost of Equity I estimated the cost of equity using the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM). Other methods such as the Dividend Discount Model (DDM) and the Earnings Capitalization Ratio can be used to estimate the cost of equity. However, in my opinion, CAPM is the superior method. My estimate of Nike’s cost of equity is 10.5 percent. I used the current yield on 20-year Treasury bonds as my risk-free rate, and the compound average premium of the market over Treasury bonds (5.9 percent) as my risk premium. For beta I took the average of Nike’s beta from 1996 to the present. V. Putting it All Together Inputting all my assumptions into the WACC formula, my estimate of Nike’s cost of capital is 8.4 percent. WACC = Kd (1-t) * D/(D+E) + Ke * E/(D+E) = 2.7% * 27.0% + 10.5% * 73.0% = 8.4%5Debt balances as of May 31, 2000 and 2001 were $1,444.6 and $1,296.6 respectively.。
Nike企业管理分析
历经峥嵘的”JIST DO IT””JIST DO IT"，是美国著名的运动鞋生产商Nike的企业口号，也是其文化个性鲜明的体现——“体育、表演、洒脱自由的运动员的精神”,这一反传统观念的企业形象的树立与发扬，甚至输出国际，都要从其创办人菲利浦·奈特的汽车行李箱里诞生Nike的传奇性故事开始。
第一集Nike的崛起如果要问是谁造就了Nike的今天，很多人会指向Nike公司创建者和CEO菲利浦·奈特，但最根本的我认为是阿迪达斯的嚣张。
由于阿迪达斯的高价位使很多热爱运动的穷人望而却步，具有商业头脑的奈特抓住了最广大的群体，又随着“慢跑热"的兴起，在商业巨头的眼皮底下跑步进入了运动服饰的市场，开始了传奇的谱写。
一个故事的开始肯定会有一个主旨贯穿全文,而奈特的目标很简单——干掉阿迪达斯。
但是想把拥有市场三分之一的阿迪达斯并非易事,不光要有勇气,还有上帝的青睐。
为了能在运动产品市场站住脚，奈特并没有过度激进的与当时的三巨头正面对决（当然他也没有那个实力）,他抓住了当时的社会趋势——运动的普及。
随着运动的大众化，专业领域的产品便显得有些过时，市场要求更富有美感和多元化的产品，所以奈特便从最普通的跑鞋下手，打造出符合大众的跑鞋。
因此确立了Nike的首要一个战略目标—-占据美国市场。
树立了目标之后,接下来便要围绕这个目标进行战略分析，了解内外部环境是第一步。
1。
外部环境当时的美国的市场大部分由Adidas，Puma，Tiger三家瓜分，怎样做才能占有一席之地呢？先由最为经典的SWOT分析法对Nike的市场开拓进行分析：2。
内部环境Nike创建初期,各种制度不完善，资金不足,很容易导致资本的流失,仅仅凭借自己的专利技术想在市场站稳脚是不可能的，必须寻找一个切实的突破口，才能打进市场。
但是这正是Nike早起能迅速崛起的一个动因，由于制度的不健全，菲尔·奈特和鲍尔曼才能控制Nike的全部运营,在企业行为反应较快的情况下能将设想迅速变成现实，这是Nike初期内部环境的一大优势。
资本预算4个案例分析
总体要求：资本预算案例分析，共4个，每个同学4个案例需要全部单独完成，讨论时每2个小组讨论1个案例。
案例1：快乐周末轮胎有限公司经过广泛的研发工作，快乐周末轮胎有限公司近期研制了一种新轮胎——“超级轮胎”。
现在需要对生产和销售“超级轮胎”的投资必要性进行决策。
这种轮胎除了能用于一般的快车道，对那些经常行驶于湿滑路面和野地的驾驶员也非常适用。
截至目前，已累积发生研发成本1000万美元。
“超级轮胎”将于今年面市，快乐周末公司打算在市场上销售四年，花费了500万美元的市场调查显示：“超级轮胎”存在一个相当大的市场。
假设你是快乐轮胎有限公司的一个财务分析师，公司的CFO，亚当.史密斯先生要求你评估“超级轮胎”项目，并拟定一份是否进行投资的建议书。
你被告知所有过去对“超级轮胎”的投资都是沉没成本，除了马上将发生的初始投资，假定所有的现金流量都是年末发生的。
快乐周末需要马上投资120 000 000美元购买生产没备以制造“超级轮胎”。
此设备预计有七年的使用寿命，第四年年末时可以51428571美元出售。
快乐周末公司打算在两类市场上销售“超级轮胎”。
（1）初级设备制造商（OEM）市场。
OEM市场包括为新车购买轮胎的主要的大汽车公司（如通用汽车）。
在OEM市场上，“超级轮胎”预计能以每只轮胎36美元的价格出售，生产每只轮胎的可变成本为18美元。
（2）更换市场。
更换市场包括所有汽车出厂后购买的轮胎。
这个市场上的利润较高。
快乐公司预计能以每只轮胎59美元的价格出售，生产每只轮胎的与OEM市场上的相同。
快乐周末轮胎有限公司打算以高于通货膨胀率1%的速度提高价格。
可变成本同样也以高于通货膨胀率1%的速度增加。
此外，“超级轮胎”项目第一年将发生25000000美元的销售和一般管理费用（这个数字在此后年份里预计将以通货膨胀率的速度增加）。
快乐周末公司的公司所得税税率为40％。
年通货膨胀率预计保持在3.25%不变。
公司使用12%的折现率来评价新产品决策。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
案例背景
NorthPoint集团是美国一家基金公司，主要投资 于财富杂志评出的世界500强企业。Kimi Rord是 NorthPoint集团的一名证券投资部经理, 正在考 虑是否投资Nike公司的股份。Joanna Cohen, 作 为Kimi的助理，向Kimi提交了她的资本成本评估 报告。
权益资 本成本
Joanna的错误有哪些？
1. 债务资本成本 Joanna使用当前年份，即2001年的总利息支出除以2000年 和2001年的债务平均值来计算的。 但是，现有债务的历史成本，对于未来的决策时不相关的 沉没成本。因此在计算资本成本时，要通过对公司未来的 现金流和债务的分析来进行投资决策，即应考虑未来的债 务带来的成本。
=6724.17+10352.01=17076.18 （百万美元） 股东权益=内在价值-负债价值=17076.18-1296.6=15799.6（百万美元） 股票内在价值=15766.6 / 271.5 = 58.12（美元）
该内在价值高于股票现价42.09美元，因此，股票价格被低估。可以进行投资。
Nike 1964年由Philip H. Knight在奥勒冈州 （Beaverton,Oregon.）创立，是一家美国体育用 品生产商，主要生产运动鞋、运动服装、体育 用品，以自己的品牌销售，分销商遍布全球。 Nike成立以来发展迅速，已成为全球体育用品的 代表性品牌。但1997年-2001年以来，公司经营 业绩较差，因此部分投资者持观望态度。
2. 权益资本成本 CAPM模型正确 市场风险溢价时，使用几何平均收益率5.9%是可行的 但是：无风险收益，一般使用较短期的国债利率而非20年期的国债利率 离目前最近的贝塔系数才能更好地反映公司目前的以及未来的风险状况，而非平均贝塔值
3. 债务资本及权益资本权数 公司权益资本Joanna直接采用财务报表账面价值计算，但实际上利用公司流通股价值计算后， 权益资本会增大，需要进行调整
正确的WACC算法
1. 调整权益资本与财务资本权数
2. 债务资本成本 取已公开发行的债券未来将支付的利息和本金折现，即债券的到期收益率来作为债务
的资本成本。
其中，P0=95.60。F为债券面值100。债券年利率为6.75%，且每半年付息一次。债券发 行日为1996/7/15，到期日为2021/7/15，案发时间为2001年，即持有至到期年数为20 年，则付息期数n=20*2=40，所以，计算得RB为7.167% 3. 权益资本成本 根据CAPM模型计算公司的权益资本成本，即RS=RF+(RM-RF). 其中无风险利率RF取短期国债利率3.59% 风险系数取最近的历史值0.69 市场风险溢价(RM-RF)取几何平均收益率5.9% 权益资本成本RS=3.59%+0.69*5.9%=7.T取38%，则可计算得： RWACC=90%*7.661%+10%*7.167%*(1-38%)=7.333%
每股内在价值
每股的内在价值需要先计算出公司的内在价值，扣除负债得到股东权益价值， 再通过股东权益价值除去流通股数量。 本案例报告使用现金流量法来估算NIKE公司的内在价值。
每股内在价值
案例总结
概念理解须深入， 机械应用无用处 WACC须小心，陷阱处处多提防 内在价值多计算， 股票投资有方案
谢谢聆听！
案例问题
1. Joanna计算的WACC有哪些错误？ 2. 正确的计算方法是什么？ 3. 计算正确的WACC 4. 计算每股的内在价值
什么是WACC
加权平均资本成本：英文Weighted Average Cost of Capital的缩写。WACC代表公司整体平均资金 成本，
债务资 本成本
WACC
按两阶段增长模型对NIKE进行估值评估。 第一阶段：2002-2011年 每年的净现金=经营现金流-税收+（折旧-资本投入）+净运营资本，其中净运营资本=流动资产-流动负债 该部分数据案例中已给出，只需要将各年净现金折现至2002年即可。
第二阶段：2012年开始，假设公司进入永续增长。则有： 2012年终值=2012年的净现金/（WACC-增长率）（附件表中WACC取12%而计算出公司终值， 因WACC变化，附件表中的终值部分需要重新计算，因此结果会有变化） 2011年终值=2012年终值/（1+WACC） 案例中亦已给出相关假设（最终增长值3%），以及2011年企业终值。将该终值折现至2002年即可。 以WACC=7.333%计算，具体计算过程将附表1. 易得， 企业内在价值=2002年-2011年折现净现金流+2012年之后永续增长现金流折现值