《失乐园》中撒旦形象的双重性分析
试析《失乐园》中撒旦的艺术形象

约翰・弥尔顿(1608-1674)是十七世纪英国著名的诗人、思想家、政治家和政论家。
他出身于伦敦一个公证人家庭,青少年时代起思想进步,厌恶封建思想,痛恨教会腐败。
革命爆发后他积极投身革命,参加了革命政府的工作,并撰写政论,先后发表了《论出版自由》、《论国王和官吏的权力》和《为英国人民申辩》等文章,轰动整个欧洲。
王权复辟后,弥尔顿的著作被焚毁,个人遭监禁,但他仍然坚持革命立场,在双目失明,经济拮据的困境中坚持完成了三大诗作《失乐园》(1667)、《复乐园》(1671)和《力士参孙》(1671)。
1674年诗人与世长辞。
《失乐园》是弥尔顿最伟大的作品。
它借用圣经故事,用史诗的形式表现了人类最初的演变和人类历史上反复出现的变革斗争。
全书共十二卷,描述了撒旦反抗上帝,战败后设计复仇,偷入上帝创造的伊甸园,引诱夏娃偷食禁果,以致人类始祖被逐出伊甸乐园,开始沉沦的故事。
诗篇大量运用圣经人物意象,将撒旦和亚当、夏娃刻画得栩栩如生,从而也将主题表现得淋漓尽致。
但是对于撒旦这个形象的理解历来众说纷纭,中国读者传统上大都把他看作一个反抗强权的革命英雄。
这一方面是受我国文学政治化倾向的影响,结合弥尔顿的生平和创作这部作品时的处境,很自然地得出这样的结论。
另一方面也是西方浪漫派诗人的影响所至。
浪漫主义诗人布莱克、拜伦、雪莱等对这个形象所体现的崇高的英雄气概推崇备至。
他们相信撒旦在史诗中被作者塑造成了真正的英雄。
虽然撒旦的形象错综复杂,充满矛盾,但在层层迷雾之下,我们依然可以看清弥尔顿笔下的撒旦始终是魔鬼的化身,教唆人类堕落的元凶。
作为一位虔诚的清教徒,弥尔顿始终认为上帝是公平、正义、仁爱的,他决不容许自己对上帝有不敬的言行。
同时,17世纪的英国人长期受基督教文化的耳濡目染,民族悠久的传统文化、传统道德给人们的行为规范、思维方式造成的深层的心理定势,使他们对亵渎上帝的行为难以接受的。
这自然也会无形中对诗人的创作产生影响。
英语毕业论文)弥尔顿《失乐园》中撒旦形象的双重性(开题报告 论文)

英语毕业论文)弥尔顿《失乐园》中撒旦形象的双重性(开题报告论文)本文旨在探讨弥尔顿的史诗诗作《失乐园》中撒旦形象的双重性。
___的《失乐园》是一部伟大的文学作品,通过描绘与人类之间的冲突以及人类的堕落与救赎,引发了许多人对于宗教和人性的思考。
而其中最令人瞩目的角色之一就是撒旦。
___的《失乐园》是一部史诗诗作,于1667年出版。
它讲述了___和___被从伊甸园驱逐的故事,探讨了人类的自由意志、道德选择和堕落的主题。
在这部作品中,___作为反派角色扮演了重要的角色。
___在《失乐园》中被描绘为一个既具有魅力又邪恶的角色。
他是的叛逆者,背叛了天堂,引诱了___和___堕入罪恶。
然而,___也展现出一些令人深思的特质。
他具有坚定的决心和无可动摇的意志,寻求自由,并为人类的自由而战斗。
他的形象既具有黑暗的一面,又有一种可怜和悲壮的英雄气概。
___的双重性体现在他既是邪恶的诱惑者,又是人类内心的探索者。
他代表了人类的欲望、野心和自由意志,也象征着对于权威和束缚的反抗。
同时,他也是一个具有矛盾情感的复杂角色,深受读者的关注和探索。
总之,撒旦在___的《失乐园》中是一个多维的形象,既具有邪恶的一面,又有一种坚定和勇敢的一面。
通过对撒旦形象的深入研究,我们能更好地理解弥尔顿的作品,以及其中蕴含的关于人性、道德选择和自由意志的思考。
本篇论文旨在探讨《失乐园》中撒旦作为反抗者和自由斗士的形象。
___在《失乐园》中被描绘为反抗的力量,他是那些不满于被束缚的人们的象征。
他不仅展现了坚定的意志力和决心,还代表了追求自由和独立的渴望。
作为一个反抗者,他敢于挑战的权威,因此被赞颂为自由斗士。
___通过撒旦的形象探索了人类对权力和自由的渴望,以及对道德价值观和道德责任的挑战。
撒旦的正面形象向我们展示了一个复杂而多维的人物,同时也引起了读者对于善恶和道德选择的思考。
本论文将通过分析《失乐园》中撒旦的言行举止,揭示他正面形象的重要性,并进一步探讨他对故事情节和主题的影响。
失乐园中最生动的形象

失乐园中最生动的形象
《失乐园》是英国文学作家约翰·弥尔顿创作的一部史诗诗歌,描述了亚当和夏娃在伊甸园中受到撒旦引诱堕落的故事。
其中最生动的形象可能是撒旦,他是一个被描绘为反叛和狡猾、具有人形和蛇形特征的人物。
在《失乐园》中,撒旦是一个具有复杂性和魅力的角色。
他拥有超凡的能力和完美的美貌,是天使长和跟随他的叛逆天使的领袖。
但撒旦的骄傲和自我中心导致了他和上帝的矛盾,最终导致他被赶出了天堂,成为被放逐的堕落天使之一。
随着剧情的发展,撒旦依靠巧妙的言辞和欺骗慢慢地影响了亚当和夏娃的思想,导致他们背离了上帝的教导,最终被驱出伊甸园。
撒旦在小说中角色的转化和复杂性,以及他引诱夏娃堕落的过程,使读者对他的印象深刻,成为小说中最具生动形象的角色之一。
简述失乐园中撒旦的形象外国文学

简述失乐园中撒旦的形象外国文学有人认为,撒旦是人类失去乐园的祸根,最终受到上帝的惩罚。
但作为一个魔鬼,撒旦不是一个击即溃、头脑简单的傻瓜,否则耶稣所受的考验就称不上奇迹了。
对付人类,撒旦一计不成又升一计,所以人类上了他的当。
在天堂,他也同样不甘寂寞,首次谋反被打入地狱仍不甘心,甚至更加疯狂地鼓动再次造反,向“独揽大权,肆虐天庭”的上帝“进行一场永不调和的战争”。
的确,撒旦的演说慷慨激昂,非常精彩,制造出一派不战不休的气势。
如果我们把它与其创作时的历史背景联系起来,上帝才是一个专制、施暴者的化身。
因此作者从撒旦的形象上隐藏着作者对革命势力的悲哀,以及对暴君者们的嘲笑和讽刺。
在诗歌中,塑造了撒旦这一叛逆者的革命形象,作者以撒旦为资产阶级革命的代言人,颂扬了反叛专制暴政的资产阶级革命思想,而最终撒旦在对上帝的对抗中失败,从而失去天堂的乐园,寓意着资产阶级革命的失败和封建势力的复辟。
作者在感情上对撒旦的失败和受到的惩罚表达了同情之心,因为撒旦的失败和受到的惩罚,很像资本主义受封建权威的压迫。
但是由于诗人是一个虔诚的教徒,在理智上并不允许他对撒旦持肯定态度,这就造就了撒旦矛盾形象的另一面,也就是撒旦本性里恶的一面的表现。
撒旦的英雄形象主要表现在前两部,那是叛逆者的英雄气概。
诗人的宗教信仰决定了撒旦最后的命运,凡是违抗上帝旨意者,最终都会受到惩罚的。
人类也是如此,亚当和夏娃受到撒旦的诱惑,违背了上帝的旨意,最终被赶出了伊甸园,但是人类的被驱逐和撒旦的被驱逐也是有区别的。
亚当和夏娃在走出伊甸园时,他们对于自己的行为怀着深深的忏悔之心,圣子给予了他们启示,天使为他们指点未来,只要他们诚心忏悔,最终是会得到上帝的原谅的,他们是满怀着希望地走向了另一个世界。
而撒旦的结局却是迥然不同的,那是他罪有应得的,这是因为撒旦选择了孤注一掷的卑劣的报复,并且没有为他的报复行为产生悔恨之意。
在成功地诱惑了人类,使无辜的人类受到上帝的惩罚时,撒旦欢呼自己的胜利,但是此时他却发现,他以及他的徒众都变成了令人厌恶的蛇,也使我们最终认清了撒旦的真实面目,他依旧是一个邪恶的魔鬼,这也是撒旦在《失乐园》中最后的形象。
失乐园中撒旦形象

试析《失乐园》中撒旦的形象车家玲(安阳师范学院人文管理学院,河南安阳 455000)摘要:撒旦是《失乐园》中颇具有争议性的人物,他既是一位为了平等和自由敢于向最高权威进行不屈不饶抗争的反叛英雄,又是一个权欲熏心、骄矜狂妄的堕落者同时他还是祢尔顿关于自由意志与理性原则并存的思想观念的艺术载体,即人为了自由和理想而奋斗,但同时人的行为得受到真理的约束。
关键字:撒旦;双重人格;自由与理性一、引言约翰·弥尔顿(1608-1674)是十七世纪英国著名的诗人、思想家、政治家和政论家。
他出身于伦敦一个公证人家庭,青少年时代起思想进步,厌恶封建思想,痛恨教会腐败。
革命爆发后他积极投身革命,参加了革命政府的工作,并撰写政论,先后发表了《论出版自由》、《论国王和官吏的权力》等文章而轰动整个欧洲。
王朝复辟后他虽然遭监禁,著作被焚烧,但仍然坚持革命立场,在双目失明,经济拮据的情况下完成了三大史诗《失乐园》、《复乐园》、《力士参孙》。
1674年诗人与世长辞。
弥尔顿的长篇史诗《失乐园》( Paradise Lost, 1667)深邃、高贵、整饬、优美,一直被誉为“英语中最伟大的诗作”,是英国文学史上不可多得的鸿篇巨制,在世界文学史上可与《神曲》和《浮士德》相媲美。
弥尔顿的长篇史诗《失乐园》,以《圣经·旧约·创世记》第二、三章关于人类始祖亚当、夏娃在撒旦引诱下偷食禁果犯下原罪,被上帝逐出伊甸园的故事为蓝本,成功地将诗人—作为一个清教徒,所相信的人类重返上帝的乐园的回归之路极为完整、生动地展现在读者面前。
这条路发端于人类始祖的原罪,转折于耶稣基督道成肉身的救赎,作结于自由意志选择下的灵魂的忏悔和回归。
诗人满怀豪情的诗意书写,所展现的是诗人的人生理想、人生信念。
就全诗而论,从太初谈起,开天辟地,创造世界,创造人类;借《圣经》故事,虽涉及全人类原罪赎罪的悲剧,但实质上说的是人类求知求生,追求自由人权,反对盲目迷信,反对封建专制,建立人类社会理想的大同世界。
浅谈撒旦在失乐园中的形象 毕业论文

摘要约翰·弥尔顿,是英语文化历史上最有名的作者之一。
他的杰作——《失乐园》,无疑是整个英语文化历史上的一座里程碑。
他创造了一个特别的形象,并且使人们能够以另一种不同的角度来看待传说中的恶魔——撒旦。
他的作品使撒旦更加形象生动,更加人性化,并且使其在某些角度上看起来是一名英雄,或是枭雄。
弥尔顿选用了一长段的篇幅来描写撒旦对他的追随者所说的一场雄辩,这段独白中也蕴含了米尔顿自己的意志和精神。
他的字句反映出了他毕生所挚爱的自由,同时还暗示了通过暴力方式进行的革命终究会失败。
这就是为什么本作中的撒旦会具有这样一种矛盾性。
他热爱自由,却不能通过暴力手段得到他想到的。
同时,撒旦在整本书中还扮演了一个失败者。
尽管弥尔顿用了一些积极的语句和情节来形容撒旦,但是该角色的邪恶本质从未有所改变。
关键词:英雄、自由、撒旦、失败目录1 简介 (1)2失乐园中的撒旦 (1)2.1撒旦作为一个自主的形象 (3)2.2英雄撒旦 (3)2.3撒旦的矛盾 (4)3圣经和本书中撒旦形象的不同 (4)3.1撒旦是圣经中一切邪恶的集合 (4)3.2撒旦是《失乐园》中的英雄 (4)3.3两个不同形象间的区别 (5)3.3.1人们认为失乐园中撒旦是英雄的原因分析 (5)3.3.2撒旦在失乐园中的形象更具人性化 (5)4该书与当时社会背景的联系 (5)4.1不同形象暗示不同阶级 (5)4.2蕴含了弥尔顿的意志 (6)4.2.1自由是整本书的主旨 (6)4.2.2撒旦的结局注定是失败的 (6)5总结 (7)参考 (8)浅谈撒旦在《失乐园》中的形象1 简介当莎士比亚还在写着他的著作的时候,英国的另一个伟大的诗人在伦敦诞生了。
他是约翰·弥尔顿。
弥尔顿的父亲是一个清教徒,他酷爱音乐,因此,在他的影响下,小弥尔顿也热爱音乐,当然,还有书。
伟大的史诗——《失乐园》,这本描述撒旦怎样背叛上帝以及亚当和夏娃如何被赶出伊甸园的故事的巨作,花费了弥尔顿7年的时间。
浅析《失乐园》中撒旦的形象塑造

浅析《失乐园》中撒旦的形象塑造【摘要】弥尔顿的《失乐园》是一部享有世界级声誉的文学作品。
作品中的撒旦作为与上帝的对抗者是历来受到争议最多的形象之一。
撒旦经历了一个从藐视到反抗到最终无奈的过程,也正是在这个过程中,我们可以分析出撒旦作为反抗者所展示的勇气和魄力,但撒旦毕竟是邪恶的,他一次次挑起了战争。
撒旦可以被看作是英雄,但他又不简单的算英雄,他是一个结合体,一个立体化的魔鬼式英雄。
【关键词】撒旦,魔鬼,英雄,立体化一、引言一直有人认为:撒旦是人类失去乐园的祸根,因为撒旦的的诱惑,人类最终受到上帝的惩罚。
作为一个魔鬼,撒旦不是一个一击即溃、头脑简单的傻瓜,他身上有一种英雄的气魄,撒旦本来就是一位大天使。
撒旦是聪明的,也可以算是狡猾的,对付人类,撒旦一计不成又生一计,所以人类上了他的当,从天使到魔鬼,撒旦最终堕落了。
撒旦是失乐园故事的核心,他推动着整个故事的发展,也体现作者众多的资产阶级革命理念。
二、英雄撒旦弥尔顿笔下的撒旦首先是位伟大的英雄,代表着弥尔顿的资产阶级革命思想,这是毋庸置疑的。
撒旦的英雄气魄体现在他具有敢于向最高权威抗争的精神:为争取自由和平等,推翻上帝的独裁统治,他领导一部分反叛天使与上帝进行斗争。
这种反叛意识正好结合当时资产阶级革命思想的核心,追求社会平等与自由,打破神权和独裁。
在诗中,撒旦敢于首先怀疑毫无道理却非让人盲目服从不可的绝对命令,面对上帝的强大的权力,撒旦毫无畏惧,率部反抗,大闹天堂。
第一次反抗失败了,他不服气,也不认输,不气馁,发挥自己的聪明才智,很像中国传统小说中描绘的那些英雄,面对强大的对手,敢于亮剑,险些儿搞得天兵天将对阵中措手不及,万分狼狈,连上帝在天国也担心撒旦的反叛会成功。
当然,撒旦还是失败了,被打落地狱。
但是他崇尚自由,他让反对者闭口而去,地狱议会上他发扬民主风格,征求大家的意见。
历经千辛万苦在新创造的伊甸乐园中寻找到人类先祖双亲的是他,利用时机促成全诗主题的展现的也是他。
《失乐园》中撒旦的艺术形象分析

《失乐园》中撒旦的艺术形象分析【摘要】《失乐园》中塑造的复杂的撒旦的形象,一直被人们从不同的视角来解读,一般的观点认为撒旦是反抗专制统治和暴政的英雄形象,本文通过对弥尔顿的《失乐园》进行深层的探讨与分析,对撒旦的堕落过程进行思考与分析,揭露了其“恶”的本质。
【关键词】失乐园;撒旦;英雄;原因前言弥尔顿是英国十七世纪著名的作家、政治家和思想家。
其诗作《失乐园》因其对主角撒旦的复杂形象的成功塑造一直被人们津津乐道,可以与《伊利亚特》、《神曲》相提并论,其深刻的思想内容和复杂的人物形象的塑造使其长期以来成为了评论界评论的焦点。
一、《失乐园》内容概述《失乐园》全书共有十二卷,主要是来自于圣经故事,运用史诗的形式来表现人类最初始的演变过程以及人类的历史上不断地进行的革命斗争。
全书的内容可以用两条线索来概括:一条是亚当和夏娃的故事,他们抵挡不住被撒旦操控的蛇的诱惑,悄悄地偷吃了分辨善恶树上的禁果,结果将地上乐园即伊甸园白白的失去的故事;另外一条线索是以撒旦为首,聚众来反抗上帝,被逐出天上乐园,打入地狱的故事,但是他们并没有放弃而是经受住了炼狱般的磨练,他们不忘初衷,反抗的欲望更加的强烈。
《失乐园》中引用了许多圣经中的人物,并且将其刻画的更加的生动鲜明,将诗歌的主题表达的淋漓尽致。
在众多的人物中,撒旦的形象刻画的最为成功,这就使的撒旦在文学的殿堂上被久久的铭记,这也是《失乐园》受欢迎的主要原因。
二、撒旦的艺术形象及其成因1、具有叛逆精神的英雄形象前两卷撒旦是受人敬仰的大天使,他仪表伟岸,声音高亢,意志顽强,富有冒险精神和谋略,有帝王般的尊严,他在地狱发表演讲时,整个地狱都能响起回声。
因此在史诗的前两卷撒旦是具有反叛精神的英雄。
他在反叛上帝失败之后,深陷地狱之中,他的王者风范仍然令人生畏。
撒旦不服输的意志和不屈的精神正常长期以来支持诗人度过了风风雨雨的革命生涯以及能够经受住晚年凄惨命运的精神力量,同时也是出于革命低迷时期时的革命者应具备的基本素质,因而可以使诗人充分发挥抒情的诗才,把撒旦刻画的活灵活现。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
An Analysis of the Dual Character of Satan’s Image inParadise Lost《失乐园》中撒旦形象的双重性分析[摘要]在约翰.弥尔顿所有的著作中,《失乐园》是最复杂,最难理解的一部作品,并为他赢得了永久的荣誉。
在《失乐园》中,撒旦的形象是最生动,逼真的,他的巨大影响力和矛盾的情感,以及其复杂性,掩盖了其他所有的形象包括上帝。
作为《失乐园》中最重要的形象,撒旦显然是令人钦佩的,而且有着巨大的影响,这种矛盾的情感吸引了众多批评家的目光,引起了几个世纪的争论。
这篇论文将要把撒旦的双重形象分成三种类型进行分析:第一种类型是把撒旦作为革命者的形象;第二类是把撒旦作为魔鬼的形象进行分析;第三类是以评论家的观点,保持中立,认为撒旦的形象,除了是由人们构想的,是抽象的以外,撒旦带给我们更多的是好与坏的混合体。
而且本论文还将要查明影响撒旦双重性格形象的因素,从分析正文看作者的写作意图;从十七世纪的社会背景看弥尔顿个人的经历和信仰。
更多的是那些潜在的读者的背景和他们独特的欣赏力,也被作者考虑在内。
所有的这些分析得出的观点是,撒旦是一个仅有的英雄和一个真正的恶魔,从他所有的看法和情感得到一个多方面的性格。
他的矛盾情感鲜明的遍及整个诗篇。
[关键词] 《失乐园》撒旦革命者魔鬼清教徒An Analysis of the Dual Character of Satan’s Image inParadise Lost[Abstract]All of John Milton’s great works. Paradise Lose is the most complicated and most profound one, which wins him endless honor. The image of Satan in Paradise Lost is supreme vivid, powerful, ambivalent and complex, overshadowing all the other characters including God.As the main character of Paradise Lost, Satan is obviously impressive and powerful, whose ambivalence catches all critics’ eyes and leads to centuries’ disputes. This dissertation will analyze the dual character of Satan’s image into three groups: The first group that the image of Satan as a revolutionist, the second group that the image of Satan as a devil, while the third group of critics, stand in the middle, seeing both sides of Satan. They identify Satan either as an abstract conception or else, more immediately, as someone who is an evil mixed with good. On the other hand, check the factors that influence his dual character of image, from the analysis of the text to the author’s intention, from the 17th century social background to Milton’s personal experiences and belief. What’s more, the potential readers’ background and individual taste will also be taken into consideration. And all these analysis lead to the point that it is too simple and arbitrary to say Satan is a mere hero or a pure devil, since he is a round character full of thoughts and emotions. His ambivalence is obviously throughout the whole poem.[Key Words]Paradise Lose Satan revolutionist devil puritanContentsIntroductionChapter 1 The Bual Character of Satan’s Image1.1 The Image of Satan as a Revolutionist1.1.1 Sadan owns the spirit of hero as a revolutionist1.1.2 Sadan’s wisdom and emotion1.2 The Image of Satan as a Devil1.2.1 Sadan is vicious and furious1.2.2 Sadan’s other wrong deedsChapter 2 Historical Factors Contributing to the Dual Character of Satan’s Image2.1 The Influence of the puritan movement2.2 The Influence of the restorationChapter 3Potential Readers’ Influence on the Formation of the Dual Character of Satan’s Image3.1 Puritans’ view of Satan3.2 Revolutionists’ idea of Satan3.3 Neutral modernists’ interpretation of SatanConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesAn Analysis of the Dual Character of Satan’s Image inParadise LostIntroductionJohn Milton, one of the greatest poets of the English language, is a political commenter of the English Bourgeois Revolution, whose importance is acknowledged all over the world. His powerful, rhetoric prose and the eloquence of his poetry had an immense influence especially on the 18th century verse. He is the last rearguard of the Renaissance and the primary promoter of Enlightenment and he is the love of every form of human culture and the steadfast devotion to duty as the highest object in human life have shaped his entire career.Of all his great works, Paradise Lost is the most complicated and most profound one, which wins him endless honor. It is indeed the only generally recognized epic in English literature since Beowulf and a heroic poem in Renaissance style. It recounts the story of Satan's rebellion against God, and of the disobedience and fall of Adam and Eve. It deals with revolt from God, with sin and fall, and with the possible salvation. It presents the author’s views in an allegoric religious form, and readers will easily discern its basic idea—exposure of the ways of Satan and justification of the ways of God to men. It is a reflection of the reactionary forces of Milton’s time and the passionate appeal for freedom.As the main character of Paradise Lost, Satan is obviously impressive and powerful, whose ambivalence catches all critics’ eyes and leads to centuries’ disputes. Those critics can be classified into three groups. The first group mainly consists of revolutionists.They traditionally read this epic with strong political inclination, thinking Satan as the protagonist and considering him a symbol of revolution (Fowler 45). They are generally called pro-Satanists. They think Satan is infinitely superior to man, entirely different from the devil of the miracle plays, and completely overshadowing the hero both in interest and in manliness (Danielson 134). The secondgroup is formed by the anti-Satanists. They follow the theme of sense and regard Satan’s hubris without sense as the cause of his own tragedy. They view Satan as an absolute devil, the root of our immense pain from generation to generation. Though his lingering traces of angelic nature and his assertion of implacable defiance at the beginning of the poem disguise him as a righteous liberator, it can’t change Satan’s evil nature (Huang Delin 52). He is doomed to destruction by the flaw of self-love and over-ambition. Both pro-Satanists and anti-Satanists have evidence to support their statements, but neither of them can prove their points of view with sufficient details. While the third group of critics, such as John Carey, stand in the middle, seeing both sides of Satan. They are apt to believe that Satan’s ambivalence is intended by Milton to achieve depth (Danielson 160). They identify Satan either as an abstract conception or else, more immediately, as someone who is an evil mixed with good.Based on the critics’ points of view, this dissertation will analyze the dual character of Satan’s image and check the factors that influence his dual character of image, from the analysis of the text to the author’s intention, from the 17th century social background to Milton’s personal experiences and belief. What’s more, the potential readers’ background and individual taste will also be taken into consideration. And all these analysis lead to the point that it is too simple and arbitrary to say Satan is a mere hero or a pure devil, since he is a round character full of thoughts and emotions. His ambivalence is obviously throughout the whole poem.Chapter 1 The dual character of Satan’s imageHistorically and traditionally, Satan is considered the symbol of evil, however, in John Milton’s epic—Paradise Lost, we can find a completely new image of him. Here he is no longer a simple-minded devil. He is a round character full of thoughts and emotions. Although in his spirit some evil genes still exist, he is gifted with more heroic characteristics. That is, Satan is a tragic villain hero driven by ambition.1.1 The image of Satan as a revolutionistRevolutionists are always courageous to fight against the uncoordinated factors of the society; they aren’t reconciled to being dictated to the mighty power. They make good use of their courage and wisdom to strike for the equality and freedom, which stand for a sound and positive society. They are confident that the victory belongs to them. In Paradise Lost, Satan demonstrates these personalities of a revolutionist in his strong desire for freedom, equality and his wisdom to fight against the tyranny of the God.1.1.1 Sadan owns the spirit of hero as a revolutionistSatan, originally called Lucifer,was one of the greatest angelic beings who serve God in Heaven. He is the most beautiful angels and God’s first-hand man, steadfast angel and the sublime grandeur of a graceful but tremendous spirit. Nevertheless, he is tired of flattering God and takes arms to fight for freedom. When being faced with God’s tyranny and mighty power, Satan doesn’t act as a coward. On the contrary, he appears even braver. He is not afraid of losing everything. Failure will only strengthen his will and his confidence.“All is not lost; the unconquerable will, /And study of revenge, immortal hate, /And courage never to submit or yield (Jin Fashen 10)”he declares, “Since through experience of this great event, /In arms not worse, in foresight much advanced, /We may with more successful hope resolve /To wage by force or guile eternal war /Irreconcilable to our grand Foe. (Jin Fashen 10)” There is undoubtedly something thrilling as he summons up his defeated powers, collects together the scatter legions of the lost angels, addresses them with words of defiance of God “Clashed on their sounding shields the din of war, /Hurling defiance towards the vault of heaven” (Zhang Boxiang 384). The sense of being lost, far from causing him to slump, propelshim with furious energy. This is how fear and despair are turned into courage. Clearly, such a turning of hell to fortitude is admirable. It is no cheapening of the heroism to say that it consists in making energetic resistance out of despair. It is not that the heroism of Satan’s defiance is bogus. On the narrative level, we cannot but admire Satan’s courage in venturing into the unknown, which shows the transcendent glory by his superior courage and abilities.If we listen to Satan as he wishes to be heard, his speech asserts equality, freedom, and nobility of soul. He appears to demand a kind of heavenly democracy; hence, he sees that God disturbs freedom as the first step toward slavery. Compared with Satan, God’s feature seems much duller. He is the ruler of heaven but “holds the tyranny (Jin Fashen 12)” by saying “what I will is Fate (Jin Fashen 86)”. He has the mighty power but still doubts it while facing Satan’s defiance. He is the creator but prevents human beings from reaching the Tree of Knowledge. He is selfish. He wants to control all the creatures under fatuity and backwardness so that he could maintain his sole reign. He leaves the fallen angels to go on falling forever and has no mercy on his people. He hates everything that would challenge his power. Belial counsels acceptance of God’s will, but his acceptance is informed by fear and sloth, not by love. Their consciousness of worth and intolerance of servitude are seen when the fallen angels claim, “rather seek /Our own good from ourselves, and from our own /Live to ourselves, though in this vast recess, /Free, and to none accountable, preferring /Hard liberty before the easy yoke” (Jin Fashen 20).It is no exaggeration to say that everything in heaven has a hellish travesty. However, Satan is just the opposite there. He looks forward to equality, to freedom and to knowledge. He poses,“…Knowledge forbidden? /Suspicious, reasonless! /Why should their Lord Envy them that? /Can it be sin to know, can it be death? /And do they only stand /By ignorance? (Jin Fashen 52)” Thus, in some way, Satan has become a speaker of the human beings. What he does is to help people to gain wisdom and to find their true happiness. In this sense, Satan, under Milton’s description, is no longer the symbol of evil but stands for the justness, liberty and equality. He stands as republican and atheist in heaven, appealing to an aristocratic notion of established status and constitutional rights. It is the liberty for which Satan iscontending and which the Father’s imposing of a new king threatens, not least by his implying that all dignities and titles are owed to the sovereign and so may be resumed or altered by him at will. From all these words, we can see the essence and virtue of a hero in Satan.1.1.2 Sadan’s wisdom and emotionAnother aspect worthy noting is Satan’s wisdom. A good example is his tempting Adam and Eve to eat fruit from the Tree of Knowledge against God’s instructions. Satan disguises himself in the shape of snake and approaches Eve (not Adam, who is more sensible) at the very time she works alone. He starts the conversation with praise for Eve’s beauty, which is woman’s favorite, then comes to the target topic, and makes the emotional Eve loss her last line of defense and cannot wait to eat the fruit and touch her bright future. Another evidence sparking is when the God announces, “Your head I him appoint; /And by myself have sworn to him shall bow /All knees in Heaven, and shall confess him Lord. (Jin Fashen 66)”,Satan’s brilliant feedback: “Who can in reason then or right assume /Monarchy over such as live by right /His equals, if in power and splendor less, /In freedom equal (Jin Fashen 68)? /our puissance is our own (Jin Fashen 70)”.This is not only a challenge to God, but also a summon for right and liberty, which is rather inspiring. What’s more, Satan is also emotional and human. For instance, when he sees Adam and Eve in love, he is moved first to admiration and love and then to pity. And at the sight of the suffering of his fellows, he bursts into “Tears such as angels weep (Danielson 168)”. Sympathy is aroused immediately by such kind of sensibility. Satan also has the determination to enjoy the happiness and share the tears together with his dear followers by promising, “Joined with me once, now misery hath joined (Jin Fashen 8)”. We do continue to admire him, not just for his bravura performance, but because we see ourselves in Satan. And rather than consider ourselves devils, we consider him human.1.2 The image of Satan as a devilAlthough Satan shows the positive character of his image, he still has some intrinsically evil genes. A leopard cannot change his spots. As the curtain rises, he is already literally and symbolically fallen: evil exists in opposition to good.“Withambitious aim”, he is “Against the throne and monarchy of God, /Raised impious war in /Heaven and battle proud with vain attempt. (Jin Fashen 4)”1.2.1 sadan is vicious and furiousPride, we are told, leads Lucifer to envy, envy to revolt, and revolt to expulsion from heaven. Looking into the following example, the motive for this slight of tongue is pride: “Our being ordain’d to govern, not to serve”, since if all are chiefs, who are the Indians (Miller 87)?If an ordination takes place, who, among equals, does the ordaining? It shows that Satan has violated the law by which he lives; his ensuing career is tragic study in the negative will bound in its own error. He tells us of feelings of pride and envy, which make Satan unable to bear the Son’s exaltation. Lifted up high, he wishes to take a higher step. However, trying to step higher from his bright eminence in heaven makes him lose his perch and the things he have had. “Lost of happiness and lasting pain torments him; /round he throws his baleful eyes, /that witnessed huge affliction and dismay mixed /with obdurate pride and steadfast hate. (Jin Fashen 6)” It is the case of self-suggested temptation and fall.The slogan of Satan’s rebellion is freedom and independence, but freedom and independence lie in obedience, not in self-assertive rebellion. We can no longer admire Satan, because he is a fool seeing his free will only in terms of self-assertion. In the unfallen world, the rule is that creation returns thanks to the creator, and this return is made freely by good will at once indebted and discharged, as Satan did before his rebellion. However, to bad will, debt becomes extortion, and the return of gratitude sticks in Satan’s throat, “in a moment quit / The debt immense of endless gratitude, /So burdensome still paying, /still to owe (Jin Fashen 42)”. In his loss, Satan speaks with a moral understanding of both the freedom of gratitude and the unfreedom of resentment. So Satan converts what is a source of gratitude and freedom into a source of resentment and constraint. In this circumstance, whatever we think of heaven’s free love, through Satan’s eyes its goodness seems compelling; this attitude makes him more and more evil. So the study of Satan’s evil is the corruption of good. Satan has violated the conditions for true liberty. The rigid authoritarianism is Satan’s and freedom lies in faithful obedience to God. To be free is precisely the same thing as to be pious. Satan’seagerness to justify his position as leader has ineptly undermined his stand as libertarian. Satan makes a false heroic idea. The idea of him destroys his innate goodness and makes his hero comes to seem childish.1.2.2sadan’s other wrong deedsHe is tragic, however, not just through the resonance of his anguish, but because he makes a choice that destroys him. As God is made up of all virtues, Satan is composed of contending fragments of evil. Those fragmented aspects of the devil are represented in medieval art by the seven deadly sins: wrath, pride, lust, envy, sloth, avarice, and gluttony. Correspondingly, in Paradise Lost, Belial symbolizes sloth; Mammon, avarice; Moloch, hated. The concluding episode of book2 compresses those many evils into three personalities: Satan, Sin, and Death. Respectively, they represent cause, act, and effect, and their chaotic family tree is an obvious perversion of God’s own begetting of the Son. Sin is Satan’s daughter-mistress and his act of disobedience, while Death is the outcome of their incest. The trinity—Satan, Sin, and Death—shown to the reader is the demonic one. Death sits within hell’s gate. When Satan first sees Sin and Death, he fails to recognize his daughter and to acknowledge his son. To Sin, he says he has never yet seen “Sight more detestable than him and thee” (Miller 97). Readers share his reaction as he recognizes the dim, primordial monsters as obscenities locked from the light of civilization. In recognizing Sin and Death, Satan admits to his own perverse deformity. When Satan leaps into chaos, he thinks that he has left Sin, Death, and hell behind. Only later does he realize that he himself is hell: Satan as cause contains both act (Sin) and result (Death) in his every fiber. Sin is the way to be damned, but also that a reprobate like Satan, who tries to avoid submission and punishment, can only do so through further sin, incurring further damnation and punishment, “for within him Hell /He brings, of worse deeds worse sufferings must ensue! (Jin Fashen 40)” and “Which way he fly is Hell (Jin Fashen 44)”. There is no room for sympathy since Satan has made the bed in which he lies.In short, Satan’s image is of dual character. By seeing from the textual level, Satan’s wickedness and heroism are crossed. On the one hand, he poses as a revolutionist fighting bravely for liberty and equality with his wisdom and emotion. Onthe other hand, he exposes his ambition and pride, holding a false idea of freedom and right, begetting Sin and Death, spreading evil and seducing human creatures. Satan is an archangelic being with perfect intelligence, but doomed to operate imperfectly.Chapter 2 Historical factors contributing to the dual characterof Satan’s imageA work cannot be interpreted correctly regardless of its related environment. Similarly, the vague image of Satan has its root in the turmoil of the time during which Paradise Lost was written. This part will check the factors that influence the image of Satan. It consists of examining the 17th century social background and the author’s experiences and belief for a better understanding of Satan’s image.2.1 The influence of the puritan movementThe Puritan movement, in its broadest sense, may be regarded as a second or greater Renaissance, a rebirth of the moral nature of man. The very Renaissance had been essentially pagan and sensuous, accompanied by a moral awakening especially in England, that greatest moral and political reform which ever swept over a nation in the short space of half a century. It had two chief objects: personal righteousness and civil and religious liberty, which is quite similar to the purposes of heavenly rebellion led by Satan.That was a transitional society, full of violence, revolution, tyranny and many unstable factors. People doubted about their future and their value. Some of them submitted and only lived for life’s sake, just like some angels yielding to God’s authority and flattering him to maintain their glories. But still many of them stood out and devoted all their life to the course of freedom and happiness, the same as Satan and his followers do. Milton was one of the revolutionists. He supports his motherland’s revolution against king’s tyranny for human liberty with his wisdom and sharpened pen. He works so hard against the European reactionaries in order to vindicate the action of beheading the king CharlesⅠthat he losses his sight, but even in such kind of condition, he still sticks to his struggle. He creates lots of great masterpieces to present the truthand reality with his imaginations, to encourage English people. This kind of perseverance can find its reflection in the image of Satan, since even when he has lost all the glories around him and been driven out of Heaven, he still holds on to his belief. According to the bigotry, bellicosity, obstinacy and radicalness reflected during the course of fighting for his personal pursuit, Satan is blind, but it is just in such defect where his lofty and self-respect lay (Ma Haijian). So was Milton. He is not only a pious puritan, but also a revolutionist eager to fight. He allows the revolutionary in himself to take root in Satan. The conflict between Satan and God is, in fact, the one that between the Parliaments which are on behalf of liberty---which Milton was advocating--- and the stubborn despotic royal force. The revolutionary spirit is quite obvious. Milton’s pursuance of freedom and equality is exactly that of Satan.At the beginning of the epic, Milton “assert Eternal Providence, /And justify the ways of God to man”(Jin Fashen 4), but the description of God and Heaven is totally different from the poet’s original intention. God is the symbol of authority while the angels are all obsequious without personality. Unsatisfied with God’s tyranny, Satan takes arms to challenge the authority and asserts civil right. That is quite in accordance with Milton’s attitude—people have their right either for the governor or against the governor, so long as they wish. Satan’s first challenge is to God. Though he know at the very beginning the margin between him and God, Satan is not afraid of performing the course he thought righteous. That makes his angelic image more glory and his deed more admirable. Even when Satan seduces our forefather, we do own thanks to him, for it is him who lets us become wit and experienced. The demanding of Adam “yet sinless, with desire to know /What nearer might concern him, how this World /Of Heaven and Earth conspicuous first began (Jin Fashen 84)” makes us feel “wisdom at one entrance quite shut out. (Jin Fashen 30)”and doubt “is knowledge so despised? /Or envy, or what reserve forbids to taste? (Jin Fashen 58)” Satan’s great courage, rebellion spirit, perseverance and wisdom are highly praised here, which makes him the real central figure in this epic.But naturally, as a national movement, Puritan Movement had its extremes and excesses. And the intensity of the struggle against despotism made men narrow and hard.In the triumph of Puritanism under Cromwell, severe laws were passed, many simple pleasures were forbidden, and an austere standard of living was forced upon an unwilling people. Next, Cromwell conquered Ireland and Scottish, unifying the three counties. And the supreme authority was in his hands as his closest followers declared Parliament dismissed in December 1653. He thus assumed the title of Lord Protector. Another autarch had replaced the former one. The initial righteous rebellion turns to be an ambitious aggression. The Movement essentially failed, since no liberty and civil right are realized. Satan shares the same process with Cromwell. They are both preservers and destroyers. As he reins the Hell, Satan becomes more extreme and more destructive. The case is genuine heroism wrongly used in relation to himself and others.A leader of liberty is transformed to a ruler of despotism, and then is damned further.2.2 The influence of the restorationUnfortunately, in 1660, when CharlesⅡsuccessfully achieved the Restoration of the kingdom, all Milton’s labors and sacrifice for humanity were apparently wasted. He was immediately marked for persecution, and his books were burned by the public hangman. His daughter, upon whom he depended in his blindness, rebelled at the task of reading to him and recording his thoughts. All the policies that he had worked for so passionately had suddenly been abrogated. So he couldn’t help sighing with strong emotion: “If you beest he—but O how fallen! (Jin Fashen 8)” The Republic came to an end; the Restoration brought people another turbulence. The whole Britain suffered total reversal again. The failure urged Milton to soul-searching. And it was the time when God’s authority resumed, and Satan was transformed to a serpent.In literature, the Age was definitely the one of confusion. The spiritual gloom, which sooner or later fastened upon all the writers of the age, was due to the breaking up of accepted standards of government and religion. That led the literary men of the time to look backward for their golden age unconsciously. This could also be a clue to understand Satan, since Milton mixed reason in Puritanism with morality and constituted Puritan Humanism, and the thought was reflected in his Paradise Lost. As the last rearguard of the Renaissance and the primary promoter of Enlightenment, he endowed his introspection to humanism on his greatest image of Satan portrayed in thispoem. Although Milton’s study of the will focused on the inner world of temptation, guilt and repentance, he treated these things not just as they borne on one’s relation to oneself or to God, but to others also. Satan’s fall corrupted others as well as himself, so no grace would be extended to him. Milton’s was a disciplined, rational, responsible moral freedom beyond the reach of most political activists. (Fowler 43)His individual emphasis is on the freedom of the disciplined life: obedience is freedom; independence is slavery. In heaven, political loyalty is religious loyalty, and Satan’s republicanism violates both. So Satan’s rebellion for freedom turns to be a path to slavery. Will is free, determined neither by divine predestination nor by subliminal psychodynamics. Satan has the free will to stand but he chooses to fall. And in Milton’s view, virtue is not cloistered innocence untroubled by passions, but rather the difficult experience of rationality, of perpetual rational choices between seductively deceptive alternatives (Fowler 37). So, no matter how just the excuses are, Satan does spread evils and bring torment to human beings. Satan’s formidable intellectual powers are engaged in what is self-deception before it turns to deception of others. The process of negation takes him from heroic denial of the order of heaven to a perverse and mean form of resistance, and ruses of concealment and self-deception re-enter in ignoble, self-corrupting forms. Here is a committed revolutionary, a supporter of regicide, who nevertheless makes his rebel angels devils.So far, Milton was lost into great ambivalence. On the one hand, instead of withdrawing from society, Milton remained social, no longer participating directly in politics, but continuing to host foreign visitors and work closely with friends and acquaintances as he produced some of his greatest writings. On the other hand, because of the force of the society, whatever he tried, he was doomed to receive more strikes and despair. He suspected of the meaning of his endeavor. So in this way we can realize why the feature of Satan is ambivalent. The author has infused his own spirits and passion into Satan’s character. Satan’s fights with God are just like Milton’s fights with the society. Satan becomes a prolocutor of the author. They both are eager for freedom and both can’t escape from the unavoidable failure. That’s the tragedy—a hero’s tragedy. To Milton, it is the reality that he hates. He has worked so hard and enthusiastically for the。