国际会计第七版课后答案(第五章) 作者:弗雷德里克综述

合集下载

国际会计答案汇总

国际会计答案汇总

Answers of Discussion Questions for International AccountingChapter 18. Given the increased globalization of the last few decades, can small domestic business survive? What advantage and disadvantages do they have compared to MNEs?在近十几年全球化加剧的情况下,国内的小企业能生存下去么?与跨国企业相比,它们有什么优势和劣势?全球化就是在全球的范围内利用各种要素增值。

从这些角度看国内的企业已经做了很多全球化工作。

全球化不一定是大企业的任务,中小企业同样可以全球化。

在全球化的战略上,需要确定三个目标:提高效率,管理风险和适应、学习与创新,才能建立全球竞争优势,利用国家差异获得成本优势,利用全球经营获得规模经济,利用多产品和多市场经营获得范围经济。

优势:除部分未改制的国有中小企业来说,一般来讲,中小企业经营机制灵活,活力较强,二是以市场为导向,贴近市场,贴近用户,市场化程度高。

企业经营灵活,调整快,进入市场快。

三是形成了自身的产业比较优势。

四是很多企业都进行了技术改进,更新了制造设备,改进了技术工艺,企业竞争力得到增强。

劣势:低水平重复建设,存在大量“小而全”。

二是多数中小企业生产设备相对陈旧,技术和工艺比较落后。

三是多数中小企业开发设计能力低,缺少自主创新能力,主要靠模仿,跟随在大企业后面亦步亦趋,难以提供自己的特色产品与服务,难以获得主动发展。

四是中小企业产品多属于劳动密集型,技术含量低,附加值不高,在激烈的市场中难以实现资金的较快积累。

五是财力不足,企业发展和提高缺乏资金支持。

六是人才缺乏,尤其缺乏高素质的管理人才和创新人才。

建议:1.发挥现有优势,克服营销竞争力的诸多问题,采取对策,抓住机遇,赢得挑战。

国际会计第七版英文版课后答案(第六章)

国际会计第七版英文版课后答案(第六章)

Chapter 6Foreign Currency TranslationDiscussion Questions Solutions1.Foreign currency translation is the process of restating a foreign account balance from onecurrency to another. Foreign currency conversion is the process of physically exchanging onecurrency for another.2.In the foreign exchange spot market, currencies bought and sold must be delivered immediately,normally within 2 business days. Thus a Singaporean tourist buying U.S. dollars at the airportbefore boarding a plane for New York would hand over Singapore dollars and immediatelyreceive the equivalent amount in U.S. dollars. The forward market handles agreements toexchange a fixed amount of one currency for another on an agreed date in the future. Forexample, a French manufacturer exporting goods invoiced in euros to a Japanese importer on 60- day credit terms would buy a forward contract to sell yen for euros 2 months in the future.Transactions in the swap market involve the simultaneous purchase (or sale) of one currency in the spot market and the sale (or purchase) of the same currency in the forward market. Thus, a Canadian investor wishing to take advantage of higher interest rates on 6-month Treasury bills in the United States would buy U.S. dollars with Canadian dollars in the spot market and invest in the United States. To guard against a fall in the value of the U.S. dollar before maturity (when the U.S. dollar proceeds are converted back to Canadian dollars), the Canadian investor would simultaneously enter into a forward contract to sell U.S. dollars for Canadian dollars 6 months in the future at today s forward exchange rate.3.The question refers to alternative exchange rates that are used to translate foreign financialstatements. The current rate is the exchange rate at the financial statement date. It issometimes called the year-end or closing rate. The historical rate is the exchange rate at the time of the underlying transaction. The average rate is the average of various exchange rates during a fiscal period. Since the average rate normally is used to translate income statement items, it isoften weighted to reflect any seasonal changes in the volume of transactions during the period.Translation gains and losses do not occur if exchange rates do not change. However, if exchange rates change, the use of current and average rates causes translation gains and losses.These do not occur when the historical rate is used because the same (constant) rate is used each period.4. In this example, the Mexican Affiliate s Canadian dollar loan is denominated in Canadian dollars.However, because the Mexican affiliate’s functional currency is U.S. dollars, the peso equivalent of the Canadian dollar borrowing would be remeasured in U.S. dollars prior to consolidation. If the Mexican affiliate’s functional currency were the peso, the Canadian dollar loan would beremeasured in pesos before being translated to U.S. dollars.5. A transaction gain or loss occurs when a foreign currency transaction, e.g., a foreign currencyborrowing, is settled at a different exchange rate than that which prevailed when the transaction was originally incurred. In this case there is an exchange of one currency for another. Atranslation gain or loss, on the other hand, is simply the result of a restatement process. There isno physical exchange of currencies involved.6. It is not possible to combine, add, or subtract accounting measurements expressed in differentcurrencies; thus, it is necessary to translate those accounts that are measured or denominated in a foreign currency into a single reporting currency. Foreign currency translation can involverestatement or remeasurement. In restatement, the local (functional) currency is kept as the unit of measure; that is, the translation process multiplies the financial results and relationships in the local currency accounts by a constant, the current rate. In contrast, remeasurement translateslocal currency results as if the underlying transactions had taken place in the reporting(functional) currency of the parent company; for example, it changes the unit of measure of aforeign subsidiary from its local (foreign) currency to the U.S. dollar.7. Major advantages and limitations of each of the major translation methods follow.Current Rate MethodAdvantages:a. Retains the initial relationships in the foreign currency statements.b. Simple to apply.Limitations:a. Violates the basic purpose of consolidation, which is to present the results of a parent and its subsidiaries as if they were a single entity.b. Inconsistent with historical cost.c. Presumes that all local assets and liabilities are subject to exchange risk.d. While stockholders equity adjustments shield an MNC s bottom line from translation gains and losses, such adjustments could distort certain financial ratios and be confusing.Current-noncurrent MethodAdvantages:a. Distortions in translated gross margins are reduced as inventories and translated at the current rate.b. Reported earnings are shielded from the distorting effects of currency fluctuations as excess translation gains are deferred and used to offset future translation losses.Limitations:a. Uses balance sheet classification as basis for translation.b. Assumes all current assets are exposed to exchange risk regardless of their form.c. Assumes long-term debt is sheltered from exchange rate risk.Monetary-nonmonetary MethodAdvantages:a. Reflects changes in domestic currency equivalent of long-term debt on a timely basis. Limitations:a. Assumes that only monetary assets and liabilities are subject to exchange rate risk.b. Exchange rate changes distort profit margins as sales transacted at current prices are matched against cost of sales measured at historical prices.c. Uses balance sheet classification as basis for translation.d. Nonmonetary items stated at current market values are translated at historical rates.Temporal MethodAdvantages:a. Theoretically valid: compatible with any accounting measurement method.b. Has the effect of translating foreign subsidiaries operations as if they were originally transacted in the home currency, which is desirable for foreign operations that are extensions of the parent’s activities. Limitation:a. A company increases its earnings volatility by recognizing translation gains and losses currently.In arguing for one translation method over another, your students should eventually realize that, in the present state of the art, there is probably no one translation method that is appropriate for all circumstances in which translations occur and for all purposes thattranslation serves. It is probably more fruitful to have students identify circumstances in which they think one translation method is more appropriate than another.8.The current rate method is appropriate when the foreign entity being consolidated is largelyindependent of the parent company. Conditions which would justify this methodology is when the foreign affiliate tends to generate and expend cash flows in the local currency, sells a product locally so that its selling price is largely insulated from exchange rate changes, incurs expenses locally, finances its self locally and does not have very many transactions with the parentcompany. In contrast, the temporal method seems appropriate in those instances when theforeign affiliate’s operations are integrally related to the parent company. Conditions whichwould justify use of the temporal method are when the foreign affiliate transacts business in the parent currency and remits such cash flows to the parent company, sells a product largely in the parent country and whose selling price is sensitive to exchange rate changes, sources its factorinputs from the parent company, receives most of its financing from the parent and has a largetwo way flow of transactions with it.9.The history of foreign currency translation in the United States suggests that the development ofaccounting principles does not depend on theoretical considerations so much as on political, institutional, and economic influences that affect accounting standard setting. It may be morerealistic to recognize that theoretically sound solutions are impossible as long as policyprescriptions are evaluated on practical grounds. Without specific choice criteria derived from investor decision models, it is fruitless to argue the conceptual merits of competing accounting treatments. It is far more productive to admit that foreign currency translation choices are simply arbitrary.Readers of consolidated financial statements should know that the foreign currency translation method used is one of several alternatives, and this should be disclosed. This approach is more open and reduces the chance that readers will draw misleading inferences.10.Foreign inflation, in particular, the differential rate of inflation between the country in which asubsidiary is located and the country of its parent determines foreign exchange rates. Theserates, in turn, are used to translate foreign currency balances to parent currency.11.In the United Kingdom, financial statements of affiliates domiciled in hyperinflationaryenvironments must first be adjusted to current price levels and then translated using the current rate; in the United States, the temporal method would be employed. The second part of thisquestion is designed to get students from abroad to find out what companies in their homecountries are doing and thereby be in a position to share their new found knowledge with theirclassmates. They need simply get on the internet and read the footnotes of a major multinational company in their home country.12.Under FAS No. 52, the parent currency is designated as the functional currency for an affiliate,whose operations are considered to be an integral part of the parent company’s operations.Accordingly, anything that affects consolidated earnings, including foreign currency translation gains and losses, is relevant to parent company shareholders and is included in reported earnings.In contrast, when a foreign affiliate s operations are independent of the parent s, the localcurrency is designated as its functional currency. Since the focus is on the affiliate s localperformance, translation gains and losses that arise solely from consolidation are irrelevant and, therefore, are not included in consolidated income.Exercises Solutions1.¥250,000,000 X .008557 = $2,139,250.¥250,000,000 ÷ ¥116.86 = $2, 139,312The difference is due to rounding.2.Since £1 = US$1.9590 and €1 = US$1.3256, £1 = US$1.9590/US$1.3256 = €1.4778.Alternatively, €1 = US$1.3256/US$1.9590 = £.6767.3.Single Transaction Perspective:4/1 Purchases (¥32,500,000/¥116.91) $277,992Cash $27,800A/P(¥32,500,000 - ¥3,250,000)/¥116.91 250,192(Credit purchase)7/1 Purchases[(¥29,250,000/¥116.91) – (¥29,250,000/¥115.47) 3,120A/P 3,120(To record increase in purchases due to yen appreciation)7/1 Interest expense(¥29,250,000 X .08 X 3/12)/¥115.47 5,066A/P(¥29,250,000/¥115.47) 253,312Cash 258,378(To record settlement)Two Transactions Perspective:4/1 Purchases $277,992Cash $27,800A/P 250,1927/1 Transaction loss 3,120A/P 3,1207/1 Interest expense 5,066A/P 253,312Cash 258,3784. a. MXN 1,750,000/MXN10.3 = C$169,903.b. The Canadian dollar equivalent of the Mexican inventory account would not change if the functional currencywas the Canadian dollar as the temporal method translates inventory, a nonmonetary asset, at the exchange rate that preserves its original measurement basis. Since inventory is being carried at its net realizable value, it would be translated at the current rate. Had inventory been carried at historical cosuld have been translated at the historical rate or MXN3,750,000/MXN9.3 = C$403,226.5. Baht is the functional currency:B 2,500,000/20 years = B 125,000B 125,000/B37 = 3,378B 5,000,000/20 years = B 250,000B 250,000/B37 = 6,757U.S. dollar is the functional currency:B 2,500,000/20 years = B 125,000B 125,000/B40 = 3,125B 5,000,000/20 years = B 250,000B 250,000/B38 = 6,579Total depreciation $ 9,7046. If the euro is the German subsidiary’s functional currency, its accounts would be t ranslated into Australian dollarsusing the current rate method. In this case the translation gain of AUD4,545,455 would appear in consolidated equity.Thus the only item affecting current income would be the transaction loss(loss on an unsettled transaction) ofAUD1,514,515 on the euro borrowing.If the Australian dollar is deemed to be the functional currency, then the transaction loss andtranslation gain would both appear in reported earnings as follows:AUD(1,514,515) transaction lossAUD4,545,455 translation gainAUD3,030,940 net foreign exchange gain7.U.S. Dollar U.S. Dollar U.S. DollarBefore CNY After CNY After CNYAppreciation Appreciation DepreciationCNY Balance Sheet ($.12=CNY1) ($.15 = CNY1) ($0.09 = CNY1)Assets Amount Current Monetary Current MonetaryNoncurrent Nonmonetary Noncurrent NonmonetaryCash NT5,000 $600 $ 750 $ 750 $ 450 $ 450Accts. Receivable 14,000 1,680 2,100 2,100 1,260 1,260Inventories(cost=24,000) 22,000 2,640 3,300 2,640 1,980 2,640Fixed assets, net 39,000 4,680 4,680 4,680 4,680 4,680Total CNY 80,000 $9,600 $10,830 $10,170 $8,370 $9,030Liabilities & Owners EquityAccts. Payable CNY21,000 $2,520 $ 3,150 $ 3,150 $1,890 $1,890Long-term debt 27,000 3,240 3,240 4,050 3,240 2,430Stockholders equity 32,000 3,840 4,440 2,970 3,240 4,710Total CNY 80,000 $9,600 $10,830 $10,170 $8,370 $9,030Accounting exposure CNY20,000 (29,000) 20,000 (29,000)Translation gain (loss) US$ 600 (870) (600) 8708.U.S. Dollar U.S. Dollar U.S. DollarBefore CNY After CNY After CNYAppreciation Appreciation DepreciationCNY Balance Sheet ($.12=CNY1) ($.15 = CNY1) ($.09 = CNY1)Assets Amount Temporal Current Temporal CurrentCash CNY5,000 $ 600 $ 750 $ 750 $ 450 $ 450Accts. Receivable 14,000 1,680 2,100 2,100 1,260 1,260Inventories(cost=24,000) 22,000 2,640 3,300 3,300 1,980 1,980Fixed assets, net 39,000 3,600 3,600 5,850 3,600 3,510Total CNY 80,000 $8,520 $9,750 $12,000 $11,700 $7,200Liabilities & Owners EquityAccts. Payable CNY21,000 $2,520 $3,150 $3,150 $1,890 $1,890Long-term debt 27,000 3,240 4,050 4,050 2,430 2,430Stockholders equity 32,000 2,760 2,550 4,800 7,380 2,880Total NT$ 80,000 $8,520 $9,750 $12,000 $11,700 $7,200Accounting exposure NT$ (7,000) 32,000 (7,000) 32,000Translation gain (loss) US$ (210) 960 210 (960)c. Students will quickly discover that each translation method has its advantages and disadvantages. After some discussion, the question of translation objectives will arise. Currency translation objectives are based on how foreign operations are viewed. If foreign operations are considered extensions of the parent, a case can be made for a historical rate method: current-noncurrent, monetary-nonmonetary, or temporal. If foreign operations are viewed from a local company perspective, a case can be made for the current rate method. Given the complexity of multinational business activities, one could argue that a single translation method will not serve all purposes for which translations are done. As long as the objectives of foreign currency translation differ among specific reporting entities, a practical solution is to insist on full disclosure of the translation procedures used so that users have a basis for reconciling any differences that exist.9.Company A (Country A)(Reporting Currency = Apeso)Beginning of Year End of YearAssets: Exchange Rate Translated Exchange Rate TranslatedApeso 100 Apeso 100 Apeso 100Bol 100 Apeso 1 = Bol 1.25 Apeso 80 Apeso 1 = Bol 2 Apeso 50Apeso 180 Apeso 150Translation loss = A$ 30Company B (Country B)(Reporting Currency = Bol)Beginning of Year End of YearAssets: Exchange Rate Translated Exchange Rate TranslatedApeso 100 Apeso 1 = Bol 1.25 Bol 125 Apeso 1 = Bol 2 Bol 200Bol 100 Bol 100 Bol 100Bol 225 Bol 300Translation gain = Bol 75b. This exercise demonstrates the effect of the reporting currency on foreign currency translation results when the current rate method is used. Both companies are in seemingly identical situations, yet one reports a translation loss while the other reports a translation gain. One company reports shrinking assets while the other reports increasing assets. Nothing has actually happened but an exchange rate change. Also, despite a stronger Apeso, Company A reports a loss. Conversely, the Bol weakened, yet Company B reports a gain. It appears that a strengthening currency is not always good news, nor is a weakening currency always bad news.If the intention is to repatriate the funds invested in the foreign country (Country B from Company A’s perspective, Country A from Company B’s perspective), the scenario makes sense. After all, CompanyA will be repatriating fewer Apesos than originally invested and CompanyB will be repatriating moreB ol’s than originally invested. Fluctuating exchange rates have changed each company s command over a foreign currency. Assuming the company intends to repatriate the currency, it makes sense toinclude the respective gain or loss in income for the current year. On the other hand it can be argued that the gain or loss should be excluded from income if the company intends to keep the foreign assets invested permanently..10.Translation RateLocal Currency is Dollar isFunctional Currency Functional CurrencyCash Current CurrentMarketable securities (cost)Current Historical aAccounts receivable Current CurrentInventory (market) Current CurrentEquipment Current HistoricalAccumulated depreciation Current HistoricalPrepaid expenses Current HistoricalGoodwill Current HistoricalAccounts payable Current CurrentDue to parent (denominated in dollars) Current CurrentBonds payable Current CurrentIncome taxes payable Current CurrentDeferred income taxes Current CurrentCommon stock Historical HistoricalPremium on common stock Historical HistoricalRetained Earnings Balancing Residual Balancing ResidualSales Average AveragePurchases Average AverageCost of Sales Average HistoricalGeneral and administrative expenses Average AverageSelling expenses Average HistoricalDepreciation Average HistoricalAmortization of goodwill Average HistoricalIncome tax expense Average AverageInter-company interest expense Average Average__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________a Fixed income securities intended to be held to maturity.11. a. Before riyal depreciation:Cash SAR 60,000,000 ÷ SAR3.75 = $ 16,000,000Inventory 120,000,000 ÷ SAR3.75 = 32,000,000Fixed Assets 750,000,000 ÷ SAR3.75 = 200,000,000Total $248,000,000After riyal depreciation:Cash SAR 60,000,000 ÷ SAR4.125 = $ 14,545,455Inventory 120,000,000 ÷ SAR3.75 = 32,000,000Fixed Assets 750,000,000 ÷ SAR3.75 = 200,000,000Total $246,545,455Translation loss $(1,454,455)b.The translation loss has no effect on MSC’s cash flows as it is the result of a restatement process.c.On a pre-tax basis, an analyst would back out the translation gain from reported earnings and add it to consolidatedequity. However, in addition inventory and fixed assets would be translated at the current rate, as opposed to thehistorical rate, and the resulting translation loss would also be taken to consolidated equity. This would result in a different earnings number as well as asset measures.Before riyal depreciation:Cash SAR 60,000,000 ÷ SAR3.75 = $ 16,000,000Inventory 120,000,000 ÷ SAR3.75 = 32,000,000Fixed Assets 750,000,000 ÷ SAR3.75 = 200,000,000Total $248,000,000After riyal depreciation:Cash SAR 60,000,000 ÷ SAR4.125 = $ 14,545,455Inventory 120,000,000 ÷ SAR4.125 = 29,090,909Fixed Assets 750,000,000 ÷ SAR4.125 = 181,818,182Total $225,454,546Translation adjustnment reflected in equity $(22,545,454)Students could also be probed and asked how the adjusted numbers would impact certain ratios such as ROA or ROE, Debt to Equity, and asset turnover.12. a. The currency effects in the first and third paragraphs have an impact on Alcan’s cash flows. IN the firstparagraph, echange rate changes affect Alcan’s future revenues and costs and directly affect cash receipts andpayments. The third paragraph involves settling foreign currency transactions at a different echange rate than when the transaction were entered into.b.Alcan appears to be employing the monetary-nonmonetary method.c. Many analysts back out translation gains and losses from reported earnings as these are largely non-cash itemsthat simply result from a restatement process. This would especially be the case if Alcan were being compared to a company employing the current rate method. Disregarding translation gains and losses would have the following effect on reported earnings:20X5 20X4 20X3With translation G/L $129m $258m $64mTranslation G/L (86) (153) (326)Without Translation G/L $215m $411m $390mThe impact on the pattern of earnings would change significantly. The year to year changes in earnings both before and after abstracting from currency translation effects are:20X5/20X3 20X5/20X4 20X4/20X3With translation G/L 102% -50% 303%Without Translation G/L 45% -48% 5%Case 6-1 Regents CorporationThe nature of Regents’s operation is such that choice of an appropriate functional currency is ultimately a judgement call. Students can argue for either currency and should be evaluated on the strength of their analysis. A major lesson of this case is that the functional currency choice is important since the currency designation dictates which translation method, (current or temporal) is ultimately used. The financial statement effects can be very different. Thus it is important for a reader of financial statements to understand how the differing measurement options affect the balance sheet and income statement and be prepared to adjust from one framework to the other, even if only crudely.TEMPORAL METHOD(U.S. DOLLAR IS THE FUNCTIONAL CURRENCY)Balance Sheet Accounts, 12/31/X7 Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Dollar EquivalentCash £ 1,060 1.80 $ 1,908Accounts receivable 2,890 1.90 5,491Inventory 3,040 1.78 5,411Fixed assets 4,400 1.70 7,480 Accumulated depreciation (420) 1.70 (714)Patent ----- -----Total £10,970 $19,576Accounts payable £ 1,610 1.80 $ 2,898Due to parent 1,800 1.80 3,240Long-term debt 4,500 1.80 8,100Deferred taxes 80 1.80 144Common stock 1,500 1.70 2,550Retained earnings 1,480 residual 2,644£10,970 $19,576Income Statement, 12/31/X8 Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Dollar Equivalent Sales £ 16,700 1.86 $ 31,062Cost of sales a (11,300) (20,706)General and administrative (1,600) 1.86 (2,976) Depreciation (280) 1.70 (476)(20) 1.82 (36)Interest (480) 1.86 (893) Transaction gain 125 1.86 233Aggregate translation adjustment b (368)Taxes:Current (670) 1.86 (1,246 )Deferred (40) 1.86 (74)Net income £ 2,435 $ 4,520Retained earnings, 12/31X7 1,480 2,644Dividends (300) 1.86 (558)Retained earnings, 12/31X8 £ 3,615 $ 6,606a Beginning inventory £ 3,040 1.78 $ 5,411 Purchases 11,690 1.86 21,743Ending inventory 3,430 1.88 6,448 Cost of Sales £ 11,300 $20,706b Aggregate translation adjustment:1. Monetary assets, 12/31/X7 £ 3,950Monetary liabilities, 12/31/X7 7,990(£ 4,040) x (1.90 - 1.80) = ($404)2. Change in negative exposure:12/31/X7 (£ 4,040)12/31/X8 (2,565 )£ 1,475Composition of decrease:Sources of monetary items:Net income £2,435Depreciation 300 £2,735Uses of monetary items:Inventory increase £(390)Addition to fixed assets (500)Purchase of patent (70)Dividends (300 ) (1,260 )£1,4753. Sources of monetary items x difference in year-end rate and rate used to translate income statement =£2,345 x (1.90 - 1.86) = $94300 x (1.90 – 1.86) = 12 $1094. Uses of monetary items x difference in year-end rate and rate used to translate those items =£(390) x (1.90 – 1.86) = $(15)(300) x (1.90 - 1.86) = (12)(500) x (1.90 - 1.82) = (40)(70) x (1.90 - 1.82) = (6 ) (73)Aggregate translation adjustment = ($404)109(73 )($368)Balance Sheet, 12/31/X8 Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Dollar EquivalentCash £ 1,150 1.90 $2,185 Accounts receivable 3,100 1.90 5,890 Inventory 3,430 1.88 6,448Fixed assets a 4,900 8,390 Accumulated depreciation b (720) (1,226)Patent 70 1.82 127Total £11,930 $21,814 Accounts payable £ 1,385 1.90 $ 2,632Due to parent 1,310 1.90 2,489Long-term debt 4,000 1.90 7,600 Deferred taxes 120 1.90 228 Common stock 1,500 1.70 2,550 Retained earnings 3,615 6,309Total £11,930 $21,814___________________________________________________________________________a Original assets £ 4,400 1.70 $ 7,480New assets 500 1.82 910$ 8,390b Original assets £ 700 1.70New assets 20 1.82 36$ 1,226 CURRENT RATE METHOD(LOCAL CURRENCY IS THE FUNCTIONAL CURRENCY)Balance Sheet Accounts, 12/31/X7 Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Dollar Equivalent Cash £ 1,060 1.80 $ 1,908 Accounts receivable 2,890 1.80 5,202 Inventory 3,040 1.80 5,472Fixed assets 4,400 1.80 7,920 Accumulated depreciation (420) 1.80 (756)Patent --- ---Total £10,970 $19,746Accounts payable £ 1,610 1.80 $ 2,898Due to parent 1,800 1.80 3,240Long-term debt 4,500 1.80 8,100Deferred taxes 80 1.80 144Common stock 1,500 1.70 2,550Retained earnings 1,480 2,355 Cumulative translation adjustment --- 459(given)Total £ 10,970 $19,746Income Statement, 12/31/X8 Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Dollar Equivalent Sales £16,700 1.86 $31,062Cost of sales (11,300) 1.86 (21,018)General and administrative (1,600) 1.86 (2,976) Depreciation (300) 1.86 (558)Interest (480) 1.86 (893) Transaction gain 125 1.86 232Taxes:Current (670) 1.86 (1,246)Deferred (40) 1.86 (74)Net income £ 2,435 $ 4,529Retained earnings, 12/31X7 1,480 2,355Dividends (300) 1.86 (558)Retained earnings, 12/31X8 £ 3,615 $ 6,326Balance Sheet, 12/31/X8 Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Dollar EquivalentCash £ 1,150 1.90 $ 2,185Accounts receivable 3,100 1.90 5,890Inventory 3,430 1.90 6,517Fixed assets 4,900 1.90 9,310Accumulated depreciation (720) 1.90 (1,368)Patent 70 1.90 133Total £ 11,930 $22,667Accounts payable £ 1,385 1.90 $ 2,632Due to parent 1,310 1.90 2,489Long-term debt 4,000 1.90 7,600Deferred taxes 120 1.90 228Common stock 1,500 1.70 2,550Retained earnings 3,615 6,326Cumulative translation adj. ----- 842aTotal £11,930 $22,667a Cumulative translation adjustment:1. Net exposed assets, 12/31/X7, x change in current rate = £2.980 x (1.90 - 1.80) = $2982. Change in net assets x difference between year-end and average rate = £2.135 x (1.90 - 1.86) = 853. Cumulative translation adjustment 12/31/X7 4594. Cumulative translation adjustment, 12/31/X8 $842。

国际会计第七版英文版课后答案(第十一章)

国际会计第七版英文版课后答案(第十一章)

Chapter 11Financial Risk ManagementDiscussion Questions1.Enterprise risk management assesses individual risks in the context of a firm’s business strategy. Risksare viewed from a portfolio perspective with risks of various business functions, e.g., FX risk, interest rate risk, political risk and the like, being coordinated by a senior financial manager responsible for keeping top management apprised of critical risks that could interfere with the accomplishment of a firm’sstrategic objectives and devising risk optimization strategies. The variables that management accountants must track include factors both external and internal to the firm and varies from company to company.2.Market risk refers to the risk of loss due to unexpected changes in the prices of currencies, interest rates,commodities, and equities. It is not confined to price changes. Market risk also includes liquidity risk, market discontinuities, credit risk, regulatory risk, tax risk, and accounting risk. An example of a foreign exchange risk is a situation where an exporter invoices a credit sale to a foreign importer in foreign currency and foreign currency devalues prior to payment.3.An FX risk management program includes the following processes:a.Forecasting the expected movement in the relation between the yuan and your domesticcurrency.b.Measuring on a periodic basis your firm’s exposure to fluctuations in the value of the yuan.c.Designing protection strategies that will minimize losses should the yuan revalue.d.Establishing internal controls to measure your performance in hedging the risk of loss fromchanges in the value of the yuan.4.Translation exposure measures the impact of exchange rate changes on the domestic currency equivalentsof a firm s foreign currency assets and liabilities. It is primarily concerned with currency restatement.Transaction exposure measures the cash flow impact of fluctuating currency values on the settlement of commercial transactions denominated in foreign currencies. Transaction exposure is concerned with acurrency conversion (exchange) process. Economic exposure attempts to measure the impact of changing exchange rates on the future revenues, costs, and sales volume of a multinational entity. It is concerned with the temporal effects of exchange rate changes.Although FAS No. 52 attempts to mitigate concern with translation gains and losses (accounting exposure), it does not totally eliminate it. Companies choosing the U.S. dollar as their functional currency will still use the temporal translation method and report translation gains and losses in period income. Companies designating the local currency as the functional currency will find their asset exposures increased as inventories and fixed assets are translated using current exchange rates. While such translation gains and losses bypass income, the adverse effects of currency fluctuations on a company’s consolidated equity will still exist. This is especially likely where loan covenant and other contractual provisions specify minimum debt-to-equity ratios. This suggests that the issue of accounting versus economic exposure is far from settled.5.The chapter lists 10 specific methods to reduce a firm’s exposure to foreign exchange risk in adevaluation-prone country. These techniques, and possible cost-benefit trade-offs, are summarized in the following table.Methods Trade-Offsa. Minimize cash balances in a. Reduced exposure versusdevaluation-prone country higher business andfinancial risk due to possible "cash-outs."b. Remitting excess cash back b. Same as item a.to the parent company.c. Accelerate the collection c. Reduced exposure versusof local currency receivables possible reduction in salesd. Defer payment of local d. Reduced exposure versuscurrency payables impaired local credit ratinge. Speed up payment of e. Reduced exposure versusforeign currency payables foregone earnings on arelatively cheap creditsourcef. Invest local currency cash f. Reduced exposure versusbalances in inventories and higher transaction costsother assets less prone to and possible mis-devaluation loss allocation of corporateresourcesg. Invest in strong currency g. Reduced exposure versusforeign assets higher transaction costsand possible governmentinterference (e.g.exchange controls)h. Raise selling prices h. Reduced exposure versuspotential erosion ofmarket sharei. Invoice exports in hard i. Reduced exposure versuscurrencies possible reduction insales abroadj. Currency swaps j. Reduced translationexposure versus increasedtransaction exposure ifparent assesses theexposed affiliate aninterest charge in hardcurrency6. A multicurrency transactions exposure report differs from a multicurrency translation exposure report in anumber of ways. First, the transactions exposure report has a cash flow orientation instead of a static balance sheet orientation. It includes off balance sheet items that are executory in nature. Finally, a multicurrency transaction exposure report has a local currency orientation, whereas a multicurrency translation exposure report has a parent currency orientation.7.Derivative instruments are formal agreements that transfer financial risk from one party to another. Thevalue of a derivative is derived from its reference to a basic underlying instrument or variable such as a foreign currency receivable or a quantum of foreign exchange. Thus the value of a forward exchange contract is related to the change in the foreign exchange rate times the notional amount being hedged. An important accounting issue is whether derivatives should receive the same accounting treatment as the basic instruments to which they relate. Specifically, should a derivative instrument hedging a foreign currency asset appear in the financial statements as a foreign currency liability? If so, should its valuation base be identical to basic instruments? Do cash flows associated with derivative instruments have thesame economic meaning as those associated with basic instruments? How should gains and losses associated with derivative instruments be reflected in the income statement? Can and should risks attaching to these financial instruments be recognized and measured?8.Student responses should proceed along the following lines. Pele Corporation, a Brazilian firm, hasborrowed a certain sum of British pounds at 9 percent and is worried that the pound will appreciate relative to the real prior to maturity. To hedge this currency risk, it arranges with a bank to swap the pounds borrowed for an equivalent amount of reals for 3 years bearing the same rate of interest. During the 3-year period, it will make periodic interest payments to the bank in reals, and in return, receive periodic interest payments in pounds. At the end of the 3-year period, it will re-exchange the real principal for pounds at the original exchange rate.9. A futures contract is a commitment to purchase or deliver a specified quantity of a financial instrument orforeign currency at a future date at a price set when the contract is made. It differs from a forward contract in several respects. A futures contract is standardized in terms of size and delivery date whereas a forward contract is tailored to a customer’s needs. Futures contracts are freely traded on organized exchanges. In contrast, there is no secondary market for forward contracts as they are private agreements between two parties. Futures contracts are carried at market values with gains or losses taken immediately to income, whereas profits on a forward contract are realized only at the delivery date. Finally, a party to a futures contract must meet periodic margin requirements. In a forward contract, margins are set once, on the date of the initial transaction.10.Fair value hedges are hedges of a firm’s foreign currency assets and liabilities and firm fore ign currencycommitments. Cash flow hedges are hedges of forecasted transactions such as a future sale or purchase.Net investment hedges are hedges of an exposed balance sheet asset or liability position. For qualifying fair value hedges, all changes in the fair value of the derivative and the underlying item that is being hedged are recognized in earnings. For qualifying cash flow hedges, the change in the fair value of the derivative is recognized in Other Comprehensive Income and recognized in earnings when the hedged cash flows affect earnings. For qualifying hedges of a net investment, changes in the fair value of the derivative are recorded in comprehensive income11.In theory, the term highly effective means that gains or losses on hedging instruments should be shouldexactly offset gains or losses on the item being hedged. In practice, it means that gains or losses on the derivative substantially offset the changes in the value or cash flow of the hedged item. Measurement of this attribute is important. If a hedging instrument does not meet the highly effective test, the hedge is terminated and deferred gains or losses on the derivative are recognized immediately in current earnings.This, in turn, introduces volatility into a firm’s reporte d earnings.12.The notion of an opportunity cost refers to the return associated with your next best opportunity. In thearea of FX risk management, it entails comparing a given risk management strategy with an appropriate standard of comparison. This provides an objective means of assessing the effectiveness of a given risk reduction program. For example, when FX risk management programs are centralized at corporate headquarters, appropriate benchmarks against which to compare the success of corporate risk protection would be programs that local managers could have implemented on their own.Exercises1.Students usually gloss over diagrams without thinking them through. This exercise forces them to thinkthrough each step of the diagram and allows them to better internalize the risk management cycle.Responses might follow the following pattern: Step 1 involves operationalizing a firms strategies intoquantifiable objectives and then identifying developments both external and internal risks that could affect the achievement of these objectives. These risks are measured by the firm’s accountants and quantified in terms of their potential impact on the firm. For example, the firm may have as its strategic objective an increase of 5% of market share in a given country per year given assumptions about the rate of economic growth in that country. The chance that this growth rate may fall short of 5% and the impact of this shortfall for projected sales in that country would be quantified. Response formulation would involve identifying protection strategies to minimize the hit to sales of projected GNP shortfalls such as promotion campaigns to maintain sales or use of alternative sourcing venues to lower sales prices. This strategy would be implemented if projected GNP started to slow beyond a certain cutoff point. The impact of this protection strategy would then be quantified in terms of actual sales relative to forecast sales taking into account the costs of protection. The information contained in risk management performance reports would then be communicated to top management who would be in a position to reaffirm or alter strategic objectives and/or risk identification processes.2.Foreign exchange risk a devaluation of the foreign currency in which an account receivable wasdenominated would cause the domestic currency cash flows to decrease. This would cause current assets to decrease. Alternatively, a revaluation of the foreign currency would cause the account receivable and current assets to increase. Interest rate risk an increase in market rates of interest would cause the price ofa short-term fixed-rate debt instrument being held as a marketable security to decrease. This, in turn,would cause current assets to decrease. A decrease in interest rates would have the opposite effect.Commodity price risk an increase in the price of copper would cause the cost of copper purchases and the resultant unexpired cost of inventories in the current asset section of the balance sheet to increase. A fall in copper prices would have the opposite effect. Equity price risk a fall in stock prices would depress the carrying value of marketable securities (current assets), and conversely.3.The purpose of this exercise is to force students to look at manager ial accounting issues from the user’sperspective. Students may suggest additional information sources with respect to inflation differentials, balance of trade and balance of payments statistics, international monetary reserves, forward exchange quotations, the behavior of related currencies, and interest rate differentials. We recommend that this exercise be assigned to small groups to encourage teamwork. At the time this exercise was prepared, professional forecasters were predicting a rate of 10.5 ecrus to theU.S. dollar.Some groups may contend that exchange markets are efficient and that exchange rate changes are simply random events. Again, they must be prepared to convince management of their case, or at a minimum, identify the consequences of not attempting exchange rate forecasts.4. Current rate Current/Noncurrent Monetary/nonmonetaryExposed assets(PHP):Cash 500,000 500,000 500,000Accounts receivable 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 Inventories(LCM) 900,000 900,000Fixed assets 1,100,000 -- --Total 3,500,000 2,400,000 1,500,000 Exposed liabilities:Short-term payables 400,000 400,000 400,000Long-term debt 800,000 --- 800,000Total 1,200,000 400,000 1,200,000Positive/(negative) exposure 2,300,000 2,000,000 300,000 Positive exposure X $0.03 $69,000 $60,000 $9,000Positive exposure X $0.02 46,000 40,000 6,000 FX gain/(loss) $(23,000) $(20,000) $(3,000)5.ILS $ £$ EquivalentExposed Assets:Cash & due from banks 100,000 50,000 (40,000) 20,000Loans 200,000 ---- ---- 100,000Fixed assets ---- 30,000 ---- 30,000Exposed Liabilities:Deposits 40,000 ---- 15,000 50,000Owners equity ---- 100,000 ---- 100,000Net exposed assets 260,000 (20,000) (55,000) NIL(liabilities)ILS $ £$ EquivalentExposed Assets:Cash & due from banks 100,000 50,000 (40,000) 20,000Loans 200,000 ---- ---- 100,000Fixed assets ---- 30,000 ---- 30,000Exposed Liabilities:Deposits 40,000 ---- 15,000 50,000Owners equity ---- 100,000 ---- 100,000Net exposed assets 260,000 (20,000) (55,000) NIL(liabilities)6.Trial Balance BeforeILS $ £$ EquivalentCash & due from banks 100,000 50,000 (40,000) 20,000Loans 200,000 ---- ---- 100,000Fixed assets ---- 30,000 ---- 30,000Deposits 40,000 ---- 15,000 50,000 Owners equity ---- 100,000 ---- 100,000Trial Balance After(£/$/ILS = 1/2/8)ILS $ £$ EquivalentCash & due from banks 100,000 50,000 (40,000) (5,000)Loans 200,000 ---- ---- 50,000Fixed assets ---- 30,000 ---- 30,000Deposits 40,000 ---- 15,000 40,000 Owners equity ---- 100,000 ---- 100,000Translation loss $(65,000)7. One recommendation might be to reduce positive exposures by engaging in balance sheet hedging, that is, by remitting excess cash back to the corporate parent, reducing the affiliate bank’s outstanding loans, or increasing its deposits in Israeli shekels.. The trade-offs here are potentially negative effects on operations, such as not satisfying loan demand against hedging translation gains and losses. Another option is to increase the pricing of bank services in Israel to provide a profit margin that can offset any FX losses. Again, the effects of such actions on competitive positioning could far exceed the benefits of hedging. A third option is to buy a forward or currency swap to hedge the exposure. Trade-offs include the out-of-pocket cost of the exchange contract versus the reported losses avoided.1.If the U.S. dollar is the functional currency, the translation gain upon consolidation is aggregated with thetransaction loss on the foreign currency borrowing and disclosed as one line item in the consolidated income statement. This figure is determined as follows:Translation gain = Positive exposure X change in exchange rate= NZD3,000,000 x $.10= $300,000Transaction loss =NZD loan balance X change in exchange rate= NZD1,000,000 x $.10= $ (100,000)Aggregate exchange adjustment = $300,000 + $ (100,000)= $200,000If the New Zealand dollar is the functional currency, the translation gain upon consolidation bypasses income and appears as a separate component in consolidated equity. It is offset by the translation loss on the New Zealand dollar borrowing.9.4/1 CD (¥32,500,000 ÷ ¥120) $250,000Cash $250,000(Purchase of CD)Chips (¥32,500,000 ÷ ¥120) $270,833Cash (¥3,250,000 ÷ ¥120) $ 27,083A/P (¥29,250,000 ÷ ¥120) 243,750(To record credit purchase)7/1 CD (¥30,000,000 ÷ [¥120 - ¥110]) $ 22,727FX gain $ 22,727(To record gain on CD investment)Purchases (¥29,250,000 ÷ [¥120 - ¥110]) 22,159Accts. Payable 22,159(To record increase in purchases and related liability accounts owing to yen appreciation) 7/1 Cash (¥30,000,000 ÷ ¥110) $278,182Interest income (¥30,000,000 X .08 X ¼) ÷ ¥110] $ 5,455CD 272,727(To record maturation of CD)Interest expense [(¥29,250,000 x.08 x 3/12) ÷ ¥110) 5,318Accts. payable (¥29,250,000 ÷ ¥110) 265,909Cash 271,227(To record settlement of purchase transaction)10. Journal entries:6/1 CHF Contract receivable $133,333Deferred premium 3,334$ Contract payable $136,667(To record contract with the foreign currency dealer to exchange $136,667 for CHF 166,667)6/30 CHF Contract receivable 1,667Transaction gain 1,667(To record transaction gain from increased dollar equivalent of forward contract receivable; $.81 - $.80 x SWF 166,667)6/30 Premium expense 1,111Deferred premium 1,111(To amortize deferred premium for 1 month)9/1 SWCHF Contract receivable 3,333Transaction gain 3,333(To record additional transaction gain by adjusting forward contract to the new current rate; $.83 - $.81 x CHF 166,667)9/1 Premium expense 2,223Deferred premium 2,223(Amortization of deferred premium balance)9/1 $ Contract payable 136,667Cash 136,667 Foreign currency 138,333CHF Contract receivable 138,333(To record delivery of $136,667 to foreign currency dealer in exchange for CHF166,667 with a dollar equivalent of $138,334 (=CHF166,667 x $.83). The Swiss francs will, in turn be used to pay for the chocolate supplies).11. Calculations:If the premium on the forward contract is considered an operating expense, and the conditions for hedge treatment are met, i.e., management designates the forward contract as a hedge, documents its risk management objective and strategy, identifies the hedging instrument, the item being hedged and the risk exposure, and that the forward is effective both prospectively and retrospectively in hedging the risk, the gain on the forward can be offset against the loss on the payable as follows:Amount paid to settle the account payable on the purchase $138,333Less Transaction gain on forward contract (5,000)Cost of purchase $133,333The $133,000 is what was originally anticipated, CHF166.667 X $0.80 = $133,333.12. Journal entries:The call option is intended to hedge an uncertain cash flow. Accordingly, gains or losses on the hedging instrument would bedisclosed in comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings in the period the sale actually takes place.June 1 Premium expense $28,125Cash $28,125($.018 X CHF 62,500 X 25)August 31 Cash $40,625Comprehensive income $40,625[($.416 - $.39) X CHF 62,500 X 25]Case 11-1Exposure Identification1. Infosys appears to have several exposures as enumerated below.Foreign Exchange RiskPage Value-Drivers88 Revenues/Selling and administrative expenses89 Cash flows from interest/dividend income96 Revenue recognition/LT leases97 Operating income/foreign currency transactions/FA98 Marketing/Overseas staff expenses99 Derivative values100 Lease obligations101 Investment returns102 Segment revenues/expenses103 Dividends to ADS holders142 Penalties on export obligations149 Valuing intangibles150 Export revenuesCommodity Price RiskPage Value-Drivers98 Power and fuel expenses145 Brand valuation147/48 Current cost disclosures149 Value of intangiblesEquity Price RiskPage Value Drivers87 Share capital98 Diluted eps100 Stock option compensation expense103 Convertible preferreds145 Cost of capital151 Economic value-addedInterest Rate RiskPage Value Drivers88 Interest expense89 Cash flows from security investments/interest income97 Gratuity/Superannuation/Provident obligations143 Employee compensation145 Cost of capital149 Value of intangibles.151 Economic value-addedInformation on the company’s risk management policies are contained on pages 108-109 of their annual report which were not reproduced in Chapter 1. We include the relevant information here. Infosys derives its revenues from 51 countries of which 78 percent were denominated in US dollars. To minimize both transaction and translation risk the company:1.Tries to match expenses in local currency with receipts in the same currency.es forward exchange contracts to cover apportion of outstanding receivables.3.Denominates contracts in non-US and non-EU regions in internationally tradable currencies to minimizeexposures to local currencies that may have non-tradability risks.Case 11-2Value At Risk: What Are Our Options?Students should be asked to play the role of the consultant, and will find it to be a contentious issue. Suggested remedies that have merit are:1. The FASB should permit deferral accounting for rolling options which would take the derivative gain or loss on each option to equity until the anticipated event occurs, as opposed to taking it immediately to income. This, however, might encourage companies to game the system, so students should also suggest ways to keep this from happening.2. Another tack would be to adhere to generally accepted accounting principles and record the gain or loss on the derivative in current income as it is marked to market, but to disclose which transactions were undertaken for hedge purposes. Management could also game the system here as speculative activities could be disclosed as hedge activities.3. Another option that students might suggest is to revert back to the earlier U.S. practice of keeping the option off balance sheet and providing supplementary disclosure of mark-to-market accounting. This might be confusing to lay readers, but it would enable analysts to better understand the components of reported earnings.It is clear from the annual report clipping that management will ignore accounting pronouncements when it is in their interest to do so. Analysts must be alert to situations where management departs from GAAP to better reflect the economics of what transpired as opposed to doing so to manage earnings.精品文档,知识共享!!!。

财务会计学(第七版)课后习题答案

财务会计学(第七版)课后习题答案

第2章货币资金、应收款项与交易性金融资产教材练习题解析1.编制银行存款余额调节表,如表2—1所示。

表2—1银行存款余额调节表单位:元银行存款日记账余额165974银行对账单余额180245加:银行代收应收票据款10900加:企业送存银行支票8000减:银行收手续费115减:企业开出支票13200银行多计利息1714调节后余额175045调节后余额1750452.相关会计分录如下:(1)借:其他货币资金———外埠存款400000贷:银行存款400000(2)借:其他货币资金———银行汇票存款15000贷:银行存款15000(3)借:原材料300000应交税费———应交增值税(进项税额)51000贷:其他货币资金———外埠存款351000(4)借:原材料10000应交税费———应交增值税(进项税额)1700贷:其他货币资金———银行汇票存款117002《财务会计学(第七版)》学习指导书(5)借:银行存款49000贷:其他货币资金———外埠存款49000(6)借:银行存款3300贷:其他货币资金———银行汇票存款33003.我国会计处理一般采用总价法。

(1)5月3日销售商品。

借:应收账款66690贷:主营业务收入57000应交税费———应交增值税(销项税额)9690(2)5月18日付款。

借:银行存款(66690×99%)660231财务费用6669贷:应收账款66690(3)5月19日退货。

借:主营业务收入(57000×20%)11400应交税费———应交增值税(销项税额)1938贷:银行存款1320462财务费用(6669×20%)133384.该企业账务处理如下:(1)20×1年年末计提坏账准备。

借:资产减值损失10000贷:坏账准备10000(2)20×2年发生坏账。

借:坏账准备4000贷:应收账款4000(3)20×2年年末计提坏账准备。

中级财务会计第五章课后习题答案

中级财务会计第五章课后习题答案

第五章章节测验题一、单项选择题:(每题2分,共10分)1、关于可供出售金融资产的计量,下列说法中正确的是(A )。

A应当按取得该资产的公允价值和相关交易费用之和作为初始确认金额B应当安取得该金融资产的公允价值作为初始确认金额,相关交易费用计入当期损益C持有期间取得的利息或现金股利,应当冲减成本D资产负债表一可供出售金融资产应当以公允价值计量,且其公允价值变动计入当期损益2、甲公司2007年4月1日从证券市场购入A公司股票60000股,划分为交易性金融资产,每股买价7元(其中包括已宣告发放尚未领取的现金股利1元),另外支付印花税及佣金8000元。

2007年年底,甲公司持有的该股票的市价总额(公允价值)为400000元。

2008年3月12日,甲公司决定出售全部A公司股票,收入现金450000元。

甲公司出售该项金融资产应确认的投资收益为(D )。

A 30000B 60000C 85000D 900003、长期股权投资采用权益法核算时,下列各项不会引起长期股权投资账面价值减少的是(C)。

A被投资单位对外捐赠B被投资单位发生净亏损C被投资单位计提盈余公积D被投资单位发放现金股利4、企业能够对被投资单位实施控制,被投资单位为本企业的(C )。

A联营企业B合营企业C子公司D分公司5、下列金融资产中,应按公允价值进行初始计量,且交易费用计入当期损益的是(A)。

A交易性金融资产B持有至到期投资C应收款项D可供出售金融资产二、多项选择题:(每题4分,共20分)1、下列项目中,属于金融资产的有(ABC )。

A现金B持有至到期投资C应收款项D应付款项2、表明金融资产发生减值的客观证据,包括(ABCD )。

A发行方或债务人发生严重财务困难B债务人违反合同条款,如偿付利息或本金违约或逾期C债务人出于经济或法律分、等方面因素的考虑,对发生财务困难的债务人做出让步D债务人很可能倒闭或进行其他债务重组3、长期股权投资成本法的适用范围是(AB)。

财务管理学第七版课后习题答案全

财务管理学第七版课后习题答案全

财务管理学第七版课后习题答案全在学习财务管理学这门课程时,课后习题是巩固知识、检验学习效果的重要手段。

以下为您提供财务管理学第七版的课后习题答案全,希望能对您的学习有所帮助。

一、单项选择题1、企业财务管理的目标是()A 利润最大化B 股东财富最大化C 企业价值最大化D 相关者利益最大化答案:C解析:企业价值最大化考虑了货币的时间价值和风险因素,能克服企业在追求利润上的短期行为,也较好地兼顾了各利益主体的利益,所以是较为合理的财务管理目标。

2、下列各项中,不属于财务管理经济环境构成要素的是()A 经济周期B 通货膨胀水平C 宏观经济政策D 公司治理结构答案:D解析:经济环境包括经济体制、经济周期、经济发展水平、宏观经济政策及社会通货膨胀水平等。

公司治理结构属于法律环境的范畴。

3、某企业于年初存入银行 10000 元,假定年利率为 12%,每年复利两次。

已知(F/P,6%,5)=13382,(F/P,6%,10)=17908,(F/P,12%,5)=17623,(F/P,12%,10)=31058,则第 5 年末的本利和为()元。

A 13382B 17623C 17908D 31058答案:C解析:每年复利两次,年利率为 12%,则实际利率为(1 + 12%/2)^2 1 = 1236%,第 5 年末的本利和= 10000×(F/P,1236%,5)= 10000×17908 = 17908(元)二、多项选择题1、下列各项中,属于财务管理风险对策的有()A 规避风险B 减少风险C 转移风险D 接受风险答案:ABCD解析:财务管理风险对策包括规避风险、减少风险、转移风险和接受风险。

2、下列各项中,属于年金形式的有()A 定期定额支付的养老金B 偿债基金C 零存整取储蓄存款的零存额D 年资本回收额答案:ABCD解析:年金是指一定时期内每次等额收付的系列款项,包括普通年金(后付年金)、即付年金(先付年金)、递延年金和永续年金。

国际会计第七版英文版课后答案(第九章)

Chapter 9International Financial Statement AnalysisDiscussion Questions1. a. Business strategy analysisDifficulties in cross-border business strategy analysis: Identifying key profit drivers and business risk in two or more countries can be daunting. Business and legal environments and corporate objectives vary around the world. Many risks (such as regulatory risk, foreign exchange risk, and credit risk) need to be evaluated and brought together coherently. In some countries, sources of information are limited and may not be accurate.b. Accounting analysisDifficulties in accounting analysis: Two issues are important here. The first is cross-country variation in accounting measurement quality, disclosure quality, and audit quality. National characteristics that cause this variation include required and generally accepted practices, monitoring and enforcement, and extent in managerial discretion in financial reporting. The second issue concerns the difficulty in obtaining information needed to conduct accounting analysis. The level of credibility and rigor of financial reporting in Anglo-American countries generally is much higher than that found elsewhere. In fact, financial reporting quality can be surprisingly low in both developed and emerging-market countries.c. Financial analysis (ratio analysis and cash flow analysis)Difficulties in financial analysis: Extensive evidence reveals substantial cross-country differences in profitability, leverage, and other financial statement ratios and amounts that result from both accounting and non-accounting factors. Differences in financial statement items caused by national differences in accounting principles can be significant, and unpredictable in amount. Even after financial statement amounts are made reasonably comparable, interpretation of those amounts must consider cross-country differences in economic, competitive, and other conditions.d. Prospective analysis (forecasting and valuation)Difficulties in prospective analysis: Exchange rate fluctuations, accounting differences, different business practices and customs, capital market differences, and many other factors have major effects on international forecasting and valuation. Application of price multiples in a cross-border setting requires that the determinants of each multiple, and reasons why multiples vary across firms, be thoroughly understood. National differences in accounting principles are one source of cross-country variations in these ratios.Finally, all four stages of business analysis may be affected by:i. information access,ii. timeliness of informationiii. foreign currency issuesiv. differences in financial statement formatsv. language and terminology barriers.2. Here we will consider the information needs of investors, creditors, regulators, and competitors.Investors have high information needs at all stages of business analysis. They need to be able to accurately assess the merits of the company’s business strategy, the quality of its accounting, the company’s financial strength, and its future prospects. Since each step in the business analysis process builds on its predecessors, each step is critical in its turn. It can’t be said that any one step is more or less important than the others.Creditors need to go through much the same analysis, but are advantaged in that through direct contact with the companies they often have more extensive and detailed information than do investors. The goal of analysis is also often somewhat different. Many investors, hoping that their shares will increase in value, are interested in prospective analysis. The creditor’s interest is more often limited to being sure (with a margin of safety) that the loan will be repaid. For the creditor, the accounting analysis, financial analysis, and forecasting, all are important; valuation is less so. Regulators have much different interests. Since regulators have no direct interest in the future earnings of the companies they regulate, a prospective analysis (in most cases) is of limited value to them. However, if regulators need to be aware of the financial strength of the companies they regulate, they will need to conduct accounting analysis and (in many cases) financial analysis, particularly when assessing how much of an economic burden can be imposed on companies resulting from a particular regulation.Competitors are intensely interested in finding out as much about a company as possible. Business strategy analysis of one’s competitors is an important part of formulating one’s own business strategy, especially in terms of assessing strengths and weaknesses. Accounting and financial analysis also can uncover strengths and weaknesses. Prospective analysis may be important if a merger or acquisition is contemplated.3. Information accessibility is a major condition for an efficient capital market, that is, information must be rapidly analyzed and made available to investors capable of acting on it. In the United States and other broadly-based financial markets, a whole industry specializing in information analysis and dissemination has developed. Similar investment analysis services in many non-U.S. capital markets are at an earlier stage of development.4. Investment analysis almost always involves paired comparisons, even if the benchmark alternative is to do nothing. In evaluating the risk and return characteristics of a non-domestic company differences in accounting measures of risk and return are often due as much to differences in measurement rules between countries as they are to real economic differences. Corporate transparency compounds the problem by depriving analysts of information necessary to adjust for national measurement differences. Many analysts consider the disclosure issue to be even more important than measurement differences.5. One way of coping with GAAP differences is to restate foreign accounting measures to an internationally recognized set of principles or the reporting framework of the investor’s home country. An alternative tack is to develop a detailed understanding of accounting practices in the investee’s country.Students will definitely disagree on this one. Eventually some will offer a compromise: use the former coping mechanism if the investee company is being compared with a firm in the investor’s home country and adopt a “multiple principles capability” when comparing the investee company to another company in the same country. Another tack would be to examine who is making the market for the investee’s shares. If local investors are making th e market, one should not ignore local norms. However, if investors in the investor’s country are making the market; e.g., U.S. institutional investors, then restatement to the investor’s home country GAAP makes sense.6. Prospective analysis invo lves forecasting a firm’s future cash flows and then valuing those cash flows. As future cash flow estimates are based on accounting measurements, differences in measurement rules between countries complicate this effort. The range of accounting choicesavailable abroad add to this complexity. However, measurement differences are only one of the variables that complicates prospective analysis, Differences in environmental variables such as rates of inflation, sovereign risk, business practices, and institutions complicate both forecasting and valuation. Different institutions include financial norms, tax regimes and market enforcement mechanisms. In terms of valuation, while P/E multiples may be popular in one country, discounted dividends may be more popular in another. Even if two countries employ the same valuation framework, differences in investment horizons and methods of calculating discount rates/cost of capital will vary.7. Translation of foreign financial statements for the convenience of domestic readers is fundamentally distinct from the translation of branch or subsidiary accounts for purposes of consolidation. In the latter case, translation involves a remeasurement process. In most countries, foreign accounts first are restated to the accounting principles of the parent country prior to restatement to parent currency. Convenience translations merely involve a restatement process in the sense that foreign accounts are multiplied by a constant to change the currency of denomination fro m domestic currency to the currency of the reader’s domicile.8. Rules of thumb can vary substantially from one country to another due to both accounting and non-accounting factors. Japan provides a striking example. Many Japanese companies are members of large trading groups (keiretsu) with large commercial banks at their core. Keiretsu often postpone interest and principal payments, so that long-term debt in Japan works more like equity in the United States. Short-term debt is attractive to Japanese companies because short-term obligations typically have lower interest rates than long-term obligations, and normally are renewed or “rolled over” rather than repaid. Thus, debt has a much different nature and purposein Japan than in the United States.The acid test ratio specifically involves cash, marketable securities and receivables as the numerator in the equation, and current liabilities as the denominator. But what counts as current liabilities versus long-term debt (or how long-term debt is viewed) is very different in Japan than in the U.S. In Japan, high short-term debt is less likely to indicate a lack of liquidity, for the reasons stated above. Banks often are willing to renew these loans because it allows them to adjust their interest rates to changing market conditions. Thus, short-term debt works like long-term debt elsewhere, and Japanese companies can operate successfully with a quick ratio at a level that would be entirely unacceptable in the United States. Note, however, that banking practices in Japan are changing rapidly, and the tolerance in Japan for high levels of debt financing may well decrease in the future.9. Important recommendations include the following:•Be aware that national differences in accounting measurement rules c an add “noise” to reported performance comparisons. The reader should be prepared to unwind accounting differences where necessary.•Use a structured approach, such as the one presented in this chapter, to ensure that all relevant factors are considered.•Cash flow-related measures are less affected by accounting principle differences than are earnings-based measures, thus making them potentially valuable in international analysis.•Audit quality varies dramatically across countries. Become familiar with the level of audit quality in a particular country before reaching conclusions using financialstatements prepared by companies in that country.•Corporate transparency also varies dramatically across countries. Be sure to assess accurately the quality of financial disclosures before reaching conclusions based on them.•Above all, appreciate that measurement and disclosure practices are environmentally based. Appreciation for institutional differences will greatly aid in proper interpretation of accounting based performance and risk measures.10. The following list describes in general fashion what probable effect the Dutch translation practice would have on selected financial ratios in comparison with the temporal method. The analysis assumes that the original financial statements of the two companies are identical in all respects save for the currency translation method used. Inventories are assumed to be carried at cost._________________________________ _______________________________________________ Devaluation ___ R evaluationCurrent ratio (liquidity) decrease increaseInv. At mkt goes downInv at mkt goes upDebt ratio (solvency) increase decreaseLoss goes in ATA so eq. smallerGain in ata eq lrg.Fixed asset turnover (efficiency) increase decreaseNet sales/assets assets smaller so inc.A ssets larger so dec.Return on assets (profitability) increase decreaseloss not in incomeGain not in incomeAs can be seen, the current rate method can have a significant effect on key financial indicators. Accordingly, security analysts must be careful to distinguish between the currency in which a foreign account is denominated and the currency in which it is measured.11. The attest function is what gives credibility to the financial statements. If this function is important in the domestic case, it is even more important internationally where statement readers are separated from the companies they are interested in not only by physical distance but also by cultural distance.12. Internal control is an activity performed by a firm’s int ernal auditors that helps to assure that management’s policies and procedures are being carried out effectively, that financial transactions are being properly reported both internally and externally and that the assets of the firm are safeguarded. Intern al control is relied upon by a firm’s external auditors in determining to what extent their work should replicate the work of the internal auditor. The role of the internal auditor has become even more important in assuring the reliability of management’s financial representations owing to the large number of financial scandals that has rocked the U.S. and other financial markets during the start of this decade. Recent legislation in the U.S., which is increasingly being emulated elsewhere, has made management responsible for assuring that their system of internal controls are not only in place but are working well. This has beennecessary to reduce investor uncertainty regarding the quality and reliability of a firm’s published financial accounts.In the absence of a strong system of internal controls, investors will adopt a more passive approach to investing as opposed to relying on firm-specific information. This involves taking a mutual fund approach to investing which attempts to diversify away information risk, although at the cost of lesser performance.Exercises1. The trend of dividends from a U.S. dollar perspective can be ascertained by translating the peso dividend stream using the $/P exchange rate prevailing at the beginning of the time series or the end. Use of the ending exchange rate provides the following trend data:20X6 ________ 20X7 ________ 20X8 ______Net income (P) 8,500 10,800 15,900Dividends (P mill’s)2,550 3,240 4.770Dividends ($000) 850 1,080 1,590Percentage change --- 27.1% 47.2%2.How the statement of cash flows appearing in Exhibit 9.5 was derived:Beg. Bal. DR. CR. End. Bal.Cash 2,400 3.990New fixed assets 8,500 (3) 2,695 (2) 555 10,640ST $ payable 500 500LT debt 4,800 (3) 1,584 6,384Capital stock 3,818 3,818Retained earnings 1,782 (1) 250 2,030Translation adjustment 1,898Sources Usesof ofFunds FundsSources:Net income (1) 250Depreciation (2) 555Increase in LT debt (3) 1,584Translation adjustment (4) 1,898Uses of funds:Increase in fixed assets (3) 2,6954,287 2,695Net increase in cash 1,5924,287 4,2873. Consolidated Funds Statement(figures appearing in parentheses denote changes due primarily to translation effects) Sources:Net income 250Depreciation 555Increase in LT debt 1,584 (1,584)Translation adjustment 1,898 (1,898)less intercompany payable 138Uses of funds:Increase in fixed assets 2,695 (2,695)Net increase in cash 1,590 (924) The $924 translation effect is that part of the $1,898 gain on the translation of net worth which is related to the translation of cash. It is derived as follows.a. Opening cash of 24,000 krona translated at .10 =$2,400Opening cash retranslated at 12/31 at .133 = 3,192Gain 792b. 6,000 krona increase in cash during the yearinitially translated at .111 =$6666,000 krona retranslated at 12/31 at .133 = 798Gain 132Total translation gain applicable to cash 9244. Yes, Infosys added value for its shareholders as its EVA was a positive RPE 1,540. Operating income more than covered the company’s cost of debt and equity.5. Debit: Cost of goods sold ¥250,000,000Taxes payable 87,500,000Credit Inventories ¥250,000,000Tax expense 87,500,0006. a.20X6 20X7 20X8Sales revenue (£) 23,500 28,650 33,160Sales revenue ($) 49,350 63,030 53,056b. Percentage change 20X7/20X6 20X8/20X7Pounds 21.9% 15.7%Dollars 27.8% -15.8%The two time series do not move in parallel fashion because of changes in exchange rates used to perform the convenience translations.c. This problem can be minimized by translating the time series using the 20X6 exchange rate or by using the 20X8 exchange rate. Trend analysis can also be performed in the local currency.7. a. ROE (per Swedish GAAP) = 4,709/88,338 = 5.3%ROE (per U.S. GAAP) = 3,127/84,761 = 3.7%b. Some students will favor using the ROE based on Swedish GAAP, especially if Volvo’sperformance is being compared with that of another company in Sweden. Others willfavor basing their performance assessment on ROE per U.S. GAAP, especially if Volvois being compared to a U.S. counterpart. The latter at least minimizes the apples tooranges issue. It is not clear which viewpoint is correct, and this question should provoke good discussion of the value of restated accounting numbers.c. Even if students all agreed that an ROE based on U.S. GAAP were preferable, the user ofthis information should take into account all institutional considerations, such asdifferences in tax laws, financial norms and business practices that affect all ratios in the Swedish business environment. In the absence of such analysis, restated ratios are likely to be misinterpreted.8. Assessing reasons for P/E ratio trends and cross-country comparisons is difficult. Thetext discusses two studies that have analyzed differences in P/E ratios between Japan and the United States in the late 1980s. The studies differ greatly in their explanations of the(then) much higher Japanese P/E ratios, and neither study claims to explain more than apart of the difference. Part but not all of the reasons were attributable to accountingmeasurement differences. We suspect that differences in institutional factors probablyexert the dominant reason for observed differences internationally.9. Students answers will naturally vary. However, they should recognize that audit practiceare influenced as much by differences in social, economic and political environments as are measurement standards. They should also recognize that standard setting is as mucha political process as it is a process of logic or sound principles.10. Judging from information provided in Exhibit 9-22, liability cases vary far more bycountry than by auditor – with 35 cases in the U,.S., over twice as many as in the nexthighest country (the U.K., with 17). No audit firms had cases in every country, and thetotal number for each auditor is relatively similar, ranging from 11 (Arthur Andersen) to18 (KPMG). The country where liability cases were least frequent was the Netherlands,with only one case.Why? Laws and regulations in the Anglo-American countries, including the UnitedStates, stress investor protection. This places more liability on the auditor and makes iteasier for companies or shareholders to bring or prove a suit. In response to the threat of litigation, auditors are probably more careful in the United States, and more willing tosubject themselves to strict regulations.Implications? It is reasonable to argue that financial reporting quality is positivelycorrelated with frequency of audit litigation. For example, the patterns of auditorlitigation shown in the table above are consistent with the relatively high financialreporting quality found in the U.S., the U.K., Australia and Canada.11. Student opinions are likely to vary on this one as well. Some will argue for opinionscoined by private professional bodies. Others, in light of Enron, et. al., will opt for more legal opinions. In the end, students should conclude that enforcement mechanisms arealso very important. Recent U.S. indictments of company officers for accountingviolations as well as mandated prison terms is unprecedented. Together with increasing recourse to the courts by aggrieved investors, the imbalance between an auditor’sresponsibility and authority is being redressed.12. Reasonable criteria for judging the merits of a database for company research include(but are not limited to):-coverage (number of companies, countries, years of data).-amount of information for each company (number of financial, market-based measures per company).-reliability, ease of use, language translations, search features.-cost (a re only some of the data “freely available?”).-access and links to other Web sites provided?Case 9-1Sandvik1.a. There are several advantages that accrue to Swedish firms employing the system of special reserves. First, political dividends accrue to firms that align their goals with those of the government. Second, there are tax advantages as expenses recognized in establishing a reserve are tax deductible. Third, the use of reserving allows companies to manage their earnings. Disadvantages include the risk of reducing a company’s reporting credibility with the international investing community. This, in turn, may limit the company’s external financing flexibility.2. The government benefits from the reserving system in that it has ally in maintaining full employment. That is to say, its macroeconomic tool kit is expanded in that it yet another vehicle for managing the economy in addition to monetary and fiscal policy.3. The use of reserves makes it difficult for statement readers who are unfamiliar with Swedish reporting practices to assess the risk and return attributes of the firm. For example, it will not be clear to what extent observed differences in financial ratios between a Swedishcompany and a non-Swedish company are due to accounting differences as opposed to real economic differences in the attributes being measured.4. The use of reserves had a dampening effect on Sandvik’s reported earnings.5. The entries used to increase the reserves can be determined by examining the change in Untaxed Reserves in the balance sheet as well as examining the relevant notes to the financial statements. The entries were:Depreciation expense 172Excess depreciation reserve 172Other expenses 13Other untaxed reserves 136. With reserves Without reservesROS 3,731/15,242 3,731 + 185(1-.03)/15,242= 24.5% = 25.7%ROA 3,731 + 1 + 633 3,731 + 1 + 633 + 185(38,142 + 22,286)/ 2 [(38,142 – 185) + (22,286 + 85)] /2= 14.4% = 15.1%Case 9-2Continental A.G.Students will first gravitate to the notes to the financial statements dealing with Special Reserves and Provisions. Their instincts are correct. The problem facing an external analyst is that it is difficult to determine which of the reserve and provision items are legitimate and which are not. It turns out that two important keys to this case are to be found in footnotes 21 and 22. Focusing on the consolidated figures, we see that Continental is using entries under Other operating income and Other operating expenses to smooth reported earnings. The following analysis backs out 1) Credit to income from the reversal of provisions, 2) Credit to income from the reduction of the general bad debt reserve, and 3) Credit to income from the reversal of special reserves appearing in note 21 and Allocation to special reserves under note 22.Adjustments:19X9Operating income DM68,029Provisions DM33,559General B/D Reserve 2,014Special reserve 32,456Special reserves 1,278Operating income 1,27820X0Operating income DM57,237Provisions DM17,312General B/D Reserves 1,101Special Reserves 38,824Special Reserves 168Operating income 168To determine the net overstatement on an after-tax basis, the students should attempt to approximate Continental’s effective tax rate. Information to do this are contained in footnote 24 and Continental’s income statement.Effective Taxes: 19X9 20X0Income tax 141,476 59,884Income after tax 227,838 93,435Income before tax 369,314 153,319Effective rate: 141,476/369,314 59,884/153,319= 39% = 39%Reduction in taxes:66,751 X .39 57,069 X .39= 26,033 = 22,257Net overstatement:66,751 57,069-26,033 -22,25740,718 34,812This overstatement, as a percentage of reported consolidated earnings, was 18% for 19X9and 37% for 20X0. Dietrich and Marissa have cau se to pay Continental’s CFO a visit.。

国际会计第七版英文版课后答案(第二章)(可编辑修改word版)

Chapter 2Development and ClassificationDiscussion Questions1.a)Sources of finance. Where capital markets/shareholders are the principal source offinance, accounting focuses on profitability, stewardship, and a fair presentation ofresults and financial position. There are high levels of disclosure in publishedfinancial statements. When banks are the principal source of finance, accountingtends to be conservative and disclosures are usually relatively low (banks have directaccess to information). When governments are the principal source of finance,accounting is aimed at the information needs of government agencies such as taxcollection, assembling macroeconomic statistics, or compliance with macroeconomicgoals.b)Legal system. Accounting in code law countries tends to be highly prescriptive,detailed, and procedural, designed to cover every possible circumstance. Accountingstandards are a part of national laws. Accounting in common law countries is moreadaptive and innovative and tends to allow more judgment to suit the circumstance.Accounting standards are set in the private sector.c)Taxation. This tends to parallel the legal system. In common law countries (whereaccounting standards are set by the accounting profession), accounting and taxationare separate. In code law countries (where accounting standards are national laws),accounting and taxation are essentially the same.d)Political and economic ties. Accounting technology and expertise is imported andexported based on the contacts that nations have with each other through commerce,conquest, etc.e)Inflation. Historical cost accounting is the basis for initially recording transactionsaround the world. Inflation puts stress on the historical cost principle. Whereinflation is high, accounting adjusts recorded amounts to reflect price level changes.f)Level of economic development. This factor defines the difficulty and types of theaccounting issues that are faced in a nation. Accounting is complex where businesstransactions are complex (in highly developed economies); it is simpler wheretransactions are simpler (in less developed countries).g)Education levels. This factor defines the limits of accounting sophistication in anation. Accounting cannot get very sophisticated where education levels arerelatively low (unless the country imports accounting training or its citizens are sentelsewhere for it).2.The text lists seven environmental circumstances asserted to have direct effects on accountingdevelopment. We judgmentally rank the list as follows:a.Sources of financeb.Legal systemc.Taxationd.Political and economic tiescation levelsf.Inflationg.Level of economic developmentStudents may wish to alter this ranking and justify their own. It should also be pointed out that the rankings for certain countries may be quite different.Capital markets as a source of finance are driving accounting development today. This phenomenon is the reason why the European Union decided to abandon its own effort at developing European accounting principles and require IFRS for EU listed companies. It is behind the convergence movement described in Chapter 8. The chapter argues that the fair presentation versus legal compliance classification describes accounting today better than the one based on legal system. This argument is consistent with sources of finance as the driver of accounting development today.Level of economic development exerts only a moderate effect. This is because developing economies tend to import accounting technologies (and training) from developed countries. For example, many countries in emerging market economies are adapting sophisticated Western accounting systems in order to enhance their development efforts.3.Culture underlies institutional and other arrangements in a nation that directly affect accountingdevelopment. Individualism, power distance, and uncertainty avoidance are likely to be the most important influences. Individualism, small power distance, and weak uncertainty avoidance tend to be correlated with and found in common law countries with fair presentation accounting. There is a strong accounting profession, accountants rely on professional judgment, and capital markets are the principal source of finance.Collectivism, large power distance, and strong uncertainty avoidance tend to be correlated with and found in code law countries with legal compliance accounting. The profession is relatively weak - accounting is influenced by law, instead. Accounting is more conservative and prescriptive, and banks and governments are the principal sources of finance.4.This question is controversial and there is no consensus of opinion at present. However, as notedin the answer to question 3, culture exerts a second-order effect on accounting. It underlies institutional and other arrangements in a nation that directly affect accounting development. We feel that economic and legal factors are more clearly linked to specific features of accounting, whereas cultural variables are linked to broader generalizations about accounting. Thus, we argue that economic and legal factors explain national differences in accounting practice better than culture.5.Generally speaking, these patterns of accounting development are still valid today, but less sothan in 1967. The descriptions of accounting in the chapter for the respective exemplar countries are broadly true. However, note that the Netherlands is really the only country that can be described by the microeconomic pattern. There are also only a few countries that follow the macroeconomic pattern. The independent discipline approach is not as ad hoc as it was in 1967.Most of these countries (in particular, the United Kingdom and United States) now have conceptual frameworks to guide accounting policy formulation. The uniform accounting approach is less relevant as more and more countries privatize their economies.We expect these patterns to break down in the future as financial reporting converges around International Financial Reporting Standards. As discussed in this chapter, the trend is for fair presentation accounting at the consolidated financial statement level. The macroeconomic and the uniform approaches will persist in certain code law countries at the individual company financial statement level (for example, for tax collection purposes). The microeconomic andindependent discipline approaches have always been fair presentation oriented. So, they will likely disappear due to convergence, as discussed above.6.Conservative measurements and secretive disclosures tend to be correlated. At the same time,less emphasis on conservative measurements and transparent disclosures also tend to be correlated. This is largely to due to the principal source of finance in a country. Banks and governments are concerned about the safety net that conservatism affords; and because they tend to have direct access to information, public disclosure is less important. Capital markets demanda fair presentation of financial position and results of operations along with high levels ofdisclosure7.Classifications are a way of viewing the world. They abstract from complexity and revealfundamental characteristics that members of the group have in common and that distinguish the various groups from each other. Classifications provide the basic structure for understanding what is alike and what is different in accounting around the world. By identifying similarities and differences, our understanding of accounting systems is improved.8.Judgmental classifications rely on knowledge, intuition and experience. Empirically derivedclassifications apply statistical methods to databases of accounting principles and practices around the world. This chapter discusses Mueller’s four approaches in acc ounting development (1967), which is essentially a judgmental classification of accounting. The fair presentation versus legal compliance classification and classifications based on legal systems are also judgmental, though largely supported by empirical data.9.The chapter discusses three major accounting classifications. The first is the one by Mueller(1967):•Macroeconomic approach, where accounting practice is designed to enhancemacroeconomic goals;•Microeconomic approach, where accounting develops from the principles ofmicroeconomics;•Independent discipline approach, where accounting develops from business practices based on judgment and trial-and-error; and•Uniform approach, where accounting is standardized so it can be used as a tool of administrative control by central government.The second classification is the one based on legal systems, which closely parallels the third classification based on practice systems. Generally speaking, the features of common law accounting (legal system) are those described for fair presentation accounting (practice system).The features of code law accounting (legal system) are those described for legal compliance accounting (practice system).Fair presentation (common law) emphasizes substance over form and is oriented toward the decision needs of external investors. Thus, it is capital markets oriented. Financial statements help investors judge managerial performance and predict future cash flows and profitability.Extensive disclosures provide additional relevant information for these purposesLegal compliance (code law) accounting is designed to satisfy government-imposed requirements such as calculating taxable income or complying with the national governmen t’s macroeconomic plan. The income amount may also be the basis for dividends paid to shareholders and bonusespaid to employees. Conservative measurements ensure that prudent amounts are distributed and smooth income brings stable tax, dividend and bonus payouts.As noted above, fair presentation accounting is associated with common law countries, while legal compliance accounting is associated with code law countries. However, many companies from code law countries now follow International Financial Reporting Standards in their consolidated financial statements. IFRS are based on the principles of fair presentation.10.The chapter contends that many accounting distinctions at the national level are becoming blurredbecause of global capital market pressures. An increasing number of companies are listing on multiple stock exchanges. This has pressured accounting policy makers around the world to harmonize (converge) reporting requirements. This has also pressured companies to devise financial reporting practices that satisfy multiple requirements and user groups. At the same time, some code law countries where accounting is aimed at legal compliance have dual reporting.Consolidated financial statements are aimed at fair presentation (IFRS), while individual company financial statements continue to be aimed at legal compliance.11.Our preference for classifying based on fair presentation versus legal compliance over legalsystem follows from the answer to question 10. Many companies from code law countries now prepare two sets of financial statements. Consolidated financial statements follow fair presentation principles, while individual company accounts follow legal compliance principles.Listed companies from the European Union now follow International Financial Reporting Standards in their consolidated financial statements. IFRS are based on fair presentation principles.12.In your authors’ opinion, the prospects for the harmonization of national systems of accounting islow. As the chapter demonstrates, accounting satisfies the information needs of its users and develops in response environmental circumstances. Unless these forces converge, there is little reason to expect accounting to converge. Also, taxation is a fundamental influence on accounting in many countries - it is the reason accounting exists in the first place. Unless governments are willing to relinquish their sovereignty over such matters, national accounting systems cannot be harmonized. At the national level, accounting systems are too entrenched.However, the story is different at the transnational (or international) level for consolidated financial statements. Convergence is occurring here, driven by the globalization of capital markets. Companies now seek capital from around the world and must appeal to the information needs of a worldwide investor group. The type of information these investors seek is similar, regardless of where they reside. This same force drove the European Union requirement for listed companies to comply with International Financial Reporting Standards starting in 2005.This means dual reporting for many companies, especially those from European countries where accounting is legalistic and tax-driven. Local financial statements will be prepared in compliance with local laws and accounting standards, but secondary financial statements will be prepared for the worldwide investor group. Consolidated financial reporting is converging onto fair presentation based on IFRS.Exercises1. a. The dominant factor influencing accounting development in Taiwan is political andeconomic ties, namely those with the United States since the 1950s. In 1949, defeated bythe Communists, Chiang Kai-shek fled to Taiwan and set up a provisional governmentthere. Taiwan soon began receiving substantial U.S. economic aid to prevent the furtherspread of Communism. Taiwan is a dynamic capitalist economy and the United States isthe country’s largest trading partner. Taiwan is an economic power that is a leadingproducer of high-technology goods. Services make up more than two-thirds of GDP.Nevertheless, small, family owned businesses are the basis for the economy. Taiwan hasa credit-based, rather than capital markets-based financial system. Its (Germanic) codelaw legal system dates from the years (1895 – 1945) when Taiwan was a Japanese colony.Given the influence of the United States, it can be expected that taxation will not directlyimpact financial reporting (despite the code law legal system). Additional developmentfactors are a low level of inflation and high education level (literacy rate approaching 100percent).b.Overall, one would expect accounting to resemble U.S. accounting, emphasizing a fairpresentation and full disclosure as opposed to compliance with legal requirements.Accountants can be expected to exercise judgment and not merely follow the rules or thetax laws.c.The above prediction is accurate according to the fifth edition of this textbook (PrenticeHall, 2005) and Ronald Ma, ed., Financial Reporting in the Pacific Asia Region,Singapore: World Scientific Publishing (1997). Accounting in Taiwan is largely basedon U.S. accounting. Accounting standard-setting is a private sector activity, modeled afterthe U.S. Financial Accounting Standards Board.2.Gambia and India (both former British colonies) have common law legal systems, while Belgium,Czech Republic, Mexico, Senegal (former French colony), and Taiwan have code law legal systems. China’s legal system is not derived from code law, but more closely resembles code law than common law. Gambia and India have fair presentation accounting because of the British colonial influence and Senegal has legal compliance accounting because of French colonial influence. As members of the European Union, both Belgium and the Czech Republic require International Financial Reporting Standards (fair presentation) for consolidated financial statements. China is also basing its reporting standards on IFRS. Because of U.S. influence, Mexico and Taiwan have fair presentation accounting.3.For each of the three comparative accounting development patterns to be identified, four U.S.examples are listed. (Students were asked to identify two examples each.)a.The macro-economic pattern1.Accounting for investment tax credits.2.Disclosure of corporate social responsibility activities.3.Selected application of accelerated depreciation methods.4.Disclosure of oil and gas reserves by oil companies.b.The micro-economic pattern1.Mark to market accounting for financial instruments.2.Segmental financial reporting according to FASB Statement No. 131.3.Pension accounting and disclosure of pension liabilities.4.Industry-specific accounting, e.g., for banks, insurance companies, public utilities,railroads.c.The independent discipline approach1.The realization principle.2.Reporting of business income as a residual between realized revenues andrecognized expenses for a given period.3.Classifying assets and liabilities as current and noncurrent on the balance sheet.4.Foreign exchange translation according to FASB Statement No. 52.4.The answer to the question depends on the countries and the companies chosen. In general, onewould expect students to discuss measurement and disclosure issues. Accounting in common law countries is based on fairness and substance over form, whereas in code law countries it stresses legal compliance, including tax laws. Thus, accounting and tax are separate in the former, but the same in the latter. Specific practices where this distinction is most obvious is in accounting for depreciation, leases, pensions, and deferred income taxes. Accounting in code law countries tends to be more conservative and it is common to see discretionary reserves used to smooth income. Of course, these are broad generalizations.Disclosure involves the amount and type. Generally, higher levels are found in common law countries and lower levels are found in code law countries. It is difficult to generalize about disclosure types. Students ought to compare such issues as disclosure of accounting policies, segment information, contingent liabilities, and social and nonfinancial matters.This exercise also lends itself to a group project where one student takes one company and another student takes the other. The length of the answer will vary depending on how in-depth the instructor wants to be.One reason why the similarities and differences may not conform to expectations is due to the type of company chosen. Large multinational corporations, especially from code law countries, often have different reporting than their domestic counterparts. Their disclosure levels are more extensive and they may not use home GAAP. All EU listed companies must now prepare consolidated statements using IFRS. It is useful to compare the two companies chosen on the basis of size, extent of multinational operations, and international listing status. Also note that the Netherlands has always followed “common law” accounting (i.e., fair presentation) even though it is a code law country.5.At the time of writing, the 2005 annual report was the most recent one available. The stockexchanges with the most foreign listed companies were New York (452), London (334), Nasdaq (332), Euronext (293), and Luxembourg (206). The attraction of New York, London, and Nasdaq for foreign companies is that these are the major capital markets in the world. Euronext and Luxembourg attract many European companies.The stock exchanges with the highest proportion of foreign to total listed companies were Luxembourg (84%), Bermuda (66%), Mexico (54%), Swiss (29%), and Euronext (23%). As noted, Luxembourg and Euronext attract many European companies. The Swiss Exchange does as well. Bermuda is known as a financial center with easy laws, which may explain its high proportion. The Mexican Exchange attracts companies from Central and South America.6.Arguably the most serious obstacle to accounting harmonization in the EU is that common andcode law countries are both represented. This determines how standards are set and the basic orientation of accounting. However, differences can be noted in every developmental factor discussed in the chapter, including the cultural dimension. Nevertheless, the economic and political ties among the member countries are a dominant force supporting EU harmonization —the group is committed to economic integration, including a single currency, the euro. EU countries are converging on fair presentation accounting for consolidated financial statements, propelled by market forces such as these.7.For the ten countries joining the EU in 2004 and the two countries joining in 2007, the level ofeconomic development and the fact that they lack developed capital markets (system of finance) is likely to be the most serious obstacles for achieving accounting harmonization with the rest of the EU. Most of these countries are still expanding their market economies from ones that were centrally planned. Accounting expertise is also still being developed.8. a. The individualism scores are: China (20), the Czech Republic (58), France (71),Germany (67), India (48), Japan (46), Mexico (30), the Netherlands (80), the UnitedKingdom (89), and the United States (91).b.Countries with high individualism scores are France, Germany, the Netherlands, UnitedKingdom, and United States. Countries with medium individualism scores are CzechRepublic, India, and Japan. Countries with low individualism scores are China andMexico.c.According to Gray, high individualism is associated with professionalism, flexibility,optimism, and transparency. (Note to instructors: After reading Chapters 3 and 4,students will recognize that these characterize Dutch, U.K. and U.S. accounting, but notFrench and German accounting. [Note also that the Netherlands, U.K., and U.S. have thehighest individualism scores of all 10 countries.]) According to Gray, low individualismis associated with statutory control, uniformity, conservatism, and secrecy. (Note toinstructors: After reading Chapters 3 and 4, students will recognize that only statutorycontrol and (to some extent) secrecy is associated with China, while only secrecy isassociated with Mexico. Gray’s prediction for these two countries is not very good.)Medium individualism scores presumably predict accounting values ‘in the middle’.(Note to instructors: After reading Chapters 3 and 4, students will recognize that theCzech Republic, India, and Japan do not really fall ‘in the middle’ on Gray’s accountingvalues. The Czech Republic and Japan generally reflect the accounting values ofstatutory control, uniformity, conservatism, and secrecy. India is generally associatedwith professionalism, flexibility, optimism, and transparency.)9. a. The uncertainty avoidance scores are: China (30), the Czech Republic (74), France (86),Germany (65), India (40), Japan (92), Mexico (82), the Netherlands (53), the UnitedKingdom (35), and the United States (46).b.Countries with high uncertainty avoidance scores are the Czech Republic, France,Germany, Japan, and Mexico. Countries with medium uncertainty avoidance scores areIndia, the Netherlands, and the United States. Countries with low uncertainty avoidancescores are China and the United Kingdom.c.According to Gray, high uncertainty avoidance is associated with statutory control,uniformity, conservatism, and secrecy. (Note to instructors: After reading Chapters 3 and4, students will recognize that Gray’s prediction describes accounting well for the CzechRepublic, France, and Germany. The prediction describes Japan before the “Big Bang”,but less so now. Except for secrecy, the prediction does not describe accounting valuesin Mexico.) According to Gray, low uncertainty avoidance is associated withprofessionalism, flexibility, optimism, and transparency. (Note to instructors: Afterreading Chapters 3 and 4, students will recognize that these are features of U.K.accounting, but not China.) Medium uncertainty avoidance scores presumably predictaccounting values ‘in the middle’. (Note to instructors: After reading Chapters 3 and 4,students will recognize that India, the Netherlands, and the United States have similaraccounting values to the United Kingdom. Gray’s prediction for these three countries isnot very good.)d.The only consistent prediction between Exercise 8 (individualism) and Exercise 9(uncertainty avoidance) is that for the United Kingdom. Gray’s model linking cultureand accounting is valid for the U.K. The model’s prediction s are exactly opposite forChina, but in neither case does it predict China’s accounting values very well. Based onindividualism, the model does a “good job” predicting the accounting values in theNetherlands, U.K., and U.S., but a “poor or moderate” job predicting accounting valuesin the other seven countries. Based on uncertainty avoidance, the model does a “good job”predicting accounting values in the Czech Republic, France, Germany, Japan, and U.K.,but a “poor or moderate” job prediction accounting in the other five countries. Overall,one would have to conclude that the success of Gray’s model linking culture andaccounting is modest at best.10.The following table summarizes the use of IFRS by domestic listed companies in the 10 countriesidentified, according to the IAS Plus Web site at the time of writing:The five countries of the European Union require their domestic listed companies to use IFRS.This EU requirement is discussed in the chapter. India, Japan, Mexico, and the United States require their domestic listed companies to use national GAAP, not IFRS. The implication is that these four countries believe that their own national standards better reflect financial reporting to various constituencies than do IFRS. (However, Chapter 4 discusses that these four countries are converging their national GAAP with IFRS.) China requires some domestic listed companies to use IFRS. The inference is that IFRS are relevant for some but not all domestic Chinese companies. (Chapter 4 notes that Chinese companies issuing so-called B-shares (shares to foreign investors) must prepare English language financial statements. One might infer that companies with B-shares would also be required to use IFRS. Chapter 4 also discusses that China is converging national GAAP to IFRS.)11.France: With banks and government as the main sources of finance, we can expectconservative and uniform measurements. With code law legal system, the focus is on complying with the law. The link to taxation means that measurements are also tax-oriented. Political and economic ties with the rest of Europe suggest that French accounting may influence and be influenced by other European countries. Low inflation indicates a low likelihood of inflationadjustments. The levels of economic development and education suggest sophisticated accounting.India: With the government and stock market as the main sources of finance, we can expect a mixed (and inconsistent) orientation –uniformity but also fair presentation. The common law legal system and separation between tax and financial accounting indicate fair presentation accounting. The political and economic ties to the U.K. and U.S.A. also suggest fair presentation accounting. (Economic ties to China are probably unimportant in describing Indian accounting.) Low inflation suggests a low likelihood of inflation adjustments. The levels of economic development and education suggest less complex accounting standards and practices.Japan: With banks as the main source of finance, we can expect conservative accounting measurements. With the code law legal system, focus is on complying with the law. The link to taxation means that measurements are also tax-oriented. Political and economic ties to theU.S.A. indicate some U.S. influence on Japanese accounting. (Economic ties to China are probably unimportant in describing Japanese accounting.) Low inflation suggests a low likelihood of inflation adjustments. The levels of economic development and education suggest sophisticated accounting.United Kingdom: With the stock market as the main source of finance, we can expect fair presentation accounting. Fair presentation accounting can also be expected because the U.K.has common law, and taxation and accounting are separate (i.e., not linked). Political and economic ties to the U.S.A. and Europe suggest accounting influence is felt to and from both areas. Low inflation indicates a low likelihood of inflation adjustments. The levels of economic development and education suggest sophisticated accounting.United States: With the stock market as the main source of finance, we can expect fair presentation accounting. Fair presentation accounting can also be expected because the U.S.A.has common law, and taxation and accounting are separate (i.e., not linked). Political and economic ties to the Canada and Mexico most likely mean that these two countries are influenced by the U.S.A., rather than the other way around. Low inflation indicates a low likelihood of inflation adjustments. The levels of economic development and education suggest sophisticated accounting.12.The irreversible globalization of capital markets and increasing trend of multiple stock exchangelistings is causing more and more companies to adopt fair presentation accounting for their worldwide audience. The chapter notes how accounting distinctions are becoming blurred.Chapter 3 also notes how Germany and Chapter 4 shows how Japan have established standard setting organizations for the purpose of adopting reporting standards for consolidated financial statements that are in line with International Financial Reporting Standards. Standard setters in the United States, Canada, Australia, and many other countries are committed to converging their financial reporting with IFRS. Finally, the European Union now requires EU-listed companies to follow IFRS in their consolidated financial statements from 2005 on.Thus, we believe that the two-way split proposed in the chapter (fair presentation versus legal compliance) will be even more significant than it is now. Countries already oriented toward fair presentation (such as Australia, Canada, the Netherlands, United Kingdom, United States) will converge around International Financial Reporting Standards. Regardless of the home country of the company concerned, consolidated financial statements will be prepared on a fair presentation/full disclosure basis, as can be seen in the EU 2005 requirement. Countries that。

国际会计第七版英文版课后答案(第九章)

Chapter 9International Financial Statement AnalysisDiscussion Questions1. a. Business strategy analysisDifficulties in cross-border business strategy analysis: Identifying key profit drivers and business risk in two or more countries can be daunting. Business and legal environments and corporate objectives vary around the world. Many risks (such as regulatory risk, foreign exchange risk, and credit risk) need to be evaluated and brought together coherently. In some countries, sources of information are limited and may not be accurate.b. Accounting analysisDifficulties in accounting analysis: Two issues are important here. The first is cross-country variation in accounting measurement quality, disclosure quality, and audit quality. National characteristics that cause this variation include required and generally accepted practices, monitoring and enforcement, and extent in managerial discretion in financial reporting. The second issue concerns the difficulty in obtaining information needed to conduct accounting analysis. The level of credibility and rigor of financial reporting in Anglo-American countries generally is much higher than that found elsewhere. In fact, financial reporting quality can be surprisingly low in both developed and emerging-market countries.c. Financial analysis (ratio analysis and cash flow analysis)Difficulties in financial analysis: Extensive evidence reveals substantial cross-country differences in profitability, leverage, and other financial statement ratios and amounts that result from both accounting and non-accounting factors. Differences in financial statement items caused by national differences in accounting principles can be significant, and unpredictable in amount. Even after financial statement amounts are made reasonably comparable, interpretation of those amounts must consider cross-country differences in economic, competitive, and other conditions.d. Prospective analysis (forecasting and valuation)Difficulties in prospective analysis: Exchange rate fluctuations, accounting differences, different business practices and customs, capital market differences, and many other factors have major effects on international forecasting and valuation. Application of price multiples in a cross-border setting requires that the determinants of each multiple, and reasons why multiples vary across firms, be thoroughly understood. National differences in accounting principles are one source of cross-country variations in these ratios.Finally, all four stages of business analysis may be affected by:i. information access,ii. timeliness of informationiii. foreign currency issuesiv. differences in financial statement formatsv. language and terminology barriers.2. Here we will consider the information needs of investors, creditors, regulators, and competitors.Investors have high information needs at all stages of business analysis. They need to be able to accurately assess the merits of the company’s business strategy, the quality of its accounting, the company’s financial strength, and its future prospects. Since each step in the business analysis process builds on its predecessors, each step is critical in its turn. It can’t be said that any one step is more or less important than the others.Creditors need to go through much the same analysis, but are advantaged in that through direct contact with the companies they often have more extensive and detailed information than do investors. The goal of analysis is also often somewhat different. Many investors, hoping that their shares will increase in value, are interested in prospective analysis. The creditor’s interest is more often limited to being sure (with a margin of safety) that the loan will be repaid. For the creditor, the accounting analysis, financial analysis, and forecasting, all are important; valuation is less so. Regulators have much different interests. Since regulators have no direct interest in the future earnings of the companies they regulate, a prospective analysis (in most cases) is of limited value to them. However, if regulators need to be aware of the financial strength of the companies they regulate, they will need to conduct accounting analysis and (in many cases) financial analysis, particularly when assessing how much of an economic burden can be imposed on companies resulting from a particular regulation.Competitors are intensely interested in finding out as much about a company as possible. Business strategy analysis of one’s competitors is an important part of formulating one’s own business strategy, especially in terms of assessing strengths and weaknesses. Accounting and financial analysis also can uncover strengths and weaknesses. Prospective analysis may be important if a merger or acquisition is contemplated.3. Information accessibility is a major condition for an efficient capital market, that is, information must be rapidly analyzed and made available to investors capable of acting on it. In the United States and other broadly-based financial markets, a whole industry specializing in information analysis and dissemination has developed. Similar investment analysis services in many non-U.S. capital markets are at an earlier stage of development.4. Investment analysis almost always involves paired comparisons, even if the benchmark alternative is to do nothing. In evaluating the risk and return characteristics of a non-domestic company differences in accounting measures of risk and return are often due as much to differences in measurement rules between countries as they are to real economic differences. Corporate transparency compounds the problem by depriving analysts of information necessary to adjust for national measurement differences. Many analysts consider the disclosure issue to be even more important than measurement differences.5. One way of coping with GAAP differences is to restate foreign accounting measures to an internationally recognized set of principles or the reporting framework of the investor’s home country. An alternative tack is to develop a detailed understanding of accounting practices in the investee’s country.Students will definitely disagree on this one. Eventually some will offer a compromise: use the former coping mechanism if the investee company is being compared with a firm in the investor’s home country and adopt a “multiple principles capability” when comparing the investee company to another company in the same country. Another tack would be to examine who is making the market for the investee’s shares. If local investors are making th e market, one should not ignore local norms. However, if investors in the investor’s country are making the market; e.g., U.S. institutional investors, then restatement to the investor’s home country GAAP makes sense.6. Prospective analysis invo lves forecasting a firm’s future cash flows and then valuing those cash flows. As future cash flow estimates are based on accounting measurements, differences in measurement rules between countries complicate this effort. The range of accounting choicesavailable abroad add to this complexity. However, measurement differences are only one of the variables that complicates prospective analysis, Differences in environmental variables such as rates of inflation, sovereign risk, business practices, and institutions complicate both forecasting and valuation. Different institutions include financial norms, tax regimes and market enforcement mechanisms. In terms of valuation, while P/E multiples may be popular in one country, discounted dividends may be more popular in another. Even if two countries employ the same valuation framework, differences in investment horizons and methods of calculating discount rates/cost of capital will vary.7. Translation of foreign financial statements for the convenience of domestic readers is fundamentally distinct from the translation of branch or subsidiary accounts for purposes of consolidation. In the latter case, translation involves a remeasurement process. In most countries, foreign accounts first are restated to the accounting principles of the parent country prior to restatement to parent currency. Convenience translations merely involve a restatement process in the sense that foreign accounts are multiplied by a constant to change the currency of denomination fro m domestic currency to the currency of the reader’s domicile.8. Rules of thumb can vary substantially from one country to another due to both accounting and non-accounting factors. Japan provides a striking example. Many Japanese companies are members of large trading groups (keiretsu) with large commercial banks at their core. Keiretsu often postpone interest and principal payments, so that long-term debt in Japan works more like equity in the United States. Short-term debt is attractive to Japanese companies because short-term obligations typically have lower interest rates than long-term obligations, and normally are renewed or “rolled over” rather than repaid. Thus, debt has a much different nature and purposein Japan than in the United States.The acid test ratio specifically involves cash, marketable securities and receivables as the numerator in the equation, and current liabilities as the denominator. But what counts as current liabilities versus long-term debt (or how long-term debt is viewed) is very different in Japan than in the U.S. In Japan, high short-term debt is less likely to indicate a lack of liquidity, for the reasons stated above. Banks often are willing to renew these loans because it allows them to adjust their interest rates to changing market conditions. Thus, short-term debt works like long-term debt elsewhere, and Japanese companies can operate successfully with a quick ratio at a level that would be entirely unacceptable in the United States. Note, however, that banking practices in Japan are changing rapidly, and the tolerance in Japan for high levels of debt financing may well decrease in the future.9. Important recommendations include the following:∙Be aware that national differences in accounting measurement rules c an add “noise” to reported performance comparisons. The reader should be prepared to unwind accounting differences where necessary.∙Use a structured approach, such as the one presented in this chapter, to ensure that all relevant factors are considered.∙Cash flow-related measures are less affected by accounting principle differences than are earnings-based measures, thus making them potentially valuable in international analysis.∙Audit quality varies dramatically across countries. Become familiar with the level of audit quality in a particular country before reaching conclusions using financialstatements prepared by companies in that country.∙Corporate transparency also varies dramatically across countries. Be sure to assess accurately the quality of financial disclosures before reaching conclusions based on them.Above all, appreciate that measurement and disclosure practices are environmentally based. Appreciation for institutional differences will greatly aid in proper interpretation of accounting based performance and risk measures.10. The following list describes in general fashion what probable effect the Dutch translation practice would have on selected financial ratios in comparison with the temporal method. The analysis assumes that the original financial statements of the two companies are identical in all respects save for the currency translation method used. Inventories are assumed to be carried at cost._________________________________ _______________________________________________ Devaluation ___ R evaluationCurrent ratio (liquidity) decrease increaseInv. At mkt goes downInv at mkt goes upDebt ratio (solvency) increase decreaseLoss goes in ATA so eq. smallerGain in ata eq lrg.Fixed asset turnover (efficiency) increase decreaseNet sales/assets assets smaller so inc.A ssets larger so dec.Return on assets (profitability) increase decreaseloss not in incomeGain not in incomeAs can be seen, the current rate method can have a significant effect on key financial indicators. Accordingly, security analysts must be careful to distinguish between the currency in which a foreign account is denominated and the currency in which it is measured.11. The attest function is what gives credibility to the financial statements. If this function is important in the domestic case, it is even more important internationally where statement readers are separated from the companies they are interested in not only by physical distance but also by cultural distance.12. Internal control is an activity performed by a firm’s int ernal auditors that helps to assure that management’s policies and procedures are being carried out effectively, that financial transactions are being properly reported both internally and externally and that the assets of the firm are safeguarded. Intern al control is relied upon by a firm’s external auditors in determining to what extent their work should replicate the work of the internal auditor. The role of the internal auditor has become even more important in assuring the reliability of management’s financial representations owing to the large number of financial scandals that has rocked the U.S. and other financial markets during the start of this decade. Recent legislation in the U.S., which is increasingly being emulated elsewhere, has made management responsible for assuring that their system of internal controls are not only in place but are working well. This has beennecessary to reduce investor uncertainty regarding the quality and reliability of a firm’s published financial accounts.In the absence of a strong system of internal controls, investors will adopt a more passive approach to investing as opposed to relying on firm-specific information. This involves taking a mutual fund approach to investing which attempts to diversify away information risk, although at the cost of lesser performance.Exercises1. The trend of dividends from a U.S. dollar perspective can be ascertained by translating the peso dividend stream using the $/P exchange rate prevailing at the beginning of the time series or the end. Use of the ending exchange rate provides the following trend data:20X6 ________ 20X7 ________ 20X8 ______Net income (P) 8,500 10,800 15,900Dividends (P mill’s)2,550 3,240 4.770Dividends ($000) 850 1,080 1,590Percentage change --- 27.1% 47.2%2.How the statement of cash flows appearing in Exhibit 9.5 was derived:Beg. Bal. DR. CR. End. Bal.Cash 2,400 3.990New fixed assets 8,500 (3) 2,695 (2) 555 10,640ST $ payable 500 500LT debt 4,800 (3) 1,584 6,384Capital stock 3,818 3,818Retained earnings 1,782 (1) 250 2,030Translation adjustment 1,898Sources Usesof ofFunds FundsSources:Net income (1) 250Depreciation (2) 555Increase in LT debt (3) 1,584Translation adjustment (4) 1,898Uses of funds:Increase in fixed assets (3) 2,6954,287 2,695Net increase in cash 1,5924,287 4,2873. Consolidated Funds Statement(figures appearing in parentheses denote changes due primarily to translation effects) Sources:Net income 250Depreciation 555Increase in LT debt 1,584 (1,584)Translation adjustment 1,898 (1,898)less intercompany payable 138Uses of funds:Increase in fixed assets 2,695 (2,695)Net increase in cash 1,590 (924) The $924 translation effect is that part of the $1,898 gain on the translation of net worth which is related to the translation of cash. It is derived as follows.a. Opening cash of 24,000 krona translated at .10 =$2,400Opening cash retranslated at 12/31 at .133 = 3,192Gain 792b. 6,000 krona increase in cash during the yearinitially translated at .111 =$6666,000 krona retranslated at 12/31 at .133 = 798Gain 132Total translation gain applicable to cash 9244. Yes, Infosys added value for its shareholders as its EVA was a positive RPE 1,540. Operating income more than covered the company’s cost of debt and equity.5. Debit: Cost of goods sold ¥250,000,000Taxes payable 87,500,000Credit Inventories ¥250,000,000Tax expense 87,500,0006. a.20X6 20X7 20X8Sales revenue (£) 23,500 28,650 33,160Sales revenue ($) 49,350 63,030 53,056b. Percentage change 20X7/20X6 20X8/20X7Pounds 21.9% 15.7%Dollars 27.8% -15.8%The two time series do not move in parallel fashion because of changes in exchange rates used to perform the convenience translations.c. This problem can be minimized by translating the time series using the 20X6 exchange rate or by using the 20X8 exchange rate. Trend analysis can also be performed in the local currency.7. a. ROE (per Swedish GAAP) = 4,709/88,338 = 5.3%ROE (per U.S. GAAP) = 3,127/84,761 = 3.7%b. Some students will favor using the ROE based on Swedish GAAP, especially if Volvo’sperformance is being compared with that of another company in Sweden. Others willfavor basing their performance assessment on ROE per U.S. GAAP, especially if Volvois being compared to a U.S. counterpart. The latter at least minimizes the apples tooranges issue. It is not clear which viewpoint is correct, and this question should provoke good discussion of the value of restated accounting numbers.c. Even if students all agreed that an ROE based on U.S. GAAP were preferable, the user ofthis information should take into account all institutional considerations, such asdifferences in tax laws, financial norms and business practices that affect all ratios in the Swedish business environment. In the absence of such analysis, restated ratios are likely to be misinterpreted.8. Assessing reasons for P/E ratio trends and cross-country comparisons is difficult. Thetext discusses two studies that have analyzed differences in P/E ratios between Japan and the United States in the late 1980s. The studies differ greatly in their explanations of the(then) much higher Japanese P/E ratios, and neither study claims to explain more than apart of the difference. Part but not all of the reasons were attributable to accountingmeasurement differences. We suspect that differences in institutional factors probablyexert the dominant reason for observed differences internationally.9. Students answers will naturally vary. However, they should recognize that audit practiceare influenced as much by differences in social, economic and political environments as are measurement standards. They should also recognize that standard setting is as mucha political process as it is a process of logic or sound principles.10. Judging from information provided in Exhibit 9-22, liability cases vary far more bycountry than by auditor – with 35 cases in the U,.S., over twice as many as in the nexthighest country (the U.K., with 17). No audit firms had cases in every country, and thetotal number for each auditor is relatively similar, ranging from 11 (Arthur Andersen) to18 (KPMG). The country where liability cases were least frequent was the Netherlands,with only one case.Why? Laws and regulations in the Anglo-American countries, including the UnitedStates, stress investor protection. This places more liability on the auditor and makes iteasier for companies or shareholders to bring or prove a suit. In response to the threat of litigation, auditors are probably more careful in the United States, and more willing tosubject themselves to strict regulations.Implications? It is reasonable to argue that financial reporting quality is positivelycorrelated with frequency of audit litigation. For example, the patterns of auditorlitigation shown in the table above are consistent with the relatively high financialreporting quality found in the U.S., the U.K., Australia and Canada.11. Student opinions are likely to vary on this one as well. Some will argue for opinionscoined by private professional bodies. Others, in light of Enron, et. al., will opt for more legal opinions. In the end, students should conclude that enforcement mechanisms arealso very important. Recent U.S. indictments of company officers for accountingviolations as well as mandated prison terms is unprecedented. Together with increasing recourse to the courts by aggrieved investors, the imbalance between an auditor’sresponsibility and authority is being redressed.12. Reasonable criteria for judging the merits of a database for company research include(but are not limited to):-coverage (number of companies, countries, years of data).-amount of information for each company (number of financial, market-based measures per company).-reliability, ease of use, language translations, search features.-cost (a re only some of the data “freely available?”).-access and links to other Web sites provided?Case 9-1Sandvik1.a. There are several advantages that accrue to Swedish firms employing the system of special reserves. First, political dividends accrue to firms that align their goals with those of the government. Second, there are tax advantages as expenses recognized in establishing a reserve are tax deductible. Third, the use of reserving allows companies to manage their earnings. Disadvantages include the risk of reducing a company’s reporting credibility with the international investing community. This, in turn, may limit the company’s external financing flexibility.2. The government benefits from the reserving system in that it has ally in maintaining full employment. That is to say, its macroeconomic tool kit is expanded in that it yet another vehicle for managing the economy in addition to monetary and fiscal policy.3. The use of reserves makes it difficult for statement readers who are unfamiliar with Swedish reporting practices to assess the risk and return attributes of the firm. For example, it will not be clear to what extent observed differences in financial ratios between a Swedishcompany and a non-Swedish company are due to accounting differences as opposed to real economic differences in the attributes being measured.4. The use of reserves had a dampening effect on Sandvik’s reported earnings.5. The entries used to increase the reserves can be determined by examining the change in Untaxed Reserves in the balance sheet as well as examining the relevant notes to the financial statements. The entries were:Depreciation expense 172Excess depreciation reserve 172Other expenses 13Other untaxed reserves 136. With reserves Without reservesROS 3,731/15,242 3,731 + 185(1-.03)/15,242= 24.5% = 25.7%ROA 3,731 + 1 + 633 3,731 + 1 + 633 + 185(38,142 + 22,286)/ 2 [(38,142 – 185) + (22,286 + 85)] /2= 14.4% = 15.1%Case 9-2Continental A.G.Students will first gravitate to the notes to the financial statements dealing with Special Reserves and Provisions. Their instincts are correct. The problem facing an external analyst is that it is difficult to determine which of the reserve and provision items are legitimate and which are not. It turns out that two important keys to this case are to be found in footnotes 21 and 22. Focusing on the consolidated figures, we see that Continental is using entries under Other operating income and Other operating expenses to smooth reported earnings. The following analysis backs out 1) Credit to income from the reversal of provisions, 2) Credit to income from the reduction of the general bad debt reserve, and 3) Credit to income from the reversal of special reserves appearing in note 21 and Allocation to special reserves under note 22.Adjustments:19X9Operating income DM68,029Provisions DM33,559General B/D Reserve 2,014Special reserve 32,456Special reserves 1,278Operating income 1,27820X0Operating income DM57,237Provisions DM17,312General B/D Reserves 1,101Special Reserves 38,824Special Reserves 168Operating income 168To determine the net overstatement on an after-tax basis, the students should attempt to approximate Continental’s effective tax rate. Information to do this are contained in footnote 24 and Continental’s income statement.Effective Taxes: 19X9 20X0Income tax 141,476 59,884Income after tax 227,838 93,435Income before tax 369,314 153,319Effective rate: 141,476/369,314 59,884/153,319= 39% = 39%Reduction in taxes:66,751 X .39 57,069 X .39= 26,033 = 22,257Net overstatement:66,751 57,069-26,033 -22,25740,718 34,812This overstatement, as a percentage of reported consolidated earnings, was 18% for 19X9and 37% for 20X0. Dietrich and Marissa have cau se to pay Continental’s CFO a visit.。

国际会计第七版英文版课后答案(第十一章)

Chapter 11Financial Risk ManagementDiscussion Questions1.Enterprise risk management assesses individual risks in the context of a firm’s business strategy. Risksare viewed from a portfolio perspective with risks of various business functions, e.g., FX risk, interest rate risk, political risk and the like, being coordinated by a senior financial manager responsible for keeping top management apprised of critical risks that could interfere with the accomplishment of a firm’sstrategic objectives and devising risk optimization strategies. The variables that management accountants must track include factors both external and internal to the firm and varies from company to company.2.Market risk refers to the risk of loss due to unexpected changes in the prices of currencies, interest rates,commodities, and equities. It is not confined to price changes. Market risk also includes liquidity risk, market discontinuities, credit risk, regulatory risk, tax risk, and accounting risk. An example of a foreign exchange risk is a situation where an exporter invoices a credit sale to a foreign importer in foreign currency and foreign currency devalues prior to payment.3.An FX risk management program includes the following processes:a.Forecasting the expected movement in the relation between the yuan and your domesticcurrency.b.Measuring on a periodic basis your firm’s exposure to fluctuations in the value of the yuan.c.Designing protection strategies that will minimize losses should the yuan revalue.d.Establishing internal controls to measure your performance in hedging the risk of loss fromchanges in the value of the yuan.4.Translation exposure measures the impact of exchange rate changes on the domestic currency equivalentsof a firm s foreign currency assets and liabilities. It is primarily concerned with currency restatement.Transaction exposure measures the cash flow impact of fluctuating currency values on the settlement of commercial transactions denominated in foreign currencies. Transaction exposure is concerned with acurrency conversion (exchange) process. Economic exposure attempts to measure the impact of changing exchange rates on the future revenues, costs, and sales volume of a multinational entity. It is concerned with the temporal effects of exchange rate changes.Although FAS No. 52 attempts to mitigate concern with translation gains and losses (accounting exposure), it does not totally eliminate it. Companies choosing the U.S. dollar as their functional currency will still use the temporal translation method and report translation gains and losses in period income. Companies designating the local currency as the functional currency will find their asset exposures increased as inventories and fixed assets are translated using current exchange rates. While such translation gains and losses bypass income, the adverse effects of currency fluctuations on a company’s consolidated equity will still exist. This is especially likely where loan covenant and other contractual provisions specify minimum debt-to-equity ratios. This suggests that the issue of accounting versus economic exposure is far from settled.5.The chapter lists 10 specific methods to reduce a firm’s exposure to foreign exchange risk in adevaluation-prone country. These techniques, and possible cost-benefit trade-offs, are summarized in the following table.Methods Trade-Offsa. Minimize cash balances in a. Reduced exposure versusdevaluation-prone country higher business andfinancial risk due to possible "cash-outs."b. Remitting excess cash back b. Same as item a.to the parent company.c. Accelerate the collection c. Reduced exposure versusof local currency receivables possible reduction in salesd. Defer payment of local d. Reduced exposure versuscurrency payables impaired local credit ratinge. Speed up payment of e. Reduced exposure versusforeign currency payables foregone earnings on arelatively cheap creditsourcef. Invest local currency cash f. Reduced exposure versusbalances in inventories and higher transaction costsother assets less prone to and possible mis-devaluation loss allocation of corporateresourcesg. Invest in strong currency g. Reduced exposure versusforeign assets higher transaction costsand possible governmentinterference (e.g.exchange controls)h. Raise selling prices h. Reduced exposure versuspotential erosion ofmarket sharei. Invoice exports in hard i. Reduced exposure versuscurrencies possible reduction insales abroadj. Currency swaps j. Reduced translationexposure versus increasedtransaction exposure ifparent assesses theexposed affiliate aninterest charge in hardcurrency6. A multicurrency transactions exposure report differs from a multicurrency translation exposure report in anumber of ways. First, the transactions exposure report has a cash flow orientation instead of a static balance sheet orientation. It includes off balance sheet items that are executory in nature. Finally, a multicurrency transaction exposure report has a local currency orientation, whereas a multicurrency translation exposure report has a parent currency orientation.7.Derivative instruments are formal agreements that transfer financial risk from one party to another. Thevalue of a derivative is derived from its reference to a basic underlying instrument or variable such as a foreign currency receivable or a quantum of foreign exchange. Thus the value of a forward exchange contract is related to the change in the foreign exchange rate times the notional amount being hedged. An important accounting issue is whether derivatives should receive the same accounting treatment as the basic instruments to which they relate. Specifically, should a derivative instrument hedging a foreign currency asset appear in the financial statements as a foreign currency liability? If so, should its valuation base be identical to basic instruments? Do cash flows associated with derivative instruments have thesame economic meaning as those associated with basic instruments? How should gains and losses associated with derivative instruments be reflected in the income statement? Can and should risks attaching to these financial instruments be recognized and measured?8.Student responses should proceed along the following lines. Pele Corporation, a Brazilian firm, hasborrowed a certain sum of British pounds at 9 percent and is worried that the pound will appreciate relative to the real prior to maturity. To hedge this currency risk, it arranges with a bank to swap the pounds borrowed for an equivalent amount of reals for 3 years bearing the same rate of interest. During the 3-year period, it will make periodic interest payments to the bank in reals, and in return, receive periodic interest payments in pounds. At the end of the 3-year period, it will re-exchange the real principal for pounds at the original exchange rate.9. A futures contract is a commitment to purchase or deliver a specified quantity of a financial instrument orforeign currency at a future date at a price set when the contract is made. It differs from a forward contract in several respects. A futures contract is standardized in terms of size and delivery date whereas a forward contract is tailored to a customer’s needs. Futures contracts are freely traded on organized exchanges. In contrast, there is no secondary market for forward contracts as they are private agreements between two parties. Futures contracts are carried at market values with gains or losses taken immediately to income, whereas profits on a forward contract are realized only at the delivery date. Finally, a party to a futures contract must meet periodic margin requirements. In a forward contract, margins are set once, on the date of the initial transaction.10.Fair value hedges are hedges of a firm’s foreign currency assets and liabilities and firm fore ign currencycommitments. Cash flow hedges are hedges of forecasted transactions such as a future sale or purchase.Net investment hedges are hedges of an exposed balance sheet asset or liability position. For qualifying fair value hedges, all changes in the fair value of the derivative and the underlying item that is being hedged are recognized in earnings. For qualifying cash flow hedges, the change in the fair value of the derivative is recognized in Other Comprehensive Income and recognized in earnings when the hedged cash flows affect earnings. For qualifying hedges of a net investment, changes in the fair value of the derivative are recorded in comprehensive income11.In theory, the term highly effective means that gains or losses on hedging instruments should be shouldexactly offset gains or losses on the item being hedged. In practice, it means that gains or losses on the derivative substantially offset the changes in the value or cash flow of the hedged item. Measurement of this attribute is important. If a hedging instrument does not meet the highly effective test, the hedge is terminated and deferred gains or losses on the derivative are recognized immediately in current earnings.This, in turn, introduces volatility into a firm’s reporte d earnings.12.The notion of an opportunity cost refers to the return associated with your next best opportunity. In thearea of FX risk management, it entails comparing a given risk management strategy with an appropriate standard of comparison. This provides an objective means of assessing the effectiveness of a given risk reduction program. For example, when FX risk management programs are centralized at corporate headquarters, appropriate benchmarks against which to compare the success of corporate risk protection would be programs that local managers could have implemented on their own.Exercises1.Students usually gloss over diagrams without thinking them through. This exercise forces them to thinkthrough each step of the diagram and allows them to better internalize the risk management cycle.Responses might follow the following pattern: Step 1 involves operationalizing a firms strategies intoquantifiable objectives and then identifying developments both external and internal risks that could affect the achievement of these objectives. These risks are measured by the firm’s accountants and quantified in terms of their potential impact on the firm. For example, the firm may have as its strategic objective an increase of 5% of market share in a given country per year given assumptions about the rate of economic growth in that country. The chance that this growth rate may fall short of 5% and the impact of this shortfall for projected sales in that country would be quantified. Response formulation would involve identifying protection strategies to minimize the hit to sales of projected GNP shortfalls such as promotion campaigns to maintain sales or use of alternative sourcing venues to lower sales prices. This strategy would be implemented if projected GNP started to slow beyond a certain cutoff point. The impact of this protection strategy would then be quantified in terms of actual sales relative to forecast sales taking into account the costs of protection. The information contained in risk management performance reports would then be communicated to top management who would be in a position to reaffirm or alter strategic objectives and/or risk identification processes.2.Foreign exchange risk a devaluation of the foreign currency in which an account receivable wasdenominated would cause the domestic currency cash flows to decrease. This would cause current assets to decrease. Alternatively, a revaluation of the foreign currency would cause the account receivable and current assets to increase. Interest rate risk an increase in market rates of interest would cause the price ofa short-term fixed-rate debt instrument being held as a marketable security to decrease. This, in turn,would cause current assets to decrease. A decrease in interest rates would have the opposite effect.Commodity price risk an increase in the price of copper would cause the cost of copper purchases and the resultant unexpired cost of inventories in the current asset section of the balance sheet to increase. A fall in copper prices would have the opposite effect. Equity price risk a fall in stock prices would depress the carrying value of marketable securities (current assets), and conversely.3.The purpose of this exercise is to force students to look at manager ial accounting issues from the user’sperspective. Students may suggest additional information sources with respect to inflation differentials, balance of trade and balance of payments statistics, international monetary reserves, forward exchange quotations, the behavior of related currencies, and interest rate differentials. We recommend that this exercise be assigned to small groups to encourage teamwork. At the time this exercise was prepared, professional forecasters were predicting a rate of 10.5 ecrus to theU.S. dollar.Some groups may contend that exchange markets are efficient and that exchange rate changes are simply random events. Again, they must be prepared to convince management of their case, or at a minimum, identify the consequences of not attempting exchange rate forecasts.4. Current rate Current/Noncurrent Monetary/nonmonetaryExposed assets(PHP):Cash 500,000 500,000 500,000Accounts receivable 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 Inventories(LCM) 900,000 900,000Fixed assets 1,100,000 -- --Total 3,500,000 2,400,000 1,500,000 Exposed liabilities:Short-term payables 400,000 400,000 400,000Long-term debt 800,000 --- 800,000Total 1,200,000 400,000 1,200,000Positive/(negative) exposure 2,300,000 2,000,000 300,000 Positive exposure X $0.03 $69,000 $60,000 $9,000Positive exposure X $0.02 46,000 40,000 6,000 FX gain/(loss) $(23,000) $(20,000) $(3,000)5.ILS $ £$ EquivalentExposed Assets:Cash & due from banks 100,000 50,000 (40,000) 20,000Loans 200,000 ---- ---- 100,000Fixed assets ---- 30,000 ---- 30,000Exposed Liabilities:Deposits 40,000 ---- 15,000 50,000Owners equity ---- 100,000 ---- 100,000Net exposed assets 260,000 (20,000) (55,000) NIL(liabilities)ILS $ £$ EquivalentExposed Assets:Cash & due from banks 100,000 50,000 (40,000) 20,000Loans 200,000 ---- ---- 100,000Fixed assets ---- 30,000 ---- 30,000Exposed Liabilities:Deposits 40,000 ---- 15,000 50,000Owners equity ---- 100,000 ---- 100,000Net exposed assets 260,000 (20,000) (55,000) NIL(liabilities)6.Trial Balance BeforeILS $ £$ EquivalentCash & due from banks 100,000 50,000 (40,000) 20,000Loans 200,000 ---- ---- 100,000Fixed assets ---- 30,000 ---- 30,000Deposits 40,000 ---- 15,000 50,000 Owners equity ---- 100,000 ---- 100,000Trial Balance After(£/$/ILS = 1/2/8)ILS $ £$ EquivalentCash & due from banks 100,000 50,000 (40,000) (5,000)Loans 200,000 ---- ---- 50,000Fixed assets ---- 30,000 ---- 30,000Deposits 40,000 ---- 15,000 40,000 Owners equity ---- 100,000 ---- 100,000Translation loss $(65,000)7. One recommendation might be to reduce positive exposures by engaging in balance sheet hedging, that is, by remitting excess cash back to the corporate parent, reducing the affiliate bank’s outstanding loans, or increasing its deposits in Israeli shekels.. The trade-offs here are potentially negative effects on operations, such as not satisfying loan demand against hedging translation gains and losses. Another option is to increase the pricing of bank services in Israel to provide a profit margin that can offset any FX losses. Again, the effects of such actions on competitive positioning could far exceed the benefits of hedging. A third option is to buy a forward or currency swap to hedge the exposure. Trade-offs include the out-of-pocket cost of the exchange contract versus the reported losses avoided.1.If the U.S. dollar is the functional currency, the translation gain upon consolidation is aggregated with thetransaction loss on the foreign currency borrowing and disclosed as one line item in the consolidated income statement. This figure is determined as follows:Translation gain = Positive exposure X change in exchange rate= NZD3,000,000 x $.10= $300,000Transaction loss =NZD loan balance X change in exchange rate= NZD1,000,000 x $.10= $ (100,000)Aggregate exchange adjustment = $300,000 + $ (100,000)= $200,000If the New Zealand dollar is the functional currency, the translation gain upon consolidation bypasses income and appears as a separate component in consolidated equity. It is offset by the translation loss on the New Zealand dollar borrowing.9.4/1 CD (¥32,500,000 ÷ ¥120) $250,000Cash $250,000(Purchase of CD)Chips (¥32,500,000 ÷ ¥120) $270,833Cash (¥3,250,000 ÷ ¥120) $ 27,083A/P (¥29,250,000 ÷ ¥120) 243,750(To record credit purchase)7/1 CD (¥30,000,000 ÷ [¥120 - ¥110]) $ 22,727FX gain $ 22,727(To record gain on CD investment)Purchases (¥29,250,000 ÷ [¥120 - ¥110]) 22,159Accts. Payable 22,159(To record increase in purchases and related liability accounts owing to yen appreciation) 7/1 Cash (¥30,000,000 ÷ ¥110) $278,182Interest income (¥30,000,000 X .08 X ¼) ÷ ¥110] $ 5,455CD 272,727(To record maturation of CD)Interest expense [(¥29,250,000 x.08 x 3/12) ÷ ¥110) 5,318Accts. payable (¥29,250,000 ÷ ¥110) 265,909Cash 271,227(To record settlement of purchase transaction)10. Journal entries:6/1 CHF Contract receivable $133,333Deferred premium 3,334$ Contract payable $136,667(To record contract with the foreign currency dealer to exchange $136,667 for CHF 166,667)6/30 CHF Contract receivable 1,667Transaction gain 1,667(To record transaction gain from increased dollar equivalent of forward contract receivable; $.81 - $.80 x SWF 166,667)6/30 Premium expense 1,111Deferred premium 1,111(To amortize deferred premium for 1 month)9/1 SWCHF Contract receivable 3,333Transaction gain 3,333(To record additional transaction gain by adjusting forward contract to the new current rate; $.83 - $.81 x CHF 166,667)9/1 Premium expense 2,223Deferred premium 2,223(Amortization of deferred premium balance)9/1 $ Contract payable 136,667Cash 136,667 Foreign currency 138,333CHF Contract receivable 138,333(To record delivery of $136,667 to foreign currency dealer in exchange for CHF166,667 with a dollar equivalent of $138,334 (=CHF166,667 x $.83). The Swiss francs will, in turn be used to pay for the chocolate supplies).11. Calculations:If the premium on the forward contract is considered an operating expense, and the conditions for hedge treatment are met, i.e., management designates the forward contract as a hedge, documents its risk management objective and strategy, identifies the hedging instrument, the item being hedged and the risk exposure, and that the forward is effective both prospectively and retrospectively in hedging the risk, the gain on the forward can be offset against the loss on the payable as follows:Amount paid to settle the account payable on the purchase $138,333Less Transaction gain on forward contract (5,000)Cost of purchase $133,333The $133,000 is what was originally anticipated, CHF166.667 X $0.80 = $133,333.12. Journal entries:The call option is intended to hedge an uncertain cash flow. Accordingly, gains or losses on the hedging instrument would bedisclosed in comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings in the period the sale actually takes place.June 1 Premium expense $28,125Cash $28,125($.018 X CHF 62,500 X 25)August 31 Cash $40,625Comprehensive income $40,625[($.416 - $.39) X CHF 62,500 X 25]Case 11-1Exposure Identification1. Infosys appears to have several exposures as enumerated below.Foreign Exchange RiskPage Value-Drivers88 Revenues/Selling and administrative expenses89 Cash flows from interest/dividend income96 Revenue recognition/LT leases97 Operating income/foreign currency transactions/FA98 Marketing/Overseas staff expenses99 Derivative values100 Lease obligations101 Investment returns102 Segment revenues/expenses103 Dividends to ADS holders142 Penalties on export obligations149 Valuing intangibles150 Export revenuesCommodity Price RiskPage Value-Drivers98 Power and fuel expenses145 Brand valuation147/48 Current cost disclosures149 Value of intangiblesEquity Price RiskPage Value Drivers87 Share capital98 Diluted eps100 Stock option compensation expense103 Convertible preferreds145 Cost of capital151 Economic value-addedInterest Rate RiskPage Value Drivers88 Interest expense89 Cash flows from security investments/interest income97 Gratuity/Superannuation/Provident obligations143 Employee compensation145 Cost of capital149 Value of intangibles.151 Economic value-addedInformation on the company’s risk management policies are contained on pages 108-109 of their annual report which were not reproduced in Chapter 1. We include the relevant information here. Infosys derives its revenues from 51 countries of which 78 percent were denominated in US dollars. To minimize both transaction and translation risk the company:1.Tries to match expenses in local currency with receipts in the same currency.es forward exchange contracts to cover apportion of outstanding receivables.3.Denominates contracts in non-US and non-EU regions in internationally tradable currencies to minimizeexposures to local currencies that may have non-tradability risks.Case 11-2Value At Risk: What Are Our Options?Students should be asked to play the role of the consultant, and will find it to be a contentious issue. Suggested remedies that have merit are:1. The FASB should permit deferral accounting for rolling options which would take the derivative gain or loss on each option to equity until the anticipated event occurs, as opposed to taking it immediately to income. This, however, might encourage companies to game the system, so students should also suggest ways to keep this from happening.2. Another tack would be to adhere to generally accepted accounting principles and record the gain or loss on the derivative in current income as it is marked to market, but to disclose which transactions were undertaken for hedge purposes. Management could also game the system here as speculative activities could be disclosed as hedge activities.3. Another option that students might suggest is to revert back to the earlier U.S. practice of keeping the option off balance sheet and providing supplementary disclosure of mark-to-market accounting. This might be confusing to lay readers, but it would enable analysts to better understand the components of reported earnings.It is clear from the annual report clipping that management will ignore accounting pronouncements when it is in their interest to do so. Analysts must be alert to situations where management departs from GAAP to better reflect the economics of what transpired as opposed to doing so to manage earnings.精品文档,知识共享!!!。

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

Chapter 5Reporting and DisclosureDiscussion Questions1. Accounting measurement is the process of assigning numerical symbols to events or objects.Disclosure, on the other hand, is the communication of accounting measurements to intended users. Advances in financial disclosure are likely to outpace those related to accounting measurement for a number of reasons. First, many would argue that financial disclosure is a less controversial area than accounting measurement. Second, changes in disclosure requirements are more rapidly implemented than changes in accounting measurement rules. Finally, whereas a single set of accounting measurement rules may not serve users equally well under different social, economic and legal systems, a company can disclose without necessarily sacrificing its accounting measurement system.2.Four reasons why multinational corporations are increasingly being held accountable toconstituencies other than traditional investor groups:a.The development and growth of the influence of trade unions.b.The growing recognition of the view that those who are significantly affected bydecisions made by institutions in general must be given the opportunity to influence thosedecisions.c.The rejection by many governments of classical economic premises such as the beliefthat the regulated pursuit of private gain maximizes society’s welfare.d.The increasing concern over the social and economic impact of multinationalcorporations in host countries.3.Arguments in favor of equal disclosure include:a.The absence of equal disclosure would create an unfair playing field for U.S. companies.Non-U.S. companies would have a competitive advantage in that they would not have todisclose the same information and so would not incur the costs involved in generatingand publishing it.b.Investors in non-U.S. companies have the same information needs as those who invest inU.S. companies. A market concerned with investor protection would make sure thatinvestors have timely and material information on all listed companies, not just thosedomiciled in the United States.c.Unequal disclosure might impede cross-company comparisons involving U.S. and non-U.S. companies.Possible reasons against equal disclosure include:a.The high cost of meeting equal disclosure requirements may deter foreign issuers fromlisting in the United States.b.The extra costs involved work against the benefits of listing to the foreign companies.Evaluation of arguments:All of these arguments have merit. There is no unambiguously correct answer as to what disclosure requirements should be imposed on foreign issuers, and there has been a contentious debate on this subject in the U.S. in recent years. In practice, fairness arguments often carry great weight in public debate, even when objective economic analysis does not support them.4.Managers in Continental Europe and in Japan have for many years strongly objected to disclosinginformation about business segment financial results. These managers have argued that the information can be used by their competitors. In addition, Continental Europe and Japan have had traditions of low disclosure.Requirements for disclosure about segment results have become more stringent in Japan, France, and Germany in response to strong investor and analyst demand for the information. More generally, the three countries are striving to improve the quality of their financial reporting standards in order to improve the reputation and credibility of their capital markets.5.The simple answer is that mandatory disclosures are corporate disclosures made in response toregulatory requirements (for example, rules issued by national regulators or stock exchanges), and that voluntary disclosures are purely discretionary in nature. The distinction between mandatory and voluntary disclosures can be ambiguous in some settings, however. For example, the requirement that U.S. companies must file Form 10-Ks with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is straightforward. However, measurement and disclosure approaches for some of the items in the Form 10-K are not. Similarly, there are widely divergent views concerning what types of press announcements are mandatory versus voluntary.Two possible explanations for differences in managers’ voluntary disclosure practices are: (1) Managers in highly competitive industries may be less forthcoming than managers in less competitive industries due to the expected cost of releasing information of potential use to their competitors. (2) Managers are expected to be more forthcoming when there is good news to disclose, than when there is bad news, particularly when the news can be expected to affect share prices.Two explanations for differences in managers’ mandatory disclosure practices are: (1) Cross-jurisdictional differences in disclosure requirements. (2) Differences in the extent of compliance with disclosure rules due to cross-jurisdictional differences in enforcement.6. Triple bottom line reporting refers to reporting on a company’s eco nomic, social, andenvironmental performance. It is a form of social responsibility reporting designed to demonstrate good corporate citizenship. So-called “sustainability” reports are an increasingly popular means of triple bottom line reporting. There is substantial variation in social reporting today. More regulation would improve comparability, but it might also stifle reporting innovations. The usefulness of social reporting to outside parties, particularly investors, needs to be demonstrated before implementing more regulation for it.6.Often we expect to observe less voluntary disclosure by companies in emerging market countriesthan by those in developed countries:a.Equity markets are relatively less developed in many emerging market countries,resulting in lower total demand for company information by investors and analysts.b.In many emerging market countries, most financing is supplied by banks and insiderssuch as family groups. This also leads to less demand for timely, credible publicdisclosure, and in these markets enhanced disclosure may have limited benefits.8. In general, for the same reasons as in Discussion Question 7, we expect to observe fewerregulatory disclosure requirements in emerging market countries than in developed countries.The equity markets and disclosure requirements in many emerging market countries are not yet well developed, and accounting and auditing systems in emerging market countries are less well developed than in more developed market countries.9. The two broad objectives of investor-oriented equity markets are investor protection and marketquality. In the absence of investor protection, investors will not be willing to participate in a market. However, in the absence of market quality, markets will not function satisfactorily.Many would consider the objectives equally important.10. It certainly is possible that more required disclosure will further encourage investorparticipation in capital markets by providing more and better information on which to base investment decisions. Benefits of increased investor participation include increased liquidity, reduced transaction costs, and more accurate and efficient market pricing. However, it can also be argued that in some situations disclosure requirements are excessive. In markets where disclosure requirements are considered too stringent, companies may be deterred from publicly listing their shares, and may choose to use secondary markets (such as the over-the-counter market in the United States) that lack the investor protections of regulated stock exchanges, and which provide investors with lower liquidity and higher transaction costs. Thus, more required disclosure is not necessarily better than less.11. Forecasts of revenues and income are relatively uncommon because there can be legalrepercussions if forecasts are not met. Forecasts rely on subjective estimates of uncertain future events, making them unreliable in many situations. Vaguer forms of forward looking information are more common than precise forecasts. For example, directional forecasts (up or down) of revenues and income are more common than range forecasts which are, in turn, more common than precise forecasts of these amounts.12. Corporate governance refers to the structure of relationships and responsibilities amongshareholders, board members, and corporate managers. Investors and financial analysts use information about a company’s corporate governance (for example, whether an audit committee’s members are independ ent, and responsibilities and remuneration of board members) to better assess the level of investor protection (and therefore, expected cash flows to investors) at the company.Exercises1. a. Transparent financial reporting means that timely and accurate disclosures are made onall important matters affecting a company’s financial position and performance. Itimplies openness, communication, and accountability.b. Transparent financial reporting protects investors because nothing is hidden from them.Investors can better assess the risks of owning securities when information is truthfuland complete. Transparent financial reporting also improves market quality. Itenhances investor confidence. Open communication creates markets that are fair,orderly, efficient, and free from abuse and misconduct.c. The financial reporting requirements on the Hong Kong Exchange promote transparentfinancial reporting and they protect investors and promote market quality. For example,they require a complete set of audited financial statements, including a balance sheet,income statement, cash flow statement, and explanatory notes. Substantial disclosuresare also required, including segments and forward looking information discussed in thechapter. Reports must include a management discussion and analysis. Accountingprinciples may be either Hong Kong Financial Reporting Standards or InternationalFinancial Reporting Standards. Both sets of standards are known for their high quality.All reports must be in English. There are requirements on corporate governance.Timely disclosure of price sensitive information is required. Annual reports must bepublished within four months of year-end and half-yearly reports must be publishedwithin three months. Overall, the reporting requirements are substantial and complete. 2.Schering AG provides a qualitative forecast of one-year-ahead and two-year-ahead net sales.One-year-ahead net sales are expected to increase in the “mid to high single-digit” range. From this, an investor would likely infer growth of between 6 and 8 percent. Two-year-ahead sales are expected to increase further. Thus, this forecast is directional (up). There are similar forecasts of net sales for certain products and for certain regions. For example, Yasmin® is expected to experience “double-digit” growth, while Betaferon® is expected to grow at “high single-digit” rates. Net sales in Europe are expected to grow at “mid single-digit” rates, while those in the United States are forecast to be “above average.” Schering also forecasts an operating margin of 18 percent for the next year. This is a precise forecast. There is no forecast of net income.Investors should find this information useful, but specific growth percentages would be even useful. Investors are concerned about a company’s future prospects. Management’s expectations guide users’ own forecasts. Investors would also find a forecast of net income useful.3. IFRS 8 requires that the following items be disclosed for each reportable segment:a.Profit or loss.b.Assets.c.Particular income and expense items if such measures are regularly provided to the chiefoperating decision maker.d.Reconciliations of reportable segment revenues, profit or loss, assets, and liabilities toconsolidated totals.(A reportable segment is an operating segment about which separate financial information isavailable that is evaluated regularly by management in assessing segment performance and deciding how to allocate resources to operating segments.)In addition to the above items, information must also be disclosed about:a.Revenues derived from products or services.b.Revenues derived from countries.c.Major customers.d.How operating segments are determined.Lafarge discloses that its reportable segments are its four product lines. The company discloses all of the items required to be disclosed by reportable segment. Operating income, assets, and individual income and expense items are reported. Segment revenues, operating income, assets, and liabilities are reconciled to consolidated totals.Lafarge also discloses revenues by selected countries and regions of the world. In addition, capital expenditure and capital employed by selected countries and regions are disclosed. There is no information about major customers, but Lafarge may have a large, diversified customer base.Overall, Lafarge complies with the requirements of IFRS 8 and even goes beyond its requirements in some cases.4. a. Overall headcount has increased between the two years. Both of its divisions(pharmaceuticals and diagnostics) show increased levels of employment. With theexception of Latin America, all regions of the world also show increased levels ofemployment. Roche attributes these increases to the fact that it has been expanding fasterthan its competitors.b.“Regretted losses” refers to “fluctuations not initiated by Roche,” presumably employeeswho quit the company on their own accord. While the overall percentage of employeeslost (“fluctuation”)has increased between the two years, the percentage of regrettedlosses has decreased.c.Roche states that it “places a high value on diversity and seeks to benefit from it….”Roche seems to have had some success in improving diversity in the company. Rochenotes that it employs people from over 190 countries and that the 336 employees in itsCorporate Center come from 23 countries. General managers from the local country head60 percent of its affiliates, and the trend is rising. Data presented on women in theworkplace all show improvements.d.Outside investors may find this information useful because it speaks to the welfare ofcompany employees. For example, satisfied employees will work harder to achieve acompany’s goals than unsatisfied ones will. The information is also useful in judgingwhether companies comply with employment laws, such as those dealing withnondiscriminatory hiring.5. The overall conclusion is that Roche’s safety record worsened while its environmental recordimproved.Safety:Note that Roche’s total number of workdays increased by 17 percent, while the total number of employees grew by 6 percent. Accidents and other measures of safety can be expected to increase, but not at rates higher than these. Occupational accidents increased by 14 percent, while work-related accidents per million working hours decreased 3 percent. These measures suggest that accident rates are about the same between the two years. There were no work-related fatalities in either year. Workdays lost due to work-related accidents increased by 31 percent, occupational illnesses increased by 60 percent, illnesses per million working hour increased 36 percent, and workdays lost due to occupational illnesses increased 42 percent. These measures indicate a worsening safety record. Transport accident per metric ton transported decreased. In general, most measures got worse.Environmental:Energy consumption increased by 5 percent and TOC t/year increased 36 percent. However, the other pollution measures (such as CO2t/year and NO2t/year) decreased. Figures later in the disclosure compare eco-efficiency measures for 2005, 2004, and 1992. Long-term trends (92/05) of all measures beside the one for CO2show significant decreases. In genera l, Roche’s environmental record has improved.6. a. According to the Web site, the objective of the International Auditing and AssuranceStandards Board (IAASB) is to serve the public interest by:∙setting, independently and under its own authority, high quality standards on auditing, quality control, review, other assurance, and related services, and ∙facilitating the convergence of national and international standards,thereby enhancing the quality and uniformity of practice throughout the world andstrengthening public confidence in the global auditing and assurance profession.b.According to this Web site, auditing standards refer to the audit or review of historicalfinancial information, while assurance standards refer to engagements dealing withsubject matters other than historical financial information.c.PricewaterhouseCoopers states that Roche’s internal sustainability reporting guidelinesare properly applied, that its data collection system is functioning as designed, and that its“social dim ension reporting provides an appropriate basis for the disclosure of socialdimension information…” Thus, Roche has received a “clean opinion”on itssustainability reporting.7. a. Corporate social responsibility is about how companies conduct themselves in relation to“stakeholders,” such as workers, consumers, and the broader society in which firmsoperate.b.Some argue that “the business of business is business.” In conducting their business,companies provide huge and critical contributions to society. Among these areproductivity gains, innovation and research, employment, and human capitaldevelopment. In poor countries, companies often contribute critical capital, technology,and skills that reduce poverty. Companies that compete and prosper make society betteroff. Under this view, the proper guardian of the public interest is government, notbusiness. Another view is that social issues (and social responsibility) are not tangentialto business but fundamental to it. Companies that ignore public sentiment makethemselves vulnerable to attack. Ignoring social issues turns a blind eye to forces thatmay alter a company’s strategic future. Thus, companies ought to do more than the lawrequires since social issues ultimately feed into shareholder value.c.Whether companies ought to report on their social responsibility activities probablydepends on one’s view of corporate social responsibility. Nevertheless, a strong case canbe made that proactive disclosure of a company’s societal contribu tions can positivelyaffect its image and ultimately its bottom line.d.As noted in c., the relevance of CSR disclosures for outside investors is that a company’ssocietal contributions can positively affect its image and ultimately its bottom line.8. a. The performance indicators recommended in the GRI guidelines are as follows:Economic Performance IndicatorsCore IndicatorsAdditional IndicatorsDirect Economic ImpactsCustomersEC1. Net sales.EC2. Geographic breakdown of markets.For each product or product range, disclosenational market share by country where this is 25% or more. Disclose market share and sales for eachcountry where national sales represent 5% or moreof GDP.SuppliersEC3. Cost of all goods, materials, and servicespurchased.EC11. Supplier breakdown by Organization and country. List all suppliers from which purchases in the reporting period represent 10% or more of total purchases in that period. Also identify all countries where total purchasing represents 5% or more of GDP. EC4. Percentage of contracts that were paid in accordance with agreed terms, excluding agreed penalty arrangements. Terms may include conditions such as scheduling of payments, form of payment, or other conditions. This indicator is the percent of contracts that werepaid according to terms, regardless of the details ofthe terms.EmployeesEC5. Total payroll and benefits (including wages,pension, other benefits, and redundancy payments)broken down by country or region. This remuneration should refer to current payments andnot include future commitments.Providers of CapitalEC6. Distributions to providers of capital brokendown by interest on debt and borrowings, anddividends on all classes of shares, with any arrearsof preferred dividends to be disclosed. Thisincludes all forms of debt and borrowings, not only long-term debt.EC7. Increase/decrease in retained earnings at endof period.Public SectorEC8. Total sum of taxes of all types paid broken down by country. EC12. Total spent on non-core business infrastructure development. This is infrastructureEC9. Subsidies received broken down by country or region. This refers to grants, tax relief, and other types of financial benefits that do not represent a transaction of goods and services.Explain definitions used for types of groups.built outside the main business activities of the reporting entity such as a school, or hospital for employees and their families.E10. Donations to community, civil society, andother groups broken down in terms of cash and in-kind donations per type of group.Indirect Economic ImpactsEC13. The Organization’s indirect economicimpacts. Identify major externalities associated withthe reporting Organization’s products and services .Environmental Performance IndicatorsCore Indicators Additional IndicatorsMaterialsEN1. Total materials use other than water, by type.Provide definitions used for types of materials.Report in tons, kilograms, or volume.EN2. Percentage of materials used that are wastes(processed or unprocessed) from sources external to the reporting Organization. Refers to both post-consumer recycled material and waste fromindustrial sources. Report in tons, kilograms, orvolume.EnergyEN3. Direct energy use segmented by primary source. Report on all energy sources used by the reportingOrganization for its own operations as well as for the production and delivery of energy products (e.g., electricity or heat) to other Organizations. Report in joules.EN17. Initiatives to use renewable energy sources and to increase energy efficiency. EN18. Energy consumption footprint (i.e., annualized lifetime energy requirements) of major products. Report in joules. EN4. Indirect energy use. Report on all energy used to produce and deliver energy products purchased by the reporting Organization (e.g., electricity or heat). Report in joules.EN19. Other indirect (upstream/downstream) energy use and implications, such as Organizational travel, product lifecycle management, and use of energy-intensive materials. WaterEN5. Total water use. EN20. Water sources and relatedecosystems/habitats significantly affected by use ofwater. Include Ramsar-listed wetlands and theoverall contribution to resulting environmentaltrends.EN21. Annual withdrawals of ground and surfacewater as a percent of annual renewable quantity ofwater available from the sources. Breakdown byregion.EN22. Total recycling and reuse of water.Include wastewater and other used water (e.g.,cooling water).BiodiversityEN6. Location and size of land owned, leased, or managed in biodiversity-rich habitats. EN23. Total amount of land owned, leased, or managed for production activities or extractive use. EN24. Amount of impermeable surface as apercentage of land purchased or leased.EN7. Description of the major impacts onbiodiversity associated with activities and/or products and services in terrestrial, freshwater, and marine environments. EN25. Impacts of activities and operations on protected and sensitive areas (e.g., IUCN protectedarea categories 1-4, world heritage sites, and biosphere reserves).EN26. Changes to natural habitats resulting fromactivities and operations and percentage of habitatprotected or restored.Identify type of habitat affected and its status.EN27. Objectives, programs, and targets forprotecting and restoring native ecosystems andspecies in degraded areas.EN28. Number of IUCN Red List species withhabitats in areas affected by operations.EN29. Business units currently operating orplanning operations in or around protected orsensitive areas.Emissions, Effluents, and WasteEN8. Greenhouse gas emissions. (CO2, CH4, N2O, HFCs, PFCs, SF6). Report separate subtotals for each gas in tons and in tons of CO2 equivalent for the following: - direct emissions from sources owned or controlled by the reporting entity - indirect emissions from imported electricity heat or steamEN30. Other relevant indirect greenhouse gas emissions. (CO2, CH4, N2O, HFCs, PFCs, SF6). Refers to emissions that are a consequence of the activities of the reporting entity, but occur from sources owned or controlled by another entity Report in tons of gas and tons of CO2 equivalent. EN9. Use and emissions of ozone-depletingsubstances. Report each figure separately in accordance with Montreal Protocol Annexes A, B, C, and E in tons of CFC-11 equivalents (ozone-depleting potential).EN31. All production, transport, import, or export of any waste deemed “hazardous” under the terms of the Basel Convention Annex I, II, III, and VIII.EN10. NOx, SOx, and other significant air emissions by type. Include emissions of substances regulated under: - local laws and regulations - Stockholm POPs Convention (Annex A, B, and C) –persistent organic pollutants - Rotterdam Convention on Prior Informed Consent (PIC)- Helsinki, Sofia, and Geneva Protocols to the Convention on Long-Range Trans-boundary Air Pollution EN32. Water sources and related ecosystems/habitats significantly affected by discharges of water and runoff. Include Ramsar-listed wetlands and the overall contribution to resulting environmental trends. See GRI Water Protocol.EN11. Total amount of waste by type anddestination.“Destination” refers to the method by w hich wasteis treated, including composting, reuse, recycling,recovery, incineration, or land filling. Explain typeof classification method and estimation method.EN12. Significant discharges to water by type.EN13. Significant spills of chemicals, oils, and fuelsin terms of total number and total volume.Significance is defined in terms of both the size ofthe spill and impact on the surroundingenvironment.SuppliersEN33. Performance of suppliers relative toenvironmental components of programmer andprocedures described in response to GovernanceStructure and Management Systems section. Products and ServicesEN14. Significant environmental impacts ofprincipal products and services.Describe and quantify where relevant.EN15. Percentage of the weight of products soldthat is reclaimable at the end of the products’ usefullife and percentage that is actually reclaimed.ComplianceEN16. Incidents of and fines for non-compliancewith all applicable internationaldeclarations/conventions/treaties, and national, sub-national, regional, and local regulations associatedwith environmental issues. Explain in terms ofcountries of operationTransportEN34. Significant environmental impacts oftransportation used for logistical purposes.OverallEN35. Total environmental expenditures by type.。

相关文档
最新文档