雅思写作素材-动物实验
雅思写作动物实验类话题论点
雅思写作动物实验类话题论点雅思考生遇到这类题目常常不知所措，由于我们平时的生活关注点不同，多数同学都不会关心这类话题。
考场上遇到动物实验也表示没有话说不知道从何种角度论证。
下面一起和雅思小编看看，这个题目该如何解析。
Arguments for Animal testing 动物实验的论点Animals are used in important scientific research It.Is necessary to do medical tests on new drugs.动物是重要的科研试验品。
(有一些实验)必须使用动物作为新药的试验品。
Animal testing helps to advance medical and scientific knowledge.Many important medical discoveries involved experimentation on animals.动物实验帮助我们提高医疗与科学水平。
很多重要的医疗发现都涉及了动物实验。
Researchers aim to minimize the suffering that animals experience.研究人员尽量会减轻动物在动物实验中所遭受的痛苦Testing for the cosmetics industry is now banned in many countries在很多国家，化妆品动物实验已经被禁止了Arguments against Animal Testing 反动物实验的论点The benefits of research using animals do not justify the suffering caused.用动物做实验的优点并不能替代(它们的)痛苦。
There are alternative methods of research.替代的研究方法。
experimentation 雅思写作 animal
experimentation 雅思写作animal全文共四篇示例，供读者参考第一篇示例：实验动物在科学研究中发挥着重要作用，但同时也引发了许多争议。
一些人认为实验动物对于人类医学研究来说是必不可少的工具，可以帮助研究人员了解疾病的发病机制并开发新的治疗方法，从而拯救更多生命。
另一些人则反对使用动物做实验，认为这是对动物权利的侵犯，应该保护动物的福利。
在这种背景下，对于实验动物的使用是一个需要权衡慎重的问题。
值得注意的是实验动物在医学研究中的重要性。
许多重大的科学突破都是通过对动物进行实验得出的。
在癌症研究中，通过在小鼠体内植入人类癌细胞，研究人员能够了解肿瘤的生长和扩散机制，从而开发出针对癌症的新药物。
在心脏病、糖尿病、神经退行性疾病等方面的研究中，实验动物也发挥着重要作用。
实验动物对于人类健康和生命的保障是至关重要的。
使用实验动物也引发了一些伦理和道德问题。
一些人认为，对动物进行实验是对它们权利的侵犯，是一种虐待行为。
实验动物往往会受到疼痛、压力和剥夺自由等不良影响，这对动物的福利造成了严重威胁。
一些人主张应该尽可能减少对实验动物的使用，或者寻找替代方法，以保护动物的权益。
为了平衡这些观点，一些国家制定了一系列法规和准则来规范实验动物的使用。
这些法规通常要求研究人员在进行实验之前必须经过伦理审查，确保实验动物的使用符合伦理准则，并且应该尽可能使用替代方法来代替实验动物。
有些研究可以通过体外细胞培养或计算机模拟来完成，而无需使用活体动物。
研究人员也被要求尽可能减少对实验动物的痛苦和痛苦，确保它们在实验中得到适当的照顾和关爱。
实验动物在科学研究中具有重要作用，但同时也带来了一些伦理和道德问题。
为了平衡这些利弊，我们应该积极推动替代方法的研究和应用，尽可能减少对实验动物的使用，并确保它们在实验中得到适当的关爱和保护。
只有这样，我们才能在保护动物权益的同时推动科学研究的进步，造福人类社会。
第二篇示例：在当今科技飞速发展的社会中，实验动物一直是科学研究中不可或缺的一部分。
雅思写作高分范文赏析：Animal Testing
雅思写作高分范文赏析：Animal TestingAnimal TestingPlease Read This Warning Before You Use This Essay for Anything (It MightSave Your Life) Animal Testing Using animals for testing is wrong and should bebanned. They have rights just as we do. Twenty-four hours a day humans are usingdefenseless animals for cruel and most often useless tests. The animals have noway of fighting back. This is why there should be new laws to protect them.These legislations also need to be enforced more regularly. Too many criminalsget away with murder. Although most labs are run by private companies, oftenexperiments are conducted by public organizations. The US government, Army andAir force in particular, has designed and carried out many animal experiments.The purposed experiments were engineered so that many animals would suffer anddie without any certainty that this suffering and death would save a singlelife, or benefit humans in anyway at all; but the same can be said for tens ofthousands of other experiments performed in the US each year. Limiting it tojust experiments done on beagles, the following might sock most people： Forinstance, at the Lovelace Foundation, Albuquerque, New Mexico, experimentersforced sixty-four beagles to inhale radioactive Strontium 90as part of a larger^Fission Product Inhalation Program^ which began in 1961 and has been paid forby the US Atomic Energy Commission. In this experimentTwenty-five of the dogseventually died. One of the deaths occurred during anepileptic seizure; anotherfrom a brain hemorrhage. Other dogs, before death, became feverish and anemic,lost their appetites, and had hemorrhages. The experimentersin their publishedreport, compared their results with that of other experiments conducted at theUniversity of Utah and the Argonne National Laboratory in which beagles wereinjected with Strontium 90. They concluded that the dose needed to produce^early death^ in fifty percent of the sample group differed from test to testbecause the dogs injected with Strontium 90 retain more of the radioactivesubstance than dogs forced to inhale it. Also, at the University of RochesterSchool Of Medicine a group of experimenters put fifty beagles in wooden boxesand irradiated them with different levels of radiation by x-rays. Twenty-one ofthe dogs died within the first two weeks. The experimenters determined the doseat which fifty percent of the animals will die with ninety-five percentconfidence. The irritated dogs vomited, had diarrhea, andlost their appetites.Later, they hemorrhaged from the mouth, nose, and eyes. In their report, theexperimenters compared their experiment to others of the same nature that eachused around seven hundred dogs. The experimenters said that the injuriesproduced in their own experiment were ^Typical of those described for the dog^(Singer 30). Similarly, experimenters for the US Food and Drug Administrationgave thirty beagles and thirty pigs large amounts of Methoxychlor (a pesticide)in their food, seven days a week for six months, ^In order to insure tissuedamage^ (30). Within eight weeks, eleven dogs exhibited signs of ^abnormalbehavior^ including nervousness, salivation, muscle spasms, and convolutions.Dogs in convultions breathed as rapidly as two hundred times a minute beforethey passed out from lack of oxygen. Upon recovery from an episode ofconvulsions and collapse, the dogs were uncoordinated, apparently blind, and anystimulus such as dropping a feeding pan, squirting water, or touching theanimals initiated another convulsion. After further experimentation on anadditional twenty beagles, the experimenters concluded that massive daily dosesof Methoxychlor produce different effects in dogs from those produced in pigs.These three examples should be enough to show that the Air force beagleexperiments were in no way exceptional. Note that all of these experiments,according to the experimenters^ own reports, obviously caused the animals tosuffer considerably before dying. No steps were taken to prevent this suffering,even when it was clear that the radiation or poison had made the animalsextremely sick. Also, these experiments are parts of series of similarexperiments, repeated with only minor variations, that are being carried out allover the country. These experiments Do Not save human lives or improve them inany way. It was already known that Strontium 90 is unhealthy before the beaglesdied; and the experimenters who poisoned dogs and pigs with Methoxychlor knewbeforehand that the large amounts they were feeding the animals (amounts nohuman could ever consume) would cause damage. In any case, as the differingresults they obtained on pigs and dogs make it clear, it isnot possible toreach any firm conclusion about the effects of a substance on humans from testson other species. The practice of experimenting on non-human animals as itexists today throughout the world reveals the brutal consequences of speciesism(Singer 29). In this country everyone is supposed to be equal, but apparentlysome people just don^t have to obey the law. That is, in New York and some otherstates, licensed laboratories are immune from ordinary anticruelty laws, andthese places are often owned by state universities, city hospitals, or even TheUnited States Public Health Service. It seems suspicious that some governmentrun facilities could be ^immune^ from their own laws (Morse 19). In relation,^No law requires that cosmetics or household products betested on animals.Nevertheless, by six^o clock this evening, hundreds of animals will have theireyes, skin, or gastrointestinal systems unnecessarily burned or destroyed. Manyanimals will suffer and die this year to produce ^new^ versions of deodorant,hair spray, lipstick, nail polish, and lots of otherproducts^ (Sequoia 27).Some of the largest cosmetics companies use animals to test their products.These are just a couple of the horrifying tests they use, namely, the DrazieTest. The Drazie test is performed almost exclusively on albino rabbits. Theyare preferred because they are docile, cheap, and their eyes do not shed tears(so chemicals placed in them do not wash out). They are also the test subject ofchoice because their eyes are clear, making it easier to observe destruction ofeye tissue; their corneal membranes are extremely susceptible to injury. Duringeach test the rabbits are immobilized (usually in a ^stock^, with only theirheads protruding) and a solid or liquid is placed in the lower lid of one eye ofeach rabbit. These substances can range from mascara to aftershave to ovencleaner. The rabbits^ eyes remain clipped open. Anesthesia is almost neveradministered. After that, the rabbits are examined at intervals of one,twenty-four, forty-eight, seventy-two, and one hundred an sixty-eight hours.Reactions, which may range from severe inflammation, to clouding of the cornea,to ulceration and rupture of the eyeball, are recorded by technicians. Somestudies continue for a period of weeks. No other attempt is made to treat therabbits or to seek any antidotes. The rabbits who survive the Drazie test maythen be used as subjects for skin-inflammation tests (27). Another widely usedprocedure is the LD-50. This is the abbreviation of the Lethal Dose 50 test.LD-50 is the lethal dose of something that will kill fifty percent of allanimals in a group of forty to two hundred. Most commonly, animals areforce-feed substances (which may be toothpaste, shaving cream, drain cleaner,pesticides, or anything else they want to test) through a stomach tube andobserved for two weeks or until death. Non-oral methods of administering thetest include injection, forced inhalation, or application to animals skin.Symptoms routinely include tremors, convultions, vomiting, diarrhea, paralysis,or bleeding from the eyes, nose, mouth. Animals that survive are destroyed (29).Additionally, when one laboratory^s research on animals establishes somethingsignificant, scores of other labs repeat the experiment, and more thousands ofanimals are needlessly tortured and killed (Morse 8). Fewlabs buy their animaltest subjects from legitimate pet stores and the majority use illegal petdealers. There are many stolen animal dealers that house the animals before,during , and after testing. These ^farms^ most frequently hold animals betweentests while the animals recuperate, before facing another research ordeal. Theseso called farms in question are mainly old barn-like buildings used as hospitalsand convalescent (recovery) wards are filthy, overcrowded pens. At one farm inparticular dogs with open chest wounds and badly infected incisions, so weakthat many could not stand, were the order of the day. These dogs were^recuperating^ from open-heart and kidney surgery. Secondly, a litter oftwo-day-old pups were found in a basket, with no food provisions in sight (Morse19). In every pen there were dogs suffering from highly contagious diseases. Ananimal^s road to a lab is seldom a direct one. Whether he^s stolen picked up asa stray, or purchased, there^s a de tour first to the animal dealer^s farm;There he waits- never under satisfactory conditions- until his ride, and oftenlife, comes to an end at the laboratory (23). Every day of the year, hundreds ofthousands of fully conscious animals are scalded, or beaten, or crushed todeath, and more are subjected to exotic surgery and then allowed to die slowlyand in agony. There is no reason for this suffering to continue (Morse 8). Inconclusion, animal testing is inhumane and no animal should be forced to enduresuch torture. Waste in government is one thing; it seems to be an acceptedliability of democracy. But the wasting of lives is something else. How did itever get this way?BibliographyFox, Michael Allen. The Case For Animal Experimentation. Los Angeles：University Of California Press, 1986. Jasper, James M. and Dorothy Nelkin, eds.The Animal Rights Crusade. New York： Macmillion Inc., 1992, 103-56. Morse, Mel.Ordeal Of The Animals. Englewood Cliffs： Prentice-Hall International, 1968.Sequoia, Anna. 67 Ways To Save The Animals. New York： Harper Collins, 1990.Singer, Peter. Animal Liberation. New York： Random House, 1975. OUTLINE I.Introduction II. Supporting evidence on testing A. Experiments funded by USgovernment 1. Strontium 90 2. Irradiation by X-rays 3. Methoxychlor B.Background on laws in US C. Examples of tests 1. The Drazie Test 2. The LD-50Test D. What the animals go through 1. Trip to the laboratory 2. Their stay atthe lab 3. After the tests are done III. Conclusion。
最新整理雅思写作高分范文赏析：Animal Testing
states, licensed laboratories are immune from ordinary anticruelty laws, and
(so chemicals placed in them do not wash out). They are also the test subject of
choice because their eyes are clear, making it easier to observe destruction of
thousands of other experiments performed in the US each year. Limiting it to
just experiments done on beagles, the following might sock most people: For
extremely sick. Also, these experiments are parts of series of similar
experiments, repeated with only minor variations, that are being carried out all
over the country. These experiments Do Not save human lives or improve them in
any way. It was already known that Strontium 90 is unhealthy before the beagles
动物实验的利弊辩论雅思作文
动物实验的利弊辩论雅思作文一、动物实验的好处。
（一）医疗进步方面。
1. 救命的突破。
嘿呀，动物实验在医疗领域那可是大功臣呢！就拿药物研发来说吧。
咱们人类想要研制出能治疗各种疑难杂症的新药，可不能直接就拿人来试药呀，那多危险。
这时候动物就像我们的小替身一样。
比如说治疗糖尿病的胰岛素，最开始就是在狗身上做实验才发现的。
如果没有那些勇敢的小狗先尝试，那现在无数的糖尿病患者可就惨咯，说不定还在天天遭受病痛的折磨，只能眼巴巴地等着死神来敲门呢。
2. 疾病研究的窗口。
动物和人类在生理结构和机能上有很多相似之处，它们就像是一扇窗户，让科学家们能窥视到疾病在生物体内的运作方式。
像研究癌症，科学家可以在老鼠身上制造相似的肿瘤模型。
老鼠繁殖快、生命周期短，这样就能在短时间内观察癌症的发生、发展过程，研究不同的治疗方法对肿瘤的影响。
要是没有动物实验这个得力助手，咱们对癌症这种超级复杂的疾病就只能像盲人摸象一样，摸到一点算一点，很难全面深入地了解它。
（二）安全性保障方面。
1. 产品安全把关。
在日常生活里，咱们用的好多东西都得经过安全性检测，化妆品、食品添加剂啥的。
把这些东西先在动物身上做实验，就像是先派个小侦察兵去探探路。
要是直接用到人身上，万一有个闪失，那可就麻烦大了。
比如有些化妆品可能含有对皮肤或者身体有害的成分，要是没有在兔子耳朵上或者小白鼠皮肤上先做测试，直接往咱们脸上抹，说不定就会引起严重的过敏反应，把好好的一张脸弄得像个大花脸，还可能有更严重的健康问题呢。
二、动物实验的弊端。
（一）动物权益问题。
1. 伦理道德的拷问。
从伦理道德的角度看，动物实验真的有点残忍呢。
那些小动物在实验室里被关着，接受各种可能会让它们痛苦的实验操作。
它们又没做错什么，凭什么要遭受这样的待遇呢？就像那些小猴子，被用来做一些脑部实验或者行为实验的时候，被限制自由，还可能会被注射一些奇怪的东西，感觉就像是把它们的生活完全打乱，只是为了满足人类的好奇心或者研究需求。
雅思写作范文及素材：animaltest
雅思写作范文及素材：animaltest雅思考生们在练习雅思大作文的时候，不仅仅要掌握各类技巧以及一些用词，还应该看看满分作文，寻找到自己的差距，加以改进。
以下便是小编整理的雅思写作animal testing范文及素材。
雅思写作满分范文animal testing一、题目Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favor of them because of their benefits to humanity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.二、分析题目大意是指，如今动物做实验已经在研究新药或者测试产品安全性等方面被广泛使用。
有些人认为这样的实验应该被禁止，因为让动物承受这样的痛苦从道德层面来说是不正确的，但是有些人则是认为它们给人类带来了很大的帮助。
讨论这两个观点，并且给出你自己的观点。
这道题目的要求是“Discuss”，即需要对于两方面的观点都要进行讨论分析，缺一不可。
考生需要做的，是对于用动物做实验这一行为的利弊分析，通过列举比较，得出一个比较具有说服力的结论。
三、范文It is true that medicines and other products are routinely tested on animals before they are cleared for human use. While I tend towards the viewpoint that animal testing is morally wrong, I would have to support a limited amount of animal experimentation for the development of medicines.第一段介绍背景，引出话题，说明用动物来测试药物或者其他产品的可使用性是十分常见的现象。
雅思写作题目解析：动物实验
雅思写作题目解析：动物实验Some people think it is necessary to use animals for testing medicinesintended for human use. Others, however, think it is notright to do that.Discuss both of these views and give you own opinion.有人认为小动物实验对于人类有益，有认为人们没有权利用动物实验，讨论两种观点，给出你的意见?思路拓展：反对小动物实验：1. 生命是平等的，不该伤害小动物;小动物的基本生存权利不可被剥夺。
2. 从道德角度看是不对的;小动物实验不道德，很残忍。
3. 小动物实验如果合法化，这种权利可能会被滥用。
支持小动物实验：1. 科学家把科技的进步归结给为实验做出了巨大贡献的小动物们;因为用动物实验便于观察小动物，小动物在一些方面和人类是有共性的。
2. 小动物实验减少了临床实验的可能，对于新药的研发推广有重要的意义;(药品;化妆品;化学产品)原创语料库：1. Animal experimentation will enable people to knowmore about themselves,for there are many similarities between human race and animals. Therefore, theresults of scientific research can help people to get further knowledge aboutmankind. 实验的结果能够协助人们更多的了解人类。
2. Every year, a great many animals undergo painful suffering or deathbecause of scientific research into the effects of drugs, food additives andother chemical products. 每一年，因为研发药品，化妆品和其他的化学产品，很多小动物经历了痛苦和死亡。
最新整理雅思写作题目解析：动物实验
雅思写作题目解析：动物实验S o m e p e o p l e t h i n k i t i s n e c e s s a r y t o u s e a n i m a l s f o r t e s t i n g m e d i c i n e si n t e n d e d f o r h u m a n u s e.O t h e r s,h o w e v e r,t h i n k i t i s n o t r i g h t t o d o t h a t.D i s c u s s b o t h o f t h e s e v i e w s a n d g i v e y o u o w no p i n i o n.有人认为小动物实验对于人类有益，有认为人们没有权利用动物实验，讨论两种观点，给出你的意见?思路拓展：反对小动物实验：1.生命是平等的，不该伤害小动物;小动物的基本生存权利不可被剥夺。
2.从道德角度看是不对的;小动物实验不道德，很残忍。
3.小动物实验如果合法化，这种权利可能会被滥用。
支持小动物实验：1.科学家把科技的进步归结给为实验做出了巨大贡献的小动物们;因为用动物实验便于观察小动物，小动物在一些方面和人类是有共性的。
2.小动物实验减少了临床实验的可能，对于新药的研发推广有重要的意义;(药品;化妆品;化学产品)原创语料库：1. A n i m a l e x p e r i m e n t a t i o n w i l l e n a b l e p e o p l e t o k n o w m o r e a b o u t t h e m s e l v e s,f o r t h e r e a r e m a n y s i m i l a r i t i e s b e t w e e n h u m a n r a c e a n d a n i m a l s.T h e r e f o r e,t h er e s u l t s o f s c i e n t i f i c r e s e a r c h c a n h e l p p e o p l e t o g e t f u r t h e r k n o w l e d g e a b o u tm a n k i n d.实验的结果可以帮助人们更多的了解人类。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
Animal 类
范文
Some people think animal experimentation should be stopped because it is cruel. Others think it is necessary for the development of science. Discuss both view and give your own opinion.
Animals were friend of foes of humanity at different times of the human history. In modern times, experiments upon animals have long been a breeding ground for spirited debate. Some animal right activists argue that we should ban animal experiments altogether because putting animals through experimentation is unjustifiable on moral grounds. Yet some other people contend that the advancement of science necessitates animal testing. Personally, I believe both their views have merit and demerit.
Granted, empirical evidence suggests that many animal experiments are performed callously without any attention to the discomfort or pain that laboratory mammals endure. First and foremost, improper confinement of test animals such as locking them up in cramped cages is inhumane. It can gravely disrupt natural biological functions of the test animal. Further, the effects of vaccination and vivisection conducted on live mammals can be chilling. They may, in some case, even constitute sheer torture of live animals.
However, from a more pragmatic perspective, evidence bounds that animal subjects are still an indispensable part at this point. In the first place, it is manifest that drug experimentation on live mammals is far more effective than experimentation on bacteria or on other lower species in testing drug safety. Drugs that have severe potential side effects on Homo sapiens must be tested by pharmaceutical companies on live mammals first to ascertain their toxicity. In the second place, in space research, live animals are still the only practical alternative to humans in testing living creature reaction to outer-space experience on a flight not considered to be sufficiently safe for human astronauts. Lastly, lab research about the behavioral tendencies of chimpanzees, gorillas and other members of the primate group is also necessary. It produces outcomes consistently advancing anthropological and genetic studies.
To conclude, I concede that experiments upon animals may induce suffering to the test animals. However, I am convinced that there are no feasible alternatives to this methodology at the current stage of scientific development. On balance, I think that we should allow animals testing to be continued but at the same time we use techniques such as anesthetic to minimize the pain of the test animal.
Animals 类词汇
动物权益保护主义者 animal rights activists
医学研究 medical research
，
残忍的cruel/ merciless/ inhuman/ callous/ brutal
活体解剖 vivisection
麻醉anaesthetic
减轻动物的痛苦 alleviate/ ease animals' pain
宠物是主人的伙伴 pets are companions of their masters
给主人心理安慰 afford their masters consolation and comfort
偷猎 poach（vi,vt）/poaching（noun）
某一种事物是没有替代物的 there are no replacement/substitutes/alternatives for something.
Animal 类模板
Animals have been friends or foes of humanity at different times of human history.《
在人类历史的不同阶段，动物曾经是人类的朋友或者敌人。
Animals are an integral part of the earth's ecosystem; therefore, animal welfare has long been an issue of intense debate.
动物是生态系统的一个不可或缺的部分。
因此，动物是否生存良好很久以来一直是引起激烈争议的话题。
Animals 类名人名言
The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated.—Gandhi。