2016美国总统大选电视辩论第二场
2016美国总统大选电视辩论第二场 希拉里川普互爆黑料斗智斗勇
2016美国总统大选电视辩论第二场希拉里川普互爆黑料斗智斗勇第二场总统大选电视辩论——川普希拉里巅峰对决高清视频全网独家下载对于美国总统候选人来讲，电视辩论是一场智力和体力的终极对决。
因为便是辩论中的表现可能会直接影响到最终的大选结果。
在历经了9月26日的第一场总统大选电视辩论上的剑拔弩张之后，副总统之间的角力对决也已经于10月4日落下帷幕。
今天美国总统大选第二场辩论，将于北京时间今日(10月10日)早上9点，在美国华盛顿大学举行。
美国共和党候选人特朗普有90分钟时间挽回自己的竞选生涯。
辩论主持人是美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)的安德森·库伯及美国广播公司(ABC)的拉达兹。
各大主流视频网站在线直播地址GET：Youtube直播地址： Youtube 2nd Presidential Debate at Washington UniversityCNN直播地址： CNN 2nd Presidential Debate at Washington UniversityNBC直播地址：NBC 2nd Presidential Debate at Washington University第二场电视辩论有哪些看点?——矛盾升级MAX如果说第一场电视辩论是礼尚往来之后，2016美国总统大学电视辩论第二场就开始来真格的了!【互挖黑历史】两位候选人辩论前夕都被曝出有损各自形象的“黑材料”。
《华盛顿邮报》7日公布了特朗普2005年一段用语非常粗俗的谈话录音，内容含有侮辱女性的言论。
“维基解密”网站也随即公开了黑客获取的希拉里华尔街高价演讲部分内容以及希拉里竞选团队一些内部邮件，其中一些言论与希拉里的公开立场不同，可能令民众对希拉里的诚信产生怀疑。
【提问环节】和第一场电视辩论的提问环节有所不同的是，这一的主持人仅负责提出半数问题，另半数将由盖洛普民意测验中心(Gallup)选出的未决选民提出。
截止小编发稿时候，第一个问题来自场下观众，这位观众问：上次辩论太“激烈”，小孩子要在大人陪同下才能观看，你们怎么看?【辩论爆点】特朗普避税疑云希拉里此前痛批共和党对手特朗普避税多年，称他是冷酷无情的商人，对国家没有贡献，她主张立法规定，参选总统必须公布税表。
美国总统大选第二场电视辩论
Transcript of second McCain, Obama debate NASHVILLE, Tennessee (CNN) -- Presidential candidates JohnMcCain and Barack Obama debated in Nashville, Tennessee, onTuesday night. NBC's Tom Brokaw moderated the debate. Here is a transcript of that debate.TOM: Good evening from Belmont University in Nashville, Tennessee. I'm Tom Brokaw of NBC News. And welcome to this second presidential debate, sponsored by the Commission on Presidential Debates. Tonight's debate is the only one with a town hall format. The Gallup Organization chose 80 uncommitted voters from the Nashville area to be here with us tonight. And earlier today, each of them gave me a copy of their question for the candidates. From all of these questions -- and from tens of thousands submitted online -- I have selected a long list of excellent questions on domestic and foreign policy. Neither the commission nor the candidates have seen the questions. And although we won't be able to get to all of them tonight, we should have a wide-ranging discussion one month before the election. Each candidate will have two minutes to respond to a common question, and there will be a one-minute follow-up. The audience here in the hall has agreed to be polite, and attentive, nocheering or outbursts. Those of you at home, of course, are not so constrained. The only exception in the hall is right now, as it is my privilege to introduce the candidates, Senator Barack Obama of Illinois and Senator John McCain of Arizona. Gentlemen? Gentlemen, we want to get underway immediately, if we can. Since you last met at Ole Miss 12 days ago, the world has changed a great deal, and not for the better. We still don't know where the bottom is at this time. As you might expect, many of the questions that we have from here in the hall tonight and from online have to do with the American economy and, in fact, with global economic conditions. I understand that you flipped a coin. And, Senator Obama, you will begin tonight. And we're going to have our first question from over here in Section A from Alan Schaefer. Alan ?QUESTION: With the economy on the downturn and retired and older citizens and workers losing their incomes, what's the fastest, most positive solution to bail these people out of the economic ruin?OBAMA: Well, Alan , thank you very much for the question. I want to first, obviously, thank Belmont University, Tom, thank you, and to all of you who are participating tonight and those of you who sent e-mail questions in. I think everybody knows now we are in the worstfinancial crisis since the Great Depression. And a lot of you I think are worried about your jobs, your pensions, your retirement accounts, your ability to send your child or your grandchild to college. And I believe this is a final verdict on the failed economic policies of the last eight years, strongly promoted by President Bush and supported by Senator McCain, that essentially said that we should strip away regulations, consumer protections, let the market run wild, and prosperity would rain down on all of us. It hasn't worked out that way. And so now we've got to take some decisive action.Now, step one was a rescue package that was passed last week. We've got to make sure that works properly. And that means strong oversight, making sure that investors, taxpayers are getting their money back and treated as investors. It means that we are cracking down on CEOs and making sure that they're not getting bonuses or golden parachutes as a consequence of this package. And, in fact, we just found out that AIG, a company that got a bailout, just a week after they got help went on a $400,000 junket. And I'll tell you what, the Treasury should demand that money back and those executives should be fired. But that's only step one.The middle-class need a rescue package. And that means tax cuts for the middle-class. It means help for homeowners so that they can stay in their homes. It means that we are helping state and localgovernments set up road projects and bridge projects that keep people in their jobs. And then long-term we've got to fix our health care system, we've got to fix our energy system that is putting such an enormous burden on families. You need somebody working for you and you've got to have somebody in Washington who is thinking about the middle class and not just those who can afford to hire lobbyists.TOM : Senator McCain?MCCAIN: Well, thank you, Tom. Thank you, Belmont University. And Senator Obama, it's good to be with you at a town hall meeting. And, Alan , thank you for your question. You go to the heart of America's worries tonight. Americans are angry, they're upset, and they're a little fearful. It's our job to fix the problem.Now, I have a plan to fix this problem and it has got to do with energy independence. We've got to stop sending $700 billion a year to countries that don't want us very -- like us very much. We have to keep Americans' taxes low. All Americans' taxes low. Let's not raise taxes on anybody today. We obviously have to stop this spending spree that's going on in Washington. Do you know that we've laid a $10 trillion debt on these young Americans who are here with us tonight, $500 billion of it we owe to China? We've got to have a package of reforms and it has got to lead to reform prosperity and peace in the world. And I think that thisproblem has become so severe, as you know, that we're going to have to do something about home values. You know that home values of retirees continues to decline and people are no longer able to afford their mortgage payments. As president of the United States, Alan, I would order the secretary of the treasury to immediately buy up the bad home loan mortgages in America and renegotiate at the new value of those homes -- at the diminished value of those homes and let people be able to make those -- be able to make those payments and stay in their homes. Is it expensive? Yes. But we all know, my friends, until we stabilize home values in America, we're never going to start turning around and creating jobs and fixing our economy. And we've got to give some trust and confidence back to America. I know how the do that, my friends. And it's my proposal, it's not Senator Obama's proposal, it's not President Bush's proposal. But I know how to get America working again, restore our economy and take care of working Americans. Thank you.TOM: Senator, we have one minute for a discussion here. Obviously the powers of the treasury secretary have been greatly expanded. The most powerful officer in the cabinet now. Hank Paulson says he won't stay on. Who do you have in mind to appoint to that very important post? Senator McCain?MCCAIN: Not you, Tom.TOM : No, with good reason.MCCAIN: You know, that's a tough question and there's a lot of qualified Americans. But I think the first criteria, Tom, would have to be somebody who immediately Americans identify with, immediately say, we can trust that individual. A supporter of Senator Obama's is Warren Buffett. He has already weighed in and helped stabilize some of the difficulties in the markets and with companies and corporations, institutions today. I like Meg Whitman, she knows what it's like to be out there in the marketplace. She knows how to create jobs. Meg Whitman was CEO of a company that started with 12 people and is now 1.3 million people in America make their living off eBay. Maybe somebody here has done a little business with them.But the point is it's going to have to be somebody who inspires trust and confidence. Because the problem in America today to a large extent, Tom, is that we don't have trust and confidence in our institutions because of the corruption on Wall Street and the greed and excess and the cronyism in Washington, D.C.TOM: All right. Senator McCain -- Senator Obama, who do you have in mind for treasury secretary?OBAMA: Well, Warren would be a pretty good choice -- Warren Buffett, and I'm pleased to have his support. But there are other folks out there. The key is making sure that the next treasury secretary understands that it's not enough just to help those at the top. Prosperity is not just going to trickle down. We've got to help the middle class. OBAMA: And we've -- you know, Senator McCain and I have some fundamental disagreements on the economy, starting with Senator McCain's statement earlier that he thought the fundamentals of the economy were sound. Part of the problem here is that for many of you, wages and incomes have flat-lined. For many of you, it is getting harder and harder to save, harder and harder to retire. And that's why, for example, on tax policy, what I want to do is provide a middle class tax cut to 95 percent of working Americans, those who are working two jobs, people who are not spending enough time with their kids, because they are struggling to make ends meet. Senator McCain is right that we've got to stabilize housing prices. But underlying that is loss of jobs and loss of income. That's something that the next treasury secretary is going to have to work on.TOM: Senator Obama, thank you very much. May I remind both of you, if I can, that we're operating under rules that you signed off on and when we have a discussion, it really is to be confined within abouta minute or so. We're going to go now, Senator McCain, to the next question from you from the hall here, and it comes from Oliver Clark (ph), who is over here in section F. Oliver?QUESTION: Well, Senators, through this economic crisis, most of the people that I know have had a difficult time. And through this bailout package, I was wondering what it is that's going to actually help those people out.MCCAIN: Well, thank you, Oliver, and that's an excellent question, because as you just described it, bailout, when I believe that it's rescue, because -- because of the greed and excess in Washington and Wall Street, Main Street was paying a very heavy price, and we know that. I left my campaign and suspended it to go back to Washington to make sure that there were additional protections for the taxpayer in the form of good oversight, in the form of taxpayers being the first to be paid back when our economy recovers -- and it will recover -- and a number of other measures.But you know, one of the real catalysts, really the match that lit this fire was Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. I'll bet you, you may never even have heard of them before this crisis. But you know, they're the ones that, with the encouragement of Senator Obama and his cronies andhis friends in Washington, that went out and made all these risky loans, gave them to people that could never afford to pay back. And you know, there were some of us that stood up two years ago and said we've got to enact legislation to fix this. We've got to stop this greed and excess. Meanwhile, the Democrats in the Senate and some -- and some members of Congress defended what Fannie and Freddie were doing. They resisted any change. Meanwhile, they were getting all kinds of money in campaign contributions. Senator Obama was the second highest recipient of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac money in history -- in history. So this rescue package means that we will stabilize markets, we will shore up these institutions. But it's not enough. That's why we're going to have to go out into the housing market and we're going to have to buy up these bad loans and we're going to have to stabilize home values, and that way, Americans, like Alan, can realize the American dream and stay in their home. But Fannie and Freddie were the catalysts, the match that started this forest fire. There were some of us -- there were some of us that stood up against it. There were others who took a hike.TOM: Senator Obama?OBAMA: Well, Oliver, first, let me tell you what's in the rescuepackage for you. Right now, the credit markets are frozen up and what that means, as a practical matter, is that small businesses and some large businesses just can't get loans. If they can't get a loan, that means that they can't make payroll. If they can't make payroll, then they may end up having to shut their doors and lay people off. And if you imagine just one company trying to deal with that, now imagine a million companies all across the country. So it could end up having an adverse effect on everybody, and that's why we had to take action. But we shouldn't have been there in the first place.Now, I've got to correct a little bit of Senator McCain's history, not surprisingly. Let's, first of all, understand that the biggest problem in this whole process was the deregulation of the financial system. Senator McCain, as recently as March, bragged about the fact that he is a deregulator. On the other hand, two years ago, I said that we've got a sub-prime lending crisis that has to be dealt with. I wrote to Secretary Paulson, I wrote to Federal Reserve Chairman Bernanke, and told them this is something we have to deal with, and nobody did anything about it. A year ago, I went to Wall Street and said we've got to reregulate, and nothing happened. And Senator McCain during that period said that we should keep on deregulating because that's how the free enterprise system works. Now, with respect to Fannie Mae, what Senator McCain didn't mention is the fact that this bill that he talked about wasn't hisown bill. He jumped on it a year after it had been introduced and it never got passed. And I never promoted Fannie Mae. In fact, Senator McCain's campaign chairman's firm was a lobbyist on behalf of Fannie Mae, not me. So -- but, look, you're not interested in hearing politicians pointing fingers. What you're interested in is trying to figure out, how is this going to impact you? This is not the end of the process; this is the beginning of the process. And that's why it's going to be so important for us to work with homeowners to make sure that they can stay in their homes. The secretary already has the power to do that in the rescue package, but it hasn't been exercised yet. And the next president has to make sure that the next Treasury secretary is thinking about how to strengthen you as a home buyer, you as a homeowner, and not simply think about bailing out banks on Wall Street.TOM: Senator Obama, time for a discussion. I'm going to begin with you. Are you saying to Mr. Clark (ph) and to the other members of the American television audience that the American economy is going to get much worse before it gets better and they ought to be prepared for that?OBAMA: No, I am confident about the American economy. But we aregoing to have to have some leadership from Washington that not only sets out much better regulations for the financial system. The problem is we still have a archaic, 20th-century regulatory system for 21st-century financial markets. We're going to have to coordinate with other countries to make sure that whatever actions we take work. But most importantly, we're going to have to help ordinary families be able to stay in their homes, make sure that they can pay their bills, deal with critical issues like health care and energy, and we're going to have to change the culture in Washington so that lobbyists and special interests aren't driving the process and your voices aren't being drowned out.TOM: Senator McCain, in all candor, do you think the economy is going to get worse before it gets better?MCCAIN: I think it depends on what we do. I think if we act effectively, if we stabilize the housing market -- which I believe we can, if we go out and buy up these bad loans, so that people can have a new mortgage at the new value of their home -- I think if we get rid of the cronyism and special interest influence in Washington so we can act more effectively. My friend, I'd like you to see the letter that a group of senators and I wrote warning exactly of this crisis. Senator Obama'sname was not on that letter. The point is -- the point is that we can fix our economy. Americans' workers are the best in the world. They're the fundamental aspect of America's economy. They're the most innovative. They're the best -- they're most -- have best -- we're the best exporters. We're the best importers. They're most effective. They are the best workers in the world. And we've got to give them a chance. They've got -- we've got to give them a chance to do their best again. And they are the innocent bystanders here in what is the biggest financial crisis and challenge of our time. We can do it.TOM: Thank you, Senator McCain. We're going to continue over in Section F, as it turns out. Senator Obama, this is a question from you from Theresa Finch. Theresa ?QUESTION: How can we trust either of you with our money when both parties got -- got us into this global economic crisis?OBAMA: Well, look, I understand your frustration and your cynicism, because while you've been carrying out your responsibilities -- most of the people here, you've got a family budget. If less money is coming in, you end up making cuts. Maybe you don't go out to dinner as much. Maybe you put off buying a new car. That's not what happens inWashington. And you're right. There is a lot of blame to go around. But I think it's important just to remember a little bit of history. When George Bush came into office, we had surpluses. And now we have half-a-trillion-dollar deficit annually. When George Bush came into office, our debt -- national debt was around $5 trillion. It's now over $10 trillion. We've almost doubled it. And so while it's true that nobody's completely innocent here, we have had over the last eight years the biggest increases in deficit spending and national debt in our history. And Senator McCain voted for four out of five of those George Bush budgets. So here's what I would do. I'm going to spend some money on the key issues that we've got to work on.You know, you may have seen your health care premiums go up. We've got to reform health care to help you and your budget. We are going to have to deal with energy because we can't keep on borrowing from the Chinese and sending money to Saudi Arabia. We are mortgaging our children's future. We've got to have a different energy plan. We've got to invest in college affordability. So we're going to have to make some investments, but we've also got to make spending cuts. And what I've proposed, you'll hear Senator McCain say, well, he's proposing a whole bunch of new spending, but actually I'm cutting more than I'm spending so that it will be a net spending cut. The key is whether or not we've got priorities that are working for you as opposed to thosewho have been dictating the policy in Washington lately, and that's mostly lobbyists and special interests. We've got to put an end to that.TOM: Senator McCain?MCCAIN: Well, Theresa (ph), thank you. And I can see why you feel that cynicism and mistrust, because the system in Washington is broken. And I have been a consistent reformer. I have advocated and taken on the special interests, whether they be the big money people by reaching across the aisle and working with Senator Feingold on campaign finance reform, whether it being a variety of other issues, working with Senator Lieberman on trying to address climate change.I have a clear record of bipartisanship. The situation today cries out for bipartisanship. Senator Obama has never taken on his leaders of his party on a single issue. And we need to reform. And so let's look at our records as well as our rhetoric. That's really part of your mistrust here. And now I suggest that maybe you go to some of these organizations that are the watchdogs of what we do, like the Citizens Against Government Waste or the National Taxpayers Union or these other organizations that watch us all the time. I don't expect you to watch every vote. And you know what you'll find? This is the most liberal big-spending record in the United States Senate. I have fought againstexcessive spending and outrages. I have fought to reduce the earmarks and eliminate them. Do you know that Senator Obama has voted for -- is proposing $860 billion of new spending now? New spending. Do you know that he voted for every increase in spending that I saw come across the floor of the United States Senate while we were working to eliminate these pork barrel earmarks? He voted for nearly a billion dollars in pork barrel earmark projects, including, by the way, $3 million for an overhead projector at a planetarium in Chicago, Illinois. My friends, do we need to spend that kind of money? I think you have to look at my record and you have to look at his. Then you have to look at our proposals for our economy, not $860 billion in new spending, but for the kinds of reforms that keep people in their jobs, get middle-income Americans working again, and getting our economy moving again. You're going to be examining our proposals tonight and in the future, and energy independence is a way to do that, is one of them. And drilling offshore and nuclear power are two vital elements of that. And I've been supporting those and I know how to fix this economy, and eliminate our dependence on foreign oil, and stop sending $700 billion a year overseas.TOM: We've run out of time. We have this one-minute discussion period going on here. There are new economic realities out there thateveryone in this hall and across this country understands that there are going to have to be some choices made. Health policies, energy policies, and entitlement reform, what are going to be your priorities in what order? Which of those will be your highest priority your first year in office and which will follow in sequence? Senator McCain?MCCAIN: The three priorities were health...TOM: The three -- health care, energy, and entitlement reform: Social Security and Medicare. In what order would you put them in terms of priorities?MCCAIN: I think you can work on all three at once, Tom. I think it's very important that reform our entitlement programs. My friends, we are not going to be able to provide the same benefit for present-day workers that we are going -- that present-day retirees have today. We're going to have to sit down across the table, Republican and Democrat, as we did in 1983 between Ronald Reagan and Tip O'Neill. I know how to do that. I have a clear record of reaching across the aisle, whether it be Joe Lieberman or Russ Feingold or Ted Kennedy or others. That's my clear record. We can work on nuclear power plants. Build a whole bunch of them, create millions of new jobs. We have tohave all of the above, alternative fuels, wind, tide, solar, natural gas, clean coal technology. All of these things we can do as Americans and we can take on this mission and we can overcome it.My friends, some of this $700 billion ends up in the hands of terrorist organizations. As far as health care is concerned, obviously, everyone is struggling to make sure that they can afford their premiums and that they can have affordable and available health care. That's the next issue. But we can do them all at once. There's no -- and we have to do them all at once. All three you mentioned are compelling national security requirements.TOM: I'm trying to play by the rules that you all established. One minute for discussion. Senator Obama, if you would give us your list of priorities, there are some real questions about whether everything can be done at once.OBAMA: We're going to have to prioritize, just like a family has to prioritize. Now, I've listed the things that I think have to be at the top of the list. Energy we have to deal with today, because you're paying $3.80 here in Nashville for gasoline, and it could go up. And it's a strain on your family budget, but it's also bad for our national security, because countries like Russia and Venezuela and, you know, in somecases, countries like Iran, are benefiting from higher oil prices. So we've got to deal with that right away. That's why I've called for an investment of $15 billion a year over 10 years. Our goal should be, in 10 year's time, we are free of dependence on Middle Eastern oil. And we can do it. Now, when JFK said we're going to the Moon in 10 years, nobody was sure how to do it, but we understood that, if the American people make a decision to do something, it gets done. So that would be priority number one.Health care is priority number two, because that broken health care system is bad not only for families, but it's making our businesses less competitive. And, number three, we've got to deal with education so that our young people are competitive in a global economy. But just one point I want to make, Tom. Senator McCain mentioned looking at our records. We do need to look at our records. Senator McCain likes to talk about earmarks a lot. And that's important. I want to go line by line through every item in the federal budget and eliminate programs that don't work and make sure that those that do work, work better and cheaper. But understand this: We also have to look at where some of our tax revenues are going. So when Senator McCain proposes a $300 billion tax cut, a continuation not only of the Bush tax cuts, but an additional $200 billion that he's going to give to big corporations, including big oil companies, $4 billion worth, that's money out of thesystem. And so we've got to prioritize both our spending side and our tax policies to make sure that they're working for you. That's what I'm going to do as president of the United States.TOM: All right, gentlemen, I want to just remind you one more time about time. We're going to have a larger deficit than the federal government does if we don't get this under control here before too long. Senator McCain, for you, we have our first question from the Internet tonight. A child of the Depression, 78-year-old Fiora (ph) from Chicago.Question: Since World War II, we have never been asked to sacrifice anything to help our country, except the blood of our heroic men and women. As president, what sacrifices -- sacrifices will you ask every American to make to help restore the American dream and to get out of the economic morass that we're now in?MCCAIN: Well, Fiora (ph), I'm going to ask the American people to understand that there are some programs that we may have to eliminate. I first proposed a long time ago that we would have to examine every agency and every bureaucracy of government. And we're going to have to eliminate those that aren't working. I know a lotof them that aren't working. One of them is in defense spending, because I've taken on some of the defense contractors. I saved the taxpayers $6.8 billion in a deal for an Air Force tanker that was done in a corrupt fashion. I believe that we have to eliminate the earmarks. And sometimes those projects, not -- not the overhead projector that Senator Obama asked for, but some of them that are really good projects, will have -- will have to be eliminated, as well. And they'll have to undergo the same scrutiny that all projects should in competition with others. So we're going to have to tell the American people that spending is going to have to be cut in America. And I recommend a spending freeze that -- except for defense, Veterans Affairs, and some other vital programs, we'll just have to have across-the-board freeze. And some of those programs may not grow as much as we would like for them to, but we can establish priorities with full transparency, with full knowledge of the American people, and full consultation, not done behind closed doors and shoving earmarks in the middle of the night into programs that we don't even -- sometimes we don't even know about until months later. And, by the way, I want to go back a second. Look, we can attack health care and energy at the same time. We're not -- we're not -- we're not rifle shots here. We are Americans. We can, with the participation of all Americans, work together and solve these problems together. Frankly,。
美国总统大选第二场辩论(中文字幕完整版)(转自CNN)-(-厦门韦博英语培训提供
美国总统大选第二场辩论（中文字幕完整版）（转自CNN）-(-厦门韦博英语培训提供美国总统大选第二场辩论（中文字幕完整版）（转自CNN）-(-厦门韦博英语培训提供美国总统大选第二场辩论（中文字幕完整版）（转自CNN）-(-厦门韦博英语培训提供美国总统大选第二场辩论（中文字幕完整版）Transcript: Second presidential debatePosted by CNN Political Unit(CNN) - President Barack Obama and Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney met in Hempstead, New York Tuesday evening for the second of three presidential debates, moderated by CNN Chief Political Correspondent Candy Crowley.CROWLEY: Good evening from Hofstra University in Hempstead, New York. I'm Candy Crowley from CNN's "State of the Union." We are here for the second presidential debate, a town hall, sponsored by the Commission on Presidential Debates.CROWLEY: The Gallup organization chose 82 uncommitted voters from the New York area. Their questions will drive the night. My goal is to give the conversation direction and to ensure questions get answered.The questions are known to me and my team only. Neither the commission, nor the candidates have seen them. I hope to get to as many questions as possible.CROWLEY: And because I am the optimistic sort, I'm sure the candidates will oblige by keeping their answers concise and on point.Each candidate has as much as two minutes to respond to a common question, and there will be a two-minute follow-up. The audience here in the hall has agreed to be polite and attentive - no cheering or booing or outbursts of any sort. We will set aside that agreement just this once to welcome President Barack Obama and Governor Mitt Romney.(APPLAUSE)Gentlemen, thank you both for joining us here tonight. We have a lot of folks who've been waiting all day to talk to you, so I want to get right to it. Governor Romney, as you know, you won the coin toss, so the first question will go to you. And I want to turn to a first-time voter, Jeremy Epstein, who has a question for you.QUESTION: Mr. President, Governor Romney, as a 20-year-old college student,all I hear from professors, neighbors and others is that when I graduate, I will have little chance to get employment. What can you say to reassure me, but more importantly my parents, that I will be able to sufficiently support myself after I graduate?ROMNEY: Thank you, Jeremy. I appreciate your - your question, and thank you for being here this evening and to all of those from Nassau County that have come, thank you for your time. Thank you to Hofstra University and to Candy Crowley for organizing and leading this - this event.Thank you, Mr. President, also for being part of this - this debate.College kids all over this country. I was in Pennsylvania with someone who had just graduated - this was in Philadelphia - and she said, "I've got my degree. I can't find a job. I've got three part-time jobs. They're just barely enough to pay for my food and pay for an apartment. I can't begin to pay back my student loans."So what we have to do is two things. We have to make sure that we make it easier for kids to afford college.ROMNEY: And also make sure that when they get out of college, there's a job. When I was governor of Massachusetts, to get a high school degree, you had to pass an exam. If you graduated in the top quarter of your class, we gave you a John and Abigail Adams scholarship, four years tuition free in the college of your choice in Massachusetts, it's a public institution.I want to make sure we keep our Pell grant program growing. We're also going to have our loan program, so that people are able to afford school. But the key thing is to make sure you can get a job when you get out of school. And what's happened over the last four years has been very, very hard for America's young people. I want you to be able to get a job.I know what it takes to get this economy going. With half of college kids graduating this year without a college - excuse me, without a job. And without a college level job, that's just unacceptable.And likewise you've got more and more debt on your back. So more debt and less jobs. I'm going to change that. I know what it takes to create good jobs again. I know what it takes to make sure that you have the kind of opportunity you deserve. And kids across this country are going to recognize, we're bringing back an economy. It's not going to be like the last four years. The middle-class has been crushed over the last four years, and jobs have been too scarce. I know what it takes to bring them back, and I'm going to do that, and make sure that when you graduate - when do you graduate?QUESTION: 2014.ROMNEY: 2014. When you come out in 2014, I presume I'm going to be president. I'm going to make sure you get a job. Thanks Jeremy. Yeah, you bet. CROWLEY: Mr. President?OBAMA: Jeremy, first of all, your future is bright. And the fact that you're making an investment in higher education is critical. Not just to you, but to the entire nation. Now, the most important thing we can do is to make sure that we are creating jobs in this country. But not just jobs, good paying jobs. Ones that can support a family.OBAMA: And what I want to do, is build on the five million jobs that we've created over the last 30 months in the private sector alone. And there are a bunch of things we can do to make sure yourfuture is bright.Number one, I want to build manufacturing jobs in this country again. Now when Governor Romney said we should let Detroit go bankrupt. I said we're going to bet on American workers and theAmerican auto industry and it's come surging back.I want to do that in industries, not just in Detroit, but all across the country andthat means we change our tax code so we're giving incentives to companies that are investing here in the United States and creating jobs here.It also means we're helping them and small businesses to export all around the world to new markets.Number two, we've got to make sure that we have the best education system in the world. And the fact that you're going to college is great, but I want everybody to get a great education andwe've worked hard to make sure that student loans are available for folks like you, but I also want to make sure that community colleges are offering slots for workers to get retrained for the jobs that are out there right now and the jobs of the future.Number three, we've got to control our own energy. Now, not only oil and natural gas, which we've been investing in; but also, we've got to make sure we're building the energy source of the future, not just thinking about next year, but ten years from now, 20 years from now. That's why we've invested in solar and wind and biofuels, energy efficient cars.We've got to reduce our deficit, but we've got to do it in a balanced way. Asking the wealthy to pay a little bit more along with cuts so that we can invest in education like yours. And let's take the money that we've been spending on war over the last decade to rebuild America, roads, bridges schools. We do those things, not only is your future going to be bright but America's future is going to bright as well. CROWLEY: Let me ask you for more immediate answer and begin with Mr. Romney just quickly what - what can you do? We're looking at a situation where 40 percent of the unemployed have been unemployed have been unemployed for six months or more. They don't have the two years that Jeremy has.美国总统大选第二场辩论（中文字幕完整版）（转自CNN）-(-厦门韦博英语培训提供温馨提示：我们厦门韦博英语分级别，分层级进行教学，适合不同英语基础的学员学习，如果您想报名学习的课程，我们会为您免费提供国际顶级口语水平测试。
美国总统选举电视辩论两则
比 赛 当天 。 尼克松 不 但拒 绝 ｌ 妆 ． 至连 胡 子 部 漫 就走 上 了 匕 甚
舞 台： 电视 台也按 照 原 计 划 ， 开 了所 有 的 灯 ， 舞 台照 得 恍 如 白 打 将
昼， 自然 ， 台上 的 温度 也特 别 高 ， 克松 只 得在 辩论 中 不 滓地 拿 舞 尼 手 帕擦 拭 额 头上 的 汗 ； 并且 ， 了一段 时 间 后 ， 站 尼克 松 的 刚痊 愈 的 脚 就开 始 隐 隐作 痛 ， 表情 也 变得痛 苦 起来 。
人看 起 来精 神抖 擞 ， 求 候选人 站 立辩 论 。 要 肯尼 迪事 先 了解 到这 一
点。 预料到灯光加强， 现场温度肯定 升高 ， 便在比赛 时， 了身较薄 穿
５ ２圜 ２． 导 术 ０６ ｌ 艺 ００领 ９
的西 服 而 怕热 、剐 刚 圈脚 伤 亡 院 周 的尼 宽 松却 忽视 了这 些 信 蔓
和老布什的教训 ， 莫要 因小失大 。
（ 自《 讲与 口才 》 摘 演 ）
余。 两相 对 比 ， 观众 心 中有 了判 断 ， 论 结束 后 ， 尼迪 的 支持 率 直 辩 肯 线上升 。 尼 克松 万 万想不 到 ， 自己会 败 在几 个他 压 根儿 就 没注 意 的小
问题 上 。 场辩论 下 来 ， 在 观众心 中就成 了形 象邋遢 、 台 紧张 、 ～ 他 上 表情 疲 惫的 代 言 人 ， 此 印象 ， 如 支持 率 又 怎能 不 的尼 克松 连 胡须 也 没有 刮干 净 ， 形象 十
分邋 遢 ； 并且 ， 色 苍 白， 头汗 水清 晰 可 见 ， 停地 擦拭 汗水 的动 脸 额 不
作显 得 他十分 紧张 ； 至． 情也越 来越 痛 苦 ， 起来 十 分疲 惫 而 甚 表 看 肯尼迪则不 同， 轻英俊 、 态潇洒， 年 仪 整场 辩 论 神情 自若 、 刃 有 游
2016美国总统大选电视辩论首选高清视频录像回放
2016美国总统大选电视辩论首选高清视频录像回放美国东部时间：2016年9月26日，下午2点。
美国2016年总统大选第一场辩论正式开战。
小编整理了2016美国总统大选电视辩论首选全程直播高清视频录像回放中文字幕内容，希望大家喜欢! 2016美国总统大选电视辩论首选直播高清视频录像回放下载2016美国总统选举首选电视辩论内容美国相关安全部门已经在长岛的霍夫斯特拉大学部署就绪。
总统大选辩论共有三场，26号为首场辩论。
辩论举办地在美国长岛的霍夫斯特拉大学。
辩手：民主党候选人：希拉里·克林顿共和党候选人：唐纳德·特朗普辩论持续时间：90分钟。
共分为六个部分，每部分15分钟时限。
大选辩论的意义何在?根据Nielson统计有1/3的选民表示辩论会对他们的投票决定产生重大影响，由此可见，距离大选结果尘埃落定还有一个多月，这三场辩论有着“扭转乾坤”的潜力。
这无疑为原本就备受关注的2016美国大选添了油加了醋，增加了大选的戏剧性和可看性。
在这个离大选结果只有一个多月的关头，希拉里和特朗普的两扇大门横在仍旧徘徊不定的选民面前，这场辩论就是他们最后的钥匙，让他们自行选择走进哪扇门。
废话不多说，我们开门见山，直奔主题，看看双方辩手在六个辩论板块中的表现。
Round One: Achieving Prosperity/实现富裕.这部分讨论的核心是美国的就业现状。
背景：从下图可见美国的失业率自金融危机以来逐渐回落到5%的水平, 但是收入不均现象仍旧险峻，有一半的美国人生活拮据，靠工资度日。
Part1:主持人：“Why are you a better choice than your opponent to create the kinds of jobs that will put more money in the pockets of American workers?”“你为什么觉得自己能比竞争对手创造更多的工作机会，以此给美国的工人带去更高的薪水?”Hillary：“First, we have to build an economy that works for everyone not just for those at the top. That means we need new jobs, good jobs, with rising incomes. I want us to invest in you. I want us to invest in your future. That means jobs in infrastructure, in advanced manufacturing, in innovation, in technology, clean renewable energy and small businesses."希拉里：“首先，我们要打造一个为每个人服务的经济体系，而不仅仅是为了顶层人士。
第二场总统辩论
第二场总统辩论：火药味浓，川普止血2016-10-10 作者：柯振兴谁能想到，在第二次总统辩论前的48小时内会发生那么多事情：共和党方面，川普先是被爆出非常露骨的羞辱女性的言论，以致于大批共和党人要求川普退出竞选，川普向民众道歉但是表示自己不会退选，民主党方面，维基解密突然又披露希拉里有偿演讲的部分语录。
因此，在第二次总统辩论之前，观众也被调高了胃口。
在第二场电视辩论中，希拉里能否乘胜追击，凭借稳健的表现再度拉高民调，特别是稳定住关键州的领先优势？在共和党的巨大压力下，川普能否以自己的表现稳定自己的军心，为自己的选情止血？川普在被提问这些事情时，会不会被激怒而失态，从而再次自损形象？有人甚至预测如果川普在本场表现糟糕，选举就将提前一个月结束。
在总统辩论前，川普还带着Paula Jones、Kathy Shelton、Juanita Broaddrick 和Kathleen Willey四位女士召开了一场小型新闻发布会，Jones，Broaddrick和Willey都声称前总统比尔·克林顿曾性骚扰或者强奸她们（但是法院都没有支持）。
这也是川普对希拉里阵营的反击，试图抹黑比尔·克林顿来打击希拉里的选情。
在辩论开始之前，双方入场后也没有握手，在观众席上的比尔克林顿也一脸严肃。
这也预示着本场辩论将充满火药味。
在第一场辩论中，电视辩论的主持人设计了“美国的前进方向”，“实现繁荣”和“保障美国安全”三个模块，分别辩论了经济问题，种族问题和国家安全与外交问题。
本次辩论中，很多选题则是从选民和网民的建议中筛选出来。
本次辩论的另一个特点是采用市政厅（Town Hall）的方式，类似一个小剧场，一些被随机选择的至今还未确定投票给谁的观众坐在两边，根据主持人的安排向舞台中间的两位候选人提问，而两位主持人负责控制时间以及促进讨论。
在这种小剧场，两位候选人也不用像上一场一直站在麦克风前回答问题，他们可以走动，特别是走到观众前回答问题。
美国总统选举辩论辩题
美国总统选举辩论辩题正方（支持美国总统选举辩论）：作为美国总统选举的重要环节，选举辩论是候选人展示自己政治理念和能力的重要机会。
首先，选举辩论能够帮助选民更好地了解候选人的政治立场和政策主张。
通过辩论，候选人可以就重大议题展开讨论，让选民更清楚地了解候选人的政治主张，有助于选民做出更明智的选择。
其次，选举辩论也能够提高选民的政治参与度。
通过观看辩论，选民可以更深入地了解候选人的政见，从而更加积极地参与到选举过程中来。
最后，选举辩论也有助于促进政治对话和民主价值观。
在辩论中，候选人可以就各种政治议题进行深入讨论，这有助于促进政治对话，让选民更好地了解各种政治观点，有助于民主社会的发展。
反方（反对美国总统选举辩论）：选举辩论并不能真正反映候选人的政治能力和素质。
首先，选举辩论往往只是表面功夫，候选人会在辩论中使用花言巧语来迷惑选民，而实际上并不能真正展现其政治能力。
其次，选举辩论往往只是形式主义，候选人会在辩论中避重就轻，而不是真正就重大议题进行深入讨论。
最后，选举辩论也容易受到舆论和媒体的影响，这样就会导致候选人在辩论中表现不真实，从而误导选民的判断。
正如美国前总统林肯所说，“你可以骗所有人一部分时间，也可以骗一部分人所有时间，但你无法骗所有人所有时间。
”选举辩论往往只是候选人表面的政治表演，不能真正反映其政治能力和素质。
综上所述，选举辩论在一定程度上有助于选民更好地了解候选人的政治立场和政策主张，提高选民的政治参与度，促进政治对话和民主价值观。
但是，选举辩论也存在着表面功夫、形式主义和容易受到舆论和媒体影响的问题。
因此，我们应该在推进选举辩论的同时，也应该对选举辩论进行改革，让选举辩论更加真实、公正和深入。
基于框架理论的美国总统大选辩论文本分析——以2016年电视辩论为例
|RADIO ＆TV JOURNAL 2019.042016年美国大选结果公布之前，许多人并不看好特朗普，因为其大胆的言论、夸张的言谈举止，似乎并不“像”总统的合适人选。
包括在大选的电视辩论中，与之前历届总统以及竞争对手希拉里相比，特朗普都显得与众不同。
因此，特朗普当选的消息一度引起广泛轰动。
通过对本次大选的重要环节———电视辩论进行观察分析之后会发现，特朗普的辩论风格也许看起来疯狂，但却是十分吸引人的，这与他辩论中完整的框架与逻辑是分不开的。
关于总统辩论的研究一般主要集中在政治学领域、辩论学领域，但很少有学者从传播学框架理论的角度讨论总统辩论。
本文主要采用框架理论对2016年美国总统大选中现任总统特朗普和民主党候选人希拉里的电视辩论文本中的语言符号进行分类整理与分析，采取普查的方式，对三次辩论的整体文本进行梳理，分析框架理论在2016年美国总统辩论中的应用情况及其所起到的作用。
一、认知框架中的框架框定认知框架，也被称为概念框架，其在语义上与交际事件相关。
认知框架的特点是：每个框架都有固定的基本范畴；语言表达跟随认知观点变化，反之亦然；一个完整框架的各个元素之间都是紧密关联的。
如果其中一个被提及，那么框架内的其他元素都会被激活。
人们总是在框架中进行思考。
在辩论中，认知框架可以帮助辩论者进行框架框定。
其恰当运用在辩论中起着至关重要的作用，在保证认知框架在公众心目中的坚固性的同时也方便了对相关话题的辩论，从而轻松击败对手。
希拉里和特朗普的辩论清楚地揭示了他们关于税收的不同政策。
在辩论过程中，特朗普率先直接采用了“税收减免”的说法，在“税收”框架下有效运用相关认知框架。
在希拉里对经济做了一番较为积极乐观的评估以及展望之后，特朗普使用“税收是一种灾难”的隐喻，表示自己不同意希拉里的增税政策。
对于美国人而言，这里的灾难不仅指美国经济，更是美国企业的未来发展，以及它们能提供给美国人的就业机会，紧接着便是美国人的生活水平。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
对于美国总统候选人来讲，电视辩论是一场智力和体力的终极对决。
因为便是辩论中的表现可能会直接影响到最终的大选结果。
在历经了9月26日的第一场总统大选电视辩论上的剑拔弩张之后，副总统之间的角力对决也已经于10月4日落下帷幕。
今天美国总统大选第二场辩论，将于北京时间今日(10月10日)早上9点，在美国华盛顿大学举行。
美国共和党候选人特朗普有90分钟时间挽回自己的竞选生涯。
辩论主持人是美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)的安德森·库伯及美国广播公司(ABC)的拉达兹。
各大主流视频网站在线直播地址GET：
Youtube直播地址：Youtube 2nd Presidential Debate at Washington
University
CNN直播地址：CNN 2nd Presidential Debate at Washington University NBC直播地址：NBC 2nd Presidential Debate at Washington University
第二场电视辩论有哪些看点?——矛盾升级MAX
如果说第一场电视辩论是礼尚往来之后，2016美国总统大学电视辩论第二场就
开始来真格的了!
【互挖黑历史】
两位候选人辩论前夕都被曝出有损各自形象的“黑材料”。
《华盛顿邮报》7日公布了特朗普2005年一段用语非常粗俗的谈话录音，内容含有侮辱女性的言论。
“维基解密”网站也随即公开了黑客获取的希拉里华尔街高价演讲部分内容以及希拉里竞选团队一些内部邮件，其中一些言论与希拉里的公开立场不同，可能令民众对希拉里的诚信产生怀疑。
【提问环节】
和第一场电视辩论的提问环节有所不同的是，这一的主持人仅负责提出半数问题，另半数将由盖洛普民意测验中心(Gallup)选出的未决选民提出。
截止小编发稿时候，第一个问题来自场下观众，这位观众问：上次辩论太“激烈”，小孩子要在大人陪同下才能观看，你们怎么看?
【辩论爆点】
特朗普避税疑云
希拉里此前痛批共和党对手特朗普避税多年，称他是冷酷无情的商人，对国家没有贡献，她主张立法规定，参选总统必须公布税表。
希拉里说，特朗普因为巨额亏损而避税，特朗普在与会计师忙于避税，以便继续维持亿万富翁的生活水平时，其他人却备受煎熬。
希拉里的健康问题
希拉里68岁、特朗普70岁，两位高龄候选人的健康状况一直是选战焦点。
他们行程满档，长途旅行不仅压力大，且经常吃得不健康且睡眠不足，对健康都是威胁-虽然他们最近相继公布体检报告，内容都是“无重大疾病，可胜任总统”。
但希拉里在9月出席9·11纪念活动时，因身体不适提前离场。
后来，她对外透露是感染肺炎，但她抱病硬撑、却差点在公开场合昏倒的行为，引发民众热烈讨论候选人的健康问题。
事实上，希拉里还有血栓问题。
特朗普则公布了自己的体检报告，显示并无大碍。
“身高190.5公分、重107公斤，身体质量指数(BMI)偏高约30。
”他的健康检查报告如此显示。
经常分享吃炸鸡、汉堡照片的特朗普自己则觉得自己“跟30岁时没两样”，
特朗普“筑墙”的移民政策
特朗普主张“遣返非法移民、在美墨边界筑高墙”，和希拉里呼吁“放宽移民措施、只遣返暴力的犯罪者和恐怖份子”的政策大相径庭，也可能是这次争辩的重点。
本文来自小站教育留学频道。