SAT作文题目分类
新sat机考阅读题目
新sat机考阅读题目
新SAT考试的阅读部分包括阅读理解和文学分析两个部分，每
部分都有5篇阅读材料，每篇材料后面有几道相关的问题。
阅读理
解部分主要考察考生对于现实世界和历史事件的理解能力，而文学
分析部分则主要考察考生对于文学作品的理解能力。
在阅读理解部分，考生需要通过阅读文章来回答问题，这些文
章可能是来自社会科学、自然科学、历史或文学方面的。
文章内容
可能涉及到科学实验、历史事件、社会现象等，要求考生能够理解
文章的主旨、作者观点、论证方式等。
问题类型包括细节理解、主
旨概括、推断引申、作者态度等。
考生需要通过阅读文章和问题，
准确理解文章的意思，抓住文章的中心思想，合理推断答案。
在文学分析部分，考生需要阅读文学作品的摘录或整篇文章，
对文学作品的结构、语言运用、主题等方面进行分析。
问题类型包
括对文学作品的主题、语言运用、情感色彩等方面进行分析和理解。
考生需要通过阅读文学作品，理解作者的写作意图，把握作品的情
感和主题，正确回答相关问题。
总的来说，新SAT考试的阅读部分要求考生具备较强的阅读理
解能力和文学分析能力，能够准确理解文章或文学作品的意思，抓
住关键信息，理清思路，正确回答相关问题。
考生可以通过多读书、多练习阅读理解题目来提高自己的阅读能力。
托福独立写作题型解析之古今对比题
托福独立写作题型解析之古今对比题有时候托福写作中会考到今昔对比题，有些考生不知道从何下手，下面小编给大家带来托福独立写作题型解析之古今对比题，希望对大家有所帮助！托福独立写作题型之古今对比题古今对比题，It is easier to be well educated today than it is in the past. 现在比过去更容易接受良好的教育。
很多同学会有疑问，这里的过去Past到底是指的什么时候。
其实ETS也没有明确的界定，我们不妨把过去界定为：一个没有现在科技和当今一切让人们生活很便捷的用品的时代。
这类题目跟二选一题一样，也必须要拿自己选择的观点和没有选择的观点进行比较，在比较中体现出来自己所选观点的优越性。
就PPT中这个题目的思路展开：首先：科技的发展让人们能够更便捷的接受教育。
比如，人们现在有各种各样的电子产品(electronic devices)，能够方便我们在网上学习，看国外教授的讲座;甚至在走路、排队的时候，都可以用移动设备(Portable devices)学习;而在过去人们只能去教室听课，形式比较单一。
其次，现在人们经济条件更好了，能够负担的起各种高等教育，甚至出国留学。
而在过去，很多人都上不起学，或者上到一定程度，迫于家庭的经济压力，不得不早早辍学打工挣钱。
【举一反三】Nowadays people are more willing to help the people who they don’t know (for example, giving food and clothes to the people who need them) than they were in the past.首先，科技的发展让人们能够很快的知道哪里有需要帮助的人(social media; smart-phones; instant messaging)其次，人们的经济水平改善了，物质方面有条件去帮助有需要的人。
SAT作文例证材料参考
中智国际SAT教育CIIC SAT WRITING TRAININGSAT写作例证细节参考中智国际教育SAT教学研究中心Marbo （2013.04）SAT作文例子参考中智学生高分版：1. Lance Armstrong｛1｝An America former professional road cyclist who won the Tour de France a record seven consecutive times .However ,no one could imagine that he was diagnosed as having testicular cancer, with a tumor that had metastasized to his brains and lungs .Though the prognosis was originally poor ,he never gives up hopes ,keeping on trying ,thus laying the brilliance of his bicycle career. What we really esteem is his persistence .Only by this could Armstrong become the only person to win seven times.(可用之处：1.persistence 2.one's deep love to career 3.optimistic 4.是否经历苦难才能成功）｛2｝Lance Armstrong ,an America former professional road racing cyclist ,won the Tour de France a record seven consecutive times. Unfortunately, in 2004 reporter Pierre Ballester published a book alleging Armstrong had used performance-enhancing drugs, which leads a heavy blow to his reputation .Facing with such a terrible situation, Armstrong immediately sued for libel according to legislation to prove his innocence. It is by this rapid response that enormously reduces the loss from not only his reputation but also his finance.(可用之处：1.quick response 2.面对批判该如何面对）2. Yao Ming{1} Yao Ming, the best-known basketball player in China, is the most outstanding Asia athlete along NBA history. While at the beginning of his NBA career, several commentators, including Bill Simmons and Dick Vitale, predicted that Yao would fail in the NBA. Also, famous basketball player Charles Barkley make fun on Yao, saying that he would kiss Kenny Smith's ass if Yao scored more than 19 points in one of his rookie-reason games .Under the mocking from medium, Yao is in a great calmness because he clears that if he pays more attention on arguing with them, he would have less time on training. It is by his attitude toward it that wins the respects from others.(可用之处：1.外界的干扰2.快速回应并不好3.付出汗水才会有回报）3. Iraq WarMistakes are easily taken if a proposition has been made just by ones own. For instance, the Iraq War, the war that began in 2003 with the invasion of Iraq by the United States under the administration of President George W Bush. However, about the administration had been argued for a long time. In fact, at the time when the invasion of Iraq first been put forward, most senators were indisagreement .Unfortunately, the President Bush willfully persisted doing that. As the result, such a great loss not only in large casualties but also in a depression of America economy testifies that the Iraq War at the beginning is incorrect. These great losses remind us of not being self-opinionated because usually mistakes can be taken without the help of others’.(可用之处：1.一意孤行会适得其反；2.做事应集合众人的建议)4. Challenger{1} In some cases, a tiny mistake may cause a huge catastrophe. For example, the Space Shuttle Challenger disaster occurred in 1986, when Space Shuttle Challenger broke apart 73 seconds into its flight, leading to the deaths of its seven crew members. The spacecraft disintegrated over the Atlantic Ocean. Disintegration of entire vehicle began after an O-ring seal in its right solid rocket booster (SRB) failed at liftoff .The O-ring failure caused a breach in the SRB joint it sealed, allowing pressurized hot gas from within the solid rocket motor to reach outside and impinge upon the adjacent SRB attachment hardware. It is this tiny mistake that broke up the orbiter. Therefore it is as vital to concern the situation as a whole as it is to emphasis details.(可用之处：1.细节决定成败；2.小的错误会酿成大错）{2}Nothing will suspend the human exploration of the universe. For instance, the Space Shuttle Challenger broke apart 73 seconds into its flight, leading to the deaths of its seven crew members. However, after the accident, NASA continue their project on investigation, hearing , engineering redesign of the SRBs, and other behind-the-senses technical and management reviews ,changes and preparations. In 1988, Space Shuttle Discovery lifted of with a crew of five from Kennedy Space Center, which represented a test of the redesigned boosters, a shift to a more conservative stance on safety. As a matter of fact, not all progress can easily be made under whatever situations while nothing will stop our attempts to explore new knowledge.5. Frank YangFrank Yang, a renowned physicist who won the Nobel Prize in theoretical physical. Although he won the top achievement –Nobel Prize for his non-conservation of parity theory, he struggled with what kind of physics he would choose at the start. When he was a graduate student, his major was experimental physics. At MIT, there was a joke widespread disseminated. It said “you can find Frank wherever has an explosion.” He tried hardly to improve his procedures, and repeated his experiment over and over; he still couldn’t figure out how to solve the problems. After his professor had an access to what he had done, the professor was attracted by his summary talent and steady theoretical physics knowledge. The professor suggested Frank that he should re-choose his major, and switchexperimental physics to theoretical physics. Frank adopted his professor idea. Consequently, he devoted his life to the theoretical which is more suitable for him and acquired the remarkable achievements for science and human. If he had not taken the advice from his professor, he might never stand out or accomplish any valuable things for human.6. BusinessPersistence plays an essential role in determining one's success in business. For example, Chirrs Gardner, the main character in the movie named The Pursuit of Happiness, is trying to be a stockbroker at a company because of the financially breaking. Excellent calculating skills are necessary for a good stockbroker. However, he knows nothing about it. Untalented as he is, he never gives up, squeezing time to finish his work when other competitors take a rest .Also, he always busy working between officers and customers tireless .After 6 months training, it is his persistence in working that guarantees his great success. Therefore, what I want to emphasize is that the individuals without outstanding ability can be successful by being persistent.7. John NashBefore 1950, Adam Smith was respected as “the father of Game Theory”, he wrote a famous book named The Wealth of Nations and demonstrated “perfect competition” which was commonly accepted by people. There is a sentence from the book “Individual ambition serious the common good” which means when each individual pursue his own interests, the benefits of the group will be improved most effectively. However, John Nash, a normal mathematician in Princeton University, created a theory “Nash Equilibrium” whic h laid the foundation of Game Theory in 1950. He doubted the statement from Adam Smith, and he succeeded. John Nash wrote a 28 pages dissertation to argue a new theory. Due to the fact that personal benefits conflict each other, the interest of a group will be harmed. To ensure the interests of whole group, individuals should find equilibrium between the personal and group interests. Consequently, John Nash received the Nobel Prize in economics and fundamentally reformed the arena of economics.8. Henry FordHenry ford, one of the most influential inventors in the history, was always inattentive in school. Once, he and a friend took a watch apart to probe the principle behind it. Angry and upset, the teacher punished him both to stay after school. Their punishment was to stay until they had fixed the watch. But the teacher did not know young ford’s genius, in ten minutes; this mechanical wizard had repaired the watch and was on this way home. It is imagination that invigorated Ford to make a through inquiry about things he did not know. He once plugged up the spout of a teapot and placed it on the fire. Then he waited to see what would happen. The water boiled and, of course, turned to steam. Since the steam had no way to escape, the teapot exploded. The explosion cracked a mirror and broke a window. Ford’s year of curiosity and tinkering paid off, when he built his imagination of horseless carriage into reality, thehistory of transportation was changed forever.9. Susan BoyleSusan Margaret Boyle is a Scottish singer who came to international public attention in 2009 after she appeared as a contestant on Britain's Got Talent. Boyle became known when she sang "I Dreamed a Dream" in the competition. In the final of the third series of the show, Boyle finished in second place. When she appeared on the Britain Got Talent stage for the first time, the audience and judges appeared apprehensive and judgmental of her frumpy appearances. Upon finishing her song, she received a standing ovation from the live audience and unanimous praise from the judges. Simon Cowell is reported to be setting up a contract with Boyle with Sony Music.10. Nick VujicicNick Vujicic is a preacher, a motivational speaker. He regularly gives speeches across subject of disability and hope. Vujicic was born with the Tetra-Amelia disorder: limbless, missing both arms at shoulder level and legless but with two small feet, one of which has two toes. His life was filled with difficulties and hardships. Being bullied at his school, Vujicic grew extremely depressed and started contemplating suicide. After begging God to grow arms and legs, Nick eventually began to realize that his accomplishments were inspirational to many, and began to thank God for being alive. A key turning point in his life was when his mother showed him a newspaper article about a man dealing with a severe disability. This led him to realize he wasn't the only one with major struggles. After graduation from college, he began his travels as a motivational speaker, focusing on the topics on hope and struggle. So far, he has spoken to over two million people so far, in twelve countries on four continents. In his DVD he said: "No Arms, No Legs, No Worries”,”“Attitude Is Altitude"11．Wolfgang Amadeus MozartWolfgang Amadeus Mozart (27 January 1756 – 5 December 1791), was a prolific and influential composer of the Classical era. He composed over 600 works, many acknowledged as pinnacles of symphonic, concert, chamber, piano, operatic, and choral music. He is among the most enduringly popular of classical composers.Mozart showed prodigious ability from his earliest childhood in Salzburg. Already competent on keyboard and violin, he composed from the age of five and performed before European royalty; at 17 he was engaged as a court musician in Salzburg, but grew restless and traveled in search of a better position, always composing abundantly. While visiting Vienna in 1781, he was dismissed from his Salzburg position. He chose to stay in the capital, where he achieved fame but little financial security. During his final years in Vienna, he composed many of his best-known symphonies, concertos, and operas, and portions of the Requiem, which was largely unfinished at the time of Mozart's death. The circumstances of his early death have been much mythologized. He was survived by his wife Constanze and twosons.( 可用之处：天才儿童，重视天赋，培养，个人兴趣)Mozart learned voraciously from others, and developed a brilliance and maturity of style that encompassed the light and graceful along with the dark and passionate. His influence on subsequent Western art music is profound. Beethoven wrote his own early compositions in the shadow of Mozart, of whom Joseph Haydn wrote that "posterity will not see such a talent again in 100 years."( 可用之处：对后人的影响)12.海底捞的成功秘诀：（tips for its success）In year 2010, Haidilao Hot Pot has been in possession of 50 chain stores around China, with a yearly revenue of 600 million Yuan, in which the net profit reaches to 100 million Yuan and the total assets gets to 250 million Yuan. Its great success derives from its impeccable service to customers. “Quality service can enhance the flavor of our food”. This slogan is long held in the company since its start up. Queuing in line for dining proves to be a painful process, but this could be a pleasure in this catering center. The waiter send cards, board games like checkers for all to pass the time; they help to change diapers for babies whose mother are busy-handed; customers are waiting for dinner while they can enjoy TV Dramas, with free fruits provided; they also can surf online in lounge , enjoy a shoeshine service, glasses-cleansening and so on . Diners there feel like home. Its reputation quickly spreads all over china. In doing so, it has ranked first in Hot Pot Section in China whatever the number of customers or the amount of profits.。
sat英语作文
sat英语作文In the 21st century, technology has become an integral partof our daily lives, transforming the way we communicate, work, and learn. The field of education, in particular, has witnessed a significant shift in its approach and methodology due to the advent of various technological tools and platforms. This essay aims to explore the impact oftechnology on modern education, discussing both itsadvantages and challenges.Introduction:The traditional model of education, which primarily relied on the teacher-student interaction in a classroom setting, has evolved to include digital resources and online learning platforms. Technology has not only made education more accessible but also more interactive and personalized.Body Paragraph 1 - Advantages of Technology in Education:One of the most significant advantages of technology in education is the accessibility it provides. Students from remote areas can now attend virtual classes and access educational materials online, which was not possible a few decades ago. Moreover, technology has made learning more engaging through the use of multimedia content, such as videos, animations, and interactive simulations, which caterto different learning styles.Body Paragraph 2 - Personalized Learning:Another benefit of technological integration in education is the ability to provide personalized learning experiences. Adaptive learning software can tailor educational content to the individual needs of each student, ensuring that they learn at their own pace and focus on areas where they need improvement.Body Paragraph 3 - Challenges of Technology in Education: Despite the numerous benefits, the integration of technology in education also presents challenges. One of the primary concerns is the digital divide, where unequal access to technology can exacerbate educational inequalities. Additionally, there is the issue of information overload, where students struggle to discern credible sources from the vast amount of information available online.Body Paragraph 4 - The Role of Teachers in a Technological Era:The role of teachers in the age of technology has also transformed. They are no longer just imparters of knowledge but facilitators of learning, guiding students in navigating the digital landscape. Teachers must also be adept at using technology to enhance their teaching methods and engage students effectively.Conclusion:In conclusion, technology has revolutionized the field of education, offering unprecedented opportunities for learning and growth. While there are challenges to overcome, the potential benefits are immense. It is crucial for educational institutions to address the digital divide and equip bothstudents and teachers with the necessary skills to harness the power of technology effectively. As we continue to embrace technological advancements, the future of education promises to be more inclusive, interactive, and effective.。
英语作文口语考试题目
P131.The writer claims in the first paragraph that, “many people find thatenduring such a harrowing ordeal ultimately changes them for thebetter.” In which sense does she mean by saying “to change for thebetter”, physically or mentally?作者在第一段声称：“许多人发现，忍受这样一种痛苦的折磨最终会使他们变得更好”，从什么意义上说，“从身体上或精神上，为了更好的改变”？2.In the second paragraph, the writer believes in “a built-in capacity toflourish under the most difficult circumstances.” Do you agree withher? Provide examples to elaborate your opinion.在第二段中，作者相信“在最困难的环境下有一种内在的能力，”你同意吗？提供例子阐述你的观点。
3.Do you agree with the statement “What doesn’t kill you actuallymakes you stronger”? Why or why not?你同意这样的说法：“什么不会杀死你反而让你更坚强”？为什么或为什么不？1. Have you had the experience of going through a very difficult situation and coming out as a better person? Or do you know someone who has experienced this?你有过经历一个非常困难的情况，变成一个更好的人的经历？或者你知道有人经历过这个？2. Unlike those who are so unfortunate to have been struck by diseases or who have been forced to go through extreme difficulties in life, some people choose to voluntarily take adventures or challenges, like extreme sports, to push themselves to limits. Why do these people do so and what can they obtain from these experiences?不同于那些不幸被疾病所困扰，或者被迫在生活中度过极端困难的人，有些人选择自愿冒险或挑战，比如极限运动，将自己推向极限。
SAT作文真题+满分范文(高难度)
SAT作文真题+满分范文（高难度）请学生每天挑选一篇文章，翻译成中文然后第二天根据中文，翻译回英文然后找学习顾问检查Assignment: Should we admire heroes but not celebrities? (2007.10)There are people suggesting that we should admire heroes but not celebrities. Admittedly, heroes are famous because they are great people, while a certain number of people become celebrities only because of their undeserved fame. However, this does not mean that all celebrities are not worthy admiration. In fact, there are still a multitude of admirable celebrities who are also amazing people and can bring us enormous positive influence.An excellent example to prove this point is Nicholas James Vujicic, who is not a hero saving a country but a celebrity famous for his unusual experiences. He was born with a rare disorder characterized by the absence of all four limbs but now is a well-known motivational speaker helping thousands of people. While born with no limbs, Vujicic was not defeated by his disability. Instead, he learned to transcend his disability. With his optimism and persistence, he successfully mastered the daily tasks of life, like typing, shaving, brushing teeth and answering the phone, and he even learned to dive and throw tennis balls without limbs. Now he is a man grateful for life and a motivational speaker giving talks to share his stories and to encourage people to be confident and thankful. A tremendous amount of his fans have learned from him optimism, self-confidence, persistence and gratitude, and I am also one of them. Vujicic is now my idol. Whenever I encounter obstacles or failures, I think of him, and then I get courage to move on.Another example of the celebrities worthy of admiration is Steve Jobs, the former CEO of the present extremely successful Apple Inc. Though not a hero saving the whole world, Jobs is, undoubtedly, one of the most renowned and influential people in the human history. His innovation has transformed a variety of fields like computer, music, movie, phone and retailing. Today,people around the world are learning from him. Entrepreneurs learn from him leadership, management and inspiring. Designers learn from him how to create a product that is both functional and beautiful. Students learn from him how to pursue what they are truly passionate about. Ordinary people who are craving for success learn from him the secrets to spectacular achievement. As a world-known celebrity, Jobs is definitely worth admiring. His wisdom and legacy will benefit generations of people.Nicholas James Vujicic and Steve Jobs are only two of the countless examples of the celebrities that worth admiring. Worshiping these famous people is no less valuable than looking up to heroes.(2006.6) Do we tend to accept the opinions of others instead of developing our own independent ideas?It is rare to find an objective and independent viewpoint on style, literature, politics, or any other matter. Many people's opinions are formed through their associations with others. It is our nature to conform; conformity is a force that few can successfully resist. We give in to the human instinct to go along with the crowd and to have its approval.Truly, it is our nature to conform, and human’s long history has witnessed the prevalence of conformity among the general public. However, this does not indicate that we will give in to our nature all the time. In the modern age, with education available to most people and with competition heating up around the globe, people in mounting number are developing their own independent ideas instead of blindly conforming to others.In history, there are abundant examples revealing that most of the remarkable breakthroughs that humans have ever made are invariably attributable to a few individuals’ independent ideas instead of those of the majority. This indicates a significant fact about the majority of our ancestors, that is, a strong tendency to conform to conventional thoughts and wisdom with little independent questioning. For instance, one of the biggest revolution in the field of astronomy was sparked by an individual—Copernicus whosehel iocentric model transformed people’s understanding of the universe. Before Copernicus’ novel idea was popularized, the public at the time tended to conform to the widely held views, believing that Earth was the center of the universe. Had it not been for C opernicus’ novel theory, the public would have been fooled for longer time.However, fortunately, this is no longer the case with modern people who have more and easier accesses to public education. Since modern education highly values critical thinking and independent thinking, people receiving this education are all encouraged and trained to do independent thinking. Hence, now it is not uncommon to see children challenging their parents’ excessive controlling at home, students questioning their teachers in class, and people protesting against unjust laws or policies in the street. These are all the manifestations of modern people’s independent thinking.Another factor contributing to the strong tendency to independent thinking is the rigorous global competition facing the present world. To succeed in this highly competitive world, one has to resort to innovation, which entails independent thinking. Hence, the ability to think independently has become a key element of one’s success. The unprecedented success of Apple Company is the best illustration of this. Thanks to its exceptional creativity, Apple not only defeats all his rivals but also brings us such amazing products as iPad and iPhone. In a word, the pressure of living in the world rife with competition is forcing people to nurture their independent thinking ability so that they can innovate and then succeed.In the past, humans were subject to conformity, but it is not the case now. The widespread public education and the competition around the world are shaping the strong tendency for people to think independently rather than just blindly following others’ steps.Assignment: When some people win, must others lose, or are there situations in which everyone wins? (2009.6)It is often assumed that when someone wins, there must be people losing. Indeed, there are some people whose winning is at the cost of the happiness of others. However, this does not mean that there is no situation in which everyone wins. In fact, when we cooperate with others, there will be a win-win situation.An excellent example to illustrate this point is the international cooperation among countries around the world to deal with the deteriorating global warming. Scientists and environmentalists have warned us that our planet is facing a warming climate globally, which will cause a series of problems like ice melting in Antarctic areas, rising of sea levels, desertification and so on. These problems will severely threaten humans’survival in the near future. Cognizant of the possible catastrophic consequences of global warming, nations around the world are trying to reach an agreement to curb global warming. While the international cooperation concerning this issue is not going on smoothly, once the international agreement is settled down, every nation will benefit from this joint effort. Once our planet is exempt from the threat of global warming, each nation will be protected. In this case, every nation is a winner. In other words, this international cooperation creates a win-win situation.Apart from international cooperation, in business world, it is also not uncommon to see win-win situations. A typical example is the partnership between Apple Company and such top record companies as Time Warner. When Jobs unveiled iPod in 2001, he sensed that the music service provided by record companies at the time was far from satisfactory. Nor were the record companies themselves satisfied with the music service, for there was massive piracy hurting their profits. Hence, to improve music service, Jobs and his team created the iTunes Store and persuaded the top record companies at the time such as Warner Music and Universal Music Group to sell music in the iTunes Store. In this successful partnership, both Apple Company and the record companies were winners, for the rising popularity of the iTunes Store not only immensely sparked the sales of iPod, but also stimulated the sales of the music of those record companies, helping them sell a million songs in six days. Now the iTunes Store it has been the most popular music vendor in the world since 2010. The spectacular success of the iTunes Store is just another example of win-win situation.One’s winning does not have to occur at the expense of others’ success or happiness. As shown in the above two examples, when there is successful cooperation, there will be a win-win situation.Assignment: Can common sense be trusted and accepted, or should it be questioned? (2009.6)Common sense is the product of society’s norms during a certain time frame, prone to reinventing itself at the change of an opinion. Such “common sense” cannot be the natural basis of all decisions and must be questioned, as it is contingent upon fickle norms.Millennia ago, the Egyptians believed that thought and reasons were formed inside the heart, not the brain. Thus, during the process of embalmment, they threw away the brain while carefully preserving the heart in an assortment of herbs. It was common sense, they thought, that one’s center of knowledgeshould rest in the center of the body. We know now that what they believed to be “common sense” was in fact flawed and incorrect, yet at the time, Egypt was the most technologically advanced nation on the planet and its beliefs were thought to be the most correct. By ancient Egypt’s e xample, we can clearly see that one era’s common sense may become utter nonsense with the passing of time.Centuries ago, the Chinese believed that their emperor was divine, a son of the heavens who had to be respected and worshipped at all times. It seems ridiculous now, that any mere mortal could be seen as a divinity, yet religious common sense of the 10th century persuaded all citizens that it was noble and necessary to worship their ruler. Their common sense depended on the religious beliefs of their time – beliefs we now perceived to be incorrect and even somewhat silly. Common sense, it seems, does not always confer common sensibility.Decades ago, Americans believed that it was common sense to spread a certain pesticide in their fields – because who could want bugs preying on potentially profitable wheat, corn, or rice products? The pesticide they used was DDT, and years later, we now know that what Americans of the mid 1900s believed to be beneficial common sense translated into environmental harm and ecosystem destruction.From the scientific beliefs of ancient Egyptians to the religious and agricultural “common sense” of the Chinese and Americans, it is evident that common sense is quite common but not necessarily sensible.。
SAT作文题目大全
SAT作文题目汇总SAT ESSAY QUESTIONS COLLECTION1.OG Practice Test 1: Is there always another explanation or another point of view?2.OG Practice Test 2: Is deception ever justified?3.OG Practice Test 3: What motivates people to change?4.OG Practice Test 4: Do changes that make our lives easier not necessarily make them better?5.OG Practice Test 5: Is conscience a more powerful motivator than money, fame, or power?6.OG Practice Test 6: Can success be disastrous?7.OG Practice Test 7: Do we need other people in order to understand ourselves?8.OG Practice Test 8: Is the world changing for the better?9.OG Practice Test 9: Do you think that ease does not challenge us and that we need adversityto help us discover who we are?10.OG Practice Test 10: Should heroes be defined as people who say what they think when weourselves lack the courage to say it?11.OC 1: Is the way something seems to be not always the same as it actually is?12.OC 2: Are bad choices and good choices equally likely to have negative consequences?13.OC 3: Do people learn who they are only when they are forced into action?14.OC 4: Are people’s lives the result of the choices they make?15.OC 5: Do closed doors make us creative?16.OC 6: Do people have to be highly competitive in order to succeed?17.CB-1: Is style more important than substance?18.CB-2: Can what we value be determined only by what we sacrifice?19.CB-3: Is perfection something to be admired or sought after?20.CB-4: What makes a person wise?21.(2005.3) Is the opinion of the majority — in government or in any other circumstances — apoor guide?22.(2005.3) Is creativity needed more than ever in the world today?23.(2005.3) Are people better at making observations, discoveries, and decisions if they remainneutral and impartial?24.(2005.3) Is a person responsible, through the example he or she sets, for the behavior of otherpeople?25.(2005.5) Do people depend on work—whether it is a job, schoolwork, or volunteer work — todetermine what their daily activities and interactions with others should be?26.(2005.5) Does progress depend on people with new ideas rather than on people whose ideasare based on the current way of doing things?27.(2005.5) Are people afraid to speak out against authority, whether the authority is anindividual, a group, or a government?28.(2005.5) Does worrying to o much about other people’s opinions prevent us from seeing thingsclearly?29.(2005.6) Do memories hinder or help people in their effort to learn from the past and succeedin the present?30.(2005.6) Do people put too much emphasis on learning practical skills?31.(2005.6) Should schools help students understand moral choices and social issues?32.(2005.6) Do newspapers, magazines, television, radio, movies, the Internet, and other mediadetermine what is important to most people?33.(2005.10) Is success in life earned or do people succeed because they are lucky?34.(2005.10) Is society’s admiration for famous people beneficial or harmful?35.(2005.10) Do we live in a time when people do not engage in serious thinking?36.(2005.10) Should people make more of an effort to keep some things private?37.(2005.11) Should our perceptions of beauty be influenced by the perceptions of beauty ofother people?38.(2005.11) Is praising others, even if the praise is excessive or undeserved, a necessary part oflife?39.(2005.11) Is conflict helpful?40.(2005.11) Has the acquisition of money and possessions replaced more meaningful ways ofmeasuring our achievements?41.(2005.12) Are leaders necessarily people who are most capable of leadership?42.(2005.12) Is knowledge of the past no longer useful for us today?43.(2005.12) Is it necessary to limit or put restrictions on freedom of thought and expression?44.(2005.12) Do the benefits of scientific and technological developments come at the cost ofundesirable changes to people’s lives?45.(2006.1) Do people accomplish more when they are allowed to do things in their own way?46.(2006.1) Is it necessary to make mistakes, even when doing so has negative consequences forother people?47.(2006.1) Can any obstacle or disadvantage be turned into something good?48.(2006.1) Are all important discoveries the result of focusing on one subject?49.(2006.4) Is it best not to change our ideas, opinions, or behaviors?50.(2006.4) Is our ability to change ourselves unlimited, or are there limits on our ability to makeimportant changes in our lives?51.(2006.4) What do you think motivates people to do their best?52.(2006.4) Should each individual decide what and how to learn?53.(2006.5) Are we free to make our own decisions or are we limited in the choices we canmake?54.(2006.5) Would the world be a better place if everyone always told the complete truth?55.(2006.5) Does the success of a community—whether it is a class, a team, a family, a nation, orany other group—depend upon people's willingness to limit their personal interests?56.(2006.5) Does the truth change depending on how people look at things?57.(2006.6) Does a strong commitment to technological progress cause a society to neglect othervalues, such as education and the protection of the environment?58.(2006.6) Are established rules too limited to guide people in real-life situations?59.(2006.6) Is it sometimes better to take risks than to follow a more reasonable course of action?60.(2006.6) Do we tend to accept the opinions of others instead of developing our ownindependent ideas?61.(2006.10) Do people achieve more success by cooperation than by competition?62.(2006.10) Is it important to question the ideas and decisions of people in positions ofauthority?63.(2006.10) Does true learning only occur when we experience difficulties?64.(2006.10) Can deception—pretending that something is true when it is not—sometimes havegood results?65.(2006.11) Do we put too much value on the ideas or actions of individual people?66.(2006.11) Can books and stories about characters and events that are not real teach usanything useful?67.(2006.11) Can people achieve success only if they aim to be perfect?68.(2006.11) Do success and happiness depend on the choices people make rather than on factorsbeyond their control?69.(2006.12) Are people more likely to be productive and successful when they ignore theopinions of others?70.(2006.12) Is it better for people to be realistic or optimistic?71.(2006.12)Is it important to try to understand people’s motivations before judging theiractions?72.(2006.12) Is happiness something over which people have no control, or can people choose tobe happy?73.(2007.1) Should people take more responsibility for solving problems that affect theircommunities or the nation in general?74.(2007.1) Is it more important to do work that one finds fulfilling or work that pays well?75.(2007.1) Is education primarily the result of influences other than school?76.(2007.1) Is it better to change one’s attitude than to change one’s circumstances?77.(2007.3) Is it more valuable for people to fit in than to be unique and different?78.(2007.3) Is it best to have low expectations and to set goals we are sure of achieving?79.(2007.3) Do we really benefit from every event or experience in some way?80.(2007.5) Should modern society be criticized for being materialistic?81.(2007.5) Can knowledge be a burden rather than a benefit?82.(2007.5) Is it always best to determine one’s own views of right and wrong, or can we benefitfrom following the crowd?83.(2007.5) Do circumstances determine whether or not we should tell the truth?84.(2007.6) Are people more likely to be happy if they focus on goals other than their ownhappiness?85.(2007.6) Is there a value in celebrating certain individuals as heroes?86.(2007.6) Have modern advancements truly improved the quality of peo ple’s lives?87.(2007.6) Do people truly benefit from hardship and misfortune?88.(2007.10) Is identity something people are born with or given, or is it something people createfor themselves?89.(2007.10) Can people ever be truly original?90.(2007.10) Do people achieve greatness only by finding out what they are especially good atand developing that attribute above all else?91.(2007.10) Should we admire heroes but not celebrities?92.(2007.11) Does having a large number of options to choose from make people happy?93.(2007.11) Is it always necessary to find new solutions to problems?94.(2007.11) Is the main value of the arts to teach us about the world around us?95.(2007.11) Is criticism —judging or finding fault with the ideas and actions of others —essential for personal well-being and social progress?96.(2007.12) Do people need to “unlearn”, or reject, many of their assumptions and ideas?97.(2007.12) Should people choose one of the two opposing sides of an issue, or is the truthusually found “in the middle”?98.(2007.12) Do images and impressions have too much of an effect on people?99.(2007.12) Is the most important purpose of technology today different from what it was in thepast?100.(2008.1) Is it always better to be original than to imitate or use the ideas of others?101.(2008.1) Is the effort involved in pursuing any goal valuable, even if the goal is not reached? 102.(2008.1) Should people always prefer new things, ideas, or values to those of the past? 103.(2008.1) Is there any value for people to belong only to a group or groups with which they something in common?104.(2008.3) Are organizations or group most successful when their members pursue individual wishes and goals?105.(2008.3) Should people always be loyal?106.(2008.3) Do people learn more from losing than from winning?107.(2008.5) Are there benefits to be gained from avoiding the use of modern technology, even when using it would make life easier?108.(2008.5) Do people place too much emphasis on winning?109.(2008.5) Are people’s actions motivated primarily by a desire for power ov er others?110.(2008.5) Do incidents from the past continue to influence the present?111.(2008.6) Does fame bring happiness, or are people who are not famous more likely to be happy?112.(2008.6) Is it better for a society when people act as individuals rather than copying the ideas and opinions of others?113.(2008.6) Are widely held views often wrong, or are such views more likely to be correct? 114.(2008.6) Are the actions of individuals more valuable than the actions of groups or teams? 115.(2008.10) Is compromise always the best way to resolve a conflict?116.(2008.10) Are the decisions made quickly just as good as decisions made slowly and carefully?117.(2008.10) Can a group of people function effectively without someone being in charge? 118.(2008.10) Do actions, not words, r eveal a person or group’s rule attitudes and intentions? 119.(2008.11) Do all established traditions deserve to remain in existence?120.(2008.11) Do people need to compare themselves with others in order to appreciate what they have?121.(2008.11) Is it necessary for people to combine their efforts with those of others in order to be the most effective?122.(2008.11) Should society limit people’s exposure to some kinds of information or forms of expression?123.(2008.12) Is persistence more important than ability in dete rmining a person’s success? 124.(2008.12) Is acting an essential part of everyday life?125.(2008.12) Can people have too much enthusiasm?126.(2008.12) Do we only help others in order to help ourselves in some way?127.(2009.1) Does planning interfere with creativity?128.(2009.1) Do highly accomplished people achieve more than others mainly because they expect more of themselves?129.(2009.1) Should people change their decisions when circumstances change, or is it best for them to stick with their original decisions?130.(2009.1) Is striving to achieve a goal always the best course of action, or should people give up if they are not making progress?131.(2009.3) Does being ethical make it hard to be successful?132.(2009.3) Is it sometimes necessary to be impolite?133.(2009.3) Should we lim it our use of the term “courage” to acts in which people risk their own well-being for the sake of others or to uphold a value?134.(2009.5) Should we pay more attention to people who are older and more experienced than we are?135.(2009.5) Should people let their feelings guide them when they make important decisions? 136.(2009.5) Has today's abundance of information only made it more difficult for us to understand the world around us?137.(2009.5) Are people best defined by what they do?138.(2009.6) Do we benefit from learning about the flaws of people we admire and respect? 139.(2009.6) Is it best for people to accept who they are and what they have, or should people always strive to better themselves?140.(2009.6) Can common sense be trusted and accepted, or should it be questioned?141.(2009.6) When some people win, must others lose, or are there situations in which everyone wins?142.(2009.10) Is using humor the best way to approach difficult situations and problems?143.(2009.10) Does everyone, even people who choose to live alone, need a network or family? 144.(2009.10) Do books, newspapers, and other media focus too much on bad news?145.(2009.10) Is it better for people to know everything they can about something before taking action or should they act first and get more information later?146.(2009.11) Are the values of a society most clearly revealed in its popular culture?147.(2009.11) Do society and other people benefit when individuals pursue their own goals? 148.(2009.11) Is it better for people to stop trying when they feel certain they will not succeed? 149.(2009.11) Should new ideas be questioned?150.(2009.12) Is it easier now to form friendships than ever before?151.(2009.12) Should people give up their privacy in exchange for convenience of free services? 152.(2009.12) Is it better for people to work out their own ideas on a problem or issue before learning how others have approached it?153.(2009.12) Is it a mistake to believe something simply an authority that it is true?154.(2010.1) Do the demands of others tend to make people more productive than they would be without such pressure?155.(2010.1) Should all people’s opinions be valued equally, or should only informed opinions be taken seriously?156.(2010.1) Should books portray the world as it is or as it should be?157.(2010.1) Do people make the greatest discoveries by exploring what is unfamiliar to them or by paying close attention to what seems familiar?158.(2010.3) Should leaders of a country or group be judged by different standards?159.(2010.3) Is moderation an obstacle to achievement and success?160.(2010.3) Does society put too much emphasis on working hard?161.(2010.5) Do small decisions often have major consequences?162.(2010.5) Is talking the most effective and satisfying way of communicating with others? 163.(2010.5) Should the government be responsible for making sure that people lead healthylives?164.(2010.5) Do people succeed by emphasizing their differences from others?165.(2010.6)Do people tend to get along better with people who are very different from them or with those who are like them?166.(2010.6)Is solitude—spending time alone—necessary for people to achieve their most important goals?167.(2010.6)Should ordinary people be considered heroes, or should the term "hero" be reserved for extraordinary people?168.(2010.6)Is it wrong to use the word "courage" to describe behaviors that are ordinary or self-interested?169.(2010.10) Is it absolutely necessary for people to study the creative arts?170.(2010.10) Is it important for people to spend time outdoors and to learn to appreciate the natural environment?171.(2010.10) Should originality always be more highly praised than conformity?172.(2010.10) Should people adapt to their new surroundings, or should they refuse to change? 173.(2010.11) Do people put much emphasis on doing things by and for themselves?174.(2010.11) Is imagination less valuable than facts and objectivity?175.(2010.11) Is a group of people more likely than an individual leader to bring about significant change?176.(2010.11) Would it be better if people were more accepting of mistakes?177.(2010.12) Is it possible to be a hero in the modern world?178.(2010.12) Does the way that information is communicated today result in people learning less than ever before?179.(2010.12) Do temporary or otherwise imperfect solutions to problems only create more serious problems?180.(2010.12) Is it better for people to have limited choices?181.(2011.1) Is an idealistic approach less valuable than a practical approach?182.(2011.1) Is it better for people to learn from others than to learn on their own?183.(2011.1) Do people put too much importance on getting every detail right on a project or task?184.(2011.1) Does the process of doing something matter more than the outcome?185.(2011.5) Do rules and limitations contribute to a person's happiness?186.(2011.5) If people worked less, would they be more creative and active during their free time?187.(2011.5) Does every individual have an obligation to think seriously about important matters, even when doing so may be difficult?188.(2011.5) Is real success achieved only by people who accomplish goals and solve problemson their own?189.(2011.6) Does every achievement bring with it new challenges?190.(2011.6) Does accepting the values of a group allow people to avoid taking responsibility for their own thoughts and actions?191.(2011.6) Do groups that encourage nonconformity and disagreement function better than those that discourage it?192.(2011.6) Are people fair when faced with unfairness?193. (2011.10) Do people need discipline to achieve freedom?194. (2011.10) Do people have to pay attention to mistakes in order to make progress?195. (2011.10) Are people overly influenced by unrealistic claims and misleading images?196. (2011.10) Are people better off if they do not listen to criticism?197. (2011.11) Should individuals take responsibility for issues and problems that do not affect them directly?198. (2011.11) Is it often difficult for people to determine what is the right thing to do?199. (2011.11) Are the consequences of people's actions more important than the motives behind the actions?200. (2011.11) Are optimistic, confident people more likely than others to make changes in their lives?挑战权威：1,3,7,10,21,22,26,27,28,29,34,35,38,39,42,43,53,56,59,60,62,69,76,77,82,85,89,91,93,95,96,98,10 0,102,110,112,113,115,122,132,134,135,138,140,141,149,153,155,157,158,164,170,172,174,182, 185,189,190,191,195,196,198,199追求完美：13,16,17,19,23,25,30,33,45,48,49,51,66,67,68,72,78,88,90,97,105,118,123,128,129,130,133,137,1 42,148,159,160,161,167,176,179,181,183,186,187,193个人价值观：5,14,18,20,24,31,37,40,74,84,109,111,120,125,131,147,168,177,192,197失败与成功：9,15,46,47,52,58,50,63,70,75,79,87,101,106,108,116,127,139,145,154,184,194,200科技恶果：4,6,8,12,32,44,57,73,80,81,86,92,99,107,119,136,144,150,151,162,163,171,178,180白色谎言：2,11,36,54,64,71,83,94,,124,146,156,169合作优势：41,55,61,65,103,104,114,117,121,126,143,152,165,166,173,175,188备注：当题目适用于多个题型时自动附给最常见的题型，如当遇到有挑权和合作都可写的例子时，自动归给挑权；同样遇到挑权和完美都可写的例子时也归类到挑权中。
sat作文字数要求
sat作文字数要求篇一：sat写作开头段也有字数要求SaT写作开头段也有字数要求这里要提醒大家的是SaT写作开头段也有字数要求，希望各位考生好好备考，仅供大家参考借鉴。
SaT作文开头段字数要求，一般写5行以内吧~3句为佳，并且算上审题,立意,想例子,想内容之类的加起来一共只能用最多5分钟,要不以后的例子就写不完了，所以开头只能写5行之内,否则时间过于紧张SaT写作的字数要求一般来说，sat作文字数控制在350-450字就已经很好了，只要达到这个范围内基本上就不会对你的分数产生任何负面的影响，只有一段字数的论文是不可能在SaT的考试中拿到高分的，这是因为只有一节段的论文是很难发挥出作者的对考题的分析和对例子的讲析。
当然如果你的字数少于300字的话，那么很有可能对你的作文产生负面影响，但是只要是300字以上就问题不大了。
实际上，很多考生怕sat作文字数不够影响自己的得分，所以，都是往多了写，但是sat作文字数也并非越多越好，当作文达到500字的时候，绝对已经高于SaT所要求的字数了，但是再写多已经不会提升你的分数了，这个时候不如好好修改一下已经写过的文章，或者把写过的文章好好润润色，加入一些强调句式或者倒装句，这样会使自己的文章看上去更有生气。
SaT写作考试虽然没有字数要求，但是根据考生的SaT作文成绩，建议考生们在SaT考试中写出大概3到5个节段的文章，考生们可以在第一段里写出一个吸引人眼球的简介，接着是一个解析清楚的body，最后跟着一个干净利落的结尾。
SaT写作开头段也有字数要求，对考生来说，SaT作文看似没有字数要求，但实际上你只有写到一定的字数才可能表达清楚文章的意思，我们还是要给自己定一个标准，不要写得太多，也不要只有一段文字，思路清晰，内容完整，除此之外，提醒考生在备考的时候注意总结SaT素材。
篇二：SaT作文考试字数的问题新航道英语SaT频道为各位考生整理了SaT作文考试字数的问题，供考生们参考使用，更多SaT辅导请继续关注杭州新航道SaT频道。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
科技类1 Assignment: are all important discoveries the result of focusing on one subject?2 Can knowledge be a burden rather than a benefit?3 Are there benefits to be gained from avoiding the use of modern technology, even when using it would make life easier?4 Has today’s abundance of information only made it more difficult for us to understand the world around us?5 Do people make the greatest discoveries by exploring what is unfamiliar to them or by paying close attention to what seems familiar?成功失败类1Assignment: Do people accomplished more when they are allowed to do things in their own way?2Assignment: Is it necessary to make mistakes, even when doing so has negative consequences for other people?3can any obstacle or disadvantage be turned into something good?4Assignment: Does the success of a community-whether it is a class, a team, a family, a nation, or any other group-depend upon people’s willingness to limit their personal interests?5Do people achieve more success by cooperation than by competition?6Do people achieve greatness only byfinding out what they are especially good at and developing that attribute above all else?7Do people place too much emphasis on winning?8Can a group of people function effectively without someone being in charge?9Do highly accomplished people achieve more than others mainly because they expect more of themselves?10Is striving to achieve a goal always the best course of action, or should people give up if they are not making progress? 11Do the demands of others tend to make people more productive than they would be with such pressure?12 Do people succeed by emphasizing their difference from other people?决定1Assignment: Are we free to make our own decisions or are we limited in the choices we can make?2Is it always best to determine one’s own views of right and wrong, or can we benefit from following the crowd?3Do decisions from the past continue to influence the present?4Are decisions made quickly just as good as decisions made slowing and carefully? 5Should people change their decisions when a circumstance change, or is it best for them to stick with their original decisions?6Should people let their feelings guide them when they make important decisions?7Is better for people to know everything they can about something before taking action, or should they act first and get more information later?8Do small decisions often have major consequences?真相谎言类: Would the world be a better place if everyone always told complete truth?Can deception-pretending that something is true when it is not-sometimes have good results?Do circumstances determine whether ornot we should tell the truth?变化类Does the truth change depending on how people look at things?挑战权威Is it important to question the ideas and decisions of people in position of authority?学习类Does true learning only occur when we experience difficulties?Should people always prefer new things, ideas or values to those of the past?Is it absolutely necessary for people to study the creative art?Can people ever be truly original?Is it always better to be original than to imitate or use the ideas of others?工作Is it more important to do work that one finds fulfilling or work that pays well?人生观Is it better to change one’s attitude than to change one’s circumstances?Should people take more responsibility for solving problems that affect their communities of the nation in general?Should modern society be criticized for being materialistic?Can people ever be truly original?Is identity something people are born with or given, or is it something people createfor themselves?Is the effort involved in pursuing any goal valuable, even if the goal is not reached?Should we admire heroes but not celebrities?Is there any value for people to belong only to a group or groups with which they have something in common?Are people’s actions motivated primarily by a desire for power over others?Is compromise always the best way to resolve a conflict?Do actions, not words, reveal a person or group’s true attitude and intentions?Does plan interfere with creativity? Should we pay more attention to people who are older and more experienced than we are?Are people best defined by what they do? Is using humor the best way to approach difficult situations and problems?Does everyone, even people who choose to live alone, need a network or family? Should all people’s opinion be valued equally, or should only informed opinions be taken seriously?Is talking the most effective and satisfying way of communicating with others?Is it important for people to spend time outdoors and to learn to appreciate their natural environment?政府Should the government be responsible for making sure that people lead healthy lives?媒体Do books, newspapers, and other media focus too much on bad news?Should books portray the world as it is or as it should be?。