Guidelines Stop TB Partnership Home Page指南遏制结核病伙伴关系主页

Year 1: Oct 2019 - Sept 2019
Year 2: Oct 2019 - Sept 2009
1. TA to countries
Deliverables
& outcome 2. Capacity
building
3.coordination of support
116 missions to 65 countries by 10 partners (WHO, Union, KNCV, GLRA)
Develop TBTEAM web tool, checking validity and accuracy of data provided Prepare global TA Plan based on the Global Stop TB Plan and TB needs Focus on Global Fund proposal and National Strategy Application preparation
108 missions to 58 countries by 15 partners (WHO, CDC, GIP ESTHER, Project
Hope, RIT/JATA, KNCV, GLRA, Union)
PSM plan, M&E plan, work plan revision, plans and guidelines for implementation of Stop TB Components, RCC Grant signature (phase 1 and 2), Grant rating (A, A1, A2, B1, etc)
Rationale for TBTEAM
DOTS Stop TB Strategy demand for technical assistance financial resources in countries number of partners numbers of missions to countries, need for coordination
Regional TBTEAM: 6 WHO regional offices
Central TBTEAM: 2.5 staff
TBTEAM partners: 35*
Financial support: USAID PEPFAR, WHO core funds, French Cooperation, national funds
activities in 2009
2009 (nov)
Missions in TBTEAM web
1152
GF GLC
Open request met TBTEAM partners Experts roster
48/55 (87%) 35 209
GDF
N-TBTEAM
32
TA plan
>25
217 150
Checking validity and accuracy of data provided in the TBTEAM webpage
Entering upcoming Missions & Events (confirmed and tentative) and open requests for technical assistance
4 workshops on grant negotiation and implementation of R7 grants
3 workshops on grant negotiation and implementation of R8 grants
2 GDF workshop on management/PSM
National TBTEAM, a response to country needs
Cancun, 4 December 2009
Pierre-Yves Norval, Stop TB Department World Health Organization Geneva
Outline
Rationale TBTEAM PEPFAR/TBTEAM Achievements and next steps
Provide feed back on conducted TA
Central TBTEAM – What it does
Develop TBTEAM strategy - align and harmonize TA at country level across all Stop TB components
TBTEAM – What it is
A mechanism for coordination of technical assistance to countries (TB TEchnical Assistance Mechanism)
National TBTEAM: 32 in 2009; 50 planned in 2019
•Armenia* •Bangladesh* •Benin •Bhutan •Burkina* •China •Cote d’Ivoire •DPR Korea •Gambia
•Guinea •Guinea B. •India* •Lao PDR •Macedonia* •Maldives* •Mongolia •Myanmar •Nepal*
Global and regional TBTEAM
Global and regional TBTEAM
Achievements in 2009
Increased buy in of TBTEAM as the TA coordination mechanism by countries, TBTEAM partners and regional TBTEAM. Increased number of N-TBTEAM and TA plan (but below targets)
Identify the National TBTEAM focal point(s); supervises National TBTEAM
Encourages National TBTEAM to: 1.upload yearly national TA plan into the TBTEAM webpage; 2. generate regional TA plan; 3. contribute to a regional Stop TB Plan based on regional gap analysis
•Niger •Papua NG* •Russia •Senegal •Sri Lanka* •Thailand* •Timor Leste* •Togo •Viet Nam
* N-TBTEAM with data entry at country level
Regional TBTEAM – What it does
how to use feedback information – Link with TB roster
PEPFAR/TBTEAM grant $3M/year
Aim: Improve Global Fund TB grant performance and relieve bottlenecks to grant implementation
GLI
TA fቤተ መጻሕፍቲ ባይዱed back
20 (<2%)
GF impl.proposal
94 90 81
54
46
46
43
39
39
37
18
14
12
11
9
8
7
5
7
4
MDR Drug
managmt
M&E
OtherManagemt
Program
ACDSiaMgnosPisr/olagbram review
TB/HIV Infection
National TBTEAM – What it does
One or two TBTEAM focal person(s) within existing body (NTP, ICC, TWG, STB Partnership, CCM) as secretariat for development of National TA Plan incorporated into annual TB work plan, National Stop TB Plan, Global Fund proposal preparation and grant negotiation (PSM, M&E, budget), grant
Ensure that meetings of existing N-TBTEAM take place quarterly, with participation of all stakeholders (NTP, civil society, private sector, etc.)
Use TBTEAM web tool to meet TA needs in addition to discussing and requesting support from usual partners
Currently used
– TA feedback by beneficiary since few months
under development
– Anonymous beneficiary satisfaction questionnaire – Measurement of performance against TOR – Defining standards – good TA practice – Technical committee (major Partners) to reach consensus on