中外教育体系对比
比较中国和德国的教育体系的异同?

比较中国和德国的教育体系的异同?教育体系作为一个国家的重要组成部分,在不同的国家之间存在着很大的差异,本文将以中国和德国两个国家的教育体系为例进行比较,一起来看看它们的异同点吧。
一、教育政策的制定中国:教育体系在中国属于国家的重要部分,政治和经济因素对其发展产生了很大的影响。
中国政府认为,教育是国家发展的基础,因此实施了长期的教育规划,促进了教育的普及和发展。
德国:德国政府高度重视教育,并制定了包括小学、中学和高中在内的全面的教育法规。
德国政府不仅提供教育经费支持,还实施了有针对性的教育政策,促进了教育的发展。
二、教育内容的差异中国:中国的教育内容注重基础知识的教授,包括语文、数学、英语等学科,强调文化传承和科学素质的培养。
此外,体育教育、美术教育也占据一席之地,但是培养学生独立思考的教育还有待加强。
德国:德国教育内容注重培养学生的思维能力,教育体系中有很多启发性教育的内容,也非常注重社交和文化交流。
除了进行传统的学科教学之外,德国还注重培养学生的实践技能和创新能力,这样可以更好地适应未来的社会发展。
三、学校教育的组织形式中国:中国的教育主要是通过中小学和大学进行,学生是根据教育规划的年龄段分别进入小学、中学和高中的,然后可以选择进入大学深造。
教育资源集中在大城市,农村地区的学生学习条件相对较差。
德国:德国教育主要流程与中国类似,但是德国的教育体系相对多元化,学生可以选择自己感兴趣的学科进行学习,大学是德国教育体系的重要组成部分,学科设置齐全,为德国年轻人的未来提供了不断扩大的发展空间。
四、师资力量不同中国:中国注重对学生的纪律和礼貌教育,对教师的要求也相对较高,教师队伍建设一直是教育部门着力加强的一个方向。
不过,由于中国师资力量的薪资体系还存在不足,很多教师有转行的想法。
德国:德国的师资力量相对更加优秀,德国教师队伍中拥有很多高素质的人才,受过良好的职业培训,对专业知识都非常熟悉。
德国的教育界发展态势较好,教育工作相当受欢迎,这意味着教育积极分子源源不断。
中西方教育文化差异与体系对比

中西方教育文化差异与体系对比随着全球化的不断深入,中西方之间的交流与互动日益频繁。
然而,由于文化、历史和政治等多方面原因,中西方在不同领域存在明显的差异。
本文将聚焦于教育领域,探讨中西方教育文化差异与体系对比。
一、教育观念的差异西方国家强调个性化发展,注重培养学生的创造力和独立思考能力。
教学方法也比较灵活,教师不仅在知识传授上扮演重要角色,还需要充当学生的辅导员和指导者。
而在中国,教育被看作是一种传统文化的承传,注重学生在纪律、秩序和道德规范上的培养。
这就使得中国的教育体系更加强调学生的纪律性和知识掌握程度,而忽略了学生们的创造性和创新能力。
二、学科设置的差异在中西方教育体系中,学科的设置也存在着巨大的差异。
西方国家的学科体系更加全面,学科种类多、难度不一。
而中国的学科体系则更加注重掌握主要的科学基础,这也使得中国学生更容易在基础科学领域获得好成绩。
不过,由于中国学科设置比较单一,学生对其他领域的掌握能力相对较弱。
三、考试制度的差异在中国,高考是一个非常重要的标志,对于学生决定自己的未来方向有重大影响。
高考制度体现了中国的考试教育,注重的是学生的应试能力和标准化测试成绩。
而在西方国家,高中生的学术表现并不能完全决定他们的发展方向。
除了成绩,西方国家还注重学生的兴趣、课外活动等多方面因素,因此学生可以根据自己的兴趣选择自己感兴趣的学科领域进行深度研究和学习。
四、师资队伍的差异在中国,在很长的时间里教育部门财政紧张,师资队伍的整体素质无法得到保证。
但是,中国教育资源的紧张并没有使得中国的教育体系逐渐衰弱下去,反而使得教师们为了赚取生活费更加努力工作。
而在西方国家,许多学区都拥有雄厚的财政支持,教师的工资和待遇要优于中国。
同时,西方国家教育系统注重教育的跨学科和应用性,因此,教师的专业素养要求更高,而且教师对于教育的热情和投入态度也被严格要求。
总之,中西方教育文化差异和体系的对比,不仅可以帮助我们更好地了解两个文化的不同之处,而且可以为我们提供一个更全面、深入的教育观点。
国外三大音乐教育体系中的音乐教育思想对比

国外三大音乐教育体系中的音乐教育思想对比音乐教育是培养学生音乐素养和音乐能力的一门学科,它在国外的发展历史悠久,有着丰富的教育理念和教学方法。
不同的国家和地区对音乐教育的理念和方法也有着不同的理解和实践。
本文将分析美国、英国和德国三个国家的音乐教育体系及其对教育思想的影响,以期为音乐教育的发展提供参考。
首先我们来看美国的音乐教育体系。
美国的音乐教育始于19世纪,当时音乐教育主要是在教堂和学校进行的,以培养学生的宗教信仰和音乐能力为主要目的。
在20世纪,随着音乐教育逐渐成为一门专业学科,美国的音乐教育开始注重学科理论的研究和实践教学的创新。
美国的音乐教育体系包括学校音乐教育、社会音乐教育和专业音乐教育三大部分,它们相互交织,相互传承,构成了一个完整的音乐教育体系。
在音乐教育思想方面,美国的音乐教育强调音乐素养的培养和音乐技能的提高,并将音乐的多元文化特征和社会意义纳入到教育内容中去。
美国的音乐教育还非常注重学生的创造性发展,鼓励学生从课堂走向舞台,参与各种音乐表演和演出活动。
通过对美国、英国和德国三个国家的音乐教育体系和教育思想的分析,我们可以看到,虽然它们的音乐教育体系有着各自的特点和发展历史,但它们都注重培养学生的音乐素养和音乐能力,都注重学生的音乐表演和创造能力,都注重音乐文化的传承和发展。
这表明,在不同的文化和教育背景下,音乐教育都有着共通的核心价值观和教育理念。
我们也可以看到,三个国家的音乐教育体系和教育思想各有侧重,它们各自都有着自己的特色和优势。
我们应该在借鉴外国音乐教育经验的也要根据本国的实际情况,充分发挥自己的优势,为音乐教育的发展注入新的活力和动力。
中西方教育体系比较研究及启示

中西方教育体系比较研究及启示引言:教育是一个国家的未来发展的基石,不同国家和文化对教育的价值观和教育体系也有所不同。
本文将对中西方教育体系进行比较研究,并探讨各自的特点和启示。
一、教育哲学观比较中西方教育体系的差异首先体现在教育哲学观上。
西方教育注重培养个体的独立思考和创造能力,重视学生的自主性和创造性。
而中国传统教育强调纪律与秩序,注重学生的听从和纪律训练。
这种差异反映了两种文化对个体和集体的重视程度。
西方注重个体的独立性和多样性,而中国注重集体的统一性和规范性。
启示:中西方教育哲学之间的差异提醒我们,教育的目标不应仅仅是传授知识,还应培养学生的创造力和独立思考能力。
教育需要与社会的发展相结合,注重培养学生的实践能力和团队合作精神。
二、教育体制比较中西方教育体系在教育体制方面也存在差异。
在西方国家中,教育体系相对较为灵活,学生可以根据自己的兴趣和能力选择不同的学校和课程。
而在中国,教育体系相对集中和统一,学生的选择权较为有限。
启示:灵活的教育体制可以更好地满足学生的个性需求和发展潜能。
鼓励学生选择适合自己的学校和课程,可以培养学生的兴趣和个性特点。
三、教学方法比较中西方教育体系的教学方法也有所不同。
在西方教育中,教师更多扮演着指导者和引导者的角色,注重启发式教学和探究式学习。
而在中国教育中,教师更多扮演着传授知识的角色,注重讲授和背诵。
启示:启发式教学和探究式学习有助于培养学生的创造力和自主学习能力。
为了培养学生的创新能力,教育体系应更注重培养学生的实践和解决问题的能力。
四、考试评价比较考试评价是教育体系中重要的一环。
在西方教育中,注重对学生全面能力的评价,主要通过多元化的考试形式和项目评估来进行。
而在中国教育中,重视对学生知识记忆的测试,主要通过高考和统一的标准化考试来进行评价。
启示:务实和多元化的考试评价可以更好地发挥学生的潜能和能力。
评价应更加注重学生的创造力和实际能力,而不仅仅是对知识的记忆。
职业教育法律体系的国际比较

职业教育法律体系的国际比较引言:职业教育在全球范围内的重要性日益凸显,各国纷纷致力于建立完善的职业教育法律体系。
本文将着眼于国际比较的视角,探讨不同国家职业教育法律体系的特点、差异和发展趋势,旨在为我国职业教育法律体系建设提供参考。
一、德国职业教育法律体系德国职业教育法律体系以“双元制”为核心,注重学校教育和企业培训的结合。
根据德国联邦职业教育法(BBiG)和联邦企业培训法(AFBG)的规定,学生可以通过学徒制度获得职业技能,并在受训期间获得工资。
同时,德国设立了专门的职业教育法院,负责处理与职业教育相关的纠纷,保障了职业教育法律的实施。
二、美国职业教育法律体系美国职业教育法律体系主要以联邦和州法律为依据,各州按照自己的实际情况制定和实施职业教育法规。
美国的职业教育注重市场导向,鼓励学生根据个人兴趣和市场需求选择职业路径。
此外,美国还建立了一系列职业教育负责机构,如职业教育与技能发展局(OVAE)和职业技术教育与训练局(OTET),以推动职业教育法律的制定和实施。
三、中国职业教育法律体系中国职业教育法律体系的建设和发展经历了多个阶段。
自1986年实施的《中华人民共和国职业教育法》以来,中国职业教育法律体系得到了逐步完善。
目前,中国的职业教育法律体系主要包括《中华人民共和国职业教育法》、《职业教育法实施细则》等法规文件,涵盖了职业教育的各个方面。
此外,中国还设立了职业教育行政部门,如职业教育与成人教育司(VEBB)和职业教育与继续教育司(DTVE),负责职业教育法律的实施和监督。
四、对比与启示通过对德国、美国和中国职业教育法律体系的比较,可以发现它们在以下几个方面存在一定差异:1. 系统性差异:德国职业教育法律体系注重学校教育和企业培训的整合,美国职业教育法律体系强调市场导向和个人选择,而中国职业教育法律体系则更加注重政府主导和规范管理。
2. 制度构建差异:各国在制定职业教育法律体系时所遵循的法律层级和关系不同,德国采用了联邦法和地方法相结合的模式,美国则由联邦法和州法构成,中国则采用了国家法和地方条例相结合的制度。
考研真题中外教育对比题

考研真题中外教育对比题近年来,考研真题中的一类题目备受关注,那就是关于中外教育的对比题。
这类题目往往要求我们对中外教育体系、教育方法、教学理念等进行比较和分析。
下面将从不同方面对中外教育展开对比,探讨其差异和优势。
一、教育体系对比中外教育体系存在明显差异。
在中国,教育分为小学、初中、高中和大学等不同阶段,学生需要按照一定的流程逐步升级。
而在一些西方国家,教育分为基础教育和高等教育两个阶段,学生的学习时间更为灵活。
此外,中国的教育注重应试,注重知识的灌输,而西方教育更注重培养学生的综合能力、创造力和批判思维。
二、教育方法对比中外教育方法也存在差异。
在中国,传统的教学方法主要注重教师的讲授和学生的被动接受,重视对知识的记忆和应试技巧的培养。
而在西方,教育注重学生的主动参与和独立思考,倡导学生通过实践探索和合作学习来获取知识。
西方教育普遍采用小组讨论、实验研究、项目制学习等方式,培养学生的创造力和解决问题的能力。
三、教育理念对比中外教育理念的差异主要体现在对学生的定位上。
中国教育强调学生的知识获取和考试成绩,注重培养学生的文化素养和学科知识。
而西方教育更注重培养学生的人格综合素质和创新能力,注重学生的个性发展和全面成长。
西方教育强调培养学生的批判性思维和创造性思维,注重培养学生的自主学习和自我管理能力。
四、教育价值观对比中外教育的价值观存在差异。
中国传统教育注重孝道、忠诚、尊重和团队合作等传统价值观的灌输。
而在西方,教育更注重个人的自由、平等、尊重和多样性,注重学生的个性发展和自我实现。
西方教育强调人的主体性和独立思考,注重培养学生的社会责任感和公民意识。
综上所述,考研真题中的中外教育对比题是一个关注教育体系和方法差异的重要方面。
中外教育在教育体系、教育方法、教学理念和教育价值观等方面都存在一定的差异,各有其优势。
我们应该在借鉴西方教育的先进经验的同时,也要保持对中国传统教育优秀文化的传承,为培养学生全面发展和适应社会需求提供更加丰富多样的教育方式和手段。
国外三大音乐教育体系中的音乐教育思想对比

国外三大音乐教育体系中的音乐教育思想对比
音乐教育一直是世界各国教育体系中的重要组成部分,不同国家的音乐教育体系也各具特色。
在国外,有三大知名的音乐教育体系,分别是美国的音乐教育体系、英国的音乐教育体系和德国的音乐教育体系。
这三个国家的音乐教育体系在音乐教育思想上有着不同的特点和优势,本文将对这三大音乐教育体系中的音乐教育思想进行对比分析。
美国的音乐教育体系以多元化为特点,注重培养学生的音乐兴趣和创造力。
美国的音乐教育体系一直以来都被认为是非常先进和多元化的,这主要得益于美国对音乐教育的重视和支持。
美国的音乐教育体系涵盖了从幼儿园到高等教育的各个阶段,在教学内容和方法上都十分注重多元化和个性化。
在学校音乐教育中,美国的教育机构注重培养学生的音乐兴趣和创造力,鼓励学生进行自主创作和表演。
美国的音乐教育还注重培养学生的听觉能力和音乐鉴赏能力,倡导学生全面发展,注重培养学生的音乐素养和审美情趣。
美国、英国和德国的音乐教育体系在音乐教育思想上各有特色。
美国的音乐教育体系以多元化为特点,注重培养学生的音乐兴趣和创造力;英国的音乐教育体系注重培养学生的音乐技能和专业水平;德国的音乐教育体系注重培养学生的音乐综合素养和实践能力。
这三种不同的音乐教育思想各有其优势和特点,通过对它们的对比分析,可以为我们了解国外音乐教育的现状和发展趋势提供重要的参考和借鉴。
希望在未来的音乐教育实践中,我们可以借鉴这些国外的音乐教育思想,不断探索和完善我国的音乐教育体系,为学生提供更加丰富和全面的音乐教育资源和教学环境。
中国和日本的教育系统有什么差异?

中国和日本的教育系统有什么差异?教育是每个国家和民族发展的基础,中国和日本作为亚洲两个重要国家,其教育系统在不同历史和文化背景下形成了各自的特点。
下面将就中国和日本的教育系统进行对比,探讨它们之间的差异。
一、学制体系差异中国和日本的学制体系有很大的不同,主要是从人才的培养角度出发,反映了两国教育的不同目标和思路。
1.1中国的学制体系中国的学制体系分为小学、初中、高中、大学等阶段,小学和初中为义务教育阶段,高中则是普通教育。
此外,还有职业教育、技工教育和成人教育等各个层次。
1.2日本的学制体系日本的学制体系则分为幼儿园、小学、中学、高中、大学五个层次,前三个层次为義務教育階段,高中和大学则是普通教育。
二、教育内容与形式的差异中国和日本的教育内容和形式也有自己的特点,在知识传授、教学方法和课外活动等方面也存在差异。
2.1中国的教育内容与形式中国的教育注重的是基础素质的培养,如语文、数学、外语等课程的教学,虽然受到文化因素的影响,知识面相对单一,但也往往依据全国各地的经济和发展水平,不同行业、职业的需要进行拓展。
教学内容中还包括思想政治课程,主要的目的是培养学生的政治意识及社会责任感,以便将来更好地融入社会。
教学方法也较为传统,以讲授为主,注重学生的知识掌握和应试能力的培养。
2.2日本的教育内容与形式日本的教育注重的是人文素养的培养,除了基础课程外还非常注意美学、道德、体育等方面的教学和培养。
教学方法较为严谨,采用了理论与实践结合的方式,注重培养学生的独立思考能力。
此外,日本的义务教育非常注重社团活动,学生可以选修自己感兴趣的社团,例如文艺、音乐、体育、科技等,以此激发学生的创造力和实践能力。
三、教育的体制管理和评价的差异中国和日本的教育体制管理和评价方式也有一定的差异。
3.1中国的教育管理与评价中国的教育管理由国家主管部门领导,统一教育内容和教学标准。
其评价方式则主要依据学生的考试成绩,采用单向传授的方式进行教学和考试。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
Differences between Chinese and Western Education System(2007-06-13 21:23:20)转载▼Most Chinese parents like to ask, “How old should be the best age for children to study overseas?” “Is the foundational education as good as China in other countries?” As the matter of fact, the argument about advantages and disadvantages between Chinese Education and Western Education is keeping on all the time. This question is also one major concern among those students who are considering going abroad. In order to find out the most suitable way for each individual, we shall gather more information and compare both matters in China and foreign countries.The basic issue of education is what kind of people we want to cultivate to be, and how to cultivate them. The concept of value, purpose of education and method of education between Chinese Education System and Western Education System are di fferentiated in many academic fields. Let’s have a look at this with 2 cases:Darin Yokel is an art teacher from one primary school in Cincinnati, America; she is also a current student of Miami University. To be as one of the exchange teacher with Chinese, she came to Kunming, Yunan to have an academic interchange. Her objective is split into 3 parts, teaching Chinese students, communicating with Chinese teachers and independent training.In Kunming, Darin found out that the painting skills of Chinese students are very good. One day, she gave out one topic which is called “happy festival” to her students, but all the students were drawing the same Christmas tree. At first she thought that Chinese students are friendly so when they met a western teacher, they drew the Christmas tree for her. But later she found that every Christmas tree those children drown are with the same batten. She looked closer, discovered that all the students were looking toward the same direction where one of the classroom wall. Then she realized that there was one Christmas tree painting on the wall which prepared by the school as the purpose of creating a suitable painting atmosphere for students.Darin covered the painting on the wall and asked the students to create their own picture, to her surprise; she was so disappointed that once she covered the wall painting, the students could not draw a “happy festival”. Some students were scratching the head, some biting the pencil, some staring at each other, but no one knew how to start their work. With the intention of solving the embarrassment, Darin has to open the cover of wall painting.There is another case far in America: one professor mentioned in his article that his son did research when he was in primary school form two. One day he came back from school and asked father to go to library, he said he is doing one research on whales so need to go and find information. The professor took his son to two libraries and borrowed more than ten books about whale. The little boy had finished his first research in his whole life on the topic of whale. It contained 3 pages and one cover with a picture of whale and sea. There were 4 tittles inside the report: introduction, what do whales eat, how whales eat and the features of whales.The professor said that this is the shortest and simplest research he has ever seen in his life; however this is the most interesting research he has ever read as well. The main concern here is not how much knowledge of whale the boy has learnt, but the process of doing the research. He concentrated so hard to gather information, read articles, identify points, write essay and so on. He was doing individually and independently all through the procedure. He totally used his brain to carry out every step, thus he has achieved much more knowledge and skills beside only whales.And this kind of research practice is continuous improving, when he was in Form Two, his research is only collecting other people’s information. But when he reached Form Five, his resear ch is moving into a further level of giving out his own ideas. Although his research is still in insufficient order or not so valid, his consciousness of creation is forming and improving.The Darin’s case is really shocking, it illustrates two crucial po ints of Chinese Education System, one is emphasize too much on teaching but neglect the importance of capability, the other one is building up strong foundation but lack of high education. We Chinese think that students with sturdy foundation can receive further knowledge better. So most Chinese parents think that the primary education in China is more stable than those western countries, and western high education is more mature than China. If students can have the combine of two education system, students could become comprehensive. That is why more and more Chinese parents intend to send their children to foreign universities.The second case shows that Western Education System encourages children to do research on their own. They believe that doing research can help children to analysis problems and solve difficulties by themselves. At mean while, students can practice what they have learnt in real work through the process of research. It is more effective than what we have been practiced in China, that students are studying for exams only while in primary education period. We are implementing 2 separate stages, learning basic knowledge in junior level and doing research in senior level.What are the significant characteristics of both Chinese Education System and Western Education System? Let’s have a compare and discuss as follows:Firstly, there are two basic concepts of education value, teaching and guiding. Teaching concept is commonly used in Chinese Education System which is base on textbook contents. Students learn knowledge through classes that are conducted by teachers inside the classroom. Besides it is being used in Chinese family education; students perceive knowledge by listening to what the parents have told them and textbooks which parents ask them to read. This concept is well effected in raising so called “good student” who always abbeys rules and regulations, inheriting traditions and general habits. It resulted that Chinese primary education is with no doubt strongly-built, especially during primary school and middle school period. That is also the reason why Chinese students can win scores of prize in Olympic competitions every year.Guiding is the main concept of education wildly used in western countries. It emphasizes the rights and respects of children, which is base on a trust motion. Schools provide students with fulfilled self-management, support them to control themselves. At home, parents see children as one equal memberof the family; they have identical duty and responsibility for the family. Western children have more freedom and private without much instruction; they are more persuaded by enlightening and leading. Westerners intend to offer children opportunities to develop themselves, discovering their potential specialties and abilities. They encourage children to study with interest under pleasure, doing what they want to do and trying the best they can. Thus western children are more responsible and confident; they have a higher grade of self-esteems because of the process of self-learning.On the other hand, self-management does not only depend on students themselves, they do need guidelines from parents and teachers. Guardians should help students to build up sufficiency and strength, also observe their grown to correct any mistakes and weakness. Chinese Education System is good at demonstrating and building moral students always following traditional rules and regulations. But western children show more aggressiveness in personal development, they become the master of their own destiny. They are more ingenious and creative, therefore, the most percentage of Nobel Prize are achieved by western people. It is said that open self-learning system hast he advantage of cultivating top creators.Secondly, the primary education in China is unilaterally seeking for the rate of upgrading since 10 years ago, meaning that they have comparison on the frank of students entering a higher level education. They rank students into 3 grads with their results, and divide schools into 3 categories. Schools recruit students within the same level of grades, so only those high scored students have the opportunity to enter famous school. As a result of this, some of the students who have lower scores may not have a fair chance to develop. Thus causes huge stress burden on both schools’ and students’ shoulders. Schools care about their reputation, certainly more pressure is given to the students. Students care about are afraid of discipline or elimination, with no choice, they have to tolerate the pressure. However, those high education properties such as colleges and universities still have a low percentage of students among all the citizens in China.In an opposite situation, there are a high percentage of high-educationed citizens. There are less entry battles in colleges and universities so that every student may have a chance to enter high education properties. They mainly emphasize the personal development skills of students and set creativeness as a major purpose of education. In their opinion, personal development is according to personal need and demand. Every one has their own character and ambition, educate children toward their interest and specialty is helpful to discover their potential capacity and talent. It is not only for the need of personal development, but also good for social development.Furthermore, parents always tell us that we should have the good manner of studying hard towards goals as a Chinese tradition. Most parents start teaching children simple calculating and writing when they are 3 or 4 years old. Almost every Chinese have the memory of being forced to Chinese ancient poems in their childhood. However, in the 21st century today, only reciting poems and textbooks, expecting high scores in exam, studying without other activities are evidently limited for the multi-changed diversity world. It is even harm for teenagers if dominate their life by studying only, because the ability of innovation is eradicated.In western countries, people more look into children’s p erceive abilities. In primary school, teachersconduct classes in discussion and games. Students have little homework but more handwork, they are studying under pleasure. All the subjects in middle school practice the point system, exams are only a small part of course module. Western students just have to keep sufficient attendance and points, they can graduate easily. They have the opportunity to manage their leisure time, develop their interests. We could obviously find out that western people are normally more positive and easy going. They have various knowledge about life and nature which is out of textbooks, also they have better communication skills to getting along with different people.Some people think that Chinese primary education is perfect; the only problem of Chinese Education System is in high level edification, so to improve our system just need to enhance higher level. It is actually an incomplete statement because human’s creativeness is nurtured since young. This nurturing must be continuous and mortified all the time. We should connect primary and high education levels with creativeness in sequence so as to cultivate our Chinese Nobel Prize Winners.Bach to the previous question, most of Chinese parents think that high education in western countries are much developed than China, in contrast, China has a firm foundation education system. The combination of both systems can braise excellent talents; therefore they keep children studying in China until middle school and send them abroad for colleges and universities. On the other hand, if we give solid foundation to children in China, at the same time, we put their creativeness as one of the targets in a purpose. As a result of that, there is going to be more talented man when they are polished up overseas.To sum up, Chinese Education System and Western Education System have their own advantages and disadvantages. Chinese emphasizes foundational knowledge whereas Western thinks highly of creativeness. If we could join two systems together, there is going be more Chinese performers on the 21st century stage.。