贝伐单抗 卵巢癌(AURELIA)研究结果

合集下载

贝伐珠单抗联合紫杉醇治疗复发性卵巢癌疗效分析

贝伐珠单抗联合紫杉醇治疗复发性卵巢癌疗效分析

贝伐珠单抗联合紫杉醇治疗复发性卵巢癌疗效分析崔艳艳【摘要】目的观察贝伐珠单抗联合紫杉醇治疗复发性卵巢癌的疗效和不良反应.方法 35例复发性卵巢癌患者应用贝伐珠单抗联合紫杉醇作为二线或多线治疗.结果35例患者均可进行疗效评价,有效率为54.29%,疾病控制率为82.86%.不良反应主要有骨髓抑制、恶心呕吐、高血压、蛋白尿等,大多为轻度.结论贝伐珠单抗联合紫杉醇治疗复发性卵巢癌安全有效,患者可耐受,是复发性卵巢癌可选择的治疗方案之一.【期刊名称】《肿瘤基础与临床》【年(卷),期】2017(030)004【总页数】3页(P286-288)【关键词】贝伐珠单抗;紫杉醇;复发性卵巢癌【作者】崔艳艳【作者单位】赤峰学院附属医院肿瘤内科,内蒙古赤峰 024000【正文语种】中文【中图分类】R737.31;R730.58卵巢癌是女性生殖系统常见恶性肿瘤之一,也是女性恶性肿瘤相关死亡的主要原因之一。

因其解剖位置、内分泌功能等特点,导致卵巢癌起病隐匿,诊断时往往已属晚期。

其标准治疗仍然是手术及术后化疗。

治疗后有约75%的患者会复发,而且多数为腹腔内复发[1]。

对于复发后的卵巢癌,肿瘤细胞减灭术和化疗成为一线及二线甚至多线治疗方法。

近年来,靶向治疗的兴起,给卵巢癌的治疗注入新的活力。

本研究用贝伐珠单抗联合紫杉醇治疗复发性卵巢癌,取得了一定的效果,现报道如下。

1.1 一般资料收集2011年7月至2016年3月在我院住院治疗的复发性卵巢癌患者共35例,年龄32~71岁,中位年龄52岁。

临床分期均为Ⅲ~Ⅳ期,所有患者至少接受过一次肿瘤细胞减灭术,且有病理学证实为卵巢癌;既往曾经接受一线、二线,甚至三线治疗,然后出现病情进展,无化疗禁忌证,ECOG评分≤2分,预计生存时间≥3个月,有可客观测量病灶。

患者既往曾接受的治疗方案包括的药物有紫杉醇、多西他赛、顺铂、卡铂、奈达铂、吉西他滨、表柔比星等。

1.2 治疗方法贝伐珠单抗7.5 mg·kg-1,d1, 加入质量分数0.9%生理盐水250mL中静脉滴注,首次静脉滴注时间控制在1.5 h,以后每次0.5~1 h,并在化疗方案开始前1 h滴注完毕。

贝伐单抗在复发性卵巢癌治疗的研究进展

贝伐单抗在复发性卵巢癌治疗的研究进展

Journal of Henan University Medical Sciencehttps //kfyz .chinajournal .net .cn /㊃综 述㊃贝伐单抗在复发性卵巢癌治疗的研究进展高梦,李冉冉,王轶英✉河南大学人民医院/河南省人民医院妇产科,郑州450003摘要 卵巢癌(O v a r i a n c a n c e r ,O C )由于易出现复发和铂耐药现象,给临床治疗带来极大困难㊂近年来,大量的试验结果表明,贝伐单抗作为抗血管生成药物能明显改善卵巢癌患者的预后㊂本文通过简述贝伐单抗的抗肿瘤机制,对其单药和联合治疗复发性卵巢癌的最新进展进行了详细介绍,并提出肿瘤标志物的联合检测及个体化精准治疗将是未来主要的发展方向㊂关键词 贝伐单抗;联合治疗;复发性卵巢癌;靶向治疗;不良反应中图分类号 R 711.75R e s e a r c h p r o gr e s s o f b e v a c i z u m a b i n t h e t r e a t m e n t o f r e c u r r e n t o v a r i a n c a n c e rG A O M e n g L I R a n r a n WA N G Y i y i n g✉D e p a r t m e n t o f O b s t e t r i c s a n d G y n e c o l o g y H e n a n U n i v e r s i t y P e o p l e s H o s p i t a l H e n a n P r o v i n c i a l P e o p l e s H o s pi t a l Z h e n gz h o u 450003 C HN A b s t r a c t c a n c e r O C i s p r o n e t o r e c u r r e n c e a n d p l a t i n u m r e s i s t a n c e w h i c h m a k e s c l i n i c a l t r e a t m e n t e x t r e m e l yd i f f i c u l t I n re c e n t y e a r s a l a r g e n u m b e r of t r i a l s h a v e s h o w n t h a t b e v a c i z u m a b a s a n a n t i -a ng i o g e n i c d r u g ca n s i g n i f i c a n t l y i m p r o v e t h e p r o g n o s i s o f o v a r i a n c a n c e r p a t i e n t s I n t h i s p a pe r t h e a n t i -t u m o r m e c h a n i s m of b e v a c i z u m a b i s b r i e f l y d e s c r i b e d t h e l a t e s t p r og r e s s o f i t s m o n o th e r a p y a n d c o m bi n a t i o n t h e r a p y fo r r e c u r r e n t o v a r i a n c a n c e r i s i n t r o d u c e d i n d e t a i l a n d t h e c o m b i n e d d e t e c t i o n o f t u m o r m a r k e r s a n d i n d i v i d u a l i z e d p r e c i s i o n t h e r a p y wi l l b e t h e m a i n d e v e l o pm e n t d i r e c t i o n i n t h e f u t u r e K e y wo r d s B e v a c i z u m a b C o m b i n a t i o n t h e r a p y R e c u r r e n t o v a r i a n c a n c e r T a r g e t e d t h e r a p y A d v e r s e r e a c t i o n s 卵巢癌至今仍是妇科肿瘤中最难克服的癌症之一,其发病率和死亡率均呈逐年递增的趋势㊂由于卵巢癌在临床上发病的隐匿,导致有多数患者在检查时已经到了晚期㊂目前,临床上基本形成了手术ң化疗ң维持治疗的标准治疗方式,其中以手术和铂类基础药物联合化疗作为治疗卵巢癌常见的一种治疗手段㊂但临床疗效欠佳,仅约80%的患者有效[1],且治疗后复发率很高[2],5年生存率不足25%[3]㊂所以,迫切需要新的治疗方案和靶向药物以延长患者复发时间,从而改善患者的预后[4]㊂临床上经过良好的肿瘤细胞减灭术和规律㊁充分㊁足够的化疗,停止治疗6个月后再次被诊断出来的病灶为复发性卵巢癌(r e c u r r e n t o v a r i a n c a n c e r,R O C )[5]㊂根据最后一次含铂方案化疗到疾病复发的持续时间,可分为铂敏感性㊁铂耐药性和铂难治性3种㊂停止治疗时间超过6个月再复发的患者为铂㊃532㊃河南大学学报(医学版),2023,42(4)收稿日期:2023-02-06基金项目:国家自然科学基金(81972441);河南省自然科学基金(182300410345)作者简介:高梦(1994-),女,硕士研究生㊂研究方向:妇科肿瘤㊂✉通信作者,E -m a i l :y i y i n g w a n g371@y a h o o .c o m Copyright ©博看网. All Rights Reserved.河南大学学报︵医学版︶CN 41-1361/R ㊀ISSN1672-7606敏感,达到了临床完全暂时缓解或部分暂时缓解并在6个月内再复发的患者称为铂耐药㊂而在第二次一线治疗期间没有达到完全暂时缓解的患者则为铂难治性患者[6]㊂1分子靶向治疗R O C的严重性和难治之处主要在于传统的手术+铂类药物替代化疗的治疗方法对其不敏感㊂R O C一直没有明确的治疗选择方案,很多患者只能再进行二线及以上的重复化疗㊂此外,很多铂敏感的患者在多次化疗后,逐渐产生化疗药物耐药,也难以获得较好的疗效㊂分子靶向药物的出现给R O C患者能够继续获得治疗成功带来了新的希望,分子靶向治疗等较新的治疗方式在多次复发患者的治疗中也显得越来越重要㊂治疗卵巢癌的分子靶向药物主要有抗血管生成药物(贝伐单抗)㊁P A R P抑制剂等㊂靶向性的治疗和药物化疗的有效联合在临床的应用已逐渐成为了一种新的发展趋势,也被广泛应用于药物化疗后对一些患者的长期维持治疗㊂大量研究结果表明,靶向性的药物治疗与单纯的化疗相比能够显著地有效延长患者的无进展生存期(p r o-g r e s s i o n-f r e e s u r v i v a l,P F S)及总生存期(o v e r a l ls u r v i v a l,O S),具有较高的临床价值㊂2贝伐单抗联合治疗在复发性卵巢癌中的应用目前,在全世界大范围内已经批准上市的抗血管生成药物主要有贝伐单抗㊁雷莫芦单抗㊁雷尼珠单抗等㊂其中,贝伐单抗是第一个被美国F D A正式批准用于抗血管生成的靶向治疗药物,欧洲药品管理局也已批准将其与化疗药物联合用于治疗晚期上皮性卵巢癌㊁输卵管癌或原发性腹膜癌,并广泛应用于临床诊断和药物治疗㊂贝伐单抗也是首个与化疗药物联合用于治疗铂敏感性晚期卵巢癌,效果显著,是目前临床上治疗R O C最常用药物㊂2.1贝伐单抗抗肿瘤的机制血管的产生影响了卵巢癌的复发及转移㊂在卵巢癌的疾病进展中,癌细胞通过促进血管相关因素的表达,诱导新生体血管的生成㊂新生血管给扩增的癌细胞提供大量的营养素和氧气,从而促进癌细胞的增殖㊁浸润和转移㊂因此,通过抑制新生血管的生成可以有效地遏制癌细胞的生成㊁扩散和转移[7],而抗血管生成药物就是这样的作用机理㊂有研究[8-9]表明,与正常的卵巢组织相比,卵巢癌中V E G F的表达水平明显增加,使得贝伐单抗成为R O C最有希望的靶向治疗药物㊂贝伐单抗是主要用于克隆重组抑制人体的毛细血管黏膜内皮层白细胞生长因子的单抗体克隆细胞抗体[10-11]㊂目前,关于贝伐单抗抑制V E G F信号通路在血管生成中作用机制的假设,包括阻断新生血管的生长,通过抑制对肿瘤的直接作用,如抑制抗凋亡自分泌信号㊁调节血管和血流的功能,通过增强输送和增加药物的有效性来消灭肿瘤㊂基于大型临床研究,贝伐单抗与化疗药物或新型抗肿瘤药物(如P A R P抑制剂)的联合治疗可以使化疗药物更多地被肿瘤细胞摄入,从而提高治疗效果[12]㊂美国F D A已批准贝伐单抗用于卵巢癌的初始治疗和复发治疗[13]㊂目前,贝伐单抗的靶向治疗已经成为了临床治疗各种R O C的一个重要治疗方案㊂2.2贝伐单抗联合化疗在复发性卵巢癌中的应用G O G-0218试验[14]作为一项Ⅲ期临床对照试验,具有多中心㊁随机㊁双盲的特点㊂分为三组(2个试验组和1个对照组)对比研究,评估贝伐单抗联合卡铂和紫杉醇治疗Ⅲ期或Ⅳ期上皮性卵巢癌㊁输卵管癌或原发性腹膜癌一线治疗手术切除后的治疗疗效㊂将患者随机分配到A组(对照组,卡铂+紫杉醇化疗6个周期)㊁B组(实验组,卡铂+紫杉醇+贝伐单抗化疗6个周期,其中贝伐单抗从第2个周期开始联合化疗)㊁C组(实验组,贝伐单抗在联合卡铂+紫杉醇化疗6个周期后,继续给予贝伐单抗单药维持治疗至22个周期),主要观察患者的中位P F S㊂结果表明,C组患者和A组患者的中位P F S分别为14.1个月和10.3个月(P<0.001),B组患者的中位P F S为12.8个月㊂C组患者的中位O S为43.8个月,A组患者的中位O S为40.6个月㊂说明贝伐单抗联合化疗及后期的单药维持治疗对于晚期卵巢癌患者的P F S和O S都有一定的临床价值,尤其对患者P F S影响尤为显著㊂I C O N-7试验[15]也是Ⅲ期随机试验,共纳入1528例初诊卵巢癌的患者,随机分别接受一线卡铂+紫杉醇(n=764)或卡铂+紫杉醇+贝伐单抗(n=764),主要观察两组患者的中位P F S㊂中位随访期限为48.9个月,期间共发生759例进展或死亡事件㊂与卡铂+紫杉醇组相比,贝伐单抗组患者中位P F S显著延长2个多月[16]㊂贝伐单抗的作用随时间变化,在12个月时达到最大获益,并在24个月㊃632㊃J o u r n a l o f H e n a n U n i v e r s i t y M e d i c a l S c i e n c e2023424Copyright©博看网. All Rights Reserved.Journal of Henan University Medical Sciencehttps //kfyz .chinajournal .net .cn /时减弱㊂中位随访28个月后,在P F S 和O S 数据的更新分析中获得了相似的结果㊂中位随访近49个月后,试验的最终O S 结果报告显示,从卡铂+紫杉醇单药治疗的44.6个月改善至贝伐单抗+卡铂+紫杉醇治疗的45.5个月(P >0.05)[17]㊂该研究表明,贝伐单抗维持治疗组在P F S 和O S 方面与单纯化疗组相比无明显差异[18]㊂J o r ge n s e n 等[19]对jo i c o n -7研究结果中的高危复发患者亚组情况进行了综合分析,发现高治疗风险的早期复发患者亚组可使患者的早期临床治疗收益更加明显,P F S 和O S 显著改善,复发风险和死亡风险均降低㊂由此结果可以看出,贝伐单抗对初期早治晚期卵巢癌及晚期初治卵巢癌患者的P F S 临床治疗效果有显著性的改善,而对于初治卵巢癌O S 的临床治疗方法有待进一步研究探索㊂但基于两项临床研究成果,欧洲药品管理局批准了贝伐单抗在晚期初治卵巢癌患者治疗中的临床治疗[20]㊂G O G -0218试验和I C O N -7试验主要是针对术后初诊为卵巢癌患者一线维持治疗的临床实验,但缺乏贝伐单抗对R O C 患者的临床疗效研究㊂关于贝伐单抗在R O C 维持治疗的临床效果,本文从三项具有代表性的试验中选取贝伐单抗联合化疗Ⅲ期临床试验对其进行了分析,见表1㊂表1 贝伐单抗联合化疗和单纯化疗在R O C 治疗中的疗效对比研究内容O C E A N S[21-22]G O G -0213[23]A U R E L I A[24]铂状态铂敏感(n =484)铂敏感(n =714)铂敏感(n =361)治疗方案B e v +G +C v s G +CB e v +P /C v s P /C非铂单药+B e v v s 非铂单药P F S/月12.4v s 8.4(P <0.01)13.8v s 10.4(P <0.01)6.7v s 3.4(P <0.01)O S/月33.6v s 32.9(P <0.05)42.2v s 37.3(P =0.447)16.6v s 13.8(P <0.174)O R R /%78.5%v s 57.4%(P <0.01)78.0%v s 59.0%(P <0.01)27.3%v s 11.8%(P <0.01)注:B e v ,贝伐单抗;G ,吉西他滨;C ,卡铂;P,紫杉醇㊂ 从表1中可清楚地看出:①在O C E A N S [21-22]研究中,共纳入484例一线含铂化疗后出现复发时间ȡ6个月的患者,随机划分为安慰剂组(吉西他滨+卡铂)㊁贝伐单抗组(吉西他滨+卡铂+贝伐单抗),在中位随访24个月后,最终分析显示,贝伐单抗组与安慰剂组相比明显延长了P F S,贝伐单抗组的O R R 也有显著的统计学改善,而两组之间的O S 没有明显差异㊂研究表明,相比传统的含铂双药化疗,化疗期间联合贝伐单抗,结束化疗后继续贝伐单抗维持治疗直至疾病进展的治疗模式改善了复发性R O C 患者的P F S 和客观缓解率(O R R ),但P F S 获益并未转化为O S 获益㊂②G O G -0213[23]研究与O C E A N S 研究类似,研究结果同样证明了抗血管药物联合含铂双药化疗给R O C 患者的P F S 和O S 带来一定程度的延长㊂而且根据O C E A N S 实验及G O G -0213,2016年美国F D A 正式批准了铂敏感R O C 患者可以通过贝伐单抗联合化疗进行治疗㊂③A U R E L I A [24]是首个专门研究贝伐单抗联合化疗对于铂耐药型R O C 治疗疗效的Ⅲ期临床试验,把铂耐药R O C 患者分为接受非铂单药化疗(如紫杉醇㊁拓扑替康或脂质体多柔比星)化疗和单药联合贝伐单抗化疗两组,研究结果表明,相比于单药化疗组,联合组延长了患者P F S 和O R R ,但O S 并未得到改善㊂由此,2014年3月美国F D A 正式批准了贝伐单抗联合化疗用于铂耐药R O C 的治疗[25]㊂但对于贝伐单抗联合化疗是否能大幅延长卵巢癌晚期患者的O S,以上研究并未得到明确定论㊂为了深入研究贝伐单抗对卵巢癌患者O S 的影响,K e n r o 等[26]选取了S P P ㊁O S 较短的铂耐药难治性晚期卵巢癌进行了长期回顾性临床分析㊂该研究经过筛选纳入57例患者作为研究对象,在贝伐单抗联合化疗筛选方案上根据患者以往的联合化疗使用方案并结合当地的医疗标准对其方案进行综合选择,如紫杉醇联合卡铂㊁吉西他滨联合卡铂等方案㊂分析结果表明,贝伐单抗联合卡铂化疗的两组患者中位数P F S 较其他对照组明显有所增加(6个月v s3个月),同时使用贝伐单抗联合卡铂化疗的两组患者中位数O S 为12个月,对照组中位数O S 为7个月,两组患者间中位O S 的差别大小具有统计学意义(P =0.008),说明在铂耐药难治性卵巢癌的化疗中联合贝伐单抗治疗,患者的中位P F S ㊁O S 都有明显改善㊂该研究结果表明,贝伐单抗联合化疗不但大大延长了P F S ,而且还扩展了O S㊂以上研究结果表明,贝伐单抗联合化疗被应用于临床治疗R O C ,可以显著改善对铂敏感以及铂耐药卵巢癌患者的临床治疗效果即P F S,同时可以提高R O C 患者的O S㊂近几年,贝伐单抗联合化疗已㊃732㊃河南大学学报(医学版),2023,42(4)Copyright ©博看网. All Rights Reserved.河南大学学报︵医学版︶CN 41-1361/R ㊀ISSN1672-7606经被添加到卵巢癌治疗的一线治疗方案中㊂2.3贝伐单抗联合P A R P抑制剂在复发性卵巢癌中的应用聚腺苷二磷酸核糖聚合酶(p o l y(A D P-r i b o s e)p o l y m e r a s e,P A R P)抑制剂是一种新型分子靶向药物㊂随着P A R P抑制剂在临床中的应用,使R O C的临床治疗结局发生重大变化,并通过同源重组途径改变了具有极端遗传复杂性和缺陷D N A修复的疾病的自然病史[27]㊂目前,我国临床常用的P A R P抑制剂主要有奥拉帕利㊁尼拉帕利㊂P A O L A-1试验[28]是一项关于奥拉帕利联合贝伐单抗作为B R C A突变患者在后期一线维持治疗的Ⅲ期临床试验㊂该研究结果表明,在使用贝伐单抗作为后期维持治疗方案的理论依据基础上,通过添加奥拉帕利可以促进B R C A突变/同源重组缺陷阳性患者的获益㊂该研究同时还表明,在维持治疗方面奥拉帕利和贝伐单抗的联合治疗比贝伐单抗单药治疗更能明显有效地降低整体人群的疾病进展㊂Ⅱ期临床试验将奥拉帕利联合西地尼布应用于治疗卵巢癌的早期患者,试验结果显示,联合治疗组可以使R O C患者的P F S明显延长,无论B R C A突变与否[29]㊂A V A N O V A试验是将尼拉帕利和贝伐单抗联合应用于铂敏感的R O C患者,试验结果显示,联合应用比尼拉帕利单药治疗能更明显提高患者中位P F S[30]㊂上述临床研究结果表明,贝伐单抗联合P A R P抑制剂的临床治疗方案无疑给晚期R O C患者带来了一个崭新的治疗前景和希望㊂P A R P抑制剂与贝伐单抗的联合治疗也将会成为未来卵巢癌维持治疗的一个重要发展方向,使实现卵巢癌慢病化管理成为一种可能㊂表2贝伐单抗临床常见不良反应及应对不良反应应对措施停药情形蛋白尿雷公藤多苷(t w p)>2+以上且24h尿蛋白>2g持续3个月,或24h尿蛋白水平>3.5g高血压噻嗪类利尿剂㊁β受体阻滞剂㊁钙离子拮抗剂㊁血管紧张素转化酶抑制剂㊁血管紧张素Ⅱ受体激动剂高血压危象/血压控制不佳>1个月静脉血栓低分子肝素动脉栓塞及严重静脉栓塞,经治疗后再次发生栓塞鼻出血/咯血少量出血,不必处理严重鼻出血或流血不止胃肠道穿孔提前应用护胃药物,胃肠减压,营养支持穿孔且有出血现象2.4贝伐单抗联合其他细胞毒药物贝伐单抗在医学上的使用不仅仅局限于和其他化疗药物的联合作用,和一些细胞毒药物的联合疗效也会显现出很好的疗效㊂C o h e n等[31]通过联合多种抗肿瘤药物来治疗R O C,结果证实贝伐单抗与其他细胞毒类药物采用同样有规律地给药方式,可使卵巢癌尤其是铂敏感和铂耐药的患者在临床上获益,所以多种抗肿瘤药物共同治疗方案在R O C治疗方面具有一定的研究价值和前景㊂C a r o l i n e等[32]通过贝伐单抗联合细胞毒药物用于治疗铂耐药性难治型卵巢癌的方法进行了研究,结果表明贝伐单抗联合细胞毒药物对于铂耐药且难治型的卵巢癌具有更高的临床价值,能够明显改善患者的P F S和O S㊂3贝伐单抗在治疗过程中出现的不良反应及应对虽然贝伐单抗在治疗R O C中具有显著效果,但也会出现一定的不良反应㊂贝伐单抗在临床应用中常出现的不良反应及应对措施见表2㊂与贝伐单抗有关的不良反应最常见的是高血压㊂已发现V E G F与调节健康的血管内皮有关[33]㊂然而,当使用像贝伐单抗这样的V E G F抑制剂时,它会减少一氧化氮的产生,对调节血压是必不可少的,从而增加高血压的风险㊂此外,较常见的不良反应为血细胞减少,所以为了减少贝伐单抗不良反应的出现,在用药前临床医生要对患者所伴发的疾病情况(如血常规㊁肝肾功能等)进行准确的筛查㊂在用药的过程中还要密切注意监测,若出现不良反应需及时处理或停药,并嘱咐患者院外定期检测血常规㊁肝肾功能等㊂因此,对于在这一时期合并所患有的高血压㊁凝血功能障碍㊁消化道系统疾病等症状的卵巢癌患者,应该适当地禁用或是慎用贝伐单抗㊂有研究[34]表明,贝伐单抗联合化疗与单纯化疗相比,并没有明显增加不良反应,临床应用安全可靠㊂其次其非特异毒性与化疗药相比较少,因此其毒副作用小,从而不会对晚期合并腹水的患者造成额外㊃832㊃J o u r n a l o f H e n a n U n i v e r s i t y M e d i c a l S c i e n c e2023424Copyright©博看网. All Rights Reserved.Journal of Henan University Medical Sciencehttps //kfyz .chinajournal .net .cn /的负担[35]㊂4 小结与展望卵巢癌作为一种妇女主要的癌症类遗传性疾病,严重影响了患者的身心健康㊂贝伐单抗在卵巢癌的临床诊断和治疗中具有重要的临床应用价值,上述研究有力地证明了贝伐单抗联合治疗能够明显地延长卵巢癌患者的生存期和疾病进展时间,并明显提高临床疗效[36]㊂据统计,我国女性卵巢癌发病年龄呈年轻化趋势,早期发现及干预尤为重要㊂因而,及早确定肿瘤标志物有重要价值,而B R C A 1及B RC A 2联合C A 125及H E 4的检测对于早期诊断出卵巢癌有重要临床意义,且为一个新的研究方向㊂这需要积极提升临床诊疗水平,同时后期维持治疗也是重中之重㊂目前,贝伐单抗已纳入医保,给临床研究和患者的使用减轻了一定的经济负担㊂综上所述,贝伐单抗联合治疗用于R O C 患者,可明显提高其预后,且无严重的不良反应,安全性可靠,能有效地降低复发率㊂对于延长卵巢癌患者的生存时间及提高其生活质量具有较高的临床应用价值,值得推荐为卵巢癌患者临床治疗的首选方案㊂但在临床上仍然需要贝伐单抗联合治疗个体化,采取更加有效和针对性的方案,对优化患者的化疗选择和改善预后大有益处㊂参考文献1 O D U N S I K I m m u n o t h e r a p yi n o v a r i a n c a n c e r J A n n O n c o l 2017 28 s 8Ⅷ1-Ⅷ7 2 KO R K M A Z T S E B E R S B A S A R A N G R e v i e w o f t h e c u r r e n t r o l e o f t a r g e t e d t h e r a pi e s a s m a i n t e n a n c e t h e r a p i e s i n f i r s t a n d s e c o n d l i n e t r e a t m e n t o f e p i t h e l i a l o v a r i a n c a n c e r i n t h e l i g h t o f c o m pl e t e d t r i a l s J C r i t R e v O n c o l H e m a t o l 2016 98 180-188 3 李一鑫 路丹P D -1 P D -L 1抑制剂治疗晚期卵巢癌的研究进展 J 现代肿瘤医学 2021 29 152741-2744 4 B A S T A A B I D Z I N S K I M B I E N K I E W I C Z A e t a l R e c o m m e n d a t i o n s o f t h e p o l i s h g y n e c o l o g i c a l o n c o l o g ys o c i e t y f o r t h e d i a gn o s i s a n d t r e a t m e n t o f o v a r i a n c a n c e r J C u r r G y n e c o l O n c o l 2017 15 1 5-23 5 罗丹 孔民 复发性卵巢癌的研究进展 J癌症进展 2019 17 17 2003-2006 6 秦佳睿 尹香花 复发性卵巢癌治疗方法的研究进展J 当代医学 2021 27 2191-194 7 张志方 席晓薇 祖剑飞 等 复发性上皮性卵巢癌的药物治疗及进展 J 实用药物与临床 2019 22 5452-4558 AV R I L S D I N C E R Y M A L I N O W S K Y K e t a l I n -c r e a s e d P D G F R -b e t a a n d V E G F R -2p r o t e i n l e v e l s a r ea s s o c i a t e d w i t h r e s i s t a n c e t o p l a t i n u m -b a s e dc h e m o t h e r -a p y a nd a d ve r s e o u t c o m e of o v a r i a n c a n c e r p a t i e n t s J O n c o t a r ge t 2017 8 58 97851-97861 9 W E B B P M J O R D A N S J E p i d e m i o l o g y of e p i t h e l i a l o v a r i a n c a n c e r J B e s t P r a c t R e s C l i n O b s t e t G yn a e -c o l 2017 4 13-14 10 M UL D E R K S C A R F E A C H U A N e t a l T h e r o l e o f b e v a c i z u m a b i n c o l o r e c t a l c a n c e r u n d e r s t a n d i n g it s b e n e f i t s a n d l i m i t a t i o n s J E x p e r t O pi n B i o l T h e r 2011 11 3405-413 11 HI C K L I N D J E L L I S L M R o l e o f t h e v a s c u l a r e n d o -t h e l i a l g r o w t h f a c t o r p a t h w a yi n t u m o r g r o w t h a n d a n -g i o ge n e s i s J J C l i n O n c o l 2005 23 5 1011-1027 12 AR M S T R O N G D K A L V A R E Z R D B A K K U M -G A M E Z J N e t a l N C C N g u i d e l i n e s i n s i gh t s o v a r i a n c a n c e r v e r s i o n 1 2019 J J N a t l C o m pr C a n c N e t w 2019 17 8896-909 13 LO I Z Z I V D E L V E C C H I O V G A R G A N O G e t a l B i o l o g i c a l p a t h -w a y s i n v o l v e d i n t u m o r a n g i o ge n e s i s a n d b e v a c i z u m a b b a s e d a n t i -a n g i o g e n i c t h e r a p y w i t h s pe c i a l r ef e r e n c e s t o o v a r i a n c a n c e r JI n t J M o l S c i 2017 18 91967 14 TE W A R I K S B U R G E R R A E N S E R R O D e t a lF i n a l o v e r a l l s u r v i v a l o f a r a n d o m i z e d t r i a l o f b e v a c i z u m -a b f o r p r i m a r yt r e a t m e n t o f o v a r i a n c a n c e r J J o u r n a l o f C l i n i c a l O n c o l o g y2019 37 26 2317-2328 15 OZ A A M C O O K A D P F I S T E R E R J e t a l S t a n d -a r d c h e m o t h e r a p y wi t h o r w i t h o u t b e v a c i z u m a b f o r w o m e n w i t h n e w l y d i a gn o s e d o v a r i a n c a n c e r I C O N 7 o v e r a l l s u r v i v a l r e s u l t s o f a p h a s e 3r a n d o m i s e d t r i a l J T h e L a n c e t O n c o l o g y2015 15 8 928-936 16 CA M P O S S A T K I N S O N TB E R L I N S e t a l A p h a s e Ⅱs t u d y o f c a r b o p l a t i n pa c l i t a x e lb e v ac i z u m a b f o l l o w ed b y ra n d o m i z a t i o n t o e i t h e rb e v ac i z u m a b a l o n e o r e r l o t i n i b a nd be v a c i z u m a b i n t h e u pf r o n t m a n a ge m e n t of p a t i e n t s w i t h o v a r i a n f a l l o pi a n t u b e o r p e r i t o n e a l c a n c e r J G yn e c o l O n c o l 2011 120 S 79-S 181 17 OZ A A M P E R R E N T J S W A R T A M e t a l I C O N 7 f i n a l o v e r a l l s u r v i v a l r e s u l t s i n t h e G C I G p h a s eⅢr a n d o m i z e d t r i a l o f b e v a c i z u m a b i n w o m e n w i t h n e w -l y d i a gn o s e d o v a r i a n c a n c e r J E J C a n c e r 2013 49 2L B A 6 18 郭崇真 曲连悦 杜荣蓉 等 贝伐珠单抗治疗卵巢癌的研究进展 J 中国新药杂志 2020 29 232677-268119 JO R G E N S E N T L H E R R S T E D T J T h e i n f l u e n c e o f p o l y p h a r m a c y p o t e n t i a l l y i n a p p r o pr i a t e m e d i c a t i o n s ㊃932㊃河南大学学报(医学版),2023,42(4)Copyright ©博看网. All Rights Reserved.河南大学学报︵医学版︶CN 41-1361/R ㊀ISSN1672-7606a n d d r u g i n t e r a c t i o n s o n t r e a t m e n t c o m p l e t i o n a n d p r o g-n o s i s i n o l d e r p a t i e n t s w i t h o v a r i a n c a n c e r J J G e r i a t rO n c o l2020114593-60220B A N E R J E E S K A Y E S B G y n e c o l o g i c a l c a n c e rf i r s t-l i n e b e v a c i z u m a b f o r o v a r i a n c a n c e r-n e w s t a n d a r d o fc a r e J N a t R e v C l i n O n c o l201294194-19621L I A O J B S W E N S E N R E O V E N E L L K J e t a lP h a s eⅡt r i a l o f a l b u m i n-b o u n d p a c l i t a x e l a n d g r a n u l o-c y t e m a c r o p h a g e c o l o n y-s t i m u l a t i n g f a c t o r a s a n i m m u n em o d u l a t o r i n r e c u r r e n t p l a t i n u m r e s i s t a n t o v a r i a n c a n c e rJ G y n e c o l o g i c O n c o l o g y20171443480-48522A G H A J A N I A N C G O F F B N Y C U M L R e t a l F i-n a l o v e r a l l s u r v i v a l a n d s a f e t y a n a l y s i s o f O C E A N S ap h a s e3t r i a l o f c h e m o t h e r a p y w i t h o r w i t h o u t b e v a c i-z u m a b i n p a t i e n t s w i t h p l a t i n u m-s e n s i t i v e r e c u r r e n to v a r i a n c a n c e r J G y n e c o l o g i c O n c o l o g y2015139110-1623R O B E R T L C M A R K F B T H O M A S J H e t a lB e v a c i z u m a b a n d p a c l i t a x e l-c a r b o p l a t i n c h e m o t h e r a p ya n d s e c o n d a r y c y t o r e d u c t i o n i n r e c u r r e n t p l a t i n u m-s e n-s i t i v e o v a r i a n c a n c e r N R G O n c o l o g y G y n e c o l o g i c O n-c o l o g y G r o u p s t ud y G O G-0213a m u l t i ce n t r e o p e n-l a b e l r a n d o m i s e d p h a s e3t r i a l J L a n c e t O n c o l2017186779-79124P U J A D E L E H I L P E R T F W E B E R B e t a l B e v-a c i z u m abc o m b i n ed w i t h c he m o t h e r a p yf o r p l a t i n u m-r e-s i s t a n t r e c u r r e n t o v a r i a n c a n c e r t h e A U R E L I A o p e n-l a-b e l r a n d o m i z e d p h a s eⅢt r i a l J201432131302-130825张洁王晓慧张苗等56例复发性卵巢癌无瘤生存期影响因素及治疗后预后分析J实用妇产科杂志2016325354-35726K E N R O C S A C H I H O N T O M O Y U K I K e t a lB e v a c i z u m a b i m p r o v e s o v e r a l l s u r v i v a l i n p l a t i n u m r e-f r a c t o r y o v a r i a n c a n c e r p a t i e n t s a r e t r o s p e c t i v e s t u d yJ T a i w a n J O b s t e t G y-n e c o l2018576819-82427陈洁张广美P A R P抑制剂联合抗血管生成剂在卵巢癌中的相关应用J临床与病理杂志202040113044-304828R A Y-C O Q U A R D I P A U T I E R P P I G N A T A S e ta l O l a p a r ib p l u s b e v ac i z u m a b a s f r i s t-l i n e m a i n t e n a n c ei n o v a r i a n c a n c e r J N E n g l J M e d2019381252416-242829L I U J F B A R R Y W T B I R R E R M e t a l C o m b i n a-t i o n c d i r a n i b a n d o l a p a r i b v e r s u s o l a p a r i b a l o n e f o rw o m e n w i t h r e c u r r e n t p l a t i n u m-s e n s i t i v e o v a r i a n c a n c e ra r a n d o m i s e d p h a s e2s t u d y J L a n c e t O n c o l201415111207-120430M I R Z E M R B E R G M A N N T K M A U-S O R E N S E NM e t a l A p h a s e I s t u d y o f t h e P A R P i n h i b i t o r n i r a p a-r i b i n c o m b i n a t i o n w i t h b e v a c i z u m a b i n p l a t i n u m-s e n s i-t i v e e p i t h e l i a l o v a r i a n c a n c e r N S G O A V A N O V A E N-G O T-O V24J C a n c e r C h e m o t h e r P h a r m a c o l2019844791-79831C O H E N S S C HW A R T Z M D O T T I N O P e t a lU s e o f a m u l t i-d r u g r e g i m e n g e m c i t a b i n e5-f l u o r o u r a-c i l i r i n o t e c a n c i s p l a t i n b e v a c i z u m a bd o ce t a x e l a n dc y c l o p h o s p h a m ide G F I P B D Cf o r h e a v i l y p r e t r e a t e dr e l a p s e d e p i t h e l i a l o v a r i a n f a l l o p i a n t u b e a n d p r i m a r yp e r i t o n e a l c a n c e r J J o u r n a l o f O v a r i a n R e s e a r c h20191213632C A R O L I N E B T R I K K E F A K A R I N A D S e t a lD e l t a t o c o t r i e n o l i n r e c u r r e n t o v a r i a n c a n c e r a p h a s eⅡt r i a l J P h a r m a c o l R e s2019141392-39633R A N I E R I G P A T R U N O R R U G G I E R I E e t a lV a s c u l a r e n d o t h e l i a l g r o w t h f a c t o r V E G F a s a t a r g e to f b e v a c i z u m a b i n c a n c e r f r o m t h e b i o l o g y t o t h e c l i n i cJ C u r r M e d C h e m 200613161845-185734左丽李小丽朱海龙等化疗联合贝伐单抗治疗晚期卵巢癌合并腹水临床疗效观察J中华肿瘤防治杂志202027S140-14135郜晓宋丽丽朱凯等贝伐单抗联合白蛋白结合型紫杉醇治疗铂类耐药的复发性卵巢癌的临床观察J中国综合临床2018343209-21436李杨杨阳尚玉敏等回顾性分析贝伐单抗联合化疗治疗复发性卵巢癌的临床疗效及安全性评价J中国临床药理学杂志201513151500-1502责任编辑:段金卯㊃042㊃J o u r n a l o f H e n a n U n i v e r s i t y M e d i c a l S c i e n c e2023424Copyright©博看网. All Rights Reserved.。

紫杉醇联合贝伐珠单抗治疗卵巢癌的效果分析

紫杉醇联合贝伐珠单抗治疗卵巢癌的效果分析

紫杉醇联合贝伐珠单抗治疗卵巢癌的效果分析岳渝【摘要】目的:探讨紫杉醇联合贝伐珠单抗化疗治疗卵巢癌的临床效果。

方法按照化疗方案不同将收治的87例卵巢癌患者分为实验组(45例)和对照组(42例),实验组患者给予紫杉醇联合贝伐珠单抗化疗,对照组给予环磷酰胺、紫杉醇联合洛铂化疗,比较两组患者近期疗效、不良反应以及3年生存情况。

结果实验组患者总有效率显著高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);实验组3年生存率显著高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者均发生不同程度骨髓抑制反应,采取对症治疗后缓解,两组间不良反应发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论紫杉醇联合贝伐珠单抗化疗治疗卵巢癌临床疗效显著,3年远期生存率较环磷酰胺、紫杉醇联合洛铂化疗方案的更高,但紫杉醇用药时需要注意预防过敏。

%Objective To explore the clinical effect of paclitaxel combined with bevacizumab chemotherapy in the treat -ment of ovarian cancer .Methods 87 cases of ovarian cancer were divided into the experiment group (45 cases) and the control group(42 cases).The experiment group were treated by paclitaxel combined with bevacizumab chemotherapy ,the control group were treated by cyclophosphamidum ,paclitaxel combined with lobaplatin chemotherapy .The clinical effects ,adverse reactions ,3-year survival of the 2 groups were compared .Results The total effective rate of the experiment group was higher than that of the control group(P<0.05);The 3-year survival rate of the experiment group were higher than that of the control group (P<0.05);Both of the 2 group had different degree of bone marrowinhibition reaction ,symptoms had remission after symptomatic treatment , there was no significant difference in the adverse reactions rate of the 2 groups(P>0.05).Conclusion The clinical effect of pa-clitaxel combined with bevacizumab chemotherapy in the treatment of ovarian cancer is remarkable ,it has higher 3-year survival rate than cyclophosphamidum ,paclitaxel combined with lobaplatin chemotherapy .Allergy induced by paclitaxel needs special at-tention.【期刊名称】《实用癌症杂志》【年(卷),期】2015(000)003【总页数】3页(P365-367)【关键词】紫杉醇;贝伐珠单抗;化疗;卵巢癌【作者】岳渝【作者单位】400042 第三军医大学大坪医院肿瘤中心【正文语种】中文【中图分类】R737.31作者单位:400042 第三军医大学大坪医院肿瘤中心The Clinical Effect of Paclitaxel Combined with Bevacizumab for Ovarian CancerYUEYu. DapingHospital,ThirdMilitaryMedicalUniversity,Chongqing,400042 【Abstract】Objective To explore the clinical effect of paclitaxel combined with bevacizumab chemotherapy in the treatment of ovariancancer.Methods 87 cases of ovarian cancer were divided into the experiment group(45 cases) and the control group(42 cases).The experiment group were treated by paclitaxel combined with bevacizumab chemotherapy,the control group were treated by cyclophosphamidum,paclitaxel combined with lobaplatin chemotherapy.The clinical effects,adverse reactions,3-year survival of the 2 groups were compared.Results The total effective rate of the experiment group was higher than that of the control group(P<0.05);The 3-year survival rate of the experiment group were higher than that of the control group(P<0.05);Both of the 2 group had different degree of bone marrow inhibition reaction,symptoms had remission after symptomatic treatment,there was no significant difference in the adverse reactions rate of the 2 groups(P>0.05).Conclusion The clinical effect of paclitaxel combined with bevacizumab chemotherapy in the treatment of ovarian cancer is remarkable,it has higher 3-year survival rate than cyclophosphamidum,paclitaxel combined with lobaplatin chemotherapy.Allergy induced by paclitaxel needs special attention. 【Key words】Paclitaxel;Bevacizumab;Chemotherapy;Ovarian cancer卵巢癌是女性生殖系统常见恶性肿瘤,临床发生率较高,严重威胁女性健康[1]。

贝伐单抗在卵巢癌治疗中的研究进展

贝伐单抗在卵巢癌治疗中的研究进展
Cancer Hospital of Yunnan Province, Yunnan Province, Kunming 650031, China
【Abstract】In the female reproductive organs in malignant tumors, ovarian cancer mortality in the first place. Although medical technology is more and more advanced, but the recurrence rate and drug resistance remains high. In recent years, people are paying more attention to the application of molecular targeted therapy in ovarian cancer, especially against angiogenesis drugs for the treatment of ovarian cancer research. In this paper, the present study most of anti-angiogenesis drugs for the treatment of ovarian cancer - bevacizumab summarized, in order to provide theoretical basis for bevacizumab treatment of ovarian cancer.
5.结语
目前,在我国,Bev仍属于非医保范围,其高昂的治疗成本( 2万/周期)很大程度上限制该药物的推广及使用。为此,如何对患者实施个体化治疗方案、如何准确预测靶向治疗疗效及评估不良反应的发生风险等问题将是今后的研究热点,其目的是使临床治疗合理化,患者获益最大化。

白蛋白紫杉醇联合贝伐单抗疗与三周疗在铂耐药复发的上性卵巢癌中的疗效研究

白蛋白紫杉醇联合贝伐单抗疗与三周疗在铂耐药复发的上性卵巢癌中的疗效研究
次要终点:
✓ 生存时间(overall survival,OS):从随机之日到死亡的时间(月)。对于到数据分 析截止日期仍存活或失访的受试者,生存以该受试者最后已知的存活时间截尾。
✓ 客观缓解率(ORR): ORR =CR+PR % 按照 RECIST 标准1.1版对影像学结果进行评估,分为完全缓解(CR)、部分缓 解(PR)、稳定(SD)、进展(PD)。
中位PFS:8.5月
周疗
ORR:23%
SD:36% 中位PFS:4.5月 中位OS:17.4月 36%患者PFS>6个月
贝伐珠单抗的指南推荐
一线治疗/维持用药
铂敏感复发用药
铂耐药复发用药
贝伐+化疗在铂耐药患者中的运用(AURELIA)
PFS
mPFS(月), 95%CI
• 剂量调整及中止治疗原则 :
如患者同时存在若干项毒性,应按照最严重的毒性进行剂量调整; 如推荐的调整剂量有矛盾,应选择最保守的推荐剂量。 当第二次出现上述需要减量的毒性时,减量至原剂量的85%;第三次出现需
要减量的毒性时,应永久停止该药物的治疗,并退出研究。 受试者无需任何理由即可在任何时间自由退出研究; 化疗最多可以推迟2周时间,否则需退出研究。
化疗+BEV PFS延长约3个月,OS无改善
Pujade-Lauraine E et al. J Clin Oncol. 2014 May 1;32(13):1302-8.
白蛋白紫杉醇在铂耐药患者中的运用
白紫周疗+贝伐
ORR:50% (95% CI,34.8%–65.1%)
中位PFS:8.08月
中位OS:17.15月
2019 ASCO会议:老年卵巢癌患者传统紫杉醇用药

贝伐珠单抗与卵巢癌

贝伐珠单抗与卵巢癌

1 伐珠 抗川 J卵巢癌 一 线治疗的 I.  ̄i 验 It lJ I ]t O ;术
c :卡 铂+ P 紫杉醇 ;贝伐 :贝伐株单抗 ; :大于2 ; :大于 3 级 级。
药品评价 21年第9 02 卷第2期 37 1
药物 与临床
i rg n D sa dCl i a ic n
( P组 、C +贝伐珠单 抗治 疗组及C +贝伐 珠单抗 治 5贝伐 珠 抗 的 1 良反应 c) P P 疗 、维持 组” 。其 中C +贝伐株单 抗治 疗 、维持组 比 P

般而 言 ,贝伐 株单 抗的 不 良反 应是 可耐受 的 ,
C 组 患者 的P S P F 显著 延长 。而截 自最 新 的资料 , 目 前 但还 是 会 出现 与其 作用机 制相 关 的不 良反应 。在 贝伐 / 4 尚未观察到三组患者在OS 上的差异。在 另一项研究中 珠单 抗的 研究 中 ,最常 见的3 级 的不 良反应 包括 :高
( O ) ,共有两 个研究组 。15 8 I N7” C 2 名新 诊断的E C、 O P C TC P 或F 患者 被纳入CP 或C 组 P+贝伐 珠单抗 治疗 、
血压 (.% . 及蛋 白尿(. 1 . … 。另外 ,出 91 9 %) 7 1 % 59 6 %) ’J
血 、动静 脉血 栓 ,伤 口 合差 、 胃肠 管穿 孔等并 发症 愈
前 ,卵 巢 癌 的 主要 治 疗 手 段仍 是 手 术 及 化 疗 。近 年
来 ,由于盆 腹腔手术技 巧的不断提 高 ,卵巢 癌患者的5 2 伐珠 抗 年生存率 已有 改善u,但多数患者 最终 仍死于 卵巢癌 。
在 以VE F 靶 点的治疗 中 ,目前 经验 最多 的要 G为
紫杉醇 +腹腔 给予 卡铂顺 铂 与贝伐珠 单抗 +紫杉 醇 + 穿孔 ,而这 些患 者在入 组时 即有影 像学 证实 的肠管 受

贝伐单抗联合新辅助化疗治疗晚期卵巢癌临床效果分析

贝伐单抗联合新辅助化疗治疗晚期卵巢癌临床效果分析

贝伐单抗联合新辅助化疗治疗晚期卵巢癌临床效果分析黄少江【期刊名称】《中国医学前沿杂志(电子版)》【年(卷),期】2017(9)6【摘要】目的分析贝伐单抗联合新辅助化疗治疗晚期卵巢癌的临床效果.方法选取2012年5月至2013年2月于本院治疗的晚期卵巢癌患者82例为研究对象,按照随机数表法将入选患者分为观察组和对照组,每组各41例.对照组患者采用新辅助化疗治疗,观察组患者在对照组治疗基础上加用贝伐单抗治疗.比较两组患者治疗前后血清糖类抗原125(carbohydrate antigen 125,CA125)水平变化、疗效及药物不良反应发生情况,随访3年,记录患者的无进展生存期和总生存期.结果治疗后两组患者CA125水平较治疗前均显著降低(P<0.05),观察组患者CA125水平显著低于对照组(P<0.05),治疗有效率显著高于对照组(P<0.05),药物不良反应总发生率显著低于对照组(P<0.05),无进展生存期和总生存期均显著长于对照组(P>0.05).结论贝伐单抗联合新辅助化疗能够有效缓解晚期卵巢癌患者的临床症状,减少药物不良反应,延长患者生存期,具有较好的临床疗效.%Objective To analyze the clinical efficacy of Bevacizumab combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer. Method From May 2012 to February 2013, 82 cases of ovarian cancer patients treated in our hospital were selected as the research objects. They were divided into observation group and control group according to the simple randomization method, 41 cases in each group. Control group patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and observation group patients were treated withBevacizumab on the basis of control group. The levels of serum carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125), curative effects and adverse drug reactions were compared between the two groups before and after treatment. After 3 years of followed-up, the progression free survival and overall survival were recorded of the two groups. Result After treatment , the CA125 levels of the two groups were significantly lower than before treatment (P < 0.05). The level of CA125 in observation group was significantly lower than control group (P < 0.05). The effective rate of observation group was significantly higher than that of control group (P < 0.05), the total incidence rate of adverse reactions was significantly lower than control group (P < 0.05), the progression free survival and overall survival were significantly longer than control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion Bevacizumab combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy can effectively alleviate the clinical symptoms of patients with advanced ovarian cancer, reduce adverse drug reactions, and improve the survival time of patients with good clinical efficacy.【总页数】4页(P109-112)【作者】黄少江【作者单位】重庆市新桥医院肿瘤科,重庆 400037【正文语种】中文【相关文献】1.贝伐单抗联合化疗治疗晚期卵巢癌患者的观察及护理 [J], 韩艳明;张桂兰;张冬青2.贝伐单抗联合化疗治疗晚期卵巢癌的临床研究进展 [J], 于瑞莲;罗锋3.贝伐单抗联合化疗治疗晚期卵巢癌患者的观察及护理 [J], 韩艳明;张桂兰;张冬青;4.肿瘤细胞减灭术联合贝伐单抗治疗晚期卵巢癌的效果 [J], 李亚俐; 段山红5.贝伐株单抗联合热灌注化疗治疗晚期卵巢癌临床观察 [J], 邹庆华;范宜锋;刘军;邢宏建因版权原因,仅展示原文概要,查看原文内容请购买。

贝伐单抗联合化疗治疗晚期卵巢癌患者的观察及护理

贝伐单抗联合化疗治疗晚期卵巢癌患者的观察及护理

贝伐单抗联合化疗治疗晚期卵巢癌患者的观察及护理目的:观察和分析贝伐单抗联合化疗治疗晚期卵巢癌的疗效及护理干预的效果。

方法:对18例晚期卵巢癌患者应用贝伐单抗联合化疗,化疗前实施心理护理,治疗期间重点观察药物疗效,预防和减轻不良反应的发生。

结果:通过治疗和护理,患者的临床症状有所改善,18例晚期卵巢癌患者有效率达83.3%。

结论:联用贝伐单抗治疗晚期卵巢癌的非特异毒性相对于化疗药物来说有所降低,治疗过程中不良反应少,研究表明联用后,不增加化疗药物的毒副作用。

有效的护理干预对于提高患者的生活质量有显著效果,值得推广应用。

标签:贝伐单抗;化疗治疗;晚期卵巢癌;护理干预;效果中图分类号R737.3 文献标识码 B 文章编号1674-6805(2012)21-0061-02卵巢癌是常见妇科恶性肿瘤之一,3/4的卵巢癌患者首次就诊时已是卵巢癌晚期,该病死亡率据妇科肿瘤第一位[1]。

近年来,分子靶向药贝伐单抗可有效作用于血管内皮生长因子靶点,延缓肿瘤的生长和转移,起到抗癌作用[2]。

2010年11月-2011年10月笔者所在科室对18例应用贝伐单抗联合化疗的晚期卵巢癌患者采取护理干预,取得良好的治疗效果。

1资料与方法1.1一般资料选取2010年11月-2011年10月笔者所在科室18例应用贝伐单抗联合化疗的晚期卵巢癌患者,年龄27~54岁,平均48岁。

1.2治疗方法18例均采用贝伐单抗联合泰素进行化疗,贝伐单抗剂量为7.5 mg/kg,加入100ml 0.9%氯化钠溶液中,于化疗结束后1 h静脉滴注,3周/次,每次给药前均进行血常规、生化、尿蛋白检查。

1.3心理护理治疗前护士以通俗易懂的语言向患者讲解贝伐单抗的作用、不良反应及注意事项[3]。

讲述通过贝伐单抗成功治疗的案例,消除患者的紧张情绪,使其充分放松,在良好、轻松的心理状态下接受治疗。

此外,护士要向患者明确说明贝伐单抗治疗后可能出现的不良反应,并告知什么是正常的反应,以消除患者的顾虑,减轻心理压力,增强治疗信心,积极配合治疗。

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

A service of the U.S. National Institutes of HealthParticipant FlowHide Participant FlowBaseline Characteristics Hide Baseline CharacteristicsOutcome MeasuresShow All Outcome MeasuresPercentage of Participants With Disease Progression or Death (Data Cutoff 14 November 2011) [ Time Frame: Screening Visit, Every8 weeks (or 9 weeks if receiving topotecan) until progression reported between day of first participant randomized (29 October 2009)until cutoff date of 14 November 2011 ]Hide Outcome Measure 1Measure Type PrimaryMeasure Title Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression or Death (Data Cutoff 14 November 2011)Measure Description Progression free survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the first documented disease progression or death, whichever occurs first. Progression was based on tumour assessment made by the investigatorsaccording to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria (for participants with measurabledisease), and for those with non-measurable disease presence or absence of lesions was noted.Time Frame Screening Visit, Every 8 weeks (or 9 weeks if receiving topotecan) until progression reported between day of first participant randomized (29 October 2009) until cutoff date of 14 November 2011Safety Issue NoPopulation DescriptionExplanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate.ITT Population: All participants randomized to study treatment, irrespective of whether or not the assigned treatment was actually received. For all efficacy analyses, participants were grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomizationReporting GroupsDescriptionChemotherapy Participants received one of the following chemotherapies at the discretion of the investigator: paclitaxel, 80mg/m^2 as a 1-hour IV infusion on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 q4w OR topotecan 4 mg/m^2 as a 30-minute IVinfusion on Days 1, 8, and 15 q4w (alternatively, a 1.25 mg/m^2 dose could have been administered over 30minutes on Days 1-5 q3w) OR PLD 40 mg/m^2 as a 1 mg/min infusion on Day 1 q4w (after Cycle 1 the drugcould have been administered as a 1 hour infusion). Depending on chosen chemotherapy, pre-medicationwas implemented according to local practices.Chemotherapy + Bevacizumab Participants received one of the following chemotherapies at the discretion of the investigator: paclitaxel, 80mg/m^2 as a 1-hour IV infusion on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 q4w OR topotecan 4 mg/m^2 as a 30-minute IVinfusion on Days 1, 8, and 15 q4w (alternatively, a 1.25 mg/m^2 dose could have been administered over 30minutes on Days 1-5 q3w) OR PLD 40 mg/m^2 as a 1 mg/min infusion on Day 1 q4w (after Cycle 1 the drugcould have been administered as a 1 hour infusion). Depending on chosen chemotherapy, pre-medicationwas implemented according to local practices. The chosen chemotherapy was combined with bevacizumab10 mg/kg IV q2w (or bevacizumab 15 mg/kg q3w if used in combination with topotecan 1.25 mg/m^2 on Days1-5 on a q3w schedule). The initial bevacizumab infusion was over 90 minutes, with subsequent infusionsover 60 minutes and then 30 minutes, as tolerated.Measured ValuesChemotherapy Chemotherapy +BevacizumabNumber of Participants Analyzed[units: participants]182 179Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression or Death (Data Cutoff 14November 2011)[units: percentage of participants]92.3 78.8No statistical analysis provided for Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression or Death (Data Cutoff 14 November 2011)2. Primary: P rogression Free Survival (PFS; Data Cutoff 14 November 2011) [ Time Frame: Screening Visit, Every 8 weeks (or 9 weeks ifreceiving topotecan) until progression reported between day of first participant randomized (29 October 2009) until cutoff date of 14November 2011 ]Hide Outcome Measure 2Measure Type PrimaryMeasure Title Progression Free Survival (PFS; Data Cutoff 14 November 2011)Measure Description PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the first documented disease progression or death, whichever occurred first. Progression was based on tumor assessment made by the investigators according to theRECIST criteria (for participants with measurable disease), and for those with non-measurable disease presence orabsence of lesions was noted. Time from randomization to occurrence of disease progression or death was measured in months. An event was defined as the earliest progressive disease or death that occurred on or before the cutoff date (14 November 2011), regardless of start of nonprotocol specified anti-cancer therapy or the bevacizumab monotherapy. Disease progression was assessed by investigator according to RECIST or by symptom deterioration, and could not be declared on the basis of rising cancer antigen 125 (CA125) levels alone. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used. 95% CI for median was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.Time Frame Screening Visit, Every 8 weeks (or 9 weeks if receiving topotecan) until progression reported between day of first participant randomized (29 October 2009) until cutoff date of 14 November 2011Safety Issue NoPopulation DescriptionExplanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate.ITT Population; only participants with an event of progression or death were included in the analysisReporting GroupsDescriptionChemotherapy Participants received one of the following chemotherapies at the discretion of the investigator: paclitaxel, 80mg/m^2 as a 1-hour IV infusion on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 q4w OR topotecan 4 mg/m^2 as a 30-minute IVinfusion on Days 1, 8, and 15 q4w (alternatively, a 1.25 mg/m^2 dose could have been administered over 30minutes on Days 1-5 q3w) OR PLD 40 mg/m^2 as a 1 mg/min infusion on Day 1 q4w (after Cycle 1 the drugcould have been administered as a 1 hour infusion). Depending on chosen chemotherapy, pre-medicationwas implemented according to local practices.Chemotherapy + Bevacizumab Participants received one of the following chemotherapies at the discretion of the investigator: paclitaxel, 80mg/m^2 as a 1-hour IV infusion on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 q4w OR topotecan 4 mg/m^2 as a 30-minute IVinfusion on Days 1, 8, and 15 q4w (alternatively, a 1.25 mg/m^2 dose could have been administered over 30minutes on Days 1-5 q3w) OR PLD 40 mg/m^2 as a 1 mg/min infusion on Day 1 q4w (after Cycle 1 the drugcould have been administered as a 1 hour infusion). Depending on chosen chemotherapy, pre-medicationwas implemented according to local practices. The chosen chemotherapy was combined with bevacizumab10 mg/kg IV q2w (or bevacizumab 15 mg/kg q3w if used in combination with topotecan 1.25 mg/m^2 on Days1-5 on a q3w schedule). The initial bevacizumab infusion was over 90 minutes, with subsequent infusionsover 60 minutes and then 30 minutes, as tolerated.Measured ValuesChemotherapy Chemotherapy + BevacizumabNumber of Participants Analyzed[units: participants]168 141Progression Free Survival (PFS; Data Cutoff 14 November 2011)[units: months]Median (95% Confidence Interval)3.4 (2.10 to 3.75) 6.7 (5.62 to 7.79)Statistical Analysis 1 for Progression Free Survival (PFS; Data Cutoff 14 November 2011)Groups [1]All groupsMethod [2]Log RankP Value [3]<0.0001Hazard Ratio (HR) [4]0.37995% Confidence Interval0.296 to 0.485[1]Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:No text entered.[2]Other relevant method information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom:No text entered.[3]Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statisticalsignificance:No text entered.[4]Other relevant estimation information:Stratified analysis:Strata were chemotherapy selected (paclitaxel, PLD, or topotecan), prior anti-angiogenic therapy (yes or no), andplatinum-free interval (less than [<] 3 or 3-6 months). Cox regression model was used to determine the hazard ratio.Statistical Analysis 2 for Progression Free Survival (PFS; Data Cutoff 14 November 2011)Groups [1]All groupsMethod [2]Log RankP Value [3]<0.0001Hazard Ratio (HR) [4]0.46095% Confidence Interval0.366 to 0.577[1]Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:No text entered.[2]Other relevant method information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom:Unstratified analysis[3]Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statisticalsignificance:No text entered.[4]Other relevant estimation information:No text entered.Statistical Analysis 3 for Progression Free Survival (PFS; Data Cutoff 14 November 2011)Groups [1]All groupsMethod [2]Peto-Peto-PrenticeP Value [3]<0.0001[1]Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:No text entered.[2]Other relevant method information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom:Unstratified analysis[3]Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statisticalsignificance:No text entered.Statistical Analysis 4 for Progression Free Survival (PFS; Data Cutoff 14 November 2011)Groups [1]All groupsMethod [2]Peto-Peto-PrenticeP Value [3]<0.0001[1]Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:No text entered.[2]Other relevant method information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom:Stratified analysis:Strata were chemotherapy selected, prior anti-angiogenic therapy, and platinum-free interval.[3]Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statisticalsignificance:No text entered.3. Secondary: P ercentage of Participants With Best Overall Confirmed Objective Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)Per Modified RECIST (Data Cutoff 14 November 2011) [ Time Frame: Screening Visit, Every 8 weeks (or 9 weeks if receivingShow Outcome Measure 3Show Outcome Measure 4Show Outcome Measure 5Show Outcome Measure 6Show Outcome Measure 7Serious Adverse Events Show Serious Adverse EventsOther Adverse EventsShow Other Adverse EventsLimitations and Caveats Hide Limitations and CaveatsMore InformationHide More Informationphone: 1-800-821-8590e-mail: genentech@No publications provided by Hoffmann-La RochePublications automatically indexed to this study:Stockler MR, Hilpert F, Friedlander M, King MT, Wenzel L, Lee CK, Joly F, de Gregorio N, Arranz JA, Mirza MR, Sorio R, Freudensprung U, Sneller V, Hales G, Pujade-Lauraine E. Patient-reported outcome results from the open-label phase III AURELIA trial evaluating bevacizumab-containing therapy for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014 May 1;32(13):1309-16. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.51.4240. Epub 2014 Mar 31.Pujade-Lauraine E, Hilpert F, Weber B, Reuss A, Poveda A, Kristensen G, Sorio R, Vergote I, Witteveen P, Bamias A, Pereira D, Wimberger P, Oaknin A, Mirza MR, Follana P, Bollag D, Ray-Coquard I. Bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy for platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer: The AURELIA open-label randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2014 May 1;32(13):1302-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.51.4489. Epub 2014 Mar 17. Erratum in: J Clin Oncol. 2014 Dec 10;32(35):4025.Responsible Party:Hoffmann-La Roche Identifier:NCT00976911History of ChangesOther Study ID Numbers:MO22224, 2009-011400-33Study First Received:September 14, 2009Results First Received:December 3, 2014Last Updated:February 24, 2015Health Authority:Spain: Ministry of Health。

相关文档
最新文档